A2. Light Source. ( i ) Units of light intensity

Similar documents
Light Source I. Takashi TANAKA (RIKEN SPring-8 Center) Cheiron 2012: Light Source I

Name U200 U55 U17 W40 Type Electromagnet Pure Permanent. NdFeB

Insertion Devices Lecture 2 Wigglers and Undulators. Jim Clarke ASTeC Daresbury Laboratory

RADIATION SOURCES AT SIBERIA-2 STORAGE RING

Synchrotron radiation: A charged particle constrained to move in curved path experiences a centripetal acceleration. Due to it, the particle radiates

Synchrotron radiation: A charged particle constrained to move in curved path experiences a centripetal acceleration. Due to this acceleration, the

3. Synchrotrons. Synchrotron Basics

Research with Synchrotron Radiation. Part I

Comparison of the brilliance limit between MAX IV 3 GeV ring and NSLS II low beta straights using the same undulator technique

Synchrotron Radiation in IRAN

JSPS Asien Science Seminar Synchrotron Radiation Science

Basics of Synchrotron Radiation Beamlines and Detectors. Basics of synchrotron radiation X-ray optics as they apply to EXAFS experiments Detectors

4.2 Photon Beam Line Systems

Developments for the FEL user facility

Lattice Design and Performance for PEP-X Light Source

Radiation Protection Considerations for the Cryogenic In-Vacuum Undulator of the EMIL Project at BESSY

Review of Future European Synchrotron Radiation Projects

Beamlines on Indian synchrotron radiation source Indus-1

Free-electron laser SACLA and its basic. Yuji Otake, on behalf of the members of XFEL R&D division RIKEN SPring-8 Center

Coherent X-Ray Sources: Synchrotron, ERL, XFEL

FURTHER UNDERSTANDING THE LCLS INJECTOR EMITTANCE*

Performance Metrics of Future Light Sources. Robert Hettel, SLAC ICFA FLS 2010 March 1, 2010

Introduction to Synchrotron Radiation and Beamlines

Measuring very low emittances using betatron radiation. Nathan Majernik October 19, 2017 FACET-II Science Workshop

SAXS and SANS facilities and experimental practice. Clement Blanchet

Part V Undulators for Free Electron Lasers

Two-Stage Chirped-Beam SASE-FEL for High Power Femtosecond X-Ray Pulse Generation

Characteristics and Properties of Synchrotron Radiation

Brightness and Coherence of Synchrotron Radiation and Free Electron Lasers. Zhirong Huang SLAC, Stanford University May 13, 2013

Feasibility Study of Short-Wavelength and High-Gain FELs in an Ultimate Storage Ring. Introduction Ultimate Storage Ring Analysis Simulation Summary

Knot undulator to generate linearly polarized photons with low on-axis power density. Abstract

How Does It All Work? A Summary of the IDEAS Beamline at the Canadian Light Source

Abstract. 1. Introduction

Introduction to electron and photon beam physics. Zhirong Huang SLAC and Stanford University

The basics of structural biology. And Why we use synchrotron sources Sean McSweeney ESRF Structural Biology Group

Jan. 5, 2006 Development of a Helical Undulator for ILC Positron Source

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy with a laser-plasma source

REVIEW OF EMITTANCE AND STABILITY MONITORING USING SYNCHROTRON RADIATION MONITORS

Synchrotron Radiation a Tool for Precise Beam Energy Measurements at the ILC

First propositions of a lattice for the future upgrade of SOLEIL. A. Nadji On behalf of the Accelerators and Engineering Division

MAGNETS AND INSERTION DEVICES FOR THE ESRF II

Accelerator Design and Construction Progress of TPS Project

PAL LINAC UPGRADE FOR A 1-3 Å XFEL

SLAC Summer School on Electron and Photon Beams. Tor Raubenheimer Lecture #2: Inverse Compton and FEL s

X-Ray Diagnostics Commissioning at the LCLS

Preliminary design study of JUICE. Joint Universities International Circular Electronsynchrotron

Radiation shielding for undulator beamline in Indus-2 synchrotron radiation source

What is? How is produced? Which are its properties? Where is produced? How and why is used? What is foreseen for the future?

David Martin High Precision Beamline Alignment at the ESRF IWAA, Grenoble 3-7 October 2016

Undulator Commissioning Spectrometer for the European XFEL

Introduction to Synchrotron Radiation

BARC/2008/E/012 BARC/2008/E/012

SSRL XAS Beam Lines Soft X-ray

X-ray Free-electron Lasers

Undulator Radiation Inside a Dielectric Waveguide

X-ray Optics needs for 3 rd and 4 th generation Light Source. Mourad Idir BNL/NSLS II 1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES

SLS at the Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), Villigen, Switzerland

CONCEPTUAL STUDY OF A SELF-SEEDING SCHEME AT FLASH2

Start-to-end beam optics development and multi-particle tracking for the ILC undulator-based positron source*

Emittance Growth and Tune Spectra at PETRA III

Linac Based Photon Sources: XFELS. Coherence Properties. J. B. Hastings. Stanford Linear Accelerator Center

Liverpool Physics Teachers Conference July

Trends in X-ray Synchrotron Radiation Research

Collecting Macromolecular Crystallographic Data at Synchrotrons. Andrew Howard ACA Summer School 12 July 2007

5 Undulators for SASE and spontaneous emission

Electron Linear Accelerators & Free-Electron Lasers

SLAC-TN-93-2 SLAC/SSRL-0002 January 1993 (SSRL/ACD) COMPARISON OF PLANAR HELICAL UNDULATOR DESIGNS FOR SPEAR BEAMLINE FIVE*

Thermal bump removal by designing an optimised crystal shape

Compact ring-based X-ray source with on-orbit and on-energy laser-plasma injection

1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES

An Overview of the Activities of ICS Sources in China

STATUS REPORT ON STORAGE RING REALIGNMENT AT SLRI

CBSE Board Class XII Physics Set 1 Board Paper Time: 3 hours [Total Marks: 70]

Shielding calculations for the design of new Beamlines at ALBA Synchrotron

Investigation of the Feasibility of a Free Electron Laser for the Cornell Electron Storage Ring and Linear Accelerator

Simulations and design for soft X-ray beamlines at MAX IV. Rami Sankari

Use of Crab Cavities for Short X-ray Pulse Production in Rings

The Proposal of Accelerator Based Light Sources for TAC Project

Accelerator Physics. Accelerator Development

Project SLiT- J Synchrotron Light in Tohoku, Japan

BEAM EXPANDER SYSTEMS IN HIGH-POWER ACCELERATOR FACILITIES 26RD & 27TH MARCH

SPARCLAB. Source For Plasma Accelerators and Radiation Compton. On behalf of SPARCLAB collaboration

MAX IV, NSLS II, PLS II, LCLS, SACLA, European XFEL,

Short Pulse, Low charge Operation of the LCLS. Josef Frisch for the LCLS Commissioning Team

Free electron lasers

Part II Effect of Insertion Devices on the Electron Beam

X-band RF driven hard X-ray FELs. Yipeng Sun ICFA Workshop on Future Light Sources March 5-9, 2012

Compact Wideband THz Source

Phase Space Gymnastics

ABSOLUTE AIR-KERMA MEASUREMENT IN A SYNCHROTRON LIGHT BEAM BY IONIZATION FREE-AIR CHAMBER

Small-Angle X-ray Scattering (SAXS) SPring-8/JASRI Naoto Yagi

Mahmoud Abdellatief, PhD Materials Science BL Scientist SESAME Synchrotron Jordan

Progress Report on the LCLS XFEL at SLAC

USPAS course on Recirculated and Energy Recovered Linacs Ivan Bazarov, Cornell University Geoff Krafft, JLAB. ERL as a X-ray Light Source

2. X-ray Sources 2.1 Electron Impact X-ray Sources - Types of X-ray Source - Bremsstrahlung Emission - Characteristic Emission

ELECTRON DYNAMICS with SYNCHROTRON RADIATION

MEASUREMENT OF TEMPORAL RESOLUTION AND DETECTION EFFICIENCY OF X-RAY STREAK CAMERA BY SINGLE PHOTON IMAGES

X-ray non-resonant and resonant magnetic scattering Laurent C. Chapon, Diamond Light Source. European School on Magnetism L. C.

Light Sources based on Storage Rings

NSRRC Current Status and the TPS Project

Transcription:

A2. Light Source The important prerequisite for the success of a radiation eperiment is to properly understand the properties of each type of light source. The present document is part of the "SPring-8 Insertion Device Handbook '96" which will aid in the process. A brief overview of the light intensity units, which are quite elementary but are crucial for the understanding of light sources, and attached figures are given below. ( i ) Units of light intensity SPring-8 is a third-generation synchrotron radiation facility, in which the insertion devices (especially the undulators) have been optimized to yield maimum "brightness." As is well known, "brightness" is one possible measure of light intensity. Other units used are "(angular) photon flu density" and "flu," but it should be noted that these units are often confused. Therefore, the definitions of the above units will be reviewed. (Europe) or Brightness (U.S.A.) The commonly used unit of this quantity is photons/sec/mm 2 /mrad 2 in 0.1% b.w. The unit corresponds to the flu density in si-dimensional phase space, and is the number of photons per unit surface area of the light source, per unit solid angle (mrad 2 ), per 0.1% relative bandwidth, per unit time (seconds). This quantity is purely an epression of density and not of the total number of photons! Optical matching can be performed (e.g., an image of the light source can be formed at the aperture of the optical system by mirror collimation), and the aperture (surface area / solid angle) of the optical system is narrower than the size/angular dispersion of the light beam imaged at the same position in optical systems which benefit from high brightness. (Angular) Photon The commonly used unit is photons/sec/mrad 2 in 0.1% b.w., corresponding to the number of photons per unit solid angle (mrad 2 ), per 0.1% relative bandwidth, per unit time (seconds). Note that this quantity is also a density. In optical systems which benefit from having a higher photon flu density than brightness, optical matching cannot be performed, and the aperture (solid angle) of the optical system is narrower than the light beam angular divergence. In the SPring-8 X-ray optical systems, optical matching generally cannot be performed, thus the photon flu density is more important than the brightness. Flu The commonly used unit is photons/sec in 0.1% b.w., corresponding to the number of photons obtained in unit time (seconds) in a limited range of solid angles (on the aperture and sample of the optical system) per 0.1% relative bandwidth. The photon flu over all solid angles (4π) is called the total flu. Optical systems which benefit from having higher total flu than brightness or photon flu density have a wider optical system aperture (solid angle) than any angular divergence of the light source. Let us compare the performance of each type of light sources (deflector, wiggler, and undulator types) using each of the above units. In a comparison of the brightness and photon flu densities, the undulator type unquestionably ranks first. The wiggler type is one-hundredth of the undulator, and the bending magnet type is one-hundredth of the wiggler. There are almost no differences between the light source types in the total flu performance. Improved performance of the accelerator (storage ring), assuming that the emittance, beam energy, and current are held stationary, will affect the brightness characteristics than the photon flu density characteristics. Naturally, it has no effect on the total flu characteristics. Also, the effect varies for different types of light sources. In the undulator type, the brightness and photon flu density improve, and the total flu alone remains unchanged. On the other hand, in wiggler and bending magnet types, the brightness may increase slightly (since the beam size decreases) while the photon flu density and total flu remain constant. 165

(ii) Beam size and divergence The size and divergence of the photon beam emitted from the light source is obtained as a convolution between the electron beam size,y (divergence,,y ) and the photon beam size σ r (divergence, σ r ) emitted by a single electron. σ r (σ r ) is a function of the photon energy and the characteristics of the light source such as the type, length and magnetic field. The electron beam size and divergence at the SPring-8 are shown in Appendi A1. (iii) Attached figures The figure is eplained using the standard beamline (in-vacuum undulator) as an eample. The results are calculated with the electron beam parameters of the low emittance operation. The light source performance at the fundamental, third order, and fifth order harmonic wavelengths are shown in the figure. For eample, consider the case where the fundamental wavelength is used to etract light of 10 kev at a resolution of 10 4. Let the aperture of the optical system to be 50 50 µrad 2. This solid angle is compatible with the aperture size of 2 2 mm 2 of a monochromator placed 40 meter away from the light source. It can be seen from the figure (bottom) that a brilliance of 1.5 0 photons/sec/mm 2 /mrad 2 /0.1%b.w., a photon flu density of 2.0 8 photons/sec/mrad 2 /0.1%b.w, and a total flu of 1.5 5 photons/sec/0.1%b.w. can be obtained. The light flu achievable by the optical system is 1.1 5 photons/sec/0.1%b.w. (degradation in flu due to the aperture is not significant). Taking into account the 10 4 resolution of the optical system, the number of photons which can be obtained every second is 1.1 4 photons. However, it should be kept in mind that this value will certainly be degraded depending on the efficiency of the optical system (efficiency of the spectrometer, the absorption due to filters, etc.). On one hand it can be seen from the figure (top) that the power density is 265 kw/mrad 2, and the total power is 3600 W, although the power collected into the optical system may be as little as 15% of the total power, down to 540 W. The reduction in power due to the aperture is in contrast to the case of the flu. This result suggests the drastic effect of the presence of the slit. All the data shown in the attached figures are calculated using SPECTRA, the synchrotron radiation calculation code developed at SPring-8. For details, refer to below. http://radiant.harima.riken.go.jp/spectra/inde_e.html (English) http://radiant.harima.riken.go.jp/spectra/inde.html (Japanese) Hideo Kitamura (Beamline division) 166

Standard-undulator beamline (BL09,10,11,12,13,29,35,37,39,41,44,47XU) Note: The minimum gap is assumed to be 8 mm. Undulator period 32 mm Numer of periods 140 Maimum field 0.86 T Maimum K value 2.5 Tunable energy range 4.4 ~ 18.5 kev(1 st ) 13.2 ~ 51 kev(3 rd ) 22 ~ 75 kev(5 th ) Maimum total power 13 kw Maimum power density 510 kw/mrad 2 10 4 1 0 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 Power (50µ rad50µ Flu (50 µ rad50µ 167

BL08W Elliptical Multipole Wiggler Wiggler period 120 mm Numer of periods 377 Maimum field 1.17 T (Vert.) 0.11 (Horiz.) Maimum K value 13.0 (Ky) 1.25 (K) Maimum total power 24.4 kw Maimum power density 26.6 kw/mrad 2 1 103 10 4 10 5 10 6 K = 0.25 K = 1.0 K = 0.5 K = 0.75 K = 0.75 0.8 K = 1.0 0.6 K = 0.5 P C,L 0.4 K = 0.25 0.2 P L 0 7 6 5 4 3 2 10 6 P C K = 0.25 K = 0.5 K = 0.75 K = 1.0 168

BL15XU Undulator period Numer of periods Maimum field Maimum K value Revolver Linear + Helical Tunable energy range Helical: 5 ~ 5 kev (Helical) 44 mm (Linear) Linear: 92 mm (Helical) 4.4 ~ 18.5 kev(1 st ) 102 (Linear) 13.2 ~ 51 kev(3 rd ) 48 (Helical) 22 ~ 75 kev(5 th ) 0.54 T (Linear) Maimum total power 5.6 kw (Helical) 0.40 T (Helical) 2.2 (Linear) Maimum power density 240 kw/mrad 2 3.4 (Helical) 1 0 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 Power (50µ rad50µ helical linear Flu (50µ rad50µ 169 10-3

BL16XU Undulator period 40 mm Numer of periods 112 Maimum field 0.93 T Maimum K value 3.5 Tunable energy range 2.2 ~ 15 kev(1 st ) 6.6 ~ 36 kev(3 rd ) 11 ~ 56 kev(5 th ) Maimum total power 15.6 kw Maimum power density 455 kw/mrad 2 10 4 1 0 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 Power (50 µ rad50µ Flu (50µ rad50µ 170

BL19LXU Undulator period 32 mm Numer of periods 781 25 m Maimum field 0.56 T Maimum K value 1.7 Tunable energy range 7.5 ~ 18.5 kev(1 st ) 22.5 ~ 51 kev(3 rd ) 37.5 ~ 75 kev(5 th ) Maimum total power 34.9 kw Maimum power density 1970 kw/mrad 2 10 4 Power (50µ rad50µ 1 0 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 Flu (50µ rad50µ 171

BL20XU Undulator period 26mm Numer of periods 173 Maimum field 0.87 T Maimum K value 2.1 Tunable energy range 7.2 ~ 21 kev(1 st ) 21.6 ~ 57 kev(3 rd ) 36 ~ 86 kev(5 th ) Maimum total power 13.8 kw Maimum power density 651 kw/mrad 2 10 6 10 4 1 0 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 Power (50µ rad50µ Flu (50µ rad50 µ 10 6 172

BL22XU Undulator period 38 mm Numer of periods 118 Maimum field 0.974 T Maimum K value 3.45 Tunable energy range 2.3 ~ 14 kev(1 st ) 6.9 ~ 42 kev(3 rd ) 11.5 ~ 70 kev(5 th ) Maimum total power 17 kw Maimum power density 510 kw/mrad 2 10 4 1 0 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 Power (50µ rad50µ Flu (50µ rad50µ 173

BL24XU Undulator period 26 mm Numer of periods 173 Maimum field 0.98 T (Vert.) 0.30 T (Horiz.) Maimum K value 2.39 (Ky) 1.45 (K) 1 0 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 Flu (50µ rad50µ Tunable energy range 4.8 ~ 22 kev(1 st ) 7.1 ~ 30 kev(3 rd ) Maimum total power 174 19 kw Maimum power density 182 kw/mrad 2 10 4 Power (50µ rad50µ n=1 n=1.5 n=1.5 n=1

BL25SU Helical Undulator period 120 mm Numer of periods 12 2 1.5 m 2 Maimum field 0.57 T Maimum K value 6.5 Tunable energy range 0.12 ~ 5 kev(1 st ) Maimum total power 3.7 kw Maimum power density 3.0 kw/mrad 2 10 4 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 Power (50µ rad50µ Flu (50µ rad50µ 10 4 175 10-3 10-4 10-5

BL27SU Figure-8 Undulator period 100 mm Numer of periods 44 Maimum field 1.0 T (Vert.) 0.26 T (Horiz.) Maimum K value 4.8 (Ky) 9.6 (K) Tunable energy range 0.05 ~ 2.5 kev th (0.5 ) 0.1 ~ 5 kev(1 st ) Maimum total power 19 kw Maimum power density 7.7 W/mrad 2 10 4 n=1 n=0.5 Power (50µ rad50µ 0 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 n=0.5 n=1 Flu (50µ rad50µ 10 4 176 10-3

BL40XU helical Undulator period 36 mm Numer of periods 123 Maimum field 0.32 T Maimum K value 1.1 Tunable energy range 7.9 ~ 16.8 kev(1 st ) Maimum total power 3.7 kw Maimum power density 109 kw/mrad 2 Power (50µ rad50µ 1 0 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 Flu (50µ rad50µ 177

BL45XU helical Undulator period 37 mm Numer of periods 37 2 1.5 m 2 Maimum field 0.50 T Maimum K value 1.7 Tunable energy range 6.7 ~ 15 kev(1 st ) 20.1 ~ 43 kev(3 rd ) 33.5 ~ 60 kev(5 th ) Maimum total power 1.4 kw Maimum power density 73 kw/mrad 2 2 (photons/sec/mm /mrad 2 in 0.1% b.w.) 0 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 Power (50µ rad50µ Flu (50µ rad50µ 178 10-3

BL46XU Undulator period 24 mm Numer of periods 187 Maimum field 1.15 T Maimum K value 2.6 Tunable energy range 5.8 ~ 24 kev(1 st ) 17 ~ 58 kev(3 rd ) 29 ~ 95 kev(5 th ) Maimum total power 19 kw Maimum power density 182 kw/mrad 2 10 6 10 4 Power (50µ rad50µ 1 0 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 Flu (50µ rad50µ 10 6 179

Bending-magnet beamline Maimum field 0.679 T Total power 0.15 kw Power density 1.5 kw/mrad 2 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Flu (1mrad50 µ 10 6 180