Superconducting qubits (Phase qubit) Quantum informatics (FKA 172)

Similar documents
Supercondcting Qubits

Lecture 2, March 1, 2018

Strong tunable coupling between a charge and a phase qubit

Entangled Macroscopic Quantum States in Two Superconducting Qubits

Lecture 2, March 2, 2017

Superconducting Qubits. Nathan Kurz PHYS January 2007

Cavity Quantum Electrodynamics with Superconducting Circuits

Introduction to Superconductivity. Superconductivity was discovered in 1911 by Kamerlingh Onnes. Zero electrical resistance

M.C. Escher. Angels and devils (detail), 1941

Qubits: Supraleitende Quantenschaltungen. (i) Grundlagen und Messung

Non-linear driving and Entanglement of a quantum bit with a quantum readout

Superconducting Flux Qubits: The state of the field

Topologicaly protected abelian Josephson qubits: theory and experiment.

Superconducting quantum bits. Péter Makk

INTRODUCTION TO SUPERCONDUCTING QUBITS AND QUANTUM EXPERIENCE: A 5-QUBIT QUANTUM PROCESSOR IN THE CLOUD

Quantum Phase Slip Junctions

Metastable states in an RF driven Josephson oscillator

Lecture 9 Superconducting qubits Ref: Clarke and Wilhelm, Nature 453, 1031 (2008).

Dynamical Casimir effect in superconducting circuits

Superconducting phase qubits

Lecture 6. Josephson junction circuits. Simple current-biased junction Assume for the moment that the only source of current is the bulk leads, and

Distributing Quantum Information with Microwave Resonators in Circuit QED

Superconducting Circuits and Quantum Information

From SQUID to Qubit Flux 1/f Noise: The Saga Continues

Entanglement Control of Superconducting Qubit Single Photon System

Theory for investigating the dynamical Casimir effect in superconducting circuits

2015 AMO Summer School. Quantum Optics with Propagating Microwaves in Superconducting Circuits I. Io-Chun, Hoi

nano Josephson junctions Quantum dynamics in

Synthesizing arbitrary photon states in a superconducting resonator

Hybrid Quantum Circuit with a Superconducting Qubit coupled to a Spin Ensemble

Superconductivity. Alexey Ustinov Universität Karlsruhe WS Alexey Ustinov WS2008/2009 Superconductivity: Lecture 1 1

Parity-Protected Josephson Qubits

Circuit Quantum Electrodynamics. Mark David Jenkins Martes cúantico, February 25th, 2014

Quantum computation with superconducting qubits

Prospects for Superconducting Qubits. David DiVincenzo Varenna Course CLXXXIII

Coherent Coupling between 4300 Superconducting Flux Qubits and a Microwave Resonator

QIC 890/891, Module 4: Microwave Parametric Amplification in Superconducting Qubit Readout experiments

Principles and Applications of Superconducting Quantum Interference Devices (SQUIDs)

Final Report. Superconducting Qubits for Quantum Computation Contract MDA C-A821/0000

Quantum Optics with Propagating Microwaves in Superconducting Circuits. Io-Chun Hoi 許耀銓

Quantum Optics and Quantum Informatics FKA173

Superconducting Qubits

6.763 Applied Superconductivity Lecture 1

Quantum Information Processing, Vol. 3, No. 1, February 2004 ( 2004) Implementing Qubits with Superconducting Integrated Circuits

Doing Atomic Physics with Electrical Circuits: Strong Coupling Cavity QED

Exploring parasitic Material Defects with superconducting Qubits

Quantum phase slip junctions

Superposition of two mesoscopically distinct quantum states: Coupling a Cooper-pair box to a large superconducting island

arxiv:cond-mat/ v2 [cond-mat.mes-hall] 26 Jul 2007

Superconducting quantum circuit research -building blocks for quantum matter- status update from the Karlsruhe lab

The Physics of Nanoelectronics

Chapter 3. Physics of Josephson Junctions: The Voltage State

Quantum Phase Dynamics in an LC shunted Josephson Junction. (KIT), Hertzstraβe 16, D Karlsruhe, Germany , Göteborg, Sweden

Nano devices for single photon source and qubit

Demonstration of conditional gate operation using superconducting charge qubits

Quantum bits with Josephson junctions

Introduction to Quantum Mechanics of Superconducting Electrical Circuits

Quantum dynamics in Josephson junction circuits Wiebke Guichard Université Joseph Fourier/ Néel Institute Nano Department Equipe Cohérence quantique

Cavity Quantum Electrodynamics (QED): Coupling a Harmonic Oscillator to a Qubit

arxiv:cond-mat/ v1 [cond-mat.supr-con] 12 Jan 2005

Superconducting Qubits Lecture 4

Chapter 5 Nanomanipulation. Chapter 5 Nanomanipulation. 5.1: With a nanotube. Cutting a nanotube. Moving a nanotube

dc measurements of macroscopic quantum levels in a superconducting qubit structure with a time-ordered meter

Process Tomography of Quantum Memory in a Josephson Phase Qubit coupled to a Two-Level State

Testing axion physics in a Josephson junction environment

Josephson phase qubit circuit for the evaluation of advanced tunnel barrier materials *

phys4.20 Page 1 - the ac Josephson effect relates the voltage V across a Junction to the temporal change of the phase difference

State tomography of capacitively shunted phase qubits with high fidelity. Abstract

arxiv:cond-mat/ v4 [cond-mat.supr-con] 13 Jun 2005

1 Quantum Dynamics of Vortices and Vortex Qubits

Dissipation in Transmon

Intrinsic Josephson π-junctions for novel devices

Advances in Josephson Quantum Circuits

10.5 Circuit quantum electrodynamics

Electrical quantum engineering with superconducting circuits

arxiv: v1 [cond-mat.supr-con] 26 Apr 2015

Den Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultäten der Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades.

Superconducting Resonators and Their Applications in Quantum Engineering

John Stewart Bell Prize. Part 1: Michel Devoret, Yale University

Circuit Quantum Electrodynamics

arxiv: v2 [cond-mat.mes-hall] 2 Feb 2011

Electronic transport in low dimensional systems

Macroscopic quantum tunnelling. effects in Josephson junctions. Suzanne Gildert

Strong-coupling Circuit QED

Supplementary information for Quantum delayed-choice experiment with a beam splitter in a quantum superposition

Quantum Information Processing with Semiconductor Quantum Dots. slides courtesy of Lieven Vandersypen, TU Delft

REALIZING QUANTUM MEASUREMENTS WITH SUPERCONDUCTING NANOCIRCUITS

Materials Origins of Decoherence in Superconducting Qubits Robert McDermott

SUPERCONDUCTING QUANTUM BITS

Mesoscopic Nano-Electro-Mechanics of Shuttle Systems

Quantum magnonics with a macroscopic ferromagnetic sphere

Preface. Preface to the Third Edition. Preface to the Second Edition. Preface to the First Edition. 1 Introduction 1

Building Blocks for Quantum Computing Part IV. Design and Construction of the Trapped Ion Quantum Computer (TIQC)

Quantum non-demolition measurement of a superconducting two-level system

Physical mechanisms of low frequency noises in superconducting qubits

Pulse and Hold Switching Current Readout of Superconducting Quantum Circuits JOCHEN WALTER

Decoherence in Josephson-junction qubits due to critical-current fluctuations

Synthesising arbitrary quantum states in a superconducting resonator

Self-Induced Resonances in Asymmetric Superconducting Quantum Interference Devices

2003 American Physical Society. Reprinted with permission.

Transcription:

Superconducting qubits (Phase qubit) Quantum informatics (FKA 172) Thilo Bauch (bauch@chalmers.se) Quantum Device Physics Laboratory, MC2, Chalmers University of Technology

Qubit proposals for implementing a quantum computer Microscopic degree of freedom Spin of electrons or nuclei Transition dipoles of atoms or ions in vacuum +Very well isolated from environmet -Hard to couple (qubit-qubit, qubit-control/readout) Quantum integrated circuits Collective electrodynamic modes of macroscopic electrical elements +-Intrinsically large electromagnetic cross-section

Basic features of quantum integrated circuits Resistance (Ω) Low dissipation: superconductivity Zero resistance is necessary condition for the preservation of quantum coherence Cooper pair condensate described by a single wave function Temperature (K) Superconducting qubits

Superconducting materials transition temperature Energy gap Al 1.2 K 170 µev Nb 9.2 K 1.5 mev Cooper pair condensate is descirbed by a single wave function Cooper pair Ψ(r)=n S 1/2 e iθ(r) where n S : Cooper pair density

Energy scale of quantum integrated circuits ħω 01 1> 0> k B T<<ħω 01 <<Δ No thermal excitations! We are able to prepare system in ground state 0> Two level system protected from quasi-particles (low intrinsic dissipation) Typical energies (see later): ω 01 /2π 5-20 GHz From k B T=hν 1 GHz corresponds to 50 mk => Experiments in dilution refrigerator

Examples of superconducting qubits charge charge/phase phase flux NEC, Chalmers, Yale, JPL CEA Saclay TU Delft, MIT, IPHT Jena NIST, UCSB

Key ingredient: non-linear, non-dissipative element. Tunnel (Josephson) junction Tunnel Superconductor 1 barrier Superconductor 2 Ψ 1 =n 1/2 S e iθ 1 Ψ 2 =n 1/2 S e iθ 2 x Ψ Ψ 1 Ψ 2 x

Tunnel (Josephson) junction Josephson equations Chalmers University of Technology Tunnel Superconductor 1 barrier Superconductor 2 Ψ 1 =n S 1/2 e iθ 1 Ψ 2 =n S 1/2 e iθ 2 Josephson 1 dissipationless (Josephson) current Josephson 2 finite voltage state

Josephson inductance Any change in Josephson current will result in a finite voltage across the Josephson junction The junction acts like a (nonlinear) inductor!!

Equation of motion for the current biased Josephson junction Chalmers University of Technology The bias current splits into three currents. From the currents through the resistor, capacitor, and Josephson element we get: I b R C I c or L J By replacing the voltage across the parallel RCL J circuit using the second Josephson equation (see 2 slides before) we get the equation of motion for the fictitious phase particle with mass proportional to the capacitance: From this equation we can directly determine the potential of the system U.

Dynamics of the current biased Josephson junction junction capacitance Josephson inductance The shunting admittance= (impedance) -1 is frequency dependent and accounts for all processes causing dissipation. ω P ΔU barrier height plasma frequency quality factor, only the real part of the admittance causes dissipation

Tilt of the washboard potential is determined by the bias current Current Voltage Characteristic of a Josephson junction WITHOUT thermal or quantum fluctuations 4 Slope 1/R N I C 3 Current I r 0 2 1 0 6 5 Voltage 2Δ/e Slope of phase particle trajectory is determined by the quality factor Q. The lower Q the steeper the trajectory (more energy loss).

Properties of the current voltage characteristics of a Josephson junction Chalmers University of Technology Ambegaokar-Baratoff: In the tunnel limit (barrier transparency << 1) where is the superconducting gap and is the absolute value of the elementary charge. where is the retrapping current. (see pp. 200-210 in Introduction to Superconductivity, Second Edition, by M. Tinkham, McGraw-Hill, Inc.) I c Current I r 0 3 2 1 0 6 (π/4)(2δ/e) Slope 1/R N 5 4 2Δ/e Voltage

Superconducting QUantum Interference Device I b (SQUID) See T. van Duzer, Principles of Superconductive Devices and Circuits, 2nd edition, Prentice Hall

Escape mechanisms from V=0 to V=0 Thermal Activation Chalmers University of Technology ΔU H.A. Kramers, Pysica 7, 284 (1940) Macroscopic Quantum Tunneling cross over temperature A.O. Caldeira, A.J. Leggett, PRL 46, 211 (1981)

Current Voltage Characteristic of a Josephson junction WITH thermal or quantum fluctuations Chalmers University of Technology switching current I S < critical current I C stochastic process 4 Current I C I S 3 2 I S 5 0 1 0 6 Voltage 2Δ/e

Switching probability from V=0 to V=0 Probability to switch after (small) time interval dt Here and stands for thermal or quantum escape rate Probability to switch in time interval between t and t+dt Probability NOT to switch up to time t I b Bias junction at a fixed current < I C and wait until junction switches and measure time difference I C V t 0 =0 t S t t repeat 10000 times+ histogram t 0

Probability to switch during a current pulse of height I and width I b Fix current pulse length and height (<I C ) I C V t... Switching probability P(I) = number of switching events number of current pulses t

Energy levels in tilted washboard potential Ic=3.9 µa C=3.1 pf I b /I C =0.977 Chalmers University of Technology For bias currents close to the critical current we can approximate the system by a two level system!!

Macroscopic quantum tunneling rates Chalmers University of Technology 1 0 Possibility to distinguish between 0 and 1 state!!

At the working point the barrier height is large enough to prevent the phase particle to escape the matastable well Measurement of Rabi oscillations Harmonic mw signal Bias current I b I C 0 0 Working point current pulse Read out pulse time time At the measuring point the barrier is lowered by applying a short dc current pulse on top of the long bias current pulse. If qubit is in state 1: switching (escape of phase particle) probability is very high. If qubit is in state 0: Switching probability is very low. For a fixed microwave pulse length repeat sequence 5000 times to accumulate statistics

Spectroscopy, relaxation time and Rabi oscillations using magnetic flux read out pulse 1 0 J. Claudon Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 187003, (2004)

Schematics of switching event measurement pulse

3 He- 4 He dilution refrigerator Gas handling panel Base temperature T=15 mk Qubit frequency: GHz (275 mk)

Qubit: Nb/AlO x /Nb SQUID Chalmers University of Technology SQUID 5 mm Magnetic flux line DC bias current

comparator DC current pulse DC flux pulse + MW shaping pulse MW source Counter (events+ time difference) mixer Power combiner/ divider

Measure probability for the SQUID/junction to switch in time interval t and t+dt as a function of bias current, when the SQUID/junction is in the ground state Measure the relaxation time T 1 of the first excited state for a fixed bias current Measure Rabi oscillations for a fixed bias current; determine roughly the driven coherence time.