LLNL DATA COLLECTION DURING NOAAETL COPE EXPERIMENT

Similar documents
Development of a High Intensity EBIT for Basic and Applied Science

Analysis of Shane Telescope Aberration and After Collimation

Modeling Laser and e-beam Generated Plasma-Plume Experiments Using LASNEX

August 3,1999. Stiffness and Strength Properties for Basic Sandwich Material Core Types UCRL-JC B. Kim, R.M. Christensen.

Parametric Instabilities in Laser/Matter Interaction: From Noise Levels to Relativistic Regimes

HEAT TRANSFER AND THERMAL STRESS ANALYSES OF A GLASS BEAM DUMP

Simulation of Double-Null Divertor Plasmas with the UEDGE Code

Modified Kriging: Evaluation, Modification, Recommendations

Safety Considerations for Laser Power on Metals in Contact with High Explosives-Experimental and Calculational Results

PROJECT PROGRESS REPORT (03/lfi?lfibr-~/15/1998):

(4) How do you develop an optimal signal detection technique from the knowledge of

Flipping Bits in the James Webb Space Telescope s Cameras

Destruction of 2,4,6=Trinitrotoluene using Ammonium Peroxydisulfate

Plutonium 239 Equivalency Calculations

Magnetic Measurements of the Elliptical Multipole Wiggler Prototype

Data Comparisons Y-12 West Tower Data

Modeling of MHD Equilibria and Current Profile Evolution during the ERS Mode in TFTR

Fission-Fusion Neutron Source

How Small Can a Launch Vehicle Be?

Solid Phase Microextraction Analysis of B83 SLTs and Core B Compatibility Test Units

Applications of Pulse Shape Analysis to HPGe Gamma-Ray Detectors

OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY

A Distributed Radiator, Heavy Ion Driven Inertial Confinement Fusion Target with Realistic, Multibeam Illumination Geometry

DML and Foil Measurements of ETA Beam Radius

Barry M. Lesht. Environmental Research Division Argonne National Laboratory Argonne, Illinois 60439

The Highest Redshift Radio Galaxy Known in the Southern Hemisphere

The Radiological Hazard of Plutonium Isotopes and Specific Plutonium Mixtures

Capabilities for Testing the Electronic Configuration in Pu

An ARM SCM Intercomparison Study-Overview and Preliminary Results for Case 1

Tell uric prof i 1 es across the Darrough Known Geothermal Resource Area, Nevada. Harold Kaufniann. Open-file Report No.

CQNl_" RESPONSE TO 100% INTERNAL QUANTUM EFFICIENCY SILICON PHOTODIODES TO LOW ENERGY ELECTRONS AND IONS

Plasma Response Control Using Advanced Feedback Techniques

Impurity Transport Studies of Intrinsic MO and Injected Ge in High Temperature ECRH Heated FTU Tokamak Plasmas

Controlling Backstreaming Ions from X-ray Converter Targets with Time Varying Final Focusing Solenoidal Lens and Beam Energy Variation

Use of Nuclear Explosives for Excavation of Sea-Level Canal Across the Negev Desert (Canal Studies Filefolder)

Partial Discharge Characterization of High-Voltage Cables and Components

Response to Comment on "The National Ignition Facility Laser Performance Status"

PROJECT PROGRESS REPORT (06/16/1998-9/15/1998):

Curvature of a Cantilever Beam Subjected to an Equi-Biaxial Bending Moment. P. Krulevitch G. C. Johnson

BASAL CAMBRIAN BASELINE GEOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION COMPLETED

Initial Results from the Lick Observatory Laser Guide Star Adaptive Optics System

Determine the Inside Wall Temperature of DSTs using an Infrared Temperature Sensor

The Gas Flow from the Gas Attenuator to the Beam Line

l-- 0 Daytime Raman Lidar Measurements of Water Vapor During the ARM 1997 Water Vapor Intensive Observation Period D.D. Turner' and J.E.M.

A Few-Group Delayed Neutron Model Based on a Consistent Set of Decay Constants. Joann M. Campbell Gregory D. Spriggs

ION EXCHANGE SEPARATION OF PLUTONIUM AND GALLIUM (1) Resource and Inventory Requirements, (2) Waste, Emissions, and Effluent, and (3) Facility Size

Nuclear Excavation (Letter to- R. E. Miller, AEC)

Using the X-FEL to understand X-ray Thomson scattering for partially ionized plasmas

SOLAR SEMIDIURNAL TIDAL WIND OSCILLATIONS ABOVE THE CART SITE. Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC06-76RLO 1830

Interaction in Precipitation

Two-Screen Method for Determining Electron Beam Energy and Deflection from Laser Wakefield Acceleration

Turbulent Scaling in Fluids. Robert Ecke, MST-10 Ning Li, MST-10 Shi-Yi Li, T-13 Yuanming Liu, MST-10

- High Energy Gull Generator

Shock compression of precompressed deuterium

GA A26057 DEMONSTRATION OF ITER OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS ON DIII-D

Application of a Three-Dimensional Prognostic Model During the ETEX Real-Time Modeling Exercise: Evaluatin of Results (u)

Valley-Fill Sandstones in the Kootenai Formation on the Crow Indian Reservation, South-Central Montana

A Germanium Detector with Optimized Compton Veto for High Sensitivity at Low Energy

c*7 U336! On Satellite Constellation Selection LA MS ^«fc ^Xiyy PLEASE RETURN TO:

Quarterly Report April 1 - June 30, By: Shirley P. Dutton. Work Performed Under Contract No.: DE-FC22-95BC14936

Laser Intensity Modulation by Nonabsorbing Defects. M. D. Feit A. M. Rubenchik

Pathway and Kinetic Analysis on the Propyl Radical + O2 Reaction System

A New Computational Method for non-lte, the Linear Response Matrix

Alex Dombos Michigan State University Nuclear and Particle Physics

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Polymer Electrolytes and Insertion Electrodes*

Three-Dimensional Silicon Photonic Crystals

John Falconer Richard Noble

Direct Determination of the Stacking Order in Gd 2 O 3 Epi-Layers on GaAs

m w n? r i OF,THISDOCUMENT IS UNLIMITED

S.A. Kreek J.E. Kammeraad D. Beckedahl G.J. Schmid J.J. Blair B. Payne A. Friensehner

Contractor Name and Address: Oxy USA, Inc. (Oxy), Midland, Texas OBJECTIVES

A Geological and Geophysical Assessment of the Royal Center Gas Storage Field in North-Central Indiana, a Joint NIPSCO, DOE & GRI Case Study

Valley-Fill Sandstones in the Kootenai Formation on the Crow Indian Reservation, South-Central Montana

GA A26474 SYNERGY IN TWO-FREQUENCY FAST WAVE CYCLOTRON HARMONIC ABSORPTION IN DIII-D

Ray M. Stringfield Robert J. Kares J. R. Thomas, Jr.

The Graphite Isotope Ratio Method (GIRM): A Plutonium Production Verification Tool

ust/ aphysics Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439, USA

Experiment. The Pinhole Neutron. Pinex. c. c. sartain UCRL-ID November 21,1958

Vector Potential Remap for 2d MHD

PLASMA MASS DENSITY, SPECIES MIX AND FLUCTUATION DIAGNOSTICS USING FAST ALFVEN WAVE

DISCLAIMER BASIN, WEST TEXAS AND NEW MEXICO

sample-specific X-ray speckle contrast variation at absorption edges $ & ~ 0

Final Technical Report. Department of Energy. for

Excitations of the transversely polarized spin density. waves in chromium. E3-r 1s

PRINCETON PLASMA PHYSICS LABORATORY PRINCETON UNIVERSITY, PRINCETON, NEW JERSEY

RESEARCH OPPORTUNITIES AT THE CNS (Y-12 AND PANTEX) NUCLEAR DETECTION AND SENSOR TESTING CENTERS (NDSTC)

Determine the Inside Wall Temperature of DSTs using an Infrared Temperature Sensor

Walter P. Lysenko John D. Gilpatrick Martin E. Schulze LINAC '98 XIX INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE CHICAGO, IL AUGUST 23-28,1998

Observing System Simulation Experiments (OSSEs) for the Mid-Columbia Basin

Use of AVHRR-Derived Spectral Reflectances to Estimate Surface Albedo across the Southern Great Plains Cloud and Radiation Testbed (CART) Site

Multi-Scale Chemical Process Modeling with Bayesian Nonparametric Regression

l-l Lawrence ARM-GCSS Intercomparison Study of Single-Column Models and Cloud System Models October 27,1999

Modeling of psec-laser-driven Ne-like and Ni-like X-ray lasers. Joseph Nilsen

EXPLOSIVE PARTICLES PARVLENE ENCAPSUTION. lac0 b Sando v a t. Normal Process Development OCTOBER DEVEZOPMENT D I V I S I O N DEZEMBER 1971

BWXT Y-12 Y-12. A BWXT/Bechtel Enterprise SMALL, PORTABLE, LIGHTWEIGHT DT NEUTRON GENERATOR FOR USE WITH NMIS

Inside Wall Temperature Measurements of DSTs Using an Infrared Temperature Sensor

RECXWH2 W/o s3-1

GA A25853 FAST ION REDISTRIBUTION AND IMPLICATIONS FOR THE HYBRID REGIME

Hyperon Particle Physics at JHF. R. E. Mischke

GA A22722 CENTRAL THOMSON SCATTERING UPGRADE ON DIII D

Transcription:

UCRL-ID-121682 LLNL DATA COLLECTION DURING NOAAETL COPE EXPERIMENT Test Plan David D. Manfrom Imaging & Detection Program September 6,1995 This is an informal report intended primarily for internal or limited external distribution.the opinionsand conclusionsstated are thoseof the authorand may or may not be those of the Laboratory. Work performed under the auspices of the US. Department of Energy by the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratoryunder Contract W-7405-Eng-48. DISTRIBUTION OF THIS DOCUMENT IS UNLlMlkD $

DISCLAIMER This document was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor the University of California nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, pfocess, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or the University of California. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessad.y state or reflect those of the United States Government or the University of California, and shall not be used for advertising or product endorsementpurpcses. This report has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractorsfrom the Office of sdentific and Technical Information P.O.Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831 Prices available from (615) 5768401, FTS6268401 Available to the public from the National Technical Information Service U.S. Department of Commerce 5285 Port Royal Rd., Springfield, VA 22161

DISCLAIMER Portions of this document may be illegible in electronic image products. Images are produced from the best available original document.

1. Introduction COPE is the acronym for the Coastal Ocean Probe Experiment, to be conducted by NOAA/ETL off the northern Oregon coast in September-October 1995. In general terms, ETL desires to collect data on how various types of microwave sensors including radar would respond to internal wave-induced modulations to the ocean surface, and what effects propagation through the atmosphere might have on the data collected. The test site was chosen because strong surface effects associated with internal gravity waves have been regularly observed there and the presence of a coastal mountain range would allow a large land-based radar to be situated high enough to image these internal wave effects. In COPE, ETL will field a broad suite of microwave sensors, and a variety of seatruth and atmospheric-truth instruments. These will include a land-based, high power, X- and Ka-band real aperture radar (RAR) located atop a 3000 ft high coastal peak, various water column, surface wave, air-sea interface, and atmospheric sensors on the FLIP measurement platform to be moored approximately 15 miles offshore, various active and passive microwave devices onboard a blimp which will fly at 6000-8000 ft altitude, two ground-based CODARs that measure large-scale surface currents, various wind profilers, and others. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's Imaging and Detection Program will take advantage of this unique site and opportunity to collect imagery with our radar that will be well ground-truthed with subsurface, surface, and above-water environmental data and possibly be compared to radar image data collected simultaneously or nearly simultaneously with another radar. Specifically, we are planning to conduct a short data collection with our Airborne Experimental Test Bed (AETB) jet aircraft-based X-band, HHpolarization synthetic aperture radar (SAR) as a piggyback to the planned COPE operation. This AETB/SAR system recently completed a major data collection as part of Project Overview conducted at AUTEC in July 1995. LLNL's objective for the COPE experiment is as follows: Collect SAR image data with the AETB XHH SAR containing natural internal wave-induced features over a range of grazing angles and look directions re: internal wave, sea, and wind directions, and characterize the internal wave-induced modulations and ambient clutter statistics as a function of these radar parameters and environmental conditions (which will vary naturally over the data collection period). We plan to accomplish this in a three-day data collection on 14, 15, and 16 September 1995. Should there be problems with bad weather or mechanical problems with the AETB/SAR, we could stay up to 19 September (up to three additional days). The operations we plan are described in the next section. Also included in this short write-up is a list of supporting data we will ask ETL to collect (we would formally request the data after the completion of the experiment).

2. Planned LLNL Operations in COPE We plan to fly three identical missions as illustrated in the attached figure, on three consecutive days. We desire to image different surface effects associated with internal waves under different subsurface, surface, and above-water conditions. We will plan for all flights to be conducted during daylight hours, with approximate on-station times as follows: Flight 1. Flight 2 Flight 3 14 September 15 September 16 September 1500 1200-1800 - 1500 (local) 0900-1200 The reason for flying at different times of day is that if there is any diurnal pattern to environmental conditions (e.g., calmer winds in the morning, picking up in the afternoon), our data collection will cover that range of conditions. In each flight, we plan on flying at three different altitudes to provide three different grazing angles. As shown in the attached figure, at each of the three altitudes we plan to fly eight (8) straight and level passes, each about 20 km in length. Six of the passes will be centered on the FLIP instrumentation platform moored offshore. These six passes will be in an asterisk pattern; the six passes will have their headings 60 degrees apart. We will likely fly headings of north, 60", 120",... 300" in the order that is most efficiently flown by the aircraft. The remaining two passes will be parallel to the coast where long-crested internal waves whose wavefronts are roughly parallel to the coast have been observed visually. The three grazing angles we desire are 5", 20", and 45". The design altitudes for these are 500 ft, 5600 ft, and 23,000 ft which were the altitudes flown in Project Overview at AUTEC. We may adjust the altitudes for the COPE flights depending on the strength of the radar backscatter on a given day. We will denote the images as Flight Number (1, 2, or 3), 5", 20, or 45" grazing angle, and Pass number (1 to 8). The aircraft will leave Van Nuys Airport on the morning of 14 September. It will refuel somewhere en route to the COPE site (NAS Alameda, Travis AFB are candidate sites), and perform the first day's data collection. It will land at Naval Air Station Whidbey Island, Washington which will be its base for the remainder of the experiment. After the third day's data collection, the aircraft will transit back to Van Nuys, again with a stop for fuel in between. The aircraft will communicate with the ground via radio frequency 122.925 MHz. The aircraft's call sign will be "Hughes 75" (tail number is 575 HA). The LLNL experiment leader on the ground (at the ETL lidar van) will use the call sign "Lima Base".

3. Data Requirements A major factor in our desire to perform a data collection during COPE is the environmental data collection systems and another radar, all of which will be in place. We anticipate requesting the following data to support interpretation of our imagery: CTD profiles ADCP current profiles Wind speed and direction Wave height Air and sea surface temperature Several (one hour apart) during In addition to the environmental data, it would be of much value to compare our radar imagery ETL's land based data. We desire that ETL collect radar data with their system during our data collection. Should there be interference between the LLNL X-band SAR and the ETL land-based radar, we would request the ETL radar be turned off but be turned on and dasta be recorded when the aircraft leaves the area. Data from two systems coincident in time is obviously the best for intercomparisons, but if that is impossible, data adjacent in time with continuous environmental data would have some value. 4. Contingency Days Should the aircraft be grounded due to weather or mechanical problems with the AETB/SAR system, we desire to stay up to another three days (19 September at the latest) to achieve our three day's data collections. Note that any weather situation that would cause a delay would have to be severe -- a severe storm or extremely high (>30 knot) winds. Note that the aircraft is all-weather and can fly IFR over or through clouds. Clouds do not affect the operation of our radar. This work was performed under the auspices of the Department of Energy by the Lawrence LivermoreNational Laborato~yunder contractw-7405-eng-48.

Coastal Ocean Probing Experiment (COPE) Proposed AETB Flight Profiles SAR Imaging Swath 1-6-From different directions over FLIP Grazing A/C Coastline Angle AIL lmaginga& B 5" 500' 2 passes 20" 5600' 2 45O 23,000' 2 Flip 1-6 6 passes 6 6