LSST Pipelines and Data Products. Jim Bosch / LSST PST / January 30, 2018

Similar documents
Photometric Products. Robert Lupton, Princeton University LSST Pipeline/Calibration Scientist PST/SAC PST/SAC,

Data Products Definition Document

Data Products Definition Document

Transient Alerts in LSST. 1 Introduction. 2 LSST Transient Science. Jeffrey Kantor Large Synoptic Survey Telescope

Image Processing in Astronomy: Current Practice & Challenges Going Forward

Tim Axelrod, Jacek Becla, Gregory Dubois-Felsmann, Jeff Kantor, Kian- Tat Lim, Robert Lupton LDM-151

Local Volume, Milky Way, Stars, Planets, Solar System: L3 Requirements

LARGE SYNOPTIC SURVEY TELESCOPE. Draft. Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST) Data Products Definition Document

Tim Axelrod, Jacek Becla, Gregory Dubois-Felsmann, Jeff Kantor, Kian- Tat Lim, Robert Lupton LDM-151

Astronomical image reduction using the Tractor

Data Processing in DES

Basics of Photometry

GALEX GR1 Instrument Performance and Calibration Review

From DES to LSST. Transient Processing Goes from Hours to Seconds. Eric Morganson, NCSA LSST Time Domain Meeting Tucson, AZ May 22, 2017

(Slides for Tue start here.)

Gaia Photometric Data Analysis Overview

Supplementary Materials for

SDSS Data Management and Photometric Quality Assessment

Science Results Enabled by SDSS Astrometric Observations

Reduced data products in the ESO Phase 3 archive (Status: 02 August 2017)

Photometric Techniques II Data analysis, errors, completeness

An end-to-end simulation framework for the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope Andrew Connolly University of Washington

Large Synoptic Survey Telescope

The shapes of faint galaxies: A window unto mass in the universe

Processing Wide Field Imaging data Mike Irwin

Weak Lensing (and other) Measurements from Ground and Space Observatories

The Dark Energy Survey Public Data Release 1

Measuring Radial Velocities of Low Mass Eclipsing Binaries

Study of the evolution of the ACS/WFC sensitivity loss

LSST Discovery Potential for Solar System Science and Planetary Defense

Improving the Absolute Astrometry of HST Data with GSC-II

Functional analysis (CU6)

Time Dependence of ACS WFC CTE Corrections for Photometry and Future Predictions

C. Watson, E. Churchwell, R. Indebetouw, M. Meade, B. Babler, B. Whitney

MULTIPLE EXPOSURES IN LARGE SURVEYS

VISTA HEMISPHERE SURVEY DATA RELEASE 1

Inside Catalogs: A Comparison of Source Extraction Software

2-D Images in Astronomy

Machine Learning Applications in Astronomy

IMPROVING THE DECONVOLUTION METHOD FOR ASTEROID IMAGES: OBSERVING 511 DAVIDA, 52 EUROPA, AND 12 VICTORIA

A Comparison of Radio and Optical Astrometric Reduction Algorithms

Introduction to the Sloan Survey

Astrometry (STEP) M. Shao

Modern Image Processing Techniques in Astronomical Sky Surveys

The WFIRST High La/tude Survey. Christopher Hirata, for the SDT November 18, 2014

Calibration Goals and Plans

Probabilistic Cataloguing in Crowded Fields

Parametrization and Classification of 20 Billion LSST Objects: Lessons from SDSS

Galaxies in Pennsylvania. Bernstein, Jarvis, Nakajima, & Rusin: Implementation of the BJ02 methods

The Large Synoptic Survey Telescope

Classifying Galaxy Morphology using Machine Learning

A new method to search for Supernova Progenitors in the PTF Archive. Frank Masci & the PTF Collaboration

Quantifying Secular Evolution Through Structural Decomposition

SKA Continuum Deep Field Surveys

Infra-red imaging of perpendicular nested bars in spiral galaxies with the Infra-red Camera at the Carlos Sanchez Telescope

Expected precision on planet radii with

9. High-level processing (astronomical data analysis)

Gaia Data Release 1: Datamodel description

APLUS: A Data Reduction Pipeline for HST/ACS and WFC3 Images

NEOFIXER A BROKER FOR NEAR EARTH ASTEROID FOLLOW-UP ROB SEAMAN & ERIC CHRISTENSEN CATALINA SKY SURVEY

An improved technique for increasing the accuracy of photometrically determined redshifts for blended galaxies

The Yale/ODI Survey(s)

SkyMapper and the Southern Sky Survey

The Impact of x-cte in the WFC3/UVIS detector on Astrometry

BigBOSS Data Reduction Software

The in-orbit wavelength calibration of the WFC G800L grism

Reverberation Mapping in the Era of MOS and Time-Domain Surveys: from SDSS to MSE

Automatic Star-tracker Optimization Framework. Andrew Tennenbaum The State University of New York at Buffalo

Catalog Information and Recommendations

Quantifying the Assembly History of Elliptical Galaxies

A Random Walk Through Astrometry

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.im] 10 Nov 2015

The Plato Input Catalog (PIC)

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.ep] 29 Nov 2017

Cosmic shear analysis of archival HST/ACS data

First results from the Stockholm VIMOS Supernova Survey

Introduction to SDSS -instruments, survey strategy, etc

(Present and) Future Surveys for Metal-Poor Stars

The Impact of Gaia on Our Knowledge of Stars and Their Planets

GLIMPSE Quality Assurance v1.0

Crystal Lake Observatory Double Star Measurements: Report #1

Searching for Needles in the Sloan Digital Haystack

Space-Based Imaging Astrometry: Life with an Undersampled PSF. Jay Anderson STScI Feb 15, 2012

Surveys at z 1. Petchara Pattarakijwanich 20 February 2013

Astrometric Performance of STIS CCD CTI Corrections on Omega Cen Images

Gaia Status & Early Releases Plan

Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE) Subsystem Design Specification: Multiband DETector (MDET)

Mario Juric Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton

LSST, Euclid, and WFIRST

A Parameterization of the Chandra Point Spread Function

PRACTICAL ANALYTICS 7/19/2012. Tamás Budavári / The Johns Hopkins University

The SKYGRID Project A Calibration Star Catalog for New Sensors. Stephen A. Gregory Boeing LTS. Tamara E. Payne Boeing LTS. John L. Africano Boeing LTS

Transient Astronomy with the Gaia Satellite

Three data analysis problems

Precision Tracking of Decimeter Targets at GEO Distances using the Magdalena Ridge Observatory 2.4-meter Telescope

Status report of the Solar System Working Group

WPHOT Solution for Flux, Position, and Proper Motion

LSST Science. Željko Ivezić, LSST Project Scientist University of Washington

CHEF applications to the ALHAMBRA survey

How to calibrate interferometric data

Transcription:

LSST Pipelines and Data Products Jim Bosch / LSST PST / January 30, 2018 1

Context This is the first of six talks on LSST's data products: 1. Pipelines and Data Products Overview (January 30, Jim Bosch) 2. Photometric Data Products (February 27, Robert Lupton) 3. Astrometric Data Products (March 27,??) 4. Alert Stream (April 24, Eric Bellm) 5. DM's Approach to Blended Sources (May 29,??) 6. Moving Object Pipelines (June 26, Mario Juric) (all dates and speakers are tentative) 2

Nomenclature Source: measurements at a single epoch Object: measurements utilizing multiple (typically all) epochs PVI: Processed Visit Image (aka calexp, Calibrated Exposure) DIA: Difference Imaging Analysis MOPS: Moving Object Processing System AP: Alert Production (aka Prompt, Nightly, Level 1) DRP: Data Release Production (aka Annual, Yearly, Level 2) User Generated: data products created by science users (Level 3) 3

Overview Data Release: all datasets for static sky science and most time domain science Prompt: "pre-release" single-epoch data products + alerts for transient and time domain science that requires fast follow-up 4

Data Release Overview Not shown: MOPS (produces SSObjects from DIASources). 5

Data Release Overview 6

Image Characterization and Calibration 7

PVIs One image for every Visit+Sensor combination, with: Photometric Calibration wavelength dependent Astrometric Calibration / WCS: includes distortions (not a simple FITS WCS) not wavelength-dependent Point Spread Function may include shifts wavelength-dependent Background Model estimated/subtracted using flats appropriate for the spectrum of the sky 8

Sources A table of detections and measurements derived from PVIs. Measurements include: Centroids Aperture and PSF photometry Adaptive-moment shapes Simple morphological star/galaxy separation Sources are probably most valuable for diagnostic purposes; if you're interested in......the static sky or stellar astrometry, use Object instead....variables, use Forced Source instead....transients or solar system objects, use DIASource and/or SSObject instead. 9

Data Release Overview 10

Coaddition and Image Differencing 11

Coadds Direct: combine warps with no special treatment of PSFs Used for deblending and most measurements. Mathematically similar to just taking longer exposures. Minimizes correlated noise. Effective coadd PSF is a weighted average of per-epoch PSFs. Matched: convolve warps to yield the same constant PSF Used for artifact detection and masking. Used as templates for image differencing (may be a different set). Used for measurements that don't include a PSF correction (e.g. aperture fluxes). Considerable correlated noise. Only the PSF-matched coadds used as templates are retained. 12

More Coadds Deep: direct coadds with data from almost all epochs Best-Seeing: direct coadds with data from the best-seeing epochs Short-Period: direct or detection coadds with data from epochs within a particular date range. Not retained. Optimal Coadds: not part of the current baseline. If implemented, would replace both Deep and Best-Seeing. 13

DIA Data Products Difference Images: (science image) - (template) Template is formed by warping, PSF-matching, and DCR-correcting the template to match the properties of the science image. DIASources: detections and measurements on Difference Images Should require minimal deblending (nearly all DIA detections will be point sources, and the static sky will have been removed). We hope to remove false positives primarily with better image processing, but will use machine-learning classifiers if necessary. DIA Data Products are the only ones we guarantee to be high-quality in crowded stellar fields. 14

Data Release Overview 15

Coadd Processing 16

Defining Objects in DRP DIAObjects are defined by associating DIASources. Objects are defined by combining DIAObjects and detections from Coadds. This can help resolve ambiguities in the original DIASource association. The set of DIAObjects is a strict subset of the set of Objects. Sources are not used to define Objects at all. They are associated with Objects after Objects are defined, and that matching will in general be ambiguous. 17

Objects: Coadd Measurements 1. 2. 3. 4. Centroids1,2,3 Adaptive-moment shapes1,2,3,4 Aperture photometry1,4 Kron and Petrosian photometry1,4 Standard colors (algorithm TBD)2,? Each band measured independently. All bands measured consistently together. Measured on Direct Coadds. Measured on PSF-Matched Coadds. 18

Data Release Overview 19

Multi-Epoch Object Characterization 20

Multi-Epoch Object Measurements Moving Point Source Fit PSF to all epochs, with parameters for absolute position, proper motion, parallax, and constant per-band flux. Restricted Bulge+Disk Model Fit a PSF-convolved linear combination of an elliptical exponential profile (Sersic n=1) and de Vaucouleurs (Sersic n=4) profile. Components will have the same ellipticity and center. Fit independently in each band. 21

Forced Photometry We will measure aperture-corrected PSF forced photometry for all Objects1 on both PVIs and Difference Images: Difference Images should be less affected by blending. PVIs should have less noise. We will have to "project" deblending results from the coadd to the measurement image for at least PVI forced photometry (how is TBD). 1. This does not include Solar System Objects, but it does include DIAObjects. 22

Probable Changes We will probably fit a bulge+disk model to all data from all bands simultaneously. This may be in addition to per-band fits, or we might parameterize per-band differences in the joint fit. We will probably tweak the parameterization of the bulge+disk model. We'd like to relax the constraint that both components have the same ellipticity without adding too many degrees of freedom. We will probably run a modern nonparametric shear estimation algorithm like BFD or Metacalibration as well, instead of relying on the bulge+disk fits for shear measurements. 23

Not Improbable Changes If we can get per-object optimal coadds working, we could drop multi-epoch object characterization entirely. Moving Point Source models would be constrained by data from Short Period coadds and per-epoch centroid derivatives measured in Forced Photometry. Bulge+Disk models would be fit to the per-object optimal coadds. 24

Other DRP Data Products Variability characterization (derived from forced photometry) Photometric redshifts (derived from Standard Colors) Survey Geometry / Masks / Completeness information: definition of these data products is currently in progress probably defined via a hierarchical pixelization of the sky (e.g. HEALPix/MOC, HTM) we will ensure that software tools exist for working with whatever format we choose 25

Prompt Processing No Object table or Coadd images. Uses Coadds and reference catalog from last DR as inputs. Simpler pipelines: no iterative refinement or self-calibration. Three pieces: Produce transient alerts within 60s. Refresh Solar System Object (SSObject) catalog daily. Perform forced photometry on new and existing DIAObjects. 26

Overview Data Release 27

Overview Prompt 28

Image Characterization and Calibration Data Release 29

Image Characterization and Calibration Prompt 30

Coaddition and Image Differencing Data Release 31

Coaddition and Image Differencing Prompt 32

Prompt Data Products PVIs Very similar to DR, but with less sophisticated image characterization (e.g. PSF models). Difference Images & DIASources Extremely similar to DR; DR might be able to do a better job masking some kinds of artifacts, and might have less noise in the templates at the start of the survey. 33

Prompt Data Products DIAObjects Prompt: created directly from associations of DIASources. DR: created from associations of DIASources, then potentially refined by comparison with coadd detections. Forced Photometry Prompt: only on Difference Images, using DIAObject positions. DR: on both Difference Images and Calibrated Images, using Object positions. 34

Prompt Data Products Solar System Objects Created incrementally by linking DIASources that were not associated with an existing high-confidence DIAObject. DR version uses only LSST inputs (e.g. no MPC orbits). Alerts A packet of information about every DIASource (including its relationships to DIAObjects and SSObjects). Does not exist at all in DRP. 35

More Information Data Products Definition Document (LSE-163): http://ls.st/dpdd Concise, focuses on data products. Polished, but still uses confusing Level-N nomenclature. Science Pipelines Design Document (LDM-151): http://ls.st/ldm-151 Much more detailed, focuses on algorithms. Rougher and sometimes speculative. Post questions at https://community.lsst.org/c/sci/data Future talks! 36