StolSpeed Vortex Generators on a Harmon Rocket II Flight Test Report

Similar documents
Skyhawk CHECKLIST 172 MODEL V - SPEEDS

To teach the instrument student knowledge of the elements related to an instrument takeoff and the primary instruments for pitch, bank, and power.

FLIGHT INSTRUMENTS. This manual is dedicated only for IVAO Network activities. This document must not be used in real aviation or in others networks.

Mechanics of Flight. Warren F. Phillips. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Professor Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Utah State University WILEY

TAKEOFF CONSIDERATIONS...

AOE 3104 Problem Sheet 10 (ans)

Fundamentals of Airplane Flight Mechanics

Example of Aircraft Climb and Maneuvering Performance. Dr. Antonio A. Trani Professor

Which instrument will become inoperative if the pitot tube becomes clogged?

PRINCIPLES OF FLIGHT

Aerodynamics SYST 460/560. George Mason University Fall 2008 CENTER FOR AIR TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH. Copyright Lance Sherry (2008)

Flight Instruments: Clocks, Tops & Toys

JAA Administrative & Guidance Material Section Five: Licensing, Part Two: Procedures

Traffic and Weather. Soaring Safety Foundation. Tom Johnson CFIG

Performance. 7. Aircraft Performance -Basics

Preface. 2 Cable space accelerator 39

Chapter 9. Nonlinear Design Models. Beard & McLain, Small Unmanned Aircraft, Princeton University Press, 2012, Chapter 9, Slide 1

Basic Information to Help Select the Correct Propeller

AE Stability and Control of Aerospace Vehicles

A Simple Wake Vortex Encounter Severity Metric

HEIGHT ALTITUDE FLIGHT LEVEL

Cockpit Basics. What does a child's spinning top have to do with flying an airplane? More than you might imagine.

Introduction to Aerospace Engineering

2008 Annual C-FOQA Statistical Summary Report

Meteorology. Review Extreme Weather a. cold front. b. warm front. What type of weather is associated with a:

FLIGHT DYNAMICS. Robert F. Stengel. Princeton University Press Princeton and Oxford

Aeroelastic Gust Response

Aircraft Performance, Stability and control with experiments in Flight. Questions

Aerodynamics and Flight Mechanics

Balanced Field Length Calculation for a Learjet 35A/36A with Under-Wing Stores on a Wet Runway

Introduction to Flight Dynamics

A compilation of key maintenance and performance articles taken from the former Lycoming Flyer Newsletter. Lycoming Flyer Key Reprints

Fin design mission. Team Members

Lesson 3: Climbs and Descents

Flight and Orbital Mechanics. Exams

Introduction to Aerospace Engineering

AEROSPACE ENGINEERING

Briefing Guide (Worksheet)

Optimal trajectory generation framework for inflight

Chapter 5 Performance analysis I Steady level flight (Lectures 17 to 20) Keywords: Steady level flight equations of motion, minimum power required,

Air Loads. Airfoil Geometry. Upper surface. Lower surface

Where Learning is Fun! Science in the Park

Aircraft Operation Anomaly Detection Using FDR Data

Briefing Guide (Worksheet)

Problem Sheet 8 (ans) above

Pipistrel ALPHA Trainer

SPECIAL CONDITION. Water Load Conditions. SPECIAL CONDITION Water Load Conditions

M o d u l e k A i r c r a f t A e r o d y n a m i c s, S t r u c t u r e s a n d S y s t e m s

Is the assumption of straight vortices valid for encounter hazard assessment?

OPERATIONAL USAGE AND FLIGHT LOADS STUDY OF GLOBAL EXPRESS XRS BUSINESS JET. A Thesis by. Alhambra L. Yee

2.4 The ASME measurement-uncertainty formulation

Aero-Propulsive-Elastic Modeling Using OpenVSP

Flight and Orbital Mechanics

Theory of Flight Flight Instruments and Performance Factors References: FTGU pages 32-34, 39-45

Learning. Goals. Page 1 of 6. Document : V1.1

Theory of Flight. Pitot Static Instruments Flight Instruments and Performance Factors. MTPs:

Airplane Icing. Accidents That Shaped Our Safety Regulations. Federal Aviation Administration

Aircraft Icing FAR/CS-25, Appendix O and P charts

Localizer Hold Autopilot

Visual Tutorial. Pitot Static System Simulator. Adobe (formerly Macromedia) Flash Requirements

Airplane Instruments 1.1 COMPASS ERRORS compass deviation. acceleration/deceleration error compass turning error

Numeric Simulation of Glider Winch Launches. Andreas Gäb, Christoph Santel

Aircraft Design I Tail loads

QNH: With this setting set on your altimeter you will be reading altitude above mean sea level based on the local station pressure.

Giovanni Tarantino, Dipartimento di Fisica e Tecnologie Relative, Università di Palermo (Italia)

Civil Air Patrol Auxiliary of the United States Air Force

ea980r Digital Anemometer User Manual

National Transportation Safety Board Aviation Accident Final Report

Flight Test Data Analysis

PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF A PISTON ENGINED AIRPLANE - PIPER CHEROKEE PA E.G.TULAPURKARA S.ANANTH TEJAS M. KULKARNI REPORT NO: AE TR

Experimental Aerodynamics. Experimental Aerodynamics

The Ice Crystal Weather Threat to Engines

SPC Aerodynamics Course Assignment Due Date Monday 28 May 2018 at 11:30

USE ALTIMETER SETTING

A SIMPLIFIED ANALYSIS OF NONLINEAR LONGITUDINAL DYNAMICS AND CONCEPTUAL CONTROL SYSTEM DESIGN

General Remarks and Instructions

AAIB Bulletin: 9/2015 G-LGNM EW/G2014/10/04. None. 51 years

Safety in Numbers SKYWATCH 497. The affordable original.

Electronic Flight Computer

Lecture No. # 09. (Refer Slide Time: 01:00)

Cruising Flight Envelope Robert Stengel, Aircraft Flight Dynamics, MAE 331, 2018

/ m U) β - r dr/dt=(n β / C) β+ (N r /C) r [8+8] (c) Effective angle of attack. [4+6+6]

Principles of Rocketry

Mechanical Turbulence Wind forms eddies as it blows around hanger, stands of trees or other obstructions

Engineering Specification

Prediction of Top of Descent Location for Idle-thrust Descents

E230 Aircraft Systems

Flight and Orbital Mechanics

GyroRotor program : user manual

AVIATR: Aerial Vehicle for In situ and Airborne Titan Reconnaissance

NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD

Introduction to Aerospace Engineering

Flight Dynamics, Simulation, and Control

SCOUT AIR ACTIVITY CENTRE- VICTORIA Scout Air Activity Target Badge Adventurer Level

Flight Operations Briefing Notes

Newton Car. Rocket Activity

Flying Qualities Criteria Robert Stengel, Aircraft Flight Dynamics MAE 331, 2018

Introduction to Atmospheric Flight. Dr. Guven Aerospace Engineer (P.hD)

TRAFFIC,TRAFFIC - 5 O CLOCK LOW - 2 MILES

FLIGHT TEST VALIDATION OF AN ANALYTICAL METHOD FOR PREDICTING TRAILING CONE SYSTEM DRAG FORCE AND DROOP ANGLE REAGAN K. WOOLF

Transcription:

StolSpeed Vortex Generators on a Harmon Rocket II Flight Test Report Vernon Little Version 1.1, November 29, 2016 Summary StolSpeed Vortex Generators were installed on a Harmon Rocket II (C-GVRL). Flight test results showed improved stall behavior and a 3 KIAS reduction in full-flap (V S0 ) stall speed; with a 1.7 KTAS reduction at fast cruise speed. Little reduction in clean stall speed or partial flaps (15 degree extension) stall speed was indicated. Figure 1. Harmon Rocket II C-GVRL 'Voltar'

Installation A set of vortex generators made by StolSpeed Pty in Australia were purchased and installed on a Harmon Rocket II, C-GVRL. Identical flight tests were performed under similar conditions before and after installation. After the flight tests, data logs were extracted and airspeed information was compiled to provide a direct performance comparison. The VGs were purchased from Aircraft Spruce Canada as the STOLSPEED VORTEX GENERATORS 80 kit. Installation took about two hours, following the on-line instructions provided by StolSpeed. The kit provides heavy paper installation templates, however, these have a tendency to distort during installation. In order to provide more precision during installation, it is recommended that these templates be copied onto thin, flexible plastic that will not distort with use. Figure 2. StolSpeed 80 Installation Kit The wingtips on C-GVRL are the W-715-1 type, with the large light cove. This prevented following the exact installation instructions which required the first VG to be installed 2 inches inboard of the wing tip. Communication with StolSpeed indicated that the first VG should be installed just inboard of the light cove.

Figure 3. Vans Aircraft Wing Tip Installation of the VGs normally should be done in warm temperatures (above 72 degrees F) in order for the adhesive to stick. Instead, due to ambient temperatures during installation in the 50 s, a warm air gun and rubbing the VGs with a wooden dowel was used. This activated the adhesive and led to proper adhesion.

Flight Tests Procedures Flight test procedures were established for both before and after tests. They consisted of the following: TAKEOFF-NO FLAPS o From a stop, apply full power and accelerate with neutral elevator and take-off trim setting until aircraft lifts off, then climb out normally FULL POWER CRUISE AT ALTITUDE o At 9000 density altitude and 2650 RPM, lean to maximum airspeed. STALL-NO FLAPS o Idle power, reduce speed at 1 knot per second until full stall break, recover STALL-15 degrees FLAPS o Idle power, reduce speed at 1 knot per second until full stall break, recover STALL-FULL FLAPS o Idle power, reduce speed at 1 knot per second until full stall break, recover ACCELERATED STALLS-LEFT o No flaps, 70 KIAS, 60 degree bank coordinated level turn until stall break, recover ACCELERATED STALLS-RIGHT o No flaps, 70 KIAS, 60 degree bank coordinated level turn until stall break, recover AILERON ROLLS-LEFT o No flaps, 130 KIAS, full control input. AILERON ROLL-RIGHT o No flaps, 130 KIAS, full control input. SPIN-LEFT o Two turn, recover SPIN-RIGHT o Two turn, recover APPROACH AND LANDING o Full flaps, 78 KIAS (before VGs) 72 KIAS (after VGs), wheel landing.

Conditions The weather and loading conditions were as follows: No VGs: Location: CYYJ Date: 11/21/2016 Altimeter Setting: 29.94 inhg Temperature 11 degrees C (sea level) Wind 26006 Runway 27 Fuel: 43 USG at take-off Take-off weight 1820 lbs. CG location 92 inches. 42 lbs of ballast carried in baggage compartment. With VGs: Location: CYYJ Date: 11/28/2016 Altimeter Setting: 29.92 inhg Temperature 8 degrees C (sea level) Wind 27002 Runway 27 Fuel: 43 USG at take-off Take-off weight 1820 lbs. CG location 92 inches. 42 lbs of ballast carried in baggage compartment. Flight Notes Both flight tests resulted in almost identical conditions. Temperature at altitude was within 1 degree C and the spread between PA and DA was within 76 feet. The second flight (with VGs), did not include the spins due to airspace restrictions. Stall testing without VGs showed a tendency for a wing drop at full stall for both straight and level stalls and accelerated stalls. Notably, stall testing with VGs could not obtain a clean break with a wing drop. Rather, a continuous stall buffet and rapid descent rate (1500+ ft/min) was obtained in the straight and level cases. In the accelerated stalls, there was no tendency for a wing to drop.

Results After the completion of both flight tests, data logs were extracted from the Dynon SkyView EFIS system and detailed analysis performed. No VG Results Speed Run PA 8469 feet DA 8999 feet RPM 2642 1/min MAP 22.1 inhg FF 15.9-16.0 USG/hr OAT 3 degrees C AOA 2 percent %HP 74 percent TAS 204.9 avg KTAS Stall Speeds (KIAS) Clean 60 wing drop 15 degrees 56 wing drop 40 degrees 56 wing drop With VG Results Speed Run PA 8479 feet DA 8935 feet RPM 2640 1/min MAP 22.1 inhg FF 16.0-16.1 USG/hr OAT 2 degrees C AOA 2 percent %HP 74 percent TAS 203.2 avg KTAS Stall Speeds (KIAS) Clean 59 no wing drop 15 degrees 56 no wing drop 40 degrees 53 no wing drop

Sources of Error As in any flight tests, there are several sources of error. Primarily, the speed runs have errors related to variations in atmospheric conditions between the tests. The logged data show this to be small (within 1 degree C and 76 feet DA-PA spread). Probably the largest source of error is caused by turbulence or small variations in the autopilot altitude hold system. For this reason, the recorded KTAS during these tests were the average speeds obtained in level flight conditions determined by examining the data logs. There is some amount of subjectivity in choosing the data sets and the error is estimated at less than 1 knot TAS. Conclusions The installation of StolSpeed VGs on Harmon Rocket II C-GVRL provides a substantial reduction in V S0 of 3 KIAS. Very little effect on V S or partial flaps stall speed was indicated. Both 1G and accelerated stall behavior was improved in all configurations, with no wing drop noted in the tests. Fast cruise speed was reduced by 1.7 KTAS, with less than 1 KTAS uncertainty in the results.