Figure 1: Schematic of ship in still water showing the action of bouyancy and weight to right the ship.

Similar documents
The phenomenon: complex motion, unusual geometry

Lab 5: Nonlinear Systems

CDS 101 Precourse Phase Plane Analysis and Stability

Resonance and response

Clearly the passage of an eigenvalue through to the positive real half plane leads to a qualitative change in the phase portrait, i.e.

TORSION PENDULUM: THE MECHANICAL NONLINEAR OSCILLATOR

x(t+ δt) - x(t) = slope δt t+δt

More Details Fixed point of mapping is point that maps into itself, i.e., x n+1 = x n.

The dynamics of the Forced Damped Pendulum. John Hubbard Cornell University and Université de Provence

Object Impact on the Free Surface and Added Mass Effect Laboratory Fall 2005 Prof. A. Techet

A plane autonomous system is a pair of simultaneous first-order differential equations,

ES205 Analysis and Design of Engineering Systems: Lab 1: An Introductory Tutorial: Getting Started with SIMULINK

Using web-based Java pplane applet to graph solutions of systems of differential equations

Modeling the Duffing Equation with an Analog Computer

M A : Ordinary Differential Equations

PHY217: Vibrations and Waves

LECTURE 8: DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS 7

Nonlinear Oscillators: Free Response

Response of A Hard Duffing Oscillator to Harmonic Excitation An Overview

Dynamics of Ocean Structures Prof. Dr. Srinivasan Chandrasekaran Department of Ocean Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Madras

Entrainment Alex Bowie April 7, 2004

Nonlinear System Analysis

Computational Physics (6810): Session 8

Oscillator Homework Problems

Unit 7: Oscillations

Nonlinear dynamics & chaos BECS

M A : Ordinary Differential Equations

Question: Total. Points:

Math 216 Final Exam 24 April, 2017

Chapter 2 Chaos theory and its relationship to complexity

General Physics I. Lecture 12: Applications of Oscillatory Motion. Prof. WAN, Xin ( 万歆 )

Dynamical Systems and Chaos Part I: Theoretical Techniques. Lecture 4: Discrete systems + Chaos. Ilya Potapov Mathematics Department, TUT Room TD325

Updated 2013 (Mathematica Version) M1.1. Lab M1: The Simple Pendulum

Introduction to Dynamical Systems Basic Concepts of Dynamics

The Effect of a Rotational Spring on the Global Stability Aspects of the Classical von Mises Model under Step Loading

Driven Harmonic Oscillator

Figure 1: Doing work on a block by pushing it across the floor.

DYNAMICS OF AN UMBILICAL CABLE FOR UNDERGROUND BORE-WELL APPLICATIONS

Chapter 10: Simple Harmonic Motion

Application 6.5B Period Doubling and Chaos in Mechanical Systems

Transitioning to Chaos in a Simple Mechanical Oscillator

EXPERIMENTAL PROJECT Rigid Pendulum Experiment

Hardening nonlinearity effects on forced vibration of viscoelastic dynamical systems to external step perturbation field

Lab 11. Spring-Mass Oscillations

Rotational Motion. Figure 1: Torsional harmonic oscillator. The locations of the rotor and fiber are indicated.

Computer Problems for Methods of Solving Ordinary Differential Equations

What happens if one pulls on the spring? The spring exerts a restoring force which is proportional to the distance it is stretched, F = - k x (1)

Math 216 Final Exam 24 April, 2017

You will return this handout to the instructor at the end of the lab period. Experimental verification of Ampere s Law.

Lab 11 - Free, Damped, and Forced Oscillations

How big is the Milky Way? Introduction. by Toby O'Neil. How big is the Milky Way? about Plus support Plus subscribe to Plus terms of use

Chaos and R-L diode Circuit

The Magnetic Pendulum

Introduction to bifurcations

Lab M5: Hooke s Law and the Simple Harmonic Oscillator

Mechanics, Heat, Oscillations and Waves Prof. V. Balakrishnan Department of Physics Indian Institute of Technology, Madras

Vibratory Motion -- Conceptual Solutions

THREE DIMENSIONAL SYSTEMS. Lecture 6: The Lorenz Equations

Analytical Mechanics - Extra Problems

Chapter 1. Introduction to Nonlinear Space Plasma Physics

Hydrostatics and Stability Dr. Hari V Warrior Department of Ocean Engineering and Naval Architecture Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur

Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos Summer 2011

Computers, Lies and the Fishing Season

ET3-7: Modelling I(V) Introduction and Objectives. Electrical, Mechanical and Thermal Systems

Chapter 13 Lecture. Essential University Physics Richard Wolfson 2 nd Edition. Oscillatory Motion Pearson Education, Inc.

Torsion Spring Oscillator with Dry Friction

Dr Ian R. Manchester Dr Ian R. Manchester AMME 3500 : Root Locus

Basic Theory of Dynamical Systems

Vibrations and waves: revision. Martin Dove Queen Mary University of London

Control of Chaos in Strongly Nonlinear Dynamic Systems

Effect of various periodic forces on Duffing oscillator

Differential Equations

xt+1 = 1 ax 2 t + y t y t+1 = bx t (1)

3 Stability and Lyapunov Functions

Experiment 4 Oscillations

From Last Time. Gravitational forces are apparent at a wide range of scales. Obeys

PH 120 Project # 2: Pendulum and chaos

LAB 6 - GRAVITATIONAL AND PASSIVE FORCES

Limit cycle oscillations at resonances

28. Pendulum phase portrait Draw the phase portrait for the pendulum (supported by an inextensible rod)

Maps and differential equations

Point mass approximation. Rigid beam mechanics. spring constant k N effective mass m e. Simple Harmonic Motion.. m e z = - k N z

CALCULATION OF NONLINEAR VIBRATIONS OF PIECEWISE-LINEAR SYSTEMS USING THE SHOOTING METHOD

Rolling marble lab. B. Pre-Lab Questions a) When an object is moving down a ramp, is its speed increasing, decreasing, or staying the same?

ME 563 HOMEWORK # 7 SOLUTIONS Fall 2010

Linear and Nonlinear Oscillators (Lecture 2)

Linear Second-Order Differential Equations LINEAR SECOND-ORDER DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS

Global analysis of the nonlinear Duffing-van der Pol type equation by a bifurcation theory and complete bifurcation groups method

Forced Oscillation and Resonance

Nonlinear Dynamic Systems Homework 1

Differential Equations 2280 Sample Midterm Exam 3 with Solutions Exam Date: 24 April 2015 at 12:50pm

The Nonlinear Pendulum

Chapter 1, Section 1.2, Example 9 (page 13) and Exercise 29 (page 15). Use the Uniqueness Tool. Select the option ẋ = x

Wind Tunnel Experiments of Stall Flutter with Structural Nonlinearity

1. In Activity 1-1, part 3, how do you think graph a will differ from graph b? 3. Draw your graph for Prediction 2-1 below:

DYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF OFFSHORE TENSION LEG PLATFORMS UNDER HYDRODYNAMIC FORCES

Math 216 Second Midterm 20 March, 2017

Lab 1: Damped, Driven Harmonic Oscillator

Lab 4 Numerical simulation of a crane

a. Follow the Start-Up Procedure in the laboratory manual. Note the safety rules.

Transcription:

MULTI-DIMENSIONAL SYSTEM: In this computer simulation we will explore a nonlinear multi-dimensional system. As before these systems are governed by equations of the form x 1 = f 1 x 2 = f 2.. x n = f n where n is the dimension of the system. A problem in ship stability. In this lab we'll be using a simplified model of a ship in rolling seas in order to study the ship s stability and find out how likely it is that the ship may capsize. We'll use the software Differential Systems to sketch the phase plane of the motion and continue our use of Matlab. This system is an example of a forced nonlinear oscillator. This lab is designed to bring home the points that, firstly, although a ship in the sea is a very complicated system, people model it reasonably effectively using a simple (often empirical model. Secondly, even though the model is simple, the behavior is not. In fact, due to the nonlinearities the ship may capsize even though the sea conditions are far from where one would expect capsize to occur. Introduction. In this study we'll consider the simple case of a ship broadside to the waves so that the wave action causes the ship to roll from side to side. Figure 1 shows a ship sitting in still water. There are two forces acting on the ship which try to cause it to "sit up straight". These are the weight and the buoyancy which act together to reduce the angle x. If the ship is displaced to one side it tries to restore itself and oscillates until the damping of the water brings it to rest. x buoyancy still water level weight Figure 1: Schematic of ship in still water showing the action of bouyancy and weight to right the ship. mjm 9/21/00 shipstab.doc

Nonlinear Dynamical Systems Lab Page 2 of 5 While experiments have deduced the equations of motion for some hull types (you can see these in the references given below a more general approach is to consider the simplest possible equation that can be investigated interactively. We choose a model which represents a ship that is biased to capsize (this could be due to wind or ice loading or movement of the cargo to one side. The simplest equation we can have in this case is x + x β + x x 2 = Fsin(ωt (1 where x is the angle of inclination of the ship, β is a damping constant, F is the amplitude of the forcing (the size of the waves and ω is the frequency with which the waves arrive. Getting a feel for the model ( Ignoring the forcing In order to see what this equation means we'll first get rid of the forcing and let β be very large (the system is overdamped. Now the equation reads x x+ x 2 Sketch this curve and locate the fixed points. What does the potential look like? (Remember f (x = dv (x/dx. Now we see what happens when capsize occurs. The ship "tips over the edge" of the potential and can't recover. We're now interested in the conditions that will lead to capsize. Again, in an effort to simplify things let's ignore the forcing for a moment. So our equation reads x + x β + x x 2 = 0 We transform this to two first order equations by defining a new variable v = x so that the equation becomes v = x (2 v = vβ x + x 2 Now we have to numerically integrate this and see which initial conditions lead to capsize. The numerical integration can be done by extending the Runge-Kutta method to two-dimensions (see Strogatz page 33 for 1-D and page 147 for 2-D. Before doing any computing you should first be able to sketch what the phase portrait looks like. Can you identify any fixed points and classify their stability? Using Differential Systems and a value of β=0.1 investigate the behavior of the system from a number of different starting points. Try to locate the bounds of stability, that is, the initial conditions which lead to capsize and those that do not. You have been supplied with a computer program in Matlab (stable.m which calls john_ode.m and unforced.m that you can use to obtain the stable region, the set of initial conditions in x and x for which the ship will not capsize. This program calls a Runge-Kutta routine to perform the numerical integration. What we'll do is set the system off with a number of initial conditions and see which conditions lead to capsize and which result in the ship settling down. Run the program. A value of β=0.1 has been set for the damping. The program has been preset with a time, t f, for which the Runge-Kutta integration will take place. Is this

Nonlinear Dynamical Systems Lab Page 3 of 5 value a good choice? What are the drawbacks of decreasing and increasing this time? Can you predict without running the program again what the effect of changing β will be? Now check the prediction by trying β= 0.01 and β=0.5. You can change the value of β by editing the program unforced.m. Explain qualitatively what happens as β is increased. The program stable.m makes an array called "basin" that holds a "zero" when the initial condition does not lead to capsize and a "one" when the ship does capsize. The set of initial conditions that do not lead to capsize is often referred to as the basin of attraction. You can get a printout of this array by typing "colormap(gray" followed by "imagesc(basin" and typing print. Print out the image that shows the stable region and put in the axes by hand. Putting in the forcing Let's now go back to our forced equation, but remove the nonlinearity. We now have an equation for a damped, driven and LINEAR oscillator. x + x β + x = Fsin(ωt We'll examine what happens as a function of frequency and the amplitude of the forcing. This equation is very well known in physics and exhibits a phenomenon known as resonance. That is, at a specific forcing frequency the response of the system is maximum. You may remember from the spring oscillator and the LRC circuit that their equations are the same as the left hand side of the above equation and exhibit a natural frequency of oscillation. If one forces the oscillator at this frequency then the response is maximum. Again use Differential Systems to explore the behavior. You will have to modify equation (2 in the computer. We run the numerical integration for a number of forcing periods so that the system has settled down after the initial transient. (You may want to start with around 20 periods, which you can do by setting the limit of the integration time to a suitable value by trial and error. The response is taken as the amplitude of the ship s roll at the end of the forcing. Set the amplitude to F = 0.05, β=0.1, the initial x = x = 0, and determine the amplitude of the oscillation as a function of frequency (for ω = 0.4 to 1.2 in steps of 0.1. Plot the response as a function of frequency (you can do this by hand. Record the frequency at which the response of the system is maximum. We call this the resonant frequency. Now we put back in the nonlinearity. What do you think its effect will be? Repeat the simulation, using a forcing amplitude of F= 0.05. Where does resonance occur? Now you see that the nonlinearity has the effect of "softening" the resonance (that is, making the resonance occur at a lower frequency. Note also that there is now a sharp discontinuity. The ship's amplitude jumps suddenly. In this particular case the jump is not fatal, but it shows that in the presence of nonlinearity the behavior of the system can change dramatically with a small change in the inputs. At this stage of the simulation we could either elect to investigate stability as a function of inital conditions or as a function of forcing frequency and amplitude. For now we'll attempt to sketch the regimes of capsize and stability as a function of forcing amplitude and forcing frequency, keeping the initial x and x fixed (both at values of 0. This means we'll have transients where the ship capsizes before it settles down to its long-term behavior and depends on the initial conditions of the simulations. For values of forcing frequency from ω=0.3 to 1.5 in steps of 0.1 vary

Nonlinear Dynamical Systems Lab Page 4 of 5 the forcing amplitude. Observe the output and sketch a graph separating the regimes of stability and instability. The graph should look a little like figure 2. One can now also start to see other strange behavior in this system. For example, as you scan in amplitude you'll see regions where the response of the system is no longer at the period of the forcing. In fact, the period is sometimes twice that of the forcing, a phenomenon called period doubling. You can find such a place at ω = 0.3 and F =0.24. Check that the period is in fact doubled. For other values of ω and F the response doesn't seem to have any periodicity and in fact seems random before capsize occurs. This is the regime of chaos, but note that a ship may capsize during the initial transient as well. It is very difficult to separate these behaviors in our current simulation. Try to shade in (roughly the regions where period doubling and this random looking behaviour occurs. Are they near where the capsize occurs? forcing amplitude inevitable capsize region of stability Whats up in the phase space? forcing frequency Figure 2: Schematic of regions of stability and instability. You may have been wondering what is happening in phase space. Unfortunately the phase space is now three-dimensional and is spanned by (x, x,t. The trajectories look like the wires of a complicated cable and wrap around each other. If we plot the phase space (x, x, the plot looks tangled. This makes visualization quite difficult but a standard technique for dealing with this is to sample the (x, x whenever t is a multiple of T = 2π /ω so what we now see is a set of dots that appear to puncture a two-dimensional sheet - this is called the Poincare Map. We can use this Poincare map to visualize the behavior of three (and higher dimensional systems and will come back to it later in the course. Have a look using Differential Systems. Generate phase plots of x vs. xusing an equation with no forcing. Now include a sin(ωτ term in the equation and examine the trajectories starting from the origin in phase space. You'll see the trajectories no longer have that "well groomed" look to them that Strogatz describes (page 149. Generate the phase plots when you are (a far from resonance, (b near to resonance and (c when the system is period doubled. Describe the appearance of these plots and explain what happens when the system makes the transition to period doubling. Lab Report: In the lab report you should cover the points that are highlighted in the text. These points are reiterated below along with some other points that you should address. 1 Show the potential and stable points. 2 Find the basin of stability (the set of initial conditions for which the ship will not capsize and explain what happens as parameters are varied. 3 Show where the resonances occur for linear and nonlinear oscillators. 4 What sort of potential would lead to a "hardening" of the resonance?

Nonlinear Dynamical Systems Lab Page 5 of 5 5 Prepare a graph showing the combinations of forcing frequency and amplitude for which the ship becomes unstable. 6 Prepare plots of the phase space for the forced and unforced equation. Describe what happens when the motion is period doubled. 7 In other ship stability studies a potential of the form V = 1 2 x 2 1 4 x 4 + bx has been used where b is a constant. Sketch this potential and the associated restoring force showing any fixed point(s. References: Soliman, M. S. and J. M. T. Thompson. "Transient and steady state analysis of capsize phenomena." Applied Ocean Research, 13(2, 82-92, (1991 Bishop, S. R. and M. S. Soliman, "The prediction of ship capsize: not all fractals are environment friendly." Applications of Fractals and Chaos. Crilly, Earnshaw and Jones (Eds. Springer-Verlag 1993