Igusa fibre integrals over local fields

Similar documents
MA 206 notes: introduction to resolution of singularities

where m is the maximal ideal of O X,p. Note that m/m 2 is a vector space. Suppose that we are given a morphism

10. Smooth Varieties. 82 Andreas Gathmann

Notes on p-divisible Groups

Geometric motivic integration

Some questions on minimal log discrepancies

Motivic integration on Artin n-stacks

Resolving singularities of varieties and families

1 Existence of the Néron model

ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY: GLOSSARY AND EXAMPLES

Lecture 1. Toric Varieties: Basics

HARTSHORNE EXERCISES

EXCLUDED HOMEOMORPHISM TYPES FOR DUAL COMPLEXES OF SURFACES

Resolving singularities of varieties and families

BEZOUT S THEOREM CHRISTIAN KLEVDAL

Extended Index. 89f depth (of a prime ideal) 121f Artin-Rees Lemma. 107f descending chain condition 74f Artinian module

Factorization of birational maps on steroids

1 Notations and Statement of the Main Results

9. Birational Maps and Blowing Up

CHAPTER 0 PRELIMINARY MATERIAL. Paul Vojta. University of California, Berkeley. 18 February 1998

mult V f, where the sum ranges over prime divisor V X. We say that two divisors D 1 and D 2 are linearly equivalent, denoted by sending

COMPLEX VARIETIES AND THE ANALYTIC TOPOLOGY

ON THE NUMBER AND BOUNDEDNESS OF LOG MINIMAL MODELS OF GENERAL TYPE

ON THE NUMBER AND BOUNDEDNESS OF LOG MINIMAL MODELS OF GENERAL TYPE

3. Lecture 3. Y Z[1/p]Hom (Sch/k) (Y, X).

Néron Models of Elliptic Curves.

1.6.1 What are Néron Models?

MATH 233B, FLATNESS AND SMOOTHNESS.

Math 210B. Artin Rees and completions

4. Images of Varieties Given a morphism f : X Y of quasi-projective varieties, a basic question might be to ask what is the image of a closed subset

1 Flat, Smooth, Unramified, and Étale Morphisms

(1) is an invertible sheaf on X, which is generated by the global sections

On the characteristic cycle of an étale sheaf

Toroidal Embeddings and Desingularization

1. Algebraic vector bundles. Affine Varieties

MATH 8253 ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY WEEK 12

Tunisian Journal of Mathematics an international publication organized by the Tunisian Mathematical Society

Néron models of abelian varieties

On Mordell-Lang in Algebraic Groups of Unipotent Rank 1

Homogeneous Coordinate Ring

MATH 8254 ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY HOMEWORK 1

(03) So when the order of { divides no N j at all then Z { (s) is holomorphic on C Now the N j are not intrinsically associated to f 1 f0g; but the or

NOTES ON FLAT MORPHISMS AND THE FPQC TOPOLOGY

Introduction to toric geometry

Proof of the Shafarevich conjecture

Resolution of Singularities in Algebraic Varieties

CHEVALLEY S THEOREM AND COMPLETE VARIETIES

BOUNDEDNESS OF MODULI OF VARIETIES OF GENERAL TYPE

Constructible isocrystals (London 2015)

Algebraic Varieties. Notes by Mateusz Micha lek for the lecture on April 17, 2018, in the IMPRS Ringvorlesung Introduction to Nonlinear Algebra

Wild ramification and the characteristic cycle of an l-adic sheaf

PROBLEMS, MATH 214A. Affine and quasi-affine varieties

Artin Approximation and Proper Base Change

Elliptic curves, Néron models, and duality

FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 26

CHEAT SHEET: PROPERTIES OF MORPHISMS OF SCHEMES

LECTURE 7: STABLE RATIONALITY AND DECOMPOSITION OF THE DIAGONAL

Logarithmic geometry and moduli

arxiv: v2 [math.ag] 1 Jan 2011

Inseparable local uniformization. Conference on valuation theory, El Escorial

Boundary of Cohen-Macaulay cone and asymptotic behavior of system of ideals

Factorization of birational maps for qe schemes in characteristic 0

INTERSECTION THEORY CLASS 7

3. The Sheaf of Regular Functions

Math 6140 Notes. Spring Codimension One Phenomena. Definition: Examples: Properties:

where Σ is a finite discrete Gal(K sep /K)-set unramified along U and F s is a finite Gal(k(s) sep /k(s))-subset

Sections of tropicalization maps (joint work with Walter Gubler and Joe Rabinoff)

Motivic zeta functions and infinite cyclic covers

On log flat descent. Luc Illusie, Chikara Nakayama, and Takeshi Tsuji

A Gauss-Bonnet theorem for constructible sheaves on reductive groups

SIMONS SYMPOSIUM 2015: OPEN PROBLEM SESSIONS

ABSTRACT NONSINGULAR CURVES

SCHEMES. David Harari. Tsinghua, February-March 2005

Logarithmic geometry and rational curves

Introduction to Arithmetic Geometry Fall 2013 Lecture #18 11/07/2013

(*) I heartily thank C. Nakayama for a careful reading of a first draft and many helpful comments.

A Humble Example of Notions of Divisor

Smooth morphisms. Peter Bruin 21 February 2007

A MORE GENERAL ABC CONJECTURE. Paul Vojta. University of California, Berkeley. 2 December 1998

Intersecting valuation rings in the Zariski-Riemann space of a field

Raynaud on F -vector schemes and prolongation

MOISHEZON SPACES IN RIGID GEOMETRY

Algebraic varieties and schemes over any scheme. Non singular varieties

HYPERSURFACES IN PROJECTIVE SCHEMES AND A MOVING LEMMA

FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 27

Mirror symmetry. Mark Gross. July 24, University of Cambridge

The Grothendieck Ring of Varieties

TROPICAL BRILL-NOETHER THEORY

div(f ) = D and deg(d) = deg(f ) = d i deg(f i ) (compare this with the definitions for smooth curves). Let:

arxiv: v2 [math.ag] 29 Aug 2009

Spherical varieties and arc spaces

APPENDIX 3: AN OVERVIEW OF CHOW GROUPS

Rings With Topologies Induced by Spaces of Functions

Qualifying Exams I, 2014 Spring

The Grothendieck-Katz Conjecture for certain locally symmetric varieties

Vojta s conjecture and level structures on abelian varieties

THE SHIMURA-TANIYAMA FORMULA AND p-divisible GROUPS

12. Linear systems Theorem Let X be a scheme over a ring A. (1) If φ: X P n A is an A-morphism then L = φ O P n

STEENROD OPERATIONS IN ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY

DEFORMATIONS VIA DIMENSION THEORY

Transcription:

March 25, 2017

1 2 Standard definitions The map ord S The map ac S 3 Toroidal constructible functions Main Theorem Some conjectures 4 Toroidalization Key Theorem Proof of Key Theorem

Igusa fibre integrals Outline Let K be any n.a. local field and f : X = A n K Y = A1 K K-morphism. Consider the fibre integral I (y) = Φ(x) dx df, K x K n,f (x)=y a for any y K which is not a critical value of f, where Φ is a locally constant function on K n with compact support. Assume 0 is a critical value of f. Then on a small neighborhood of 0, I (y) is locally constant on the complement of {0}. Igusa s Theorem describes how I (y) behaves for y 0.

Notation for local fields Let K be any n.a. local field. We will use the following notation. O K is the valuation ring of K. ord K : K \ {0} Z the valuation of K. K the residue field of K. q := ( K) the cardinality of the residue field of K. y K := q ord K (y), for any y K. The Haar measure on K is normalized such that O K has measure 1. For any y O K, denote by ȳ the reduction modulo the maximal ideal. Let π be a fixed element of K with ord K (π) = 1. For any y K \ {0}, the angular component ac(y) := yπ ord K (y). And moreover ac(y) := ac(y).

Igusa s Theorem Outline Igusa s Theorem (1975) Assume char(k) = 0. For y 0 in a small enough neighborhood of 0, the fibre integral I (y) is a finite C-linear combination of functions of the form χ(ac(y)) C(ord K (y)) q E(ord K (y)) with χ a character (continuous and complex valued) of the group of units in O K, and C, E numeric quasi-polynomials on Z, deg(e) 1. A quasi-polynomial on Z (or more generally on a lattice) is a complex valued function that is given by a polynomial on each congruence class modulo a suitable modulus N 0. It is called numeric if it takes values in Z.

Igusa s question Outline Igusa s proof is based on embedded resolution of singularities. Can also be proved by cell decomposition (D. 1984) Igusa posed the question how this would generalize when the dimension of the target of f is > 1 (the multivariate case). First results for the multivariate case were obtained by Loeser (1988), Lichtin (1997), and D. (1998). This was for a fixed local field. The present talk is about an analog of Igusa s Theorem, yielding a description of the fibre integral in the multivariate case, which is uniform in all local fields of residue characteristic 0. Cluckers and Loeser (2005) proved, using cell decomposition, that these integrals are specializations of motivic constructible functions. In this talk I will use a different method (flat toroidalization of morphisms) to get a related result. Local toroidalization was already used by Lichtin (1997) to get bounds for some fibre integrals.

Strict toroidal embeddings Standard definitions The map ord S The map ac S Let R be a normal noetherian integral domain. A variety over R is a separated integral scheme of finite type over R. An inclusion U X of varieties over R is a strict toroidal embedding over R if U is smooth /R, U is dense open in X, and locally for the Zariski topology on X there is an étale morphism from X to a toric variety Spec (R[x e e ˇσ]), with U = inverse image of the big torus. D := X \ U is called the toroidal divisor. A strict toroidal embedding U X over R is called smooth if X is smooth over R. Equivalent with X smooth over R and X \ U strict normal crossings divisor on X over R. Denote the irreducible components of D by E i, i I. For J I let E J := j J E j \ i I \J E i. This is smooth over R. The irreducible components of the E J are called the strata of U X. For S a stratum, put Star(S) := {strata whose closure S}.

The natural map ord S Standard definitions The map ord S The map ac S Let S be stratum of the toroidal embedding U X over R, D := X \ U. Let M S = group of Cartier divisors on Star(S) with support D. Note that M S = Z codim S. If X smooth/r, then M S has standard basis {[E i ] E i S}. Let ˇσ S = cone in M S R generated by the effective Cartier divisors. Let N S = Hom(N S, Z) = Z codim S. Let σ S = dual of ˇσ S. Is a full dimensional polyhedral cone in N S R. If X smooth/r, then σ S = R codim S 0. Let R = O F, with F a number field. For any n.a. local field K F, we have a natural map: ord S : {a X (O K ) \ D(O K ) ā S} σ S N S a linear map : c ˇσ S M S ord K (x c (a)) > 0 with x c any element in O X,ā with div(x c ) = c locally at ā.

The natural map ac S Standard definitions The map ord S The map ac S Choose c 1,, c r ˇσ S which form a basis for the lattice M S. If X smooth/r, then choose the standard basis. The normal torus bundle N S X of S X is the restriction to S of i=1,...,r L (c i ) where L (c i ) is the line bundle of c i on X minus 0. If X smooth/r, then N S X is the normal bundle of S X minus the classes of tangent vectors to X that are tangent to some E i S. For any n.a. local field K F, we have a natural map: ac S : {a X (O K ) \ D(O K ) ā S} N S X (K) a ( ā, r i=1 ac(x i(a)) s i (ā) ) with locally at ā, div(x i ) = c i, and s i the local section 1/x i of L(c i ). If X smooth/r, then a ( ā, ( r i=1 ac(x i(a)) x i )ā ).

Toroidal constructible functions (1) Toroidal constructible functions Main Theorem Some conjectures Let A := Z[q, q 1, ( 1 1 q j ) j N0 ]. Let R = O F, with F a number field. Let U F X F a strict toroidal embedding over F. Let Φ be a family of functions Φ K : U F (K) C, where K runs over all n.a. local fields F, with char K 0. Definition Φ is toroidal constructible on U F w.r.t. U F X F, if for some (hence each) model U X over R of U F X F we have (uniformly for char( K) 0): 1 The support of Φ K is contained in {x X (O K ) \ D(O K )} U F (K). 2 For each stratum S of U X, the restriction of Φ K to {x X (O K ) \ D(O K ) x S} is a finite A-linear combination of functions of the form given in next slide.

Toroidal constructible functions (2) Toroidal constructible functions Main Theorem Some conjectures Functions of the form with (λ ac S (x) ( K)) C(ord S (x)) q E(ordS (x)) λ K 0 (Var N ) S X C a numerical quasi-polynomial on N S E a numerical quasi-polynomial on N S, with deg(e) 1

Toroidal constructible functions Main Theorem Some conjectures Schwartz-Bruhat constructible functions Let U F nonsing. variety over number field F. Let Φ be family of functions Φ K : U F (K) C, where K runs over all n.a. local fields F, char K 0. Definition Φ is Schwartz-Bruhat constructible on U F (S-B-constructible on U F ) if it is toroidal constructible w.r.t. the trivial toroidal embedding U F U F. Then Φ K has support U(O K ), with U a model over O F of U F. On U(O K ), Φ K is a finite A-linear combination of functions x (λ x ( K)), with λ K 0 (Var U ). Hence it is locally constant with compact support.

Main Theorem Outline Toroidal constructible functions Main Theorem Some conjectures Main Theorem Let f : X Y be a dominant morphism of nonsingular varieties over a number field F, and ω X, ω Y volume forms on X, Y. Let U Y Y be a dense open subset over which f is smooth. For K any n.a. local field F with char( K) 0, consider I K (y) = Φ K (x) ω X f (ω Y ), for y U Y (K), K x X (K), f (x)=y where the family (Φ K ) K is toroidal constructible on X w.r.t. some strict toroidal embedding of X. Then there exists a toroidal constructible function on some open dense subset Ǔ Y U Y, w.r.t. a smooth strict toroidal embedding of Ǔ Y, which equals I K (y) for any y Ǔ Y (K) with I K (y) absolutely convergent.

Conjectures Outline Toroidal constructible functions Main Theorem Some conjectures Note that the integral I K (y) always converges absolutely when Φ is S-B constructible on X. Conjecture 1. In the Main Theorem we can take Ǔ Y = U Y, if Φ is S-B constructible on X. Theorem 2. Conjecture 1 is true if the Strong Toroidalization Conjecture is true. Thus true when dim X 3 and F big enough, by Cutkosky (2007). Conjecture 2. (± Loeser s conjecture 1988) In the Main Theorem assume moreover that Φ is S-B constructible on X and that f is without blow-up. If Y \ U Y is a strict normal crossings divisor, then (I K ) K is toroidal constructible on U Y w.r.t. U Y Y.

Toroidalization of Morphisms, I Toroidalization Key Theorem Proof of Key Theorem Theorem: Flat Weak Toroidalization (Abramovich-Karu 2000, + ɛ) Let k be a field, char(k) = 0. Let f : X Y be a dominant morphism of k-varieties, and Z X X, Z Y Y closed subsets. Then there exist strict toroidal embeddings U X X, U Y Y, and a commutative diagram U X X m X f U Y Y m Y X f Y with m X, m Y modifications, Y nonsingular, and 1 f is flat and toroidal w.r.t. U X X, U Y Y, 2 m 1 X (Z X ) X \ U X, and m 1 Y (Z Y ) Y \ U Y, 3 the restrictions of m X, m Y to U X, U Y are open embeddings.

Toroidalization of Morphisms, II Toroidalization Key Theorem Proof of Key Theorem The source X of f might have singularities. Such a morphism f is called toroidal w.r.t. the given toroidal embeddings, if it is dominant, maps U X into U Y, and is locally for the étale topology (on source and target) isomorphic to a toric morphism (i.e. given by monomials) of toric k-varieties, respecting the toroidal divisors. Strong Toroidalization Conjecture (weakened) In the Weak Toroidalization Theorem assume moreover: X,Y are nonsingular, f is smooth over Y \ Z Y, and f 1 (Y \ Z Y ) = X \ Z X. Then we can choose f such that the open embeddings of U X, U Y induced by m X, m Y are surjections onto X \ Z X, Y \ Z Y.

Key Theorem Outline Toroidalization Key Theorem Proof of Key Theorem Key Theorem Let f : X Y be a flat toroidal morphism over a number field F, w.r.t. strict toroidal embeddings U X X, U Y Y, and ω X, ω Y volume forms on U X, U Y. Note that f UX is smooth over U Y. Assume Y is nonsingular. For K any n.a. local field F with char( K) 0, consider I K (y) = Φ K (x) ω X f (ω Y ), for y U Y (K), K x U X (K), f (x)=y where the family (Φ K ) K is toroidal constructible on U X w.r.t. U X X. Then there exists a toroidal constructible function on U Y, w.r.t. U Y Y, which equals I K (y) for any y U Y (K) with I K (y) absolutely convergent.

Consequences Outline Toroidalization Key Theorem Proof of Key Theorem The Main Theorem is an easy consequence of the Key Theorem, using Flat Weak Toroidalization. Alternatively it can be proved using the tame cell decomposition of Pas. In about the same way one obtains an alternative proof that the (uniform p-adic) constructible functions of Cluckers-Loeser are closed under integration, in the special case that there are no additive characters involved (by using toroidalization instead of cell decomposition). Corollary(of the Key Theorem). Loeser s Conjecture (Conjecture 2) is true if f : X Y is a toroidal morphism w.r.t. strict toroidal embeddings of an open in X and U Y Y. Indeed, a morphism without blow-up is flat.

The proof: preparations Toroidalization Key Theorem Proof of Key Theorem Set D X := X \ U X, D Y := Y \ U Y, the toroidal divisors. Denote by same letters models for X, Y, f,, over R = O F. Let µ tor X /Y be the measure on the fibers given locally by ωx tor K f (ωy tor) with ωx tor, ωtor Y local generators for Ωdim R X X (log D X ), Ω dim R Y Y (log D Y ). It suffices to prove the Key Theorem for the measure ω X f (ω Y ) K replaced by the toroidal measure µ tor X /Y. Let S be any stratum for U X X, and S a stratum for U Y Y with f (S) S. Consider the following commutative diagram.

The proof: the diagram Toroidalization Key Theorem Proof of Key Theorem {x X (O K ) \ D X (O K ) x S} f (ord S, ac S ) ( σ S N S ) N S X ( K) f {y Y (O K ) \ D Y (O K ) ȳ S } (ord S, ac S ) ( σ S N S ) N S Y ( K) f induced by morphism of lattices, and smooth morphism of torus bundles. The two vertical arrows are surjections. Toroidal Hensel s Lemma. Given y bottom-left, and α top-right, with y and α mapping to same element in bottom-right, then there exists an x top-left which maps to y and α. The µ tor X /Y -measure of the set of these x equals qdim Y dim X.

The proof: finishing Outline Toroidalization Key Theorem Proof of Key Theorem Summing over all strata S with f (S) S, and summing over all α, yields a very explicit formula for the fibre integral I K (y). This formula contains expressions of the form B(w) := C(v) q E(v) v σ S N S, f (v)=w for w σ S N S, where C(v), E(v) are numeric quasi-polynomials on the lattice N S, deg(e) 1. Because f is flat, a Lemma of Abramovich and Karu (2000) implies that f maps each one-dimensional face of the cone σ S into a one-dimensional face of σ S. This combinatorial fact implies that B(w) is an A-linear combination of functions of the form C (w) q E (w), with C, E numeric quasi-polynomials, deg(e ) 1 (whenever absolutely convergent).