Weekly Weather and Crop Bulletin

Transcription

1 Washington, D.C. Weekly Weather and Crop Bulletin Released June,, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (SS),, U.S. Department of Agriculture. For information on "" call Mark E. Miller at ()-, office hours : a.m. to : p.m. ET. National Weather Summary Volume, No. May - June, For additional information, call () -. Highlights: For the second consecutive week, hot, dry weather in the West contrasted sharply with cool, showery conditions in most areas from the Plains eastward. Record heat in California and the Southwest elevated weekly temperatures up to degrees F above normal, maintaining heavy irrigation and electrical demands. Across the drought-affected northern High Plains and interior Northwest, warm, mostly dry weather depleted topsoil moisture, increasing stress on pastures and dryland small grains. Showers and thunderstorms peppered the remainder of the Plains, generally benefiting winter wheat and emerging summer crops, but slowing fieldwork and causing localized wind, hail, and flood damage. Weekly rainfall totaled inches or more in southeastern Nebraska, all of Kansas and Oklahoma except far western areas, and northeastern Texas. At least inches of rain soaked much of eastern Oklahoma and parts of central and southwestern Kansas. In the Corn Belt, occasional showers hampered soybean and final corn planting, while cool weather ( to degrees F below normal) slowed summer crop emergence and development. Despite the showers, pockets of unfavorable dryness persisted in the lower Ohio Valley. Meanwhile, heavy rain overspread the Southeast, easing stress on unirrigated summer crops and curbing the threat of wildfires. Although topsoil moisture was adequate by week s end across most of the South, lingering dryness was noted in the southern Atlantic s, the central Gulf Coast region, and extreme southern Texas. Heat spread across southern and western Texas early in the week, then returned to much of the West thereafter. In Texas, Midland opened the week with consecutive daily-record highs ( degrees F on May and ). More than seven dozen Western daily-record highs were set or tied from May - June, the majority in California. On the th in California, May-record highs were broken in Cuyama ( degrees F) and downtown San Francisco ( degrees F). San Francisco s previous May record, degrees F, had stood since. On the last day of the month, the high of degrees F in Stockton,, tied their May record (previously noted on May, ) and represented their record-breaking ninth day of triple-digit heat during May (previously days in ). Elsewhere in California, May record-tying highs on the st reached degrees F in Paso Robles and degrees F on Mt. Wilson. Southern California highs on May included degrees F in Death Valley and degrees F in Palm Springs. Hot weather again shifted eastward toward week s end. On June in Nevada, Eureka s high of degrees F marked their earliest high temperature at or above degrees F (formerly degrees F on June, ). On June, record heat returned to southern Texas, where Brownsville ( degrees F) tied their daily-record high. In contrast, scattered daily-record lows were reported in the Northwest early in the week, and in the Great Lakes and Northeastern s after midweek. On May, record lows across the interior Northwest included degrees F in Redmond, OR, and degrees F in Yakima,. A day later, record lows in Montana fell to degrees F in Kalispell and degrees F in Lewistown. Farther east, the last day of May featured daily-record lows in locations such as Youngstown, ( degrees F), and Alpena, ( degrees F). Widespread severe thunderstorm outbreaks were reported by the Storm Prediction Center on May,,, and June. The first three outbreaks primarily affected the central and southern Plains and parts of the South, while the June event struck hardest in the western Corn Belt. On May, daily-record rainfall totals were observed in locations such as Oklahoma City, (. inches), and Lincoln, (. inches). A day later, daily records were established in El Dorado, (. inches), Jackson, (. inches), and Orlando, FL (. inches). May rainfall reached record proportions in Charleston, WV (. inches), and totaled. inches We (-)

2 in Muskogee,,. inches of which fell in hours on May -. In contrast, May rainfall was the lowest on record in locations such as Tampa, FL (a trace), Ft. Myers, FL (. inch), and Kalispell, (. inch). During May, windy, often warm weather on the northern High Plains aggravated drought conditions. In Glasgow,, where, January-May precipitation totaled. inches ( percent of normal), the monthly average wind speed of. mph eclipsed their previous May record of. mph, set in and. In Hawaii, showers increased across windward areas late in the week. On Kauai, Wainiha reported a weekly total of. inches,. inches of which fell in hours on June -. Meanwhile, cold weather lingered across western Alaska (as much as degrees F below normal), but milder weather (up to degrees F above normal) overspread the remainder of the. On May, Barrow notched a high of degrees F, the first time their temperature attained the freezing mark since October,. Two days later, Fairbanks high temperature reached degrees F, degrees F above normal. National Agricultural Summary May - June, Highlights: Cold weather limited growth of spring row crops in the Corn Belt and hindered winter wheat development on the Great Plains. In some areas of the Corn Belt, young corn and soybean plants were also stressed by excessive topsoil moisture. Heavy rainfall halted field activities in Kansas, Oklahoma, Missouri, and interior parts of the lower Mississippi Valley and Southeast. The storms produced isolated flash floods, strong winds, and hail, but also improved topsoil moisture supplies, especially in the Southeast. In the Southwest and interior areas of the Pacific Northwest, above-normal temperatures stimulated crop development and dry weather aided fieldwork. Light precipitation provided much-needed moisture for small grain crops in the northern High Plains. In the Northeast, cold, wet weather hindered plant development and limited fieldwork. Corn: Ninety percent of the crop was emerged, compared with percent a year ago. Fields quickly emerged in the western and northern Corn Belt, but growth was very slow due to cold nighttime temperatures. In North Dakota, percent of the acreage emerged during the week. Emergence progressed between and percentage points in Minnesota, Wisconsin, and South Dakota. The condition of emerged fields deteriorated across most of the Corn Belt due to the abnormally cold weather and saturated soils. Conditions improved in the central Great Plains and southern Corn Belt, where precipitation reduced moisture shortages and temperatures were not as cold. Winter Wheat: Eighty-three percent of the acreage was at or beyond the heading stage and percent was harvested. Crop development remained behind last year s rapid pace and trailed slightly behind the -year average. Harvest progress lagged behind last year s percent, but was equal to the -year average. Above-normal temperatures promoted rapid development on the central and northern High Plains and interior areas of the Pacific Northwest. Cool weather limited heading progress in Nebraska and South Dakota, but fields rapidly entered the heading stage in Michigan, despite cooler-than-normal weather. Harvest was about one-fourth complete in Texas, as progress was aided by dry weather most of the week. The harvest season began in Arkansas, Missouri, and Oklahoma, but progress was slow due to wet weather. Soybeans: Eighty percent of the acreage was planted, behind last year s -percent progress, but ahead of the -percent average for this date. Fifty-nine percent was emerged, compared with percent a year ago. Planting was active across the northern Corn Belt and adjacent areas of the Great Plains due to favorably dry weather. About one-third of the acreage was planted in Wisconsin during the week, and more than one-fourth was seeded in the Dakotas. Rain sharply curtailed planting progress in Missouri and Michigan and limited progress in other areas of the southern and eastern Corn Belt. Fields rapidly emerged across most of the Corn Belt, despite colder-than-normal temperatures. Emergence advanced between and percentage points in Iowa, Minnesota, South Dakota, and Wisconsin. However, growth was slow and some fields were stressed by excessive soil moisture. Cotton: Eighty-eight percent of the crop was planted, and percent was squaring. Planting progress and crop development were slightly ahead of last year and the -year average. Heavy rain halted planting in interior areas of the Southeast and parts of the mid-atlantic Coastal Plain, while delays were brief and scattered along the eastern Gulf Coast and southern Atlantic Coastal Plain. Georgia and South Carolina growers planted and percent of their acreage, respectively, but progress remained behind

3 normal in both s. In Texas, planting advanced percentage points, even though heavy rain limited planting in some areas and excessively dry soils hindered planting in other areas. Cotton squaring accelerated in the Southwest, especially in Arizona, due to above-normal temperatures. Hot daytime temperatures also aided development in Louisiana, where percent of the acreage entered the squaring stage during the week. Heavy rain, strong winds, and large hail damaged fields in Oklahoma. Small grains: Barley and spring wheat were and percent planted, respectively. Last year, planting was virtually complete by this date. However, planting remained slightly ahead of the -year average of and percent for barley and spring wheat, respectively. Dry weather aided progress in North Dakota, where growers seeded percent of their barley and percent of their spring wheat during the week. Barley and spring wheat were percent emerged, well behind last year s early emergence. However, spring wheat emergence was equal to the -year average, and barley emergence was just slightly behind the average for this date. About one-fifth of the barley and spring wheat acreage emerged in Minnesota and North Dakota during the week. In Montana, emergence was boosted by light precipitation. Crop conditions in Minnesota benefited from dry weather. The oat crop was percent emerged, behind last year s -percent progress, but slightly ahead of the -percent average for this date. Fields rapidly emerged in North Dakota, despite cooler-than-normal weather. Emergence lagged well behind normal in Minnesota and slightly behind normal in Nebraska and Wisconsin. Rice: Ninety-four percent of the crop was emerged, compared with percent at this time last year and percent normally emerged by this date. Triple-digit day time temperatures promoted rapid emergence and stimulated vegetative growth in California, while below-normal temperatures slightly hampered growth in the interior Mississippi Delta. Sorghum: Planting was percent complete, percentage points behind last year, but ahead of the -percent average for this date. Widespread, heavy rainfall limited planting progress to just percentage points in Kansas, Oklahoma, and Missouri. In Nebraska, growers planted more than one-fifth of their acreage during the week, despite rain delays. Planting progressed with few delays in Colorado, Illinois, and New Mexico. Other crops: The peanut crop was percent planted, equal to last year and ahead of the percent normally planted by this date. Planting was active in the southern Great Plains and Southeast most of the week, with rain delays mainly confined to the eastern Gulf Coast and mid-atlantic Coastal Plain. The rain provided much-needed moisture for germinating seeds in recently planted fields and improved crop conditions in emerged fields. Fifty-one percent of the sunflower acreage was planted, compared with percent planted by this date last year. Dry weather aided planting in the northern Great Plains, although progress stilllagged behind normal in South Dakota. We (-)

4 Winter Wheat: Percent Headed, Selected s Winter Wheat: Percent Harvested, Selected s Jun, Week Ending - May, Jun, Avg. Jun, Week Ending - May, Jun, Avg. OR OR Sts These s planted % of last year s winter wheat Sts These s harvested % of last year s winter wheat Soybeans: Percent Planted, Selected s Soybeans: Percent Emerged, Selected s Jun, Week Ending - May, Jun, Avg. Jun, Week Ending - May, Jun, Avg. Sts These s planted % of last year s soybean Sts These s planted % of last year s soybean June SS, UA

5 Jun, Corn: Percent Emerged, Selected s Week Ending - May, Jun, Avg. Sts These s planted % of last year s corn NM Sorghum: Percent Planted, Selected s Jun, Week Ending - May, Jun, Avg. AZ SC Jun, Cotton: Percent Planted, Selected s Week Ending - May, Jun, Avg. Sts These s planted % of last year s cotton AZ SC Cotton: Percent Squaring, Selected s Jun, Week Ending - May, Jun, Avg. * Sts These s planted % of last year s sorghum Sts * Revised. These s planted % of last year s cotton June SS, UA

6 Spring Wheat: Percent Planted, Selected s Spring Wheat: Percent Emerged, Selected s Jun, Week Ending - May, Jun, Avg. Jun, Week Ending - May, Jun, Avg. Sts These s planted % of last year s spring wheat Sts These s planted % of last year s spring wheat Barley: Percent Planted, Selected s Barley: Percent Emerged, Selected s Jun, Week Ending - May, Jun, Avg. Jun, Week Ending - May, Jun, Avg. Sts These s planted % of last year s barley Sts These s planted % of last year s barley Jun, Rice: Percent Emerged, Selected s Week Ending - May, Jun, Avg. Sts These s planted % of last year s rice Jun, Oats: Percent Emerged, Selected s Week Ending - May, Jun, Avg. Sts These s planted % of last year s oat June SS, UA

7 FL Jun, Peanuts: Percent Planted, Selected s Week Ending - May, Jun, Avg. Sts These s planted % of last year s peanut Sunflowers: Percent Planted, Selected s Jun, Week Ending - May, Jun, Avg. Sts These s planted % of last year s sunflowers June SS, UA

8 Corn: Crop Condition by Percent, Selected s VP P F G EX Percent Sts OR Winter Wheat: Crop Condition by Percent, Selected s VP P F G EX Percent Sts Spring Wheat: Crop Condition by Percent, Selected s VP P F G EX Percent Sts Barley: Crop Condition by Percent, Selected s VP P F G EX Percent Sts Oats: Crop Condition by Percent, Selected s VP P F G EX Percent Sts June SS, UA

9 Soybeans: Crop Condition by Percent, Selected s VP P F G EX Percent Sts Rice: Crop Condition by Percent, Selected s VP P F G EX Percent AZ SC Cotton: Crop Condition by Percent, Selected s VP P F G EX Percent Sts FL Sts Peanut: Crop Condition by Percent, Selected s VP P F G EX Percent Sts June SS, UA

10 Pasture and Range: Crop Condition by Percent, Selected s VP P F G EX VP P F G EX Percent Percent AZ CT DE FL ME MD MA NV NH NJ NM NY OR RI SC UT VT WV WY Sts VP-Very Poor, P-Poor, F-Fair, G-Good, EX-Excellent. National crop conditions for selected s are weighted based on planted acres. AZ CT DE FL ME MD MA June, Nitrogen Fertilizer Available: Percent of Normal Supply % of Normal % of Normal April, April, June, April, NV NH NJ NM NY OR RI SC UT VT WV WY US April, June SS, UA

11 The next "" report will be released after p.m. ET on June,. The United s Department of Agriculture (UA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact the UA s TGET Center at -- (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write UA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room -W, Whitten Building, Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C., -, or call -- (voice or TDD). UA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. ACCESS TO REPORTS!! For your convenience, there are several ways to obtain SS reports, data products, and services: TERT ACCESS All SS reports are available free of charge on the worldwide Internet. For access, connect to the Internet and go to the SS Home Page at: Select Today s Reports or Publications and then Reports by Calendar or Publications and then Search, by Title or Subject. E-MA SUBSCRIPTION There are two options for subscribing via . All SS reports are available by subscription free of charge direct to your address. ) Starting with the SS Home Page at click on Publications, then click on the Subscribe by button which takes you to the page describing delivery of reports. Finally, click on Go to the Subscription Page and follow the instructions. ) If you do NOT have Internet access, send an message to: usda-reports@usda.mannlib.cornell.edu. In the body of the message type the word: list. AUTOFAX ACCESS SSFax service is available for some reports from your fax machine. Please call --, using the handset attached to your fax. Respond to the voice prompts. Document is a list of available reports PRTED REPORTS OR DATA PRODUCTS LL OUR TOLL-FREE ORDER DESK: -- (U.S. and Canada) Other areas, please call -- FAX: -- (Visa, MasterCard, check, or money order acceptable for payment.) ASSISTAE For assistance with general agricultural statistics or further information about SS or its products or services, contact the Agricultural Statistics Hotline at --, : a.m. to : p.m. ET, or nass@nass.usda.gov.