arxiv: v2 [astro-ph.ep] 8 Feb 2014
|
|
- Dominick Walsh
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Submitted for publication in the Astrophysical Journal Preprint typeset using L A TEX style emulateapj v. 5/2/11 ORBITAL DYNAMICS OF MULTI-PLANET SYSTEMS WITH ECCENTRICITY DIVERSITY Stephen R. Kane 1, Sean N. Raymond 2,3 Submitted for publication in the Astrophysical Journal arxiv: v2 [astro-ph.ep] 8 Feb 2014 ABSTRACT Since exoplanets were detected using the radial velocity method, they have revealed a diverse distribution of orbital configurations. Amongst these are planets in highly eccentric orbits (e > 0.5). Most of these systems consist of a single planet but several have been found to also contain a longer period planet in a near-circular orbit. Here we use the latest Keplerian orbital solutions to investigate four known systems which exhibit this extreme eccentricity diversity; HD 37605, HD 74156, HD , and HD We place limits on the presence of additional planets in these systems based on the radial velocity residuals. We show that the two known planets in each system exchange angular momentum through secular oscillations of their eccentricities. We calculate the amplitude and timescale for these eccentricity oscillations and associated periastron precession. We further demonstrate the effect of mutual orbital inclinations on the amplitude of high-frequency eccentricity oscillations. Finally, we discuss the implications of these oscillations in the context of possible origin scenarios for unequal eccentricities. Subject headings: planetary systems techniques: radial velocities stars: individual (HD 37605, HD 74156, HD , HD ) 1. INTRODUCTION The discovery of exoplanets has yielded many surprises with regards to their properties in comparison with the planets in our Solar System. Amongst these are planets in highly eccentric orbits (e > 0.5), such as 16 Cyg B b (Cochran et al. 1997) and HD 80606b (Naef et al. 2001). The number of detected exoplanets is sufficient to note a divergence from circular orbits which occurs beyond a semi-major axis of 0.1 AU (Butler et al. 2006). There is evidence that this correlation is also present in the exoplanetary candidates discovered by the Kepler mission (Kane et al. 2012a), along with evidence that eccentricities tend to decrease with decreasing planetary size. For planets below the size of Neptune, orbits are more likely to be circular since these planets cannot efficiently excite the eccentricities of other planets so collisions are favored over scattering (Goldreich et al. 2004). The more efficient tidal dissipation in this regime also leads to shorter tidal circularization time scales (Goldreich & Soter 1966). The discovery of planets in highly eccentric orbits, particularly in multi-planet systems, presented a challenge for formation and dynamical models. Significant progress has been made in the meantime towards understanding these interesting systems (e.g., Rasio & Ford (1996); Weidenschilling & Marzari (1996); Lin & Ida (1997)). For multi-planet systems, additional constraints are imposed on eccentricity values due to the requirement that the system remain dynamically staskane@sfsu.edu 1 Department of Physics & Astronomy, San Francisco State University, 1600 Holloway Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94132, USA 2 CNRS, UMR 5804, Laboratoire d Astrophysique de Bordeaux, 2 rue de l Observatoire, BP 89, F Floirac Cedex, France 3 Université de Bordeaux, Observatoire Aquitain des Sciences de l Univers, 2 rue de l Observatoire, BP 89, F Floirac Cedex, France ble. Dynamical interactions of multi-planet systems in the context of eccentricity and formation models have been investigated by numerous authors (Ford & Rasio 2008; Jurić & Tremaine 2008; Malmberg & Davies 2008; Matsumura et al. 2008; Raymond et al. 2008, 2010; Wang & Ford 2011; Timpe et al. 2013). Fromthe known multi-planet systems, there are four in particular which stand out with respect to the diversity of eccentricities present within the system. These are the HD (Cochran et al. 2011; Wang et al. 2012), HD (Naef et al. 2004; Meschiari et al. 2011), HD (Giguere et al.2012), andhd168443(marcy et al.1999, 2001; Pilyavsky et al. 2011) systems. Each of these systems contain two giant planets where the inner planet has an eccentricity larger than 0.5 whereas the orbit of the outer planet is much closer to circular. It was shown by Laughlin & Chambers (2001) that dynamical interactions between exoplanets can also result in subsequent radial velocity variations that diverge from Keplerian orbital assumptions. It is therefore interesting to consider the dynamical history and stability of these systems as well as scenarios for their origins. In this paper we present a detailed study of these four systems with high eccentricity diversity. In Section 2 we summarize the orbital configurations and system parameters for the systems discussed in this study. In Section 3 we utilize the radial velocity solutions for these systems to place quantitative limits on additional planets in each system. Section 4 presents the dynamical analysis of each system including the oscillations of the planet orbital eccentricities and associated periastron precession. In Section 5 we discuss the effects of mutual inclinations on the dynamical stabilities. Section 6 attempts to explore the origins of systems with such eccentricity diversity based on our simulations. We discuss further implications of these analyses in Section 7 and then provide concluding remarks in Section SYSTEM PARAMETERS
2 2 Stephen R. Kane & Sean N. Raymond Fig. 1. A top-down view of each system described in the paper: HD (top-left), HD (top-right), HD (bottom-left), HD (bottom-right). The orbits of the system planets are shown as solid lines and the Solar System planets are included as dashed lines for comparison. For exoplanetary systems in which there is significant orbital eccentricity present, one must take care to prevent mis-interpretation of the radial velocity data. There are several ambiguities which can arise including confusing an eccentric orbit with 2:1 resonant systems (Anglada-Escudé et al. 2010), 1:1 resonant coorbital planets ( Trojan pairs ) (Laughlin & Chambers 2002; Giuppone et al. 2012), and circular planets with long-period companions (Rodigas & Hinz 2009). A concise summary of these confusion issues is described by Wittenmyer et al. (2013) in which they test single planet eccentric systems for multiplicity. The analysis we present here focuses on four systems: HD 37605, HD 74156, HD , and HD A top-downviewofeachofthesesystemsisshowninfigure 1 in which the orbits of both system planets are shown (solid lines) along with orbits of the Solar System planets for scale purposes (dashed lines). The criteria for selecting these systems was twofold. Firstly, the system was required to be a multi-planet system in which the inner planet has an eccentricity greater than 0.5. Secondly, the system must have sufficient data, including at least one complete orbital phase of the outer planet, to minimize the potential confusion issues mentioned above. HD 37605b was the first planet discovered using the Hobby-Eberly Telescope (Cochran et al. 2011). Further studies by Wang et al. (2012) refined the orbit of the inner planet as well as detecting an additional planet in a long-period orbit. The HD system was discovered by Naef et al. (2004) using ELODIE data. The orbits of the both planets were further refined by (Meschiari et al. 2011) using Keck/HIRES data. The HD system was another case in which both planets were announced simultaneously, this time by Giguere et al. (2012) with Keck/HIRES data. HD b was discovered by Marcy et al. (1999), who also detected evidence of a
3 Orbital Dynamics of Multi-Planet Systems 3 TABLE 1 System Parameters Parameter HD (1) HD (2) b c b c M (M ) 1.000± P (days) ± ± ± ± 15 T (5) p ± ± ± ±33 e ± ± ± ± 0.02 ω (deg) ± ±78 174±2 268 ±4 K (ms 1 ) ± ± ±4 115 ±3 M psini (M J ) ± ± ± ±0.2 a (AU) ± ± ± ± 0.02 Parameter HD (3) HD (4) b c b c M (M ) 1.09± ±0.019 P (days) ± ± ± ± 0.57 T (5) p ± ± ± ±2.2 e 0.73 ± ± ± ± ω (deg) 78.7± ± ± ± K (ms 1 ) 51.1± ± ± ±0.618 M psini (M J ) 0.77± ± ± ±0.21 a (AU) 0.36 ± ± ± ± (1) Wang et al. (2012) (2) Meschiari et al. (2011) (3) Giguere et al. (2012) (4) Pilyavsky et al. (2011) (5) JD 2,440,000 trend due to an additional planet. This trend was later confirmed to be a second planet by Marcy et al. (2001). The orbits of both planets were later refined by Pilyavsky et al. (2011). We summarize the Keplerian orbital solutions for each of these systems in Table 1. These are the parameters used throughout the remainder of the paper to perform analyses of the orbits. One striking feature seen in Figure 1 and Table 1 is that these particular kinds of systems are all approximately the same size scale. This is not a selection effect nor due to observational bias since the detection of the outer planet resulted from continued monitoring. The semi-major axes of the planets range between AU and AU for the inner and outer planets respectively. To quantify the similarity of the system size scales, we compared these systems with others by extracting orbital data for all 2-planet systems detected using the radial velocity method from the Exoplanet Data Explorer 4 (Wright et al. 2011). The data are current as of 27th September Figure 2 plots the semi-major axes of the inner planet as a function of the ratio of outer to inner planet semi-major axes. For the four systems considered here, these ratios are 13.47, 13.37, 6.72, 9.68 for HD 37605, HD 74156, HD , and HD respectively (depicted as stars in Figure 2). Note that HD and HD are almost identical in this respect and so are almost indistinguishable in Figure 2. All four systems occupy a relatively small fraction of the known distribution shown in this figure, possibly due to the dynamical constraints imposed by the eccentricity of the inner planet. 3. LIMITS ON ADDITIONAL PLANETS Before we investigated the dynamical interactions of the 2-planet systems, we first tested both the Keple- 4 Fig. 2. This plot includes all 2-planet systems detected using the radial velocity technique. The semi-major axis of the inner planet is plotted as a function of the ratio of the outer to inner planet semi-major axes. The locations of the four systems studied in this paper are shown as stars. rian orbital solutions previously found (see Table 1) and determined if the residuals may disguise the presence of further planetary companions. The radial velocity data were obtained from the published literature and from the NASA Exoplanet Archive 5 (Akeson et al. 2013). We fit the radial velocity data using the partially linearized, least-squares fitting procedure described in Wright & Howard (2009) and estimated parameter uncertainties using the BOOTTRAN bootstrapping routines described in Wang et al. (2012). We obtained Keplerian orbital solutions consistent with those described in Table 1 and thus adopt the rms residuals of those analyses. The rms residuals are used to place 1 3 σ thresholds 5
4 4 Stephen R. Kane & Sean N. Raymond Fig. 3. Exclusion regions (above the lines) for additional planets with the HD (top-left), HD (top-right), HD (bottom-left), and HD (bottom-right) systems. The 1 3 σ exclusion boundaries are based upon the rms scatter of the residuals to radial velocity data after the best-fit Keplerian model has been removed. The detected planets in each system are shown for reference. which limits the presence of additional planetary companions in each system as a function of both planetary mass and orbital period. This is achieved using the maximum semi-amplitude of the radial velocity allowed by the residuals. This is expressed as ( ) 1/3 2πG M p sini 1 K = (1) P (M +M p ) 2/3 1 e 2 where P is the period, i is the inclination of the planetary orbit, e is the eccentricity, and M p and M are the masses of the planet and parent star respectively. We assume a circular orbits which is a reasonable assumption for all but high eccentricities which would likely render the system unstable. The resulting mass limit thresholds are shown for each system in Figure 3. In each case the 3σ threshold lies substantially below the mass range of the two known planets. Due to the similarity in both the amplitude of the residuals and the mass of the system host stars, the constraints on possible undetected planetary masses as a function of orbital period is almost identical for all four systems. The similarity of the systems is further emphasized by the use of identical axis scales on each of the plots. For each system, there is usually a combination of radial velocity data sources which often result in the rms scatter of the fit residuals being dominated by one or TABLE 2 Planetary Upper Mass Limits System 3σ mass limit (M J ) P = 100 days P = 1000 days HD HD HD HD more of those sources. In these situations we adopt the rms scatter for the highest quality data to establish the limits of additional planets described here. For HD 37605, the rms scatter of the residuals is 7.61 ms 1 when HET data are included but the Keck/HIRES data alone produce residuals of 2.08 ms 1. For HD 74156, the rms scatter of 12.8 ms 1 is dominated by CORALIE and ELODIE data. The rms scatter of the Keck data residuals alone is 3.5 ms 1. The radial velocity data for both HD and HD were obtained exclusively from Keck/HIRES and the resulting rms scatter of the residuals is 2.9 ms 1 and 3.9 ms 1 respectively. The planetary upper limits imposed by this analysis for each system are shown in Table 2 at orbital periods of 100 and 1000 days. This shows similar results of planets more massive than M J being excluded from lying between the known planets at the 3σ level. This
5 Orbital Dynamics of Multi-Planet Systems 5 Fig. 4. Dynamical simulations of the HD system, showing the eccentricity oscillations of both planets (top panel) and the periastron precession of the b planet (middle panel) and c planet (bottom panel). The zoom window in the top panel shows a simulation period of 50,000 years. is likely due to instability regions imposed by the oscillating eccentricities of the much more massive inner and outer planet. We explore these oscillations in the following section. 4. DYNAMICAL ANALYSIS The stability of exoplanetary systems has been explored in considerable depth by such authors as Chambers et al. (1996); Barnes & Greenberg (2006b, 2007). In this section we examine the dynamical interactions of the four particular two-planet systems which are the subject of this paper. The N-body integrations required for the dynamical simulations were performed by utilizing the Mercury Integrator Package, described in more detail by Chambers (1999). For these simulations, we adopted the hybrid symplectic/bulirsch-stoer integrator. We also used a Jacobi coordinate system which generally provides more accurate results for multi-planet systems (Wisdom & Holman 1991; Wisdom 2006) except in cases of close encounters (Chambers 1999). The integrations were performed for a simulation of 106 years, in steps of 100 years, starting at the present epoch The HD System The initial eccentricity and argument of periastron for the HD b and c planets are , 220 and 0.013, 221 respectively (see Table 1). The results of the N-body integrations are plotted in Figure 4. The eccentricity oscillations shown in the top panel complete approximately two cycles during the 106 year simulation. The range of eccentricity for the b and c planets are and respectively. Thus, in this case, the amplitude of the eccentricity variations for the outer planet exceeds that of the inner planet. These results have several details of note. Firstly, the high-amplitude eccentricity oscillations of the outer planet are comprised of smaller-amplitude higherfrequency oscillations. This is shown by the zoomed-in region in the top panel of Figure 4 which has a timespan of 50,000 years. The amplitude of these higherfrequency oscillations is 0.05 with a period of 550 years. Secondly, the periastron arguments of the planets begin closely aligned (see Table 1) but differing precession rates result in them being slightly out of sync with each other. The precession of the inner planet
6 6 Stephen R. Kane & Sean N. Raymond Fig. 5. Dynamical simulations of the HD system, showing the eccentricity oscillations of both planets (top panel) and the periastron precession of the b planet (middle panel) and c planet (bottom panel). The zoom window in the top panel shows a simulation period of 50,000 years. (0.164 /century) is slightly higher than that for the outer planet (0.14 /century). Note also that during those moments when the eccentricity of the outer planet is 0.0 then the periastron argument becomes highly uncertain (since ω is undefined when e = 0.0) resulting in a dispersion of the ω values near those times. For this reason the evolution of the periastron argument for the outer planet is difficult to determine and may possibly match that of the inner planet The HD System jor eccentricity variation in this case occurs for the inner planet whereas the variations for the outer planet are far more subtle. The high-frequency oscillations shown in the zoom-in window of the top panel of Figure 5 show evidence of vibrational beating with an amplitude that is negligible compared with the low-frequency oscillations. Although the first-order eccentricity oscillations of the planets share the same frequency, the periastron precessions (shown in the bottom two panels) do not. The precession rates of the inner and outer planet are 0.05 /century and /century respectively. The HD system differs from the other three in this study in that both the mass ratio of the two planets and the eccentricity of the outer planet are the highest of all four systems. As shown in Figure 1 and Table 1, the orientation of the orbits are not closely aligned as was the case for HD The N-body integration results for HD are plotted in Figure 5. The eccentricity oscillations for both planets shown in the top panel complete approximately 12 cycles during the 106 year simulation. The range of eccentricity for the b and c planets are and respectively. The ma The HD System Of the four systems, the HD system contains both the largest orbital period and the highest eccentricity for the inner planet. Additionally, the periastron arguments for the inner and outer planets are almost perfectly anti-aligned (π out of phase) with one another. The N-body integration results for HD are plotted in Figure 6. This figure shows that both the oscillation of the eccentricities and periastron precession of the orbits (0.06 /century) remain approximately in sync for
7 Orbital Dynamics of Multi-Planet Systems 7 Fig. 6. Dynamical simulations of the HD system, showing the eccentricity oscillations of both planets (top panel) and the periastron precession of the b planet (middle panel) and c planet (bottom panel). The zoom window in the top panel shows a simulation period of 50,000 years. the two planets during the 100,000 year simulation. Note also that the outer planet also exhibits higher-frequency eccentricity oscillations although at a much smaller amplitude than for the outer planet in the other three systems (see the zoom-in window in the top panel of Figure 6. The range of eccentricity for the b and c planets are and respectively. Thus, the major oscillations occur for the outer planet. The eccentricity of the outer planet is periodically forced to zero which produces a similar ambiguity in the periastron argument as was seen in the case of HD (see Section 4.1) The HD System The stability of the HD system has been previously studied by Barnes & Quinn (2004) in which they found that the system is stable although weak interactions occur between the two planets. The revised orbital parameters provided by Pilyavsky et al. (2011) do not result in a substantial change to the conclusion of system stability. The planets of the HD system have the largest minimum masses of all four systems. This results in substantially increased interactions be- tween the two planets and a relatively high-frequency of both the eccentricity oscillations and periastron precession of the orbits. The results of the N-body integration for HD are shown in Figure 7. The range of eccentricity for the b and c planets are and respectively. Although the eccentricity oscillations have almost the same frequency, the amplitude of the outer planet oscillations are almost half that of the inner planet and have a high-frequency component as seen in the other three systems. The periastron precession rate of the inner planet is substantial: 0.23 /century compared with 0.06 /century for the outer planet. 5. MUTUAL INCLINATIONS Here we briefly investigate the effect of introducing a mutual inclination into the results of our simulations and the predicted angular momentum exchange. We performed this investigation for the HD system since the results for this system shown in Section 4 yield the most well-defined eccentricity oscillations of the four systems considered. To do this, we repeated the N-body integrations with mutual orbital inclinations from 0 to 90 in increments of 5. Shown in Figure 8 are the results
8 8 Stephen R. Kane & Sean N. Raymond Fig. 7. Dynamical simulations of the HD system, showing the eccentricity oscillations of both planets (top panel) and the periastron precession of the b planet (middle panel) and c planet (bottom panel). The zoom window in the top panel shows a simulation period of 50,000 years. for 5 and 10 mutual inclinations where the eccentricity evolution of the b planet is shown for the full 100,000 year simulation. The effect of introducing a mutual inclination is to increase the amplitude of both the primary (low-frequency) and secondary (high-frequency) oscillations. This increase in oscillation amplitude increases with increasing mutual inclination until the inner planet is ejected from the system, the timescale of which depends on the amount of mutual inclination present. For example, the HD system does not remain stable for the full 100,000 year simulation for mutual inclinations larger than 60. Although the amplitude of the secondary oscillations increases with increasing mutual inclination (see Figure 8), the frequency of the oscillations remains the same. Thus it would require several hundred years of observations (in the case of HD ) in order to detect the extent of the mutual inclination from such eccentricity variations. 6. ORIGIN OF SYSTEMS WITH UNEQUAL ECCENTRICITIES We have attempted to understand the origin of these systems with large differences in eccentricity. The large eccentricities of exoplanets are thought to be the scars of past planet-planet scattering events (Adams & Laughlin 2003; Chatterjee et al. 2008; Juric & Tremaine 2008). We mined a dataset of simulations of planet-planet scattering to determine what conditions were required to create such systems. The simulations we used were presented in several previous studies of planet-planet scattering and its consequences (Raymond et al. 2008, 2009, 2010; Timpe et al. 2013). We focused on a particular set of simulations referred to as the mixed set in previous papers. These simulations started from three giant planets with masses between one Saturn mass and 1000M (roughly 3 Jupiter masses), chosen to follow a dn/dm M 1.1 distribution (Butler et al. 2006). The planets were initially placed on circular orbits with small mutual inclinations between a few and ten AU, spaced by 4-5 mutual Hill radii. About 60% of the simulations became unstable within 100 Myr. Our sample consists of 448 simulations in which two planets survived (and energy was adequately conserved).
9 Orbital Dynamics of Multi-Planet Systems 9 Fig. 8. The effect of introducing mutual inclination (i m) to the HD system on the eccentricity evolution of planet b. Top panel: i m = 5. Bottom panel: i m = systems (3.1% of the sample) contained an outer planet on an eccentric orbit (e outer > 0.5) and a significantly less-eccentric inner planet (e inner < 0.25). These represent potential analogs to the systems studied in this paper. The 14 potential analogs differed from the rest of the sample in two ways. First, the innermost planet both at the start and end of the simulations was systematically more massive than the outer planet(s). A K-S test showed that the difference between the potential analogs and the other simulations was statistically significant, with p = The number of encounters undergone during the scattering process was higher for the potential analogs but with a lower statistical significance (p = 0.03). In essence, the analog systems were created by multiple scattering between planets in the outer parts of their systems and this scattering was only weakly coupled to the more massive, inner planet. The mass ratios between the surviving planets are again different between the control sample and the potential analogs. The potential analogs have a higher innerto-outer planetary mass ratio with a strong statistical significance (p = ). This is because a more massive inner planet is less affected by the scattering between outer planets and thus keeps a smaller eccentricity. However, the four systems that we study here all have more massive outer planets. There wasonly one analogsystem with a moremassive outer planet. In that system the planetary instability was system-wide. The inner planet was initially scattered outward by the middle planet, then back inward by the outer planet. The planet that was initially the middle one was then scattered outward, was again repeatedly scattered by the roughly equal-mass outer planet and eventually ejected from the system. The outer planet s large eccentricity was a result of its having been scattered off a similar-sized planet, scattering among equal-mass planets representing the strongest possible eccentricity increase (Raymond et al. 2010). To explain the observed systems we therefore need to invoke strong scattering events with specific characteristics. The scattering must have most strongly affected the outermost observed planet and it must have included a roughly equal-mass planet that was ejected. The innermost, less massive planet, must have been sufficiently removed from this scattering to survive on a lower eccentricity orbit (clearly seen in Figure 2 by the large orbital separations in these systems). The most likely origin of such conditions would therefore be systems in which two or more high-mass planets formed on wider orbits than an inner, lower-mass planet. Of course, this assumes a self-unstable system. There is also the possibility of an outside-in perturbation on the system from a passing star or wide binary (Zakamska & Tremaine 2004; Malmberg et al. 2007; Kaib et al. 2013). In that case, a significant separation between the inner and outer planets is still needed to avoid transmitting the perturbation all the way to the inner parts of the system. 7. DISCUSSION An aspect of interest in the orbital configurations of the systems studied here is the origin and subsequent evolution of those orbits (see Section 6). Veras & Ford (2009) showed that finding these kinds of systems at a particular epoch can have a low associated probability. For example, Figure 4 reveals that the c planet in the HD system spends the majority of its orbit at a significantly higher eccentricity than that which is currently observed. It is also unlikely that the planets would have formed in such orbits without significant transfers of angular momentum to an additional component (stellar or planetary) no longer present in the system. Thus, an important property of these systems with eccentricity diversity is the angular momentum deficit (AMD), which is the difference in angular momentum of the system compared with the angular momentum if the planets were in circular orbits with the same semi-major axes. This is
10 10 Stephen R. Kane & Sean N. Raymond Fig. 9. A polar plot of eb ec versus ω for each of the four systems described in this paper: HD (top-left), HD (top-right), HD (bottom-left), HD (bottom-right). According to the criteria of Barnes & Greenberg (2006c), the apsidal modes are librating for HD and HD , and circulating for HD and HD given by the following equation: N q X 2 L p 1 1 ei AMD (2) i=1 where Lp = Mp,i M Mp,i + M q G(Mp,i + M )ai (3) is the angular momentum of a circular orbit for planet i. In cases where Mp,1 Mp,2, such as HD 37605, the inner planet has much less orbital angular momentum than the outer planet resulting in larger eccentricity oscillations for a given AMD value. The system with the smallest eccentricity oscillations is HD As noted in Section 4.2, this is also the system with the highest planetary mass ratio and eccentricity of the outer planet. These facts combined with the relatively slow periastron precession of the outer planet are consistent with the findings of Barnes & Quinn (2004) that the system is unlikely to possess unstable configurations. Calculations of the AMD for these systems show that the HD system has a substantially higher (factor of 2) AMD than the other three. The various types of apsidal motion in interacting exoplanetary systems have been investigated in detail by Barnes & Greenberg (2006a,c). Barnes & Greenberg (2006c) distinguish between two basic types of apsidal behavior, libration and circulation, where the boundary between them is referred to as a secular separatrix. This distinction may be used as an additional tool in characterizing the long-term behavior of Keplerian orbital elements of multi-planet systems. Figure 9 represents the apsidal trajectory graphically for the four systems dis-
11 Orbital Dynamics of Multi-Planet Systems 11 cussed here. The plot uses the eccentricity of the inner and outer planets (e b and e c respectively) and the difference in periastron arguments ( ω) to create a polar representation of the apsidal behavior. This shows that the apsidalmodes ofhd 74156and HD are circulating since the polar trajectories encompass the origin. This is consistent with the relatively small amplitude of the c planet eccentricity evolutions shown in Figures 5 and 7. Conversely, HD and HD are shown to be librating systems and are close to the separatrix between secular libration and circulation. This is also consistent with Figures 4 and 6 since those show that the c planet eccentricities regularly approach zero. Finally, it is worth considering as to whether the oscillations described here in both the eccentricity and periastron precession may be detectable in reasonable timescales. The high-frequency secondary oscillations in the eccentricity of the outer planet, such as HD and HD , are of relatively low amplitude. The orbital precession of exoplanets has been previously investigated by Kane et al. (2012b) who found that the timescales for such precession is unlikely to allow detection except for the very short-period planets. By comparison, the perihelion precessions of Mercury and Earth are /century and /century respectively (Clemence 1947). For the cases presented in Section 4, the period of eccentricity oscillation and periastron precession are at least several centuries in even the most optimistic cases. The main hindrance however is that the uncertainties associated with those parameters tend to be comparable to the expected variations. 8. CONCLUSIONS Exoplanet discoveries are leading to a diverse range of multi-planet system configurations. Here we have concentrated on a particular configuration which consists of two planets in which the inner planet has an eccentricity larger than 0.5. As shown in Section 2, these systems bear many similarities, in particular the ratio of the outer to inner planet semi-major axes which is likely a constraint imposed by the unique dynamics present in these systems. Through an examination of the residuals to the radial velocity fits to the data, we are able to exclude the presence of planets with masses larger than 0.5M J with orbital periods less than 1000 days at the 3σ level. Our N-body integrations of each system show that there is a synchronous transfer of angular momentum between the planets in most cases. The case of HD is interesting due to the high mass ratio, the relatively small amplitude of eccentricity oscillation and periastron precession of the outer planet, and the relatively high AMD for the system. The high-frequency secondary eccentricity oscillations for the outer planets is indicative of outer planet responses to frequent dynamical interactions with the much shorter period inner planet. The effect of introducing a mutual inclination is to increase the amplitude of secondary oscillations in the inner planet until that planet is subsequently ejected from the system. The AMDs of these systems provide indications that these systems have indeed had a significant perturbation event which produced these relatively rare orbital configurations. As more of these kinds of systems are discovered, we can gain further understanding as to their frequency and dynamical histories. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors would like to thank the anonymous referee, whose comments greatly improved the quality of the paper. This research has made use of the Exoplanet Orbit Database and the Exoplanet Data Explorer at exoplanets.org. This research has also made use of the NASA Exoplanet Archive, which is operated by the California Institute of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration under the Exoplanet Exploration Program. REFERENCES Adams, F.C., Laughlin, G. 2003, Icarus, 163, 290 Akeson, R.L., et al. 2013, PASP, 125, 989 Anglada-Escudé, G., López-Morales, M., Chambers, J.E., 2010, ApJ, 709, 168 Barnes, R., Quinn, T. 2004, ApJ, 611, 494 Barnes, R., Greenberg, R. 2006, ApJ, 638, 478 Barnes, R., Greenberg, R. 2006, ApJ, 647, L163 Barnes, R., Greenberg, R. 2006, ApJ, 652, L53 Barnes, R., Greenberg, R. 2007, ApJ, 665, L67 Butler, R.P., et al., 2006, ApJ, 646, 505 Chambers, J.E., Wetherill, G.W., Boss, A.P. 1996, Icarus, 119, 261 Chambers, J.E. 1999, MNRAS, 304, 793 Chatterjee, S., Ford, E.B., Matsumura, S., Rasio, F.A. 2008, ApJ, 686, 580 Clemence, G.M. 1947, RvMP, 19, 361 Cochran, W.D., Hatzes, A.P., Butler, R.P., Marcy, G.W. 1997, ApJ, 483, 457 Cochran, W.D., et al. 2004, ApJ, 611, L133 Ford, E.B., Rasio, F.A., 2008, ApJ, 686, 621 Giguere, M.J., et al. 2012, ApJ, 744, 4 Giuppone, C.A., Benítez-Llambay, P., Beaugé, C. 2012, MNRAS, 421, 356 Goldreich, P., Soter, S., 1966, Icarus, 5, 375 Goldreich, P., Lithwick, Y., Sari, R. 2004, ApJ, 614, 497 Jurić, M., Tremaine, S., 2008, ApJ, 686, 603 Kaib, N.A., Raymond, S.N., Duncan, M. 2013, Nature, 493, 381 Kane, S.R., Ciardi, D.R., Gelino, D.M., von Braun, K. 2012, MNRAS, 425, 757 Kane, S.R., Horner, J., von Braun, K. 2012, ApJ, 757, 105 Laughlin, G., Chambers, J.E. 2001, ApJ, 551, L109 Laughlin, G., Chambers, J.E. 2002, AJ, 124, 592 Lin, D.N.C., Ida, S. 1997, ApJ, 477, 781 Malmberg, D., de Angeli, F., Davies, M.B., Church, R.P., Mackey, D., Wilkinson, M.I. 2007, MNRAS, 378, 1207 Malmberg, D., Davies, M.B., 2009, MNRAS, 394, L26 Marcy, G.W., Butler, R.P., Vogt, S.S., Fischer, D., Liu, M.C. 1999, ApJ, 520, 239 Marcy, G.W., et al. 2001, ApJ, 555, 418 Matsumura, S., Takeda, G., Rasio, F.A., 2008, ApJ, 686, L29 Meschiari, S., Laughlin, G., Vogt, Steven S. Butler, R.P., Rivera, E.J., Haghighipour, N., Jalowiczor, P. 2011, ApJ, 727, 117 Naef, D., et al. 2001, A&A, 375, L27 Naef, D., Mayor, M., Beuzit, J.L., Perrier, C., Queloz, D., Sivan, J.P., Udry, S. 2004, A&A, 414, 351 Pilyavsky, G., et al. 2011, ApJ, 743, 162 Rasio, F.A., Ford, E.B. 1996, Science, 274, 954 Raymond, S.N., Barnes, R., Armitage, P.J., Gorelick, N. 2008, ApJ, 687, L107 Raymond, S.N., Armitage, P.J., Gorelick, N. 2009, ApJ, 699, L88 Raymond, S.N., Armitage, P.J., Gorelick, N. 2010, ApJ, 711, 772 Rodigas, T.J., Hinz, P.M. 2009, ApJ, 702, 716 Timpe, M., Barnes, R., Kopparapu, R., Raymond, S.N., Greenberg, R., Gorelick, N. 2013, AJ, 146, 63 Veras, D., Ford, E.B. 2009, ApJ, 690, L1
12 12 Stephen R. Kane & Sean N. Raymond Wang, J., Ford, E.B., 2011, MNRAS, 418, 1822 Wang, S.X., et al. 2012, ApJ, 761, 46 Weidenschilling, S.J., Marzari, F. 1996, Nature, 384, 619 Wisdom, J., Holman, M. 1991, AJ, 102, 1528 Wisdom, J. 2006, AJ, 131, 2294 Wittenmyer, R.A., et al. 2013, ApJS, 208, 2 Wright, J.T., Howard, A.W. 2009, ApJS, 182, 205 Wright, J.T., et al. 2011, PASP, 123, 412 Zakamska, N.L., Tremaine, S. 2004, AJ, 128, 869
2 Ford, Rasio, & Yu. 2. Two Planets, Unequal Masses
2 Ford, Rasio, & Yu unlikely to have developed such a large eccentricity, since dissipation in the disk tends to circularize orbits. Dynamical instabilities leading to the ejection of one planet while
More informationThe Long-Term Dynamical Evolution of Planetary Systems
The Long-Term Dynamical Evolution of Planetary Systems Melvyn B. Davies Department of Astronomy and Theoretical Physics Lund University Co-authors: Fred Adams, Philip Armitage, John Chambers, Eric Ford,
More informationDynamically Unstable Planetary Systems Emerging Out of Gas Disks
EXTREME SOLAR SYSTEMS ASP Conference Series, Vol. 398, 2008 D. Fischer, F. A. Rasio, S. E. Thorsett, and A. Wolszczan Dynamically Unstable Planetary Systems Emerging Out of Gas Disks Soko Matsumura, Edward
More informationHabitability in the Upsilon Andromedae System
Habitability in the Upsilon Andromedae System Adrienne Dove University of Missouri Columbia Institute for Astronomy University of Hawaii Mentor: Nader Haghighipour ABSTRACT We investigate the habitability
More informationTesting Theories of Planet Formation & Dynamical Evolution of Planetary Systems using Orbital Properties of Exoplanets
Testing Theories of Planet Formation & Dynamical Evolution of Planetary Systems using Orbital Properties of Exoplanets Eric B. Ford Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics (Starting at UF in August
More informationThe exoplanet eccentricity distribution from Kepler planet candidates
Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 425, 757 762 (2012) doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21627.x The exoplanet eccentricity distribution from Kepler planet candidates Stephen R. Kane, David R. Ciardi, Dawn M. Gelino
More informationExtrasolar Planet Interactions
EXOPLANETS: Detection, Formation and Dynamics Proceedings IAU Symposium No. 249, 2008 S. Ferraz-Mello, & Y.S. Sun, eds.? c 2008 International Astronomical Union DOI: 00.0000/X000000000000000X Extrasolar
More informationarxiv: v1 [astro-ph.ep] 18 Aug 2014
Submitted for publication in the Astrophysical Journal Preprint typeset using L A TEX style emulateapj v. 5/2/11 ON THE INCLINATION AND HABITABILITY OF THE HD 10180 SYSTEM Stephen R. Kane 1, Dawn M. Gelino
More informationDynamical Stability of Terrestrial and Giant Planets in the HD Planetary System
Dynamical Stability of Terrestrial and Giant Planets in the HD 155358 Planetary System James Haynes Advisor: Nader Haghighipour ABSTRACT The results of a study of the dynamical evolution and the habitability
More informationKozai-Lidov oscillations
Kozai-Lidov oscillations Kozai (1962 - asteroids); Lidov (1962 - artificial satellites) arise most simply in restricted three-body problem (two massive bodies on a Kepler orbit + a test particle) e.g.,
More informationThe Use of Transit Timing to Detect Extrasolar Planets with Masses as Small as Earth
arxiv:astro-ph/41228v1 1 Dec 24 The Use of Transit Timing to Detect Extrasolar Planets with Masses as Small as Earth Matthew J. Holman, 1 Norman W. Murray 2,3 1 Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics,
More informationSolar System evolution and the diversity of planetary systems
Solar System evolution and the diversity of planetary systems Alessandro Morbidelli (OCA, Nice) Work in collaboration with: R. Brasser, A. Crida, R. Gomes, H. Levison, F. Masset, D. O brien, S. Raymond,
More informationExoplanets: a dynamic field
Exoplanets: a dynamic field Alexander James Mustill Amy Bonsor, Melvyn B. Davies, Boris Gänsicke, Anders Johansen, Dimitri Veras, Eva Villaver The (transiting) exoplanet population Solar System Hot Jupiters:
More informationarxiv: v1 [astro-ph.ep] 15 Apr 2016
An Earth-Like Planet in GJ 832 System S. Satyal 1, J. Griffith 1, Z. E. Musielak 1,2 1 The Department of Physics, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington TX 76019 2 Kiepenheuer-Institut für Sonnenphysik,
More informationPlanetary system dynamics. Planetary migration Kozai resonance Apsidal resonance and secular theories Mean motion resonances Gravitational scattering
Planetary system dynamics Planetary migration Kozai resonance Apsidal resonance and secular theories Mean motion resonances Gravitational scattering How should the planets of a typical planetary system
More informationJoseph Castro Mentor: Nader Haghighipour
ON THE POSSIBILITY OF ADDITIONAL PLANETS IN THE γ CEPHEI BINARY-PLANETARY SYSTEM Joseph Castro Mentor: Nader Haghighipour ABSTRACT Results of the simulations of the dynamical stability of additional hypothetical
More informationThe Dynamical Evolution of Exoplanet Systems
The Dynamical Evolution of Exoplanet Systems Melvyn B. Davies Department of Astronomy and Theoretical Physics Lund Observatory Collaborators: Clément Bonnerot, John Chambers, Ross Church, Francesca de
More informationThe dynamical evolution of exoplanet systems. Melvyn B. Davies Department of Astronomy and Theoretical Physics Lund University
The dynamical evolution of exoplanet systems Melvyn B. Davies Department of Astronomy and Theoretical Physics Lund University Today s Talk 1) Begin with our Solar System. 2) Then consider tightly-packed
More informationA REGION VOID OF IRREGULAR SATELLITES AROUND JUPITER
The Astronomical Journal, 136:909 918, 2008 September c 2008. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. doi:10.1088/0004-6256/136/3/909 A REGION VOID OF IRREGULAR SATELLITES
More informationarxiv: v1 [astro-ph.ep] 3 Apr 2018
Astronomy& Astrophysics manuscript no. zanardi_ c ESO 28 September 2, 28 The role of the general relativity on icy body reservoirs under the effects of an inner eccentric Jupiter M. Zanardi, 2, G. C. de
More informationEccentricity pumping of a planet on an inclined orbit by a disc
Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 44, 49 414 21) doi:1.1111/j.1365-2966.21.16295.x Eccentricity pumping of a planet on an inclined orbit by a disc Caroline Terquem 1,2 and Aikel Ajmia 1 1 Institut d Astrophysique
More informationLecture 20: Planet formation II. Clues from Exoplanets
Lecture 20: Planet formation II. Clues from Exoplanets 1 Outline Definition of a planet Properties of exoplanets Formation models for exoplanets gravitational instability model core accretion scenario
More informationEvidence of a Neptune-sized Planet in the ρ 1 Cancri System
Evidence of a Neptune-sized Planet in the ρ 1 Cancri System Jack Wisdom 1 ABSTRACT Reanalyzing published data, I find evidence of a Neptune-sized planet in the ρ 1 Cancri system with a period near 261
More informationInduced Eccentricities of Extra Solar Planets by Distant Stellar Companions
Induced Eccentricities of Extra Solar Planets by Distant Stellar Companions T. Mazeh Wise Observatory, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel Abstract. This paper explores the assumption that the high eccentricities
More informationThe effects of fly-bys on planetary systems
Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 411, 859 877 (2011) doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17730.x The effects of fly-bys on planetary systems Daniel Malmberg, 1 Melvyn B. Davies 1 and Douglas C. Heggie 2 1 Lund Observatory,
More informationTidal Evolution of Close-In Extra-Solar Planets
Exoplanets: Detection, Formation and Dynamics Proceedings IAU Symposium No. 249, 2008 Y.-S. Sun, S. Ferraz-Mello & J.-L. Zhou, eds. c 2008 International Astronomical Union DOI: 00.0000/X000000000000000X
More informationA DYNAMICAL PERSPECTIVE ON ADDITIONAL PLANETS IN 55 CANCRI
The Astrophysical Journal, 689:478Y491, 2008 December 10 # 2008. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed in U.S.A. A A DYNAMICAL PERSPECTIVE ON ADDITIONAL PLANETS IN 55 CANCRI Sean
More informationPlanetary System Stability and Evolution. N. Jeremy Kasdin Princeton University
Planetary System Stability and Evolution N. Jeremy Kasdin Princeton University (Lots of help from Eric Ford, Florida and Robert Vanderbei, Princeton) KISS Exoplanet Workshop 10 November 2009 Motivation
More informationarxiv: v1 [astro-ph.ep] 13 Sep 2017
Astronomical Journal, manuscript. Preprint typeset using L A TEX style emulateapj v. 03/07/07 THE SCATTERING OUTCOMES OF KEPLER CIRCUMBINARY PLANETS: PLANET MASS RATIO Yan-Xiang Gong 1,2, Jianghui Ji 1
More informationDynamical Instabilities in Extrasolar Planetary Systems
Dynamical Instabilities in Extrasolar Planetary Systems By Kenneth K. Yu Submitted to the Department of Physics and Astronomy in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Arts
More informationarxiv: v2 [astro-ph.ep] 4 Jul 2013
Forever alone? Testing single eccentric planetary systems for multiple companions arxiv:1307.0894v2 [astro-ph.ep] 4 Jul 2013 Robert A. Wittenmyer 1, Songhu Wang 2, Jonathan Horner 1, C.G. Tinney 1, R.P.
More informationFrequency map analysis of the 3/1 resonance between planets b and c in the 55 Cancri system ABSTRACT
A&A 442, 359 364 (2005) DOI: 151/0004-6361:20053164 c ESO 2005 Astronomy & Astrophysics Frequency map analysis of the 3/1 resonance between planets b and c in the 55 Cancri system F. Marzari 1,H.Scholl
More informationHydrodynamic Outcomes. Transitional Discs. of Planet Scattering in. Nick Moeckel IoA. Phil Armitage Colorado
Hydrodynamic Outcomes of Planet Scattering in Transitional Discs Nick Moeckel IoA Phil Armitage Colorado Messy Transitional Dynamics Hydro to Gravitational transition HR 8799 Marois+ HST imaging of Orion
More informationarxiv:astro-ph/ v2 15 May 2008
Draft version May 15, 2008 Preprint typeset using L A TEX style emulateapj v. 10/09/06 DYNAMICAL OUTCOMES OF PLANET PLANET SCATTERING Sourav Chatterjee, 1 Eric B. Ford, 2,3,4 Soko Matsumura, 1 and Frederic
More informationarxiv:astro-ph/ v1 24 Apr 2000
Sub-Saturn Planet Candidates to HD 16141 and HD 46375 1 Geoffrey W. Marcy 2, R. Paul Butler 3, Steven S. Vogt 4 gmarcy@etoile.berkeley.edu arxiv:astro-ph/0004326v1 24 Apr 2000 Received ; accepted Submitted
More informationHD10647 and the Distribution of Exoplanet Properties with Semi-major Axis
Extrasolar planets : Today and Tomorrow ASP Conference Series, Vol. 321, 2004 J.-P. Beaulieu, A. Lecavelier des Etangs, and C. Terquem HD10647 and the Distribution of Exoplanet Properties with Semi-major
More informationOuter-planet scattering can gently tilt an inner planetary system
Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 000, 1 10 (2016) Printed 1 August 2016 (MN LATEX style file v2.2) Outer-planet scattering can gently tilt an inner planetary system Pierre Gratia, 1 Daniel Fabrycky 2 1 Department
More informationTidal Dissipation in Binaries
Tidal Dissipation in Binaries From Merging White Dwarfs to Exoplanetary Systems Dong Lai Cornell University March 14, 2013, Harvard ITC Colloquium Tidal Dissipation in Binaries I. Merging White Dwarf Binaries
More informationProbing the Galactic Planetary Census
Probing the Galactic Planetary Census Greg Laughlin -- UCSC Astronomy Exoplanet News from the AAS meeting (New York Times) The finding was called exciting by Dr. Kenneth Franklin of the American Museum-Hayden
More informationWhite Paper. Terrestrial and Habitable Planet Formation in Binary and Multi-star Systems
Authors White Paper (Submitted to ExoPlanet Task Force) Terrestrial and Habitable Planet Formation in Binary and Multi-star Systems Nader Haghighipour Institute for Astronomy and NASA Astrobiology Institute,
More informationA dynamical perspective on additional planets in 55 Cancri
A dynamical perspective on additional planets in 55 Cancri Sean N. Raymond 1,2, Rory Barnes 3 & Noel Gorelick 4 ABSTRACT Five planets are known to orbit the star 55 Cancri. The recently-discovered planet
More informationResonance Capture. Alice Quillen. University of Rochester. Isaac Newton Institute Dec 2009
Resonance Capture Alice Quillen University of Rochester Isaac Newton Institute Dec 2009 This Talk Resonance Capture extension to nonadiabatic regime Astrophysical settings: Dust spiraling inward via radiation
More informationII. Results from Transiting Planets. 1. Global Properties 2. The Rossiter-McClaughlin Effect
II. Results from Transiting Planets 1. Global Properties 2. The Rossiter-McClaughlin Effect Planet Radius Most transiting planets tend to be inflated. Approximately 68% of all transiting planets have radii
More informationarxiv: v1 [astro-ph.ep] 20 Nov 2018
Astronomy & Astrophysics manuscript no. A_A_33097_Busetti c ESO 2018 November 21, 2018 Stability of planets in triple star systems F. Busetti 1, H. Beust 2, and C. Harley 1 1 Univ. of the Witwatersrand,
More informationTerrestrial planet formation in exoplanetary systems with a giant planet on an external orbit
A&A 384, 594 62 (22) DOI:.5/4-636:278 c ESO 22 Astronomy & Astrophysics Terrestrial planet formation in exoplanetary systems with a giant planet on an external orbit P. Thébault,F.Marzari 2, and H. Scholl
More informationarxiv: v1 [astro-ph] 23 May 2007
Terrestrial Planet Formation in Binary Star Systems arxiv:0705.3444v1 [astro-ph] 23 May 2007 Elisa V. Quintana 1 and Jack J. Lissauer 2 1 SETI Institute, 515 N. Whisman Road, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA
More informationECCENTRICITY EXCITATION AND APSIDAL RESONANCE CAPTURE IN THE PLANETARY SYSTEM ANDROMEDAE E. I. Chiang 1 and N. Murray 2
The Astrophysical Journal, 576:473 477, 2002 September # 2002. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed in U.S.A. ECCENTRICITY EXCITATION AND APSIDAL RESONANCE CAPTURE IN THE PLANETARY
More informationOrbital Evolution in Extra-solar systems
Orbital Evolution in Extra-solar systems George Voyatzis Section of Astronomy, Astrophysics and Mechanics, Department of Physics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece. Abstract Nowadays, extra-solar
More informationDynamic Exoplanets. Alexander James Mustill
Dynamic Exoplanets Alexander James Mustill Exoplanets: not (all) like the Solar System Exoplanets: not (all) like the Solar System Solar System Lissauer et al 14 Key questions to bear in mind What is role
More informationImportance of the study of extrasolar planets. Exoplanets Introduction. Importance of the study of extrasolar planets
Importance of the study of extrasolar planets Exoplanets Introduction Planets and Astrobiology (2017-2018) G. Vladilo Technological and scientific spin-offs Exoplanet observations are driving huge technological
More informationFORMING DIFFERENT PLANETARY ARCHITECTURES. I. FORMATION EFFICIENCY OF HOT JUPITES FROM HIGH-ECCENTRICITY MECHANISMS
Draft version February 7, Preprint typeset using L A TEX style AASTeX v.. FORMING DIFFERENT PLANETARY ARCHITECTURES. I. FORMATION EFFICIENCY OF HOT JUPITES FROM HIGH-ECCENTRICITY MECHANISMS Ying Wang,
More informationCENTRAL STAR LUMINOSITY MEAN GLOBAL TEMPERATURE SILICATE-ROCK WEATHERING SPREADING RATE HEAT FLOW
Order and Chaos in Stellar and Planetary Systems ASP Conference Series, Vol. 000, 2003 G. G. Byrd, K. V. Kholshevnikov, eds. Habitability and Stability of Orbits for Earth-Like Planets in the Extrasolar
More informationarxiv: v2 [astro-ph.ep] 30 Nov 2013
Extreme orbital evolution from hierarchical secular coupling of two giant planets Jean Teyssandier,, Smadar Naoz 2,3, Ian Lizarraga 4, Frederic A. Rasio 3,5 arxiv:3.548v2 [astro-ph.ep] 3 Nov 23 ABSTRACT
More informationUNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ
UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ NUMERICAL AND ANALYTIC RESEARCH INTO THE FORMATION OF THE HD 80606B PLANETARY SYSTEM A thesis submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of
More informationarxiv:astro-ph/ v1 14 Sep 2005
For publication in Bayesian Inference and Maximum Entropy Methods, San Jose 25, K. H. Knuth, A. E. Abbas, R. D. Morris, J. P. Castle (eds.), AIP Conference Proceeding A Bayesian Analysis of Extrasolar
More informationDetection & Characterization of Resonant Planetary Systems with SIM
Detection & Characterization of Resonant Planetary Systems with SIM Eric B. Ford U Florida September 25, 2008 SIM Science Studies Workshop This Project: Tom Loredo, Althea Moorhead, Dimitri Veras Artwork
More informationTidal evolution of the Kepler-10 system
MNRAS 430, 951 960 (2013) doi:10.1093/mnras/sts623 Tidal evolution of the Kepler-10 system Yao Dong 1,2 and Jianghui Ji 1 1 Purple Mountain Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China
More informationPlanetary Systems in Stellar Clusters
Planetary Systems in Stellar Clusters Melvyn B. Davies Department of Astronomy and Theoretical Physics Lund Observatory Collaborators: John Chambers, Ross Church, Francesca de Angeli, Douglas Heggie, Thijs
More informationConditions of Dynamical Stability for the HD Planetary System
Conditions of Dynamical Stability for the HD 160691 Planetary System Eric Bois Observatoire Aquitain des Sciences de l Univers, Université Bordeaux 1, UMR CNRS/INSU 5804, B.P.89, F-33270 Floirac, France
More informationAnalysis of Radial Velocity Measurements
Analysis of Radial Velocity Measurements Sistemas Planetários - 2nd project - 2011/2012 João Faria 1. Introduction The existence of solar systems other than our own has been speculated for a long time,
More informationHABITABLE EXTRASOLAR PLANETARY SYSTEMS, THE CASE OF 55 CNC
HABITABLE EXTRASOLAR PLANETARY SYSTEMS, THE CASE OF 55 CNC Desiree Cotto-Figueroa University of Puerto Rico at Humacao Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii Mentor : Nader Haghighipour ABSTRACT
More informationThe stability of planets in the Alpha Centauri system
The stability of planets in the Alpha Centauri system Paul A. Wiegert 1, Matt Holman 2 1 Department of Astronomy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada 2 Canadian Institute for Theoretical Astrophysics,
More informationTHE ROLE OF GIANT PLANETS IN TERRESTRIAL PLANET FORMATION Harold F. Levison 1 and Craig Agnor 2
The Astronomical Journal, 125:2692 2713, 23 May # 23. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed in U.S.A. E THE ROLE OF GIANT PLANETS IN TERRESTRIAL PLANET FORMATION Harold F. Levison
More informationMars Growth Stunted by an Early Orbital Instability between the Giant Planets
Mars Growth Stunted by an Early Orbital Instability between the Giant Planets M.S. Clement University of Oklahoma Advisor: Professor N.A. Kaib Collaborators: S.N. Raymond, K.J. Walsh 19 September 2017
More informationPervasive Orbital Eccentricities Dictate the Habitability of Extrasolar Earths
Pervasive Orbital Eccentricities Dictate the Habitability of Extrasolar Earths Ryosuke Kita, 1 Frederic Rasio, 1,2 and Genya Takeda 1 arxiv:1003.0633v2 [astro-ph.ep] 2 Mar 2010 1 Department of Physics
More informationarxiv: v1 [astro-ph.sr] 2 Dec 2015
Astronomy & Astrophysics manuscript no. gl581ha c ESO 18 September, 18 Periodic Hα variations in GL 581: Further evidence for an activity origin to GL 581d A. P. Hatzes Thüringer Landessternwarte Tautenburg,
More informationDynamical behaviour of the primitive asteroid belt
Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 293, 405 410 (1998) Dynamical behaviour of the primitive asteroid belt Adrián Brunini Observatorio Astronómico de La Plata, Profoeg, Paseo del Bosque, (1900) La Plata, Argentina
More informationPossible commensurabilities among pairs of extrasolar planets
Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 333, L26 L30 (2002) Possible commensurabilities among pairs of extrasolar planets Richard P. Nelson P and John C. B. Papaloizou Astronomy Unit, Queen Mary, University of London,
More informationArchitecture and demographics of planetary systems
Architecture and demographics of planetary systems Struve (1952) The demography of the planets that we detect is strongly affected by detection methods psychology of the observer Understanding planet demography
More informationarxiv: v1 [astro-ph.ep] 8 Feb 2017
Dynamics and evolution of planets in mean-motion resonances Alexandre C. M. Correia, Jean-Baptiste Delisle, and Jacques Laskar arxiv:1702.02494v1 [astro-ph.ep] 8 Feb 2017 Abstract In some planetary systems
More informationarxiv: v1 [astro-ph.ep] 23 Nov 2011
Draft version September 3, 18 Preprint typeset using L A TEX style emulateapj v. 11/1/9 PUMPING THE ECCENTRICITY OF EXOPLANETS BY TIDAL EFFECT Alexandre C.M. Correia Department of Physics, I3N, University
More informationTerrestrial Planet Formation Around Individual Stars Within Binary Star Systems
Terrestrial Planet Formation Around Individual Stars Within Binary Star Systems Elisa V. Quintana Space Science and Astrobiology Division 245-3, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035 equintan@pollack.arc.nasa.gov
More informationChapter 2 Evolution History of Extrasolar Planetary Systems
Chapter 2 Evolution History of Extrasolar Planetary Systems Abstract In this chapter, we review the basics on the detection and characterization of exoplanetary systems. We first focus on the two leading
More informationTHE ORIGIN AND EVOLUTION OF FREE-FLOATING PLANETS IN STAR CLUSTERS
THE ORIGIN AND EVOLUTION OF FREE-FLOATING PLANETS IN STAR CLUSTERS M.B.N. (Thijs) Kouwenhoven Kavli Institute for Astronomy and Astrophysics, Peking University Hao Wei (MPIA), Li Yun (KIAA), Wang Long
More informationData from: The Extrasolar Planet Encyclopaedia.
Data from: The Extrasolar Planet Encyclopaedia http://exoplanet.eu/ 2009->10 Status of Exoplanet Searches Direct Detection: 5->9 planets detected Sensitive to large planets in large orbits around faint
More informationWhat can be learned from the dynamics of packed planetary systems?
What can be learned from the dynamics of packed planetary systems? Rosemary Mardling Monash University University of Geneva some Kepler gravitational molecules... credit: Fabrycky :-) a stable pair of
More informationPlanetenbewegung in Sternsystemen. The Effect of Resonances. Part 2
Planetenbewegung in Sternsystemen The Effect of Resonances Part 2 Topics overview 1. Definition and examples of resonances 2. Disturbing function 3. Mean-motion resonance (MMR) 4. Secular resonance (SR)
More informationFORMATION OF HOT PLANETS BY A COMBINATION OF PLANET SCATTERING, TIDAL CIRCULARIZATION, AND THE KOZAI MECHANISM
The Astrophysical Journal, 678:498Y508, 008 May 1 # 008. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed in U.S.A. FORMATION OF HOT PLANETS BY A COMBINATION OF PLANET SCATTERING, TIDAL
More informationarxiv: v1 [astro-ph.ep] 28 Aug 2012
Revisiting ρ 1 Cancri e: A New Mass Determination Of The Transiting super-earth 1 Michael Endl arxiv:1208.5709v1 [astro-ph.ep] 28 Aug 2012 McDonald Observatory, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin,
More informationarxiv: v1 [astro-ph.ep] 18 Feb 2009
Astronomy & Astrophysics manuscript no. 1531ms c ESO 2016 November 20, 2016 arxiv:0902.2997v1 [astro-ph.ep] 18 Feb 2009 Letter to the Editor Bayesian analysis of the radial velocities of HD 11506 reveals
More informationarxiv:astro-ph/ v1 10 Nov 2005
Astronomy & Astrophysics manuscript no. ms c ESO 17 August 3, 17 About putative Neptune-like extrasolar planetary candidates Krzysztof Goździewski and Cezary Migaszewski Toruń Centre for Astronomy, PL-87-1
More informationDynamical properties of the Solar System. Second Kepler s Law. Dynamics of planetary orbits. ν: true anomaly
First Kepler s Law The secondary body moves in an elliptical orbit, with the primary body at the focus Valid for bound orbits with E < 0 The conservation of the total energy E yields a constant semi-major
More informationASTB01 Exoplanets Lab
ASTB01 Exoplanets Lab Author: Anders Johansen Revision date: $Date: 2015/08/28 14:55:59 $ Planets orbiting stars other than the Sun are called exoplanets. Stellar light reflected off
More informationPlanetary Formation and Orbital Stability in Binary Star Systems
Mem. S.A.It. Suppl. Vol. 6, 172 c SAIt 2005 Memorie della Supplementi Planetary Formation and Orbital Stability in Binary Star Systems D. Turrini 1, M. Barbieri 1, F. Marzari 2, P. Thebault 3, and P. Tricarico
More informationAccretion of Planets. Bill Hartmann. Star & Planet Formation Minicourse, U of T Astronomy Dept. Lecture 5 - Ed Thommes
Accretion of Planets Bill Hartmann Star & Planet Formation Minicourse, U of T Astronomy Dept. Lecture 5 - Ed Thommes Overview Start with planetesimals: km-size bodies, interactions are gravitational (formation
More informationDynamical Tides in Binaries
Dynamical Tides in Binaries I. Merging White Dwarf Binaries II. Kepler KOI-54 III. Hot Jupiter Systems Dong Lai Cornell University 4/5/2012, IAS, Princeton Equilibrium Tide M, R M Equilibrium Tide M, R
More informationPlanet Formation: theory and observations. Sean Raymond University of Colorado (until Friday) Observatoire de Bordeaux
Planet Formation: theory and observations Sean Raymond University of Colorado (until Friday) Observatoire de Bordeaux Outline Stages of Planet Formation Solar System Formation Cores to disks (c2d) Observational
More informationOrbital instability of close-in exomoons in non-coplanar systems
Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 7 () Printed 8 February (MN LATEX style file v.) Orbital instability of close-in exomoons in non-coplanar systems However, questions arise on whether exomoons exist because we
More informationSecular Orbital Evolution of Compact Planet Systems
Secular Orbital Evolution of Compact Planet Systems Ke Zhang, Douglas P. Hamilton, and Soko Matsumura Department of Astronomy, University of Maryland College Park, MD 20742, USA Corresponding Authors:
More informationHigh-Accuracy Measurements of Variations in Transit Timing: A New Method for Detecting Terrestrial-Class Extrasolar Planets
High-Accuracy Measurements of Variations in Transit Timing: A New Method for Detecting Terrestrial-Class Extrasolar Planets A science white paper submitted to Astro2010 Decadal Survey (Planetary Systems
More informationarxiv: v2 [astro-ph.ep] 26 Apr 2016
Interaction Cross Sections and Survival Rates for Proposed Solar System Member Planet Nine Gongjie Li 1 and Fred C. Adams 2,3 arxiv:1602.08496v2 [astro-ph.ep] 26 Apr 2016 1 Harvard-Smithsonian Center for
More informationHABITABLE PLANET FORMATION IN BINARY PLANETARY SYSTEMS
The Astrophysical Journal, 666:436 Y 446, 2007 September 1 # 2007. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed in U.S.A. HABITABLE PLANET FORMATION IN BINARY PLANETARY SYSTEMS Nader
More informationTerrestrial planet formation surrounding close binary stars
Icarus 185 (2006) 1 20 www.elsevier.com/locate/icarus Terrestrial planet formation surrounding close binary stars Elisa V. Quintana, Jack J. Lissauer Space Science and Astrobiology Division 245-3, NASA
More informationF. Marzari, Dept. Physics, Padova Univ. Planetary migration
F. Marzari, Dept. Physics, Padova Univ. Planetary migration Standard model of planet formation based on Solar system exploration Small semimajor axes Large eccentricities The standard model Protostar +Disk
More informationarxiv: v1 [astro-ph.ep] 17 Dec 2015
Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 000, 1 15 (2015) Printed 27 February 2018 (MN LATEX style file v2.2) Dynamical Constraints on Outer Planets in Super-Earth Systems Matthew J. Read 1 and Mark C. Wyatt 1 1 Institute
More informationFormation and evolution of the two 4/3 resonant giants planets in HD
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201424820 c ESO 2014 Astronomy & Astrophysics Formation and evolution of the two 4/3 resonant giants planets in HD 200964 M. Tadeu dos Santos, J. A. Correa-Otto, T. A. Michtchenko,
More informationOGLE-TR-56. Guillermo Torres, Maciej Konacki, Dimitar D. Sasselov and Saurabh Jha INTRODUCTION
OGLE-TR-56 Guillermo Torres, Maciej Konacki, Dimitar D. Sasselov and Saurabh Jha Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics Caltech, Department of Geological and Planetary Sciences University of California
More informationEXONEST The Exoplanetary Explorer. Kevin H. Knuth and Ben Placek Department of Physics University at Albany (SUNY) Albany NY
EXONEST The Exoplanetary Explorer Kevin H. Knuth and Ben Placek Department of Physics University at Albany (SUNY) Albany NY Kepler Mission The Kepler mission, launched in 2009, aims to explore the structure
More informationWP the Mass-Radius relationship for gas giants
WP 115 100 the Mass-Radius relationship for gas giants Tristan Guillot, Mathieu Havel Observatoire de la Côte d'azur, CNRS UMR 6202 Objectives: Understand the expected impact of PLATO photometry on the
More informationhd b greg laughlin jonathan langton ucsc
hd 80606 b greg laughlin jonathan langton ucsc The success of the planet detection programs has enabled the comparative study of populations of planets, as well as the detailed investigation of individual
More information