Professional Portfolio Selection Techniques: From Markowitz to Innovative Engineering
|
|
- Clarissa Pitts
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Massachusetts Institute of Technology Sponsor: Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Cosponsor: Science Engineering and Business Club Professional Portfolio Selection Techniques: From Markowitz to Innovative Engineering Part 2 and in collaboration with MIT - Wed Jan 16, Thu Jan , 04:00-6:00pm,
2 The process of portfolio construction Asset allocation: - strategic asset allocation - tactical asset allocation 1 st Day January 16 th G.A.M Model: a new tactical asset allocation technique PID feedback controller theory Applications and future research 2 nd Day January 17 th January October 16, 4,
3 INNOVATION 1. INTRODUCTION Use of the Feedback controller, widely applied in most industrial processes, as a technique for financial portfolio management.** AIM METHOD Tactical Portfolio Asset Allocation Technique. Rebalancing of Assets determined by the controlled value of Risk Adjusted Return subject to the action of the Controller. The innovative procedure consists in the controlling action over the uncertain behavior of the plurality of assets comprising the portfolio. The controller attempts to regulate the dynamics of the portfolio by rebalancing the weights of the different assets in such a way to force the portfolio risk adjusted return to approach the Set Point. (*), ** Patent Pending International - National 3
4 The Innovation 1. INTRODUCTION Comprises Seeking STABILITY CONSISTENCY of Portfolio Risk Adjusted Return over the time horizon by controlling Risk Adjusted Retun 4
5 2. BACKGROUND Strategic Asset Allocation = Selecting a Long Term Target Asset Allocation most common framework: mean-variance construction of Markowitz (1952) Tactical Asset Allocation = Short Term Modification of Assets around the Target systematic and methodic processes for evaluating prospective rates of return on various asset classes and establishing an asset allocation response intended to capture higher rewards 5
6 2. BACKGROUND Tactical Asset Allocation (TAA) asset allocation strategy that allows active departures from the Strategic asset mix based upon rigorous objective measures active management. It often involves forecasting asset returns, volatilities and correlations. The forecasted variables may be functions of fundamental variables, economic variables or even technical variables. 6
7 3. RISK ADJUSTED RETURN Portfolio Managers main Objective is to achieve a relevant Risk Adjusted Return. In literature and in the financial industry business, numerous kinds of return/risk ratios are commonly used. Sharpe Ratio Sortino Ratio Treynor Ratio Information Ratio... 7
8 4. SYSTEMS: MANUAL VS AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS Manual Control = System involving a Person Controlling a Machine. Automatic Control = System involving Machines Only. 8
9 4. SYSTEMS: MANUAL VS AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS (ESAMPLES) Manual Control: Driving an Automobile Automatic Control: Room Temperature Set by a Thermostat 9
10 4. SYSTEMS: REGULATORS VS TRACKING (SERVO) SYSTEMS Regulators: Systems designed to Hold a System Steady against Unknown Disturbances Servo: Systems designed to Track a Reference Signal 10
11 4. OPEN-LOOP SYSTEMS The Controller does not use a Measure of the System Output being Controlled in Computing the Control Action to Take. 11
12 4. FEEDBACK SYSTEMS Feedback Systems (Processes): defined by the Return to the Input of a part of the Output of a Machine, System, or Process. Controlled Output Signal is Measured and Fed Back for use in the Control Computation. 12
13 4.1 OPEN AND CLOSED LOOPS OPEN LOOP SYSTEM CLOSED LOOP SYSTEM System 1 affects system 2 System 2 affects system 1 13
14 4.1 CLOSED LOOP (EXAMPLE) Household Furnace Controlled by a Thermostat: Qout Desired Temperature THERMO- STAT Gas Valve FURNACE Qin + - HOUSE Room Temperature Fig. 01 BLOCK DIAGRAM 14
15 4.1 CLOSED LOOP (EXAMPLE) Household Furnace Controlled by a Thermostat: Plot of Room Temperature and Furnace Action Initially Room Temperature << Reference (or SET POINT) Temperature. Thermostat ON Gas Valve ON Heat Qin supplied to House at rate > Qout (Heat loss) Room temperature will rise until > Reference Point Gas Valve OFF Room Temperature will drop until below Reference point Gas Valve ON 15
16 4.1 CLOSED LOOP (Components) ACTUATOR = Gas Furnace PROCESS = House OUTPUT = Room Temperature Disturbances = Flow of Heat from the house via wall conduction, etc. PLANT = Combination of Process and Actuator CONTROLLER = components which compute desired controlled signal SENSOR = Thermostat COMPARATOR = Computes the difference between reference signal and sensor output. 16
17 4.2 FEEDBACK SYSTEM PARAMETERS Set-Point = Target Value that an Automatic Control System will aim to Reach. Output = Current Output of the System. Error = Difference between Set Point and Current Output of the System. Block Diagram of Plant = Mathematical Relations in Graph Form 17
18 4.3 DYNAMICS Dynamic Model = Mathematical Description via equation of motion of the system Three domains within which to study dynamic response S-plane Frequency Response State Space 18
19 4.3 DYNAMICS Feedback allows the Dynamics (Behavior) of a System to be modified: Stability Augmentation. Closed Loop Modifies Natural Behavior. 19
20 4.3 DYNAMICS - Superposition PRINCIPLE OF SUPERPOSITION if input is a sum of signals Response = Sum of Individual Responses to respective Signals It works for Linear Time-Invariant Systems Used to solve Systems by System responses to a set of elementary signals Decomposing given signal into sum of elementary responses Solve subsystems General response = sum of single subsystem solutions Elementary signals Impulse = Intense Force for Short Time Exponential e st f ( τ ) δ ( t τ ) dτ = f ( t) 20
21 4.3 DYNAMICS Transfer Function Exponential input u( t)= e st Output of the form y( t) = H( s) e st Where: S can be complex S = σ + jω Transfer Function = Transfer gain from U(S) to Y(S) = Y ( S) = H ( S) U ( S) Ratio of the Laplace Transform of Output to Laplace Transform of Input 21
22 4.3 DYNAMICS Laplace Transform Definition F ( s) = f ( t) dt e st 0 22
23 DYNAMICS Laplace Transform S-Plane ( ) ( ) k s k s k s s e k s e s e s kt k kt k t t k s s t t kt kt kt ) cos( ) sin( ) 1( 1 ) ( δ Impulse Impulse ) ( ) ( 1 ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) 1( ) ( k S F t f k S F k kt f S F k t f S H t t h e e e kt ks kt + =
24 DYNAMICS Frequency Response ( ) [ ] [ ] ) ( ), ( ) cos( ) ( ) ( 2 ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( 2 ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( 2 ) cos( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ω ϕ ω ϕ ω ω ω ω ω ω ω ω ω ω ω ϕ ω ϕ ω ω ϕ ω ω ω ω ω ω ω ω j H j H M t AM M M A t y M j H j H j H A t y j H t y t u j H t y t u j s A t A t u e e e e e e e e e e e t j t j j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j = = + = + = = + = = = = = = + = = + +
25 4.3 DYNAMICS Frequency Response for k= 1: 1 H( s) = s+ k 1 H( jω) = jω+ k 1 M = 2 ω + k 1 ω ϕ= tan k y( t) = AM cos( ωt+ ϕ) 2 Bode Plot 25
26 4.4 BLOCK DIAGRAM 26
27 4.4 BLOCK DIAGRAM + R e U Y - G c G p Fig. 01 Y R GcG p = 1+ GcG p Transfer Function = Linear Mapping of the Laplace Transform of the Input, R, to the Output Y Where Y = Process Output; R = Set-Point; G p = Process Gain; G c Controller Gain Y ( S) U ( S) = H ( S) 27
28 4.5 STABILITY Poles & Zeros b( s) H ( s) = a( s) a( s) = 0 H ( s) b( s) H ( s) = a( s) b( s) = 0 H ( s) = = 0 Such S-values Poles of H(s) Transfer Function Denominator factors Such S-values Zeros of H(s) Transfer Function Numerator Factors 28
29 Exponential decay Stability τ = 1 k 4.5 STABILITY Poles & Zeros H ( s) h( t) k > = 0 = e kt 1 s + k s 1( t) < 0 Exponential growth Instability τ = Time Constant H ( s) h( t) k < 0 = = s 1 + e kt s 1( t) > k 0 29
30 4.5 STABILITY Poles & Zeros 2s + 1 H ( s) = 2 + 3s + s 2 = 1 s s
31 4.5 STABILITY Poles & Zeros EXPLORING THE S-PLANE... 31
32 4.5 STABILITY Poles & Zeros 32
33 4.5 Complex Poles H ( s) = 2 ω n ω n s + 2ζ S ω n ζ Damping Ratio s = σ ± j ω d ω n Natural Frequency σ = ζ ω n ω d = n ω θ = sin 1 ζ 1 ζ 2 33
34 For Low Damping Oscillator y Response For High Damping (near 1) No Oscillations 4.5 Impulse Response σ < 0 Unstable σ > 0 Stable σ = 0 n.a. 34
35 4.5 Step Response (Unit Step Response) RISE TIME Time necessary to Approach Set Point (t r ) SETTLING TIME Time necessary for Transient to Decay (t s ) OVERSHOOT % of Overshoot value to Steady State Value (M % ) PEAK TIME Time to reach highest point (t p ) Time Domain Specifications 35
36 4.5 Step Response (Unit Step Response) Time Domain Specifications RISE TIME Time necessary to Approach Set Point (t r ) SETTLING TIME Time necessary for Transient to Decay (t s ) OVERSHOOT % of Overshoot value to Steady State Value (M % ) PEAK TIME Time to reach highest point (t p ) 36
37 4.5 Step Response (Unit Step Response) Time Domain Specifications RISE TIME Time necessary to Approach Set Point (t r ) Rise Time t r 1.8 ω n For ζ =
38 4.5 Step Response (Unit Step Response) Time Domain Specifications PEAK TIME Time to reach highest point (t p ) Peak Time t p π ω d For ζ = 0. 5 ω d = n ω 1 ζ 2 38
39 4.5 Step Response (Unit Step Response) Time Domain Specifications OVERSHOOT % of Overshoot value to Steady State Value (M % ) Overshoot M p = e πζ 1 2 ζ For ζ =
40 4.5 Step Response (Unit Step Response) Time Domain Specifications SETTLING TIME Time necessary for Transient to Decay (t s ) Settling Time t s = 4.6 ζ ω n = 4.6 σ σ = ζ ω n For ζ =
41 4.5 Step Response (Unit Step Response) Time Domain Specifications Design Specify t r, M p and t s : ω n ζ ζ ( σ t 1.8 t 4.6 s r M p ) 41
42 4.5 Step Response (Unit Step Response) Time Domain Specifications Design Specify t r, M p and t s : sin 1 ζ ω n σ t r M t s ω n 0.6sec 3sec ζ ζ ( σ p = 10% 1.8 ω n ) ζ 3.0rad σ 1.5sec t t r M s p / sec 42
43 4.5 Step Response (Unit Step Response) Time Domain Specifications Design Adding a Zero Adding a Derivative Effect Increase Overshoot Decrease Rise Time Adding a Pole s-term in the denominator pure integration finite value stability Integral of Impulse Finite Value Integral of Step Function Ramp Function Infinite Value 43
44 4.5 Step Response (Unit Step Response) Time Domain Specifications Design For a 2 -order system with no zeros: t t r M s 1.8 ω n p 16%, ζ = σ Zero in LHP Increase Overshoot Zero in RHP Decrease Overshoot Pole in LHP Increase Rise Time the denominator pure integration 44
45 4.6 Model From Experimental Data Transient Response input an impulse or a step function to the system Frequency Response Data exciting the system with sinusoidal input at various frequencies Random Noise Data 45
46 4.6 Model From Experimental Data GAM Model Transient Response to a step function representing the SP value = Desired value of the Returns. 46
47 5.1 FEEDBACK CONTROLLER Several parameters characterize the process. The difference ("error ) signal is used to adjust input to the process in order to bring the process' measured value back to its desired Set-Point. In Feedback Control the error is less sensitive to variations in the plant gain than errors in open loop control Feedback Controller can adjust process outputs based on History of Error Signal; Rate of Change of Error Signal; More Accurate Control; More Stable Control; Controller can be easily adjusted ("tuned") to the desired application. 47
48 5.1 FEEDBACK CONTROLLER The ideal version of the Feedback Controller is given by the formula: 1 de( t) u( t) = k e( t) + + e( τ ) dτ p T d dt i where u = Control Signal; e = Control Error; R = Reference Value, or Set-Point. T Proportional Term P Control Signal = Integral Term I Derivative Term D 48
49 5.2 FEEDBACK COTROLLER Proportional Term, P Adjusts Output in Direct Proportion to Controller Input (Error, e). Parameter gain, K p. Effect: lifts gain with no change in phase. Proportional - handles the immediate error, the error is multiplied by a constant K p (for "proportional"), and added to the controlled quantity. 49
50 5.3 FEEDBACK CONTROLLER Integral Term, I The Integral action causes the Output to Ramp. Used to eliminate Steady State Error. Effect: lifts gain at low frequency. Gives Zero Steady State Error. Infinite Gain + Phase Lag. Integral - To learn from the past, the error is integrated (added up) over a period of time, and then multiplied by a constant K i and added to the controlled quantity. Eventually, a well-tuned Feedback Controller loop's process output will settle down at the Set-Point. 50
51 Derivative Term, D 5.4 FEEDBACK CONTROLLER The derivative action, characterized by parameter K d, anticipates where the process is going by considering the derivative of the controller input (error, e). Gives High Gain at Low Frequency + Phase Lead at High Frequency Derivative - To handle the future. The 1st derivative over time is calculated, and multiplied by constant K d, and added to the controlled quantity. The derivative term controls the response to a change in the system. The larger the derivative term, the more the controller responds to changes in the process's output. A Controller loop is also called a "predictive controller." The D term is reduced when trying to dampen a controller's response to short term changes. 51
52 6. METHOD - the G.A.M. model Novel approach to Portfolio Tactical Asset Allocation. Recalling TAA Constant Proportion, Core Satellite and Active Strategies. Portfolio Assets Rebalancing is dictated by an Asset Selection Technique Consisting in the Optimization of Risk Adjusted Return by means of the G.A.M. model. 52
53 6.1 METHOD - the G.A.M. model Tests performed using the following data: Time horizon: 11 years Frequency: Monthly Number of Assets: 9 Period: January 1996 October asset Monthly Data Portfolio [10 years]; Comparison between the G.A.M. Portfolio and the Buy-and-Hold Portfolio. 53
54 6. METHOD - the G.A.M. model Risk Adjusted Return is not Optimized via Rebalancing of Asset Weights following a Forecasting Methodology of the Expected Return Vector. Investors seek Consistent and Stable Portfolio Performance over Time. Risk Adjusted Return is induced towards Stability Risk Adjusted Return is Controlled. 54
55 6. METHOD - the G.A.M. model For a portfolio to be tactically managed over a time horizon by means of the G.A.M. model: Given an initial asset allocation mix (Initial Portfolio), the assets are rebalanced at a predetermined frequency (monthly, or bimonthly, or quarterly); the rebalancing process is determined by choosing that particular mix of assets such at, at each iteration (monthly, or bimonthly, or quarterly), the current risk adjusted return approaches the current controlled system output. 55
56 6.2.1 METHOD - the G.A.M. model 1. Choose risk adjusted return parameter (Set-Point); 2. Set risk adjusted return value; 3. Set Controller parameters; 4. Choose Initial Portfolio (IP); i.e 1. All equivalents weights among the plurality of all the assets of the portfolio; or 2. Initial Portfolio could be dictated by Markovitz Asset Allocation. 56
57 6.2.2 METHOD - the G.A.M. model PID [Continuous] PID [Discrete] PID [Simple Lag Implementation] 57
58 6.2.3 METHOD - the G.A.M. model 1. Calculate first risk adjusted return value for the Initial Portfolio. 2. Controller determines the controlled value of the risk adjusted return for the portfolio. Rebalancing of the Portfolio is necessary in order for the Portfolio Risk Adjusted Return to comply with the Controller. 3. New data acquisition from financial markets is performed and the corresponding Risk Adjusted Return is calculated based on the current financial market data. 4. Tasks 2, 3 and 4 are iteratively repeated at a predetermined frequency until the chosen time horizon has been reached. 5. The purpose of performing these iterations is to Stabilize Portfolio Risk Adjusted Return via the combined contributions of the Controller and actual financial markets. Portfolio Asset Rebalancing and variation of Asset Mix is a result of both the Controller Effect and the Financial Market Dynamics. 58
59 6.2.4 METHOD - the G.A.M. model 59
60 7. EMPIRICAL RESULTS B&H Portfolio Returns GAM Portfolio Returns B&H Portfolio σ GAM Portfolio σ B&H Portfolio Sharpe Ratio GAM Portfolio Sharpe Ratio % 9.52% 4.84% 4.77% % 8.59% 8.25% 12.04% % -9.71% 10.47% 23.42% % 58.99% 8.27% 27.86% % 16.79% 7.64% 17.32% % 14.78% 8.53% 12.55% % 28.79% 8.05% 17.54% % 0.87% 5.61% 16.06% % 20.32% 4.49% 11.89% % -2.36% 5.80% 13.37% % 27.01% 4.00% 13.15%
61 7. EMPIRICAL RESULTS B&H Portfolio Sharpe Ratio GAM Portfolio Sharpe Ratio Poly. (B&H Portfolio Sharpe Ratio) Poly. (GAM Portfolio Sharpe Ratio) ,996 1,997 1,998 1,999 2,000 2,001 2,002 2,003 2,004 2,005 2,006 61
62 8. CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE WORK INNOVATION FUTURE WORK ELECTRICAL ENGINERING + The innovation consists in using a Controller to control (to minimize the error e) portfolio risk adjusted return. Controlling = to have risk adjusted return approach and hold a steady state value as close as possible to the desired risk adjusted return. Controller needs to minimize steady state error the difference between Set-Point and the desired risk adjusted return over the time horizon. Adopting many more asset classes. Making Assets Time Series vary in frequency and length. Using other risk adjusted returns or other indices (I.e. Sortino, Information Ratio).. Take into account transaction and management fees. Use parameters setting and constraints. Use a index based portfolio as the Buy-and-Hold Portfolio ENHANCING FINANCE = FINANCIAL MARKET ANALYSIS 62
63 CONTACT INFORMATION Ing. Prof. Dott.ssa 63
64 APPENDIX βeta Ra = RFR + β (Rm- RFR) Where Ra = Return of an asset A RFR = Risk Free Rate Rm = Expected Market Return The measure of an asset's risk in relation to the market 64
65 Appendix D Cf/(1+%) ^Year 65
66 Appendix A Simple Lag Derivation 66
67 Appendix A Simple Lag Derivation 67
68 Appendix Z Ziegler-Nichols Tuning for PID Controller k p 0.6 k u k i 0.5 P u k d P u P u =Period of oscillation k u =Proportional gain at the edge of oscillatory behavior 68
69 Appendix F Frequency Response and Bode Plots Dynamic compensation can be based on Bode Plots Bode Plots can be determined experimentally 69
Dynamic Response. Assoc. Prof. Enver Tatlicioglu. Department of Electrical & Electronics Engineering Izmir Institute of Technology.
Dynamic Response Assoc. Prof. Enver Tatlicioglu Department of Electrical & Electronics Engineering Izmir Institute of Technology Chapter 3 Assoc. Prof. Enver Tatlicioglu (EEE@IYTE) EE362 Feedback Control
More informationFeedback Control of Linear SISO systems. Process Dynamics and Control
Feedback Control of Linear SISO systems Process Dynamics and Control 1 Open-Loop Process The study of dynamics was limited to open-loop systems Observe process behavior as a result of specific input signals
More informationIntroduction to Feedback Control
Introduction to Feedback Control Control System Design Why Control? Open-Loop vs Closed-Loop (Feedback) Why Use Feedback Control? Closed-Loop Control System Structure Elements of a Feedback Control System
More informationLecture 5 Classical Control Overview III. Dr. Radhakant Padhi Asst. Professor Dept. of Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore
Lecture 5 Classical Control Overview III Dr. Radhakant Padhi Asst. Professor Dept. of Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore A Fundamental Problem in Control Systems Poles of open
More informationMAE143a: Signals & Systems (& Control) Final Exam (2011) solutions
MAE143a: Signals & Systems (& Control) Final Exam (2011) solutions Question 1. SIGNALS: Design of a noise-cancelling headphone system. 1a. Based on the low-pass filter given, design a high-pass filter,
More information(b) A unity feedback system is characterized by the transfer function. Design a suitable compensator to meet the following specifications:
1. (a) The open loop transfer function of a unity feedback control system is given by G(S) = K/S(1+0.1S)(1+S) (i) Determine the value of K so that the resonance peak M r of the system is equal to 1.4.
More informationDr Ian R. Manchester Dr Ian R. Manchester AMME 3500 : Review
Week Date Content Notes 1 6 Mar Introduction 2 13 Mar Frequency Domain Modelling 3 20 Mar Transient Performance and the s-plane 4 27 Mar Block Diagrams Assign 1 Due 5 3 Apr Feedback System Characteristics
More informationCourse Summary. The course cannot be summarized in one lecture.
Course Summary Unit 1: Introduction Unit 2: Modeling in the Frequency Domain Unit 3: Time Response Unit 4: Block Diagram Reduction Unit 5: Stability Unit 6: Steady-State Error Unit 7: Root Locus Techniques
More informationVideo 5.1 Vijay Kumar and Ani Hsieh
Video 5.1 Vijay Kumar and Ani Hsieh Robo3x-1.1 1 The Purpose of Control Input/Stimulus/ Disturbance System or Plant Output/ Response Understand the Black Box Evaluate the Performance Change the Behavior
More information6.1 Sketch the z-domain root locus and find the critical gain for the following systems K., the closed-loop characteristic equation is K + z 0.
6. Sketch the z-domain root locus and find the critical gain for the following systems K (i) Gz () z 4. (ii) Gz K () ( z+ 9. )( z 9. ) (iii) Gz () Kz ( z. )( z ) (iv) Gz () Kz ( + 9. ) ( z. )( z 8. ) (i)
More informationTime Response Analysis (Part II)
Time Response Analysis (Part II). A critically damped, continuous-time, second order system, when sampled, will have (in Z domain) (a) A simple pole (b) Double pole on real axis (c) Double pole on imaginary
More informationOutline. Classical Control. Lecture 1
Outline Outline Outline 1 Introduction 2 Prerequisites Block diagram for system modeling Modeling Mechanical Electrical Outline Introduction Background Basic Systems Models/Transfers functions 1 Introduction
More informationSystems Analysis and Control
Systems Analysis and Control Matthew M. Peet Arizona State University Lecture 21: Stability Margins and Closing the Loop Overview In this Lecture, you will learn: Closing the Loop Effect on Bode Plot Effect
More informationTransient Response of a Second-Order System
Transient Response of a Second-Order System ECEN 830 Spring 01 1. Introduction In connection with this experiment, you are selecting the gains in your feedback loop to obtain a well-behaved closed-loop
More informationLecture 25: Tue Nov 27, 2018
Lecture 25: Tue Nov 27, 2018 Reminder: Lab 3 moved to Tuesday Dec 4 Lecture: review time-domain characteristics of 2nd-order systems intro to control: feedback open-loop vs closed-loop control intro to
More informationR a) Compare open loop and closed loop control systems. b) Clearly bring out, from basics, Force-current and Force-Voltage analogies.
SET - 1 II B. Tech II Semester Supplementary Examinations Dec 01 1. a) Compare open loop and closed loop control systems. b) Clearly bring out, from basics, Force-current and Force-Voltage analogies..
More informationDynamic Behavior. Chapter 5
1 Dynamic Behavior In analyzing process dynamic and process control systems, it is important to know how the process responds to changes in the process inputs. A number of standard types of input changes
More informationECE 388 Automatic Control
Lead Compensator and PID Control Associate Prof. Dr. of Mechatronics Engineeering Çankaya University Compulsory Course in Electronic and Communication Engineering Credits (2/2/3) Course Webpage: http://ece388.cankaya.edu.tr
More informationAnalysis and Design of Control Systems in the Time Domain
Chapter 6 Analysis and Design of Control Systems in the Time Domain 6. Concepts of feedback control Given a system, we can classify it as an open loop or a closed loop depends on the usage of the feedback.
More informationControl of Manufacturing Processes
Control of Manufacturing Processes Subject 2.830 Spring 2004 Lecture #19 Position Control and Root Locus Analysis" April 22, 2004 The Position Servo Problem, reference position NC Control Robots Injection
More informationEE3CL4: Introduction to Linear Control Systems
1 / 17 EE3CL4: Introduction to Linear Control Systems Section 7: McMaster University Winter 2018 2 / 17 Outline 1 4 / 17 Cascade compensation Throughout this lecture we consider the case of H(s) = 1. We
More informationagree w/input bond => + sign disagree w/input bond => - sign
1 ME 344 REVIEW FOR FINAL EXAM LOCATION: CPE 2.204 M. D. BRYANT DATE: Wednesday, May 7, 2008 9-noon Finals week office hours: May 6, 4-7 pm Permitted at final exam: 1 sheet of formulas & calculator I.
More informationAnswers to multiple choice questions
Answers to multiple choice questions Chapter 2 M2.1 (b) M2.2 (a) M2.3 (d) M2.4 (b) M2.5 (a) M2.6 (b) M2.7 (b) M2.8 (c) M2.9 (a) M2.10 (b) Chapter 3 M3.1 (b) M3.2 (d) M3.3 (d) M3.4 (d) M3.5 (c) M3.6 (c)
More informationSystems Analysis and Control
Systems Analysis and Control Matthew M. Peet Illinois Institute of Technology Lecture 8: Response Characteristics Overview In this Lecture, you will learn: Characteristics of the Response Stability Real
More informationEE 422G - Signals and Systems Laboratory
EE 4G - Signals and Systems Laboratory Lab 9 PID Control Kevin D. Donohue Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Kentucky Lexington, KY 40506 April, 04 Objectives: Identify the
More informationController Design using Root Locus
Chapter 4 Controller Design using Root Locus 4. PD Control Root locus is a useful tool to design different types of controllers. Below, we will illustrate the design of proportional derivative controllers
More informationCompensator Design to Improve Transient Performance Using Root Locus
1 Compensator Design to Improve Transient Performance Using Root Locus Prof. Guy Beale Electrical and Computer Engineering Department George Mason University Fairfax, Virginia Correspondence concerning
More informationPerformance of Feedback Control Systems
Performance of Feedback Control Systems Design of a PID Controller Transient Response of a Closed Loop System Damping Coefficient, Natural frequency, Settling time and Steady-state Error and Type 0, Type
More informationAN INTRODUCTION TO THE CONTROL THEORY
Open-Loop controller An Open-Loop (OL) controller is characterized by no direct connection between the output of the system and its input; therefore external disturbance, non-linear dynamics and parameter
More informationECSE 4962 Control Systems Design. A Brief Tutorial on Control Design
ECSE 4962 Control Systems Design A Brief Tutorial on Control Design Instructor: Professor John T. Wen TA: Ben Potsaid http://www.cat.rpi.edu/~wen/ecse4962s04/ Don t Wait Until The Last Minute! You got
More informationControl of Manufacturing Processes
Control of Manufacturing Processes Subject 2.830 Spring 2004 Lecture #18 Basic Control Loop Analysis" April 15, 2004 Revisit Temperature Control Problem τ dy dt + y = u τ = time constant = gain y ss =
More informationDr Ian R. Manchester
Week Content Notes 1 Introduction 2 Frequency Domain Modelling 3 Transient Performance and the s-plane 4 Block Diagrams 5 Feedback System Characteristics Assign 1 Due 6 Root Locus 7 Root Locus 2 Assign
More information100 (s + 10) (s + 100) e 0.5s. s 100 (s + 10) (s + 100). G(s) =
1 AME 3315; Spring 215; Midterm 2 Review (not graded) Problems: 9.3 9.8 9.9 9.12 except parts 5 and 6. 9.13 except parts 4 and 5 9.28 9.34 You are given the transfer function: G(s) = 1) Plot the bode plot
More informationIC6501 CONTROL SYSTEMS
DHANALAKSHMI COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING CHENNAI DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING YEAR/SEMESTER: II/IV IC6501 CONTROL SYSTEMS UNIT I SYSTEMS AND THEIR REPRESENTATION 1. What is the mathematical
More informationCHBE320 LECTURE XI CONTROLLER DESIGN AND PID CONTOLLER TUNING. Professor Dae Ryook Yang
CHBE320 LECTURE XI CONTROLLER DESIGN AND PID CONTOLLER TUNING Professor Dae Ryook Yang Spring 2018 Dept. of Chemical and Biological Engineering 11-1 Road Map of the Lecture XI Controller Design and PID
More informationSchool of Mechanical Engineering Purdue University. ME375 Feedback Control - 1
Introduction to Feedback Control Control System Design Why Control? Open-Loop vs Closed-Loop (Feedback) Why Use Feedback Control? Closed-Loop Control System Structure Elements of a Feedback Control System
More informationAutomatic Control (TSRT15): Lecture 7
Automatic Control (TSRT15): Lecture 7 Tianshi Chen Division of Automatic Control Dept. of Electrical Engineering Email: tschen@isy.liu.se Phone: 13-282226 Office: B-house extrance 25-27 Outline 2 Feedforward
More informationControl System. Contents
Contents Chapter Topic Page Chapter- Chapter- Chapter-3 Chapter-4 Introduction Transfer Function, Block Diagrams and Signal Flow Graphs Mathematical Modeling Control System 35 Time Response Analysis of
More informationChapter 2. Classical Control System Design. Dutch Institute of Systems and Control
Chapter 2 Classical Control System Design Overview Ch. 2. 2. Classical control system design Introduction Introduction Steady-state Steady-state errors errors Type Type k k systems systems Integral Integral
More informationDiscrete Systems. Step response and pole locations. Mark Cannon. Hilary Term Lecture
Discrete Systems Mark Cannon Hilary Term 22 - Lecture 4 Step response and pole locations 4 - Review Definition of -transform: U() = Z{u k } = u k k k= Discrete transfer function: Y () U() = G() = Z{g k},
More informationDIGITAL CONTROLLER DESIGN
ECE4540/5540: Digital Control Systems 5 DIGITAL CONTROLLER DESIGN 5.: Direct digital design: Steady-state accuracy We have spent quite a bit of time discussing digital hybrid system analysis, and some
More informationTable of Laplacetransform
Appendix Table of Laplacetransform pairs 1(t) f(s) oct), unit impulse at t = 0 a, a constant or step of magnitude a at t = 0 a s t, a ramp function e- at, an exponential function s + a sin wt, a sine fun
More informationAlireza Mousavi Brunel University
Alireza Mousavi Brunel University 1 » Control Process» Control Systems Design & Analysis 2 Open-Loop Control: Is normally a simple switch on and switch off process, for example a light in a room is switched
More informationTopic # Feedback Control Systems
Topic #1 16.31 Feedback Control Systems Motivation Basic Linear System Response Fall 2007 16.31 1 1 16.31: Introduction r(t) e(t) d(t) y(t) G c (s) G(s) u(t) Goal: Design a controller G c (s) so that the
More informationMAS107 Control Theory Exam Solutions 2008
MAS07 CONTROL THEORY. HOVLAND: EXAM SOLUTION 2008 MAS07 Control Theory Exam Solutions 2008 Geir Hovland, Mechatronics Group, Grimstad, Norway June 30, 2008 C. Repeat question B, but plot the phase curve
More informationFEEDBACK CONTROL SYSTEMS
FEEDBAC CONTROL SYSTEMS. Control System Design. Open and Closed-Loop Control Systems 3. Why Closed-Loop Control? 4. Case Study --- Speed Control of a DC Motor 5. Steady-State Errors in Unity Feedback Control
More informationIMPROVED TECHNIQUE OF MULTI-STAGE COMPENSATION. K. M. Yanev A. Obok Opok
IMPROVED TECHNIQUE OF MULTI-STAGE COMPENSATION K. M. Yanev A. Obok Opok Considering marginal control systems, a useful technique, contributing to the method of multi-stage compensation is suggested. A
More informationControl Systems. EC / EE / IN. For
Control Systems For EC / EE / IN By www.thegateacademy.com Syllabus Syllabus for Control Systems Basic Control System Components; Block Diagrammatic Description, Reduction of Block Diagrams. Open Loop
More informationINTRODUCTION TO DIGITAL CONTROL
ECE4540/5540: Digital Control Systems INTRODUCTION TO DIGITAL CONTROL.: Introduction In ECE450/ECE550 Feedback Control Systems, welearnedhow to make an analog controller D(s) to control a linear-time-invariant
More informationIndex. Index. More information. in this web service Cambridge University Press
A-type elements, 4 7, 18, 31, 168, 198, 202, 219, 220, 222, 225 A-type variables. See Across variable ac current, 172, 251 ac induction motor, 251 Acceleration rotational, 30 translational, 16 Accumulator,
More informationBASIC PROPERTIES OF FEEDBACK
ECE450/550: Feedback Control Systems. 4 BASIC PROPERTIES OF FEEDBACK 4.: Setting up an example to benchmark controllers There are two basic types/categories of control systems: OPEN LOOP: Disturbance r(t)
More informationEC CONTROL SYSTEM UNIT I- CONTROL SYSTEM MODELING
EC 2255 - CONTROL SYSTEM UNIT I- CONTROL SYSTEM MODELING 1. What is meant by a system? It is an arrangement of physical components related in such a manner as to form an entire unit. 2. List the two types
More informationSystems Analysis and Control
Systems Analysis and Control Matthew M. Peet Illinois Institute of Technology Lecture : Different Types of Control Overview In this Lecture, you will learn: Limits of Proportional Feedback Performance
More informationExercise 1 (A Non-minimum Phase System)
Prof. Dr. E. Frazzoli 5-59- Control Systems I (HS 25) Solution Exercise Set Loop Shaping Noele Norris, 9th December 26 Exercise (A Non-minimum Phase System) To increase the rise time of the system, we
More informationSystems Analysis and Control
Systems Analysis and Control Matthew M. Peet Arizona State University Lecture 8: Response Characteristics Overview In this Lecture, you will learn: Characteristics of the Response Stability Real Poles
More informationChemical Process Dynamics and Control. Aisha Osman Mohamed Ahmed Department of Chemical Engineering Faculty of Engineering, Red Sea University
Chemical Process Dynamics and Control Aisha Osman Mohamed Ahmed Department of Chemical Engineering Faculty of Engineering, Red Sea University 1 Chapter 4 System Stability 2 Chapter Objectives End of this
More informationAutomatic Control 2. Loop shaping. Prof. Alberto Bemporad. University of Trento. Academic year
Automatic Control 2 Loop shaping Prof. Alberto Bemporad University of Trento Academic year 21-211 Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 2 Academic year 21-211 1 / 39 Feedback
More informationExercise 1 (A Non-minimum Phase System)
Prof. Dr. E. Frazzoli 5-59- Control Systems I (Autumn 27) Solution Exercise Set 2 Loop Shaping clruch@ethz.ch, 8th December 27 Exercise (A Non-minimum Phase System) To decrease the rise time of the system,
More informationPart IB Paper 6: Information Engineering LINEAR SYSTEMS AND CONTROL. Glenn Vinnicombe HANDOUT 5. An Introduction to Feedback Control Systems
Part IB Paper 6: Information Engineering LINEAR SYSTEMS AND CONTROL Glenn Vinnicombe HANDOUT 5 An Introduction to Feedback Control Systems ē(s) ȳ(s) Σ K(s) G(s) z(s) H(s) z(s) = H(s)G(s)K(s) L(s) ē(s)=
More informationChapter 2 SDOF Vibration Control 2.1 Transfer Function
Chapter SDOF Vibration Control.1 Transfer Function mx ɺɺ( t) + cxɺ ( t) + kx( t) = F( t) Defines the transfer function as output over input X ( s) 1 = G( s) = (1.39) F( s) ms + cs + k s is a complex number:
More informationSTABILITY. Have looked at modeling dynamic systems using differential equations. and used the Laplace transform to help find step and impulse
SIGNALS AND SYSTEMS: PAPER 3C1 HANDOUT 4. Dr David Corrigan 1. Electronic and Electrical Engineering Dept. corrigad@tcd.ie www.sigmedia.tv STABILITY Have looked at modeling dynamic systems using differential
More informationKINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING
KINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK SUB.NAME : CONTROL SYSTEMS BRANCH : ECE YEAR : II SEMESTER: IV 1. What is control system? 2. Define open
More informationControl Systems I. Lecture 6: Poles and Zeros. Readings: Emilio Frazzoli. Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control D-MAVT ETH Zürich
Control Systems I Lecture 6: Poles and Zeros Readings: Emilio Frazzoli Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control D-MAVT ETH Zürich October 27, 2017 E. Frazzoli (ETH) Lecture 6: Control Systems I 27/10/2017
More informationEE C128 / ME C134 Fall 2014 HW 6.2 Solutions. HW 6.2 Solutions
EE C28 / ME C34 Fall 24 HW 6.2 Solutions. PI Controller For the system G = K (s+)(s+3)(s+8) HW 6.2 Solutions in negative feedback operating at a damping ratio of., we are going to design a PI controller
More informationRoot Locus Design Example #3
Root Locus Design Example #3 A. Introduction The system represents a linear model for vertical motion of an underwater vehicle at zero forward speed. The vehicle is assumed to have zero pitch and roll
More informationLaplace Transform Part 1: Introduction (I&N Chap 13)
Laplace Transform Part 1: Introduction (I&N Chap 13) Definition of the L.T. L.T. of Singularity Functions L.T. Pairs Properties of the L.T. Inverse L.T. Convolution IVT(initial value theorem) & FVT (final
More informationProcess Control & Instrumentation (CH 3040)
First-order systems Process Control & Instrumentation (CH 3040) Arun K. Tangirala Department of Chemical Engineering, IIT Madras January - April 010 Lectures: Mon, Tue, Wed, Fri Extra class: Thu A first-order
More informationCourse roadmap. Step response for 2nd-order system. Step response for 2nd-order system
ME45: Control Systems Lecture Time response of nd-order systems Prof. Clar Radcliffe and Prof. Jongeun Choi Department of Mechanical Engineering Michigan State University Modeling Laplace transform Transfer
More information7.2 Controller tuning from specified characteristic polynomial
192 Finn Haugen: PID Control 7.2 Controller tuning from specified characteristic polynomial 7.2.1 Introduction The subsequent sections explain controller tuning based on specifications of the characteristic
More informationSoftware Engineering 3DX3. Slides 8: Root Locus Techniques
Software Engineering 3DX3 Slides 8: Root Locus Techniques Dr. Ryan Leduc Department of Computing and Software McMaster University Material based on Control Systems Engineering by N. Nise. c 2006, 2007
More informationCHAPTER 1 Basic Concepts of Control System. CHAPTER 6 Hydraulic Control System
CHAPTER 1 Basic Concepts of Control System 1. What is open loop control systems and closed loop control systems? Compare open loop control system with closed loop control system. Write down major advantages
More informationECE317 : Feedback and Control
ECE317 : Feedback and Control Lecture : Routh-Hurwitz stability criterion Examples Dr. Richard Tymerski Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering Portland State University 1 Course roadmap Modeling
More informationECE317 : Feedback and Control
ECE317 : Feedback and Control Lecture : Steady-state error Dr. Richard Tymerski Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering Portland State University 1 Course roadmap Modeling Analysis Design Laplace
More informationControls Problems for Qualifying Exam - Spring 2014
Controls Problems for Qualifying Exam - Spring 2014 Problem 1 Consider the system block diagram given in Figure 1. Find the overall transfer function T(s) = C(s)/R(s). Note that this transfer function
More informationDynamic System Response. Dynamic System Response K. Craig 1
Dynamic System Response Dynamic System Response K. Craig 1 Dynamic System Response LTI Behavior vs. Non-LTI Behavior Solution of Linear, Constant-Coefficient, Ordinary Differential Equations Classical
More informationLinear State Feedback Controller Design
Assignment For EE5101 - Linear Systems Sem I AY2010/2011 Linear State Feedback Controller Design Phang Swee King A0033585A Email: king@nus.edu.sg NGS/ECE Dept. Faculty of Engineering National University
More informationCHAPTER 10: STABILITY &TUNING
When I complete this chapter, I want to be able to do the following. Determine the stability of a process without control Determine the stability of a closed-loop feedback control system Use these approaches
More informationCh 14: Feedback Control systems
Ch 4: Feedback Control systems Part IV A is concerned with sinle loop control The followin topics are covered in chapter 4: The concept of feedback control Block diaram development Classical feedback controllers
More informationClassify a transfer function to see which order or ramp it can follow and with which expected error.
Dr. J. Tani, Prof. Dr. E. Frazzoli 5-059-00 Control Systems I (Autumn 208) Exercise Set 0 Topic: Specifications for Feedback Systems Discussion: 30.. 208 Learning objectives: The student can grizzi@ethz.ch,
More informationAPPLICATIONS FOR ROBOTICS
Version: 1 CONTROL APPLICATIONS FOR ROBOTICS TEX d: Feb. 17, 214 PREVIEW We show that the transfer function and conditions of stability for linear systems can be studied using Laplace transforms. Table
More informationD(s) G(s) A control system design definition
R E Compensation D(s) U Plant G(s) Y Figure 7. A control system design definition x x x 2 x 2 U 2 s s 7 2 Y Figure 7.2 A block diagram representing Eq. (7.) in control form z U 2 s z Y 4 z 2 s z 2 3 Figure
More informationFirst-Order Low-Pass Filter
Filters, Cost Functions, and Controller Structures Robert Stengel Optimal Control and Estimation MAE 546 Princeton University, 218! Dynamic systems as low-pass filters! Frequency response of dynamic systems!
More informationHomework 7 - Solutions
Homework 7 - Solutions Note: This homework is worth a total of 48 points. 1. Compensators (9 points) For a unity feedback system given below, with G(s) = K s(s + 5)(s + 11) do the following: (c) Find the
More informationIterative Controller Tuning Using Bode s Integrals
Iterative Controller Tuning Using Bode s Integrals A. Karimi, D. Garcia and R. Longchamp Laboratoire d automatique, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), 05 Lausanne, Switzerland. email: alireza.karimi@epfl.ch
More informationMASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Mechanical Engineering 2.04A Systems and Controls Spring 2013
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Mechanical Engineering 2.04A Systems and Controls Spring 2013 Problem Set #4 Posted: Thursday, Mar. 7, 13 Due: Thursday, Mar. 14, 13 1. Sketch the Root
More informationCHAPTER 7 STEADY-STATE RESPONSE ANALYSES
CHAPTER 7 STEADY-STATE RESPONSE ANALYSES 1. Introduction The steady state error is a measure of system accuracy. These errors arise from the nature of the inputs, system type and from nonlinearities of
More informationQFT Framework for Robust Tuning of Power System Stabilizers
45-E-PSS-75 QFT Framework for Robust Tuning of Power System Stabilizers Seyyed Mohammad Mahdi Alavi, Roozbeh Izadi-Zamanabadi Department of Control Engineering, Aalborg University, Denmark Correspondence
More information(a) Find the transfer function of the amplifier. Ans.: G(s) =
126 INTRDUCTIN T CNTR ENGINEERING 10( s 1) (a) Find the transfer function of the amplifier. Ans.: (. 02s 1)(. 001s 1) (b) Find the expected percent overshoot for a step input for the closed-loop system
More informationFrequency Response Techniques
4th Edition T E N Frequency Response Techniques SOLUTION TO CASE STUDY CHALLENGE Antenna Control: Stability Design and Transient Performance First find the forward transfer function, G(s). Pot: K 1 = 10
More informationLecture 12. Upcoming labs: Final Exam on 12/21/2015 (Monday)10:30-12:30
289 Upcoming labs: Lecture 12 Lab 20: Internal model control (finish up) Lab 22: Force or Torque control experiments [Integrative] (2-3 sessions) Final Exam on 12/21/2015 (Monday)10:30-12:30 Today: Recap
More informationC(s) R(s) 1 C(s) C(s) C(s) = s - T. Ts + 1 = 1 s - 1. s + (1 T) Taking the inverse Laplace transform of Equation (5 2), we obtain
analyses of the step response, ramp response, and impulse response of the second-order systems are presented. Section 5 4 discusses the transient-response analysis of higherorder systems. Section 5 5 gives
More informationEE C128 / ME C134 Fall 2014 HW 8 - Solutions. HW 8 - Solutions
EE C28 / ME C34 Fall 24 HW 8 - Solutions HW 8 - Solutions. Transient Response Design via Gain Adjustment For a transfer function G(s) = in negative feedback, find the gain to yield a 5% s(s+2)(s+85) overshoot
More informationQuanser NI-ELVIS Trainer (QNET) Series: QNET Experiment #02: DC Motor Position Control. DC Motor Control Trainer (DCMCT) Student Manual
Quanser NI-ELVIS Trainer (QNET) Series: QNET Experiment #02: DC Motor Position Control DC Motor Control Trainer (DCMCT) Student Manual Table of Contents 1 Laboratory Objectives1 2 References1 3 DCMCT Plant
More informationLecture 7:Time Response Pole-Zero Maps Influence of Poles and Zeros Higher Order Systems and Pole Dominance Criterion
Cleveland State University MCE441: Intr. Linear Control Lecture 7:Time Influence of Poles and Zeros Higher Order and Pole Criterion Prof. Richter 1 / 26 First-Order Specs: Step : Pole Real inputs contain
More informationSolutions for Tutorial 10 Stability Analysis
Solutions for Tutorial 1 Stability Analysis 1.1 In this question, you will analyze the series of three isothermal CSTR s show in Figure 1.1. The model for each reactor is the same at presented in Textbook
More informationCascade Control of a Continuous Stirred Tank Reactor (CSTR)
Journal of Applied and Industrial Sciences, 213, 1 (4): 16-23, ISSN: 2328-4595 (PRINT), ISSN: 2328-469 (ONLINE) Research Article Cascade Control of a Continuous Stirred Tank Reactor (CSTR) 16 A. O. Ahmed
More informationFATIMA MICHAEL COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY
FATIMA MICHAEL COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY Senkottai Village, Madurai Sivagangai Main Road, Madurai - 625 020. An ISO 9001:2008 Certified Institution DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION
More informationAMME3500: System Dynamics & Control
Stefan B. Williams May, 211 AMME35: System Dynamics & Control Assignment 4 Note: This assignment contributes 15% towards your final mark. This assignment is due at 4pm on Monday, May 3 th during Week 13
More informationControl System (ECE411) Lectures 13 & 14
Control System (ECE411) Lectures 13 & 14, Professor Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Colorado State University Fall 2016 Steady-State Error Analysis Remark: For a unity feedback system
More informationDue Wednesday, February 6th EE/MFS 599 HW #5
Due Wednesday, February 6th EE/MFS 599 HW #5 You may use Matlab/Simulink wherever applicable. Consider the standard, unity-feedback closed loop control system shown below where G(s) = /[s q (s+)(s+9)]
More information