Fidelity and Metrics of quantum states
|
|
- Edwin Garrett
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Fidelity and Metrics of quantum states Zhi-Hao Ma, Fu-Lin Zhang, Jing-Ling Chen arxiv: v [quant-ph] ov 008 Abstract Fidelity plays an important role in quantum information theory. In this paper, two pairs of metrics of quantum states are introduced based on the Uhlmann-Jozsa fidelity and super-fidelity. They are proved to satisfy the axioms of metrics and return to the Sine metric and Bures metric for the qubit case. The CP expansive property and convex property of the metrics are studied. These metrics have deep connections with the known important metrics such as trace metric, Sine metric, Bures metric, and spectral metric, and are useful to quantify entanglement. I. Background, problem, and result Suppose one has two quantum states ρ and σ, then the Uhlmann-Jozsa fidelity [] between ρ and σ is given by F(ρ, σ) = [Tr ρ σρ ]. Uhlmann-Jozsa fidelity plays an important role in quantum information theory and quantum computation [], []. We know that for the case of qubit, Uhlmann-Jozsa fidelity has a simple form. From the Bloch sphere representation of quantum states, a qubit is described by a density matrix as([3]): ρ(u) = (I + σ u), where I is the unit matrix and σ = (σ, σ, σ 3 ) are the Pauli matrices. Assume ρ(u) and ρ(v) are two states of one qubit, then they can represented by two vectors u and v in the Bloch sphere. The Uhlmann-Jozsa fidelity for qubits has an elegant form([4] and [5]): F(ρ(u), ρ(v)) = [ + u v + u v ], where u v is the inner product of two vectors u and v, and u is the magnitude of u. We know that for quantum states, the Uhlmann- Jozsa fidelity has no simple form like the case of qubits. To use the simple form of fidelity, we note that in [6], the authors introduce a new fidelity, called super-fidelity, and proved that Uhlmann-Jozsa fidelity can be bounded above by the super-fidelity G(ρ, ρ ): F(ρ, ρ ) G(ρ, ρ ) := Trρ ρ +. ( Trρ )( Trρ ) Zhi-Hao Ma was in Department of Mathematics, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, 0040, China( mazhihao@sjtu.edu.cn), Lin-Fu Zhang, and Jing-Ling Chen were in Theoretical Physics Division, Chern Institute of Mathematics, ankai University, Tianjin, 30007, China ( chenjl@nankai.edu.cn). When ρ and ρ are two qubits, super-fidelity G(ρ, ρ ) coincides with Uhlmann-Jozsa fidelity F(ρ, ρ ). The super-fidelity G(ρ, ρ ) has some good properties. Let ρ u = (I + ( ) λ.u) be the density matrix of a qunit( quantum state), where I is the unit matrix, λ = (λ, λ,...λ ) are the generators of SU(), and u is the ( )-dimensional Bloch vector. Then super-fidelity is rewritten as G(ρ u, ρ v ) = [ + ( ) u.v + ( ) ( u )( v )]. This shows that super-fidelity only depends on the magnitudes of u, v and the angle between them(that is, u.v). Fidelity by itself is not a metric. It is a measure of the closeness of two states. As a metric defined on quantum states, d(x, y) is a function satisfies the following four axioms: (M). d(x, y) 0 for all states x and y; (M). d(x, y) = 0 if and only if x = y; (M3). d(x, y) = d(y, x) for all states x and y; (M4). The triangle inequality: d(x, y) d(x, z) + d(y, z) for all states x, y and z. One may expect that a metric, which is a measure of distance, can be built up from fidelity. Indeed, the following three functions A(ρ, σ) := arccos F(ρ, σ), B(ρ, σ) := F(ρ, σ), C(ρ, σ) := F(ρ, σ), exhibit such metric properties. They are now commonly known in the literature as the Bures angle, the Bures metric, and the Sine metric ([7],[8], [9]), respectively. For super-fidelity, one can define the metric as ([6],[0]): D M (ρ, ρ ) = G(ρ, ρ ). It was proved in [6] and [0] that D M (ρ, ρ ) is a genuine distance. So we know that based on fidelity or super-fidelity, one can generally define a metric D(ρ, σ) as D(ρ, σ) := φ(f(ρ, σ)) (or D(ρ, σ) := φ(g(ρ, σ))), where φ(t) is a monotonically decreasing function of t, and D(ρ, σ) is required to satisfy the axioms M-M4. From this way, one can define many useful metrics. All of the above metrics belong to this type and play important roles in quantum information theory. The purpose of this paper is to introduce a new way to define metric of quantum states based on fidelity. In Sec. II, the new metric is defined. We study the qubit case in detail and naturally connect the new metric with the well-known trace metric, the Sine metric and Bures metric. In Sec. III, we show that the new metric defined is truly a metric, i.e.,
2 it satisfies the axioms M-M4. The upper bound for the metric is also presented. In Sec.IV, we discussed the properties of the metrics, such as CP expansive property and convex property. Conclusions are made in the last section. II. Metric induced by Uhlmann-Jozsa fidelity Let us define a metric of quantum states as follows: D T (ρ, σ) = max F(ρ, ) F(σ, ), () where the maximization is taken over all quantum states (mixed or pure). We call this metric D T (ρ, σ) as the T- metric, and denote the state that attained the maximal as the optimal state for the metric D T (ρ, σ). ote that the T-metric was first introduced in [] for pure sates of an abstract transition probability space, here T means transition probability. In this paper, we define it for arbitrary quantum states in the Hilbert space. The above definition of metric is interesting: we know that fidelity is a measure of the closeness of two states, usually, if we want to get a distance for state ρ, σ from fidelity, we use a composition of a monotonically decreasing function and the fidelity F(ρ, σ), e.g.,define metric as C(ρ, σ) := F(ρ, σ), this definition uses the fidelity of ρ and σ directly. Our definition, however, does not use the fidelity F(ρ, σ) directly, we need a bridge state, and the metric D T (ρ, σ) is the biggest difference between the two fidelity F(ρ, ) and F(σ, ), this definition may has some clear geometrical meaning, and we leave as a further topic. On the other hand, our metric may be not easy to calculate. But we know when is a pure state, the Uhlmann-Jozsa fidelity can be simplified as F(ρ, ) = Tr(ρ), hence one can define another version of metric as follows: D PT (ρ, σ) = max F(ρ, ) F(σ, ), () where the maximization is taken over all pure states. We call this metric as the PT-metric, and call the pure state that attained the maximal as the optimal pure state. Also, we can define metric from super-fidelity. Define a metric as follows: D G (ρ, σ) = max G(ρ, ) G(σ, ). (3) where the maximization is taken over all quantum states. We call this metric as the G-metric. And call the state that attained the maximal as the optimal state. Similarly, we can define a metric as follows: D PG (ρ, σ) = max G(ρ, ) G(σ, ) (4) where the maximization is taken over all pure states. We call the metric D PG (ρ, σ) as PG-metric. And call the state that attained the maximal as the optimal pure state. In this section, we consider the case of qubits (twodimensional quantum system). Then we have the following Theorems. Theorem. For the qubit case, D PT (ρ(u), ρ(v)) equals to the trace metric, namely, D PT (ρ(u), ρ(v)) = u v = D tr (ρ(u), ρ(v)). Proof. Let ρ = ρ(u), σ = ρ(v) and = ρ(w), since is a pure state, which means w =, then we get F(ρ, ) F(σ, ) = (u v) w u v. The optimal pure state is = ρ(w), where w is a vector that parallels to u v. Thus D PT (ρ(u), ρ(v)) = u v = D tr (ρ(u), ρ(v)). Theorem. For the qubit case, D T (ρ(u), ρ(v)) equals to the Sine metric, namely, D T (ρ, σ) = F(ρ, σ) = C(ρ, σ). Proof. Let ρ = ρ(u), σ = ρ(v) and = ρ(w), then one obtains F(ρ, ) F(σ, ) = (u v) w + w ( u v ) [ u v w + w u ] v u v + u v = F(ρ(u), ρ(v)). The optimal state is = ρ(w), where w is a vector that u v parallels to u v, and w =. Thus we F(ρ(u),ρ(v)) have D T (ρ, σ) = F(ρ, σ) = C(ρ, σ). This significant result seems surprising, since we know that F(ρ, σ) is the Sine metric introduced in ([7],[8], [9]), which plays an important role in quantum information processing ([7],[8], [9]), but here we can recover it for the qubit case through the definition (). One may wonder whether the Bures metric can be obtained by the similar definition. The answer is positive. By using the same approach developed in Theorem, for the qubit case one can prove that Bures metric B(ρ, σ) := F(ρ, σ) can be expressed in the following equivalent form B(ρ, σ) = max [ + F(ρ, ) F(σ, ) F(ρ, ) F(σ, ) ], (5) where the maximization is taken over all quantum states. Since for qubits, Uhlmann-Jozsa fidelity coincides with super-fidelity. We get that for qubits, metric D PG (ρ, σ) equal the trace metric and metric D G (ρ, σ) equal the sine metric. III. Metric character of D T and D PT We come to discuss the case of qunit( density matrix). In this case, if is a pure state, then the Uhlmann-
3 3 Jozsa fidelity may have a simple form: F(ρ, ) = Tr(ρ), so we first show the metric character of D PT (ρ, σ), where the optimal state is restricted to pure state, and then turn to show the metric character of D T (ρ, σ). We need the following concepts: For two quantum state ρ and σ, let λ i, (i =,, 3,..., d), be all eigenvalues of ρ σ, and λ i s are arranged as λ λ... λ d. Similarly, let λ i be all eigenvalues of σ ρ. Define E(ρ, σ) := max λ i and define E(σ, ρ) := maxλ i, so we know that λ = max λ i. ow we give an interpretation of E(ρ, σ). Proposition. Let ρ and σ be two quantum states. The following hold: E(ρ, σ) = maxtr(p(ρ σ), (6) P where the maximization is taken over all pure states P. Proof. We can diagonal ρ σ as Tr[(ρ σ)p] = Tr[(U(ρ σ)u + UPU + )] = Tr(DP ), where D is a diagonal matrix, and satisfy U(ρ σ)u + = D [since P is an arbitrary pure state, in the following we still denote Tr(DP ) as Tr(DP)]. Suppose P = ψ ψ, then we get Tr[(ρ σ)p] = Tr(DP) = ψ D ψ, assume ψ = α i i, then we get Tr[(ρ σ)p] = i α i λ i λ. This ends the proof. ote that generally E(ρ, σ) is not a metric, since E(ρ, σ) may not equal to E(σ, ρ), but we can symmetrize it as: D S (ρ, σ) := max[e(ρ, σ), E(σ, ρ)] = max λ i, (7) where λ i is the absolute value of λ i. From the knowledge of matrix analysis, D S (ρ, σ) equals to the spectral metric between ρ and σ, which was defined as the largest singular value of ρ σ, hence we know that D S (ρ, σ) is nothing but the spectral metric. For the qubit case, the D S (ρ, σ) or the spectral metric is also equal to the trace metric, i.e., D S (ρ(u), ρ(v)) = u v. ow we show the metric character of D PT (ρ, σ). Proposition. For states ρ, σ, we have D PT (ρ, σ) = D S (ρ, σ), i.e, the PT-metric we studied is in fact the same as the spectral metric. Proof. From definition, D PT (ρ, σ) = max F(ρ, ) F(σ, ), since z is an arbitrary pure state, we have F(ρ, ) = Tr(ρ). It yields F(ρ, ) F(σ, ) = Tr(ρ) Tr(σ), then we get max Tr(ρ) Tr(σ) = max(e(ρ, σ), E(σ, ρ)) = D S (ρ, σ). The Proposition is proved. ow we know that the PT-metric equals to the spectral metric, so it is a true metric. In the following we shall prove that the T-metric is also a true metric. Proposition 3. The T-metric D T (ρ, σ) as shown in Eq. () is truly a metric, i.e, it satisfies conditions M-M4. Proof. From definition, it is easy to prove conditions M and M3 hold. What we need to do is to prove conditions M and M4. If ρ = σ, then of course D T (ρ, σ) = 0. If D T (ρ, σ) = 0, we will prove ρ = σ. From the definition, we know that D T (ρ, σ) D PT (ρ, σ), so we get D PT (ρ, σ) = 0, since D PT (ρ, σ) is a true metric, we get ρ = σ. ow we come to prove M4, the triangle inequality D T (ρ, σ) D T (ρ, ) + D T (σ, ). D T (ρ, σ) = max F(ρ, ) F(σ, ), and suppose is the state that attains the maximal, so D T (ρ, σ) = F(ρ, ) F(σ, ). We assume that F(ρ, ) F(σ, ) = F(ρ, ) F(σ, ), then we get F(ρ, ) F(σ, ) = F(ρ, ) F(w, )+F(w, ) F(σ, ) F(ρ, ) F(w, ) + F(w, ) F(σ, ) D T (ρ, w)+d T (w, σ). Thus one finally has D T (ρ, σ) D T (ρ, w) + D T (σ, w). Proof finished. It is easy to prove that the PG-metric equal to the PTmetric, so we know that the PG-metric is nothing but the spectral metric, so it is a true metric, and we can prove that the G-metric is also a true metric, i.e, it satisfies conditions M-M4. The method is the same as that of Proposition 3. IV. Super-fidelity and related Metrics We have proved that T-metric is a true metric, but this definition is not operational, because it uses taking maximal for all states, so we need an operational form of the metric. We know that for qubits, it has a clear form as: D T (ρ, σ) = F(ρ, σ), how about higher dimension? For the qunit case, one does not have the relation D T (ρ, σ) = F(ρ, σ) as in Theorem. However, the numerical computation indicates the following upper bound holds: D T (ρ, σ) F(ρ, σ). (8) ow we will give the rigorous proof: as was shown in [7], such an inequality holds: F(ρ, ) F(σ, ) F(ρ, σ) (9) for arbitrary quantum states ρ, σ,. Taking maximal in the left hand of inequality (9), we get the inequality (8). How about G-metric? Like the proof of lemma, we can expect the following holds: For qunits ρ(u) and ρ(v), D G (ρ(u), ρ(v)) = G(ρ(u), ρ(v)). ( ) The proof is the following: Let ρ = ρ(u), σ = ρ(v) and = ρ(w), then one obtains G(ρ, ) G(σ, ) = (u v) w + w ( u v ) [ u v w + w u ] v = ( ) = G(ρ(u), ρ(v)). u v + u v (0) [ u.v u v ] The optimal state is = ρ(w), where w is a vector that parallels to u v, and w = u v. G(ρ(u),ρ(v))
4 4 The above proof seems to be correct, but is is not solid. In fact, we know that D G (ρ, σ) = max G(ρ, ) G(σ, ) range from 0 to, since G(ρ, ) and G(σ, ) are all range ( ) from 0 to, but G(ρ(u), ρ(v)) range from ( ) 0 to, which is a contraction. The reason is subtle. When the maximal attained, i.e., ( ) D G (ρ, σ) = G(ρ(u), ρ(v)), we need that the inequality (0) becomes quality, that means the optimal state = ρ(w) is attained, where w is a vector that parallels to u v, and w = u v, but in G(ρ(u),ρ(v)) fact we can not always get such optimal state. Because such an operator may not be a density operator! It is well known that every density matrix can be represented by the ( )-dimensional Bloch vector as: ρ(u) = (I + ( ) λ.u), but the converse is not true, i.e., not all operator of the form (I + ( ) λ.u) is a density matrix, where u is an arbitrary ( )- dimensional Bloch vector. ote that a density matrix must satisfy three conditions: (a). Trace unity, Tr(ρ(u)) =. (b) Hermitian, ρ(u) = ρ(u); and (c). positivity, i.e., all eigenvalues of ρ(u) are non-negative. Indeed, the operator (I + ( ) λ.u) automatically satisfies the conditions (a) and (b). However, not every vector u, u, allows ρ(u) satisfies the positive condition (c), we only know that when u, ρ(u) is always a density operator, see([4]). To get that inequality (0) becomes equality, we need that the optimal state = ρ(w) is a density matrix, where w is a vector that parallels to u v, and w = u v G(ρ(u),ρ(v)), but this is not always true in general. So we can only get the following relation holds: ( ) D G (ρ, σ) G(ρ, σ). () The following counterexample will show that strictly inequality will occur. Example. Let ψ = , φ = Define ρ = ψ ψ, σ = φ φ, then we know that ρ, σ are all pure states, it is easy to prove that in this case D G (ρ, σ) = D PT (ρ, σ) = D S (ρ, σ) =, while (3) 4 G(ρ, σ) = 3 8 >. For the operational form of D G (ρ, σ) for general states, we leave as a further topic. Suppose d(ρ, σ) is a distance on quantum states, we wish that this distance has some useful properties, such as the following: (P.) Unitary invariance: d(ρ, ρ ) = d(uρ U, Uρ U ), for any unitary operator U. (P.) Convex: for all 0 λ, states ρ, ρ, σ, σ, d(λρ + ( λ)ρ, σ) λd(ρ, σ) + ( λ)d(ρ, σ). A stronger version of P is the following: (P.) Joint Convex: for all 0 λ, states ρ, ρ, σ, σ, d(λρ + ( λ)ρ, λσ + ( λ)σ ) λd(ρ, σ ) + ( λ)d(ρ, σ ). In quantum information theory, a quantum operation or a quantum channel is representated by a completely positive trace preserving (CPT) map. We wish that a metric function is contractive under CPT map, this lead the following: (P3.) CP non-expansive property: suppose φ is a completely positive trace preserving (CPT) map, ρ, σ are two density matrices, then the following inequality holds: d(φ(ρ), φ(σ)) d(ρ, σ). We know that the super-fidelity G(ρ, σ) is a good fidelity measure. Recently, we find the deep connection between super-fidelity and concurrence([]). Also, super-fidelity has the following appealing properties([6]): i ) Bounds: 0 G(ρ, ρ ). ii ) Symmetry: G(ρ, ρ ) = G(ρ, ρ ). iii ) Unitary invariance: G(ρ, ρ ) = G(Uρ U, Uρ U ), for any unitary operator U. iv ) Concavity: super fidelity is concave, that is for states ρ, σ, σ and λ [0, ]. G(ρ, λσ + ( λ)σ ) λg(ρ, σ ) + ( λ)g(ρ, σ ). v ) Properties of the tensor product: Super fidelity is super multiplicative, that is, for states ρ, ρ, σ, σ G(ρ ρ, σ σ ) G(ρ, σ )G(ρ, σ ) We know that the Uhlmann-Jozsa fidelity F(ρ, σ) has the CP expansive property, that is the following: If ρ and σ are density matrices, Φ is a CPT map, then F(Φ(ρ), Φ(σ)) F(ρ, σ). We may guess that if super-fidelity has the CP expansive property, the following counterexample shows that this property does not holds. Example ([0]). Let A = , B = , Define Φ(γ) = AγA + +BγB +, where γ is an arbitrary density operator, then we defined a completely positive trace preserving map. Let ρ and σ be the density operators defined by ρ = , σ = ,
5 5 Then Φ(ρ) = 0 0 0, Φ(σ) = 0 0 0, One then easily obtains G(ρ, σ) > G(Φ(ρ), Φ(σ)), which shows that the CP expansive property property does not hold for super-fidelity. It is interesting to note that this example was first appear in [3] to show that the Hilbert- Schmidt metric is not contractive under quantum operation. Based on super-fidelity, one can define the metric as ([6],[0]): D M (ρ, ρ ) = G(ρ, ρ ). it was proved in [6] and [0] that D M (ρ, ρ ) is a genuine distance. The example shows that D M (ρ, ρ ) does not satisfying the CP non-expansive property. However, based on super-fidelity, we can also define another two metrics, the G-metric and PG-metric. Do the two metrics have the CP non-expansive property? Let us first consider the PG-metric. We know that PGmetric is in fact the spectral metric, and it was proved in [4] that the spectral metric is contractive under quantum operation. ow we will give a simple proof for this. Proposition 4.(contractive of the PG-metric): The PGmetric D PG (ρ, σ) has the CP non-expansive property. Proof. Let us denote M n as the set of all matrices, M n becomes a Hilbert space with inner product < X, Y >:= Tr(XY ), X, Y M n A linear map T induces its adjoint map as: < T(X), Y >=< X, T Y >. If φ is a positive map, then the adjoint map φ is also a positive map. The trace preserving property of φ means that φ is unital, that is, φ (I) = I. ow suppose γ is the optimal pure state for quantum states φ(ρ), φ(σ), so we get D PG (φ(ρ), φ(σ)) = G(φ(ρ), γ) G(φ(σ), γ). = (Trφ(ρ)γ) (Trφ(σ)γ). Let γ = φ (γ). Then we have Theorem is proved. D PG (φ(ρ), φ(σ)) = (Trφ(ρ)γ) (Trφ(σ)γ) = (Trρφ (γ)) (Trσφ (γ)) = (Trργ ) (Trσγ ) D PG (ρ, σ) Proposition 5. (joint convexity of the PG-metric): Let {p i } be probability distributions over an index set, let ρ i and σ i be density operators with the indices from the same index set. Then D PG ( i p i ρ i, i p i σ i ) i p i D PG (ρ i, σ i ) We know that D PG (ρ, σ) = D S (ρ, σ) = max(e(ρ, σ), E(σ, ρ)), so we only need to prove the following holds: E( i p i ρ i, i p i σ i ) i p i E(ρ i, σ i ) since E(ρ, σ) = max Tr(γ(ρ σ)), where the maximization γ in the right hand is taken over all pure states γ, then there exists a pure state γ such that E( i p i ρ i, i p i σ i ) = i The proof is complete. p i Tr(γ(ρ i σ i )) i p i E(ρ i, σ i ). Let us see how about the G-metric? Using example, we get D G (ρ, σ) = max G(ρ, ) G(σ, ) = max Tr(ρ σ) + Tr ( Trρ Trσ ) = max Tr(ρ σ) =, while D G(Φ(ρ), Φ(σ)) = max Tr(Φ(ρ) Φ(σ)) =, this example shows that D G (ρ, σ) D G (Φ(ρ), Φ(σ)). So we get that the CP non-expansive property Fails for the G-matric D G (ρ, σ). The numerical method show that the T-metric and the G-metric D T (ρ, σ) = max F(ρ, ) F(σ, ) D G (ρ, σ) = max G(ρ, ) G(σ, ) both satisfying the CP non-expansive property. And how about the convex property? We find that, neither of the metrics D T and D G are convex, however, numerical experiment shows that their square are convex, that is mean, the following convex property holds: D T((λρ + ( λ)ρ ), σ) λd T(ρ, σ) + ( λ)d T(ρ, σ) D G((λρ + ( λ)ρ ), σ) λd G(ρ, σ) + ( λ)d G(ρ, σ) V. Conclusions In this paper, we give a new method to get metrics from fidelity. This method is remarkable different from the usual method. We first define new metric D T from Uhlmann- Jozsa fidelity and metric D G from the super-fidelity. For qubits case, the two metrics coincides with Sine metric. Then properties of both metrics are discussed. We find that they are all contractive under quantum operations, and their square are convex, these show that the two metrics are all good candidates for geometrical entanglement measure. ow we give an application for the metrics D T and D G. ote that there are many entanglement measures, one of them is the geometrical measure. Its idea is based on the following: The set of all separable states is a convex set, denoted as S, the geometrical entanglement measure is defined as the minimal distance of the state ρ to any state of S: E(ρ) = min D(ρ, σ). σ S
6 6 It was showed that for the entanglement measure defined as above to be a good entanglement measure, the distance D(ρ, σ) need verify the following properties[6]: (a). D(ρ σ) 0 and D(ρ ρ) = 0. (b). D(ε(ρ) ε(σ)) D(ρ σ) for any CPT map ε. Our metrics D T and D G satisfying the above conditions, so we can introduce two new entanglement measures by or E(ρ) = min σ (D T (ρ, σ)) E(ρ) = min σ (D G (ρ, σ)) Where D T (ρ, σ)(res.d G (ρ, σ)) is the T-metric (res.gmetric), and the infimum is taken over all separable states. Acknowledgments This work is supported by the ew teacher Foundation of Ministry of Education of P.R.China (Grant o ). J.L.C is supported in part by SF of China (Grant o ), and Program for ew Century Excellent Talents in University, and the Projectsponsored by SRF for ROCS, SEM. References [] A. Uhlmann, The transition probability in the state space of a *-algebra Rep. Math. Phys., 9, 73 (976). [] R. Jozsa, Fidelity for Mixed Quantum States J. Mod. Opt., 4, 35(994); B. Schumacher, Quantum coding Phys. Rev. A, 5, 738 (995). X. B. Wang, C. H. Oh, and L. C. Kwek, Bures fidelity of displaced squeezed thermal states Phys. Rev. A,58, 486 (998); X. Wang, Z. Sun, and Z. D. Wang, Operator fidelity susceptibility: an indicator of quantum criticality arxiv: [3] Michael A. ielsen, Isaac Chuang. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. [4] J. L. Chen, L. Fu, A. A. Ungar, X. G. Zhao, Alternative fidelity measure between two states of an -state quantum system Phys. Rev. A, 65, (00). [5] J. L. Chen, L. Fu, A. A. Ungar, X. G. Zhao, Geometric observation for Bures fidelity between two states of a qubit Phys. Rev. A, 65, 04303(00). [6] J.A.Miszczak, Z. Pucha la, P.Horodecki, A.Uhlmann, K. Życzkowski, Sub and super fidelity as bounds for quantum fidelity arxiv: [7] A.E. Rastegin, Sine distance for quantum states arxiv: quant-ph/060. [8] A.E. Rastegin, Relative error of state-dependent cloning Phys. Rev. A, 66, 04304(00). [9] A. Gilchrist,. K. Langford, and M. A. ielsen, Distance measures to compare real and ideal quantum processes Phys. Rev. A, 7, 0630(005). [0] Paulo E. M. F. Mendonca, R. d. J. apolitano, Marcelo A. Marchiolli, C. J. Foster, Yeong-Cherng Liang, An alternative fidelity measure for quantum states arxiv: v. [] J. G. F.Belinfante, Transition probability spaces J. Math. Phys, vol. 7, 85 9 (976). [] Zhihao Ma, Dong-Ling Deng, Fu-Lin Zhang, Jing-Ling Chen, Simple proof for the bounds of concurrence arxiv: [3] Masanao Ozawa,, Entanglement measures and the HilbertC- Schmidt distance Phys. Lett. A,68, 58 (000). [4] D.Garca, M. Wolf, D.Petz, M.Ruskai, Contractivity of positive and trace-preserving maps under L p norms J. Math. Phys, 47, [5] W.Bruzda, V.Cappellini, H.Sommers, K.Życzkowski, Random Quantum Operations arxiv: [6] V. Vedral, M. B. Plenio, M. A. Rippin, and P. L. Knight, Quantifying Entanglement Phys.Rev.Lett, 78, 75(997).
A Holevo-type bound for a Hilbert Schmidt distance measure
Journal of Quantum Information Science, 205, *,** Published Online **** 204 in SciRes. http://www.scirp.org/journal/**** http://dx.doi.org/0.4236/****.204.***** A Holevo-type bound for a Hilbert Schmidt
More informationEntanglement Measures and Monotones
Entanglement Measures and Monotones PHYS 500 - Southern Illinois University March 30, 2017 PHYS 500 - Southern Illinois University Entanglement Measures and Monotones March 30, 2017 1 / 11 Quantifying
More informationMP 472 Quantum Information and Computation
MP 472 Quantum Information and Computation http://www.thphys.may.ie/staff/jvala/mp472.htm Outline Open quantum systems The density operator ensemble of quantum states general properties the reduced density
More informationFidelity and fidelity susceptibility based on Hilbert-Schmidt inner product
. Article. Progress of Projects Supported by NSFC SCIENCE CHINA Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy September 01 Vol. 55 No. 9: 159 1534 doi: 10.1007/s11433-01-485-0 Fidelity and fidelity susceptibility based
More informationarxiv: v4 [quant-ph] 27 Dec 2015
Quantifying channels output similarity with applications to quantum control Lukasz Pawela 1 and Zbigniew Pucha la 1,2 arxiv:1412.8694v4 [quant-ph] 27 Dec 2015 1 Institute of Theoretical and Applied Informatics,
More informationMajorization-preserving quantum channels
Majorization-preserving quantum channels arxiv:1209.5233v2 [quant-ph] 15 Dec 2012 Lin Zhang Institute of Mathematics, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou 310018, PR China Abstract In this report, we give
More informationValerio Cappellini. References
CETER FOR THEORETICAL PHYSICS OF THE POLISH ACADEMY OF SCIECES WARSAW, POLAD RADOM DESITY MATRICES AD THEIR DETERMIATS 4 30 SEPTEMBER 5 TH SFB TR 1 MEETIG OF 006 I PRZEGORZAłY KRAKÓW Valerio Cappellini
More informationarxiv: v3 [quant-ph] 17 Nov 2014
REE From EOF Eylee Jung 1 and DaeKil Park 1, 1 Department of Electronic Engineering, Kyungnam University, Changwon 631-701, Korea Department of Physics, Kyungnam University, Changwon 631-701, Korea arxiv:1404.7708v3
More informationExperimentally feasible measures of distance between quantum operations
Quantum Inf Process DOI 10.1007/s11128-010-0166-1 Experimentally feasible measures of distance between quantum operations Zbigniew Puchała Jarosław Adam Miszczak Piotr Gawron Bartłomiej Gardas Received:
More informationIntroduction to quantum information processing
Introduction to quantum information processing Fidelity and other distance metrics Brad Lackey 3 November 2016 FIDELITY AND OTHER DISTANCE METRICS 1 of 17 OUTLINE 1 Noise channels 2 Fidelity 3 Trace distance
More informationEntropy in Classical and Quantum Information Theory
Entropy in Classical and Quantum Information Theory William Fedus Physics Department, University of California, San Diego. Entropy is a central concept in both classical and quantum information theory,
More informationSome Bipartite States Do Not Arise from Channels
Some Bipartite States Do Not Arise from Channels arxiv:quant-ph/0303141v3 16 Apr 003 Mary Beth Ruskai Department of Mathematics, Tufts University Medford, Massachusetts 0155 USA marybeth.ruskai@tufts.edu
More informationTransition Probability (Fidelity) and its Relatives
Transition Probability (Fidelity) and its Relatives Armin Uhlmann University of Leipzig, Institute for Theoretical Physics Abstract Transition Probability (fidelity) for pairs of density operators can
More informationThe Minimax Fidelity for Quantum Channels: Theory and Some Applications
The Minimax Fidelity for Quantum Channels: Theory and Some Applications Maxim Raginsky University of I!inois V.P. Belavkin, G.M. D Ariano and M. Raginsky Operational distance and fidelity for quantum channels
More informationQuantum Chaos and Nonunitary Dynamics
Quantum Chaos and Nonunitary Dynamics Karol Życzkowski in collaboration with W. Bruzda, V. Cappellini, H.-J. Sommers, M. Smaczyński Phys. Lett. A 373, 320 (2009) Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University,
More informationarxiv: v3 [quant-ph] 5 Jun 2015
Entanglement and swap of quantum states in two qubits Takaya Ikuto and Satoshi Ishizaka Graduate School of Integrated Arts and Sciences, Hiroshima University, Higashihiroshima, 739-8521, Japan (Dated:
More informationA fidelity measure for quantum channels
5 November 2001 Physics Letters A 290 (2001) 11 18 www.elsevier.com/locate/pla A fidelity measure for quantum channels Maxim Raginsky Center for Photonic Communication and Computing, Department of Electrical
More informationMultiplicativity of Maximal p Norms in Werner Holevo Channels for 1 < p 2
Multiplicativity of Maximal p Norms in Werner Holevo Channels for 1 < p 2 arxiv:quant-ph/0410063v1 8 Oct 2004 Nilanjana Datta Statistical Laboratory Centre for Mathematical Sciences University of Cambridge
More informationNullity of Measurement-induced Nonlocality. Yu Guo
Jul. 18-22, 2011, at Taiyuan. Nullity of Measurement-induced Nonlocality Yu Guo (Joint work with Pro. Jinchuan Hou) 1 1 27 Department of Mathematics Shanxi Datong University Datong, China guoyu3@yahoo.com.cn
More informationApplication of Structural Physical Approximation to Partial Transpose in Teleportation. Satyabrata Adhikari Delhi Technological University (DTU)
Application of Structural Physical Approximation to Partial Transpose in Teleportation Satyabrata Adhikari Delhi Technological University (DTU) Singlet fraction and its usefulness in Teleportation Singlet
More informationarxiv: v2 [quant-ph] 7 Apr 2014
Quantum Chernoff bound as a measure of efficiency of quantum cloning for mixed states arxiv:1404.0915v [quant-ph] 7 Apr 014 Iulia Ghiu Centre for Advanced Quantum Physics, Department of Physics, University
More informationEntanglement and Symmetry in Multiple-Qubit States: a geometrical approach
Entanglement and Symmetry in Multiple-Qubit States: a geometrical approach Gregg Jaeger Quantum Imaging Laboratory and College of General Studies Boston University, Boston MA 015 U. S. A. Abstract. The
More informationINSTITUT FOURIER. Quantum correlations and Geometry. Dominique Spehner
i f INSTITUT FOURIER Quantum correlations and Geometry Dominique Spehner Institut Fourier et Laboratoire de Physique et Modélisation des Milieux Condensés, Grenoble Outlines Entangled and non-classical
More informationPhysics 239/139 Spring 2018 Assignment 6
University of California at San Diego Department of Physics Prof. John McGreevy Physics 239/139 Spring 2018 Assignment 6 Due 12:30pm Monday, May 14, 2018 1. Brainwarmers on Kraus operators. (a) Check that
More informationQuantum Stochastic Maps and Frobenius Perron Theorem
Quantum Stochastic Maps and Frobenius Perron Theorem Karol Życzkowski in collaboration with W. Bruzda, V. Cappellini, H.-J. Sommers, M. Smaczyński Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University, Cracow,
More informationEstimation of Optimal Singlet Fraction (OSF) and Entanglement Negativity (EN)
Estimation of Optimal Singlet Fraction (OSF) and Entanglement Negativity (EN) Satyabrata Adhikari Delhi Technological University satyabrata@dtu.ac.in December 4, 2018 Satyabrata Adhikari (DTU) Estimation
More informationarxiv: v1 [quant-ph] 2 Nov 2018
Entanglement and Measurement-induced quantum correlation in Heisenberg spin models arxiv:1811.733v1 [quant-ph] 2 Nov 218 Abstract Indrajith V S, R. Muthuganesan, R. Sankaranarayanan Department of Physics,
More informationQuantum entanglement and symmetry
Journal of Physics: Conference Series Quantum entanglement and symmetry To cite this article: D Chrucisi and A Kossaowsi 2007 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 87 012008 View the article online for updates and enhancements.
More informationNumerical range and random matrices
Numerical range and random matrices Karol Życzkowski in collaboration with P. Gawron, J. Miszczak, Z. Pucha la (Gliwice), C. Dunkl (Virginia), J. Holbrook (Guelph), B. Collins (Ottawa) and A. Litvak (Edmonton)
More informationPrivate quantum subsystems and error correction
Private quantum subsystems and error correction Sarah Plosker Department of Mathematics and Computer Science Brandon University September 26, 2014 Outline 1 Classical Versus Quantum Setting Classical Setting
More informationEstimating entanglement in a class of N-qudit states
Estimating entanglement in a class of N-qudit states Sumiyoshi Abe 1,2,3 1 Physics Division, College of Information Science and Engineering, Huaqiao University, Xiamen 361021, China 2 Department of Physical
More informationMax-Planck-Institut für Mathematik in den Naturwissenschaften Leipzig
Max-Planc-Institut für Mathemati in den Naturwissenschaften Leipzig Uncertainty Relations Based on Sew Information with Quantum Memory by Zhi-Hao Ma, Zhi-Hua Chen, and Shao-Ming Fei Preprint no.: 4 207
More informationAverage Fidelity of Teleportation in Quantum Noise Channel
Commun. Theor. Phys. (Beijing, China) 45 (006) pp. 80 806 c International Academic Publishers Vol. 45, No. 5, May 15, 006 Average Fidelity of Teleportation in Quantum Noise Channel HAO Xiang, ZHANG Rong,
More informationMaximal Entanglement A New Measure of Entanglement
1 Maximal Entanglement A New Measure of Entanglement Salman Beigi School of Mathematics, Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences IPM, Tehran, Iran arxiv:1405.50v1 [quant-ph] 11 May 014 Abstract
More informationChapter 5. Density matrix formalism
Chapter 5 Density matrix formalism In chap we formulated quantum mechanics for isolated systems. In practice systems interect with their environnement and we need a description that takes this feature
More information1. Basic rules of quantum mechanics
1. Basic rules of quantum mechanics How to describe the states of an ideally controlled system? How to describe changes in an ideally controlled system? How to describe measurements on an ideally controlled
More informationLecture 4: Purifications and fidelity
CS 766/QIC 820 Theory of Quantum Information (Fall 2011) Lecture 4: Purifications and fidelity Throughout this lecture we will be discussing pairs of registers of the form (X, Y), and the relationships
More informationStructure of Unital Maps and the Asymptotic Quantum Birkhoff Conjecture. Peter Shor MIT Cambridge, MA Joint work with Anand Oza and Dimiter Ostrev
Structure of Unital Maps and the Asymptotic Quantum Birkhoff Conjecture Peter Shor MIT Cambridge, MA Joint work with Anand Oza and Dimiter Ostrev The Superposition Principle (Physicists): If a quantum
More informationarxiv:quant-ph/ v1 11 Nov 2005
On the SU() Parametrization of Qutrits arxiv:quant-ph/5v Nov 5 A. T. Bölükbaşı, T. Dereli Department of Physics, Koç University 445 Sarıyer, İstanbul, Turkey Abstract Parametrization of qutrits on the
More informationGeometry of Entanglement
Geometry of Entanglement Bachelor Thesis Group of Quantum Optics, Quantum Nanophysics and Quantum Information University of Vienna WS 21 2659 SE Seminar Quantenphysik I Supervising Professor: Ao. Univ.-Prof.
More informationarxiv: v1 [quant-ph] 3 Jan 2008
A paradigm for entanglement theory based on quantum communication Jonathan Oppenheim 1 1 Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge U.K. arxiv:0801.0458v1 [quant-ph]
More informationarxiv:quant-ph/ v1 27 Jul 2005
Negativity and Concurrence for two qutrits arxiv:quant-ph/57263v 27 Jul 25 Suranjana Rai and Jagdish R. Luthra ( ) Raitech, Tuscaloosa, AL 3545 ( ) Departamento de Física, Universidad de los Andes, A.A.
More informationSome applications of matrix inequalities in Rényi entropy
Some applications of matrix inequalities in Rényi entropy arxiv:608.03362v [math-ph] Aug 206 Hadi Reisizadeh, and S. Mahmoud Manjegani 2, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 2 Department
More informationAn Interpolation Problem by Completely Positive Maps and its. Quantum Cloning
An Interpolation Problem by Completely Positive Maps and its Application in Quantum Cloning College of Mathematics and Information Science, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi an, China, 710062 gzhihua@tom.com
More informationEntanglement Measures and Monotones Pt. 2
Entanglement Measures and Monotones Pt. 2 PHYS 500 - Southern Illinois University April 8, 2017 PHYS 500 - Southern Illinois University Entanglement Measures and Monotones Pt. 2 April 8, 2017 1 / 13 Entanglement
More informationQuantum Entanglement- Fundamental Aspects
Quantum Entanglement- Fundamental Aspects Debasis Sarkar Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Calcutta, 92, A.P.C. Road, Kolkata- 700009, India Abstract Entanglement is one of the most useful
More informationMax-Planck-Institut für Mathematik in den Naturwissenschaften Leipzig
Max-Planck-Institut für Mathematik in den Naturwissenschaften Leipzig Coherence of Assistance and Regularized Coherence of Assistance by Ming-Jing Zhao, Teng Ma, and Shao-Ming Fei Preprint no.: 14 2018
More informationarxiv: v2 [quant-ph] 6 Oct 2010
Closed formula for the relative entropy of entanglement in all dimensions Shmuel Friedland, and Gilad Gour 2, Department of Mathematics, Statistics and Computer Science University of Illinois at Chicago,
More informationPh 219/CS 219. Exercises Due: Friday 20 October 2006
1 Ph 219/CS 219 Exercises Due: Friday 20 October 2006 1.1 How far apart are two quantum states? Consider two quantum states described by density operators ρ and ρ in an N-dimensional Hilbert space, and
More informationBipartite and Tripartite Entanglement in a Three-Qubit Heisenberg Model
Commun. Theor. Phys. (Beijing, China) 46 (006) pp. 969 974 c International Academic Publishers Vol. 46, No. 6, December 5, 006 Bipartite and Tripartite Entanglement in a Three-Qubit Heisenberg Model REN
More informationEntanglement, mixedness, and spin-flip symmetry in multiple-qubit systems
Boston University OpenBU College of General Studies http://open.bu.edu BU Open Access Articles 2003-08-01 Entanglement, mixedness, and spin-flip symmetry in multiple-qubit systems Jaeger, Gregg AMER PHYSICAL
More informationarxiv: v3 [quant-ph] 30 Oct 2017
Noname manuscript No (will be inserted by the editor) Lower bound on concurrence for arbitrary-dimensional tripartite quantum states Wei Chen Shao-Ming Fei Zhu-Jun Zheng arxiv:160304716v3 [quant-ph] 30
More informationOn PPT States in C K C M C N Composite Quantum Systems
Commun. Theor. Phys. (Beijing, China) 42 (2004) pp. 25 222 c International Academic Publishers Vol. 42, No. 2, August 5, 2004 On PPT States in C K C M C N Composite Quantum Systems WANG Xiao-Hong, FEI
More informationIntroduction to Quantum Information Hermann Kampermann
Introduction to Quantum Information Hermann Kampermann Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf Theoretische Physik III Summer school Bleubeuren July 014 Contents 1 Quantum Mechanics...........................
More informationHilbert Space, Entanglement, Quantum Gates, Bell States, Superdense Coding.
CS 94- Bell States Bell Inequalities 9//04 Fall 004 Lecture Hilbert Space Entanglement Quantum Gates Bell States Superdense Coding 1 One qubit: Recall that the state of a single qubit can be written as
More informationIs the world more classical or more quantum?
Is the world more classical or more quantum? A. Lovas, A. Andai BUTE, Department of Analysis XXVI International Fall Workshop on Geometry and Physics Braga, 4-7 September 2017 A. Lovas, A. Andai Is the
More informationarxiv: v2 [quant-ph] 17 Aug 2017
Absolutely separating quantum maps and channels arxiv:1703.00344v [quant-ph] 17 Aug 017 1. Introduction S N Filippov 1,, K Yu Magadov 1 and M A Jivulescu 3 1 Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology,
More informationTHE NUMBER OF ORTHOGONAL CONJUGATIONS
THE NUMBER OF ORTHOGONAL CONJUGATIONS Armin Uhlmann University of Leipzig, Institute for Theoretical Physics After a short introduction to anti-linearity, bounds for the number of orthogonal (skew) conjugations
More informationRestricted Numerical Range and some its applications
Restricted Numerical Range and some its applications Karol Życzkowski in collaboration with P. Gawron, J. Miszczak, Z. Pucha la (Gliwice), L. Skowronek (Kraków), M.D. Choi (Toronto), C. Dunkl (Virginia)
More informationMathematical Methods for Quantum Information Theory. Part I: Matrix Analysis. Koenraad Audenaert (RHUL, UK)
Mathematical Methods for Quantum Information Theory Part I: Matrix Analysis Koenraad Audenaert (RHUL, UK) September 14, 2008 Preface Books on Matrix Analysis: R. Bhatia, Matrix Analysis, Springer, 1997.
More informationBoundary of the Set of Separable States
Boundary of the Set of Separale States Mingjun Shi, Jiangfeng Du Laoratory of Quantum Communication and Quantum Computation, Department of Modern Physics, University of Science and Technology of China,
More informationTwo-mode excited entangled coherent states and their entanglement properties
Vol 18 No 4, April 2009 c 2009 Chin. Phys. Soc. 1674-1056/2009/18(04)/1328-05 Chinese Physics B and IOP Publishing Ltd Two-mode excited entangled coherent states and their entanglement properties Zhou
More informationAbstract. In this article, several matrix norm inequalities are proved by making use of the Hiroshima 2003 result on majorization relations.
HIROSHIMA S THEOREM AND MATRIX NORM INEQUALITIES MINGHUA LIN AND HENRY WOLKOWICZ Abstract. In this article, several matrix norm inequalities are proved by making use of the Hiroshima 2003 result on majorization
More informationA geometric analysis of the Markovian evolution of open quantum systems
A geometric analysis of the Markovian evolution of open quantum systems University of Zaragoza, BIFI, Spain Joint work with J. F. Cariñena, J. Clemente-Gallardo, G. Marmo Martes Cuantico, June 13th, 2017
More informationEntanglement or Separability an introduction
Bachelor Thesis Entanglement or Separability an introduction Lukas Schneiderbauer December 22, 2012 Quantum entanglement is a huge and active research field these days. Not only the philosophical aspects
More informationTheory of Quantum Entanglement
Theory of Quantum Entanglement Shao-Ming Fei Capital Normal University, Beijing Universität Bonn, Bonn Richard Feynman 1980 Certain quantum mechanical effects cannot be simulated efficiently on a classical
More informationEntanglement: concept, measures and open problems
Entanglement: concept, measures and open problems Division of Mathematical Physics Lund University June 2013 Project in Quantum information. Supervisor: Peter Samuelsson Outline 1 Motivation for study
More informationChapter 2 The Density Matrix
Chapter 2 The Density Matrix We are going to require a more general description of a quantum state than that given by a state vector. The density matrix provides such a description. Its use is required
More informationEntropic security using conditional min-entropy
Entropic security using conditional min-entropy Frédéric Dupuis and Simon Pierre Desrosiers March 4, 007 1 Preliminary We will use the usual bra and ket notation for pure states where a unit length complex
More informationNon-Completely Positive Maps: Properties and Applications
Non-Completely Positive Maps: Properties and Applications By Christopher Wood A thesis submitted to Macquarie University in partial fulfilment of the degree of Bachelor of Science with Honours Department
More informationLecture 4: Postulates of quantum mechanics
Lecture 4: Postulates of quantum mechanics Rajat Mittal IIT Kanpur The postulates of quantum mechanics provide us the mathematical formalism over which the physical theory is developed. For people studying
More informationMaximally Entangled State and Bell s Inequality in Qubits
Maximally Entangled State and Bell s Inequality in Qubits arxiv:1711.04415v1 [quant-ph] 13 Nov 2017 Su-Kuan Chu a 1, Chen-Te Ma b 2, Rong-Xin Miao c 3 and Chih-Hung Wu b 4 a Joint Quantum Institute and
More informationWhen Is a Measurement Reversible?
When Is a Measurement Reversible? Information Gain and Disturbance in Quantum Measurements (revisited) Physical Review A 93, 062314 (2016) Francesco Buscemi, Siddhartha Das, Mark M. Wilde contributed talk
More informationDECAY OF SINGLET CONVERSION PROBABILITY IN ONE DIMENSIONAL QUANTUM NETWORKS
DECAY OF SINGLET CONVERSION PROBABILITY IN ONE DIMENSIONAL QUANTUM NETWORKS SCOTT HOTTOVY Abstract. Quantum networks are used to transmit and process information by using the phenomena of quantum mechanics.
More informationPh 219/CS 219. Exercises Due: Friday 3 November 2006
Ph 9/CS 9 Exercises Due: Friday 3 November 006. Fidelity We saw in Exercise. that the trace norm ρ ρ tr provides a useful measure of the distinguishability of the states ρ and ρ. Another useful measure
More information08a. Operators on Hilbert spaces. 1. Boundedness, continuity, operator norms
(February 24, 2017) 08a. Operators on Hilbert spaces Paul Garrett garrett@math.umn.edu http://www.math.umn.edu/ garrett/ [This document is http://www.math.umn.edu/ garrett/m/real/notes 2016-17/08a-ops
More informationarxiv: v1 [quant-ph] 11 Aug 2014
arxiv:1408.2340v1 [quant-ph] 11 Aug 2014 QUANTUM CHANNELS WITH POLYTOPIC IMAGES AND IMAGE ADDITIVITY MOTOHISA FUKUDA, ION NECHITA, AND MICHAEL M. WOLF Abstract. We study quantum channels with respect to
More informationNon-Markovian Quantum Dynamics of Open Systems
Non-Markovian Quantum Dynamics of Open Systems Heinz-Peter Breuer Physikalisches Institut, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg 640. WE-Heraeus-Seminar Non-Markovianity and Strong Coupling Effects in Thermodynamics
More informationarxiv:quant-ph/ v1 16 Oct 2006
Noisy qutrit channels Agata Chȩcińska, Krzysztof Wódkiewicz, Instytut Fizyki Teoretycznej, Uniwersytet Warszawski, Hoża 69, -68 Warszawa, Poland Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of New Mexico,
More informationMultipartite Monogamy of the Entanglement of Formation. Abstract
Multipartite Monogamy of the Entanglement of Formation Xian Shi Institute of Mathematics, Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China University of Chinese
More informationarxiv:quant-ph/ v1 20 Oct 2005
Approximate programmable quantum processors Mark Hillery 1,2,Mário Ziman 2,3, and Vladimír Bužek 2,4 1 Department of Physics, Hunter College of CUY, 695 Park Avenue, ew York, Y 10021 USA 2 Research Center
More informationCompression and entanglement, entanglement transformations
PHYSICS 491: Symmetry and Quantum Information April 27, 2017 Compression and entanglement, entanglement transformations Lecture 8 Michael Walter, Stanford University These lecture notes are not proof-read
More informationarxiv: v2 [quant-ph] 23 Jun 2015
Convex ordering and quantification of quantumness arxiv:1004.1944v2 [quant-ph] 23 Jun 2015 J Sperling Arbeitsgruppe Theoretische Quantenoptik, Institut für Physik, Universität Rostock, D-18051 Rostock,
More informationThe Solovay-Kitaev theorem
The Solovay-Kitaev theorem Maris Ozols December 10, 009 1 Introduction There are several accounts of the Solovay-Kitaev theorem available [K97, NC00, KSV0, DN05]. I chose to base my report on [NC00], since
More informationShared Purity of Multipartite Quantum States
Shared Purity of Multipartite Quantum States Anindya Biswas Harish-Chandra Research Institute December 3, 2013 Anindya Biswas (HRI) Shared Purity December 3, 2013 1 / 38 Outline of the talk 1 Motivation
More informationContraction Coefficients for Noisy Quantum Channels
Contraction Coefficients for Noisy Quantum Channels Mary Beth Ruskai ruskai@member.ams.org joint work with F. Hiai Daejeon February, 2016 1 M. B. Ruskai Contraction of Quantum Channels Recall Relative
More informationHomework 3 - Solutions
Homework 3 - Solutions The Transpose an Partial Transpose. 1 Let { 1, 2,, } be an orthonormal basis for C. The transpose map efine with respect to this basis is a superoperator Γ that acts on an operator
More informationMax-Planck-Institut für Mathematik in den Naturwissenschaften Leipzig
Max-Planck-Institut für Mathematik in den aturwissenschaften Leipzig Bell inequality for multipartite qubit quantum system and the maximal violation by Ming Li and Shao-Ming Fei Preprint no.: 27 2013 Bell
More informationarxiv: v2 [quant-ph] 4 Oct 2008
ON CLASSES OF LOCAL UNITARY TRANSFORMATIONS arxiv:0808.3298v2 [quant-ph] 4 Oct 2008 NAIHUAN JING Abstract. We give a one-to-one correspondence between classes of density matrices under local unitary invariance
More informationQuantum Entanglement: Detection, Classification, and Quantification
Quantum Entanglement: Detection, Classification, and Quantification Diplomarbeit zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades,,Magister der Naturwissenschaften an der Universität Wien eingereicht von Philipp
More informationarxiv:quant-ph/ v2 27 Sep 2002
Quantum Information and Computation, Vol. 1, No. 0 (2001) 000 000 c Rinton Press LOCAL VS. JOINT MEASUREMENTS FOR THE ENTANGLEMENT OF ASSISTANCE arxiv:quant-ph/0206192v2 27 Sep 2002 T. LAUSTSEN, 1,2 F.
More informationarxiv: v1 [quant-ph] 24 May 2011
Geometry of entanglement witnesses for two qutrits Dariusz Chruściński and Filip A. Wudarski Institute of Physics, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Grudzi adzka 5/7, 87 100 Toruń, Poland May 25, 2011 arxiv:1105.4821v1
More informationThe Principles of Quantum Mechanics: Pt. 1
The Principles of Quantum Mechanics: Pt. 1 PHYS 476Q - Southern Illinois University February 15, 2018 PHYS 476Q - Southern Illinois University The Principles of Quantum Mechanics: Pt. 1 February 15, 2018
More informationAn Introduction to Quantum Computation and Quantum Information
An to and Graduate Group in Applied Math University of California, Davis March 13, 009 A bit of history Benioff 198 : First paper published mentioning quantum computing Feynman 198 : Use a quantum computer
More informationClassification of the Entangled States of 2 L M N
Classification of the Entangled States of 2 L M N Liang-Liang Sun 1, Jun-Li Li 1 and Cong-Feng Qiao 1,2 arxiv:1401.6609v1 [quant-ph] 26 Jan 2014 1 School of Physics, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
More informationQuantum chaos in composite systems
Quantum chaos in composite systems Karol Życzkowski in collaboration with Lukasz Pawela and Zbigniew Pucha la (Gliwice) Smoluchowski Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University, Cracow and Center for
More informationThe following definition is fundamental.
1. Some Basics from Linear Algebra With these notes, I will try and clarify certain topics that I only quickly mention in class. First and foremost, I will assume that you are familiar with many basic
More informationEntropic characterization of quantum operations
Entropic characterization of quantum operations W. Roga 1, M. Fannes 2 and K. Życzkowski1,3 arxiv:1101.4105v1 [quant-ph] 21 Jan 2011 1 Instytut Fizyki im. Smoluchowskiego, Uniwersytet Jagielloński, PL-30-059
More informationMax-Planck-Institut für Mathematik in den Naturwissenschaften Leipzig
Max-Planck-Institut für Mathematik in den aturwissenschaften Leipzig Genuine multipartite entanglement detection and lower bound of multipartite concurrence by Ming Li, Shao-Ming Fei, Xianqing Li-Jost,
More informationBorromean Entanglement Revisited
Borromean Entanglement Revisited Ayumu SUGITA Abstract An interesting analogy between quantum entangled states and topological links was suggested by Aravind. In particular, he emphasized a connection
More information