Analytic Continuation of Analytic (Fractal) Functions
|
|
- Basil Welch
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Analytic Continuation of Analytic (Fractal) Functions Michael F. Barnsley Andrew Vince (UFL) Australian National University 10 December 2012
2 Analytic continuations of fractals generalises analytic continuation of analytic functions Given a (piece of) an analytic fractal function can we continue it?
3 Analytic continuations of fractals generalises analytic continuation of analytic functions Given a (piece of) an analytic fractal function can we continue it? Analytic continuation is a cornerstone notion in mathematics and applications
4 Analytic iterated function systems (IFS) W = {X; w 1, w 2,.., w N } where w n : X X real analytic X =complete subset of R 2
5 Analytic iterated function systems (IFS) W = {X; w 1, w 2,.., w N } where w n : X X real analytic X =complete subset of R 2 W : 2 X 2 X defined by W(S) = w i (S);
6 Analytic iterated function systems (IFS) W = {X; w 1, w 2,.., w N } where w n : X X real analytic X =complete subset of R 2 W : 2 X 2 X defined by W(S) = w i (S); an attractor is a compact set A K s.t. lim k W k (S) = A for all bounded nonempty S X
7 analytic fractal functions W = {X R 2 ; w 1, w 2,.., w N } where w n : X X analytic f : [0, 1] R is an analytic fractal function if
8 analytic fractal functions W = {X R 2 ; w 1, w 2,.., w N } where w n : X X analytic f : [0, 1] R is an analytic fractal function if G(f ) is the attractor of an analytic IFS
9 analytic fractal functions W = {X R 2 ; w 1, w 2,.., w N } where w n : X X analytic f : [0, 1] R is an analytic fractal function if G(f ) is the attractor of an analytic IFS examples include analytic functions, arcs of wavelets, fractal interpolation functions, Wieirstrass nowhere differentiable functions, and functions defined by Julia sets.
10 Analytic fractal functions
11 Analytic fractal functions
12 All real analytic functions are analytic fractal functions Theorem 1: If f : [0, 1] R is real analytic on a neighborhood of [0, 1] then there is an analytic IFS whose attractor is G(f ).
13 All real analytic functions are analytic fractal functions Theorem 1: If f : [0, 1] R is real analytic on a neighborhood of [0, 1] then there is an analytic IFS whose attractor is G(f ). PROOF: If f is strictly increasing with f (x) not varying too much, IFS is {X; w 1 = ( x 2, f (f 1 (y) 2 )), w 2 = (x/2 + 1/2, f ( f 1 (y) + 1 ))}. 2
14 All real analytic functions are analytic fractal functions Theorem 1: If f : [0, 1] R is real analytic on a neighborhood of [0, 1] then there is an analytic IFS whose attractor is G(f ). PROOF: If f is strictly increasing with f (x) not varying too much, IFS is {X; w 1 = ( x 2, f (f 1 (y) 2 )), w 2 = (x/2 + 1/2, f ( f 1 (y) + 1 ))}. 2 Otherwise, first conjugate by T(x, y) = (x, y + Cx) with C sufficiently large.
15 Examples: QUADRATIC, EXPONENTIAL The graph of f : [0, 1] R, f (x) = x 2 is the attractor of the analytic IFS {R 2 ; w 1 = (x/2, y/4), w 2 = ((x + 1)/2, (2x + y + 1)/4)}
16 Examples: QUADRATIC, EXPONENTIAL The graph of f : [0, 1] R, f (x) = x 2 is the attractor of the analytic IFS {R 2 ; w 1 = (x/2, y/4), w 2 = ((x + 1)/2, (2x + y + 1)/4)} The graph of f : [1, 2] R, f (x) = e x is the attractor of the analytic IFS {X; w 1 = (x/2 + 1/2, ey), w 2 (x, y) = (x/2 + 1, e y)}
17 fractal continuation=fractal "blow-up" Let A be attractor of W = {X; w 1, w 2 }
18 fractal continuation=fractal "blow-up" Let A be attractor of W = {X; w 1, w 2 } Let θ = θ 1 θ 2... {1, 2}
19 fractal continuation=fractal "blow-up" Let A be attractor of W = {X; w 1, w 2 } Let θ = θ 1 θ 2... {1, 2} B(θ 1 θ 2...θ k ) = w 1 θ 1 w 1 θ 2... w 1 (A) θ k
20 fractal continuation=fractal "blow-up" Let A be attractor of W = {X; w 1, w 2 } Let θ = θ 1 θ 2... {1, 2} B(θ 1 θ 2...θ k ) = w 1 θ 1 w 1 θ 2... w 1 θ k (A) A = B( ) B(θ 1 ) B(θ 1 θ 2 )... B(θ 1 θ 2...θ k )...
21 fractal continuation=fractal "blow-up" Let A be attractor of W = {X; w 1, w 2 } Let θ = θ 1 θ 2... {1, 2} B(θ 1 θ 2...θ k ) = w 1 θ 1 w 1 θ 2... w 1 θ k (A) A = B( ) B(θ 1 ) B(θ 1 θ 2 )... B(θ 1 θ 2...θ k )... B(θ) := k N B(θ 1 θ 2...θ k ) is a continuation of A.
22 Continuation of real analytic attractors Let A be attractor of an analytic IFS W = {X; w 1, w 2 }.
23 Continuation of real analytic attractors Let A be attractor of an analytic IFS W = {X; w 1, w 2 }. Theorem 2: If A is an arc of the graph G(f ) of a real analytic function f : D R R, then B(θ) is the graph of an analytic continuation of f.
24 Example (i) PARABOLA
25 Example (i) PARABOLA The graph of f : [0, 1] R, f (x) = x 2 is the attractor of the (analytic) IFS W ={R 2 ; w 1 = (x/2, y/4), w 2 = ((x + 1)/2, (2x + y + 1)/4)}
26 Example (i) PARABOLA The graph of f : [0, 1] R, f (x) = x 2 is the attractor of the (analytic) IFS W ={R 2 ; w 1 = (x/2, y/4), w 2 = ((x + 1)/2, (2x + y + 1)/4)} For almost all θ I, B(θ) = {(x, x 2 ) : x R}
27 Examples: real analytic attractors Example (ii) EXPONENTIAL
28 Examples: real analytic attractors Example (ii) EXPONENTIAL The graph of f : [1, 2] R, f (x) = e x is the attractor of the IFS W ={R 2 ; w 1 = (x/2 + 1/2, ey), w 2 (x, y) = (x/2 + 1, e 2 y)}
29 Examples: real analytic attractors Example (ii) EXPONENTIAL The graph of f : [1, 2] R, f (x) = e x is the attractor of the IFS W ={R 2 ; w 1 = (x/2 + 1/2, ey), w 2 (x, y) = (x/2 + 1, e 2 y)} For almost all θ I, B(θ) = {(x, e x ) : x R}
30 Description of FIFs x 0 = 0 < x 1 < x 2 = 1, (x i, y i ) R 2 : i = 0, 1, 2
31 Description of FIFs x 0 = 0 < x 1 < x 2 = 1, (x i, y i ) R 2 : i = 0, 1, 2 w i : X X
32 Description of FIFs x 0 = 0 < x 1 < x 2 = 1, (x i, y i ) R 2 : i = 0, 1, 2 w i : X X w i (x, y) = (a i x + h i, F i (x, y)) with w i (x 0, y 0 ) = (x i 1, y i 1 ), w i (x N, y N ) = (x i, y i )
33 Description of FIFs x 0 = 0 < x 1 < x 2 = 1, (x i, y i ) R 2 : i = 0, 1, 2 w i : X X w i (x, y) = (a i x + h i, F i (x, y)) with w i (x 0, y 0 ) = (x i 1, y i 1 ), w i (x N, y N ) = (x i, y i ) F i (x, y)/ y < 1
34 Description of FIFs x 0 = 0 < x 1 < x 2 = 1, (x i, y i ) R 2 : i = 0, 1, 2 w i : X X w i (x, y) = (a i x + h i, F i (x, y)) with w i (x 0, y 0 ) = (x i 1, y i 1 ), w i (x N, y N ) = (x i, y i ) F i (x, y)/ y < 1 Theorem 0: The IFS W = {X; w 1, w 2 } has a unique attractor which is the graph of a function f : [0, 1] R.
35 Description of FIFs x 0 = 0 < x 1 < x 2 = 1, (x i, y i ) R 2 : i = 0, 1, 2 w i : X X w i (x, y) = (a i x + h i, F i (x, y)) with w i (x 0, y 0 ) = (x i 1, y i 1 ), w i (x N, y N ) = (x i, y i ) F i (x, y)/ y < 1 Theorem 0: The IFS W = {X; w 1, w 2 } has a unique attractor which is the graph of a function f : [0, 1] R. PROOF: Simple generalisation of theorem in Massopust book.
36 Description of FIFs x 0 = 0 < x 1 < x 2 = 1, (x i, y i ) R 2 : i = 0, 1, 2 w i : X X w i (x, y) = (a i x + h i, F i (x, y)) with w i (x 0, y 0 ) = (x i 1, y i 1 ), w i (x N, y N ) = (x i, y i ) F i (x, y)/ y < 1 Theorem 0: The IFS W = {X; w 1, w 2 } has a unique attractor which is the graph of a function f : [0, 1] R. PROOF: Simple generalisation of theorem in Massopust book. If the w i s are real analytic then f is called an analytic FIF.
37 Analytic FIF may be rough, or rectifiable, or smooth, or analytic
38 Continuation of real analytic attractors Theorem 2: If A is an arc of the graph of an analytic FIF f : D R R, then B(θ) is the graph of f θ : I θ R, which coincides with f on D. Moreover, dim H (G(f )) = dim H ( B(θ 1 θ 2...θ k ) for all k.
39 Example of continuation of FIFs A= attractor of {R 2 ; w 1 = (x/2,.5x + py), w 2 = (x/2 + 1,.5x + py + 1)}
40 Example of continuation of FIFs A= attractor of {R 2 ; w 1 = (x/2,.5x + py), w 2 = (x/2 + 1,.5x + py + 1)}...is the graph of a FIF: (Minkowski) dimension D(d), cts. dep. on p ( 1, 1)
41 Example of continuation of FIFs A= attractor of {R 2 ; w 1 = (x/2,.5x + py), w 2 = (x/2 + 1,.5x + py + 1)}...is the graph of a FIF: (Minkowski) dimension D(d), cts. dep. on p ( 1, 1) here p = 0.3 and the graph is of finite length
42 Example of continuation of FIFs same as the previous example, but now p = 0.5
43 Example of continuation of FIFs same as the previous example, but now p = 0.5 once differentiable except at countably many points
44 Example: fractal continuations Fractal continuations of a high Minkowski dimension analytic fractal function
45 Example: fractal continuations Fractal continuations of a high Minkowski dimension analytic fractal function nowhere differentiable and dim( B(θ)) = dim(a) > 1
46 Fractal continuations Fractal continuations of an analytic fractal function
47 Examples: differentiable functions EXAMPLE : continuation of the attractor of two affine maps: possesses continuous first derivative.
48 Examples: differentiable functions EXAMPLE : continuation of the attractor of two affine maps: possesses continuous first derivative. Related to the Kigami triangle.
49 Examples: julia sets EXAMPLE (vi): Part of the Julia set J for z Because of symmetries, also the attractor of {D C; z + 0.3, z 0.3}.
50 Examples: julia sets continued Continuation of EXAMPLE: in this example B is a quasi-circle. Continuation is unique, equals the full Julia set.
51 Examples: julia sets continued
52 Examples: Daubechies wavelets These wavelets are piecewise fractal interpolation functions, attractors of analytic IFSs. Pieces have unique analytic continuations B(θ)
53 Uniqueness of Fractal Continuations Theorem 4 If the graph G(f ) of f : [0, 1] R is the (FIF) attractor of two different analytic IFSs, each of the form {R 2 ; (a n x + h n, F n (x, y)) n = 1, 2,..., N}, then the continuation associated with is same for each.
54 Uniqueness of Fractal Continuations Theorem 4 If the graph G(f ) of f : [0, 1] R is the (FIF) attractor of two different analytic IFSs, each of the form {R 2 ; (a n x + h n, F n (x, y)) n = 1, 2,..., N}, then the continuation associated with is same for each. PROOF: Commutation and Wieirstass preparation theorem.
55 Uniqueness of Fractal Continuations Theorem 5 If the graph G(f ) of f : [0, 1] R is a (FIF) attractor of an analytic IFS of the form {R 2, (l n (x), F n (x, y), N = 2}, and f (x) is infinitely differentiable, or G(f ) has a tangent at all except countably many points, then the set of continuations is unique.
56 Uniqueness of Fractal Continuations Theorem 5 If the graph G(f ) of f : [0, 1] R is a (FIF) attractor of an analytic IFS of the form {R 2, (l n (x), F n (x, y), N = 2}, and f (x) is infinitely differentiable, or G(f ) has a tangent at all except countably many points, then the set of continuations is unique. PROOF:The main steps:
57 Uniqueness of Fractal Continuations Theorem 5 If the graph G(f ) of f : [0, 1] R is a (FIF) attractor of an analytic IFS of the form {R 2, (l n (x), F n (x, y), N = 2}, and f (x) is infinitely differentiable, or G(f ) has a tangent at all except countably many points, then the set of continuations is unique. PROOF:The main steps: (i) Theorem A: f is Lipshitz (bootstrap argument).
58 Uniqueness of Fractal Continuations Theorem 5 If the graph G(f ) of f : [0, 1] R is a (FIF) attractor of an analytic IFS of the form {R 2, (l n (x), F n (x, y), N = 2}, and f (x) is infinitely differentiable, or G(f ) has a tangent at all except countably many points, then the set of continuations is unique. PROOF:The main steps: (i) Theorem A: f is Lipshitz (bootstrap argument). (ii) Theorem B: if G(f ) is rectifiable then f (x) is discontinuous only at points with two addresses.
59 Uniqueness of Fractal Continuations Theorem 5 If the graph G(f ) of f : [0, 1] R is a (FIF) attractor of an analytic IFS of the form {R 2, (l n (x), F n (x, y), N = 2}, and f (x) is infinitely differentiable, or G(f ) has a tangent at all except countably many points, then the set of continuations is unique. PROOF:The main steps: (i) Theorem A: f is Lipshitz (bootstrap argument). (ii) Theorem B: if G(f ) is rectifiable then f (x) is discontinuous only at points with two addresses. (iii) If two IFSs, Theorem B implies set of points with double addresses is same.
60 Uniqueness of Fractal Continuations Theorem 5 If the graph G(f ) of f : [0, 1] R is a (FIF) attractor of an analytic IFS of the form {R 2, (l n (x), F n (x, y), N = 2}, and f (x) is infinitely differentiable, or G(f ) has a tangent at all except countably many points, then the set of continuations is unique. PROOF:The main steps: (i) Theorem A: f is Lipshitz (bootstrap argument). (ii) Theorem B: if G(f ) is rectifiable then f (x) is discontinuous only at points with two addresses. (iii) If two IFSs, Theorem B implies set of points with double addresses is same. (iv) Theorem A implies interpolation nodes are the same. Then Wieirstrass.
61 Uniqueness of Fractal Continuations Theorem 5 If the graph G(f ) of f : [0, 1] R is a (FIF) attractor of an analytic IFS of the form {R 2, (l n (x), F n (x, y), N = 2}, and f (x) is infinitely differentiable, or G(f ) has a tangent at all except countably many points, then the set of continuations is unique. PROOF:The main steps: (i) Theorem A: f is Lipshitz (bootstrap argument). (ii) Theorem B: if G(f ) is rectifiable then f (x) is discontinuous only at points with two addresses. (iii) If two IFSs, Theorem B implies set of points with double addresses is same. (iv) Theorem A implies interpolation nodes are the same. Then Wieirstrass. arxiv: v2 (Nov 2012)
62 Uniqueness of Fractal Continuations Theorem 5 If the graph G(f ) of f : [0, 1] R is a (FIF) attractor of an analytic IFS of the form {R 2, (l n (x), F n (x, y), N = 2}, and f (x) is infinitely differentiable, or G(f ) has a tangent at all except countably many points, then the set of continuations is unique. PROOF:The main steps: (i) Theorem A: f is Lipshitz (bootstrap argument). (ii) Theorem B: if G(f ) is rectifiable then f (x) is discontinuous only at points with two addresses. (iii) If two IFSs, Theorem B implies set of points with double addresses is same. (iv) Theorem A implies interpolation nodes are the same. Then Wieirstrass. arxiv: v2 (Nov 2012) Conjecture: continuations of analytic FIF is unique.
63 Fast basins the fast-basin is B := {x X : k N s.t.w k ({x}) A = } = θ {1,2} B(θ)
64 Fast basins the fast-basin is B := {x X : k N s.t.w k ({x}) A = } = θ {1,2} B(θ) Reverse invariance: W 1 ( B) = A W 1 ( B)
65 Picture shows fast basin for Sierpinski
66 Inherited properties Theorem 6 (with K. Lesniak) The following properties are inherited from A to B and B(θ): (i) (arc-) connected; (ii) empty interior; (iii) σ-porous (*); (iv) topological covering dimension; (v) Hausdorff dimension (*).
67 Inherited properties Theorem 6 (with K. Lesniak) The following properties are inherited from A to B and B(θ): (i) (arc-) connected; (ii) empty interior; (iii) σ-porous (*); (iv) topological covering dimension; (v) Hausdorff dimension (*). (*) means : assumes W is bi-lipshitz.
68 Branched) fracta(l-mani)folds (
69 Fractal manifolds fractal manifold using fern
70 Fast basins and fractal manifolds
71 Kigami fast-basin
72 Kigami fast-basin
73 Kigami fast-basin
74 Kigami fast-basin
75 Kigami fractal manifold
Self-Referentiality, Fractels, and Applications
Self-Referentiality, Fractels, and Applications Peter Massopust Center of Mathematics Research Unit M15 Technical University of Munich Germany 2nd IM-Workshop on Applied Approximation, Signals, and Images,
More informationFast Basins and Branched Fractal Manifolds of Attractors of Iterated Function Systems
Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications Fast Basins and Branched Fractal Manifolds of Attractors of Iterated Function Systems Michael F. BARNSLEY and Andrew VINCE Mathematical Sciences
More informationTHE CONLEY ATTRACTORS OF AN ITERATED FUNCTION SYSTEM
Bull. Aust. Math. Soc. 88 (2013), 267 279 doi:10.1017/s0004972713000348 THE CONLEY ATTRACTORS OF AN ITERATED FUNCTION SYSTEM MICHAEL F. BARNSLEY and ANDREW VINCE (Received 15 August 2012; accepted 21 February
More informationHABILITATION THESIS. New results in the theory of Countable Iterated Function Systems
HABILITATION THESIS New results in the theory of Countable Iterated Function Systems - abstract - Nicolae-Adrian Secelean Specialization: Mathematics Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu 2014 Abstract The
More informationNOTES ON BARNSLEY FERN
NOTES ON BARNSLEY FERN ERIC MARTIN 1. Affine transformations An affine transformation on the plane is a mapping T that preserves collinearity and ratios of distances: given two points A and B, if C is
More informationConstruction of Smooth Fractal Surfaces Using Hermite Fractal Interpolation Functions. P. Bouboulis, L. Dalla and M. Kostaki-Kosta
BULLETIN OF THE GREEK MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 54 27 (79 95) Construction of Smooth Fractal Surfaces Using Hermite Fractal Interpolation Functions P. Bouboulis L. Dalla and M. Kostaki-Kosta Received
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.ds] 17 Mar 2010
REAL PROJECTIVE ITERATED FUNCTION SYSTEMS MICHAEL F. BARNSLEY, ANDREW VINCE, AND DAVID C. WILSON arxiv:003.3473v [math.ds] 7 Mar 200 Abstract. This paper contains four main results associated with an attractor
More informationFractals. R. J. Renka 11/14/2016. Department of Computer Science & Engineering University of North Texas. R. J. Renka Fractals
Fractals R. J. Renka Department of Computer Science & Engineering University of North Texas 11/14/2016 Introduction In graphics, fractals are used to produce natural scenes with irregular shapes, such
More informationUSING THE RANDOM ITERATION ALGORITHM TO CREATE FRACTALS
USING THE RANDOM ITERATION ALGORITHM TO CREATE FRACTALS UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND DIRECTED READING PROGRAM FALL 205 BY ADAM ANDERSON THE SIERPINSKI GASKET 2 Stage 0: A 0 = 2 22 A 0 = Stage : A = 2 = 4 A
More informationApproximation of the attractor of a countable iterated function system 1
General Mathematics Vol. 17, No. 3 (2009), 221 231 Approximation of the attractor of a countable iterated function system 1 Nicolae-Adrian Secelean Abstract In this paper we will describe a construction
More informationHIDDEN VARIABLE BIVARIATE FRACTAL INTERPOLATION SURFACES
Fractals, Vol. 11, No. 3 (2003 277 288 c World Scientific Publishing Company HIDDEN VARIABLE BIVARIATE FRACTAL INTERPOLATION SURFACES A. K. B. CHAND and G. P. KAPOOR Department of Mathematics, Indian Institute
More informationFractals and Dimension
Chapter 7 Fractals and Dimension Dimension We say that a smooth curve has dimension 1, a plane has dimension 2 and so on, but it is not so obvious at first what dimension we should ascribe to the Sierpinski
More informationAn Introduction to Self Similar Structures
An Introduction to Self Similar Structures Christopher Hayes University of Connecticut April 6th, 2018 Christopher Hayes (University of Connecticut) An Introduction to Self Similar Structures April 6th,
More informationExpectations over Fractal Sets
Expectations over Fractal Sets Michael Rose Jon Borwein, David Bailey, Richard Crandall, Nathan Clisby 21st June 2015 Synapse spatial distributions R.E. Crandall, On the fractal distribution of brain synapses.
More informationMath 203A - Solution Set 1
Math 203A - Solution Set 1 Problem 1. Show that the Zariski topology on A 2 is not the product of the Zariski topologies on A 1 A 1. Answer: Clearly, the diagonal Z = {(x, y) : x y = 0} A 2 is closed in
More informationHyperbolicity of Renormalization for C r Unimodal Maps
Hyperbolicity of Renormalization for C r Unimodal Maps A guided tour Edson de Faria Department of Mathematics IME-USP December 13, 2010 (joint work with W. de Melo and A. Pinto) Ann. of Math. 164(2006),
More informationNAME: Mathematics 205A, Fall 2008, Final Examination. Answer Key
NAME: Mathematics 205A, Fall 2008, Final Examination Answer Key 1 1. [25 points] Let X be a set with 2 or more elements. Show that there are topologies U and V on X such that the identity map J : (X, U)
More informationThe Minimal Element Theorem
The Minimal Element Theorem The CMC Dynamics Theorem deals with describing all of the periodic or repeated geometric behavior of a properly embedded CMC surface with bounded second fundamental form in
More informationV -variable fractals and superfractals
V -variable fractals and superfractals Michael Barnsley, John E Hutchinson and Örjan Stenflo Department of Mathematics, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT. 0200, Australia Department of Mathematics,
More informationLECTURE 15: COMPLETENESS AND CONVEXITY
LECTURE 15: COMPLETENESS AND CONVEXITY 1. The Hopf-Rinow Theorem Recall that a Riemannian manifold (M, g) is called geodesically complete if the maximal defining interval of any geodesic is R. On the other
More information+ ε /2N) be the k th interval. k=1. k=1. k=1. k=1
Trevor, Angel, and Michael Measure Zero, the Cantor Set, and the Cantor Function Measure Zero : Definition : Let X be a subset of R, the real number line, X has measure zero if and only if ε > 0 a set
More informationPart II. Geometry and Groups. Year
Part II Year 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2014 Paper 4, Section I 3F 49 Define the limit set Λ(G) of a Kleinian group G. Assuming that G has no finite orbit in H 3 S 2, and that Λ(G),
More informationCHAOS/FRACTAL
CHAOS/FRACTAL 8 6.8.6 4.4. 4 5..4.6.8.4 8...8 6.8.6 - - 4.6.4.4 -.. - -6-5 -4 - - -..95.955.96.965.97.975.98..4.6.8 Presentation in Dynamical System. By Fred Khoury Introduction This paper is divided into
More informationMichael F. Barnsley & Andrew Vince
Fractal Continuation Michael F. Barnsley & Andrew Vince Constructive Approximation ISSN 0176-4276 Volume 38 Number 2 Constr Approx 2013) 38:311-337 DOI 10.1007/s00365-013-9205-3 1 23 Your article is protected
More informationOne-sided shift spaces over infinite alphabets
Reasoning Mind West Coast Operator Algebra Seminar October 26, 2013 Joint work with William Ott and Mark Tomforde Classical Construction Infinite Issues New Infinite Construction Shift Spaces Classical
More informationHow circular are generalized circles
How circular are generalized circles Mario Ponce A plane circle is defined as the locus of points that have constant distance (radius) from a distinguished point (center). In this short note we treat with
More informationJulia Sets and the Mandelbrot Set
Julia Sets and the Mandelbrot Set Julia sets are certain fractal sets in the complex plane that arise from the dynamics of complex polynomials. These notes give a brief introduction to Julia sets and explore
More informationV -VARIABLE FRACTALS: FRACTALS WITH PARTIAL SELF SIMILARITY
-ARIABLE FRACTALS: FRACTALS WITH PARTIAL SELF SIMILARITY MICHAEL BARNSLEY, JOHN E. HUTCHINSON, AND ÖRJAN STENFLO Abstract. We establish properties of a new type of fractal which has partial self similarity
More informationSymbolic dynamics for Lozi maps
Symbolic dynamics for Lozi maps M. Misiurewicz, S. Štimac Abstract We study the family of the Lozi maps L a,b : R 2 R 2, L a,b (x, y) = (1+y a x, bx), and their strange attractors Λ a,b. We introduce the
More informationOn a Topological Problem of Strange Attractors. Ibrahim Kirat and Ayhan Yurdaer
On a Topological Problem of Strange Attractors Ibrahim Kirat and Ayhan Yurdaer Department of Mathematics, Istanbul Technical University, 34469,Maslak-Istanbul, Turkey E-mail: ibkst@yahoo.com and yurdaerayhan@itu.edu.tr
More informationLocally convex spaces, the hyperplane separation theorem, and the Krein-Milman theorem
56 Chapter 7 Locally convex spaces, the hyperplane separation theorem, and the Krein-Milman theorem Recall that C(X) is not a normed linear space when X is not compact. On the other hand we could use semi
More informationExamensarbete. Fractals and Computer Graphics. Meritxell Joanpere Salvadó
Examensarbete Fractals and Computer Graphics Meritxell Joanpere Salvadó LiTH - MAT - INT - A - - 20 / 0 - - SE Fractals and Computer Graphics Applied Mathematics, Linköpings Universitet Meritxell Joanpere
More informationTHE SHIFT SPACE FOR AN INFINITE ITERATED FUNCTION SYSTEM
THE SHIFT SPACE FOR AN INFINITE ITERATED FUNCTION SYSTEM ALEXANDRU MIHAIL and RADU MICULESCU The aim of the paper is to define the shift space for an infinite iterated function systems (IIFS) and to describe
More informationSelf-similar Fractals: Projections, Sections and Percolation
Self-similar Fractals: Projections, Sections and Percolation University of St Andrews, Scotland, UK Summary Self-similar sets Hausdorff dimension Projections Fractal percolation Sections or slices Projections
More informationHausdorff Measure. Jimmy Briggs and Tim Tyree. December 3, 2016
Hausdorff Measure Jimmy Briggs and Tim Tyree December 3, 2016 1 1 Introduction In this report, we explore the the measurement of arbitrary subsets of the metric space (X, ρ), a topological space X along
More informationA strongly invariant pinched core strip that does not contain any arc of curve.
A strongly invariant pinched core strip that does not contain any arc of curve. Lluís Alsedà in collaboration with F. Mañosas and L. Morales Departament de Matemàtiques Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
More informationMath 203A - Solution Set 1
Math 203A - Solution Set 1 Problem 1. Show that the Zariski topology on A 2 is not the product of the Zariski topologies on A 1 A 1. Answer: Clearly, the diagonal Z = {(x, y) : x y = 0} A 2 is closed in
More informationTake a line segment of length one unit and divide it into N equal old length. Take a square (dimension 2) of area one square unit and divide
Fractal Geometr A Fractal is a geometric object whose dimension is fractional Most fractals are self similar, that is when an small part of a fractal is magnified the result resembles the original fractal
More informationJULIA SETS AND BIFURCATION DIAGRAMS FOR EXPONENTIAL MAPS
BULLETIN (New Series) OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 11, Number 1, July 1984 JULIA SETS AND BIFURCATION DIAGRAMS FOR EXPONENTIAL MAPS BY ROBERT L. DEVANEY ABSTRACT. We describe some of the
More informationProblem Set 2: Solutions Math 201A: Fall 2016
Problem Set 2: s Math 201A: Fall 2016 Problem 1. (a) Prove that a closed subset of a complete metric space is complete. (b) Prove that a closed subset of a compact metric space is compact. (c) Prove that
More informationCMSC 425: Lecture 12 Procedural Generation: Fractals
: Lecture 12 Procedural Generation: Fractals Reading: This material comes from classic computer-graphics books. Procedural Generation: One of the important issues in game development is how to generate
More information1 Sets of real numbers
1 Sets of real numbers Outline Sets of numbers, operations, functions Sets of natural, integer, rational and real numbers Operations with real numbers and their properties Representations of real numbers
More informationSummer Algebraic Geometry Seminar
Summer Algebraic Geometry Seminar Lectures by Bart Snapp About This Document These lectures are based on Chapters 1 and 2 of An Invitation to Algebraic Geometry by Karen Smith et al. 1 Affine Varieties
More informationDynamics of Newton maps of quadratic polynomial homomorphisms of R 2.
arxiv:1812.11595v1 [math.ds] 30 Dec 2018 Dynamics of Newton maps of quadratic polynomial homomorphisms of R 2. Roberto De Leo Howard University, Washington DC 20059 (USA) January 1, 2019 Keywords: Newton
More informationThe Chaos Game on a General Iterated Function System
arxiv:1005.0322v1 [math.mg] 3 May 2010 The Chaos Game on a General Iterated Function System Michael F. Barnsley Department of Mathematics Australian National University Canberra, ACT, Australia michael.barnsley@maths.anu.edu.au
More informationJulia sets in higher dimensions
Julia sets in higher dimensions Dan Nicks University of Nottingham June 2017 Overview Complex dynamics. Quasiregular maps on R d. Iteration of quasiregular maps. Complex dynamics The study of iteration
More informationTOPOLOGY PROCEEDINGS Volume 36 (2010) Pages E-Published on April 2, 2010
http://topology.auburn.edu/tp/ TOPOLOGY PROCEEDINGS Volume 36 (2010) Pages 189-211 E-Published on April 2, 2010 A CHARACTERIZATION OF HYPERBOLIC AFFINE ITERATED FUNCTION SYSTEMS ROSS ATKINS, MICHAEL F.
More information(x k ) sequence in F, lim x k = x x F. If F : R n R is a function, level sets and sublevel sets of F are any sets of the form (respectively);
STABILITY OF EQUILIBRIA AND LIAPUNOV FUNCTIONS. By topological properties in general we mean qualitative geometric properties (of subsets of R n or of functions in R n ), that is, those that don t depend
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.dg] 19 Jun 2017
LIMITING BEHAVIOR OF SEQUENCES OF PROPERLY EMBEDDED MINIMAL DISKS arxiv:1706.06186v1 [math.dg] 19 Jun 2017 DAVID HOFFMAN AND BRIAN WHITE Abstract. We develop a theory of minimal θ-graphs and characterize
More informationIntroduction to fractal analysis of orbits of dynamical systems. ZAGREB DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS WORKSHOP 2018 Zagreb, October 22-26, 2018
Vesna Županović Introduction to fractal analysis of orbits of dynamical systems University of Zagreb, Croatia Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing Centre for Nonlinear Dynamics, Zagreb ZAGREB
More informationThe Hausdorff Measure of the Attractor of an Iterated Function System with Parameter
ISSN 1479-3889 (print), 1479-3897 (online) International Journal of Nonlinear Science Vol. 3 (2007) No. 2, pp. 150-154 The Hausdorff Measure of the Attractor of an Iterated Function System with Parameter
More informationFractals and iteration function systems II Complex systems simulation
Fractals and iteration function systems II Complex systems simulation Facultad de Informática (UPM) Sonia Sastre November 24, 2011 Sonia Sastre () Fractals and iteration function systems November 24, 2011
More informationIterated function systems on functions of bounded variation
Iterated function systems on functions of bounded variation D. La Torre, F. Mendivil and E.R. Vrscay December 18, 2015 Abstract We show that under certain hypotheses, an Iterated Function System on Mappings
More informationDIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY 1 PROBLEM SET 1 SOLUTIONS
DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY PROBLEM SET SOLUTIONS Lee: -4,--5,-6,-7 Problem -4: If k is an integer between 0 and min m, n, show that the set of m n matrices whose rank is at least k is an open submanifold of
More informationMath 203A - Solution Set 1
Math 203A - Solution Set 1 Problem 1. Show that the Zariski topology on A 2 is not the product of the Zariski topologies on A 1 A 1. Answer: Clearly, the diagonal Z = {(x, y) : x y = 0} A 2 is closed in
More informationLozi-like maps. M. Misiurewicz and S. Štimac. May 13, 2017
Lozi-like maps M. Misiurewicz and S. Štimac May 13, 017 Abstract We define a broad class of piecewise smooth plane homeomorphisms which have properties similar to the properties of Lozi maps, including
More informationConstruction of recurrent fractal interpolation surfaces(rfiss) on rectangular grids
Construction of recurrent fractal interpolation surfacesrfiss on rectangular grids Wolfgang Metzler a,, Chol Hui Yun b a Faculty of Mathematics University of Kassel, Kassel, F. R. Germany b Faculty of
More informationCONTRACTION MAPPING & THE COLLAGE THEOREM Porter 1. Abstract
CONTRACTION MAPPING & THE COLLAGE THEOREM Porter 1 Abstract The Collage Theorem was given by Michael F. Barnsley who wanted to show that it was possible to reconstruct images using a set of functions.
More informationTopological dynamics: basic notions and examples
CHAPTER 9 Topological dynamics: basic notions and examples We introduce the notion of a dynamical system, over a given semigroup S. This is a (compact Hausdorff) topological space on which the semigroup
More informationGOLDEN GASKETS: VARIATIONS ON THE SIERPIŃSKI SIEVE
GOLDEN GASKETS: VARIATIONS ON THE SIERPIŃSKI SIEVE DAVE BROOMHEAD, JAMES MONTALDI, AND NIKITA SIDOROV ABSTRACT. We consider the iterated function systems (IFSs) that consist of three general similitudes
More informationFoliation dynamics, shape and classification
Foliation dynamics, shape and classification Steve Hurder University of Illinois at Chicago www.math.uic.edu/ hurder Theorem: [Denjoy, 1932] There exist a C 1 -foliation F of codimension-1 with an exceptional
More informationLimiting Dynamics of quadratic polynomials and Parabolic Blowups
Limiting Dynamics of quadratic polynomials and Parabolic Blowups John Hubbard Joint work with Ismael Bachy MUCH inspired by work of Adam Epstein and helped by discussions with Xavier Buff and Sarah Koch
More informationDynamics of Tangent. Robert L. Devaney Department of Mathematics Boston University Boston, Mass Linda Keen
Dynamics of Tangent Robert L. Devaney Department of Mathematics Boston University Boston, Mass. 02215 Linda Keen Department of Mathematics Herbert H. Lehman College, CUNY Bronx, N.Y. 10468 Abstract We
More information(iv) Whitney s condition B. Suppose S β S α. If two sequences (a k ) S α and (b k ) S β both converge to the same x S β then lim.
0.1. Stratified spaces. References are [7], [6], [3]. Singular spaces are naturally associated to many important mathematical objects (for example in representation theory). We are essentially interested
More informationHyperbolic Dynamics. Todd Fisher. Department of Mathematics University of Maryland, College Park. Hyperbolic Dynamics p.
Hyperbolic Dynamics p. 1/36 Hyperbolic Dynamics Todd Fisher tfisher@math.umd.edu Department of Mathematics University of Maryland, College Park Hyperbolic Dynamics p. 2/36 What is a dynamical system? Phase
More informationNovel Approach to Calculation of Box Dimension of Fractal Functions
Applied Mathematical Sciences, vol. 8, 2014, no. 144, 7175-7181 HIKARI Ltd, www.m-hikari.com http://dx.doi.org/10.12988/ams.2014.49718 Novel Approach to Calculation of Box Dimension of Fractal Functions
More informationINDECOMPOSABILITY IN INVERSE LIMITS WITH SET-VALUED FUNCTIONS
INDECOMPOSABILITY IN INVERSE LIMITS WITH SET-VALUED FUNCTIONS JAMES P. KELLY AND JONATHAN MEDDAUGH Abstract. In this paper, we develop a sufficient condition for the inverse limit of upper semi-continuous
More information2. Intersection Multiplicities
2. Intersection Multiplicities 11 2. Intersection Multiplicities Let us start our study of curves by introducing the concept of intersection multiplicity, which will be central throughout these notes.
More informationConnectedness loci of complex polynomials: beyond the Mandelbrot set
Connectedness loci of complex polynomials: beyond the Mandelbrot set Sabyasachi Mukherjee Stony Brook University TIFR, June 2016 Contents 1 Background 2 Antiholomorphic Dynamics 3 Main Theorems (joint
More informationEssential hyperbolicity versus homoclinic bifurcations. Global dynamics beyond uniform hyperbolicity, Beijing 2009 Sylvain Crovisier - Enrique Pujals
Essential hyperbolicity versus homoclinic bifurcations Global dynamics beyond uniform hyperbolicity, Beijing 2009 Sylvain Crovisier - Enrique Pujals Generic dynamics Consider: M: compact boundaryless manifold,
More informationFor Ramin. From Jonathan December 9, 2014
For Ramin From Jonathan December 9, 2014 1 Foundations. 1.0 Overview. Traditionally, knot diagrams are employed as a device which converts a topological object into a combinatorial one. One begins with
More informationDifferential Topology Solution Set #2
Differential Topology Solution Set #2 Select Solutions 1. Show that X compact implies that any smooth map f : X Y is proper. Recall that a space is called compact if, for every cover {U } by open sets
More informationBredon, Introduction to compact transformation groups, Academic Press
1 Introduction Outline Section 3: Topology of 2-orbifolds: Compact group actions Compact group actions Orbit spaces. Tubes and slices. Path-lifting, covering homotopy Locally smooth actions Smooth actions
More informationTopological properties
CHAPTER 4 Topological properties 1. Connectedness Definitions and examples Basic properties Connected components Connected versus path connected, again 2. Compactness Definition and first examples Topological
More informationDAVID MAPS AND HAUSDORFF DIMENSION
Annales Academiæ Scientiarum Fennicæ Mathematica Volumen 9, 004, 38 DAVID MAPS AND HAUSDORFF DIMENSION Saeed Zakeri Stony Brook University, Institute for Mathematical Sciences Stony Brook, NY 794-365,
More informationLocal time of self-affine sets of Brownian motion type and the jigsaw puzzle problem
Local time of self-affine sets of Brownian motion type and the jigsaw puzzle problem (Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 49 (04), pp.79-93) Yu-Mei XUE and Teturo KAMAE Abstract Let Ω [0,
More informationCOMPLETELY INVARIANT JULIA SETS OF POLYNOMIAL SEMIGROUPS
Series Logo Volume 00, Number 00, Xxxx 19xx COMPLETELY INVARIANT JULIA SETS OF POLYNOMIAL SEMIGROUPS RICH STANKEWITZ Abstract. Let G be a semigroup of rational functions of degree at least two, under composition
More informationThe core entropy of polynomials of higher degree
The core entropy of polynomials of higher degree Giulio Tiozzo University of Toronto In memory of Tan Lei Angers, October 23, 2017 First email: March 4, 2012 Hi Mr. Giulio Tiozzo, My name is Tan Lei.
More informationContents Ordered Fields... 2 Ordered sets and fields... 2 Construction of the Reals 1: Dedekind Cuts... 2 Metric Spaces... 3
Analysis Math Notes Study Guide Real Analysis Contents Ordered Fields 2 Ordered sets and fields 2 Construction of the Reals 1: Dedekind Cuts 2 Metric Spaces 3 Metric Spaces 3 Definitions 4 Separability
More informationLECTURE 3: SMOOTH FUNCTIONS
LECTURE 3: SMOOTH FUNCTIONS Let M be a smooth manifold. 1. Smooth Functions Definition 1.1. We say a function f : M R is smooth if for any chart {ϕ α, U α, V α } in A that defines the smooth structure
More informationCOMPLEX VARIETIES AND THE ANALYTIC TOPOLOGY
COMPLEX VARIETIES AND THE ANALYTIC TOPOLOGY BRIAN OSSERMAN Classical algebraic geometers studied algebraic varieties over the complex numbers. In this setting, they didn t have to worry about the Zariski
More informationIntroduction to Topology
Introduction to Topology Randall R. Holmes Auburn University Typeset by AMS-TEX Chapter 1. Metric Spaces 1. Definition and Examples. As the course progresses we will need to review some basic notions about
More informationTHE VISIBLE PART OF PLANE SELF-SIMILAR SETS
PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 141, Number 1, January 2013, Pages 269 278 S 0002-9939(2012)11312-7 Article electronically published on May 16, 2012 THE VISIBLE PART OF PLANE SELF-SIMILAR
More informationThe Order in Chaos. Jeremy Batterson. May 13, 2013
2 The Order in Chaos Jeremy Batterson May 13, 2013 Fractal geometry will make you see everything differently. There is a danger in reading further. You risk the loss of your childhood vision of clouds,
More informationRandom Walks on Hyperbolic Groups III
Random Walks on Hyperbolic Groups III Steve Lalley University of Chicago January 2014 Hyperbolic Groups Definition, Examples Geometric Boundary Ledrappier-Kaimanovich Formula Martin Boundary of FRRW on
More informationProblem Set 5. 2 n k. Then a nk (x) = 1+( 1)k
Problem Set 5 1. (Folland 2.43) For x [, 1), let 1 a n (x)2 n (a n (x) = or 1) be the base-2 expansion of x. (If x is a dyadic rational, choose the expansion such that a n (x) = for large n.) Then the
More informationChapter 3. Riemannian Manifolds - I. The subject of this thesis is to extend the combinatorial curve reconstruction approach to curves
Chapter 3 Riemannian Manifolds - I The subject of this thesis is to extend the combinatorial curve reconstruction approach to curves embedded in Riemannian manifolds. A Riemannian manifold is an abstraction
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.ds] 6 Apr 2011
STABILIZATION OF HETERODIMENSIONAL CYCLES C. BONATTI, L. J. DÍAZ, AND S. KIRIKI arxiv:1104.0980v1 [math.ds] 6 Apr 2011 Abstract. We consider diffeomorphisms f with heteroclinic cycles associated to saddles
More informationUndecidable properties of self-affine sets and multi-tape automata
Undecidable properties of self-affine sets and multi-tape automata Timo Jolivet 1,2 and Jarkko Kari 1 1 Department of Mathematics, University of Turku, Finland 2 LIAFA, Université Paris Diderot, France
More informationDeepness of the boundary of bounded type quadratic Siegel disks following C. McMullen
Deepness of the boundary of bounded type quadratic Siegel disks following C. McMullen At the advent of the 70 aniversary of Adrien Douady Carsten Lunde Petersen IMFUFA, Roskilde University Disques de Siegel,
More informationOn the topological differences between the Mandelbrot set and the tricorn
On the topological differences between the Mandelbrot set and the tricorn Sabyasachi Mukherjee Jacobs University Bremen Poland, July 2014 Basic definitions We consider the iteration of quadratic anti-polynomials
More informationA Tourist s Guide to The General Topology of Dynamical Systems
A Tourist s Guide to The General Topology of Dynamical Systems Graduate Studies in Mathematics, V. 1, American Mathematical Society Providence, R.I. Ethan Akin Mathematics Department The City College 137
More informationDYNAMICAL SYSTEMS PROBLEMS. asgor/ (1) Which of the following maps are topologically transitive (minimal,
DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS PROBLEMS http://www.math.uci.edu/ asgor/ (1) Which of the following maps are topologically transitive (minimal, topologically mixing)? identity map on a circle; irrational rotation of
More informationB 1 = {B(x, r) x = (x 1, x 2 ) H, 0 < r < x 2 }. (a) Show that B = B 1 B 2 is a basis for a topology on X.
Math 6342/7350: Topology and Geometry Sample Preliminary Exam Questions 1. For each of the following topological spaces X i, determine whether X i and X i X i are homeomorphic. (a) X 1 = [0, 1] (b) X 2
More informationReal Analysis Prelim Questions Day 1 August 27, 2013
Real Analysis Prelim Questions Day 1 August 27, 2013 are 5 questions. TIME LIMIT: 3 hours Instructions: Measure and measurable refer to Lebesgue measure µ n on R n, and M(R n ) is the collection of measurable
More informationA LITTLE REAL ANALYSIS AND TOPOLOGY
A LITTLE REAL ANALYSIS AND TOPOLOGY 1. NOTATION Before we begin some notational definitions are useful. (1) Z = {, 3, 2, 1, 0, 1, 2, 3, }is the set of integers. (2) Q = { a b : aεz, bεz {0}} is the set
More informationSupermixed labyrinth fractals
Supermixed labyrinth fractals arxiv:802.0546v [math.gt] 5 Feb 208 Ligia L. Cristea strublistea@gmail.com Gunther Leobacher gunther.leobacher@uni-graz.at Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz Institut für Mathematik
More informationIntroduction. Hausdorff Measure on O-Minimal Structures. Outline
Introduction and Motivation Introduction Hausdorff Measure on O-Minimal Structures Integral geometry on o-minimal structures Antongiulio Fornasiero fornasiero@mail.dm.unipi.it Università di Pisa Conference
More informationFractals. Part 6 : Julia and Mandelbrot sets, Martin Samuelčík Department of Applied Informatics
Fractals Part 6 : Julia and Mandelbrot sets, Martin Samuelčík Department of Applied Informatics Problem of initial points Newton method for computing root of function numerically Computing using iterations
More informationIf one wants to study iterations of functions or mappings,
The Mandelbrot Set And Its Julia Sets If one wants to study iterations of functions or mappings, f n = f f, as n becomes arbitrarily large then Julia sets are an important tool. They show up as the boundaries
More information