arxiv:hep-ph/ v1 7 Jun 2001

Transcription

1 Detailed Balancing and the Structure of Proton arxiv:hep-ph/006074v 7 Jun 200 Yongjun Zhang and Bin Zhang 2 Department of Physics, Peking University Beijing, 0087, P. R. China 2 Department of Physics, Tsinghua University Beijing, 00084, P. R. China February 28, 2008 Abstract The protons are taken as an ensemble of Fock states. Using detailed balancing principle, ensemble density metrix on the basis of the number of partons is calculated, and so some information about intrinsic gluons and intrinsic sea quarks are gained without any parameter. PACS numbers: 2.40.Ee, 2.8.Lg, 4.20.Dh In the experiment, there are always a lot of protons involved. So it is convenient to deal protons in a big ensemble of protons. In the ensemble, every proton is a system. We do not know the wavefunction of protons and even do not know whether all the protons in the same pure wavefunction or not. So we do not know the ensemble density matrix. But we can still get some information in the following method. First, take the ensemble density matrix on the basis of Fock state. Every Fock state is a pure wavefunction defined as i, j, k; ψ(u )...ϕ(g)... which has fixed number partons and every parton has fixed wavefunction. Here i is the number of pair of ūu quarks, j is the number of pair dd quarks and k is number of gluons, ψ and ϕ are the wavefunctions of single partons. All these partons are intrinsic. This Fock state has the quantum numbers of proton: color singlet, spin, 2 valance up-quark, valance down-quark. This Fock 2 state is some like the light-cone Fock state used by Stanley J. Brodsky [] and n-parton Fock state used by Paul Hoyer and D.P. Roy [2]. yongjunzhang@26.net

2 Second, block the ensemble density matrix into the new basis: subensemble which represented as i, j, k. The subensemble i, j, k is define as the assembly of all Fock state in the kind of i, j, k; ψ(u )...ϕ(g)... from the big ensemble, i, j, k i, j, k ψ...ϕ...,ψ...ϕ... i, j, k; ψ(u )...ϕ(g)... i, j, k; ψ(u )...ϕ(g).... () The subensemble i, j, k has fixed number of partons and has quantum numbers of proton. The subensemble i, j, k also can be represented in the way i, j, k uud } ūu {{ ūu}} dd {{ dd } g g. (2) }{{} i j k Here we use the symbol to represent the subensemble which is not a pure Fock state. All kind of subensemble can be written out as or uud, uudg, uudgg,... uudūu, uudūug, uudūugg,... uud dd, uud ddg, uud ddgg,... uudūu dd, uudūu ddg, uudūu ddgg,... uudūuūu, uudūuūug, uudūuūugg,... uud dd dd, uud dd ddg, uud dd ddgg, () 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,, 0, 0, 2,..., 0, 0,, 0,,, 0, 2,... 0,, 0, 0,,, 0,, 2,...,, 0,,,,,, 2,... 2, 0, 0, 2, 0,, 2, 0, 2,... 0, 2, 0, 0, 2,, 0, 2, 2, (4) The diagonal part of ensemble density matrix on the basis of subensemble is ˆρ ρ 0,0,0 0, 0, 0 0, 0, 0 + ρ 0,0, 0, 0, 0, 0, + ρ 0,0,2 0, 0, 2 0, 0, ρ,0,0, 0, 0, 0, 0 + ρ,0,, 0,, 0, + ρ,0,2, 0, 2, 0,

3 +ρ 0,,0 0,, 0 0,, 0 + ρ 0,, 0,, 0,, + ρ 0,,2 0,, 2 0,, ρ,,0,, 0,, 0 + ρ,,,,,, + ρ,,2,, 2,, ρ 2,0,0 2, 0, 0 2, 0, 0 + ρ 2,0, 2, 0, 2, 0, + ρ 2,0,2 2, 0, 2 2, 0, ρ 0,2,0 0, 2, 0 0, 2, 0 + ρ 0,2, 0, 2, 0, 2, + ρ 0,2,2 0, 2, 2 0, 2, , where should satisfy normalizing condition, (5). (6) i,j,k Some information of the proton are hide in the diagonal element of this density matrix,. Using statistical property of the ensemble, the diagonal element can be calculated without any parameter. let us trace one system(a proton) in the big ensemble(a pack of protons). At the time t 0, the system is in one state of a subensemble which represented as (A). After a while, at the time t δt, the state of the system has three probability: (a) not changed, (b) changed to another state belong the same subensemble(a), (c) changed to a state belong different subensemble represented as (B). In the last case, the density of subensemble (A) decreased (ρ A ). On the other hand, some state in subensemble (B) will changed to subensemble(a) during same period, and increase the density of subensemble (A) (ρ A ). These two anti-process just compensate each other, so ρ A unchange. This is the so called detailed balacing, which demand every two subensemble balance each other. So we have i, j, k balance ρ i,j,k i, j, k, (7) { i, j, k i, j, k } ρ i,j,k { i, j, k i, j, k }, (8) i, j, k i, j, k ρ i,j,k i, j, k i, j, k. (9) All that we need to know is the the ratio between the translation rate of i, j, k i, j, k and the translation rate of i, j, k i, j, k. But the translation rate is very complicate that involving: the number of partons, the quantum number(color,spin,flavor), the cross section, the volume of proton, exchange symmetry(pauli blocking), the velocity of partons and even the detail of the quantum wavefunctions of the partons, and so on. Here, we only take into account the number of partons and neglect the interaction involving g gg which is not important here.

4 The translation between two subensemble has two ways: splitting and recombination. Splitting rate is proportional to the number of the partons that may split. Recombination rate is proportional to both the number of those two kinds partons that may recombine. So we have the following two kinds of relations. () Detailed balancing involving q qg, uud uudg, (0) uudg 2 uudgg, () uudgg uudggg, (2)... () uudūu 5 uudūug, (4) 5... (5) i, j, k i + j (i + j)k i, j, k. (6) then a general formula can be concluded, k, (7) ρ i,j,0 k!. (8) (2) Detailed balancing involving g qq, uudg uudūu, (9) uudg 2 uud dd, (20) uudūug 2 4 uudūuūu, (2) 4

5 Then a general formula can be concluded, uudūug uudūu dd, (22) 2... (2) i, j, i, j, 0, (24) i(i + 2) i, j, j(j + ) i, j, 0. (25) ρ i,j,0 ρ i,j, i(i + 2), (26) ρ i,j,0 ρ i,j, j(j + ), (27) ρ i,j,0 2 ρ 0,j, i!(i + 2)!, (28) ρ i,j,0 ρ i,0, j!(j + )!, (29) ρ i,j,0 2 ρ 0,0, i!(i + 2)!j!(j + )!. (0) Use relation ρ 0,0, ρ 0,0,0 and merge formula(8), (0) to give the last general formula ρ 0,0,0 2 i!(i + 2)!j!(j + )!k!. () Then from normalizing condition(6) and formula(), all can be calculate that shown in Table. From data of Table, we get u valence 2.000, (2) d valence.000, () ū i 0.08, (4) d j 0.42, (5) g k 0.997, (6) d ū (7) 5

6 Table : i j k uud uudūu uud dd uudūu dd uud dd dd uudūuūu uudūu dd dd uudūuūu dd uud dd dd dd uudūuūuūu Only d ū can be check by experiment directly because it s Q 2 dependence is small. Experiment H [] give d ū 0.8±0.02 which consist with our data. The other data can be compared to the parton distribution given by GRV98[4] as input at Q 2 0.4GeV. Integrate the parton distribution of GRV98 to give the the number of partons, u valance 2.000, (8) d valance.000, (9) d ū 0.4, (40) ū + d.6, (4) g.256, (42) which is not too far from our data. About momentum scale behind our model, can be estimated in the following way, µ M Proton u + d + ū + d + g 98MeV MeV. (4) We would like to thank to Wei-zhen Deng for helpful discussions. 6

7 References [] Stanley J. Brodsky, Nucl.Phys.Proc.Suppl. 90 (2000) - [2] Paul Hoyer, D.P. Roy, Phys.Lett. B40 (997) 6-66 [] FNAL E866/NuSea Collaboration: R. S. Towell, P. L. McGaughey, et al (hepex/0000), p.. [4] M. Glück, E. Reya, A. Vogt, Eur.Phys.J. C5 (998)