Steps in Uncertainty Quantification
|
|
- Augustine Todd
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Steps in Uncertainty Quantification Challenge: How do we do uncertainty quantification for computationally expensive models? Example: We have a computational budget of 5 model evaluations. Bayesian inference and uncertainty propagation require 2, evaluations.
2 Uncertainty Quantification Challenges Example: MFC model Fourth-order PDE MFC = f Capacitor probe M = -c E 2 - c - [k e(e, )E + k 2 " irr (E, )] MFC(x) Bayesian Inference: Took 6 days! Macro-Fiber Composite Problem: c E I.2 5 PDE solutions Solution: Highly efficient surrogate models 38
3 Example: Consider the heat equation with the response Boundary Conditions Initial Conditions Z Z Z Z Surrogate Models: Motivation f (q) u(t, x, y, z)dxdydzdt t x, y, z Notes: Requires approximation of PDE in 3-D What would be a simple surrogate? 39
4 Example: Consider the heat equation with the response Boundary Conditions Initial Conditions Z Z Z Z Surrogate Models: Motivation f (q) u(t, x, y, z)dxdydzdt t Surrogate: Quadratic x, y, z y s (q) =(q -.25) Question: How do you construct a polynomial surrogate? Regression Interpolation
5 Recall: Consider the model with the response Boundary Conditions Initial Conditions Z Z Z Z Surrogate Models f (q) u(t, x, y, z)dxdydzdt t Surrogate: Quadratic x, y, z y s (q) =(q -.25) Question: How do you construct a polynomial surrogate? Interpolation Regression M=7 k=2
6 Surrogate Models Question: How do we keep from fitting noise? Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) AIC = 2k - 2 log[ (y q)] Bayesian Information Criterion (AIC) BIC = k log(m) - 2 log[ (y q)] Likelihood: 2 (y q) = (2 2 ) M/2 e-ss q/2 MX SS q = [y m - y s (q m )] 2 m= Maximize Minimize M=7 k=2 42
7 Surrogate Models Question: How do we keep from fitting noise? Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) AIC = 2k - 2 log[ (y q)] Bayesian Information Criterion (AIC) Likelihood: BIC = k log(m) - 2 log[ (y q)] 2 (y q) = (2 2 ) M/2 e-ss q/2 MX SS q = [y m - y s (q m )] 2 Example: Exercise: m= y = exp(.7q +.3q 2 ) Maximize Construct a polynomial surrogate using the code response_surface.m. What order seems appropriate? Minimize q2 q M=7 k=2
8 Notes: Often termed response surface models, emulators, meta-models. Data-Fit Models Constructed via interpolation or regression. Data can consist of high-fidelity simulations or experiments. y = f(q) Example: Steady-state Euler-Bernouilli beam model with PZT patch YI d 4 w dx 4 (x) =k pv pzt (x) Data: Displacement observations Parameter: YI 44
9 Data-Fit Models Example: Steady-state Euler-Bernouilli beam model with PZT patch YI d 4 w dx 4 (x) =k pv pzt (x) Data: Displacement observations Parameter: YI Training points: 5 Polynomial surrogate: 6 th order Bayesian Inference displacement x YI
10 Notes: Often termed response surface models, surrogates, emulators, meta-models. Rely on interpolation or regression. Data-Fit Models Data can consist of high-fidelity simulations or experiments. Common techniques: polynomial models, kriging (Gaussian process regression), orthogonal polynomials. Strategy: Consider high fidelity model y = f (q) with M model evaluations y m = f (q m ), m =,..., M Statistical Model: f s (q): Surrogate for f (q) Surrogate: y K (Q) =f s (Q) = y = f(q) KX k k(q) k= Note: k(q) orthogonal with respect to inner product associated with pdf e.g., Q N(, ): Hermite polynomials Q U(-, ): Legendre polynomials y m = f s (q m )+" m, m =,..., M 46
11 Orthogonal Polynomial Representations Representation: Properties: KX y K (Q) = k k(q) (i) E[y K (Q)] = k= Note: (Q) = implies that (ii) var[y K (Q)] = KX k= 2 k k E[ (Q)] = Z E[ i(q) j(q)] = i(q) j(q) (q)dq = ij i 2 where i = E[ i (Q)] Note: Can be used for: Uncertainty propagation Sobol-based global sensitivity analysis Issue: How does one compute k, k =,..., K? Stochastic Galerkin techniques (Polynomial Chaos Expansion PCE) Nonintrusive PCE (Discrete projection) Stochastic collocation Regression-based methods with sparsity control (Lasso) Note: Methods nonintrusive and treat code as blackbox. 47
12 Orthogonal Polynomial Representations Nonintrusive PCE: to obtain k = Z y(q) k(q) (q)dq k Quadrature: k k Take weighted inner product of y(q) = P k= k k(q) RX y(q r ) k(q r )w r r= Note: (i) Low-dimensional: Tensored -D quadrature rules e.g., Gaussian (ii) Moderate-dimensional: Sparse grid (Smolyak) techniques (iii) High-dimensional: Monte Carlo or quasi-monte Carlo (QMC) techniques Regression-Based Methods with Sparsity Control (Lasso): Solve KX min k - dk 2 subject to k 6 2R K + k= Note: Sample points {q m } M m= 2 R M (K +) where jk = k(q j ) d =[y(q ),..., y(q m )] e.g., SPGL MATLAB Solver for large-scale sparse reconstruction 48
13 Stochastic Collocation Strategy: Consider high fidelity model y = f (q) y m with M model evaluations y m = f (q m ), m =,..., M Collocation Surrogate: MX Y M (q) = y m L m (q) m= where L m (q) is a Lagrange polynomial, which in -D, is represented by L m (q) = MY j= j6=m q - q j q m - q j = (q - q ) (q - q m- )(q - q m+ ) (q - q M ) (q m - q ) (q m - q m- )(q m - q m+ ) (q m - q M ) Note: L m (q j )= jm =, j 6= m, j = m Result: Y M (q m )=y m 49
14 Orthogonal Polynomial Methods for PDE Evolution Model: e.g., = N(u, Q)+F(Q), x 2 D, t 2 [, ) B(u, Q) =G(Q), x t 2 [, ) u(, x, Q) =I(Q), x 2 D Weak Formulation: For all v 2 V Z Z vdx + N(u, Q)S(v)dx = F(Q)vdx D D Z Response: y(t, x) = u(t, x, q) (q)dq Example: 2 y(t,)=u(t, L) = u(, x) =u (x) For all v 2 H (, L) vdx + dv dx = Representation: KX u K (t, x, Q) = u k (t, x) k(q) = k= KX k= j= JX u jk (t) j (x) k(q) Discrete Projection: u k (t, x) RX u(t, x, q r ) k(q r )w r k e.g., Finite elements r= 5
15 Surrogate Models Grid Choice Example: Consider the Runge function f (q) = +25q 2 with points q j = - +(j - ) 2 M, j =,..., M.2.8 f(q) q 5
16 Surrogate Models Grid Choice Example: Consider the Runge function f (q) = +25q 2 with points q j = - +(j - ) 2 M, j =,..., M.2.8 f(q) q f(q) q 52
17 Surrogate Models Grid Choice Example: Consider the Runge function f (q) = +25q 2 with points q j = - +(j - ) 2 M, j =,..., M q j = - cos (j - ) M -, j =,..., M f(q) f(q) q q 2 f(q) q 53
18 Surrogate Models Grid Choice Example: Consider the Runge function f (q) = +25q 2 with points q j = - +(j - ) 2 M, j =,..., M q j = - cos (j - ) M -, j =,..., M f(q) f(q) q q.5.8 f(q) 2 4 f(q) q q 54
19 Sparse Grid Techniques Tensored Grids: Exponential growth Sparse Grids: Same accuracy p R` Sparse Grid R Tensored Grid R =(R`) p , > ,9 > ,353,8 >
20 Surrogate Construction: Nuclear Power Plant Design Subchannel Code (COBRA-TF): 33 VUQ parameters reduced to 5 using SA Surrogate: Total pressure drop Kriging (GP) emulator constructed using 5 COBRA-TF runs perturbing 5 active inputs. Use remaining computational budget to evaluate quality of surrogate using postprocessed Dakota outputs. Predicted Total Pressure Drop Sample Quantities 2 Out-of-Sample Validation Out of sample Validation Calculated Total Pressure Drop 2 2 Theoretical Quantities 56
21 Model: ds dt = bn - L S B L apple L + B L - di dt = LS B L apple L + B L + dr = I - br dt db H = I - B H dt db L = B H - B L dt Example: SIR Cholera Model H S H S B H apple H + B H - ( B H apple H + B H - bs + b)i S β L β H I ξ B H χ B L γ δ R Model Parameter Symbol Units Values Rate of drinking B L cholera L.5 week Rate of drinking B H cholera H 7.5 ( ) week # bacteria B L cholera carrying capacity apple L m` 6 # bacteria apple B H cholera carrying capacity apple L H m` 7 Human birth and death rate b week Rate of decay from B H to B L week 5 # bacteria Rate at which infectious individuals 7 spread B H bacteria to water # individuals m` week 7 Death rate of B L cholera Rate of recovery from cholera week week
22 generalized total indices Example: SIR Cholera Model Strategy: Employed collocation and discrete projection with sparse grids to compute time-dependent global sensitivity indices time [weeks] apple L b L H L Conclusion: Sensitive indices : Recovery rate H: Rate of drinking B H cholera apple L : B L carrying capacity; Note apple H = apple L /7 : Rate at which B H bacteria spread generalized Sobol index MC (N mc = 4 ) Alg (N quad = 69) Alg (N quad = 277) Alg 2 (N mc = 5/N kl = 2) Alg 2 (N mc = 5/N kl = 5) Alg 2 (N mc = 5/N kl = 5) L H apple L b L parameter
23 Model: ds dt = bn - L S B L apple L + B L - di dt = LS B L apple L + B L + dr = I - br dt db H = I - B H dt db L = B H - B L dt Example: SIR Cholera Model H S H S B H apple H + B H - ( B H apple H + B H - bs + b)i S β L β H I ξ B H χ B L γ δ R Model Parameter Symbol Units Values Rate of drinking B L cholera L.5 week Rate of drinking B H cholera H 7.5 ( ) week # bacteria B L cholera carrying capacity apple L m` 6 # bacteria apple B H cholera carrying capacity apple L H m` 7 Human birth and death rate b week Rate of decay from B H to B L week 5 # bacteria Rate at which infectious individuals 7 spread B H bacteria to water # individuals m` week 7 Death rate of B L cholera Rate of recovery from cholera week week
24 Steps in Uncertainty Quantification 6
25 6. Quantification of Model Discrepancy Thin Beam Essentially all models are wrong, but some are useful George E.P. Box Example: Thin beam driven by PZT patches Euler-Bernoulli Model: with Z L apple 2 dt = k p V (t) Note: 7 parameters, 32 states Statistical Model: Z x2 x For all dx dx + 2 V Z L apple (x) = hb + p h p b p p (x), YI(x) =YI + Y p I p p (x) ci(x) =ci + c p I p p (x) t i dx y(t i, q) =w(t i, x, q) Y i = y(t i, q)+" i 6 Y i
26 Quantification of Model Discrepancy Thin Beam Example: Good model fit Y i = y(t i, q)+" i Note: Observation errors not iid x 7 Model Fit to Data Mathematical Model y(t i ;q) Data Reference: Additive observation errors Y i = y(t i, q)+ (t i, eq)+" i M.C. Kennedy and A. O Hagan, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 2. Frequency Content Frequency
27 Quantification of Model Discrepancy Thin Beam Example: Good model fit Problem: Observation errors not iid Model Fit to Data Result: Prediction intervals wrong Approaches: GP Model: Inaccurate for extrapolation Control-based approaches: difficult to extrapolate. Problem: correct physics or biology required for extrapolation! Prediction Intervals and Data
28 Quantification of Model Discrepancy Thin Beam Problem: Measurement errors not iid Result: Prediction intervals wrong Model Fit to Data One Approach: Determine components of model you trust (e.g., conservation laws) and don t trust (e.g., closure relations). Embed uncertainty into latter. T. Oliver, G. Terejanu, C.S. Simmons, R.D. Moser, Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng, SAMSI Program: Model Uncertainty: Mathematical and Statistical (MUMS) Prediction Intervals and Data
29 Quantification of Model Discrepancy Thin Beam Our Solution: Optimize calibration interval Use damping/frequency domain results to guide Displacement (µm) Time (s) Displacement (µm) Time (s) Calibrate on [,] Calibrate on [.25,.25] Note: We have substantially extended calibration regime Displacement (µm) Time (s) Displacement (µm) Time (s) Displacement (µm) Time (s)
30 Notes: Concluding Remarks UQ requires a synergy between engineering, statistics, and applied mathematics. Model calibration, model selection, uncertainty propagation and experimental design are natural in a Bayesian framework. Goal is to predict model responses with quantified and reduced uncertainties. Parameter selection is critical to isolate identifiable and influential parameters. Surrogate models critical for computationally intensive simulation codes. Codes and packages: Sandia Dakota, R, MATLAB, Python, nanohub. Prediction is very difficult, especially if it s about the future, Niels Bohr. Displacement (µm) Time (s)
31 Books: References R.C. Smith, Uncertainty Quantification: Theory, Implementation, and Applications, SIAM, Philadelphia, 24. Incomplete References: Orthogonal Polynomial Methods and High-Dimensional Approximation Theory: M. Babuška, F. Nobile and R. Tempone, Numer. Math., 25 A. Cohen, R. De Vore and C. Schwab, Analysis and Applications, 2 M. Gunzburger, C.G. Webster and G. Zhang, Acta Numerica, 24. O.P. Le Maître and O.M. Knio, Spectral Methods for Uncertainty Quantification, 2 S., Uncertainty Quantification: Theory, Implementation, and Applications, 24. A.L. Teckentrup, P. Jantsch, M. Gunzburger and C.G. Webster, SIAM/ASA J. Uncert. Quant., 25 D. Xiu, Numerical Methods for Stochastic Computations: A Spectral Method Approach, 2. 67
32 References Incomplete References: Sparse Grids: H-J. Bungartz and M. Griebel, Acta Numerica, 24 M. Gunzburger et al., Water Resources Research, 23. F. Nobile, R. Tempone and C.G. Webster, SIAM J. Num. Anal., 28 Compressed Sensing: A. Chkifra, N. Dexter, H. Tran and C.G. Webster, Mathematics of Computation, Submitted Infinite-Dimensional Bayesian Inference: A.M. Stuart, Acta Numerica 2 T. Bui-Thanh et al., SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 23 S.J. Vollmer, SIAM/ASA J. Uncertainty Quantification, 25. T. Bui-Thanh and Q. Nguyen, Inverse Problems and Imaging, 26, 68
Parameter Selection Techniques and Surrogate Models
Parameter Selection Techniques and Surrogate Models Model Reduction: Will discuss two forms Parameter space reduction Surrogate models to reduce model complexity Input Representation Local Sensitivity
More informationSpectral Representation of Random Processes
Spectral Representation of Random Processes Example: Represent u(t,x,q) by! u K (t, x, Q) = u k (t, x) k(q) where k(q) are orthogonal polynomials. Single Random Variable:! Let k (Q) be orthogonal with
More informationUncertainty Quantification in Computational Models
Uncertainty Quantification in Computational Models Habib N. Najm Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, CA, USA Workshop on Understanding Climate Change from Data (UCC11) University of Minnesota, Minneapolis,
More informationPolynomial chaos expansions for sensitivity analysis
c DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL, ENVIRONMENTAL AND GEOMATIC ENGINEERING CHAIR OF RISK, SAFETY & UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION Polynomial chaos expansions for sensitivity analysis B. Sudret Chair of Risk, Safety & Uncertainty
More informationUncertainty Propagation
Setting: Uncertainty Propagation We assume that we have determined distributions for parameters e.g., Bayesian inference, prior experiments, expert opinion Ṫ 1 = 1 - d 1 T 1 - (1 - ")k 1 VT 1 Ṫ 2 = 2 -
More informationStochastic Collocation Methods for Polynomial Chaos: Analysis and Applications
Stochastic Collocation Methods for Polynomial Chaos: Analysis and Applications Dongbin Xiu Department of Mathematics, Purdue University Support: AFOSR FA955-8-1-353 (Computational Math) SF CAREER DMS-64535
More informationAlgorithms for Uncertainty Quantification
Algorithms for Uncertainty Quantification Lecture 9: Sensitivity Analysis ST 2018 Tobias Neckel Scientific Computing in Computer Science TUM Repetition of Previous Lecture Sparse grids in Uncertainty Quantification
More informationSENSITIVITY ANALYSIS IN NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF MULTIPHASE FLOW FOR CO 2 STORAGE IN SALINE AQUIFERS USING THE PROBABILISTIC COLLOCATION APPROACH
XIX International Conference on Water Resources CMWR 2012 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign June 17-22,2012 SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS IN NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF MULTIPHASE FLOW FOR CO 2 STORAGE IN
More informationUncertainty Quantification for multiscale kinetic equations with random inputs. Shi Jin. University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA
Uncertainty Quantification for multiscale kinetic equations with random inputs Shi Jin University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA Where do kinetic equations sit in physics Kinetic equations with applications
More informationFast Numerical Methods for Stochastic Computations
Fast AreviewbyDongbinXiu May 16 th,2013 Outline Motivation 1 Motivation 2 3 4 5 Example: Burgers Equation Let us consider the Burger s equation: u t + uu x = νu xx, x [ 1, 1] u( 1) =1 u(1) = 1 Example:
More informationSparse polynomial chaos expansions in engineering applications
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL, ENVIRONMENTAL AND GEOMATIC ENGINEERING CHAIR OF RISK, SAFETY & UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION Sparse polynomial chaos expansions in engineering applications B. Sudret G. Blatman (EDF R&D,
More informationBeyond Wiener Askey Expansions: Handling Arbitrary PDFs
Journal of Scientific Computing, Vol. 27, Nos. 1 3, June 2006 ( 2005) DOI: 10.1007/s10915-005-9038-8 Beyond Wiener Askey Expansions: Handling Arbitrary PDFs Xiaoliang Wan 1 and George Em Karniadakis 1
More informationStochastic Spectral Approaches to Bayesian Inference
Stochastic Spectral Approaches to Bayesian Inference Prof. Nathan L. Gibson Department of Mathematics Applied Mathematics and Computation Seminar March 4, 2011 Prof. Gibson (OSU) Spectral Approaches to
More informationUncertainty Quantification and hypocoercivity based sensitivity analysis for multiscale kinetic equations with random inputs.
Uncertainty Quantification and hypocoercivity based sensitivity analysis for multiscale kinetic equations with random inputs Shi Jin University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA Shanghai Jiao Tong University,
More informationAt A Glance. UQ16 Mobile App.
At A Glance UQ16 Mobile App Scan the QR code with any QR reader and download the TripBuilder EventMobile app to your iphone, ipad, itouch or Android mobile device. To access the app or the HTML 5 version,
More informationUncertainty Quantification for multiscale kinetic equations with high dimensional random inputs with sparse grids
Uncertainty Quantification for multiscale kinetic equations with high dimensional random inputs with sparse grids Shi Jin University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA Kinetic equations Different Q Boltmann Landau
More informationSTOCHASTIC SAMPLING METHODS
STOCHASTIC SAMPLING METHODS APPROXIMATING QUANTITIES OF INTEREST USING SAMPLING METHODS Recall that quantities of interest often require the evaluation of stochastic integrals of functions of the solutions
More informationUtilizing Adjoint-Based Techniques to Improve the Accuracy and Reliability in Uncertainty Quantification
Utilizing Adjoint-Based Techniques to Improve the Accuracy and Reliability in Uncertainty Quantification Tim Wildey Sandia National Laboratories Center for Computing Research (CCR) Collaborators: E. Cyr,
More informationPerformance Evaluation of Generalized Polynomial Chaos
Performance Evaluation of Generalized Polynomial Chaos Dongbin Xiu, Didier Lucor, C.-H. Su, and George Em Karniadakis 1 Division of Applied Mathematics, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA, gk@dam.brown.edu
More informationUncertainty quantification and calibration of computer models. February 5th, 2014
Uncertainty quantification and calibration of computer models February 5th, 2014 Physical model Physical model is defined by a set of differential equations. Now, they are usually described by computer
More informationSampling and low-rank tensor approximation of the response surface
Sampling and low-rank tensor approximation of the response surface tifica Alexander Litvinenko 1,2 (joint work with Hermann G. Matthies 3 ) 1 Group of Raul Tempone, SRI UQ, and 2 Group of David Keyes,
More informationA comparison of polynomial chaos and Gaussian process emulation for uncertainty quantification in computer experiments
University of Exeter Department of Mathematics A comparison of polynomial chaos and Gaussian process emulation for uncertainty quantification in computer experiments Nathan Edward Owen May 2017 Supervised
More informationModel Calibration under Uncertainty: Matching Distribution Information
Model Calibration under Uncertainty: Matching Distribution Information Laura P. Swiler, Brian M. Adams, and Michael S. Eldred September 11, 008 AIAA Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference
More informationDimension-adaptive sparse grid for industrial applications using Sobol variances
Master of Science Thesis Dimension-adaptive sparse grid for industrial applications using Sobol variances Heavy gas flow over a barrier March 11, 2015 Ad Dimension-adaptive sparse grid for industrial
More informationAccuracy, Precision and Efficiency in Sparse Grids
John, Information Technology Department, Virginia Tech.... http://people.sc.fsu.edu/ jburkardt/presentations/ sandia 2009.pdf... Computer Science Research Institute, Sandia National Laboratory, 23 July
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.na] 3 Apr 2019
arxiv:1904.02017v1 [math.na] 3 Apr 2019 Poly-Sinc Solution of Stochastic Elliptic Differential Equations Maha Youssef and Roland Pulch Institute of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Greifswald,
More informationPolynomial chaos expansions for structural reliability analysis
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL, ENVIRONMENTAL AND GEOMATIC ENGINEERING CHAIR OF RISK, SAFETY & UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION Polynomial chaos expansions for structural reliability analysis B. Sudret & S. Marelli Incl.
More informationIntroduction to Uncertainty Quantification in Computational Science Handout #3
Introduction to Uncertainty Quantification in Computational Science Handout #3 Gianluca Iaccarino Department of Mechanical Engineering Stanford University June 29 - July 1, 2009 Scuola di Dottorato di
More informationEstimating functional uncertainty using polynomial chaos and adjoint equations
0. Estimating functional uncertainty using polynomial chaos and adjoint equations February 24, 2011 1 Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, Usa 2 Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Moscow,
More informationIntro BCS/Low Rank Model Inference/Comparison Summary References. UQTk. A Flexible Python/C++ Toolkit for Uncertainty Quantification
A Flexible Python/C++ Toolkit for Uncertainty Quantification Bert Debusschere, Khachik Sargsyan, Cosmin Safta, Prashant Rai, Kenny Chowdhary bjdebus@sandia.gov Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore,
More informationQuantifying conformation fluctuation induced uncertainty in bio-molecular systems
Quantifying conformation fluctuation induced uncertainty in bio-molecular systems Guang Lin, Dept. of Mathematics & School of Mechanical Engineering, Purdue University Collaborative work with Huan Lei,
More informationarxiv: v2 [math.na] 8 Sep 2017
arxiv:1704.06339v [math.na] 8 Sep 017 A Monte Carlo approach to computing stiffness matrices arising in polynomial chaos approximations Juan Galvis O. Andrés Cuervo September 3, 018 Abstract We use a Monte
More informationDinesh Kumar, Mehrdad Raisee and Chris Lacor
Dinesh Kumar, Mehrdad Raisee and Chris Lacor Fluid Mechanics and Thermodynamics Research Group Vrije Universiteit Brussel, BELGIUM dkumar@vub.ac.be; m_raisee@yahoo.com; chris.lacor@vub.ac.be October, 2014
More informationOverview. Bayesian assimilation of experimental data into simulation (for Goland wing flutter) Why not uncertainty quantification?
Delft University of Technology Overview Bayesian assimilation of experimental data into simulation (for Goland wing flutter), Simao Marques 1. Why not uncertainty quantification? 2. Why uncertainty quantification?
More informationPrediction of Stochastic Eye Diagrams via IC Equivalents and Lagrange Polynomials
Prediction of Stochastic Eye Diagrams via IC Equivalents and Lagrange Polynomials Paolo Manfredi, Igor S. Stievano, Flavio G. Canavero Department of Electronics and Telecommunications (DET) Politecnico
More informationSimulating with uncertainty : the rough surface scattering problem
Simulating with uncertainty : the rough surface scattering problem Uday Khankhoje Assistant Professor, Electrical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Madras Uday Khankhoje (EE, IITM) Simulating
More informationGaussian process regression for Sensitivity analysis
Gaussian process regression for Sensitivity analysis GPSS Workshop on UQ, Sheffield, September 2016 Nicolas Durrande, Mines St-Étienne, durrande@emse.fr GPSS workshop on UQ GPs for sensitivity analysis
More informationICES REPORT A posteriori error control for partial differential equations with random data
ICES REPORT 13-8 April 213 A posteriori error control for partial differential equations with random data by Corey M. Bryant, Serge Prudhomme, and Timothy Wildey The Institute for Computational Engineering
More informationComputer Science Technical Report TR May 08, 2007
Computer Science Technical Report TR-7-8 May 8, 27 Haiyan Cheng and Adrian Sandu Efficient Uncertainty Quantification with Polynomial Chaos for Implicit Stiff Systems Computer Science Department Virginia
More informationGaussian Processes for Computer Experiments
Gaussian Processes for Computer Experiments Jeremy Oakley School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Sheffield www.jeremy-oakley.staff.shef.ac.uk 1 / 43 Computer models Computer model represented
More informationSobol-Hoeffding Decomposition with Application to Global Sensitivity Analysis
Sobol-Hoeffding decomposition Application to Global SA Computation of the SI Sobol-Hoeffding Decomposition with Application to Global Sensitivity Analysis Olivier Le Maître with Colleague & Friend Omar
More informationarxiv: v2 [physics.comp-ph] 15 Sep 2015
On Uncertainty Quantification of Lithium-ion Batteries: Application to an LiC 6 /LiCoO 2 cell arxiv:1505.07776v2 [physics.comp-ph] 15 Sep 2015 Mohammad Hadigol a, Kurt Maute a, Alireza Doostan a, a Aerospace
More informationMulti-Element Probabilistic Collocation Method in High Dimensions
Multi-Element Probabilistic Collocation Method in High Dimensions Jasmine Foo and George Em Karniadakis Division of Applied Mathematics, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912 USA Abstract We combine multi-element
More informationStochastic structural dynamic analysis with random damping parameters
Stochastic structural dynamic analysis with random damping parameters K. Sepahvand 1, F. Saati Khosroshahi, C. A. Geweth and S. Marburg Chair of Vibroacoustics of Vehicles and Machines Department of Mechanical
More informationPredictive Engineering and Computational Sciences. Research Challenges in VUQ. Robert Moser. The University of Texas at Austin.
PECOS Predictive Engineering and Computational Sciences Research Challenges in VUQ Robert Moser The University of Texas at Austin March 2012 Robert Moser 1 / 9 Justifying Extrapolitive Predictions Need
More informationAdaptive Collocation with Kernel Density Estimation
Examples of with Kernel Density Estimation Howard C. Elman Department of Computer Science University of Maryland at College Park Christopher W. Miller Applied Mathematics and Scientific Computing Program
More informationDownloaded 08/12/13 to Redistribution subject to SIAM license or copyright; see
SIAM J. MATRIX ANAL. APPL. Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 195 209 c 2012 Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics A POSTERIORI ERROR ANALYSIS OF PARAMETERIZED LINEAR SYSTEMS USING SPECTRAL METHODS T. BUTLER,
More informationError Budgets: A Path from Uncertainty Quantification to Model Validation
Error Budgets: A Path from Uncertainty Quantification to Model Validation Roger Ghanem Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering Civil Engineering University of Southern California Los Angeles Advanced Simulation
More informationUncertainty Propagation and Global Sensitivity Analysis in Hybrid Simulation using Polynomial Chaos Expansion
Uncertainty Propagation and Global Sensitivity Analysis in Hybrid Simulation using Polynomial Chaos Expansion EU-US-Asia workshop on hybrid testing Ispra, 5-6 October 2015 G. Abbiati, S. Marelli, O.S.
More informationScalable algorithms for optimal experimental design for infinite-dimensional nonlinear Bayesian inverse problems
Scalable algorithms for optimal experimental design for infinite-dimensional nonlinear Bayesian inverse problems Alen Alexanderian (Math/NC State), Omar Ghattas (ICES/UT-Austin), Noémi Petra (Applied Math/UC
More informationA Polynomial Chaos Approach to Robust Multiobjective Optimization
A Polynomial Chaos Approach to Robust Multiobjective Optimization Silvia Poles 1, Alberto Lovison 2 1 EnginSoft S.p.A., Optimization Consulting Via Giambellino, 7 35129 Padova, Italy s.poles@enginsoft.it
More informationQuasi-optimal and adaptive sparse grids with control variates for PDEs with random diffusion coefficient
Quasi-optimal and adaptive sparse grids with control variates for PDEs with random diffusion coefficient F. Nobile, L. Tamellini, R. Tempone, F. Tesei CSQI - MATHICSE, EPFL, Switzerland Dipartimento di
More informationProbing the covariance matrix
Probing the covariance matrix Kenneth M. Hanson Los Alamos National Laboratory (ret.) BIE Users Group Meeting, September 24, 2013 This presentation available at http://kmh-lanl.hansonhub.com/ LA-UR-06-5241
More informationEFFICIENT SHAPE OPTIMIZATION USING POLYNOMIAL CHAOS EXPANSION AND LOCAL SENSITIVITIES
9 th ASCE Specialty Conference on Probabilistic Mechanics and Structural Reliability EFFICIENT SHAPE OPTIMIZATION USING POLYNOMIAL CHAOS EXPANSION AND LOCAL SENSITIVITIES Nam H. Kim and Haoyu Wang University
More informationSolving the stochastic steady-state diffusion problem using multigrid
IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis (2007) 27, 675 688 doi:10.1093/imanum/drm006 Advance Access publication on April 9, 2007 Solving the stochastic steady-state diffusion problem using multigrid HOWARD ELMAN
More informationPolynomial Chaos and Karhunen-Loeve Expansion
Polynomial Chaos and Karhunen-Loeve Expansion 1) Random Variables Consider a system that is modeled by R = M(x, t, X) where X is a random variable. We are interested in determining the probability of the
More informationEFFICIENT STOCHASTIC GALERKIN METHODS FOR RANDOM DIFFUSION EQUATIONS
EFFICIENT STOCHASTIC GALERKIN METHODS FOR RANDOM DIFFUSION EQUATIONS DONGBIN XIU AND JIE SHEN Abstract. We discuss in this paper efficient solvers for stochastic diffusion equations in random media. We
More informationMethod of Finite Elements I
Method of Finite Elements I PhD Candidate - Charilaos Mylonas HIL H33.1 and Boundary Conditions, 26 March, 2018 Institute of Structural Engineering Method of Finite Elements I 1 Outline 1 2 Penalty method
More informationAt-A-Glance SIAM Events Mobile App
At-A-Glance SIAM Events Mobile App Scan the QR code with any QR reader and download the TripBuilder EventMobile app to your iphone, ipad, itouch or Android mobile device.you can also visit www.tripbuildermedia.com/apps/siamevents
More informationAnalysis and Computation of Hyperbolic PDEs with Random Data
Analysis and Computation of Hyperbolic PDEs with Random Data Mohammad Motamed 1, Fabio Nobile 2,3 and Raúl Tempone 1 1 King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal, Saudi Arabia 2 EPFL Lausanne,
More informationPC EXPANSION FOR GLOBAL SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF NON-SMOOTH FUNCTIONALS OF UNCERTAIN STOCHASTIC DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS SOLUTIONS
PC EXPANSION FOR GLOBAL SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF NON-SMOOTH FUNCTIONALS OF UNCERTAIN STOCHASTIC DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS SOLUTIONS M. Navarro, O.P. Le Maître,2, O.M. Knio,3 mariaisabel.navarrojimenez@kaust.edu.sa
More informationUncertainty Quantification in Discrete Fracture Network Models
Uncertainty Quantification in Discrete Fracture Network Models Claudio Canuto Dipartimento di Scienze Matematiche, Politecnico di Torino claudio.canuto@polito.it Joint work with Stefano Berrone, Sandra
More informationIntroduction to Gaussian Processes
Introduction to Gaussian Processes 1 Objectives to express prior knowledge/beliefs about model outputs using Gaussian process (GP) to sample functions from the probability measure defined by GP to build
More informationSolving the steady state diffusion equation with uncertainty Final Presentation
Solving the steady state diffusion equation with uncertainty Final Presentation Virginia Forstall vhfors@gmail.com Advisor: Howard Elman elman@cs.umd.edu Department of Computer Science May 6, 2012 Problem
More informationGradient Enhanced Universal Kriging Model for Uncertainty Propagation in Nuclear Engineering
Gradient Enhanced Universal Kriging Model for Uncertainty Propagation in Nuclear Engineering Brian A. Lockwood 1 and Mihai Anitescu 2 1 Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Wyoming 2 Mathematics
More informationMulti-fidelity sensitivity analysis
Multi-fidelity sensitivity analysis Loic Le Gratiet 1,2, Claire Cannamela 2 & Bertrand Iooss 3 1 Université Denis-Diderot, Paris, France 2 CEA, DAM, DIF, F-91297 Arpajon, France 3 EDF R&D, 6 quai Watier,
More informationImplementation of Sparse Wavelet-Galerkin FEM for Stochastic PDEs
Implementation of Sparse Wavelet-Galerkin FEM for Stochastic PDEs Roman Andreev ETH ZÜRICH / 29 JAN 29 TOC of the Talk Motivation & Set-Up Model Problem Stochastic Galerkin FEM Conclusions & Outlook Motivation
More informationOutline Introduction OLS Design of experiments Regression. Metamodeling. ME598/494 Lecture. Max Yi Ren
1 / 34 Metamodeling ME598/494 Lecture Max Yi Ren Department of Mechanical Engineering, Arizona State University March 1, 2015 2 / 34 1. preliminaries 1.1 motivation 1.2 ordinary least square 1.3 information
More informationHyperbolic Polynomial Chaos Expansion (HPCE) and its Application to Statistical Analysis of Nonlinear Circuits
Hyperbolic Polynomial Chaos Expansion HPCE and its Application to Statistical Analysis of Nonlinear Circuits Majid Ahadi, Aditi Krishna Prasad, Sourajeet Roy High Speed System Simulations Laboratory Department
More informationOriginal Research. Sensitivity Analysis and Variance Reduction in a Stochastic NDT Problem
To appear in the International Journal of Computer Mathematics Vol. xx, No. xx, xx 2014, 1 9 Original Research Sensitivity Analysis and Variance Reduction in a Stochastic NDT Problem R. H. De Staelen a
More informationMonte Carlo Methods for Uncertainty Quantification
Monte Carlo Methods for Uncertainty Quantification Mike Giles Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford Contemporary Numerical Techniques Mike Giles (Oxford) Monte Carlo methods 1 / 23 Lecture outline
More informationEvaluation of Non-Intrusive Approaches for Wiener-Askey Generalized Polynomial Chaos
49th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference 6t 7 - April 28, Schaumburg, IL AIAA 28-892 Evaluation of Non-Intrusive Approaches for Wiener-Askey Generalized
More informationNONLOCALITY AND STOCHASTICITY TWO EMERGENT DIRECTIONS FOR APPLIED MATHEMATICS. Max Gunzburger
NONLOCALITY AND STOCHASTICITY TWO EMERGENT DIRECTIONS FOR APPLIED MATHEMATICS Max Gunzburger Department of Scientific Computing Florida State University North Carolina State University, March 10, 2011
More informationUncertainty Evolution In Stochastic Dynamic Models Using Polynomial Chaos
Noname manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor) Uncertainty Evolution In Stochastic Dynamic Models Using Polynomial Chaos Umamaheswara Konda Puneet Singla Tarunraj Singh Peter Scott Received: date
More informationUncertainty Quantification via Sparse Polynomial Chaos Expansion
University of Colorado, Boulder CU Scholar Mechanical Engineering Graduate Theses & Dissertations Mechanical Engineering Spring 1-1-2015 Uncertainty Quantification via Sparse Polynomial Chaos Expansion
More informationASSESSMENT OF COLLOCATION AND GALERKIN APPROACHES TO LINEAR DIFFUSION EQUATIONS WITH RANDOM DATA
International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification, 11):19 33, 2011 ASSESSMENT OF COLLOCATION AND GALERKIN APPROACHES TO LINEAR DIFFUSION EQUATIONS WITH RANDOM DATA Howard C. Elman, 1, Christopher W.
More informationERROR AND UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION AND SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS IN MECHANICS COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification, 1 (2): 147 161 (2011) ERROR AND UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION AND SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS IN MECHANICS COMPUTATIONAL MODELS Bin Liang & Sankaran Mahadevan
More informationNON-LINEAR APPROXIMATION OF BAYESIAN UPDATE
tifica NON-LINEAR APPROXIMATION OF BAYESIAN UPDATE Alexander Litvinenko 1, Hermann G. Matthies 2, Elmar Zander 2 http://sri-uq.kaust.edu.sa/ 1 Extreme Computing Research Center, KAUST, 2 Institute of Scientific
More informationAn Empirical Chaos Expansion Method for Uncertainty Quantification
An Empirical Chaos Expansion Method for Uncertainty Quantification Melvin Leok and Gautam Wilkins Abstract. Uncertainty quantification seeks to provide a quantitative means to understand complex systems
More informationState Space Representation of Gaussian Processes
State Space Representation of Gaussian Processes Simo Särkkä Department of Biomedical Engineering and Computational Science (BECS) Aalto University, Espoo, Finland June 12th, 2013 Simo Särkkä (Aalto University)
More informationRobust Optimal Control using Polynomial Chaos and Adjoints for Systems with Uncertain Inputs
2th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference 27-3 June 211, Honolulu, Hawaii AIAA 211-369 Robust Optimal Control using Polynomial Chaos and Adjoints for Systems with Uncertain Inputs Sriram General
More informationUncertainty Quantification and Validation Using RAVEN. A. Alfonsi, C. Rabiti. Risk-Informed Safety Margin Characterization. https://lwrs.inl.
Risk-Informed Safety Margin Characterization Uncertainty Quantification and Validation Using RAVEN https://lwrs.inl.gov A. Alfonsi, C. Rabiti North Carolina State University, Raleigh 06/28/2017 Assumptions
More informationAn introduction to Bayesian statistics and model calibration and a host of related topics
An introduction to Bayesian statistics and model calibration and a host of related topics Derek Bingham Statistics and Actuarial Science Simon Fraser University Cast of thousands have participated in the
More informationUncertainty analysis of large-scale systems using domain decomposition
Center for Turbulence Research Annual Research Briefs 2007 143 Uncertainty analysis of large-scale systems using domain decomposition By D. Ghosh, C. Farhat AND P. Avery 1. Motivation and objectives A
More informationSURROGATE PREPOSTERIOR ANALYSES FOR PREDICTING AND ENHANCING IDENTIFIABILITY IN MODEL CALIBRATION
International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification, ():xxx xxx, 0 SURROGATE PREPOSTERIOR ANALYSES FOR PREDICTING AND ENHANCING IDENTIFIABILITY IN MODEL CALIBRATION Zhen Jiang, Daniel W. Apley, & Wei
More informationApplication and validation of polynomial chaos methods to quantify uncertainties in simulating the Gulf of Mexico circulation using HYCOM.
Application and validation of polynomial chaos methods to quantify uncertainties in simulating the Gulf of Mexico circulation using HYCOM. Mohamed Iskandarani Matthieu Le Hénaff Carlisle Thacker University
More informationSolving the Stochastic Steady-State Diffusion Problem Using Multigrid
Solving the Stochastic Steady-State Diffusion Problem Using Multigrid Tengfei Su Applied Mathematics and Scientific Computing Advisor: Howard Elman Department of Computer Science Sept. 29, 2015 Tengfei
More informationA reduced-order stochastic finite element analysis for structures with uncertainties
A reduced-order stochastic finite element analysis for structures with uncertainties Ji Yang 1, Béatrice Faverjon 1,2, Herwig Peters 1, icole Kessissoglou 1 1 School of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,
More informationStochastic Capacitance Extraction Considering Process Variation with Spatial Correlation
Stochastic Capacitance Extraction Considering Process Variation with Spatial Correlation Tuck Chan EE Department UCLA, CA 90095 tuckie@ucla.edu Fang Gong EE Department UCLA, CA 90095 gongfang@ucla.edu
More informationarxiv: v1 [stat.me] 10 Jul 2009
6th St.Petersburg Workshop on Simulation (2009) 1091-1096 Improvement of random LHD for high dimensions arxiv:0907.1823v1 [stat.me] 10 Jul 2009 Andrey Pepelyshev 1 Abstract Designs of experiments for multivariate
More informationFinal Report: DE-FG02-95ER25239 Spectral Representations of Uncertainty: Algorithms and Applications
Final Report: DE-FG02-95ER25239 Spectral Representations of Uncertainty: Algorithms and Applications PI: George Em Karniadakis Division of Applied Mathematics, Brown University April 25, 2005 1 Objectives
More informationSparse Grid Collocation for Uncertainty Quantification
Sparse Grid Collocation for Uncertainty Quantification John Burkardt Department of Scientific Computing Florida State University Ajou University 14 August 2013 http://people.sc.fsu.edu/ jburkardt/presentations/......
More informationGaussian with mean ( µ ) and standard deviation ( σ)
Slide from Pieter Abbeel Gaussian with mean ( µ ) and standard deviation ( σ) 10/6/16 CSE-571: Robotics X ~ N( µ, σ ) Y ~ N( aµ + b, a σ ) Y = ax + b + + + + 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1, ~ ) ( ) ( ), ( ~ ), (
More informationDifferentiation and Integration
Differentiation and Integration (Lectures on Numerical Analysis for Economists II) Jesús Fernández-Villaverde 1 and Pablo Guerrón 2 February 12, 2018 1 University of Pennsylvania 2 Boston College Motivation
More informationKernel-based Approximation. Methods using MATLAB. Gregory Fasshauer. Interdisciplinary Mathematical Sciences. Michael McCourt.
SINGAPORE SHANGHAI Vol TAIPEI - Interdisciplinary Mathematical Sciences 19 Kernel-based Approximation Methods using MATLAB Gregory Fasshauer Illinois Institute of Technology, USA Michael McCourt University
More informationSparse Quadrature Algorithms for Bayesian Inverse Problems
Sparse Quadrature Algorithms for Bayesian Inverse Problems Claudia Schillings, Christoph Schwab Pro*Doc Retreat Disentis 2013 Numerical Analysis and Scientific Computing Disentis - 15 August, 2013 research
More informationUncertainty Quantification in MEMS
Uncertainty Quantification in MEMS N. Agarwal and N. R. Aluru Department of Mechanical Science and Engineering for Advanced Science and Technology Introduction Capacitive RF MEMS switch Comb drive Various
More informationCovariance function estimation in Gaussian process regression
Covariance function estimation in Gaussian process regression François Bachoc Department of Statistics and Operations Research, University of Vienna WU Research Seminar - May 2015 François Bachoc Gaussian
More informationIntroduction to Gaussian Processes
Introduction to Gaussian Processes Neil D. Lawrence GPSS 10th June 2013 Book Rasmussen and Williams (2006) Outline The Gaussian Density Covariance from Basis Functions Basis Function Representations Constructing
More informationFast Numerical Methods for Stochastic Computations: A Review
COMMUNICATIONS IN COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS Vol. 5, No. 2-4, pp. 242-272 Commun. Comput. Phys. February 2009 REVIEW ARTICLE Fast Numerical Methods for Stochastic Computations: A Review Dongbin Xiu Department
More information