Global properties of atomic nuclei

Transcription

1 Global properties of atomic nuclei

2 How to probe nuclear size? Electron Sca5ering from nuclei For low energies and under condi0ons where the electron does not penetrate the nucleus, the electron sca5ering can be described by the Rutherford formula. The Rutherford formula is an analy0c expression for the differen0al sca5ering cross sec0on, and for a projec0le charge of e, it is Kine0c energy of electron elastic scattering: k = k', ν = 0, q 2 = k 2 (1 - cos θ) As the energy of the electrons is raised enough to make them an effec0ve nuclear probe, a number of other effects become significant, and the sca5ering behavior diverges from the Rutherford formula. The probing electrons are rela0vis0c, they produce significant nuclear recoil, and they interact via their magne0c moment as well as by their charge. When the magne0c moment and recoil are taken into account, the expression is called the Mo5 cross sec0on.

3 A major period of inves0ga0on of nuclear size and structure occurred in the 1950's with the work of Robert Hofstadter and others who compared their high energy electron sca5ering results with the Mo5 cross sec0on. The illustra0on below from Hofstadter's work shows the divergence from the Mo5 cross sec0on which indicates that the electrons are penetra0ng the nucleus - departure from point- par0cle sca5ering is evidence of the structure of the nucleus.

4 The cross sec0on from elas0c electron sca5ering is: Mott cross section form factor Form factor q three momentum transfer of electron

5 Calculated and measured densities

6 Sizes Assuming the nucleus is a spherical object with a sharp surface and constant nucleonic density ρ 0 = 0.16 nucleons/fm 3, demonstrate the relation: R 1.2A 1/3 fm ρ ( 0) = 0.16 nucleons/fm 3 ( ) = ρ 0 1+ exp$ r R ρ r ( * ) " # a % + '- &, 1 R 1.2A 1/3 fm, a 0.6fm

7 Pairing and binding

8 I. Tanihata et al., PRL 55 (1985) 2676 Halos For super achievers:

9 =M Table I summarizes the various contributions to the energy, including the QED corrections and the finite nuclear size term. Since all the lower-order terms can now be calculated to very high precision, including the QED terms of order 3, the dominant source of uncertainty comes from the QED corrections of order 4 or higher. Yet, this QED uncertainty (10 Laser MHz) trapping is larger than of thexotic finite nuclear atoms. size effect, thus preventing an extraction of the nuclear size directly from TABLE I. Contributions to the electronic binding energy and their orders of magnitude in atomic units. a 0 is the Bohr radius, 1=137. For helium, the atomic number Z ¼ 2, and the mass ratio =M g I is the nuclear g factor. d is the nuclear dipole polarizability. Contribution Magnitude Nonrelativistic energy Z 2 Mass polarization Z 2 =M Second-order mass polarization Z 2 ð=mþ 2 Relativistic corrections Z 4 2 Relativistic recoil Z 4 2 =M Anomalous magnetic moment Z 4 3 Hyperfine structure Z 3 g I 2 0 Lamb shift Z 4 3 ln þ Radiative recoil Z 4 3 ðlnþ=m Finite nuclear size Z 4 hr c =a 0 i 2 Nuclear polarization Z 3 e 2 d =ða 4 0 Þ = RMP 85, 1383 (2013) Isotope Shift µ=reduced electron mass FIG. 1 (color Difference online). in (Top mean-square panel) Two-neutron charge radii separation for energies (S the 2n ) N~60 for Zregion, ¼ 32 45PRL versus 105, N The new(2010) Kr data reported here are represented by filled diamonds (error bars

10 Neutron & proton density distribu0ons Density (fm -3 ) (n) (p) Diffuseness Skin Sn (p) (n) Halo Radius (fm) Radius (fm)

11 Neutron radii Proton-Nucleus elastic Pion, alpha, d scattering Pion photoproduction Involve strong probes Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, (2014)

12 = Ω + Ω Ω Ω = ) ( 4sin Q F Q G d d d d d d d d A P W F L R L R θ πα σ σ σ σ F n (Q 2 ) Z 0 of Weak Interaction Parity Violating Asymmetry 0 Weinberg angle: proton neutron Electric charge 1 0 Weak charge Parity- viola0ng electron sca5ering M Z =90.19 GeV! ~7 10-7

13 Lead ( 208 Pb) Radius Experiment : PREX Analysis is clean, like electromagnetic scattering: 1. Probes the entire nuclear volume 2. Perturbation theory applies E = 850 MeV, θ = 6 electrons on lead 0 Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, (2012) PREX: fm Theory: ± fm 208 Pb

14 S. Mizutori et al., Phys. Rev. C61, (2000) Proton Number Z < HFB/SLy4 neutron skin Neutron Number N

15 Protons and neutrons aren t point particles charge distribution in the neutron charge distribution in the proton ] -1 [fm 4 r 2 Breit ] -1 [fm 4 r 2 Breit r [fm] r [fm] Figure 2.5: relativistic Darwin- Foldy correction

16 Proton size puzzle Muon has a mass of MeV, which is about 200 times that of the electron Bohr radius: Proton radius determinations over time 2S 1/2-2P 1/2 Proton charge radii obtained from hydrogen spectroscopy S 1/2-2P 1/2 2S 1/2-2P 3/2 Proton radius (fm) year Orsay, 1962 Stanford, 1963 Saskatoon, 1974 Mainz, 1980 Sick, 2003 Hydrogen muonic hydrogen Dispersion fit CODATA 2006 MAMI, 2010 JLab, 2011 Sick, 2011 CODATA S-2S + 2S- 4S 1/2 1S-2S + 2S- 4D 5/2 1S-2S + 2S- 4P 1/2 1S-2S + 2S- 4P 3/2 1S-2S + 2S- 6S 1/2 1S-2S + 2S- 6D 5/2 1S-2S + 2S- 8S 1/2 1S-2S + 2S- 8D 3/2 1S-2S + 2S- 8D 5/2 1S-2S + 2S-12D 3/2 1S-2S + 2S-12D 5/2 1S-2S + 1S - 3S 1/2 Pohl et al. H avg = fm µp : fm proton charge radius (fm)