DISTURBANCE ATTENUATION IN A MAGNETIC LEVITATION SYSTEM WITH ACCELERATION FEEDBACK
|
|
- Rosemary Wilkerson
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 DISTURBANCE ATTENUATION IN A MAGNETIC LEVITATION SYSTEM WITH ACCELERATION FEEDBACK Feng Tian Department of Mechanical Engineering Marquette University Milwaukee, WI USA feng.tian@mu.edu Kevin Craig Department of Mechanical Engineering Marquette University Milwaukee, WI USA kevin.craig@mu.edu Mark Nagurka Department of Mechanical Engineering Marquette University Milwaukee, WI USA mark.nagurka@mu.edu Abstract The objective of this work is to demonstrate the use of acceleration feedback to improve the performance of a maglev system, especially in disturbance attenuation. In the single degreeof-freedom DOF system studied here, acceleration feedback has the effect of virtually increasing inertia, damping and stiffness. It is shown that it can be used to increase disturbance rejection without sacrificing tracking performance. Both analytical and experimental results demonstrate that disturbance rejection can be improved with acceleration feedback. I. INTRODUCTION Magnetic levitation or maglev systems utilize electromagnetic forces to achieve levitation. They are open-loop unstable and inherently nonlinear. Feedback control loops are used to manipulate the electromagnetic forces to counterbalance gravity. Examples of maglev technology can be found in frictionless bearings, vibration isolation equipment, and maglev vehicles. A classic control design approach for a maglev system is to linearize the nonlinear system dynamics about an operating point equilibrium point and design a linear controller that operates about that point. Although the system is designed to work at the operating point or its vicinity, disturbances may drive the system away from the operating point. If the disturbances are too large, the system will lose balance and fail to operate. Research work has been carried out to find how to attenuate disturbances and improve the performance of maglev systems. Investigators have proposed different control strategies. Shan and Menq [1] reported two disturbance rejection algorithms internal model-based control and sliding mode control that improved the dynamic stiffness of a magnetic suspension stage. Both simulation and experiments indicated that the dynamic stiffness of their system was increased. Fang, Feemster and Dawson [2] reported a position regulation control strategy developed for a magnetic levitation system operating in the presence of a bounded, nonlinear, periodic disturbance. They included simulation results, but no experimental data was reported. Another position regulation control strategy, reported by the same authors in 2006 [3], required that the disturbance be bounded and the period of the disturbance be known. She, Xin and Yamaura [4] described a technique called equivalentinput-disturbance estimation. The controller, designed using H control theory, generated an input signal based on the information from a state observer. The input signal cancelled the effect of the real disturbance. They provided simulation results without experimental verification. Previous research efforts show that different control strategies can be used to increase the overall performance of a maglev system. This research investigates an approach that improves disturbance attenuation while not changing the system response to a reference signal. Acceleration feedback has been studied by previous researchers and proved to be effective in improving system performance in disturbance rejection. However, prior work has not discussed the implementation of acceleration feedback on maglev systems. The primary goal of this paper is to show that acceleration feedback can be used on a maglev system to attenuate disturbance. Both analytical and experimental evaluations of the acceleration feedback technique are presented. The acceleration control type servo system was proposed as a novel design paradigm of servo systems by Hori [5], and was further developed as a hybrid control method for the position and mechanical impedance of robot actuators [6]. Experiments demonstrated the effectiveness of both systems in disturbance suppression. Acceleration feedback control has also been reported and used to improve the performance of DC drives [7]. It allows systems to achieve substantially higher overall stiffness without requiring higher bandwidths of the velocity and position loops. For a maglev system, it is important to note that acceleration feedback control alone does not guarantee stability. For that, the system needs a position regulator. The acceleration feedback changes the effective inertia, damping, and stiffness of the system. It increases the effective inertia of the system for disturbance rejection purposes. The maglev system used in this research is stabilized with a PD controller. The system serves as a baseline from which to make performance comparisons. Comparisons are made between the system responses with and without an acceleration /11/$ IEEE 51
2 feedback loop to a sinusoidal position command, first as a position reference signal R and then as a disturbance signal D, as is shown in Fig. 1. Performance is evaluated based on the magnitude ratio in db of the output versus input signals. Fig. 1. Block diagram of a system subject to disturbance D In the following sections, the plant model of the maglev system is presented and the basic theory of acceleration feedback is introduced. The design, analysis, and simulation of the acceleration feedback controller are shown. Experimental results demonstrate the advantage of improved performance with acceleration feedback on the maglev system. II. MAGLEV PLANT AND POSITION REGULATOR Fig. 2 shows a free body diagram of a single degree-offreedom DOF maglev device. Woodson and Melcher [8] Equation 2 shows the nonlinear form of the plant. In order to design a linear controller for the system, a linearized model is derived at the operating point where i = i 0, x = x 0, and ẋ = 0. The Taylor series of equation 2 is 2 i 0 2i 2 0 mẍ = mg K 1 + K 1 K 2 + x 0 K 2 + x 0 3 δx 2i 0 K 1 K 2 + x 0 2 δi 3 At the operating point the system reaches equilibrium, 2 i 0 mg = K 1 4 K 2 + x 0 Substituting equation 4 into equation 3, 2i 2 2i 0 0 mẍ = K 1 K 2 + x 0 3 δx K 1 K 2 + x 0 2 δi 5 where x = x 0 + δx and i = i 0 + δi. Letting and k x = K 1 m k i = K 1 m 2i 2 0 K 2 + x 0 3 2i 0 K 2 + x 0 2 the equation of motion for the magnetic system is 6 7 ẍ = k x δx k i δi 8 Equation 8 is the linearized governing equation for the maglev system where the current δi is controlled. Fig. 3 shows the block diagram of the open-loop system where Xs is the Laplace transform of δx and Is is the Laplace transform of δi. Fig. 2. Free body diagram of the maglev system proved that the attractive force acting on the ferrous object is approximated by 2 F i, x i = K 1 1 K 2 + x where K 1 and K 2 are parameters characterized by the geometry and construction of the electromagnet. These parameters are determined experimentally in this research. Equation 1 can also be derived from Maxwell s equations. One important assumption is that the ferrous object stays at the vicinity of the electromagnet so the magnetic fringe flux can be neglected. The governing equation for the ferrous object is determined using Newton s second law. Assuming vertical motion only, a force balance on the levitated object shown in Fig. 2 yields 2 i mẍ = mg K 1 2 K 2 + x Fig. 3. Block diagram of the open-loop system without acceleration feedback Taking the Laplace transform of both sides of equation 8 and assuming zero initial conditions, s 2 Xs = k x Xs k i Is 9 Rearranging, the open-loop transfer function of the system is Xs Is = k i s 2 10 k x where the input is the control current and the output is the levitated object position. From equation 10 the system has a 52
3 pair of real poles at ± k x. The plant is open-loop unstable due to the positive real pole. A position regulator is needed to achieve stable levitation. In this research, a PD controller is used. If the levitated object moves away from the desired operating point, the controller will adjust the current passing through the electromagnet to provide a restoring force to attenuate the position error. From the control perspective, this is similar to adding stiffness by using the gains of the controller. Fig. 4 shows the block diagram of such a position feedback controller in a cascaded configuration. Fig. 6. Bode diagram of a maglev system with different controller gains Fig. 4. Maglev system with a PD controller For such a system, the stiffness is provided solely by the controller. It is sometimes referred to as the active stiffness. Active stiffness is added by the stiffness terms resulting from the controller gains. Fig. 5 shows the block diagram of such a system with a disturbance D. Fig. 5. System without acceleration feedback loop with disturbance D The transfer function between the disturbance D and the output position X for this system is III. ACCELERATION FEEDBACK PRINCIPLE Schmidt and Lorenz [7] demonstrated the principle, design, and implementation of acceleration feedback control to improve the performance of DC servo drives. In their research, the acceleration signal was estimated using an acceleration observer, scaled by a factor k AF B and fed back to the controller. The feedback loop adds electronic inertia to the system. In this research, the acceleration signal is calculated using equation 8 instead of measuring it with an accelerometer. Fig. 7 shows a block diagram of a maglev system with acceleration feedback assuming the acceleration signal is available. The acceleration calculation and acceleration feedback implementation will be given in the Experimental Results section. The acceleration feedback loop is closed by a positive feedback instead of a negative one because there is a negative sign in the open-loop transfer function of the plant, as is shown in equation 10. Xs Ds = k i s k i K d s + k i K p k x From equation 11, it is obvious that the frequency response is shaped by the active controller gain K d and K p. The position regulator is actively used to achieve a stable levitation as well as reduce the response of the system to disturbances. In order to increase the stiffness of the system, a larger controller gain is needed. Fig. 6 shows the Bode plot of two system with different P gains and D gains. From the plot we can see higher controller gains help to attenuate the system response to the disturbance. However, for a maglev system, increasing the controller gain may cause the system to be unstable. The conclusion is that in order to increase the stiffness, the controller gains need to be increased, but only certain gain values will maintain the stability of the system. To raise the dynamic stiffness without changing the controller gains requires the use of acceleration feedback. Fig. 7. Block diagram of the open-loop system with acceleration feedback With the acceleration feedback loop, the current error signal e become e = δi + k AF B ẍ 12 The acceleration signal ẍ becomes ẍ = k i e + k x δx 13 Substituting equation 13 into equation 12, the acceleration signal can be written as ẍ = k i δi + k AF B ẍ + k x δx 14 53
4 Take the Laplace transform of both sides of equation 14 and rearranging, the open-loop transfer function of the maglev system with an acceleration feedback loop is Xs Is = k i 1 + k i k AF B s 2 15 k x where the input is the control current and the output is the gap distance. To ensure the transfer function between the reference single R and output X remains the same, the PD position control gains must be scaled by a factor of 1 + k i k AF B. The closed loop system with both a PD controller and an acceleration feedback loop is shown in Fig. 8. Fig. 8. System with a PD controller and an acceleration feedback loop The transfer function between the disturbance D and the displacement X is Xs Ds = k i /[1 + k i k AF B s 2 + k i 1 + k i k AF B K d s +k i 1 + k i k AF B K p k x ] 16 The effect of adding acceleration feedback is the same as adding some inertia the so-called electronic inertia. The electronic inertia makes the disturbance seem like it is acting on a larger mass. The resulting effect on the dynamic stiffness is shown in Fig. 9. The phase shift does not change and is thus omitted here. increased. The concept can be understood better by taking a look at the dynamic stiffness change of the system, which is the inverse of the transfer function between the disturbance and the system output. For a system without acceleration feedback, the dynamic stiffness is Ds Xs = s2 + k i K d s + k i K p k x k i 17 For a system with acceleration feedback, the dynamic stiffness is Ds Xs = [1 + k i k AF B s 2 + k i 1 + k i k AF B K d s +k i 1 + k i k AF B K p k x ]/ k i 18 The denominators of equations 17 and 18 are the same and the numerators are the characteristic equations of the systems. By choosing an appropriate acceleration feedback gain k AF B, the gains for the double derivative term, derivative term, and constant term can be made larger in equation 18 than those in equation 17. The factor 1+k AF B makes the mass seem to be k AF B times more than its real value. This additional part is the so-called electronic inertia added to the system. In addition, the electronic damping coefficient k i K d is increased by k i k AF B times. The equivalent stiffness is also increased. It means more effort in disturbance D is needed to achieve the same X. In other words, a system with acceleration feedback will have less change when experiencing the same disturbance as a system without acceleration feedback. Introducing an acceleration feedback loop has the effect of increasing the effective mass, damping, and stiffness of the system. Experiments will show that the system response to the reference signal remains unchanged. IV. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS For the maglev system discussed here, the position signal is available for measurement and the control current, which is the output of the controller, is assumed known. Equation 8 gives the expression of the acceleration signal based on the position feedback signal and control current. Fig. 10 shows the block diagram of the maglev system with an acceleration feedback loop, in which the acceleration signal is calculated from the measured position signal and control current. Note that there is also a position feedback loop to achieve a stable levitation. Fig. 9. System responses of systems with and without acceleration feedback With acceleration feedback the dynamic magnitude response curve shifts down, which means the stiffness of the system has Fig. 10. Block diagram of a maglev system with acceleration feedback 54
5 The acceleration feedback controller for the maglev system is implemented in MATLAB/SIMULINK R with a dspace R control design system. The dspace R system allows high level programming using SIMULINK R blocks, and can automatically transfer the SIMULINK R programs into executable files. Two experiments are performed on a tabletop maglev testbed. The first experiment compares the response of the maglev system with and without acceleration feedback to a sinusoidal reference signal. The second compares the response of the maglev system with and without acceleration feedback to a sinusoidal disturbance signal. Fig. 11 shows the result of the first experiment. It can be seen that the maglev system responds almost the same whether the acceleration feedback is used or not. Fig. 12. System outputs of a maglev system subject to a sine disturbance V. CONCLUSION AND FUTURE WORK Fig. 11. System outputs of a maglev system tracking a sine command signal The experiment was repeated for reference sine signals with frequencies from 0.1 Hz to 10 Hz. Experimental results show that the system can track a reference signal up to about 9 Hz. If the reference signal has a frequency larger than 10 Hz, the system fails to track the signal or loses stability. This is because the linearized system does not take into consideration the nonlinear character of the components at high frequencies. Although the Bode plot analysis shows results up to about 1600 Hz, the experiment validation only reached a maximum frequency of 9 Hz. Fig. 12 shows the comparison between the system outputs with and without the acceleration feedback loop. The disturbance is greatly attenuated in the system with an acceleration feedback loop. Fig. 9 shows the magnitude ratio of the disturbance signal is about 60 db smaller in the system with an acceleration feedback loop. The amplitude of the system with acceleration feedback is five times smaller than that of the system without it. The signal becomes noisy when the amplitude of the system output becomes small. The experiment demonstrates that an acceleration feedback loop in the system successfully attenuates the disturbance. An analytical and experimental comparison of the system responses of a maglev system with and without acceleration feedback loop is presented. Analytical and experimental results show that the disturbance is attenuated significantly for the system with an acceleration feedback loop. For the disturbance signal, adding an acceleration feedback loop to the system has the same effect as adding inertia, damping, and stiffness in the system. The performance of the system subject to a disturbance is improved. It is also shown that the system response to a reference signal remains unchanged whether the system has an acceleration feedback loop or not. The acceleration feedback control method has been experimentally validated to be effective on a single DOF maglev system where the nonlinear model of the maglev system was linearized and a linear PD controller was used. Future work may investigate the possibility of implementing the acceleration feedback method with a nonlinear controller. In addition, the use of acceleration feedback to reject disturbances may be tested on multiple DOF maglev systems. REFERENCES [1] X. Shan and C. Menq. Robust disturbance rejection for improved dynamic stiffness of a magnetic suspension stage. IEEE/ASME TRANS- ACTION ON MECHATRONICS, 2002: [2] Y. Fang, M. Feemster, and D. Dawson. Nonlinear disturbance rejection for magnetic levitation systems. Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Control. Houston, [3] M. Feemster, Y. Fang, and Dawson M. Darren. Disturbance rejection for a magnetic levitation system. IEEE/ASME TRANSACTION ON MECHATRONICS. 2006: [4] X She, X. Xin, and T. Yamaura, Analysis and design of control system with equivalent-input-disturbance estimation. Proceeedings of the 2006 IEEE International Conference on Control Applications. Munich, [5] Y. Hori, Disturbance suppression on an acceleration control type dc servo system. Conf. Rec. PESC
6 [6] Y. Hori, Position and mechanical impedance control method of robot actuator based on the acceleration control. Conf. Rec. PESC [7] P. Schmidt and D. Robert, Design Principles and Implementation of Acceleration Feedback to Improve Performance of DC drives. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRY APPLICATIONS, 1992: [8] H. Woodson and J. Melcher,Electromechanical Dynamics: Part I: Discrete Systems, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.,
Acceleration Feedback
Acceleration Feedback Mechanical Engineer Modeling & Simulation Electro- Mechanics Electrical- Electronics Engineer Sensors Actuators Computer Systems Engineer Embedded Control Controls Engineer Mechatronic
More informationJournal of System Design and Dynamics
Zero Power Non-Contact Suspension System with Permanent Magnet Motion Feedback* Feng SUN** and Koichi OKA** ** Kochi University of Technology 185 Miyanokuchi, Tosayamada, Kami city, Kochi 782-8502, Japan
More information1 x(k +1)=(Φ LH) x(k) = T 1 x 2 (k) x1 (0) 1 T x 2(0) T x 1 (0) x 2 (0) x(1) = x(2) = x(3) =
567 This is often referred to as Þnite settling time or deadbeat design because the dynamics will settle in a Þnite number of sample periods. This estimator always drives the error to zero in time 2T or
More informationControl Using Sliding Mode Of the Magnetic Suspension System
International Journal of Electrical & Computer Sciences IJECS-IJENS Vol:10 No:03 1 Control Using Sliding Mode Of the Magnetic Suspension System Yousfi Khemissi Department of Electrical Engineering Najran
More informationDr Ian R. Manchester Dr Ian R. Manchester AMME 3500 : Review
Week Date Content Notes 1 6 Mar Introduction 2 13 Mar Frequency Domain Modelling 3 20 Mar Transient Performance and the s-plane 4 27 Mar Block Diagrams Assign 1 Due 5 3 Apr Feedback System Characteristics
More informationInter-Ing 2005 INTERDISCIPLINARITY IN ENGINEERING SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE WITH INTERNATIONAL PARTICIPATION, TG. MUREŞ ROMÂNIA, NOVEMBER 2005.
Inter-Ing 5 INTERDISCIPLINARITY IN ENGINEERING SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE WITH INTERNATIONAL PARTICIPATION, TG. MUREŞ ROMÂNIA, 1-11 NOVEMBER 5. DESIGN OF A SIMPLE DIGITAL CONTROLLER FOR A MAGNETIC LEVITATION
More informationModeling and Motion Control of a Magnetically Navigated Microrobotic System
Proceedings of the 3 rd International Conference on Control, Dynamic Systems, and Robotics (CDSR 16) Ottawa, Canada - May 9-10, 2016 Paper No. 102 DOI: 10.11159/cdsr16.102 Modeling and Motion Control of
More informationH-infinity Model Reference Controller Design for Magnetic Levitation System
H.I. Ali Control and Systems Engineering Department, University of Technology Baghdad, Iraq 6043@uotechnology.edu.iq H-infinity Model Reference Controller Design for Magnetic Levitation System Abstract-
More informationInter-Ing 2005 INTERDISCIPLINARITY IN ENGINEERING SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE WITH INTERNATIONAL PARTICIPATION, TG. MUREŞ ROMÂNIA, NOVEMBER 2005.
Inter-Ing 5 INTERDISCIPLINARITY IN ENGINEERING SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE WITH INTERNATIONAL PARTICIPATION, TG. MUREŞ ROMÂNIA, 1-11 NOVEMBER 5. FUZZY CONTROL FOR A MAGNETIC LEVITATION SYSTEM. MODELING AND SIMULATION
More informationAS A POPULAR approach for compensating external
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, VOL. 16, NO. 1, JANUARY 2008 137 A Novel Robust Nonlinear Motion Controller With Disturbance Observer Zi-Jiang Yang, Hiroshi Tsubakihara, Shunshoku Kanae,
More informationELECTRODYNAMIC magnetic suspension systems (EDS
460 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, VOL. 41, NO. 1, JANUARY 2005 Mathematical Model of the 5-DOF Sled Dynamics of an Electrodynamic Maglev System With a Passive Sled Jeroen de Boeij, Maarten Steinbuch,
More informationComputer Exercise Modeling and control of a magnetic suspension system N S. magnetic. gravity. Figure 1: Sketch of the magnetic levitation system.
Control Systems Automatic I Computer Exercise Modeling and control of a magnetic suspension system magnetic N S x gravity N Figure 1: Sketch of the magnetic levitation system. Scope of the project and
More informationChapter 23: Principles of Passive Vibration Control: Design of absorber
Chapter 23: Principles of Passive Vibration Control: Design of absorber INTRODUCTION The term 'vibration absorber' is used for passive devices attached to the vibrating structure. Such devices are made
More informationFeedback Control of Linear SISO systems. Process Dynamics and Control
Feedback Control of Linear SISO systems Process Dynamics and Control 1 Open-Loop Process The study of dynamics was limited to open-loop systems Observe process behavior as a result of specific input signals
More informationNONLINEAR CONTROL OF A MAGNETIC LEVITATION SYSTEM USING FEEDBACK LINEARIZATION
NONLINEAR CONTROL OF A MAGNETIC LEVITATION SYSTEM USING FEEDBACK LINEARIZATION *Raghuwansh Singh ABSTRACT The given problem is modeling and testing a magnetic levitation of system which will levitate a
More informationSystem Parameter Identification for Uncertain Two Degree of Freedom Vibration System
System Parameter Identification for Uncertain Two Degree of Freedom Vibration System Hojong Lee and Yong Suk Kang Department of Mechanical Engineering, Virginia Tech 318 Randolph Hall, Blacksburg, VA,
More informationPosition with Force Feedback Control of Manipulator Arm
Position with Force Feedback Control of Manipulator Arm 1 B. K. Chitra, 2 J. Nandha Gopal, 3 Dr. K. Rajeswari PG Student, Department of EIE Assistant Professor, Professor, Department of EEE Abstract This
More informationJerk derivative feedforward control for motion systems
Jerk derivative feedforward control for motion systems Matthijs Boerlage Rob Tousain Maarten Steinbuch Abstract This work discusses reference trajectory relevant model based feedforward design. For motion
More informationNONLINEAR BACKSTEPPING DESIGN OF ANTI-LOCK BRAKING SYSTEMS WITH ASSISTANCE OF ACTIVE SUSPENSIONS
NONLINEA BACKSTEPPING DESIGN OF ANTI-LOCK BAKING SYSTEMS WITH ASSISTANCE OF ACTIVE SUSPENSIONS Wei-En Ting and Jung-Shan Lin 1 Department of Electrical Engineering National Chi Nan University 31 University
More informationFriction Modeling and Compensation for Haptic Interfaces
Friction Modeling and Compensation for Haptic Interfaces Nicholas L. Bernstein * Dale A. Lawrence * Lucy Y. Pao (*) University of Colorado, Aerospace Engineering, USA ( ) University of Colorado, Electrical
More informationPrüfung Regelungstechnik I (Control Systems I) Übersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam!
Prüfung Regelungstechnik I (Control Systems I) Prof. Dr. Lino Guzzella 29. 8. 2 Übersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam! Do not mark up this translation aid
More informationMechatronics Engineering. Li Wen
Mechatronics Engineering Li Wen Bio-inspired robot-dc motor drive Unstable system Mirko Kovac,EPFL Modeling and simulation of the control system Problems 1. Why we establish mathematical model of the control
More informationModeling the 3-DOF Dynamics of an Electrodynamic Maglev Suspension System with a Passive Sled
Modeling the 3-DOF Dynamics of an Electrodynamic Maglev Suspension System with a Passive Sled Jeroen de Boeij 3, Héctor Gutiérrez *1, Rahul Agarwal 2 and Maarten Steinbuch 3 1 Department of Mechanical
More informationVehicular Suspension and Propulsion Using Double Sided Linear Induction Machines
Vehicular Suspension and Propulsion Using Double Sided Linear Induction Machines Tom Cox Power Electronics Machines and Control Group The University of Nottingham Nottingham, UK t.cox@nottingham.ac.uk
More informationPERIODIC signals are commonly experienced in industrial
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, VOL. 15, NO. 2, MARCH 2007 369 Repetitive Learning Control of Nonlinear Continuous-Time Systems Using Quasi-Sliding Mode Xiao-Dong Li, Tommy W. S. Chow,
More informationQFT Framework for Robust Tuning of Power System Stabilizers
45-E-PSS-75 QFT Framework for Robust Tuning of Power System Stabilizers Seyyed Mohammad Mahdi Alavi, Roozbeh Izadi-Zamanabadi Department of Control Engineering, Aalborg University, Denmark Correspondence
More informationInverted Pendulum System
Introduction Inverted Pendulum System This lab experiment consists of two experimental procedures, each with sub parts. Experiment 1 is used to determine the system parameters needed to implement a controller.
More informationCHAPTER 3 QUARTER AIRCRAFT MODELING
30 CHAPTER 3 QUARTER AIRCRAFT MODELING 3.1 GENERAL In this chapter, the quarter aircraft model is developed and the dynamic equations are derived. The quarter aircraft model is two degrees of freedom model
More informationCo-simulation of Magnetic Bearing System based on Adams and MATLAB
6th International Conference on Machinery, Materials, Environment, Biotechnology and Computer (MMEBC 016) Co-simulation of Magnetic Bearing System based on Adams and MATLAB Sijia Liu1, a, Jingbo Shi, b
More informationGeneral procedure for formulation of robot dynamics STEP 1 STEP 3. Module 9 : Robot Dynamics & controls
Module 9 : Robot Dynamics & controls Lecture 32 : General procedure for dynamics equation forming and introduction to control Objectives In this course you will learn the following Lagrangian Formulation
More information[Type the document title]
[Type the company name] [Type the document title] [Type the document subtitle] Camila [Pick the date] Abstract Impedance and admittance control are complementary in terms of stability and performance properties.
More informationDEVELOPMENT OF A NOVEL ACTIVE ISOLATION CONCEPT 1
DEVELOPMENT OF A NOVEL ACTIVE ISOLATION CONCEPT 1 Michiel J. Vervoordeldonk, Theo A.M. Ruijl, Rob M.G. Rijs Philips Centre for Industrial Technology, PO Box 518, 5600 MD Eindhoven, The Netherlands 2 1
More informationسایت آموزش مهندسی مکانیک
http://www.drshokuhi.com سایت آموزش مهندسی مکانیک 1 Single-degree-of-freedom Systems 1.1 INTRODUCTION In this chapter the vibration of a single-degree-of-freedom system will be analyzed and reviewed. Analysis,
More information(Refer Slide Time: 1:42)
Control Engineering Prof. Madan Gopal Department of Electrical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi Lecture - 21 Basic Principles of Feedback Control (Contd..) Friends, let me get started
More informationUniversity of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research. Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record
Watanabe, N., & Stoten, D. P. (214). Actuator control for a rapid prototyping railway bogie, using a dynamically substructured systems approach. In Proceedings of 12th International Conference on Motion
More informationModelling and State Dependent Riccati Equation Control of an Active Hydro-Pneumatic Suspension System
Proceedings of the International Conference of Control, Dynamic Systems, and Robotics Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, May 15-16 214 Paper No. 31 Modelling and State Dependent Riccati Equation Control of an Hydro-Pneumatic
More informationmagnitude [db] phase [deg] frequency [Hz] feedforward motor load -
ITERATIVE LEARNING CONTROL OF INDUSTRIAL MOTION SYSTEMS Maarten Steinbuch and René van de Molengraft Eindhoven University of Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Systems and Control Group, P.O.
More informationRobot Manipulator Control. Hesheng Wang Dept. of Automation
Robot Manipulator Control Hesheng Wang Dept. of Automation Introduction Industrial robots work based on the teaching/playback scheme Operators teach the task procedure to a robot he robot plays back eecute
More informationControl System Design
ELEC ENG 4CL4: Control System Design Notes for Lecture #36 Dr. Ian C. Bruce Room: CRL-229 Phone ext.: 26984 Email: ibruce@mail.ece.mcmaster.ca Friday, April 4, 2003 3. Cascade Control Next we turn to an
More informationRobust Loop Shaping Force Feedback Controller
Robust Loop Shaping Force Feedback Controller Dynamic For Effective Force Force Control Testing Using Loop Shaping Paper Title N. Nakata & E. Krug Johns Hopkins University, USA SUMMARY: Effective force
More informationAnalysis and Design of Hybrid AI/Control Systems
Analysis and Design of Hybrid AI/Control Systems Glen Henshaw, PhD (formerly) Space Systems Laboratory University of Maryland,College Park 13 May 2011 Dynamically Complex Vehicles Increased deployment
More informationRobust Control of Robot Manipulator by Model Based Disturbance Attenuation
IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 511-513, Nov./Dec. 2003 obust Control of obot Manipulator by Model Based Disturbance Attenuation Keywords : obot manipulators, MBDA, position control,
More informationVibration control with optimized sliding surface for active suspension systems using geophone
Vibration control with optimized sliding surface for active suspension systems using geophone Chenyang Ding, A.A.H. Damen, and P.P.J. van den Bosch Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O. Box 53, Eindhoven,
More informationSystems. Active Vibration Isolation of Multi-Degree-of-Freedom
Active Vibration Isolation of Multi-Degree-of-Freedom Systems WASSIM M. HADDAD School of Aerospace Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332-0150 USA ALI RAZAVI George W Woodruff
More informationVibration Suppression of a 2-Mass Drive System with Multiple Feedbacks
International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 5, Issue 11, November 2015 168 Vibration Suppression of a 2-Mass Drive System with Multiple Feedbacks L. Vidyaratan Meetei, Benjamin
More informationPositioning Servo Design Example
Positioning Servo Design Example 1 Goal. The goal in this design example is to design a control system that will be used in a pick-and-place robot to move the link of a robot between two positions. Usually
More informationChapter 2 SDOF Vibration Control 2.1 Transfer Function
Chapter SDOF Vibration Control.1 Transfer Function mx ɺɺ( t) + cxɺ ( t) + kx( t) = F( t) Defines the transfer function as output over input X ( s) 1 = G( s) = (1.39) F( s) ms + cs + k s is a complex number:
More informationH CONTROL AND SLIDING MODE CONTROL OF MAGNETIC LEVITATION SYSTEM
333 Asian Journal of Control, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 333-340, September 2002 H CONTROL AND SLIDING MODE CONTROL OF MAGNETIC LEVITATION SYSTEM Jing-Chung Shen ABSTRACT In this paper, H disturbance attenuation
More informationIndex. Index. More information. in this web service Cambridge University Press
A-type elements, 4 7, 18, 31, 168, 198, 202, 219, 220, 222, 225 A-type variables. See Across variable ac current, 172, 251 ac induction motor, 251 Acceleration rotational, 30 translational, 16 Accumulator,
More informationIntroduction to Feedback Control
Introduction to Feedback Control Control System Design Why Control? Open-Loop vs Closed-Loop (Feedback) Why Use Feedback Control? Closed-Loop Control System Structure Elements of a Feedback Control System
More informationAdaptive Robust Tracking Control of Robot Manipulators in the Task-space under Uncertainties
Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 3(1): 308-322, 2009 ISSN 1991-8178 Adaptive Robust Tracking Control of Robot Manipulators in the Task-space under Uncertainties M.R.Soltanpour, M.M.Fateh
More informationAdaptive fuzzy observer and robust controller for a 2-DOF robot arm
Adaptive fuzzy observer and robust controller for a -DOF robot arm S. Bindiganavile Nagesh, Zs. Lendek, A.A. Khalate, R. Babuška Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg, 8 CD Delft, The Netherlands (email:
More informationNonlinear PD Controllers with Gravity Compensation for Robot Manipulators
BULGARIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES CYBERNETICS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES Volume 4, No Sofia 04 Print ISSN: 3-970; Online ISSN: 34-408 DOI: 0.478/cait-04-00 Nonlinear PD Controllers with Gravity Compensation
More informationA FEEDBACK STRUCTURE WITH HIGHER ORDER DERIVATIVES IN REGULATOR. Ryszard Gessing
A FEEDBACK STRUCTURE WITH HIGHER ORDER DERIVATIVES IN REGULATOR Ryszard Gessing Politechnika Śl aska Instytut Automatyki, ul. Akademicka 16, 44-101 Gliwice, Poland, fax: +4832 372127, email: gessing@ia.gliwice.edu.pl
More informationMechatronic System Case Study: Rotary Inverted Pendulum Dynamic System Investigation
Mechatronic System Case Study: Rotary Inverted Pendulum Dynamic System Investigation Dr. Kevin Craig Greenheck Chair in Engineering Design & Professor of Mechanical Engineering Marquette University K.
More informationDragline Bucket and Rigging Dynamics
Dragline Bucket and Rigging Dynamics Dr Peter Ridley and Rindert Algra Dr Peter Corke School of Mechanical Engineering, CSIRO Manufacturing Science and Technology, Queensland University of Technology,
More informationTopic # Feedback Control Systems
Topic #1 16.31 Feedback Control Systems Motivation Basic Linear System Response Fall 2007 16.31 1 1 16.31: Introduction r(t) e(t) d(t) y(t) G c (s) G(s) u(t) Goal: Design a controller G c (s) so that the
More informationApplication of Neuro Fuzzy Reduced Order Observer in Magnetic Bearing Systems
Application of Neuro Fuzzy Reduced Order Observer in Magnetic Bearing Systems M. A., Eltantawie, Member, IAENG Abstract Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) is used to design fuzzy reduced order
More informationDesign of a Variable Structure Controller for an Electromagnetic Suspension System
International Journal of Applied Science and Technology Vol. 7, No. ; March 7 Design of a Variable Structure Controller for an Electromagnetic Suspension System Babagana M. Mustapha Department of Electrical
More informationCOMPLIANT CONTROL FOR PHYSICAL HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTION
COMPLIANT CONTROL FOR PHYSICAL HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTION Andrea Calanca Paolo Fiorini Invited Speakers Nevio Luigi Tagliamonte Fabrizio Sergi 18/07/2014 Andrea Calanca - Altair Lab 2 In this tutorial Review
More informationModelling the Electromechanical Interactions in a Null-Flux EDS Maglev System
Modelling the Electromechanical Interactions in a Null-Flux EDS Maglev System Jeroen de Boeij,2, Maarten Steinbuch 2 and Hector Gutiérrez Department of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering Florida Institute
More informationMagnetic Field and Oscillating Analysis of Hybrid Suspension Systems Combining Magnetic Spring and Damper
APSAEM12 Jorunal of the Japan Society of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics Vol.21, No.3 (2013) Regular Paper Magnetic Field and Oscillating Analysis of Hybrid Suspension Systems Combining Magnetic
More informationDr Ian R. Manchester
Week Content Notes 1 Introduction 2 Frequency Domain Modelling 3 Transient Performance and the s-plane 4 Block Diagrams 5 Feedback System Characteristics Assign 1 Due 6 Root Locus 7 Root Locus 2 Assign
More informationLecture 12. Upcoming labs: Final Exam on 12/21/2015 (Monday)10:30-12:30
289 Upcoming labs: Lecture 12 Lab 20: Internal model control (finish up) Lab 22: Force or Torque control experiments [Integrative] (2-3 sessions) Final Exam on 12/21/2015 (Monday)10:30-12:30 Today: Recap
More informationControl for. Maarten Steinbuch Dept. Mechanical Engineering Control Systems Technology Group TU/e
Control for Maarten Steinbuch Dept. Mechanical Engineering Control Systems Technology Group TU/e Motion Systems m F Introduction Timedomain tuning Frequency domain & stability Filters Feedforward Servo-oriented
More informationClosed-loop system 2/1/2016. Generally MIMO case. Two-degrees-of-freedom (2 DOF) control structure. (2 DOF structure) The closed loop equations become
Closed-loop system enerally MIMO case Two-degrees-of-freedom (2 DOF) control structure (2 DOF structure) 2 The closed loop equations become solving for z gives where is the closed loop transfer function
More informationHover Control for Helicopter Using Neural Network-Based Model Reference Adaptive Controller
Vol.13 No.1, 217 مجلد 13 العدد 217 1 Hover Control for Helicopter Using Neural Network-Based Model Reference Adaptive Controller Abdul-Basset A. Al-Hussein Electrical Engineering Department Basrah University
More informationCHAPTER INTRODUCTION
CHAPTER 3 DYNAMIC RESPONSE OF 2 DOF QUARTER CAR PASSIVE SUSPENSION SYSTEM (QC-PSS) AND 2 DOF QUARTER CAR ELECTROHYDRAULIC ACTIVE SUSPENSION SYSTEM (QC-EH-ASS) 3.1 INTRODUCTION In this chapter, the dynamic
More informationYTÜ Mechanical Engineering Department
YTÜ Mechanical Engineering Department Lecture of Special Laboratory of Machine Theory, System Dynamics and Control Division Coupled Tank 1 Level Control with using Feedforward PI Controller Lab Date: Lab
More informationWataru Ohnishi a) Student Member, Hiroshi Fujimoto Senior Member Koichi Sakata Member, Kazuhiro Suzuki Non-member Kazuaki Saiki Member.
IEEJ International Workshop on Sensing, Actuation, and Motion Control Proposal of Decoupling Control Method for High-Precision Stages using Multiple Actuators considering the Misalignment among the Actuation
More informationProgrammable Valves: a Solution to Bypass Deadband Problem of Electro-Hydraulic Systems
Programmable Valves: a Solution to Bypass Deadband Problem of Electro-Hydraulic Systems Song Liu and Bin Yao Abstract The closed-center PDC/servo valves have overlapped spools to prevent internal leakage
More informationRobust fuzzy control of an active magnetic bearing subject to voltage saturation
University of Wollongong Research Online Faculty of Informatics - Papers (Archive) Faculty of Engineering and Information Sciences 2010 Robust fuzzy control of an active magnetic bearing subject to voltage
More informationavailable online at CONTROL OF THE DOUBLE INVERTED PENDULUM ON A CART USING THE NATURAL MOTION
Acta Polytechnica 3(6):883 889 3 Czech Technical University in Prague 3 doi:.43/ap.3.3.883 available online at http://ojs.cvut.cz/ojs/index.php/ap CONTROL OF THE DOUBLE INVERTED PENDULUM ON A CART USING
More informationObserver Based Friction Cancellation in Mechanical Systems
2014 14th International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems (ICCAS 2014) Oct. 22 25, 2014 in KINTEX, Gyeonggi-do, Korea Observer Based Friction Cancellation in Mechanical Systems Caner Odabaş
More informationModeling, Control and Experimental Validation of a Device for Seismic Events Simulation
Modeling, Control and Experimental Validation of a Device for Seismic Events Simulation Paolo Righettini, Roberto Strada, Vittorio Lorenzi, Alberto Oldani, Mattia Rossetti Abstract Single and multi-axis
More informationStudy of Active Force Control in Biodynamic Hand Model
Study of Active Force Control in Biodynamic Hand Model AZIZAN AS ARRY, MOHD ZARHAMDY MD. ZAIN, MUSA MAILAH, MOHAMED HUSSEIN, ZULKIFLI MOHD YUSOP Department of Applied Mechanics, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering,
More informationWide Range Stabilization Of A Magnetic Levitation System Using Analog Fuzzy Supervisory Phase Lead Compensated Controller
11 International Conference on Modeling, Simulation and Control IPCSIT vol.1 (11) (11) IACSIT Press, Singapore Wide Range Stabilization f A Magnetic Levitation System Using Analog Fuzzy Supervisory Phase
More informationAnalysis and Design of Control Systems in the Time Domain
Chapter 6 Analysis and Design of Control Systems in the Time Domain 6. Concepts of feedback control Given a system, we can classify it as an open loop or a closed loop depends on the usage of the feedback.
More informationBalancing of an Inverted Pendulum with a SCARA Robot
Balancing of an Inverted Pendulum with a SCARA Robot Bernhard Sprenger, Ladislav Kucera, and Safer Mourad Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich (ETHZ Institute of Robotics 89 Zurich, Switzerland
More informationMODELING AND HIGH-PERFORMANCE CONTROL OF ELECTRIC MACHINES
MODELING AND HIGH-PERFORMANCE CONTROL OF ELECTRIC MACHINES JOHN CHIASSON IEEE PRESS ü t SERIES ON POWER ENGINEERING IEEE Press Series on Power Engineering Mohamed E. El-Hawary, Series Editor The Institute
More informationSchool of Mechanical Engineering Purdue University. ME375 Feedback Control - 1
Introduction to Feedback Control Control System Design Why Control? Open-Loop vs Closed-Loop (Feedback) Why Use Feedback Control? Closed-Loop Control System Structure Elements of a Feedback Control System
More informationChapter 2 Review of Linear and Nonlinear Controller Designs
Chapter 2 Review of Linear and Nonlinear Controller Designs This Chapter reviews several flight controller designs for unmanned rotorcraft. 1 Flight control systems have been proposed and tested on a wide
More informationTopic # Feedback Control Systems
Topic #19 16.31 Feedback Control Systems Stengel Chapter 6 Question: how well do the large gain and phase margins discussed for LQR map over to DOFB using LQR and LQE (called LQG)? Fall 2010 16.30/31 19
More informationYTÜ Mechanical Engineering Department
YTÜ Mechanical Engineering Department Lecture of Special Laboratory of Machine Theory, System Dynamics and Control Division Coupled Tank 1 Level Control with using Feedforward PI Controller Lab Report
More informationOptimal Plant Shaping for High Bandwidth Disturbance Rejection in Discrete Disturbance Observers
Optimal Plant Shaping for High Bandwidth Disturbance Rejection in Discrete Disturbance Observers Xu Chen and Masayoshi Tomiuka Abstract The Qfilter cutoff frequency in a Disturbance Observer DOB) is restricted
More informationJoint Torque Control for Backlash Compensation in Two-Inertia System
Joint Torque Control for Backlash Compensation in Two-Inertia System Shota Yamada*, Hiroshi Fujimoto** The University of Tokyo 5--5, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 227-856 Japan Phone: +8-4-736-3873*, +8-4-736-43**
More informationInternational Journal of Advance Engineering and Research Development SIMULATION OF FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL OF PERMANENT MAGNET SYNCHRONOUS MOTOR
Scientific Journal of Impact Factor(SJIF): 3.134 e-issn(o): 2348-4470 p-issn(p): 2348-6406 International Journal of Advance Engineering and Research Development Volume 2,Issue 4, April -2015 SIMULATION
More informationFIRST YEAR MATHS FOR PHYSICS STUDENTS NORMAL MODES AND WAVES. Hilary Term Prof. G.G.Ross. Question Sheet 1: Normal Modes
FIRST YEAR MATHS FOR PHYSICS STUDENTS NORMAL MODES AND WAVES Hilary Term 008. Prof. G.G.Ross Question Sheet : Normal Modes [Questions marked with an asterisk (*) cover topics also covered by the unstarred
More informationD(s) G(s) A control system design definition
R E Compensation D(s) U Plant G(s) Y Figure 7. A control system design definition x x x 2 x 2 U 2 s s 7 2 Y Figure 7.2 A block diagram representing Eq. (7.) in control form z U 2 s z Y 4 z 2 s z 2 3 Figure
More informationResearch on Permanent Magnet Linear Synchronous Motor Control System Simulation *
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com AASRI Procedia 3 (2012 ) 262 269 2012 AASRI Conference on Modeling, Identification and Control Research on Permanent Magnet Linear Synchronous Motor Control System
More informationOptimization of two-dimensional permanent magnet arrays for diamagnetic levitation
Optimization of two-dimensional permanent magnet arrays for diamagnetic levitation Roland Moser, François Barrot, Jan Sandtner, Hannes Bleuler Laboratory of Robotic Systems Swiss Federal Institute of Technology,
More informationA Hand-Held Probe for Vibro-Elastography
A Hand-Held Probe for Vibro-Elastography Hassan Rivaz and Robert Rohling Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada rohling@ece.ubc.ca www.ece.ubc.ca/
More informationFinite Element Modules for Demonstrating Critical Concepts in Engineering Vibration Course
Finite Element Modules for Demonstrating Critical Concepts in Engineering Vibration Course Shengyong Zhang Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering College of Engineering and Technology Purdue University
More informationAPPLICATIONS OF HERMETICALLY SEALED FLUID DAMPERS FOR LOW LEVEL, WIDE BANDWIDTH VIBRATION ISOLATION
APPLICATIONS OF HERMETICALLY SEALED FLUID DAMPERS FOR LOW LEVEL, WIDE BANDWIDTH VIBRATION ISOLATION by Alan R. Klembczyk, Chief Engineer Taylor Devices, Inc. 90 Taylor Drive North Tonawanda, NY 14120-0748
More informationChapter 5 Design. D. J. Inman 1/51 Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech
Chapter 5 Design Acceptable vibration levels (ISO) Vibration isolation Vibration absorbers Effects of damping in absorbers Optimization Viscoelastic damping treatments Critical Speeds Design for vibration
More informationClassical Dual-Inverted-Pendulum Control
PRESENTED AT THE 23 IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL 4399 Classical Dual-Inverted-Pendulum Control Kent H. Lundberg James K. Roberge Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Massachusetts
More informationReal-Time Implementation of a LQR-Based Controller for the Stabilization of a Double Inverted Pendulum
Proceedings of the International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists 017 Vol I,, March 15-17, 017, Hong Kong Real-Time Implementation of a LQR-Based Controller for the Stabilization of
More informationFEEDBACK CONTROL SYSTEMS
FEEDBAC CONTROL SYSTEMS. Control System Design. Open and Closed-Loop Control Systems 3. Why Closed-Loop Control? 4. Case Study --- Speed Control of a DC Motor 5. Steady-State Errors in Unity Feedback Control
More informationEXPERIMENTAL DEMONSTRATION OF RESET CONTROL DESIGN 1 ABSTRACT
EXPERIMENTAL DEMONSTRATION OF RESET CONTROL DESIGN 1 Y. Zheng, Y. Chait, 3 C.V. Hollot, 4 M. Steinbuch 5 and M. Norg 6 ABSTRACT Using the describing function method, engineers in the 195 s and 196 s conceived
More informationExperimental Investigation of Inertial Force Control for Substructure Shake Table Tests
Experimental Investigation of Inertial Force Control for Substructure Shake Table Tests M. Stehman & N. Nakata The Johns Hopkins University, USA SUMMARY: This study investigates the use of inertial masses
More information