REENTRY TRAJECTORIES FOR SPACE VEHICLES
|
|
- Abigayle Young
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 REENTRY TRAJECTORIES FOR SPACE VEHICLES Tutorial Lectures at the 4th ICATT, Madrid 2010 J. F. GOESTER Centre National d Etudes Spatiales DCT/SB/MO jean-francois.goester@cnes.fr
2 SPACE VEHICLE REENTRY deorbit V atmosphere Terre atmospheric arc orbital arc E point: (Z=120 km) initial orbit Natural reentries DEORBIT MANEUVER ORBITAL ARC ATMOSPHERIC ARC Controlled reentries 2
3 SPACE VEHICLE REENTRY : DEORBITATION deorbit V atmosphere Terre atmospheric arc orbital arc E point: (Z=120 km) initial orbit Natural reentries DEORBIT MANEUVER ORBITAL ARC ATMOSPHERIC ARC Controlled reentries 3
4 DEORBITATION : POSITION-VELOCITY PARAMETERS To fully define the center of mass motion, we need 6 parameters : x,y,z,v x,v y,v z Orbital motion study leads to choose other set of parameters speaking for themselves" as : a, e, i, ω, Ω, v Classical flight dynamics will use : Z, lat, lon, V, γ, χ Z : lat : lon : V : Topocentric or geodetic altitude (or r : radius) Topocentric or geodetic latitude Longitude / Greenwich Velocity module local horizontal plane γ : Flight Path Angle χ : Velocity Azimuth Ion North r Iat V 4
5 DEORBITATION : MANEUVER PARAMETERS INTENSITY If impulsive maneuver : V : velocity increment (m/s) else: r s γ 0 Ψ ω V γ s ω V S F : thrust level (Newton) V 0 Isp : specific impulse (s) F=q.g 0.Isp with q = -dm/dt α e DIRECTION ω : angle between thrust direction and orbital plane ω : angle between projection of thrust direction on the orbital plane and velocity (or horizontal) γ e β e V e Ψ 5
6 DEORBITATION : IMPULSIVE ASSUMPTION (1/5) PARAMETERS : Before maneuver : [ r s, α s, β s, V s, γ s, ψ s ] Maneuver : [ V, ω, ω ] After maneuver : [r 0, α 0, β 0, V 0, γ 0, ψ 0 ] At Z = 120km : [r e, α e, β e, V e, γ e, ψ e ] FIRST SIMPLIFICATIONS : Reference relative to initial conditions : α s = 0, β s = 0 et ψ s = 0 Impulsive assumption : r 0 = r s, α 0 = α s et β 0 = β s Keplerian orbit : ψ 0 = ψ e = ψ By definition : r e = r T km Initial conditions Final conditions KEEPING PARAMETERS : [ r s, V s, γ s ], [ V, ω, ω ], [ V 0, γ 0, ψ ], [α e, β e, V e, γ e ] 6
7 MOTION EQUATIONS : vectorial relation : V = V 0 V S V sin( ω' ) V cos( ω' )cos( ω γ V cos( ω' ) sin( ω γ Conservation of the total energy on the orbital arc: Conservation of the kinetic moment on the orbital arc: = V DEORBITATION : IMPULSIVE ASSUMPTION (2/5) 0 cos( γ s s 0 ) ) sin( ψ) = V 0 ) = V cos( γ 0 sin( γ V 2 e 0 0 )cos( ψ) V ) + V s cos( γ s s cos( γ = V0 + 2µ ( ) re r0 r0v0 cos( γ0) = re Ve cos( γ ) s ) e ) Relation on the longitudinal range α e (implicit equation) : µ (1 cos( αe )) r0 cos( αe + γ ) + e = 2 r V cos( ) re cos( 0) 0 0 γ γ 0 Relation on the cross range β e (spherical trigonometry) : 0 sin( β e ) = sin( α e ) sin( ψ) 7
8 DEORBITATION : IMPULSIVE ASSUMPTION (3/5) V [m/s] Influence of the ω parameter (γe = -1.3 deg ; ω = 0 deg) 200 km 300 km 400 km In plane thrust direction [deg]
9 300 V [m/s] DEORBITATION : IMPULSIVE ASSUMPTION (4/5) Influence of the ω parameter (γe = -1.3 deg ; ω = 180 deg) Out of plane thrust direction [deg] Ye [km] Out of plane thrust direction [deg]
10 DEORBITATION : IMPULSIVE ASSUMPTION (5/5) Initial values (γe = -1.3 deg): hs = 300 km Vs = γs = 0. deg V = km/s m/s ω = 180. deg ω = 0. deg Dispersions on initial values : d(h s ) = 10. m d(v s ) = 0.02 m/s d(γ s ) = 0. deg d( V )= -1. m/s d(ω ) = 1. deg d(ω ) = 1. deg δz s [m] δv s [m/s] δγ s [deg] δ V [m/s] δω [deg] δω [deg] Somme quadratique δv e [m/s] δγ e [deg] δx e [km] δy e [km]
11 DEORBITATION: CONTINUOUS THRUST (1/11) When the «thrust / mass» ratio is low and involves longer maneuvers durations (order of magnitude comparable to orbital period). Hermes or ATV example : F = 800 to 1600 N (Isp ~ 310 s) mass ~ 20 tons mg Isp by integration of the equation F = qg 0 Isp, we obtain : t = (1 e F => up to t > 1000 s for orbital periods of about 5500 s Problems linked to these durations: greater needed V (thus higher ergols consumption) precision at Z=120 km (in position and velocity) Cases of impossibility to obtain aimed conditions at Z=120 km V 0 g0isp ) 11
12 DEORBITATION: CONTINUOUS THRUST (2/11) γ e EVOLUTION FOR AN AIMED PERIGEE ALTITUDE OF 0 KM -0,80 γ e [deg] -0,90-1,00-1,10-1,20-1,30-1,40-1,50-1,60-1,70-1,80-1,90 Altitude of the initial circular orbit [km]
13 DEORBITATION : CONTINUOUS THRUST (3/11) t [sec] THRUST DURATION (H per = 0 km ; F = 1600 N ; Isp = 310 s ; m = 20 t) Continuous thrust Altitude of the initial circular orbit [km]
14 DEORBITATION : CONTINUOUS THRUST (4/11) V [m/s] DIFFERENCE ON V (Hper = 0 km ; F = 1600 N ; Isp = 310 s ; m = 20 t) Continuous thrust Impulsive thrust Altitude of the initial circular orbit [km]
15 DEORBITATION : CONTINUOUS THRUST (5/11) 1200 Merg [kg] DIFFERENCE ON ERGOLS CONSUMPTION (Hper = 0 km ; F = 1600 N ; Isp = 310 s ; m = 20 t) Continuous thrust Impulsive thrust Altitude of the initial circular orbit [km]
16 DEORBITATION : CONTINUOUS THRUST (6/11) DIFFERENCE ON TIME REMAINING AFTER END OF BOOST (Hper = 0 km ; F = 1600 N ; Isp = 310 s ; m = 20 t) T120 [mn] Continuous thrust Impulsive thrust Altitude of the initial circular orbit [km]
17 DEORBITATION: CONTINUOUS THRUST (7/11) Thrust duration V imp E E initial orbit initial orbit γ e γ e Terre Terre Z = 120 km Z = 120 km Thrust direction optimization and/or several maneuvers 17
18 DEORBITATION : CONTINUOUS THRUST (8/11) TWO MANEUVERS STRATEGIES: 2 braking V V1 V2 1 accelerating V and 1 braking V intermediate orbit V2 Terre Terre intermediate orbit initial orbit initial orbit 18 V1
19 DEORBITATION : CONTINUOUS THRUST (9/11) ADVANTAGES : duration of each boost is shorter (divided by about two in case of two breaking V s) ergols consumption is lower (5 to 10 %) Time between end of last maneuver and Z=120 km is longer => opportunities recovery (for low initial altitudes) Computation of the second maneuver can be done w.r.t the first one (dispersions issued from its realization can be taken into account) DRAWBACKS : Longer duration of the deorbit phase Intermediate elliptic orbit: Lower perigee (atmospheric drag) Drift of the apsides line versus the landing site longitude Nominal landing site 19
20 DEORBITATION : CONTINUOUS THRUST (10/11) V [m/s] DIFFERENCE ON V (Hper = 0 km ; F = 1600 N ; Isp = 310 s ; m = 20 t) maneuver 2 braking maneuvers Impulsive thrust Altitude of the initial circular orbit [km]
21 DEORBITATION : CONTINUOUS THRUST (11/11) DIFFERENCE ON TIME REMAINING AFTER END OF BOOST (Hper = 0 km ; F = 1600 N ; Isp = 310 s ; m = 20 t) T120 [mn] 1 maneuver 2 braking maneuvers Impulsive thrust Altitude of the initial circular orbit [km]
22 MIR de-orbiting (1/2) No specific MIR engines were available, so it was chosen to use engines of a Progress vehicle previously docked MIR mass (about 130/140 tons) and thrust acceleration produced by this Progress vehicle engines did not allow to carry out the deorbitation only with one maneuver. Originally, it was foreseen to execute up to 4 maneuvers distributed on several days but uncertainties on AOCS at those unusual very low orbits lead to envisage the following strategy : 2 initial maneuvers of about 10 m/s each on daily orbits 15/16 to prepare for the third and final impulse (i.e. semi major axis sufficiently high to stay 24 hours in orbit and a well phased apsides line). Those maneuvers executed using the 8 Progress attitude control engines A final maneuver of about 25 m/s executed in two sub phases : First with the main engine + the attitude control engines Then, only with the attitude control engines 22
23 MIR de-orbiting (2/2) Also due to uncertainties on the AOCS, it has been chosen to keep an inertial attitude including during the boosts. In order not to be too far from the optimal attitude (opposite to velocity), a pitch angle was computed in to have the direction almost aligned on the velocity/horizontal line at the middle of the boost (+ a 4 deg bias due to position of the center of gravity). Then, for so critical maneuvers, it was absolutely required to have a maximum of visibility from the ground : Maneuvers were foreseen on daily orbit numbers 15, 16 and 02 to get also visibility on orbits 13, 14 and 01 (orbits with large visibilities with Russian ground stations) A particular constraint was applied on the end of the two first maneuvers to be in visibility of the Petropavlovsk (PPK) ground station for a complete passage (to get a full diagnostic in case of problems occur on the attitude control). 23
24 MIR de-orbiting (3/3) 24
25 Vehicle constraints : «Flight dynamics» constraints ASTRA 1K De-orbiting (1/2) Maneuver can only be executed when Sun pointed (or anti Sun pointed) because only Sun sensors were operational (but not Earth sensors). Maneuver has to be programmed between time when satellite was entering in eclipse + 10 mn and time when it was exiting + 20 mn because of thermal constraints on propulsive engines. Maneuver has to occur above 150 km of altitude (AOCS constraints) To get thrust direction as close as possible to the orbital plane (for a best thrust efficiency) To align thrust direction as close as possible to the velocity axis (for a best efficiency on the semi-major) To set the maneuver as close as possible to the apogee To control perigee positioning to be phased with the landing site 25
26 ASTRA 1K De-orbiting (2/2) Beginning of the maneuver End of the maneuver Impacts Fragmentation Command: s ( m/s) on 10th Dec 2002 / 00:42:21 26
27 ATV De-orbiting (1/3) Main ATV vehicle constraints : The duration of the maneuvers must not exceed 30 minutes. => influence on the amount of maneuvers since ATV has a low thrust/mass ratio. The perigee altitude of the intermediary orbits must not be lower than 200 km at 3 σ in order not to degrade the solar arrays. The delay between the end of the last deorbitation maneuver and 120 km altitude must be typically 20 min (10 min for the tumbling acquisition and typically 10 min more for onboard operational verifications after tumbling acquisition). Main ATV mission constraints : Before the maneuvers, minimum 3h00 (2 orbits) must be scheduled in order to perform orbit determination, maneuver computation and on-board loading. A back-up deorbitation orbit is required a day (thus 2 opportunities per day). A back-up day must be foreseen. It means that it must be possible to deorbit on the same orbit numbers one day later. 27
28 ATV De-orbiting (2/3) The deorbitation sequence consists in transferring the ATV from an orbital point to a ground point by decreasing its perigee altitude through two maneuvers. The first maneuver will have two objectives: The first one is to put the ATV from a circular orbit to an elliptical orbit with the required apside line orientation (phasing with the entry point). The second objective is to decrease the perigee altitude. The second maneuver is then located at the apogee of the intermediary orbit and decrease the perigee altitude up to 0 km. V1 final orbit V2 Earth H per = 0 km intermediate orbit initial orbit 28
29 ATV De-orbiting (3/3) Generic nominal reentry : The ATV has waited for the entry opportunity docked to the ISS. As soon as ATV is in visibility of the Russian ground stations, dedocking is performed. Several orbits later, the deorbit sequence starts Jules Verne mission : Dedocking three weeks before the reentry (5th September) Rephasing in order to get visibility from ISS during the reentry => Additional maneuvers Reentry observation with airborne means night time observation => Orbit number and reentry epoch modification 29
30 DEO2 DEO1 29/09/08 10:00:24 (UTC) V = m/s (388.3 s) ATV REENTRY (altitude profile) 29/09/08 12:58:18 (UTC) V = m/s ( s) ~ 13:31:34 (UTC) Z ~ 120 km Deorbitation phase orbital phase atmospheric phase ~ 13:36:19 (UTC) Explosion (Z ~75 km) ~ 13:43:09 (UTC) first impacts South Pacific Ocean 30
31 ATV REENTRY (ground track) nominal impact point (mean fragment) lat = lon = area 31
32 ATV REENTRY : fragmentation 32
33 SPACE VEHICLE REENTRY : ATMOSPHERIC ARC deorbit V atmosphere Terre atmospheric arc orbital arc E point: (Z=120 km) initial orbit Natural reentries DEORBIT MANEUVER ORBITAL ARC ATMOSPHERIC ARC Controlled reentries 33
34 Attitude parameters : α, β, µ, p, q, r ATMOSPHERIC ARC : ATTITUDE X AV X AER Y AER α : angle of attack β : slip side angle µ : bank angle α β V AER G β X AV p (roll) Y AV q (pitch) G YAV p : roll rate q : pitch rate l : yaw rate ZAV α µ ZAER ZH LOCAL = i Z AV r (yaw) 34
35 Main forces : ATMOSPHERIC ARC : FORCES Gravitational forces (central term + J2 term) Aerodynamic forces (drag + lift [assumption β = 0]) Weight = mg [ ( sinγ ) i' + ( cos γ ) j' ] i Drag = 1 ρ 2 SC aérov 2 i x j µ k 1 ρ 2 [ k ] 2 z Lift = SC aérov ( cos µ ) j + ( sin µ ) Lift 35
36 ATMOSPHERIC ARC : EQUATIONS Assumptions : no side slip angle (β = 0) ; central term of geopotential (J 2 = 0) Derivation of position : dr/dt dr ( ) d ( ) d( lon) ( ) ( χ) = V sin γ lat V dt = cos γ cos dt r Derivation of velocity : dv/dt dt = V r cos ( γ) ( χ) ( ) sin cos lat dv dt = gsin 1 2 SC 2 2 ( γ) ρ x V + terme en ω m E dγ dt dχ dt = g V + 2ω cos 1 SC = ρ 2 m E 1 2 SC V r ( ) z 2 γ + ρ V cos( µ ) + cos( γ) + 2ωcos( lat) sin( χ) + terme en ω z V 2 sin µ m V r ( ) + cos( γ) tg( lat) sin( χ) 2 ( sin( lat) tg( γ) cos( lat) cos( χ) ) + terme en ω E E 36
37 ATMOSPHERIC ARC : SIMPLIFYING ASSUMPTIONS FIRST REBOUND ASSUMPTION : no side slip angle (β =0) central term of geopotential (J 2 =0) Fixed Earth frame (ω E =0) small γ (sin γ = γ and cos γ = 1) (V 2 /r - g) small vs lift term V γ 2 2 = = V γ 2 e 2 e e 2C D CL cos ( ) ( γ γe ) µ SCL cos βm ( µ ) ( ρ ρ ) e EQUILIBRIUM ASSUMPTION : no side slip angle (β =0) central term of geopotential (J 2 =0) Fixed Earth frame (ω E =0) small γ (sin γ = 0 and cos γ = 1) d γ /dt small vs other terms of the equation d γ /dt = 37
38 ATMOSPHERIC ARC : EQUILIBRIUM ASSUMPTION dv dt = 2 V 1 g (L /D)cos( µ ) avec V = V gr T et L /D = C C Z X deceleration is inversely proportional to L/D γ = βr T C 2CX β(z z0 ) avec ρ = ρ 2 0e Z cos( µ )V X X r T Y Y r T Ψ = π e e = = χ = L D 1 V cos( µ )Log( 1 V L D L D e 1 V sin( µ )cos( µ ) Log( 1 V sin( µ )Log( V V 2 e ) 2 2 e 1 r L 1 V 1+ V t t = T cos( µ ) Log( e e ) 2 g D 1+ V 1 Ve ) Longitudinal range is proportional to L/D ) V e 1 V Log( 1+ V 1+ V 1 V e e ) Cross range is proportional to square of L/D 38
39 ATMOSPHERIC ARC : ANALYTIC / NUMERICAL COMPARISON ANALYTIC / NUMERICAL COMPARISON SCx / m = m 2 /kg L/D = 0.2 First rebound assumption γe = -5 deg Altitude (km) Numerical simulation Equilibrium assumption Velocity (m/s) 39
40 ANALYTICAL MODELS LIMITATIONS: Low precision of atmospheric models Fixed Earth frame hypothesis aerodynamic coefficients variations along the flight: Depends on the Mach, Reynolds or Knudsen number Depends on angle of attack (AoA) Depends on altitude variations on attitude angles (command laws) ATMOSPHERIC ARC : NUMERICAL INTEGRATION STRONGLY NON LINEAR MOTION => NUMERICAL INTEGRATION : varied atmospheric models : US76, GRAM, CIRA, MSIS + Martian models more precise aerodynamic data bases (for example, dependence on Mach, altitude, AOA, side slip angle, etc) More sophisticated guidance laws and more realistic attitude motion (6 degrees of freedom motion) 40
41 ATMOSPHERIC ARC : METHODOLOGY Objective : to find guidance laws during hypersonic phase in order to maximize cross range and minimize heat quantity while respecting varied mechanical and/or thermal constraints. Methodology : flight domain determination Optimization under constraints simplified laws Guidance Dispersions studies 41
42 ATMOSPHERIC ARC : GNC/NGC definitions measurements NAVIGATION θ, dθ/dt + other estimated parameters X, dx/dt, θ, dθ/dt other estimated parameters GUIDANCE commanded α, β, µ CONTROL Actuator commands 42
43 ATMOSPHERIC ARC : EXAMPLES «THEORETICAL» STUDY OF INHABITED CAPSULES GEMINI CAPSULES GUIDANCE SOYUZ GUIDANCE L/D HYPERSONIC GUIDANCE ARD MISSION 43
44 ATMOSPHERIC ARC : INHABITED CAPSULE (1/6) HYPOTHESES: initial circular equatorial orbit; altitude = 400 km impulsive V standard US76 atmosphere two types of vehicles: «type A» «type B» mass 5.5 t 8 t Sref 13.2 m m 2 L/D max
45 ATMOSPHERIC ARC : INHABITED CAPSULE (2/6) COMMAND LAWS : «type A» AoA Bank angle Mach > deg 90 deg 23.7 < Mach < deg 90 -> 45 deg 15 < Mach < deg 45 -> 12 deg 1 < Mach < deg 12 deg «type B» AoA Bank angle Mach > deg 90 deg 22.5 < Mach < deg 90 -> 45 deg 1 < Mach < deg 45 -> 5 deg α α V V 45
46 ATMOSPHERIC ARC : INHABITED CAPSULE (3/6) BANK ANGLE COMMAND LAWS Bank Angle [deg] "Type A" "Type B" t [sec] Initial ground track µ=90 deg Cross Range Cross Range 46
47 ATMOSPHERIC ARC : INHABITED CAPSULE (4/6) TRAJECTORIES : «type A» «type B» V AoA Cross range Longitudinal range nmax Pdyn max Φref max Heat quantity 97.8 m/s 145 deg 108 km 5850 km 2.52 g 9.39 kpa kw/m MJ/ m 2 98 m/s 130 deg 519 km 8180 km 1.58 g 7.61 kpa kw/m MJ/ m 2 47
48 CONSTRAINTS ATMOSPHERIC ARC : INHABITED CAPSULE (5/6) Load factor [g] 3,0 2,5 2,0 1,5 1,0 0,5 0,0 "Type A" "Type B" t [sec] reference heat flux [kw/m 2 ] "Type A" "Type B" t [sec]
49 ORBITAL DISPERSIONS : ATMOSPHERIC ARC : INHABITED CAPSULE (6/6) δ( V) of +/- 1 m/s ATMOSPHERIC DISPERSIONS : T of +/- 20 K on US76 atmosphere DISPERSIONS AERODYNAMIQUES: +/- 10% on Cx +/- 10% on L/D (Cz/Cx) «type A» «type B» Cross range error Longitudinal range error nmax Φref max Pdyn max -26 / +31 km -505 / +587 km 2.69 g kw/m kpa / km / +800 km 1.69 g 536 kw/m kpa 49
50 ATMOSPHERIC ARC : GEMINI CAPSULES GUIDANCE guidance initialization altitude guidance initialization Lifting trajectory altitude Half lifting trajectory Full lifting trajectory Ballistic trajectories TARGET maneuver capacities ROLL GUIDANCE (GEMINI III,IV,VIII,IX-A,X,XI,XII) Longitudinal range Ballistic trajectory TARGET maneuver capacities Longitudinal 50 range CONSTANT BANK ANGLE GUIDANCE (GEMINI V,VI-A,VII)
51 t deb t fin = t deb + t d ATMOSPHERIC ARC : SOYUZ CAPSULES GUIDANCE Start of the deorbit maneuver End of the deorbit maneuver Separation (H=140km) t sep = t deb + t sep (soft cycle) or t sep = t deb s + τ (hard cycle) H=100 km Start of guidance (Vs=25.6m/s;H~80km) avec : Vs = t tsep. V ( t) dt Vs=1024.4m/s γ com = c(1-2s)(60 o +δγ cor ) = c te for extra-atmospheric correction γ com = c(1-2s)(60 o +δγ cor ) for atmospheric correction DEORBITATION PARAMETERS : - V = m/s - Duration ~ 4 mn - LANDING AREAS: KAZAKHSTAN (ARKALYK,DZHEKAZGAN) - RAAN longitude: 20 o East to 55 o West - OPPORTUNITIES PER DAY: 3 to 4 Roll-reversal (Vs=4300.8m/s) c = -1 End of guidance (Vs=7372.8m/s;H~21km) γ com = -(1-2S)60 o Impact point Parachute phase (H~10.7km) 51
52 Flight domain : ATMOSPHERIC ARC : L/D HYPERSONIC GUIDANCE (1/9) altitude Equilibrium glide Thermal limit Load factor limit Dynamic pressure limit velocity Deceleration Load factor limit Dynamic pressure limit Thermal limit (V,Z) => Mach => α (α,mach,z) => Cx Z => ρ (ρ,cx,v) => D Equilibrium glide velocity 52
53 Optimization / reference profile ATMOSPHERIC ARC : L/D HYPERSONIC GUIDANCE (2/9) Deceleration Load factor limit margins Dynamic pressure limit Thermal limit iso-d linear D linear Vz Equilibrium glide iso-t velocity 53
54 ATMOSPHERIC ARC : L/D HYPERSONIC GUIDANCE (3/9) If neglecting terms due to Earth rotation and considering γ 0: dv 1 SC ρ dt 2 m A way to interact on drag deceleration is to modify C x V C x = f ( α, Mach = ) V son By modifying AoA, deceleration is then instantaneously modified Problems: instability controllability x 2 V influence on thermal protection surfaces 54
55 ATMOSPHERIC ARC : L/D HYPERSONIC GUIDANCE (4/9) Another way to interact on drag deceleration is to use bank angle variations V 2 = abs 1 SC Vγ g + ρ z V 2 cos µ r 2 m µ makes dγ/dt varying dγ/dt makes γ varying then Vz = dz/dt = Vsin(γ) dz/dt makes Z varying then ρ et thus D = f(ρ) Most of the time, we will keep relatively simple angle of attack profiles and will compute bank angle variations to follow a drag deceleration profile ( ) 55
56 lateral guidance : ATMOSPHERIC ARC : L/D HYPERSONIC GUIDANCE (5/9) Projection of the relative velocity On the local horizontal plane ROAD Landing runway road Current point great circle arc velocity : roll-reversals 56
57 α (deg) Reference AoA Real AoA ATMOSPHERIC ARC : L/D HYPERSONIC GUIDANCE (6/9) ANGLE OF ATTACK Total velocity (m/s) SIDE SLIP ANGLE β (deg) 0,100 0,050 0,000-0,050 commanded side slip angle real side slip angle Total velocity (m/s) ,100 µ (deg) BANK ANGLE commanded bank angle 30 real bank angle Total velocity (m/s)
58 ATMOSPHERIC ARC : L/D HYPERSONIC GUIDANCE (7/9) DRAG DECELERATION DREF DCOM Dreal 5 D (m/s^2) Total velocity (m/s) 58
59 ATMOSPHERIC ARC : L/D HYPERSONIC GUIDANCE (8/9) Landing site distance (dland) deceleration Dref comp. k(dland) comp. Dcom comp k 1 k 3 P.I.D Roll reversals tests lateral guidance ddref/dv comp. µ ref comp. Vz Vzref comp. - + k µ com comp. µ com comp. Reference AoA AoA modulation k α α ref comp. α com comp. - + k µ 59
60 ATMOSPHERIC ARC : L/D HYPERSONIC GUIDANCE (9/9) 40 GROUND TRACK 1st roll-reversal 2nd roll-reversal End of Black-Out 20 latitude (deg) 0-20 Z= 120 km 1st bank maneuver Beginning of Black-Out longitude (deg) 60
61 Characteristics Control : mass: 2716 kg reference surface: m 2 APOLLO shape Angle of Attack: about 160 deg. via 7 hydrazine thrusters On-board navigation IMU GPS Atmospheric guidance (Apollo/Shuttle derived) reference drag deceleration profile longitudinal range roll-reversals for lateral guidance ATMOSPHERIC ARC : ARD MISSION (1/4) 61
62 ATMOSPHERIC ARC : ARD MISSION (2/4) 62
63 ATMOSPHERIC ARC : ARD MISSION (3/4) 63
64 Good precision on orbit based on GPS PVT measurements Very good representation of the simulations of orbital arcs and especially atmospheric arc (with guidance) Good consideration of wind profiles obtained at H0-30 mn Final difference between real point (issued from GPS) and predicted one : 4.93 km ATMOSPHERIC ARC : ARD MISSION (4/4) 64
65 REENTRY TRAJECTORIES FOR SPACE VEHICLES Tutorial Lectures at the 4th ICATT, Madrid 2010 J. F. GOESTER Centre National d Etudes Spatiales DCT/SB/MO jean-francois.goester@cnes.fr
66 ARD : Air Range Instrumentation Aircraft 66
67 ARD : RECOVERY 67
Orbit Design Marcelo Suárez. 6th Science Meeting; Seattle, WA, USA July 2010
Orbit Design Marcelo Suárez Orbit Design Requirements The following Science Requirements provided drivers for Orbit Design: Global Coverage: the entire extent (100%) of the ice-free ocean surface to at
More informationRocket Science 102 : Energy Analysis, Available vs Required
Rocket Science 102 : Energy Analysis, Available vs Required ΔV Not in Taylor 1 Available Ignoring Aerodynamic Drag. The available Delta V for a Given rocket burn/propellant load is ( ) V = g I ln 1+ P
More informationNAVIGATION & MISSION DESIGN BRANCH
c o d e 5 9 5 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Michael Mesarch Michael.A.Mesarch@nasa.gov NAVIGATION & MISSION DESIGN BRANCH www.nasa.gov Outline Orbital Elements Orbital Precession Differential
More information21 JSTS Vol. 27, No. 2
21 JSTS Vol. 27, No. 2 Technical Challenges and Study on Guided Reentry Flight for Capsule Spacecraft Shuichi MATSUMOTO 1), Yoshinori KONDOH 1), Takane IMADA 1) and Naoki SATO 1) 1) Japan Aerospace Exploration
More informationChapter 1 Lecture 2. Introduction 2. Topics. Chapter-1
Chapter 1 Lecture 2 Introduction 2 Topics 1.4 Equilibrium of airplane 1.5 Number of equations of motion for airplane in flight 1.5.1 Degrees of freedom 1.5.2 Degrees of freedom for a rigid airplane 1.6
More information1. (a) Describe the difference between over-expanded, under-expanded and ideallyexpanded
Code No: R05322106 Set No. 1 1. (a) Describe the difference between over-expanded, under-expanded and ideallyexpanded rocket nozzles. (b) While on its way into orbit a space shuttle with an initial mass
More informationAUTONOMOUS AND ROBUST RENDEZVOUS GUIDANCE ON ELLIPTICAL ORBIT SUBJECT TO J 2 PERTURBATION.
AUTONOMOUS AND ROBUST RENDEZVOUS GUIDANCE ON ELLIPTICAL ORBIT SUBJECT TO J 2 PERTURBATION Emmanuel GOGIBUS (1), Hervé CHARBONNEL (2), Patrick DELPY (3) (1) Astrium Space Transportation, 66 route de Verneuil,
More informationEnd of Life Re-orbiting The Meteosat-5 Experience
End of Life Re-orbiting The Meteosat-5 Experience Milan EUMETSAT, Darmstadt, Germany This article illustrates the orbit maneuver sequence performed during Meteosat- 5 End of Life (EOL) re-orbiting operations
More informationASTRIUM. Interplanetary Path Early Design Tools at ASTRIUM Space Transportation. Nathalie DELATTRE ASTRIUM Space Transportation.
Interplanetary Path Early Design Tools at Space Transportation Nathalie DELATTRE Space Transportation Page 1 Interplanetary missions Prime approach: -ST has developed tools for all phases Launch from Earth
More informationINNOVATIVE STRATEGY FOR Z9 REENTRY
INNOVATIVE STRATEGY FOR Z9 REENTRY Gregor Martens*, Elena Vellutini**, Irene Cruciani* *ELV, Corso Garibaldi, 34 Colleferro (Italy) **Aizoon, Viale Città d Europa 681, 144, Roma (Italy) Abstract Large
More informationAstrodynamics (AERO0024)
Astrodynamics (AERO0024) 5B. Orbital Maneuvers Gaëtan Kerschen Space Structures & Systems Lab (S3L) Previous Lecture: Coplanar Maneuvers 5.1 INTRODUCTION 5.1.1 Why? 5.1.2 How? 5.1.3 How much? 5.1.4 When?
More informationInitial Trajectory and Atmospheric Effects
Initial Trajectory and Atmospheric Effects G. Flanagan Alna Space Program July 13, 2011 Introduction A major consideration for an earth-based accelerator is atmospheric drag. Drag loses mean that the gun
More informationRELATIVE MISSION ANALYSIS FOR PROBA 3: SAFE ORBITS AND CAM
5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SPACECRAFT FORMATION FLYING MISSIONS AND TECHNOLOGIES RELATIVE MISSION ANALYSIS FOR PROBA 3: SAFE ORBITS AND CAM Munich, 31 st May 2013 T. V. Peters D. Escorial Presented
More informationProton Launch System Mission Planner s Guide SECTION 2. LV Performance
Proton Launch System Mission Planner s Guide SECTION 2 LV Performance 2. LV PERFORMANCE 2.1 OVERVIEW This section provides the information needed to make preliminary performance estimates for the Proton
More informationOptElec: an Optimisation Software for Low-Thrust Orbit Transfer Including Satellite and Operation Constraints
OptElec: an Optimisation Software for Low-Thrust Orbit Transfer Including Satellite and Operation Constraints 7th International Conference on Astrodynamics Tools and Techniques, DLR, Oberpfaffenhofen Nov
More informationAS3010: Introduction to Space Technology
AS3010: Introduction to Space Technology L E C T U R E S 8-9 Part B, Lectures 8-9 23 March, 2017 C O N T E N T S In this lecture, we will look at factors that cause an orbit to change over time orbital
More informationAstrodynamics (AERO0024)
Astrodynamics (AERO0024) 5B. Orbital Maneuvers Gaëtan Kerschen Space Structures & Systems Lab (S3L) Previous Lecture: Coplanar Maneuvers 5.1 INTRODUCTION 5.1.1 Why? 5.1.2 How? 5.1.3 How much? 5.1.4 When?
More informationMETHODS OF BALLISTIC SUPPORT AND SUPERVISION OF RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGICAL EXPERIMENTS OF FOTON SC
METHODS OF BALLISTIC SUPPORT AND SUPERVISION OF RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGICAL EXPERIMENTS OF FOTON SC Jury. M. Ustalov RSC TsSKB-Progress, Samara, Russia Abstract A wide range of research and technological
More informationSELENE TRANSLUNAR TRAJECTORY AND LUNAR ORBIT INJECTION
SELENE TRANSLUNAR TRAJECTORY AND LUNAR ORBIT INJECTION Yasuihiro Kawakatsu (*1) Ken Nakajima (*2), Masahiro Ogasawara (*3), Yutaka Kaneko (*1), Yoshisada Takizawa (*1) (*1) National Space Development Agency
More informationAN ANALYTICAL SOLUTION TO QUICK-RESPONSE COLLISION AVOIDANCE MANEUVERS IN LOW EARTH ORBIT
AAS 16-366 AN ANALYTICAL SOLUTION TO QUICK-RESPONSE COLLISION AVOIDANCE MANEUVERS IN LOW EARTH ORBIT Jason A. Reiter * and David B. Spencer INTRODUCTION Collision avoidance maneuvers to prevent orbital
More informationRE-ENTRY TRAJECTORY SIMULATION OF A SMALL BALLISTIC RECOVERABLE SATELLITE
INPE-11308-PRE/6745 RE-ENTRY TRAJECTORY SIMULATION OF A SMALL BALLISTIC RECOVERABLE SATELLITE Walkiria Schulz* Paulo Moraes Jr. ADVANCES IN SPACE DYNAMICS 4: CELESTIAL MECHANICS AND ASTRONAUTICS, H. K.
More informationRAPID GEOSYNCHRONOUS TRANSFER ORBIT ASCENT PLAN GENERATION. Daniel X. Junker (1) Phone: ,
RAPID GEOSYNCHRONOUS TRANSFER ORBIT ASCENT PLAN GENERATION Daniel X. Junker (1) (1) LSE Space GmbH, Argelsrieder Feld 22, 82234 Wessling, Germany, Phone: +49 160 9111 6696, daniel.junker@lsespace.com Abstract:
More informationAPPENDIX B SUMMARY OF ORBITAL MECHANICS RELEVANT TO REMOTE SENSING
APPENDIX B SUMMARY OF ORBITAL MECHANICS RELEVANT TO REMOTE SENSING Orbit selection and sensor characteristics are closely related to the strategy required to achieve the desired results. Different types
More informationSatellite Orbits.
atellite Orbits It was announced few days ago that a 6-ton NAA weather no-longer functioning satellite that was launched in 1991 would crash into arth some time between Thursday, 22 eptember 2011 and aturday,
More informationSuccessful Demonstration for Upper Stage Controlled Re-entry Experiment by H-IIB Launch Vehicle
11 Successful Demonstration for Upper Stage Controlled Re-entry Experiment by H-IIB Launch Vehicle KAZUO TAKASE *1 MASANORI TSUBOI *2 SHIGERU MORI *3 KIYOSHI KOBAYASHI *3 The space debris created by launch
More informationSatellite Orbital Maneuvers and Transfers. Dr Ugur GUVEN
Satellite Orbital Maneuvers and Transfers Dr Ugur GUVEN Orbit Maneuvers At some point during the lifetime of most space vehicles or satellites, we must change one or more of the orbital elements. For example,
More informationFlight and Orbital Mechanics. Exams
1 Flight and Orbital Mechanics Exams Exam AE2104-11: Flight and Orbital Mechanics (23 January 2013, 09.00 12.00) Please put your name, student number and ALL YOUR INITIALS on your work. Answer all questions
More informationSSTD = Standard deviation SMA = Semi Major Axis
- 1 C - EPC-95-212 NOVEL ORBT RASNG STRATEGY MAKES LOW THRUST COMMERCALLY VABLE. ARNON SPTZER* ABSTRACT A new technique for utilizing low thrust Electric Propulsion System (EPS) for orbit raising has been
More informationCHAPTER 3 PERFORMANCE
PERFORMANCE 3.1 Introduction The LM-3A performance figures given in this chapter are based on the following assumptions: Launching from XSLC (Xichang Satellite Launch Center, Sichuan Province, China),
More informationFormation Flying and Rendezvous and Docking Simulator for Exploration Missions (FAMOS-V2)
Formation Flying and Rendezvous and Docking Simulator for Exploration Missions (FAMOS-V2) Galder Bengoa, F. Alonso, D. García, M. Graziano (GMV S.A.) Dr. Guillermo Ortega (ESA/ESTEC) 2nd ESA Workshop on
More informationSection 13. Orbit Perturbation. Orbit Perturbation. Atmospheric Drag. Orbit Lifetime
Section 13 Orbit Perturbation Orbit Perturbation A satellite s orbit around the Earth is affected by o Asphericity of the Earth s gravitational potential : Most significant o Atmospheric drag : Orbital
More informationThe Orbit Control of ERS-1 and ERS-2 for a Very Accurate Tandem Configuration
The Orbit Control of ERS-1 and ERS-2 for a Very Accurate Tandem Configuration Mats Rosengren European Space Operations Centre Robert Bosch Str 5 D64293 Darmstadt Germany Email: mrosengr@esoc.esa.de Abstract
More informationCHAPTER 3 PERFORMANCE
PERFORMANCE The launch performance given in this chapter is based on the following assumptions: The LV system parameters being all nominal values; Mass of the LV adapter and the separation system are included
More informationSession 6: Analytical Approximations for Low Thrust Maneuvers
Session 6: Analytical Approximations for Low Thrust Maneuvers As mentioned in the previous lecture, solving non-keplerian problems in general requires the use of perturbation methods and many are only
More informationTechnology of Rocket
Technology of Rocket Parts of Rocket There are four major parts of rocket Structural system Propulsion system Guidance system Payload system Structural system The structural system of a rocket includes
More informationSIMBOL-X: A FORMATION FLYING MISSION ON HEO FOR EXPLORING THE UNIVERSE
SIMBOL-X: A FORMATION FLYING MISSION ON HEO FOR EXPLORING THE UNIVERSE P. Gamet, R. Epenoy, C. Salcedo Centre National D Etudes Spatiales (CNES) 18 avenue Edouard Belin, 31401 TOULOUSE Cedex 9, France
More information21 Flight checklists Mission 1: Delta-glider to ISS
21 Flight checklists This section contains point-by-point checklists for some complete flights. While flying these checklists, you may want to save regularly ( ), so you can pick up from a previous state
More informationHYPER Industrial Feasibility Study Final Presentation Orbit Selection
Industrial Feasibility Study Final Presentation Orbit Selection Steve Kemble Astrium Ltd. 6 March 2003 Mission Analysis Lense Thiring effect and orbit requirements Orbital environment Gravity Atmospheric
More informationDesign of Attitude Determination and Control Subsystem
Design of Attitude Determination and Control Subsystem 1) Control Modes and Requirements Control Modes: Control Modes Explanation 1 ) Spin-Up Mode - Acquisition of Stability through spin-up maneuver -
More informationFlight and Orbital Mechanics
Flight and Orbital Mechanics Lecture slides Challenge the future 1 Flight and Orbital Mechanics Lecture 7 Equations of motion Mark Voskuijl Semester 1-2012 Delft University of Technology Challenge the
More informationCOUPLED OPTIMIZATION OF LAUNCHER AND ALL-ELECTRIC SATELLITE TRAJECTORIES
COUPLED OPTIMIZATION OF LAUNCHER AND ALL-ELECTRIC SATELLITE TRAJECTORIES M. Verlet (1), B. Slama (1), S. Reynaud (1), and M. Cerf (1) (1) Airbus Defence and Space, 66 Route de Verneuil, 78133 Les Mureaux,
More informationAttitude Control Simulator for the Small Satellite and Its Validation by On-orbit Data of QSAT-EOS
SSC17-P1-17 Attitude Control Simulator for the Small Satellite and Its Validation by On-orbit Data of QSAT-EOS Masayuki Katayama, Yuta Suzaki Mitsubishi Precision Company Limited 345 Kamikmachiya, Kamakura
More informationLaunch abort trajectory optimisation for reusable launch vehicles
Launch abort trajectory optimisation for reusable launch vehicles Federico Toso and Christie Alisa Maddock Centre for Future Air Space Transportation Technologies University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, G1
More informationBasic Ascent Performance Analyses
Basic Ascent Performance Analyses Ascent Mission Requirements Ideal Burnout Solution Constant & Average Gravity Models Gravity Loss Concept Effect of Drag on Ascent Performance Drag Profile Approximation
More informationOptimization of Eccentricity during a Two Burn Station Acquisition Sequence of a Geosynchronous Orbit
Optimization of Eccentricity during a Two Burn Station Acquisition Sequence of a Geosynchronous Orbit A project present to The Faculty of the Department of Aerospace Engineering San Jose State University
More informationSemi-Analytical Guidance Algorithm for Fast Retargeting Maneuvers Computation during Planetary Descent and Landing
ASTRA 2013 - ESA/ESTEC, Noordwijk, the Netherlands Semi-Analytical Guidance Algorithm for Fast Retargeting Maneuvers Computation during Planetary Descent and Landing Michèle LAVAGNA, Paolo LUNGHI Politecnico
More informationLecture1: Characteristics of Hypersonic Atmosphere
Module 1: Hypersonic Atmosphere Lecture1: Characteristics of Hypersonic Atmosphere 1.1 Introduction Hypersonic flight has special traits, some of which are seen in every hypersonic flight. Presence of
More informationQuadcopter Dynamics 1
Quadcopter Dynamics 1 Bréguet Richet Gyroplane No. 1 1907 Brothers Louis Bréguet and Jacques Bréguet Guidance of Professor Charles Richet The first flight demonstration of Gyroplane No. 1 with no control
More informationSOLVING THE INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION (ISS) MOTION CONTROL LONG-TERM PLANNING PROBLEM
SOLVING THE INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION (ISS) MOTION CONTROL LONG-TERM PLANNING PROBLEM V. N. Zhukov, Dr. E. K. Melnikov, A. I. Smirnov Mission Control Center, Central Research Institute of Machine Building,
More informationOrbit Evolution of the Swarm Mission Detlef Sieg
Orbit Evolution of the Swarm Mission Detlef Sieg Content Orbit history absolute Aerodynamic scale factors from orbit determination Altitude history and prediction RAAN/LTAN (orbit plane rotation) Orbital
More informationCHAPTER 3 PERFORMANCE
PERFORMANCE 3.1 Introduction The LM-3B performance figures given in this chapter are based on the following assumptions: Launching from XSLC (Xichang Satellite Launch Center, Sichuan Province, China),
More informationGravity Turn Concept. Curvilinear Coordinate System Gravity Turn Manoeuvre concept Solutions for Constant Pitch Rate
Gravity Turn Concept Curvilinear Coordinate System Gravity Turn Manoeuvre concept Solutions for Constant Pitch Rate Inclined Motion Concept In reality, vertical motion is used only for a very small part
More informationAEROTHERMODYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF INNOVATIVE HYPERSONIC DEPLOYABLE REENTRY CAPSULES. Raffaele Savino University of Naples Federico II
AEROTHERMODYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF INNOVATIVE HYPERSONIC DEPLOYABLE REENTRY CAPSULES Raffaele Savino University of Naples Federico II Objectives Show the main capabilities of deployable aero-brakes for Earth
More informationEXAMINATION OF THE LIFETIME, EVOLUTION AND RE-ENTRY FEATURES FOR THE "MOLNIYA" TYPE ORBITS
EXAMINATION OF THE LIFETIME, EVOLUTION AND RE-ENTRY FEATURES FOR THE "MOLNIYA" TYPE ORBITS ABSTRACT Yu.F. Kolyuka, N.M. Ivanov, T.I. Afanasieva, T.A. Gridchina Mission Control Center, 4, Pionerskaya str.,
More informationLecture D30 - Orbit Transfers
J. Peraire 16.07 Dynamics Fall 004 Version 1.1 Lecture D30 - Orbit Transfers In this lecture, we will consider how to transfer from one orbit, or trajectory, to another. One of the assumptions that we
More informationPREDICTING THE ATMOSPHERIC RE-ENTRY OF SPACE DEBRIS THROUGH THE QB50 ENTRYSAT MISSION
PREDICTING THE ATMOSPHERIC RE-ENTRY OF SPACE DEBRIS THROUGH THE QB50 ENTRYSAT MISSION Y. Prevereaud (1), F. Sourgen (2), D. Mimoun (3), A.Gaboriaud (4), J-L. Verant (5), and J-M. Moschetta (6) (1) ONERA
More informationOrbital Mechanics MARYLAND U N I V E R S I T Y O F. Orbital Mechanics. ENAE 483/788D - Principles of Space Systems Design
Discussion of 483/484 project organization Planetary launch and entry overview Energy and velocity in orbit Elliptical orbit parameters Orbital elements Coplanar orbital transfers Noncoplanar transfers
More informationPower, Propulsion, and Thermal Preliminary Design Review James Black Matt Marcus Grant McLaughlin Michelle Sultzman
Power, Propulsion, and Thermal Preliminary Design Review James Black Matt Marcus Grant McLaughlin Michelle Sultzman Outline 1. Crew Systems Design Selection 2. Thermal Requirements and Design 3. Power
More informationFORMATION FLYING WITH SHEPHERD SATELLITES NIAC Fellows Meeting Michael LaPointe Ohio Aerospace Institute
FORMATION FLYING WITH SHEPHERD SATELLITES 2001 NIAC Fellows Meeting Michael LaPointe Ohio Aerospace Institute WHAT IS FORMATION FLYING? Two or more satellites flying in prescribed orbits at a fixed separation
More informationDesign and modelling of an airship station holding controller for low cost satellite operations
AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit 15-18 August 25, San Francisco, California AIAA 25-62 Design and modelling of an airship station holding controller for low cost satellite
More informationFLIGHT DYNAMICS MISSION ANALYSIS AND OPERATIONS FOR GALILEO SATELLITES: ORBITAL MANEUVERS STRATEGY DESIGN AND PERFORMANCES
FLIGHT DYNAMICS MISSION ANALYSIS AND OPERATIONS FOR GALILEO SATELLITES: ORBITAL MANEUVERS STRATEGY DESIGN AND PERFORMANCES Angélique Gaudel (1), Denis Carbonne (2), Pierre Labourdette (3), Laurence Lorda
More informationBallistic Atmospheric Entry (Part II)
Ballistic Atmospheric Entry (Part II) News updates Straight-line (no gravity) ballistic entry based on altitude, rather than density Planetary entries (at least a start) 1 2010 David L. Akin - All rights
More informationChapter 5 - Part 1. Orbit Perturbations. D.Mortari - AERO-423
Chapter 5 - Part 1 Orbit Perturbations D.Mortari - AERO-43 Orbital Elements Orbit normal i North Orbit plane Equatorial plane ϕ P O ω Ω i Vernal equinox Ascending node D. Mortari - AERO-43 Introduction
More informationSatellite Communications
Satellite Communications Lecture (3) Chapter 2.1 1 Gravitational Force Newton s 2nd Law: r r F = m a Newton s Law Of Universal Gravitation (assuming point masses or spheres): Putting these together: r
More informationFigure 1. View of ALSAT-2A spacecraft
ALSAT-2A TRANSFER AND FIRST YEAR OPERATIONS M. Kameche (1), A.H. Gicquel (2), D. Joalland (3) (1) CTS/ASAL, 1 Avenue de la Palestine, BP 13, Arzew 31200 Oran, Algérie, email:mo_kameche@netcourrier.com
More informationRobotic Mobility Atmospheric Flight
Robotic Mobility Atmospheric Flight Gaseous planetary environments (Mars, Venus, Titan)! Lighter-than- air (balloons, dirigibles)! Heavier-than- air (aircraft, rotorcraft) 1 2014 David L. Akin - All rights
More informationOrbital Mechanics MARYLAND U N I V E R S I T Y O F. Orbital Mechanics. ENAE 483/788D - Principles of Space Systems Design
Lecture #05 September 15, 2015 Planetary launch and entry overview Energy and velocity in orbit Elliptical orbit parameters Orbital elements Coplanar orbital transfers Noncoplanar transfers Time in orbit
More informationPlanetary entry environment
AE4870B - Re-entry - Summary Chapter 1 Planetary entry environment 1.1 Planetary shapes Even though the shape of, for instance, the Earth is determined by many factors, an approximation, which is adequate
More informationA THREE-DIMENSIONAL PREDICTIVE ENTRY GUIDANCE APPROACH
AIAA 2-3959 A THREE-DIMENSIONAL PREDICTIVE ENTRY GUIDANCE APPROACH K. D. Mease andd.t.chen Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering University of California, Irvine, CA 92697 S. Tandon, D.H.Young,
More informationExperimental Analysis of Low Earth Orbit Satellites due to Atmospheric Perturbations
Experimental Analysis of Low Earth Orbit Satellites due to Atmospheric Perturbations Aman Saluja #1, Manish Bansal #2, M Raja #3, Mohd Maaz #4 #Aerospace Department, University of Petroleum and Energy
More informationSpacecraft De-Orbit Point Targeting using Aerodynamic Drag
AIAA SciTech Forum 9-13 January 2017, Grapevine, Texas AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference AIAA 2017-1268 Spacecraft De-Orbit Point Targeting using Aerodynamic Drag Sanny R. Omar 1 and Riccardo
More informationAstrodynamics (AERO0024)
Astrodynamics (AERO0024) 5. Dominant Perturbations Gaëtan Kerschen Space Structures & Systems Lab (S3L) Motivation Assumption of a two-body system in which the central body acts gravitationally as a point
More informationRobotic Mobility Above the Surface
Free Space Relative Orbital Motion Airless Major Bodies (moons) 1 2016 David L. Akin - All rights reserved http://spacecraft.ssl.umd.edu Propulsive Motion in Free Space Basic motion governed by Newton
More informationBallistic Atmospheric Entry
Ballistic Atmospheric Entry Standard atmospheres Orbital decay due to atmospheric drag Straight-line (no gravity) ballistic entry based on atmospheric density 1 2010 David L. Akin - All rights reserved
More informationHow Small Can a Launch Vehicle Be?
UCRL-CONF-213232 LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY How Small Can a Launch Vehicle Be? John C. Whitehead July 10, 2005 41 st AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit Tucson, AZ Paper
More informationPerformance Characterization of Supersonic Retropropulsion for Application to High-Mass Mars Entry, Descent, and Landing
Performance Characterization of Supersonic Retropropulsion for Application to High-Mass Mars Entry, Descent, and Landing Ashley M. Korzun 1 and Robert D. Braun 2 Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta,
More informationOrbital Mechanics MARYLAND U N I V E R S I T Y O F. Orbital Mechanics. ENAE 483/788D - Principles of Space Systems Design
Planetary launch and entry overview Energy and velocity in orbit Elliptical orbit parameters Orbital elements Coplanar orbital transfers Noncoplanar transfers Time in orbit Interplanetary trajectories
More informationCase Studies for Uncertainty Quantification of a High-fidelity Spacecraft Oriented Break-up Tool. Bent Fritsche, HTG Stijn Lemmens, ESA
Case Studies for Uncertainty Quantification of a High-fidelity Spacecraft Oriented Break-up Tool Bent Fritsche, HTG Stijn Lemmens, ESA 8th European Symposium on Aerothermodynamics for Space Vehicles Lisbon,
More informationLecture 2c: Satellite Orbits
Lecture 2c: Satellite Orbits Outline 1. Newton s Laws of Mo3on 2. Newton s Law of Universal Gravita3on 3. Kepler s Laws 4. Pu>ng Newton and Kepler s Laws together and applying them to the Earth-satellite
More informationSECTION 9 ORBIT DATA - LAUNCH TRAJECTORY
SECTION 9 ORBIT DATA - LAUNCH TRAJECTORY --~'- SECTION 9 LAUNCH TRAJECTORY 9.1 MISSION PROFILE IUE was launched by a three-stage Delta 2914 launch vehicle from Cape Kennedy on January 26, 1978 at l7 h
More informationQB50 Proposed Deployment ConOps. Dan Oltrogge Center for Space Standards and Innovation Co-Lead, QB50 Orbit Dynamics Working Group
QB50 Proposed Deployment ConOps Dan Oltrogge Center for Space Standards and Innovation Co-Lead, QB50 Orbit Dynamics Working Group 25 Apr 2014 Proposed QB50 Deployment ConOps Want to develop and characterize
More informationAscent Phase Trajectory Optimization for a Hypersonic Vehicle Using Nonlinear Programming
Ascent Phase Trajectory Optimization for a Hypersonic Vehicle Using Nonlinear Programming H.M. Prasanna,D.Ghose, M.S. Bhat, C. Bhattacharyya, and J. Umakant 3 Department of Aerospace Engineering Department
More informationUlrich Walter. Astronautics. The Physics of Space Flight. 2nd, Enlarged and Improved Edition
Ulrich Walter Astronautics The Physics of Space Flight 2nd, Enlarged and Improved Edition Preface to Second Edition Preface XVII Acknowledgments XIX List of Symbols XXI XV 1 Rocket Fundamentals 1 1.1 Rocket
More informationAstrodynamics (AERO0024)
Astrodynamics (AERO0024) 5. Dominant Perturbations Gaëtan Kerschen Space Structures & Systems Lab (S3L) Motivation Assumption of a two-body system in which the central body acts gravitationally as a point
More informationLunar Landing Trajectory and Abort Trajectory Integrated Optimization Design.
Lunar Landing Trajectory and Abort Trajectory Integrated Optimization Design Bai Chengchao (1), Guo Jifeng (2), and Xu Xibao (3) (1)(2) School of Astronautics, Harbin Institute of Technology, (451)864128766
More informationExample of Aircraft Climb and Maneuvering Performance. Dr. Antonio A. Trani Professor
Example of Aircraft Climb and Maneuvering Performance CEE 5614 Analysis of Air Transportation Systems Dr. Antonio A. Trani Professor Example - Aircraft Climb Performance Aircraft maneuvering performance
More information(b) The period T and the angular frequency ω of uniform rotation are related to the cyclic frequency f as. , ω = 2πf =
PHY 302 K. Solutions for problem set #9. Non-textbook problem #1: (a) Rotation frequency of 1 Hz means one revolution per second, or 60 revolutions per minute (RPM). The pre-lp vinyl disks rotated at 78
More informationStatistical methods to address the compliance of GTO with the French Space Operations Act
Statistical methods to address the compliance of GTO with the French Space Operations Act 64 th IAC, 23-27 September 2013, BEIJING, China H.Fraysse and al. Context Space Debris Mitigation is one objective
More informationMAE 180A: Spacecraft Guidance I, Summer 2009 Homework 2 Due Tuesday, July 14, in class.
MAE 180A: Spacecraft Guidance I, Summer 2009 Homework 2 Due Tuesday, July 14, in class. Guidelines: Please turn in a neat and clean homework that gives all the formulae that you have used as well as details
More informationRocket Performance MARYLAND U N I V E R S I T Y O F. Ballistic Entry ENAE Launch and Entry Vehicle Design
Rocket Performance Parallel staging Modular staging Standard atmospheres Orbital decay due to drag Straight-line (no gravity) entry based on atmospheric density 1 2014 David L. Akin - All rights reserved
More informationMission Design Options for Solar-C Plan-A
Solar-C Science Definition Meeting Nov. 18, 2008, ISAS Mission Design Options for Solar-C Plan-A Y. Kawakatsu (JAXA) M. Morimoto (JAXA) J. A. Atchison (Cornell U.) J. Kawaguchi (JAXA) 1 Introduction 2
More informationMISSION ANALYSIS FOR ROSETTA DESCENDING PHASE
MISSION ANALYSIS FOR ROSETTA DESCENDING PHASE J. BERNARD CNES 18,Avenue E. Belin : 33 (0) 5 61 8 5 00 Fax : (0) 5 61 7 35 40 Email : jacques.bernard@cnes.fr F.X. CHAFFAUT CNES 18,Avenue E. Belin : 33 (0)
More informationHomework #1 Solution: March 8, 2006
12.540 Homework #1 Solution: March 8, 2006 Question 1: (a) Convert geodetic position 290 deg Long 42 deg latitude ellipsoidal height 0 m into Cartesian and geocentric coordinates. (b) How far apart on
More informationTHE METEOROLOGICAL ROCKET SYSTEM FOR ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH
THE METEOROLOGICAL ROCKET SYSTEM FOR ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH Komissarenko Alexander I. (1) Kuznetsov Vladimir M. (1) Filippov Valerii V. (1) Ryndina Elena C. (1) (1) State Unitary Enterprise KBP Instrument
More informationInternational Space Station (ISS) Nears A Six-Figure Orbit Count
1. Introduction Adopting the definition consistent with ubiquitous two-line element sets (TLEs) used to track virtually any artifact orbiting Earth, an orbit count n tallies the number of northbound equator
More informationSpacecraft transfer from interplanetary to low near planet orbit by use of aerobraking in Venus s atmosphere
Spacecraft transfer from interplanetary to low near planet orbit by use of aerobraking in Venus s atmosphere N. Eismont 1, A. Ledkov 2, R. Nazirov 3 Space Research Institute of RAS (IKI), 117997, Moscow,
More informationMAE 180A: Spacecraft Guidance I, Summer 2009 Homework 4 Due Thursday, July 30.
MAE 180A: Spacecraft Guidance I, Summer 2009 Homework 4 Due Thursday, July 30. Guidelines: Please turn in a neat and clean homework that gives all the formulae that you have used as well as details that
More informationOrbital Mechanics MARYLAND. Orbital Mechanics. ENAE 483/788D - Principles of Space Systems Design
Lecture #08 September 22, 2016 Planetary launch and entry overview Energy and velocity in orbit Elliptical orbit parameters Orbital elements Coplanar orbital transfers Noncoplanar transfers Time in orbit
More informationEntry Aerodynamics MARYLAND U N I V E R S I T Y O F. Entry Aerodynamics. ENAE Launch and Entry Vehicle Design
Atmospheric Regimes on Entry Basic fluid parameters Definition of Mean Free Path Rarified gas Newtonian flow Continuum Newtonian flow (hypersonics) 2014 David L. Akin - All rights reserved http://spacecraft.ssl.umd.edu
More informationSPACE SHUTTLE ROLL MANEUVER
SPACE SHUTTLE ROLL MANEUVER Instructional Objectives Students will analyze space shuttle schematics and data to: demonstrate graph and schematic interpretation skills; apply integration techniques to evaluate
More information