Effect of Precipitation on Operation Range of the CO 2

Transcription

1 Korean Chem. Eng. Res., Vol. 45, No. 3, June, 007, pp g g o mk m o oi n m oi iii i lo Ç Ç k Ç p *Ç p * o re o * l v l o rl re o q 71- (006 1o 18p r, 007 1o 11p }ˆ) Effect of Precipitation on Operation Range of the Capture Process using Ammonia Water Absorbent Jong Kyun You, Ho Seok Park, Won Hi Hong, Jongkee Park* and Jong-Nam Kim* Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, KAIST, 373-1, Guseong-dong, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon , Korea *Chemical Process Research Center, KIER, 71- Jang-dong, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon , Korea (Receivecd 18 January 006, accepted 11 January 007) k d p ˆ } o r rp n r k k p rn p m. p ˆ n r p rl r k k r m (loading, mol / ) r m. p o l r kl Pitzer p pn l k k r l n r l m. 5 O p p k k r n l s k r p p n p lp pl. k k r l NH 4 rp p p l slp rk m. 5~14 Op k k r 93, 313 Kl 0.5 p l rp m. r p ˆp sl p f k k r d } rl n ppp k pl. n r p l d p ˆ } o r rm k k l 97~31 Kpl. h Abstract Ammoniater was investigated as a new absorbent of the chemical absorption process for the removal of in flue gas. The suitable range of ammoniater concentration and loading (mol CO /mol NH 3 ) were decided in the point of view of absorption capacity and NH 4 precipitation. The absorption capacity of and the precipitation of NH 4 in liquid phase were calculated by the Pitzer model for electrolyte solution. The absorption capacity of the ammoniater over 5 O was higher than that of conventional amine absorbent. The loadings where precipitation occurred were decided at various absorbent concentrations. Theses values were higher than 0.5 in the concentration range of 5-14 O at 93, 313 K. The absorber for the removal of in flue gas could be operated without NH 4 precipitation by using high concentration of ammoniater below these loading values. The optimum temperature of the ammoniater absorbent for removal of in flue gas was K depending on the concentration of ammoniater. Key words: Ammonia Water, Absorption, Carbon Dioxide, Precipitation, Pitzer Model 1. p ˆ v m p tnopp k r p. Špr k s ll p ˆ r o p l v p. l v p ˆ } t, k To whom correspondence should be addressed. whhong@kaist.ac.kr rl p r p d tp p ˆ } q rp rp k r p [1]. p pn p ˆ p } rl MEA(monoethanolamine), DEA (diethanolamine), MDEA(N-methyldiethanolamine), AMP(-Amino-- methyl-1-propanol) p k r p rp n. Yehm Bai[-3] k k k rl n q l v l qrp v tq k k d 58

2 k k r pn p ˆ r rl r p sl mll m 59 } n r re m. k k rl n n, k rm k kp ep r p r p. k kp ep, k l p r, p p p opp p. k k d } n r n e r l p lr r. r p p re lp er q l rn m kv l. l l d } n rl k k r p rn p m. p ˆ n r p rl k k rp sl s p r m. p o l rl rp r m, r kl Pitzer p n l k k rl sq p m.. m d t p ˆ k k rm e (1)~(5)p p p k p. H O Ë NH 4 OH (1) H O Ë HCO 3 H () HCO 3 Ë H (3) Ë NH COO H O (4) H O Ë H OH (5) (1)~(5)p p l NH 4, NH COONH 4, (NH 4 p r pp p. pp e (6)~(10), p e (11)p ˆ l. e (11)l Table 1l re l [4, 5]. K 1 m NH4 m γ γ OH NH OH m NH3 γ NH3 m K HCO3 m H γ HCO m CO γ H γ CO γ H m K CO3 m H γ CO K 4 K 5 m γ HCO3 HCO3 m NHCOO γ a NHCOO w m NH3 m γ NH3 γ HCO3 HCO3 γ γ H OH m H m OH C lnk C C T 3 lnt C 4 T (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) e (1)~(5)p pl p r,, H Om NH 4, Table 1. Coefficients for equilibrium constants for reaction (1) to (5) [4, 5] C lnk C C T 3 lnt C 4 T Reaction C 1 C C 3 10 C , , , , NH COO, HCO 3, 3, H, OH p pmsp r v (electrolyte) nkp. r v nkl p Gibbs energy Pitzer[6]l p e (1) re l [7]. G E ( 0) f RTn w M 1 ( I) m i m j β ij w i wj w m i m j i wj wk w ( ( 1) β ij ( )) m k τ ijk (1) e (1)p p p (acivity coefficient) (1) lp p. p rp k lv rp β ij e [4] e (13)p llv. I lnγ i A φ z i ( 0) --ln( 1 b I) m 1 b I b j β ij 3 m j m k τ ijk j w j wk w (13) e (13)p m e (6)~(10)p p e 5, e (14)~(16)p v ve, r ve(electroneutrality)p l re p l p (molality) p. m NH3 t m, NH3 m NH4 m NHCOO m CO, t m NH3 t α m m m, CO NHCOO HCO3 m NH4 m H m m NHCOO m HCO3 CO3 m OH 3. y (14) (15) (16) 3-1. nm o rp k rl rp v k mll sl lk. p ml p p p l k k r l rp n, p r p p o l r p m. rp k k r l l rp NMR m. k k rl l NH 4, NH COONH 4, (NH 4 p rp p. p v p t o } o (> 99%)p NMRp r l Fig. 1(A)l ˆ l. NH 4 p n 16 ppm, NH COONH 16, 167, 168 ppm, (NH ppm p l r rp m. 95 Kp ml 10~5 wt% k k l tp l rp okp v pe. 10 k v lp snkp ph k k l 8.1~9.m. r l r p NMR Fig. 1(B)l ˆ l. NMR m 16 ppm }l p l r p NH 4 pp p pl. p NH COONH 4 m (NH 4 mp l n NH 4 l j l rp rp n p NH 4 sq p. l NH 4 r l. 3-. h d p ˆ rp ˆ sls p l r f I m CO3 Korean Chem. Eng. Res., Vol. 45, No. 3, June, 007

3 60 or Ë Ë o Ë s Ë s Fig. 1. NMR spectra of (A) ammonium carbamate, ammonium carbonate, and ammonium bicarbonate, (B) products after the reaction between ammoniater and carbon dioxide at various concentrations from 10 to 5 wt%. m 93~333 K, k k mol NH /kg H O p l k 3 rl sq p m. p o p m p l p l m p kp l [8, 9] l Fig. m 3l ˆ l. r m 93~333 K, k k.1~11.8 Op ol p q p p p. Edward [4] Kurz [8]p e (13)p p o binary interaction parameter / /H O l l m. p k k l l Kurz [8]p re interaction parameter n n p p q m m k k k r d p ˆ rl n o q n p k r p p n p lk. k k l p r k rp MEA(monoethanolamine)m AMP(-Amino--methyl-1- propanol) l Fig. 4l ˆ l. 5 O(8 wt%) p p k k r n l 30 wt%p n k MEA, AMP p n p lp pl n m oiiii i r NH 4 e (17)p pp n (solubility o45 o k Fig.. Partial pressure of (A) and (B) in the.1 mol/kg aqueous solution at various temperatures;,, -experimental data (Van Krevelen et al.[8]), Line - prediction, this work. product)p e (18) re l [8]. NH 4 K NH4HCO3 Ë NH 4 (s) (17) m NH4 m γ γ HCO3 NH4 HCO3, exp T (18) rp (loading) p p p s m. r p v l NH 4 m HCO 3 pm m. pm sp p p e (18)p n ƒv r p [8]. r mll p p o l Kurz [8]p m. Kurz [8]p m 313 K, k k 6.3, 11.8 mol/kgl kl r l m. Fig. 5l ˆ m p rp ml v k mlp q m. Fig. 6l k k l k r l NH 4 rp eq (α precipitation )p ˆ l. r p p lr o l p p l ˆp nr lk. p rp d } rl r

4 k k r pn p ˆ r rl r p sl mll m 61 Fig. 5. Prediction of solubility limitation of NH 4 at 313 K:, experimental data (Kurz et al.[8]) -without precipitation, - with precipitation, Line - prediction, this work. Fig. 3. Partial pressure of (A) and (B) in the various concentrations aqueous solution;,, -experimental data (Kurz et al.[8], Van Krevelen et al.[9]), Line - prediction, this work. Fig. 6. loading of NH 4 precipitate formation at various concentration of ammoniater. 0.5 p l sl p, slm 93~313 K l l 5 O p p k k k l p r rlp r n ppp k p. Fig. 4. Comparison of absorption capacity between ammoniater and conventional amine absorbents; -experimental data (Shen et al.[10]), -experimental data (Li et al.[11], Seo et al.[1]), Line - prediction, this work oi p rp rp (α max )p p p (α eq )p r. m p p n v α eq v l l o v, p m l NH 4 p r p np r sl Korean Chem. Eng. Res., Vol. 45, No. 3, June, 007

5 6 or Ë Ë o Ë s Ë s ) r m. p l k k rl rp p p o l 6.5~0 O(10~5 wt%) k k l rp NMR r m. NMR m 16 ppml l r p NH 4 p p p m. Pitzer p pn l k k r l n l r l m. 5 O p p k k r n l s k r p p n p lp pl. k k r l NH 4 rp p p l slp rk m. 5~14 Op k k r 93, 313 Kl 0.5p l rp m. r p ˆp sl p f k k r d } rl n ppp k pl. n r p l d p ˆ } o r rm k k l 97~31 Kpl. 9 O k k 303 Kl n 0.1 kg /kg solution(1.6 kg /kg )p ˆ l. Fig. 7. Maximum (A) loading and (B) absorption capacity of ammoniater at various temperatures (p CO 15 kpa). p rp s (α precipitate )l r p. Fig. 7(A)l k 15 kpap dl l k k rp m, sl p ˆ l. 5 / kgh Op rl rp v kp p p k s (α eq )l p r l. 7 O p p rp n rp mlp s q l p m mll sl rp (α precipitation )p r l. Fig. 7(A)l ˆ m p q p sl p ˆ m 7~13 mol /kg H Ol 97~31 K v m. sl p n (kg /kg solution)p ˆ Fig. 7(B)m. k 15 kpap l d } l l k k l n p v, r p l rp m sq p p. 9 Op n r s 303 Kl n 0.1 kg /kg solution(1.6 kg /kg )p lp pl. 4. d p ˆ } n k k r k k p rn p m. p ˆ n r p rl r k k r m (loading, mol / o45 o k l p ˆ r } l (CDRS, Carbon Dioxide Reduction and Sequestration R&D Center)p vop lp pl. k A φ : debye-hückel constant [kg 1/ mol -1/ ] : activity of pure water [mol/kg] b : parameter in equation (13) [kg 1/ mol -1/ ] f 1 (I), f (I) : functions in Pitzer s equation G E : total excess Gibbs free energy I : ionic strength [mol/kg] K : equilibrium constant of reaction with activities expressed in molalities M w : molecular weight of pure water [kg/mol] : molality of species i [mol/kg] m i m CO,t m CO,eq m NH3,t n w : total molality of [mol/kg] : molality of in equilibrium with gas phase [mol/kg] : total molality of [mol/kg] : number of moles of pure water [mol] R : gas constant T : temperature [K] z i : ionic charges on species i [-] m m α : loading moles of /moles of [-] (0) (1) β ij, β ij γ i τ ijk : binary interaction parameters defined by Pitzer : activity coefficient of species i (on molality scale) : ternary interaction coefficient

6 k k r pn p ˆ r rl r p sl mll m 63 y 1. Chakma, A., Separation of and SO from Flue Gas Streams by Liquid Membranes, Energy Convers. Manage., 36(6/9), (1995).. Yeh, A. C. and Bai, H., Comparison of Ammonia and Monoethanolamine Solvents to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions, The Science of the Total Environment, 8(/3), (1999). 3. Bai, H. and Yeh, A. C., Removal of Greenhouse Gas by Ammonia Scrubbing, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 36(6), (1997). 4. Edwards, T. J., Maurer, G., Newman, J. and Prausnitz, J. M., Vapor-Liquid Equilibria in Multicomponent Aqueous Solutions of Volatile Weak Electrolytes, AIChE J., 4(6), (1978). 5. Bieling, V., Rumpf, B. and Maurer, G., An Evolutionary Optimization Method for Modeling the Solubility of Ammonia and Carbon Dioxide in Aqueous Solutions, Fluid Phase Equilibria, 53, 51-59(1989). 6. Pitzer, K. S., Thermodynamics of Electrolytes, J. Phys. Chem., 77(), 68-77(1973). 7. Bieling, V., Kurz, F., Rumpf, B. and Maurer, G., Simultaneous Solubility of Ammonia and Carbon Dioxide in Aqueous Solution of Sodium Sulfate in the Temperature Range K and Pressure up to 3 MPa, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 34, (1995). 8. Kurz, F., Rumpf, B. and Maurer, G., Vapor-Liquid-Solid Equilibria in the System - -H O from Around 310 to 470 K: New Experimental Data and Modeling, Fluid Phase Equilibria, 104, 61-75(1995). 9. Van Krevelen, D. W., Hoftijzer, P. J. and Huntjens, F. J., Composition and Vapour Pressures of Aqueous Solutions of Ammonia, Carbon Dioxide, and Hydrogen Sulphide, Rec. Trav. Chim. Pays-bas, 68, (1949). 10. Shen, K.-P. and Li, M.-H., Solubility of Carbon Dioxide in Aqueous Mixtures of Monoethanolamine with Methyldiethanolamine, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 37(1), (199). 11. Li, M.-H. and Chang, B.-C., Solubilities of Carbon Dioxide in Water Monoethanolamine -amino--methyl-1-propanol, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 39(3), (1994). 1. Seo, D.-J. and Hong, W. H., Solubilities of Carbon Dioxide in Aqueous Mixtures of Diethanolamine and -Amino--methyl-1- Propanol, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 41(), 58-60(1996). Korean Chem. Eng. Res., Vol. 45, No. 3, June, 007