Report of key comparison CCQM K92
|
|
- Frederick Craig
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Slovak Institute of Metrology Karloveská 63, SK Bratislava 4, Slovakia Report of key comparison CCQM K92 "Electrolytic conductivity at 0.05 S m -1 and 20 S m -1 Final report L. Vyskočil, M. Máriássy (SMU), Adrian Reyes, Marcela Monroy (CENAM), Alena Vospělová (ČMI), Bertil Magnusson, Rauno Pyykkö (SP), Elena Kardash (INPL), Fabiano Barbieri Gonzaga, I.C.S. Fraga, J.C. Lopes, W.B. Silva Jr, P.P. Borges, W.F.C. Rocha (INMETRO), Francesca Durbiano, E. Orrù (INRiM), Kenneth W. Pratt (NIST), Pia Tønnes Jakobsen, Hans Dalsgaard Jensen, Jørgen Avnskjold (DFM), L.A. Konopelko, Y.A. Kustikov, V.I. Suvorov (VNIIM), Song Xiaoping, Wang Hai (NIM), Steffen Seitz, Petra Spitzer (PTB), Vladimir Gavrilkin, Leonid Prokopenko, Oleksiy Stennik (Ukrmetrteststandart), Wladyslaw Kozlowski, Joanna Dumanska - Kulpa, Izabela Grzybowska (GUM), Yury A. Ovchinnikov (VNIIFTRI), Zsófia Nagyné Szilágyi, Judit Fükö (MKEH) July 2013
2 CCQM-K92 2 Abstract The aim of the key comparison CCQM-K92 was to demonstrate the capabilities of the participating NMIs to measure electrolytic conductivity of an unknown sample. Two samples with nominal electrolytic conductivity values of 0.05 S m -1 and 20 S m -1 have been prepared for comparison. For the first time conductivity value larger than those given in the IUPAC document [1] was measured in CCQM comparison. Thus no calibration standards with similar conductivity value were available. The comparison was an activity of the Electrochemical Working Group (EAWG) of the CCQM and was coordinated by SMU. In the comparison NMIs from fifteen countries took part. The higher conductivity (20 S m -1 ) was measured by ten participants. Good agreement of the results was observed for the majority of participants.
3 CCQM-K92 3 Contents ABSTRACT...2 INTRODUCTION...4 METROLOGY AREA...4 BRANCH...4 SUBJECT...4 TIME SCHEDULE...4 PARTICIPANTS...4 SAMPLE DESCRIPTION...5 SAMPLE PREPARATION AND DISTRIBUTION...5 REPLACEMENT SAMPLE PREPARATION...5 CHECK OF HOMOGENEITY...6 CHECK OF STABILITY...7 STATISTICAL TESTING OF STABILITY...9 RESULTS...10 SAMPLE WITH NOMINAL VALUE 0.05 S M SAMPLE WITH NOMINAL VALUE 20 S M DISCUSSION...14 THE FORMULAS FOR CALCULATION OF ESTIMATORS...14 CALCULATION OF THE DEGREES OF EQUIVALENCE...14 COMMUNICATION WITH THE PARTICIPANTS...15 REFERENCE VALUE FOR 0.05 S M Degrees of Equivalence S m REFERENCE VALUE FOR 20 S M Degrees of Equivalence - 20 S m CONCLUSIONS...19 ACKNOWLEDGMENT...19 REFERENCES...19 APPENDIX...20 ADDRESSES OF PARTICIPANTS...20
4 CCQM-K92 4 Introduction Metrology Area Amount of Substance Branch Electrochemistry Subject Determination of the electrolytic conductivity of two unknown samples with nominal value 0.05 S m -1 a 20 S m -1 (Water solution of KCl). Time schedule Dispatch of the samples 9 February 2011 Deadline for receipt of the report 25 April 2011 Discussion of results EAWG meeting, April 2011 Draft A report October 2011 Draft B report September 2012 Draft B report corrected February 2013 Participants Participants are listed in Table 1. VNIIM and VNIIFTRI measured one sample each, as their responsibilities are in different ranges in electrolytic conductivity. Table 1 Table of Participants N o Acronym Institute Country Contact Person 1 CENAM CENAM MEX Adrian Reyes, Marcela Monroy 2 CMI Český metrologický ústav CZE Alena Vospělová 3 DFM Danish Fundamental Metrology DNK Pia Tønnes Jakobsen 4 GUM Central Office of Measures POL Wladyslaw Kozlowski 5 INMETRO National Institute of Metrology, Quality and Technology BRA Fabiano Barbieri Gonzaga 6 INPL The National Physical Laboratory of Israel ISR Elena Kardash 7 INRiM Instituto Nazionale di Ricerca Metrologica ITA Francesca Durbiano 8 MKEH Hungarian Trade Licensing Office HUN Zsófia Nagyné Szilágyi 9 NIM National Institute of Metrology CHN Song Xiaoping 10 NIST National Institute of Standards and Technology USA Kenneth W. Pratt 11 PTB Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt DEU Steffen Seitz 12 SMU Slovenský metrologický ústav SVK Leoš Vyskočil 13 SP SP Technical Research Institute of Sweden SWE Bertil Magnusson
5 CCQM-K UMTS Ukrmetrteststandart UKR Vladimir Gavrilkin 15 VNIIFTRI National Research Institute Physicotechnical and Radio Engineering Measurements RUS Yury A. Ovchinnikov 16 VNIIM D.I. Mendeleyev Institute for Metrology RUS Prof. L.A. Konopelko Sample description Sample preparation and distribution Samples consisted of water solutions of potassium chloride. Reagent grade KCl and distilled water were used for the solution with electrolytic conductivity 20 S m -1. The 0.05 S m -1 solution was prepared by diluting the above solution with distilled water. Both solutions were prepared on February 2, The solutions were filled into 500 ml HDPE bottles (Nalgene), which were subsequently sealed into aluminium laminated plastic foil to prevent composition change of the solutions. The samples were distributed to the participants on February 9, 2011 by courier companies FedEx and DHL (Russia, Mexico). In one case (NIM, China) the sample was received damaged. A replacement bottle was sent immediately and was received intact. The sample sent to Moscow stuck at the customs and was later returned to SMU. The second shipment arrived at its destination. Replacement sample preparation Some participants reported instability of 0.05 S m -1 sample after opening, and the same effect was confirmed by the coordinating laboratory. Therefore a new batch of this solution was prepared from high-purity KCl and deionised water and the new samples were distributed to the participants free of charge. The stability of new samples after opening was satisfactory. Check of the bottle integrity Participants were requested to weigh the received bottles to verify that they were unchanged during the transport. The mass change was smaller than 0.05 g in all cases except VNIIM, where the difference amounted up to 0.5 g, and NIM that reported one leaking bottle with KCl crystallisation in the bag. NIM was sent a replacement bottle. Figure 1 Relative differences between the weights of bottles - 0,05 S m -1
6 CCQM-K92 6 Relative differences between the weights of bottles - 0,05 S m -1 0,010% 0,008% 0,006% 0,004% 0,002% 0,000% -0,002% DNK MEX CZE POL BRA ISR ITA ITA HUN CHN DEU SVK SWE UKR RUS USA -0,004% -0,006% -0,008% -0,010% Figure 2 Relative differences between the weights of bottles - 20 S m -1 Relative differences between the weights of bottles - 20 S m -1 0,010% 0,008% 0,006% 0,004% 0,002% 0,000% -0,002% -0,004% -0,006% -0,008% -0,010% DNK DNK MEX POL BRA ISR HUN CHN DEU UKR RUS Check of Homogeneity Homogeneity of the solution was checked after filling. To identify possible trends, solutions from the first and the last bottle were measured. Both results were identical within uncertainty of measurement. The data are depicted in figures 3 and 4.
7 CCQM-K92 7 Figure 3 20,34 Check of homogeneity for 20 S m -1 solution Check of Homogeneity for 20,0 S/m 20,32 Conductivity ( S/m) 20,30 20,28 20,26 20,24 20,22 First bottle Last bottle 20,20 Figure 4 0,05020 Check of homogeneity for 0.05 S m -1 solution Check of Homogeneity for 0,05 S/m 0,05015 Conductivity ( S/m) 0, , , , ,04990 First bottle Last bottle 0,04985 Check of Stability Several bottles were selected for stability measurements. Samples were measured in irregular intervals during 80 to 90 days. The measurement results for solution with nominal conductivity 0.05 S m -1 are given in figure 5 and table 2. Figure 5 The stability measurement for sample with nominal conductivity value 0.05 S m -1
8 CCQM-K92 8 0,05020 Measurement of Stability for 0,05 S/m 0,05015 Conductivity S/m 0, , , , , Days Table 2 The stability Measurement for Sample with Nominal Value 0.05 S m -1 Days Date Bottle Conductivity (S.m -1 ) U (k=2) (S.m -1 ) B3 0, , B3 0, , B3 0, , B3 0, , B17 0, , B17 0, , B10 0, , B10 0, , The measurement results for solution with nominal conductivity 20 S m -1 are given in figure 6 and table 3. Figure 6 The stability measurement for sample with nominal conductivity value 20 S m -1
9 CCQM-K ,320 20,310 20,300 Measurement of Stability for 20 S/m Conductivity S/m 20,290 20,280 20,270 20,260 20,250 20, Days Table 3 The stability measurement for sample with nominal conductivity value 20 S m -1 Days Date Bottle Conductivity (S.m -1 ) U (k=2) (S.m -1 ) B9 20,288 0, B9 20,287 0, B9 20,287 0, B9 20,287 0, B9 20,288 0, B1 20,288 0, B1 20,288 0, B1 20,287 0, B1 20,287 0, B18 20,287 0, B18 20,287 0, B18 20,287 0, B24 20,288 0, B24 20,288 0,012 Statistical testing of stability The statistical testing of stability is based on the fact, that for a stable sample the is the trend statistically not significant. Either a test of correlation coefficient can be used the slope of a regression line can be tested. The procedure for the test of the slope is following: Using least-squares regression the slope b 1 of the regression line and residual variance s R are calculated. Test criterion t is calculated as follows:
10 CCQM-K92 10 ( x x) 2 b1 i t = (1) sr In the statistical tables for critical values of Student distribution a critical value t α (n-2) for (n- 2) degrees of freedom at significance level α=0,05 (95 % probability) is looked up. If the value of the test criterion does not exceed the critical value, the slope is statistically not significant. Table 4 Results of Statistical Testing of Stability Sample Value of Test. Criterion t Critical Value Degrees of Freedom Significance Level 0,05 S/m 0,779 2, ,05 20,0 S/m 1,241 2, ,05 Verdict No trend was observed No trend was observed As can be seen from the data in table 4, for both solutions the stability during the given time period was confirmed. Results Sample with nominal value 0.05 S m -1 The measurement conditions and methods used at different institutes are given in Table 5. The results of measurements of the new sample with nominal conductivity of 0.05 S m -1 are given in Table 6 and displayed graphically in Figure 7. Four laboratories from 15 used a primary measurement procedure. Table 5 Conditions of Measurement at Various Institutes S m -1 Institute Country Date of report Traceability Measurement frequency [Hz] DFM DNK Primary CRM DFM Jones type cell CENAM MEX SMU CRM Jones type cell CMI CZE Primary measurement Removable central part 1000 GUM POL DFM CRM Jones type cell INMETRO BRA Primary measurement Piston type INPL ISR SMU CRM Four electrode DC cell DC method
11 CCQM-K92 11 INRIM ITA Primary measurement Removable central part MKEH HUN OIML R56 Four electrode DC cell DC method NIM CHN IUPAC Jones type cell PTB DEU Primary measurement Piston type SMU SVK IUPAC Jones type cell 1000 SP SWE IUPAC WTW TetraCon 325? UMTS UKR Primary CRM UMTS Jones type cell 1000 VNIIFTRI RUS VNIIFTRI CRM Jones type cell? NIST USA Primary NIST CRM Daggett type cell Table 6 Results for sample with nominal value of electrolytic conductivity 0.05 S m -1 Institute Country EC 0,05 S/m u (k=1) INRIM ITA 0, , INMETRO BRA 0, , CMI CZE 0, , INPL ISR 0, , MKEH HUN 0, , GUM POL 0, , SMU SVK 0, , VNIIFTRI RUS 0, , DFM DNK 0, , NIST USA 0, , NIM CHN 0, , PTB DEU 0, , CENAM MEX 0, , SP SWE 0, , UMTS UKR 0, , Figure 7 The plot of results for sample with nominal conductivity value 0.05 S m -1 (standard uncertainty given)
12 CCQM-K ,0503 CCQM-K92 (Electrolytic Conductivity) - Nominal Value 0.05 S/m 0,0502 Electrolytic Conductivity / S m -1 0,0501 0,0500 0,0499 0,0498 ITA BRA ISR CZE HUN POL SVK RUS (VNIIFTRI) DNK USA CHN DEU MEX SWE UKR 0,0497 Sample with nominal value 20 S m -1 The measurement conditions and methods used at different institutes are given in Table 7. The results of measurements of the sample with nominal conductivity of 20 S m -1 are given in Table 8 and displayed graphically in Figure 8. Three laboratories from 10 used a primary measurement procedure. Table 7 Conditions of Measurement at Various Institutes - 20 S m -1 Institute Country Date of registered mail Traceability Measurement frequency [Hz] CENAM MEX SMU CRM Jones type cell GUM POL DFM CRM Jones type cell INPL ISR SMU CRM Four electrode DC cell DC method DFM DNK Primary CRM DFM Jones type cell VNIIM RUS IUPAC Jones type cell 1000 NIM CHN IUPAC Jones type cell MKEH HUN OIML R56 Four electrode DC cell DC method PTB DEU Primary measurement Piston type UMTS UKR Primary CRM UMTS Jones type cell 1000 INMETRO BRA Primary measurement Piston type
13 CCQM-K92 13 Table 8 Results for sample with nominal value of electrolytic conductivity 20 S m -1 Institute Country EC 20 S/m u (k=1) CENAM MEX 20,123 0,025 GUM POL 20,279 0,011 INPL ISR 20,280 0,014 DFM DNK 20,283 0,007 VNIIM RUS 20,290 0,007 NIM CHN 20,300 0,006 MKEH HUN 20,306 0,005 PTB DEU 20,308 0,007 UMTS UKR 20,344 0,004 INMETRO BRA 20,412 0,423 Figure 8 The plot of results for sample with nominal conductivity value 20 S m -1 (standard uncertainty given) CCQM-K92 (Electrolytic Conductivity) - Nominal Value 20 S/m 20,45 Electrolytic Conductivity / S m -1 20,40 20,35 20,30 20,25 20,20 MEX POL ISR DNK RUS (VNIIM) CHN HUN DEU UKR BRA 20,15 20,10
14 CCQM-K92 14 Discussion Nominal values of electrolytic conductivity of the samples were 0.05 S m -1 and 20 S m laboratories took part in the measurement of the 0.05 S m -1 sample. Sample with nominal value of electrolytic conductivity 20 S m -1 was measured by 10 laboratories. The Formulas for Calculation of Estimators κ Arithmetic Mean i κ = (2) n ( ) ( ) κi κ Standard Deviation of Arithmetic Mean uam = (3) n n 1 2 WM = wi xi Weighted Mean κ (4) 1 ui Calculation of Weights for Weighted Mean w = i (5) 2 1 ui wi xi xr Uncertainty of Weighted Mean uwm = (6) n 1 w 2 2 ( ( ) ) ( ) i Uncertainty of Median 1,858 u = median( κ ~ κ ) (7) i n 1 Calculation of the Degrees of Equivalence The degrees of equivalence for each participant, D i, and its standard uncertainty, u(d i ), are given by Eq 8 and Eq 9, respectively: ( KCRV) D κ (8) i = i
15 CCQM-K92 15 u 2 2 D = uκ + u KCRV i i (9) The standardized deviations E n are given by formula (10) E n = κ KCRV i U 2 κ i + U 2 KCRV (10) Communication with the participants DFM and NIST highlighted the instability of the first (0.05 S m -1 ) sample INRIM and UMTS were requested to check their results; no numerical error was found, but new results were sent in after recalibration of the cells. These new data are given in discussion only, as the original data have to be used. VNIIM was asked to correct the result for bottle weighing; corrected mass was sent. VNIIFTRI was requested to check its results; VNIIFTRI has found a mistake by transfer of value constant from primary to secondary cell and provided new results. CMI requested to postpone the deadline for internal reasons. Reference Value for 0.05 S m -1 Basic statistical data. Arithmetic mean S m -1 Standard uncertainty S m -1 Median S m -1 Standard uncertainty S m -1 The consistency information for different datasets is given in table 9. Table 9 Chi square values for nominal value S m -1 (values in bold are critical values)
16 CCQM-K92 16 Participants Degrees of freedom χ 2 - calculated χ 2 tabulated 95% probability Weighted mean Stand. uncertainty (Birge treatment) Birge Ratio All 14 78,437 23,685 0, , ,37 1,30 ITA excluded 13 52,656 22,362 0, , ,01 1,31 ITA, UKR excluded 12 22,171 21,026 0, , ,36 1,32 ITA, UKR, HUN excluded 11 12,627 19,675 0, , ,07 1,34 Numbers given in bold are tabulated data for 95 % probability and corresponding degrees of freedom. If ITA, UKR, HUN are not taken into account, the chi-squares value is smaller than the critical value. As a reference value KCRV = S m -1 (u = S m -1 ) was agreed. Degrees of Equivalence S m -1 Table 10 Degrees of Equivalence S m -1 Institute Country D i S/m U Di S/m INRIM ITA -0, , INMETRO BRA -0, , CMI CZE -0, , INPL ISR -0, , MKEH HUN -0, , GUM POL -0, , SMU SVK -0, , VNIIFTRI RUS -0, , DFM DNK -0, , NIST USA 0, , NIM CHN 0, , PTB DEU 0, , CENAM MEX 0, , SP SWE 0, , UMTS UKR 0, , Figure 9 Degrees of Equivalence for sample with nominal conductivity value 0.05 S m -1
17 CCQM-K ,0003 CCQM-K92 Degrees of Equivalence S/m 0,0002 Degrees of Equivalence 0,0001 0,0000-0,0001-0,0002-0,0003 ITA BRA ISR CZE HUN POL SVK RUS (VNIIFTRI) DNK USA CHN DEU MEX SWE UKR Reference Value for 20 S m -1 Basic statistical data. Arithmetic mean S m -1 Standard uncertainty S m -1 Median S m -1 Standard uncertainty S m -1 The consistency information for different datasets is given in table 11. Table 11 Chi square values for nominal value 20 S m -1 (values in bold are critical values) Participants Degrees of freedom χ 2 - calculated χ 2 tabulated 95% probability Weighted mean (S.m -1 ) Stand. uncertainty (Birge treatment) Birge Ratio All 9 192,287 16,919 20,3120 0,0096 4,62 1,37 UKR excluded 8 63,101 15,507 20,2945 0,0073 2,81 1,39 UKR, MEX excluded 7 15,528 14,067 20,2964 0,0039 1,49 1,42
18 CCQM-K92 18 Numbers given in bold are tabulated (critical) data for 95 % probability and corresponding degrees of freedom. If MEX, UKR are not taken into account, the chi-squares value is still slightly larger than the critical value. However, any further exclusion does not improve the chi-square value. As a reference value KCRV = S m -1 (u = S m -1 ) was agreed. Degrees of Equivalence - 20 S m -1 Table 12 Degrees of Equivalence 20 S m -1 Institute Country D i U Di S/m S/m CENAM MEX -0,173 0,051 GUM POL -0,017 0,023 INPL ISR -0,016 0,029 DFM DNK -0,013 0,015 VNIIM RUS -0,006 0,015 NIM CHN 0,004 0,014 MKEH HUN 0,009 0,013 PTB DEU 0,012 0,016 UMTS UKR 0,048 0,010 INMETRO BRA 0,115 0,845 CCQM-K92 Degrees of Equivalence - 20 S/m 0,20 0,15 0,10 Degrees of Equivalence 0,05 0,00-0,05-0,10-0,15 MEX POL ISR DNK RUS (VNIIM) CHN HUN DEU UKR BRA -0,20 Figure 8 Degrees of Equivalence for sample with nominal conductivity value 20 S m -1
19 CCQM-K92 19 Posterior work reported by DFM: DFM has since submitting K92 results and Draft A, examined the detailed frequency behaviour of its conductivity cells (cf. presentation EAWG/12-07 at CCQM-EAWG, Paris, April 2012). On this basis, we have shifted the frequency range used for extrapolation towards higher frequencies (towards lower phase angles) for measurements of high conductivity in the secondary cell, which provided traceability to the cell used at 20 S/m. The cell constant of the cell used in K92 at 20 S/m has thus been reevaluated and would today give a result with DoE of ± Conclusions Sixteen laboratories took part in the comparison, 15 measured sample with nominal conductivity of 0,05 S/m and 10 laboratories measured sample with nominal conductivity of 20 S/m. A good agreement of the results was observed for most laboratories. In some cases excessive uncertainty was due to measurement of very small resistance (less than 0,1 Ω) due to low cell constant of the conductivity cells used. In the case of measurements of sample with conductivity ~20 S/m in secondary cells there could be some problems with calibration, as CRMs with such a high conductivity are not commonly available. These measurements thus can be classified as extrapolation measurements. How far the light shines statement: The results in this comparison on the 0.05 S/m solution can be considered to be representative for measurement capabilities in the range from S/m to 0.15 S/m. The results in this comparison on the 20 S/m solution can be considered to be representative for measurement capabilities in the range from 6 S/m to 25 S/m. Due to the increased difficulty associated with performing the measurement as the conductivity increases, for the range from 25 S/m to 60 S/m the results from this comparison are to be complemented in the review process by a detailed technical evaluation of the measurement procedure. Acknowledgment The coordinating laboratory gratefully acknowledges the contributions of all participants and of the members of the CCQM Working Group on Electrochemical Analysis for their valuable suggestions concerning the measurement protocol and the evaluation process. References 1. Pure Appl. Chem., Vol. 73, No. 11, pp , Final Report for Key Comparison CCQM-K36, available at 3. Final Report for Key Comparison CCQM-K36.1, available at
20 CCQM-K92 20 Appendix Addresses of participants Adrian Reyes, Marcela Monroy CENAM Km 4.5 Carretera a los Cues, Mpio. El Marques, Queretaro, Mexico. CP MEXICO Alena Vospělová Český metrologický ústav (ČMI) Okružní Brno CZECH REPUBLIC Bertil Magnusson SP Technical Research Institute of Sweden Brinellgatan Borås SWEDEN Elena Kardash The National Physical Laboratory of Israel (INPL) Danciger A bldg., Givat-Ram, Jerusalem, 91904, ISRAEL Fabiano Barbieri Gonzaga National Institute of Metrology, Standardization and Industrial Quality - INMETRO Av. Nossa Senhora das Graças, 50, Xerém Duque de Caxias, RJ, Brazil BRAZIL Francesca Durbiano Instituto Nazionale di Ricerca Metrologica (INRiM) Strada delle Cacce 91, CAP 10135, Torino, ITALY Kenneth W. Pratt National Institute of Standards and Technology Building 227, Room B Bureau Dr., Stop 8391 Gaithersburg, MD U.S.A. Leoš Vyskočil
21 CCQM-K92 21 Slovak Institute of Metrology Karloveska 63, SK Bratislava SLOVAKIA Pia Tønnes Jakobsen Danish Fundamental Metrology A/S (DFM) Matematiktorvet 307, DK-2800 Kgs. Lyngby DENMARK Prof. L.A. Konopelko D.I. Mendeleyev Institute for Metrology (VNIIM) 19, Moskovsky pr., St. Petersburg, RUSSIA Song Xiaoping National Institute of Metrology (NIM) No. 18, Bei San Huan Dong Lu, Beijing , P.R.CHINA Steffen Seitz Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB) Fachbereich 3.1 Bundesallee Braunschweig GERMANY Vladimir Gavrilkin Ukrmetrteststandart Metrologichna str.,4 Kiev, UKRAINA Wladyslaw Kozlowski Central Office of Measures (GUM) Laboratory of Electrochemistry Elektoralna Str Warsaw, POLAND Yury A. Ovchinnikov VNIIFTRI (National Research Institute Physicotechnical and Radio Engineering Measurements) , Mendeleevo, Moscow region, Russia VNIIFTRI, Lab 35 RUSSIA
Report of key comparison CCQM K105
30/6/2014 Report of key comparison CCQM K105 "Electrolytic conductivity at 5.3 S m -1 " Final report F. Durbiano and E. Orrù, T. Asakai, J. Avnskjold, F. Barbieri Gonzaga, J. Dumańska, I. C. S. Fraga,
More informationFinal report on CCQM-K36.1 with erratum
Final report on CCQM-K36.1 with erratum 5 October 2010 Ref 1107-03 HDJ Report no. DFM-2008-R07 Summary A follow-up comparison to CCQM-K36 has been carried out November 2007 to February 2008, designated
More informationReport of subsequent key comparison CCQM K18.1
Slovak Institute of Metrology Karloveská 63, SK-84255 Bratislava 4, Slovakia Report of subsequent key comparison CCQM K18.1 ph of carbonate buffer Final Report L. Vyskočil, M. Máriássy, Marcela Monroy,
More informationReport of key comparison CCQM K18
Slovak Institute of Metrology Karloveská 63, SK-84255 Bratislava 4, Slovakia Report of key comparison CCQM K18 ph of carbonate buffer Final report L. Vyskočil, M. Máriássy, Susumu Nakamura, Igor Maksimov,
More informationKey Comparison. CCQM K Electrolytic Conductivity at 0.5 S m -1 and 5 ms m -1. Final Report
Key Comparison CCQM K36.2016 Electrolytic Conductivity at 0.5 S m -1 and 5 ms m -1 Final Report Steffen Seitz, Beatrice Sander Alan Snedden, Lisa DeLeeBeeck, Galia Ticona Canaza, Toshiaki Asakai, Igor
More informationCCQM WG on Electrochemical Analysis. Final report on CCQM K99 Key comparison on ph of an unknown phosphate buffer March 2015
CCQM WG on Electrochemical Analysis Final report on CCQM K99 Key comparison on ph of an unknown phosphate buffer March 215 F. Bastkowski, P. Spitzer, B. Sander, M. Máriássy, L. Dimitrova, A. Reyes, A.
More informationFinal report on CCQM-K19.1
Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt PTB Bundesallee 1, 38116 Braunschweig Final report on CCQM-K19.1 ph of borate buffer P Spitzer 1, B Adel 1, J Meyer 1, J Matzke 1, F B Gonzaga 2, P P Borges 2, J C
More informationPurpose of the comparison. Time schedule
6 1en r CCQM WG on Electrochemical Analysis Final report on CCQM K91 Key comparison on ph of an unknown phthalate buffer 22 April 213 P. Spitzer, F. Bastkowski, B. Adel, L. Dimitrova, F. B. Gonzaga, P.
More informationKey comparison CCQM-K34 Assay of potassium hydrogen phthalate
Slovak Institute of Metrology Karloveská 63, SK-842 55 Bratislava 4, Slovakia Key comparison CCQM-K34 Assay of potassium hydrogen phthalate Final report Michal Máriássy With participation of: Martin Breitenbach
More informationComparison Euramet 898
Euramet 898 Electrolytic at pure water level final report 2010-02-05 Euramet Electrochemical Analysis WG Comparison Euramet 898 Electrolytic at pure water level Petra Spitzer 1, Hans Jensen 2, Bertil Magnusson
More informationKey comparison CCQM-K96 Determination of amount content of dichromate
Slovak Institute of Metrology Karloveská 63, SK-842 55 Bratislava 4, Slovakia Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science Key comparison CCQM-K96 Determination of amount content of dichromate Final
More informationELECTROLYTIC CONDUCTIVITY AS A QUALITY INDICATOR FOR BIOETHANOL
XX IMEKO World Congress Metrology for Green Growth September 9 14, 2012, Busan, Republic of Korea ELECTROLYTIC CONDUCTIVITY AS A QUALITY INDICATOR FOR BIOETHANOL S. Seitz 1, P. Spitzer 1, F. Durbiano 2,
More informationReport on EURAMET.M.M-S9
FINAL REPORT Report on EURAMET.M.M-S9 Supplementary comparison of 500 microgram, 200 microgram, 100 microgram and 50 microgram weights (EURAMET project number 1310) Stuart DAVIDSON 1, Adriana VALCU 2,
More informationReport of the key comparison APMP.QM-K19 APMP comparison on ph measurement of borate buffer
Report of the key comparison APMP.QM-K19 APMP comparison on ph measurement of borate buffer (Final Report) Participants: Akiharu Hioki, Toshiaki Asakai, Igor Maksimov, Toshihiro Suzuki and Tsutomu Miura
More informationSIM AUV.A-K1.prev Microphone Intercomparison
Participants: Report on SIM AUV.A-K1.prev Microphone Intercomparison by Knud Rasmussen, DPLA CENAM, División de Vibraciones y Acústica km 4,5 Carretera a los Cués C.P. 76241 Querétaro, México DPLA, Danish
More informationsensors ISSN
Sensors 2011, 11, 8072-8084; doi:10.3390/s110808072 OPEN ACCESS sensors ISSN 1424-8220 www.mdpi.com/journal/sensors Article Sensitivities of Key Parameters in the Preparation of Silver/Silver Chloride
More informationFinal Report CCM.V-K2 Comparison
Final Report CCM.V-K2 Comparison C. Patrick Maggi, David Trowbridge, M Thomas Zubler Cannon Abstract This report describes the second CCM key comparison in capillary viscometry at nine National Metrology
More informationKey Comparison CCQM-K73 Amount Content of H + in Hydrochloric Acid (0.1 mol kg -1 )
Key Comparison CCQM-K73 Amount Content of H in Hydrochloric Acid (0.1 mol kg -1 ) Final Report: 26 October 2012 Kenneth W. Pratt 1,2 Jose Luis Ortiz-Aparicio, Francisco Javier Matehuala-Sanchez, Monika
More informationA comparison of primary platinum-iridium kilogram mass standards among eighteen European NMIs
IMEKO 20 th TC3, 3 rd TC16 and 1 st TC22 International Conference Cultivating metrological knowledge 27 th to 30 th November, 2007. Merida, Mexico. A comparison of primary platinum-iridium kilogram mass
More informationCalibration of long gauge blocks. Technical protocol (Issue 1)
CIPM Key Comparison: Calibration of Long Gauge Blocks 1 National Physical Laboratory CIPM Key Comparison CCL-K2 Calibration of long gauge blocks Technical protocol (Issue 1) Contents 1. Introduction...
More informationCCQM-K27.2 Second Subsequent Study: Determination of Ethanol in Aqueous Media Final Report
CCQM-K27.2 Second Subsequent Study: Determination of Ethanol in Aqueous Media Final Report Michele M. Schantz, Reenie M. Parris, and Willie E. May National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
More informationFinal Report on CIPM key comparison of multiples and submultiples of the kilogram (CCM.M-K2)
1 Final Report on CIPM key comparison of multiples and submultiples of the kilogram (CCM.M-K) 1. Introduction L.O. Becerra 1, W. Bich, N. Bignell 3, G.D. Chapman 4, J.W. Chung 5 S. Davidson 6, M. Gläser
More informationCOOMET.M.V-S2 (587/RU-a/12) COOMET SUPPLEMENTARY COMPARISON IN THE FIELD OF MEASUREMENTS OF LIQUIDS KINEMATIC VISCOSITY
Final Report COOMET.M.V-S2 (587/RU-a/12) COOMET SUPPLEMENTARY COMPARISON IN THE FIELD OF MEASUREMENTS OF LIQUIDS KINEMATIC VISCOSITY List of authors: a) Coordinator of comparison: Alexey Demyanov, D. I.
More informationInternational Comparison
International Comparison Adriaan M.H. van der Veen 1, Hans-Joachim Heine, Freek N.C. Brinkmann 1, Paul R. Ziel 1, Ed W.B. de Leer 1, Wang Lin Zhen 3, Kenji Kato 4, Leonid A. Konopelko 5, Tatjana A. Popova
More informationNPL REPORT ENG 13. Report on EUROMET key comparison of multiples and submultiples of the kilogram (EUROMET.M.M-K2) M Perkin NOT RESTRICTED
NPL REPORT ENG 13 Report on EUROMET key comparison of multiples and submultiples of the kilogram (EUROMET.M.M-K2) M Perkin NOT RESTRICTED March 2009 Report on EUROMET key comparison of multiples and submultiples
More informationFINAL REPORT OF THE BILATERAL COMPARISON OF THE CALIBRATIONS OF STANDARD WEIGHTS BETWEEN CENAM-MEXICO AND INEN-ECUADOR SIM.M.M-S4 (SIM.7.
FINAL REPORT OF THE BILATERAL COMPARISON OF THE CALIBRATIONS OF STANDARD WEIGHTS BETWEEN CENAM-MEXICO AND INEN-ECUADOR (SIM.7.42) 1 Luis Omar Becerra, 2 René Chanchay 1 Centro Nacional de Metrología (CENAM),
More informationCCL-K5. CMM 1D: Step Gauge and Ball Bars. Final Report
Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt CIPM Key Comparison CCL-K5 CMM 1D: Step Gauge and Ball Bars Final Report V3.2 Otto Jusko, PTB, Braunschweig, September 2009 CCL-K5_Final_Report_V3.2(corr).doc Page
More informationDRAFT B, Final Report on CIPM key comparison of 1 kg standards in stainless steel (CCM.M-K1)
1 DRAFT B, Final Report on CIPM key comparison of 1 kg standards in stainless steel (CCM.M-K1) C. Aupetit 1, L.O. Becerra, N. Bignell 3, W. Bich 4, G.D. Chapman 5, J.W. Chung 6, J. Coarasa 7, S. Davidson
More informationNational Physical Laboratory Hampton Road Teddington Middlesex United Kingdom TW11 0LW
NPL REPORT ENG 17 Report on EURAMET key comparison of multiples and submultiples of the kilogram (EURAMET.M.M-K2.1) M Perkin NOT RESTRICTED July 2009 National Physical Laboratory Hampton Road Teddington
More informationFinal Report - Version B.5
CIPM Key Comparison CCL-K2 Calibration of long gauge blocks Final Report - Version B.5 Andrew Lewis, NPL, Teddington, March 2003 CCL-K2 Version B.5 Page 1 of 40 Contents Contents... 2 1 Introduction...
More informationA bilateral comparison of a 1 kg platinum standard
DANSK FUNDAMENTAL METROLOGI DANISH FUNDAMENTAL METROLOGY Report on A bilateral comparison of a 1 kg platinum standard by Lars Nielsen Danish Fundamental Metrology B 307, Matematiktorvet, DK-800 Kgs. Lyngby
More informationFinal Report on COOMET Supplementary Comparison of Capacitance at 100 pf (COOMET.EM-S4)
State Enterprise All-Ukrainian State Scientific and Production Center of Standardization, Metrology, Certification and Protection of Consumer (SE Ukrmetrteststandard ) Approved by the chairman of TC 1.3
More informationNational Physical Laboratory Hampton Road Teddington Middlesex United Kingdom TW11 0LW
NPL REPORT ENG 4 Report on EUROMET key comparison of 1 kg standards in stainless steel (EUROMET.M.M-K4) M Perkin NOT RESTRICTED February 008 National Physical Laboratory Hampton Road Teddington Middlesex
More informationEuramet project 1187 Comparison of Instrument Current Transformers up to 10 ka. Technical protocol (March 2012)
Euramet project 87 Comparison of Instrument Current Transformers up to 0 ka Technical protocol (March 0). Introduction AC current ratio is one of two basic parameters in the area of metrology of instrument
More informationFINAL REPORT ON THE KEY COMPARISON EUROMET.AUV.A-K3
FINAL REPORT ON THE KEY COMPARISON EUROMET.AUV.A-K3 June 26 CCAUV Approved September 26 ISTITUTO NAZIONALE DI RICERCA METROLOGICA & THE DANISH PRIMARY LABORATORY FOR ACOUSTICS Knud Rasmussen Danish Primary
More informationCCQM-K45: Sn in tomato paste key comparison
CCQM-K45: Sn in tomato paste key comparison Final report September 2006 CCQM-K45: Sn in tomato paste key comparison Final report September 2006 Contact Point: Gill Holcombe Tel: +44 (0)20 8943 7442 Prepared
More informationCCL Key Comparison CCL-K Calibration of Diameter Standards
CCL Key Comparison CCL-K4.2015 Calibration of Diameter Standards (Final) Gaithersburg, Maryland USA September 2015 CCL-K4 2015 Contents 1 Document control...2 2 Introduction...2 3 Organization...2 3.1
More informationTECHNICAL PAPERS. Ulrich Breuel, Barbara Werner, Petra Spitzer and Hans D. Jensen
Experiences with Novel Secondary Conductivity Sensors within the German Calibration Service (DKD) Ulrich Breuel, Barbara Werner, Petra Spitzer and Hans D. Jensen Abstract: International efforts concentrate
More informationChapter 9.D Services Trade Data
Chapter 9.D Services Trade Data Arjan Lejour, Nico van Leeuwen and Robert A. McDougall 9.D.1 Introduction This paper has two aims. First of all, it presents CPB s contribution of bilateral services trade
More informationCCM Vickers key comparison. Final Report
Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt Braunschweig CCM Vickers key comparison Final Report Braunschweig, March 2005 / K. Herrmann 1 Content 1 Introduction 3 2 Organisation 3 2.1 Participants 3 2.2 Time
More informationFinal Report on COOMET Key Comparison of Capacitance at 10 pf (COOMET.EM-K4)
State Enterprise All-Ukrainian State Scientific and Production Center of Standardization, Metrology, Certification and Protection of Consumer (SE Ukrmetrteststandard ) Approved by the chairman of TC 1.3
More informationFORCE STANDARDS COMPARISON BETWEEN PTB (GERMANY) AND CENAM (MEXICO).
FORCE STANDARDS COMPARISON BETWEEN PTB (GERMANY) AND CENAM (MEXICO). Jorge C. Torres-Guzmán*, Amritlal Sawla**, Daniel Ramírez-Ahedo* * Centro Nacional de Metrología, México. **Physikalisch-Technische
More informationMeasurement of the 30 Si mole fraction in the new Avogadro silicon material by Neutron Activation and high resolution spectrometry
Measurement of the 30 Si mole fraction in the new Avogadro silicon material by Neutron Activation and high resolution spectrometry Marco Di Luzio 1,2, Attila Stopic 3, Giancarlo D Agostino 1, John W Bennett
More informationHigh pressure comparison among seven European national laboratories
IMEKO 20 th TC3, 3 rd TC16 and 1 st TC22 International Conference Cultivating metrological knowledge 27 th to 30 th November, 2007. Merida, Mexico. High pressure comparison among seven European national
More informationFinal Report on the Torque Key Comparison CCM.T-K2 Measurand Torque: 0 kn m, 10 kn m, 20 kn m Dirk Röske 1), Koji Ogushi 2)
Final Report on the Torque Key Comparison CCM.T-K Measurand Torque: kn m, 1 kn m, kn m Dirk Röske 1), Koji Ogushi ) 1) ) Dirk RÖSKE Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt Department 1. Solid Mechanics orking
More informationAnalysis of copper in ethanol. Final Report
Key comparison CCQM-K100 Analysis of copper in ethanol Final Report Authors: Tao ZHOU () 1, Elias Kakoulides () 2, Yanbei ZHU () 3, Reinhard Jaehrling, Olaf Rienitz () 4, David Saxby () 5, Pranee Phukphatthanachai,
More informationLINKING SIM MASS COMPARISONS TO THE KCRV ON 1 kg. Luis O. Becerra CENAM Querétaro, Qro., Mexico,
LINKING SIM MASS COMPARISONS TO THE KCRV ON 1 kg Luis O. Becerra CENAM Querétaro, Qro., Mexico, lbecerra@cenam.mx Abstract. Within the frame of SIM (Sistema Interamericano de Metrología), inter laboratory
More informationFORCE NATIONAL STANDARDS COMPARISON BETWEEN CENAM/MEXICO AND NIM/CHINA
FORCE NATIONAL STANDARDS COMPARISON BETWEEN CENAM/MEXICO AND NIM/CHINA Qingzhong Li *, Jorge C. Torres G.**, Daniel A. Ramírez A.** *National Institute of Metrology (NIM) Beijing, 100013, China Tel/fax:
More informationStudy for the requalification of Inmetro's Primary Hardness Standardization Machine for Vickers HV3 scale
Journal of Physics: Conference Series PAPER OPEN ACCESS Study for the requalification of Inmetro's Primary Hardness Standardization Machine for Vickers HV3 scale To cite this article: J T Filho et al 2015
More informationPROTOCOL OF MASS AND VOLUME COMPARISONS BETWEEN SIM NMIs
PROTOCOL OF MASS AND VOLUME COMPARISONS BETWEEN SIM NMIs 1. General Information This comparison is being carried out in order to compare the degree of equivalence in mass, conventional mass, volume and
More informationForce Key Comparison EUROMET.M.F-K2. (50 kn and 100 kn) EURAMET Project No 518. Final Report. 14 July Pilot: NPL, United Kingdom
Force Key Comparison EUROMET.M.F-K2 (50 kn and 100 kn) EURAMET Project No 518 Final Report 14 July 2014 Pilot: NPL, United Kingdom Co-authors: Renato Reis Machado (INMETRO, Brazil), Petr Kašpar (CMI, Czech
More informationAppendix B1. Reports of SMU
Appendix B1 Reports of SMU Euromet Project 600 Comparison of Surface Roughness Standards /13 EUROMET SUPPLEMENTARY COMPARISON SURFACE TEXTURE Project No. 600 Final Report Elaborated by: M. Szmicskova Bratislava,
More informationPreparation of nitrous oxide (N 2 O) in air standard being traceable to SI by gravimetric method
Preparation of nitrous oxide ( O) in air standard being traceable to SI by gravimetric method 15th WMO Meeting of Experts on Carbon Dioxide, Other Greenhouse Gases, and Related Tracer Measurement Techniques
More informationAFRIMETS. Supplementary Comparison Programme. Calibration of Gauge Blocks. by Mechanical Comparison Method AFRIMETS.L S3.
AFRIMETS Secretariat Private Bag X34 Lynnwood Ridge 0040 AFRIMETS Supplementary Comparison Programme Calibration of Gauge Blocks by Mechanical Comparison Method AFRIMETS.L S3 Final Report Giza, Egypt,
More informationFinal Report on the EURAMET.PR-K1.a-2009 Comparison of Spectral Irradiance 250 nm nm
NPL REPORT COM 1 NPL REPORT OP 12 Final Report on the EURAMET.PR-K1.a-2009 Comparison of Spectral Irradiance 250 nm - 2500 nm TERESA GOODMAN 1, WILLIAM SERVANTES 1, EMMA WOOLLIAMS 1, PETER SPERFELD 2,
More informationSIM Regional Comparison on. The Calibration of Internal and External Diameter Standards SIM.L-K FINAL REPORT July 2012
SIM Regional Comparison on The Calibration of Internal and External Diameter Standards SIM.L-K4.2009 FINAL REPORT July 2012 Theodore Doiron (NIST), J. A. Pires Alves (INMETRO), Bruno R. Gastaldi (INTI),
More informationComparison between the CENAM (Mexico) 150 kn and the INRiM (Italy) 1 MN force standard machines
IMEKO 20 th TC3, 3 rd TC16 and 1 st TC22 International Conference Cultivating metrological knowledge 27 th to 30 th November, 2007. Merida, Mexico. Comparison between the CENAM (Mexico) 150 kn and the
More informationREPORT to the CCT on Comparison COOMET. T-K3 (COOMET theme No. 285/RU-а/03) Final Report
REPORT to the CCT on Comparison COOMET. T-K3 (COOMET theme No. 285/RU-а/03) Final Report REGIONAL COMPARISONS OF THE NATIONAL STANDARDS OF TEMPERATURE IN THE RANGE FROM THE TRIPLE POINT OF WATER TO THE
More informationTechnical Protocol of the CIPM Key Comparison CCAUV.V-K5
Technical Protocol of the CIPM Key Comparison CCAUV.V-K5 2017-03-06 revised 2018-02-13 (changed schedule) Task and Purpose of the Comparison According to the rules set up by the CIPM MRA the consultative
More informationSIM FORCE STANDARDS COMPARISON UP TO 10 kn
SIM FORCE STANDARDS COMPARISON UP TO 10 kn Jorge C. Torres-Guzmán, Daniel A. Ramírez-Ahedo Centro Nacional de Metrología, CENAM.. ABSTRACT A comparison in the quantity of force was carried out among the
More informationFinal Report On RMO VICKERS KEY COMPARISON COOMET M.H-K1
Final Report On RMO VICKERS KEY COMPARISON COOMET M.H-K1 E. Aslanyan¹, F. Menelao², K. Herrmann², A. Aslanyan¹, V. Pivovarov¹, E. Galat 3, Y. Dovzhenko 4, M. Zhamanbalin 5 ¹ All Russian Research Institute
More informationFinal Report On COOMET Vickers PTB/VNIIFTRI Key Comparison (COOMET.M.H- K1.b and COOMET.M.H- K1.c)
Version 7 of 01-19-07 Final Report On COOMET Vickers PTB/VNIIFTRI Key Comparison (COOMET.M.H- K1.b and COOMET.M.H- K1.c) E. Aslanyan¹, K. Herrmann² ¹ All Russian Research Institute for Physical -Technical
More informationPreparation of nitrous oxide in air standard (320 nmol/mol) for CCQM-K68
Preparation of nitrous oxide in air standard (320 nmol/mol) for CCQM-K68 8th APMP/TCQM Gas CRM Workshop June 10 th, 2010 Tukuba, Ibaraki, Japan Nobuyuki Aoki, Takuya Shimosaka, Nobuhiro Matsumoto, Kenji
More informationFinal Report. CCEM Comparison of 10 pf Capacitance Standards. Anne-Marie Jeffery Electricity Division NIST May 2000 Revised March 2002
Final Report CCEM Comparison of 10 pf Capacitance Standards Anne-Marie Jeffery Electricity Division NIST May 2000 Revised March 2002 Abstract Comparison of electrical standards must be carried out periodically
More informationINTERCOMPARISON OF WATER TRIPLE POINT CELLS FROM INTIBS AND INRIM 1. INTRODUCTION
METROLOGY AND MEASUREMENT SYSTEMS VOL. XV, NUMBER 4 (2008) A. SZMYRKA-GRZEBYK 1, A. KOWAL 1, L. LIPIŃSKI 1, PETER P. M. STEUR 2, R. DEMATTEIS 2 1 Institute of Low Temperature and Structure Research PAN,
More informationPhysikalisch Technische Bundesanstalt
EUROMET Key comparison L-K6: CMM 2-D Artifact / Ball Plate 1 Physikalisch Technische Bundesanstalt EUROMET Key Comparison L - K6 CMM 2-D Artifact: Ball Plate Technical Protocol Rev 2 EUROMET Key comparison
More informationBIPM/CIPM key comparison CCM.FF-K Final Report for Volume of Liquids at 20 L and 100 ml - Piloted by Centro Nacional de Metrología (CENAM)
BIPM/CIPM key comparison CCM.FF-K4.1.2011 Final Report for Volume of Liquids at 20 L and 100 ml - Piloted by Centro Nacional de Metrología (CENAM) Pilot: R. Arias, M. Maldonado (CENAM, Mexico) rarias@cenam.mx
More informationForce Key Comparison CCM.F-K1.a and CCM.F-K1.b 5 kn and 10 kn. Aimo Pusa MIKES Finland
Force Key Comparison CCM.F-K1.a and CCM.F-K1.b 5 kn and 10 kn Aimo Pusa 09.02.2009 MIKES Finland 2 Content Page Content 3 Foreword 4 Chapter 1 1.1 General 6 1.2 Characteristics of the transducers 8 1.3
More informationInteramerican Metrology System (SIM) Regional Metrology Organization (RMO) Capacitance Comparison, Final Report
Interamerican Metrology System (SIM) Regional Metrology Organization (RMO) Capacitance Comparison, Final Report SIM.EM-K4., 0 pf fused-silica standard capacitor at 000 Hz SIM.EM-S4., 00 pf fused-silica
More informationSupplementary Comparison EURAMET.EM-S19 EURAMET Project No. 688
Supplementary Comparison EURAMET.EMS19 EURAMET Project No. 688 Bilateral Comparison of Measurements of Current Transformers (CTs) Between and Final Report Hüseyin Çaycı (, Pilot Laboratory) January 211
More informationGuest Forum. ph Measurement using the Harned Cell. The Screening Committee Lecture for the First Dr. Masao Horiba s Award
Guest Forum The Screening Committee Lecture for the First Dr. Masao Horiba s Award ph Measurement using the Harned Cell -ph Values Acceptable for the International Society- Susumu Nakamura National Institute
More informationCentro Nacional de Metrología. CIPM Key Comparison CCL KC-6
CIPM CCL Key comparison: Calibration of CMM 2-D Artifacts 1/162 Centro Nacional de Metrología CIPM Key Comparison CCL KC-6 Calibration of Coordinate Measuring Machine (CMM) Two-dimensional (2-D) Artifacts
More informationEUROMET Project 702 EUROMET.M.D-K4
EUROMET TC-M Meeting 2007 Thursday, 01 March 2007 EUROMET Project 702 EUROMET.M.D-K4 Comparison of the calibrations of high resolution hydrometers for liquid density determinations Salvatore Lorefice INRIM,
More informationASIA PACIFIC METROLOGY PROGRAME
APMP.M.M-K6 (SUB) multiples mass key comparison ASIA PACIFIC METROLOGY PROGRAME Final Report of APMP Comparison of Mass standards APMP.M.M-K6 (SUB) multiples mass key comparison Coordinated by: Vietnam
More informationPhysikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt
Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt COOMET Supplementary Comparison COOMET.L-S18 (COOMET project: 673/UA-a/15) Involute gear measurement standards Final report September 2017 Coordinator: Physikalisch-Technische
More informationHigh pressure comparisons between seven European National Laboratories
J4/2007 High pressure comparisons between seven European National Laboratories Range 50 MPa to 500 MPa Report on EUROMET Project 881 Markku Rantanen, Sari Semenoja, Måns Ackerholm, Antoine Condereys, Zdenek
More informationINTERNATIONAL KEY COMPARISON OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON FLOW FACILITIES CCM-FF-K2 (Final Report) BIPM Pavillon de Breteuil F Sevres France
INTERNATIONAL KEY COMPARISON OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON FLOW FACILITIES CCM-FF-K2 (Final Report) A Report for BIPM Pavillon de Breteuil F-92312 Sevres France Project No: FFIN56 October 2008 Report No: XXXX/XXX
More informationCentre for Metrology and Accreditation, MIKES
Centre for Metrology and Accreditation, MIKES Publication J4/22 Northern European Comparison: Calibration of gauge blocks by mechanical comparison, final report A. Lassila EUROMET Project no.: 639 Helsinki,
More informationReport on IPQ-DFM bilateral comparison on phosphate buffer 2008
Report on IPQ-DFM bilateral comparison on phosphate buffer 2008 30 April 2009 Ref 1107-03 PTJ Report no. DFM-2008-R30 Summary In 2008 IPQ asked DFM to participate in a bilateral comparison on ph following
More informationSupplementary comparison SIM.M.FF-S12. Final Report for Volume of Liquids at 20 L
Supplementary comparison SIM.M.FF-S12 Final Report for Volume of Liquids at 20 L Pilot: M. Maldonado (CENAM, Mexico) mmaldona@cenam.mx km 4.5 Carretera a los Cués, El Marqués, Qro 76241, Mexico Participants:
More informationComparison protocol EURAMET project
Comparison protocol EURAMET project Bilateral three-phase AC and energy comparison at frequency 1. Introduction This bilateral comparison was triggered by MIKES need to get support for their planned extension
More informationINTERNATIONAL COMPARISON OF PLATINUM RESISTANCE THERMOMETERS BETWEEN CHILE AND ECUADOR
INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON OF PLATINUM RESISTANCE THERMOMETERS BETWEEN CHILE AND ECUADOR M. Araya 1, D. Almeida 2 1 National Laboratory of Temperature of Chile, LCPNT, Santiago, Chile 2 Ecuadorian Standardization
More informationTechnical Protocol of the Bilateral Comparison in Primary Angular Vibration Calibration CCAUV.V-S1
Technical Protocol of the Bilateral Comparison in Primary Angular Vibration Calibration CCAUV.V-S1 Updated at 12-December-2012 Task and Purpose of the Comparison According to the rules set up by the CIPM
More informationPTB S 16.5 MN HYDRAULIC AMPLIFICATION MACHINE AFTER MODERNIZATION
IMEKO 22 nd TC3, 15 th TC5 and 3 rd TC22 International Conferences 3 to 5 February, 2014, Cape Town, Republic of South Africa PTB S 16.5 MN HYDRAULIC AMPLIFICATION MACHINE AFTER MODERNIZATION R. Kumme
More informationStudies to develop certified reference material to calibrate spectrophotometer in ultraviolet region
Studies to develop certified reference material to calibrate spectrophotometer in ultraviolet region Felipe Carvalho da Conceição, Paulo Paschoal Borges and Juliana Freitas Santos Gomes 2 National Institute
More informationFINAL REPORT. European co-operation for Accreditation (EA) Interlaboratory Comparison IR3: Calibration of a Radiation Protection Dosimeter
- 1 (59) - EA IR3 Final Report ENEA-INMRI SIT Servizio di Taratura in Italia FINAL REPORT European co-operation for Accreditation (EA) Interlaboratory Comparison IR3: Calibration of a Radiation Protection
More informationDEVELOPMENT OF A FLOW-THROUGH CELL FOR ACCURATE MEASUREMENTS OF LOW ELECTROLYTIC CONDUCTIVITY
XIX IMEKO World Congress Fundamental and Applied Metrology September 6 11, 2009, Lisbon, Portugal DEVELOPMENT OF A FLOW-THROUGH CELL FOR ACCURATE MEASUREMENTS OF LOW ELECTROLYTIC CONDUCTIVITY C. Boveri
More informationSummary of the ICRM Life Sciences Working Group Meeting
Summary of the ICRM Life Sciences Working Group Meeting 19-20 November 201 National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, UK Jeffery T. Cessna Nuclear Medicine Metrology Meeting, 21 November 2014, NPL, Teddinton,
More informationMulti Analyte Custom Grade Solution. Aluminum, Potassium, Magnesium, ANALYTE CERTIFIED VALUE ANALYTE CERTIFIED VALUE
1.0 ACCREDITATION / REGISTRATION INORGANIC VENTURES is accredited to ISO Guide 34, "General Requirements for the Competence of Reference Material Producers" and ISO/IEC 17025, "General Requirements for
More informationEURAMET Project no Inter-comparison of a 1000 L proving tank
EURAMET Project no. 1157 Inter-comparison of a 1000 L proving tank Final Report IPQ (Elsa Batista) Coordinator of the comparison VSL (Erik Smits) Pilot and coordinator of the comparison September 2013
More informationBureau International des Poids et Mesures
Bureau International des Poids et Mesures Comparison of the air-kerma standards of the VNIIM and the BIPM in the medium-energy x-ray range D.T. Burns, N.D. Villevalde, A.V. Oborin and E.N. Yurjatin September
More informationINTERNATIONAL COMPARISON OF WATER TRIPLE POINT CELLS LEADING TO A MORE PRECISE DEFINITION OF THE KELVIN
INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON OF WATER TRIPLE POINT CELLS LEADING TO A MORE PRECISE DEFINITION OF THE KELVIN Michael Stock and Stéphane Solve Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM) Pavillon de Breteuil,
More informationIntroduction. (hqp://www.bipm.org/en/measurement- units/new- si/)
OUT US WORLDWIDE METROLOGY INTERNATIONAL EQUIVALENCE the future revision of the SI MEASUREMENT UNITS Introduction SERVICES PUBLICATIONS (hqp://www.bipm.org/en/measurement- units/new- si/) Future revision
More informationSIM SIM.M.D-K3. provide. SIM.M.M-K5 for. A set of. Institute LACOMET LATU INTI. Country Costa Rica Uruguay Argentina Chile México Canada Brazil
FINAL REPORT SIM COMPARISON IN VOLUME OF WEIGHTS SIM.M.D-K3 Kornblit, F 1 ; Leiblich, J. 1 ; Becerra, L.O. ; Peña, L.M. ; Luján, L. ; Díaz,J.C. ; Centeno, L.M. ; Ramos, O 3 ; Rodríguez, S. 3 ; Santo, C.
More informationFinal Report EUROMET PROJECT 818 CALIBRATION FACTOR OF THERMISTOR MOUNTS. Jan P.M. de Vreede
Final Report EUROMET PROJECT 818 CALIBRATION FACTOR OF THERMISTOR MOUNTS Jan P.M. de Vreede Department of Electricity, Radiation and Length NMi Van Swinden Laboratorium Thijsseweg 11, 2629 JA Delft, the
More informationDESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND EVALUATION OF A HUMIDITY GENERATOR
Copyright 2013 by ABCM DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND EVALUATION OF A HUMIDITY GENERATOR Amaury Roteger de Oliveira Renato Nunes Teixeira Instituto Nacional de Metrologia, Qualidade e Tecnologia - Inmetro Diretoria
More informationCHEK Proficiency study 642. Migration of formaldehyde from melamine kitchenware. Date 7 July 2016 Version 1 Status Final Report number CHEK
CHEK Proficiency study 642 Migration of formaldehyde from melamine kitchenware Date 7 July 2016 Version 1 Status Final Report number CHEK-16-642 page 1 Colophon Number 642 Name Migration of formaldehyde
More informationThe Avogadro constant: Counting atoms in a single-crystal 28 Si sphere
The Avogadro constant: Counting atoms in a single-crystal 28 sphere Peter Becker Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt Braunschweig The new SI Royal Society London, 24-25 Jan 2011 Our Intention: Replace
More informationFinal Report on APMP.M.M-K4.1 - Bilateral Comparison of 1 kg Stainless Steel Mass Standards between KRISS and A*STAR
Final Report on APMP.M.M-K4.1 - Bilateral Comparison of 1 kg Stainless Steel Mass Standards between KRISS and A*STAR Jin Wan Chung 1, Shih Mean Lee, Sungjun Lee 1 1 Korea Research Institute of Standards
More informationLab i x i u i Lab i x i u i / (mg/kg) / (mg/kg) / (mg/kg) / (mg/kg)
MEASURAND : Mass fraction of total Arsenic in brown rice flour NOMINAL VALUE : 0.05 mg/kg to 0.5 mg/kg MEASURAND : Mass fraction of Cadmium in brown rice flour NOMINAL VALUE : 0.1 mg/kg to 0.5 mg/kg x
More information