INTERSECTION THEOREMS FOR SYSTEMS OF FINITE SETS

Transcription

1 INTERSECTION THEOREMS FOR SYSTEMS OF FINITE SETS By P. ERD0S, CHAO KO (Szechuan), and R. RADO {Reading) [Received 13 August 1961] 1. Introduction E. SPEBJOBIB (1) has proved that every system of subsets a v of a set of finite cardinal m, such that a^ < a y for p. ^ v contains at most I I elements, where p = [$ro]. This note concerns analogues of this result. We shall impose an upper limitation on the cardinals of the a v and a lower limitation on the cardinals of the intersection of any two sets a v, and we shall deduce upper estimates, in many cases best-possible, for the number of elements of such a system of sets a v. 2. Notation The letters a, b, c, d, x, y, z denote finite sets of non-negative integers, all other lower-case letters denote non-negative integers. Iffc^ I, then [k, I) denotes the set {k,k+l,k+2,...,l-l} = {*:fc < «< Q. The obliteration operator " serves to remove from any system of elements the element above which it is placed. Thus [k,i) = {k,k-{-l,...,fy. The cardinal of o is \a\\ inclusion (in the wide sense), union, difference, and intersection of sets are denoted by o c b, a-\-b, a b, ab respectively, and a b = a ab for all a, b. By 8(k,l,m) we denote the set of all systems (a o,a v...,d n ) such that a v c[0,m); \a v \ ^1 (v <»), 3. Results THEOBEM 1. // 1 < I < \m; (a o,...,d n ) e S(l,l,m), If, in addition, \a v \ < I for some v, then n < I I. THBOBBM 2. Let k < I < m, n > 2, (a o,...,d n ) e S{k, I, m). Suppose that either o» ^-? i i 7 / ^ - \ /i\ 21 ^ fc+m, \a v \ = I (v < n) (1) orf 21 «g 1+m, \a v \^l (v <»). (2) t The condition \ay\ sg I ia in fact implied by (a,,..., A K ) 6 S{k, I, m). Quart. J. Math. Oxford (3), 12 (1961),

2 314 P. ERDOS, CHAO KO, AND R. RADO Then (a) either (i) \a o...d n \ >k, n ( * ) or (ii) a o...tf n < k < I < TO, n then n fc. Obviously, if a v = I for v < ra, then the upper estimates for n in Theorem 1 and in Theorem 2 (a) (i) and (6) are best-possible. For, if k ^ I <C m and if a 0,..., d n are the distinct sets a such that then [O,i)coc[0,m), (a o,...,d n )e8(k,l,m), o =Z, (m-k\ 4. The following lemma i8 due to Spemer (1). We give the proof since it is extremely short. LEMMA. // n 0 Js 1, a v c [0, m), o,, = l 0 (v < n 0 ), ia«7i iaere are oftow<n o (m l o ){l o + l)~ l sets b such that, for some v, v<n 0, a v cbc[0,m), 6 = Z 0 +l. (3) Proof. Let 74 be the number of sets b denned above. Then, by counting in two different ways the number of pairs (v, b) satisfying (3), we obtain ^(m 1 0 ) ^ n^-fl), which proves the lemma. 5. Proof of Theorem 1 Case 1. Let \a v \ = I (v < n). We have m ^ 2. If m = 2, then 1=1; n = 1 ^ I I. Now let m ^ 3 and use induction over m. Choose, for fixed I, m, n, the a, in such a way that the hypothesis holds and, in addition, the number f(a o,...,d n ) = s Q +...+S n is minimal, where 8 V is the sum of the elements of a v. Put A = {a v : v < n}. If 21 =TO, then [0, m) a v $ A and, hence Now let 21 < TO.. 1/TO\ /TO-1\

3 ON INTERSECTION THEOREMS 316 Case 1 o. Suppose that whenever m leaea, Ae[0,m) o, then a {TO 1}+{A} 6 A. We may assume that, for some n 0 < n, ffl-leo, (v<n 0 ), TO l^a, (n 0 < v < n). Put 6, = a v {TO 1} (v < n 0 ). Let /i < v < TI 0. Then and there is A e [0, m) a /i a p. Then 6 M +{A} e 4, 6^6, = ( and therefore Since 2(t 1) < m 2 <TO 1 we obtain, by the induction hypothesis, n. (m 2\ o..,, ^ 9 )" Similarly, smce l we have n n 0 < (^ ). Thus Case 1 b. Suppose that there are ae A, A e [0, TO) a such that TO lea, Then A <TO 1. We may assume that a {m l}-\-{x}$a. TO lea,, X$a v, b v = a v {TO 1}+{A} $A (V < n 0 ), TO leo r, A^a,,, c r = a v {TO l}+{a}e^l (n 0 < v < 74), TO lea,, Aea ( (74 < v < 74), m l$a v (n t^.v<n). Here I^TIO^TIJ^TI^^TI. Put b v = a K (TI 0 ^ v < 71). We now show that (i, J,)6«(1,U). (4) Let ft < v <TO. We have to prove that ^ * &, b^b y # 0. (5) If/A<v<7i t) or7i 0^/i<v, then (5) clearly holds. Now let \t <ra 0 ^ v. Then 6^ ^ ^4, b v = a v e A, and hence 6 M 9^ b v. If n 0 < v < T^, then c p e-4, and there is a e a^c,,. Then a = A, u^m-1, and aeb^b y. If 7^ ^ v < Tig, then A e 6^fe F. K, finally, 7ij, ^ v < n, then there is

4 316 P. ERDOS, CHAO KO, AND R. BADO p e a h a v. Then psa v, P < TO 1, peb^by. This proves (5) and therefore (4). However, we have f(b o,...,k)-f{<h,-,&n) = no(-[m-l]+a) < 0, which contradicts the minimum property of (a 0,..., d n ). This shows that Case 1 b cannot occur. Case 2: min(v < n) \a v \ l 0 < I. If l 0 = I, then we have Case 1. Now let l 0 <l and use induction over I 1 0. We may assume that l«,l = h (" < «o). I«KI > 'o K < * <»), (6) where 1 ^Zn 0 ^Ln. Let 6 0,..., i ni be the distinct sets b such that (3) holds for some v. Then (»i-g < 2(l-l)+l-m < 0, (7) and hence, by the lemma, n^ ^ TI^. Also, Hence, from our induction hypothesis, and Theorem 1 follows. 6. Proof of Theorem 2 Cast 1: k = 0. Then n < ^+(71-71,,) < (^^ V Now (a) (ii) is impossible, and (a) (i) is identical with (b), so that all we have to prove is that»^ l 0 < I, 1 3%: n Q ^ n. If l 0 = I then \a v \ = 1 (v < n), n < rm., Again, we may assume (6), where Now let l 0 < I and use induction over Z Z o. Let 6 0,..., 6 ni be the distinct sets b such that (3) holds for some v. Again (7) holds and, by the lemma, n 0. We have (b o,...,f> ni,a nt,...,d n )es(o,l,m) and, by our induction hypothesis, This proves the assertion.

5 ON INTERSECTION THEOREMS 317 Case 2: k > 0. We separate this into two cases. Case 2 a. Suppose that (1) holds. Put a o...< n = r. We now show that, if r ^ k, then (i) follows. We may assume that a o...d n = [m r,m). Put a^o.m r) = c F (v < n). Th6n (c o,...,e n )es(o,l-r,m-r), 2(l r) (m r) = 2l r m < 21 k m < 0. Hence, by Case 1, k\ ) so that (i) holds. We now Buppose that (i) is false, and we deduce (ii). We k^6 a o...<j n = r < k < \a oai \ < a o < I, and therefore 21 ^ k-\-m < Z+m, A; < I < m. There is a maximal number p ^ n such that there exist ^ " sets a n,..., d p satisfying (ao>... f4p)es(t, I>m ). (8) Put A' = {a r : v < p). We assert that (a o,...,d p )t8(k+l,l,m). (9) For otherwise la^a^l > k (^ < v < n). Let a e A'. Then we can choose o' c [0,TO)such that \a'\ = l, \aa'\ = l-l. Then, for every b e A', we have \a'b\ ^ a6 -l > fc and hence, since p is maximal, a' e A'. By repeated application of this result we find that [0,1), [m-l,m) ea', k < \[0,l)[m-l,m)\ = l-(m-l) < k, which is the desired contradiction. This proves (9), and hence there are sets a, b e A' such that \ab\ = k. Since a o...<j p < K--^nl < *> there is c e A' such that \abc\ < k. Denote by T the set of all triples (x, y, z) such that x ca,y c b, z c c, a;[ = \y \ = \z \ = k, \x-\-y-\-z <: I. Put <f>(x,y,z) = {d: x+y+z cde A'}. Then, by (8), A' = ^{(x,y,z)et)4,(x,y,z). If (x,y,z) e T and s = z+y+z, then s > k since otherwise we obtain the contradiction k > \abc\ > xt/z = z = k.

6 318 P. ERDOS, CHAO KO, AND R. RADO Hence m k 1\ (m k 1 m-l which proves (ii). Case 2b. Suppose that (2) holds. We may assume (6), where l 0 < I; 1 < *&o ^ n. If l 0 = I, then Case 2 a applies. Now let l Q < I and use induction over I 1 0. Let b 0,..., h nj be the distinct sets b satisfying, for some v, the relations (3). Then (7) holdb and hence, by the lemma, rij ^ n 0. Also, since l 0 < I < m, so that m i 0 > 2, we have, by definition of the bp, K-K = Oo-dn.. \b o...h ni a w..d n \ = \a o...d n \ < k. Since (J, ^v-^j^ftu), it follows from our induction hypothesis that It remains to prove (b) in Case 2. If k = I, then (b) is trivial. If ( 7\3, then */ (m-k\ _ (m-k-l\m- -k-l\m-k /m-k-l\(iy \l-k) -\l-k-l)lso that (b) follows from (a). This completes the proof of Theorem ) )[) Concluding remarks (i) In Theorem 2 (b) the condition m ^ k+(l-kfy, though certainly not best-possible, cannot be omitted. It is possible for (a o,...,d n ) e S(k,l,m), k ^ l ^ m to hold and, at the same time, n > I I. This is shown by the following example due to S. H. Min and kindly communicated to the authors. Let a^,..., d n be the distinct sets a such that ac[0,8), a = 4, o[0,4) = 3. Then n = 16, K,...,^) G 5(2,4,8), h~ \ = Q = 15 < n.

7 ON INTERSECTION THEOREMS 31» A more general example is the following. Let r > 0 and denote by o 0,..., d n the distinct sets a such that Then and we have ac[0,4r), a = 2r, a[0, 2r) > r. (a o,...,ci n )es(2,2r > 4r), and, for every large r, possibly for every r > 2, we have I I < n. \ t «/ We put forward the conjecture that, for our special values of k, I, m, this represents a case with maximal n, i.e. // r>0, (a Q,...,d n )es(2,2r,4r),,, l/4r\ l/2r\ B then n < - 2\r) (ii) K in the definition of ^2\2J 8(1, l,m) 2 in \ ) 2, the condition a h <. a v $. a^ is replaced by a^ = a y and if no restriction is placed upon \a y \, then the problem of estimating n becomes trivial, and we have the result: Let m > 0 and a y c [0,TO)for v < n, and a^ = a y, a )i a y = 0 for fi <L v < n. Then n ^ 2 m ~ 1, and there are 2 m ~ 1 n subsets a n,..., d^-i of [0, m) such that a^ ^= a v, a fi a y ^ 0 for p < v < 2 m ~ 1. To prove this we note that of two sets which are complementary in [0,TO) at most one occurs among a 0,..., d n, and, if n < 2 m ~ 1, then there is a pair of complementary sets a, b neither of which occurs among a 0,..., d n. It follows that at least one of a, 6 intersects every a v, so that this set can be taken as a n. and (iii) Let I > 3, 21 <TO, and suppose that a H 7^ ar> a r c [0,TO), \a r \ = 1 for v < n, a fi. a v 7^ 0 f r M < v < n > an( l tt o...(i n = 0. We conjecture that the maximum value of n for which such sets o r can be found is n 0, where /TO 3\

8 320 ON INTERSECTION THEOREMS A system of n 0 sets with the required properties is obtained by taking all sets o such that ac[0,m), o[0,3) >2, \a\ = I. (iv) The following problem may be of interest. Let k < m. Determine the largest number n such that there is a system of n sets a r satisfying the conditions If m-\-k is even, then the system consisting of the a such that ac[0,m), o >l(m+t) has the required properties. We suspect that this system contains the maximum possible number of sets for fixed m and k such that m-\-k is even. (v) If in (ii) the condition a^a v^a (ji < v < n) is replaced by a n a r a P # 0 (JJ- < v < p < n), then the structure of the system a v is largely determined by the result: Let m ^ 2, & c [0, m) /or v < n, a^ = a, for /x < v < n, and a ti a v a P # 0 /of /x < v < p < n. TAen TI ^ 2" 1-1, owd, t/ n = 2 1 "- 1, iaen o 0 a^..a n = 0, so that the a v are au, 2-1 sets a c [0, m) which contain some fixed number t (t < m). For there is a largest p (I ^Z p ^.n) such that If p = n, then a o...(2 n = a r = 0 for some v < n. K ^> < n, then any two of the n+1 distinct sets have a non-empty intersection and hence, by (ii), n+1 ^ 2-1. Different proofs of (v) have been found by L. P6sa, G. Haj6s, G. Pollak, and M. Simonovits. REFERENCE 1. E. Spemer, Math. Z. 27 (1928)