Math 341: Convex Geometry. Xi Chen

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Math 341: Convex Geometry. Xi Chen"

Transcription

1 Math 341: Convex Geometry Xi Chen 479 Central Academic Building, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2G1, CANADA address:

2

3 CHAPTER 1 Basics 1. Euclidean Geometry 1.1. Vector spaces. Let R be the set of real numbers. We use R n to denote the n dimensional Euclidean space. Every point in R n is given by an n-tuple (x 1, x 2,..., x n ), where x i R. We can define two operations on R n. One is called vector addition: we define the sum of (x 1, x 2,..., x n ) R n and (y 1, y 2,..., y n ) R n to be (1.1) (x 1, x 2,..., x n ) + (y 1, y 2,..., y n ) = (x 1 + y 1, x 2 + y 2, x n + y n ) The other is called scalar multiplication: we defined the product of λ R and (x 1, x 2,..., x n ) to be (1.2) λ(x 1, x 2,..., x n ) = (λx 1, λx 2,..., λx n ) These two operations obviously have the following properties: VS1 (Commutativity) For any u = (x 1, x 2,..., x n ) and v = (y 1, y 2,..., y n ) R n (1.3) u + v = v + u VS2 (Associativity) For any u = (x 1, x 2,..., x n ), v = (y 1, y 2,..., y n ) and w = (z 1, z 2,..., z n ) R n, (1.4) (u + v) + w = u + (v + w) VS3 (Associativity for Scalar Multiplication) For any λ 1, λ 2 R and u = (x 1, x 2,..., x n ) R n, (1.5) (λ 1 λ 2 )u = λ 1 (λ 2 u) VS4 (Distribution Law) For any λ R, u = (x 1, x 2,..., x n ) and v = (y 1, y 2,..., y n ) R n (1.6) λ(u + v) = λu + λv R n, equipped with these two operations, is called a vector space over R, or a real vector space. Indeed, any set equipped with two operations that satisfy the axioms VS1-VS4 is a vector space. 3

4 4 1. BASICS Geometric representation of vectors. A vector u = (u 1, u 2,..., u n ) R n can be represented by an arrow starting at point P = (x 1, x 2,..., x n ) and ending at point Q = (y 1, y 2,..., y n ), where y i = x i + u i for i = 1, 2,..., n. By convention, we write u = P Q. Let O = (0, 0,..., 0) be the origin. Since there is a one-to-one correspondence between the vector OP and the point P, we also call a vector in R n a point from time to time. Vector addition can be interpreted geometrically by so-called parallelogram criterion: let A, B, C, D be the vertices (in clockwise order) of a parallelogram. Then AB + AD = AC. Similarly, here is the geometric interpretation for scalar multiplication: let u = P Q and P R = λu. Then P, Q, R are collinear, P R = λ P Q and Q and R are on the same side of P iff λ 0. Proposition 1.1. Let R be the point lying on the line P Q between P and Q and satisfying: P R / RQ = λ. Then (1.7) OR = t 1 OP + (1 t) OQ with t = 1 + λ Proof. We see from the assumption that P R = λ RQ. And since P R = OR OP and RQ = OQ OR, we have OR OP = λ( OQ OR). And (1.7) follows. Let V be a vector space (over R) Linear dependence and dimension. We say that v 1, v 2,..., v k V are linearly dependent if there exist λ 1, λ 2,..., λ k R, not all zero, such that λ 1 v 1 +λ 2 v λ k v k = 0; and v 1, v 2,..., v k are linearly independent if they are not linearly dependent. Proposition 1.2. Any m > n vectors v 1, v 2,..., v m in R n are linearly dependent. Proof. Let v i = (a i1, a i2,..., a in ) for i = 1, 2,..., m and A = (a ij ) m n. Using Gaussian elimination, A can be turn into an upper-triangular matrix B = (b ij ) m n after a series of row operations. That is, there exists a nonsingular matrix C = (c ij ) m m such that CA = B = (b ij ) m n, where b ij = 0 for i > j. Therefore, (1.8) c m1 v 1 + c m2 v c mm v m = (b m1, b m2,..., b mn ) = 0 Since C is nonsingular, i.e., det(c) 0, c m1, c m2,..., c mm cannot be all zero. Hence v 1, v 2,..., v m are linearly dependent. We say that v V is a linear combination of v 1, v 2,..., v k V if there exist λ 1, λ 2,..., λ k R such that v = λ 1 v 1 + λ 2 v λ k v k. Let S be a subset of V. We say that S generates V if every vector in V is a linear combination of some vectors in S. We say that S is a basis of V if S generates V and v 1, v 2,..., v k are linearly independent for any finite subset {v 1, v 2,..., v k } S.

5 1. EUCLIDEAN GEOMETRY 5 Theorem 1.3. Let S 1 and S 2 be two bases of V. Then S 1 = S 2. Proof. We will only prove the theorem when S 1 and S 2 are finite as that is the only case we need here. Let S 1 = {u 1, u 2,..., u n } and S 2 = {v 1, v 2,..., v m }. Since S 1 generates V, v j is a linear combination of u 1, u 2,..., u n, i.e., v j = a 1j u 1 + a 2j u a nj u n for some a 1j R. Suppose that m > n. By Proposition 1.2, the m vectors (a 1j, a 2j,..., a nj ) are linear dependent. Hence there exist λ 1, λ 2,..., λ m R, not all zero, such that (1.9) λ j (a 1j, a 2j,..., a nj ) = 0 By (1.9), we have (1.10) λ j v j = λ j (a 1j u 1 + a 2j u a nj u n ) = 0 and hence v 1, v 2,..., v m are linear dependent. Contradiction. Therefore, m n. Similarly, n m. Therefore, m = n and S 1 = S 2. Let S be a basis of V and we define the dimension of vector space V to be dim V = S. By the above theorem, dim V is independent of the choice of basis S. To emphansize the fact V is a vector space over R, we write dim R V for the dimension of V over R. Obviously, dim R R n = n Linear subspaces. A subset W V is a (linear) subspace of V if W is closed under vector addition and scalar multiplication, i.e., u + v W for any u, v W and λu W for any u W and λ R. A subspace W V is itself a vector space (over R). Proposition 1.4. W V is a linear subspace if and only if u+λv W for any u, v W and λ R. Proof. : Since W is a subspace, λv W and hence u + λv W. : Since u + λv W for all u, v W and λ R, u + v W by letting λ = 1 and λv W by letting u = 0. For two subsets A, B V and λ R, we define (1.11) A + B = {a + b : a A, b B} and λa = {λa : a A} If A = {x} consists of a single vector, we often write x + B for A + B and we call x + B a translate of B. The following are obvious. Proposition 1.5. Let A, B, C V and λ, µ R. Then (1) A + B = B + A; (2) (A + B) + C = A + (B + C); (3) λ(a + B) = λa + λb; (4) (λ + µ)a = λa + µa; (5) (λµ)a = λ(µa); (6) A is a subspace if and only if A + A = A and λa = A for any λ 0;

6 6 1. BASICS (7) If A and B are subspaces, so is A + B; (8) The intersection of any collection of subspaces is a subspace. Let V and W be two vector spaces. We call a map f : V W a linear map or transformation if f(x + y) = f(x) + f(y) and f(λx) = λf(x) for all x, y V and λ R Affine dependence and affine subspaces. The translate of a linear subspace of V is called an affine subspace. Let W V be a linear subspace and x + W be an affine subspace. The dimension of x + W is defined to be the dimension of W. An affine subspace of dimension 1 is called a line. An affine subspace in V of dimension dim V 1 is called a hyperplane. An affine subspace of dimension k is called a k-plane. Proposition 1.6. (1) Let S V be an affine subspace V and let y S. Then S y = ( y) + S is a linear subspace of V. (2) The intersection of any collection of affine subspaces is an affine subspace. Proof. For (1), let S = x + W for some x V and linear subspace W V. Then y = x + w for some w W. Then S y = x + W (x + w) = W w. We claim that W w = W. For any u W, u + w W and hence u = (u + w) w W w; therefore W W w. And since u w W, W w W. Therefore, S y = W w = W is a linear subspace. For (2), let {S i V } i I be a collection of affine subspaces of V. If i I S i is empty, we are done. If not, let y i I S i. By (1), W i = S i y is a linear subspace. We claim that (1.12) S i = + W i ) = y + i I i I(y i I and then S i is an affine subspace since W i is a linear subspace. To prove (1.12), let x S i. Then x S i = y + W i. Hence x y W i for all i I. Consequently, (1.13) x y W i x y + W i S i y + W i i I i I i I i I Let w W i. Then y + w S i for all i I. Therefore, y + w S i and y + W i S i. And (1.12) follows. We say vectors u 1, u 2,..., u m V are affinely dependent if there exist λ 1, λ 2,..., λ m R, not all zero, such that λ 1 + λ λ m = 0 and λ 1 u 1 + λ 2 u λ m u m = 0. We say u is an affine combination of u 1, u 2,..., u m if there exist λ 1, λ 2,..., λ m R such that λ 1 + λ λ m = 1 and u = λ 1 u 1 + λ 2 u λ m u m. Proposition 1.7. Let v 1, v 2,..., v m R n with v j = (a 1j, a 2j,..., a nj ) for j = 1, 2,..., m and let u j = (1, a 1j, a 2j,..., a nj ) R n+1. (1) v 1, v 2,..., v m are affinely dependent if and only if u 1, u 2,..., u m are linearly dependent. W i

7 1. EUCLIDEAN GEOMETRY 7 (2) Let v = (a 1, a 2,..., a n ) and u = (1, a 1, a 2,..., a n ). Then v is an affine combination of v 1, v 2,..., v m if and only if u is a linear combination of u 1, u 2,..., u m. Proof. For (1), (1.14) u 1, u 2,..., u m linearly dependent λ 1, λ 2,..., λ m R, not all zero, such that 0 = λ j u j = λ j (1, a 1j, a 2j,..., a nj ) λ j = 0 and λ j v j = v 1, v 2,..., v m affinely dependent λ j (a 1j, a 2j,..., a nj ) = 0 For (2), (1.15) u is a linear combination of u 1, u 2,..., u m λ 1, λ 2,..., λ m R such that (1, a 1, a 2,..., a n ) = u = λ j u j = λ j (1, a 1j, a 2j,..., a nj ) λ j = 1 and λ j v j = λ j (a 1j, a 2j,..., a nj ) = (a 1, a 2,..., a n ) = v v is an affine combination of v 1, v 2,..., v m Corollary 1.8. Any m > n + 1 vectors in R n are affinely dependent. A set S is said to be affine if every affine combination of two points in S belongs to S, i.e., λx + (1 λ)y S for any x, y S. Proposition 1.9. A set S is affine if and only if every affine combination of points of S lies in S. Proof. is trivial. : We prove by induction on n that λ 1 v 1 + λ 2 v λ n v n S for any v 1, v 2,..., v n S and λ 1 + λ λ n = 1. This holds for n = 2 by definition. Suppose that it holds for n < k. When n = k > 2. At least one of λ 1, λ 2,..., λ k is not equal to 1. Without the loss of generality, assume that

8 8 1. BASICS λ k 1. Then λ 1 + λ λ k 1 0. Therefore, (1.16) λ 1 v 1 + λ 2 v λ k 1 v k 1 + λ k v k ( λ 1 = (λ 1 + λ λ k 1 ) v 1 λ 1 + λ λ k 1 + λ 2 λ k 1 v v k 1 λ 1 + λ λ k 1 λ 1 + λ λ k 1 By induction hypothesis, (1.17) v = ) + λ k v k λ 1 v 1 λ 1 + λ λ k 1 λ 2 λ k 1 + v v k 1 S λ 1 + λ λ k 1 λ 1 + λ λ k 1 Therefore, λ 1 v 1 + λ 2 v λ k v k = (λ 1 + λ λ k 1 )v + λ k v k S. Theorem S V is affine if and only if S is an affine subspace. Proof. : If S is empty, there is nothing to prove. Suppose that v S. Let W = S v. We will show that W is a linear subspace of V and then it follows that S is an affine subspace. Let x, y S and λ R. Then (1.18) (x v) + λ(y v) = (x + λy λv) v Note that x + λy λv is an affine combination of x, y and v. Therefore, x + λy λv S, (x v) + λ(y v) W and W is a linear subspace. : Suppose that S is an affine subspace. Let S = v + W, where W is a linear subspace of V. For x, y W and λ R, (1.19) λ(v + x) + (1 λ)(v + y) = v + (λx + (1 λ)y) v + W = S Therefore, S is affine. By the above theorem, affine subspaces and affine sets are the same things. Therefore, we will use these two terms interchangably from now on. The affine hull of a set S is the intersection of all the affine sets which contain S, denoted by aff(s). Alternatively, the affine hull of S can be defined as the smallest affine set that contains S in the sense that aff(s) T for any affine set T S. Proposition The affine hull of S consists precisely of all affine combinations of points of S. That is, (1.20) aff(s) = T = {λ 1 x 1 + λ 2 x λ m x m : λ 1 + λ λ m = 1, x 1, x 2,..., x m S} Proof. By Proposition 1.9, λ 1 x 1 + λ 2 x λ m x m aff(s) for all λ 1 + λ λ m = 1, x 1, x 2,..., x m S. Therefore, T aff(s).

9 1. EUCLIDEAN GEOMETRY 9 On the other hand, for any λ R, x = α 1 x 1 + α 2 x α m x m and y = β 1 y 1 +β 2 y β n y n T with α 1 +α α m = β 1 +β β n = 1 and x 1, x 2,..., x m, y 1, y 2,..., y n S, n (1.21) λx + (1 λ)y = λα i x i + (1 λ)β j y j Since (1.22) λα i + i=1 i=1 n (1 λ)β j = 1 λx+(1 λ)y is an affine combination of x 1, x 2,..., x m, y 1, y 2,..., y n. Therefore, λx + (1 λ)y T and T is affine. It follows from the definition of aff(s) that aff(s) T. Hence T = aff(s). Using the concept of affine hull, we have a (rudimentary) notion of dimensions of subsets in a vector space. The dimension of a set S V is the dimension of its affine hull aff(s). Note that this is not a widelyaccepted notion of dimension. For example, take S = {p, q} consisting of two distinct points p and q. Then aff(s) is the line joining p and q. Then dim(s) = dim(aff(s)) = 1. However, our intuition tells us S should have dimension 0; a better notion of dimension should give dim(s) = 0. However, this is the definition we will use throughout this notes Topology on R n. The inner product u, v of u = (x 1, x 2,..., x n ) and v = (y 1, y 2,..., y n ) R n is defined to be (1.23) u, v = x 1 y 1 + x 2 y x n y n Alternatively, we write u, v = u v. It is easy to check the following. Proposition Let u, v, w R n and λ R. (1) u, u 0 and the equality holds if and only if u = 0; (2) u, v = v, u ; (3) u + v, w = u, w + v, w ; (4) λ u, v = λu, v ; (5) u + v, u + v + u v, u v = 2 u, u + 2 v, v For every v V, we define the norm of v, denoted by v, to be v = v, v. Proposition Let u, v V and λ R. Then (1) λv = λ v ; (2) u, v u v ; (3) u + v u + v and the equality holds when u = λv for some λ R.

10 10 1. BASICS Proof. (1) is trivial. For (2), which is usually called Schwartz inequality, since (1.24) u + λv, u + λv = ( v 2 )λ 2 + (2 u, v )λ + u 2 0 for any u, v V and λ R, (1.25) (2 u, v ) 2 4 u 2 v 2 0 and (2) follows. (3) follows from (2) directly. For any two points p, q R n, we define the distance between p and q as (1.26) d(p, q) = op oq where o is the origin. It is easy to check Proposition Let x, y, z R n. (1) (Triangle Inequality) d(x, y) + d(y, z) d(z, x); (2) d(x, y) 0 and the equality holds if and only if x = y. d(, ) is called a metric on and this makes R n a metric space. It induces a topology on R n. For x R n and r > 0, we define (1.27) B(x, r) = {y R n : d(y, x) < r} to be the open ball with center x and radius r. Let S R n. A point x S is an interior point of S if B(x, r) S for some r > 0. The interior of S, denoted by Int(S), is the subset of S consisting of all interior points of S. S is open if S = Int(S), i.e., every point of S is an interior point of S. Proposition (1) The union of any collection of open sets is open. (2) The intersection of any finitely many open sets is open. (3) Int(S) is the union of all open subsets that are contained in S. Proof. For (1), let {S i } i I be a collection of open sets. For any point x S i, x S α for some α I. Since S α is open, there exists r > 0 such that B(x, r) S α and B(x, r) S i. Consequently, x is an interior point of S i and S i is open. For (2), it suffices to prove the intersection of two open sets is open. Let S 1 and S 2 be two open sets. Let x S 1 S 2. Since S 1 and S 2 are open, there exist r 1, r 2 > 0 such that B(x, r 1 ) S 1 and B(x, r 2 ) S 2. Let r = min(r 1, r 2 ). Then B(x, r) S 1 S 2 and x is an interior point of S 1 S 2. Hence S 1 S 2 is open. For (3), it is obvious that Int(S) S is open. It suffices to show that any open set T S is contained in Int(S). Let x T. Since T is open, there exists r > 0 such that B(x, r) T S. So x is an interior point of S and x Int(S). Therefore, T Int(S).

11 1. EUCLIDEAN GEOMETRY 11 A set S is called closed if the complement of S is open. The closure of S, denoted by cl(s), is the intersection of all closed sets that contain S. Proposition (1) The intersection of any collection of closed sets is closed. (2) The union of any finitely many closed sets is closed. (3) x cl(s) if and only if B(x, r) S for all r > 0. (4) cl(s c ) = Int(S) c. Proof. (1) and (2) follow directly from Proposition For (3), let x cl(s). If B(x, r) S = for some r > 0, B(x, r) c S and then x B(x, r) c by the definition of cl(s); contradiction. Therefore, B(x, r) S for all r > 0. On the other hand, let x be a point with the property that B(x, r) S for all r > 0. To show that x cl(s), it suffices to show that x T for every closed set T S. Suppose that x T. Then x T c. Since T c is open, B(x, r) T c for some r > 0. Hence B(x, c) T = and B(x, c) S =. Contradiction. For (4), first notice that S c Int(S) c. Since Int(S) c is closed, cl(s c ) Int(S) c. Let x Int(S) c. If x cl(s c ), then B(x, r) S c = for some r > 0. Consequently, B(x, r) S and x Int(S). Contradiction. Therefore, x cl(s c ) and (4) follows. The boundary of S, denoted by bd(s), is the difference cl(s) Int(S). It is not hard to see that x bd(s) if B(x, r) S and B(x, r) S c for any r > 0. Let S be a subset of R n. S is contained in its affine hull aff(s) = R k. The relative interior of S, denoted by relint(s), is the interior of S as a subset of R k. A map R n R m is called continuous if f 1 (U) is open for any open set U R m. A set S R n is bounded if S B(o, R) for some R > 0. A set S R n is compact if it is closed and bounded. Theorem The images of compact sets under a continuous map are compact. We will not prove this theorem here. Interested students may check any standard real analysis book for a proof. Theorem 1.18 (Extreme Value Theorem). Let S be a compact set and f : S R be a continuous function on S. Then f(x) achieves maximum and minimum on S. Again, one may find a proof for this theorem in any standard real analysis book. A set S is connected if there do not exist two open sets A and B such that A S, B S, A B = and S A B.

12 12 1. BASICS 2. Convex Sets 2.1. Definitions. Let x, y R n. We use the notation xy to denote the line segment (2.1) xy = {αx + βy : α, β 0, α + β = 1} A set S R n is convex if xy S for any x, y S. We call a vector x a convex combination of x 1, x 2,..., x m if there exists λ 1, λ 2,..., λ m 0 such that λ 1 +λ λ m = 1 and x = λ 1 x 1 +λ 2 x λ m x m. Obviously, xy is the set consisting of all convex combinations of the two points x and y. So S is convex if it contains all convex combinations of any two points in S. Actually, this is true for any finitely many points in S. That is, we have Proposition 2.1. S is convex if and only if it contains all convex combinations of any finitely many points in S. The proof of the above proposition goes exactly like that of Proposition 1.9. The following is obvious. We will leave the proofs of the following two statements as exercises. Proposition 2.2. The intersection of any collection of convex sets is convex. Proposition 2.3. Let f : V W be a linear transformation between two real vector spaces V and W. Then f(s) is convex for any convex set S V and f 1 (T ) is convex for any convex set T W. The convex hull of a set S, denoted by conv(s), is the intersection of all convex sets which contain S. Proposition 2.4. The convex hull of S consists precisely of all convex combinations of points of S. That is, (2.2) conv(s) = T = {λ 1 x 1 + λ 2 x λ m x m : λ i 0, λ i = 1, x i S for i = 1, 2,..., m} i=1 The proof of the above proposition goes exactly like that of Proposition 1.11, which we will not repeat here. Next we will show the interior and closure of a convex set are still convex. Proposition 2.5. Let S be a convex set. If x Int(S) and y S, then relint xy Int(S). Consequently, Int(S) is convex. Proof. Note that (2.3) relint xy = {αx + βy : α, β > 0, α + β = 1} Let z = αx + βy relint xy. Since x Int(S), B(x, r) S for some r > 0. Since S is convex, αb(x, r) + βy S. Note that (2.4) αb(x, r) + βy = B(αx, αr) + βy = B(αx + βy, αr) = B(z, αr)

13 Therefore, z Int(S) and relint xy Int(S). 2. CONVEX SETS 13 Proposition 2.6. Let S be a convex set. Then cl(s) is convex. Proof. Let x, y cl(s). To show cl(s) is convex, it suffices to show αx + βy cl(s) for all α, β 0 with α + β = 1. Since x cl(s), there exists a sequence {x n S} such that d(x, x n ) 0 as n. Similarly, there exists a sequence {y n S} such that d(y, y n ) 0 as n. To show that z = αx + βx cl(s), it suffices to show that there exists a squence {z n S} such that d(z, z n ) 0 as n. Let z n = αx n + βy n. Obviously, z n S since x n, y n S and S is convex. Then (2.5) d(z, z n ) = z z n = α(x x n ) + β(y y n ) α x x n + β y y n = αd(x, x n ) + βd(y n ) Therefore, lim n d(z, z n ) = 0 because lim n d(x, x n ) = lim n d(y, y n ) = 0. Proposition 2.7. If S is an open set, then conv(s) is also open. Proof. It suffices to show that conv(s) Int(conv(S)). Since S conv(s), Int(S) Int(conv(S)). Since S is open, S Int(conv(S)). By Proposition 2.5, Int(conv(S)) is convex. Therefore, conv(s) Int(conv(S)). It is natural to expect the convex hull of a closed set is also closed. However, this is not true. For example, let f : R R be an arbitrary positive continuous function satisfying (2.6) lim f(x) = lim f(x) = 0 x x and S = {(x, y) : y f(x)}. Since f(x) is continuous, S is closed but we claim that conv(s) = {(x, y) : y > 0}, which is not closed. Let r = (x 0, y 0 ) R 2 with y 0 > 0. Since f(x) 0 as x, there exists x 1 < x 0 such that f(x 0 ) < y 0. Similarly, there exists x 2 > x 0 such that f(x 2 ) < y 0. Let p = (x 1, y 0 ) and q = (x 2, y 0 ). Since y 0 f(x i ) for i = 1, 2, p, q S. So pq conv(s). Obviously, r pq and therefore r conv(s). Hence H = {(x, y) : y > 0} conv(s). On the other hand, S H and H is convex. Therefore, H = conv(s). Therefore, the convex hull of a closed set S R n is not necessarily convex. However, if we further assume that S is bounded, i.e., S is compact, conv(s) is compact. The proof of this theorem requires Caratheodory s theorem Caratheodory s Theorem. Theorem 2.8 (Caratheodory). If S is nonempty subset of R n, then every x in conv(s) can be expressed as a convex combination of n + 1 or fewer points of S.

14 14 1. BASICS Proof. Let m be the smallest number such that x is the convex combination of m points. Then there exist x 1, x 2,..., x m S and λ 1, λ 2,..., λ m 0 such that (2.7) λ i = 1 and x = λ i x i i=1 Due to our choice of m, λ i > 0 for all i = 1, 2,..., m. Suppose that m > n + 1. By Corollary 1.8, x 1, x 2,..., x m are affinely dependent, i.e., there exist γ 1, γ 2,..., γ m, not all zero, such that (2.8) γ i = 0 and γ i x i = 0 i=1 Let I = {i : γ i > 0} {1, 2,..., m}. Since γ 1, γ 2,..., γ m are not all zero, I. Let (2.9) a = min i I and let α i = λ i aγ i. If i I, then α i 0 since a λ i /γ i ; if i I, γ i 0 and hence α i 0. Therefore, α i 0 for all i = 1, 2,..., m. By (2.8), (2.10) α i = i=1 λ i = 1 and i=1 i=1 λ i γ i i=1 α i x i = i=1 λ i x i = x Due to our choice of a, there is at least one i I such that a = λ i /γ i. Correspondingly, α i = 0. Therefore by (2.10), x is a convex combination of x 1, x 2,..., ˆx i,..., x m. Contradiction. Proposition 2.9. If S R n is a compact set, then conv(s) is also compact. Proof. By Caratheodory s theorem, every point x conv(s) is the convex combination of some n + 1 points x 1, x 2,..., x n+1 in S. Let f : (R n ) n+1 R n+1 : R n be the map: (2.11) f(x 1, x 2,..., x n+1, λ 1, λ 2,..., λ n+1 ) = λ 1 x 1 + λ 2 x λ n+1 x n+1 where x i R n and λ i R. Let (2.12) D = {(λ 1, λ 2,..., λ n+1 ) : λ 1, λ 2,..., λ n+1 0, λ 1 +λ λ n+1 = 1} Then f is continuous and D is compact. By Caratheodory s theorem, f(s n+1 D) = conv(s). Since S n+1 D is compact, conv(s) is compact. Proposition Let S R n be a convex set. If S, then relint(s). i=1

15 2. CONVEX SETS 15 Proof. Consider S as a convex subset of aff(s) = R k. We will show that Int(S) 0. Since aff(s) = R k, there exist x 1, x 2,..., x k+1 S which are affinely independent. Let D R k+1 be the subset (2.13) D = {(λ 1, λ 2,..., λ k+1 ) : λ 1 + λ λ k+1 = 1} Let f : D R k be the map (2.14) f(λ 1, λ 2,..., λ k+1 ) = λ 1 x 1 + λ 2 x λ k+1 x k+1 f is obviously continuous and onto. Also we claim that f is one-to-one. Otherwise, there exist (λ 1, λ 2,..., λ k+1 ) (λ 1, λ 2,..., λ k+1 ) D such that f(λ 1, λ 2,..., λ k+1 ) = f(λ 1, λ 2,..., λ k+1 ), which implies (2.15) (λ 1 λ 1)x 1 + (λ 2 λ 2)x (λ k+1 λ k+1 )x k+1 = 0 and hence x 1, x 2,..., x k+1 are affinely dependent. Contradiction. Hence f is one-to-one. Let g = f 1 : R k D be the inverse of f and let (2.16) g(z 1, z 2,..., z k ) = (g 1 (z 1, z 2,..., z k ), g 2 (z 1, z 2,..., z k ),..., g k+1 (z 1, z 2,..., z k )) where g i are functions from R k R. More explicitly, let x j = (a 1j, a 2j,..., a kj ) and A be the (k + 1) (k + 1) matrix a 11 a a 1,k+1 a 21 a a 2,k+1 (2.17) a k1 a k2... a k,k Then (2.18) z g 1 (z 1, z 2,..., z k ) 1 g 2 (z 1, z 2,..., z k ) z 2. = A 1. z g k+1 (z 1, z 2,..., z k )) k 1 Therefore, each g i (z 1, z 2,..., z k ) is a (nonhomogeneous) linear function in z 1, z 2,..., z k. Therefore, g i is continuous and g is continuous. Let (2.19) x 0 = 1 k + 1 (x 1 + x x k+1 ) S Then 1 (2.20) y 0 = g(x 0 ) = ( k + 1, 1 k + 1,..., 1 k + 1 )

16 16 1. BASICS Choose an arbitrary r with 0 < r < 1/(k + 1). Since g is continuous, U = g 1 (B(y 0, r) D) is an open set in R k that contains the point x 0. Note (2.21) U = {λ 1 x 1 +λ 2 x λ k+1 x k+1 : (λ 1, λ 2,..., λ k+1 ) B(y 0, r) D} Since 0 < r < 1/(k + 1), λ 1, λ 2,..., λ k+1 > 0 for every (λ 1, λ 2,..., λ k+1 ) B(y 0, r). Therefore, U S and x 0 Int(S).

17 CHAPTER 2 Some Selected Topics in Convex Geometry 1. Helly s Theorem Theorem 1.1. Let S 1, S 2,..., S m be m n+1 convex sets in R n. If every n+1 sets among S 1, S 2,..., S m have nonempty intersection, S 1 S 2... S m. Proof. We prove by induction on m. It is trivial for m = n+1. Suppose that it holds for m < l, where l > n+1. We want to show it holds for m = l. By induction hypothesis, any m 1 sets among S 1, S 2,..., S m have nonempty intersection. That is, if we let (1.1) T k = S 1 S 2... Ŝk... S m T k for every k = 1, 2,..., m. Since T k, we choose (arbitrarily) a point x k T k. Since m n + 2, x 1, x 2,..., x m are affinely dependent. That is, there exist λ 1, λ 2,..., λ m R, not all zero, such that (1.2) λ 1 x 1 + λ 2 x λ m x m = 0 and (1.3) λ 1 + λ λ m = 0 Obviously, we may rewrite (1.2) as (1.4) By (1.3), (1.5) λ = λ i >0 λ i >0 λ i x i = λ j 0 λ j x j λ i = λ j 0 λ j Since λ 1, λ 2,..., λ m are not all zero, λ > 0. Hence ( ) λi x i = λ λ j 0 (1.6) x = λ i >0 ( λj λ ) x j Therefore, x is a convex combination of {x i : λ i > 0} and it is also a convex combination of {x j : λ j 0}. Let I = {i : λ i > 0} and J = {j : λ j 0}. Obviously, I J = {1, 2,..., m} and I J =. Since x i S j for any i j, 17

18 18 2. SOME SELECTED TOPICS IN CONVEX GEOMETRY x i j J S j for every i I. Since j J S j is convex, x in j J S j. By the same argument, we see that x i I S i. Therefore, (1.7) x ( S i ) ( m S j ) = S k i I j J Therefore, m k=1 S k. Obviously, the number n + 1 in the theorem is optimal. It is easy to find, for example, three convex sets in R 2 such that any two of them have nonempty intersection but all three of them have empty intersection. k=1 2. Introduction to Linear Programming Let us consider the following question: Question 2.1. Given points x, x 1, x 2,..., x m R n, determine whether x conv{x 1, x 2,..., x m }. Here we assume that dim aff{x 1, x 2,..., x m } = n; otherwise, we can restrict ourselves to R k = aff{x 1, x 2,..., x m }. The case m = n + 1 is easy to treat. Since x 1, x 2,..., x n+1 are affinely independent, x can be written as an affine combination of x 1, x 2,..., x n+1 in a unique way: (2.1) x = λ 1 x 1 + λ 2 x λ n+1 x m where (2.2) λ 1 + λ λ m = 1. Therefore, x conv{x 1, x 2,..., x n+1 } if and only if λ i 0 for all i = 1, 2,..., n + 1. However, the situation is more complicated when m > n + 1. We let x i = (a 1i, a 2i,..., a ni ) and x = (b 1, b 2,..., b n ). Then (2.1) and (2.2) expand to a 11 λ 1 + a 12 λ a 1m λ m = b 1 a 21 λ 1 + a 22 λ a 2m λ m = b 2 (2.3) =. a n1 λ 1 + a n2 λ a nm λ m = b n λ 1 + λ λ m = 1 with λ 1, λ 2,..., λ m 0. Obviously, x conv{x 1, x 2,..., x n+1 } if and only if (2.3) has a solution. Here we may assume b i 0 for all i; otherwise, if b i < 0, we replace the i-th equation by (2.4) a i1 λ 1 a i2 λ 2... a im λ m = b i For reasons that will be clear later, we add n auxiliary variables λ m+1, λ m+2,..., λ m+n, λ m+n+1. We consider the following problem:

19 2. INTRODUCTION TO LINEAR PROGRAMMING 19 Question 2.2. Minimize the function f(λ 1, λ 2,..., λ m, λ m+1, λ m+2,..., λ m+n+1 ) (2.5) = λ m+1 + λ m λ m+n+1 with λ i 0 (i = 1, 2,..., m,..., m + n + 1) satisfying m a 1jλ j + λ m+1 = b 1 (2.6) m a 2jλ j + λ m+2 = b m a njλ j + λ m+n = b n m λ j + λ m+n+1 = 1 Lemma 2.3. x conv{x 1, x 2,..., x m } if and only if f min = 0 in Question 2.2. Question 2.2 is a typical problem in so-called Linear Programming (LP). One of the many algorithms to solve a LP problem is Simplex Method. We will use the following example to demonstrate the algorithm. Example 2.1. Let x 1 = (1, 0), x 2 = (0, 1), x 3 = (1, 1) and x 4 = ( 2, 2). Determine whether x = ( 1, 1) conv{x 1, x 2, x 3, x 4 }. First we need to formulate the problem as in Question 2.2. Obviously, x conv{x 1, x 2, x 3, x 4 } if and only if the system of linear equations λ 1 + λ 3 2λ 4 = 1 (2.7) λ 2 + λ 3 2λ 4 = 1 λ 1 + λ 2 + λ 3 + λ 4 = 1 has a solution with λ i 0 for i = 1, 2, 3, 4. It is a requirement of simplex method that b i 0. Therefore, we change (2.7) to the form λ 1 λ 3 + 2λ 4 = 1 (2.8) λ 2 λ 3 + 2λ 4 = 1 λ 1 + λ 2 + λ 3 + λ 4 = 1 By adding three auxiliary variables λ 5, λ 6, λ 7, we put it into a LP problem: ( ) Minimize f(λ 1,..., λ 7 ) = λ 5 + λ 6 + λ 7 with λ i 0 satisfying λ 1 λ 3 + 2λ 4 + λ 5 = 1 (2.9) λ 2 λ 3 + 2λ 4 + λ 6 = 1 λ 1 + λ 2 + λ 3 + λ 4 + λ 7 = 1 In order to apply simplex method to ( ), we need first to put the objective function f in terms of λ 1, λ 2, λ 3, λ 4 (using (2.9)) (2.10) f(λ 1,..., λ 7 ) = λ 3 5λ We put the coefficients of (2.9) and (2.10) into a table called simplex tableau:

20 20 2. SOME SELECTED TOPICS IN CONVEX GEOMETRY (2.11) Note that the last row (c 1, c 2,..., c m+n+1, A) corresponds to the objective function (2.12) f(λ 1, λ 2,..., λ m+n+1 ) = c 1 λ 1 + c 2 λ c m+n+1 λ m+n+1 + A The algorithm goes as follows: (1) If the entries of the last row except the rightmost entry, i.e., c j 0 for all j, stop and we are done. The minimum of f is given by A, where A is the rightmost entry of the last row. And x conv{x 1, x 2,..., x m } if and only if A = 0, i.e., the rightmost entry of the last row vanishes. (2) If one of c j < 0, we look at the j-th column. We choose the entry a kj (called pivoting term) such that a kj > 0 and (2.13) { } b k bi = min : a ij > 0 a kj a ij Then we use a kj to eliminate all the other entries of the j-the column by row operations. (3) Repeat step (2) until (1) happens. Now lets carry it out for our example: (the pivoting term of each step is boxed)

21 3. CONVEX FUNCTIONS 21 (2.14) Therefore, f min = 0 and x conv{x 1, x 2, x 3, x 4 }. In addition, the final tableau also tells us how to write x as a convex combination of x 1, x 2, x 3, x 4. Note that if we let λ 3 = λ 5 = λ 6 = λ 7 = 0, then 2λ 4 = 6/5, λ 1 = 1/5 and (5/2)λ 2 = 1/2. Consequently, x = (1/5)x 1 + (1/5)x 2 + (3/5)x Convex Functions Given a function f(x), we consider the region S = {(x, y) : y f(x)} R 2. There is a very useful criterion on the convexity of S. Theorem 3.1. Suppose that f(x) is twice differentiable and f (x) 0 for all a x b. Then the region S = {(x, y) : y f(x), a x b} is convex. An easy corollary of the above theorem is the following:

22 22 2. SOME SELECTED TOPICS IN CONVEX GEOMETRY Corollary 3.2. Suppose that f(x) is twice differentiable and f (x) 0 for all a x b. Then the region S = {(x, y) : y f(x), a x b} is convex. Proof. Since f (x) 0, f (x) 0 for a x b. Then S = {(x, y) : y f(x)} is convex by the above theorem. Geometrically, S is the reflection of S with respect to the x-axis. More precisely, let g : R 2 R 2 be the linear map given by g(x, y) = (x, y). Then S = g(s ). Since the images of convex sets under linear maps are convex, S is convex. The proof of Theorem 3.1 is elementary. It uses nothing more than Mean Value Theorem (MVT). Let p = (x p, y p ) and q = (x q, y q ) be two points in S. WLOG, assume that x p < x q. Since p, q S, y p f(x p ) and y q f(x q ). Suppose that pq S. Then there exists a point r = (x r, y r ) pq such that r S, i.e., y r < f(x r ). By MVT, there exists x u (x p, x r ) such that (3.1) f (x u ) = f(x r) f(x p ) x r x p and there exists x v (x r, x q ) such that (3.2) f (x v ) = f(x q) f(x r ) x q x r Since y r < f(x r ) and y p f(x p ), (3.3) By the same reason, (3.4) Since p, q, r are collinear, (3.5) Therefore, (3.6) f(x r ) f(x p ) x r x p f(x q ) f(x r ) x q x r y r y p x r x p y q y r x q x r y r y p x r x p = y q y r x q x r f(x r ) f(x p ) x r x p f(x q) f(x r ) x q x r That is, f (x u ) > f (x v ). This contradicts the fact that f (x) 0 and f (x) is nondecreasing on [a, b]. Theorem 3.1 can be generalized to dimension greater than 2. We will state the following without proof. Theorem 3.3. Let f(x 1, x 2,..., x n ) be a twice differentiable function in n variables. Suppose that the n n matrix (called the Hessian of f) [ 2 ] f (3.7) H = x i x j n n

23 3. CONVEX FUNCTIONS 23 is positive definitive for every (x 1, x 2,..., x n ) in a convex set D R n. Then the region (3.8) S = {(x 1, x 2,..., x n+1 ) : x n+1 f(x 1, x 2,..., x n ), (x 1, x 2,..., x n ) D} in R n+1 is convex.

24

25 Bibliography [L] S. R. Lay, Convex Sets and Their Applications. Pure and Applied Mathematics. A Wiley-Interscience Publication. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York,

Appendix B Convex analysis

Appendix B Convex analysis This version: 28/02/2014 Appendix B Convex analysis In this appendix we review a few basic notions of convexity and related notions that will be important for us at various times. B.1 The Hausdorff distance

More information

Lecture 1: Convex Sets January 23

Lecture 1: Convex Sets January 23 IE 521: Convex Optimization Instructor: Niao He Lecture 1: Convex Sets January 23 Spring 2017, UIUC Scribe: Niao He Courtesy warning: These notes do not necessarily cover everything discussed in the class.

More information

Basic convexity. 1.1 Convex sets and combinations. λ + μ b (λ + μ)a;

Basic convexity. 1.1 Convex sets and combinations. λ + μ b (λ + μ)a; 1 Basic convexity 1.1 Convex sets and combinations AsetA R n is convex if together with any two points x, y it contains the segment [x, y], thus if (1 λ)x + λy A for x, y A, 0 λ 1. Examples of convex sets

More information

Course 212: Academic Year Section 1: Metric Spaces

Course 212: Academic Year Section 1: Metric Spaces Course 212: Academic Year 1991-2 Section 1: Metric Spaces D. R. Wilkins Contents 1 Metric Spaces 3 1.1 Distance Functions and Metric Spaces............. 3 1.2 Convergence and Continuity in Metric Spaces.........

More information

Optimality Conditions for Nonsmooth Convex Optimization

Optimality Conditions for Nonsmooth Convex Optimization Optimality Conditions for Nonsmooth Convex Optimization Sangkyun Lee Oct 22, 2014 Let us consider a convex function f : R n R, where R is the extended real field, R := R {, + }, which is proper (f never

More information

Set, functions and Euclidean space. Seungjin Han

Set, functions and Euclidean space. Seungjin Han Set, functions and Euclidean space Seungjin Han September, 2018 1 Some Basics LOGIC A is necessary for B : If B holds, then A holds. B A A B is the contraposition of B A. A is sufficient for B: If A holds,

More information

Chapter 1. Preliminaries

Chapter 1. Preliminaries Introduction This dissertation is a reading of chapter 4 in part I of the book : Integer and Combinatorial Optimization by George L. Nemhauser & Laurence A. Wolsey. The chapter elaborates links between

More information

Convex Sets with Applications to Economics

Convex Sets with Applications to Economics Convex Sets with Applications to Economics Debasis Mishra March 10, 2010 1 Convex Sets A set C R n is called convex if for all x, y C, we have λx+(1 λ)y C for all λ [0, 1]. The definition says that for

More information

The following definition is fundamental.

The following definition is fundamental. 1. Some Basics from Linear Algebra With these notes, I will try and clarify certain topics that I only quickly mention in class. First and foremost, I will assume that you are familiar with many basic

More information

MA651 Topology. Lecture 10. Metric Spaces.

MA651 Topology. Lecture 10. Metric Spaces. MA65 Topology. Lecture 0. Metric Spaces. This text is based on the following books: Topology by James Dugundgji Fundamental concepts of topology by Peter O Neil Linear Algebra and Analysis by Marc Zamansky

More information

Chapter 2 Convex Analysis

Chapter 2 Convex Analysis Chapter 2 Convex Analysis The theory of nonsmooth analysis is based on convex analysis. Thus, we start this chapter by giving basic concepts and results of convexity (for further readings see also [202,

More information

NOTES (1) FOR MATH 375, FALL 2012

NOTES (1) FOR MATH 375, FALL 2012 NOTES 1) FOR MATH 375, FALL 2012 1 Vector Spaces 11 Axioms Linear algebra grows out of the problem of solving simultaneous systems of linear equations such as 3x + 2y = 5, 111) x 3y = 9, or 2x + 3y z =

More information

2. Metric Spaces. 2.1 Definitions etc.

2. Metric Spaces. 2.1 Definitions etc. 2. Metric Spaces 2.1 Definitions etc. The procedure in Section for regarding R as a topological space may be generalized to many other sets in which there is some kind of distance (formally, sets with

More information

1 Topology Definition of a topology Basis (Base) of a topology The subspace topology & the product topology on X Y 3

1 Topology Definition of a topology Basis (Base) of a topology The subspace topology & the product topology on X Y 3 Index Page 1 Topology 2 1.1 Definition of a topology 2 1.2 Basis (Base) of a topology 2 1.3 The subspace topology & the product topology on X Y 3 1.4 Basic topology concepts: limit points, closed sets,

More information

IE 521 Convex Optimization

IE 521 Convex Optimization Lecture 1: 16th January 2019 Outline 1 / 20 Which set is different from others? Figure: Four sets 2 / 20 Which set is different from others? Figure: Four sets 3 / 20 Interior, Closure, Boundary Definition.

More information

Week 3: Faces of convex sets

Week 3: Faces of convex sets Week 3: Faces of convex sets Conic Optimisation MATH515 Semester 018 Vera Roshchina School of Mathematics and Statistics, UNSW August 9, 018 Contents 1. Faces of convex sets 1. Minkowski theorem 3 3. Minimal

More information

Appendix PRELIMINARIES 1. THEOREMS OF ALTERNATIVES FOR SYSTEMS OF LINEAR CONSTRAINTS

Appendix PRELIMINARIES 1. THEOREMS OF ALTERNATIVES FOR SYSTEMS OF LINEAR CONSTRAINTS Appendix PRELIMINARIES 1. THEOREMS OF ALTERNATIVES FOR SYSTEMS OF LINEAR CONSTRAINTS Here we consider systems of linear constraints, consisting of equations or inequalities or both. A feasible solution

More information

Chapter 2. Convex Sets: basic results

Chapter 2. Convex Sets: basic results Chapter 2 Convex Sets: basic results In this chapter, we introduce one of the most important tools in the mathematical approach to Economics, namely the theory of convex sets. Almost every situation we

More information

MATH 51H Section 4. October 16, Recall what it means for a function between metric spaces to be continuous:

MATH 51H Section 4. October 16, Recall what it means for a function between metric spaces to be continuous: MATH 51H Section 4 October 16, 2015 1 Continuity Recall what it means for a function between metric spaces to be continuous: Definition. Let (X, d X ), (Y, d Y ) be metric spaces. A function f : X Y is

More information

Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences. Supergradients. KC Border Fall 2001 v ::15.45

Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences. Supergradients. KC Border Fall 2001 v ::15.45 Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences Supergradients KC Border Fall 2001 1 The supergradient of a concave function There is a useful way to characterize the concavity of differentiable functions.

More information

Lecture 6 - Convex Sets

Lecture 6 - Convex Sets Lecture 6 - Convex Sets Definition A set C R n is called convex if for any x, y C and λ [0, 1], the point λx + (1 λ)y belongs to C. The above definition is equivalent to saying that for any x, y C, the

More information

Vector Spaces. Addition : R n R n R n Scalar multiplication : R R n R n.

Vector Spaces. Addition : R n R n R n Scalar multiplication : R R n R n. Vector Spaces Definition: The usual addition and scalar multiplication of n-tuples x = (x 1,..., x n ) R n (also called vectors) are the addition and scalar multiplication operations defined component-wise:

More information

Helly's Theorem and its Equivalences via Convex Analysis

Helly's Theorem and its Equivalences via Convex Analysis Portland State University PDXScholar University Honors Theses University Honors College 2014 Helly's Theorem and its Equivalences via Convex Analysis Adam Robinson Portland State University Let us know

More information

2 so Q[ 2] is closed under both additive and multiplicative inverses. a 2 2b 2 + b

2 so Q[ 2] is closed under both additive and multiplicative inverses. a 2 2b 2 + b . FINITE-DIMENSIONAL VECTOR SPACES.. Fields By now you ll have acquired a fair knowledge of matrices. These are a concrete embodiment of something rather more abstract. Sometimes it is easier to use matrices,

More information

MATH 31BH Homework 1 Solutions

MATH 31BH Homework 1 Solutions MATH 3BH Homework Solutions January 0, 04 Problem.5. (a) (x, y)-plane in R 3 is closed and not open. To see that this plane is not open, notice that any ball around the origin (0, 0, 0) will contain points

More information

MATH 225 Summer 2005 Linear Algebra II Solutions to Assignment 1 Due: Wednesday July 13, 2005

MATH 225 Summer 2005 Linear Algebra II Solutions to Assignment 1 Due: Wednesday July 13, 2005 MATH 225 Summer 25 Linear Algebra II Solutions to Assignment 1 Due: Wednesday July 13, 25 Department of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences University of Alberta Question 1. [p 224. #2] The set of all

More information

Chapter 1. Preliminaries. The purpose of this chapter is to provide some basic background information. Linear Space. Hilbert Space.

Chapter 1. Preliminaries. The purpose of this chapter is to provide some basic background information. Linear Space. Hilbert Space. Chapter 1 Preliminaries The purpose of this chapter is to provide some basic background information. Linear Space Hilbert Space Basic Principles 1 2 Preliminaries Linear Space The notion of linear space

More information

Lecture Notes in Advanced Calculus 1 (80315) Raz Kupferman Institute of Mathematics The Hebrew University

Lecture Notes in Advanced Calculus 1 (80315) Raz Kupferman Institute of Mathematics The Hebrew University Lecture Notes in Advanced Calculus 1 (80315) Raz Kupferman Institute of Mathematics The Hebrew University February 7, 2007 2 Contents 1 Metric Spaces 1 1.1 Basic definitions...........................

More information

Discrete Geometry. Problem 1. Austin Mohr. April 26, 2012

Discrete Geometry. Problem 1. Austin Mohr. April 26, 2012 Discrete Geometry Austin Mohr April 26, 2012 Problem 1 Theorem 1 (Linear Programming Duality). Suppose x, y, b, c R n and A R n n, Ax b, x 0, A T y c, and y 0. If x maximizes c T x and y minimizes b T

More information

Analysis-3 lecture schemes

Analysis-3 lecture schemes Analysis-3 lecture schemes (with Homeworks) 1 Csörgő István November, 2015 1 A jegyzet az ELTE Informatikai Kar 2015. évi Jegyzetpályázatának támogatásával készült Contents 1. Lesson 1 4 1.1. The Space

More information

08a. Operators on Hilbert spaces. 1. Boundedness, continuity, operator norms

08a. Operators on Hilbert spaces. 1. Boundedness, continuity, operator norms (February 24, 2017) 08a. Operators on Hilbert spaces Paul Garrett garrett@math.umn.edu http://www.math.umn.edu/ garrett/ [This document is http://www.math.umn.edu/ garrett/m/real/notes 2016-17/08a-ops

More information

Functional Analysis. Franck Sueur Metric spaces Definitions Completeness Compactness Separability...

Functional Analysis. Franck Sueur Metric spaces Definitions Completeness Compactness Separability... Functional Analysis Franck Sueur 2018-2019 Contents 1 Metric spaces 1 1.1 Definitions........................................ 1 1.2 Completeness...................................... 3 1.3 Compactness......................................

More information

Math 117: Topology of the Real Numbers

Math 117: Topology of the Real Numbers Math 117: Topology of the Real Numbers John Douglas Moore November 10, 2008 The goal of these notes is to highlight the most important topics presented in Chapter 3 of the text [1] and to provide a few

More information

Introduction to Geometry

Introduction to Geometry Introduction to Geometry it is a draft of lecture notes of H.M. Khudaverdian. Manchester, 18 May 211 Contents 1 Euclidean space 3 1.1 Vector space............................ 3 1.2 Basic example of n-dimensional

More information

Optimization and Optimal Control in Banach Spaces

Optimization and Optimal Control in Banach Spaces Optimization and Optimal Control in Banach Spaces Bernhard Schmitzer October 19, 2017 1 Convex non-smooth optimization with proximal operators Remark 1.1 (Motivation). Convex optimization: easier to solve,

More information

Chapter 2 Metric Spaces

Chapter 2 Metric Spaces Chapter 2 Metric Spaces The purpose of this chapter is to present a summary of some basic properties of metric and topological spaces that play an important role in the main body of the book. 2.1 Metrics

More information

Maths 212: Homework Solutions

Maths 212: Homework Solutions Maths 212: Homework Solutions 1. The definition of A ensures that x π for all x A, so π is an upper bound of A. To show it is the least upper bound, suppose x < π and consider two cases. If x < 1, then

More information

Handout 2: Elements of Convex Analysis

Handout 2: Elements of Convex Analysis ENGG 5501: Foundations of Optimization 2018 19 First Term Handout 2: Elements of Convex Analysis Instructor: Anthony Man Cho So September 10, 2018 As briefly mentioned in Handout 1, the notion of convexity

More information

MAT 570 REAL ANALYSIS LECTURE NOTES. Contents. 1. Sets Functions Countability Axiom of choice Equivalence relations 9

MAT 570 REAL ANALYSIS LECTURE NOTES. Contents. 1. Sets Functions Countability Axiom of choice Equivalence relations 9 MAT 570 REAL ANALYSIS LECTURE NOTES PROFESSOR: JOHN QUIGG SEMESTER: FALL 204 Contents. Sets 2 2. Functions 5 3. Countability 7 4. Axiom of choice 8 5. Equivalence relations 9 6. Real numbers 9 7. Extended

More information

Hilbert spaces. 1. Cauchy-Schwarz-Bunyakowsky inequality

Hilbert spaces. 1. Cauchy-Schwarz-Bunyakowsky inequality (October 29, 2016) Hilbert spaces Paul Garrett garrett@math.umn.edu http://www.math.umn.edu/ garrett/ [This document is http://www.math.umn.edu/ garrett/m/fun/notes 2016-17/03 hsp.pdf] Hilbert spaces are

More information

Elementary linear algebra

Elementary linear algebra Chapter 1 Elementary linear algebra 1.1 Vector spaces Vector spaces owe their importance to the fact that so many models arising in the solutions of specific problems turn out to be vector spaces. The

More information

Linear Algebra I. Ronald van Luijk, 2015

Linear Algebra I. Ronald van Luijk, 2015 Linear Algebra I Ronald van Luijk, 2015 With many parts from Linear Algebra I by Michael Stoll, 2007 Contents Dependencies among sections 3 Chapter 1. Euclidean space: lines and hyperplanes 5 1.1. Definition

More information

Math 530 Lecture Notes. Xi Chen

Math 530 Lecture Notes. Xi Chen Math 530 Lecture Notes Xi Chen 632 Central Academic Building, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2G1, CANADA E-mail address: xichen@math.ualberta.ca 1991 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary

More information

Math Camp Lecture 4: Linear Algebra. Xiao Yu Wang. Aug 2010 MIT. Xiao Yu Wang (MIT) Math Camp /10 1 / 88

Math Camp Lecture 4: Linear Algebra. Xiao Yu Wang. Aug 2010 MIT. Xiao Yu Wang (MIT) Math Camp /10 1 / 88 Math Camp 2010 Lecture 4: Linear Algebra Xiao Yu Wang MIT Aug 2010 Xiao Yu Wang (MIT) Math Camp 2010 08/10 1 / 88 Linear Algebra Game Plan Vector Spaces Linear Transformations and Matrices Determinant

More information

Preliminary Version Draft 2015

Preliminary Version Draft 2015 Convex Geometry Introduction Martin Henk TU Berlin Winter semester 2014/15 webpage CONTENTS i Contents Preface ii WS 2014/15 0 Some basic and convex facts 1 1 Support and separate 7 2 Radon, Helly, Caratheodory

More information

Math General Topology Fall 2012 Homework 1 Solutions

Math General Topology Fall 2012 Homework 1 Solutions Math 535 - General Topology Fall 2012 Homework 1 Solutions Definition. Let V be a (real or complex) vector space. A norm on V is a function : V R satisfying: 1. Positivity: x 0 for all x V and moreover

More information

POLARS AND DUAL CONES

POLARS AND DUAL CONES POLARS AND DUAL CONES VERA ROSHCHINA Abstract. The goal of this note is to remind the basic definitions of convex sets and their polars. For more details see the classic references [1, 2] and [3] for polytopes.

More information

Helly s Theorem with Applications in Combinatorial Geometry. Andrejs Treibergs. Wednesday, August 31, 2016

Helly s Theorem with Applications in Combinatorial Geometry. Andrejs Treibergs. Wednesday, August 31, 2016 Undergraduate Colloquium: Helly s Theorem with Applications in Combinatorial Geometry Andrejs Treibergs University of Utah Wednesday, August 31, 2016 2. USAC Lecture on Helly s Theorem The URL for these

More information

Convex Geometry. Carsten Schütt

Convex Geometry. Carsten Schütt Convex Geometry Carsten Schütt November 25, 2006 2 Contents 0.1 Convex sets... 4 0.2 Separation.... 9 0.3 Extreme points..... 15 0.4 Blaschke selection principle... 18 0.5 Polytopes and polyhedra.... 23

More information

Elements of Convex Optimization Theory

Elements of Convex Optimization Theory Elements of Convex Optimization Theory Costis Skiadas August 2015 This is a revised and extended version of Appendix A of Skiadas (2009), providing a self-contained overview of elements of convex optimization

More information

Convex Analysis and Economic Theory Winter 2018

Convex Analysis and Economic Theory Winter 2018 Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences Ec 181 KC Border Convex Analysis and Economic Theory Winter 2018 Supplement A: Mathematical background A.1 Extended real numbers The extended real number

More information

AN INTRODUCTION TO CONVEXITY

AN INTRODUCTION TO CONVEXITY AN INTRODUCTION TO CONVEXITY GEIR DAHL NOVEMBER 2010 University of Oslo, Centre of Mathematics for Applications, P.O.Box 1053, Blindern, 0316 Oslo, Norway (geird@math.uio.no) Contents 1 The basic concepts

More information

1 Basics of vector space

1 Basics of vector space Linear Algebra- Review And Beyond Lecture 1 In this lecture, we will talk about the most basic and important concept of linear algebra vector space. After the basics of vector space, I will introduce dual

More information

Linear Algebra. Preliminary Lecture Notes

Linear Algebra. Preliminary Lecture Notes Linear Algebra Preliminary Lecture Notes Adolfo J. Rumbos c Draft date April 29, 23 2 Contents Motivation for the course 5 2 Euclidean n dimensional Space 7 2. Definition of n Dimensional Euclidean Space...........

More information

CHAPTER 1. Metric Spaces. 1. Definition and examples

CHAPTER 1. Metric Spaces. 1. Definition and examples CHAPTER Metric Spaces. Definition and examples Metric spaces generalize and clarify the notion of distance in the real line. The definitions will provide us with a useful tool for more general applications

More information

Topological properties

Topological properties CHAPTER 4 Topological properties 1. Connectedness Definitions and examples Basic properties Connected components Connected versus path connected, again 2. Compactness Definition and first examples Topological

More information

2 Metric Spaces Definitions Exotic Examples... 3

2 Metric Spaces Definitions Exotic Examples... 3 Contents 1 Vector Spaces and Norms 1 2 Metric Spaces 2 2.1 Definitions.......................................... 2 2.2 Exotic Examples...................................... 3 3 Topologies 4 3.1 Open Sets..........................................

More information

Convex Sets. Prof. Dan A. Simovici UMB

Convex Sets. Prof. Dan A. Simovici UMB Convex Sets Prof. Dan A. Simovici UMB 1 / 57 Outline 1 Closures, Interiors, Borders of Sets in R n 2 Segments and Convex Sets 3 Properties of the Class of Convex Sets 4 Closure and Interior Points of Convex

More information

After taking the square and expanding, we get x + y 2 = (x + y) (x + y) = x 2 + 2x y + y 2, inequality in analysis, we obtain.

After taking the square and expanding, we get x + y 2 = (x + y) (x + y) = x 2 + 2x y + y 2, inequality in analysis, we obtain. Lecture 1: August 25 Introduction. Topology grew out of certain questions in geometry and analysis about 100 years ago. As Wikipedia puts it, the motivating insight behind topology is that some geometric

More information

Real Analysis Math 131AH Rudin, Chapter #1. Dominique Abdi

Real Analysis Math 131AH Rudin, Chapter #1. Dominique Abdi Real Analysis Math 3AH Rudin, Chapter # Dominique Abdi.. If r is rational (r 0) and x is irrational, prove that r + x and rx are irrational. Solution. Assume the contrary, that r+x and rx are rational.

More information

NOTES ON VECTOR-VALUED INTEGRATION MATH 581, SPRING 2017

NOTES ON VECTOR-VALUED INTEGRATION MATH 581, SPRING 2017 NOTES ON VECTOR-VALUED INTEGRATION MATH 58, SPRING 207 Throughout, X will denote a Banach space. Definition 0.. Let ϕ(s) : X be a continuous function from a compact Jordan region R n to a Banach space

More information

MAT-INF4110/MAT-INF9110 Mathematical optimization

MAT-INF4110/MAT-INF9110 Mathematical optimization MAT-INF4110/MAT-INF9110 Mathematical optimization Geir Dahl August 20, 2013 Convexity Part IV Chapter 4 Representation of convex sets different representations of convex sets, boundary polyhedra and polytopes:

More information

A NICE PROOF OF FARKAS LEMMA

A NICE PROOF OF FARKAS LEMMA A NICE PROOF OF FARKAS LEMMA DANIEL VICTOR TAUSK Abstract. The goal of this short note is to present a nice proof of Farkas Lemma which states that if C is the convex cone spanned by a finite set and if

More information

Metric Spaces and Topology

Metric Spaces and Topology Chapter 2 Metric Spaces and Topology From an engineering perspective, the most important way to construct a topology on a set is to define the topology in terms of a metric on the set. This approach underlies

More information

(c) For each α R \ {0}, the mapping x αx is a homeomorphism of X.

(c) For each α R \ {0}, the mapping x αx is a homeomorphism of X. A short account of topological vector spaces Normed spaces, and especially Banach spaces, are basic ambient spaces in Infinite- Dimensional Analysis. However, there are situations in which it is necessary

More information

The weak topology of locally convex spaces and the weak-* topology of their duals

The weak topology of locally convex spaces and the weak-* topology of their duals The weak topology of locally convex spaces and the weak-* topology of their duals Jordan Bell jordan.bell@gmail.com Department of Mathematics, University of Toronto April 3, 2014 1 Introduction These notes

More information

2.2. Show that U 0 is a vector space. For each α 0 in F, show by example that U α does not satisfy closure.

2.2. Show that U 0 is a vector space. For each α 0 in F, show by example that U α does not satisfy closure. Hints for Exercises 1.3. This diagram says that f α = β g. I will prove f injective g injective. You should show g injective f injective. Assume f is injective. Now suppose g(x) = g(y) for some x, y A.

More information

REVIEW OF ESSENTIAL MATH 346 TOPICS

REVIEW OF ESSENTIAL MATH 346 TOPICS REVIEW OF ESSENTIAL MATH 346 TOPICS 1. AXIOMATIC STRUCTURE OF R Doğan Çömez The real number system is a complete ordered field, i.e., it is a set R which is endowed with addition and multiplication operations

More information

Locally convex spaces, the hyperplane separation theorem, and the Krein-Milman theorem

Locally convex spaces, the hyperplane separation theorem, and the Krein-Milman theorem 56 Chapter 7 Locally convex spaces, the hyperplane separation theorem, and the Krein-Milman theorem Recall that C(X) is not a normed linear space when X is not compact. On the other hand we could use semi

More information

MATH 426, TOPOLOGY. p 1.

MATH 426, TOPOLOGY. p 1. MATH 426, TOPOLOGY THE p-norms In this document we assume an extended real line, where is an element greater than all real numbers; the interval notation [1, ] will be used to mean [1, ) { }. 1. THE p

More information

Topological properties of Z p and Q p and Euclidean models

Topological properties of Z p and Q p and Euclidean models Topological properties of Z p and Q p and Euclidean models Samuel Trautwein, Esther Röder, Giorgio Barozzi November 3, 20 Topology of Q p vs Topology of R Both R and Q p are normed fields and complete

More information

CHAPTER 7. Connectedness

CHAPTER 7. Connectedness CHAPTER 7 Connectedness 7.1. Connected topological spaces Definition 7.1. A topological space (X, T X ) is said to be connected if there is no continuous surjection f : X {0, 1} where the two point set

More information

Convex Optimization Notes

Convex Optimization Notes Convex Optimization Notes Jonathan Siegel January 2017 1 Convex Analysis This section is devoted to the study of convex functions f : B R {+ } and convex sets U B, for B a Banach space. The case of B =

More information

Convex Functions and Optimization

Convex Functions and Optimization Chapter 5 Convex Functions and Optimization 5.1 Convex Functions Our next topic is that of convex functions. Again, we will concentrate on the context of a map f : R n R although the situation can be generalized

More information

Math 201 Topology I. Lecture notes of Prof. Hicham Gebran

Math 201 Topology I. Lecture notes of Prof. Hicham Gebran Math 201 Topology I Lecture notes of Prof. Hicham Gebran hicham.gebran@yahoo.com Lebanese University, Fanar, Fall 2015-2016 http://fs2.ul.edu.lb/math http://hichamgebran.wordpress.com 2 Introduction and

More information

Optimization Theory. A Concise Introduction. Jiongmin Yong

Optimization Theory. A Concise Introduction. Jiongmin Yong October 11, 017 16:5 ws-book9x6 Book Title Optimization Theory 017-08-Lecture Notes page 1 1 Optimization Theory A Concise Introduction Jiongmin Yong Optimization Theory 017-08-Lecture Notes page Optimization

More information

Linear Algebra. Preliminary Lecture Notes

Linear Algebra. Preliminary Lecture Notes Linear Algebra Preliminary Lecture Notes Adolfo J. Rumbos c Draft date May 9, 29 2 Contents 1 Motivation for the course 5 2 Euclidean n dimensional Space 7 2.1 Definition of n Dimensional Euclidean Space...........

More information

Introduction to Real Analysis Alternative Chapter 1

Introduction to Real Analysis Alternative Chapter 1 Christopher Heil Introduction to Real Analysis Alternative Chapter 1 A Primer on Norms and Banach Spaces Last Updated: March 10, 2018 c 2018 by Christopher Heil Chapter 1 A Primer on Norms and Banach Spaces

More information

Real Analysis Notes. Thomas Goller

Real Analysis Notes. Thomas Goller Real Analysis Notes Thomas Goller September 4, 2011 Contents 1 Abstract Measure Spaces 2 1.1 Basic Definitions........................... 2 1.2 Measurable Functions........................ 2 1.3 Integration..............................

More information

Chapter 1. Measure Spaces. 1.1 Algebras and σ algebras of sets Notation and preliminaries

Chapter 1. Measure Spaces. 1.1 Algebras and σ algebras of sets Notation and preliminaries Chapter 1 Measure Spaces 1.1 Algebras and σ algebras of sets 1.1.1 Notation and preliminaries We shall denote by X a nonempty set, by P(X) the set of all parts (i.e., subsets) of X, and by the empty set.

More information

Contents Real Vector Spaces Linear Equations and Linear Inequalities Polyhedra Linear Programs and the Simplex Method Lagrangian Duality

Contents Real Vector Spaces Linear Equations and Linear Inequalities Polyhedra Linear Programs and the Simplex Method Lagrangian Duality Contents Introduction v Chapter 1. Real Vector Spaces 1 1.1. Linear and Affine Spaces 1 1.2. Maps and Matrices 4 1.3. Inner Products and Norms 7 1.4. Continuous and Differentiable Functions 11 Chapter

More information

Extreme points of compact convex sets

Extreme points of compact convex sets Extreme points of compact convex sets In this chapter, we are going to show that compact convex sets are determined by a proper subset, the set of its extreme points. Let us start with the main definition.

More information

Topology. Xiaolong Han. Department of Mathematics, California State University, Northridge, CA 91330, USA address:

Topology. Xiaolong Han. Department of Mathematics, California State University, Northridge, CA 91330, USA  address: Topology Xiaolong Han Department of Mathematics, California State University, Northridge, CA 91330, USA E-mail address: Xiaolong.Han@csun.edu Remark. You are entitled to a reward of 1 point toward a homework

More information

arxiv: v1 [math.mg] 4 Jan 2013

arxiv: v1 [math.mg] 4 Jan 2013 On the boundary of closed convex sets in E n arxiv:1301.0688v1 [math.mg] 4 Jan 2013 January 7, 2013 M. Beltagy Faculty of Science, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt E-mail: beltagy50@yahoo.com. S. Shenawy

More information

k-dimensional INTERSECTIONS OF CONVEX SETS AND CONVEX KERNELS

k-dimensional INTERSECTIONS OF CONVEX SETS AND CONVEX KERNELS Discrete Mathematics 36 (1981) 233-237 North-Holland Publishing Company k-dimensional INTERSECTIONS OF CONVEX SETS AND CONVEX KERNELS Marilyn BREEN Department of Mahematics, Chiversify of Oklahoma, Norman,

More information

Linear Algebra M1 - FIB. Contents: 5. Matrices, systems of linear equations and determinants 6. Vector space 7. Linear maps 8.

Linear Algebra M1 - FIB. Contents: 5. Matrices, systems of linear equations and determinants 6. Vector space 7. Linear maps 8. Linear Algebra M1 - FIB Contents: 5 Matrices, systems of linear equations and determinants 6 Vector space 7 Linear maps 8 Diagonalization Anna de Mier Montserrat Maureso Dept Matemàtica Aplicada II Translation:

More information

2019 Spring MATH2060A Mathematical Analysis II 1

2019 Spring MATH2060A Mathematical Analysis II 1 2019 Spring MATH2060A Mathematical Analysis II 1 Notes 1. CONVEX FUNCTIONS First we define what a convex function is. Let f be a function on an interval I. For x < y in I, the straight line connecting

More information

Your first day at work MATH 806 (Fall 2015)

Your first day at work MATH 806 (Fall 2015) Your first day at work MATH 806 (Fall 2015) 1. Let X be a set (with no particular algebraic structure). A function d : X X R is called a metric on X (and then X is called a metric space) when d satisfies

More information

Topological vectorspaces

Topological vectorspaces (July 25, 2011) Topological vectorspaces Paul Garrett garrett@math.umn.edu http://www.math.umn.edu/ garrett/ Natural non-fréchet spaces Topological vector spaces Quotients and linear maps More topological

More information

Exercises: Brunn, Minkowski and convex pie

Exercises: Brunn, Minkowski and convex pie Lecture 1 Exercises: Brunn, Minkowski and convex pie Consider the following problem: 1.1 Playing a convex pie Consider the following game with two players - you and me. I am cooking a pie, which should

More information

FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS LECTURE NOTES: COMPACT SETS AND FINITE-DIMENSIONAL SPACES. 1. Compact Sets

FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS LECTURE NOTES: COMPACT SETS AND FINITE-DIMENSIONAL SPACES. 1. Compact Sets FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS LECTURE NOTES: COMPACT SETS AND FINITE-DIMENSIONAL SPACES CHRISTOPHER HEIL 1. Compact Sets Definition 1.1 (Compact and Totally Bounded Sets). Let X be a metric space, and let E X be

More information

Mathematics II, course

Mathematics II, course Mathematics II, course 2013-2014 Juan Pablo Rincón Zapatero October 24, 2013 Summary: The course has four parts that we describe below. (I) Topology in Rn is a brief review of the main concepts and properties

More information

In English, this means that if we travel on a straight line between any two points in C, then we never leave C.

In English, this means that if we travel on a straight line between any two points in C, then we never leave C. Convex sets In this section, we will be introduced to some of the mathematical fundamentals of convex sets. In order to motivate some of the definitions, we will look at the closest point problem from

More information

Measures and Measure Spaces

Measures and Measure Spaces Chapter 2 Measures and Measure Spaces In summarizing the flaws of the Riemann integral we can focus on two main points: 1) Many nice functions are not Riemann integrable. 2) The Riemann integral does not

More information

Metric Space Topology (Spring 2016) Selected Homework Solutions. HW1 Q1.2. Suppose that d is a metric on a set X. Prove that the inequality d(x, y)

Metric Space Topology (Spring 2016) Selected Homework Solutions. HW1 Q1.2. Suppose that d is a metric on a set X. Prove that the inequality d(x, y) Metric Space Topology (Spring 2016) Selected Homework Solutions HW1 Q1.2. Suppose that d is a metric on a set X. Prove that the inequality d(x, y) d(z, w) d(x, z) + d(y, w) holds for all w, x, y, z X.

More information

Some Background Material

Some Background Material Chapter 1 Some Background Material In the first chapter, we present a quick review of elementary - but important - material as a way of dipping our toes in the water. This chapter also introduces important

More information

Decidability of consistency of function and derivative information for a triangle and a convex quadrilateral

Decidability of consistency of function and derivative information for a triangle and a convex quadrilateral Decidability of consistency of function and derivative information for a triangle and a convex quadrilateral Abbas Edalat Department of Computing Imperial College London Abstract Given a triangle in the

More information

CHAPTER II HILBERT SPACES

CHAPTER II HILBERT SPACES CHAPTER II HILBERT SPACES 2.1 Geometry of Hilbert Spaces Definition 2.1.1. Let X be a complex linear space. An inner product on X is a function, : X X C which satisfies the following axioms : 1. y, x =

More information

Convex Analysis and Economic Theory AY Elementary properties of convex functions

Convex Analysis and Economic Theory AY Elementary properties of convex functions Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences Ec 181 KC Border Convex Analysis and Economic Theory AY 2018 2019 Topic 6: Convex functions I 6.1 Elementary properties of convex functions We may occasionally

More information

NOTES on LINEAR ALGEBRA 1

NOTES on LINEAR ALGEBRA 1 School of Economics, Management and Statistics University of Bologna Academic Year 207/8 NOTES on LINEAR ALGEBRA for the students of Stats and Maths This is a modified version of the notes by Prof Laura

More information