From now on we assume that K = K.
|
|
- Posy Marsh
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Divisors
2 From now on we assume that K = K. Definition The (additively written) free abelian group generated by P F is denoted by D F and is called the divisor group of F/K. The elements of D F are called divisors. That is, a divisor is a formal sum P P F n p P with n p Z, where almost all n P = 0. The support of a divisor D is defined by supp D = {P P f : n P 0}. 1
3 We shall also write n p P, P S where S is a finite subset of P F including supp D. A divisor of the form D = P, where P P F is called a prime divisor. For Q P F and D = n p P D F we define v Q (D) = n Q. Therefore, supp D = {P P f : v P (D) 0} and D = v P (D)P. P supp D We also define a partial ordering on D F by D 1 D 2 if and only if v P (D 1 ) v P (D 2 ) for all P P F. A divisor D 0 is called positive (or efficient). 2
4 The degree of a divisor is defined by deg D = P P F v P (D) deg P and induces a homomorphism deg : D F Z. Definition Let 0 x F. We denote by Z (respectively, by N) the set of all zeros (respectively, poles) of x and define the zero, pole, and principal divisors of x by (x) 0 = P Z v P (x)p, (x) = P N v P (x)p, and (x) = (x) 0 (x), respectively (why these divisors are well-defined?). 3
5 Then (x) 0, (x) 0, and (x) = v P (x)p. P P F Also, x K if and only if (x) = 0. Definition The group P F = {(x) : 0 x F } (why this is a group?) is called the group of principal divisors of F/K. The factor group C F = D F /P F is called the divisor class group. For a divisor D D F, the corresponding element of C F class of D and is denoted [D]. is called the divisor Divisors D and D are called equivalent, denoted D D, if [D] = [D ] (what does it mean?). Definition For a divisor A D F we define L(A) = {x F : (x) A}. 4
6 If A = r n i P i s i=1 j=1 m j Q j, where n i, m j > 0, then x L(A) is and only if x has zeros of order m j at Q j, j = 1,..., m, and x may have poles only at P 1,..., P n, with the pole order at P i being at most n i, i = 1,..., n. Remark Let A D F. Then (a) x L(A) if and only if v P (x) v P (A) for all P P F (why?), and (b) L(A) {0} if and only if there is a divisor A A such that A 0 (why?). 5
7 Lemma Let A D F. Then (a) L(A) is a vector space over K, and (b) if A A, then L(A ) L(A) (isomorphic as vector spaces over K). Proof (a) Let x, y L(A) and let a K. Then, for all P P F, v P (x + y) min{v P (x), v P (y)} v P (A), and v P (ax) = v P (a) + v P (x) = v P (x) v P (A). 6
8 (b) Let A = A + (z), 0 z F. Let x L(A). Since for all P P F, v P (zx) = v P (z) + v P (x) v P (z) v P (A) = v P (A (z)) = v P (A ), the function ϕ z : L(A) F defined by ϕ z (x) = zx is a linear mapping whose image is included in L(A ). Similarly, the function ϕ z 1 : L(A ) F defined by ϕ z 1(x) = z 1 x is a linear mapping whose image is included in L(A). Since ϕ z and ϕ z 1 are inverse to each other, both of them are isomorphisms between L(A ) and L(A). Lemma (a) L(0) = K. (b) If A < 0, then L(A) = {0}. 7
9 Proof (a) If 0 x K, then (x) = 0, implying K L(0). If 0 x L(0), then (x) 0. Thus, x has no pole, and, therefore, is in K (why?). (b) Assume to the contrary that there exists an 0 x L(0). Then (x) A > 0. Therefore, x has a zero, but has no pole, which is impossible (why?). 8
10 Lemma Let A, B D F be such that A B. Then L(A) L(B) and dim(l(b)/l(a)) deg B deg A. Proof The inclusion L(A) L(B) is trivial, and for the second assertion we may assume that B = A + P for some P P F (why?). Let t F be such that v P (t) = v P (B) = v P (A) + 1 (why there is such a t?). Then, for x L(B) we have v P (x) v P (B) = v P (t). Therefore, xt O P and we have a K-linear map ψ : L(B) F P defined by ψ(x) = xt(p ). This map is well defined (why?) and Ker ψ = L(A), because x Ker ψ if and only if v P (xt) > 0, which is equivalent to v P (x) v P (A) (why?). Thus, ψ induces an injection of L(B)/L(A) into F P, implying dim(l(b)/l(a)) dim F P = deg P = deg B deg A. 9
11 Proposition Let A = A + A with positive divisors A + and A. Then dim L(A) deg A In particular, L(A) is a finite-dimensional vector space over K. Proof Since L(A) L(A + ) (why?), it suffices to show that dim L(A + ) deg A We have dim(l(a + )/L(0)) deg A + (why?). Since L(0) = K (why?) dim L(A + ) = dim(l(a + )/L(0)) + 1, and the proof is complete. Definition For a divisor A D F, dim L(A) is called the dimension of A and is denoted dim A. 10
12 Proposition Let x F \ K. Then deg(x) 0 = deg(x) = [F : K(x)]. 1 In particular, any principal divisor has degree zero. Corollary (a) Let A A. Then dim A = dim A and deg A = deg A. (b) If deg A < 0, then dim A = 0. (c) If deg A = 0, then the following three assertions are equivalent. (1) A is principal. (2) dim A 1. (3) dim A = 1. 1 Here we use our assumption that K = K (how?). 11
13 Proof of the corollary (a) is immediate (how?). (b) Assume to the contrary that dim A > 0. Then there is a divisor A A such that A 0 (why?). Therefore, deg A = deg A 0, which contradicts our assumption. (c) (1) (2): If A = (x), then x 1 L(A) (why?), implying dim A 1. (2) (3): Again, there is a divisor A A such that A 0. This, together with deg A = 0, implies A = 0. Hence dim A = dim A = dim 0 = 1. (3) (1): There exists a 0 z L(A) (why?), and we have (z) + A 0. Since deg((z) + A) 0, (z) + A = 0. Thus, A = (z) = (z 1 ) is principal. 12
14 Proof of the proposition Let n = [F : K(x)] and let B = (x) = r v Pi (x)p i, i=1 where P 1,..., P r are all the poles of x. Then deg B = deg(x) = r v Pi (x 1 ) deg P i. i=1 We have already seen that deg B n (where?). Thus the proof will be complete when we show that deg B n as well. 13
15 Let u 1,..., u n be a basis of F/K(x) and let a divisor C 0 be such that (u i ) C, i = 1,..., n. Let l 0 and let 0 i l. Then for all j = 1,..., n, x i u j L(lB + C) (why?), and, since x i u j are linearly independent over K (why?), Let deg C = c. Then (why?), implying for all l N. Therefore, deg B n. dim L(lB + C) n(l + 1). l deg B + c + 1 dim L(lB + C) n(l + 1), l(deg B n) n c 1 Finally, since (x) 0 = (x 1 ), deg(x) 0 = deg(x 1 ) = [F : K(x 1 )] = [F : K(x)]. 14
16 Example Let 0 z K(x). Then z = a f(x), where a K and f(x), g(x) g(x) K[x] are monic and relatively prime. Let r s f(x) = p i (x) n i and g(x) = q j (x) m j i=1 j=1 with pairwise distinct irreducible polynomials p i (x), q j (x) K[x]. Then (z) = r n i P i i=1 s m j Q j + (deg g deg f)p, j=1 where P i and Q j are places corresponding to p i (x) and q j (x), respectively. 15
17 Proposition There is a constant γ Z such that for all divisors A D F, deg A dim A γ. Proof Let x F \ K and let B = (x). Then there exists a divisor C 0 such that for all l N, (why?). In addition, (why?). Therefore, dim L(lB + C) (l + 1) deg B dim L(lB) + deg C dim L(lB + C) dim lb (l + 1) deg B deg C = deg(lb) + ([F : K(x)] deg C) (why?). Thus, for some γ Z (which one?), for all l > 0 (why?). deg(lb) dim(lb) γ 16
18 That is, the proposition holds when A is of the form l(x), l 0 and x F \ K, and we continue to prove that it holds when we substitute lb with any A D F, with the above γ. For this we shall need the claim below. Claim For any A D F there exist divisors A 1 and D and a non-negative integer l such that A A 1, A 1 D, and D lb. Proof of the claim Let A 1 max{0, A}, e.g., A 1 = A +. Then dim(lb A 1 ) dim(lb) deg A 1 deg(lb) γ deg A 1 > 0 for sufficiently large l. Let 0 z L(lB A 1 ) and let D = A 1 (z). Then A 1 D and D A 1 (A 1 lb) = lb 17
19 Proof of the proposition (continued) Let A 1, D, and l be as in the claim. Then deg A dim A deg A 1 dim A 1 = deg D dim D deg(lb) dim(lb) γ Definition The genus g of F/K is defined by g = max{deg A dim A + 1 : A D F }. Remark The genus of F/K is a non-negative integer (why?). 18
20 Theorem (Riemann s theorem) Let F/K be a function field of genus g. Then (a) For all A D F, dim A deg A + 1 g. (b) There is a constant c (that depends on F/K) such that for all A D F with deg A c, dim A = deg A + 1 g. Proof (a) is immediate. (b) Let A 0 D F be such that g = deg A 0 dim A We put c = deg A 0 +g. Then dim(a A 0 ) deg(a A 0 ) + 1 g c deg A g 1 and there is a non-zero z L(A A 0 ). Let A = A + (z). Then A A 0, implying deg A dim A = deg A dim A deg A 0 dim A 0 = g 1. 19
21 Example The genus of the rational function field K(x)/K is zero. Indeed, for r 0, 1, x,..., x r L(rP ), implying r + 1 dim(rp ) = deg(rp ) + 1 g }{{} for sufficiently large r = r + 1 g. 20
Some consequences of the Riemann-Roch theorem
Some consequences of the Riemann-Roch theorem Proposition Let g 0 Z and W 0 D F be such that for all A D F, dim A = deg A + 1 g 0 + dim(w 0 A). Then g 0 = g and W 0 is a canonical divisor. Proof We have
More informationThe Riemann-Roch Theorem
The Riemann-Roch Theorem In this lecture F/K is an algebraic function field of genus g. Definition For A D F, is called the index of specialty of A. i(a) = dim A deg A + g 1 Definition An adele of F/K
More informationAlgebraic function fields
Algebraic function fields 1 Places Definition An algebraic function field F/K of one variable over K is an extension field F K such that F is a finite algebraic extension of K(x) for some element x F which
More informationwhere c R and the content of f is one. 1
9. Gauss Lemma Obviously it would be nice to have some more general methods of proving that a given polynomial is irreducible. The first is rather beautiful and due to Gauss. The basic idea is as follows.
More informationbe any ring homomorphism and let s S be any element of S. Then there is a unique ring homomorphism
21. Polynomial rings Let us now turn out attention to determining the prime elements of a polynomial ring, where the coefficient ring is a field. We already know that such a polynomial ring is a UFD. Therefore
More informationPolynomial Rings. (Last Updated: December 8, 2017)
Polynomial Rings (Last Updated: December 8, 2017) These notes are derived primarily from Abstract Algebra, Theory and Applications by Thomas Judson (16ed). Most of this material is drawn from Chapters
More informationSection II.1. Free Abelian Groups
II.1. Free Abelian Groups 1 Section II.1. Free Abelian Groups Note. This section and the next, are independent of the rest of this chapter. The primary use of the results of this chapter is in the proof
More information38 Irreducibility criteria in rings of polynomials
38 Irreducibility criteria in rings of polynomials 38.1 Theorem. Let p(x), q(x) R[x] be polynomials such that p(x) = a 0 + a 1 x +... + a n x n, q(x) = b 0 + b 1 x +... + b m x m and a n, b m 0. If b m
More informationDedekind Domains. Mathematics 601
Dedekind Domains Mathematics 601 In this note we prove several facts about Dedekind domains that we will use in the course of proving the Riemann-Roch theorem. The main theorem shows that if K/F is a finite
More information55 Separable Extensions
55 Separable Extensions In 54, we established the foundations of Galois theory, but we have no handy criterion for determining whether a given field extension is Galois or not. Even in the quite simple
More informationMath 203A - Solution Set 3
Math 03A - Solution Set 3 Problem 1 Which of the following algebraic sets are isomorphic: (i) A 1 (ii) Z(xy) A (iii) Z(x + y ) A (iv) Z(x y 5 ) A (v) Z(y x, z x 3 ) A Answer: We claim that (i) and (v)
More informationbut no smaller power is equal to one. polynomial is defined to be
13. Radical and Cyclic Extensions The main purpose of this section is to look at the Galois groups of x n a. The first case to consider is a = 1. Definition 13.1. Let K be a field. An element ω K is said
More informationFactorization in Polynomial Rings
Factorization in Polynomial Rings Throughout these notes, F denotes a field. 1 Long division with remainder We begin with some basic definitions. Definition 1.1. Let f, g F [x]. We say that f divides g,
More informationMath 201C Homework. Edward Burkard. g 1 (u) v + f 2(u) g 2 (u) v2 + + f n(u) a 2,k u k v a 1,k u k v + k=0. k=0 d
Math 201C Homework Edward Burkard 5.1. Field Extensions. 5. Fields and Galois Theory Exercise 5.1.7. If v is algebraic over K(u) for some u F and v is transcendental over K, then u is algebraic over K(v).
More informationPolynomial Rings. i=0. i=0. n+m. i=0. k=0
Polynomial Rings 1. Definitions and Basic Properties For convenience, the ring will always be a commutative ring with identity. Basic Properties The polynomial ring R[x] in the indeterminate x with coefficients
More information1. Divisors on Riemann surfaces All the Riemann surfaces in this note are assumed to be connected and compact.
1. Divisors on Riemann surfaces All the Riemann surfaces in this note are assumed to be connected and compact. Let X be a Riemann surface of genus g 0 and K(X) be the field of meromorphic functions on
More informationAbstract Algebra, Second Edition, by John A. Beachy and William D. Blair. Corrections and clarifications
1 Abstract Algebra, Second Edition, by John A. Beachy and William D. Blair Corrections and clarifications Note: Some corrections were made after the first printing of the text. page 9, line 8 For of the
More informationMATH 326: RINGS AND MODULES STEFAN GILLE
MATH 326: RINGS AND MODULES STEFAN GILLE 1 2 STEFAN GILLE 1. Rings We recall first the definition of a group. 1.1. Definition. Let G be a non empty set. The set G is called a group if there is a map called
More informationMATH 8253 ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY WEEK 12
MATH 8253 ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY WEEK 2 CİHAN BAHRAN 3.2.. Let Y be a Noetherian scheme. Show that any Y -scheme X of finite type is Noetherian. Moreover, if Y is of finite dimension, then so is X. Write f
More informationPolynomials over UFD s
Polynomials over UFD s Let R be a UFD and let K be the field of fractions of R. Our goal is to compare arithmetic in the rings R[x] and K[x]. We introduce the following notion. Definition 1. A non-constant
More informationmult V f, where the sum ranges over prime divisor V X. We say that two divisors D 1 and D 2 are linearly equivalent, denoted by sending
2. The canonical divisor In this section we will introduce one of the most important invariants in the birational classification of varieties. Definition 2.1. Let X be a normal quasi-projective variety
More informationChapter 12. Additive polynomials Definition and basic properties
Chapter 12 Additive polynomials 12.1 Definition and basic properties A polynomial f K[X] is called additive if f(a + b) = f(a) + f(b) (12.1) for all elements a, b in every extension field L of K, that
More informationn P say, then (X A Y ) P
COMMUTATIVE ALGEBRA 35 7.2. The Picard group of a ring. Definition. A line bundle over a ring A is a finitely generated projective A-module such that the rank function Spec A N is constant with value 1.
More informationIntroduction to Arithmetic Geometry Fall 2013 Lecture #23 11/26/2013
18.782 Introduction to Arithmetic Geometry Fall 2013 Lecture #23 11/26/2013 As usual, a curve is a smooth projective (geometrically irreducible) variety of dimension one and k is a perfect field. 23.1
More informationCourse 311: Michaelmas Term 2005 Part III: Topics in Commutative Algebra
Course 311: Michaelmas Term 2005 Part III: Topics in Commutative Algebra D. R. Wilkins Contents 3 Topics in Commutative Algebra 2 3.1 Rings and Fields......................... 2 3.2 Ideals...............................
More information2 ALGEBRA II. Contents
ALGEBRA II 1 2 ALGEBRA II Contents 1. Results from elementary number theory 3 2. Groups 4 2.1. Denition, Subgroup, Order of an element 4 2.2. Equivalence relation, Lagrange's theorem, Cyclic group 9 2.3.
More informationMath 581 Problem Set 3 Solutions
Math 581 Problem Set 3 Solutions 1. Prove that complex conjugation is a isomorphism from C to C. Proof: First we prove that it is a homomorphism. Define : C C by (z) = z. Note that (1) = 1. The other properties
More information50 Algebraic Extensions
50 Algebraic Extensions Let E/K be a field extension and let a E be algebraic over K. Then there is a nonzero polynomial f in K[x] such that f(a) = 0. Hence the subset A = {f K[x]: f(a) = 0} of K[x] does
More informationφ(xy) = (xy) n = x n y n = φ(x)φ(y)
Groups 1. (Algebra Comp S03) Let A, B and C be normal subgroups of a group G with A B. If A C = B C and AC = BC then prove that A = B. Let b B. Since b = b1 BC = AC, there are a A and c C such that b =
More informationFactorization in Integral Domains II
Factorization in Integral Domains II 1 Statement of the main theorem Throughout these notes, unless otherwise specified, R is a UFD with field of quotients F. The main examples will be R = Z, F = Q, and
More informationRUUD PELLIKAAN, HENNING STICHTENOTH, AND FERNANDO TORRES
Appeared in: Finite Fields and their Applications, vol. 4, pp. 38-392, 998. WEIERSTRASS SEMIGROUPS IN AN ASYMPTOTICALLY GOOD TOWER OF FUNCTION FIELDS RUUD PELLIKAAN, HENNING STICHTENOTH, AND FERNANDO TORRES
More informationPrime Rational Functions and Integral Polynomials. Jesse Larone, Bachelor of Science. Mathematics and Statistics
Prime Rational Functions and Integral Polynomials Jesse Larone, Bachelor of Science Mathematics and Statistics Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Faculty
More informationFields and Galois Theory. Below are some results dealing with fields, up to and including the fundamental theorem of Galois theory.
Fields and Galois Theory Below are some results dealing with fields, up to and including the fundamental theorem of Galois theory. This should be a reasonably logical ordering, so that a result here should
More informationA GRAPHICAL REPRESENTATION OF RINGS VIA AUTOMORPHISM GROUPS
A GRAPHICAL REPRESENTATION OF RINGS VIA AUTOMORPHISM GROUPS N. MOHAN KUMAR AND PRAMOD K. SHARMA Abstract. Let R be a commutative ring with identity. We define a graph Γ Aut R (R) on R, with vertices elements
More informationTC10 / 3. Finite fields S. Xambó
TC10 / 3. Finite fields S. Xambó The ring Construction of finite fields The Frobenius automorphism Splitting field of a polynomial Structure of the multiplicative group of a finite field Structure of the
More informationDIVISORS ON NONSINGULAR CURVES
DIVISORS ON NONSINGULAR CURVES BRIAN OSSERMAN We now begin a closer study of the behavior of projective nonsingular curves, and morphisms between them, as well as to projective space. To this end, we introduce
More informationFinite Fields. [Parts from Chapter 16. Also applications of FTGT]
Finite Fields [Parts from Chapter 16. Also applications of FTGT] Lemma [Ch 16, 4.6] Assume F is a finite field. Then the multiplicative group F := F \ {0} is cyclic. Proof Recall from basic group theory
More informationLecture Notes Math 371: Algebra (Fall 2006) by Nathanael Leedom Ackerman
Lecture Notes Math 371: Algebra (Fall 2006) by Nathanael Leedom Ackerman October 31, 2006 TALK SLOWLY AND WRITE NEATLY!! 1 0.1 Symbolic Adjunction of Roots When dealing with subfields of C it is easy to
More informationAN EXPOSITION OF THE RIEMANN ROCH THEOREM FOR CURVES
AN EXPOSITION OF THE RIEMANN ROCH THEOREM FOR CURVES DOMINIC L. WYNTER Abstract. We introduce the concepts of divisors on nonsingular irreducible projective algebraic curves, the genus of such a curve,
More informationLecture 2. (1) Every P L A (M) has a maximal element, (2) Every ascending chain of submodules stabilizes (ACC).
Lecture 2 1. Noetherian and Artinian rings and modules Let A be a commutative ring with identity, A M a module, and φ : M N an A-linear map. Then ker φ = {m M : φ(m) = 0} is a submodule of M and im φ is
More informationTheorem 5.3. Let E/F, E = F (u), be a simple field extension. Then u is algebraic if and only if E/F is finite. In this case, [E : F ] = deg f u.
5. Fields 5.1. Field extensions. Let F E be a subfield of the field E. We also describe this situation by saying that E is an extension field of F, and we write E/F to express this fact. If E/F is a field
More informationRINGS: SUMMARY OF MATERIAL
RINGS: SUMMARY OF MATERIAL BRIAN OSSERMAN This is a summary of terms used and main results proved in the subject of rings, from Chapters 11-13 of Artin. Definitions not included here may be considered
More informationSchool of Mathematics and Statistics. MT5836 Galois Theory. Handout 0: Course Information
MRQ 2017 School of Mathematics and Statistics MT5836 Galois Theory Handout 0: Course Information Lecturer: Martyn Quick, Room 326. Prerequisite: MT3505 (or MT4517) Rings & Fields Lectures: Tutorials: Mon
More informationMath 429/581 (Advanced) Group Theory. Summary of Definitions, Examples, and Theorems by Stefan Gille
Math 429/581 (Advanced) Group Theory Summary of Definitions, Examples, and Theorems by Stefan Gille 1 2 0. Group Operations 0.1. Definition. Let G be a group and X a set. A (left) operation of G on X is
More informationABSTRACT NONSINGULAR CURVES
ABSTRACT NONSINGULAR CURVES Affine Varieties Notation. Let k be a field, such as the rational numbers Q or the complex numbers C. We call affine n-space the collection A n k of points P = a 1, a,..., a
More informationNOTES ON FINITE FIELDS
NOTES ON FINITE FIELDS AARON LANDESMAN CONTENTS 1. Introduction to finite fields 2 2. Definition and constructions of fields 3 2.1. The definition of a field 3 2.2. Constructing field extensions by adjoining
More informationALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY COURSE NOTES, LECTURE 2: HILBERT S NULLSTELLENSATZ.
ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY COURSE NOTES, LECTURE 2: HILBERT S NULLSTELLENSATZ. ANDREW SALCH 1. Hilbert s Nullstellensatz. The last lecture left off with the claim that, if J k[x 1,..., x n ] is an ideal, then
More information9. Finite fields. 1. Uniqueness
9. Finite fields 9.1 Uniqueness 9.2 Frobenius automorphisms 9.3 Counting irreducibles 1. Uniqueness Among other things, the following result justifies speaking of the field with p n elements (for prime
More informationLecture 7: Polynomial rings
Lecture 7: Polynomial rings Rajat Mittal IIT Kanpur You have seen polynomials many a times till now. The purpose of this lecture is to give a formal treatment to constructing polynomials and the rules
More informationA finite universal SAGBI basis for the kernel of a derivation. Osaka Journal of Mathematics. 41(4) P.759-P.792
Title Author(s) A finite universal SAGBI basis for the kernel of a derivation Kuroda, Shigeru Citation Osaka Journal of Mathematics. 4(4) P.759-P.792 Issue Date 2004-2 Text Version publisher URL https://doi.org/0.890/838
More information11. Dimension. 96 Andreas Gathmann
96 Andreas Gathmann 11. Dimension We have already met several situations in this course in which it seemed to be desirable to have a notion of dimension (of a variety, or more generally of a ring): for
More informationSection V.6. Separability
V.6. Separability 1 Section V.6. Separability Note. Recall that in Definition V.3.10, an extension field F is a separable extension of K if every element of F is algebraic over K and every root of the
More informationGalois Theory, summary
Galois Theory, summary Chapter 11 11.1. UFD, definition. Any two elements have gcd 11.2 PID. Every PID is a UFD. There are UFD s which are not PID s (example F [x, y]). 11.3 ED. Every ED is a PID (and
More informationThe Riemann Hypothesis for Function Fields
The Riemann Hypothesis for Function Fields Trevor Vilardi MthSc 952 1 Function Fields Let F = F q be the finite field with q elements (q is a prime power). Definiton 1. Let K/F (x) be an extension of F.
More informationALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY I, FALL 2016.
ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY I, FALL 2016. DIVISORS. 1. Weil and Cartier divisors Let X be an algebraic variety. Define a Weil divisor on X as a formal (finite) linear combination of irreducible subvarieties of
More informationSome Remarks on Prill s Problem
AFFINE ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY pp. 287 292 Some Remarks on Prill s Problem Abstract. N. Mohan Kumar If f : X Y is a non-constant map of smooth curves over C and if there is a degree two map π : X C where C
More informationComputations/Applications
Computations/Applications 1. Find the inverse of x + 1 in the ring F 5 [x]/(x 3 1). Solution: We use the Euclidean Algorithm: x 3 1 (x + 1)(x + 4x + 1) + 3 (x + 1) 3(x + ) + 0. Thus 3 (x 3 1) + (x + 1)(4x
More informationMATH 431 PART 2: POLYNOMIAL RINGS AND FACTORIZATION
MATH 431 PART 2: POLYNOMIAL RINGS AND FACTORIZATION 1. Polynomial rings (review) Definition 1. A polynomial f(x) with coefficients in a ring R is n f(x) = a i x i = a 0 + a 1 x + a 2 x 2 + + a n x n i=0
More informationMath 121 Homework 2 Solutions
Math 121 Homework 2 Solutions Problem 13.2 #16. Let K/F be an algebraic extension and let R be a ring contained in K that contains F. Prove that R is a subfield of K containing F. We will give two proofs.
More informationMathematical Olympiad Training Polynomials
Mathematical Olympiad Training Polynomials Definition A polynomial over a ring R(Z, Q, R, C) in x is an expression of the form p(x) = a n x n + a n 1 x n 1 + + a 1 x + a 0, a i R, for 0 i n. If a n 0,
More informationHILBERT FUNCTIONS. 1. Introduction
HILBERT FUCTIOS JORDA SCHETTLER 1. Introduction A Hilbert function (so far as we will discuss) is a map from the nonnegative integers to themselves which records the lengths of composition series of each
More informationIntroduction to Arithmetic Geometry Fall 2013 Lecture #17 11/05/2013
18.782 Introduction to Arithmetic Geometry Fall 2013 Lecture #17 11/05/2013 Throughout this lecture k denotes an algebraically closed field. 17.1 Tangent spaces and hypersurfaces For any polynomial f k[x
More informationThe Riemann Roch Theorem
The Riemann Roch Theorem Well, a Riemann surface is a certain kind of Hausdorf space You know what a Hausdorf space is, don t you? Its also compact, ok I guess it is also a manifold Surely you know what
More informationHomework 8 Solutions to Selected Problems
Homework 8 Solutions to Selected Problems June 7, 01 1 Chapter 17, Problem Let f(x D[x] and suppose f(x is reducible in D[x]. That is, there exist polynomials g(x and h(x in D[x] such that g(x and h(x
More informationMoreover this binary operation satisfies the following properties
Contents 1 Algebraic structures 1 1.1 Group........................................... 1 1.1.1 Definitions and examples............................. 1 1.1.2 Subgroup.....................................
More informationGEOMETRIC CONSTRUCTIONS AND ALGEBRAIC FIELD EXTENSIONS
GEOMETRIC CONSTRUCTIONS AND ALGEBRAIC FIELD EXTENSIONS JENNY WANG Abstract. In this paper, we study field extensions obtained by polynomial rings and maximal ideals in order to determine whether solutions
More informationPrimes of the form X² + ny² in function fields
Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2010 Primes of the form X² + ny² in function fields Piotr Maciak Louisiana State University and Agricultural and
More informationON THE REPRESENTABILITY OF Hilb n k[x] (x) Roy Mikael Skjelnes
ON THE REPRESENTABILITY OF Hilb n k[x] (x) Roy Mikael Skjelnes Abstract. Let k[x] (x) be the polynomial ring k[x] localized in the maximal ideal (x) k[x]. We study the Hilbert functor parameterizing ideals
More information4.5 Hilbert s Nullstellensatz (Zeros Theorem)
4.5 Hilbert s Nullstellensatz (Zeros Theorem) We develop a deep result of Hilbert s, relating solutions of polynomial equations to ideals of polynomial rings in many variables. Notation: Put A = F[x 1,...,x
More informationD-MATH Algebra I HS18 Prof. Rahul Pandharipande. Solution 6. Unique Factorization Domains
D-MATH Algebra I HS18 Prof. Rahul Pandharipande Solution 6 Unique Factorization Domains 1. Let R be a UFD. Let that a, b R be coprime elements (that is, gcd(a, b) R ) and c R. Suppose that a c and b c.
More informationPolynomial Rings : Linear Algebra Notes
Polynomial Rings : Linear Algebra Notes Satya Mandal September 27, 2005 1 Section 1: Basics Definition 1.1 A nonempty set R is said to be a ring if the following are satisfied: 1. R has two binary operations,
More informationIntegral Extensions. Chapter Integral Elements Definitions and Comments Lemma
Chapter 2 Integral Extensions 2.1 Integral Elements 2.1.1 Definitions and Comments Let R be a subring of the ring S, and let α S. We say that α is integral over R if α isarootofamonic polynomial with coefficients
More information5 Dedekind extensions
18.785 Number theory I Fall 2016 Lecture #5 09/22/2016 5 Dedekind extensions In this lecture we prove that the integral closure of a Dedekind domain in a finite extension of its fraction field is also
More information5 Set Operations, Functions, and Counting
5 Set Operations, Functions, and Counting Let N denote the positive integers, N 0 := N {0} be the non-negative integers and Z = N 0 ( N) the positive and negative integers including 0, Q the rational numbers,
More information4. Noether normalisation
4. Noether normalisation We shall say that a ring R is an affine ring (or affine k-algebra) if R is isomorphic to a polynomial ring over a field k with finitely many indeterminates modulo an ideal, i.e.,
More information1.5 The Nil and Jacobson Radicals
1.5 The Nil and Jacobson Radicals The idea of a radical of a ring A is an ideal I comprising some nasty piece of A such that A/I is well-behaved or tractable. Two types considered here are the nil and
More informationChapter 8. P-adic numbers. 8.1 Absolute values
Chapter 8 P-adic numbers Literature: N. Koblitz, p-adic Numbers, p-adic Analysis, and Zeta-Functions, 2nd edition, Graduate Texts in Mathematics 58, Springer Verlag 1984, corrected 2nd printing 1996, Chap.
More informationHow many units can a commutative ring have?
How many units can a commutative ring have? Sunil K. Chebolu and Keir Locridge Abstract. László Fuchs posed the following problem in 960, which remains open: classify the abelian groups occurring as the
More informationCHAPTER I. Rings. Definition A ring R is a set with two binary operations, addition + and
CHAPTER I Rings 1.1 Definitions and Examples Definition 1.1.1. A ring R is a set with two binary operations, addition + and multiplication satisfying the following conditions for all a, b, c in R : (i)
More informationGalois Theory. This material is review from Linear Algebra but we include it for completeness.
Galois Theory Galois Theory has its origins in the study of polynomial equations and their solutions. What is has revealed is a deep connection between the theory of fields and that of groups. We first
More information54.1 Definition: Let E/K and F/K be field extensions. A mapping : E
54 Galois Theory This paragraph gives an exposition of Galois theory. Given any field extension E/K we associate intermediate fields of E/K with subgroups of a group called the Galois group of the extension.
More informationCommutative Algebra and Algebraic Geometry. Robert Friedman
Commutative Algebra and Algebraic Geometry Robert Friedman August 1, 2006 2 Disclaimer: These are rough notes for a course on commutative algebra and algebraic geometry. I would appreciate all suggestions
More informationPermutation Polynomials over Finite Fields
Permutation Polynomials over Finite Fields Omar Kihel Brock University 1 Finite Fields 2 How to Construct a Finite Field 3 Permutation Polynomials 4 Characterization of PP Finite Fields Let p be a prime.
More informationElliptic Curves and Public Key Cryptography (3rd VDS Summer School) Discussion/Problem Session I
Elliptic Curves and Public Key Cryptography (3rd VDS Summer School) Discussion/Problem Session I You are expected to at least read through this document before Wednesday s discussion session. Hopefully,
More informationFACTORIZATION OF IDEALS
FACTORIZATION OF IDEALS 1. General strategy Recall the statement of unique factorization of ideals in Dedekind domains: Theorem 1.1. Let A be a Dedekind domain and I a nonzero ideal of A. Then there are
More informationCHAPTER 14. Ideals and Factor Rings
CHAPTER 14 Ideals and Factor Rings Ideals Definition (Ideal). A subring A of a ring R is called a (two-sided) ideal of R if for every r 2 R and every a 2 A, ra 2 A and ar 2 A. Note. (1) A absorbs elements
More informationAdvanced Algebra II. Mar. 2, 2007 (Fri.) 1. commutative ring theory In this chapter, rings are assume to be commutative with identity.
Advanced Algebra II Mar. 2, 2007 (Fri.) 1. commutative ring theory In this chapter, rings are assume to be commutative with identity. 1.1. basic definitions. We recall some basic definitions in the section.
More information12 Hilbert polynomials
12 Hilbert polynomials 12.1 Calibration Let X P n be a (not necessarily irreducible) closed algebraic subset. In this section, we ll look at a device which measures the way X sits inside P n. Throughout
More informationFields. Victoria Noquez. March 19, 2009
Fields Victoria Noquez March 19, 2009 5.1 Basics Definition 1. A field K is a commutative non-zero ring (0 1) such that any x K, x 0, has a unique inverse x 1 such that xx 1 = x 1 x = 1. Definition 2.
More informationGauss s Theorem. Theorem: Suppose R is a U.F.D.. Then R[x] is a U.F.D. To show this we need to constuct some discrete valuations of R.
Gauss s Theorem Theorem: Suppose R is a U.F.D.. Then R[x] is a U.F.D. To show this we need to constuct some discrete valuations of R. Proposition: Suppose R is a U.F.D. and that π is an irreducible element
More informationAlgebra Qualifying Exam August 2001 Do all 5 problems. 1. Let G be afinite group of order 504 = 23 32 7. a. Show that G cannot be isomorphic to a subgroup of the alternating group Alt 7. (5 points) b.
More information10. Smooth Varieties. 82 Andreas Gathmann
82 Andreas Gathmann 10. Smooth Varieties Let a be a point on a variety X. In the last chapter we have introduced the tangent cone C a X as a way to study X locally around a (see Construction 9.20). It
More informationOn Permutation Polynomials over Local Finite Commutative Rings
International Journal of Algebra, Vol. 12, 2018, no. 7, 285-295 HIKARI Ltd, www.m-hikari.com https://doi.org/10.12988/ija.2018.8935 On Permutation Polynomials over Local Finite Commutative Rings Javier
More informationMath Introduction to Modern Algebra
Math 343 - Introduction to Modern Algebra Notes Field Theory Basics Let R be a ring. M is called a maximal ideal of R if M is a proper ideal of R and there is no proper ideal of R that properly contains
More information8 Appendix: Polynomial Rings
8 Appendix: Polynomial Rings Throughout we suppose, unless otherwise specified, that R is a commutative ring. 8.1 (Largely) a reminder about polynomials A polynomial in the indeterminate X with coefficients
More informationThe Kummer Pairing. Alexander J. Barrios Purdue University. 12 September 2013
The Kummer Pairing Alexander J. Barrios Purdue University 12 September 2013 Preliminaries Theorem 1 (Artin. Let ψ 1, ψ 2,..., ψ n be distinct group homomorphisms from a group G into K, where K is a field.
More informationClassification of Finite Fields
Classification of Finite Fields In these notes we use the properties of the polynomial x pd x to classify finite fields. The importance of this polynomial is explained by the following basic proposition.
More informationMT5836 Galois Theory MRQ
MT5836 Galois Theory MRQ May 3, 2017 Contents Introduction 3 Structure of the lecture course............................... 4 Recommended texts..................................... 4 1 Rings, Fields and
More informationCHEVALLEY S THEOREM AND COMPLETE VARIETIES
CHEVALLEY S THEOREM AND COMPLETE VARIETIES BRIAN OSSERMAN In this note, we introduce the concept which plays the role of compactness for varieties completeness. We prove that completeness can be characterized
More informationUniversity of Ottawa
University of Ottawa Department of Mathematics and Statistics MAT3143: Ring Theory Professor: Hadi Salmasian Final Exam April 21, 2015 Surname First Name Instructions: (a) You have 3 hours to complete
More information