GENERALIZED FREUDENTHAL SUSPENSION THEOREM AND DE-SUSPENDING AND DE-LOOPING CELLULAR INEQUALITIES
|
|
- Sibyl Francine Warner
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 GENERALIZED FREUDENTHAL SUSPENSION THEOREM AND DE-SUSPENDING AND DE-LOOPING CELLULAR INEQUALITIES WOJCIECH CHACHÓLSKI 1. Introduction This paper is about a certain global approach toward unstable homotopy theory. It has grown out of recent work of A.K.Bousfield (see [1] and [2]) and E.Dror Farjoun (see [6], [7] and [8]), and has been developed by the latter in his recent book [8]. The key roles are played by two geometric relations between spaces. Here are two surprising facts, which are reflections of these relations: The following theorem is surprising because it says that if A is a suspension, then for any map A X, the homotopy fiber of the cofiber Fib(X X/A) anda have unstably quite a lot in common (see corollary 8.9): Theorem. Let A X X/A be a cofibration sequence of pointed and connected spaces and Y be a pointed space. If A is weakly equivalent to a suspension of a connected space, then the following statements about Y are equivalent: map (A, Y ) is weakly contractible. map (ΩΣA, ( Y ) is weakly ) contractible. map Fib(X X/A),Y is weakly contractible. The following theorem is surprising because of its generality (see corollary 10.3): Theorem. Let F E A be any fibration over a connected space A and h be any homology theory. If F E is an h isomorphism, then A is h acyclic. We are going to study two geometric relations between spaces. These relations are associated to two ways of building one spaces from another: Let us choose a connected space A. By C(A) we denote the smallest class of spaces which contains A, is closed under taking weak equivalences, homotopy push-outs, and arbitrary wedges. We say that X is A-cellularorthatitisbuiltfromA, ifx belongs to C(A). We denote this relation by X A. By establishing the relation X A we will know that X can be built from A using homotopy push-outs and arbitrary wedges. This relation though, does not say how to do it. 1
2 2 WOJCIECH CHACHÓLSKI By C(A) we denote the smallest class of spaces which contains A and is closed under some simple operations. In addition to taking weak equivalences, homotopy push-outs, and arbitrary wedges, as it is in the case of C(A), we require that C(A) is also closed under taking extensions by fibrations. That is, for any fibration sequence F E B, iff C(A) andb C(A), then E C(A). We say that X is A-acyclic or that X is killed by A, ifx belongs to C(A). We denote this relation by X>A. By establishing the relation X>Awe will know that X can be built from A using homotopy push-outs, arbitrary wedges, and extensions by fibrations. As before, this relation does not say how to do it. Following E.Dror Farjoun we will call the relations and > respectively a strong and a weak cellular inequality. There are two important functors related to cellular inequalities. It is A.K.Bousfield s periodization functor P A (see [1, section 2.8]) and E.Dror Farjoun s colocalization functor CW A (see [6, section 3]). AspaceX is A-acyclic if and only if P A (X) is weakly contractible. Thus the class C(A) coincides with the kernel of the functor P A (see [4, theorem 17.3]). Studying classes C(A) is the same as studying unstable Bousfield classes (see [1, section 9]). AspaceX is A-cellular if and only if the natural map CW A (X) X is a weak equivalence. Thus the class C(A) coincides with the image of the functor CW A (see [4, theorem 8.2]). More surprisingly there is also a functor F : Spaces Spaces, such that X is A-cellular if and only if F (X) is weakly contractible. Therefore the class of A-cellular spaces coincides with the kernel of some functor (see [4, theorem 20.5]). This characterization of classes C(A) andc(a) gives universal properties that describe A-cellular and A-acyclic spaces (see theorem 3.2 and theorem 4.2). The relations and > preserve homotopy properties that are invariant under taking homotopy push-outs, arbitrary wedges, and in the case of the relation > extensions by fibrations. Being acyclic with respect to some homology theory, or p- torsion, or n-connected are just some of the examples of these properties. By choosing one of them, using the relations and >, we can approximate one space by another. We regard two spaces as being close to each other if they satisfy the chosen property. It turns out that many traditional theorems are just reflections of some cellular approximations. Here are some examples of non trivial cellular inequalities: The following is the only general statement, known to me, that relates the homotopy fibers of maps in a homotopy push-out diagram (see [5, theorem 9.4]): Let the following be a homotopy push-out square of connected spaces: A B C D If Fib(A B) is connected, then: Fib(C D) Fib(A B).
3 DE-SUSPENDING AND DE-LOOPING CELLULAR INEQUALITIES 3 Generalized Blakers Massey theorem (see [3, theorem 7.1]): Let the following be a homotopy push-out square of connected spaces: A B Let P = holim(c D B). There is a natural map A P. If Fib(A B) and Fib(A C) are connected, then: Fib(ΣA ΣP ) Fib(A B) Fib(A C). C D Generalized Freudenthal suspension theorem (see theorem 7.2): Let X be connected. If X ΩΣX is the adjoint map to the identity ΣX id ΣX, then Fib(X ΩΣX) ΩX ΩX. Let f :ΣX Y and g : X ΩY be a pair of adjoint maps. If Y is simply connected, then: Fib(f :ΣX Y ) > ΣFib(g : X ΩY ) ΩY ΩY. If Fib(f :ΣX Y ) is simply connected, then: Fib(g : X ΩY ) > ΩFib(f :ΣX Y ) ΩX ΩX. (see corollary 7.3). The goal is to establish various rules for operating on the symbols X A and X> A. Then use these roles in particular cases to show non trivial cellular inequalities. In this paper we are focusing on a question: when can we de-suspend and de-loop cellular inequalities? We say that A allows de-suspending (weak) cellular inequalities if ΣA (>)ΣX implies A (>)X. We say that a simply connected space A allows de-looping (weak) cellular inequalities if ΩX (>)ΩA implies X (>)A. Weprove various characterizations of these properties. In particular we show: A allows de-suspending (weak) cellular inequalities if the class C(A) ( C(A) ) is generated by a loop space (see theorem 8.3) A allows de-looping (weak) cellular inequalities if the class C(A) ( C(A) ) is generated by a suspension of a connected space (see theorem 9.6 and proposition 10.5). We also prove a result, that was originally observed by E.Dror Farjoun. It says that if A allows de-looping weak cellular inequalities, then it allows de-suspending weak cellular inequalities (see corollary 10.6). Thus for any X and Y,Σ n+1 X>Σ n Y is equivalent to ΣX >Y. In preparation for proving these statements, we observe that certain duality is taking place, where we consider A (>) as the dual of X (>)A. The following is an example of almost dual statements that are both true: Theorem. If A X X/A is a cofibration sequence of connected spaces, then: ΩΣA Fib(X X/A) A (see proposition 8.1).
4 4 WOJCIECH CHACHÓLSKI If F E A is a fibration over a connected space A, then E/F ΣΩA, and after only a single suspension: ΣA Σ(E/F) (see theorem 10.1). 2. Notation This paper is written simplicialy. By a space we mean a simplicial set. All spaces except mapping spaces and spaces that are formed as homotopy limits are not assumed to be connected. Thus if we consider a space ΩX or the homotopy fiber F of amapx Y, we do not assume that they are connected, whereas we do assume that X and Y are. Only two exceptions are made: see theorem 3.5 and theorem 9.1 The homotopy cofiber of a map A X is denoted either by X/A, ifitisclear which map we are considering, or by Cof(A X) if we want to point out the map. Let us choose a basepoint in X. The homotopy fiber of a map A X at the chosen basepoint is denoted by Fib(A X). If X is connected, then the homotopy type of Fib(A X) does not depend on the choice of a basepoint in X. For a space X, byσx we denote the unreduced suspension of X. Ifwechoosea basepoint in X, byωx we denote the homotopy fiber of the basepoint map X. Let X and Y be pointed spaces. The subspace X {y 0 } {x 0 } Y of X Y is denoted by X Y andiscalledthewedgeofx and Y. The quotient space X Y/(X Y ) is denoted by X Y and is called the smash of X and Y. For any choice of basepoints in X and S 1,ΣX is weakly equivalent to X S 1. Let X and Y be spaces. The homotopy push-out hocolim(x p 1 X Y p 2 Y )is denoted by X Y and is called the join of X and Y. For any any choice of basepoints in X and Y,thejoinX Y is weakly equivalent to Σ(X Y ). 3. Strong cellular inequalities In this section the definition and properties of the notion of cellular inequalities will be presented. Cellular inequalities were introduced by E. Dror Farjoun (see [7] and [8]). For a detail discussion of this notion see also [3] and [4]. Definition 3.1. The class C(A) is the smallest class of spaces such that: A C(A). If X C(A) and X Y, then Y C(A). If X i C(A), then hocolim(x 0 X 1 X 2 ) C(A). If X i C(A), then X i C(A). If X i C(A), then hocolim(x 0 X 1 ) C(A). One can think about the class C(A) as generated by A using some simple operations: taking homotopy push-outs and arbitrary wedges (the closure of C(A) under taking telescopes follows from its closure under taking homotopy push-outs and arbitrary wedges).
5 DE-SUSPENDING AND DE-LOOPING CELLULAR INEQUALITIES 5 Notation. If X C(A), then we will write X A, and call the relation a cellular inequality. Sometimes we will also refer to the relation as to a strong cellular inequality. If X A, then we will say that X is built from A, orthatx is A-cellular. The relation X A says that there exists a recipe which describes how to built X from A using homotopy push-outs and arbitrary wedges. It does not give any explicit procedure to built X from A. By establishing the relation X A we will learn that for any homotopy property ξ of spaces, which is preserved by homotopy push-outs and arbitrary wedges, if A satisfies ξ, thensodoesx. Therefore the property of being A-cellular is the universal one among all the homotopy properties that are satisfied by A and are preserved by homotopy push-outs and arbitrary wedges. The universality of this property can also be expressed as follows: Theorem 3.2 (E. Dror Farjoun [6, theorem 3.1]). A space X is A-cellular if and only if for any choice of basepoints in A and X, whenever a map f : Y Z between pointed Kan simplicial sets induces a weak equivalence between mapping spaces from A, f : map (A, Y ) map (A, Z), then it also induces a weak equivalence between mapping spaces from X, f : map (X, Y ) map (X, Z). Remark 3.3. This universal property says that a space X is A-cellular if the natural map CW A X X is a weak equivalence, where CW A is E.Dror Farjoun s colocalization functor (see [4, section 7] and [6, section 3.4]). Thus this universal property identifies the class C(A) as the image of some idempotent functor. The goal is to establish various rules for operating on the symbol X A, and then use those rules in particular cases to show non trivial cellular inequalities. The following proposition and theorem list some basic, although most of them non obvious, examples and rules for operating on the symbol X A. Theorem 3.4. (1) If X is a retract of A, then X A (see [6, section 2.3]). Thus for any A, A. (2) Let the following be a homotopy push-out square: A B If Fib(A B) is connected, then: Fib(C D) Fib(A B). (see [5, theorem 9.4]). C D (3) X ΣA is equivalent to X being simply connected and ΩX A (see [4, theorem 10.8]). Thus ΩΣA A. (4) If X A and Y B, then X Y A B (see [3, corollary 3.10]). In particular since Y S 1 is always true, we have: X Y ΣX.
6 6 WOJCIECH CHACHÓLSKI (5) We can suspend cellular inequalities. If X A, then ΣX ΣA (see [4, corollary 10.2]). (6) We can loop cellular inequalities. If A is simply connected and X A, then ΩX ΩA (see [4, corollary 10.4]). (7) Let f : X Y be a map. Then: Fib(Σf :ΣX ΣY ) Y/X ΣFib(f : X Y ) (see [4, theorem 10.9]). Notice that we are not assuming that Fib(f) is connected. By considering the map A, we obtain that any A is ΣΩA-cellular. In the following theorem we are making an exception from our rule and we are not assuming that involved spaces are connected. Theorem 3.5 ([3, theorem 5.1]). Let B be a connected space. Let us consider the following commutative diagram: H @R l Y E E/Y f p g G X B B/X where: F E is the homotopy fiber of p : E B, G X is the homotopy fiber of g : X B, H Y is the homotopy fiber of the composition g f : Y B, E E/Y is the homotopy cofiber of l : Y E, B B/X is the homotopy cofiber of g : X B, maps H F, H G and E/Y B/X are induced by l, f, p and g, Z E/Y is the homotopy fiber of E/Y B/X. If hocolim(g H F ) is connected, then Z hocolim(g H F ). 4. Weak cellular inequalities In this section the definition and basic properties of the notion of weak cellular inequalities will be presented. This notion was introduced by E.Dror Farjoun (see [7] and [8]). For a detail discussion of this notion see also [4]. Definition 4.1. The class C(A) is the smallest class of spaces such that: A C(A). If X C(A) and X Y, then Y C(A).
7 DE-SUSPENDING AND DE-LOOPING CELLULAR INEQUALITIES 7 If X i C(A), then hoclim(x 0 X 1 X 2 ) C(A). If X i C(A), then X i C(A). If X i C(A), then hocolim(x 0 X 1 ) C(A). If F E B is a fibration sequence and F, B C(A), then E C(A). One can think about the class C(A) as generated by A using some simple operations. In addition to taking homotopy push-outs and arbitrary wedges, as it is in the case of C(A), one is also allowed to take extensions by fibrations. Notation. If X C(A), then we will write X>A, and call the relation > a weak cellular inequality. If X>A,thenwesaythatX is killed by A or that X is A-acyclic. The relation X>Asays that we can built X from A using homotopy push-outs, arbitrary wedges and extensions by fibrations. It does not say how to do it. By establishing the relation X>Awe will learn that for any homotopy property ξ of spaces, which is preserved by homotopy push-outs, arbitrary wedges, and extensions by fibrations, if A satisfies ξ, then so does X. Therefore the property of being A-acyclic is the universal one among all the homotopy properties that are satisfied by A and are preserved by homotopy push-outs, arbitrary wedges, and extensions by fibrations. The universality of this property can also be expressed as follows: Theorem 4.2 ([4, theorem 17.3]). A space X is A-acyclic if and only if for any choice of basepoints in A and X and for any pointed Kan simplicial set Y,ifthe mapping space map (A, Y ) is weakly contractible, then so is map (X, Y ). Remark 4.3. This universal property says that a space X is A-acyclic if P A (X) is weakly contractible, where P A is A.K.Bousfield s periodization functor (see [1, section 2.8]). Thus this universal property identifies the class C(A) as the kernel of some idempotent functor (see [4, theorem 17.3]). We will use the following properties of the relation >: Theorem 4.4. (1) X>ΣAis equivalent to X being simply connected and ΩX >A(see [4, theorem 18.5] and compare with theorem 3.4.(3)). (2) Let F E B be a fibration sequence. If F A and B>ΣA, then E A (see [5, corollary 8.4]). It is obvious from the definitions that if X A, thenx > A. In general the reverse implication does not hold. There is a striking example involving loops on spheres. For every n, S n > ΩS n+1, but S n ΩS n+1 happens only when S n is an H-space, thus when n =1, 3, 7 (see [4, corollary 20.13]).
8 8 WOJCIECH CHACHÓLSKI 5. Ganea s theorem In this section a generalized Ganea theorem is going to be presented. Although this theorem has been known, we will present its proof. We start with stating two well known properties of homotopy fibers. For the reference see [7]. Proposition 5.1. If the following be a commutative diagram, then: X Y Fib ( hocolim(z X Y ) W ) hocolim ( Fib(Z W ) Fib(X W ) Fib(Y W ) ). Z W Let (X 0 X 1 X 2 ) be a telescope diagram. Then: Fib ( X 0 hocolim(x 0 X 1 ) ) hocolim ( Fib(X 0 X 1 ) Fib(X 0 X 2 ) ) As a corollary we get Ganea s theorem: Theorem 5.2 (Ganea). Let X 0 and X 1 be spaces. There is a weak equivalence: Fib(X 0 X 1 X 0 X 1 ) ΩX 0 ΩX 1. There is a generalized version of this theorem. In order to give its formulation we have to introduced some notation. Let us assume that we have a family of pointed spaces (X 0,X 1,...,X n ). By i k (0 k n) we denote the following inclusion: i k : X l X l, (x 0,...,x n 1 ) (x 0,...x k 1,,x k,...,x n 1 ) l k 0 l n 0 l n Let W be the union of all the images of i k.thusw is the subspace of the product X 0 X 1 X n. It consists of (n + 1)-tuples (x 0,x 1,...,x n ) where there is at least one index s for which x s =. We will call W the thick wedge of the family (X 0,X 1,...,X n ). Theorem 5.3. Fib(W 0 l n X l ) ΩX 0 ΩX 1 ΩX n. Proof. The proof is by induction on n. Forn = 1 we already know that the statement is true. Let V denotes the thick wedge of the family (X 0,X 1,...,X n 1 ). It is clear from the definition that: W = colim ( ) X l V V X n 0 l n 1
9 DE-SUSPENDING AND DE-LOOPING CELLULAR INEQUALITIES 9 where V V X n is the inclusion V V X n. Since this map is a cofibration, we have: W hocolim( 0 l n 1 X l V V X n ). By analyzing the appropriate homotopy fibers and using proposition 5.1, we get: Fib ( W ( pr hocolim ΩX 1 n ΩXn Fib ( V 0 l n 0 l n 1 X l ) ) pr2 ( X l Fib V ) ) X l 0 l n 1 By inductive assumption Fib(V 0 l n 1 X l ) ΩX 0 ΩX 1 ΩX n 1.Therefore: Fib(W 0 l n X l ) (ΩX 0 ΩX 1 ΩX n 1 ) ΩX n. 6. I.M.James Construction Let X be a pointed space. By J(X) we denote the reduced free simplicial monoid generated by X. For every n 0, there is a n-fold multiplication map X n J(X), (x 1,...,x n ) x 1 x 2 x n, whose image will be denoted by J n. Let (X,X,...,X) be the constant family of (n + 1) pointed spaces. The thick wedge of this family will be denoted by W (n). There is a unique map W (n) J n such that for any 0 k n, the composition (X n i k W (n) J n ) is equal to the n-fold multiplication map. This map fits into the following push-out diagram: W (n) X n+1 J n J n+1 Since the maps involved are cofibrations, the above diagram is also homotopy pushout. I.M.James showed that the map X hocolim(j 1 J 2 )isweakly equivalent to the map X ΩΣX, which is adjoint to the identity ΣX id ΣX (see [9, theorem 2.6]). (n+1) def Theorem 6.1. Fib(J n J n+1 ) (ΩX) =ΩX } ΩX{{ ΩX}. n+1 Proof. According to generalized Ganea s theorem (see 5.3): Using theorem 3.4.(2) we can conclude: Fib(W (n) X n+1 ) (ΩX) (n+1) Fib(J n J n+1 ) Fib(W (n) X n+1 ) (ΩX) (n+1)
10 10 WOJCIECH CHACHÓLSKI 7. Generalized Freudenthal Suspension Theorem In order to construct the map ΣΩX X, which is adjoint to the identity map ΩX id ΩX, one can use the following algorithm: take the homotopy pull-back, forget about X, and take the homotopy push-out: ΩX ΩX X ΣΩX the natural map ΣΩX hocolim( ΩX ) X is adjoint to the identity map ΩX id ΩX. Therefore by proposition 5.1: Corollary 7.1. Fib(ΣΩX X) ΩX ΩX. Dually, to construct the map X ΩΣX, which is adjoint to the identity map ΣX id ΣX, one can use the following algorithm: take the homotopy push-out, forget about X, and take the homotopy pull-back: X ΩΣX ΣX ΣX the natural map X holim( ΣX ) ΩΣX is adjoint to the identity map ΣX id ΣX. In the case of the map ΣΩX X we could identify its homotopy fiber. In the case of the map X ΩΣX we will approximate its homotopy fiber using cellular inequalities. This will give us Generalized Freudenthal Suspension Theorem: Theorem 7.2. Fib(X ΩΣX) ΩX ΩX. Proof. We will use I.M.James model for the map X ΩΣX. We will prove by induction on n that Fib(X J n ) ΩX ΩX. SinceJ 1 = X and the map X J 1 is the identity, the statement is true for n =1. Let us assume that it is true for n 1. We will show that Fib(X J n+1 ) ΩX ΩX. The map X J n+1 can be factored as (X J n J n+1 ), therefore we have the following fibration sequence: Fib(X J n ) Fib(X J n+1 ) Fib(J n J n+1 ) By inductive assumption Fib(X J n ) ΩX ΩX. According to theorem 6.1: Fib(J n J n+1 ) (ΩX) (n+1)
11 DE-SUSPENDING AND DE-LOOPING CELLULAR INEQUALITIES 11 and thus by theorem 3.4.(4): Fib(J n J n+1 ) ΣΩX ΩX. It follows from theorem 4.4.(2), thatfib(x J n+1 ) ΩX ΩX. To conclude the proof, observe (see proposition 5.1): Fib(X ΩΣX) Fib ( X hocolim(j 1 J 2 ) ) hocolim ( Fib(X J 1 ) Fib(X J 2 ) ) ΩX ΩX Corollary 7.3. Let f :ΣX Y, g : X ΩY be a pair of adjoint maps. If Y is simply connected, then: Fib(f :ΣX Y ) > ΣFib(g : X ΩY ) ΩY ΩY If Fib(f :ΣX Y ) is simply connected, then: Fib(g : X ΩY ) > ΩFib(f :ΣX Y ) ΩX ΩX (Notice that this corollary gives weak cellular inequalities.) Proof. In order to construct the adjoint map to g : X ΩY we have to take its suspension and than compose it with the natural map ΣΩY Y : (ΣX It follows that we have a fibration sequence: Fib(ΣX Σg ΣΩY ) Fib(ΣX f Y )=(ΣX Σg ΣΩY Y ) f Y ) Fib(ΣΩY Y ) Simply connectedness of Y gives connectedness of ΩY, and thus theorem 3.4.(7) implies: Fib(Σg :ΣX ΣΩY ) ΣFib(g : X ΩY ). Since Fib(ΣΩY Y ) ΩY ΩY, it follows that Fib(f :ΣX Y ) > ΣFib(g : X ΩY ) ΩY ΩY. In order to construct the adjoint map to f :ΣX Y we have to loop this map and than pre-compose it with the natural map X ΩΣX: (X g ΩY )=(X ΩΣX Ωf ΩY ) Therefore we have a fibration sequence with a connected base: Fib(X ΩΣX) Fib(X g ΩY ) Fib(ΩΣX Ωf ΩY ) Since Fib(X ΩΣX) ΩX ΩX (see theorem 7.2), we get: Fib(g : X ΩY ) > ΩFib(f :ΣX Y ) ΩX ΩX
12 12 WOJCIECH CHACHÓLSKI 8. De-suspending cellular inequalities In this section we are going to discuss under what circumstances we can de-suspend cellular inequalities. We start with a preliminary result: Proposition 8.1. Let A X X/A be a cofibration sequence. Then: ΩΣA Fib(X X/A) A Proof. Consider the following two homotopy push-out squares: A X X/A X X/A ΣA By applying theorem 3.4.(2) we can conclude: ΩΣA Fib(X X/A) A. Definition 8.2. We say that a space A allows de-suspending (weak) cellular inequalities if ΣA (>)ΣX implies A (>)X. The following theorem shows that the problem of de-suspending cellular inequalities is closely related to reversing the inequalities stated in proposition 8.1: Theorem 8.3. The following statements are equivalent: (1) A allows de-suspending (weak) cellular inequalities. (2) A (>)ΩΣA. (3) C(A) =C(ΩΣA) ( C(A) =C(ΩΣA) ). (4) If A X X/A is a cofibration sequence, then A (>)Fib(X X/A). (5) If A X X/A is a cofibration sequence, then C(A) =C ( Fib(X X/A) ) ( ) C(A) =C(Fib(X X/A)). (6) There exists a simply connected space B, such that C(A) =C(ΩB) ( C(A) = C(ΩB) ). Proof. (1) (2). Notice that by theorem 3.4.(3) the inequality ΩΣA ΩΣA is equivalent to ΣA ΣΩΣA. Thus since A allows de-suspending (weak) cellular inequalities, we get: A (>)ΩΣA. (2) (3) (4) (5) (6). Those implications are either obvious or are easy corollaries of proposition 8.1. (6) (1). By looping the inequality B ΣΩB (see theorem 3.4(7)), we get: ΩB ΩΣΩB. Let us assume that ΣA (>)ΣX. It follows from theorem 3.4.(3) (theorem 4.4.(1))that ΩΣA (>)X, and therefore A (>)ΩB ΩΣΩB (>)ΩΣA (>)X.
13 DE-SUSPENDING AND DE-LOOPING CELLULAR INEQUALITIES 13 Remark 8.4. Let us consider the following property of a space A: If A X X/A is a cofibration sequence, then C(A) =C ( Fib(X X/A) ) ( ) C(A) =C(Fib(X X/A)). Theorem 8.3 indicates that this property depends only on the class C(A) ( C(A) ) generated by A, rather than on the homotopy type of A (compare with remark 9.7 and remark 10.8). Theorem 8.3 gives us a simple procedure of constructing new spaces that allow de-suspending (weak) cellular inequalities out of old ones: Corollary 8.5. For a simply connected spaces B, ΩB allows de-suspending cellular inequalities. Let A X X/A be a cofibration sequence. If we can de-suspend (weak) cellular inequalities with A, then so can we with Fib(X X/A) and ΩΣA. In order to start the above procedure, we would like to have some examples of spaces for which we can de-suspend cellular inequalities. If A is an H-space, it is a retract of ΩΣA, and thus we have a strong cellular inequality A ΩΣA (see theorem 3.4.(1)). Therefore H-spaces allow de-suspending cellular inequalities. In general though, it is difficult to expect that there is a strong cellular inequality A ΩΣA, since according to [4, corollary 20.13] S n ΩS n+1 if and only if S n is an H-space. However, it is alwaystruethatwehaveaweak cellular inequality S n > ΩS n+1. It was originally observed by E.Dror Farjoun, that in general suspensions do allow de-suspending weak cellular inequalities: Theorem 8.6. If C(A) =C(ΣB), then A allows de-suspending weak cellular inequalities. Proof. Since the property of allowing de-suspending weak cellular inequalities depends only on the class C(A), we can assume that A ΣB. To prove the theorem, we have to show that A>ΩΣA. Therefore it would be enough to prove that the homotopy fiber Fib(A ΩΣA) is built from ΩΣA. Using Generalized Freudenthal Suspension Theorem (see theorem 7.2) we will show more: Lemma 8.7. If A ΣB, then Fib(A ΩΣA) ΣΩΣA. Proof. By theorem 7.2 Fib(A ΩΣA) ΩA ΩA. We will prove the lemma, if we show that ΩA ΩA ΣΩΣA. By suspending inequality ΩΣB B, weget: ΣΩA ΣΩΣB ΣB A. Since ΩA ΩA ΣΩA ΩA, theorem 3.4.(4) implies ΩA ΩA ΣΣΩA, and therefore, by the previous argument ΩA ΩA ΣΩΣA. Notice that ΣA ΣΩΣA, and thus the lemma is proven. Corollary 8.8. Σ n+1 A>Σ n B if and only if ΣA >B.
14 14 WOJCIECH CHACHÓLSKI Corollary 8.9. Let A X X/A be a cofibration sequence, Y be a Kan simplicial set and ξ be any property of spaces that is preserved under taking homotopy pushouts, arbitrary wedges and extensions by fibrations. If A ΣB, then A allows desuspending weak cellular inequalities. Therefore: C(A) =C(Fib(X X/A)) = C(ΩΣA) It follows that A satisfies ξ if and only if Fib(X X/A) does. In particular the following statements about Y are equivalent: map (A, ( Y ) is weakly contractible. ) map Fib(X X/A),Y is weakly contractible. map (ΩΣA, Y ) is weakly contractible. In the next two sections the question of de-looping cellular inequalities will be addressed. We will discus separately the cases of strong and weak cellular inequalities. 9. De-looping strong cellular inequalities We start with a theorem, which says that under some rather general assumptions the dual statement to theorem 3.4.(2) is true, where X A is consider to be the dual of A X. In the following theorem we are making an exception from our rule and we are not assuming that involved spaces are connected. Theorem 9.1. Let the following be a homotopy pull-back square: Y E p X B If p is a principal fibration and E/Y is connected, then B/X E/Y. Proof. Let B K be the classifying map of the principal fibration p : E B. Thus K is connected. Consider the following commutative diagram: X B K id K Notice that Fib(B K) E, Fib(X K) Y and Fib(K id K). Therefore, according to theorem 3.5: B/X Fib(B/X K/K) hocolim( Y E) E/Y. Corollary 9.2. Let F E A be a fibration. Then E/F ΣΩA.
15 DE-SUSPENDING AND DE-LOOPING CELLULAR INEQUALITIES 15 Proof. Let us consider the following homotopy pull-back square: ΩA F E Since the map E is a principal fibration and /ΩA ΣΩA is connected, we can applying theorem 3.5, obtaining: E/F ΣΩA. Corollary 9.3. If F E A is a principal fibration, then A E/F ΣΩA. Proof. The second inequality is a consequence of corollary 9.2. To show the first inequality consider the following homotopy pull-back square, and apply theorem 9.1: F E A Remark 9.4. I am not aware of any example of a non principal fibration F E A, for which A would not be E/F cellular or E/F acyclic. For example if the map E A has a section, or A is a suspension, then A is a retract of E/F, and therefore A is E/F-cellular. In fact, in the next section we will prove a general, slightly weaker statement, that for any fibration F E A after only a single suspension we have: ΣA Σ(E/F) (see theorem 10.1). Definition 9.5. We say that a simply connected space A allows de-looping strong cellular inequalities if ΩX ΩA implies X A. The following theorem shows that the problem of de-looping cellular inequalities is closely related to reversing the inequalities stated in corollary 9.3: Theorem 9.6. Let A be simply connected. The following statements are equivalent: (1) A allows de-looping strong cellular inequalities. (2) ΣΩA A. (3) C(A) =C(ΣΩA). (4) If F E A is a fibration, then E/F A. (5) If F E A is a principal fibration, then C(A) =C(E/F). (6) There exists a space B, suchthatc(a) =C(ΣB).
16 16 WOJCIECH CHACHÓLSKI Proof. (1) (2). By theorem 3.4.(3) inequality ΣΩA ΣΩA is equivalent to ΩΣΩA ΩA. Therefore since A allows de-looping cellular inequalities, we get: ΣΩA A. (2) (3) (4) (5) (6). Those implications are either obvious or are easy consequences of corollary 9.2 and corollary 9.3. (6) (1). By suspending the inequality ΩΣB B, we get: ΣΩΣB ΣB. Let us assume that ΩX ΩA. It follows from theorem 3.4.(3) that X ΣΩA and therefore X ΣΩA ΣΩΣB ΣB A. Remark 9.7. Let us consider the following two properties of a space A: (1) If F E A is a principal fibration, then C(E/F)=C(A). (2) If F E A is a fibration, not necessarily principal, then C(E/F)=C(A). Theorem 9.6 indicates that the property (1) depends only on the class C(A) generated by A, rather than on the homotopy type of A. I do not know whether property (2) also depends only on the class C(A). Observe that if A is a suspension, then for any fibration F E A, A is a retract of E/F, and thus A E/F. SinceA is a suspension, by theorem 9.6, ΣΩA A. Therefore suspensions satisfy property (2). If this property depends only on the class C(A), then in the theorem 9.6 we would not have to restrict ourselves to principal fibrations. 10. De-looping weak cellular inequalities We start with proving that after only a single suspension the dual statement to proposition 8.1 is also true: Theorem Let F E p A be a fibration, possibly non principal. Then ΣA Σ(E/F). Lemma Let f : X X Y be the graph of the map f : X Y, i.e. f(x) = (x, f(x)). For any choice of a basepoint in Y, Σ ( (X Y )/ f(x) ) Σ(X Y ). Therefore the suspension of the homotopy cofiber of the graph f depends only on the spaces X and Y, and does not depend on the map f. Proof. Let us choose a basepoint in Y,andlet : X Y be the trivial map. Consider the following two sets of composable maps: X X Y p 1 X, X f X Y p 1 X Notice that the composition of these both sets of maps gives the identity, therefore: Σ(X Y ) Σ ( (X Y )/ (X) ) Cof(X Y p 1 X) Σ ( (X Y )/ f(x) )
17 DE-SUSPENDING AND DE-LOOPING CELLULAR INEQUALITIES 17 Proof of the theorem. Consider the following commutative diagram: p E E A p p 2 According to theorem 3.5: A id (E A)/ p(e) Fib ( (E A)/ p(e) A/A ) hocolim( F E) E/F By suspending this inequality and applying the lemma, we get: Σ(E A) Σ ( E A)/ p(e) ) Σ(E/F) Since A is a retract of E A, wehave:a E A, and thus ΣA Σ(E/F). Corollary Let F E A be a fibration and h be any homology theory. If F E is h isomorphism, then A is h -acyclic (notice that we are not making any assumptions about the fibration). Definition We say that a simply connected space A allows de-looping weak cellular inequalities if ΩX > ΩA implies X > A. Proposition Let A be simply connected. The following statements are equivalent: (1) A allows de-looping weak cellular inequalities. (2) ΣΩA >A. (3) C(A) =C(ΣΩA). (4) There exists a space B, suchthatc(a) =C(ΣB). Proof. (1) (2). By theorem 3.4.(3) we have: ΩΣΩA ΩA. SinceA allows de-looping weak cellular inequalities,s ΣΩA >A. (2) (3) (4). Those implications are either obvious or are easy corollaries of theorem 3.4.(7). (4) (1). LetΩX>ΩA. By theorem 4.4.(1), weget: X>ΣΩA >ΣΩΣB >ΣB > A. Corollary 8.9 together with the above proposition imply: Corollary Let A be simply connected. If A allows de-looping weak cellular inequalities, then it allows de-suspending weak cellular inequalities. Theorem Let A be simply connected. The following statements are equivalent: (1) A allows de-looping weak cellular inequalities. A
18 18 WOJCIECH CHACHÓLSKI (2) If F E A is a fibration sequence, then E/F > A. (3) If F E A is a fibration sequence, then C(A) =C(E/F). Proof. (1) (2). SinceA allows de-looping weak cellular inequalities, therefore ΣΩA > A (see proposition 10.5). Corollary 9.2 implies: E/F ΣΩA >A. (2) (3). WehavetoshowthatA>E/F. By theorem 10.1 ΣA Σ(E/F). Since A allows de-looping weak cellular inequalities, then it also allows de-suspending weak cellular inequalities (see corollary 10.6), therefore A>E/F. (3) (1). Consider the loop fibration ΩA A. By assumption C(A) = C(ΣΩA), and thus by proposition 10.5 A allows de-looping weak cellular inequalities. Remark Let us consider the following property of a simply connected space A: If F E A is a fibration, then C(A) =C(E/F). Theorem 10.7 indicates that this property depends only on the class C(A) generated by A, rather than on the homotopy type of A (compare with remarks 8.4 and 9.7). References 1. A.K.Bousfield, Localization and periodicity in unstable homotopy theory, preprint. 2. A.K.Bousfield, Unstable localization and periodicity, Proc. to the conf. in Alg. Top. Barcelona, Summer W. Chachólski, A generalization of the triad theorem of Blakers-Massey, Submitted for publication, W. Chachólski, On the functors CW A and P A, to appear in Duke Journal of Mathematics. 5. W.Chachólski, Closed classes, Proc. to the conf. in Alg. Top. Barcelona, Summer E.Dror Farjoun, Cellular spaces, preprint. 7. E.Dror Farjoun, Cellular inequalities, Proc. to the conf. in Alg. Top. Northeastern Univ. June 1993, Springer Verlag. 8. E.Dror Farjoun, Cellular Spaces, Null Spaces and Homotopy Localization, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1622, Springer Verlag G. W. Whitehead, Elements of Homotopy Theory, Grad. Texts in Math. 61, Springer Verlag The Fields Institute, 222 College St., University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5T 3J1, Canada address: wchachol@fields.toronto.edu
arxiv:math/ v1 [math.at] 13 Nov 2001
arxiv:math/0111151v1 [math.at] 13 Nov 2001 Miller Spaces and Spherical Resolvability of Finite Complexes Abstract Jeffrey Strom Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755 Jeffrey.Strom@Dartmouth.edu www.math.dartmouth.edu/~strom/
More informationSOME EXERCISES. This is not an assignment, though some exercises on this list might become part of an assignment. Class 2
SOME EXERCISES This is not an assignment, though some exercises on this list might become part of an assignment. Class 2 (1) Let C be a category and let X C. Prove that the assignment Y C(Y, X) is a functor
More informationFIBERWISE LOCALIZATION AND THE CUBE THEOREM
FIBERWISE LOCALIZATION AND THE CUBE THEOREM DAVID CHATAUR AND JÉRÔME SCHERER Abstract. In this paper we explain when it is possible to construct fiberwise localizations in model categories. For pointed
More informationMath Homotopy Theory Hurewicz theorem
Math 527 - Homotopy Theory Hurewicz theorem Martin Frankland March 25, 2013 1 Background material Proposition 1.1. For all n 1, we have π n (S n ) = Z, generated by the class of the identity map id: S
More informationFINITE SPECTRA CARY MALKIEWICH
FINITE SPECTRA CARY MALKIEWICH These notes were written in 2014-2015 to help me understand how the different notions of finiteness for spectra are related. I am usually surprised that the basics are not
More informationHOMOTOPY THEORY ADAM KAYE
HOMOTOPY THEORY ADAM KAYE 1. CW Approximation The CW approximation theorem says that every space is weakly equivalent to a CW complex. Theorem 1.1 (CW Approximation). There exists a functor Γ from the
More informationMath 272b Notes; Spring 2005 Michael Hopkins
Math 272b Notes; Spring 2005 Michael Hopkins David Glasser February 9, 2005 1 Wed, 2/2/2005 11 Administrivia mjh@mathharvardedu Computing homotopy groups lets you classify all spaces Homotopy theory on
More informationLecture 4: Stabilization
Lecture 4: Stabilization There are many stabilization processes in topology, and often matters simplify in a stable limit. As a first example, consider the sequence of inclusions (4.1) S 0 S 1 S 2 S 3
More informationREPRESENTATIONS OF SPACES
REPRESENTATIONS OF SPACES WOJCIECH CHACHÓLSKI AND JÉRÔME SCHERER Abstract. We explain how the notion of homotopy colimits gives rise to that of mapping spaces, even in categories which are not simplicial.
More informationSUSPENSION SPLITTINGS AND HOPF INVARIANTS FOR RETRACTS OF THE LOOPS ON CO-H-SPACES
SUSPENSION SPLITTINGS AND HOPF INVARIANTS FOR RETRACTS OF THE LOOPS ON CO-H-SPACES J. GRBIĆ, S. THERIAULT AND J. WU Abstract. W James constructed a functorial homotopy decomposition ΣΩΣX ΣX(n) for path-connected,
More informationA UNIVERSAL PROPERTY FOR Sp(2) AT THE PRIME 3
Homology, Homotopy and Applications, vol. 11(1), 2009, pp.1 15 A UNIVERSAL PROPERTY FOR Sp(2) AT THE PRIME 3 JELENA GRBIĆ and STEPHEN THERIAULT (communicated by Donald M. Davis) Abstract We study a universal
More informationAXIOMS FOR GENERALIZED FARRELL-TATE COHOMOLOGY
AXIOMS FOR GENERALIZED FARRELL-TATE COHOMOLOGY JOHN R. KLEIN Abstract. In [Kl] we defined a variant of Farrell-Tate cohomology for a topological group G and any naive G-spectrum E by taking the homotopy
More informationCellular Spaces. by E. Dror Farjoun. 0. Introduction and Main Results
Cellular Spaces by E. Dror Farjoun 0. Introduction and Main Results The aim of the present work is to study, in a systematic way, the possibility of constructing new spaces out of a given collection of
More informationLECTURE 2: THE THICK SUBCATEGORY THEOREM
LECTURE 2: THE THICK SUBCATEGORY THEOREM 1. Introduction Suppose we wanted to prove that all p-local finite spectra of type n were evil. In general, this might be extremely hard to show. The thick subcategory
More informationSPLITTING OFF T -SPACES AND DUALITY. Yeon Soo Yoon*
JOURNAL OF THE CHUNGCHEONG MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 16, No.1, June 2003 SPLITTING OFF T -SPACES AND DUALITY Yeon Soo Yoon* Abstract. We obtain a necessary condition for splitting T -space off a space
More informationCLASS NOTES MATH 527 (SPRING 2011) WEEK 5
CLASS NOTES MATH 527 (SPRING 2011) WEEK 5 BERTRAND GUILLOU 1. Mon, Feb. 14 The same method we used to prove the Whitehead theorem last time also gives the following result. Theorem 1.1. Let X be CW and
More informationStabilization and classification of poincare duality embeddings
Wayne State University Wayne State University Dissertations 1-1-2012 Stabilization and classification of poincare duality embeddings John Whitson Peter Wayne State University, Follow this and additional
More informationPeriodic Localization, Tate Cohomology, and Infinite Loopspaces Talk 1
Periodic Localization, Tate Cohomology, and Infinite Loopspaces Talk 1 Nicholas J. Kuhn University of Virginia University of Georgia, May, 2010 University of Georgia, May, 2010 1 / Three talks Introduction
More informationSECTION 2: THE COMPACT-OPEN TOPOLOGY AND LOOP SPACES
SECTION 2: THE COMPACT-OPEN TOPOLOGY AND LOOP SPACES In this section we will give the important constructions of loop spaces and reduced suspensions associated to pointed spaces. For this purpose there
More informationL E C T U R E N O T E S O N H O M O T O P Y T H E O R Y A N D A P P L I C AT I O N S
L A U R E N T I U M A X I M U N I V E R S I T Y O F W I S C O N S I N - M A D I S O N L E C T U R E N O T E S O N H O M O T O P Y T H E O R Y A N D A P P L I C AT I O N S i Contents 1 Basics of Homotopy
More informationOn Obstructions to Realizing Diagrams of Π-algebras
On Obstructions to Realizing Diagrams of Π-algebras Mark W. Johnson mwj3@psu.edu March 16, 2008. On Obstructions to Realizing Diagrams of Π-algebras 1/13 Overview Collaboration with David Blanc and Jim
More informationNULLIFICATION AND CELLULARIZATION OF CLASSIFYING SPACES OF FINITE GROUPS
TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 359, Number 4, April 2007, Pages 1791 1816 S 0002-9947(06)03926-2 Article electronically published on October 17, 2006 NULLIFICATION AND CELLULARIZATION
More informationStable homotopy and the Adams Spectral Sequence
F A C U L T Y O F S C I E N C E U N I V E R S I T Y O F C O P E N H A G E N Master Project in Mathematics Paolo Masulli Stable homotopy and the Adams Spectral Sequence Advisor: Jesper Grodal Handed-in:
More informationLecture 2: Spectra and localization
Lecture 2: Spectra and localization Paul VanKoughnett February 15, 2013 1 Spectra (Throughout, spaces means pointed topological spaces or simplicial sets we ll be clear where we need one version or the
More informationMULTIPLE DISJUNCTION FOR SPACES OF POINCARÉ EMBEDDINGS
MULTIPLE DISJUNCTION FOR SPACES OF POINCARÉ EMBEDDINGS THOMAS G. GOODWILLIE AND JOHN R. KLEIN Abstract. Still at it. Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Some Language 6 3. Getting the ambient space to be connected
More informationBOUSFIELD LOCALIZATIONS OF CLASSIFYING SPACES OF NILPOTENT GROUPS
BOUSFIELD LOCALIZATIONS OF CLASSIFYING SPACES OF NILPOTENT GROUPS W. G. DWYER, E. DROR FARJOUN, AND D. C. RAVENEL 1. Introduction Let G be a finitely generated nilpotent group. The object of this paper
More informationEquivalence of the Combinatorial Definition (Lecture 11)
Equivalence of the Combinatorial Definition (Lecture 11) September 26, 2014 Our goal in this lecture is to complete the proof of our first main theorem by proving the following: Theorem 1. The map of simplicial
More informationTHE CELLULARIZATION PRINCIPLE FOR QUILLEN ADJUNCTIONS
THE CELLULARIZATION PRINCIPLE FOR QUILLEN ADJUNCTIONS J. P. C. GREENLEES AND B. SHIPLEY Abstract. The Cellularization Principle states that under rather weak conditions, a Quillen adjunction of stable
More informationDECOMPOSITIONS OF LOOPED CO-H-SPACES
DECOMPOSITIONS OF LOOPED CO-H-SPACES J. GRBIĆ, S. THERIAULT, AND J. WU Abstract. We prove two homotopy decomposition theorems for the loops on simply-connected co-h-spaces, including a generalization of
More informationHOMOTOPY THEORY OF THE SUSPENSIONS OF THE PROJECTIVE PLANE
HOMOTOPY THEORY OF THE SUSPENSIONS OF THE PROJECTIVE PLANE J. WU Abstract. The homotopy theory of the suspensions of the real projective plane is largely investigated. The homotopy groups are computed
More informationAndré Quillen spectral sequence for THH
Topology and its Applications 29 (2003) 273 280 www.elsevier.com/locate/topol André Quillen spectral sequence for THH Vahagn Minasian University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 409 W. Green St, Urbana,
More informationCW-complexes. Stephen A. Mitchell. November 1997
CW-complexes Stephen A. Mitchell November 1997 A CW-complex is first of all a Hausdorff space X equipped with a collection of characteristic maps φ n α : D n X. Here n ranges over the nonnegative integers,
More informationSpaces with high topological complexity
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 144A, 761 773, 2014 Spaces with high topological complexity Aleksandra Franc Faculty of Computer and Information Science, University of Ljubljana, Tržaška
More information1 Whitehead s theorem.
1 Whitehead s theorem. Statement: If f : X Y is a map of CW complexes inducing isomorphisms on all homotopy groups, then f is a homotopy equivalence. Moreover, if f is the inclusion of a subcomplex X in
More informationThe Ordinary RO(C 2 )-graded Cohomology of a Point
The Ordinary RO(C 2 )-graded Cohomology of a Point Tiago uerreiro May 27, 2015 Abstract This paper consists of an extended abstract of the Master Thesis of the author. Here, we outline the most important
More informationOn Maps from Loop Suspensions to Loop Spaces and the Shuffle Relations on the Cohen Groups. J. Wu
On Maps from Loop Suspensions to Loop Spaces and the Shuffle Relations on the Cohen Groups J. Wu Author address: Department of Mathematics, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117543, Republic
More informationDerived Algebraic Geometry I: Stable -Categories
Derived Algebraic Geometry I: Stable -Categories October 8, 2009 Contents 1 Introduction 2 2 Stable -Categories 3 3 The Homotopy Category of a Stable -Category 6 4 Properties of Stable -Categories 12 5
More informationAn introduction to spectra
An introduction to spectra Aaron Mazel-Gee In this talk I ll introduce spectra and show how to reframe a good deal of classical algebraic topology in their language (homology and cohomology, long exact
More informationA CLOSED MODEL CATEGORY FOR (n 1)-CONNECTED SPACES
PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 124, Number 11, November 1996 A CLOSED MODEL CATEGORY FOR (n 1)-CONNECTED SPACES J. IGNACIO EXTREMIANA ALDANA, L. JAVIER HERNÁNDEZ PARICIO, AND M.
More informationOn Eilenberg-MacLanes Spaces (Term paper for Math 272a)
On Eilenberg-MacLanes Spaces (Term paper for Math 272a) Xi Yin Physics Department Harvard University Abstract This paper discusses basic properties of Eilenberg-MacLane spaces K(G, n), their cohomology
More informationCLASS NOTES MATH 527 (SPRING 2011) WEEK 6
CLASS NOTES MATH 527 (SPRING 2011) WEEK 6 BERTRAND GUILLOU 1. Mon, Feb. 21 Note that since we have C() = X A C (A) and the inclusion A C (A) at time 0 is a coibration, it ollows that the pushout map i
More information7. Homotopy and the Fundamental Group
7. Homotopy and the Fundamental Group The group G will be called the fundamental group of the manifold V. J. Henri Poincaré, 895 The properties of a topological space that we have developed so far have
More informationMath 752 Week s 1 1
Math 752 Week 13 1 Homotopy Groups Definition 1. For n 0 and X a topological space with x 0 X, define π n (X) = {f : (I n, I n ) (X, x 0 )}/ where is the usual homotopy of maps. Then we have the following
More informationON ORTHOGONAL PAIRS IN CATEGORIES AND LOCALISATION
ON ORTHOGONAL PAIRS IN CATEGORIES AND LOCALISATION Carles Casacuberta, Georg Peschke and Markus Pfenniger In memory of Frank Adams 0 Introduction Special forms of the following situation are often encountered
More informationOn the slice spectral sequence
msp Algebraic & Geometric Topology 13 (2013) 1743 1755 On the slice spectral sequence JOHN ULLMAN We introduce a variant of the slice spectral sequence which uses only regular slice cells, and state the
More informationHomotopy groups with coefficients
Contemporary Mathematics Homotopy groups with coefficients Joseph A. Neisendorfer Abstract. This paper has two goals. It is an expository paper on homotopy groups with coefficients in an abelian group
More informationGrothendieck duality for affine M 0 -schemes.
Grothendieck duality for affine M 0 -schemes. A. Salch March 2011 Outline Classical Grothendieck duality. M 0 -schemes. Derived categories without an abelian category of modules. Computing Lf and Rf and
More informationDerivatives of the identity functor and operads
University of Oregon Manifolds, K-theory, and Related Topics Dubrovnik, Croatia 23 June 2014 Motivation We are interested in finding examples of categories in which the Goodwillie derivatives of the identity
More informationTHE FUNDAMENTAL GROUP AND CW COMPLEXES
THE FUNDAMENTAL GROUP AND CW COMPLEXES JAE HYUNG SIM Abstract. This paper is a quick introduction to some basic concepts in Algebraic Topology. We start by defining homotopy and delving into the Fundamental
More informationMTH 428/528. Introduction to Topology II. Elements of Algebraic Topology. Bernard Badzioch
MTH 428/528 Introduction to Topology II Elements of Algebraic Topology Bernard Badzioch 2016.12.12 Contents 1. Some Motivation.......................................................... 3 2. Categories
More informationMath Homotopy Theory Spring 2013 Homework 13 Solutions
Math 527 - Homotopy Theory Spring 2013 Homework 13 Solutions Definition. A space weakly equivalent to a product of Eilenberg-MacLane spaces is called a generalized Eilenberg-MacLane space, or GEM for short.
More informationPOSTNIKOV EXTENSIONS OF RING SPECTRA
POSTNIKOV EXTENSIONS OF RING SPECTRA DANIEL DUGGER AND BROOKE SHIPLEY Abstract. We give a functorial construction of k-invariants for ring spectra, and use these to classify extensions in the Postnikov
More informationON THE HOMOTOPY TYPE OF INFINITE STUNTED PROJECTIVE SPACES FREDERICK R. COHEN* AND RAN LEVI
ON THE HOMOTOPY TYPE OF INFINITE STUNTED PROJECTIVE SPACES FREDERICK R. COHEN* AND RAN LEVI 1. introduction Consider the space X n = RP /RP n 1 together with the boundary map in the Barratt-Puppe sequence
More information28 The fundamental groupoid, revisited The Serre spectral sequence The transgression The path-loop fibre sequence 23
Contents 8 The fundamental groupoid, revisited 1 9 The Serre spectral sequence 9 30 The transgression 18 31 The path-loop fibre sequence 3 8 The fundamental groupoid, revisited The path category PX for
More informationSPECTRAL ENRICHMENTS OF MODEL CATEGORIES
SPECTRAL ENRICHMENTS OF MODEL CATEGORIES DANIEL DUGGER Abstract. We prove that every stable, presentable model category can be enriched in a natural way over symmetric spectra. As a consequence of the
More informationThe positive complete model structure and why we need it
The positive complete model structure and why we need it Hood Chatham Alan told us in his talk about what information we can get about the homotopical structure of S G directly. In particular, he built
More informationAlgebraic Models for Homotopy Types III Algebraic Models in p-adic Homotopy Theory
Algebraic Models for Homotopy Types III Algebraic Models in p-adic Homotopy Theory Michael A. Mandell Indiana University Young Topologists Meeting 2013 July 11, 2013 M.A.Mandell (IU) Models in p-adic Homotopy
More informationArchivum Mathematicum
Archivum Mathematicum Lukáš Vokřínek Heaps and unpointed stable homotopy theory Archivum Mathematicum, Vol. 50 (2014), No. 5, 323 332 Persistent URL: http://dml.cz/dmlcz/144074 Terms of use: Masaryk University,
More informationMultiplicative properties of Atiyah duality
Multiplicative properties of Atiyah duality Ralph L. Cohen Stanford University January 8, 2004 Abstract Let M n be a closed, connected n-manifold. Let M denote the Thom spectrum of its stable normal bundle.
More informationLOWER BOUNDS FOR TOPOLOGICAL COMPLEXITY
LOWER BOUNDS FOR TOPOLOGICAL COMPLEXITY ALEKSANDRA FRANC AND PETAR PAVEŠIĆ Abstract. We introduce fibrewise Whitehead- and fibrewise Ganea definitions of topological complexity. We then define several
More informationEssential Category Weight and Phantom Maps
Essential Category Weight and Phantom Maps Jeffrey Strom Wayne State University strom@math.wayne.edu The purpose of this paper is to study the relationship between maps with infinite essential category
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.at] 13 Nov 2007
SMOOTH PARAMETRIZED TORSION A MANIFOLD APPROACH arxiv:0711.1911v1 [math.at] 13 Nov 2007 BERNARD BADZIOCH, WOJCIECH DORABIA LA, AND BRUCE WILLIAMS Abstract. We give a construction of a torsion invariant
More informationThe Hurewicz Theorem
The Hurewicz Theorem April 5, 011 1 Introduction The fundamental group and homology groups both give extremely useful information, particularly about path-connected spaces. Both can be considered as functors,
More informationEquivalent statements of the telescope conjecture
Equivalent statements of the telescope conjecture Martin Frankland April 7, 2011 The purpose of this expository note is to clarify the relationship between various statements of the telescope conjecture.
More informationSpectra and G spectra
September 23, 2015 http://math.harvard.edu/ ecp/latex/talks/intro-to-spectra.pdf Cell structures Definition A cell structure on a pointed space X is an inductive presentation by iteratively attaching n
More informationCombinatorial Models for M (Lecture 10)
Combinatorial Models for M (Lecture 10) September 24, 2014 Let f : X Y be a map of finite nonsingular simplicial sets. In the previous lecture, we showed that the induced map f : X Y is a fibration if
More informationALGEBRAICALLY TRIVIAL, BUT TOPOLOGICALLY NON-TRIVIAL MAP. Contents 1. Introduction 1
ALGEBRAICALLY TRIVIAL, BUT TOPOLOGICALLY NON-TRIVIAL MAP HONG GYUN KIM Abstract. I studied the construction of an algebraically trivial, but topologically non-trivial map by Hopf map p : S 3 S 2 and a
More informationLecture 9: Alexander Duality
Lecture 9: Alexander Duality 2/2/15 Let X be a finite CW complex embedded cellularly into S n, i.e. X S n. Let A S n X be a finite CW complex such that A is homotopy equivalent to S n X. Example 1.1. X
More informationLECTURE 3: EXAMPLES OF GOODWILLIE CALCULUS
LECTURE 3: EXAMPLES OF GOODWILLIE CALCULUS In these notes, we ll (subconsciously) switch between saying -category and category Feel free to generously pour or rip out, whatever you fancy the prefix - throughout
More informationSTABLE FINITENESS PROPERTIES OF INFINITE DISCRETE GROUPS
STABLE FINITENESS PROPERTIES OF INFINITE DISCRETE GROUPS NOÉ BÁRCENAS, DIETER DEGRIJSE AND IRAKLI PATCHKORIA Abstract. Let G be an infinite discrete group. A classifying space for proper actions of G is
More informationA new infinite family in 2 π S by Mark Mahowald (1976)
A new infinite family in 2 π S by Mark Mahowald (1976) Michael Andrews Department of Mathematics MIT November 6, 2013 Abstract On October 31 st 2013 I spoke in the Thursday seminar on Mahowald s η j paper.
More informationMATH 215B HOMEWORK 4 SOLUTIONS
MATH 215B HOMEWORK 4 SOLUTIONS 1. (8 marks) Compute the homology groups of the space X obtained from n by identifying all faces of the same dimension in the following way: [v 0,..., ˆv j,..., v n ] is
More informationA universal space for plus-constructions
A universal space for plus-constructions A. J. Berrick and Carles Casacuberta Abstract We exhibit a two-dimensional, acyclic, Eilenberg Mac Lane space W such that, for every space X, the plus-construction
More informationAlgebraic Topology European Mathematical Society Zürich 2008 Tammo tom Dieck Georg-August-Universität
1 Algebraic Topology European Mathematical Society Zürich 2008 Tammo tom Dieck Georg-August-Universität Corrections for the first printing Page 7 +6: j is already assumed to be an inclusion. But the assertion
More informationA LOOPING DELOOPING ADJUNCTION FOR TOPOLOGICAL SPACES
Homology, Homotopy and Applications, vol. 19(1), 2017, pp.37 57 A LOOPING DELOOPING ADJUNCTION FOR TOPOLOGICAL SPACES MARTINA ROVELLI (communicated by Brooke Shipley) Abstract Every principal G-bundle
More informationFREUDENTHAL SUSPENSION THEOREM
FREUDENTHAL SUSPENSION THEOREM TENGREN ZHANG Abstract. In this paper, I will prove the Freudenthal suspension theorem, and use that to explain what stable homotopy groups are. All the results stated in
More informationHomotopy type theory: a new connection between logic, category theory and topology
Homotopy type theory: a new connection between logic, category theory and topology André Joyal UQÀM Category Theory Seminar, CUNY, October 26, 2018 Classical connections between logic, algebra and topology
More information30 Surfaces and nondegenerate symmetric bilinear forms
80 CHAPTER 3. COHOMOLOGY AND DUALITY This calculation is useful! Corollary 29.4. Let p, q > 0. Any map S p+q S p S q induces the zero map in H p+q ( ). Proof. Let f : S p+q S p S q be such a map. It induces
More information1. Classifying Spaces. Classifying Spaces
Classifying Spaces 1. Classifying Spaces. To make our lives much easier, all topological spaces from now on will be homeomorphic to CW complexes. Fact: All smooth manifolds are homeomorphic to CW complexes.
More informationLECTURE 3: EXAMPLES OF GOODWILLIE CALCULUS
LECTURE 3: EXAMPLES OF GOODWILLIE CALCULUS SANATH DEVALAPURKAR In these notes, we ll (subconsciously) switch between saying -category and category. Feel free to generously pour or rip out, whatever you
More informationLOOP SPACES IN MOTIVIC HOMOTOPY THEORY. A Dissertation MARVIN GLEN DECKER
LOOP SPACES IN MOTIVIC HOMOTOPY THEORY A Dissertation by MARVIN GLEN DECKER Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.sg] 13 Apr 2010
Pre-quantization of the Moduli Space of Flat G-Bundles arxiv:1004.2286v1 [math.sg] 13 Apr 2010 by Derek Krepski A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy
More informationBEN KNUDSEN. Conf k (f) Conf k (Y )
CONFIGURATION SPACES IN ALGEBRAIC TOPOLOGY: LECTURE 2 BEN KNUDSEN We begin our study of configuration spaces by observing a few of their basic properties. First, we note that, if f : X Y is an injective
More informationPostnikov extensions of ring spectra
1785 1829 1785 arxiv version: fonts, pagination and layout may vary from AGT published version Postnikov extensions of ring spectra DANIEL DUGGER BROOKE SHIPLEY We give a functorial construction of k invariants
More informationEQUIVARIANT ALGEBRAIC TOPOLOGY
EQUIVARIANT ALGEBRAIC TOPOLOGY JAY SHAH Abstract. This paper develops the introductory theory of equivariant algebraic topology. We first define G-CW complexes and prove some basic homotopy-theoretic results
More informationTHE HOMOTOPY CALCULUS OF CATEGORIES AND GRAPHS
THE HOMOTOPY CALCULUS OF CATEGORIES AND GRAPHS by DEBORAH A. VICINSKY A DISSERTATION Presented to the Department of Mathematics and the Graduate School of the University of Oregon in partial fulfillment
More informationOVERVIEW OF SPECTRA. Contents
OVERVIEW OF SPECTRA Contents 1. Motivation 1 2. Some recollections about Top 3 3. Spanier Whitehead category 4 4. Properties of the Stable Homotopy Category HoSpectra 5 5. Topics 7 1. Motivation There
More informationMATH730 NOTES WEEK 8
MATH730 NOTES WEEK 8 1. Van Kampen s Theorem The main idea of this section is to compute fundamental groups by decomposing a space X into smaller pieces X = U V where the fundamental groups of U, V, and
More informationBOUSFIELD LOCALIZATION AND ALGEBRAS OVER OPERADS
BOUSFIELD LOCALIZATION AND ALGEBRAS OVER OPERADS DAVID WHITE Thanks for the invitation and thanks to Peter May for all the helpful conversations over the years. More details can be found on my website:
More informationHomology theory. Lecture 29-3/7/2011. Lecture 30-3/8/2011. Lecture 31-3/9/2011 Math 757 Homology theory. March 9, 2011
Math 757 Homology theory March 9, 2011 Theorem 183 Let G = π 1 (X, x 0 ) then for n 1 h : π n (X, x 0 ) H n (X ) factors through the quotient map q : π n (X, x 0 ) π n (X, x 0 ) G to π n (X, x 0 ) G the
More informationUniversität Regensburg Mathematik
Universität Regensburg Mathematik Brown representability in A 1 -homotopy theory Niko Naumann and Markus Spitzweck Preprint Nr. 18/2009 Brown representability in A 1 -homotopy theory Niko Naumann and Markus
More informationMODEL CATEGORIES OF DIAGRAM SPECTRA
MODEL CATEGORIES OF DIAGRAM SPECTRA M. A. MANDELL, J. P. MAY, S. SCHWEDE, AND B. SHIPLEY Abstract. Working in the category T of based spaces, we give the basic theory of diagram spaces and diagram spectra.
More informationHomotopy Colimits of Relative Categories (Preliminary Version)
Homotopy Colimits of Relative Categories (Preliminary Version) Lennart Meier October 28, 2014 Grothendieck constructions of model categories have recently received some attention as in [HP14]. We will
More informationWILLIAM RICHTER. (Communicated by Brooke Shipley)
PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 00, Number 0, Pages 000 000 S 0002-9939(XX)0000-0 A CONJECTURE OF GRAY AND THE p-th POWER MAP ON Ω 2 S 2np+1 WILLIAM RICHTER (Communicated by Brooke
More informationSymmetric Spectra and Topological Hochschild Homology
K-Theory 19: 155 183, 2000. c 2000 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. 155 Symmetric Spectra and Topological Hochschild Homology BROOKE SHIPLEY Department of Mathematics, Purdue University,
More informationMathematical Journal of Okayama University
Mathematical Journal of Okayama University Volume 44, Issue 1 2002 Article 1 JANUARY 2002 On the Group π(σa B,X) Seiya Sasao Tokyo Institute of Technology Copyright c 2002 by the authors. Mathematical
More informationSECTION 5: EILENBERG ZILBER EQUIVALENCES AND THE KÜNNETH THEOREMS
SECTION 5: EILENBERG ZILBER EQUIVALENCES AND THE KÜNNETH THEOREMS In this section we will prove the Künneth theorem which in principle allows us to calculate the (co)homology of product spaces as soon
More informationStabilization as a CW approximation
Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra 140 (1999) 23 32 Stabilization as a CW approximation A.D. Elmendorf Department of Mathematics, Purdue University Calumet, Hammond, IN 46323, USA Communicated by E.M.
More informationCellularity, composition, and morphisms of algebraic weak factorization systems
Cellularity, composition, and morphisms of algebraic weak factorization systems Emily Riehl University of Chicago http://www.math.uchicago.edu/~eriehl 19 July, 2011 International Category Theory Conference
More informationStable Homotopy Theory A gateway to modern mathematics.
Stable Homotopy Theory A gateway to modern mathematics. Sunil Chebolu Department of Mathematics University of Western Ontario http://www.math.uwo.ca/ schebolu 1 Plan of the talk 1. Introduction to stable
More information