Nuclear Forces / DFT for Nuclei III
|
|
- Nicholas Willis
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Nuclear Forces / DFT for Nuclei III Department of Physics Ohio State University August, 2008 I. Overview of EFT/RG. II. Chiral effective field theory. III. RG for nuclear forces. EFT for many-body systems. IV. EFT/DFT for dilute Fermi systems. V. Ab initio nuclear DFT.
2 Outline RG Dilute Renormalization Group for Nuclear Forces EFT for Dilute Fermi Systems
3 Outline RG Dilute Coupling Flow Decoupling V low k vs. SRG 3-Body Renormalization Group for Nuclear Forces EFT for Dilute Fermi Systems
4 Sources of Nonperturbative Physics for NN 1 Strong short-range repulsion ( hard core or singular V 2π ) 2 Iterated tensor (S 12 ) interaction 3 Near zero-energy bound states
5 Sources of Nonperturbative Physics for NN 1 Strong short-range repulsion ( hard core or singular V 2π ) 2 Iterated tensor (S 12 ) interaction 3 Near zero-energy bound states
6 Why Did Our Low-Pass Filter Fail? Basic problem: low k and high k are coupled E.g., perturbation theory for (tangent of) phase shift: k V k + k k V k k V k (k 2 k 2 )/m + Solution: Unitary transformation of the H matrix = decouple! E n = Ψ n H Ψ n = ( Ψ n U )UHU (U Ψ n ) = Ψ n H Ψ n Various methods: V low k, SRG, UCOM, phase shift (degrees) AV18 E lab (MeV) 1 S0 AV18 [k max = 2.2 fm -1 ]
7 Computational Aside: Digital Potentials Although momentum is continuous in principle, in practice represented as discrete (gaussian quadrature) grid: = Calculations become just matrix multiplications! E.g., k V k + k k V k k V k (k 2 k 2 )/m + = V ii+ j V ij V ji 1 (k 2 i k 2 j )/m Resolution is sufficient for many significant figures
8 Flow Equations in Action: NN Only In each partial wave with ɛ k = 2 k 2 /M and λ 2 = 1/ s dv λ dλ (k, k ) (ɛ k ɛ k ) 2 V λ (k, k ) + q (ɛ k + ɛ k 2ɛ q )V λ (k, q)v λ (q, k )
9 Flow Equations in Action: NN Only In each partial wave with ɛ k = 2 k 2 /M and λ 2 = 1/ s dv λ dλ (k, k ) (ɛ k ɛ k ) 2 V λ (k, k ) + q (ɛ k + ɛ k 2ɛ q )V λ (k, q)v λ (q, k )
10 Flow Equations in Action: NN Only In each partial wave with ɛ k = 2 k 2 /M and λ 2 = 1/ s dv λ dλ (k, k ) (ɛ k ɛ k ) 2 V λ (k, k ) + q (ɛ k + ɛ k 2ɛ q )V λ (k, q)v λ (q, k )
11 Flow Equations in Action: NN Only In each partial wave with ɛ k = 2 k 2 /M and λ 2 = 1/ s dv λ dλ (k, k ) (ɛ k ɛ k ) 2 V λ (k, k ) + q (ɛ k + ɛ k 2ɛ q )V λ (k, q)v λ (q, k )
12 Flow Equations in Action: NN Only In each partial wave with ɛ k = 2 k 2 /M and λ 2 = 1/ s dv λ dλ (k, k ) (ɛ k ɛ k ) 2 V λ (k, k ) + q (ɛ k + ɛ k 2ɛ q )V λ (k, q)v λ (q, k )
13 Flow Equations in Action: NN Only In each partial wave with ɛ k = 2 k 2 /M and λ 2 = 1/ s dv λ dλ (k, k ) (ɛ k ɛ k ) 2 V λ (k, k ) + q (ɛ k + ɛ k 2ɛ q )V λ (k, q)v λ (q, k )
14 Flow Equations in Action: NN Only In each partial wave with ɛ k = 2 k 2 /M and λ 2 = 1/ s dv λ dλ (k, k ) (ɛ k ɛ k ) 2 V λ (k, k ) + q (ɛ k + ɛ k 2ɛ q )V λ (k, q)v λ (q, k )
15 Flow Equations in Action: NN Only In each partial wave with ɛ k = 2 k 2 /M and λ 2 = 1/ s dv λ dλ (k, k ) (ɛ k ɛ k ) 2 V λ (k, k ) + q (ɛ k + ɛ k 2ɛ q )V λ (k, q)v λ (q, k )
16 Flow Equations in Action: NN Only In each partial wave with ɛ k = 2 k 2 /M and λ 2 = 1/ s dv λ dλ (k, k ) (ɛ k ɛ k ) 2 V λ (k, k ) + q (ɛ k + ɛ k 2ɛ q )V λ (k, q)v λ (q, k )
17 Flow Equations in Action: NN Only In each partial wave with ɛ k = 2 k 2 /M and λ 2 = 1/ s dv λ dλ (k, k ) (ɛ k ɛ k ) 2 V λ (k, k ) + q (ɛ k + ɛ k 2ɛ q )V λ (k, q)v λ (q, k )
18 Flow Equations in Action: NN Only In each partial wave with ɛ k = 2 k 2 /M and λ 2 = 1/ s dv λ dλ (k, k ) (ɛ k ɛ k ) 2 V λ (k, k ) + q (ɛ k + ɛ k 2ɛ q )V λ (k, q)v λ (q, k )
19 Flow Equations in Action: NN Only In each partial wave with ɛ k = 2 k 2 /M and λ 2 = 1/ s dv λ dλ (k, k ) (ɛ k ɛ k ) 2 V λ (k, k ) + q (ɛ k + ɛ k 2ɛ q )V λ (k, q)v λ (q, k )
20 Flow Equations in Action: NN Only In each partial wave with ɛ k = 2 k 2 /M and λ 2 = 1/ s dv λ dλ (k, k ) (ɛ k ɛ k ) 2 V λ (k, k ) + q (ɛ k + ɛ k 2ɛ q )V λ (k, q)v λ (q, k )
21 Flow Equations in Action: NN Only In each partial wave with ɛ k = 2 k 2 /M and λ 2 = 1/ s dv λ dλ (k, k ) (ɛ k ɛ k ) 2 V λ (k, k ) + q (ɛ k + ɛ k 2ɛ q )V λ (k, q)v λ (q, k )
22 Unitary Transformation: Bare vs. SRG phase shifts 0 δ [deg] S0 1 3 P1 P0 bare ps vsrg ps δ [deg] P1 F3 G E lab [MeV] E lab [MeV] E lab [MeV]
23 Low-Pass Filters Work! phase shift [deg] RG Dilute Coupling Flow Decoupling V low k vs. SRG 3-Body [nucl-th/ ] Phase shifts with V s (k, k ) = 0 for k, k > k max S0 3 S P0 3 F E lab [MeV] D AV18 AV18 [k max = 2.2 fm -1 ] V s [k max = 2.2 fm -1 ]
24 Consequences of a Repulsive Core Revisited S1 deuteron probability density 0.3 uncorrelated correlated 300 ψ(r) 2 [fm 3 ] Argonne v 18 ψ(r) 2 [fm 3 ] V(r) [MeV] r [fm] r [fm] Probability at short separations suppressed = correlations Greatly complicates expansion of many-body wave functions Short-distance structure high-momentum components 100
25 Consequences of a Repulsive Core Revisited S1 deuteron probability density 0.3 uncorrelated correlated 300 ψ(r) 2 [fm -3 ] Argonne v 18 λ = 4.0 fm -1 λ = 3.0 fm -1 λ = 2.0 fm -1 ψ(r) 2 [fm 3 ] V(r) [MeV] r [fm] r [fm] Transformed potential = no short-range correlations in wf Potential is now non-local: V (r)ψ(r) d 3 r V (r, r )ψ(r ) Not a problem for many-body methods using ho matrix elements 100
26 Variational Calculations Converge Rapidly Absolute error vs. λ of the predicted deuteron binding energy from a variational calculation in a fixed-size basis of harmonic oscillators (N max ω excitations) 10 0 N 3 LO [550/600] E d - E var [MeV] N max = 6 N max = 10 N max = λ [fm 1 ]
27 bare r d [fm] Long-Distance Physics Preserved Matrix elements dominated by long range run slowly for λ 2 fm 1 Here: examples from deuteron (compressed scales) N 3 LO (550/600 MeV) V srg Deuteron rms radius λ [fm 1 ] bare Q d [fm 2 ] bare <1/r> expt. Deuteron quadrupole N 3 LO (550/600 MeV) V srg λ [fm 1 ] Deuteron <1/r> N 3 LO (550/600 MeV) V srg λ [fm 1 ]
28 Compare to Usual RG Transformation [AV18 3 S 1 ] Conventional RG = Lower a cutoff Λ in relative k, k SRG = Drive the Hamiltonian toward diagonal [λ 1/s 1/4 ] Both transformations decouple high and low momenta
29 Flow Equations and the SRG: History In the early 1970 s, Ken Wilson and Franz Wegner = critical phenomena and renormalization group (RG) Twenty years later, Wilson and Wegner innovate again Unitary RG flow to make many-particle Hamiltonians increasingly energy diagonal Glazek and Wilson, Renormalization of Hamiltonians (1993) = SRG for QCD on the light front Wegner, Flow Equations for Hamiltonians (1994) = condensed matter problems S. Kehrein, Flow-Equation Approach to Many-Particle Systems Dissipative quantum systems to correlated electron physics to non-equilibrium problems to... Particularly well suited for low-energy nuclear physics! Only applied since one year ago [nucl-th/ ] See ntg/srg/
30 Band Diagonalizing with SRG RG Dilute Coupling Flow Decoupling V low k vs. SRG 3-Body Transform an initial hamiltonian, H = T + V: H s = U(s)HU (s) T + V s, [nucl-th/ ] where s is the flow parameter. Differentiating wrt s: dh s ds = [η(s), H s] with η(s) du(s) ds U (s) = η (s). η(s) is specified by the commutator with T diagonal = T D : which yields the flow equation, η(s) = [T D, H s ], dh s ds = dv s ds = [[T D, H s ], H s ]. T D determines flow: T D = T or T 2 or H D ( T + (V s ) D ) or...
31 MATLAB Code for SRG is Easy to Play With! % V_s is a vector of the current potential; convert to square matrix V_s_matrix = reshape(v_s, tot_pts, tot_pts); H_s_matrix = T_matrix + V_s_matrix; % form the Hamiltontian % Matrix for the right side of the SRG differential equation if (strcmp(evolution, T )) rhs_matrix = my_commutator( my_commutator(t_matrix, H_s_matrix),... H_s_matrix ); elseif (strcmp(evolution, Wegner )) rhs_matrix = my_commutator( my_commutator(diag(diag(h_s_matrix)),... H_s_matrix), H_s_matrix ); elseif ( strcmp(evolution, sharp_bd ) strcmp(evolution, smooth_bd )... strcmp(evolution, weird_bd ) ) % P_matrix is a matrix that builds the block diagonal constraint % or the matrix made from the f regulator. rhs_matrix = my_commutator(... my_commutator(p_matrix.* H_s_matrix.* P_matrix +... (1-P_matrix).* H_s_matrix.* (1-P_matrix ),... H_s_matrix), H_s_matrix );
32 Flow in NN Momentum Basis with η(s) = [T, H s ] For NN only, project onto partial-wave rel. momentum k dv s ds = [[T rel, V s ], H s ] with ɛ k = 2 k 2 /M and λ 2 = 1/ s dv λ dλ (k, k ) (ɛ k ɛ k ) 2 V λ (k, k )+ q (ɛ k + ɛ k 2ɛ q )V λ (k, q)v λ (q, k ) V λ=2.5 (k, k ) 1st term 2nd term V λ=2.0 (k, k ) First term drives V λ toward diagonal: V λ (k, k ) = V λ= (k, k ) e [(ɛ k ɛ k )/λ 2 ] 2 +
33 Flow of N 3 LO Chiral EFT Potentials 1 S 0 from N 3 LO (500 MeV) of Entem/Machleidt 1 S 0 from N 3 LO (550/600 MeV) of Epelbaum et al. See ntg/srg/ for more!
34 Flow of N 3 LO Potentials RG Dilute Coupling Flow Decoupling V low k vs. SRG 3-Body 3 S 1 from N 3 LO (500 MeV) of Entem/Machleidt 3 S 1 from N 3 LO (550/600 MeV) of Epelbaum et al. See srg/ for more!
35 Run to Lower λ via SRG = Universality λ = 5.0 fm 1 1 S0 Diagonal V λ (k, k) Off-Diagonal V λ (k, 0) λ = 5.0 fm 1 1 S0 V λ (k,k) [fm] /600 [E/G/M] 600/700 [E/G/M] 500 [E/M] 600 [E/M] k [fm 1 ] V λ (k,0) [fm] /600 [E/G/M] 600/700 [E/G/M] 500 [E/M] 600 [E/M] k [fm 1 ]
36 Run to Lower λ via SRG = Universality λ = 4.0 fm 1 1 S0 Diagonal V λ (k, k) Off-Diagonal V λ (k, 0) λ = 4.0 fm 1 1 S0 V λ (k,k) [fm] /600 [E/G/M] 600/700 [E/G/M] 500 [E/M] 600 [E/M] k [fm 1 ] V λ (k,0) [fm] /600 [E/G/M] 600/700 [E/G/M] 500 [E/M] 600 [E/M] k [fm 1 ]
37 Run to Lower λ via SRG = Universality λ = 3.0 fm 1 1 S0 Diagonal V λ (k, k) Off-Diagonal V λ (k, 0) λ = 3.0 fm 1 1 S0 V λ (k,k) [fm] /600 [E/G/M] 600/700 [E/G/M] 500 [E/M] 600 [E/M] k [fm 1 ] V λ (k,0) [fm] /600 [E/G/M] 600/700 [E/G/M] 500 [E/M] 600 [E/M] k [fm 1 ]
38 Run to Lower λ via SRG = Universality λ = 2.5 fm 1 1 S0 Diagonal V λ (k, k) Off-Diagonal V λ (k, 0) λ = 2.5 fm 1 1 S0 V λ (k,k) [fm] /600 [E/G/M] 600/700 [E/G/M] 500 [E/M] 600 [E/M] k [fm 1 ] V λ (k,0) [fm] /600 [E/G/M] 600/700 [E/G/M] 500 [E/M] 600 [E/M] k [fm 1 ]
39 Run to Lower λ via SRG = Universality λ = 2.0 fm 1 1 S0 Diagonal V λ (k, k) Off-Diagonal V λ (k, 0) λ = 2.0 fm 1 1 S0 V λ (k,k) [fm] /600 [E/G/M] 600/700 [E/G/M] 500 [E/M] 600 [E/M] k [fm 1 ] V λ (k,0) [fm] /600 [E/G/M] 600/700 [E/G/M] 500 [E/M] 600 [E/M] k [fm 1 ]
40 Run to Lower λ via SRG = Universality λ = 1.5 fm 1 1 S0 Diagonal V λ (k, k) Off-Diagonal V λ (k, 0) λ = 1.5 fm 1 1 S0 V λ (k,k) [fm] /600 [E/G/M] 600/700 [E/G/M] 500 [E/M] 600 [E/M] k [fm 1 ] V λ (k,0) [fm] /600 [E/G/M] 600/700 [E/G/M] 500 [E/M] 600 [E/M] k [fm 1 ]
41 Low-Momentum Interactions from RG [AV18 3 S 1 ] V low k = Lower a cutoff Λ in relative k, k [sharp] SRG = Drive the Hamiltonian toward diagonal [λ 1/s 1/4 ] Other transformations also decouple (e.g., UCOM) Isn t chiral EFT already soft? Or why not use a lower cutoff? [e.g., E/G/M: 450 MeV, E/M: N3LOW (400 MeV)]
42 Low-Momentum Interactions from RG [AV18 3 S 1 ] V low k = Lower a cutoff Λ in relative k, k [e (k 2 /Λ 2 ) 8 ] SRG = Drive the Hamiltonian toward diagonal [λ 1/s 1/4 ] Other transformations also decouple (e.g., UCOM) Isn t chiral EFT already soft? Or why not use a lower cutoff? [e.g., E/G/M: 450 MeV, E/M: N3LOW (400 MeV)]
43 Low-Momentum Interactions from RG [AV18 3 S 1 ] V low k = Lower a cutoff Λ in k, k [e (k 2 /Λ 2 ) 4 ] SRG = Drive the Hamiltonian toward diagonal [λ 1/s 1/4 ] Other transformations also decouple (e.g., UCOM) Isn t chiral EFT already soft? Or why not use a lower cutoff? [e.g., E/G/M: 450 MeV, E/M: N3LOW (400 MeV)]
44 Lower Cutoff via RG = Universality T Bogner, Kuo, Schwenk k +k k +k k +k = V Λ k +k T + q Λ V Λ Require dt dλ = 0 = RG equation for V Λ Integrated = Lee-Suzuki Run cutoff to Λ 2 fm 1 Same long distance physics = coalesce to V low k V low k (k,k) [fm] [nucl-th/ ] Λ = 3.0 fm 1 1 S /500 [E/G/M] 550/600 [E/G/M] /700 [E/G/M] 500 [E/M] 600 [E/M] k/λ
45 Lower Cutoff via RG = Universality T Bogner, Kuo, Schwenk k +k k +k k +k = V Λ k +k T + q Λ V Λ Require dt dλ = 0 = RG equation for V Λ Integrated = Lee-Suzuki Run cutoff to Λ 2 fm 1 Same long distance physics = coalesce to V low k V low k (k,k) [fm] [nucl-th/ ] Λ = 2.5 fm 1 1 S /500 [E/G/M] 550/600 [E/G/M] /700 [E/G/M] 500 [E/M] 600 [E/M] k/λ
46 Lower Cutoff via RG = Universality T Bogner, Kuo, Schwenk k +k k +k k +k = V Λ k +k T + q Λ V Λ Require dt dλ = 0 = RG equation for V Λ Integrated = Lee-Suzuki Run cutoff to Λ 2 fm 1 Same long distance physics = coalesce to V low k V low k (k,k) [fm] [nucl-th/ ] Λ = 2.0 fm 1 1 S /500 [E/G/M] 550/600 [E/G/M] /700 [E/G/M] 500 [E/M] 600 [E/M] k/λ
47 Lower Cutoff via RG = Universality T Bogner, Kuo, Schwenk k +k k +k k +k = V Λ k +k T + q Λ V Λ Require dt dλ = 0 = RG equation for V Λ Integrated = Lee-Suzuki Run cutoff to Λ 2 fm 1 Same long distance physics = coalesce to V low k V low k (k,k) [fm] [nucl-th/ ] Λ = 1.5 fm 1 1 S /500 [E/G/M] 550/600 [E/G/M] /700 [E/G/M] 500 [E/M] 600 [E/M] k/λ
48 Block Diagonalization Via SRG [arxiv: ] Can we get a Λ = 2 fm 1 V low k -like potential with SRG? ( Yes! Use dhs ds = [[G PHs P 0 s, H s ], H s ] with G s = 0 QH s Q )
49 Block Diagonalization Via SRG [arxiv: ] Can we get a Λ = 2 fm 1 V low k -like potential with SRG? ( Yes! Use dhs ds = [[G PHs P 0 s, H s ], H s ] with G s = 0 QH s Q )
50 Block Diagonalization Via SRG [arxiv: ] Can we get a Λ = 2 fm 1 V low k -like potential with SRG? ( Yes! Use dhs ds = [[G PHs P 0 s, H s ], H s ] with G s = 0 QH s Q )
51 Block Diagonalization Via SRG [arxiv: ] Can we get a Λ = 2 fm 1 V low k -like potential with SRG? ( Yes! Use dhs ds = [[G PHs P 0 s, H s ], H s ] with G s = 0 QH s Q )
52 Block Diagonalization Via SRG [arxiv: ] Can we get a Λ = 2 fm 1 V low k -like potential with SRG? ( Yes! Use dhs ds = [[G PHs P 0 s, H s ], H s ] with G s = 0 QH s Q )
53 Block Diagonalization Via SRG [arxiv: ] Can we get a Λ = 2 fm 1 V low k -like potential with SRG? ( Yes! Use dhs ds = [[G PHs P 0 s, H s ], H s ] with G s = 0 QH s Q )
54 Block Diagonalization Via SRG [arxiv: ] Can we get a Λ = 2 fm 1 V low k -like potential with SRG? ( Yes! Use dhs ds = [[G PHs P 0 s, H s ], H s ] with G s = 0 QH s Q )
55 Block Diagonalization Via SRG [arxiv: ] Can we get a Λ = 2 fm 1 V low k -like potential with SRG? ( Yes! Use dhs ds = [[G PHs P 0 s, H s ], H s ] with G s = 0 QH s Q )
56 Block Diagonalization Via SRG [arxiv: ] Can we get a Λ = 2 fm 1 V low k -like potential with SRG? ( Yes! Use dhs ds = [[G PHs P 0 s, H s ], H s ] with G s = 0 QH s Q )
57 Block Diagonalization Via SRG [arxiv: ] Can we get a Λ = 2 fm 1 V low k -like potential with SRG? ( Yes! Use dhs ds = [[G PHs P 0 s, H s ], H s ] with G s = 0 QH s Q )
58 Block Diagonalization Via SRG [arxiv: ] Can we get a Λ = 2 fm 1 V low k -like potential with SRG? ( Yes! Use dhs ds = [[G PHs P 0 s, H s ], H s ] with G s = 0 QH s Q )
59 Compare SRG Block Diagonal and V low k Decoupling means that they are functionally equivalent Can we directly relate Lee-Suzuki V low k and this SRG? Can we use this SRG to evolve in the 3N system?
60 Compare SRG Block Diagonal and V low k Decoupling means that they are functionally equivalent Can we directly relate Lee-Suzuki V low k and this SRG? Can we use this SRG to evolve in the 3N system?
61 Weinberg Eigenvalue Analysis of Convergence Born Series: T (E) = V + V 1 E H 0 V + V 1 E H 0 V 1 E H 0 V + For fixed E, find (complex) eigenvalues η ν (E) [Weinberg] 1 E H 0 V Γ ν = η ν Γ ν = T (E) Γ ν = V Γ ν (1 + η ν + η 2 ν + ) = T diverges if any η ν (E) 1 [nucl-th/ ] Im η Im η 1 S0 3 S1 3 D Re η Re η AV18 CD-Bonn N 3 LO (500 MeV) 1 2 AV18 CD-Bonn N 3 LO
62 Lowering the Cutoff Increases Perturbativeness Weinberg eigenvalue analysis (repulsive) [nucl-th/ ] Im η 1 S S Re η Λ = 10 fm -1 Λ = 7 fm -1 Λ = 5 fm -1 Λ = 4 fm -1 Λ = 3 fm -1 Λ = 2 fm -1 N 3 LO η ν (E=0) Argonne v 18 N 2 LO-550/600 [19] N 3 LO-550/600 [14] N 3 LO [13] Λ (fm -1 )
63 Lowering the Cutoff Increases Perturbativeness Weinberg eigenvalue analysis (repulsive) [nucl-th/ ] Im η 3 S1 3 D S1 3 D Re η Λ = 10 fm -1 Λ = 7 fm -1 Λ = 5 fm -1 Λ = 4 fm -1 Λ = 3 fm -1 Λ = 2 fm -1 N 3 LO η ν (E=0) Argonne v 18 N 2 LO-550/600 N 3 LO-550/600 N 3 LO [Entem] Λ (fm -1 )
64 Lowering the Cutoff Increases Perturbativeness Weinberg eigenvalue analysis (η ν at 2.22 MeV vs. density) 1 3 S1 with Pauli blocking η ν (B d ) Λ = 4.0 fm -1 Λ = 3.0 fm -1 Λ = 2.0 fm k F [fm -1 ] Pauli blocking in nuclear matter increases it even more! at Fermi surface, pairing revealed by η ν > 1
65 Variational Calculations in Three-Nucleon Systems Triton ground-state energy vs. size of harmonic oscillator basis (N max ω excitations) Rapid convergence as λ decreases See arxiv: for more examples Different binding energies = 3-body contribution E t [MeV] MeV N max initial λ = 4 fm 1 λ = 3 fm 1 λ = 2 fm 1 λ = 1 fm 1 550/600 MeV N max
66 Flow Equations Lead to Many-Body Forces Schematically: dv s [[ ds = a a, ] a } a {{ aa }, ] a } a {{ aa } = + a } a {{ a aaa } + 2-body 2-body 3-body! so there will be A-body forces generated (!). Is this a problem? Normal ordering and truncation may be sufficient Ok if induced many-body forces are same size as natural ones Nuclear 3-body forces already needed in unevolved potential Natural hierarchy from chiral EFT = stop flow equations if unnatural Many-body methods must deal with them!
67 Observations on Three-Body Forces Three-body forces arise from eliminating dof s excited states of nucleon relativistic effects high-momentum intermediate states Omitting 3-body forces leads to model dependence observables depend on λ e.g., Tjon line 3-body contributions increase with density saturates nuclear matter E b ( 4 He) [MeV] how large is 4-body? E b ( 3 H) [MeV] A=3,4 binding energies SRG NN only, λ in fm 1 λ=1.0 N 3 LO λ=1.25 λ=1.75 λ=1.5 λ=2.0 λ=2.25 Expt. λ=2.5 λ=3.0 NN potentials SRG N 3 LO (500 MeV)
68 Observations on Three-Body Forces Three-body forces arise from eliminating dof s excited states of nucleon relativistic effects high-momentum intermediate states Omitting 3-body forces leads to model dependence observables depend on λ e.g., Tjon line 3-body contributions increase with density saturates nuclear matter E gs [MeV] Li N 3 SRG NCSM LO (500 MeV) how large is 4-body? λ [fm 1 ]
69 Diagrams for SRG = Three-body Decouples V (2) s = [T, V (2) s ] = [[T, V (2) s ], T ] = V (3) s = [T, V (3) s ] = [[T, V (3) s ], T ] = dv s (2) (a, b) = a b + a c b a c b ds (ɛ a ɛ b ) 2 V (2) s (a, b) c [(ɛ a ɛ c ) (ɛ c ɛ b )] V (2) s (a, c) V (2) s (c, b) dv (3) s ds =
70 1D Laboratory for SRG Few-Body Physics E. Jurgenson et al. [OSU] Use a simple sum-of-gaussians potential, e.g., V (x) = 34 e (x/0.2)2 8.5 e (x/0.8)2 SRG results in two-particle system qualitatively like NN: ψ(x) λ = infinity V(x) x Bound-state energies: 0.92 (A Nuclear = Forces/DFT 2), 2.57 (A = 3),...
71 1D Laboratory for SRG Few-Body Physics E. Jurgenson et al. [OSU] Use a simple sum-of-gaussians potential, e.g., V (x) = 34 e (x/0.2)2 8.5 e (x/0.8)2 SRG results in two-particle system qualitatively like NN: ψ(x) λ = infinity λ = V(x) x Bound-state energies: 0.92 (A Nuclear = Forces/DFT 2), 2.57 (A = 3),...
72 1D Laboratory for SRG Few-Body Physics E. Jurgenson et al. [OSU] Use a simple sum-of-gaussians potential, e.g., V (x) = 34 e (x/0.2)2 8.5 e (x/0.8)2 SRG results in two-particle system qualitatively like NN: ψ(x) λ = infinity λ = 5 λ = V(x) x Bound-state energies: 0.92 (A Nuclear = Forces/DFT 2), 2.57 (A = 3),...
73 1D Laboratory for SRG Few-Body Physics E. Jurgenson et al. [OSU] Use a simple sum-of-gaussians potential, e.g., V (x) = 34 e (x/0.2)2 8.5 e (x/0.8)2 SRG results in two-particle system qualitatively like NN: ψ(x) λ = infinity λ = 5 λ = 3 λ = V(x) x Bound-state energies: 0.92 (A Nuclear = Forces/DFT 2), 2.57 (A = 3),...
74 1D SRG Evolution with T rel in a Jacobi HO Basis Rather than evolving in momentum space use recursive symmetrization formalism developed for NCSM directly obtain SRG matrix elements in HO basis separate 3-body evolution not needed Compare A = 3 2-body only to full body evolution: A = 3 bosons SRG running in h.o. basis A = 3 bosons N max = 40 Ground-State Energy Binding Energy body only λ = infinity λ = 4 λ = body only λ N max cut
75 1D SRG Evolution with T rel in a Jacobi HO Basis Rather than evolving in momentum space use recursive symmetrization formalism developed for NCSM directly obtain SRG matrix elements in HO basis separate 3-body evolution not needed Compare A = 3 2-body only to full body evolution: A = 3 bosons SRG running in h.o. basis A = 3 bosons N max = 40 Ground-State Energy Binding Energy body λ = infinity λ = 4 λ = body only body λ N max cut
76 1D SRG Evolution with T rel in a Jacobi HO Basis A 4 follows by embedding A 1 in A (Navratil et al.) Compare A = 4 2-body only to full body evolution 4.5 Ground-State Energy A = 4 bosons SRG running in h.o. basis 2-body only λ
77 1D SRG Evolution with T rel in a Jacobi HO Basis A 4 follows by embedding A 1 in A (Navratil et al.) Compare A = 4 2-body only to full body evolution 4.5 Ground-State Energy A = 4 bosons SRG running in h.o. basis 2-body only body λ
78 1D SRG Evolution with T rel in a Jacobi HO Basis A 4 follows by embedding A 1 in A (Navratil et al.) Compare A = 4 2-body only to full body evolution Now extract 3NF from A = 3 and look at body only 4.5 Ground-State Energy A = 4 bosons SRG running in h.o. basis 2-body only body body only λ Year 2 3: other generators/schemes, scaling analysis, 3D
79 What are the measurable quantities? True observables do not change under field redefinitions or unitary transformations in low-energy effective theories Examples: cross sections and conserved quantities like charge Many useful quantities are extracted from measurements via a convolution (e.g., using some type of factorization) But these will vary with the convention used E.g., parton distributions Conventions are renormalization prescriptions, cutoffs,... Different potentials reflect different conventions The convention for the long-range part of NN N potentials is agreed to be (local) pion exchange, but differs widely for the short-range part. (Note: V low k preserves long-distance part.)
80 Quantities that vary with convention = not observables deuteron D-state probability [e.g., Friar, PRC 20 (1979)] off-shell effects [Fearing/Scherer] occupation numbers [Hammer/rjf] wound integrals short-range part of wave functions short-range potentials; e.g., contribution of short-range 3-body forces P D N 3 LO (500 MeV) with e (p2 /Λ 2 ) Binding energy (MeV) E d D-state probability 2.23 Asymptotic D-S ratio Λ (fm -1 ) η d
81 Every Operator Flows RG Dilute Coupling Flow Decoupling V low k vs. SRG 3-Body Evolution with s of any operator O is given by: O s = U(s)OU (s) so O s evolves via do s ds = [[T rel, V s ], O s ] Matrix elements of evolved operators are unchanged 4π [u(q) 2 + w(q) 2 ] [fm 3 ] AV18 V s at λ = 2 fm 1 V s at λ = 1.5 fm 1 V low k at Λ = 2.0 fm 1 CD-Bonn Consider momentum distribution < ψ d a qa q ψ d > at q = 4.5 fm 1 q [fm 1 ]
82 Integrand of < ψ d Ua qa q U ψ d > at q = 4.5 fm 1 Flow of deuteron matrix element integrand is toward low k Simple variational ansatz works well = No fine-tuning Factorization: U(k, q) K (k)q(q) for k λ, q λ
83 Summary: Atomic Nuclei at Low Resolution Strategy: Lower the resolution as much as possible High resolution = high momenta can be painful! ( It hurts when I do this. Then don t do that. ) Correlations in wave functions reduced dramatically Non-local potentials and many-body forces generated
84 Summary: Atomic Nuclei at Low Resolution Strategy: Lower the resolution as much as possible High resolution = high momenta can be painful! ( It hurts when I do this. Then don t do that. ) Correlations in wave functions reduced dramatically Non-local potentials and many-body forces generated Flow equations (SRG) achieve low resolution by decoupling Band (or block) diagonalizing Hamiltonian matrix Unitary transformations: observables don t change! Nuclear case: evolve until few-body forces start to explode
85 Summary: Atomic Nuclei at Low Resolution Strategy: Lower the resolution as much as possible High resolution = high momenta can be painful! ( It hurts when I do this. Then don t do that. ) Correlations in wave functions reduced dramatically Non-local potentials and many-body forces generated Flow equations (SRG) achieve low resolution by decoupling Band (or block) diagonalizing Hamiltonian matrix Unitary transformations: observables don t change! Nuclear case: evolve until few-body forces start to explode Applications to nuclei and beyond Coupled cluster and FCI for nuclei converges much faster MBPT works = constructive nuclear density functional theory Flow equations already applied to QCD and condensed matter Systems of cold atoms?
86 Outline RG Dilute Fermi 3-Body Renormalization Group for Nuclear Forces EFT for Dilute Fermi Systems
87 RG Dilute Fermi 3-Body Simple Many-Body Problem: Hard Spheres Infinite potential at radius R sin(kr+δ) R 0 R r Scattering length a 0 = R Dilute nr 3 1 = k F a 0 1 What is the energy / particle of the uniform system? [nucl-th/ ] DFT: Add a trap ~ 1/ k F
88 RG Dilute Fermi 3-Body At Low Energies: Effective Range Expansion As first shown by Schwinger, k l+1 cot δ l (k) has a power series expansion. For l = 0: k cot δ 0 = 1 a r 0k 2 Pr 3 0 k 4 + defines the scattering length a 0 and the effective range r 0 While r 0 R, the range of the potential, a 0 can be anything if a 0 R, it is called natural a 0 R (unnatural) is particularly interesting = cold atoms The effective range expansion for hard sphere scattering is: k cot( kr) = 1 R Rk 2 + = a 0 = R r 0 = 2R/3 so the low-energy effective theory is natural
89 RG Dilute Fermi 3-Body EFT for Natural Short-Range Interaction A simple, general interaction is a sum of delta functions and derivatives of delta functions. In momentum space, k V eft k = C C 2(k 2 + k 2 ) + C 2 k k + Or, L eft has most general local (contact) interactions: L eft = ψ [ i t + 2 2M ] ψ C 0 2 (ψ ψ) 2 + C 2 [ (ψψ) (ψ 2 ψ) + h.c. ] 16 + C 2 8 (ψ ψ) (ψ ψ) D 0 6 (ψ ψ) Dimensional analysis = C 2i 4π M R2i+1, D 2i 4π M R2i+4
90 RG Dilute Fermi 3-Body Effective Field Theory Ingredients Ref: Hammer, rjf [nucl-th/ ] 1 Use the most general L with low-energy dof s consistent with global and local symmetries of underlying theory L eft = ψ [ ] i t + 2 2M ψ C 0 2 (ψ ψ) 2 D 0 6 (ψ ψ)
91 RG Dilute Fermi 3-Body Effective Field Theory Ingredients Ref: Hammer, rjf [nucl-th/ ] 1 Use the most general L with low-energy dof s consistent with global and local symmetries of underlying theory L eft = ψ [ ] i t + 2 2M ψ C 0 2 (ψ ψ) 2 D 0 6 (ψ ψ) Declaration of regularization and renormalization scheme natural a 0 = dimensional regularization and min. subtraction
92 RG Dilute Fermi 3-Body Effective Field Theory Ingredients Ref: Hammer, rjf [nucl-th/ ] 1 Use the most general L with low-energy dof s consistent with global and local symmetries of underlying theory L eft = ψ [ ] i t + 2 2M ψ C 0 2 (ψ ψ) 2 D 0 6 (ψ ψ) Declaration of regularization and renormalization scheme natural a 0 = dimensional regularization and min. subtraction 3 Well-defined power counting = small expansion parameters use the separation of scales = k F Λ with Λ 1/R = k F a 0, etc. O ( k 6 F) : O ( k 7 F ) : + E = ρ k F 2 [ 3 2M π (k Fa 0 ) + 4 ] 35π 2 (11 2 ln 2)(k Fa 0 ) 2 + cleanly recovers perturbative free-space ERE and in-medium energy density (including logs), plus error estimates
93 RG Dilute Fermi 3-Body Feynman Rules for EFT Vertices L eft = ψ [ i t + 2 2M ] ψ C 0 2 (ψ ψ) 2 + C 2 [ (ψψ) (ψ 2 ψ) + h.c. ] 16 + C 2 8 (ψ ψ) (ψ ψ) D 0 6 (ψ ψ) P/2 + k P/2 + k = P/2 k P/2 k i k k 2 + k 2 V EFT k ic 0 ic 2 2 ic 2 k k = + id 0
94 Renormalization RG Dilute Fermi 3-Body Reproduce f 0 (k) in perturbation theory (Born series): f 0 (k) a 0 ia 2 0k (a 3 0 a2 0r 0 /2)k 2 + O(k 3 a 4 0) Consider the leading potential V (0) EFT (x) = C 0δ(x) or k V (0) eft k = = C 0 Choosing C 0 a 0 gets the first term. Now k VG 0 V k : d 3 q 1 = C 0 M (2π) 3 k 2 q 2 + iɛ C 0! = Linear divergence!
95 Renormalization RG Dilute Fermi 3-Body Reproduce f 0 (k) in perturbation theory (Born series): f 0 (k) a 0 ia 2 0k (a 3 0 a2 0r 0 /2)k 2 + O(k 3 a 4 0) Consider the leading potential V (0) EFT (x) = C 0δ(x) or k V (0) eft k = = C 0 Choosing C 0 a 0 gets the first term. Now k VG 0 V k : = Λc d 3 q (2π) 3 1 k 2 q 2 + iɛ Λ c 2π 2 ik 4π + O(k 2 Λ c ) = If cutoff at Λ c, then can absorb into C 0, but all powers of k 2
96 Renormalization RG Dilute Fermi 3-Body Reproduce f 0 (k) in perturbation theory (Born series): f 0 (k) a 0 ia 2 0k (a 3 0 a2 0r 0 /2)k 2 + O(k 3 a 4 0) Consider the leading potential V (0) EFT (x) = C 0δ(x) or k V (0) eft k = = C 0 Choosing C 0 a 0 gets the first term. Now k VG 0 V k : d D q 1 D 3 = (2π) 3 k 2 q 2 ik + iɛ 4π Dimensional regularization with minimal subtraction = only one power of k!
97 RG Dilute Fermi 3-Body Dim. reg. + minimal subtraction = simple power counting: P/2 + k P/2 + k = + P/2 k P/2 k it (k, cos θ) ic 0 M 4π (C0)2 k O(k 3 ) ( M )2 +i (C 0) 3 k 2 ic 2k 2 ic 4π 2k 2 cos θ Matching in free space: C 0 = 4π M a 0 = 4π M R, C 2 = 4π a0 2r 0 M 2 = 4π M R3 3, Recovers effective range expansion order-by-order with perturbative diagrammatic expansion one power of k per diagram estimate truncation error from dimensional analysis
98 RG Dilute Fermi 3-Body Noninteracting Fermi Sea at T = 0 Put system in a large box (V = L 3 ) with periodic bc s spin-isospin degeneracy ν (e.g., for nuclei, ν = 4) fill momentum states up to Fermi momentum k F k F k F N = ν 1, E = ν k k 2 k 2 2M
99 RG Dilute Fermi 3-Body Noninteracting Fermi Sea at T = 0 Put system in a large box (V = L 3 ) with periodic bc s spin-isospin degeneracy ν (e.g., for nuclei, ν = 4) fill momentum states up to Fermi momentum k F k F k F N = ν 1, E = ν k k 2 k 2 2M Use: F(k) dk i F(k i) k i = i F(k i) 2π L n i = 2π L i F (k i)
100 RG Dilute Fermi 3-Body Noninteracting Fermi Sea at T = 0 Put system in a large box (V = L 3 ) with periodic bc s spin-isospin degeneracy ν (e.g., for nuclei, ν = 4) fill momentum states up to Fermi momentum k F k F k F N = ν 1, E = ν k k 2 k 2 2M Use: F(k) dk i F(k i) k i = i F(k i) 2π L n i = 2π L In 1-D: N = ν L 2π In 3-D: N = ν V (2π) 3 +kf k F dk = νk F π L = ρ = N L = νk F π ; kf d 3 k = νk 3 F 6π 2 V = ρ = N V = νk 3 F 6π 2 ; i F (k i) E L = 1 2 kf 2 3 2M ρ E V = 3 2 kf 2 5 2M ρ
101 RG Dilute Fermi 3-Body Noninteracting Fermi Sea at T = 0 Put system in a large box (V = L 3 ) with periodic bc s spin-isospin degeneracy ν (e.g., for nuclei, ν = 4) fill momentum states up to Fermi momentum k F k F k F N = ν 1, E = ν k k 2 k 2 2M Use: F(k) dk i F(k i) k i = i F(k i) 2π L n i = 2π L In 1-D: N = ν L 2π In 3-D: N = ν V (2π) 3 +kf k F dk = νk F π L = ρ = N L = νk F π ; kf d 3 k = νk 3 F 6π 2 V = ρ = N V = νk 3 F 6π 2 ; i F (k i) E L = 1 2 kf 2 3 2M ρ Volume/particle V /N = 1/ρ 1/k 3 F, so spacing 1/k F E V = 3 2 kf 2 5 2M ρ
102 RG Dilute Fermi 3-Body Energy Density From Summing Over Fermi Sea Leading order V (0) EFT (x) = C 0δ(x) = V (0) EFT (k, k ) = C 0 = E LO = C 0 ν(ν 1) 2 ( kf ) 2 1 a 0 k 6 k F
103 RG Dilute Fermi 3-Body Energy Density From Summing Over Fermi Sea Leading order V (0) EFT (x) = C 0δ(x) = V (0) EFT (k, k ) = C 0 = E LO = C 0 ν(ν 1) 2 ( kf At the next order, we get a linear divergence again: = E NLO k F ) 2 1 a 0 k 6 k d 3 q (2π) 3 C 2 0 k 2 q 2 F
104 RG Dilute Fermi 3-Body Energy Density From Summing Over Fermi Sea Leading order V (0) EFT (x) = C 0δ(x) = V (0) EFT (k, k ) = C 0 = E LO = C 0 ν(ν 1) 2 ( kf At the next order, we get a linear divergence again: = E NLO k F ) 2 1 a 0 k 6 k d 3 q (2π) 3 C 2 0 k 2 q 2 Same renormalization fixes it! Particles holes k F 1 k 2 q 2 = 0 1 k 2 q 2 kf 0 1 D 3 k 2 q 2 kf 0 F 1 k 2 q 2 a2 0k 7 F
105 RG Dilute Fermi 3-Body Feynman Rules for Energy Density at T = 0 T = 0 Energy density E is sum of Hugenholtz diagrams same vertices as free space (same renormalization!) Feynman rules: 1 Each line is assigned conserved k (k 0, k) and [ω k k 2 /2M] ( θ(k kf ) ig 0 ( k) αβ = iδ αβ k 0 ω k + iɛ + θ(k ) F k) k 0 ω k iɛ 2 β α δ γ (δ αγ δ βδ + δ αδ δ βγ ) (if spin-independent) 3 After spin summations, δ αα ν in every closed fermion loop. 4 Integrate d 4 k/(2π) 4 with e ik 00 + for tadpoles 5 Symmetry factor i/(s l max l=2 (l!)k ) counts vertex permutations and equivalent l tuples of lines
106 RG Dilute Fermi 3-Body Power Counting Power counting rules 1 for every propagator (line): M/k 2 F 2 for every loop integration: k 5 F /M 3 for every n body vertex with 2i derivatives: k 2i F /MΛ2i+3n 5 Diagram with V n 2i n body vertices scales as (k F ) β only: β = 5 + n=2 i=0 e.g., O ( k 6 F) : = V 2 0 = 1 (3n + 2i 5)V2i n. = β = 5 + ( ) 1 = 6 = O(k 6 F )
107 RG Dilute Fermi 3-Body Power Counting Power counting rules 1 for every propagator (line): M/k 2 F 2 for every loop integration: k 5 F /M 3 for every n body vertex with 2i derivatives: k 2i F /MΛ2i+3n 5 Diagram with V n 2i n body vertices scales as (k F ) β only: β = 5 + n=2 i=0 (3n + 2i 5)V2i n. e.g., = V 2 0 = 2 = β = 5 + ( ) 2 = 7 = O(k 7 F )
108 RG Dilute Fermi 3-Body T = 0 Energy Density from Hugenholtz Diagrams E V = ρ k F 2 [ 3 2M 5 ]
109 RG Dilute Fermi 3-Body T = 0 Energy Density from Hugenholtz Diagrams E O ( kf 6 ) : V = ρ k F 2 [ (ν 1) 2M 5 3π (k Fa 0 ) ]
110 RG Dilute Fermi 3-Body T = 0 Energy Density from Hugenholtz Diagrams O ( k 6 F) : O ( k 7 F) : + E V = ρ k F 2 [ (ν 1) 2M 5 3π (k Fa 0 ) 4 + (ν 1) 35π 2 (11 2 ln 2)(k Fa 0 ) 2 ]
111 RG Dilute Fermi 3-Body T = 0 Energy Density from Hugenholtz Diagrams O ( k 6 F) : O ( k 7 F) : + E V = ρ k F 2 [ (ν 1) 2M 5 3π (k Fa 0 ) 4 + (ν 1) 35π 2 (11 2 ln 2)(k Fa 0 ) 2 O ( k 8 F) : + ]
112 RG Dilute Fermi 3-Body T = 0 Energy Density from Hugenholtz Diagrams O ( k 6 F) : O ( k 7 F) : + E V = ρ k F 2 [ (ν 1) 2M 5 3π (k Fa 0 ) 4 + (ν 1) 35π 2 (11 2 ln 2)(k Fa 0 ) 2 O ( k 8 F) : + + (ν 1) ( (ν 3) ) (k F a 0 ) ]
113 RG Dilute Fermi 3-Body T = 0 Energy Density from Hugenholtz Diagrams O ( k 6 F) : O ( k 7 F) : + E V = ρ k F 2 [ (ν 1) 2M 5 3π (k Fa 0 ) 4 + (ν 1) 35π 2 (11 2 ln 2)(k Fa 0 ) 2 O ( k 8 F) : (ν 1) ( (ν 3) ) (k F a 0 ) 3 + (ν 1) 1 10π (k Fr 0 )(k F a 0 ) 2 + (ν + 1) 1 5π (k Fa p ) 3 + ]
114 RG Dilute Fermi 3-Body Looks Like a Power Series in k F! Is it?
115 RG Dilute Fermi 3-Body Looks Like a Power Series in k F! Is it? New logarithmic divergences in 3 3 scattering + (C 0 ) 4 ln(k/λ c )
116 RG Dilute Fermi 3-Body Looks Like a Power Series in k F! Is it? New logarithmic divergences in 3 3 scattering + (C 0 ) 4 ln(k/λ c ) Changes in Λ c must be absorbed by 3-body coupling D 0 (Λ c ) = D 0 (Λ c ) (C 0 ) 4 ln(a 0 Λ c ) + const. [Braaten & Nieto] [ ] d = 0 = fixes coefficient! dλ c
117 RG Dilute Fermi 3-Body Looks Like a Power Series in k F! Is it? New logarithmic divergences in 3 3 scattering + (C 0 ) 4 ln(k/λ c ) Changes in Λ c must be absorbed by 3-body coupling D 0 (Λ c ) = D 0 (Λ c ) (C 0 ) 4 ln(a 0 Λ c ) + const. [Braaten & Nieto] [ ] d = 0 = fixes coefficient! dλ c What does this imply for the energy density? O ( k 9 F ln(k F ) ) : + + (ν 2)(ν 1) (k Fa 0 ) 4 ln(k F a 0 )
118 RG Dilute Fermi 3-Body Summary: Dilute Fermi System with Natural a 0 The many-body energy density is perturbative in k F a 0 efficiently reproduced by the EFT approach Power counting = error estimate from omitted diagrams Three-body forces are inevitable in a low-energy effective theory and not unique = they depend on the two-body potential The case of a natural scattering length is under control for a uniform system What about a finite # of fermions in a trap? (Lecture IV) What if the scattering length is not natural?
Applications of Renormalization Group Methods in Nuclear Physics 2
Applications of Renormalization Group Methods in Nuclear Physics 2 Dick Furnstahl Department of Physics Ohio State University HUGS 2014 Outline: Lecture 2 Lecture 2: SRG in practice Recap from lecture
More informationSimilarity RG and Many-Body Operators
Similarity RG and Many-Body Operators Department of Physics Ohio State University February, 2010 Collaborators: E. Anderson, S. Bogner, S. Glazek, E. Jurgenson, P. Navratil, R. Perry, L. Platter, A. Schwenk,
More informationRenormalization group methods in nuclear few- and many-body problems
Renormalization group methods in nuclear few- and many-body problems Lecture 1 S.K. Bogner (NSCL/MSU) 2011 National Nuclear Physics Summer School University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Useful readings
More informationRenormalization group methods in nuclear few- and many-body problems
Renormalization group methods in nuclear few- and many-body problems Lecture 1 S.K. Bogner (NSCL/MSU) 2011 National Nuclear Physics Summer School University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Useful readings
More informationNuclear Observables at Low Resolution
Nuclear Observables at Low Resolution Eric R. Anderson Department of Physics The Ohio State University September 13, 2011 In Collaboration with: S.K Bogner, R.J. Furnstahl, K. Hebeler, E.D. Jurgenson,
More informationAtomic Nuclei at Low Resolution
Atomic Department of Physics Ohio State University November, 29 Collaborators: E. Anderson, S. Bogner, S. Glazek, E. Jurgenson, R. Perry, S. Ramanan, A. Schwenk + UNEDF collaboration Overview DOFs EFT
More informationSimilarity renormalization group for nucleon-nucleon interactions
PHYSICAL REVIEW C 75, 0600(R) (2007) Similarity renormalization group for nucleon-nucleon interactions S. K. Bogner, * R. J. Furnstahl, and R. J. Perry Department of Physics, The Ohio State University,
More informationSimilarity Renormalization Groups (SRG) for nuclear forces Nuclear structure and nuclear astrophysics
Similarity Renormalization Groups (SRG) for nuclear forces Nuclear structure and nuclear astrophysics Philipp Dijkstal 12.05.2016 1 Introduction The talk on Similarity Renormalization Groups (SRG) from
More informationAt the end of Section 4, a summary of basic principles for low-energy effective theories was given, which we recap here.
Nuclear Forces 2 (last revised: September 30, 2014) 6 1 6. Nuclear Forces 2 a. Recap: Principles of low-energy effective theories Figure 1: Left: high-resolution, with wavelength of probe short compared
More informationSimplifying the Nuclear Many-Body Problem with Low-Momentum Interactions
Simplifying the Nuclear Many-Body Problem with Low-Momentum Interactions Scott Bogner September 2005 Collaborators: Dick Furnstahl, Achim Schwenk, and Andreas Nogga The Conventional Nuclear Many-Body Problem
More informationarxiv:nucl-th/ v1 5 Jan 2007
Are low-energy nuclear observables sensitive to high-energy phase shifts? S.K. Bogner 1, R.J. Furnstahl 1, R.J. Perry 1, A. Schwenk 2 arxiv:nucl-th/711v1 5 Jan 27 1 Department of Physics, The Ohio State
More informationMicroscopically Based Energy Functionals. S.K. Bogner (NSCL/MSU)
Microscopically Based Energy Functionals S.K. Bogner (NSCL/MSU) Dream Scenario: From QCD to Nuclei 2 SciDAC 2 Project Building a Universal Nuclear Energy Density Functional See http://undef.org for details
More informationIn-medium Similarity Renormalization Group for nuclear many-body systems
In-medium Similarity Renormalization Group for nuclear many-body systems Koshiroh Tsukiyama (CNS/ U. Tokyo) Dec. 3-5 2011 HPCI project Large-scale quantum many-body calculations for nuclear property and
More informationRenormalization group methods in nuclear few- and many-body problems
Renormalization group methods in nuclear few- and many-body problems Lecture 2 S.K. Bogner (NSCL/MSU) 2011 National Nuclear Physics Summer School University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Lecture 2 outline
More informationPart III: The Nuclear Many-Body Problem
Part III: The Nuclear Many-Body Problem To understand the properties of complex nuclei from first principles Microscopic Valence- Space Interactions Model spaces Many-body perturbation theory (MBPT) Calculating
More informationEffective Field Theory for Density Functional Theory II
Effective Field Theory for Density Functional Theory II Department of Physics Ohio State University February, 2006 I. Overview of EFT, RG, DFT for fermion many-body systems II. EFT/DFT for dilute Fermi
More informationThe Renormalization Group in Nuclear Physics
Nuclear Physics B Proceedings Supplement (211) 1 37 Nuclear Physics B Proceedings Supplement The Renormalization Group in Nuclear Physics R. J. Furnstahl Department of Physics, Ohio State University, Columbus,
More informationRG & EFT for nuclear forces
RG & EFT for nuclear forces Andreas Nogga, Forschungszentrum Jülich ECT* school, Feb/March 2006 Low momentum interactions: Using the RG to simplify the nuclear force for many-body calculations. Application
More informationNon-empirical energy functionals from low-momentum interactions
Introduction Conclusions Bibliography Non-empirical energy functionals from low-momentum interactions II. from renormalization group methods T. Duguet 1,2 1 DSM/Irfu/SPhN, CEA Saclay, France 2 National
More informationEffective Field Theory for Many-Body Systems
Outline Systems EFT Dilute DFT Future Effective Field Theory for Many-Body Systems Department of Physics Ohio State University February 19, 2004 Outline Systems EFT Dilute DFT Future Principles of Effective
More informationNuclear structure I: Introduction and nuclear interactions
Nuclear structure I: Introduction and nuclear interactions Stefano Gandolfi Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) National Nuclear Physics Summer School Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) July
More informationRenormalization Group Methods for the Nuclear Many-Body Problem
Renormalization Group Methods for the Nuclear Many-Body Problem A. Schwenk a,b.friman b and G.E. Brown c a Department of Physics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 41 b Gesellschaft für Schwerionenforschung,
More informationThree-Body Bound State Calculations by Using Three-Dimensional Low Momentum Interaction V low k
Preprint number: 6.668 Three-Body Bound State Calculations by Using Three-Dimensional Low Momentum Interaction V low k arxiv:6.668v [nucl-th Feb M. R. Hadizadeh, Institute of Nuclear and Particle Physics,
More informationRenormalization group methods in nuclear few- and many-body problems
Renormalization group methods in nuclear few- and many-body problems Lecture 3 S.K. Bogner (NSCL/MSU) 2011 National Nuclear Physics Summer School University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Lecture 2 outline
More informationModern Theory of Nuclear Forces
Evgeny Epelbaum, FZ Jülich & University Bonn Lacanau, 29.09.2009 Modern Theory of Nuclear Forces Lecture 1: Lecture 2: Lecture 3: Introduction & first look into ChPT EFTs for two nucleons Nuclear forces
More informationStatus report and plans from OSU and MSU
Status report and plans from OSU and MSU Validated(Nuclear( Interac/ons( +(MSU,(ORNL,UT,ANL,ORNL( fusion( Stellar(burning( Structure(and(Reac/ons:( Light(and(Medium(Nuclei( Ab-ini/o' RGM' CI' Chiral'EFT'
More informationCoupled-cluster theory for medium-mass nuclei
Coupled-cluster theory for medium-mass nuclei Thomas Papenbrock and G. Hagen (ORNL) D. J. Dean (ORNL) M. Hjorth-Jensen (Oslo) A. Nogga (Juelich) A. Schwenk (TRIUMF) P. Piecuch (MSU) M. Wloch (MSU) Seattle,
More informationEffective Field Theory and. the Nuclear Many-Body Problem
Effective Field Theory and the Nuclear Many-Body Problem Thomas Schaefer North Carolina State University 1 Schematic Phase Diagram of Dense Matter T nuclear matter µ e neutron matter? quark matter µ 2
More informationThree-nucleon potentials in nuclear matter. Alessandro Lovato
Three-nucleon potentials in nuclear matter Alessandro Lovato PRC 83, 054003 (2011) arxiv:1109.5489 Outline Ab initio many body method Nuclear Hamiltonian: 2- and 3- body potentials Density dependent potential
More informationNuclear few- and many-body systems in a discrete variable representation basis
Nuclear few- and many-body systems in a discrete variable representation basis Jeremy W. Holt* Department of Physics University of Washington *with A. Bulgac, M. M. Forbes L. Coraggio, N. Itaco, R. Machleidt,
More informationFrontiers in Ab Initio Nuclear Structure Theory. Robert Roth
Frontiers in Ab Initio Nuclear Structure Theory Robert Roth New Era of Nuclear Structure Theory QCD at low energies improved understanding through effective field theories & lattice simulations New Era
More informationCan the shell model be truly ab initio? and other questions
Canada s national laboratory for particle and nuclear physics and accelerator-based science Can the shell model be truly ab initio? and other questions Ragnar Stroberg TRIUMF The tower of effective field
More informationRG & EFT for nuclear forces
RG & EFT for nuclear forces Andreas Nogga, Forschungszentrum Jülich ECT* school, Feb/March 2006 Low momentum interactions: Using the RG to simplify the nuclear force for many-body calculations. Application
More informationThe UNEDF Project. Dick Furnstahl. October, Collaborators: UNEDF ( Department of Physics Ohio State University
Department of Physics Ohio State University October, 2007 Collaborators: UNEDF (http://unedf.org) Topics Overview DFT RG 3NF DME Appendix Possible Topics Overview of the UNEDF Project Density Functional
More informationFew-nucleon contributions to π-nucleus scattering
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Few-nucleon contributions to π-nucleus scattering Andreas Nogga, Forschungszentrum Jülich INT Program on Simulations and Symmetries: Cold Atoms, QCD, and Few-hadron
More informationAb Initio Nuclear Structure Theory
Ab Initio Nuclear Structure Theory Lecture 1: Hamiltonian Robert Roth Overview Lecture 1: Hamiltonian Prelude Many-Body Quantum Mechanics Nuclear Hamiltonian Matrix Elements Lecture 2: Correlations Two-Body
More informationShort-Ranged Central and Tensor Correlations. Nuclear Many-Body Systems. Reaction Theory for Nuclei far from INT Seattle
Short-Ranged Central and Tensor Correlations in Nuclear Many-Body Systems Reaction Theory for Nuclei far from Stability @ INT Seattle September 6-, Hans Feldmeier, Thomas Neff, Robert Roth Contents Motivation
More informationFew Body Methods in Nuclear Physics - Lecture I
Few Body Methods in Nuclear Physics - Lecture I Nir Barnea The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel Sept. 2010 Course Outline 1 Introduction - Few-Body Nuclear Physics 2 Gaussian Expansion - The Stochastic
More informationCoupled-cluster theory for nuclei
Coupled-cluster theory for nuclei Thomas Papenbrock and G. Hagen D. J. Dean M. Hjorth-Jensen B. Velamur Asokan INT workshop Weakly-bound systems in atomic and nuclear physics Seattle, March 8-12, 2010
More informationTime dependent coupled-cluster method
Time dependent coupled-cluster method Thomas Papenbrock and G. Hagen & H. A. Nam (ORNL), David Pigg (Vanderbilt) 7 th ANL/INT/JINA/MSU annual FRIB workshop August 8-12, 2011 Interfaces Between Nuclear
More informationEffective Field Theory for Cold Atoms I
Effective Field Theory for Cold Atoms I H.-W. Hammer Institut für Kernphysik, TU Darmstadt and Extreme Matter Institute EMMI School on Effective Field Theory across Length Scales, ICTP-SAIFR, Sao Paulo,
More informationNuclear physics around the unitarity limit
Nuclear physics around the unitarity limit Sebastian König Nuclear Theory Workshop TRIUMF, Vancouver, BC February 28, 2017 SK, H.W. Grießhammer, H.-W. Hammer, U. van Kolck, arxiv:1607.04623 [nucl-th] SK,
More informationFunctional RG for few-body physics
Functional RG for few-body physics Michael C Birse The University of Manchester Review of results from: Schmidt and Moroz, arxiv:0910.4586 Krippa, Walet and Birse, arxiv:0911.4608 Krippa, Walet and Birse,
More informationNuclear Structure and Reactions using Lattice Effective Field Theory
Nuclear Structure and Reactions using Lattice Effective Field Theory Dean Lee North Carolina State University Nuclear Lattice EFT Collaboration Frontiers of Nuclear Physics Kavli Institute for Theoretical
More informationPoS(Confinement8)147. Universality in QCD and Halo Nuclei
Helmholtz-Institut für Strahlen- und Kernphysik (Theorie) and Bethe Center for Theoretical Physics, University of Bonn, Germany E-mail: hammer@itkp.uni-bonn.de Effective Field Theory (EFT) provides a powerful
More informationAb Initio Nuclear Structure Theory with Chiral NN+3N Interactions. Robert Roth
Ab Initio Nuclear Structure Theory with Chiral NN+3N Interactions Robert Roth From QCD to Nuclear Structure Nuclear Structure Low-Energy QCD From QCD to Nuclear Structure Nuclear Structure NN+3N Interaction
More informationTritium β decay in pionless EFT
Ohio University June 0, 207 Recipe for EFT(/π) For momenta p < m π pions can be integrated out as degrees of freedom and only nucleons and external currents are left. Write down all possible terms of nucleons
More informationLattice Simulations with Chiral Nuclear Forces
Lattice Simulations with Chiral Nuclear Forces Hermann Krebs FZ Jülich & Universität Bonn July 23, 2008, XQCD 2008, NCSU In collaboration with B. Borasoy, E. Epelbaum, D. Lee, U. Meißner Outline EFT and
More informationPion-nucleon scattering around the delta-isobar resonance
Pion-nucleon scattering around the delta-isobar resonance Bingwei Long (ECT*) In collaboration with U. van Kolck (U. Arizona) What do we really do Fettes & Meissner 2001... Standard ChPT Isospin 3/2 What
More informationLight hypernuclei based on chiral and phenomenological interactions
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Light hypernuclei based on chiral and phenomenological interactions Andreas Nogga, Forschungszentrum Jülich International Conference on Hypernuclear and Strange Particle
More informationQuantum Monte Carlo calculations of medium mass nuclei
Quantum Monte Carlo calculations of medium mass nuclei Diego Lonardoni FRIB Theory Fellow In collaboration with: J. Carlson, LANL S. Gandolfi, LANL X. Wang, Huzhou University, China A. Lovato, ANL & UniTN
More informationOverview of low energy NN interaction and few nucleon systems
1 Overview of low energy NN interaction and few nucleon systems Renato Higa Theory Group, Jefferson Lab Cebaf Center, A3 (ext6363) higa@jlaborg Lecture II Basics on chiral EFT π EFT Chiral effective field
More informationPionless EFT for Few-Body Systems
Pionless EFT for Few-Body Systems Betzalel Bazak Physique Theorique Institut de Physique Nucleaire d Orsay Nuclear Physics from Lattice QCD Insitute for Nuclear Theory April 7, 2016 Seattle Betzalel Bazak
More informationApplications of Renormalization Group Methods in Nuclear Physics 1
Applications of Renormalization Group Methods in Nuclear Physics 1 Dick Furnstahl Department of Physics Ohio State University HUGS 2014 Outline: Lecture 1 Lecture 1: Overview Preview: Running couplings/potentials
More informationNew Horizons in Ab Initio Nuclear Structure Theory. Robert Roth
New Horizons in Ab Initio Nuclear Structure Theory Robert Roth New Era of Low-Energy Nuclear Physics Experiment new facilities and experiments to produce nuclei far-off stability and study a range of observables
More informationAb initio lattice EFT from light to medium mass nuclei Nuclear Lattice EFT Collaboration
Ab initio lattice EFT from light to medium mass nuclei Nuclear Lattice EFT Collaboration Evgeny Epelbaum (Bochum) Hermann Krebs (Bochum) Timo Lähde (Jülich) Dean Lee (NC State) Thomas Luu (Jülich/Bonn)
More informationTowards a model-independent low momentum nucleon-nucleon interaction
Towards a model-independent low momentum nucleon-nucleon interaction S.K. Bogner a, T.T.S. Kuo a 2, A. Schwenk a 3, D.R. Entem b and R. Machleidt b arxiv:nucl-th/84v3 22 Oct 23 Abstract a Department of
More informationarxiv: v1 [nucl-th] 31 Oct 2013
Renormalization Group Invariance in the Subtractive Renormalization Approach to the NN Interactions S. Szpigel and V. S. Timóteo arxiv:1311.61v1 [nucl-th] 31 Oct 13 Faculdade de Computação e Informática,
More informationNuclear structure from chiral-perturbation-theory two- plus three-nucleon interactions
Nuclear structure from chiral-perturbation-theory two- plus three-nucleon interactions Petr Navratil Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory* Collaborators: W. E. Ormand (LLNL), J. P. Vary (ISU), E. Caurier
More informationNew Horizons in Ab Initio Nuclear Structure Theory. Robert Roth
New Horizons in Ab Initio Nuclear Structure Theory Robert Roth New Era of Nuclear Structure Theory QCD at low energies improved understanding through effective field theories & lattice simulations quantum
More informationThe NN system: why and how we iterate
The NN system: why and how we iterate Daniel Phillips Ohio University Research supported by the US department of energy Plan Why we iterate I: contact interactions Why we iterate II: pion exchange How
More informationThe No-Core Shell Model
The No-Core Shell Model New Perspectives on P-shell Nuclei - The Shell Model and Beyond Erich Ormand Petr Navratil Christian Forssen Vesselin Gueorguiev Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Collaborators:
More informationToward a unified description of equilibrium and dynamics of neutron star matter
Toward a unified description of equilibrium and dynamics of neutron star matter Omar Benhar INFN and Department of Physics Sapienza Università di Roma I-00185 Roma, Italy Based on work done in collaboration
More informationEffective Field Theory and. the Nuclear Many-Body Problem
Effective Field Theory and the Nuclear Many-Body Problem Thomas Schaefer North Carolina State University 1 Nuclear Effective Field Theory Low Energy Nucleons: Nucleons are point particles Interactions
More informationAb Initio Electromagnetic Transitions with the IMSRG
Ab Initio Electromagnetic Transitions with the IMSRG Nathan Parzuchowski Michigan State University March, 017 1 / 1 Outline IMSRG IMSRG rotates the Hamiltonian into a coordinate system where simple methods
More informationEffective Field Theory and Finite-Density Systems
ANNUAL REVIEWS Further Click here for quick links to Annual Reviews content online, including: Other articles in this volume Top cited articles Top downloaded articles Our comprehensive search Effective
More informationEvgeny Epelbaum. Forschungszentrum Jülich & Universität Bonn
Evgeny Epelbaum KHuK Jahrestagung, GSI, 25.10.2007 Evgeny Epelbaum Forschungszentrum Jülich & Universität Bonn Outline Motivation & Introduction Few nucleons in chiral EFT: where do we stand Work in progress:
More informationNeutron-rich matter and neutrino-matter interactions based on chiral effective field theory
Neutron-rich matter and neutrino-matter interactions based on chiral effective field theory Achim Schwenk Astrophysical Transients: Multi-Messenger Probes of Nuclear Physics INT, July 29, 2011 Outline
More informationCoulomb effects in pionless effective field theory
Coulomb effects in pionless effective field theory Sebastian König in collaboration with Hans-Werner Hammer Helmholtz-Institut für Strahlen- und Kernphysik (Theorie) and Bethe Center for Theoretical Physics,
More informationAb initio effective interactions and operators from IM-SRG
Canada s national laboratory for particle and nuclear physics Laboratoire national canadien pour la recherche en physique nucleaire et en physique des particules U = eη b initio effective interactions
More informationEffective Field Theory for light nuclear systems
Effective Field Theory for light nuclear systems Jimmy Rotureau Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden B. Barrett, University of Arizona, Tucson I. Stetcu, University of Washington, Seattle
More informationEffective operators from wave function factorization
Effective operators from wave function factorization Scott Bogner NSCL/FRIB Laboratory & Department of Physics and Astronomy Michigan State University Some motivating questions Can we understand the general
More informationTHE THREE NUCLEON SYSTEM AT LEADING ORDER OF CHIRAL EFFECTIVE THEORY
THE THREE NUCLEON SYSTEM AT LEADING ORDER OF CHIRAL EFFECTIVE THEORY Young-Ho Song(RISP, Institute for Basic Science) Collaboration with R. Lazauskas( IPHC, IN2P3-CNRS) U. van Kolck (Orsay, IPN & Arizona
More informationQuantum Monte Carlo calculations of neutron and nuclear matter
Quantum Monte Carlo calculations of neutron and nuclear matter Stefano Gandolfi Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) Advances and perspectives in computational nuclear physics, Hilton Waikoloa Village,
More informationMean-field concept. (Ref: Isotope Science Facility at Michigan State University, MSUCL-1345, p. 41, Nov. 2006) 1/5/16 Volker Oberacker, Vanderbilt 1
Mean-field concept (Ref: Isotope Science Facility at Michigan State University, MSUCL-1345, p. 41, Nov. 2006) 1/5/16 Volker Oberacker, Vanderbilt 1 Static Hartree-Fock (HF) theory Fundamental puzzle: The
More informationEFT Approaches to αα and Nα Systems
1 EFT Approaches to αα and Nα Systems Renato Higa Kernfysisch Versneller Instituut University of Groningen Simulations and Symmetries, INT Program, Mar. 30, 2010 2 EFT Approaches to αα and Nα Systems Outline
More informationThe theory of nuclear forces: Is the never-ending ending story coming to an end? R. Machleidt University of Idaho
The theory of nuclear forces: Is the never-ending ending story coming to an end? University of Idaho What s left to say? Put the recent progress into a wider perspective. Fill in some missing details.
More informationUltracold atoms and neutron-rich matter in nuclei and astrophysics
Ultracold atoms and neutron-rich matter in nuclei and astrophysics Achim Schwenk NORDITA program Pushing the boundaries with cold atoms Stockholm, Jan. 23, 2013 Outline Advances in nuclear forces 3N forces
More informationNuclear physics: a laboratory for many-particle quantum mechanics or From model to theory in nuclear structure physics
Nuclear physics: a laboratory for many-particle quantum mechanics or From model to theory in nuclear structure physics G.F. Bertsch University of Washington Stockholm University and the Royal Institute
More informationNUCLEAR STRUCTURE AB INITIO
December, 6:8 WSPC/Trim Size: 9in x 6in for Proceedings master NUCLEAR STRUCTURE AB INITIO H. FELDMEIER AND T. NEFF Gesellschaft für Schwerionenforschung mbh Planckstr., D-69 Darmstadt, Germany E-mail:
More informationNuclei as Bound States
Nuclei as Bound States Lecture 1: Hamiltonian Robert Roth Overview Lecture 1: Hamiltonian Prelude Nuclear Hamiltonian Matrix Elements Two-Body Problem Correlations & Unitary Transformations Lecture 2:
More information(Todays) Progress in coupled cluster compuations of atomic nuclei
(Todays) Progress in coupled cluster compuations of atomic nuclei Gaute Hagen Oak Ridge National Laboratory Progress in Ab Initio Techniques in Nuclear Physics TRIUMF, February 26 th, 2019 Collaborators
More informationEffective Field Theory for Nuclear Physics! Akshay Vaghani! Mississippi State University!
Effective Field Theory for Nuclear Physics! Akshay Vaghani! Mississippi State University! Overview! Introduction! Basic ideas of EFT! Basic Examples of EFT! Algorithm of EFT! Review NN scattering! NN scattering
More informationNuclear structure III: Nuclear and neutron matter. National Nuclear Physics Summer School Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) July 18-29, 2016
Nuclear structure III: Nuclear and neutron matter Stefano Gandolfi Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) National Nuclear Physics Summer School Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) July 18-29, 2016
More informationThe shell model as an ab initio tool: effective interactions and operators from IM-SRG
Canada s national laboratory for particle and nuclear physics Laboratoire national canadien pour la recherche en physique nucleaire et en physique des particules U = eη The shell model as an ab initio
More informationChiral effective field theory on the lattice: Ab initio calculations of nuclei
Chiral effective field theory on the lattice: Ab initio calculations of nuclei Nuclear Lattice EFT Collaboration Evgeny Epelbaum (Bochum) Hermann Krebs (Bochum) Timo Lähde (Jülich) Dean Lee (NC State)
More informationThe oxygen anomaly F O
The oxygen anomaly O F The oxygen anomaly - not reproduced without 3N forces O F without 3N forces, NN interactions too attractive many-body theory based on two-nucleon forces: drip-line incorrect at 28
More informationInfrared and ultraviolet cutoffs in variational calculations with a harmonic oscillator basis
Infrared and ultraviolet cutoffs in variational calculations with a harmonic oscillator basis Sidney A. Coon University of Arizona Collaborators Bira van Kolck University of Arizona Michael Kruse University
More informationPairing in Nuclear and Neutron Matter Screening effects
Pairing Degrees of Freedom in Nuclei and Nuclear Medium Seattle, Nov. 14-17, 2005 Outline: Pairing in Nuclear and Neutron Matter Screening effects U. Lombardo pairing due to the nuclear (realistic) interaction
More informationarxiv: v2 [nucl-th] 7 Mar 2014
Few-Body Systems (EFB22) manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor) E. Ruiz Arriola S. Szpigel V. S. Timóteo Fixed points of the Similarity Renormalization Group and the Nuclear Many-Body Problem
More informationRenormalization Group: non perturbative aspects and applications in statistical and solid state physics.
Renormalization Group: non perturbative aspects and applications in statistical and solid state physics. Bertrand Delamotte Saclay, march 3, 2009 Introduction Field theory: - infinitely many degrees of
More informationElectroweak Probes of Three-Nucleon Systems
Stetson University July 3, 08 Brief Outline Form factors of three-nucleon systems Hadronic parity-violation in three-nucleon systems Pionless Effective Field Theory Ideally suited for momenta p < m π since
More informationNew Frontiers in Nuclear Structure Theory
New Frontiers in Nuclear Structure Theory From Realistic Interactions to the Nuclear Chart Robert Roth Institut für Kernphysik Technical University Darmstadt Overview Motivation Nucleon-Nucleon Interactions
More informationLight Nuclei from chiral EFT interactions
Light Nuclei from chiral EFT interactions Petr Navratil Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory* Collaborators: V. G. Gueorguiev (UCM), J. P. Vary (ISU), W. E. Ormand (LLNL), A. Nogga (Julich), S. Quaglioni
More informationReview of lattice EFT methods and connections to lattice QCD
Review of lattice EFT methods and connections to lattice QCD Dean Lee Michigan State University uclear Lattice EFT Collaboration Multi-Hadron Systems from Lattice QCD Institute for uclear Theory Feburary
More informationUnitary-model-operator approach to nuclear many-body problems
Unitary-model-operator approach to nuclear many-body problems in collaboration with Structure calc. for many-nucleon systems Kenji Suzuki (Kyushu Inst. of Tech.) Ryoji kamoto (Kyushu Inst. of Tech.) V
More informationModern Theory of Nuclear Forces
Evgeny Epelbaum, FZ Jülich & University Bonn Lacanau, 28.09.2009 Modern Theory of Nuclear Forces Lecture 1: Lecture 2: Introduction & first look into ChPT EFTs for two nucleons Chiral Perturbation Theory
More informationC.A. Bertulani, Texas A&M University-Commerce
C.A. Bertulani, Texas A&M University-Commerce in collaboration with: Renato Higa (University of Sao Paulo) Bira van Kolck (Orsay/U. of Arizona) INT/Seattle, Universality in Few-Body Systems, March 10,
More informationCoupled-cluster computations of weak decays in nuclei
Coupled-cluster computations of weak decays in nuclei Gaute Hagen Oak Ridge National Laboratory Nuclear ab initio Theories and Neutrino Physics INT, March 6th, 2018 Trend in realistic ab-initio calculations
More informationQuantitative understanding nuclear structure and scattering processes, based on underlying NN interactions.
Microscopic descriptions of nuclear scattering and reaction processes on the basis of chiral EFT M. Kohno Research Center for Nuclear Physics, Osaka, Japan Quantitative understanding nuclear structure
More information