arxiv: v3 [hep-th] 6 Jan 2018

Transcription

1 FIAN/TD-10/15 IITP/TH-13/15 ITEP/TH-4/15 On universal knot polynomials A. Mironov a,b,c,d,, R. Mkrtchyan e,, and A. Morozov b,c,d,, arxiv: v3 [hep-th] 6 Jan 018 a Lebedev Physics Institute, Moscow , Russia b ITEP, Moscow 11718, Russia c Institute for Information Transmission Problems, Moscow 17994, Russia d National Research Nuclear University MEPhI, Moscow , Russia e Yerevan Physics Institute, Alikhanian Br. Str., Yerevan 0036, Armenia We present a universal knot polynomials for - and 3-strand torus knots in adjoint representation, by universalization of appropriate Rosso-Jones formula. According to universality, these polynomials coincide with adjoined colored HOMFLY and Kauffman polynomials at SL and SO/Sp lines on Vogel s plane, and give their exceptional group s counterparts on exceptional line. We demonstrate that[m,n]=[n,m] topological invariance, when applicable, take place on the entire Vogel s plane. We also suggest the universal form of invariant of figure eight knot in adjoint representation, and suggest existence of such universalization for any knot in adjoint and its descendant representation. Properties of universal polynomials and applications of these results are discussed. Contents 1 Introduction 1.1 Universality in simple Lie algebras and gauge theories Universal knot polynomials oint polynomials 4.1 Rosso-Jones formula SUN series SO/Sp series Exceptional algebras Universal description The universal form of Rosso-Jones formula for and 3 strands strand knots and links strand knots and links Universal knot polynomial for the figure-eight knot mironov@lpi.ru; mironov@itep.ru mrl55@list.ru morozov@itep.ru 1

2 5 On properties of the universal polynomials Trefoil The uniform HOMFLY polynomial The adjoint Kauffman polynomial The universal polynomial Exceptional groups Examples of exceptional knot polynomials for the trefoil General -strand torus knots [,k+1] The HOMFLY polynomial The Kauffman polynomial Other knots Conclusion 1 7 Acknowledgements 8 Appendix A 9 Appendix B 3 1 Introduction 1.1 Universality in simple Lie algebras and gauge theories Representation theory is in the basis of our understanding of symmetries of physical theories and plays an increasingly important role with revealing of new hidden symmetries, sometime quite involved, which govern the structure of states and dynamics of string theory and its field theory reductions. Representation theory looks different for different simple Lie algebras, however, it seems that this is only because representations are classified by weights, not by roots. The sub-sector of representation theory associated with roots now shows significant signs of universality: many group-invariant quantities can be represented as values of analytical functions, defined over entire Vogel s plane see the definition below, at a special points from Vogel s Table 39, 40. This sector is formed by the adjoint representation and representations appearing in decomposition of its tensor powers. That is the reason to nickname it a E 8 -sector of representation theory, because for the maximal exceptional algebra E 8, where the fundamental representation coincides with the adjoint one, it provides a complete description. This picture is not established yet. There are arguments and conjectures pro and contra, and the picture itself should be further clarified. However, the perspective of unification of all simple Lie algebras or at least some sectors of their representation theory is so attractive, that it certainly deserves a detailed study. The present paper presents a new arguments in favor of universality, by universalization of some types of knot polynomials. The term universality refers to the notion of the Universal Lie algebra introduced by Vogel in [1], see also [], which, roughly speaking, was intended to be a model for all simple Lie algebras. That idea was based on his study of his introduced Λ-algebra of three-leg Jacobi diagrams [3], acting on different spaces of diagram and aimed finally to construction of finite Vassiliev s invariants of knots. These works present first impressive examples of universal quantities, such as e.g. dimensions of adjoint and its descendant representations, and provide a motivation for subsequent developments. Latter particularly includes the whole series of universal dimension formulae in simple Lie algebras [4], and proof of of universality of many quantities in Chern-Simons gauge theory [5]. An additional support to the universality comes from the geometric engineering[6, 7]: there gauge groups are secondary entities emerging from particular singularities of Calabi-Yau spaces, and it is unnatural for algebras of different series to appear in a different way, they should rather possess a common, i.e. universal description. Note that in connected to this field Kostant s paper [8] the ADE part of Vogel s Table appears already at There are a lot of open questions in this field, e.g. its relations to the Langlands theory [9, 10]. Particularly important is problem of existence of a universal form of corresponding duality, which is a basis of our understanding of S-duality in string theories.

3 1. Universal knot polynomials As shown in [5, 11], in the Chern-Simons gauge theory [1] on the 3d sphere universal are such quantities as central charge, perturbative and non-perturbative partition functions, etc., and particularly unknotted Wilson average in adjoint representation. In the present paper we discuss the problem of universality of adjoint Wilson averages for some knotted curves. It is well-known [13], that they are connected with knot polynomials [14]. Knot polynomials are usually defined with the help of concrete types of simple Lie algebras: best known are the HOMFLY and Kauffman polynomials, associated respectively with SUN and SON. The definition of these polynomials already implies an analytical continuation from positive integer to generic values of N, and the universality is a far-going generalization, which can unify some of the HOMFLY and Kauffman polynomials those which are colored by representations from the set of adjoint descendants into a single quantity. It is worth mentioning that finite Vassiliev s invariants [15], which were among initial aims of Vogel s study [3], arise in perturbative expansions of knot polynomials [16]. Given these expectations, it is a natural task to lift entire knot polynomials to the universal level, i.e. to define them as functions of the above mentioned parameters in such a way, that at least the known HOMFLY and Kauffman polynomials arise for their corresponding values, and, moreover, at other special values one gets polynomials for SpN and for the exceptional groups. The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate that for the adjoint-colored polynomials this is indeed possible, at least for some classes of knots. Namely, we find universal knot polynomials for and 3-strand torus knots, when Rosso-Jones formula [17, 18] is available for any representation of any simple Lie algebra, moreover, in this case the Rosso-Jones formula itself can be made universal. We also do so for the figure eight knot 4 1, where this provides a new set of colored HOMFLY polynomials and continuation to exceptional groups is a new result of its own value. Remarkably, the universal formulas inherit distinguished properties of ordinary knot polynomials like evolution [19, 0], factorization of special polynomials [19, 1, ] and differential expansion [3]. Actual development proceeded as follows. First, for any given link/knot L we introduced the uniform adjoint HOMFLY H L q A, which are still polynomials in A = q N despite the appearance of N in parametrization of its Young diagram: H L q A = q N = H L [1 N ] q A = qn 1 This new polynomial in all calculated cases is remarkably simple and possesses wonderful properties. Second, we consider the adjoint Kauffman polynomial K L q A = KL [11]q A note that A = q N 1 for SON and Sp N. It is known for a limited classes of knots, however wide enough to establish universality in cases we interested in. Third, for a few small knots we found a universal polynomial U L u,v,w, which is a symmetric Laurent polynomial of three variables u = q α, v = q β and w = q γ α, β and γ are the conventional Vogel s parameters [3], and interpolates between the uniform HOMFLY and Kauffman polynomials, when specialized to SU and SO lines of Table 39: 1 U L u = q,v = q,w = A = H L q A, U L u = q,v = q 4,w = q 3 A = K L q A 3 It is a highly non-trivial fact that such an interpolation exists at all: the corresponding system of equations on coefficients of the mentioned Laurent polynomial is highly overdetermined, but appears to have a solution. To understand a non-triviality of this fact, one can try to represent in such a way the simplest fundamental HOMFLY polynomial H 41 [1] = 1 + A + A q q = 1+{Aq}{A/q} nothing to say, to interpolate it to the fundamental Kauffman polynomial K 41 [1] = 1+q 1+q A +A q q 1 A A q 1 + q Aq+1A q{a} Aq. One of the sources of problem is that any Kauffman polynomial is an invariant of non-oriented links only, while the fundamental HOMFLY polynomial is an invariant of oriented links. However, the HOMFLY polynomial in the adjoint representation also does not differ between differently oriented links, since the adjoint representation is self-conjugated. 1 For a different relation between colored Kauffman and HOMFLY polynomials see [4]. = 3

4 On the other hand, 3 defines the universal polynomial if it exists ambiguously: only modulo a symmetric polynomial uv 1uw 1vw 1u v 1uv 1u w 1uw 1v w 1vw 1 4 of a relatively high degree 4. For very small knots one can fix this ambiguity by requirement of having polynomial of minimal degree, but for bigger knots with knot polynomials of higher degree this doesn t work. Forth, we lifted formulas for small knots to those for the entire 1-parametric and 3-strand torus families. This lifting helps us to tame/reduce the ambiguity for at least the knots of this type. Fifth, finally we found a way to directly derive universal expressions for the - and 3-strand knots from the general Rosso-Jones formula, valid for any group. As original Rosso-Jones expression, it is valid and hence prove universality for corresponding links, also. Below we concentrate mainly on the universal Rosso-Jones formula, omitting most details of our original calculation. However, original methods, and universality statement/hypothesis are actually applicable/suggested to an arbitrary knots, if sufficiently much is known about their colored HOMFLY and Kauffman polynomials. As an illustration, we present the answer for the universal adjoint polynomial of the figure-eight knot 4 1. We stress again that this answer should be used with a certain care, because the ambiguity issue is not fully resolved. The real resolution would come from lifting to the Vogel universal level of the full Rosso-Jones formula and, more generally, of the modern version of the Reshetikhin-Turaev formalism [5]-[30]. Finally, some properties of universal polynomials are discussed in the last section. oint polynomials oint is a distinguished representation from many points of view, both in physics and in mathematics. Closer to our purposes in this paper, universal Vogel s [3] and Landsberg and Manivel s [4] formulas see also [] deal with some irreducible representations in an arbitrary powers of adjoint representation of Lie algebra, while its extension to all representations, including fundamental, is problematic. In this section we collect just some of the relevant technical details..1 Rosso-Jones formula The original expression for invariants of torus knots/links, derived by Rosso and Jones in [17], looks as P [m,n] R = qmnκr D R q q n m κ Q ϕy σ [m,n] D Q q 5 Y Q Here Y runs over all Young diagrams with m boxes, Q runs over all irreducible representations, with multiplicities, of the gauge group i.e. the group, of which R is the representation in one of the subspaces of R m with symmetry Y, ϕ Y σ [m,n] is the character of Y representation of symmetric group S m evaluated on the element σ 1...σ m 1 n of braid group B m, considered as an element of S m, κ Q is the second Casimir of Q, D Q q are the usual quantum dimensions, see below. Elements σ 1,...,σ m 1 are usual generators of the braid group B m, interchanging two neighboring strands, so their product reduced to the symmetric group S m is just a cyclic permutation 1,,...m. Obviously, its m-th power will be an identity element. If m,n are mutually prime, this is a knot invariant, otherwise it is the invariant of the corresponding l-component link, where l is the greatest common divisor of m and n. The Rosso-Jones formula is given here in the topological framing. The Rosso-Jones formula can be rewritten in a more inspiring form [18] P [m,n] R q = qmnκr D R q c RQ q n m κ Q DQ q 6 Q R m It also has far going generalizations to arbitrary knot polynomials in braid realizations [8, 9]. This formula treats differently the number m of strands in the braid and its length evolution parameter n: the m n symmetry of the answer, P [m,n] R = P [n,m] R, necessary for its topological invariance, is technically a non-trivial fact. The sum in this formula goes over all irreducible representations Q, belonging to the m-th power of the original representation R, κ Q = Λ Q,Λ Q +ρ 7 4

5 is the corresponding eigenvalue of the Casimir operator and D Q = [Λ Q +ρ,α] [ρ,α] α + is its quantum dimension. Here Λ Q is the highest weight of the representation Q, ρ is the Weyl vector, equal to the half sum of positive roots, and square bracket denotes the quantum number: [x] = qx q x q q 1 = {qx } {q}, {x} = x x 1 9 The coefficients c RQ are integers. They are explicitly given by a somewhat sophisticated formula [17]: c RQ = ϕ WQ σ [m,n] 10 i.e. c RQ is the correspondingvalue ofsymmetric groupcharacterϕ, in representationw Q ofs m, which describes the multiplicity of representation Q in decomposition R m = Q W Q Q 11 A more elegant version is to define c RQ through characters of the original algebra, extended to the space of time-variables this is a well known procedure for SUN, but requires a more detailed explanation in the case of exceptional algebras. Then one can apply the Adams plethysm rule: for knots Âd m χ R p k χ R p mk = c RQ χ Q p k 1 Q R m and l i=1âd m/l χ Ri = Q 8 c RQ χ Q p k 13 for the l component link in representation R = l i=1 R i. The quantum dimensions are restrictions of timedependent characters to the topological locus : D Q = tr Q q ρ = χ Q p k, p k = tr q kρ 14 where the last trace is taken in the fundamental representation. Clearly, these definitions imply an extension of the r.h.s. of 6 to the entire space of time variables [7], however such H [m,n] R q p k does not possess the m n symmetry, i.e. is not fully topologically invariant depends also on the braid representation. If one prefers to work entirely on the topological locus, one should use the original 10. For SUN the knot polynomial P is called HOMFLY-PT polynomial, and we denote it by H. Usually HOMFLY is defined as a polynomial of two variables q and A, specialization to particular SUN is provided by putting A = q N. For SON it is called Kauffman polynomial, denoted by K and specialization is A = q N 1. The SpN case can be obtained from the SON one by the substitution N N, transposition of Young diagrams and renormalization of scalar product in algebra or, equivalently, on the language of Chern-Simons theory, by renormalization of coupling constant, see [37, 5] for gauge theories side of this equivalence, and [19, 1] for that in knots theory. Some extra modifications are needed in the case of superpolynomials, see [19] and [31]. Isomorphisms between different small groups imply relations between HOMFLY and Kauffman polynomials forthe purposesofthis paperwerestrictformulastoadjointrepresentation, SO = [11], Sp = [11] tr = []. With appropriate choice of normalization of scalar products one has: SO3 = SU/Z = K q A = q 4 = H q A = q SO4 = SU /Z = K q A = q 3 = H q A = q SO6 = SU4/Z = K q A = q 5 = H q A = q 4 15 SU = Sp = H q A = q 4 = K q 1 A = q 3 SO5 = Sp4/Z = K q A = q 8 = K q 1 A = q 5 5

6 As a corollary, K q A = q 6 = K q 4 A = q 8 = K q 1 A = q 3 16 Twist knots can be described by a very similar evolution formula [0, 3], only in this case m =, but Q R R, where R is a conjugate representation, and c RQ are substituted by more complicated expressions, requiring separate tedious calculations.. SUN series ForSUNtheparameterA = q N capturesallthedependenceonn, providedthequantumdimensionsd Q q A are also expressed through it, see below. For arbitrary representation R in this case, the second Casimir is equal to κ R = κ R R N + R N 17 withκ R = r i,j R j i, wherethesumgoesovertheboxesoftheyoungdiagramrandκ R isthecorresponding eigenvalue of the cut-and-join operator [33], Ŵ χ Q = κ Q χ Q 18 Note that the shift of κ R in 17 is essential in order to guarantee that κ [1N ] = 0, since representation [1 N ] is equivalent to the singlet. For SUN, the adjoint representation is associated with the N-dependent self-conjugate hook diagram = [1 N ] for SUN 19 As usual, conjugate is the diagram, which after rotation by π can be added to the original diagram to form a full rectangular of the length/height N. What also distinguishes adjoint representation of SUN is the slow growth of its dimension d adj = [N + 1][N 1] for large N, which signals about strong cancelations in the hook formula D R = i,j R [N +i j] [hooklength i,j ] 0 normally dimension of an M-box diagram would grow as N M, but since the denominator can also grow as fast as M!, compensation is possible for M N, and it indeed takes place for the adjoint representation. This also implies that the powers of adjoint representation decompose into a relatively small number of irreducibles, just seven: = [1 N ] [1 N ] = [4 N ] [4 N 3 1 ] = [31 N 3 ] [33 N 3 ] [33 N 4 1 ] = [1 N 4 ] δ N, [3 N 1] = [1 N ] [ N ] = [0] 1 where [0] denotes one-dimensional singlet representation. Technically this works as follows: say, for SU4 adjoint representation is [11], and from the decomposition [11] = [4] [411] N=4 [31] [41111] [33] [3311] N=4 [] [31] N=4 [11] [3111] [311111] [] N=4 [0] +[11] +[1111] only the six underlined Young diagrams one with multiplicity two have no more than N = 4 lines and survive for SU4, moreover, the double-underlined diagrams with exactly N = 4 lines are further simplified. Note also that the adjoint representation is self-conjugate, and so are the five representations in its square, the remaining two are conjugate of each other, [31 N 3 ] = [33 N 3 ]. However, if we extend SUN group by automorphysms of its Dynkin diagram, then the sum of two last representations becomes one irreducible representation of extended group. It also deserves mentioning that quantum dimensions of symmetric and antisymmetric squares of the representation R are equal to D R ±Âd D R D Rq A ±D R q A 3 6

7 In particular, for SUN, i.e. at A = q N one has, say, and D q +D q = D 4 q A+D q A 4 D q +D q = D [4 N ]q+d [1 N 4 ]q+d q+1 D q D q = D [33 N 3 ]q+d [31 N 3 ]q+d q where the dimensions are: D [4 N ]q = {A} {Aq 3 }{A/q} {q } {q}, D [1 N 4 ]q = {Aq}{A} {A/q 3 } {q } {q}, D = {Aq}{A/q} {q}, D [33 N 3 ]q = D [31 N 3 ]q = {Aq }{Aq}{A/q }{A/q} {q } {q} 5 6 The -Adams plethysm decomposition is even smaller than the square of the adjoint 1: it does not contain the item with multiplicity two one symmetric and one anti-symmetric: they hence drop out of the alternated sum: Ad ˆ = [1 N ] [1 N ] = [4 N ] [4 N 3 1 ] = [31 N 3 ] [33 N 3 ] 7 [33 N 4 1 ] = [1 N 4 ] δ N, [31] = [] [ N ] = [0] so that the Rosso-Jones formula for the adjoint-colored HOMFLY polynomials of the -strand torus knots states: [ A H [,n] q A = 1 ] n D D q [4N ] +Aq n D [1N 4] A n D [31N 3] +D [33N 3]+A 4n 8.3 SO/Sp series Similarly to the SUN case, representations of SON are also labeled by Young diagrams, besides spinor ones. The quantum dimensions d R for various representations of SON are very similar to D R of SUN, if expressed through the parameter A, but with a notable change: one has to parameterize A = q N 1 in d R for SON, instead of A = q N in D R for SUN. These dimensions can be calculated using formula 8 or [34, 4.9] for the representation given by the Young diagram R with the lines {r i }, i = 1,...,lR: d R = 1 i<j lr {q ri rj+j i }{Aq ri+rj+1 i j } {q j i }{Aq 1 i j } lr k=1 {A 1/ q r k k+ 1 } {A 1/ q k+ 1 } r k s=1 {Aq rk+1 k s lr } {q s k+lr } 9 A table of the first dimensions and their product rules can be found in the Appendix A. The Adams plethysm relations look like Âd d [1] = d [] d [11] +1, Âd 3 d [1] = d [3] d [1] +d [111], Âd d [] = d [4] d [31] +d [] +d [] d [11] +1 Âd d [11] = d [] d [11] +d [1111] +d [] d [11] The adjoint representation of SON is independent of N and is just the first antisymmetric representation: = [11] for SON 31 7

8 Its symmetric and antisymmetric squares are decomposed as follows: S = S [11] = []+[1111]+[]+[0], Λ = Λ [11] = [11]+[11] = [11]+ 3 and, accordingly, d [11] q+d 11q = d q+d 1111 q+d q+1, d [11] q d 11q = d [11] q+d [11] q Also note that unlike the SUN case there are now only two irreducible representations in the antisymmetric square, but one of them is still adjoint. However, there is no longer an adjoint in the symmetric square. Since the Young diagram of the adjoint representation for SON is the same for all N, calculation of the adjoint Kauffman polynomial is much simpler. According to [35], for the two-strand torus knots [, n] one has: K [,n] = K[,n] [11] = q 4n A 4n A n d [] q n A n d [11] +q 6n A n d [1111] +q n A n d [] q n A n d [11] +1 d [11] 34 The fundamental and symmetric reduced Kauffman polynomials are respectively A q n n A n d K [,n] [] q n A n d [11] +1 [1] = 35 d [1] and K [,n] [] = q4n A 4n d [] q 6n A n d [4] q n A n d [31] +A n d [] +q n A n d [] q n A n d [11] For comparison with the fundamental Kauffman polynomials in [36] one should substitute there A ia and z = i{q}..4 Exceptional algebras It is possible to calculate, in a similar fashion, quantum dimensions see Appendix B and knots polynomials for some knots e.g. two-strand knots for exceptional algebras. However, this is more time-consuming, and, more important, as we shall see in the next section, actually exceptional algebras have some similarity with classical series in a sense that they all are located on the line in Vogel s plane. So we present below polynomial for trefoil on that line, i.e. simultaneously for all exceptional algebras, as is done above for SU and SO/Sp lines. Answer for particular algebras appear at special values of parameter N, given as well as definitions of Vogel s plane, exceptional line, etc in next Section, 39, 40. oint knot polynomial for the trefoil 3 1 = [,3] = [3,] on the exceptional line is: 33 P [3],Exc q A = A1 1+q 4 +A+q 3 +q 3 qa q 1 A 5 +q A 3 q A 15 1 q +q 4 A 6 1+q q 4 +q 6 q A 7 1 q +q 4 +q 6 q A 8 q A 11 q +q 1q q 1 q A q4 +q 6 q A 13 +{q} q 1 A 4 []A 9 +qa 14 qa 16 q 1 A 17 +qa 18 +{q} A 10 q 4 37 where A = q N+. The primary differential expansion in these variables is P [3],Exc q A 1. A A +1+A A 1 A

9 .5 Universal description Above formulas are fairly complicated, and the best way to look at them is from the universal point of view. In fact, most of them can be obtained by substitution into the some universal expressions of the particular values of three projective, universal, Vogel s parameters α, β, γ, relevant up to rescaling and permutations, according to the following Vogel s Table [1]: algebra α β γ SUN N SON 4 N 4 SpN 1 1 N + ExcN N +4 N +4 where all exceptional simple Lie algebras belong to the Exc line at special values of parameter: 39 N 1 / ExcN A G D 4 F 4 E 6 E 7 E 8 40 Tables 40 and 39 are derived from the following main observation of Vogel. Consider simple Lie algebra extended by the automorphisms of its Dynkin diagram with second Casimir s eigenvalue t, in some arbitrary normalization. Then symmetric square of adjoint decomposes in a uniform way, for all algebras: S = 1+Y α+y β+y γ 41 where Y α,y β,y γ have eigenvalues of the same Casimir operator 4t α,4t β,4t γ, respectively. One can show that t = α+β +γ. Actually this is definition of these parameters, which evidently fix them up to common multiplier and permutations. Correspondingly they span the so-called Vogel s plane, which is factor of projective plane over symmetric group, P /S 3, [4]. Vogel [3, 1] gave a universal expressions for dimension of algebra: and for Y. representations: dim = α tβ tγ t αβγ 4 3α t β t γ t t β +t γ +t dimy α = α α β β α γ γ These expressions for dimensions are universal in a sense that they are given by smooth rational, in this case functions of parameters, which at values from Vogel s Table 39, 40 give dimensions for corresponding simple Lie algebra. One can easily check that dimensions of two sides of 41 coincide at an arbitrary values of parameters. Vogel [3, 1] and Landsberg and Manivel [4] have found a lot of universal formulas for dimensions of irreps of simple Lie algebras, belonging to powers of adjoint representation. Quantization of most of them is already carried on. The universal character of adjoint representation i.e. character of adjoint, restricted on Weyl line, or, in other words, quantum version of 4 is given in [5]: 43 χ xρ fx = r+ µ e xµ,ρ = x e θ+ρ,µ e x θ+ρ,µ e x ρ,µ e x ρ,µ µ + fx = sinhxα t 4 sinhx β t sinhx α 4 sinhx γ t 4 sinhx β 4 sinhx γ where r is the rank of the algebra, + is the set of all all positive roots, θ = Λ is the highest root. Introducing, in agreement with 8, q = e x 45 we get finally in the convenient form: 9

10 D = fx = { uvw}{ vuw}{ wuv} { u}{ v}{ w} 46 Note that for Chern-Simons theory this is Wilson average for unknot provided we take x = π/δ, q = expπ/δ,δ = κ+t, where κ is coupling constant in front of Chern-Simons action. Note also that now theory is invariant w.r.t. the simultaneous rescaling of all 4 parameters α, β, γ, κ, and quantization of coupling κ means that it should be an arbitrary integer in the so-called minimal normalization, given in Table 39, 40. Quantum dimensions of Y. are given in [38]: D Y α = {uvw}{u vw}{uv w}{v uw}{w uv}{vw/ u} { u}{u}{ v}{ w}{ u/v}{ u/w} 47 One can check that quantum dimensions of both sides of 41 coincide [38]: S D = D q+d q = 1+D Y α+d Y β+d Y γ 48 It is a hypothesis of Deligne [39] or universal characters hypothesis, completely checked for SL line [39] that quantum dimensions satisfy this and other standard characters relations not only for points of Lie algebras, but also on the entire Vogel s plane. For the remaining antisymmetric subspace of square of adjoint the decomposition and dimensions are Λ = +X 49 and quantum dimensions satisfy dimx = t αt βt γt+αt+βt+γ α β γ 50 Λ D = D + D q D q D q = D +D X 51 with [39] D X = D {u vw}{v uw}{w uv} {u}{v}{w} uv 1 vw+ 1 uw+ 1 + uv vw uw 5 The q-powers of the half of the corresponding universal expressions for the quadratic Casimir operators are [3]: λ = q t = uvw, λ Y α = q t α = uv w, λ X = q t = uvw 53 We use here the notation from [1] for particular descendants of the adjoint representation. Formulas for Y β and Y γ are obtained from Y α by cyclic permutations of u,v,w. In the next Section we shall present similar formulas for decomposition of the cube of adjoint representation. 3 The universal form of Rosso-Jones formula for and 3 strands. Our aim in this section is to rewrite Rosso-Jones expressions5, 6 for invariants of the torus knots/links in the universal form. Its only group-depending elements are eigenvalues of second Casimir and quantum dimensions of representations Q, so we need universal expressions for them strand knots and links In this case m = and both Casimirs and quantum dimensions of irreps in decomposition of the square of adjoint are universal, as recalled in previous sections. There are two diagrams Y with two boxes, symmetric square - i.e. a row of two boxes, and antisymmetric, a column of two boxes. For n odd corresponding characters ϕ Y σ [,n], evaluated on the only non-trivial element of S, are 1 and -1, respectively. 10

11 This allows one to rewrite 5, 6 in the universal form for the -strand torus knots, i.e. n = k+1: U [,n=k+1] or = uvw4n 1+λ Y α n D Y α+λ Y β n D Y β+λ Y γ n D Y γ λ n D D λ n X D X U [,n] = uvwn uvw n D X +u n D Yα +v n D Yβ +w n D Yγ uvw n D D For n = 1, i.e. for the unknot, U [,1] = 1, for general odd positive n this is a polynomial in positive powers of u,v,w, proportional to uvw n. It is almost evident that this expression reproduces the -strand adjoint Kauffman polynomials at the SON line u = q, v = q 4, w = A/q 3, as long as dimensions and eigenvalues are reproduced by above universal expressions. Onemay askwhat it means at the SUN line u = q, v = q, w = A, wherethe three non-unit dimensions in the symmetric square are D Y α = {A} {Aq 3 }{A/q} [] {q} 4, D Y β = {A}{Aq}{A/q3 } [] {q} 4, D Y γ = {Aq}{A/q} {q} = D 56 and the coinciding dimensions of two mutually-conjugate non-adjoint representations [31 N 3 ] and [33 N 3 ], which form X in the SUN case, see 8 in the antisymmetric square are D X = {Aq }{Aq}{A/q}{A/q } 57 [] {q} 4 Clearly, 54 in this case is the uniform HOMFLY polynomial H from 1, 8. To universally describe the -strand torus links, i.e. for n = k, one has to change signs in front of the two last items from minus to plus, since now we are evaluating characters of one-dimensional representations on the identity element of S, so they both are equal to 1: U [,n=k] = uvw4n 1+λ Y α n D Y α+λ Y β n D Y β+λ Y γ n D Y γ+λ n D D +λ n X D X 58 The Rosso-Jones expression and its universalization closely resembles Okubo s formula [40] for eigenvalues of higher order Casimirs, used in [41] to obtain universal expression for generating function of eigenvalues of higher Casimir operators strand knots and links The universalization of general Rosso-Jones formula 5, 6 for 3-strand knots/links is also possible. The cube of adjoint representation is decomposed as follows: 3 = S 3 +S [1] +Λ 3 59 where the three terms in the sum correspond to the three components of the cube with different Young diagram symmetries, according to notations. First and third terms are 1-dimensional representations of the symmetric group S 3, second term is two-dimensional standards representation of S 3. Decompositions of these terms into universal irreps are, according to Theorem 3.8 of [1]: S 3 = X 1 X Bα Bβ Bγ Y 3 α Y 3 β Y 3 γ Λ 3 = X 0 X Y α Y β Y γ X 3 α X 3 β X 3 γ 60 S [1] = X 1 X Y α Y β Y γ Bα Bβ Bγ Cα Cβ Cγ 61 11

12 X 0 is a singlet with unit dimension and eigenvalue, X 1 =, representations X and Y are the same as appeared in the square of adjoint in sec..5, their dimensions and associated eigenvalues are given in 5 and 53. The plethysm Adams rule together with Deligne hypothesis gives the quantum dimensions of the three sectors: D S 3 q = D q 3 +3D q D q+d q 3, 6 D Λ3 q = D q 3 3D q D q+d q 3, 6 6 D S[1] q = D q 3 D q 3 3 where the plethystic replace q q n in the universal terms means u u n, v v n, w w n. To get the universal Rosso-Jones formula for 3-strand knots we note that characters multipliers ϕ Y σ [3,n=3k±1] for fully symmetric and antisymmetric representations of S 3 are 1, and that for [1] contribution standard two-dimensional representation of S 3 is -1, see, e.g. [4]. These values also follows from the Adams rule plethysm: So: 3-Adams = S 3 S [1] +Λ 3 63 U [3,n] = uvw6n D I ±λ n/3 I D I 64 where the sign is plus for representations from the 3 and 111 sectors in 3, and minus for those from the one 1 sector. This means that there are numerous cancellations and contributing to the sum over I in 64 are actually 10 representations: seven with the sign plus and three X 0 X 3 α X 3 β X 3 γ Y 3 α Y 3 β Y 3 γ 65 Cα Cβ Cγ 66 with the sign minus. According to Theorem 3.8 in [1] the corresponding Casimir s eigenvalues lead to λ Xi = uvw i, i = 0,1,,3, λ Y α = uv w, λ Y3 α = v 3 w 3, λ B α = u 3 v w, λ C α = u 3/ v 3 w 3 67 Note that contributing to 64 are only representations, whose eigenvalues are cubic in parameters u, v, w, so that λ /3 I are integer powers. Starting from the cube of adjoint, the quantum dimensions are rarely known in the universal form. A part of the problem is that even at the classical level some of them are not just rational functions of parameters α,β,γ, but belong to certain extensions of this field cubic in the case of 3, as shown in [1]. However, it is very interesting and important that the Rosso-Jones formula appears insensitive to this complication! The classical dimensions for all components of 3 are provided in the same theorem 3.8, and quantization for some of them for those, belonging to the symmetric cube is suggested in [38]. The classical dimension of X 3 is expressed through the parameters α, β and γ by algebraic functions: it involves roots of a cubic equation with coefficients made from these parameters, which make problem for explicit quantization. However, since all the three X 3 has coincident eigenvalues, only the sum of all the three enters 64, i.e. the character hypothesis eliminates this problem. More exactly, the sum can be obtained by subtraction of known dimensions from that of the antisymmetric cube: D X3 D X3α +D X3β +D X3γ = D Λ3 1 D X D Yα D Yβ D Yγ 68 The resulting explicit formula is long and not very informative, therefore we do not present it here. 1

13 The essentially new quantum dimensions at the cube level are [38] D Y3α = {uvw}{v w}{w v}{v uw}{w uv}{uv w}{uw v}{vw/u u}{vw u} { u}{ v}{ w}{u}{u u}{ v/u}{ w/u}{ u/v}{ u/w} D Bα = {uvw}{v uw}{w uv}{uv w}{uw v}{vw u}{u v}{u w}{uv/ w}{uw/ v} { u}{u}{ v} { w} { v/w}{ w/v}{ v/u}{ w/u} 69 and, finally, applying characters hypothesis to relation from Theorem 3.8: we get quantum dimension of Cα: Y α = +X +Y α+y 3 α+bβ+bγ+cα 70 D Cα = {uvw}{vw}{v w}{w v}{u vw}{uv w}{uw v}{v uw}{w uv} { u} {u 3/ }{ v}{ w}{ u/v}{ u/w}{ u/v}{ u/w} 71 uv 1 uw+ 1 u vw + uv uw vw + u It is easy to check that together with 5 and 6 these expressions are consistent with decompositions 59. Substituting all this into 64, we extend 54 to U [3,n=3k±1] = uvw4n uvw n +D X3 +u n D Y3α +v n D Y3β +w n D Y3γ u n D Cα v n D Cβ w n D Cγ D 7 OnecandirectlycheckthatU [3,] = U [,3], whichisimpliedbythetopologicalinvarianceoftheknotpolynomials. On the SON line u = q, v = q 4, w = q 3 A this reproduces the answer of [35] for Kauffman polynomial, K [3,n] = K [3,n] [11] = q 6n A 6n q n A n d [333] A n d [31] +q n A n d [3111] +q n A n d [] d [11] q 6n A n d [1111] +q 10n A n d with D X3 = d [] +d [3111], D Y3α = d [333], D Y3β = d [111111], D Y3γ = 0, 74 D Cα = d [31], D Cβ = d [11], D Cγ = 0 Dimensions Y 3 γ and Cγ vanish for SON already at the classical level, since they are proportional to α+β SON = 0. One the SUN line u = q, v = q, w = A, one reproduces the uniform HOMFLY provided D Y3α = {Aq5 }{Aq} {A} {A/q} {q 3 } {q } {q} = D [63 N ], D Y3β = {A/q5 }{A/q} {A} {Aq} {q 3 } {q } {q} = D [1 N 6 ], 75 and D Y3γ = 1 = D [0], D Cα = {Aq4 }{Aq }{A} {A/q}{A/q } {q 3 } {q }{q} 3 = D [5 N 3 1] +D [543 N 3 ], D Cβ = {A/q4 }{A/q }{A} {Aq}{Aq } {q 3 } {q }{q} 3 = D [31 N 5 ] +D [333 N 5 1], D Cγ = 0 D X3 = {Aq3 }{Aq}{A/q}{A/q 3 } {q 3 } {q } {q} q +4+q A +A 3q 4 +q ++q +3q

14 Again, for SUN already the classical dimension D Cγ α+β SUN = 0. We remind that X 3 is actually a sum of three representations, namely, for SUN D X3 = D X3α +D X3β +D X3γ = {Aq3 }{Aq }{Aq}{A/q}{A/q }{A/q 3 } {q 3 } {q } {q} + {Aq3 }{Aq} {A/q} {A/q 3 } {q 3 } {q} 4 = = D [43 N 4 1] +D [41 N 4 ] +D [4443 N 4 ] 77 in excellentaccordancewith 68. The three dimensionsfrom 3, which donot contributetothe Rosso-Jones formula 7, for SUN are: D Bα = {Aq}{A} {A/q 3 } {q} {q } = D [ 1 N 4 ], D Bβ = {Aq3 }{A} {A/q} {q} {q } = D [4 N ], D Bγ = {Aq3 }{Aq} {A/q} {A/q 3 } {q} 4 {q 3 } = D [43 N 4 1] The extension of the formula 7 to the case of 3-strand links is immediate but looks much longer. In this case all the terms in the expansion 59 contribute, since now we evaluate characters, ϕ Y σ [3,n=3k], on identity element of group, which gives dimensions of representations, i.e. 1,1, for symmetric, antisymmetric and [1] cases, respectively. So, for links we get 78 U [3,n=3k] = uvw1k uvw 6k +6uvw 4k D X1 +6uvw k D X +D X3 +3u k uvw k D Yα+ D +3v k uvw k D Yβ +3w k uvw k D Yγ +3vw k D Bα +3uw k D Bβ +3uv k D Bγ + +u 3k D Cα +v 3k D Cβ +w 3k D Cγ +u 6k D Y3α +v 6k D Y3β +w 6k D Y3γ 79 An extension to four and more strands is more difficult, because much less is known about universal formulas for dimensions even classical in higher powers of adjoint representation. However, as we discover above in the 3-strand example, the most difficult questions like quantization of individual dimensions D X3α, which even classically are algebraic functions of the universal parameters, can be irrelevant for knot theory, at least for the torus knots, so one can hope that similar phenomena can happen in higher powers, also. Non-torus knots is another challenge. As we will now demonstrate with the example of the simplest nontorus 4 1, their knot polynomials can also be lifted to the universal level, though a systematic way to do so still needs to be developed. 4 Universal knot polynomial for the figure-eight knot 4 1 The uniform adjoint HOMFLY is equal to H 41 q A = 1 + q +q +{q } q3 +q 3 q +q 1 {A} + while the adjoint Kauffman polynomial for 4 1 was found in [43]: q 3 +q 3 {A} q +q 1, 80 K 41 = K41 [11] = A4 1 q +q 6 q 8 q 10 +q 1 +A 3 q 3 +q 4q 3 +3q 5 +q 7 3q 9 +q A q 6 3q q 4q 4 +7q 6 q 8 3q 10 +q 1 +A q 7 q 5 6q 3 +7q +4q 1 10q 3 +q q 7 q 9 q 11 q 10 q 8 5q 6 +7q 4 +3q 13+3q +7q 4 5q 6 q 8 +q A 1 q 11 q 9 +5q 7 +q 5 10q 3 +4q +7q 1 6q 3 q 5 +q 7 +A q 1 3q 10 q 8 +7q 6 4q 4 6q +6 3q 4 +q 6 +A 3 q 13 3q 9 +q 7 +3q 5 4q 3 +q 1 q 3 +A 4 q 1 q 10 q 8 +q 6 q +1 14

15 The universal knot polynomial is given by U 41 = ,0, 1+1,0, 1 1,1, 1 Since 4 1 is fully amphicheiral, the polynomial is symmetric under the change 81 because of this in 81 we use the notation u,v,w u 1,v 1,w = uvw 4 +uvw 4, 300 = u 3 +v 3 +w 3 +u 3 +v 3 +w 3,31 = u 3 v w +u 3 v w 1 +5 permutations,,0, 1 = u /v +v/u +u /w+w/u +v /u+u/v +v /w+w/v +w /u+u/w +w /v +v/w, 1,0, 1 = u/v+u/w+v/w+v/u+w/u+w/v, note non-trivial multiplicities. Expression 81 reproduces the uniform HOMFLY and Kauffman polynomials at the SUN and SON lines uv = 1 and u v = 1. The ambiguity left by comparison with uniform HOMFLY and Kauffman polynomials is proportional to uv 1vw 1uw 1u v 1uv 1vw 1v w 1uw 1u w 1 uvw 4 84 times a rational function, which is odd under 8. Adding such polynomials would increase the power of 81. At the exceptional line w = u v U 41 1 uv 1 1 uv 1 uv 1+uv +uv 4 1 u v +3uv +...+uv On properties of the universal polynomials As mentioned in the Introduction, our actual calculation started from the uniform HOMFLY and attempts to unify them with the Kauffman polynomials into a universal expression. It is instructive to present some more details about these polynomials and their properties, which has a natural extension to the universal level. Let us first list the properties that we are going to check for the universal polynomials of the concrete knots. i The special polynomial property: U K u = 1,v = 1,w = [ σ K w] where σ K w is a universal special polynomial in the fundamental representation this implies that the universality is preserved even in the fundamental representation for the special polynomial. ii The Alexander property: 86 Uu,v,w K = 1 87 uvw=1 The condition uvw = 1 reduces to trivial Abelian factors for the concrete groups and is equivalent to N = 0 in the SUN case, hence, the name Alexander. iii The differential expansion related to the Alexander property above: U K u,v,w 1. uvw 1uvw+1 88 The remainder of this division can be further refined and depends on the knot. Below we consider examples of concrete knots, manifest expressions for their polynomials and check properties i-iii. 15

16 5.1 Trefoil The uniform HOMFLY polynomial For the trefoil the uniform HOMFLY 1 is given by a remarkably simple expression: H [,3] = A8 A q +q q +1 q + A8 q q 1 A A 89 Here A = q N. This formula certainly coincides with 8 for n = 3 and with 54 at the SUN line u = q, v = q, w = A. Expressions 89 and 80 are also in accord with that in [44, p.5]. We immediately check that: ii Its special polynomial is a square of the fundamental one: This is instead of H [,3] q = 1 A = A A = H [,3] N q = 1 A = A A N = for the usual adjoint colored HOMFLY at fixed N. ii Its Alexander polynomial is just unity: iii Its differential expansion starts from {A} : 5.1. The adjoint Kauffman polynomial H [,3] H [,3] q = 1 A 90 N q = 1 A 91 H [,3] q A = 1 = 1 9 H [,3] 1.. A A 1 93 The Kauffman polynomial for the trefoil K [,3] q,a can be read off from 34 for n = 3. i. The special polynomials at q = 1 are the same for SUN and SON, provided both are expressed in terms of A which originally were identified respectively with q N and q N 1 : K R q = 1 = K R [1] q = 1 = H R [1] q = 1 = H Rq = 1 94 We already saw in 90 that the uniform adjoint HOMFLY H at q = 1 is also a square of the fundamental special polynomial, and now we see the reason: this is exactly the property of the adjoint Kauffman polynomial K [11], K [11] q = 1 = H[1] q = 1 95 and if there is the universality, the same should be true for the uniform HOMFLY. ii. Also and iii. K [,3] q A = ±q = 1, 96 K [,3] q A 1. Aq +1{A/q} 97 16

17 5.1.3 The universal polynomial It is not a surprise now that the universal polynomial, which for the trefoil is explicitly equal to U [,3] adj = 1+ 1 uvw + 1 uvw 1 uv1 uw1 vw S S 665 S 555 S S 44 S 1 + S 666 +S 555 3S 544 S S S 33 +S = = uvw 4 u 6 v 6 w 6 +u 6 v 6 w 5 +v 6 w 6 u 5 +w 6 u 6 v 5 u 6 v 5 w 5 +v 6 w 5 u 5 +w 6 u 5 v 5 u 5 v 4 w 4 +v 5 w 4 u 4 +w 5 u 4 v 4 +u 5 v 4 w 3 +v 5 w 4 u 3 +w 5 u 4 v 3 +u 5 w 4 v 3 +v 5 u 4 w 3 +w 5 v 4 u u 4 v 4 w 4 u 4 v 4 w 3 +v 4 w 4 u 3 +w 4 u 4 v 3 +u 4 v 3 w 3 +v 4 w 3 u 3 +w 4 u 3 v 3 u 4 v w +v 4 w u +w 4 u v u 3 v 3 w +v 3 w 3 u +w 3 u 3 v +u 3 v w +v 3 w u +w 3 u v u 3 v w+v 3 w u+w 3 u v +u 3 w v +v 3 u w +w 3 v u u v w +u +v +w +uv +vw+wu+1 i satisfies the generalized factorization property at u = v = 1 ii it satisfies the Alexander identity and iii there is a differential expansion: U [,3] U [,3] u = v = 1,w = w w 99 U [,3] u,v,w uvw=1 = S u,v,w 1 = uvw 1uvw S 887 3S 877 3S S S 666 3S 644 3S 554 +S +1 In these formulas S abc are the elementary symmetric polynomials, S abc = 1 6 u a v b w c +5 permutations 10 Note that S aaa = uvw a, but u a v a w b +v a w a u b +w a u a v b = 3S aab. There is also a couple of weaker properties: at w = 1 U [,3] w = 1,u,v 1 = uv 1 uv +1 u 6 v 6 u 4 v 4 u +v +u+v+u 4 v 4 +u 3 v 3 +u v +uv and also at w = 1 U [,3] w = 1,u,v 1 = uv 1 uv +1 u 7 v 7 +3u 6 v u 4 v 4 u 3 v +v 3 u +u u+v v+u 4 v 4 +u 3 v 3 +u v +uv Exceptional groups iii For exceptional groups we get an additional factorization in differential expansions: by U [,3] 1 uvw 1 is divisible 17

18 1 q 1+q /3 for G 1 q 1+q 4 1+q +q for F 4 1 q 6 1+q for E q 6 1+q 1+q 4 for E 7 1 q 6 1+q 1+q +q 4 +q 6 +q 8 = 1 q 10 1+q 1+q +q 4 for E 8 In general on the exceptional line w = u v and from 98 one gets: U [,3] w = u v,u,v 1 = uv 1 uv 6 1 uv 3 uv u+v To compare, on the SU and SO/Sp lines v = u 1 and v = u one respectively has and U [,3] v = u 1,u,w 1 = w 1 u u 3 u +uw 6 +u 4 u +1w 4 u w u 107 U [,3] v = u,u,w 1 = w u w +u u 11 u 1u 1w u Examples of exceptional knot polynomials for the trefoil We list here first adjoint exceptional knot polynomials, since they have never been calculated so far. We added for comparison the cases of small classical groups. 18

19 P [3 1],A 1 q = J [3 1] [] = q 4 1+q 6 q 10 +q 1 q 14 q 16 +q 18 P [3 1],A q = H [3 1] [1] q A = q3 = q 8 1+q 4 q 6 +q 8 q 10 +q 1 4q 14 +3q 16 q 18 +q 0 q +q 4 P [3 1],A 3 q = H [3 1] [11] q A = q4 = q 1 1+q 4 q 8 +q 10 q 1 +q 14 q 16 q 18 +3q 0 q +q 4 +q 6 q 8 +q 30 P [3 1],A 4 q = H [3 1] [111] q A = q5 = q 16 1+q 4 +q 8 q 10 +q 1 q 14 +q 16 q 18 +q 0 q +3q 4 q 6 +q 8 +q 3 q 34 +q P [3 1],D q = K [3 1] q A = q = 1 1 [11] P [3 1],D q = K [3 1] [11] q A = q3 = q 4 1+q 6 q 10 +q 1 q 14 q 16 +q 18 = P [3 1],A 1 q P [3 1],D 3 q = K [3 1] [11] q A = q5 = q 1 1+q 4 q 8 +q 10 q 1 +q 14 q 16 q 18 +3q 0 q +q 4 +q 6 q 8 +q 30 = P [3 1],A 3 q P [3 1],D 4 q = K [3 1] [11] q A = q7 = q 0 1+q 4 +q 6 q 10 +q 1 +q 14 4q 16 q 18 +3q 0 5q 4 +q q 8 q 30 3q 3 +q 34 +q 36 q 38 q 40 +q 4 P [3 1],D 5 q = K [3 1] [11] q A = q9 = q 8 1+q 4 +q 6 +q 8 q 0 q +q 6 q 8 q 30 q 3 +q 34 +3q 36 q 40 q 4 +q 44 +q 46 q 50 q 5 +q P [3 1],G q = q 1 1+q 4 +q 14/3 +q 16/3 q 0/3 q /3 q 8 +q 8/3 +q 10 +q 3/3 q 34/3 q 1 q 38/3 q 40/3 +q 14 +q 44/3 +q 46/3 q 50/3 3q 5/3 q 18 +q 58/3 +3q 0 +q 6/3 q q 68/3 q 70/3 +q 74/3 +q 76/3 q 80/3 q 8/3 q 8 +q 30 P [3 1],F 4 q = q 3 1+q 4 +q 7 +q 8 +q 16 q 18 +q 0 q 1 q q 3 q 5 q 6 +q 7 +q 8 q 30 q 34 q 35 +q 36 +q 37 q 38 +q 39 +3q 40 +q 41 q 4 q 45 q 46 +q 48 +q 5 +q 53 q 54 q 55 q 58 +q 60 P [3 1],E 6 q = q 44 1+q 4 +q 8 +q 10 +q 16 q 4 q 8 q 30 q 3 q 40 q 44 +q 48 +3q 5 q 58 +q 68 q 7 q 76 +q 78 P [3 1],E 7 q = q 68 1+q 4 +q 10 +q 14 +q 0 +q 4 q 6 +q 8 q 30 q q 38 q 40 q 44 q 46 +q 48 q 50 +q 5 q 54 q 60 +q 6 q 64 +q 66 q q 70 +q 7 q 74 +3q 76 q 78 +q 80 q 84 +q 86 q 88 +q 90 q 9 +q 100 q 10 +q 104 q 106 q 11 +q 114 P [3 1],E 8 q = q q 4 +q 14 +q +q 8 +q 36 q 4 +q 44 q 50 q 56 q 60 +q 6 q 64 q 7 q 74 +q 76 q 78 q 8 +q 84 q 86 q 88 +q 9 q 96 +q 10 q 104 +q 106 +q 110 q 11 +q 114 +q 116 q 1 +3q 14 q q 13 q 136 +q 138 q 144 +q 146 q 15 +q 164 q 166 +q 17 q 174 q 184 +q

20 5. General -strand torus knots [, k + 1] 5..1 The HOMFLY polynomial For the entire one-parametric family of the -strand knots, the HOMFLY polynomial in the fundamental representation is H [,k+1] and the special polynomial is equal to = A k+1 q k 1 {Aq} q k+1 {A/q} {q } H [,k+1] [1] q = 1 = 109 k +1 ka A k 110 The uniform HOMFLY polynomial in the adjoint representation, a generalization of 89 turns out to be H [,k+1] q A = A 4k+4 1 Xk +A 4k A X k A{A}Y k +A 4k+4 {A }{q} Z k 111 where and e.g. X k = qk 1 +q k+1 q +q 1, Y k = qk+ q k q q 11 k 1 Z k = A 4k 1 i Y i Y i +A Y i 1 i=0 113 Z 1 = 1, Z = A 4 +q +q A +q +q, Z 3 = A 8 +q +q A 6 +q +q A 4 +q +q q 4 +1+q 4 A +q 4 +1+q 4, i This uniform HOMFLY satisfies and H [,k+1] q = 1 A = H [,k+1] [1] q = 1 A 115 ii moreover, H [,k+1] q A = 1 = 1, 116 iii the deviation from unity is always quadratically small: 5.. The Kauffman polynomial H [,k+1] q A 1.. {A} 117 The normalized Kauffman polynomial for -strand knots is given by the Rosso-Jones formula 34, K [,n] = K[,n] [11] = q 4n A 4n A n d [] q n A n d [11] +q 6n A n d [1111] +q n A n d [] q n A n d [11] +1 d [11] and satisfies 118 i and K [,k+1] q = 1 A = σ A [,k+1] 119 0

21 ii K [,k+1] q A = ±q = 1, 10 iii Its deviation from unity is only linear, but always has an additional factor Aq 1: K [,k+1] q A 1.. Aq +1{A/q} 11 We remind that in this case A = q N 1, so A = q corresponds to the Abelian SO group. 5.3 Other knots The same properties i-iii are also true for the 3-strand torus knots and also for the figure-eight knot. For this later, in particular, U 41 u = v = 1,w = w 1+w 1 and the properties i-iii for the SUN line look like H 41 q = 1 A = A 1+A = σ 41 A, H 41 q A = 1 = 1, 13 H 41 q A 1. {A} moreover, the complete refined differential expansion iii is in this case H 41 q A = 1 + q +q +{q } q3 +q 3 q +q 1 {A} + q 3 +q 3 {A} q +q 1 14 If not the underlined term, this differential expansion would very much resemble that for the symmetric representations [1], H 41 [] q A = 1+q +q 1 {Aq }{A/q}+{Aq 3 }{Aq }{A}{A/q}, r k 1 H 41 [r] q A = 1+ [r]! {Aq +i }{Aq i 1 } [k]![r k]! k=1 As to underlined {q} term it first appeared in [45], see also [3] for a little more about such terms. Similarly, for SON line we have: 6 Conclusion i=0 15 K Aq +1 {A/q} 16 In this paper we constructed the universal adjoint knot polynomials for the -strand torus knots formula 54 and links formula 58, for the 3-strand torus knots formula 7 and links formula 79, see also formulas 67 for the eigenvalues of the cut-and-join operator, κ R and formulas for the universal quantum dimensions: 69, 71 and 68 with 6, 56 and 57. We also proposed a universal adjoint knot polynomial for the figure eight knot in 81. These are the first examples of universal expressions for non-trivial knots, and they provide a strong evidence that all adjoint colored knot polynomials exhibit Vogel s universality and can be lifted to entire Vogel s plane, so that the corresponding HOMFLY and Kauffman polynomials are just their particular cases on particular hyperplanes of codimension one. This fact opens absolutely new perspectives for study of both the universality and the colored knot polynomials and deserves extension in various directions: to other knots, to superpolynomials and to other representations from the family of adjoint descendants. Another application of present results can be in the study of the theory of Jacobi diagrams and Vogel s Λ-algebra. From the point of view of the Chern-Simons theory above polynomials are Wilson averages for a given knot in adjoint representation. In a given order in perturbation theory it is the sum of Jacoby diagrams depending on gauge group weighted with space-time integrals, independent of gauge group, but dependent on 1