The basics of frame theory

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "The basics of frame theory"

Transcription

1 First version released on 30 June 2006 This version released on 30 June 2006 The basics o rame theory Harold Simmons The University o Manchester hsimmons@ manchester.ac.uk This is the irst part o a series o notes [3, 4, 5, 6, 7] on rames, with several more to come. In this part I set down the basic deinitions and properties, give a ew examples, and begin the discussion o nuclei. The last section looks at various categorical properties, and could be omitted at a irst reading. 1 Ater that you should read [4] and [5] in the order you preer. That will give you a good grounding in the subject. The whole collection can be ound at [1] I you have never seen this collection beore then perhaps you should read [2]. Contents 1 The category o rames The basic notions Topologies Complete boolean algebras The implication on a rame Morphisms as poset adjunctions The universal algebra o rames Quotients o rames Quotients in Set Quotients in Sup Quotients in Frm Nuclei on rames Various relections Relections in general Relection rom Meet Relection rom Dlt Relection rom Sup Relection rom Set Reerences Index The category o rames In this section we irst set up the deinition o a rame and a rame morphism, we then look at two important classes o rames, and inally we sort out some useul gadgetry. 1 It might make more sense to make Section 5 the bulk o another set o notes on relections in general or various kinds o structured posets. 1

2 1.1 The basic notions Is there a better way to start than with a deinition? 1.1 DEFINITION. A rame is a structure where (A, ) is a complete poset (A,,, ) is a -semilattice (A,,, ) is a -semilattice and where these satisy (A,,,,, ) (FDL) a X = {a x x X} or each a A and X A. This is the Frame Distributive Law. A rame morphism A B between rames A, B is a unction : A B which preserves the distinguished attributes. Let Frm be the category o rames and rame morphisms. We must understand exactly what this deinition says so it is worth looking at some o its details. A rame A is carried by a poset (A, ) which is complete, that is both X X exist or each subset X A. In particular, A has both extremes = = A A = = the top and the bottom. Three o these, the two extremes and are selected as distinguished attributes. However, is not a distinguished attribute o the rame, but the binary join is. This signature, the selected attributes, determines the notion o a rame morphism. This is a unction, as indicated, which preserves the comparison, in other words it is monotone, and satisies ( ) = (x y) = (x) (y) ( ) = ( X) = (X) 2

3 or each x, y A and X A (where A is the source o the morphism). In particular we can have ( X) (X) or X A. We will see a general reason or this in Subsection 1.2. For each unction : A B we write or the image o (X) = {(x) x X} (Y ) = {x A (x) Y } direct X A inverse Y B across, respectively. As well as carrying these attributes a rame is required to satisy FDL. As a particular case o this we may take a couple X = {x, y} o elements to obtain a (x y) = (a x) (a y) and hence the rame is a distributive lattice. Consequently the rame also satisies or a, x, y A. However, it can happen that a (x y) = (a x) (a y) a X {a x x x} or a A and X A. We will see an example o this in Subsection 1.2. The import o the FDL can be expressed in a dierent way. We look at this in Subsection 1.4. As we have seen, each rame is both a -semilattice and a -semilattice. More precisely, there is a pair Frm Meet Frm Sup o orgetul unctors. We take a closer look at these in Section 5. The precise deinition o Meet is given in Subsection 5.2, and that o Sup slightly earlier in Subsection 3.2. It s time to look at two substantial examples. We make each o these a subsection. 1.2 Topologies Historically, topologies ormed the motivating examples o rames. Beore we look at them let s ix some notation which we used throughout these notes, and other sets in the series. Let S be a topological space. Thus we have two amilies OS CS 3

4 o subsets o S, the open closed subsets o S, respectively. Here OS is the topology. We also have two operations ( ) ( ) on subsets o S, providing the interior closure o a subset o S, respectively. Any o these our gadgets uniquely determines the topology. We also write ( ) or the set theoretic complementation on S. This, o course, is independent o the particular topology on S. To be a topology the amily OS must contain the two extremes S and, and be closed under binary intersections and arbitrary unions. This almost shows that (OS,,, S,, ) is a rame. All that is needed is the observation that FDL holds since OS sits inside the power set PS and the relevant operations are computed set theoretically. This is a useul way i motivating the distinguished attributes o a rame. We know that or U OS the intersection U need not be open. The inimum o U in OS is given by U = ( U) using the interior operation o the space. Note also that or a topology OS we need not have W U = {W U u U} or W OS and U OS. Thus the opposite o FDL need not hold in a rame. Consider a continuous map T φ between a pair spaces S, T. By deinition o continuity we have φ (U) OT or each U OS. A couple o simple calculations shows that the assignment S OS φ OT is a rame morphism. In particular, a rame morphisms need not preserve arbitrary inima. This construction sets up a contravariant unctor Top O Frm rom spaces to rames. I you are new to this game you should go through the various calculations missing here. In [5] we show that O is one hal o a contravariant adjunction between Frm and Top. This connection enables many topological properties to be analysed using rame theoretic methods. That is what point-ree topology is about. 4

5 1.3 Complete boolean algebras In this subsection we isolate a large subcategory o Frm. A boolean algebra is a distributive lattice A or which each element is complemented. That is, or each a A there is a, necessarily unique, element b A such that a b = a b = hold. We write a or the element b, so that ( ) is a 1-placed operator on A. Notice that a = a (or i b is the complement o a, then a is the complement o b). Notice that any lattice morphism A B rom a boolean algebra A preserves complements, that is i a, b are complementary o A, then (a), (b) are complementary in B. The operation ( ) on a boolean algebra A has various properties. In particular we have a x y x a y or a, x, y A. The proo o this is more important than the result. To prove we remember a a = so that x = ( a a) x = ( a x) (a x) a y using a x y at the inal step. A similar argument starting rom a a = gives the converse implication. This kind o trick is used several times in this subsection. A complete boolean algebra is a boolean algebra which is complete as a poset. Such an algebra has all the attributes to be a rame, but what about FDL? 1.2 LEMMA. Each complete boolean algebra is a rame. Proo. Let A be a cba. Certainly A is a complete lattice, so it suices to show that A satisies the FDL. To this end let l = a X r = {a x x X} or a A and x A. The comparison r l is trivial, so it remains to veriy the converse. We use the equivalence given above. For x X we have a x l so that x a l 5

6 to give X a l and hence r l, as required. In any boolean algebra the interaction between meets, joins, and complementation is given by the De Morgan laws. There are similar laws or complete boolean algebras. We need one o these. 1.3 LEMMA. For an arbitrary subset X o a complete boolean algebra A we have X = ( Y ) where Y = { x x X} is the auxiliary subset. Proo. Let a = X b = Y so that it suices to show that a, b are complementary, that is a b = a b = hold. For each y = x Y we have a y x x = and hence, since A is a rame, to give the let hand equality. Let c = b. For each x X we have so that c x. Thus c a, and hence a b = {a y y Y } = c x c b = a b c b = to give the right hand equality. Complete boolean algebras orm the objects o two dierent categories, Cba and CBA. Given two such algebras A, B and arrow A B 6

7 in Cba is simply a lattice morphism, that is a unction that preserves the initary attributes. As we saw above, such a morphism preserves complements. An arrow in CBA, sometime called a complete morphism, preserves arbitrary inima and suprema, that is ( X) = (X) ( X) = (X) or each subset X o the source. Each object o CBA is a special kind o rame, and each arrow o CBA is a special kind o rame morphism. Thus we have a orgetul unctor CBA Frm this time with Frm as the target, not the source. You might think that there is a third category where the objects are complete boolean algebras, and the arrows are the rame morphisms between these algebras. However, the next result shows that this is just CBA. 1.4 LEMMA. Let A B be a rame morphism rom a complete boolean algebra A to a rame B. Then is a complete morphism, that is ( X) = (X) or each X A. Proo. Let b = ( X) d = (X) or the given subset X. The monotonicity o ensures that b d, so it suices to show the converse comparison. Let Y = { x x X} c = ( Y ) so that ( Y ) = X (by Lemma 1.3), and hence b and c are complementary in B. For each y = x Y we have d (y) (x) ( x) = since passes across. Also passes across so that and hence c = {(y) y Y } d c = {d (y) y Y } = by the FDL in B. Finally, remembering that c b = 7

8 we have as required. d = d (c b) = (d c) (d b) = d b b For each pair A, B o complete boolean algebras, we certainly have an inclusions CBA[A, B] Frm[A, B] o arrow sets (since each complete morphism is a rame morphism). Lemma 1.4 shows that, in act, this inclusion is an equality. Thus we have the ollowing. 1.5 THEOREM. The category CBA o complete boolean algebras and complete morphisms is a ull subcategory o the category Frm o rames. In [7] we investigate just how CBA sits inside Frm. 1.4 The implication on a rame A rame is a complete lattice which satisies the FDL. This equational requirement can be codiied in a dierent way, and produces a useul tool. 1.6 DEFINITION. An implication on a -semilattice A is a two placed operation ( ) such that x (b a) b x a or all a, b, x A. Trivially, at most one implication can be carried by a -semilattice. Carrying one enorces certain properties. 1.7 LEMMA. A complete lattice A carries an implication precisely when it is a rame. Proo. Suppose irst that A is a rame. For a, b A set so that (b a) = {x A b x a} b x a = x (b a) (or arbitrary x A). We require the converse. But b (b a) = {b x b x a} a by the FDL, and this leads to the required result. Conversely, suppose A carries an implication, and consider any a A and X A. It suices to show a X {a x x X} (since the converse comparison is trivial). Let y = {a x x X} 8

9 so that a x y or each x X. The implication property gives x (a y) or each such x, so that X (a y) and hence by a second use o the implication property. a X y This shows that a rame is exactly the same thing as a complete heyting algebra. However, that description can be misleading since rame morphisms need not preserve implication. It is worth looking at two examples o implication. 1.8 EXAMPLES. (a) For a topology OS on a space S the implication is given by (V U) = (V U) or U, V OS. To see this consider an arbitrary W OS. Then W (V U) W (V U) W V U to give the required result. We oten use a topology OS to illustrate various aspects o rame theory. Sometimes we use OS directly, but sometimes it is more enlightening to look at CS. This oten requires the insertion o a complementation at appropriate places. In this particular case, or X, Y CS we have (Y X ) = (Y X ) = (X Y ) which is clearly important in some situations. (b) For a complete boolean algebra A the implication is given by (b a) = b a using the negation on A. In other words we have x b a b x a or a, b, x A. This is the observation made just beore Lemma 1.2. We will return to the idea o a negation shortly. There are many identities involving the implication. Some o these are given in the next two results. It isn t worth remembering most o these, but the proo technique repeated use o the characterizing equivalence is important. 9

10 1.9 LEMMA. On a rame A we have (i) a (x a) (ii) x (x a) = x a (iii) x y = (y a) (x a) (iv) (( X) a) = {(x a) x X} or all a, x, y A and X A. Proo. (i). Since x a a, this is immediate. (ii). For each z A we have z x (x a) z x and z (x a) z x and x z a z a or the required result. The last step here requires just a ew moment s thought. (iii). Let z = (x a) where x y. Then so that as required. (iv). For each z A we have x z y z a z (x a) z ( X) a z X a {z x X} a ( x X)[z x a] ( x X)[z (x a)] z {(x a) x X} or the required result. notice the use o FDL at the second step. Part (iv) o this result is one o the ew identities worth remembering. Notice that by taking X = {x, y} we obtain ((x y) a) = (x a) (y a) as a particular case. The next deinition may look a little strange but, as we will learn, the operator produced is very important DEFINITION. For a rame A we set w a (x) = ((x a) a) or each a, x A to produce an operator w a on A. 10

11 We will use these operators quite a lot. Here are their simple properties LEMMA. For each element a o a rame A, the operator w a is inlationary, monotone, and idempotent, and satisies or each x, y A. (w a (x) a) = w a (x a) = (x a) w a (x y) = w a (x) w a (y) Proo. For each x A a use o Lemma 1.9(ii) gives so that x (x a) = x a a x ((x a) a) = w a (x) to show that w a is inlationary. Two uses o Lemma 1.9(iii) shows that w a is monotone. Beore we show that w a we veriy the let hand identity. To this end let z = (w a (x) a) = w a (x a) where the right hand equality is an immediate consequence o the deinition o w a. Since x w a (x), we have x z w a (x) z a so that or the required result. With this we have to show that w a is idempotent. Finally, or x, y A we have z (x a) w a )x a) = z w 2 a (x) = ((w a(x) a) a) = ((x a) a) = w a (x) w a (x y) w a (x) w a (y) since w a is monotone. This a converse comparison will give the remaining required result. To this end let z = w a (x) w a (y) so that to give z w a (x) z (x a) a and hence, using Lemma 1.9(iv), we have z w a (y) z (y a) a z ((x y) a) = z ((x a) (y a)) = (z (x a)) (z (y a)) a 11

12 which leads to the required comparison. A particular case o implication gives the negation a = (a ) o an element a A. This is characterized by z a a z = or z A. Now this terminology and notation may be conusing you, or in Subsection 1.3 we have used both in conjunction with a complete boolean algebra. Let s clear that up. We say an element a A o a rame A is complemented i a b a b = or some (necessarily unique) element b A. We then say that b is the complement o a in A. Notice that this terminology agrees with the boolean case LEMMA. Let A be an arbitrary rame, and consider a A. The element a is complemented precisely when a a =. Furthermore, i a is complemented, then its complement is its negation a. Proo. Suppose irst that a is complemented, that is a b a b = or some b A. The irst o these gives b a and the second gives a = a (a b) = ( a a) ( a b) = ( a b) b to show that a = b, and hence a a = b a = holds. Conversely, suppose then, with b = a, we have a a = a b = a a = a b = a a = to show that a is complemented. This result show that we can deine the notion o a complement element o a rame in terms o the behaviour o the negation operation on that rame. We extend this idea. 12

13 1.13 DEFINITION. An element a A o a rame A is, respectively, complemented regular dense i using the negation operation on A. a a a = a a = Notice that double negation ( ) is nothing more than the operation w o Deinition In particular, or each element a we have a a a = a by a particular case o a part o Lemma This shows that a is dense precisely when a =. This observation also shows that a is regular (no matter what element a we start with). Also, as in the proo o Lemma 1.11 we have (a b) = a b or all elements a, b. In particular, and element o the orm a a is always regular. Finally, since a = a (a a) we see that each element o a rame is the meet o a regular element and a denser element. This is a standard lattice theoretic observation. Deinition 1.13 uses standard terminology rom lattice theory, but the words are also used in topology. There is no conlict EXAMPLE. Consider a topology OS viewed as a rame. For each U, V OS we have V U = V U V U = U to show that U is the negation o U in OS. In particular, U is complemented precisely when U U = S U = U U = U in other words when U is clopen. 2 Since U = U = U we see that U is regular in the sense o Deinition 1.13 precisely when it is topologically regular. Finally, U is dense in the sense o Deinition 1.13 precisely when U = U = S equivalently when that is when U is topologically dense. U = S 2 I sometimes tell students that this is where the negation symbol comes rom. Some o them don t believe me. 13

14 In time we will develop the ideas in this example quite a bit urther. Every complemented element is regular, but in general the converse doesn t hold. In act, we have the ollowing LEMMA. A rame A is boolean precisely when each element is regular. Proo. Suppose A is boolean, so that a a = or each element A. On replacing a be a we have a a = so that a is the complement o a. But this complement is a, so that a = a. Conversely, suppose that ( ) is the identity unction on A. For each a A we have a a) = so that a a = (a a) = ( a a) = = to show that a is the complement o a. Most o the calculations in this section have been rather standard, only only occasionally have we needed the completeness o the rame. In due course we will need to go through several calculations which are more rame speciic. 1.5 Morphisms as poset adjunctions Each rame morphism is a -preserving unction between complete posets. In particular, as a poset map this unction has a right adjoint. This is a useul gadget, and is worth a bit o notation DEFINITION. For each rame morphism = rom rame A to rame B A B the right adjoint is the unique monotone map rom B to A such that (a) b a (b) or all a A and b B. Each o A and B is a poset. I we view each as a category that a unctor rom one to the other is just a monotone map. Two such maps are adjoint as unctors precisely when the are adjoint in the sense o Deinition Here we use upper and lower decorations 14

15 to distinguish between the let and the right component o the adjunction. (However, you are warned that some writers don t use this convention, perhaps because they don t understand it.) Finally, not that not every poset adjunction between a pair o rames gives a rame morphism. This let adjoint must also preserve initary meets. A simple exercise show that or each rame morphism (or any poset adjunction) we have ( Y ) = (Y ) or each Y B. However, need not be a rame morphism. In act, it need not preserve even binary joins. Each continuous map T φ S between a pair o spaces gives a rame morphism OS φ OT between the carried topologies, and hence produces an adjoint pair OS φ φ OT where φ = φ is the let adjoint. What is the right adjoint φ? It is reasonable to expect this to have something to do with direct images LEMMA. For each continuous map φ, as above, the right adjoint φ is give by or each W OT. φ (W) = φ (W ) Proo. Consider U OS and W OT. We have U φ (W ) φ (W ) U φ (W ) U ( t T)[t W = φ(t) U ] ( t T)[φ(t) U = t W] ( t T)[t φ (U) = t W] φ (U) W to veriy the required equivalence. We said earlier that the right adjoint o a rame morphism need not preserve even binary joins. We can illustrate this using two very simple spaces EXAMPLE. Consider the 2-point spaces T = {l, r} S = {0, 1} 15

16 with T discrete and with (so that S is sierpinski space). Let OS = {, {1}, S} φ(l) = 0 φ(r) = 1 to produce a continuous map rom T to S. With U = {l} V = {r} we have φ (U V ) = φ (T) = φ ( ) = = = S φ (U) = φ (U ) = φ(r) = {1} = S = φ (V ) = φ (V ) = φ(l) = {0} = {0} = {1} so that φ (U V ) = S φ (U) φ (V ) = {1} to show that φ is not a -morphism. We will, o course, have a lot more to say about rame morphisms in general. 2 The universal algebra o rames Here by universal algebra I don t mean anything very sophisticated; just some inormation about subrames, and a ew o the simple categorical properties o Frm. Quotient rame are let until the next section. Given a rame A = (A,,,,, ) a subrame is a subset B A which is itsel a rame under the restriction o the distinguished attributes o A. Thus, B and B is closed under binary meets and arbitrary suprema. The FDL then automatically transers to B. This is as must as we need to know about subrames, or they are not very interesting. However, let s not dismiss them just yet. Given rames B A we know that any computation involving and done in B agrees with the corresponding computation done in A. However, the implication and negation on B need not agree with those on A. 2.1 EXAMPLE. Consider two topologies on the same set S. Let us write OS S ( ) ( ) or the two respective interior operations. Thus E E or each subset E S, and these can be ar apart. For U, V OS the two implications are given by (V U) = (V U) (V U) = (V U) respectively, and these can be very dierent. 16

17 Recall that, respectively, an arrow B m A A e B o Frm is i or each parallel pair arrows monic epic C g B B g C the implication m = m g = = g e = g e = = g hold. Since the arrows in Frm are unctions (o a certain kind) we have m injective = m monic e surjective = m epic by the obvious cancellation argument. We show that the monics o Frm are precisely the injective arrows, but there are epics which are not surjective. To deal with monics we use the 3-element rame 1 3 = 0 where 0 < < 1. This can be used to separate the elements o an arbitrary rame. Consider any rame B and any element b B. consider the unction as on the let : 3 B (1)= ( )= b (0)= given by the equalities on the right. Almost trivially this is a rame morphism. Trivially, every rame morphism rom 3 arises in this way. 2.2 THEOREM. In the category Frm the monics are precisely the injective morphisms. Proo. On general grounds each injective morphism is monic. Conversely, suppose B m A is monic and consider any b, c B with m(b) = m(c). We require b = c. Let 3 g 17 B

18 be the pair o arrows determined by ( ) = b g( ) = c with (0), (1), g(0), g(1) as they must be. We have (m )( ) = m(b) = m(c) = (m g)( ) so that and hence since m is monic. This gives as required. m = m g = g b = ( ) = g( ) = c Not every epic in Frm is surjective. We use a particular example to show this. In act, the example illustrates a little bit more. Remember that a bimorphism is a morphism that is both monic and epic. Thus each isomorphism is a bimorphism. we give an example o a bimorphism that is not surjective, and not an isomorphism. 2.3 EXAMPLE. Let S be a T 1 topological space, with topology OS. The insertion OS PS is certainly monic, and is surjective only when S is discrete (so that OS = PS). We show that the insertion is epic. Since S is T 1, we know that points are closed. For each point p S let U p = {p} X p = {p} to obtain the set attached to p. We have or each subset E S. Consider any morphism open closed E = {X p p E} PS C to an arbitrary rame C. Since U p and X p are complements in PS, the values (U p ) (X p ) are complements in C. Thus the value (X p ) is uniquely determined by (U p ). 18

19 consider two morphism PS g C which agree on OS. We show that = g, and hence the insertion is epic. For each p S we have (U p ) = g(u p ) and hence (X p ) = g(x p ) by the remarks above. Consider any E S. Using the representation o E in terms o the X p, the preservation properties o and g give (E) = {(X p ) p X} = {g(x p ) p X} = g(e) or the required result. To conclude this section we make a simple observation which, as the story unolds, will become more and more important. Let ( ) 1 2 = 1 = ( ) 0 be the 2-element and 1-element rame, respectively. Almost trivially, these are the initial inal objects o Frm, respectively. In other words, or each rame A there are unique morphisms 2 A A 1 given in the obvious way. This uses 2 as a rame. We can also view it as a topological space. We don t use the discrete topology, rather we use O2 = {, { },2} the upper section topology. Notice that 3 = O2. When viewed in this way we reer to the space 2 as the sierpinski space. As we will ind out, this has a controlling interest in point-ree topology. 3 Quotients o rames A quotient o a rame A is a surjective morphism A B to some rame B. In particular, the structure o the target B is completely determined by the structure o the source A and the nature o. As in almost any algebraic situation, 19

20 the structure o B can be coded by a congruence on A. However, rames being what they are, this congruence on A can be replaced by another ar more useul and amenable gadget. These gadgets, the nuclei on A, are the central components in a amily o techniques which are a distinctive eature o the analysis o rames. We begin to develop these in Section 4, then more extensively in [4]. In this section we concentrate on characterizing quotients and thereby showing how nuclei irst appear. To do that (and to prepare or more sophisticated uses) we set the development in a broader context. Thus we look at quotient in the category Sup o -semilattices, and to do that we look briely at quotients in the category Set o sets. 3.1 Quotients in Set Almost all algebraic quotients can be obtained by reining a simple construction in the category Set o sets and unctons. Let A be a set, and let be an equivalence relation on A. Let A/ be the set o blocks o, the set o -equivalence classes, and let A η A/ be the canonical surjection. Thus or each a A η(a) = {x A a x} is the block to which a belongs. In particular, we have or x, y A. Conversely consider any unction η(x) = η(y) x y A B rom A. Setting x y (x) = (y) or x, y A produces an equivalence relation on A. Because o what comes later it is useul to think o this as the kernel o. These two construction are related by the ollowing, rather simple but undamental, result. 3.1 THEOREM. Let be an equivalence relation on the set A and let be a unction rom A, as above. Suppose is included in the kernel o, that is we have x y = (x) = (y) 20

21 or x, y A. Then there is a unique unction such that A B commutes. η A/ Proo. Consider any block α A/ and set (α) = (a) or any a α. The compatibility o with ensures this is a well-deined unction A/ B and trivially we have ( η)(a) = (a) or each a A. This shows there is at least one unction that makes the triangle commutes. Since η is surjective this is the only possible ill-in unction. There are several algebraic reinements o this result. When the two sets A, B carry similar algebraic structures and is a companion morphism we may imposed on A/ a similar algebraic structure such that both η and become morphisms. 3.2 Quotients in Sup The construction o Theorem 3.1 can be reined to obtain a similar actorization o morphisms in many algebraic situations. In the irst instance we replace the arbitrary equivalence relation by a congruence, a special kind o equivalence relation that respects the distinguished attributes. Then, i we are lucky, we can replace that congruence by another, more amenable, gadget. For instance, or groups or rings the congruence can be replaced by a particular one o its blocks, the normal subgroups or ideals, respectively. However, these two version still involve dealing with block representatives, which is always a nuisance. A similar thing happens with -semilattices and rames, but or these the replacement has a quite dierent character and does not require block representatives. Beore we get to these new gadgets we nee to sort out what a Sup-congruence is. And beore that I suppose I should tell you what the category is. 3.2 DEFINITION. The objects o the category Sup are the complete posets. When viewed in this way we reer to such an object as a -semilattice. An arrow o Sup, or -morphism, is a unction A B : A B 21

22 between to -semilattices such that ( X) = (X) or each X A. Each -semilattice is a complete poset, and so has all inima as well as all suprema. However, a -morphism need not preserve any inima, even binary meets. Note that since =, such a -morphism must preserve bottom, but it need not preserve top. You should think about this, and make sure you understand why. We can now begin to sort out what a Sup-congruence is. To do that it is convenient to introduce a bit o temporary notation. Let A be a -semilattice, and be an equivalence relation on A. When is a Sup-congruence on A? Let X = {x i i I} Y = {y i i I} be a pair o similarly indexed subsets o A (that is, over the same index set). We write i X Y ( i I)[x i y i ] that is i X and Y are point-wise equivalent. 3.3 DEFINITION. An equivalence relation on a -semilattice A is a Sup-congruence i we have X Y = X Y or each similarly indexed pair X, Y o subsets o A. Let A B be a -morphism. As in the Set-case, the kernel o is the equivalence relation on A given by x y (x) = (y) or x, y A. The morphism property translates into the ollowing. 3.4 LEMMA. The kernel o a -morphism is a Sup-congruence on the source algebra. Our job here is to produce a converse o this result, We show that every Supcongruence is obtained rom a -morphism. Consider how we might do that. Let A be a -semilattice and let be a Sup-congruence on A. As in the Set-case, consider the unction A η A/ 22

23 which sends each element to its block. The idea is to urnish A/ as a -semilattice in such a way that η becomes a -morphism. How might we urnish A/ with a supremum operation? Consider a subset X o A/. By choosing block representatives we can view this as X = η [X] or some subset X o A. The idea is to deine X = η( X) which automatically ensures that η is a -morphism. There is, o course, some work to be done. We must show that the deinition o this supremum operation in A/ is independent o the choice o block representatives. We also have to show that it is a supremum operation, which mean we should irst set up a partial ordering on A/ and show that η is monotone. All this can be done, but it s messy and, thankully, avoidable. The cause o the mess is the use o arbitrary block representatives. This can be cleaned up using special block representatives. 3.5 LEMMA. Let be a Sup-congruence on a -semilattice A. Then each -block has a unique largest member. Proo. Consider any a A. Let X = {x i i I} be an indexing o the block to which a belongs. Also let Y = {y i i I} where y i = a or each i I. By construction we have X Y so that (since is a Sup-congruence) X Y = a to show that X is the largest member o the block in question. In the standard congruence situation each block is handled by some block representative, some member o that block. In general any one representative is no better than any other. However, Lemma 3.5 shows that each block o a Sup-congruence has a special representative, and that is the one we use. We also use the operator which attaches to each element its largest mate. 3.6 DEFINITION. Let be a Sup-congruence on a -semilattice A. The selector or is the operator j : A A given by j(a) = {x A a x} or each a A. 23

24 By construction, i j is the selector o the congruence on A then we have ( ) a j(a) ( ) x a = x j(a) or all a, x A. These two properties characterize being the selector o, and enable us to see selectors in a dierent light. Recall that a closure operation on A is a unction j : A A which is inlationary, monotone, and idempotent, that is or all a, b A. (i) a j(a) (m) b a = j(b) j(a) (c) j(j(a)) = j(a) 3.7 LEMMA. Let A be a -semilattice. The selectors on A are precisely the closure operators. Each closure operation is the selector o precisely one congruence. There is a bijective correspondence between Sup-congruence relations and closure operators on A. Proo. Suppose that j is the selector o the congruence on A. We use the two properties ( ) and ( ) rom above to show that j is a closure operation on A. For each a A we have a a, so that ( ) gives a j(a), to show that j is inlationary. Consider a, b A with b a. We have a j(a) b j(b) by ( ), so that by the congruence property, and hence j(a) j(b) a b = a j(b) j(a) j(b) j(a) by ( ). This shows that j is monotone. Consider any a A and let b = j(j(a)). We have a j(a) b by two uses o ( ), so that b a, and hence b j(a) by ( ). The converse comparison j(a) b holds since j is inlationary. This shows that j is idempotent. These three small arguments show that the selector j is a closure operation. Suppose j is a closure operation on A. We show that j is the selector o at least one congruence on A. To this end consider the relation on A given by x y j(x) = j(y) or x, y A. Trivially, this is an equivalence relation on A. To show it is a congruence relation suppose X Y or two similarly indexed subsets X, Y o A. For each y Y there is some x X with x y, so that y j(y) = j(x) j( X) 24

25 by the inlationary and monotone properties o j. Thus Y j( X) to give j( Y ) j(j( X)) j( X) by the monotone and idempotent properties o j. By symmetry this gives j( X) = j( Y ) and hence X Y as required to show that is a congruence on A. The idempotent and inlationary properties o j ensure that ( ) and ( ) hold, and hence j is the selector o. Trivially (by deinition) each congruence has just one selector. Thus, to complete the whole proo it suices to show that each closure operation is the selector o just one congruence. We show that i j is the selector o the congruence then x y j(x) = j(y) or each x, y A. Consider x, y A with x y. By hypothesis, j is the selector o, and hence x j(y) y j(x) by two uses o ( ). Thus j(x) = j(y) by the monotone and idempotent properties o j. Consider x, y A with j(x) j(y). By hypothesis, j is the selector o, and hence x j(x) = j(y) y by two uses o ( ). Thus x y since is an equivalence relation. This result enables us to do away with any use o block representatives, and to replace the use o congruences by the use o closure operators. In time this will give us a collection o powerul techniques or analysing -semilattices, but or now we concentrate on producing a Sup-version o Theorem DEFINITION. Let A be a -semilattice. A subset F A is -closed i X F or each X F. For a closure operation j on A we set A j = j (A) = {x A j(x) = x} to obtain the set o ixed elements o j. Observe that i F A is -closed then, by considering F, we have = F, and hence F is non-empty. These -closed sets have a more important property. 3.9 LEMMA. Let A be a -semilattice. For each closure operation j on A the subset A j is -closed. For each -closed subset F A there is a unique closure operation j on A with F = A j There is a bijective correspondence between closure operations on A and -closed subsets. 25

26 Proo. Let j be a closure operation on A and consider X A j. For each x X we have X x so that j( X) j(x) = x and hence j( X) X to show that X A j. Let F be -closed in A. For each a A set j(a) = {x F a x} to obtain an operator j on A. Almost trivially, this j is inlationary and monotone. Furthermore, or each a A we have j(a) F a F = j(a) = a (where the -closed property gives the let hand condition). In combination these two conditions give j(j(a)) = j(a) (or each a A), to show that j is idempotent, and hence is a closure operation. The right hand condition gives F A j. Conversely, i a A j then a = j(a) F by the let hand condition, to show F = A j. Finally, suppose we have A j = A k or closure operations on A. Consider any a A. We have j(a) A j = A k, so that and hence k(j(a)) = j(a) k(a) k(j(a)) = j(a) by the inlationary property o j and the monotone property o k. A similar argument gives j(a) k(a), and hence j = k. We now have enough background to begin the Sup-analogue o Theorem 3.1. Let A be a -semilattice, and let j be a closure operation on A. Remember that we think o j as a more socially acceptable version o a Sup-congruence on A. Consider the unction A a j A j j(a) (and do not conuse this with the very similar unction j). Since A j is a subset o A it inherits a comparison rom A, so A j is at least a poset. We show a bit more LEMMA. Consider the situation above. For each subset X A j, the element j( X) is the supremum o X in A j. The poset (A j, ) is complete. The assignment j is a Sup-morphism. 26

27 Proo. Consider X A j. For each x X we have x X j( X) A j so that j( X) is an upper bound o X in A j. Let a A j be any upper bound o X in A j. We have X a (in A) so that j( X) j(a) = a to show that j( X) is the least upper bound o X in A j. This also shows that A j is complete (as a poset). To show that j is a Sup-morphism we require j ( X) = j( j (X)) or each X A. The element on the right hand side is the supremum o the subset j (X)) in A j. This required equality rephrases as and we veriy this via two comparisons. For each x X we have j( X) = j( {j(x) x X}) x j(x) {j(x) x X}) so that and hence X {j(x) x X}) j( X) j( {j(x) x X}) since j is monotone. Conversely, or each x X we have x X so that to give and hence j(x) j( X) {j(x) x X} j( X) j( {j(x) x X}) j 2 ( X) = j( X) since j is monotone and idempotent. By Lemma 3.4 each Sup-morphism A B 27

28 has a kernel given by x y (x) = (y) or x, y A. This, o course, views the kernel as a congruence. By Lemma 3.7 we may re-view this congruence as a closure operation k given by k(x) = k(y) x y or x, y A. These two characterizations enable us to move directly rom the morphism to the closure operation k DEFINITION. For each Sup-morphism, as above, the kernel o is the unique closure operation k on A (the source o ) such that k(x) = k(y) (x) = (y) or all x, y A. This deinition uniquely speciies the kernel o a morphism, but doesn t really tell us what it is. To discover that we remember that each Sup-morphism has a right adjoint A B which, as I promised you earlier, has its uses LEMMA. For each Sup-morphism, as above, the kernel is the composite. Proo. By the general properties o poset adjunctions we know that k = is a closure operation on the source A. Thus it suices to show that ( )(x) = ( )(y) (x) = (y) holds or all x.y A. The implication is immediate, and the converse holds since =. With a little bit more work we can characterize the kernel directly in terms o the morphism without using the right adjoint COROLLARY. For each Sup-morphism, as above, the kernel is the closure operation k such that x k(a) (x) (a) or each x, a A. Proo. We have x (y) x y or each x A and y B. Setting y = (a) = (a) gives the required result. Finally we can prove the -reinement o Theorem

29 3.14 THEOREM. Let j be a closure operation on the -semilattice A, and let A B be a Sup-morphism with kernel k. Suppose j k. Then there is a unique Sup-morphism such that A j B A j commutes. Proo. Since j is surjective, there can be at most one such ill-in morphism. For each a A we have k(k(a)) = k(a) so that (k(a)) = (a) by one o the characteristic properties o the kernel k o. We also have so that and hence by the previous observation. For each x A j set to obtain a unction : A j a j(a) k(a) (a) (j(a)) (k(a)) = (a) (j(a)) = (a) (x) = (x) B. We have just seen that ( j )(a) = (j(a)) = (a) or each a A, so it suices to show that is a Sup-morphism. We require ( X) = (X) or each X A j. Here is the supremum operation on A j. This condition unravels as (j( X)) = (X) which, since j =, reduces to the given morphism property o. As you can probably guess, we are going to reine this result even urther by replacing Sup by Frm. 29

30 3.3 Quotients in Frm The results o Subsection 3.2 are important in a wider context, but here we are primarily concerned with rames. Each rame morphism A B is a -morphism o a special kind. As such it has a kernel j given by x j(a) (x) (a) or x, a A. This j is a closure operation on A, o a special kind. Our job in this subsection is to isolate and begin to investigate these special closure operations 3.15 DEFINITION. A nucleus on a rame A is a closure operation j on A such that j(a b) = j(a) j(b) or all a, b A. I you think about it you have already seen one amily o examples o nuclei. We will return to those examples later LEMMA. The kernel o a rame morphism is a nucleus on the source. Proo. Consider a rame morphism with its kernel j, as above. For a, b A (the source o and carrier o j) we have (a b) = (a) (b) and we require a corresponding equality or j. For each x A the characterizing property o j gives x j(a b) (x) (a b) = (a) (b) (x) (a) and (x) (b) x j(a) and x j(b) x j(a) j(b) so that as required. j(a b) = j(a) j(b) O course, we want to show that every nucleus arises as the kernel o a rame morphism. To do that we reine the ideas o Deintion DEFINITION. A ixed set o a rame A is a -closed subset F A such that a A j = (x a) A j or all a, x A. 30

31 By Lemma 3.9 the closure operations on a rame A correspond to the -subsets. This correspondence reines as ollows LEMMA. A closure operation j on a rame A is a nucleus precisely when its set A j o ixed elements is a ixed set. Proo. Suppose irst that j is a nucleus and consider y = (x a) or a A j and arbitrary x A. We have x y a, so that to give x j(y) j(x) j(y) j(x y) j(a) = a j(y) (x a) = y and hence y A j. This shows that A j is a ixed set. Conversely, suppose A j is a ixed set, and consider arbitrary x, y A. It suices to show that j(x) j(y) j(x y) (since the converse comparison is a consequence o the monotonicity o j). Let a = j(x y), so that a A j. We have x y j(x y) = a so that to give and hence y (x a) A j j(y) (x a) x j(y) a holds. A repeat o this argument (with x and y playing dierent roles) gives j(x) j(y) a which is the required result. Each nucleus j on a rame A has a ixed set A j and, by Lemma 3.10, j induces a -morphism rom A ro Aj with j as its kernel. This reines as ollows LEMMA. Let j be a nucleus on the rame A. The ixed set A j is a rame, and the assignment A a j A j j(a) is a rame morphism. 31

32 Proo. By Lemma 3.10 the poset (A j, ) is complete. Thus, by Lemma 1.7, it suices to show that A j carries an implication. But Lemma 3.18 shows that A j is closed under the implication carried by A, and it is easy to check that this provides an implication on A j. By Lemma 3.10 the assignment j is a Sup-morphism, thus we require j (x y) = j (x) j (y) or x, y A. This is immediate since j is a nucleus. With this we can prove the reinement o Theorem THEOREM. Let j be a nucleusn on the rame A, and let A B be a rame morphism with kernel k. Suppose j k. Then there is a unique rame morphism such that commutes. A j B A j Proo. By Theorem 3.14 there is a unique Sup-morphism or which the triangle commutes. Thus it suices to show that this satisies (x y) = (x) (y) or x, y A j. This is an immediate consequence o the deinition o since A j A and is a rame morphism. The results o this section show that we ought to ind out a lot more about nuclei. We begin that in the next section. 4 Nuclei on rames As in Deinition 3.15, a nucleus j on a rame A is a closure operation that passes across binary meets. The results o Subsection 3.3 suggest that these nuclei have a role to play in the analysis o rames. In act, as we will see later, they have a considerable impact on the whole subject. In this section we look at a ew o the basic examples and results. 4.1 DEFINITION. For each element a o a rame A we set u a (x) = (a x) v a (x) = (a x) w a (x) = ((x a) a) or each x A, to obtain three operators on A. 32

33 The operators w a are the same as those introduced in Deinition 1.10, and we now see that Lemma 1.11 shows that each o these is a nucleus. That is the harder part o the proo o the ollowing. 4.2 LEMMA. For each rame A and a A, the three operators u a, v a, w a are nuclei on A. Several straight orward calculations show that u a and v a are nuclei, but let s look at another proo. The kernel o each rame morphism is a nucleus on the source. This can be a useul way o showing that an operator is a nucleus. Here is a simple example o this technique. 4.3 EXAMPLE. Let A be a rame and let a A be an arbitrary element. Consider the two principal sections [a, ] [, a] above and below a. Each o these is a complete poset in its own right. In act, ater a ew moment s thought we see that each is a rame in its own right (but neither is a subrame o A, unless a takes an extreme position). However, each o the two assignments A [a, ] A [, a] y a y y a y is a surjective rame morphism. (You should check this and notice how the FDL is used.) Each o these morphisms has a kernel k given by y k(x) a y a x y k(x) a y a x respectively. These give k = u a k = v a to show that u a and v a are nuclei on A. The ixed set A ua o u a is precisely the interval [a, ] we started rom. This ixed set A va o v a is not the interval [, a], but is is canonically isomorphic to this interval. In a spatial situation the u and v nuclei have a common generalization. 4.4 DEFINITION. Let S be a space with topology OS, and let E S. We set [E](U) = (E U) or each U OS, to produce an operator on OS. Observe that or an open set A OS we have [A](U) = A U or each U OS, and so [A] = u A on OS. Similarly, we have [A ](U) = (A U) = (A U) or each U OS, and so [A ] = v A on OS. Later we will see that u a and v a are complementary on an arbitrary rame. A proo o the ollowing is straight orward. 33

34 4.5 LEMMA. For each space S with topology OS and each E S, the operator [E] is a nucleus on OS. Proo. Trivially, the operator [E] is inlationary and monotone. For F, G S we have (F G) = F G and hence [E] is a pre-nucleus. Finally, or U OS we have [E] 2 (U) = [E]([E](U)) = (E (E U) ) (E E U) = (E U) = [E](U) to show that [E] is idempotent. As with the u and v nuclei, it is instructive to see [E] exhibited as the kernel o a rame morphism. To do this consider a continuous map T φ S rom a space T to a space S. From Lemma 1.17 this induces a rame morphism and its adjoint OS φ φ OT where φ (U) = φ (U) φ (W) = φ (W ) or each U OS and V OT. This morphism has a kernel which has a simpler description. φ φ 4.6 LEMMA. For the situation above the kernel o φ is [E] where E = T φ (S), the complement o the range o φ. Proo. Let k be the kernel o φ. Remembering the characterization k given by Corollary 3.13, or each U, V OS we have V k(u) φ (V ) φ (U) ( t T)[φ(t) V = φ(t) U] ( s φ (T))[s V = s U] φ (T) V U V E U V [E](U) to give the required result. This idea deserve a bit o terminology. 34

35 4.7 DEFINITION. A nucleus on a topology OS is spatially induced i it has the orm [E] or some E S. In general or a space there are nuclei on OS that are not spatially induced. In act, as we will see in [6] every nucleus on a topology is spatially induced precisely when the parent space has a certain amount o pathology. Thus we could say that it is those nuclei on a topology that are not spatially induced that are the interesting ones. We irst met the nuclei w in Subsection 1.4, where I said they are important gadgets. Here is one (but not the only) reason or saying that. 4.8 LEMMA. For each rame A and element a A, when viewed as a rame the ixed set is boolean. Proo. Observe that a = w a ( ) is the bottom o A wa. Consider any x A wa. We must produce some y A wa with A wa x y = a w a (x y) = where, o course, w a (x y) = is the join o x and y in A wa. Let y = (x a) so that w a (y) = w a (x a) = (w a (x) a) = (x a) = y By Lemma In particular, y A wa. Also x y = x a = a since a x. Thus it remains to deal with the join in A wa. Using Lemma 1.9(iv) we have ((x y) a) = (x a) (y a) = y (y a) = a since a y. Thus or the required result. w a (x y) = (a a) = Each nucleus w a gives a boolean quotient. What is more interesting is that ever boolean quotient arises in this way. 4.9 THEOREM. Suppose A B is a surjective rame morphism with a boolean target B. Then the kernel k o is w a where a = k( ). 35

36 Proo. In this proo it is convenient to write A A B B or the extremes o the two rames. Thus a = k( A ), and satisies (a) = B. We irst check that (x ) (x) (x a) = B or each x A. For (x ) we have (x ) (x) (x a) = B (x) (x a) = (x (x a)) = (x a) (a) = B to give the equality. This does not use any properties o B. For (x ) we know that (x) has a complement in B and this is the image o some element o A. Thus we have (x) (z) = B (x) (z) = B or some z A. The lower one o these gives so that (since k is the kernel o ) and hence which with the upper one leads to as required. From (x, x ) we have (x z) ( A ) x z k( A ) = a z (x a) (x) (x a) (x) (z) = B b (x) b (x a) = B or each b B. Thus, or each y A we have y k(x) (y) (x) (y) (x a) = B = ( A ) (y (x a)) ( A ) y (x a) k( A ) = a y (x a) a y w a (x) to give the required result. Each nucleus j on the rame A produces a quotient A j A j 36

37 to the rame A j o element ixed by j. Furthermore, each quotient o A arises in this way (up to a unique isomorphism over A). We have seen that u a and v a arise rom A [a, ] A [, a] respectively, where a little bit o care is needed with the right hand quotient. What about A j A wa or arbitrary a? To answer that we irst look at the particular case a =. For each x A we have w (x) = ((x ) ) x so that w is just double negation on A. In particular A w = A = {x A x = x} is the set o regular elements o A. This is converted into a rame using x y = (x y) = ( x y) as the join o x and y in A. This is well known in topological circles EXAMPLE. For the topology OS on a space S the rame (OS) is the complete boolean algebra o regular open sets o S. We know that a regular element o OS is just a regular open set. For two such sets U, V the join in (OS) is given by U V = (U V ) = (U V ) which is precisely the way we convert the regular open sets into a boolean algebra. For each a A the quotient A wa is a complete boolean algebra. We have just seen that A = A wbot is the analogue o the boolean algebra o regular pen sets. To deal with A wa or arbitrary a we look at the interval [a, ] as a rame. What is the negation o an element x [a, ] in [a, ]? It is that element y [a, ] such that z y z x a or z [a, ]. In other words it is (x a), which does live in [a, ]. Furthermore, the double negation o x in [a, ] is just w a (x). Thus to veriy the ollowing. [a, ] = A wa 37

(C) The rationals and the reals as linearly ordered sets. Contents. 1 The characterizing results

(C) The rationals and the reals as linearly ordered sets. Contents. 1 The characterizing results (C) The rationals and the reals as linearly ordered sets We know that both Q and R are something special. When we think about about either o these we usually view it as a ield, or at least some kind o

More information

Cantor-Bendixson, socle, and atomicity H. Simmons

Cantor-Bendixson, socle, and atomicity H. Simmons Cantor-Bendixson, socle, and atomicity H. Simmons The University, Manchester, England Harold.Simmons @ manchester.ac.uk This document is the second in the series [1] [7], concerned with the use of lattices

More information

SEPARATED AND PROPER MORPHISMS

SEPARATED AND PROPER MORPHISMS SEPARATED AND PROPER MORPHISMS BRIAN OSSERMAN The notions o separatedness and properness are the algebraic geometry analogues o the Hausdor condition and compactness in topology. For varieties over the

More information

SEPARATED AND PROPER MORPHISMS

SEPARATED AND PROPER MORPHISMS SEPARATED AND PROPER MORPHISMS BRIAN OSSERMAN Last quarter, we introduced the closed diagonal condition or a prevariety to be a prevariety, and the universally closed condition or a variety to be complete.

More information

The fundamental triangle of a space

The fundamental triangle of a space First version released on 6 July 2006 This version released on 6 July 2006 The fundamental triangle of a space Harold Simmons The University of Manchester hsimmons@ manchester.ac.uk This rather curious

More information

VALUATIVE CRITERIA FOR SEPARATED AND PROPER MORPHISMS

VALUATIVE CRITERIA FOR SEPARATED AND PROPER MORPHISMS VALUATIVE CRITERIA FOR SEPARATED AND PROPER MORPHISMS BRIAN OSSERMAN Recall that or prevarieties, we had criteria or being a variety or or being complete in terms o existence and uniqueness o limits, where

More information

The point space of a frame

The point space of a frame First version released on 2 July 2006 This version released on 2 July 2006 The point space of a frame Harold Simmons The University of Manchester hsimmons@ manchester.ac.uk In [3] we constructed a contravariant

More information

HSP SUBCATEGORIES OF EILENBERG-MOORE ALGEBRAS

HSP SUBCATEGORIES OF EILENBERG-MOORE ALGEBRAS HSP SUBCATEGORIES OF EILENBERG-MOORE ALGEBRAS MICHAEL BARR Abstract. Given a triple T on a complete category C and a actorization system E /M on the category o algebras, we show there is a 1-1 correspondence

More information

Categories and Natural Transformations

Categories and Natural Transformations Categories and Natural Transormations Ethan Jerzak 17 August 2007 1 Introduction The motivation or studying Category Theory is to ormalise the underlying similarities between a broad range o mathematical

More information

VALUATIVE CRITERIA BRIAN OSSERMAN

VALUATIVE CRITERIA BRIAN OSSERMAN VALUATIVE CRITERIA BRIAN OSSERMAN Intuitively, one can think o separatedness as (a relative version o) uniqueness o limits, and properness as (a relative version o) existence o (unique) limits. It is not

More information

An introduction to idioms H. Simmons

An introduction to idioms H. Simmons An introduction to idioms H. Simmons The University, Manchester, England Harold.Simmons @ manchester.ac.uk This document is the first in the series [1] [7], concerned with the use of lattices as a tool

More information

The tensor product of commutative monoids

The tensor product of commutative monoids The tensor product of commutative monoids We work throughout in the category Cmd of commutative monoids. In other words, all the monoids we meet are commutative, and consequently we say monoid in place

More information

1 Categories, Functors, and Natural Transformations. Discrete categories. A category is discrete when every arrow is an identity.

1 Categories, Functors, and Natural Transformations. Discrete categories. A category is discrete when every arrow is an identity. MacLane: Categories or Working Mathematician 1 Categories, Functors, and Natural Transormations 1.1 Axioms or Categories 1.2 Categories Discrete categories. A category is discrete when every arrow is an

More information

LIMITS AND COLIMITS. m : M X. in a category G of structured sets of some sort call them gadgets the image subset

LIMITS AND COLIMITS. m : M X. in a category G of structured sets of some sort call them gadgets the image subset 5 LIMITS ND COLIMITS In this chapter we irst briely discuss some topics namely subobjects and pullbacks relating to the deinitions that we already have. This is partly in order to see how these are used,

More information

CATEGORIES. 1.1 Introduction

CATEGORIES. 1.1 Introduction 1 CATEGORIES 1.1 Introduction What is category theory? As a irst approximation, one could say that category theory is the mathematical study o (abstract) algebras o unctions. Just as group theory is the

More information

Descent on the étale site Wouter Zomervrucht, October 14, 2014

Descent on the étale site Wouter Zomervrucht, October 14, 2014 Descent on the étale site Wouter Zomervrucht, October 14, 2014 We treat two eatures o the étale site: descent o morphisms and descent o quasi-coherent sheaves. All will also be true on the larger pp and

More information

Mathematical Foundations Group, The University, Manchester, England {rsexton, manchester.ac.uk

Mathematical Foundations Group, The University, Manchester, England {rsexton, manchester.ac.uk Point-sensitive and point-free patch constructions R. A. Sexton and H. Simmons Mathematical Foundations Group, The University, Manchester, England {rsexton, hsimmons}@ manchester.ac.uk Abstract Using the

More information

Math 216A. A gluing construction of Proj(S)

Math 216A. A gluing construction of Proj(S) Math 216A. A gluing construction o Proj(S) 1. Some basic deinitions Let S = n 0 S n be an N-graded ring (we ollows French terminology here, even though outside o France it is commonly accepted that N does

More information

Math 248B. Base change morphisms

Math 248B. Base change morphisms Math 248B. Base change morphisms 1. Motivation A basic operation with shea cohomology is pullback. For a continuous map o topological spaces : X X and an abelian shea F on X with (topological) pullback

More information

The Clifford algebra and the Chevalley map - a computational approach (detailed version 1 ) Darij Grinberg Version 0.6 (3 June 2016). Not proofread!

The Clifford algebra and the Chevalley map - a computational approach (detailed version 1 ) Darij Grinberg Version 0.6 (3 June 2016). Not proofread! The Cliord algebra and the Chevalley map - a computational approach detailed version 1 Darij Grinberg Version 0.6 3 June 2016. Not prooread! 1. Introduction: the Cliord algebra The theory o the Cliord

More information

Problem Set. Problems on Unordered Summation. Math 5323, Fall Februray 15, 2001 ANSWERS

Problem Set. Problems on Unordered Summation. Math 5323, Fall Februray 15, 2001 ANSWERS Problem Set Problems on Unordered Summation Math 5323, Fall 2001 Februray 15, 2001 ANSWERS i 1 Unordered Sums o Real Terms In calculus and real analysis, one deines the convergence o an ininite series

More information

Roberto s Notes on Differential Calculus Chapter 8: Graphical analysis Section 1. Extreme points

Roberto s Notes on Differential Calculus Chapter 8: Graphical analysis Section 1. Extreme points Roberto s Notes on Dierential Calculus Chapter 8: Graphical analysis Section 1 Extreme points What you need to know already: How to solve basic algebraic and trigonometric equations. All basic techniques

More information

CHOW S LEMMA. Matthew Emerton

CHOW S LEMMA. Matthew Emerton CHOW LEMMA Matthew Emerton The aim o this note is to prove the ollowing orm o Chow s Lemma: uppose that : is a separated inite type morphism o Noetherian schemes. Then (or some suiciently large n) there

More information

GENERAL ABSTRACT NONSENSE

GENERAL ABSTRACT NONSENSE GENERAL ABSTRACT NONSENSE MARCELLO DELGADO Abstract. In this paper, we seek to understand limits, a uniying notion that brings together the ideas o pullbacks, products, and equalizers. To do this, we will

More information

2. ETA EVALUATIONS USING WEBER FUNCTIONS. Introduction

2. ETA EVALUATIONS USING WEBER FUNCTIONS. Introduction . ETA EVALUATIONS USING WEBER FUNCTIONS Introduction So ar we have seen some o the methods or providing eta evaluations that appear in the literature and we have seen some o the interesting properties

More information

FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 2

FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 2 FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 2 RAVI VAKIL CONTENTS 1. Where we were 1 2. Yoneda s lemma 2 3. Limits and colimits 6 4. Adjoints 8 First, some bureaucratic details. We will move to 380-F for Monday

More information

( x) f = where P and Q are polynomials.

( x) f = where P and Q are polynomials. 9.8 Graphing Rational Functions Lets begin with a deinition. Deinition: Rational Function A rational unction is a unction o the orm ( ) ( ) ( ) P where P and Q are polynomials. Q An eample o a simple rational

More information

GENERALIZED ABSTRACT NONSENSE: CATEGORY THEORY AND ADJUNCTIONS

GENERALIZED ABSTRACT NONSENSE: CATEGORY THEORY AND ADJUNCTIONS GENERALIZED ABSTRACT NONSENSE: CATEGORY THEORY AND ADJUNCTIONS CHRIS HENDERSON Abstract. This paper will move through the basics o category theory, eventually deining natural transormations and adjunctions

More information

Boolean Algebra and Propositional Logic

Boolean Algebra and Propositional Logic Boolean Algebra and Propositional Logic Takahiro Kato September 10, 2015 ABSTRACT. This article provides yet another characterization of Boolean algebras and, using this characterization, establishes a

More information

3. The Sheaf of Regular Functions

3. The Sheaf of Regular Functions 24 Andreas Gathmann 3. The Sheaf of Regular Functions After having defined affine varieties, our next goal must be to say what kind of maps between them we want to consider as morphisms, i. e. as nice

More information

Seminaar Abstrakte Wiskunde Seminar in Abstract Mathematics Lecture notes in progress (27 March 2010)

Seminaar Abstrakte Wiskunde Seminar in Abstract Mathematics Lecture notes in progress (27 March 2010) http://math.sun.ac.za/amsc/sam Seminaar Abstrakte Wiskunde Seminar in Abstract Mathematics 2009-2010 Lecture notes in progress (27 March 2010) Contents 2009 Semester I: Elements 5 1. Cartesian product

More information

A dummy first page. If you want to print 2-up, run of from page 2 (the next page). This will get the book page number in the correct corner.

A dummy first page. If you want to print 2-up, run of from page 2 (the next page). This will get the book page number in the correct corner. 1 A dummy first page If you want to print 2-up, run of from page 2 (the next page). This will get the book page number in the correct corner. A point-free and point-sensitive analysis of the patch assembly

More information

Boolean Algebra and Propositional Logic

Boolean Algebra and Propositional Logic Boolean Algebra and Propositional Logic Takahiro Kato June 23, 2015 This article provides yet another characterization of Boolean algebras and, using this characterization, establishes a more direct connection

More information

Probabilistic Observations and Valuations (Extended Abstract) 1

Probabilistic Observations and Valuations (Extended Abstract) 1 Replace this ile with prentcsmacro.sty or your meeting, or with entcsmacro.sty or your meeting. Both can be ound at the ENTCS Macro Home Page. Probabilistic Observations and Valuations (Extended Abstract)

More information

The concept of limit

The concept of limit Roberto s Notes on Dierential Calculus Chapter 1: Limits and continuity Section 1 The concept o limit What you need to know already: All basic concepts about unctions. What you can learn here: What limits

More information

Category Theory. Course by Dr. Arthur Hughes, Typset by Cathal Ormond

Category Theory. Course by Dr. Arthur Hughes, Typset by Cathal Ormond Category Theory Course by Dr. Arthur Hughes, 2010 Typset by Cathal Ormond Contents 1 Types, Composition and Identities 3 1.1 Programs..................................... 3 1.2 Functional Laws.................................

More information

ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY COURSE NOTES, LECTURE 2: HILBERT S NULLSTELLENSATZ.

ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY COURSE NOTES, LECTURE 2: HILBERT S NULLSTELLENSATZ. ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY COURSE NOTES, LECTURE 2: HILBERT S NULLSTELLENSATZ. ANDREW SALCH 1. Hilbert s Nullstellensatz. The last lecture left off with the claim that, if J k[x 1,..., x n ] is an ideal, then

More information

A coverage construction of the reals and the irrationals

A coverage construction of the reals and the irrationals Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 145 (2007) 176 203 www.elsevier.com/locate/apal A coverage construction of the reals and the irrationals Harold Simmons 1 School of Computer Science, Mathematical Foundations

More information

The extended Cantor-Bendixson analysis of trees Harold Simmons

The extended Cantor-Bendixson analysis of trees Harold Simmons The extended Cantor-Bendixson analysis of trees Harold Simmons Mathematical Foundations Group, The University, Manchester, England hsimmons@manchester.ac.uk Abstract The Hausdorff analysis of chains is

More information

Finite Dimensional Hilbert Spaces are Complete for Dagger Compact Closed Categories (Extended Abstract)

Finite Dimensional Hilbert Spaces are Complete for Dagger Compact Closed Categories (Extended Abstract) Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 270 (1) (2011) 113 119 www.elsevier.com/locate/entcs Finite Dimensional Hilbert Spaces are Complete or Dagger Compact Closed Categories (Extended bstract)

More information

STAT 801: Mathematical Statistics. Hypothesis Testing

STAT 801: Mathematical Statistics. Hypothesis Testing STAT 801: Mathematical Statistics Hypothesis Testing Hypothesis testing: a statistical problem where you must choose, on the basis o data X, between two alternatives. We ormalize this as the problem o

More information

Math 754 Chapter III: Fiber bundles. Classifying spaces. Applications

Math 754 Chapter III: Fiber bundles. Classifying spaces. Applications Math 754 Chapter III: Fiber bundles. Classiying spaces. Applications Laurențiu Maxim Department o Mathematics University o Wisconsin maxim@math.wisc.edu April 18, 2018 Contents 1 Fiber bundles 2 2 Principle

More information

Lattice Theory Lecture 5. Completions

Lattice Theory Lecture 5. Completions Lattice Theory Lecture 5 Completions John Harding New Mexico State University www.math.nmsu.edu/ JohnHarding.html jharding@nmsu.edu Toulouse, July 2017 Completions Definition A completion of a poset P

More information

The Adjoint Functor Theorem.

The Adjoint Functor Theorem. The Adjoint Functor Theorem. Kevin Buzzard February 7, 2012 Last modified 17/06/2002. 1 Introduction. The existence of free groups is immediate from the Adjoint Functor Theorem. Whilst I ve long believed

More information

Representation Theory of Hopf Algebroids. Atsushi Yamaguchi

Representation Theory of Hopf Algebroids. Atsushi Yamaguchi Representation Theory o H Algebroids Atsushi Yamaguchi Contents o this slide 1. Internal categories and H algebroids (7p) 2. Fibered category o modules (6p) 3. Representations o H algebroids (7p) 4. Restrictions

More information

Congruence Boolean Lifting Property

Congruence Boolean Lifting Property Congruence Boolean Lifting Property George GEORGESCU and Claudia MUREŞAN University of Bucharest Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science Academiei 14, RO 010014, Bucharest, Romania Emails: georgescu.capreni@yahoo.com;

More information

Modern Algebra Prof. Manindra Agrawal Department of Computer Science and Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur

Modern Algebra Prof. Manindra Agrawal Department of Computer Science and Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur Modern Algebra Prof. Manindra Agrawal Department of Computer Science and Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur Lecture 02 Groups: Subgroups and homomorphism (Refer Slide Time: 00:13) We looked

More information

In the index (pages ), reduce all page numbers by 2.

In the index (pages ), reduce all page numbers by 2. Errata or Nilpotence and periodicity in stable homotopy theory (Annals O Mathematics Study No. 28, Princeton University Press, 992) by Douglas C. Ravenel, July 2, 997, edition. Most o these were ound by

More information

Notes about Filters. Samuel Mimram. December 6, 2012

Notes about Filters. Samuel Mimram. December 6, 2012 Notes about Filters Samuel Mimram December 6, 2012 1 Filters and ultrafilters Definition 1. A filter F on a poset (L, ) is a subset of L which is upwardclosed and downward-directed (= is a filter-base):

More information

ALGEBRA II: RINGS AND MODULES OVER LITTLE RINGS.

ALGEBRA II: RINGS AND MODULES OVER LITTLE RINGS. ALGEBRA II: RINGS AND MODULES OVER LITTLE RINGS. KEVIN MCGERTY. 1. RINGS The central characters of this course are algebraic objects known as rings. A ring is any mathematical structure where you can add

More information

Connectedness. Proposition 2.2. The following are equivalent for a topological space (X, T ).

Connectedness. Proposition 2.2. The following are equivalent for a topological space (X, T ). Connectedness 1 Motivation Connectedness is the sort of topological property that students love. Its definition is intuitive and easy to understand, and it is a powerful tool in proofs of well-known results.

More information

THE HOMOTOPY THEORY OF EQUIVALENCE RELATIONS

THE HOMOTOPY THEORY OF EQUIVALENCE RELATIONS THE HOMOTOPY THEORY OF EQUIVALENCE RELATIONS FINNUR LÁRUSSON Abstract. We give a detailed exposition o the homotopy theory o equivalence relations, perhaps the simplest nontrivial example o a model structure.

More information

Boolean Algebra CHAPTER 15

Boolean Algebra CHAPTER 15 CHAPTER 15 Boolean Algebra 15.1 INTRODUCTION Both sets and propositions satisfy similar laws, which are listed in Tables 1-1 and 4-1 (in Chapters 1 and 4, respectively). These laws are used to define an

More information

Boolean Algebras, Boolean Rings and Stone s Representation Theorem

Boolean Algebras, Boolean Rings and Stone s Representation Theorem Boolean Algebras, Boolean Rings and Stone s Representation Theorem Hongtaek Jung December 27, 2017 Abstract This is a part of a supplementary note for a Logic and Set Theory course. The main goal is to

More information

Physics 2B Chapter 17 Notes - First Law of Thermo Spring 2018

Physics 2B Chapter 17 Notes - First Law of Thermo Spring 2018 Internal Energy o a Gas Work Done by a Gas Special Processes The First Law o Thermodynamics p Diagrams The First Law o Thermodynamics is all about the energy o a gas: how much energy does the gas possess,

More information

COMMUTATIVE ALGEBRA LECTURE 1: SOME CATEGORY THEORY

COMMUTATIVE ALGEBRA LECTURE 1: SOME CATEGORY THEORY COMMUTATIVE ALGEBRA LECTURE 1: SOME CATEGORY THEORY VIVEK SHENDE A ring is a set R with two binary operations, an addition + and a multiplication. Always there should be an identity 0 for addition, an

More information

Notes on Ordered Sets

Notes on Ordered Sets Notes on Ordered Sets Mariusz Wodzicki September 10, 2013 1 Vocabulary 1.1 Definitions Definition 1.1 A binary relation on a set S is said to be a partial order if it is reflexive, x x, weakly antisymmetric,

More information

UMS 7/2/14. Nawaz John Sultani. July 12, Abstract

UMS 7/2/14. Nawaz John Sultani. July 12, Abstract UMS 7/2/14 Nawaz John Sultani July 12, 2014 Notes or July, 2 2014 UMS lecture Abstract 1 Quick Review o Universals Deinition 1.1. I S : D C is a unctor and c an object o C, a universal arrow rom c to S

More information

Category Theory. Categories. Definition.

Category Theory. Categories. Definition. Category Theory Category theory is a general mathematical theory of structures, systems of structures and relationships between systems of structures. It provides a unifying and economic mathematical modeling

More information

Metric spaces and metrizability

Metric spaces and metrizability 1 Motivation Metric spaces and metrizability By this point in the course, this section should not need much in the way of motivation. From the very beginning, we have talked about R n usual and how relatively

More information

CS 361 Meeting 28 11/14/18

CS 361 Meeting 28 11/14/18 CS 361 Meeting 28 11/14/18 Announcements 1. Homework 9 due Friday Computation Histories 1. Some very interesting proos o undecidability rely on the technique o constructing a language that describes the

More information

CHEVALLEY S THEOREM AND COMPLETE VARIETIES

CHEVALLEY S THEOREM AND COMPLETE VARIETIES CHEVALLEY S THEOREM AND COMPLETE VARIETIES BRIAN OSSERMAN In this note, we introduce the concept which plays the role of compactness for varieties completeness. We prove that completeness can be characterized

More information

2. Prime and Maximal Ideals

2. Prime and Maximal Ideals 18 Andreas Gathmann 2. Prime and Maximal Ideals There are two special kinds of ideals that are of particular importance, both algebraically and geometrically: the so-called prime and maximal ideals. Let

More information

POL502: Foundations. Kosuke Imai Department of Politics, Princeton University. October 10, 2005

POL502: Foundations. Kosuke Imai Department of Politics, Princeton University. October 10, 2005 POL502: Foundations Kosuke Imai Department of Politics, Princeton University October 10, 2005 Our first task is to develop the foundations that are necessary for the materials covered in this course. 1

More information

Algebraic Geometry

Algebraic Geometry MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 18.726 Algebraic Geometry Spring 2009 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms. 18.726: Algebraic Geometry

More information

Boolean Algebras. Chapter 2

Boolean Algebras. Chapter 2 Chapter 2 Boolean Algebras Let X be an arbitrary set and let P(X) be the class of all subsets of X (the power set of X). Three natural set-theoretic operations on P(X) are the binary operations of union

More information

Part V. 17 Introduction: What are measures and why measurable sets. Lebesgue Integration Theory

Part V. 17 Introduction: What are measures and why measurable sets. Lebesgue Integration Theory Part V 7 Introduction: What are measures and why measurable sets Lebesgue Integration Theory Definition 7. (Preliminary). A measure on a set is a function :2 [ ] such that. () = 2. If { } = is a finite

More information

Joseph Muscat Categories. 1 December 2012

Joseph Muscat Categories. 1 December 2012 Joseph Muscat 2015 1 Categories joseph.muscat@um.edu.mt 1 December 2012 1 Objects and Morphisms category is a class o objects with morphisms : (a way o comparing/substituting/mapping/processing to ) such

More information

2MA105 Algebraic Structures I

2MA105 Algebraic Structures I 2MA105 Algebraic Structures I Per-Anders Svensson http://homepage.lnu.se/staff/psvmsi/2ma105.html Lecture 12 Partially Ordered Sets Lattices Bounded Lattices Distributive Lattices Complemented Lattices

More information

Direct Limits. Mathematics 683, Fall 2013

Direct Limits. Mathematics 683, Fall 2013 Direct Limits Mathematics 683, Fall 2013 In this note we define direct limits and prove their basic properties. This notion is important in various places in algebra. In particular, in algebraic geometry

More information

NONSINGULAR CURVES BRIAN OSSERMAN

NONSINGULAR CURVES BRIAN OSSERMAN NONSINGULAR CURVES BRIAN OSSERMAN The primary goal of this note is to prove that every abstract nonsingular curve can be realized as an open subset of a (unique) nonsingular projective curve. Note that

More information

LECTURE 6: FIBER BUNDLES

LECTURE 6: FIBER BUNDLES LECTURE 6: FIBER BUNDLES In this section we will introduce the interesting class o ibrations given by iber bundles. Fiber bundles lay an imortant role in many geometric contexts. For examle, the Grassmaniann

More information

Span, Cospan, and Other Double Categories

Span, Cospan, and Other Double Categories ariv:1201.3789v1 [math.ct] 18 Jan 2012 Span, Cospan, and Other Double Categories Susan Nieield July 19, 2018 Abstract Given a double category D such that D 0 has pushouts, we characterize oplax/lax adjunctions

More information

CLASS NOTES MATH 527 (SPRING 2011) WEEK 6

CLASS NOTES MATH 527 (SPRING 2011) WEEK 6 CLASS NOTES MATH 527 (SPRING 2011) WEEK 6 BERTRAND GUILLOU 1. Mon, Feb. 21 Note that since we have C() = X A C (A) and the inclusion A C (A) at time 0 is a coibration, it ollows that the pushout map i

More information

Math 762 Spring h Y (Z 1 ) (1) h X (Z 2 ) h X (Z 1 ) Φ Z 1. h Y (Z 2 )

Math 762 Spring h Y (Z 1 ) (1) h X (Z 2 ) h X (Z 1 ) Φ Z 1. h Y (Z 2 ) Math 762 Spring 2016 Homework 3 Drew Armstrong Problem 1. Yoneda s Lemma. We have seen that the bifunctor Hom C (, ) : C C Set is analogous to a bilinear form on a K-vector space, : V V K. Recall that

More information

ne varieties (continued)

ne varieties (continued) Chapter 2 A ne varieties (continued) 2.1 Products For some problems its not very natural to restrict to irreducible varieties. So we broaden the previous story. Given an a ne algebraic set X A n k, we

More information

Closure operators on sets and algebraic lattices

Closure operators on sets and algebraic lattices Closure operators on sets and algebraic lattices Sergiu Rudeanu University of Bucharest Romania Closure operators are abundant in mathematics; here are a few examples. Given an algebraic structure, such

More information

Exercises on chapter 0

Exercises on chapter 0 Exercises on chapter 0 1. A partially ordered set (poset) is a set X together with a relation such that (a) x x for all x X; (b) x y and y x implies that x = y for all x, y X; (c) x y and y z implies that

More information

Tangent Categories. David M. Roberts, Urs Schreiber and Todd Trimble. September 5, 2007

Tangent Categories. David M. Roberts, Urs Schreiber and Todd Trimble. September 5, 2007 Tangent Categories David M Roberts, Urs Schreiber and Todd Trimble September 5, 2007 Abstract For any n-category C we consider the sub-n-category T C C 2 o squares in C with pinned let boundary This resolves

More information

University of Cape Town

University of Cape Town The copyright o this thesis rests with the. No quotation rom it or inormation derived rom it is to be published without ull acknowledgement o the source. The thesis is to be used or private study or non-commercial

More information

Sets and Motivation for Boolean algebra

Sets and Motivation for Boolean algebra SET THEORY Basic concepts Notations Subset Algebra of sets The power set Ordered pairs and Cartesian product Relations on sets Types of relations and their properties Relational matrix and the graph of

More information

Objectives. By the time the student is finished with this section of the workbook, he/she should be able

Objectives. By the time the student is finished with this section of the workbook, he/she should be able FUNCTIONS Quadratic Functions......8 Absolute Value Functions.....48 Translations o Functions..57 Radical Functions...61 Eponential Functions...7 Logarithmic Functions......8 Cubic Functions......91 Piece-Wise

More information

THE COALGEBRAIC STRUCTURE OF CELL COMPLEXES

THE COALGEBRAIC STRUCTURE OF CELL COMPLEXES Theory and pplications o Categories, Vol. 26, No. 11, 2012, pp. 304 330. THE COLGEBRIC STRUCTURE OF CELL COMPLEXES THOMS THORNE bstract. The relative cell complexes with respect to a generating set o coibrations

More information

Basic properties of limits

Basic properties of limits Roberto s Notes on Dierential Calculus Chapter : Limits and continuity Section Basic properties o its What you need to know already: The basic concepts, notation and terminology related to its. What you

More information

Extending Algebraic Operations to D-Completions

Extending Algebraic Operations to D-Completions Replace this file with prentcsmacro.sty for your meeting, or with entcsmacro.sty for your meeting. Both can be found at the ENTCS Macro Home Page. Extending Algebraic Operations to D-Completions Klaus

More information

Commutative Algebra Lecture 3: Lattices and Categories (Sept. 13, 2013)

Commutative Algebra Lecture 3: Lattices and Categories (Sept. 13, 2013) Commutative Algebra Lecture 3: Lattices and Categories (Sept. 13, 2013) Navid Alaei September 17, 2013 1 Lattice Basics There are, in general, two equivalent approaches to defining a lattice; one is rather

More information

Introduction to Arithmetic Geometry Fall 2013 Lecture #18 11/07/2013

Introduction to Arithmetic Geometry Fall 2013 Lecture #18 11/07/2013 18.782 Introduction to Arithmetic Geometry Fall 2013 Lecture #18 11/07/2013 As usual, all the rings we consider are commutative rings with an identity element. 18.1 Regular local rings Consider a local

More information

The Hurewicz Theorem

The Hurewicz Theorem The Hurewicz Theorem April 5, 011 1 Introduction The fundamental group and homology groups both give extremely useful information, particularly about path-connected spaces. Both can be considered as functors,

More information

A bitopological point-free approach to compactifications

A bitopological point-free approach to compactifications A bitopological point-free approach to compactifications Olaf Karl Klinke a, Achim Jung a, M. Andrew Moshier b a School of Computer Science University of Birmingham Birmingham, B15 2TT England b School

More information

A Non-Topological View of Dcpos as Convergence Spaces

A Non-Topological View of Dcpos as Convergence Spaces A Non-Topological View of Dcpos as Convergence Spaces Reinhold Heckmann AbsInt Angewandte Informatik GmbH, Stuhlsatzenhausweg 69, D-66123 Saarbrücken, Germany e-mail: heckmann@absint.com Abstract The category

More information

CHAPTER 1. AFFINE ALGEBRAIC VARIETIES

CHAPTER 1. AFFINE ALGEBRAIC VARIETIES CHAPTER 1. AFFINE ALGEBRAIC VARIETIES During this first part of the course, we will establish a correspondence between various geometric notions and algebraic ones. Some references for this part of the

More information

CHAPTER 3: THE INTEGERS Z

CHAPTER 3: THE INTEGERS Z CHAPTER 3: THE INTEGERS Z MATH 378, CSUSM. SPRING 2009. AITKEN 1. Introduction The natural numbers are designed for measuring the size of finite sets, but what if you want to compare the sizes of two sets?

More information

Algebraic Geometry Spring 2009

Algebraic Geometry Spring 2009 MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 18.726 Algebraic Geometry Spring 2009 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms. 18.726: Algebraic Geometry

More information

CATEGORY THEORY. Cats have been around for 70 years. Eilenberg + Mac Lane =. Cats are about building bridges between different parts of maths.

CATEGORY THEORY. Cats have been around for 70 years. Eilenberg + Mac Lane =. Cats are about building bridges between different parts of maths. CATEGORY THEORY PROFESSOR PETER JOHNSTONE Cats have been around for 70 years. Eilenberg + Mac Lane =. Cats are about building bridges between different parts of maths. Definition 1.1. A category C consists

More information

Variations on a Casselman-Osborne theme

Variations on a Casselman-Osborne theme Variations on a Casselman-Osborne theme Dragan Miličić Introduction This paper is inspired by two classical results in homological algebra o modules over an enveloping algebra lemmas o Casselman-Osborne

More information

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Monomorphism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/monomorphism 1 of 3 24/11/2012 02:01 Monomorphism From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia In the context of abstract algebra or

More information

Topology Proceedings. COPYRIGHT c by Topology Proceedings. All rights reserved.

Topology Proceedings. COPYRIGHT c by Topology Proceedings. All rights reserved. Topology Proceedings Web: http://topology.auburn.edu/tp/ Mail: Topology Proceedings Department of Mathematics & tatistics Auburn University, Alabama 36849, UA E-mail: topolog@auburn.edu IN: 0146-4124 COPYRIGHT

More information

Topos Theory. Lectures 17-20: The interpretation of logic in categories. Olivia Caramello. Topos Theory. Olivia Caramello.

Topos Theory. Lectures 17-20: The interpretation of logic in categories. Olivia Caramello. Topos Theory. Olivia Caramello. logic s Lectures 17-20: logic in 2 / 40 logic s Interpreting first-order logic in In Logic, first-order s are a wide class of formal s used for talking about structures of any kind (where the restriction

More information

Algebraic Geometry. Andreas Gathmann. Class Notes TU Kaiserslautern 2014

Algebraic Geometry. Andreas Gathmann. Class Notes TU Kaiserslautern 2014 Algebraic Geometry Andreas Gathmann Class Notes TU Kaiserslautern 2014 Contents 0. Introduction......................... 3 1. Affine Varieties........................ 9 2. The Zariski Topology......................

More information