arxiv:hep-ph/ v1 5 Oct 2005

Transcription

1 Preprint typeset in JHEP style - HYPER VERSION RITS-PP-003 arxiv:hep-ph/ v1 5 Oct 2005 Constraint on the heavy sterile neutrino mixing angles in the SO10) model with double see-saw mechanism Takeshi Fukuyama, Tatsuru Kikuchi, and Koichi Matsuda Department of Physics, Ritsumeikan University Kusatsu, Shiga, , Japan fukuyama@se.ritsumei.ac.jp, rp009979@se.ritsumei.ac.jp Department of Physics, Osaka University Toyonaka, Osaka, , Japan matsuda@het.phys.sci.osaka-u.ac.jp Abstract: Constraints on the heavy sterile neutrino mixing angles are studied in the framework of a minimal supersymmetric SO10) model with double see-saw mechanism. A new singlet matter in addition to the right-handed neutrinos is introduced to realize the double see-saw mechanism. The minimal SO10) model gives an unambiguous Dirac neutrino mass matrix, which enables us to predict the masses and the mixing angles in the enlarged 9 9 neutrino mass matrix. Mixing angles between the light Majorana neutrinos and the heavy sterile neutrinos are shown to be within the LEP experimental bound on all ranges of the Majorana phases. Keywords: Neutrino Physics, Beyond Standard Model, GUT.

2 Recent neutrino oscillation data opened up a new window to prove physics beyond the Standard Model. The see-saw mechanism [1] can give a guideline to construct models of new physics through the existence of the right-handed neutrinos. Although the essential concept of the see-saw mechanism is the same, there can be many possibilities according to the types of the see-saw mechanism. For instance, as motivated by the superstring inspired E 6 models, we come to consider the double see-saw mechanism [2, 3, 4, 5, 6] and it s extension, the type-iii see-saw mechanism [7, 8]. In this letter we add some new aspects on the mixing angles between active and sterile neutrinos in the enlarged 9 9 mass matrix. The constraints on the mixing angles are imposed so as to satisfy the current neutrino oscillation data. We accept the same Lagrangian as in [5]. That is, we add a new singlet matter S) in addition to the right-handed neutrino ν c ) per a generation. The Lagrangian in this model is given by L Y = Y ij ν ν c i L j H u + Y ij s ν c i S j H s + µ s S 2 i + h.c., 1) where L j is the lepton doublet, and H u, H s are the SU2) L doublet, singlet Higgs fields. The mass terms of the Lagrangian 1) are re-written in a matrix form in the base with {ν, ν c, S} as follows [2, 3, 4, 5, 6], M = 0 m D 0 0 M D 0 MD T µ s I m T D. 2) Here m D Y ν H u, M D Y s H s, and I diag1,1,1). In this paper we assume that the mass matrix M D is written in terms of a unitary matrix V as M D ) ij = Vij M Dj where the unitary matrix V diagonalises a combination M D MD T, V T M D M T D V = diag M 2 D1,M2 D2,M2 D3). 3) On the other hand, the full 9 9 mass matrix 2) can be diagonalised by using a unitary matrix U as U T M U = diagm 1,m 2,m 3, m N1,m N2,,m N5,m }{{ N6 ), 4) } heavy isosinglet neutrinos where m N1 m N2 < m N3 m N4 < m N5 m N6. If the eigenvalues of each 3 3 matrix satisfy µ s m Di M Di as was assumed in [5], the light mass eigenvalue is roughly given by M ν µ s m D /M D ) 2. The MNS mixing matrix U MNS is the first 3 3 part of this unitary matrix U, U ea U MNS U µa U = U τa. 5) Here the label A runs over the extra mass eigenstates A = 4,, 9, and the extraordinary matrix element U ea gives a sterile to active neutrino mixing angle that have to be small 1

3 enough so as to satisfy the current experimental bound, which is obtained from the invisible decays of the Z boson measured in L3 experiment at LEP. After integrating out the heavy singlets, ν c and S, we obtain the effective light neutrino mass matrix as M ν = MD 1 m ) T D µs M 1 D m D). 6) This light Majorana mass matrix can be diagonalised by the MNS matrix, U T MNS M ν U MNS = diag m 1,m 2,m 3 ). 7) In order to make a prediction on the Dirac neutrino mass matrix m D, we make use of the minimal SO10) model [9], which becomes compatible with neutrino oscillation data by considering the CP phases [10, 11] and furthermore the RGE effects [12]. See also [13, 14, 15, 16, 17] for the type-ii see-saw and [18, 19] for fitting refinement. In the minimal SO10) model the Dirac neutrino mass matrix m D is almost unambiguously fixed from the data of 9 masses of charged fermions and 3 mixing angles and 1 CP phase in the CKM matrix, irrespective to the types of the see-saw mechanism. The type of the see-saw mechanism affects on the choice of the input data like the masses of strange and top quarks. The compact review of fixing m D should be addressed to [5]. For the light Dirac neutrino mass matrix m D, we input the values which are predicted in the previous paper [5]. However, unlike the case of minimal SO10) GUT model, we can not fix σ the only unknown parameter in the minimal SO10) model before fitting with neutrino oscillation data [10]). So we can obtain the heavy Dirac neutrino mass matrix M D as a function of µ s and the three undetermined parameters, σ, two Majorana phases ϕ 1 and ϕ 2 in the MNS mixng matrix for fixed U e3 = 0. We note that the Dirac phase has little effect on our calculations if U e3 has non-zero tiny values. Then, we get a prediction on the mass spectra and the active to sterile neutrino mixing angles for µ s = 1 [kev] in Fig. 1 and 3. In these Figures we varied the parameters ϕ 1, ϕ 2 and σ from 0 to 2π. The same results for the case of µ s = 100 [ev] are shown in Fig. 2 and 4. This shows that if the parameter µ s varies from 1 [kev] to 100 [ev], then we obtain the result which shows one order of magnitude larger mixing angles and one half order of magnitude smaller mass eigenvalues. That is similar for the case of larger value of the parameter µ s. The results in Fig. 3 and 4 show that there exists a parameter space for µ s around kev scale, which is allowed by the present experiments [20]. The allowed ranges for each mass eigenvalues and the mixing angles are listed in Table 1 and 2. Also it may be worthwhile noticing that such kev scale lepton number violation may lead to an interesting signature in the neutrinoless double beta decay [21] or becomes a possible candidate for the cold dark matter [22]. These subjects are the topics for the future study. Acknowledgments The authors thank the Yukawa Institute for Theoretical Physics at Kyoto University. Discussions during the YITP workshop YITP-W on Progress in Particle Physics 2005 were useful to complete this work. The work of T.F. is supported in part by the Grant-in- Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Science and Culture of Japan 2

4 The allowed ranges for mass eigenvalues The allowed ranges for mixing angles [GeV] < m N1 < [GeV] < log 10 Ue4 2) < [GeV] < m N2 < [GeV] < log 10 Ue5 2) < [GeV] < m N3 < [TeV] < log 10 Ue6 2) < [GeV] < m N4 < [TeV] < log 10 Ue7 2) < [TeV] < m N5 < [TeV] < log 10 Ue8 2) < [TeV] < m N6 < [TeV] < log 10 Ue9 2) < Table 1: The allowed ranges for each mass eigenvalues and the mixing angles in case of µ s = 1 [kev]. The allowed ranges for mass eigenvalues The allowed ranges for mixing angles [GeV] < m N1 < [GeV] < log 10 Ue4 2) < [GeV] < m N2 < [GeV] < log 10 Ue5 2) < [GeV] < m N3 < [GeV] < log 10 Ue6 2) < [GeV] < m N4 < [GeV] < log 10 Ue7 2) < [TeV] < m N5 < [TeV] < log 10 Ue8 2) < [TeV] < m N6 < [TeV] < log 10 Ue9 2) < Table 2: The allowed ranges for each mass eigenvalues and the mixing angles in case of µ s = 100 [ev]. # ). The work of T.K. and K.M. are supported by the Research Fellowship of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science #7336 and #3700). References [1] T. Yanagida, Horizontal Gauge Symmetry and Masses of Neutrinos, in Proceedings of the workshop on the Unified Theory and Baryon Number in the Universe, edited by O. Sawada and A. Sugamoto KEK, Tsukuba, 1979); M. Gell-Mann, P. Ramond, and R. Slansky, The family group in grand unified theories, in Supergravity, edited by D. Freedman and P. van Niewenhuizen north-holland, Amsterdam 1979); R. N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanović, Neutrino mass and spontaneous parity nonconservation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, ). [2] E. Witten, New Issues In Manifolds Of SU3) Holonomy, Nucl. Phys. B 268, ). [3] R. N. Mohapatra, Mechanism For Understanding Small Neutrino Mass In Superstring Theories, Phys. Rev. Lett ) 561. [4] R. N. Mohapatra and J. W. F. Valle, Neutrino Mass And Baryon-Number Nonconservation In Superstring Models, Phys. Rev. D 34, ). [5] T. Fukuyama, A. Ilakovac, T. Kikuchi and K. Matsuda, Neutrino oscillations in a supersymmetric SO10) model with type-iii see-saw mechanism, JHEP 0506, ) [arxiv:hep-ph/ ]. [6] M. Malinsky, J. C. Romao and J. W. F. Valle, Novel supersymmetric SO10) seesaw mechanism, [arxiv:hep-ph/ ]. 3

5 [7] S. M. Barr, A different see-saw formula for neutrino masses, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, ) [arxiv:hep-ph/ ]. [8] S. M. Barr and I. Dorsner, A prediction from the type III see-saw mechanism, [arxiv:hep-ph/ ]. [9] K. S. Babu and R. N. Mohapatra, Predictive neutrino spectrum in minimal SO10) grand unification, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, ) [arxiv:hep-ph/ ]. [10] K. Matsuda, Y. Koide and T. Fukuyama, Can the SO10) model with two Higgs doublets reproduce the observed fermion masses?, Phys. Rev. D 64, ) [arxiv:hep-ph/ ]. [11] K. Matsuda, Y. Koide, T. Fukuyama and H. Nishiura, How far can the SO10) two Higgs model describe the observed neutrino masses and mixings?, Phys. Rev. D 65, ) [Erratum-ibid. D 65, )] [arxiv:hep-ph/ ]; [12] T. Fukuyama and N. Okada, Neutrino oscillation data versus minimal supersymmetric SO10) model, JHEP 0211, ) [arxiv:hep-ph/ ]. [13] B. Bajc, G. Senjanović and F. Vissani, b - tau unification and large atmospheric mixing: A case for non-canonical see-saw, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, ) [arxiv:hep-ph/ ]. [14] H. S. Goh, R. N. Mohapatra and S. P. Ng, Minimal SUSY SO10), b tau unification and large neutrino mixings, Phys. Lett. B 570, ) [arxiv:hep-ph/ ]. [15] H. S. Goh, R. N. Mohapatra and S. P. Ng, Minimal SUSY SO10) model and predictions for neutrino mixings and leptonic CP violation, Phys. Rev. D 68, ) [arxiv:hep-ph/ ]. [16] B. Dutta, Y. Mimura and R. N. Mohapatra, CKM CP violation in a minimal SO10) model for neutrinos and its implications, Phys. Rev. D 69, ) [arxiv:hep-ph/ ]. [17] S. Bertolini and M. Malinsky, On CP violation in minimal renormalizable SUSY SO10) and beyond, [arxiv:hep-ph/ ]. [18] K. Matsuda, Phenomenological analysis of lepton and quark Yukawa couplings in SO10) two Higgs model, Phys. Rev. D 69, ) [arxiv:hep-ph/ ]. [19] K. S. Babu and C. Macesanu, Neutrino masses and mixings in a minimal SO10) model, [arxiv:hep-ph/ ]. [20] P. Achard et al. [L3 Collaboration], Search for heavy isosinglet neutrino in e+ e- annihilation at LEP, Phys. Lett. B 517, ) [arxiv:hep-ex/ ]. [21] Z. G. Berezhiani, A. Y. Smirnov and J. W. F. Valle, Observable Majoron emission in neutrinoless double beta decay, Phys. Lett. B 291, ) [arxiv:hep-ph/ ]. [22] V. Berezinsky and J. W. F. Valle, The KeV majoron as a dark matter particle, Phys. Lett. B 318, ) [arxiv:hep-ph/ ]. 4

6 0 µ = 1 [kev] s 2 Log U ) ea Log m [GeV]) 10 Ni Figure 1: Constraint on the heavy sterile mixing angles in cases of µ s = 1 [kev] with varied ϕ 1, ϕ 2 and σ from 0 to 2π. 0 µ = 100 [ev] s -2 2 Log U ) ea Log m [GeV]) 10 Ni Figure 2: Constraint on the heavy sterile mixing angles in cases of µ s = 100 [ev] with varied ϕ 1, ϕ 2 and σ from 0 to 2π. 5

7 Figure 3: The same figure as of Figure 1 but overwritten in the LEP experimental bound [20]. 6

8 Figure 4: The same figure as of Figure 2 but overwritten in the LEP experimental bound [20]. 7