arxiv: v1 [quant-ph] 18 Apr 2018

Transcription

1 Spatial search on Sierpinski carpet using quantum walk Shu Tamegai, Shohei Watabe, and Tetsuro Nikuni Tokyo University of Science, 1-3 Kagurazaka, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, , Japan Abstract arxiv: v1 [quant-ph] 18 Apr 2018 We investigate a spatial search problem on a fractal lattice using the quantum walk. A recent study made a conjecture that the behavior of the search on a fractal lattice is determined by the spectral dimension not by the fractal dimension. However, this conjecture has so far only been discussed in connection with two- and three-dimensional Sierpinski gaskets. We tackle this problem for the two-dimensional Sierpinski carpet, and show that our simulation result supports the conjecture. 1

2 The quantum algorithms for the spatial search problem have been intensively and extensively studied [1 6]. One expects that the superposition of the states can efficiently find a marked object from a huge database. The quantum spatial search algorithm evolve the state by alternating the oracle and the quantum walk operators. In order to solve this spatial search problem, the number of oracle calls should be optimized to concentrate the probability amplitude at the marked vertex. Understanding the scaling behavior of the optimal oracle calls is an important problem, which has been studied in a variety of regular lattice geometries [1 4]. Indeed, the number of interval steps between peaks of the marked vertex probability is given by DN 1/D orπ N/4 [4, 5], where D is the dimension, N the number of sites. In fractal geometry, there are three characteristic dimensions the Euclidean dimension d E, the fractal (or the Hausdorff) dimension d f, and the spectral (or the fracton) dimension d s, so the question is which dimension determines the scaling behavior of the optimal number of oracle calls in a fractal lattice. Recently, an interesting conjecture for a fractal lattice was made by Patel and Raghunathan [5] that the scaling behavior of the spatial search is determined by the spectral dimension d s neither by the Euclidean dimension d E nor by the fractal dimension d f. This conjecture was derived based on numerical studies for two- and three-dimensional Sierpinski gaskets. In this paper, we investigate this conjecture for other fractal lattice geometry, the twodimensional Sierpinski carpet, as in Fig. 1. We will show that our numerical simulation supports the conjecture made by Patel and Raphunathan [5]. In the quantum spatial search, we employ the flip-flop walk [6] as the quantum walk, where the state ψ( x, t) a x,l (t) x ˆl (1) l FIG. 1. (Color online) Sierpinski carpets at various stages. The red vertex at each stage represents the marked vertex. 2

3 FIG. 2. (Color online) Probability distribution for quantum spatial search on a two-dimensional Sierpinski carpet in the case when the amplitude distribution is concentrated toward the marked vertex. The data are for the stage S= P t o FIG. 3. (Color online) Time evolution of the marked vertex probability P( x = 0, t) for the quantum spatial search on the two-dimensional Sierpinski carpet. The data are for the stage S= 4. is constructed in the Hilbert spaceh search H N H k. Here, x H N is associated with the position degree of freedom and ˆl H k is associated with the link degree of freedom [5]. In the case of two-dimensional Sierpinski carpets, we take the dimension ofh k as k=4, for simplicity. The quantum spatial search algorithm is performed by the time evolution with alternately operating the oracle R and the quantum walk W, i.e. ψ( x, t) = (WR) t ψ( x, 0). The oracle R=I gives the maximum contrast between a marked vertex at the origin x= 0 and the rest. The quantum walk operator W is composed of a Grover diffusion operator G [7] and a shift operator S, i.e. W = SG. The Grover diffusion operator work as the inversion operator, given by [5] a x,l G 2 a x,l a x,l, (2) k l where in the case of the marked vertex, we do not operate the Grover diffusion operator [1]. The operatorsshifts the amplitude along its link direction and reverses the link direction, [5] x ˆl S x+ ˆl ˆl. (3) 3

4 Q N FIG. 4. (Color online) Scaling of the optimal steps of the oracle calls Q for the spatial search on the twodimensional Sierpinski carpet. The linear fit is for the data from the stage S= 1 to S= P t FIG. 5. (Color online) Time evolution of return probability for classical random walker on a Sierpinski carpet. The linear fit is for the data of the stage S= 10. If there is no vertex in the link direction ˆl, we take x ˆl S x ˆl. For the time evolution governed by the unitary operator W = SG [5], one may expect oscillation of the probability distribution as a function of the time step. In the present quantum spatial search, it is customary to chose the initial state to be the uniform superposition state, ψ( x, 0) =(Nk) 1/2 l x ˆl. (4) We numerically simulate the quantum spatial search algorithm on the two-dimensional Sierpinski carpet for stage S= 1 8 (N= ). The probability distribution P( x, t)= l a x,l (t) 2 can be concentrated at the marked vertex in the two-dimensional Sierpinski carpet (Fig. 2). We reasonably find oscillation of the probability at the marked vertex P( x= 0, t)= l a 0,l (t) 2 (Fig. 3). We identify the periodicity as the optimal time steps Q to the oracle calls, which is extracted by using the Fourier transformation of the oscillatory data of the marked vertex probability P( x= 0, t). In our numerical simulation, we employed the number of steps to be approximately The size dependence of the optimal number of oracle calls Q is shown in Fig. 4. Assuming Q N b, our fit gives the scaling behavior, Q=3.79(4)N (6), which gives the scaling exponent 4

5 b = (6). In the following, we analyze this scaling exponent in connection with the fractal structure. In fractal geometry, one has the Euclidean dimension d E, the fractal dimension d f, and the spectral dimension d s. In the two-dimensional Sierpinski carpet, the Euclidean dimension is given by d E = 2. The fractal dimension can be obtained by log M(ǫ) d f = lim, (5) ǫ 0 log 1 ǫ where M is the number of sticks, and ǫ the scaling factor. In the two-dimensional Sierpinski carpet, one has d f = ln 8/ ln 3= Although the spectral dimension for the Sierpinski gasket is simply given by d s = 2 ln(d E + 1)/ ln(d E + 3) [8, 9], there is no explicit expression for the spectral dimension d s of the Sierpinski carpet. We therefore numerically determine the spectral dimension from the scaling behavior of the return probability of the classical random walk [11], P c ( x= 0, t) t ds/2. Here, P c ( x= 0, t) is the probability that the classical random-walker starting from x= 0 at t=0 is found at the same position at t. From a simple scaling fit of our numerical simulation, we find P c ( 0, t)=84.7(9)t 0.871(4) (Fig. 5), and thus the spectral dimension of the twodimensional Sierpinski carpet is given by d s = 1.743(8). Our result is consistent with the earlier analytic prediction for the range of the spectral dimension d s [10]. We finally compare the spectral dimension with the scaling behavior of the optimal number of oracle calls Q. Using our numerical data, we find the approximate relation b 1/d s = 0.573(5). (In the case of the fractal dimension, we find 1/d f = ) Even if one expects that the slight difference may be eliminated by using ancilla control [12], we should carefully note the relation b 1/d s, because no mathematically rigorous arguments exist. However, our numerical results imply that, for a two-dimensional Sierpinski carpet, the relevant scaling for the quantum spatial search may be given by Q N 1/d s rather than by Q N 1/d E,f. In this paper, we investigated the spatial search problem on a two-dimensional Sierpinski carpet using the quantum walk. Our numerical simulation shows that the dynamics of the quantum spatial search on the fractal lattice is governed by the spectral dimension. It supports recent conjecture that the scaling behavior of the spatial search on a fractal lattice is determined by the spectral dimension not by the fractal dimension. 5

6 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS S.W. was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant No. JP16K T.N. was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant No. JP16K [1] N. Shenvi, J. Kempe, and K. B. Whaley, Phys. Rev. A 67, (2003). [2] A. Patel, K. S. Raghunathan, and M. A. Rahaman, Phys. Rev. A 82, (2010). [3] G. Abal, R. Donangelo, F. L. Marquezino, and R. Portugal, Math. Struct. Comp. Sci. 20, 999 (2010). [4] A. Patel and M. A. Rahaman, Phys. Rev. A 82, (2010). [5] A. Patel and K. S. Raghunathan, Phys. Rev. A 86, (2012). [6] A. Ambainis, J. Kempe, and A. Rivosh, in Proceedings of ACM-SIAM SODA05 (ACM Press, New York, 2005), p [7] L. K. Grover, Phys. Rev. Lett (1997). [8] S. Alexander and R. Orbach, J. Phys. Lett. 43, 625 (1982). [9] R. Rammal and G. Toulouse, J. Phys. Lett. 44, 13 (1983). [10] M. T. Barlow and R. F. Bass, Canad. J. Math. 51, 673 (1999). [11] Robert A. Meyers (2011), Mathematics of Complexity and Dynamical Systems, Springer Science & Business Media, pp. 21. [12] A. Tulsi, Phys. Rev. A 78, (2008); see also Ph.D. thesis, Indian Institute of Science,