Iterative improvement algorithms. Beyond Classical Search. Outline. Example: Traveling Salesperson Problem

Transcription

1 Iterative improvement algorithms In many optimization problems, path is irrelevant; the goal state itself is the solution Beyond Classical earch Chapter 4, ections Then state space = set of complete configurations; find optimal configuration, e.g., TP or, find configuration satisfying constraints, e.g., timetable In such cases, can use iterative improvement algorithms; keep a single current state, try to improve it Constant space, suitable for online as well as offline search Chapter 4, ections Chapter 4, ections Outline Example: Traveling alesperson Problem Hill-climbing imulated annealing tart with any complete tour, perform pairwise exchanges Genetic algorithms (briefly) ocal search in continuous spaces (briefly) Variants of this approach get within 1% of optimal very quickly with thousands of cities Chapter 4, ections Chapter 4, ections

2 Example: n-queens Put n queens on an n n board with no two queens on the same row, column, or diagonal Move a queen to reduce number of conflicts Hill-climbing contd. Useful to consider state space landscape objective function global maximum shoulder local maximum "flat" local maximum h = 5 h = 2 h = 0 Almost always solves n-queens problems almost instantaneously for very large n, e.g., n=1million current state state space andom-restart hill climbing overcomes local maxima (eventually a good initial state) andom sideways moves escape from shoulders loop on flat maxima Chapter 4, ections Chapter 4, ections Hill-climbing (or gradient ascent/descent) idges ike climbing Everest in thick fog with amnesia function Hill-Climbing( problem) returns a state that is a local maximum inputs: problem, a problem local variables: current, a node neighbor, a node current Make-Node(Initial-tate[problem]) loop do neighbor a highest-valued successor of current if Value[neighbor] Value[current] then return tate[current] current neighbor end Chapter 4, ections Chapter 4, ections

3 imulated annealing Idea: escape local maxima by allowing some bad moves but gradually decrease their size and frequency function imulated-annealing( problem, schedule) returns a solution state inputs: problem, a problem schedule, a mapping from time to temperature local variables: current, a node next, a node T, a temperature controlling prob. of downward steps current Make-Node(Initial-tate[problem]) for t 1 to do T schedule[t] if T = 0 then return current next a randomly selected successor of current E Value[next] Value[current] if E > 0 then current next else current next only with probability e E/T ocal beam search Idea: k random initial states; choose and keep top k of all their successors Not the same as k hill climbing searches run in parallel! earches that find good states recruit other searches to join them However, if the successors from an initial state are not selected, the search starting from that state is effectively abandoned. Problem: quite often, all k states end up on same local hill Idea:? Chapter 4, ections Chapter 4, ections Properties of simulated annealing At fixed temperature T, state occupation probability reaches Boltzman distribution p(x) = αe E(x) kt T decreased slowly enough = always reach best state x because e E(x ) kt /e E(x) kt = e E(x ) E(x) kt 1 for small T Is this necessarily an interesting guarantee?? Devised by Metropolis et al., 1953, for physical process modelling Widely used in VI layout, airline scheduling, etc. ocal Beam earch Idea: k random initial states; choose and keep top k of all their successors Not the same as k hill climbing searches run in parallel! earches that find good states recruit other searches to join them However, if the successors from an initial state are not selected, the search starting from that state is effectively abandoned. Problem: quite often, all k states end up on same local hill Idea: choose k successors randomly, biased towards good ones (tochastic Beam earch) Observe the close analogy to natural selection! Chapter 4, ections Chapter 4, ections

4 Genetic algorithms = stochastic beam search + generate successors from pairs of states % 29% 26% % Continuous state spaces uppose we want to site three airports in omania: 6-D state space defined by (x 1,y 2 ), (x 2,y 2 ), (x 3,y 3 ) objective function f(x 1,y 2,x 2,y 2,x 3,y 3 ) = sum of squared distances from each city to nearest airport Fitness election Pairs Cross Over Mutation Chapter 4, ections Chapter 4, ections Genetic algorithms contd. GAs require states encoded as strings (GPs use programs) Crossover helps iff substrings are meaningful components + = Continuous state spaces Discretization uppose we want to site three airports in omania: 6-D state space defined by (x 1,y 2 ), (x 2,y 2 ), (x 3,y 3 ) objective function f(x 1,y 2,x 2,y 2,x 3,y 3 ) = sum of squared distances from each city to nearest airport Discretization methods turn continuous space into discrete space eachstatehassixdiscretevariables(e.g. ±δ miles, whereδ isaconstant) [or grid cells] each state has how many possible successors? GAs evolution: e.g., real genes encode replication machinery! Chapter 4, ections Chapter 4, ections

5 Continuous state spaces Discretization uppose we want to site three airports in omania: 6-D state space defined by (x 1,y 2 ), (x 2,y 2 ), (x 3,y 3 ) objective function f(x 1,y 2,x 2,y 2,x 3,y 3 ) = sum of squared distances from each city to nearest airport Discretization methods turn continuous space into discrete space Ch. 3 Ch What is the key difference? Contrast and ummary eachstatehassixdiscretevariables(e.g. ±δ miles, whereδ isaconstant) [or grid cells] each state has how many possible successors? 12[book](action: changeonlyonevariable xor( xor )yofoneairport) (action: change at least one variable) what is the algorithm? Chapter 4, ections Chapter 4, ections Continuous state spaces No Discretization Gradient (of the objective function) methods compute f = f, f, f, f, f, f x 1 y 1 x 2 y 2 x 3 y 3 To increase/reduce f, e.g., by x x+α f(x) ometimes can solve for f(x) = 0 exactly (e.g., only one airport). Otherwise,Newton aphson(1664,1690)iteratesx x H 1 f (x) f(x) to solve f(x) = 0, where H ij = 2 f/ x i x j Contrast and ummary Ch. 3: It is the journey, not the destination. (optimize the path) Ch : It is the destination, not the journey (optimize the goal) Different problem formulation, do we still need: Initial state (state space):? uccessor function (actions):? tep (path) cost:? Goal test:? Chapter 4, ections Chapter 4, ections

6 Contrast and ummary Ch. 3: It is the journey, not the destination. (optimize the path) Ch : It is the destination, not the journey (optimize the goal) Different problem formulation, do we still need: Initial state (state space): yes [but different kind of states] uccessor function (actions): yes [but different kind of actions] tep (path) cost: no [not the journey] Goal test: no [optimize objective function] earching with Non-deterministic Actions performing an action might not yield the expected successor state uck can clean one dirty square, but sometimes an adjacent dirty square as well uck on a clean square can sometimes make it dirty The n-queen and TP problems can be forumluated in either way, how? Chapter 4, ections Chapter 4, ections kipping the rest Erratic Vacuum World not just a sequence of actions, but backup/contingency plans from tate 1: [uck, if tate = 5 then [ight, uck] else [] ] Chapter 4, ections Chapter 4, ections

7 And-Or earch Tree ensorless problems uck 1 ight No sensor the agent does not know which state it is in Is it hopeless? GOA uck ight eft uck OOP OOP uck eft OOP GOA 8 5 GOA OOP every path reaches a goal, a repeated state, or a dead end Chapter 4, ections Chapter 4, ections lippery floor Belief tates uck 1 ight Each belief state is a collection of possible physical states. 5 2 ight 6 12 reachable belief states (out of 255 possible belief states) If the actions have uncertain outcomes, how many belief states are there? Chapter 4, ections Chapter 4, ections

8 Contingency problems Environment is partially observable Fixed sequence: [uck, ight, uck] Actions have uncertain outcomes Addtional percepts during execution: [uck, ight, if[ Dirty] then uck] More in Chapter 12 (Planning) Adversarial environment (e.g., games): Chapter 6 Chapter 4, ections