arxiv: v1 [physics.atom-ph] 21 Dec 2009

Transcription

1 Applie Physics B manuscript No. (will be inserte by the eitor) A Compact Microchip-Base Atomic Clock Base on Ultracol Trappe Rb Atoms Daniel M. Farkas 1, Alex Zozulya 2, Dana Z. Anerson 1 arxiv: v1 [physics.atom-ph] 21 Dec Department of Physics an JILA, University of Colorao, Bouler, CO , USA 2 Department of Physics, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, 100 Institute Roa, Worcester, MA 01609, USA Receive: ate / Revise version: ate Abstract We propose a compact atomic clock base on ultracol Rb atoms that are magnetically trappe near the surface of an atom microchip. An interrogation scheme that combines electromagnetically-inuce transparency (EIT) with Ramsey s metho of separate oscillatory fiels can achieve atomic shot-noise level performance of / τ for 10 6 atoms. The EIT signal can be etecte with a heteroyne technique that provies noiseless gain; with this technique the optical phase shift of a 100 pw probe beam can be etecte at the photon shot-noise level. Numerical calculations of the ensity matrix equations are use to ientify realistic operating parameters at which AC Stark shifts are eliminate. By consiering fluctuations in these parameters, we estimate that AC Stark shifts can be cancele to a level better than An overview of the apparatus is presente with estimates of uty cycle an power consumption. 1 Introuction Recent progress in miniaturizing col- an ultracolatom systems has opene up the possibility of using ultracol matter an Bose-Einstein conensates (BECs) for portable applications. Inertial sensing, gravimetry, an timekeeping all stan to benefit from recent avances in the fiel [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. Some key evelopments inclue compact ultrahigh vacuum (UHV) systems, istribute-feeback ioe lasers, an silicon fabrication techniques for both trapping with atom microchips an MEMS-base fiber-optic components. Several of these technologies were recently use to emonstrate BEC prouction in a robust, portable system having a volume of only 0.4 m 3 [10]. We propose a transportable, miniature atomic clock base on laser-coole 87 Rb atoms that are magnetically trappe near the surface of an atom microchip [6]. Coole, trappe atoms have significant potential in aressing nees for high-accuracy clocks having a small footprint. For example, Doppler shifts are significantly reuce by the col temperatures, while the spatial confinement provie by the trap prevents ecoherence from wall collisions. In aition, atom trapping can in principle make the clock insensitive to orientation in a gravitational fiel an can accommoate a ynamic environment subject to moest g-forces. Moreover, implementation with an atom microchip enables one to consier its integration with other chip-base col atom sensors. Currently, chip-scale atomic clocks (CSACs) base on hot alkali vapors represent the state-of-the-art in miniature atomic clocks [11, 12, 13]. Although instabilities own to have been achieve, there are obstacles to achieving better performance from these evices. First, the coherence time of the atoms is shortene by collisions between the atoms an the cell walls. Although the use of buffer gases reuces ephasing, coherence times are still limite to only a few ms. Secon, this use of a buffer gas introuces pressure-epenent frequency shifts that are affecte by temperature changes. Thir, continuous excitation of the atoms by the laser fiel generates AC Stark shifts an linewith broaening that contribute to long-term rift [14, 15]. With the limitations of clocks base on vapor cells on the one han, an the unpreceente accuracies better than in trappe, col-atom macroscale clocks on the other [16, 17], cooling an trapping are avantageous towars enabling further progress in the evelopment of miniature atomic clocks. Atom trapping is crucial for lengthening coherence times an hence improving clock stability. For example, consier a physics package measuring no more than 10 cm in any imension. Without trapping, the coherence time of an atom will be limite by the travel time of 50 ms before gravity forces it to hit a wall, where the resulting collision will estroy the coherence. The resulting linewith is 10 Hz, regarless of how col the atoms are. Permitting the

2 2 Daniel M. Farkas et al. clock s physical imension to be even longer than 10 cm in the irection of gravity, the atomic transverse temperature still limits travel times to less than 50 ms, assuming typical atom temperatures from a magneto-optical trap ( 150 µk for 87 Rb). For magnetically trappe, groun state Rb atoms, coherence times greater than 2 s have been observe experimentally [6, 18]. Our target for a backgroun pressure of Torr an atom temperature of less than 1 µk shoul result in coherence times of at least 1 s, proviing an interrogation time equivalent to that of a 1.25 m fountain clock. The resulting Ramsey fringe linewith of 0.5 Hz woul be an orer of magnitue narrower than what can be obtaine with untrappe col atoms an two orers of magnitue narrower than what can be obtaine in a vapor cell. Such improvements more than compensate for the loss of atoms that accompany cooling an trapping. Due to their insensitivity to magnetic fiels, the m = 0 magnetic sublevels normally use as the clock states in alkali-atom clocks cannot be use. Instea, the low-fiel seeking, magnetically trappable F = 1, m F = 1 an F = 2, m F = +2 groun state sublevels can be use. In a magnetic fiel near 3.23 G, the first-orer Zeeman shift of this transition cancels, helping to reuce the sensitivity of the clock frequency to fluctuations an inhomogeneities in the trapping fiels [6, 18]. For interrogating the atoms, we consier Ramsey s metho of separate oscillatory fiels with pulse electromagnetically inuce transparency (EIT) [19]. Implementations of Ramsey spectroscopy using pulse EIT have been stuie extensively in atomic beams an vapor cells [20,21,22]. However, to our knowlege, no attempt has yet been mae to experimentally observe this phenomenon in col, trappe atoms, where it has been propose as a way to eliminate AC Stark shifts in atomic clocks [19, 22, 23]. This paper is ivie into four sections. The first part is a basic overview of the propose experimental approach. The secon part presents theoretical calculations of Ramsey spectroscopy with pulse EIT. From numerical solutions to the ensity matrix equations, clock stability is estimate for realistic operating parameters. The thir part focuses on systematic effects. We show that for a proper choice of laser pulse urations an etunings, AC Stark shifts can be eliminate. Dephasing ue to magnetic fiel inhomogeneity an mean-fiel shifts are also reviewe. In the last part, an overview of a propose experimental implementation is presente with focus on a compact UHV vacuum system. Estimates of the uty cycle an power consumption for a first generation implementation are also presente. 2 Experimental Overview A simplifie energy iagram of the D 2 transition in 87 Rb is shown in Fig. 1. The clock states 1 = 5 2 S 1/2, F = Fig. 1 Simplifie energy iagram of 87 Rb. The clock states 1 = 5 2 S 1/2, F = 1, m F = 1 an 2 = 5 2 S 1/2, F = 2, m F = +1 can be magnetically trappe an have an energy spacing equal to the 6.8 GHz groun-state hyperfine splitting. The excite state 3 can be either the 5 2 P 3/2, F = 2, m F = 0 or the 5 2 P 3/2, F = 1, m F = 0 sublevel. 1, m F = 1 an 2 = 5 2 S 1/2, F = 2, m F = +1 have an energy splitting ω 21 equal to the 6.8 GHz grounstate hyperfine splitting. These sublevels were chosen as clock states since they are both low-fiel seekers that can be trappe in a magnetic fiel minimum. A pair of laser beams with wavelengths near 780 nm an frequencies separate by 6.8 GHz are use to rive two electric ipole transitions: a σ + -polarize probe beam rives the transition 1 3 an a σ -polarize coupling beam rives the transition 2 3. State 3 is one of the magnetic sublevels in the excite 5 2 P 3/2 manifol. Due to selection rules, this state must have magnetic component m F = 0 an total angular momentum F = F ± 1 = 1 or 2. Therefore the states 5 2 P 3/2, F = 1, m F = 0 or 5 2 P 3/2, F = 2, m F = 0 can serve as 3. Unprime labels F an m refer to groun states in the 5 2 S 1/2 manifol, an prime labels are use for excite states in the 5 2 P 3/2 manifol. All atoms must be in states 1 or 2 at the beginning of the operational sequence (see Fig. 2). This can be achieve either by optically pumping atoms into one of these states or simply waiting for atoms in other states, which are magnetically untrappable, to be ejecte from the trapping region. Probe an coupling laser fiels are then pulse for uration t 1, using EIT to put the atoms into a steay-state, coherent superposition of states 1 an 2 : ψ = Ω c 1 Ω p 2, (1) Ωp 2 + Ωc 2

3 A Compact Microchip-Base Atomic Clock Base on Ultracol Trappe Rb Atoms 3 Fig. 2 The interrogation scheme uses pulse EIT to implement Ramsey s metho of separate oscillatory fiels. The first pulse puts the atoms into a superposition of clock states. Atoms then precess in the ark for an interrogation time T, after which the laser ifference frequency is compare to the clock transition frequency by measuring an optical phase shift inscribe on the probe beam uring the secon EIT pulse. where Ω p an Ω c are the Rabi frequencies of the probe an coupling transitions, respectively. We assume Ω p = Ω c, resulting in an equal superposition ( 1 2 )/ 2. In this case, the initial EIT pulse is functionally equivalent to the initial π/2 pulse in Ramsey spectroscopy. After the laser fiels are extinguishe, the atoms freely precess in the ark for an interrogation time T. This step is equivalent to the secon stage in Ramsey spectroscopy, yieling fringes of with 1/(2T ) Hz. The linear ecrease in linewith with interrogation time is one of the great benefits of Ramsey s metho. By comparison, spectroscopy methos that continuously probe atoms, such as the coherent population trapping (CPT) interrogation one in CSACs, yiel clock performances that improve only as the square-root of time. The coherent superposition state create with the first EIT pulse is ark with respect to a pair of laser beams whose ifference frequency is equal to ω 21. This ark state is etecte by applying a secon EIT pulse of uration t 2 an monitoring the optical phase shift of the probe beam. If the laser ifference frequency is equal to ω 21, then the atomic sample remains transparent, an no phase shift is inscribe by the atoms onto the probe beam. If the laser ifference frequency oes not equal ω 21, then the atoms will not be ark an the probe beam will pick up a phase shift. We assume that the Rabi frequencies of the secon pulse are the same as those for the first pulse, otherwise the secon pulse will pump atoms into a ifferent superposition state, via Eqn. 1, leaing to a non-zero phase shift of the probe beam even if the laser ifference frequency equals ω 21. For magnetically trappe Rb atoms, recent theoretical work has investigate the impact of fiel inhomogeneity an col collisional shifts on coherence time, frequency rift, an accuracy [24]. We work within the parameters of references [18] an [24] an consier a sample of Rb atoms that has been evaporatively coole to a temperature of T a = 500 nk. Atoms are trappe near the surface of an atom microchip in a harmonic trap forme from electrical currents running through conuctors on the chip surface. The atomic ensity will have a Gaussian spatial profile with a FWHM of 8 ln 2 k B T a /(m ω 2 ), Fig. 3 Schematic for optical heteroyne etection of a 100 pw beam at the shot-noise level. The probe is split into strong (P s 1 mw) an weak (P w 100 pw) beams. The weak beam is frequency shifte with an acousto-optic moulator (AOM) before passing through the atomic clou. The weak an strong beam are recombine on the face of a photoetector. The electronic beat at the AOM frequency is emoulate using a phase-shifte copy of the AOM rive. The proper choice of phase φ selects between in-phase an quarature signals, one of which is irectly proportional to the phase shift inscribe by the atoms onto the weak beam. where k B is Boltzmann s constant an m is the atomic mass. For a transverse trap frequency of ω t = 100 Hz an an axial trap frequency of ω a = 10 Hz, the size of the atomic clou is 25 µm in the transverse irections an 250 µm in the axial irection. For simplicity, we assume the atomic sample to have a uniform cylinrical ensity profile with these imensions. Moe-matching the waist of the probe beam to the very tight transverse imension of the atomic clou presents a challenge for achieving shot-noise limite etection of the probe beam. To avoi saturation of the optical transitions (i.e. Ω c,ω p (2π)6 MHz), the probe power must be less than 1 nw. Such low powers cannot be etecte at the shot-noise level using conventional PIN or avalanche photoioes. To help circumvent this limitation, we choose the F = 2, m F = 0 sublevel for the excite state 3. Compare to the F = 1, m F = 0 sublevel, the probe transition to this state is weaker, an therefore larger probe powers can be tolerate. We present two optical-rf ouble heteroyne techniques for etecting laser powers as low as 100 pw at the shot-noise level. In the first technique (see Fig. 3), the probe laser is split into weak an strong beams of powers P w an P s, respectively. The weak beam (P w 100 pw) is shifte by 80 MHz in an acousto-optic moulator (AOM) before passing through the atomic clou. The strong beam (P s 1 mw) propagates parallel to the weak beam, but is laterally translate so that it oes not interact with the atoms. The two beams are recombine with a beamsplitter an the heteroyne beat at 80 MHz is etecte with a silicon photoetector. The beat signal has an amplitue proportional to P w P s, with the strong beam acting as a local oscillator that pro-

4 4 Daniel M. Farkas et al. vies noiseless gain for etection of the weak beam. At 80 MHz, technical noise on the lasers has rolle off an the beat can be etecte at the shot-noise limit. The shot noise is ominate by that of the strong beam an is proportional to P s. The resulting signal-to-noise ratio of P w P s / P s = P w is etermine by the shotnoise of the weak beam. The electronic signal at 80 MHz is emoulate with an ajustable phase φ that selects between the in-phase an quarature components. A limitation of this technique is that mechanical rift of the optics will introuce systematic errors. The success of this scheme, therefore, epens crucially on the mechanical stability of the setup. One metho for avoiing this limitation is to repeat the probe measurement a secon time without atoms. This secon measurement calibrates the systematic error an can be use to correct the first measurement. The use of two measurements assumes that mechanical rift is slow compare to the time require to perform two probe measurements. For mechanical vibrations on faster timescales, a ualwavelength interferometer can be use. Here, systematic phase shifts are measure at the same time as the atominuce phase shift using a laser beam at a wavelength much ifferent than that of the probe. The secon heteroyne etection technique is base on phase moulation of the probe beam. Here, strong moulation generates a weak carrier with strong siebans that provie noiseless gain for carrier etection. In the absence of an atom-inuce optical phase shift, a phase moulate beam will prouce no electronic beat signal upon photoetection. However, once the carrier is phase shifte, the phase moulation is partially converte into amplitue moulation that can be electronically etecte. The benefit of this approach is that optical phase shifts ue to mechanical instabilities affect all frequency components ientically; this common-moe systematic noise will therefore be rejecte upon etection. However, the rawback to this approach is the rise of aitional AC Stark shifts ue to the multiple frequency components of the probe beam. 3 Theoretical Calculations 3.1 The Dynamical Equations of Motion Consier the three-level system shown in Fig. 1 in the presence of an electromagnetic fiel given by E = 1 2 [A 31 exp( iω 31 t) + A 32 exp( iω 32 t) + c.c.]. (2) The fiel consists of two components: a probe beam of amplitue A 31 an frequency ω 31 that is nearly resonant with the transition 1 3, an a coupling beam of amplitue A 32 an frequency ω 32 that is nearly resonant with the transition 2 3. Light changes the optical properties of the meium because it affects the evolution of the atomic ensity operator ρ. The evolution equation for ρ is t ρ = ī h [H a + H int, ρ] + R ρ, (3) where H a is the atomic Hamiltonian in the absence of light an H int = D E(t) is the ipole interaction Hamiltonian between the light fiel an the atom. D is the ipole moment operator an R ρ is the relaxation operator. An electric ipole transition between clock states 1 an 2 is not allowe by selection rules. The resulting atomic ipole operator has the form D = 3 1 µ µ 32 + c.c., (4) where µ mn = m D n is the ipole transition matrix element. The Hamiltonian H = H a +H int in the rotatingframe approximation can be written H = hω hω hω h ( Ω e iω31t + Ω e iω32t + c.c. ) (5) 2 where Ω 31 = µ 31 A 31 / h an Ω 32 = µ 32 A 32 / h are the Rabi frequencies of the probe an coupling transitions, respectively. Evolution of the electromagnetic fiel is governe by Maxwell s equations, which reuce to 2 E 1 2 ( c 2 t 2 E + 1 ) P = 0, (6) ɛ 0 where P is the polarization of the meium. The atomic ipole operator is given by Eqn. 4, so the single atom polarization is p = µ 13 ρ 31 + µ 23 ρ 32 + c.c. (7) In orer to estimate clock stability, we numerically solve the ensity matrix equations for the three-level system. The solutions are use to obtain the susceptibility, from which the optical phase shift inscribe by the atoms onto the probe beam can be calculate. The phase shift is numerically integrate as a function of time to obtain theoretical Ramsey fringes as well as numerical estimates for signal-to-noise ratio an clock stability. The polarization P of the meium is given by the relation P = 1 2 (P 31 + P 32 + c.c.) (8) = n a (µ 13 ρ 31 + µ 23 ρ 32 + c.c.) (9) where n a is the ensity of atoms. The steay-state response of the term P 31 oscillates at the frequency ω 31

5 A Compact Microchip-Base Atomic Clock Base on Ultracol Trappe Rb Atoms 5 (P 31 exp( ω 31 t)) an the term P 32 oscillates at the frequency ω 32. Eqns. 3 an 5 show that the coherences, or off-iagonal elements of the ensity matrix, can be written as ρ 31 = σ 31 exp( iω 31 t) an ρ 32 = σ 32 exp( iω 32 t), where the functions σ ij are slow functions of time as compare with the exponentials. It is convenient to factor out the fast time epenence from the problem an work with slow-varying elements of the ensity matrix. This is achieve by going to the interaction representation, i.e. factorizing the Hamiltonian in Eqn. 5 as H = H 0 +V an introucing the interaction-representation ensity operator σ by the relation σ = exp(ih 0 t/ h)ρ exp( ih 0 t/ h). The ensity operator σ obeys the equation where t σ = ī h [V I, σ] + R σ, (10) V I = exp(ih 0 t/ h)v exp( ih 0 t/ h) (11) is the interaction Hamiltonian. Similarly, R σ is the relaxation operator in the interaction representation. The Hamiltonian H 0 shoul be chosen so that elements of the ensity matrix σ are slow functions of time, i.e. o not contain fast time scales on the orer of inverses of laser frequencies. A convenient choice is an H 0 = h(ω 3 ω 31 ) h(ω 3 ω 32 ) hω (12) V = h h h ( Ω e iω31t + Ω e iω32t + c.c. ), (13) 2 where 31 = ω 31 (ω 3 ω 1 ) an 32 = ω 32 (ω 3 ω 2 ) are the etunings of the two lasers from the frequencies of the corresponing transitions with which they are nearly resonant. The slowly-varying ensity matrix σ is relate to the full ensity matrix ρ by ρ 11 ρ 12 e i(ω31 ω32)t ρ 13 e iω31t σ = ρ 21 e i(ω31 ω32)t ρ 22 ρ 23 e iω32t. (14) ρ 31 e iω31t ρ 32 e iω32t ρ 33 The interaction Hamiltonian V I in Eqn. 11 is given by the expression 31 0 Ω 13 /2 V I = h 0 32 Ω 23 /2. (15) Ω 31 /2 Ω 32 /2 0 The relaxation matrix is given by Γ 31 σ 33 γ c σ 12 γ c1 σ 13 Rσ = γ c σ 21 Γ 32 σ 33 γ c2 σ 23. (16) γ c1 σ 31 γ c2 σ 32 Γ σ 33 The relaxation matrix inclues the total spontaneous ecay rate Γ of the excite state; partial ecay rates Γ 31 an Γ 32 of the excite state to the clock states 1 an 2, respectively; optical ecoherences γ c1 an γ c2 ; an the Raman ecoherence γ c. The system is assume to be open, implying that atoms are lost upon spontaneously ecaying to states other than 1 or 2. As a result, the total ecay rate of the excite state Γ = (2π)6.0 MHz is larger than the sum of the partial ecay rates (see Table 1). We ignore ecoherence between the clock states (i.e. γ c = 0) an set the optical ecoherences equal to half of their corresponing partial ecay rates (i.e. γ c1 = Γ 31 /2 an γ c2 = Γ 32 /2). The set of equations for the elements of the ensity matrix takes the form t σ 21 = (iδ γ c )σ 21 + i 2 [Ω 23σ 31 Ω 31 σ 23 ], [ t σ 31 = i( 0 + δ ] 2 ) γ c1 σ 31 + i 2 [Ω 31(σ 11 σ 33 ) + Ω 32 σ 21 ], [ t σ 23 = i( 0 δ ] 2 ) γ c2 σ 23 (17) i 2 [Ω 23(σ 22 σ 33 ) + Ω 13 σ 21 ], t σ 11 = Γ 31 σ 33 + i 2 [Ω 13σ 31 c.c.], t σ 22 = Γ 32 σ 33 i 2 [Ω 32σ 23 c.c.], t σ 33 = Γ σ 33 + i 2 [ Ω 13σ 31 + Ω 32 σ 23 c.c.], where the Raman etuning δ = = (ω 31 ω 32 ) (ω 2 ω 1 ) is the ifference between laser ifference frequency an the atomic clock frequency ω 21 = ω 2 ω 1. The common-moe etuning 0 = ( )/2 is the average of the two laser etunings. The polarization of the atomic sample is given by P = 1 2 (P 31 + P 32 + c.c.) = n a [µ 13 σ 31 e iω31t + µ 23 σ 32 e iω32t + c.c.]. (18) The relative ielectric constant of the meium is ɛ = 1+χ, where χ is the meium susceptibility. Using Eqns. 6 an 18, χ becomes χ(ω p ) = 2n aω 13 hσ 31 ɛ 0 A p 2, χ(ω c ) = 2n aω 23 hσ 32 ɛ 0 A c 2, (19) where ω p an ω c are the probe an coupling optical frequencies, respectively.

6 6 Daniel M. Farkas et al. Probe Coupling Transition Partial Decay Rate (MHz) Dipole Moment (C m) Rabi Frequency (khz) Intensity (W/m 2 ) Power (pw) Table 1 Transition properties use for numerical simulations [25]. The excite magnetic sublevel F = 2, m F = 0 is use for state 3. The intensities of the two lasers are chosen so that the Rabi frequencies for the two transitions are the same. For obtaining laser power from intensity, a beam waist of 25 µm is assume. 3.2 Numerical Analysis Eqns. 17 were solve numerically using properties for the relevant transitions in 87 Rb (see Table 1). Both probe an coupling lasers are on resonance with their respective transitions (i.e. δ = 0 an 0 = 0). Several factors must be consiere when choosing appropriate values for the Rabi frequencies. A longer response time, as neee for a smaller Rabi frequencies, permits the electronic signal processing to operate at lower banwiths, which simplifies the etection circuitry. On the other han, smaller Rabi frequencies result in lower optical powers that in turn leas to lower etection signal-to-noise ratios. Taking these consierations into account, we chose Ω c = Ω p = (2π)150 khz for numerical estimates. Assuming a beam waist of 25 µm, the corresponing probe power is 130 pw. Fig. 4 illustrates how the probe an coupling beams moify the ensity matrix populations. We assume the atomic sample starts entirely in state 1 (i.e. ρ 11 = 1, ρ 22 = ρ 33 = 0), although any choice of initial conitions will lea to the same steay-state response of equal clock state populations (ρ 11 = ρ 22 ). The steay-state population ρ 33 = 0 in the presence of resonant laser fiels is the clearest inication that the sample becomes optically transparent. Note that the excite state population ρ 33 briefly becomes non-zero. Although a large fraction of this excite state population ecays into the ark coherent state, the remainer ecays to groun state sublevels other than the clock states. Atoms in these other groun states will no longer be trappe an can therefore escape from the atomic clou. The result is steay-state populations that sum to less than 1. Assuming these untrappe atoms are initially at rest, either gravity or a magnetic force will force them to fall out of the trap in less than 5 ms (ignoring collisions with other atoms). Although these untrappe atoms remain in the atomic clou for the entire uration of the first pulse, they are not resonant with probe an coupling beams ue to the magnetic fiel that lifts the egeneracy of magnetic sublevels. Fig. 4 The change in atomic populations as the initial EIT pulse is applie. The atoms start in the atomic eigenstate 1 (ρ 11 = 1). For Ω p = Ω c, the steay-state populations of the groun states are equal (ρ 11 = ρ 22). The excite state becomes briefly populate (ρ 33 > 0) before attaining its steaystate value of 0. Fig. 5 The change in groun state coherence between the two clock states uring the initial EIT pulse. Pumping of the atoms into a coherent superposition state gives rise to a non-zero, steay-state value of ρ (1) 21. Fig. 5 shows how coherence between the clock states is create uring the initial pulse. For an equal superposition state, the coherence between clock states, given by the off-iagonal element ρ 21 of the ensity matrix, equal in magnitue to the clock state populations ρ 11 an ρ 22. It is this non-zero coherence that ifferentiates atoms in a superposition state from atoms in equal populations of two ifferent atomic eigenstates. attains a final value ρ (1) 21 After the initial EIT pulse, atoms precess in the ark for time T, uring which the coherence ρ (1) 21 picks up a phase shift factor exp( δ T ). After precession, the secon EIT pulse is applie. We assume that values of the Rabi frequencies Ω c an Ω p, Raman etuning δ, an common-moe etuning 0 are equal to those use for the first pulse. Eqns. 17 are again solve numerically, this time using ρ (1) 21 exp( δ T ) for the initial value of the coherence. The clock state populations obtaine at the

7 A Compact Microchip-Base Atomic Clock Base on Ultracol Trappe Rb Atoms 7 Parameter Value Atom Number Atom Temperature T a 500 nk Atom Clou Length l 250 µm Atom Clou Waist 25 µm Peak Atom Density n a cm 3 First Pulse Duration t 1 10 µs Interrogation Time T 1 s Fringe FWHM Γ R 0.5 Hz Secon Pulse Duration t 2 10 µs Photoioe Responsivity R 0.5 A/W at 780 nm Weak Probe Power P w 130 pw Strong Probe Power P s 1 mw Fig. 6 Optical phase shift as a function of time uring the secon EIT pulse. When the Raman etuning is on resonance (δ = 0), the atomic sample is transparent an the probe beam picks up no phase shift from the atoms. The largest phase shifts occur for δ = (n/2 + 1/4)/T, where n is an integer. Table 2 Assume values for operational parameters. phase shifts are ispersive an therefore have a zerocrossing at δ = 0. As a result, for small δ, the integrate photocurrent is irectly proportional to the correction that must be applie to the laser ifference frequency. 3.3 Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) an Frequency Instability The expecte noise is obtaine by integrating the noise current i n over the uration t 2 of the secon EIT pulse. This yiels a noise charge q n. Assuming the photoetection noise is etermine by the photon shot noise of the strong probe laser, the rms noise current σ i is given by σ i = i 2 n i n 2 = 2eRP s f, (20) Fig. 7 Integrate optical phase shift as a function of Raman etuning δ shows Ramsey fringes with a FWHM of Γ R = 1/(2T ), where T is the interrogation time. en of the first pulse are use as the initial values for the secon pulse. The optical phase shift is given by φ = 2πl(n 1)/λ, where l is the length of the atomic sample in the propagation irection of the probe laser an the real component of the refractive inex is given by n = Re[ 1 + χ(ω p )]. Fig. 6 illustrates the calculate optical phase shift as a function of time. When the laser ifference frequency is resonant with the clock frequency ω 21 (i.e. δ = 0), the sample is transparent an there is no phase shift (re). The maximum phase shift (black) occurs for δ = ±2π 1/(4T ) Hz. The etecte photocurrent is given by I = 2R P w P s φ, where R is the responsivity of the photoetector. To maximize signal-to-noise, the photocurrent is numerically integrate up to time t 2. Ramsey fringes of FWHM Γ R = 1/(2T ) are visible in Fig. 7, which shows the integrate photocurrent as a function of Raman etuning δ. Unlike fringes that are obtaine from absorption measurements, fringes obtaine from optical where e is the electron charge an the circuit banwith 2π f = 1/τ R is the inverse of the characteristic response time τ R of the circuit. The noise charge q n exhibits a ranom walk of uration t 2, yieling a mean-square noise charge q 2 n of q 2 n = 2 D t 2, (21) where D = σ i τ R is the iffusion coefficient. Eqn. 21 assumes that the circuit response time τ R is much faster than t 2 (i.e. τ R t 2 ). The rms noise charge σ q can then be expresse σ q = q 2 n q n 2 = 2eRP s t 2 /π. (22) Note that in the limit τ R t 2, σ q epens only on t 2 an not on the circuit banwith. The signal is obtaine from the slope S of the Ramsey fringe near δ = 0. The signal-to-noise ratio SNR=S/σ q is numerically calculate to be for the experimental parameters liste in Table 2. The fractional frequency instability, as limite by noise of the optical etection, is σ y (et) (τ) = 1 Γ R f 0 SNR 1 τ = / τ, (23)

8 8 Daniel M. Farkas et al. where f 0 = ω 21 /(2π) = 6.8 GHz is the clock frequency an τ is the integration time. The SNR of the optical etection is almost two orers of magnitue larger than the SNR ue to atom shot noise alone (SNR N a = 10 3 for N a = 10 6 atoms): σ (atoms) y (τ) = 1 f 0 Γ R Na 1 τ = / τ. (24) Asie from systematic effects an technical noise sources, clock performance will therefore be limite by the atom shot noise. 4 Systematic Effects In this section, two systematic effects that impact the accuracy an long-term stability of the clock are consiere. The first, AC Stark shifts, can be eliminate with a proper choice of laser parameters (e.g. intensities, EIT pulse uration, an common-moe laser etuning). The secon set of shifts arise from the combine effects of magnetic fiel inhomogeneity an mean fiel shifts. The sensitivity of the clock frequency on relevant experimental parameters, incluing laser intensity, optical frequency, pulse timing, trap magnetic fiels, an atom number is presente. The overall clock performance is calculate base on conservative estimates of rift in these parameters. 4.1 AC Stark Shifts AC Stark shifts, or light shifts, are one of the most problematic sources of systematic error in both miniature an full-size atomic clocks. The term light shifts refer to any effect that moifies the clock frequency through the atomic interaction with the laser fiels (an other oscillating electromagnetic fiels). The result is a clock whose accuracy ultimately epens on external experimental parameters instea of the inherent properties of the atomic species. In aition to accuracy, rift in these parameters can affect clock stability. The avantage of pulse EIT as a clock interrogation scheme is that a proper choice of Rabi frequencies (as etermine by the laser intensities), EIT pulse uration, an common-moe laser etuning leas to a clock that is free of all light shifts. Our goal in this section is not to provie an accurate calculation that inclues all sources of light shifts, which woul be a computationally intensive task. Rather, we show that the shift-free configuration can be obtaine for realistic operating parameters by just accounting for the the largest source of non-resonant light shifts. However, since the ientification of shift-free parameters is best one experimentally, our numerically stuies strongly suggest that an experimental approach woul succee in achieving a shift-free clock. Light shifts can be ivie into two categories. The first are shifts that arise from the resonant interaction of the two laser fiels with the three-level atomic system (i.e. the iealize system represente in Fig. 1). These shifts, which we label resonant, have been stuie experimentally in atomic beams an have been foun to arise when the initial EIT laser pulse is extinguishe before the steay-state response has been reache. For the case of a close atomic system with excite state ecay rate Γ, the resonant light shift δ can be expresse mathematically as δ = 1 ( ) 1 T tan 1 D 0 e αt1 1 sin(βt 1), (25) where D 0 is the ifference in the initial clock state populations [23]. The Raman amping rate α an Raman ispersion β are given by α = 1 Ω 2 Γ 2 Γ (26) β = Ω2 0 Γ , (27) 0 where Ω is the Rabi frequency of both probe an coupling transitions (i.e. Ω p = Ω c ) an the interrogation time T is assume to be much longer than the pulse uration t 1. The assumption of small common-moe etunings ( 0 Γ ) yiels α Ω 2 /(2Γ ) an β Ω 2 0 /Γ 2. The aitional assumption that the argument of the arctangent is much less than 1 allows us to simplify Eqn. 25 to δ = D 0 0 T Ω 2 t 1 Γ 2. (28) e Ω2 t 1 2Γ 1 Eqn. 28 shows how the resonant shift epens on various experimental parameters. The shifts are inversely proportional to interrogation time T, reflecting the fact that the longer the atoms precess in the ark, the less the clock transition is perturbe by the lasers. The exponential term arises from the extinction of the first EIT pulse before the steay-state response is reache. This term is reuce by increasing t 1 or Ω, which allows the system to reach equilibrium more quickly. In aition, shifts are reuce if the initial clock state populations are closer to their steay-state values. As a result, the shift is proportional to D 0. Last, the resonant light shift can be mae positive or negative via the linear epenence on 0. Aitional AC Stark shifts arise from the presence of other atomic states. We label these shifts non-resonant since the lasers that couple these transitions are etune by many linewiths. In general, these shifts scale inversely with laser etuning, so the ominant contribution will come from other nearby magnetic sublevels in the 5 2 S 1/2 groun state an 5 2 P 3/2 excite state hyperfine manifols (see Fig. 8). Although there are 24 sublevels in total, only three of the eight sublevels in the

9 A Compact Microchip-Base Atomic Clock Base on Ultracol Trappe Rb Atoms 9 Fig. 8 Energy iagram of the 5 2 S 1/2 groun state an 5 2 P 3/2 excite state hyperfine manifols in 87 Rb. Resonant (soli line) an non-resonant (ashe line) transitions allowe by the probe (coupling) laser are shown in re (blue). Only transitions that couple to the clock states in the groun state manifol are consiere. groun state can be magnetically trappe; contributions from the five other untrappable groun-state sublevels are ignore. Furthermore, the F = 2, m F = 2 groun state sublevel, which can be magnetically trappe, cannot be populate via spontaneous ecay of an m = 0 excite level, leaving the two clock states as the only groun state sublevels that nee consieration. Of the sixteen excite state sublevels, only six can be non-resonantly couple to the clock states with circularly polarize light. The excite non-resonant sublevel that prouces the largest AC Stark shift is 4 = F = 1, m F = 0. There are two reasons for this. First, the state 4 is the only non-resonant excite sublevel that couples to both laser fiels. Secon, non-resonant transitions to excite sublevels with m = 2 are couple with a laser etuning of 6.8 GHz, while the etunings for transitions to m = 0 sublevels are given by the smaller 100 to 300 MHz splittings of the excite 5 2 P 3/2 manifol. In fact, for our choice of state 3, the etuning of 157 MHz for state 4 is smaller than that of all other m = 0 non-resonant sublevels. To cancel light shifts in the clock, a resonant light shift that is equal in magnitue, but opposite in sign, to the sum of all non-resonant light shifts is intentionally introuce; the resulting resonant an non-resonant light shifts sum to zero. To emonstrate this cancelation numerically, the ensity matrix in Eqn. 14 was enlarge to a 4 4 matrix for the inclusion of state 4 in the system ynamics. The expane ensity matrix equations were solve an the integrate optical phase shift was calculate as a function of δ over the center part of the central Ramsey fringe. The clock frequency is given by the value of δ at which the fringe signal equals 0, which was foun numerically for ifferent parameters. Fig. 9 The total light shift as a function of common-moe etuning 0 for ifferent values of the pulse uration t 1. Several assumptions were mae in solving the 4-level system. First, the slave-state approximation was mae by setting the time-erivative of the coherence between the two excite states equal to 0. This is equivalent to assuming that the population of state 4 is negligible. Secon, the resonant light shifts in Eqn. 28 epen only on the uration t 1 of the first EIT pulse. Non-resonant light shifts, on the other han, arise for any time the laser fiels are present, an are therefore affecte by the uration of both pulses. To simplify the calculations, the first an secon pulse urations are assume to be equal, or t 1 = t 2. Thir, the Rabi frequencies are assume to both equal a fixe value Ω c = Ω p = (2π)150 khz, an the initial atomic population is assume to be entirely in state 1 so that D 0 = 1. As a result, the resonant light shift in Eqn. 28 is moifie by changing the pulse urations an common-moe etuning 0. Fourth, both resonant an non-resonant light shifts scale inversely with interrogation time T in the limit T t 1 ; the value T = 1 s was use for all calculations. The epenence of the clock frequency on pulse uration is presente in Fig. 9, which shows the total light shift scaling linearly with 0. For values of t 1 = t 2 between 4 an 12 µs, the total light shift can be eliminate for etunings 0 between -4 an -14 khz. The steepest slope of mhz/(khz T ) was foun for t 1 6 µs. This worst-case epenency of the clock performance on fluctuations in 0 correspons to a fractional frequency shift of The common-moe etuning f at which light shifts cancel is plotte as a function of pulse uration in Fig. 10. The maximum value of f occurs near 6 µs. At this point, the clock will be least sensitive to fluctuations in pulse uration. However, this point also correspons to the greatest sensitivity to fluctuations in 0. Therefore, pulse urations ifferent from 6 µs shoul also be consiere, even though this will increase sensitivity to timing jitter. Clock shifts arising from fluctuations in the laser parameters were estimate by numerically calculating

10 10 Daniel M. Farkas et al. Parameter t 1 = 6 µs t 1 = 20 µs units (khz T ) 1 t (0.1% T ) 1 t (0.1% T ) 1 Ω p (0.5% T ) 1 Ω c (0.5% T ) 1 Fig. 10 Shift-free value f of the common-moe etuning as a function of pulse uration t 1. the total light shift for small changes of these parameters. Table 3 summarizes the results for t 1 = 6 µs an t 1 = 20 µs. The units are normalize to typical uncertainties of the corresponing parameters (i.e. a 1 khz uncertainty in 0, a 0.1% shift in t 1, etc.). Even though we assume the first an secon pulses are equal in uration, timing jitter affects light shifts ifferently for the two pulses. Therefore, we consier the effects of timing jitter for each pulse separately. Changes in the Rabi frequencies arise from laser intensity variations an are expecte to be the largest source of laser-inuce inaccuracy for t 1 = 20 µs. For t 1 = 6 µs, the ominant sensitivity is ue to 0, whose fluctuations epen on how stable the optical frequencies are. For both values of t 1, the clock is least sensitive to timing jitter in the laser pulses. The overall performance is slightly better for t 1 = 20 µs ue to the reuce sensitivity to 0. In this case, all inaccuracies ue to laser-inuce effects are less than Active stabilization of the laser intensity coul reuce this even further. The epenency of the clock frequency on the Rabi frequencies, even uner light-shift-free conitions, implies that the f cannot be experimentally ientifie by varying probe an coupling laser intensities. Instea, f can be foun by measuring the clock frequency as a function of 0 for ifferent values of T. Since both resonant an non-resonant light shifts scale inversely with T, the clock frequency varies linearly with 0 with a slope proportional to 1/T. When plotting the shifts for all values of T on the same graph, the lines corresponing to ifferent values of T will intersect at the shift-free etuning f (see Fig. 3c in Reference [19]). 4.2 Dephasing an Coherence Times After the atoms have been pumpe into a coherent superposition state, two effects lea to ephasing an systematic frequency shifts: ifferential Zeeman shifts an mean-fiel shifts. These two effects generate a sprea in clock frequencies ν that cause the atoms to precess at Table 3 Light shifts arising from uncertainties in the common-moe etuning 0, pulse urations t 1 an t 2, an Rabi frequencies Ω c an Ω p. Values are obtaine for t 1 = 6 µs an t 1 = 20 µs assuming Ω c = Ω p = (2π)150 khz, t 1 = t 2, an 0 = f. Shifts are inversely proportional to T. Units are expresse in terms of typical uncertainties of the corresponing parameters. ifferent rates, washing out the Ramsey fringes. These two effects can be mae to largely cancel each other for a proper choice of trap magnetic fiels. Differential Zeeman shifts arise from the inhomogeneous magnetic fiel of the trap. In a harmonic trap, hotter atoms with greater kinetic energy are able to travel farther from the trap center, where they are expose to larger magnetic fiels an therefore greater Zeeman shifts. The magnetic fiel of the trap can be written B = B m + α t ( x 2 + y 2) + α l z 2, (29) where B m is the minimum value of the fiel at the center of the trap; x, y, an z are the trap s spatial coorinates; an α t an α l are the fiel curvatures in the transverse an longituinal irections, respectively. In the presence of a weak magnetic fiel, the potential energy U(x, y, z) of an atom scales linearly with the fiel: U(x, y, z) = g F m F µ B [B m + α t ( x 2 + y 2) + α l z 2 ], (30) where g F an m F are the g-factor an magnetic quantum number of the atomic state, µ B is the Bohr magneton, an m is the mass of the atom. The prouct g F m F is equal to 1/2 for both clock states. The Breit-Rabi formula preicts that the linear Zeeman shifts of the two clock states are equal at B G. Near B 0, the secon-orer Zeeman shift of the clock transition can be expresse ν z = b(b B 0 ) 2 ν m, (31) where b = 431 Hz/G 2 an ν m 4497 Hz. Plugging Eqn. 30 into Eqn. 31 gives the position-epenent Zeeman shift ν z (x, y, z) of the clock transition ν z (x, y, z) = b [ B m B 0 + α t (x 2 + y 2 ) + α l z 2] 2 νm. (32) The Zeeman shift varies as the fourth power of position. More importantly, the sign of B m B 0 can be change to make the curvature at the trap center positive (B m > B 0 ), negative (B m < B 0 ), or flat (B m = B 0 ).

11 A Compact Microchip-Base Atomic Clock Base on Ultracol Trappe Rb Atoms 11 Parameter Sensitivity Parameter Uncertainty Frequency Uncertainty (mhz) Fractional Frequency Uncertainty B m -35 Hz/G 10 5 = 30 µg T a 1 Hz/µK 10 5 = 5 pk N -5 µhz/atom N = f 0.3 mhz/% 0.5% Table 4 Differential Zeeman shifts an mean-fiel shifts arising from uncertainties in the trap bias fiel B m, atom temperature T a, atom number N, an population partition f. Typical uncertainties in the parameters, an the corresponing shifts in the clock frequency are liste. Sensitivities in the secon column are taken from reference [24]. For col, non-conense atoms in the s-wave regime, atom-atom collisions generate a frequency shift that epens on scattering length an atomic ensity. For the clock transition, this mean-fiel shift can be expresse ν c = 2 h m [α 12a 12 (n 1 n 2 ) + α 22 a 22 n 2 α 11 a 11 n 1 ] = h m n[α 22a 22 α 11 a 11 + f(2α 12 a 12 α 11 a 11 α 22 a 22 )], (33) where m is the atomic mass, n 1 an n 2 are the atomic ensities for states 1 an 2, n = n 1 + n 2 is the total atomic ensity, an the partition f = (n 1 n 2 )/n is the fractional change in population ensities ue to unequal superpositions. We assume the atoms are pumpe into equal superposition states (i.e. f = 0). The s-wave scattering lengths are represente by a ij an the zeroistance two-atom correlation functions are given by α ij. For non-conense atoms, α 11 = α 22 = α 12 = 2. Using the measure scattering lengths of a 22 = 95.47a 0, a 11 = a 0, an a 12 = 98.09a 0 [26], where a 0 is the Bohr raius, Eqn. 33 can be simplifie to ν c (x, y, z) = h m a 0n(x, y, z), (34) which shows that the shift is both negative an proportional to atom ensity n(x, y, z). Due to the Gaussian ensity profile of the ensemble, atoms at the center of the trap experience a more negative shift than atoms at the ege of the trap. The mean-fiel shift can be mostly cancele by the ifferential Zeeman shift when B m is chosen to be slightly less than B 0. In this case, the Zeeman shift ν z has positive curvature at the trap center, in contrast to the negative curvature of the collisional shift. Taken together, the combine shift is nearly flat across the spatial extent of the trap, thus reucing the sprea of clock frequencies an increasing coherence times. A theoretical framework has been evelope in reference [24] for better estimating ephasing times of Rb atoms in a magnetic trap. In this work, the total shift ν z + ν c was either spatially average over a Maxwell- Boltzmann istribution of atoms of finite temperature or average over the motion of the atoms in the trap. The resulting average shift was use to compute the variance σ 2, from which the ephasing time is given by ( 2πσ) 1. Calculations showe goo agreement with previous experimental ata [6, 18]. This framework was use to both minimize the line sprea of the clock transition an to increase the ephasing time by varying atom temperature, bias magnetic fiel, peak atom ensity, atom number, population partition, an trap frequencies [24]. Dephasing times as long as 20 s, corresponing to a line sprea of 11 mhz, were obtaine for experimental parameters similar to those use in references [6] an [18]: a temperature T a = 500 nk, peak ensities of /cm 3, a total atom number N = 10 5, a population partition f = 0, axial trap frequencies between 1 Hz an 10 Hz, an transverse trap frequencies between 300 Hz an 1 khz. The effects of fluctuations in magnetic fiel, temperature, atom number, an partition on clock performance are summarize in Table 4, with values for the sensitivities coming from reference [24]. The largest fractional frequency sensitivity is ue to fluctuations in atom number N. Unlike rift in the other parameters, fluctuations in atom number have a white noise spectrum, an therefore this source of clock instability will improve as 1/ τ for repeate clock cycles (assuming each clock cycle starts with the same nominal number of atoms). Although this systematic effect will slightly egrae stability, it will not contribute to the noise floor that will ultimately limit the long-term stability of the clock. The stability of the trap bias fiel B m is limite by the stability of the electrical current flowing through the atom chip; a 10 5 relative stability can be reaily achieve. Since the final atom temperature is etermine by the RF evaporation frequency an bias fiel B m, the temperature shoul have the same relative stability as B m. One source of rift in the population partition f is fluctuations in the Rabi frequencies of the two optical transitions. For probe an coupling laser intensities stable to 1%, the Rabi frequencies, an therefore the partition f, will be stable to 0.5%. The effects of fluctuations in the trap frequencies are negligible [24]. Given that the magnetic trap is expecte to be the largest source of systematic error, we briefly consier a miniature clock that confines atoms optically (e.g. an optical ipole trap). This approach coul require several Watts of laser power, however this is not necessarily a larger power rain than what is alreay neee for magnetically trapping on a microchip. Similar to a fountain

12 12 Daniel M. Farkas et al. clock, this configuration coul use the m = 0 groun state sublevels for the clock transition, helping to reuce sensitivity to stray magnetic fiels. Due to the lack of a magic wavelength for alkali atomic clocks base on optical ipole traps, an aitional light shift that epens on the intensity an wavelength of the trapping laser will arise [27, 28, 29]. Although further calculations for the case of Rb are neee, this light shift coul in principle be eliminate either using the pulse EIT scheme presente here [19] or with the aition of an external magnetic fiel [29,30,31]. The result woul be an atomic clock free of both light shifts an Zeeman shifts. 5 Description of Propose Apparatus In this section, we present a overview of how recent technological evelopments in ultracol atom technology can be aopte for the creation of a miniature, transportable atomic clock. There are four critical elements to the propose system: the miniature ultrahigh-vacuum (UHV) cell with integrate atom microchip; magnets; the laser system, optics, an etection system; an control electronics with a low phase noise microwave oscillator. Our focus here is primarily on the UHV cell an laser system. The optical etection system has alreay been iscusse above (see Fig. 3). Miniaturization of control electronics an low phase noise microwave oscillators has alreay been evelope for CSACs, an our proposal relies on the same technology. The clock will be base on a ouble MOT vacuum cell system (see Fig. 11) that has been use for several col-atom experiments an applications in our lab at the University of Colorao at Bouler. The ouble MOT configuration offers a substantial avantage in proviing high atom flux, fast loaing times, an long MOT an magnetic trap lifetimes. With an internal volume of 30 cm 3, this cell has a vacuum level better than Torr an has been use to create Bose-Einstein conensates near the surface of an integrate atom microchip with a uty cycle as fast as 3 s [10]. The microchip is anoically bone onto the en of one of the chambers, where it forms a wall of the cell. Current is passe into the vacuum through UHV-compatible electrical vias fabricate on the chip. Low vacuum levels are maintaine by a 2 l/s ion pump an non-evaporable getters. Cell construction utilizes silicon-to-glass anoic boning an stanar metal, glass, an glass-to-metal construction methos. These construction techniques enable high-temperature bake-outs up to 300 C, which is essential for goo UHV performance. The cell consists of two chambers joine by a 0.75 mm aperture that permits ifferential pumping between the two chambers. In the lower chamber, a 2D + MOT prouces a beam of col atoms, which fees the upper cell, where the atoms are capture in a 3D MOT. The 2D + MOT prouces a capture atom flux of 0.5 to 1 billion atoms/s with less than 120 mw of total optical power. The 2D + MOT chamber is operate near 10 7 Torr of rubiium pressure for high capture efficiency, while the 3D MOT chamber is maintaine at a much lower pressure for long trap lifetimes. Typical trap lifetimes are 10 to 20 s for the 3D MOT, an 4 to 7 s for a Ioffe-Pritchar magnetic trap. After capture in the 3D MOT, the magnetic fiels are turne off an a few ms of polarization graient cooling (PGC) is applie to bring the atom temperature below 50 µk. The atoms are then optically pumpe into a single, trappable magnetic sublevel. External magnetic fiel coils are use to transport atoms a istance of 1 cm in 300 to 500 ms, leaving the col atomic clou within 0.5 mm of the vacuum sie of the atom microchip. Atoms are transferre onto the chip by simultaneously ramping up current flowing on the chip an ramping own current flowing through the external fiel coils. The chip conuctor forms a Z configuration that, in conjunction with a pair of external bias fiels parallel to the chip surface, creates a Ioffe-Pritchar trap approximately 100 µm from the chip surface. Evaporative cooling with an RF antenna reuces the atom temperature below 1 µk. There are several benefits to using atom microchips. First, the significantly higher trap frequencies that can be obtaine (1-2 khz in the transverse irection) compare to macroscopic magnetic traps spees up rethermalization uring evaporative cooling, helping to shorten the uration of this stage. Secon, less RF power can be use uring evaporation by placing the RF antenna on the back-sie of the chip, where it is less than 0.5 mm away from the atoms. In aition, the ability to generate very stable electrical currents may lea to trap fiels that are more stable than what can be obtaine with permanent magnets, which have at best a temperature coefficient of 0.03%/ C. One rawback to using an atom microchip is power consumption. The chip trap must be on uring evaporative cooling an clock interrogation, for a total of several secons. Assuming a wire resistance of 2 Ω an a steaystate current of 1.5 A, the resulting power issipation is more than 4 W (ignoring the aitional power neee to generate external bias fiels). One way to mitigate this loss is to use a planar configuration of permanent magnets on the chip as the final trap [32]. Chip wires can then be use for the much shorter stage of transferring atoms to the chip. Distribute feeback (DFB) ioe lasers can be use to create a compact laser system that, compare to external cavity ioe lasers, is significantly more robust towars mechanical vibrations. In aition to the one or two lasers neee for EIT, up to two aitional lasers are neee for the MOT: one for the 5S 1/2, F = 2 5P 3/2, F = 3 cooling transition an the other for the 5S 1/2, F = 1 5P 3/2, F = 2 repumping transition. MOTs of 1 to 2 billion atoms have been achieve in the

13 A Compact Microchip-Base Atomic Clock Base on Ultracol Trappe Rb Atoms 13 Fig. 11 Schematic of the ouble MOT vacuum cell system. two-chamber cell of Fig. 11 using 120 mw of combine cooling an repump power. However, to obtain 1 million atoms in a magnetic trap after evaporative cooling, we estimate only 100 to 200 million atoms will be neee in the 3D MOT. As a result, we expect only 20 to 30 mw of laser light will be necessary. By tuning the power an frequencies of the cooling an repump lasers, these lasers coul also serve as the EIT probe an coupling lasers. This option woul reuce volume an power consumption by minimizing the number of lasers in the system. 6 Timing an Power Consumption Table 5 lists timing an power consumption estimates for one operational cycle of the clock. The total uration is between 3 an 6 s, an the clock instabilities calculate in Section 3.3 must be increase by the square-root of this time. The ominant power rains in the physics package are the RF signal use for evaporative cooling ( 1 W); the power issipate by the chip wires ( 5 W) uring evaporative cooling an clock interrogation; an the power use to rive external magnetic fiel coils. Operation of the col-atom clock in conjunction with a CSAC provies a means of uty-cycle operation to reuce overall power consumption. For example, the colatom apparatus can be operate once every hunre secons, proviing perioic frequency corrections to a continuously-running CSAC. Since the power uty cycle is reuce to 1%, the average power consume by the col-atom physics package is reuce by two orers of magnitue. Stage Duration (ms) Power (W) MOT Cooling PGC Transfer to Chip Evaporative Cooling First EIT Pulse Interrogation Secon EIT Pulse Table 5 Timing an power consumption estimates for one operational cycle of the propose clock. 7 Conclusion an Outlook We have investigate the feasibility of a transportable, miniature atom clock base on laser cooling an magnetic trapping of 87 Rb atoms near the surface of an atom microchip. A Ramsey sequence base on pulse EIT, in conjunction with a heteroyne optical etection approach that can etect optical powers as low as 100 pw at the shot noise level, can achieve etection almost two orers of magnitue more sensitive than performance limite by the shot-noise of 10 6 atoms. By constructing the clock aroun a compact, UHV ouble MOT cell, interrogation times up to 1 s shoul be attainable, resulting in Ramsey fringes as narrow as 0.5 Hz. Through the use of an integrate atom microchip, this compact geometry both improves clock stability by increasing uty cycle an reuces power consumption by minimizing the volume of external magnetic fiel coils.