Predicate Logic. 1 Predicate Logic Symbolization

Denote John by j and Smith by s, is a bachelor by predicate letter B. The statements (1) and (2) may be written as B(j) and B(s).

PREDICATE CALCULUS Predicates Statement function Variables Free and bound variables Quantifiers Universe of discourse Logical equivalences and implications for quantified statements Theory of inference

2. Use quantifiers to express the associative law for multiplication of real numbers.

1. Define statement function of one variable. When it will become a statement? Statement function is an expression containing symbols and an individual variable. It becomes a statement when the variable

Phil 2B03 (McMaster University Final Examination) Page 1 of 4

Phil 2B03 (McMaster University Final Examination) Page 1 of 4 1. [SL proof] (a) Prove the formal validity of the following sequent: (F & G), F H, H G H (1) (F & G) Prem (2) F H Prem (3) H G Prem (4) H

Bertie3 Exercises. 1 Problem Set #3, PD Exercises

Bertie3 Exercises 1 Problem Set #3, PD Exercises 1. 1 ( x)qx P 2 ( x)w x P ( x)(qx W x) 2. 1 ( x)(ax (Bx Cx)) P 2 Bd P Ad 3. 1 ( x)jxx P 2 ( y) Ry P ( y)(jyy Ry) 4. 1 ( x)(lx (Mx Bx)) P 2 ( y)(my Jy) P

SYMBOLIC LOGIC UNIT 10: SINGULAR SENTENCES

SYMBOLIC LOGIC UNIT 10: SINGULAR SENTENCES Singular Sentences name Paris is beautiful (monadic) predicate (monadic) predicate letter Bp individual constant Singular Sentences Bp These are our new simple

Formal Logic: Quantifiers, Predicates, and Validity. CS 130 Discrete Structures

Formal Logic: Quantifiers, Predicates, and Validity CS 130 Discrete Structures Variables and Statements Variables: A variable is a symbol that stands for an individual in a collection or set. For example,

Answers to the Exercises -- Chapter 3

Answers to the Exercises -- Chapter 3 SECTION 1 1. a. Fred is an orangutan. Of b. Gertrude is an orangutan but Fred isn't. Gertrude is an orangutan [and] Fred is not [an orangutan]. Og ~Of c. Tony Blair

Formal (Natural) Deduction for Predicate Calculus

Formal (Natural) Deduction for Predicate Calculus Lila Kari University of Waterloo Formal (Natural) Deduction for Predicate Calculus CS245, Logic and Computation 1 / 42 Formal deducibility for predicate

Predicate Logic combines the distinctive features of syllogistic and propositional logic.

Predicate Logic combines the distinctive features of syllogistic and propositional logic. The fundamental component in predicate logic is the predicate, which is always symbolized with upper case letters.

DERIVATIONS IN SYMBOLIC LOGIC I

DERIVATIONS IN SYMBOLIC LOGIC I Tomoya Sato Department of Philosophy University of California, San Diego Phil120: Symbolic Logic Summer 2014 TOMOYA SATO LECTURE 5: DERIVATIONS IN SYMBOLIC LOGIC I 1 / 40

ADDITIONAL SOLUTIONS for exercises in Introductory Symbolic Logic Without Formal Proofs

1 ADDITIONAL SOLUTIONS for exercises in Introductory Symbolic Logic Without Formal Proofs P. 32 2. P v ~J 3. ~P ~J 4. ~P (~A ~J) 5. ~(J v A) 6. [J v (~A ~J)] 7. J A 8. J (A P) 9. J (A v P) 11. P v (A J)

Predicate Logic Quantifier Rules

Predicate Logic Quantifier Rules CS251 at CCUT, Spring 2017 David Lu May 8 th, 2017 Contents 1. Universal Instantiation (UI) 2. Existential Generalization (EG) 3. Universal Generalization (UG) 4. Existential

INSTITIÚID TEICNEOLAÍOCHTA CHEATHARLACH INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY CARLOW PREDICATE LOGIC

1 CHAPTER 7. PREDICATE LOGIC 1 INSTITIÚID TEICNEOLAÍOCHTA CHEATHARLACH INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY CARLOW PREDICATE LOGIC 1 Predicate Logic 1.1 Introduction There are various arguments which cannot be dealt

Philosophy 240 Symbolic Logic Russell Marcus Hamilton College Fall 2014

Philosophy 240 Symbolic Logic Russell Marcus Hamilton College Fall 2014 Class #23 - Translation into Predicate Logic II ( 3.2) Only as a Quantifier P Only Ps are Qs is logically equivalent to all Qs are

6. COMPLEX PREDICATES

318 Hardegree, Symbolic Logic (1) x... y...rxy (1a) x(sx & y(py Rxy)) (1b) x(px & y(sy Rxy)) (2) x... y...ryx (2a) x(sx & y(py Ryx)) (2b) x(px & y(sy Ryx)) (3) x... y...rxy (3a) x(sx y(py & Rxy)) (3b)

Symbolising Quantified Arguments

Symbolising Quantified Arguments 1. (i) Symbolise the following argument, given the universe of discourse is U = set of all animals. Animals are either male or female. Not all Cats are male, Therefore,

4 Quantifiers and Quantified Arguments 4.1 Quantifiers

4 Quantifiers and Quantified Arguments 4.1 Quantifiers Recall from Chapter 3 the definition of a predicate as an assertion containing one or more variables such that, if the variables are replaced by objects

Rules Build Arguments Rules Building Arguments

Section 1.6 1 Section Summary Valid Arguments Inference Rules for Propositional Logic Using Rules of Inference to Build Arguments Rules of Inference for Quantified Statements Building Arguments for Quantified

Predicate Logic. Example. Statements in Predicate Logic. Some statements cannot be expressed in propositional logic, such as: Predicate Logic

Predicate Logic Predicate Logic (Rosen, Chapter 1.4-1.6) TOPICS Predicate Logic Quantifiers Logical Equivalence Predicate Proofs Some statements cannot be expressed in propositional logic, such as: All

RULES OF UNIVERSAL INSTANTIATION AND GENERALIZATION, EXISTENTIAL INSTANTIATION AND GENERALIZATION, AND RULES OF QUANTIFIER EQUIVALENCE

1 UNIT 2 RULES OF UNIVERSAL INSTANTIATION AND GENERALIZATION, EXISTENTIAL INSTANTIATION AND GENERALIZATION, AND RULES OF QUANTIFIER EQUIVALENCE Contents 2.0 Objectives 2.1 Introduction 2.2 Rules of Quantification

Introduction to Predicate Logic Part 1. Professor Anita Wasilewska Lecture Notes (1)

Introduction to Predicate Logic Part 1 Professor Anita Wasilewska Lecture Notes (1) Introduction Lecture Notes (1) and (2) provide an OVERVIEW of a standard intuitive formalization and introduction to

All psychiatrists are doctors All doctors are college graduates All psychiatrists are college graduates

Predicate Logic In what we ve discussed thus far, we haven t addressed other kinds of valid inferences: those involving quantification and predication. For example: All philosophers are wise Socrates is

University of Ottawa CSI 2101 Midterm Test Instructor: Lucia Moura. March 1, :00 pm Duration: 1:15 hs

University of Ottawa CSI 2101 Midterm Test Instructor: Lucia Moura March 1, 2012 1:00 pm Duration: 1:15 hs Closed book, no calculators THIS MIDTERM AND ITS SOLUTION IS SUBJECT TO COPYRIGHT; NO PARTS OF

Section Summary. Section 1.5 9/9/2014

Section 1.5 Section Summary Nested Quantifiers Order of Quantifiers Translating from Nested Quantifiers into English Translating Mathematical Statements into Statements involving Nested Quantifiers Translated

1 Introduction to Predicate Resolution

1 Introduction to Predicate Resolution The resolution proof system for Predicate Logic operates, as in propositional case on sets of clauses and uses a resolution rule as the only rule of inference. The

Lecture 10: Predicate Logic and Its Language

Discrete Mathematics (II) Spring 2017 Lecture 10: Predicate Logic and Its Language Lecturer: Yi Li 1 Predicates and Quantifiers In this action, we show you why a richer language should be introduced than

Section 1.1 Propositions

Set Theory & Logic Section 1.1 Propositions Fall, 2009 Section 1.1 Propositions In Chapter 1, our main goals are to prove sentences about numbers, equations or functions and to write the proofs. Definition.

3. The Logic of Quantified Statements Summary. Aaron Tan August 2017

3. The Logic of Quantified Statements Summary Aaron Tan 28 31 August 2017 1 3. The Logic of Quantified Statements 3.1 Predicates and Quantified Statements I Predicate; domain; truth set Universal quantifier,

Propositional Logic Not Enough

Section 1.4 Propositional Logic Not Enough If we have: All men are mortal. Socrates is a man. Does it follow that Socrates is mortal? Can t be represented in propositional logic. Need a language that talks

Sec$on Summary. Valid Arguments Inference Rules for Propositional Logic. Inference Rules for Quantified Statements. Building Arguments

Section 1.6 Sec$on Summary Valid Arguments Inference Rules for Propositional Logic Building Arguments Inference Rules for Quantified Statements Building Arguments 2 Revisi$ng the Socrates Example We have

PHIL 50 INTRODUCTION TO LOGIC 1 FREE AND BOUND VARIABLES MARCELLO DI BELLO STANFORD UNIVERSITY DERIVATIONS IN PREDICATE LOGIC WEEK #8

PHIL 50 INTRODUCTION TO LOGIC MARCELLO DI BELLO STANFORD UNIVERSITY DERIVATIONS IN PREDICATE LOGIC WEEK #8 1 FREE AND BOUND VARIABLES Before discussing the derivation rules for predicate logic, we should

March Algebra 2 Question 1. March Algebra 2 Question 1

March Algebra 2 Question 1 If the statement is always true for the domain, assign that part a 3. If it is sometimes true, assign it a 2. If it is never true, assign it a 1. Your answer for this question

Sec$on Summary. Valid Arguments Inference Rules for Propositional Logic. Inference Rules for Quantified Statements. Building Arguments

Section 1.6 Sec$on Summary Valid Arguments Inference Rules for Propositional Logic Building Arguments Inference Rules for Quantified Statements Building Arguments 2 Revisi$ng the Socrates Example We have

Semantics I, Rutgers University Week 3-1 Yimei Xiang September 17, Predicate logic

Semantics I, Rutgers University Week 3-1 Yimei Xiang September 17, 2018 Predicate logic 1. Why propositional logic is not enough? Discussion: (i) Does (1a) contradict (1b)? [Two sentences are contradictory

Section 8.3 Higher-Order Logic A logic is higher-order if it allows predicate names or function names to be quantified or to be arguments of a

Section 8.3 Higher-Order Logic A logic is higher-order if it allows predicate names or function names to be quantified or to be arguments of a predicate. Example. The sentence, There is a function with

Proseminar on Semantic Theory Fall 2013 Ling 720 First Order (Predicate) Logic: Syntax and Natural Deduction 1

First Order (Predicate) Logic: Syntax and Natural Deduction 1 A Reminder of Our Plot I wish to provide some historical and intellectual context to the formal tools that logicians developed to study the

Normal Forms for First-Order Logic

Logic and Proof Hilary 2016 James Worrell Normal Forms for First-Order Logic In this lecture we show how to transform an arbitrary formula of first-order logic to an equisatisfiable formula in Skolem form.

Lecture 10 CS 1813 Discrete Mathematics. Quantify What? Reasoning with Predicates

Lecture 10 CS 1813 Discrete Mathematics Quantify What? Reasoning with Predicates 1 More Examples with Forall the Universal Quantifier L predicate about qsort L(n) length(qsort[a 1, a 2,, a n ] ) = n Universe

Predicate Logic: Introduction and Translations

Predicate Logic: Introduction and Translations Alice Gao Lecture 10 Based on work by J. Buss, L. Kari, A. Lubiw, B. Bonakdarpour, D. Maftuleac, C. Roberts, R. Trefler, and P. Van Beek 1/29 Outline Predicate

1 FUNDAMENTALS OF LOGIC NO.8 SEMANTICS OF PREDICATE LOGIC Tatsuya Hagino hagino@sfc.keio.ac.jp lecture URL https://vu5.sfc.keio.ac.jp/slide/ 2 So Far Propositional Logic Logical connectives (,,, ) Truth

Relational Predicates and Overlapping Quantifiers, 8.6. I. Introducing Relational Predicates

Philosophy 109, Modern Logic, Queens College Russell Marcus, Instructor email: philosophy@thatmarcusfamily.org website: http://philosophy.thatmarcusfamily.org Office phone: (718) 997-5287 Relational Predicates

Topic DPL: Answers. Exercise 1.1a Explain why the rule &E for MPL is a sound rule.

Topic DPL: Answers Exercise 1.1a Explain why the rule &E for MPL is a sound rule. In MPL, if (φ&ψ) is true under some interpretation then φ and ψ are true under that interpretation too. Thus, if (φ&ψ)

Lecture Predicates and Quantifiers 1.5 Nested Quantifiers

Lecture 4 1.4 Predicates and Quantifiers 1.5 Nested Quantifiers Predicates The statement "x is greater than 3" has two parts. The first part, "x", is the subject of the statement. The second part, "is

Outline. Rules of Inferences Discrete Mathematics I MATH/COSC 1056E. Example: Existence of Superman. Outline

Outline s Discrete Mathematics I MATH/COSC 1056E Julien Dompierre Department of Mathematics and Computer Science Laurentian University Sudbury, August 6, 2008 Using to Build Arguments and Quantifiers Outline

Predicate Calculus - Syntax

Predicate Calculus - Syntax Lila Kari University of Waterloo Predicate Calculus - Syntax CS245, Logic and Computation 1 / 26 The language L pred of Predicate Calculus - Syntax L pred, the formal language

1.3 Predicates and Quantifiers

1.3 Predicates and Quantifiers INTRODUCTION Statements x>3, x=y+3 and x + y=z are not propositions, if the variables are not specified. In this section we discuss the ways of producing propositions from

Transparencies to accompany Rosen, Discrete Mathematics and Its Applications Section 1.3. Section 1.3 Predicates and Quantifiers

Section 1.3 Predicates and Quantifiers A generalization of propositions - propositional functions or predicates.: propositions which contain variables Predicates become propositions once every variable

G52DOA - Derivation of Algorithms Predicate Logic

G52DOA - Derivation of Algorithms Predicate Logic Venanzio Capretta Predicate Logic So far, we studied propositional logic, in which we started with unspecified propositional variables A, B, C, and combined

Full file at Chapter 1

Chapter 1 Use the following to answer questions 1-5: In the questions below determine whether the proposition is TRUE or FALSE 1. 1 + 1 = 3 if and only if 2 + 2 = 3. 2. If it is raining, then it is raining.

2/2/2018. CS 103 Discrete Structures. Chapter 1. Propositional Logic. Chapter 1.1. Propositional Logic

CS 103 Discrete Structures Chapter 1 Propositional Logic Chapter 1.1 Propositional Logic 1 1.1 Propositional Logic Definition: A proposition :is a declarative sentence (that is, a sentence that declares

11. If John Madden has a pleasant personality and is not a political expert, then he's no TV newscaster.

11. If John Madden has a pleasant personality and is not a political expert, then he's no TV newscaster. EXERCISE 7-8: 1. (Fa Ga) (Fb Gb) 3. [Fa (Ga Ha)] [Fb (Gb Hb)] 5. ~ (Fa Ga) ~ (Fb Gb) 7. ~ [(Fa Ga)

Predicate Logic. CSE 191, Class Note 02: Predicate Logic Computer Sci & Eng Dept SUNY Buffalo

Predicate Logic CSE 191, Class Note 02: Predicate Logic Computer Sci & Eng Dept SUNY Buffalo c Xin He (University at Buffalo) CSE 191 Discrete Structures 1 / 22 Outline 1 From Proposition to Predicate

Mathacle. PSet ---- Algebra, Logic. Level Number Name: Date: I. BASICS OF PROPOSITIONAL LOGIC

I. BASICS OF PROPOSITIONAL LOGIC George Boole (1815-1864) developed logic as an abstract mathematical system consisting of propositions, operations (conjunction, disjunction, and negation), and rules for

Technische Universität München Summer term 2011 Theoretische Informatik Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c J. Esparza / M. Luttenberger / R.

Technische Universität München Summer term 2011 Theoretische Informatik Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c J. Esparza / M. Luttenberger / R. Neumann SOLUTION Logic Endterm 2 Please note : If not stated otherwise, all answers

7 Classical Quantified Logic

7 Classical Quantified Logic efore examining quantified modal logic, we review a bare-bones system for first-order predicate or quantificational logic, i.e., that involving the quantifiers x... and x...,

5-5 Solving Polynomial Equations

Factor completely. If the polynomial is not factorable, write prime. 1. 3ax + 2ay az + 3bx + 2by bz (a + b)(3x + 2y z) 2. 2kx + 4mx 2nx 3ky 6my + 3ny (2x 3y)(k + 2m n) 3. 2x 3 + 5y 3 prime 4. 16g 3 + 2h

06 From Propositional to Predicate Logic

Martin Henz February 19, 2014 Generated on Wednesday 19 th February, 2014, 09:48 1 Syntax of Predicate Logic 2 3 4 5 6 Need for Richer Language Predicates Variables Functions 1 Syntax of Predicate Logic

Section Summary. Predicate logic Quantifiers. Negating Quantifiers. Translating English to Logic. Universal Quantifier Existential Quantifier

Section 1.4 Section Summary Predicate logic Quantifiers Universal Quantifier Existential Quantifier Negating Quantifiers De Morgan s Laws for Quantifiers Translating English to Logic Propositional Logic

Predicate Logic - Deductive Systems

CS402, Spring 2018 G for Predicate Logic Let s remind ourselves of semantic tableaux. Consider xp(x) xq(x) x(p(x) q(x)). ( xp(x) xq(x) x(p(x) q(x))) xp(x) xq(x), x(p(x) q(x)) xp(x), x(p(x) q(x)) xq(x),

CSE Discrete Structures

CSE 2315 - Discrete Structures Homework 2- Fall 2010 Due Date: Oct. 7 2010, 3:30 pm Proofs using Predicate Logic For all your predicate logic proofs you can use only the rules given in the following tables.

COMP 409: Logic Homework 5

COMP 409: Logic Homework 5 Note: The pages below refer to the text from the book by Enderton. 1. Exercises 1-6 on p. 78. 1. Translate into this language the English sentences listed below. If the English

Review. Propositions, propositional operators, truth tables. Logical Equivalences. Tautologies & contradictions

Review Propositions, propositional operators, truth tables Logical Equivalences. Tautologies & contradictions Some common logical equivalences Predicates & quantifiers Some logical equivalences involving

WORLD MATH DAY ACTIVITY PACK. Ages worldmathsday.com UNICEF WORLD MATH DAY Lesson Plans Age 4 10 ACTIVITY RESOURCE

UNICEF AND WORLD MATH DAY Hp qy WORLD MATH DAY ACTIVITY PACK A 4-10 UNICEF WORLD MATH DAY 2018 L P A 4 10 ACTIVITY RESOURCE APPENDIX 1 APPENDIX 2 G S---Bx Sy E f y UNICEF WORLD MATH DAY 2018 L P A 4-10

CS 214 Introduction to Discrete Structures. Chapter 1 Formal Logic. Mikel D. Petty, Ph.D.

CS 214 Introduction to Discrete Structures Chapter 1 Formal Logic Mikel D. Petty, Ph.D. Center for Modeling, Simulation, and Analysis CS 214 Formal Logic 1.2 Chapter sections and objectives 1.1 Statements,

THE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY OF GAZA ENGINEERING FACULTY DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER ENGINEERING DISCRETE MATHMATICS DISCUSSION ECOM Eng. Huda M.

THE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY OF GAZA ENGINEERING FACULTY DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER ENGINEERING DISCRETE MATHMATICS DISCUSSION ECOM 2011 Eng. Huda M. Dawoud September, 2015 Section 1: Propositional Logic 2. Which

CS 250/251 Discrete Structures I and II Section 005 Fall/Winter Professor York

CS 250/251 Discrete Structures I and II Section 005 Fall/Winter 2013-2014 Professor York Practice Quiz March 10, 2014 CALCULATORS ALLOWED, SHOW ALL YOUR WORK 1. Construct the power set of the set A = {1,2,3}

University of Ottawa CSI 2101 Midterm Test Instructor: Lucia Moura. February 9, :30 pm Duration: 1:50 hs. Closed book, no calculators

University of Ottawa CSI 2101 Midterm Test Instructor: Lucia Moura February 9, 2010 11:30 pm Duration: 1:50 hs Closed book, no calculators Last name: First name: Student number: There are 5 questions and

Discrete Mathematics Basic Proof Methods

Discrete Mathematics 1-2. Basic Proof Methods Nature & Importance of Proofs In mathematics, a proof is: a correct(well-reasoned, logically valid) and complete (clear, detailed) argument that rigorously

Knowledge representation in AI Symbolic Logic

Lecture No. 2 Knowledge representation in AI Symbolic Logic Simbolic logic representation Formal system Propositional logic Predicate logic Theorem proving 1. Knowledge representation Why Symbolic logic

Continuous Random Variables

1 / 24 Continuous Random Variables Saravanan Vijayakumaran sarva@ee.iitb.ac.in Department of Electrical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Bombay February 27, 2013 2 / 24 Continuous Random Variables

Test 1 Solutions(COT3100) (1) Prove that the following Absorption Law is correct. I.e, prove this is a tautology:

Test 1 Solutions(COT3100) Sitharam (1) Prove that the following Absorption Law is correct. I.e, prove this is a tautology: ( q (p q) (r p)) r Solution. This is Modus Tollens applied twice, with transitivity

DISCRIMINANT EXAM QUESTIONS

DISCRIMINANT EXAM QUESTIONS Question 1 (**) Show by using the discriminant that the graph of the curve with equation y = x 4x + 10, does not cross the x axis. proof Question (**) Show that the quadratic

Predicate Logic. Andreas Klappenecker

Predicate Logic Andreas Klappenecker Predicates A function P from a set D to the set Prop of propositions is called a predicate. The set D is called the domain of P. Example Let D=Z be the set of integers.

DO NOT FORGET!!! WRITE YOUR NAME HERE. Philosophy 109 Final Exam, Spring 2007 (80 points total) ~ ( x)

Page 1 of 13 DO NOT FORGET!!! WRITE YOUR NAME HERE Philosophy 109 Final Exam, Spring 2007 (80 points total) ~ ( x) Part I: Symbolization into RL: Provide symbolizations of the following sentences, using

Recall that the expression x > 3 is not a proposition. Why?

Predicates and Quantifiers Predicates and Quantifiers 1 Recall that the expression x > 3 is not a proposition. Why? Notation: We will use the propositional function notation to denote the expression "

First order Logic ( Predicate Logic) and Methods of Proof

First order Logic ( Predicate Logic) and Methods of Proof 1 Outline Introduction Terminology: Propositional functions; arguments; arity; universe of discourse Quantifiers Definition; using, mixing, negating

MATH 1090 Problem Set #3 Solutions March York University

York University Faculties of Science and Engineering, Arts, Atkinson MATH 1090. Problem Set #3 Solutions Section M 1. Use Resolution (possibly in combination with the Deduction Theorem, Implication as

(308 ) EXAMPLES. 1. FIND the quotient and remainder when. II. 1. Find a root of the equation x* = +J Find a root of the equation x 6 = ^ - 1.

(308 ) EXAMPLES. N 1. FIND the quotient and remainder when is divided by x 4. I. x 5 + 7x* + 3a; 3 + 17a 2 + 10* - 14 2. Expand (a + bx) n in powers of x, and then obtain the first derived function of

Predicates and Quantifiers. CS 231 Dianna Xu

Predicates and Quantifiers CS 231 Dianna Xu 1 Predicates Consider P(x) = x < 5 P(x) has no truth values (x is not given a value) P(1) is true 1< 5 is true P(10) is false 10 < 5 is false Thus, P(x) will

i.e. The conclusion to the following argument says If you had an A, then you d have a ~(B v Z).

7.5 Conditional Proof (CP): Conditional Proof is a different way to do proofs. Using CP will always get you a horseshoe statement, so the best time to use it is when your conclusion is either a horseshoe

Quantifiers Here is a (true) statement about real numbers: Every real number is either rational or irrational.

Quantifiers 1-17-2008 Here is a (true) statement about real numbers: Every real number is either rational or irrational. I could try to translate the statement as follows: Let P = x is a real number Q

(Refer Slide Time: 02:20)

Discrete Mathematical Structures Dr. Kamala Krithivasan Department of Computer Science and Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Madras Lecture - 5 Logical Inference In the last class we saw about

Discrete Structures for Computer Science

Discrete Structures for Computer Science William Garrison bill@cs.pitt.edu 6311 Sennott Square Lecture #4: Predicates and Quantifiers Based on materials developed by Dr. Adam Lee Topics n Predicates n

CS 220: Discrete Structures and their Applications. Predicate Logic Section in zybooks

CS 220: Discrete Structures and their Applications Predicate Logic Section 1.6-1.10 in zybooks From propositional to predicate logic Let s consider the statement x is an odd number Its truth value depends

Lecture 2. x if x X B n f(x) = α(x) if x S n 1 D n

Lecture 2 1.10 Cell attachments Let X be a topological space and α : S n 1 X be a map. Consider the space X D n with the disjoint union topology. Consider further the set X B n and a function f : X D n

MS 2001: Test 1 B Solutions

MS 2001: Test 1 B Solutions Name: Student Number: Answer all questions. Marks may be lost if necessary work is not clearly shown. Remarks by me in italics and would not be required in a test - J.P. Question

Section Summary. Predicate logic Quantifiers. Negating Quantifiers. Translating English to Logic. Universal Quantifier Existential Quantifier

Section 1.4 Section Summary Predicate logic Quantifiers Universal Quantifier Existential Quantifier Negating Quantifiers De Morgan s Laws for Quantifiers Translating English to Logic Propositional Logic

Logic and Modelling. Introduction to Predicate Logic. Jörg Endrullis. VU University Amsterdam

Logic and Modelling Introduction to Predicate Logic Jörg Endrullis VU University Amsterdam Predicate Logic In propositional logic there are: propositional variables p, q, r,... that can be T or F In predicate

Notes on Propositional and First-Order Logic (CPSC 229 Class Notes, January )

Notes on Propositional and First-Order Logic (CPSC 229 Class Notes, January 23 30 2017) John Lasseter Revised February 14, 2017 The following notes are a record of the class sessions we ve devoted to the

1A Logic 2015 Model Answers

1A Logic 2015 Model Answers Section A 1. (a) Show each of the following [40]: (i) P Q, Q R, P R P 1 P Q 2 Q R 3 P R 4 P 5 P R, 4 6 P 7 Q DS, 1, 6 8 R DS, 2, 7 9 R 10 I, 8, 9 11 R E, 9, 10 12 P MT, 3, 11

The second-order 1D wave equation

C The second-order D wave equation C. Homogeneous wave equation with constant speed The simplest form of the second-order wave equation is given by: x 2 = Like the first-order wave equation, it responds

Announcements & Overview

Branden Fitelson Philosophy 4515 (Advanced Logic) Notes 1 Announcements & Overview Administrative Stuff HW #3 grades and solutions have been posted HW #4 s due date extended to next Friday (LMPL/L2PL proofs)

Mathematics 426 Robert Gross Homework 9 Answers

Mathematics 4 Robert Gross Homework 9 Answers. Suppose that X is a normal random variable with mean µ and standard deviation σ. Suppose that PX > 9 PX

Discrete Mathematics and Its Applications

Discrete Mathematics and Its Applications Lecture 1: The Foundations: Logic and Proofs (1.3-1.5) MING GAO DASE @ ECNU (for course related communications) mgao@dase.ecnu.edu.cn Sep. 19, 2017 Outline 1 Logical

CSCI-2200 FOUNDATIONS OF COMPUTER SCIENCE

1 CSCI-2200 FOUNDATIONS OF COMPUTER SCIENCE Spring 2015 February 5, 2015 2 Announcements Homework 1 is due now. Homework 2 will be posted on the web site today. It is due Thursday, Feb. 12 at 10am in class.

Parts Manual. EPIC II Critical Care Bed REF 2031

EPIC II Critical Care Bed REF 2031 Parts Manual For parts or technical assistance call: USA: 1-800-327-0770 2013/05 B.0 2031-109-006 REV B www.stryker.com Table of Contents English Product Labels... 4

DRAFT - Math 101 Lecture Note - Dr. Said Algarni

2 Limits 2.1 The Tangent Problems The word tangent is derived from the Latin word tangens, which means touching. A tangent line to a curve is a line that touches the curve and a secant line is a line that

Predicate Logic & Quantification

Predicate Logic & Quantification Things you should do Homework 1 due today at 3pm Via gradescope. Directions posted on the website. Group homework 1 posted, due Tuesday. Groups of 1-3. We suggest 3. In

Proposi'onal Logic Not Enough

Section 1.4 Proposi'onal Logic Not Enough If we have: All men are mortal. Socrates is a man. Socrates is mortal Compare to: If it is snowing, then I will study discrete math. It is snowing. I will study

Full file at

Transparencies to accompany Rosen, Discrete Mathematics and Its Applications Introduction Chapter 1 - Introduction Applications of discrete mathematics: Formal Languages (computer languages) Compiler Design