ARTICLE. Super-Twisting Algorithm in presence of time and state dependent perturbations
|
|
- Melvin Harrison
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 To appear in the International Journal of Control Vol., No., Month XX, 4 ARTICLE Super-Twisting Algorithm in presence of time and state dependent perturbations I. Castillo a and L. Fridman a and J. A. Moreno b a Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México UNAM, 45, CDMX, México; b Instituto de Ingeniería, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México UNAM, 45, CDMX, México. v. released April 6 In this paper Generalized Super-Twisting Algorithm is applied to a class of systems whose perturbation and uncertain control coefficient are time and state dependent. A non-smooth strict Lyapunov function is used to obtain the conditions for the global finite-time stability and to estimate the time of convergence. Keywords: Sliding Modes, Super-Twisting Algorithm.. Introduction The Sliding Mode Control SMC technique has been known as one of the most efficient tools for theoretically exact compensation of matched uncertainties and perturbations in control systems V. I. Utkin, 99. This properties are achieved due to the discontinuity of control law. Discontinuities in control law in presence of nonidealities e.g. non-modeled dynamics, time delays, hysteresis, etc. produce high-frequency oscillations in the states which is the worst disadvantage of the SMC methodology, the called chattering effect Boiko & Fridman, 5; V. I. Utkin, 99. The Super-Twisting Algorithm STA Levant, 993 was designed as an alternative to conventional Sliding Mode controllers. STA introduces a dynamic extension to the system such that the discontinuous term is hidden behind an integrator, that is why it generates a continuous control signal ensuring theoretically exact compensation of Lipschitz perturbations as well as providing finite-time convergence of the output and its derivative. The properties of the STA are actively discussed see for example Bernuau, Polyakov, Efimov, & Perruquetti 3; Boiko & Fridman 5; Orlov, Aoustin, & Chevallereau ; Polyakov & Poznyak 9; V. Utkin 6; V. I. Utkin 3, as well as the possibilities of its adaptation see for example Shtessel, Taleb, & Plestan ; V. I. Utkin & Poznyak 3. In Levant 993, the proof of convergence was made by means of geometrical arguments for the case when uncertainty in the control coefficient and perturbations only dependent on time. Different Lyapunov functions J. Moreno, ; J. A. Moreno & Osorio, 8; Orlov et al., ; Polyakov & Poznyak, 9; V. I. Utkin, 3 were recently designed in order to get convergence conditions and estimations of the reaching time. Nevertheless, this Lyapunov proofs are made under conservative assumptions: the perturbations are dependent only on time Levant, 993; J. Moreno,. the control coefficient is known Gonzalez, Moreno, & Fridman, ; Guzmán & Moreno, 5; Levant, 993; J. Moreno, ; Picó, Picó-Marco, Vignoni, & Battista, 3. Corresponding author. lfridman@unam.mx In Gonzalez et al. it is considered that the perturbations are state dependent but the total time derivative of the
2 3 perturbations are dependent on state and time, but it is supposed that their total time derivative, i.e. control signal is a priori bounded by some constant Gonzalez et al., ; Shtessel et al.,. In reality for example, any uncertainty in the inertia moment of a mechanical system cause time and state dependent uncertainties/perturbations and also time and state dependent uncertain control coefficient. In this paper the possibility of implementation of General STA GSTA under more general scenarios is considered: the case when both, the perturbation and control coefficient are state and time dependent and, moreover, the control coefficient is uncertain.. Motivation example: Consider the problem of velocity tracking in mechanical system + cos q q + g sin q + b q + arctan q = u, where q R and q R are the state variables and u R the torque control input. The terms of the differential equation represent a varying inertia moment, gravitational term and viscous and dry friction, respectively. It is desired to realize exact velocity tracking to a desired trajectory q d. The dependence of the functions on the variable q can be seen as exogenous functions of time. By defining the error variable e = q q d, the velocity error dynamics are ė = γqu γqg sin q γqbe + q d + arctan e + q d q d, where γq = / + cos q. Here, the time-varying function γqt is an uncertain time-varying control coefficient. Let us remark that γqt is bounded by <.5 γqt, with a bounded time derivative. If the standard STA u st = k e / + z, ż = k e, where a b = a b sign a, is applied to the plant, the closed-loop can be written as ė = k γq e / + γqz g sin q + b e + q d + arctan e + q d q d. γq e Note that the function k e / is not able to compensate any of the non vanishing perturbation terms, so they need to be compensated through the integral action. One of the specific features of the STA lies in the equation of the dynamic extension... ė = k e q d + g cos q γq q d γ q γq + bc q d +bcė, 3 ϕ c = e+ q d + e + q d +, where the discontinuous function k e has to overcome the derivative of the perturbations. Replacing in 3 the value of the last term we get perturbation is assumed a priori to be bounded.
3 t ė = k e + ϕ bcγk e / bcγk e τ dτ +bcγ } {{ } ut t ϕτ b k e τ / e τ dτ 4 Here, an algebraic loop occurs in the gains design since the gains themselves become part of the perturbation to overcome, as shown in equation 4. In Shtessel et al. and Gonzalez et al., the control signal ut is assumed to be bounded a priori, and the algebraic loop never occurs. Moreover, a necessary condition of stability of the STA is that k > ϕ + bcė. Is easy to see that the terms in ϕ can be bounded by a constant, nevertheless, non-bounded terms related with the dynamics of the controller itself appear in equation 4. These cannot be globally dominated by the sign function k e. This behavior can be interpreted as perturbations that can grow exponentially in time. Several problems arise when trying to find STA gains k and k that ensure the stability of the closed-loop and dominate the derivative of such perturbation: STA gain k needs to be designed based on functions depending on STA gains k and k! This is an algebraic loop that has not been addressed in any previous work. Although the perturbations ϕ can be bounded by a constant, the terms bcγk e / t bcγk e τ dτ can be very big depending on the initial conditions e and perturbations. 3 The time variation in the control coefficient γqt introduces the term qd γ qt γqt to the total time derivative, and the bounds of γqt and its derivative γqt should be also taken into account in the controller gains design. 4 State dependent perturbations implies state dependent derivatives which makes the perturbation to grow exponentially in time. It is worth noting that the standard STA cannot be designed for the situations and. Moreover, it is not clear if the stability of the system is preserved in spite of the unknown variations of the coefficients in equation due to the uncertain control coefficient γq. The standard gain design for STA Levant, 998 is not applicable here. Evenmore, the nonlinear terms of the Standard STA are not enough to maintain the global stability of the system in presence of uncertain control coefficient and state dependent perturbation. Then, an improved STA will be used to solve this problem. Generalized Super-Twisting Algorithm J. Moreno, ; J. A. Moreno, 9 is defined by u = k φ x + z, ż = k φ x, 5 φ x = x + x, φ x = x + 3 x + x. Note that the Generalized STA GSTA has an extra linear term x in function φ x and growing terms 3 x and x in function φ x, such that φ x = φ xφ x with φ x = +. With the extra linear term, three degrees of freedom in the GSTA gains design are obtained: k, k and. The growing terms help to counteract the effects of state dependent perturbations which can grow exponentially in time. Contribution: This paper proposes a global finite-time stability analysis for the GSTA based on a strict non-smooth Lyapunov function in three different scenarios: x 3
4 state and time dependent uncertain control coefficient and perturbations, known control coefficient with state and time dependent perturbations and, 3 time dependent uncertain control coefficient and perturbation. Section presents the problem statement for the 3 different scenarios and the main results: subsection. considers the general problem of state and time dependent uncertain control coefficient and perturbations, subsection., known control coefficient with state and time dependent perturbations, and subsection.3 time dependent uncertain control coefficient and perturbation. In Section 3, the motivation example is revisited to show the proposed gain design and its effectiveness through simulations. Finally some conclusions are presented in Section 4.. Problem Statements and Main Results The main goal of this paper is to find the conditions for GSTA gains {k, k, } design taking into account the known bounds of the uncertain control coefficient and perturbations as well as its partial derivatives with respect to the time and state, such that the trajectories of the system globally converge to zero in finite-time.. General case Consider the scalar dynamic system represented by the differential equation ẋ = γx, tu + ϕx, t, 6 where x R is the state and u R is the control input. The functions ϕx, t and γx, t are uncertain functions dependent on the state and time. In order to guarantee a continuous control signal, the uncertain control coefficient γx, t and perturbation ϕx, t should be also continuous, since x ẋ, and therefore = γ u + ϕ u eq = ϕ γ. Hence, ϕ and γ are assumed to be Lipschitz continuous functions with respect to t and ϕ, γ C with respect to x. The uncertain control coefficient function is also assumed to be bounded by positive constants < γx, t k M. 7 Following Gonzalez et al., we split the perturbations in two parts ϕx, t = ϕ x, t + ϕ x, t, 8 such that the first term is vanishing at the origin, i.e. ϕ, t = for all t, and bounded by ϕ x, t α φ x. 9 4
5 The total time derivative of the second term divided by the control coefficient γx, t can be represented as d dt ϕ x, t γx, t = ϕ γ t ϕ γ γ t δ x,t System 6 in closed-loop with GSTA 5 has the form + γ ϕ ϕ γ x γ x δ x,t ẋ a = δ x, t + δ x, tẋ. b ẋ = k γx, tφ x + ϕ x, t + γx, t z + ϕ x, t, γx, t and defining x = x and x = z + ϕx,t γx,t, we obtain ẋ = γx, t k φ x + ϕ x, t ẋ = k φ x + d dt ϕ x, t γx, t γx, t + x, a. b Moreover, according to the previous discussion we assume that the perturbation terms are such that the functions δ x, t = γx, t ϕ x, t t ϕ x, t γ x, t γx, t, δ x, t = t γx, t ϕ x, t x ϕ x, t γx, t γ x, t x are bounded by positive constants δ x, t δ, δ x, t δ. 3 Theorem : Suppose that γx, t and ϕx, t of system 6 satisfy 7 and 3. Then, the states x and x converge to zero and z converges to ϕx, t, globally and in finite-time, if GSTA gains k, k and > are designed as follows: for any ɛ > : k > + ɛ 4ɛ α k M + δ ɛ k + ɛ M Λk + α, 4 4ɛ Λ k = α k M + δ ɛ δ k α M ɛkM km + δ. k k M hɛ c c k + δ, k M hɛ c + c k + δ, 5 5
6 k min k min k k a b Figure.: Decrease of of k min and k min vs. + ɛkm + ɛ k = 6 hɛ 8 m m kk kk h = δ δ α + δ + δ ɛ + α. + ɛ k α, c = k + ɛk M, k = k α km. Moreover, a system trajectory starting at x = x, x reaches the origin in a time smaller than T x = µ ln V x, x +. 6 µ µ Remark : When the perturbation in the system is state dependent, the function δ x, t appears in the total time derivative, and it is worth noting that the extra terms in functions φ x and φ x related with the gain, are necessary to guarantee the global stability of the equilibrium point. This behavior can be observed in 4 and 5, where the gain appears in the ratio δ. This allows to arbitrarily decrease the effects of the perturbation δ by increasing the gain. GSTA gain does not only allow to guarantee the global stability of the system. It can be used to reduce the chattering effect by reducing the minimum values of gains k and k see Figs. a and b. Once the gain is fixed, the possible set of gains k and k are depicted in Fig. a. The parameter ɛ >, also allows to adjust the minimum values k min and k min. Fig. a shows how the parameter ɛ can be selected such that k min and k min are in their lowest values.. Case of state dependent perturbations and known coefficient of control The second case of analysis is taking into account time and state dependent perturbations with known coefficient of control, ẋ = u + ϕx, t, 7 where x R is the state, u R is the control input, and ϕ a Lipschitz continuous function with respect to t and ϕ C with respect to x. 6
7 k k and k k min k min a Set of GSTA gains {k, k }, when and parameter ɛ are fixed. k b Minimum values of k and k vs ɛ. Figure.: Theorem. Set of possible selection of gains {k, k, }. ǫ In this case the total time derivative of the second term of perturbation 8 is given by d dt ϕ x, t = ϕ t δ x,t ϕ + x δ x,t ẋ 8a = δ x, t + δ x, tẋ. 8b Note that functions δ x, t and δ x, t in 8 are a particular case of when control coefficient is γ =. System 7 in closed-loop with GSTA takes the form ẋ = k φ x + z + ϕ x, t + ϕ x, t. Defining x = x and x = z + ϕ x, t, we have ẋ = k φ x + x + ϕ x, t, 9a ẋ = k φ x + d dt ϕ x, t. 9b Moreover, the perturbation terms are such that the functions δ x, t = ϕ x, t, δ x, t = ϕ x, t t x are bounded by positive constants δ x, t δ, δ x, t δ. Corollary : Suppose that ϕx, t of the system 7 satisfy. Then, the states x and x converge to zero and z converges to ϕx, t, globally and in finite-time, if GSTA gains k, k and > are designed as follows: for any ɛ > : 7
8 k > + ɛ δ + α, k > + ɛ δ α 4 hɛ k α + δ + δ ɛ + α + δ 3 Remark : When the control coefficient is known or it is unknown but constant, the partial derivatives of γ with respect to the state and time are zero γ t = γ x, = GSTA is able to ensure the global finite-time stability even in the case of unbounded perturbations ϕ..3 Case of time dependent uncertain control coefficient and perturbation The last case of analysis is taking into account an uncertain control coefficient and a perturbation, both Lipschitz continuous functions of time, ẋ = γtu + ϕt, 4 where x R is the state and u R is the control input. The uncertain control coefficient is assumed to be bounded by positive constants < γt k M. 5 The total derivative of the second term in the perturbation 8 has the form δ t := d dt System 4 in closed-loop with GSTA has the form and defining x = x and x = z + ϕt γt, ẋ ϕ t = dϕ γt γ dt ϕ dγ γ dt. 6 = k γtφ x + ϕ t + γt ẋ = γt k φ x + ϕ t ẋ = k φ x + d dt ϕ t γt z + ϕt γt γt + x,. The total time derivative of the perturbation is assumed to be bounded by a positive constant, δ t δ. 7 Corollary : Suppose that γt and ϕt of system 4 satisfy 5 and 7. Then, the states x and x converge to zero and z converges to ϕt γt, globally and in finite-time, if GSTA gains k, k and are designed as follows: for any ɛ > : 8
9 k > + ɛ 4ɛ α + ɛ k M + Λk + α. 4ɛ 8a Λ k = α k M + 6ɛk M δ. k k M ɛ c c k + δ, k M ɛ c + c k + δ, 8b + ɛkm + ɛ α k = 6ɛ 8 δ + + m m kk kk c = m kk + ɛk M, = k α. k. Example : Let be ϕt = t and γt = t+ +. The time derivatives are ϕt = and γt = t+ which are bounded by, and k m =, k M =. Using 6 and 7, ϕt + ϕt γt.3. Following 8, we design the GSTA gains ɛ =, k = 3, k = 5 and =. Fig. 3a shows the functions ϕt and γt. Fig. 3b shows the behavior of d dt, and the value of the bound δ. It ϕt γt can be seen how the perturbation term never exceeds the calculated bound. The Sliding Mode is achieved almost at the beginning of the simulation and remains there for all future time Fig. 3c. Note that the perturbation grows without limit, and the GSTA is able to compensate it globally and for all time. GSTA compensates uncertainties coming from both, uncertain control coefficient and perturbation, as the ratio ϕ. Note that boundedness in 7 and 3 implies that the the product dγ dt γ ϕ should be bounded. This is an example where the term ϕ can be growing in time while decreases such that bounds 7 and 3 exist. Example : ϕt = sint + and γt = +.5 cost. The time derivatives are φt = cost, γt =.5 sint.5, =.5, k M =.5. Using 6 and 7 the derivative dγ dt δ t = cost.5 sintsint cost +.5 cost, δ t 6. In Figure 4, it is possible to observe the set of possible selection of gains following 8, for example k =, k = 3 and =. Also the set of possible gains following Levant 993 is depicted. It is possible to see that the obtained gain conditions for GSTA in presence of time dependent uncertain control coefficient and perturbations is much less restrictive. 9
10 5.4 ϕt. γt.8.6 d dt δ ϕt γt Time s a Perturbation and uncertain control coefficient b d dt ϕt γt vs δ. State x Control u Time s c Finite-time convergence to Sliding Mode and control signal. Figure 3.: Example. 3 5 Levant,93 Corollary k k Figure 4.
11 Remark 3: It is worth noting that system perturbations in Example cannot be covered by conditions found in Levant 993. Moreover, in Example, the STA gain conditions 8 is much less restrictive than those found in Levant Motivation Example revisited Consider again the system and the desired speed as q d = a sin ωt. System parameters are b =, g =, a =, ω =, =.5, k M =. The closed-loop with the GSTA, and perturbations split in two parts ė = k γqφ e γqbe +γqz g sin q b q d + arctan e + q d q d. 9 γq ϕ e,t ϕ e,t γq Then, the system with dynamic extension e = z + ϕe,t γq, can be rewritten in the form ϕe, t γt The partial derivatives are ė = γqk φ e + γqe + ϕ e, t 3a ė = k φ e + d ϕ e, t, 3b dt γq = g sin q b q d + arctan e + q d q d γq. γq cosq sinq = t + cos q, γq =, e ϕe, t t ϕe, t e = = γq g sinq + b q d + b arctane + q d γq g cosq + b q d + bγq e + q d +. Following the proposed analysis, from 9, we get that and the bounds 3 are e + q d + bγqe < α e = 6 > bk M and α =., δ x, t aω + b + ω + g = 4 δ x, t bk M =.... q d, 3c Then, using 4 and 5 we can select ɛ = and k = 4 > k min = 9.8, and k = 7 > k min = 7.59.
12 Tracking q d q gsinq b q 3 Control u Time s a Finite-time convergence of the states and control signal. γq Time s b State dependent perturbation and the uncertain control coefficient. Figure 5.: System trajectories with initial condition q =, q =. GSTA gains are designed with the proposed method. The state and control converge to zero in finite-time. Fig. 5a shows the speed variable converging to the desired reference in finite-time and the continuous control signal. Fig. 5b shows the state dependent perturbation and the uncertain control coefficient. With the proposed design the problem of the algebraic loop, uncertain control coefficient and state dependent perturbations can be solved. 4. Conclusions In this paper it is shown that during the STA design for systems with the state dependent perturbation or/and uncertain control coefficient the problem of algebraic loop appears and classic STA is unable to solve this problem. To overcome the problem of the algebraic loop the GSTA is proposed. Based on strict non-smooth Lyapunov function J. Moreno, the sufficient conditions for global finite-time stability for three scenarios are found. Moreover, it turns that in case when perturbations and control coefficient are time-dependent the analysis performed in this paper provides much less restrictive conditions for global finite-time convergence. Acknowledgement The authors are grateful for the financial support of Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología CONACyT CVU 4555,Project 47; PAPIIT-UNAM Programa de Apoyo a Proyectos de Investigacíon e Innovación Tecnológica IN 36; Programa de Cooperación FI-II, Project IISGBAS--5. References Bernuau, E., Polyakov, A., Efimov, D., & Perruquetti, W. 3. Verification of ISS, IISS and IOSS properties applying weighted homogeneity. Systems and Control Letters, 6, Retrieved from
13 Boiko, I., & Fridman, L. 5, Sept. Analysis of chattering in continuous sliding-mode controllers. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 5 9, Gonzalez, T., Moreno, J. A., & Fridman, L., Aug. Variable gain super-twisting sliding mode control. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 57 8, -5. Guzmán, E., & Moreno, J. A. 5. Super-twisting observer for second-order systems with time-varying coefficient. IET Control Theory Applications, 9 4, Levant, A Sliding order and sliding accuracy in sliding mode control. International Journal of Control, 58 6, Retrieved from Levant, A Robust exact differentiation via sliding mode technique*. Automatica, 34 3, Retrieved from Moreno, J.. Lyapunov approach for analysis and design of second order sliding mode algorithms. In L. Fridman, J. A. Moreno, & R. Iriarte Eds., Sliding modes after the first decade of the st century Vol. 4, p Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. Moreno, J. A. 9, Jan. A linear framework for the robust stability analysis of a generalized super-twisting algorithm. In Electrical engineering, computing science and automatic control,cce,9 6th international conference on p. -6. Moreno, J. A., & Osorio, M. 8, Dec. A lyapunov approach to second-order sliding mode controllers and observers. In Decision and control, 8. cdc 8. 47th ieee conference on. cancun, méxico p Orlov, Y., Aoustin, Y., & Chevallereau, C., March. Finite time stabilization of a perturbed double integrator-part i: Continuous sliding mode-based output feedback synthesis. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 56 3, Picó, J., Picó-Marco, E., Vignoni, A., & Battista, H. D. 3. Stability preserving maps for finitetime convergence: Super-twisting sliding-mode algorithm. Automatica, 49, Retrieved from Polyakov, A., & Poznyak, A. 9, Aug. Reaching time estimation for super-twisting second order sliding mode controller via lyapunov function designing. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 54 8, Shtessel, Y., Taleb, M., & Plestan, F.. A novel adaptive-gain supertwisting sliding mode controller: Methodology and application. Automatica, 48 5, Retrieved from Utkin, V. 6, March. Discussion aspects of high-order sliding mode control. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 6 3, Utkin, V. I. 99. Sliding modes in control and optimization. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. Utkin, V. I. 3, Aug. On convergence time and disturbance rejection of super-twisting control. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 58 8, 3-7. Utkin, V. I., & Poznyak, A. S. 3. Adaptive sliding mode control with application to super-twist algorithm: Equivalent control method. Automatica, 49, Retrieved from Appendix A. Proofs Proof of the Theorem 3
14 A. Separation of Perturbations Consider the first order system ẋ = γx, tu + ϕx, t. A The terms ϕx, t and γx, t are uncertain functions dependent on the state and time. The control coefficient function is assumed to be bounded by positive constants Terms of perturbation are < γx, t k M. A ϕx, t = ϕ x, t + ϕ x, t such that the first term is vanishing at the origin bounded by and the second term has its total derivative such that d ϕ x, t = ϕ dt γx, t γ t ϕ γ γ t δ x,t ϕ x, t α φ x A3 + γ ϕ ϕ γ x γ x δ x,t ẋ A4 = δ x, t + δ x, tẋ A5 Moreover, the partial derivatives of the perturbation are bounded by positive constants δ x, t δ, δ x, t δ. A6 A. Closed-Loop System A closed-loop with the Generalized STA can be written as ẋ = k γx, tφ x + ϕ x, t + γx, t z + ϕx,t γx,t and expressing the system with the change of variables x = x and x = z + ϕx,t γx,t, with x = x x T, The first equation can be rewritten as ẋ = γx, t k φ x + ϕ x, t γx, t + x, A7a ẋ = k φ x + d ϕ x, t A7b dt γx, t ẋ = γx, t k φ x + x, 4
15 where k = k ϕ x, t γx, tφ x, A8 and note that from A and 9, ϕ x, t γx, tφ x From, we rewrite the second equation as α φ x γx, t φ x α. ẋ = k φ x + δ x, t + δ x, tẋ = k φ x + δ x, t + δ x, tγx, t k φ x + x = k φ x + δ x, t δ x, tγx, t k φ x + δ x, tγx, tx. Due to the fact that φ x = φ x φ x, ẋ = φ x = γx, tφ x k φ x + δ x, t φ x δ x, t k γx, t φ x k γx, t + δ x, t φ x k φ x + φ + δ x, tγx, t φ x x δ x, t γx, tφ x + δ x, t φ x x. A.3 Representation of Lyapunov candidate derivative in quadratic form Now consider the candidate Lyapunov function V = ξ T P ξ, P = Whose derivative along the trajectories of the system V = φ x p φ x x γx, t k φ x + x + + p x φ x γx, tφ k x γx, t + δ x, t φ x k { k φ x + x = γx, tφ x + p x φ x p φ x x k γx, t + δ x, t φ x k p, ξ p T = φ x x A9 + φ x + φ x + After several algebraic manipulations, it is possible to group the terms δ x, t γx, tφ x + δ x, t φ x x δ x, t γx, tφ x + δ } x, t φ x x. 5
16 { V = γx, tφ x k + k δ x, t φ x p δ x, t φ x The last two terms can be rewritten as p δ x, t γx, tφ x x then, substituting, p δ x, t φ x k γx, t k + p p γx, t δ x, t φ x x + p δ x, t γx, tφ x x δ x, t γx, tφ x φ x = p δ x, t γx, tφ x φ x x φ x + φ x x δ x, t γx, tφ x φ x } δ x, t γx, tφ x φ x. V = γx, tφ x p k δ x, t φ x k δ x, t γx, t φ x φ x + p k + k p δ x, t φ x p δ x, t φ x h h x. + p δ x, t φ x } {{ } p From functions on GSTA controller φ x = we have x p k δ x, t γx, t φ x φ x x p k φ x ; φ x = sign x + 3 x + x. +, and φ x = x + 3 x + x Several terms can be grouped as perturbed bounded terms, p = p δx,t φ x k = γx,t k = k ϕx,t k δx,t φ x p p, p k k, k γx,tφ x k k, k = h = pδx,t φ x h h, h = = = p δ, p + δ k M k δ, k + δ, k α, k + α p δ, + p δ,,. A 6
17 and rewritten in a matrix form, V = γx, tφ x k p k q t φ x p k k h + p φ x x } {{ } q 3t h q t x Aa = γx, tφ x ξ T Qtξ Ab where q t q Qt = 3 t = q 3 t q t k p k p k k h + p p k k h + p h. A If matrix Qt is positive definite then the time derivative V is negative definite. A.4 Positiveness of matrix Qt The determinant of matrix Qt can be expressed as det Qt = a p p + b p p + c p, A3 where a p = 4, b p = h k + k p, c p = 4 h k k p h k. Note that the coefficient a p is negative, then, in order to get the positiveness of det Qt, the discriminant of the second degree equation det Qt = must be positive, and the constant value p should be selected within the interval defined by the two real roots of det Qt =. p x, t = b p 4a p c p = h k k p >, A4 For the h > factor > δ x, tp φ x p > δ. A5 A6 For k > factor k > δ. 7
18 For k p > factor, we get p > k, and taking into account A p > p > k α k α Then, a possible selection of p is p = + ɛ, for ɛ >. A7 k α Finally, from A6 and A7 we get kkm α +ɛ > δ, and consequently k > δ + ɛ + α. The two real roots of the quadratic equation det Qt = are p + = h k + k p + δ x, t φ x + p x, t. p = h k + k p + δ x, t φ x } {{ } p c p x, t. A8 A9a A9b The two real roots define the endpoints of an interval wich is a set of all possible values for p such that Qt >. However, the endpoints are dependent on perturbed bounded terms h, k, k and δ x, t/φ x which make each endpoint to move from a minumum value p + min, p min to a maximum value p + Max, p Max. A valid selection of a constant p must belong to an intersection set between the minor endpoint at its maximum value p Max and the maximum end point at its minumum value p + min as shown in Figure A. p p Max, p+ min. A Some possible bounds for the terms in A9 are < p c p c p c, and < p x, t p x, t p x, t, where p c = h k + k p δ, pc = h k + k p + δ, p x, t = h k k p, p x, t = k p. h k 8
19 det Qt Intersection p min p Max p + min p + Max Figure A.: Intersection set. and note that possible upper and lower bounds for p Max, p+ min are p Max h k + k p δ h k k p p + min h k + k p + δ + h k k p. A A Then p should be selected within p h k + k p δ h k k p, + p + δ h k k + h k k p. A3 A.5 Intersection set In order to guarantee a non-empty intersection set the next condition must hold p + min > p Max. A4 Then, A4 can be rewritten as + p x, t > p c p x, t. pc After several algebraic manipulations, the last inequality can be expressed as where a k K + b k K + c k >, A5 +ɛkm km a k =, kkm b k = 4 hɛ, c k = +ɛ and with a change of variable K = k. kkm δα + δ δɛ + α, 9
20 Solutions of the last inequality belong to the interior of the interval defined by K = b k ± k a k a k = hɛ k + ɛk M ± k + ɛk M k where + k = b ɛkm + ɛ k 4a k c k = 6 hɛ 8 m m kk kk Finally, gain k can be selected within the interval k δ α + δ + δ ɛ + α. k M hɛ c c k + δ, k M hɛ c + c k + δ, A6 h = δ + ɛ k α, c = k + ɛk M, k = k α km. A.6 Guarantee the existence of the interval for gain k In order to have an interval between two real roots, the discriminant k to zero k. It is possible to express the last inequality as must be greater or equals a k k + b k k + c k > A7 where a k = 6ɛ, b k = 8+ɛ α k M + δ ɛ c k = 8+ɛ k k m M δα + δ. k M +, It is worth it to note that, the coefficient a k is positive and the discriminant k = b k 4a k c k of A7 is always positive k = 64 + ɛ k m α k M + δ ɛ δ k α M + + 8ɛkM km Λ k + δ >. Then, there is always possible to find a gain k to ensure the existence of a valid selection interval for the gain k. Selecting the k gain, is possible to ensure that the interior set of parables p is not empty, and therefore, to ensure the positiveness of det Qt.
21 Gain k can be selected as k > b k + a k > + ɛ 4ɛ b k 4a k c k + α, a k α k M + δ ɛ k M ɛ 4ɛ Λk + α. A8 A9 We have shown that if A9 and A6 are satisfied, det Qt >. However the condition A9 does not imply A8 for every case. Condition A8 and A9 when δ x, t =, α = are k > δ + ɛ + ɛ δ, k > k M + by modifying the factor k M + to k M + + we achieve δ + ɛ δ + δ ɛ δ + ɛ δ km km δ ɛ + δ + ɛ δ A3 A3 km +. A3 then A9 always imply A8. Finally, condition A9 ensures that the term h = q t >. It can be seen that if det Qt = q tq t q 3 t > and q t >, q t is also positive definite. Therefore, matrix Qt is positive definite. A.7 Finite-time convergence and Convergence Time Based on J. A. Moreno 9, recall the standard inequality for quadratic forms and λ min {P } ξ ξ T P ξ λ max {P } ξ, ξ = ξ + ξ = φ x + x = x + x 3 + x + x A33 is the Euclidean norm of ξ, and note that the inequality x ξ V x, x λ min {P } is satisfied. Since Qt is definite positive and all its elements are bounded, then Qt εi >, for ε > and I the identity matrix, we can rewrite
22 where V γx, tφ x ξ T Qtξ φ x ξ T εiξ εφ x ξ ε ξ x ε ξ ελ min {P } λ max {P } V x, x ε λ max {P } V x, x µ V x, x µ V x, x, µ = ελ min {P } λ max {P }, µ = ε λ max {P }. that shows that the system trajectories converge in finite time. Since the solution of the differential equation v = µ v µ v, v = v si given by vt = exp µ t v + µ µ exp µ t, if µ and µ >. If follows from A34 and the comparison principle that V t vt, when V x, x v. Therefore, x t and x t converge to zero in finite-time and reaches that value at most after a time given by T = µ ln V x, x + µ µ A34 Proof of the Corollary When there is no uncertain control coefficient, the bounds of the function γx, t are, with loss of generality k M = = and quadratic term in inequality A5 become zero. Then, the condition for gain k is k > 6 hɛ c k + δ + ɛ k α > 4 hɛ Condition from quadratic inequality A7 reduces to A35a δ α + δ + δ ɛ + α + δ A35b k > + ɛ δ + α, A36
23 the same as in A8. Proof of the Corollary When there is no state dependent perturbations, the function δ x, t =, then the conditions are simply reduced as k k M ɛ c c k + δ, k M ɛ c + c k + δ, A37 + ɛkm + ɛ k = 6ɛ 8 δ + m m kk kk α. h = δ + ɛ k α, c = k + ɛk M, k = k α km. Gain k can be selected as k > + ɛ 4ɛ α + ɛ k M + Λk + α. 4ɛ A38 Λ k = α k M + 6ɛk M δ. 3
High order integral sliding mode control with gain adaptation
3 European Control Conference (ECC) July 7-9, 3, Zürich, Switzerland. High order integral sliding mode control with gain adaptation M. Taleb, F. Plestan, and B. Bououlid Abstract In this paper, an adaptive
More informationLyapunov Stability Analysis of a Twisting Based Control Algorithm for Systems with Unmatched Perturbations
5th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and European Control Conference (CDC-ECC) Orlando, FL, USA, December -5, Lyapunov Stability Analysis of a Twisting Based Control Algorithm for Systems with Unmatched
More informationDual-Layer Adaptive Sliding Mode Control
Dual-Layer Adaptive Sliding Mode Control Christopher Edwards 1, and Yuri Shtessel 2 Abstract This paper proposes new and novel equivalent control-based adaptive schemes for both conventional and super-twisting
More informationHigher order sliding mode control based on adaptive first order sliding mode controller
Preprints of the 19th World Congress The International Federation of Automatic Control Cape Town, South Africa. August 4-9, 14 Higher order sliding mode control based on adaptive first order sliding mode
More informationHow to Implement Super-Twisting Controller based on Sliding Mode Observer?
How to Implement Super-Twisting Controller based on Sliding Mode Observer? Asif Chalanga 1 Shyam Kamal 2 Prof.L.Fridman 3 Prof.B.Bandyopadhyay 4 and Prof.J.A.Moreno 5 124 Indian Institute of Technology
More informationMin-Max Output Integral Sliding Mode Control for Multiplant Linear Uncertain Systems
Proceedings of the 27 American Control Conference Marriott Marquis Hotel at Times Square New York City, USA, July -3, 27 FrC.4 Min-Max Output Integral Sliding Mode Control for Multiplant Linear Uncertain
More informationRobust Regulation for a 3-DOF Helicopter via Sliding-Modes Control and Observation Techniques
21 American Control Conference Marriott Waterfront, Baltimore, MD, USA June 3-July 2, 21 ThC15.1 Robust Regulation for a 3-DOF Helicopter via Sliding-Modes Control and Observation Techniques Héctor Ríos,
More informationSliding Mode Control à la Lyapunov
Sliding Mode Control à la Lyapunov Jaime A. Moreno Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Eléctrica y Computación, Instituto de Ingeniería, 04510 México D.F., Mexico, JMorenoP@ii.unam.mx 4th-8th September
More informationA sub-optimal second order sliding mode controller for systems with saturating actuators
28 American Control Conference Westin Seattle Hotel, Seattle, Washington, USA June -3, 28 FrB2.5 A sub-optimal second order sliding mode for systems with saturating actuators Antonella Ferrara and Matteo
More informationAn adaptive version of a second order sliding mode output feedback controller
213 European Control Conference (ECC) July 17-19, 213, Zürich, Switzerland. An adaptive version of a second order sliding mode output feedback controller Antonio Estrada, Franck Plestan and Benyamine Allouche
More informationIEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY 1
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY 1 Robust Control With Exact Uncertainties Compensation: With or Without Chattering? Alejandra Ferreira, Member, IEEE, Francisco Javier Bejarano, and Leonid
More informationStability and Robustness of Homogeneous Differential Inclusions
Stability and Robustness of Homogeneous Differential Inclusions Arie Levant 1, Denis Efimov 23, Andrey Polyakov 23, Wilfrid Perruquetti 2 Abstract The known results on asymptotic stability of homogeneous
More informationNonlinear Control Lecture 5: Stability Analysis II
Nonlinear Control Lecture 5: Stability Analysis II Farzaneh Abdollahi Department of Electrical Engineering Amirkabir University of Technology Fall 2010 Farzaneh Abdollahi Nonlinear Control Lecture 5 1/41
More informationA Novel Integral-Based Event Triggering Control for Linear Time-Invariant Systems
53rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control December 15-17, 2014. Los Angeles, California, USA A Novel Integral-Based Event Triggering Control for Linear Time-Invariant Systems Seyed Hossein Mousavi 1,
More informationPole-Placement in Higher-Order Sliding-Mode Control
Preprints of the 19th World Congress The International Federation of Automatic Control Cape Town, South Africa. August 4-9, 14 Pole-Placement in Higher-Order Sliding-Mode Control Debbie Hernández Fernando
More informationDynamic Integral Sliding Mode Control of Nonlinear SISO Systems with States Dependent Matched and Mismatched Uncertainties
Milano (Italy) August 28 - September 2, 2 Dynamic Integral Sliding Mode Control of Nonlinear SISO Systems with States Dependent Matched and Mismatched Uncertainties Qudrat Khan*, Aamer Iqbal Bhatti,* Qadeer
More informationHIGHER ORDER SLIDING MODES AND ARBITRARY-ORDER EXACT ROBUST DIFFERENTIATION
HIGHER ORDER SLIDING MODES AND ARBITRARY-ORDER EXACT ROBUST DIFFERENTIATION A. Levant Institute for Industrial Mathematics, 4/24 Yehuda Ha-Nachtom St., Beer-Sheva 843, Israel Fax: +972-7-232 and E-mail:
More informationConverse Lyapunov theorem and Input-to-State Stability
Converse Lyapunov theorem and Input-to-State Stability April 6, 2014 1 Converse Lyapunov theorem In the previous lecture, we have discussed few examples of nonlinear control systems and stability concepts
More informationDisturbance Attenuation for a Class of Nonlinear Systems by Output Feedback
Disturbance Attenuation for a Class of Nonlinear Systems by Output Feedback Wei in Chunjiang Qian and Xianqing Huang Submitted to Systems & Control etters /5/ Abstract This paper studies the problem of
More informationNavigation and Obstacle Avoidance via Backstepping for Mechanical Systems with Drift in the Closed Loop
Navigation and Obstacle Avoidance via Backstepping for Mechanical Systems with Drift in the Closed Loop Jan Maximilian Montenbruck, Mathias Bürger, Frank Allgöwer Abstract We study backstepping controllers
More informationAn homotopy method for exact tracking of nonlinear nonminimum phase systems: the example of the spherical inverted pendulum
9 American Control Conference Hyatt Regency Riverfront, St. Louis, MO, USA June -, 9 FrA.5 An homotopy method for exact tracking of nonlinear nonminimum phase systems: the example of the spherical inverted
More informationChapter III. Stability of Linear Systems
1 Chapter III Stability of Linear Systems 1. Stability and state transition matrix 2. Time-varying (non-autonomous) systems 3. Time-invariant systems 1 STABILITY AND STATE TRANSITION MATRIX 2 In this chapter,
More informationPassivity-based Stabilization of Non-Compact Sets
Passivity-based Stabilization of Non-Compact Sets Mohamed I. El-Hawwary and Manfredi Maggiore Abstract We investigate the stabilization of closed sets for passive nonlinear systems which are contained
More informationNonlinear Observers. Jaime A. Moreno. Eléctrica y Computación Instituto de Ingeniería Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
Nonlinear Observers Jaime A. Moreno JMorenoP@ii.unam.mx Eléctrica y Computación Instituto de Ingeniería Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México XVI Congreso Latinoamericano de Control Automático October
More informationVARIABLE GAIN SUPER-TWISTING CONTROL USING ONLY OUTPUT FEEDBACK
Natal RN 5 a 8 de outubro de 5 VARIABLE GAIN SUPER-TWISTING CONTROL USING ONLY OUTPUT FEEDBACK Paulo Victor N. M. Vidal Timon Asch Keijock Eduardo V. L. Nunes Liu Hsu Dept. of Electrical Eng./COPPE Federal
More informationLyapunov Stability of Linear Predictor Feedback for Distributed Input Delays
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL VOL. 56 NO. 3 MARCH 2011 655 Lyapunov Stability of Linear Predictor Feedback for Distributed Input Delays Nikolaos Bekiaris-Liberis Miroslav Krstic In this case system
More informationUnit quaternion observer based attitude stabilization of a rigid spacecraft without velocity measurement
Proceedings of the 45th IEEE Conference on Decision & Control Manchester Grand Hyatt Hotel San Diego, CA, USA, December 3-5, 6 Unit quaternion observer based attitude stabilization of a rigid spacecraft
More informationConvergence Rate of Nonlinear Switched Systems
Convergence Rate of Nonlinear Switched Systems Philippe JOUAN and Saïd NACIRI arxiv:1511.01737v1 [math.oc] 5 Nov 2015 January 23, 2018 Abstract This paper is concerned with the convergence rate of the
More informationStability theory is a fundamental topic in mathematics and engineering, that include every
Stability Theory Stability theory is a fundamental topic in mathematics and engineering, that include every branches of control theory. For a control system, the least requirement is that the system is
More informationDelay-Dependent Stability Criteria for Linear Systems with Multiple Time Delays
Delay-Dependent Stability Criteria for Linear Systems with Multiple Time Delays Yong He, Min Wu, Jin-Hua She Abstract This paper deals with the problem of the delay-dependent stability of linear systems
More information1 The Observability Canonical Form
NONLINEAR OBSERVERS AND SEPARATION PRINCIPLE 1 The Observability Canonical Form In this Chapter we discuss the design of observers for nonlinear systems modelled by equations of the form ẋ = f(x, u) (1)
More informationGramians based model reduction for hybrid switched systems
Gramians based model reduction for hybrid switched systems Y. Chahlaoui Younes.Chahlaoui@manchester.ac.uk Centre for Interdisciplinary Computational and Dynamical Analysis (CICADA) School of Mathematics
More informationFinite-time Attractive Ellipsoid Method Using Implicit Lyapunov Functions
Finite-time Attractive Ellipsoid Method Using Implicit Lyapunov Functions Manuel Mera, Andrey Polyakov, Wilfrid Perruquetti, Gang Zheng To cite this version: Manuel Mera, Andrey Polyakov, Wilfrid Perruquetti,
More informationUSING DYNAMIC NEURAL NETWORKS TO GENERATE CHAOS: AN INVERSE OPTIMAL CONTROL APPROACH
International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, Vol. 11, No. 3 (2001) 857 863 c World Scientific Publishing Company USING DYNAMIC NEURAL NETWORKS TO GENERATE CHAOS: AN INVERSE OPTIMAL CONTROL APPROACH
More informationFinite-Time Converging Jump Observer for Switched Linear Systems with Unknown Inputs
Finite-Time Converging Jump Observer for Switched Linear Systems with Unknown Inputs F.J. Bejarano a, A. Pisano b, E. Usai b a National Autonomous University of Mexico, Engineering Faculty, Division of
More informationExponential Controller for Robot Manipulators
Exponential Controller for Robot Manipulators Fernando Reyes Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla Grupo de Robótica de la Facultad de Ciencias de la Electrónica Apartado Postal 542, Puebla 7200, México
More informationIntroduction to Nonlinear Control Lecture # 3 Time-Varying and Perturbed Systems
p. 1/5 Introduction to Nonlinear Control Lecture # 3 Time-Varying and Perturbed Systems p. 2/5 Time-varying Systems ẋ = f(t, x) f(t, x) is piecewise continuous in t and locally Lipschitz in x for all t
More informationControl of the Inertia Wheel Pendulum by Bounded Torques
Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, and the European Control Conference 5 Seville, Spain, December -5, 5 ThC6.5 Control of the Inertia Wheel Pendulum by Bounded Torques Victor
More informationSecond Order Sliding Mode Control for Nonlinear Affine Systems with Quantized Uncertainty
Second Order Sliding Mode Control for Nonlinear Affine Systems with Quantized Uncertainty Gian Paolo Incremona a, Michele Cucuzzella b, Antonella Ferrara b a Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e
More informationAdaptive Robust Tracking Control of Robot Manipulators in the Task-space under Uncertainties
Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 3(1): 308-322, 2009 ISSN 1991-8178 Adaptive Robust Tracking Control of Robot Manipulators in the Task-space under Uncertainties M.R.Soltanpour, M.M.Fateh
More informationTarget Localization and Circumnavigation Using Bearing Measurements in 2D
Target Localization and Circumnavigation Using Bearing Measurements in D Mohammad Deghat, Iman Shames, Brian D. O. Anderson and Changbin Yu Abstract This paper considers the problem of localization and
More informationChaos suppression of uncertain gyros in a given finite time
Chin. Phys. B Vol. 1, No. 11 1 1155 Chaos suppression of uncertain gyros in a given finite time Mohammad Pourmahmood Aghababa a and Hasan Pourmahmood Aghababa bc a Electrical Engineering Department, Urmia
More informationOn Sontag s Formula for the Input-to-State Practical Stabilization of Retarded Control-Affine Systems
On Sontag s Formula for the Input-to-State Practical Stabilization of Retarded Control-Affine Systems arxiv:1206.4240v1 [math.oc] 19 Jun 2012 P. Pepe Abstract In this paper input-to-state practically stabilizing
More informationEnergy-based Swing-up of the Acrobot and Time-optimal Motion
Energy-based Swing-up of the Acrobot and Time-optimal Motion Ravi N. Banavar Systems and Control Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay Mumbai-476, India Email: banavar@ee.iitb.ac.in Telephone:(91)-(22)
More informationEML5311 Lyapunov Stability & Robust Control Design
EML5311 Lyapunov Stability & Robust Control Design 1 Lyapunov Stability criterion In Robust control design of nonlinear uncertain systems, stability theory plays an important role in engineering systems.
More informationSliding mode control of continuous time systems with reaching law based on exponential function
Journal of Physics: Conference Series PAPER OPEN ACCESS Sliding mode control of continuous time systems with reaching law based on exponential function To cite this article: Piotr Gamorski 15 J. Phys.:
More informationL -Bounded Robust Control of Nonlinear Cascade Systems
L -Bounded Robust Control of Nonlinear Cascade Systems Shoudong Huang M.R. James Z.P. Jiang August 19, 2004 Accepted by Systems & Control Letters Abstract In this paper, we consider the L -bounded robust
More informationHigher Order Sliding Mode Control: A Control Lyapunov Function Based Approach
Higher Order Sliding Mode Control: A Control Lyapunov Function Based Approach Shyam Kamal IIT Bombay Systems and Control Engg. CRNTS Building, Powai, Mumbai India shyam@sc.iitb.ac.in B. Bandyopadhyay IIT
More informationRobust Stabilization of Non-Minimum Phase Nonlinear Systems Using Extended High Gain Observers
28 American Control Conference Westin Seattle Hotel, Seattle, Washington, USA June 11-13, 28 WeC15.1 Robust Stabilization of Non-Minimum Phase Nonlinear Systems Using Extended High Gain Observers Shahid
More informationState and Parameter Estimation of a CSTR
Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Occidente Repositorio Institucional del ITESO rei.iteso.mx Departamento de Matemáticas y Física DMAF - Artículos y ponencias con arbitrae 2012-10 State
More informationIEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL. 58, NO. 5, MAY invertible, that is (1) In this way, on, and on, system (3) becomes
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL. 58, NO. 5, MAY 2013 1269 Sliding Mode and Active Disturbance Rejection Control to Stabilization of One-Dimensional Anti-Stable Wave Equations Subject to Disturbance
More informationGlobal Practical Output Regulation of a Class of Nonlinear Systems by Output Feedback
Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, and the European Control Conference 2005 Seville, Spain, December 2-5, 2005 ThB09.4 Global Practical Output Regulation of a Class of Nonlinear
More informationA higher order sliding mode controller for a class of MIMO nonlinear systems: application to PM synchronous motor control
A higher order sliding mode controller for a class of MIMO nonlinear systems: application to PM synchronous motor control S Laghrouche, F Plestan and A Glumineau Abstract A new robust higher order sliding
More informationTracking Control of a Class of Differential Inclusion Systems via Sliding Mode Technique
International Journal of Automation and Computing (3), June 24, 38-32 DOI: 7/s633-4-793-6 Tracking Control of a Class of Differential Inclusion Systems via Sliding Mode Technique Lei-Po Liu Zhu-Mu Fu Xiao-Na
More informationGlobal stabilization of feedforward systems with exponentially unstable Jacobian linearization
Global stabilization of feedforward systems with exponentially unstable Jacobian linearization F Grognard, R Sepulchre, G Bastin Center for Systems Engineering and Applied Mechanics Université catholique
More informationEN Nonlinear Control and Planning in Robotics Lecture 3: Stability February 4, 2015
EN530.678 Nonlinear Control and Planning in Robotics Lecture 3: Stability February 4, 2015 Prof: Marin Kobilarov 0.1 Model prerequisites Consider ẋ = f(t, x). We will make the following basic assumptions
More informationDamped harmonic motion
Damped harmonic motion March 3, 016 Harmonic motion is studied in the presence of a damping force proportional to the velocity. The complex method is introduced, and the different cases of under-damping,
More informationModel Orbit Robust Stabilization (MORS) of Pendubot with Application to Swing up Control
Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, and the European Control Conference 5 Seville, Spain, December 1-15, 5 WeIC18.1 Model Orbit Robust Stabilization (MORS) of Pendubot with
More informationControlling Human Heart Rate Response During Treadmill Exercise
Controlling Human Heart Rate Response During Treadmill Exercise Frédéric Mazenc (INRIA-DISCO), Michael Malisoff (LSU), and Marcio de Queiroz (LSU) Special Session: Advances in Biomedical Mathematics 2011
More informationConverse Lyapunov-Krasovskii Theorems for Systems Described by Neutral Functional Differential Equation in Hale s Form
Converse Lyapunov-Krasovskii Theorems for Systems Described by Neutral Functional Differential Equation in Hale s Form arxiv:1206.3504v1 [math.ds] 15 Jun 2012 P. Pepe I. Karafyllis Abstract In this paper
More informationDelay-dependent Stability Analysis for Markovian Jump Systems with Interval Time-varying-delays
International Journal of Automation and Computing 7(2), May 2010, 224-229 DOI: 10.1007/s11633-010-0224-2 Delay-dependent Stability Analysis for Markovian Jump Systems with Interval Time-varying-delays
More informationSTABILITY OF PLANAR NONLINEAR SWITCHED SYSTEMS
LABORATOIRE INORMATIQUE, SINAUX ET SYSTÈMES DE SOPHIA ANTIPOLIS UMR 6070 STABILITY O PLANAR NONLINEAR SWITCHED SYSTEMS Ugo Boscain, régoire Charlot Projet TOpModel Rapport de recherche ISRN I3S/RR 2004-07
More informationOutput Regulation of Uncertain Nonlinear Systems with Nonlinear Exosystems
Output Regulation of Uncertain Nonlinear Systems with Nonlinear Exosystems Zhengtao Ding Manchester School of Engineering, University of Manchester Oxford Road, Manchester M3 9PL, United Kingdom zhengtaoding@manacuk
More information1. Find the solution of the following uncontrolled linear system. 2 α 1 1
Appendix B Revision Problems 1. Find the solution of the following uncontrolled linear system 0 1 1 ẋ = x, x(0) =. 2 3 1 Class test, August 1998 2. Given the linear system described by 2 α 1 1 ẋ = x +
More informationLyapunov Optimizing Sliding Mode Control for Robot Manipulators
Applied Mathematical Sciences, Vol. 7, 2013, no. 63, 3123-3139 HIKARI Ltd, www.m-hikari.com Lyapunov Optimizing Sliding Mode Control for Robot Manipulators Chutiphon Pukdeboon Department of Mathematics
More informationComputing Optimized Nonlinear Sliding Surfaces
Computing Optimized Nonlinear Sliding Surfaces Azad Ghaffari and Mohammad Javad Yazdanpanah Abstract In this paper, we have concentrated on real systems consisting of structural uncertainties and affected
More informationNew methodologies for adaptive sliding mode control
New methodologies for adaptive sliding mode control Franck Plestan, Yuri Shtessel, Vincent Bregeault, Alexander Poznyak To cite this version: Franck Plestan, Yuri Shtessel, Vincent Bregeault, Alexander
More informationThe ϵ-capacity of a gain matrix and tolerable disturbances: Discrete-time perturbed linear systems
IOSR Journal of Mathematics (IOSR-JM) e-issn: 2278-5728, p-issn: 2319-765X. Volume 11, Issue 3 Ver. IV (May - Jun. 2015), PP 52-62 www.iosrjournals.org The ϵ-capacity of a gain matrix and tolerable disturbances:
More informationAn Approach of Robust Iterative Learning Control for Uncertain Systems
,,, 323 E-mail: mxsun@zjut.edu.cn :, Lyapunov( ),,.,,,.,,. :,,, An Approach of Robust Iterative Learning Control for Uncertain Systems Mingxuan Sun, Chaonan Jiang, Yanwei Li College of Information Engineering,
More informationState estimation of uncertain multiple model with unknown inputs
State estimation of uncertain multiple model with unknown inputs Abdelkader Akhenak, Mohammed Chadli, Didier Maquin and José Ragot Centre de Recherche en Automatique de Nancy, CNRS UMR 79 Institut National
More informationAutonomous Helicopter Landing A Nonlinear Output Regulation Perspective
Autonomous Helicopter Landing A Nonlinear Output Regulation Perspective Andrea Serrani Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Collaborative Center for Control Sciences The Ohio State University
More informationIEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL. 52, NO. 11, NOVEMBER
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL. 52, NO. 11, NOVEMBER 2007 2085 Analysis of Chattering in Systems With Second-Order Sliding Modes Igor Boiko, Member, IEEE, Leonid Fridman, Member, IEEE, Alessro
More informationTopic # /31 Feedback Control Systems. Analysis of Nonlinear Systems Lyapunov Stability Analysis
Topic # 16.30/31 Feedback Control Systems Analysis of Nonlinear Systems Lyapunov Stability Analysis Fall 010 16.30/31 Lyapunov Stability Analysis Very general method to prove (or disprove) stability of
More informationControl of industrial robots. Centralized control
Control of industrial robots Centralized control Prof. Paolo Rocco (paolo.rocco@polimi.it) Politecnico di Milano ipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria Introduction Centralized control
More informationElectronic Throttle Valve Control Design Based on Sliding Mode Perturbation Estimator
on Sliding Mode Perturbation Estimator Asst. Prof. Dr. Shibly Ahmed Al-Samarraie, Lect. Yasir Khudhair Al-Nadawi, Mustafa Hussein Mishary, Muntadher Mohammed Salih Control & Systems Engineering Department,
More informationSliding Mode Regulator as Solution to Optimal Control Problem for Nonlinear Polynomial Systems
29 American Control Conference Hyatt Regency Riverfront, St. Louis, MO, USA June -2, 29 WeA3.5 Sliding Mode Regulator as Solution to Optimal Control Problem for Nonlinear Polynomial Systems Michael Basin
More informationL 2 -induced Gains of Switched Systems and Classes of Switching Signals
L 2 -induced Gains of Switched Systems and Classes of Switching Signals Kenji Hirata and João P. Hespanha Abstract This paper addresses the L 2-induced gain analysis for switched linear systems. We exploit
More informationSTABILIZATION FOR A CLASS OF UNCERTAIN MULTI-TIME DELAYS SYSTEM USING SLIDING MODE CONTROLLER. Received April 2010; revised August 2010
International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information and Control ICIC International c 2011 ISSN 1349-4198 Volume 7, Number 7(B), July 2011 pp. 4195 4205 STABILIZATION FOR A CLASS OF UNCERTAIN MULTI-TIME
More informationDelay-independent stability via a reset loop
Delay-independent stability via a reset loop S. Tarbouriech & L. Zaccarian (LAAS-CNRS) Joint work with F. Perez Rubio & A. Banos (Universidad de Murcia) L2S Paris, 20-22 November 2012 L2S Paris, 20-22
More informationEN Nonlinear Control and Planning in Robotics Lecture 10: Lyapunov Redesign and Robust Backstepping April 6, 2015
EN530.678 Nonlinear Control and Planning in Robotics Lecture 10: Lyapunov Redesign and Robust Backstepping April 6, 2015 Prof: Marin Kobilarov 1 Uncertainty and Lyapunov Redesign Consider the system [1]
More informationControl Systems I. Lecture 2: Modeling. Suggested Readings: Åström & Murray Ch. 2-3, Guzzella Ch Emilio Frazzoli
Control Systems I Lecture 2: Modeling Suggested Readings: Åström & Murray Ch. 2-3, Guzzella Ch. 2-3 Emilio Frazzoli Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control D-MAVT ETH Zürich September 29, 2017 E. Frazzoli
More informationUDE-based Dynamic Surface Control for Strict-feedback Systems with Mismatched Disturbances
16 American Control Conference ACC) Boston Marriott Copley Place July 6-8, 16. Boston, MA, USA UDE-based Dynamic Surface Control for Strict-feedback Systems with Mismatched Disturbances Jiguo Dai, Beibei
More informationA NONLINEAR TRANSFORMATION APPROACH TO GLOBAL ADAPTIVE OUTPUT FEEDBACK CONTROL OF 3RD-ORDER UNCERTAIN NONLINEAR SYSTEMS
Copyright 00 IFAC 15th Triennial World Congress, Barcelona, Spain A NONLINEAR TRANSFORMATION APPROACH TO GLOBAL ADAPTIVE OUTPUT FEEDBACK CONTROL OF RD-ORDER UNCERTAIN NONLINEAR SYSTEMS Choon-Ki Ahn, Beom-Soo
More informationObserver Based Output Feedback Tracking Control of Robot Manipulators
1 IEEE International Conference on Control Applications Part of 1 IEEE Multi-Conference on Systems and Control Yokohama, Japan, September 8-1, 1 Observer Based Output Feedback Tracking Control of Robot
More informationNewtonian Mechanics. Chapter Classical space-time
Chapter 1 Newtonian Mechanics In these notes classical mechanics will be viewed as a mathematical model for the description of physical systems consisting of a certain (generally finite) number of particles
More informationDeterministic Dynamic Programming
Deterministic Dynamic Programming 1 Value Function Consider the following optimal control problem in Mayer s form: V (t 0, x 0 ) = inf u U J(t 1, x(t 1 )) (1) subject to ẋ(t) = f(t, x(t), u(t)), x(t 0
More informationEvent-based Stabilization of Nonlinear Time-Delay Systems
Preprints of the 19th World Congress The International Federation of Automatic Control Event-based Stabilization of Nonlinear Time-Delay Systems Sylvain Durand Nicolas Marchand J. Fermi Guerrero-Castellanos
More informationThe Rationale for Second Level Adaptation
The Rationale for Second Level Adaptation Kumpati S. Narendra, Yu Wang and Wei Chen Center for Systems Science, Yale University arxiv:1510.04989v1 [cs.sy] 16 Oct 2015 Abstract Recently, a new approach
More informationTrajectory Tracking Control of Bimodal Piecewise Affine Systems
25 American Control Conference June 8-1, 25. Portland, OR, USA ThB17.4 Trajectory Tracking Control of Bimodal Piecewise Affine Systems Kazunori Sakurama, Toshiharu Sugie and Kazushi Nakano Abstract This
More informationEvent-based control of input-output linearizable systems
Milano (Italy) August 28 - September 2, 2 Event-based control of input-output linearizable systems Christian Stöcker Jan Lunze Institute of Automation and Computer Control, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Universitätsstr.
More information458 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, VOL. 16, NO. 3, MAY 2008
458 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, VOL 16, NO 3, MAY 2008 Brief Papers Adaptive Control for Nonlinearly Parameterized Uncertainties in Robot Manipulators N V Q Hung, Member, IEEE, H D
More informationRobust Model Free Control of Robotic Manipulators with Prescribed Transient and Steady State Performance
Robust Model Free Control of Robotic Manipulators with Prescribed Transient and Steady State Performance Charalampos P. Bechlioulis, Minas V. Liarokapis and Kostas J. Kyriakopoulos Abstract In this paper,
More informationProf. Krstic Nonlinear Systems MAE281A Homework set 1 Linearization & phase portrait
Prof. Krstic Nonlinear Systems MAE28A Homework set Linearization & phase portrait. For each of the following systems, find all equilibrium points and determine the type of each isolated equilibrium. Use
More informationStabilization of a 3D Rigid Pendulum
25 American Control Conference June 8-, 25. Portland, OR, USA ThC5.6 Stabilization of a 3D Rigid Pendulum Nalin A. Chaturvedi, Fabio Bacconi, Amit K. Sanyal, Dennis Bernstein, N. Harris McClamroch Department
More informationA new method to obtain ultimate bounds and convergence rates for perturbed time-delay systems
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROBUST AND NONLINEAR ONTROL Int. J. Robust. Nonlinear ontrol 212; 22:187 188 ublished online 21 September 211 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com)..179 SHORT OMMUNIATION
More information1 Lyapunov theory of stability
M.Kawski, APM 581 Diff Equns Intro to Lyapunov theory. November 15, 29 1 1 Lyapunov theory of stability Introduction. Lyapunov s second (or direct) method provides tools for studying (asymptotic) stability
More informationThe PVTOL Aircraft. 2.1 Introduction
2 The PVTOL Aircraft 2.1 Introduction We introduce in this chapter the well-known Planar Vertical Take-Off and Landing (PVTOL) aircraft problem. The PVTOL represents a challenging nonlinear systems control
More informationSensorless PBC of induction motors: A separation principle from ISS properties
Proceedings of the 46th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control New Orleans, LA, USA, Dec. 12-14, 27 FrC9.2 Sensorless PBC of induction motors: A separation principle from ISS properties Jaime A. Moreno
More informationAdaptive Predictive Observer Design for Class of Uncertain Nonlinear Systems with Bounded Disturbance
International Journal of Control Science and Engineering 2018, 8(2): 31-35 DOI: 10.5923/j.control.20180802.01 Adaptive Predictive Observer Design for Class of Saeed Kashefi *, Majid Hajatipor Faculty of
More informationTrajectory tracking & Path-following control
Cooperative Control of Multiple Robotic Vehicles: Theory and Practice Trajectory tracking & Path-following control EECI Graduate School on Control Supélec, Feb. 21-25, 2011 A word about T Tracking and
More information