Analytische Qualitätssicherung Baden-Württemberg
|
|
- Moris Barker
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Analytische Qualitätssicherung Baen-Württemberg Proficiency Test 1/13 TW S1 sweeteners an benzotriazoles in rinking water acesulfam, cyclamate, saccharin, sucralose, 1H-benzotriazole, 4-methyl-1H-benzotriazole, 5-methylbenzotriazole, sum of methyl-1h-benzotriazoles provie by AQS Baen-Württemberg at Institute for Sanitary Engineering, Water Quality an Soli Waste Management, University of Stuttgart Bantäle 2, Stuttgart-Büsnau, Germany an IWW Water Center Moritzstr. 26, Mülheim an er Ruhr, Germany on behalf of Lanesanstalt für Umwelt, Messungen un Naturschutz Baen-Württemberg Stuttgart, in July 2013
2 Responsibilities: Scientific irector AQS: Dr.-Ing. Dipl.-Chem. Michael Koch PT manager: Dr.-Ing. Frank Baumeister AQS Baen-Württemberg at Institute of Sanitary Engineering, Water Quality an Soli Waste Management at University of Stuttgart Bantäle Stuttgart-Büsnau Germany Tel.: +49 (0)711 / Fax: +49 (0)711 / info@aqsbw.e
3 PT 1/13 TW S1 LIST OF CONTENTS GENERAL... 1 PT DESIGN... 1 SAMPLE PREPARATION... 1 SAMPLE DISTRIBUTION... 1 ANALYTICAL METHODS... 2 SUBMISSION OF RESULTS... 2 EVALUATION PROCEDURE... 2 ASSESSMENT... 3 EVALUATION... 3 EXPLANATION OF APPENDIX A... 4 EXPLANATION OF APPENDIX B... 5 EXPLANATION OF APPENDIX C... 5 MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY... 6 TRACEABLE REFERENCE VALUES... 7 INTERNET... 8 Appenix A ACESULFAM... A-1 CYCLAMAT... A-7 SACCHARIN... A-13 SUCRALOSE... A- 1H-BENZOTRIAZOL... A- 4-METHYL-1H-BENZOTRIAZOLE... A-33 5-METHYL-1H-BENZOTRIAZOLE... A-37 SUM OF BENZOTRIAZOLES... A-43 Appenix B Appenix C ACESULFAM... C-1 CYCLAMAT... C-10 SACCHARIN... C- SUCRALOSE... C-28 1H-BENZOTRIAZOEL... C-37 4-METHYL-1H-BENZOTRIAZOLE... C-46 5-METHYL-1H-BENZOTRIAZOLE... C-55 SUM OF BENZOTRIAZOLES... C-64
4 PT 1/13 TW S1 page 1 General This PT was provie by AQS Baen-Württemberg in cooperation with IWW Water Center in Mülheim an er Ruhr an with the network NORMAN (Network of reference laboratories for monitoring of emerging environmental pollutants). In this roun acesulfam, cyclamate, saccharin, sucralose, 1-H-benzotriazole, 4-methyl-1Hbenzotriazole, 5-methyl-1H-benzotriazole an the sum of the methyl-1hbenzotriazoles were to be etermine. The PT was supporte by Lanesanstalt für Umwelt, Messungen un Naturschutz in Baen-Württemberg. The PT was execute an evaluate accoring to the requirements of DIN A45 an ISO/TS PT esign Each participant receive the following samples: 3 samples for the etermination of acesulfam, cyclamate, saccharin, sucralose, 1H-benzotriazole, 4-methyl-1H-benzotriazole, 5-methyl-1Hbenzotriazole in 1000-ml-groun bottles. The samples were preserve by aing 40 mg/l soium azie. The samples also containe acetonitrile as solubility promoter. 3 ifferent concentration levels/batches were prouce. All participants receive the same samples. Sample preparation The samples for the etermination of the sweeteners an benzotriazoles were base on a real groun water matrix from the northern part of the region Ruhr in North Rhine-Westphalia. The groun water was use without treatment for the sample preparation. The groun water was spike with stock solutions an the concentrations covere rinking an groun water relevant ranges. Sample istribution The samples were ispatche on 29 th January 2013 by express service.
5 PT 1/13 TW S1 page 2 Analytical methos The participants were free to choose a suitable metho, but following limits of quantification were require: parameter acesulfam cyclamate saccharin sucralose 1H-benzotriazole 4-methyl-1H-benzotriazole 5-methyl-1H-benzotriazole limit of quantification 0,05 µg/l* 0,05 µg/l* 0,05 µg/l* 0,1 µg/l 0,05 µg/l 0,05 µg/l 0,05 µg/l *concentration referre to the aci an not to the salt of the respective substance The samples ha to be analyse in uplicate over the complete metho (sample preparation an measurement). The participants were aske to report the result as average value in µg/l. The concentration for the parameters acesulfam, cyclamate an saccharin referre to the aci form of the sweeteners an not on the respective salt. The samples containe 4-methyl-1H-benzotriazole an 5-methyl-1H-benzotriazole. In the case that both substances were quantifie separately, the single values ha to be reporte as well as the sum of both substances. Otherwise the sum of both substances ha to be reporte. The participants were aske to report the results with three significant igits. Submission of results The ealine for the submission of results was on 28 th February Evaluation proceure The statistical evaluation was execute accoring to DIN A45 an ISO TS Interlaboratory comparisons for proficiency testing of analytical chemistry laboratories. From the participants results a relative stanar eviation was calculate for each concentration level an parameter using the Q-metho. The reference values (see chapter Traceable reference values ) were use as assigne values x a. The stanar eviation resulting from the Q-metho was use as σ ). σ ) was limite as follows: lower limit: 5% upper limit: % A z-score was calculate for each measurement result erive from the assigne value x a an the stanar eviation for proficiency assessment σ ) : result z score = σˆ x a The z-score was moifie to a z U -score with a correction factor for proficiency assessment (as escribe in the stanars mentione above). The tolerance limit was efine as Iz U I=2,0.
6 PT 1/13 TW S1 page 3 Assessment There was no overall assessment of the proficiency test roun, but the single parameters were assesse. A parameter was assesse as successful, if more than half of the values were correctly etermine (2 out of 3 values are within the tolerance limits). Evaluation Number of participants: 36 1 laboratory i not report any result. Number of reporte values: 591 Number of accepte values: 511 (86,46 %) In the following figure the successful an not successful laboratories for each parameter are illustrate.
7 PT 1/13 TW S1 page 4 Explanation of Appenix A Appenix A contains for each parameter - parameter tables - a figure of participants means versus the spike amounts for the etermination of the recovery rate - a figure of the relative stanar eviations versus the concentrations - a figure of the tolerance limits in the PT versus the concentrations - the frequency of application of analytical methos - the metho specific evaluation - a comparison of mean an reference values for each concentration level - a comparison of the relative stanar eviations of the ifferent methos - the statistical characteristics of the metho specific evaluation - a tabular comparison of the means with the reference values an their uncertainties Parameter tables In these tables the following values for each concentration level are liste: assigne value expane uncertainty of the assigne value in %, calculate accoring to ISO 128 using the formula rel. stanar eviation U = 2 1. number of values stanar eviation, calculate using robust statistical metho stanar eviation for proficiency assessment for the calculation of z U -scores rel. stanar eviation for proficiency assessment tolerance limits above an below permitte eviations above an below in % number of values in this level number of not satisfactory values below an above the assigne value an the percentage of these values in total. Determination of recovery rate In the iagrams of the assigne values versus the spike amount of analyte a linear regression line was calculate using a generalize least square regression which takes into account the uncertainties of the values in both irections. From these values the recovery rate for each parameter was etermine (see iagrams). The slope of the line inicates the average recovery rate. The iagrams also contain the expane uncertainty (k=2) of the concentrations from the spike an the assigne values. Relative stanar eviations an tolerance limits The iagrams for the relative stanar eviation vs. the assigne value show the concentration epenency of the stanar eviation an the tolerance limits in percent. The relative stanar eviations calculate from participants ata are the stars connecte by an interrupte line, the rel. stanar eviation taken from the variance function (an sometimes limite by the upper or lower limit) are given by squares, connecte by a continuous line.
8 PT 1/13 TW S1 page 5 Metho specific evaluation For each parameter the methos use by the participants are shown in a iagram. In a secon iagram for each metho with a frequency of more than 5 %, values are sorte in 5 categories: too low results with z U -score < -2 low results with 2 z U -score < 1 correct results with 1 z U -score +1 high results with +1 < z U -score +2 too high results with z U -score > +2 Comparison of means an reference values for each concentration level Finally the mean value calculate from all results, the reference value (see chapter Traceable reference values) are compare with mean values calculate for all methos separately. All mean values were calculate using the Hampel estimator escribe in ISO/TS Mean values were calculate only, if more than 8 results were within a z-score-range of ± 2. The means are reporte with their expane uncertainty, calculate accoring to ISO 128. All mean values an their expane uncertainties are aitionally compare with the reference values an their expane uncertainties. Explanation of Appenix B Participants were aske to report expane uncertainties of their results on a voluntary basis. In this iagram for each parameter the reporte uncertainties for all concentration levels with the reproucibility stanar eviation (horizontal line) are isplaye. Values which eviate from the reproucibility stanar eviation with a factor more than 2 are usually not realistic. Explanation of Appenix C In the last part of the report, for all concentration levels the results of all participants are illustrate. Confientiality of participants is ensure by using lab coes. The lab coes were sent to participants with the certificates. In etail Appenix C contains: - a table with all ata - figures with o all reporte results o all z U -scores o all reporte expane uncertainties o all ζ scores Table with all ata The assigne value with the expane uncertainty an the tolerance limits for the concentration level is illustrate in the table. For each participant the following ata are given: lab coe reporte result measurement uncertainty of the value (if reporte) ζ-score for this value, calculate with the following formula ζ = x x u 2 lab a + u 2 ref, with
9 PT 1/13 TW S1 page 6 x x a = ifference from the measure value an the assigne value u lab = stanar uncertainty of the value, reporte by the participant u ref = stanar uncertainty of the assigne value z U -score for proficiency assessment assessment of the value accoring to its z-score Meaning of ζ-scores: The assessment of ζ-scores is similar to that of z U -scores. If the ata are normally istribute an the uncertainties are well estimate, ζ-scores will lie between -2 an +2 with a probability of aroun 95 %. ζ-scores are mainly influence by the measurement uncertainties reporte by the laboratory. Therefore ζ-scores are usually not appropriate for the assessment of the reporte results, unless the reporte measurement uncertainty is checke for fitnessfor-purpose. Therefore we o not use the ζ-scores for the assessment of the laboratories. Nevertheless ζ-scores are appropriate to check the plausibility of the reporte measurement uncertainty: If the z U -score of a result is within the tolerance limit an the ζ-score is outsie, then the measurement uncertainty is unerestimate. If the z U -score is outsie the tolerance limits an the absolute value of the ζ-score is lower than two, then the requirements of the proficiency test were stronger compare with the reporte measurement uncertainty. Diagrams of uncertainty ata In the first figure for all lab coes the measurement uncertainty (together with the reproucibility stanar eviation) is illustrate. The secon figure shows the associate ζ-scores. Measurement uncertainty 10 (28,6%) out of laboratories with vali values reporte measurement uncertainties. In total 3 (30,96%) out of 591 vali values were given with the measurement uncertainty. The following table isplays the number of values with measurement uncertainty against the accreitation status. Accreitation status of the values Number of values Number of values with measurement uncertainty accreite (60,8%) not accreite 1 27 (20,5%) not specifie (8,9%) We woul like to put emphasis on the fact that reporting of measurement uncertainties in our PT scheme is absolutely voluntary. The only objective is to help all participants to reasonably hanle measurement uncertainties an their estimation. The iagrams show that the sprea of reporte uncertainties in some cases is vast, from unrealistic low values up to very high. A plausibility check using reproucibility stanar eviations of the PT roun coul be helpful here. If measurement uncertainties are unerestimate values assesse as satisfactory in the PT ( z U 2), will have a large ζ-score. ζ > 2 means that the own requirements (efine in terms of estimate uncertainty) are not fulfille. 31 (,3%) of the 161 values reporte with uncertainties an having a z U -score z U 2.0 ha a ζ-score > 2.0. This means that the requirements of the PT scheme have been fulfille, but not the own requirements, the uncertainty is unerestimate.
10 PT 1/13 TW S1 page 7 Traceable reference values Traceability of analytical results to national an international references is of increasing importance in all laboratories. This is not easy to realise for chemical analyses an often can only be one by analysing certifie reference materials. But availability of these reference materials in the water sector is very limite. Therefore we try to provie reference values for the proficiency test samples, traceable to national an international references. Since our PT samples without exception are spike, real water samples, reference values can be calculate from the sum of matrix content an spike amount of analyte. For both summans traceable values an their uncertainty have to be etermine. Thereby we assume that no unrecognise bias resulting from sample preparation an transport is present an that we recognise all uncertainty components. All spiking of samples was controlle gravimetrically an volumetrically. This proceure allows the preparation of a complete uncertainty buget. The first step is the specification of the measuran with a formula. This shows the links between the result an all influence quantities for the parameter. with: c lot m ss V 1 V 2 V lot V ss V 1_total V 2_total m lot_total ρ lot P concentration of the analyte in the lot resulting from the spike mass of substance ae for preparation of the stock solution volume of stock solution ae into the ilution A volume of ilution A ae into the ilution B volume of ilution B ae into the lot volume of stock solution total volume of ilution A total volume of ilution B total mass of the lot ensity of the lot in g/l purity of the use substance Base on this formula the uncertainty buget can be prepare an all components can be quantifie. The following figure shows a typical istribution of the contributions for saccharin. The main contributions result from the purity of the chemical an the pipette steps.
11 PT 1/13 TW S1 page 8 Attention was pai to use a groun water which i not contain any analyte. Therefore no matrix content ha to be consiere an the reference values coul be calculate irectly from the spikes. Internet The report is available on the following webpage:
12 acesulfam level assigne value [µg/l] expane uncertainty of the assigne value [%] stanar eviation, calculate using robust statistics [µg/l] stanar eviation for proficiency assessment [µg/l] stanar eviation for proficiency assessment [%] upper tolerance limit [µg/l] lower tolerance limit [µg/l] upper tolerance limit [%] lower tolerance limit [%] number of results out below out above 1 0,24 1,65 0,09 0, ,59 0,3115 0,1647,02-29, ,0 2 2,440 1,65 0,5081 0, ,89 3,591 1,506 47,13-38, ,5 3 4,706 1,65 0,7922 0, ,77 6,441 3,239 36,86-31, ,5 sum ,3 out [%] Recovery an matrix content e n e n Slope of the regression: 1,002, recovery: 100,2% Page A-1 of 48
13 Relative stanar eviation an tolerance limits l n The relative stanar eviation, calculate with the Q-metho, i not reach the limits. e l n Page A-2 of 48
14 Metho specific evaluation e e e e e >D^ >D^ K e l e LC-MS - extraction LC-MS - irect injection The values, etermine after extraction, showe a broaer statistical istribution an a higher ratio of outliers. Page A-3 of 48
15 Comparison of means an reference values level mean [µg/l] exp. uncertainty [µg/l] exp. uncertainty [%] reference value [µg/l] exp. uncertainty [µg/l] exp. uncertainty [%] 1 0,2302 0,0161 7,0 0,24 0,0038 1,7 2 2,4 0,228 9,4 2,440 0,040 1,7 3 4,723 0,6 7,5 4,706 0,078 1,7 >D^ n Page A-4 of 48
16 >D^ n >D^ e n Page A-5 of 48
17 l >D^ LC-MS - irect injection level robust mean [µg/l] exp. unc. of the mean [µg/l] exp. unc. of the mean [%] robust stanar eviation [µg/l] 1 0,23 0,009 4,042 0,0 15, , ,424 0,1 4,11 0,374 15, , ,673 0,16 3,426 0,614 13, ,74 robust stanar eviation [%] number of results out below out above out [%] Page A-6 of 48
18 cyclamat level assigne value [µg/l] expane uncertainty of the assigne value [%] stanar eviation, calculate using robust statistics [µg/l] stanar eviation for proficiency assessment [µg/l] stanar eviation for proficiency assessment [%] upper tolerance limit [µg/l] lower tolerance limit [µg/l] upper tolerance limit [%] lower tolerance limit [%] number of results out below out above 1 0,1670 1,65 0,0297 0,0303,16 0,22 0, ,26-33, ,1 2 0,8015 1,65 0,1312 0, ,16 1,085 0,5602,37-30, ,4 3 1,710 1,65 0,2646 0, ,26 2,278 1,222 33,21-28, ,4 sum ,7 out [%] Recovery an matrix content e e n e e e e e e n Slope of the regression: 1,05, recovery: 102% Page A-7 of 48
19 Relative stanar eviation an tolerance limits l e e e e n The relative stanar eviation, calculate with the Q-metho, i not reach the limits. l e e e e n Page A-8 of 48
20 Metho specific evaluation e e eee e e e >D^ >D^ K e l e LC-MS - extraction LC-MS - irect injection The ifferences between the methos were not significant. Page A-9 of 48
21 Comparison of means an reference values level mean [µg/l] exp. uncertainty [µg/l] exp. uncertainty [%] reference value [µg/l] exp. uncertainty [µg/l] exp. uncertainty [%] 1 0,1636 0,0143 8,7 0,1670 0,0028 1,7 2 0,8120 0,0631 7,8 0,8015 0,0133 1,7 3 1,7 0,127 7,3 1,710 0,028 1,7 e e n e e >D^ Page A-10 of 48
22 >D^ e e e e n >D^ e e n e e Page A-11 of 48
23 e e e l e e e >D^ LC-MS - irect injection level robust mean [µg/l] exp. unc. of the mean [µg/l] exp. unc. of the mean [%] robust stanar eviation [µg/l] 1 0,165 0,008 5,039 0,028 17, ,11 2 0,803 0,039 4,816 0,131 16, 0 1 5, ,769 0,082 4,62 0,285 16, ,263 robust stanar eviation [%] number of results out below out above out [%] Page A-12 of 48
24 saccharin level assigne value [µg/l] expane uncertainty of the assigne value [%] stanar eviation, calculate using robust statistics [µg/l] stanar eviation for proficiency assessment [µg/l] stanar eviation for proficiency assessment [%] upper tolerance limit [µg/l] lower tolerance limit [µg/l] upper tolerance limit [%] lower tolerance limit [%] number of results out below out above 1 0,2056 1,66 0,0453 0, ,58 0,3061 0, ,92-39, ,2 2 0,91 1,66 0,1427 0,14 15, 1,2 0, ,42-28, ,2 3 1,850 1,66 0,3626 0,88,39 2,652 1,9 43,33 -, ,8 sum ,7 out [%] Recovery an matrix content n n Slope of the regression: 1,0047, recovery: 100,5% Page A-13 of 48
25 Relative stanar eviation an tolerance limits l e e e e n The relative stanar eviation, calculate with the Q-metho, i not reach the limits. e l e e e e n Page A-14 of 48
26 Metho specific evaluation e eeee e ee e >D^ >D^ K e l e LC-MS - extraction LC-MS - irect injection The values, etermine after extraction, showe a broaer statistical istribution. Page A-15 of 48
27 Comparison of means an reference values level mean [µg/l] exp. uncertainty [µg/l] exp. uncertainty [%] reference value [µg/l] exp. uncertainty [µg/l] exp. uncertainty [%] 1 0,2099 0, ,6 0,2056 0,00 1,7 2 0,9300 0,0700 7,5 0,91 0,0153 1,7 3 1,869 0,178 9,5 1,850 0,031 1,7 >D^ n Page A-16 of 48
28 >D^ e n e >D^ n Page A-17 of 48
29 l >D^ LC-MS - irect injection level robust mean [µg/l] exp. unc. of the mean [µg/l] exp. unc. of the mean [%] robust stanar eviation [µg/l] 1 0,208 0,013 6,157 0,042 20, , ,913 0,0 3,869 0,117 12, ,65 3 1,884 0,086 4,557 0,291 15, ,11 robust stanar eviation [%] number of results out below out above out [%] Page A- of 48
30 sucralose level assigne value [µg/l] expane uncertainty of the assigne value [%] stanar eviation, calculate using robust statistics [µg/l] stanar eviation for proficiency assessment [µg/l] stanar eviation for proficiency assessment [%] upper tolerance limit [µg/l] lower tolerance limit [µg/l] upper tolerance limit [%] lower tolerance limit [%] number of results out below out above 1 0,37 1,94 0,0626 0,0624,53 0,4593 0, ,67 -, ,0 2 1,599 1,94 0,28 0, ,45 2,099 1,165 31,29-27, ,0 3 2,877 1,94 0,3097 0,21 11,20 3,562 2,265 23,79-21, ,0 sum ,0 out [%] Recovery an matrix content n n Slope of the regression: 0,9610, recovery: 96,1% Page A- of 48
31 Relative stanar eviation an tolerance limits l n The relative stanar eviation, calculate with the Q-metho, i not reach the limits. l n Page A-20 of 48
32 Metho specific evaluation e e e >D^ >D^ K e l e LC-MS - extraction LC-MS - irect injection The values, etermine after extraction, showe a broaer statistical istribution an a higher ratio of too high values. Page A-21 of 48
33 Comparison of means an reference values level mean [µg/l] exp. uncertainty [µg/l] exp. uncertainty [%] reference value [µg/l] exp. uncertainty [µg/l] exp. uncertainty [%] 1 0,06 0,0313 9,8 0,37 0,0062 1,9 2 1,563 0,113 7,2 1,599 0,031 1,9 3 2,766 0,155 5,6 2,877 0,056 1,9 n >D^ Page A-22 of 48
34 >D^ e e n e e >D^ n Page A-23 of 48
35 l >D^ LC-MS - irect injection level robust mean [µg/l] exp. unc. of the mean [µg/l] exp. unc. of the mean [%] robust stanar eviation [µg/l] 1 0,6 0,014 4,143 0,043 13, ,75 2 1,527 0,064 4,178 0,204 13, , 3 2,817 0,105 3,711 0,3 11, ,75 robust stanar eviation [%] number of results out below out above out [%] Page A-24 of 48
36 1H-benzotriazole level assigne value [µg/l] expane uncertainty of the assigne value [%] stanar eviation, calculate using robust statistics [µg/l] stanar eviation for proficiency assessment [µg/l] stanar eviation for proficiency assessment [%] upper tolerance limit [µg/l] lower tolerance limit [µg/l] upper tolerance limit [%] lower tolerance limit [%] number of results out below out above 1 0,1224 1,70 0,0174 0, ,24 0,1601 0, ,81-26, ,9 2 0,6883 1,70 0,0786 0, ,22 0,8681 0, ,12-23, ,9 3 1,927 1,70 0,58 0, ,78 2,367 1,5 22,84-20, ,4 sum ,0 out [%] Recovery an matrix content, n n Slope of the regression: 0,94, recovery: 93,2% Page A- of 48
37 Relative stanar eviation an tolerance limits, l n The relative stanar eviation, calculate with the Q-metho, i not reach the limits., l n Page A-26 of 48
38 Metho specific evaluation, e e eeee e eee e >D^ >D^ K, e l e LC-MS - extraction LC-MS - irect injection The values, etermine with LC-MS - irect injection, showe the closest istribution. Page A-27 of 48
39 Comparison of means an reference values level mean [µg/l] exp. uncertainty [µg/l] exp. uncertainty [%] reference value [µg/l] exp. uncertainty [µg/l] exp. uncertainty [%] 1 0,1221 0,0082 6,7 0,1224 0,0021 1,7 2 0,6433 0,0371 5,8 0,6883 0,0117 1,7 3 1,817 0,093 5,1 1,927 0,033 1,7 >D^ n e e Page A-28 of 48
40 >D^ e e e n >D^ n Page A-29 of 48
41 e l e e >D^ LC-MS - irect injection level robust mean [µg/l] exp. unc. of the mean [µg/l] exp. unc. of the mean [%] robust stanar eviation [µg/l] 1 0,123 0,003 2,675 0,011 9, ,53 2 0,647 0,0 2,729 0,062 9, ,79 3 1,856 0,039 2,101 0,136 7, ,79 robust stanar eviation [%] number of results out below out above out [%] Page A-30 of 48
42 4-methyl-1H-benzotriazole level assigne value [µg/l] expane uncertainty of the assigne value [%] stanar eviation, calculate using robust statistics [µg/l] stanar eviation for proficiency assessment [µg/l] stanar eviation for proficiency assessment [%] upper tolerance limit [µg/l] lower tolerance limit [µg/l] upper tolerance limit [%] lower tolerance limit [%] number of results out below out above 1 0,2015 2,12 0,0280 0, ,97 0,76 0, ,84-24, ,5 2 0,73 2,12 0,0788 0,07 10,00 0,8782 0, ,09 -, ,4 3 1,451 2,12 0,1307 0,1230 8,48 1,708 1,214 17,74-16, ,6 sum ,5 out [%] Recovery an matrix content e e n e e, e e e n Slope of the regression: 1,0704, recovery: 107% Page A-31 of 48
43 Relative stanar eviation an tolerance limits, l e e e n The relative stanar eviation, calculate with the Q-metho, i not reach the limits., l e e e n Page A- of 48
44 Metho specific evaluation, e ee e ee >D^ >D^ K, e l LC-MS - extraction LC-MS - irect injection The ifferences between the methos were not significant. Page A-33 of 48
45 Comparison of means an reference values level mean [µg/l] exp. uncertainty [µg/l] exp. uncertainty [%] reference value [µg/l] exp. uncertainty [µg/l] exp. uncertainty [%] 1 0,2161 0,0170 7,9 0,2015 0,0043 2,1 2 0,7881 0,0478 6,1 0,73 0,0153 2,1 3 1,541 0,079 5,1 1,451 0,031 2,1 >D^ n Page A- of 48
46 >D^ e e e e n >D^ e e n e e Page A- of 48
47 l e e >D^ LC-MS - irect injection level robust mean [µg/l] exp. unc. of the mean [µg/l] exp. unc. of the mean [%] robust stanar eviation [µg/l] 1 0,217 0,009 4,146 0, ,27 2 0,79 0,037 4,724 0,099 12, , ,565 0,04 2,548 0,106 6, , robust stanar eviation [%] number of results out below out above out [%] Page A-36 of 48
48 5-methyl-1H-benzotriazole level assigne value [µg/l] expane uncertainty of the assigne value [%] stanar eviation, calculate using robust statistics [µg/l] stanar eviation for proficiency assessment [µg/l] stanar eviation for proficiency assessment [%] upper tolerance limit [µg/l] lower tolerance limit [µg/l] upper tolerance limit [%] lower tolerance limit [%] number of results out below out above 1 0,1490 1,71 0,01 0,01 9,07 0,1773 0,1231,04-17, ,3 2 0,6704 1,71 0,0458 0,0452 6,75 0,7641 0, ,98-13, ,2 3 1,460 1,71 0,2153 0, ,77 1,928 1,056,05-27, ,5 sum ,3 out [%] Recovery an matrix content e e n e e, e e e n Slope of the regression: 1,01, recovery: 101,2% Page A-37 of 48
49 Relative stanar eviation an tolerance limits, l e e e n The relative stanar eviation, calculate with the Q-metho, i not reach the limits., l e e e n Page A-38 of 48
50 Metho specific evaluation, e ee e ee >D^ >D^ K, e l e LC-MS - extraction LC-MS - irect injection The ifferences between the methos were not significant. Page A-39 of 48
51 Comparison of means an reference values level mean [µg/l] exp. uncertainty [µg/l] exp. uncertainty [%] reference value [µg/l] exp. uncertainty [µg/l] exp. uncertainty [%] 1 0,1492 0,0082 5,5 0,1490 0,00 1,7 2 0,6792 0,0278 4,1 0,6704 0,0114 1,7 3 1,458 0,131 9,0 1,460 0,0 1,7 e e n e e >D^ Page A-40 of 48
52 >D^ e e e n >D^ e e n e e Page A-41 of 48
53 e l e e >D^ LC-MS - irect injection level robust mean [µg/l] exp. unc. of the mean [µg/l] exp. unc. of the mean [%] robust stanar eviation [µg/l] 1 0,151 0,005 3,591 0,014 9, ,27 3 1,475 0,072 4,848 0, 12, ,091 robust stanar eviation [%] number of results out below out above out [%] Page A-42 of 48
54 sum _methylbenzotriazole level assigne value [µg/l] expane uncertainty of the assigne value [%] stanar eviation, calculate using robust statistics [µg/l] stanar eviation for proficiency assessment [µg/l] stanar eviation for proficiency assessment [%] upper tolerance limit [µg/l] lower tolerance limit [µg/l] upper tolerance limit [%] lower tolerance limit [%] number of results out below out above 1 0,04 1,42 0,0703 0, ,42 0,5114 0,22 45,92-37, ,0 2 1,396 1,37 0,21 0,22 15,89 1,880 0,9820,72-29, ,8 3 2,911 1,36 0,3627 0, ,66 3,701 2,214 27,14-23, ,5 sum ,1 out [%] Recovery an matrix content n n Slope of the regression: 0,9839, recovery: 98,4% Page A-43 of 48
55 Relative stanar eviation an tolerance limits l n The relative stanar eviation, calculate with the Q-metho, i not reach the limits. e l n Page A-44 of 48
56 Metho specific evaluation e e ee e e e >D^ >D^ K e l e LC-MS - extraction LC-MS - irect injection The values, etermine with LC-MS after extraction, showe a higher ratio of too low values. Page A-45 of 48
57 Comparison of means an reference values level mean [µg/l] exp. uncertainty [µg/l] exp. uncertainty [%] reference value [µg/l] exp. uncertainty [µg/l] exp. uncertainty [%] 1 0,45 0,05 10,0 0,04 0,0050 1,4 2 1,372 0,107 7,8 1,396 0,0 1,4 3 2,864 0,178 6,2 2,911 0,040 1,4 n >D^ Page A-46 of 48
58 >D^ e n e e >D^ n Page A-47 of 48
59 l >D^ LC-MS - irect injection level robust mean [µg/l] exp. unc. of the mean [µg/l] exp. unc. of the mean [%] robust stanar eviation [µg/l] 1 0,4 0,017 4,801 0,056 16, ,11 2 1,396 0,069 4,977 0,236 16, , ,962 0,083 2,812 0,283 9, ,22 robust stanar eviation [%] number of results out below out above out [%] Page A-48 of 48
60 el l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l Page B-1 of B-4
61 el el l l l l l l el el el l l l l l l Page B-2 of B-4
62 , l l l l l l l l D, l l l l l l Page B-3 of B-4
63 D, l l l l l l l D l l l l l l Page B-4 of B-4
64 assigne value [µg/l]* upper tolerance limit [µg/l] acesulfam - 1 0,24 0,3115 ± 0,0038 lower tolerance limit [µg/l] 0,1647 lab coe result [µg/l] ± ζ-score z U -score assessm. 1 0,227-0, ,2-1, ,22-0, ,2-0, ,2 0, ,13-3,0-11 0,216-0, ,233 0,033 0,0 0, ,268 0, ,28 0,1 1,0 1, ,203-0,9 + 0,266 0,04 1,7 0,8 + 0,229 0,046-0,1-0, ,275 1, ,267 0, ,243 0, , -0,4 + 0,243 0,009 2,2 0, ,282 1, ,9 0,7 + 0,169 0,004-22,9-1, ,249 0,06 0,6 0,4 + 0,217 0,04-0,8-0,5 + 0,213 0,033-1,2-0, ,373 3,6-38 0,442 5,3-39 0,3-1, ,229-0, ,233 0, ,136-2,8-46 0,213-0,6 + * The state uncertainty of the assigne value is the expane uncertainty with a coverage factor k=2 corresponing to a confience level of about 95% Page C-1 of C-72
65 n e h Page C-2 of C-72
66 n e e ^ ζ Page C-3 of C-72
67 assigne value [µg/l]* upper tolerance limit [µg/l] acesulfam - 2 2,44 3,591 ± 0,04 lower tolerance limit [µg/l] 1,506 lab coe result [µg/l] ± ζ-score z U -score assessm. 1 2,288-0, ,03-0, ,28-0, ,38-0, ,38-0, ,15-2,8-11 2,1-0, ,54 0,36 0,6 0, ,79 0, ,2 2,1 1,7 3,1-16 2,08-0,8 + 2,84 0,426 1,9 0,7 + 2,311 0,462-0,6-0, ,796 0, ,98 0, ,55 0, ,436 0,0 + 2,561 0,061 3,3 0, ,979 0, ,27-2,5-1,76 0,042-23,4-1, ,45 0,61 0,0 0,0 + 2,414 0,58-0,1-0,1 + 2,3 0,7-0,8-0, ,87 2,5-38 4,02 2,7-39 2,03-0, ,36-0, ,58 0, ,286-4,6-46 2,27-0,4 + * The state uncertainty of the assigne value is the expane uncertainty with a coverage factor k=2 corresponing to a confience level of about 95% Page C-4 of C-72
68 n h Page C-5 of C-72
69 n ^ ζ Page C-6 of C-72
70 assigne value [µg/l]* upper tolerance limit [µg/l] acesulfam - 3 4,706 6,441 ± 0,078 lower tolerance limit [µg/l] 3,239 lab coe result [µg/l] ± ζ-score z U -score assessm. 1 4,431-0, ,06-0, ,51-0, ,55-0, ,73 0, ,33-3,2-11 4, -0, ,85 0,68 0,4 0, ,37 0, ,3 2,8 1,9 3,0-16 3,78-1,3 + 5,12 0,768 1,1 0,5 + 4,509 0,902-0,4-0, ,457 2, ,88 1, ,77 0, ,72 0,0 + 4,841 0,15 1,6 0, ,841 1, ,78-4,0-3,41 0,042-29,3-1, ,62 1,16-0,1-0,1 + 4,53 0,38-0,9-0,2 + 4,42 0,686-0,8-0, ,11 1, ,48 3,2-39 3,55-1, ,69 0, ,87 0, ,488-5,7-46 4,61-0,1 + * The state uncertainty of the assigne value is the expane uncertainty with a coverage factor k=2 corresponing to a confience level of about 95% Page C-7 of C-72
71 e e e n e e h Page C-8 of C-72
72 n ^ ζ Page C-9 of C-72
73 assigne value [µg/l]* upper tolerance limit [µg/l] cyclamat - 1 0,167 0,22 ± 0,0028 lower tolerance limit [µg/l] 0,1109 lab coe result [µg/l] ± ζ-score z U -score assessm. 1 0,152-0, ,15-0, ,175 0, , 0, ,156-0, ,7 0, ,17 0,04 0,2 0, ,171 0,1 + 0,1 0,02-3,1-1,1 + 0,095 0,0-5,7-2,6-20 0,1 0, ,8 0, ,163-0, ,1645-0,1 + 0,136 0,012-5,0-1, ,204 1, ,7 2,7-0,154 0,007-3,4-0, ,16 0,04-0,3-0,2 + 0,157 0,02-1,0-0,4 + 0,164 0,047-0,1-0, ,276 3,2-38 0,123-1, ,176 0, ,147-0, ,158-0, ,055-4,0 - * The state uncertainty of the assigne value is the expane uncertainty with a coverage factor k=2 corresponing to a confience level of about 95% Page C-10 of C-72
74 n h Page C-11 of C-72
75 n ^ ζ e e Page C-12 of C-72
76 assigne value [µg/l]* upper tolerance limit [µg/l] cyclamat - 2 0,8015 1,085 ± 0,0133 lower tolerance limit [µg/l] 0,5602 lab coe result [µg/l] ± ζ-score z U -score assessm. 1 0,692-0, ,66-1, ,794-0, ,07 1, ,774-0, ,87 0, ,88 0,3 0,5 0, ,674-1,1 + 0,9 0,14 1,9 0,9 + 0,664 0,173-1,6-1, ,829 0, ,898 0, ,746-0, ,8005 0,0 + 0,658 0,039-6,9-1, ,965 1, ,861 0,4 + 0,771 0,016-2,9-0, ,76 0, -0,4-0,3 + 0,75 0,04-2,4-0,4 + 0,723 0,205-0,8-0, ,2 2,8-38 0,847 0, ,815 0, ,86 0, ,867 0, ,209-4,9 - * The state uncertainty of the assigne value is the expane uncertainty with a coverage factor k=2 corresponing to a confience level of about 95% Page C-13 of C-72
77 e e n e h Page C-14 of C-72
78 n ^ ζ e e e Page C-15 of C-72
79 assigne value [µg/l]* upper tolerance limit [µg/l] cyclamat - 3 1,71 2,278 ± 0,028 lower tolerance limit [µg/l] 1,222 lab coe result [µg/l] ± ζ-score z U -score assessm. 1 1,478-1, ,48-0, ,69-0, ,13 1, ,61-0, ,87 0, ,7 0,5 0,0 0, ,69-0,1 + 1,91 0,287 1,4 0,7 + 1,362 0,4-2,0-1, ,966 0, , ,57-0, ,7015 0,0 + 1,436 0,067-7,5-1, ,5 1, ,56-0,6 + 1,62 0,067-2,5-0, ,7 0,43 0,0 0,0 + 1,608 0,14-1,4-0,4 + 1,59 0,451-0,5-0, ,12 1, , 2,1-39 1,63-0, ,85 0, ,56-0, ,524-4,9 - * The state uncertainty of the assigne value is the expane uncertainty with a coverage factor k=2 corresponing to a confience level of about 95% Page C-16 of C-72
80 n e h Page C-17 of C-72
81 e n ^ ζ e e Page C- of C-72
82 assigne value [µg/l]* upper tolerance limit [µg/l] saccharin - 1 0,2056 0,3061 ± 0,00 lower tolerance limit [µg/l] 0,1245 lab coe result [µg/l] ± ζ-score z U -score assessm. 1 0, -0, , -0, ,203-0, ,27 1, ,151-1, ,249 0, ,27 0,09 1,4 1, ,216 0,2 + 0,205 0,031 0,0 0,0 + 0,4 0,074 1,3 1, ,298 1, ,169-0, ,2055 0,0 + 0,145 0,023-5,2-1, ,2-0, ,9-0,2 + 0,169 0,005-12,1-0, ,238 0,08 0,8 0,6 + 0,175 0,04-1,5-0,8 + 0,224 0,038 1,0 0, ,26 1, ,2 0, ,4-0, ,7-0, ,3 0, ,071-3,3 - * The state uncertainty of the assigne value is the expane uncertainty with a coverage factor k=2 corresponing to a confience level of about 95% Page C- of C-72
83 n h Page C-20 of C-72
84 e e n e e ^ ζ e e Page C-21 of C-72
85 assigne value [µg/l]* upper tolerance limit [µg/l] saccharin - 2 0,91 1,2 ± 0,0153 lower tolerance limit [µg/l] 0,6598 lab coe result [µg/l] ± ζ-score z U -score assessm. 1 0,905-0, ,88-0, ,921 0, ,2 1, ,817-0, ,947 0, ,5 0,9 1,3 3,7-16 0,816-0, ,015 7,0 0,5 + 0,99 0,287 0,5 0, ,4 1, ,872-0, ,914-0,1 + 0,698 0,067-6,6-1, ,8-0, ,774-1,1 + 0,828 0,016-8,8-0, ,969 0, 0,3 0,3 + 0,789 0,14-1,9-1,0 + 0,951 0,162 0,3 0, ,17 1, ,11 1, ,873-0, ,983 0, ,936 0, ,229-5,2 - * The state uncertainty of the assigne value is the expane uncertainty with a coverage factor k=2 corresponing to a confience level of about 95% Page C-22 of C-72
86 e e e n e h Page C-23 of C-72
87 e e n e e e e ^ ζ e e Page C-24 of C-72
88 assigne value [µg/l]* upper tolerance limit [µg/l] saccharin - 3 1,85 2,652 ± 0,031 lower tolerance limit [µg/l] 1,9 lab coe result [µg/l] ± ζ-score z U -score assessm. 1 1,78-0, , ,86 0, ,09 0, ,43-1, ,63 1, ,3 1,1 2,6 3,6-16 1,54-0,9 + 1,9 0,285 0,3 0,1 + 2,07 0,6 0,7 0, ,687 2,1-21 1,77-0, ,873 0,1 + 1,46 0,114-6,6-1, ,705-0, ,47-1,2 + 1,67 0,057-5,6-0, ,88 0,66 0,1 0,1 + 1,598 0, -2,8-0,8 + 1,87 0,3 0,1 0, ,24 1, ,22 0, ,87 0, ,77-0, ,94 0, ,405-4,4 - * The state uncertainty of the assigne value is the expane uncertainty with a coverage factor k=2 corresponing to a confience level of about 95% Page C- of C-72
89 n h Page C-26 of C-72
90 n e e ^ ζ e e Page C-27 of C-72
91 assigne value [µg/l]* upper tolerance limit [µg/l] sucralose - 1 0,37 0,4593 ± 0,0062 lower tolerance limit [µg/l] 0,2048 lab coe result [µg/l] ± ζ-score z U -score assessm. 2 0,22-1, ,145-3,0-5 0,271-0, ,305-0, ,1 0, ,29 0,2-0,3-0, ,8 0,4 + 0,2 0,051 0,9 0,3 + 0,3 0,076 0,3 0, ,36 0, ,272-0, ,393 1, ,15 0,0 + 0,9 0,056 0,3 0, ,447 1, ,236-1,5 + 0,333 0,003 3,9 0, ,339 0,1 0,4 0,3 + 0, 0,08 0,5 0,3 + 0,274 0,089-1,0-0, ,3 0, ,382 0, ,305-0, ,398 1, ,974 9,4 - * The state uncertainty of the assigne value is the expane uncertainty with a coverage factor k=2 corresponing to a confience level of about 95% Page C-28 of C-72
92 e n e e e h Page C-29 of C-72
93 n ^ ζ Page C-30 of C-72
94 assigne value [µg/l]* upper tolerance limit [µg/l] sucralose - 2 1,599 2,099 ± 0,031 lower tolerance limit [µg/l] 1,165 lab coe result [µg/l] ± ζ-score z U -score assessm. 2 1,27-1, ,686-4,2-5 1,39-1, ,43-0, ,42-0, ,9 0,5 1,2 1, ,73 0,5 + 1,64 0,246 0,3 0,2 + 1,404 0,3-1,2-0, ,574-0, , -1, ,87 1, ,64 0,2 + 1,478 0,141-1,7-0, ,7 0, ,57-0,1 + 1,58 0,106-0,3-0, ,52 0,46-0,3-0,4 + 1,641 0,48 0,2 0,2 + 1,42 0,458-0,8-0, ,45-0, ,67 0, ,53-0, ,13 2,1-45 5,276 14,7 - * The state uncertainty of the assigne value is the expane uncertainty with a coverage factor k=2 corresponing to a confience level of about 95% Page C-31 of C-72
95 e n h Page C- of C-72
96 e n ^ ζ Page C-33 of C-72
97 assigne value [µg/l]* upper tolerance limit [µg/l] sucralose - 3 2,877 3,562 ± 0,056 lower tolerance limit [µg/l] 2,265 lab coe result [µg/l] ± ζ-score z U -score assessm. 2 2,8-0, ,1-2,5-5 2,43-1, ,46-1, ,08 0, ,8 0,7-0,2-0, ,89 0,0 + 3,04 0,456 0,7 0,5 + 2,757 0,6-0,4-0, ,026 0, ,62-0, ,62 2,2-24 2,8955 0,1 + 2,666 0,139-2,8-0, ,282 1, ,7-0,6 + 2,82 0,104-1,0-0, ,59 0,78-0,7-0,9 + 2,748 0,38-0,7-0,4 + 2,57 0,83-0,7-1, ,96 0, ,97-3,0-43 2,69-0, ,78-0, ,0 17,9 - * The state uncertainty of the assigne value is the expane uncertainty with a coverage factor k=2 corresponing to a confience level of about 95% Page C- of C-72
98 e e e e n h Page C- of C-72
99 e e e n e ^ ζ Page C-36 of C-72
100 assigne value [µg/l]* upper tolerance limit [µg/l] 1H-benzotriazole - 1 0,1224 ± 0,0021 0,1601 lower tolerance limit [µg/l] 0,08965 lab coe result [µg/l] ± ζ-score z U -score assessm. 2 0,1-1, ,122 0, ,121-0, ,136 0, ,53 21,6-10 0,11-0, ,129 0,02 0,7 0, ,133 0, ,066 0,003-30,9-3,4-0,123 0,0 0,1 0,0 + 0,129 0,026 0,5 0, ,141 1, ,131 0, ,1 0,1 + 0,128 0,007 1,6 0, ,144 1, ,11-0, ,264 7,5-0,129 0,007 1,8 0,4 + 0,129 0,04 0,3 0,4 + 0,1 0,015 1,7 0, ,106-1, ,13 0, ,139 0, ,0865-2,2-44 0,1-0, ,1-1, ,111-0,7 + * The state uncertainty of the assigne value is the expane uncertainty with a coverage factor k=2 corresponing to a confience level of about 95% Page C-37 of C-72
101 e n, h, Page C-38 of C-72
102 , n 17 12, ^ ζ ee Page C-39 of C-72
103 assigne value [µg/l]* upper tolerance limit [µg/l] 1H-benzotriazole - 2 0,6883 ± 0,0117 0,8681 lower tolerance limit [µg/l] 0,5292 lab coe result [µg/l] ± ζ-score z U -score assessm. 2 0,55-1, ,668-0, ,685 0, ,683-0, ,6-1, ,54-1, ,683 0,1-0,1-0, ,659-0, ,472 0,02 -,7-2,7-0,631 0,095-1,2-0,7 + 0,633 0,127-0,9-0, ,742 0, ,669-0, ,69 0,0 + 0,663 0,097-0,5-0, ,788 1, ,62-0, ,544-1,8 + 0,685 0,014-0,4 0,0 + 0,623 0,04-3,1-0,8 + 0,64 0,072-1,3-0, ,9 2,4-38 0,692 0, ,691 0, ,464-2,8-44 0,611-1, ,054-8,0-46 0,612-1,0 + * The state uncertainty of the assigne value is the expane uncertainty with a coverage factor k=2 corresponing to a confience level of about 95% Page C-40 of C-72
104 e e e e n, e e h, Page C-41 of C-72
105 , n e e 17 12, ^ ζ Page C-42 of C-72
106 assigne value [µg/l]* upper tolerance limit [µg/l] 1H-benzotriazole - 3 1,927 ± 0,033 2,367 lower tolerance limit [µg/l] 1,5 lab coe result [µg/l] ± ζ-score z U -score assessm. 2 1,83-0, ,07 0, ,93 0, ,68-1, , -3,1-10 1,55-1, ,89 0,28-0,3-0, ,89-0, ,41 0,07-13,4-2,6-1,8 0,27-0,9-0,6 + 1,813 0,363-0,6-0, ,0 0, ,9-0, ,9015-0,1 + 1,904 0,158-0,3-0, ,09 0, ,82-0, ,84-5,5-1,92 0,07-0,2 0,0 + 1,816 0,3-0,7-0,6 + 1,85 0,208-0,7-0, ,92 0, ,88-0, ,7-1, ,09-4,2-44 1,67-1, ,2-8,6-46 1,68-1,3 + * The state uncertainty of the assigne value is the expane uncertainty with a coverage factor k=2 corresponing to a confience level of about 95% Page C-43 of C-72
107 n, e e h, Page C-44 of C-72
108 , n 17 12, ^ ζ e e e Page C-45 of C-72
109 assigne value [µg/l]* upper tolerance limit [µg/l] 4-methyl-1H-benzotriazole - 1 0,2015 ± 0,0043 0,76 lower tolerance limit [µg/l] 0,1522 lab coe result [µg/l] ± ζ-score z U -score assessm. 4 0,208 0, ,238 1, ,223 0, ,2 0,03 1,1 0, ,236 1, ,145 0,007-13,8-2,3-0,21 0,0 0,5 0,3 + 0,217 0,043 0,7 0, ,22 0, ,2245 0,8 + 0,175 0,012-4,3-1, ,245 1,6 + 0,285 0,06 2,8 3,0-0,22 0,03 1,2 0, ,237 1, ,167-1, ,6-0,2 + * The state uncertainty of the assigne value is the expane uncertainty with a coverage factor k=2 corresponing to a confience level of about 95% Page C-46 of C-72
110 , n , h Page C-47 of C-72
111 , e e n 17 12, ^ ζ e e e Page C-48 of C-72
112 assigne value [µg/l]* upper tolerance limit [µg/l] 4-methyl-1H-benzotriazole - 2 0,73 ± 0,0153 0,8782 lower tolerance limit [µg/l] 0,5868 lab coe result [µg/l] ± ζ-score z U -score assessm. 4 0,766 0, ,758 0, ,87 1, ,786 0,12 1,0 0, ,841 1, ,41 0,02 -,0-4,6-0,73 0,11 0,1 0,1 + 0,738 0,148 0,2 0, ,898 2,3-24 0,8105 1,1 + 0,741 0,004 2,0 0, ,812 1,1 + 0,784 0,04 2,7 0,8 + 0,768 0,104 0,8 0, ,96 3,1-43 0,657-1, ,731 0,1 + * The state uncertainty of the assigne value is the expane uncertainty with a coverage factor k=2 corresponing to a confience level of about 95% Page C-49 of C-72
113 , e n e , h Page C-50 of C-72
114 , e n e e 17 12, ^ ζ Page C-51 of C-72
115 assigne value [µg/l]* upper tolerance limit [µg/l] 4-methyl-1H-benzotriazole - 3 1,451 ± 0,031 1,708 lower tolerance limit [µg/l] 1,214 lab coe result [µg/l] ± ζ-score z U -score assessm. 4 1,56 0, ,53 0, , -1, ,57 0,24 1,0 0, ,66 1, ,849 0,04-23,9-5,1-1,47 0,221 0,2 0,2 + 1,488 0,298 0,3 0, ,655 1, ,61 1,3 + 1,524 0,114 1,2 0, ,669 1,7 + 1,667 0,1 4,1 1,7 + 1,54 0,209 0,8 0, ,6 1, ,27-1, ,42-0,3 + * The state uncertainty of the assigne value is the expane uncertainty with a coverage factor k=2 corresponing to a confience level of about 95% Page C-52 of C-72
116 , e e n e e , h e Page C-53 of C-72
117 , n 17 12, ^ ζ ee Page C-54 of C-72
118 assigne value [µg/l]* upper tolerance limit [µg/l] 5-methyl-1H-benzotriazole - 1 0,149 ± 0,00 0,1773 lower tolerance limit [µg/l] 0,1231 lab coe result [µg/l] ± ζ-score z U -score assessm. 4 0,069-6,2-5 0,144-0, ,137-0, ,155 0,02 0,6 0, ,148-0, ,06 0,003-45,3-6,9-0,148 0,022-0,1-0,1 + 0,152 0,03 0,2 0, ,166 1, ,15 0,1 + 0,244 0,029 6,4 6,7-29 0,158 0,6 + 0,14 0,04-0,4-0,7 + 0,146 0,0-0,3-0, ,146-0, ,0755-5,7-44 0,149 0,0 + * The state uncertainty of the assigne value is the expane uncertainty with a coverage factor k=2 corresponing to a confience level of about 95% Page C-55 of C-72
119 , n , e e h e e Page C-56 of C-72
120 , n 17 12, e e ^ ζ e e Page C-57 of C-72
121 assigne value [µg/l]* upper tolerance limit [µg/l] 5-methyl-1H-benzotriazole - 2 0,6704 ± 0,0114 0,7641 lower tolerance limit [µg/l] 0,5828 lab coe result [µg/l] ± ζ-score z U -score assessm. 4 0,44-5,3-5 0,671 0, ,747 1, ,683 0,1 0,3 0, ,649-0, ,291 0,02 -,9-8,7-0,664 0,01-0,8-0,1 + 0,654 0,131-0,2-0, ,72 1, ,6705 0,0 + 1,052 0,033 22,2 8,1-29 0,67 0,0 + 0,669 0,16 0,0 0,0 + 0,644 0,082-0,6-0, ,83 3,4-43 0,33-7,8-44 0,654-0,4 + * The state uncertainty of the assigne value is the expane uncertainty with a coverage factor k=2 corresponing to a confience level of about 95% Page C-58 of C-72
122 , e n e , e e h e e Page C-59 of C-72
123 , e e n e e D, ^ ζ e Page C-60 of C-72
124 assigne value [µg/l]* upper tolerance limit [µg/l] 5-methyl-1H-benzotriazole - 3 1,46 ± 0,0 1,928 lower tolerance limit [µg/l] 1,056 lab coe result [µg/l] ± ζ-score z U -score assessm. 4 1,16-1, ,36-0, ,73 1, ,47 0,22 0,1 0, ,45 0, ,682 0,03-39,9-3,9-1,46 0,2 0,0 0,0 + 1,443 0,289-0,1-0, ,571 0, ,46 0,0 + 1,706 0,2 2,2 1, ,5 0,3 + 1,367 0,28-0,7-0,5 + 1,49 0,9 0,3 0, ,63 0, ,454-5,0-44 1,24-1,1 + * The state uncertainty of the assigne value is the expane uncertainty with a coverage factor k=2 corresponing to a confience level of about 95% Page C-61 of C-72
125 , n , h e Page C-62 of C-72
126 , n 17 12, ^ ζ e Page C-63 of C-72
127 assigne value [µg/l]* upper tolerance limit [µg/l] sum _methylbenzotriazoles - 1 0,04 ± 0,005 0,5114 lower tolerance limit [µg/l] 0,22 lab coe result [µg/l] ± ζ-score z U -score assessm. 2 0,28-1, ,382 0, ,3-0, ,3-0, ,373 0,06 0,7 0, ,384 0, ,226 0,01-22,3-1,9 + 0,8 0,1 + 0,369 0,074 0,5 0, ,386 0, ,313-0, ,3745 0,3 + 0,4 0,041 3,3 0, ,403 0, ,29-0, ,514 2,0 + 0,3 0,004-52,5-2,6-0,4 0,1 1,5 0,9 + 0,366 0, ,383 0, ,313-0, ,338-0, ,243-1, ,5-0, ,05-4,6-46 0,362 0,1 + * The state uncertainty of the assigne value is the expane uncertainty with a coverage factor k=2 corresponing to a confience level of about 95% Page C-64 of C-72
128 e n h Page C-65 of C-72
Analytische Qualitätssicherung Baden-Württemberg
Analytische Qualitätssicherung Baen-Württemberg Proficiency Test /12 TW O special organic parameters in rinking water acrylamie, epichlororhyrin provie by AQS Baen-Württemberg at Institute for Sanitary
More informationAnalytische Qualitätssicherung Baden-Württemberg
Analytische Qualitätssicherung Baden-Württemberg Proficiency Test 2/15 TW S5 Sulfonylurea herbicides amidosulfuron, metsulfuron-methyl, nicosulfuron, thifensulfuron-methyl, triasulfuron provided by AQS
More informationAnalytische Qualitätssicherung Baden-Württemberg
Analytische Qualitätssicherung Baden-Württemberg Proficiency Test 2/17 TW S3 alkylphenoles in drinking water Nonylphenol, Octylphenol, Bisphenol-A provided by AQS Baden-Württemberg at Institute for Sanitary
More informationPriority. Profic. iency. University of Stuttgart
Analytische Qualitätssicherung Baen-Württemberg PT-WFD Profic iency Priority pesticies Test 6/ in surface water aclonifen, alachlor, atrazine, bifenox, chlorfenvinphos, chlorpyrifos, cybutryne, iuron,
More informationAnalytische Qualitätssicherung Baden-Württemberg
Analytische Qualitätssicherung Baden-Württemberg Proficiency Test /1 - TW S7 Trifluoroacetic acid in drinking water - Trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) Final report provided by AQS Baden-Württemberg at Institute
More informationProficiency Test 2/10 TW O5 Special organic analytes in drinking water
Analytische Qualitätssicherung Baden-Württemberg Proficiency Test 2/ TW O5 Special organic analytes in drinking water Metabolites of pesticides and Glyphosate provided by AQS Baden-Württemberg at Institute
More informationAnalytische Qualitätssicherung Baden-Württemberg
Analytische Qualitätssicherung Baden-Württemberg Proficiency Test 7/16 - Ions in waste water - ammonium-nitrogen, nitrate-nitrogen, nitrite-nitrogen, total phosphorous, total cyanide, cyanide (week acid
More informationAnalytische Qualitätssicherung Baden-Württemberg
Analytische Qualitätssicherung Baden-Württemberg Proficiency Test UKWIR SS 17 PAH in surface water with suspended solids Anthracene, Fluoranthene, Naphtalene, Benzo[a]pyrene, Benzo[b]fluoranthene, Benzo[k]fluoranthene,
More informationScoring systems for quantitative schemes what are the different principles?
Scoring systems for quantitative schemes what are the different principles? Dr.-Ing. Frank Baumeister TGZ AQS-BW at Institute for Sanitary Engineering, Water Quality and Solid Waste Management of the University
More informationSurvey Sampling. 1 Design-based Inference. Kosuke Imai Department of Politics, Princeton University. February 19, 2013
Survey Sampling Kosuke Imai Department of Politics, Princeton University February 19, 2013 Survey sampling is one of the most commonly use ata collection methos for social scientists. We begin by escribing
More informationIt is important that the batch numbers of the reference material and on the certificate are identical.
Eurofins Miljø A/S Smeeskovvej 38 DK-8464 Galten CERTIFICATE FOR QC DWB MAJOR COMPONENTS IN DRINKING WATER BATCH: VKI-16-8-0510 an VKI-16-9-0510 INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE OF THE REFERENCE MATERIAL Description
More informationHomogeneity of EQA samples requirements according to ISO/IEC 17043
Homogeneity of EQA samples requirements according to ISO/IEC 17043 Dr.-Ing. Frank Baumeister TGZ AQS-BW at Institute for Sanitary Engineering, Water Quality and Solid Waste Management University of Stuttgart
More informationInverse Theory Course: LTU Kiruna. Day 1
Inverse Theory Course: LTU Kiruna. Day Hugh Pumphrey March 6, 0 Preamble These are the notes for the course Inverse Theory to be taught at LuleåTekniska Universitet, Kiruna in February 00. They are not
More informationComputing Exact Confidence Coefficients of Simultaneous Confidence Intervals for Multinomial Proportions and their Functions
Working Paper 2013:5 Department of Statistics Computing Exact Confience Coefficients of Simultaneous Confience Intervals for Multinomial Proportions an their Functions Shaobo Jin Working Paper 2013:5
More informationMeasurement uncertainty revisited Alternative approaches to uncertainty evaluation
Measurement uncertainty revisited Alternative approaches to uncertainty evaluation based on EUROLAB Technical Report No. 1/007 Dr.-Ing. Michael Koch Institute for Sanitary Engineering, Water Quality and
More informationThis module is part of the. Memobust Handbook. on Methodology of Modern Business Statistics
This moule is part of the Memobust Hanbook on Methoology of Moern Business Statistics 26 March 2014 Metho: Balance Sampling for Multi-Way Stratification Contents General section... 3 1. Summary... 3 2.
More informationBATCH: VKI Description. Use. It may also. be used for. Analysis For quality samples. Production
Eurofins Miljø A/S Smeeskovvej 38 DK-8464 Galten CERTIFICATE FOR QC LOAM SOIL B TRACE ELEMENTS/METALSS IN SOIL BATCH: VKI-20-3-0109 INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE OF THE REFERENCE MATERIAL L Description This reference
More informationPREPARATION OF THE NATIONAL MAGNETIC FIELD STANDARD IN CROATIA
n IMEKO TC 11 International Symposium METROLOGICAL INFRASTRUCTURE June 15-17, 11, Cavtat, Dubrovni Riviera, Croatia PREPARATION OF THE NATIONAL MAGNETIC FIELD STANDARD IN CROATIA A. Pavić 1, L.Ferović,
More informationMath Skills. Fractions
Throughout your stuy of science, you will often nee to solve math problems. This appenix is esigne to help you quickly review the basic math skills you will use most often. Fractions Aing an Subtracting
More informationImproving Estimation Accuracy in Nonrandomized Response Questioning Methods by Multiple Answers
International Journal of Statistics an Probability; Vol 6, No 5; September 207 ISSN 927-7032 E-ISSN 927-7040 Publishe by Canaian Center of Science an Eucation Improving Estimation Accuracy in Nonranomize
More informationUncertainty of Measurement (Analytical) Maré Linsky 14 October 2015
Uncertainty of Measurement (Analytical) Maré Linsky 14 October 015 Introduction Uncertainty of Measurement GUM (Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement ) (Analytical) Method Validation and
More informationCONTROL CHARTS FOR VARIABLES
UNIT CONTOL CHATS FO VAIABLES Structure.1 Introuction Objectives. Control Chart Technique.3 Control Charts for Variables.4 Control Chart for Mean(-Chart).5 ange Chart (-Chart).6 Stanar Deviation Chart
More informationAn Approach for Design of Multi-element USBL Systems
An Approach for Design of Multi-element USBL Systems MIKHAIL ARKHIPOV Department of Postgrauate Stuies Technological University of the Mixteca Carretera a Acatlima Km. 2.5 Huajuapan e Leon Oaxaca 69000
More informationELECTRON DIFFRACTION
ELECTRON DIFFRACTION Electrons : wave or quanta? Measurement of wavelength an momentum of electrons. Introuction Electrons isplay both wave an particle properties. What is the relationship between the
More informationADIT DEBRIS PROJECTION DUE TO AN EXPLOSION IN AN UNDERGROUND AMMUNITION STORAGE MAGAZINE
ADIT DEBRIS PROJECTION DUE TO AN EXPLOSION IN AN UNDERGROUND AMMUNITION STORAGE MAGAZINE Froe Opsvik, Knut Bråtveit Holm an Svein Rollvik Forsvarets forskningsinstitutt, FFI Norwegian Defence Research
More information3.2 Shot peening - modeling 3 PROCEEDINGS
3.2 Shot peening - moeling 3 PROCEEDINGS Computer assiste coverage simulation François-Xavier Abaie a, b a FROHN, Germany, fx.abaie@frohn.com. b PEENING ACCESSORIES, Switzerlan, info@peening.ch Keywors:
More informationDeveloping a Method for Increasing Accuracy and Precision in Measurement System Analysis: A Fuzzy Approach
Journal of Inustrial Engineering 6(00 5-3 Developing a Metho for Increasing Accuracy an Precision in Measurement System Analysis: A Fuzzy Approach Abolfazl Kazemi a, Hassan Haleh a, Vahi Hajipour b, Seye
More informationMath Notes on differentials, the Chain Rule, gradients, directional derivative, and normal vectors
Math 18.02 Notes on ifferentials, the Chain Rule, graients, irectional erivative, an normal vectors Tangent plane an linear approximation We efine the partial erivatives of f( xy, ) as follows: f f( x+
More informationA Modification of the Jarque-Bera Test. for Normality
Int. J. Contemp. Math. Sciences, Vol. 8, 01, no. 17, 84-85 HIKARI Lt, www.m-hikari.com http://x.oi.org/10.1988/ijcms.01.9106 A Moification of the Jarque-Bera Test for Normality Moawa El-Fallah Ab El-Salam
More informationHyperbolic Moment Equations Using Quadrature-Based Projection Methods
Hyperbolic Moment Equations Using Quarature-Base Projection Methos J. Koellermeier an M. Torrilhon Department of Mathematics, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany Abstract. Kinetic equations like the
More informationResilient Modulus Prediction Model for Fine-Grained Soils in Ohio: Preliminary Study
Resilient Moulus Preiction Moel for Fine-Graine Soils in Ohio: Preliminary Stuy by Teruhisa Masaa: Associate Professor, Civil Engineering Department Ohio University, Athens, OH 4570 Tel: (740) 59-474 Fax:
More informationarxiv: v3 [hep-ex] 20 Aug 2013
A Global Fit Determination of Effective m 31 from Baseline Depenence of Reactor ν e Disappearance T.J.C. Bezerra, H. Furuta, an F. Suekane Research Center for Neutrino Science, Tohoku University, Senai,
More informationinflow outflow Part I. Regular tasks for MAE598/494 Task 1
MAE 494/598, Fall 2016 Project #1 (Regular tasks = 20 points) Har copy of report is ue at the start of class on the ue ate. The rules on collaboration will be release separately. Please always follow the
More informationLinear and quadratic approximation
Linear an quaratic approximation November 11, 2013 Definition: Suppose f is a function that is ifferentiable on an interval I containing the point a. The linear approximation to f at a is the linear function
More informationAverage value of position for the anharmonic oscillator: Classical versus quantum results
verage value of position for the anharmonic oscillator: Classical versus quantum results R. W. Robinett Department of Physics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 682 Receive
More informationPARALLEL-PLATE CAPACITATOR
Physics Department Electric an Magnetism Laboratory PARALLEL-PLATE CAPACITATOR 1. Goal. The goal of this practice is the stuy of the electric fiel an electric potential insie a parallelplate capacitor.
More informationu t v t v t c a u t b a v t u t v t b a
Nonlinear Dynamical Systems In orer to iscuss nonlinear ynamical systems, we must first consier linear ynamical systems. Linear ynamical systems are just systems of linear equations like we have been stuying
More informationarxiv:cond-mat/ v1 31 Jan 2003
Nosé-Hoover sampling of quantum entangle istribution functions D. Mentrup an J. Schnack 1 arxiv:con-mat/030165 v1 31 Jan 003 Abstract Universität Osnabrück, Fachbereich Physik Barbarastr. 7, D-49069 Osnabrück
More informationExperiment 2, Physics 2BL
Experiment 2, Physics 2BL Deuction of Mass Distributions. Last Upate: 2009-05-03 Preparation Before this experiment, we recommen you review or familiarize yourself with the following: Chapters 4-6 in Taylor
More informationNew Statistical Test for Quality Control in High Dimension Data Set
International Journal of Applie Engineering Research ISSN 973-456 Volume, Number 6 (7) pp. 64-649 New Statistical Test for Quality Control in High Dimension Data Set Shamshuritawati Sharif, Suzilah Ismail
More informationEIGEN-ANALYSIS OF KERNEL OPERATORS FOR NONLINEAR DIMENSION REDUCTION AND DISCRIMINATION
EIGEN-ANALYSIS OF KERNEL OPERATORS FOR NONLINEAR DIMENSION REDUCTION AND DISCRIMINATION DISSERTATION Presente in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Grauate
More informationVI. Linking and Equating: Getting from A to B Unleashing the full power of Rasch models means identifying, perhaps conceiving an important aspect,
VI. Linking an Equating: Getting from A to B Unleashing the full power of Rasch moels means ientifying, perhaps conceiving an important aspect, efining a useful construct, an calibrating a pool of relevant
More informationThe Role of Proficiency Tests in the Estimation of Measurement Uncertainty of PCDD/PCDF and PCB Determination by Isotope Dilution Methods
The Role of Proficiency Tests in the Estimation of Measurement Uncertainty of PCDD/PCDF and PCB Determination by Isotope Dilution Methods e-mail: stefano@raccanelli.eu Stefano Raccanelli, Environmental
More informationA USER-FRIENDLY TOOL FOR SIMULATING THE TIME-DEPENDENT FIELD DISTRIBUTION IN PE INSULATION ON THE BASIS OF A PHYSICAL APPROACH
A USER-FRIENLY TOOL FOR SIMULATING THE TIME-EPENENT FIEL ISTRIBUTION IN PE INSULATION ON THE BASIS OF A PHYSICAL APPROACH Séverine LE ROY, Laboratoire Plasma et Conversion Energie, (France), severine.leroy@laplace.univ-tlse.fr
More informationLogarithmic spurious regressions
Logarithmic spurious regressions Robert M. e Jong Michigan State University February 5, 22 Abstract Spurious regressions, i.e. regressions in which an integrate process is regresse on another integrate
More informationELEC3114 Control Systems 1
ELEC34 Control Systems Linear Systems - Moelling - Some Issues Session 2, 2007 Introuction Linear systems may be represente in a number of ifferent ways. Figure shows the relationship between various representations.
More informationCascaded redundancy reduction
Network: Comput. Neural Syst. 9 (1998) 73 84. Printe in the UK PII: S0954-898X(98)88342-5 Cascae reunancy reuction Virginia R e Sa an Geoffrey E Hinton Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto,
More informationCode_Aster. Detection of the singularities and calculation of a map of size of elements
Titre : Détection es singularités et calcul une carte [...] Date : 0/0/0 Page : /6 Responsable : DLMAS Josselin Clé : R4.0.04 Révision : Detection of the singularities an calculation of a map of size of
More information'HVLJQ &RQVLGHUDWLRQ LQ 0DWHULDO 6HOHFWLRQ 'HVLJQ 6HQVLWLYLW\,1752'8&7,21
Large amping in a structural material may be either esirable or unesirable, epening on the engineering application at han. For example, amping is a esirable property to the esigner concerne with limiting
More informationensembles When working with density operators, we can use this connection to define a generalized Bloch vector: v x Tr x, v y Tr y
Ph195a lecture notes, 1/3/01 Density operators for spin- 1 ensembles So far in our iscussion of spin- 1 systems, we have restricte our attention to the case of pure states an Hamiltonian evolution. Toay
More informationSPECIALIST MATHEMATICS
Victorian Certificate of Eucation 07 SUPERVISOR TO ATTACH PROCESSING LABEL HERE Letter STUDENT NUMBER SPECIALIST MATHEMATICS Written examination Friay 0 November 07 Reaing time: 9.00 am to 9.5 am (5 minutes)
More informationModel for Dopant and Impurity Segregation During Vapor Phase Growth
Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. Vol. 648, P3.11.1-7 2001 Materials Research Society Moel for Dopant an Impurity Segregation During Vapor Phase Growth Craig B. Arnol an Michael J. Aziz Division of Engineering
More informationBoth the ASME B and the draft VDI/VDE 2617 have strengths and
Choosing Test Positions for Laser Tracker Evaluation an Future Stanars Development ala Muralikrishnan 1, Daniel Sawyer 1, Christopher lackburn 1, Steven Phillips 1, Craig Shakarji 1, E Morse 2, an Robert
More informationImage Denoising Using Spatial Adaptive Thresholding
International Journal of Engineering Technology, Management an Applie Sciences Image Denoising Using Spatial Aaptive Thresholing Raneesh Mishra M. Tech Stuent, Department of Electronics & Communication,
More informationNuclear spin relaxation of sodium cations in bacteriophage Pf1 solutions
THE JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS 125, 244509 2006 Nuclear spin relaxation of soium cations in bacteriophage Pf1 solutions D. N. Sobieski, N. R. Krueger, S. Vyas, a an M. P. Augustine b Department of Chemistry,
More informationTopic 7: Convergence of Random Variables
Topic 7: Convergence of Ranom Variables Course 003, 2016 Page 0 The Inference Problem So far, our starting point has been a given probability space (S, F, P). We now look at how to generate information
More informationMEASUREMENT OF THE ANGLE φ 1 (β) AND B B MIXING (RECENT RESULTS FROM BaBar AND Belle) Kazuo Abe KEK, Tsukuba, Japan
Physics in Collision - Zeuthen, Germany, June 26-28, 23 MEASUREMENT OF THE ANGLE φ 1 (β) AND B B MIXING (RECENT RESULTS FROM BaBar AND Belle) Kazuo Abe KEK, Tsukuba, Japan 35-81 ABSTRACT Recent results
More informationExamining Geometric Integration for Propagating Orbit Trajectories with Non-Conservative Forcing
Examining Geometric Integration for Propagating Orbit Trajectories with Non-Conservative Forcing Course Project for CDS 05 - Geometric Mechanics John M. Carson III California Institute of Technology June
More informationDistribution Restriction Statement Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
CECW-ED Engineer Manual 1110-2-2104 Department of the Army U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Washington, DC 20314-1000 Engineering an Design STRENGTH DESIGN FOR REINFORCED CONCRETE HYDRAULIC STRUCTURES Distribution
More informationThe Press-Schechter mass function
The Press-Schechter mass function To state the obvious: It is important to relate our theories to what we can observe. We have looke at linear perturbation theory, an we have consiere a simple moel for
More informationLinear First-Order Equations
5 Linear First-Orer Equations Linear first-orer ifferential equations make up another important class of ifferential equations that commonly arise in applications an are relatively easy to solve (in theory)
More informationProficiency testing: Aqueous ethanol. Test and measurement Workshop Marcellé Archer. 20 September 2011
Proficiency testing: Aqueous ethanol Test and measurement Workshop Marcellé Archer 20 September 2011 NMISA Ethanol PT schemes Purpose of a PT scheme Consistent good performance is the goal One bad result
More informationHybrid Fusion for Biometrics: Combining Score-level and Decision-level Fusion
Hybri Fusion for Biometrics: Combining Score-level an Decision-level Fusion Qian Tao Raymon Velhuis Signals an Systems Group, University of Twente Postbus 217, 7500AE Enschee, the Netherlans {q.tao,r.n.j.velhuis}@ewi.utwente.nl
More informationand from it produce the action integral whose variation we set to zero:
Lagrange Multipliers Monay, 6 September 01 Sometimes it is convenient to use reunant coorinates, an to effect the variation of the action consistent with the constraints via the metho of Lagrange unetermine
More informationUniversity of California, Berkeley
University of California, Berkeley U.C. Berkeley Division of Biostatistics Working Paper Series Year 2011 Paper 283 Targete Maximum Likelihoo stimation of Conitional Relative Risk in a Semi-parametric
More informationIMPROVING THE ACCURACY IN PERFORMANCE PREDICTION FOR NEW COLLECTOR DESIGNS
IMPROVING THE ACCURACY IN PERFORMANCE PREDICTION FOR NEW COLLECTOR DESIGNS Peter Kovács 1, Ulrik Pettersson 1, Martin Persson 1, Bgt Perers 2 an Stephan Fischer 3 1 SP Technical Research Institute of Swe,
More informationSchrödinger s equation.
Physics 342 Lecture 5 Schröinger s Equation Lecture 5 Physics 342 Quantum Mechanics I Wenesay, February 3r, 2010 Toay we iscuss Schröinger s equation an show that it supports the basic interpretation of
More informationSemiclassical analysis of long-wavelength multiphoton processes: The Rydberg atom
PHYSICAL REVIEW A 69, 063409 (2004) Semiclassical analysis of long-wavelength multiphoton processes: The Ryberg atom Luz V. Vela-Arevalo* an Ronal F. Fox Center for Nonlinear Sciences an School of Physics,
More informationTMA 4195 Matematisk modellering Exam Tuesday December 16, :00 13:00 Problems and solution with additional comments
Problem F U L W D g m 3 2 s 2 0 0 0 0 2 kg 0 0 0 0 0 0 Table : Dimension matrix TMA 495 Matematisk moellering Exam Tuesay December 6, 2008 09:00 3:00 Problems an solution with aitional comments The necessary
More informationImage Based Monitoring for Combustion Systems
Image Base onitoring for Combustion Systems J. Chen, ember, IAENG an.-y. Hsu Abstract A novel metho of on-line flame etection in vieo is propose. It aims to early etect the current state of the combustion
More informationG j dq i + G j. q i. = a jt. and
Lagrange Multipliers Wenesay, 8 September 011 Sometimes it is convenient to use reunant coorinates, an to effect the variation of the action consistent with the constraints via the metho of Lagrange unetermine
More informationarxiv: v1 [hep-lat] 19 Nov 2013
HU-EP-13/69 SFB/CPP-13-98 DESY 13-225 Applicability of Quasi-Monte Carlo for lattice systems arxiv:1311.4726v1 [hep-lat] 19 ov 2013, a,b Tobias Hartung, c Karl Jansen, b Hernan Leovey, Anreas Griewank
More informationThe derivative of a function f(x) is another function, defined in terms of a limiting expression: f(x + δx) f(x)
Y. D. Chong (2016) MH2801: Complex Methos for the Sciences 1. Derivatives The erivative of a function f(x) is another function, efine in terms of a limiting expression: f (x) f (x) lim x δx 0 f(x + δx)
More informationThermal conductivity of graded composites: Numerical simulations and an effective medium approximation
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE 34 (999)5497 5503 Thermal conuctivity of grae composites: Numerical simulations an an effective meium approximation P. M. HUI Department of Physics, The Chinese University
More informationTrack Initialization from Incomplete Measurements
Track Initialiation from Incomplete Measurements Christian R. Berger, Martina Daun an Wolfgang Koch Department of Electrical an Computer Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 6269,
More informationNumerical Integrator. Graphics
1 Introuction CS229 Dynamics Hanout The question of the week is how owe write a ynamic simulator for particles, rigi boies, or an articulate character such as a human figure?" In their SIGGRPH course notes,
More informationA simple model for the small-strain behaviour of soils
A simple moel for the small-strain behaviour of soils José Jorge Naer Department of Structural an Geotechnical ngineering, Polytechnic School, University of São Paulo 05508-900, São Paulo, Brazil, e-mail:
More information28.1 Parametric Yield Estimation Considering Leakage Variability
8.1 Parametric Yiel Estimation Consiering Leakage Variability Rajeev R. Rao, Aniruh Devgan*, Davi Blaauw, Dennis Sylvester University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, *IBM Corporation, Austin, TX {rrrao, blaauw,
More informationState observers and recursive filters in classical feedback control theory
State observers an recursive filters in classical feeback control theory State-feeback control example: secon-orer system Consier the riven secon-orer system q q q u x q x q x x x x Here u coul represent
More informationImproved Geoid Model for Syria Using the Local Gravimetric and GPS Measurements 1
Improve Geoi Moel for Syria Using the Local Gravimetric an GPS Measurements 1 Ria Al-Masri 2 Abstract "The objective of this paper is to iscuss recent research one by the author to evelop a new improve
More informationSensors & Transducers 2015 by IFSA Publishing, S. L.
Sensors & Transucers, Vol. 184, Issue 1, January 15, pp. 53-59 Sensors & Transucers 15 by IFSA Publishing, S. L. http://www.sensorsportal.com Non-invasive an Locally Resolve Measurement of Soun Velocity
More informationChapter 4. Electrostatics of Macroscopic Media
Chapter 4. Electrostatics of Macroscopic Meia 4.1 Multipole Expansion Approximate potentials at large istances 3 x' x' (x') x x' x x Fig 4.1 We consier the potential in the far-fiel region (see Fig. 4.1
More informationLATTICE-BASED D-OPTIMUM DESIGN FOR FOURIER REGRESSION
The Annals of Statistics 1997, Vol. 25, No. 6, 2313 2327 LATTICE-BASED D-OPTIMUM DESIGN FOR FOURIER REGRESSION By Eva Riccomagno, 1 Rainer Schwabe 2 an Henry P. Wynn 1 University of Warwick, Technische
More informationA Comparison between a Conventional Power System Stabilizer (PSS) and Novel PSS Based on Feedback Linearization Technique
J. Basic. Appl. Sci. Res., ()9-99,, TextRoa Publication ISSN 9-434 Journal of Basic an Applie Scientific Research www.textroa.com A Comparison between a Conventional Power System Stabilizer (PSS) an Novel
More informationTHE EFFICIENCIES OF THE SPATIAL MEDIAN AND SPATIAL SIGN COVARIANCE MATRIX FOR ELLIPTICALLY SYMMETRIC DISTRIBUTIONS
THE EFFICIENCIES OF THE SPATIAL MEDIAN AND SPATIAL SIGN COVARIANCE MATRIX FOR ELLIPTICALLY SYMMETRIC DISTRIBUTIONS BY ANDREW F. MAGYAR A issertation submitte to the Grauate School New Brunswick Rutgers,
More informationText S1: Simulation models and detailed method for early warning signal calculation
1 Text S1: Simulation moels an etaile metho for early warning signal calculation Steven J. Lae, Thilo Gross Max Planck Institute for the Physics of Complex Systems, Nöthnitzer Str. 38, 01187 Dresen, Germany
More informationStatic Equilibrium. Theory: The conditions for the mechanical equilibrium of a rigid body are (a) (b)
LPC Physics A 00 Las Positas College, Physics Department Staff Purpose: To etermine that, for a boy in equilibrium, the following are true: The sum of the torques about any point is zero The sum of forces
More informationNon-Linear Bayesian CBRN Source Term Estimation
Non-Linear Bayesian CBRN Source Term Estimation Peter Robins Hazar Assessment, Simulation an Preiction Group Dstl Porton Down, UK. probins@stl.gov.uk Paul Thomas Hazar Assessment, Simulation an Preiction
More informationParameter estimation: A new approach to weighting a priori information
Parameter estimation: A new approach to weighting a priori information J.L. Mea Department of Mathematics, Boise State University, Boise, ID 83725-555 E-mail: jmea@boisestate.eu Abstract. We propose a
More informationARCH 614 Note Set 5 S2012abn. Moments & Supports
RCH 614 Note Set 5 S2012abn Moments & Supports Notation: = perpenicular istance to a force from a point = name for force vectors or magnitue of a force, as is P, Q, R x = force component in the x irection
More informationCode_Aster. Detection of the singularities and computation of a card of size of elements
Titre : Détection es singularités et calcul une carte [...] Date : 0/0/0 Page : /6 Responsable : Josselin DLMAS Clé : R4.0.04 Révision : 9755 Detection of the singularities an computation of a car of size
More informationThe Standard Atmosphere. Dr Andrew French
The Stanar Atmosphere Dr Anrew French 1 The International Stanar Atmosphere (ISA) is an iealize moel of the variation of average air pressure an temperature with altitue. Assumptions: The atmosphere consists
More informationCONFIRMATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS
1 CONFIRMATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS The purpose of confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) is to explain the pattern of associations among a set of observe variables in terms of a smaller number of unerlying latent
More informationPHYS 414 Problem Set 2: Turtles all the way down
PHYS 414 Problem Set 2: Turtles all the way own This problem set explores the common structure of ynamical theories in statistical physics as you pass from one length an time scale to another. Brownian
More informationHyperbolic Systems of Equations Posed on Erroneous Curved Domains
Hyperbolic Systems of Equations Pose on Erroneous Curve Domains Jan Norström a, Samira Nikkar b a Department of Mathematics, Computational Mathematics, Linköping University, SE-58 83 Linköping, Sween (
More informationImplicit Differentiation
Implicit Differentiation Thus far, the functions we have been concerne with have been efine explicitly. A function is efine explicitly if the output is given irectly in terms of the input. For instance,
More informationCREATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE NATIONAL HUMIDITY STANDARD OF GASES
CREATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE NATIONAL HUMIDITY STANDARD OF GASES Efimia LUCHIAN, Constantin BORDIANU, Grigore BUZUC, Victoria CEBAN National Institute of Metrology, Chisinau, Republic of Molova tel.:
More informationThe new concepts of measurement error s regularities and effect characteristics
The new concepts of measurement error s regularities an effect characteristics Ye Xiaoming[1,] Liu Haibo [3,,] Ling Mo[3] Xiao Xuebin [5] [1] School of Geoesy an Geomatics, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei,
More informationModel studies of nonadiabatic dynamics
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS VOLUME 109, NUMBER 12 22 SEPTEMBER 1998 Moel stuies of nonaiabatic ynamics Daniela Kohen a) Lucent Technologies, Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, New Jersey 07974 Frank H. Stillinger
More informationReproducibility within the Laboratory R w Control Sample Covering the Whole Analytical Process
Flowchart for Nordtest Method (a) Specify measurand Quantify components for within lab reproducibility A control samples B possible steps, not covered by the control sample Quantify bias components Convert
More information