Hankel vector moment sequences and the non-tangential regularity at infinity of two-variable Pick functions
|
|
- Noah Robertson
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Hankel vector moment sequences and the non-tangential regularity at infinity of two-variable Pick functions Jim Agler John E. McCarthy January 7, 202 Abstract A Pick function of d variables is a holomorphic map from Π d to Π, where Π is the upper halfplane. Some Pick functions of one variable have an asymptotic expansion at infinity, a power series n= ρ nz n with real numbers ρ n that gives an asymptotic expansion on nontangential approach regions to infinity. H. Hamburger in 92 characterized which sequences {ρ n } can occur. We give an extension of Hamburger s results to Pick functions of two variables. Introduction A Pick function of one variable is a holomorphic map from the upper halfplane, which we shall denote by Π, into Π. A Pick function of two variables is a holomorphic map from Π 2 to Π. The purpose of this note is to extend to two variables certain well-known results about the asymptotic analysis of Pick functions in one variable. MSC 32A70, 46E22 Partially supported by National Science Foundation Grant DMS Partially supported by National Science Foundation Grant DMS
2 . One variable results In 922, R. Nevanlinna showed that a Pick class function of one variable that decays at infinity is the Cauchy transform of a finite measure on R. Theorem.. [3] If F : Π Π is analytic and satisfies lim sup y yf (iy) <, (.2) then there exists a unique finite positive Borel measure µ on R so that F (z) = dµ(t) t z. (.3) We shall say that a set S in Π approaches non-tangentially, S nt, if is in the closure, and there is a constant c such that z c Im(z) for all z S. If F has a representation as in (.3), then F (z) = ρ z + o(/ z ) as z nt, where ρ = µ. If µ has more moments, then there is a higher order asymptotic expansion at. H. Hamburger proved the following two theorems [8, 9]. For a proof of Theorem.4 as stated, see [7, Thm. 2.2] or [5, Thm 3.2.]. Theorem.4. Let real constants ρ,..., ρ 2N be given. There exists a Pick function F satisfying F (z) = ρ z + ρ 2 z ρ 2N z 2N + o( z (2N ) ) (.5) as z nt if and only if there is a measure µ on R whose first 2(N ) moments are finite and satisfy t k dµ(t) = ρ k+, 0 k 2(N ). (.6) Moreover, in this case F has a representation as in (.3) for some measure µ satisfying (.6). 2
3 Hamburger gave an alternate equivalent condition. There is also a proof in [7, Thm..2]; and see [2, Thm. 3.3] for an alternative formulation (but without a proof). Theorem.7. Let ρ,..., ρ 2N be given real numbers. There exists a Pick function F satisfying (.5) if and only if the N-by-N Hankel matrix ρ ρ 2... ρ N ρ 2 ρ 3... ρ N+ H =... ρ N ρ N+... ρ 2N is positive semi-definite and has the property that whenever (c, c 2,..., c N, 0) t is in the kernel of H, then (0, c, c 2,..., c N ) t is also in the kernel. In 88, L. Kronecker proved the following theorem [] (see [4, Thm. I.3.] for a modern treatment). Theorem.8. The infinite Hankel form ρ ρ 2 ρ 3... ρ 2 ρ 3 ρ 4... ρ 3 ρ 4 ρ is finite rank if and only if F (z) = n= ρ n z n is a rational function..2 Two variable results A two variable version of Theorem. was proved in [4]; see also Theorem 8.4 below. Before stating it, let us introduce some notation. If is an operator on a Hilbert space, and z = (z, z 2 ) is a point in C 2, we shall use z to denote the operator z = z + z 2 (I ). 3
4 Theorem.9. [4] Let h : Π 2 Π be a Pick function of two variables. Then lim sup sf (is, is) < s if and only if there is a Hilbert space H, a self-adjoint densely defined operator A on H, a positive contraction on H, and a vector α in H, such that h(z) = < (A z ) α, α >, z Π 2. (.0) We shall say that h has a type I Nevanlinna representation if it has a representation as in (.0). In one variable, the Poisson integral of any finite positive measure on R is the real part of a Pick function that decays like (.2), so the study of asymptotic expansions (.5) and solutions to the moment problem (.6) for arbitrary measures are tightly bound. In two variables, their study diverges. The infinite Hamburger moment problem in several variables is studied in [6] and [8]; for an algorithm for solving the problem in two variables, see [9]. For the truncated problem, see for example the memoir [7] and subsequent papers. Our objective is to study the two variable analogue of (.5). If one restricts z to the diagonal {z = z 2 }, then (.0) becomes (.3), where µ is the scalar spectral measure of A for the vector α. Saying that an even moment γ 2k exists in this case is the assertion that t k is in the domain of A. We shall generalize this idea to two variables. We shall let m and n denote ordered pairs of nonnegative integers. We set e = (, 0) and e 2 = (0, ). If n = (n, n 2 ), we set n = n + n 2, and for a pair z = (z, z 2 ) we follow the usual convention of letting z n = z n z n 2 2. For N a positive integer we set I N = {n n N}. We now define an object that we shall call a finite Hankel vector moment sequence, or for short, a finite HVMS. For simplicity, we take N 2; see (2.) for general N. Definition.. For a fixed positive integer N 2, a finite Hankel vector moment sequence is a 3-tuple, ({α n } n IN,, A) where: {α n } n IN is a sequence of vectors in some Hilbert space H; is a positive contraction acting on H, satisfying for each l =,..., N α (0,l) = 0 = ( )α (l,0) = 0; (.2) A is a partially defined symmetric operator on H with the property that {α n n N } Dom(A); (.3) 4
5 for each n I N, Here is the main result of this paper. Aα n = α n+e + ( )α n+e2. (.4) Theorem.5. A Pick function h of two variables satisfies h(z) = ρ n z + n o( z (2N ) ) (.6) n I 2N as z nt, for some real numbers ρ n, if and only if it has a representation as in (.0) and there is a finite HVMS ({α n } n IN,, A) with α = α (,0) +α (0,). Moreover, ρ k is given by the formula: ρ k = { α n, Aα m : m +n = k, m 2 +n 2 = k 2, m +m 2 = k /2 }. When k =, one interprets the right-hand side of the inner product as α (so ρ (,0) = α (,0), α and ρ (0,) = α (0,), α ). By z nt we mean that z while z stays in an approach region {z Π 2 : z c min{imz, Imz 2 }} for some c. The notation M/2 stands for the greatest integer less than or equal to M/2. The forward implication of (.5) is Theorem 4.2; the converse is Theorem 3.0. To relate Theorem.5 to Theorems.4 and.7, think in one variable of α n as t n in L 2 (µ), and A as multiplication by t on L 2 (µ). Then ρ k is given by a single term, t k/2, t k/2. Theorem.7 also has a two variable analogue, which we give in Theorem 5.7. This justifies our nomenclature of Hankel vector moment sequence. The last condition in Theorem 5.7 is an analogue of the last condition in Theorem.7; for an explanation of it, see Section 5. Theorem 5.7 Let a = (a, a 2 ) be a pair of matrices on I N. Then there is a finite HVMS ({α n } n IN,, A) such that a mn = α n, α m a 2 mn = ( )α n, α m 5
6 if and only if the following four conditions obtain: a and a 2 are positive semi-definite. a m+e,n + a 2 m+e 2,n = a m,n+e + a 2 m,n+e 2 whenever m, n I N. a (0,l),(0,l) = a 2 (l,0),(l,0) = 0 for l =,..., N. supp(f) I N and (a + a 2 )f = 0 (a S + a 2 S 2 )f = 0. In Section 6, we discuss infinite sequences. One multi-variable generalization of Kronecker s Theorem.8 was proved by S. C. Power [5]. In Theorem 6.6, we prove another. Theorem 6.6: Let h have non-tangential asymptotic expansions of all orders at infinity. Then there is an infinite HVMS ({α n },, A) with α = α (,0) + α (0,), and h(z) =< (A z ) α, α >. The sequence can be chosen with rank α n, α m < if and only if h is a rational function. In Section 7, we give an example of a construction of functions in the Pick class that have asymptotic expansions. In Section 8, we give some technical results on models. 2 Finite Hankel Vector Moment Sequences Definition 2.. For a fixed positive integer N, a finite Hankel vector moment sequence is a 3-tuple, ({α n } n IN,, A) where: {α n } n IN is a sequence of vectors in some Hilbert space H; is a positive contraction acting on H, satisfying for each l =,..., N α (0,l) = 0 = ( )α (l,0) = 0; (2.2) A is a partially defined symmetric operator on H with the properties that, if N 2 {α n n N } Dom(A); (2.3) and, for each n I N, Aα n = α n+e + ( )α n+e2. (2.4) When N = conditions (2.3) and (2.4) are dropped. 6
7 Every symmetric operator has a self-adjoint extension on a possibly larger Hilbert space; so there is no loss in generality in assuming A is self-adjoint. If ({α n } n IN,, A) is a finite HVMS, we frequently shall abuse the notation somewhat and refer to the entire tuple by simply {α n }. If {α n } is an HVMS as above, we refer to N as the size of {α n }, as the Hankel weight of {α n }, A as the Hankel shift of {α n }, and finally the vectors, α n are called the vector moments of {α n }. Our first proposition gives a simple yet fundamental property of HVMS s. If z C 2 and is a positive contraction on a Hilbert space H, we defined z = z + z 2 ( ). As is a positive contraction, the spectral theorem implies that z is a well defined analytic operator valued function on the set {z C 2 z 2 0, z /z 2 / (, 0]}. If {α n } is an HVMS with shift A and weight, and l is a positive integer we shall adopt the notation, R l (z) = z (Az )l. Note that if z {z C 2 z 2 0, z /z 2 / (, 0]}, then the domain of R l (z) is all of H if l = and for l 2 is inductively defined by Dom((R l (z))) = {α H (z A)i z α Dom(A) i = 0,..., l 2}. Note also that R l ( z) R l (z). Proposition 2.5. Let {α n } be an HVMS of size N and let α = α (,0) + α (0,). (2.6) If l N, then and α Dom(R l (z)) (2.7) R l (z)α = n =l z n α n (2.8) for all z in {z C 2 z 2 0, z /z 2 / (, 0]}. Proof. We induct on N. If N = and l =, then trivially 2.7 holds. Also, by 2.2, α (0,) = 0 = ( )α (,0) = 0. Hence, R (z)α = z α 7
8 = z α (,0) + z α (0,) = z α (,0) + z 2 α (,0) = n = z n α n. Now assume that the proposition holds for HVMS s of size N. Fix an HVMS, {α n } n IN+, of size N +. The case when l = is handled as in the previous paragraph. If 2 l N +, as {α n } n IN is an HVMS of size N, the inductive hypothesis implies that R l (z)α = z AR l (z)α = z A n =l z n α n. (2.9) As {α n } n IN+ is of size N + and l N, 2.3 implies that α n Dom(A) whenever n = l. Hence, 2.9 implies that α Dom(R l (z)). Also, using 2.2 and 2.4 we see via 2.9 that R l (z) α = z A n =l = z = z z n =l z l z n α n z α n n+e + z α (l,0) + z m =l m (l,0),(0,l) = α z l (l,0) + z z m =l m (l,0)(0,l) = α z l (l,0) + z z 2 n =l m =l m (l,0),(0,l) z ( )α m m + z m =l m (l,0),(0,l) z z m α m+ z n ( )α n+e 2 z z m α m+ z l 2 z 2 z ( )α m m + α z2 l (0,l) m =l m (l,0)(0,l) ( )α (0,l) (z + z 2 ( )) z α m m + α z2 l (0,l) 8
9 = α z l (l,0) + = n =l z n α n. m =l m (l,0)(0,l) z α m m + α z2 l (0,l) The property described by 2.7 in Proposition 2.5 arises as an issue in many of the applications of HVMS s that we have in mind. Accordingly, we introduce the following definition. Definition 2.0. Let H be a Hilbert space, α H, and assume that is a positive contraction on H. If A is a symmetric operator on H, we say that A has finite complex vector (, α)-moments to order N if for each z {z z 2 0, z /z 2 / (, 0]}, α Dom((Az )l ) for l =,..., N. We say that A has finite real vector (, α)-moments to order N if for each b R +2, α Dom((Ab )l ) for l =,..., N. The following converse to Proposition 2.5 provides a useful criterion to verify that a given symmetric operator and positive operator are associated with an HVMS. Proposition 2.. Let H be a Hilbert space, let α H and assume that A and are operators acting on H, with A symmetric and a positive contraction. The following conditions are equivalent. (i) There exists a sequence {α n } n IN in H such that α = α (,0) + α (0,) and ({α n }, A, ) is an HVMS. (ii) A has finite complex vector (, α)-moments to order N and for each l =,..., N there exist vectors α n, n = l such that R l (z)α = n =l z n α n whenever z {z z 2 0, z /z 2 / (, 0]}. 9
10 (iii) A has finite real vector (, α)-moments to order N and for each l =,..., N there exist vectors α n, n = l such that R l (b)α = n =l b n α n (2.2) whenever b R +2. Proof. That (i) implies (ii) follows from 2.5. Obviously, (ii) implies (iii). Assume that (iii) holds. To show that 2.2 holds when l = and that α = α (,0) + α (0,), equate coefficients in the following equation obtained from 2.2 when l =. α = b b α = b R (b)α = (b + b 2 ( ))( b α (,0) + b 2 α (0,) ). Now assume N 2. Note that the moment condition implies that for l N, R l (b)α Dom(A). Hence by 2.2, for all b R +2. As span{ n =l n =l b n α n Dom(A), b n α n b R +2 } = span{α n n = l}, it follows that 2.3 holds. Now fix l with l N. compute using 2.2 that m =l b Aα m m = A m =l = b n =l+ b m α m b n α n Noting that b R l+ (b) = AR l (b), we 0
11 = b α (0,l+) + b l+ 2 + b 2 b l+ m =l ( )α (l+,0). b m ( α m+e + ( )α m+e2 ) Equating terms in this formula yields that 2.4 holds for 2 l N and that 2.2 for 2 l N. We now turn to a much more subtle characterization of HVMS s given in Theorem 2.2 below. Suppose that {α n } is an HVMS of size N with weight and shift A and let α be as in 2.6. Let R + = {t R t > 0}. For k 2N define functions r k : R +2 R by the formulas, r (b) = < R (b)α, α > = < b α, α > if k = (2.3) r k (b) = < R l (b)α, AR l (b)α > if 3 k = 2l (2.4) r k (b) = < R l (b)α, AR l (b)α > if 2 k = 2l, (2.5) where the expressions R l (b)α make sense by Proposition 2.5. Computing r k (b) using 2.8 yields the qualitative information that for each k with k 2N, r k (b) is a homogenous polynomial in = ( b b, b 2 ) of degree k. To formalize these properties of α,, and A we introduce the following definition. Definition 2.6. Let H be a Hilbert space, α H, and assume that is a positive contraction on H. Assume that A is a symmetric operator on H with finite real vector (, α)-moments to order N. For k 2n we define the k th scalar (, α)-moment of A by equations (2.3) to (2.5). Before continuing, we remark that ontologically the scalar (, α)-moments of A are functions on (R + ) 2. However, if these functions happen to be given by homogenous polynomials (as e.g. occurs in the case of an HVMS), then there is an obvious way to extend the moment functions to all of C 2. Concrete formulas for this case would be r (z) = < R (z)α, α > = < z α, α > if k = (2.7) r k (z) = < R l (z)α, AR l (z) α > if 3 k = 2l (2.8) r k (z) = < R l (z)α, AR l (z) α > if 2 k = 2l. (2.9)
12 Remark If ({α n }, A, ) is a finite HVMS, then by Proposition 2. the k th scalar (, α)-moments of A are given by r (b) = b α (,0), α + b 2 α (0,), α if k = r k (b) r k (b) = m =l, n =l α b m+n n, α m+e + ( )α m+e2 if 3 k = 2l = m =l, n =l α b m+n n, α m+e + ( )α m+e2 if 2 k = 2l. In particular, they only depend on the Gram matrices a = α n, α m and a 2 = ( )α n, α m. Theorem 2.2. Let H be a Hilbert space, α H, and N. Assume that is a positive contraction on H and A is a symmetric operator on H. There exists an indexed sequence {α n } n IN of vectors in H such that ({α n }, A, ) is an HVMS of size N and α = α (,0) + α (,0) (2.22) if and only if A has finite real vector (, α)-moments to order N and for each k 2N, the k th scalar (, α)-moment of A is a homogeneous polynomial in of order k. b Proof. The necessity of the homogeneity condition follows by the discussion leading up to Definition 2.6. To prove the sufficiency we proceed by induction on N. When N =, there is only one scalar moment given by r (b) =< b α, α >. If r is homogenous of degree one, then there exist constants a and a 2 such that < b α, α >= a + a 2. (2.23) b b 2 We analyze 2.23 by making the substitutions, Noting that in the new variables x and t, b = x and b 2 = t x. (2.24) t b = t x (t ), (2.25) 2
13 one computes that 2.23 becomes < (t ) α, α >= a t + a 2 t. (2.26) Now, 2.26 implies that the scalar spectral measure of w.r.t. α is supported in the set {0, }, which in turn implies that ( )α = 0. Letting α (,0) = α and α (0,) = ( )α, we see immediately that 2.22 holds. As and ( )α (,0) = ( ) α = 0 α (,0) = ( )α = 0, we see that 2.2 holds. Finally, as 2.3 and 2.4 are both vacuous when N =, the theorem is proved for the special case when N = Now suppose the sufficiency of the homogeneity conditions whenever A has finite vector (, α)-moments to order N and 2N homogenous scalar (, α)-moments. Fix A,, and α with the properties that A has finite real vector (, α)-moments to order N and 2N + homogenous real scalar (, α)- moments, r k (b). We need to show that there exists an indexed sequence {α n } n IN+ in H such that ({α n }, A, ) is an HVMS of size N + and such that α = α (,0) + α (,0). By Proposition 2. this will be accomplished if we can construct an indexed set {α n } n IN+ in H such that {α n } n IN Dom(A) (2.27) and R l (b)α = n =l b n α n for l =,..., N +. (2.28) By the induction hypothesis, there exists an indexed set of vectors in H, {α n } n IN such that 2.22 holds and such that ({α n } n IN, A, ) is an HVMS of size N. By the homogeneity of r 2N+ (b), there exist scalars ρ n, n = 2N +, such that r 2N+ (b) = ρ n (2.29) b n n =2N+ On the other hand, by the definition of the odd scalar moments, 2.4, r 2N+ (b) =< b AR N(b)α, AR N (b)α >. (2.30) 3
14 Finally, Proposition 2.5 implies that R N (b)α = n =N b n α n. (2.3) The remainder of the proof consists of employing the substitutions, 2.24, to make various deductions from 2.29, 2.30, and 2.3 pertinent to establishing 2.27 and To facilitate our calculations we shall employ the notation, t n = t n (t ) n 2. Making the substitutions, 2.24, in 2.3, we obtain that R N (b)α = (tx) N t n α n. (2.32) n =N As A is assumed to have finite real vector (, α)-moments to order N, the left side of 2.32 is in the domain of A for all b (R + ) 2. Hence, the right side of 2.32 is in the domain of A for all t R +. Noting that the set {t n n = N} is a basis for the polynomials of degree less than or equal to N, it follows that α n Dom(A) whenever n = N. On the other hand, as ({α n } n IN, A, ) is an HVMS of size N, it follows from 2.3 that α n Dom(A) whenever n < N. Thus, we have shown that 2.27 holds. In order to verify 2.28 we must first explain how α n is defined when n = N +. Substitute 2.3 into 2.30 and then equate the right hand sides of 2.29 and 2.30 to obtain, (tx) (2N+) ρ n t n = t x which simplifies to p(t) t(t ) n =2N+ < (t ) (tx) N =< (t ) t m Aα m, (tx) N t m Aα m, t m Aα m > t m Aα m >, (2.33) where p is the polynomial of degree less than or equal to 2N + defined by p(t) = ρ n t n. (2.34) n =2N+ 4
15 For m a multi-index, we define Q m (t), an operator-valued polynomial of degree m, by the formula, Q m (t) = tm m t. Computing with the right side of 2.33 yields that < (t ) t m Aα m, t m Aα m > = < (t ) = < = < = < Q m (t)aα m, [(t )Q m (t) + m ]Aα m, + < (t ) Q m (t)aα m, + < Q m (t)aα m, + < t m Aα m > m Aα m, t m Aα m > m Aα m, (t ) m Aα m, (t ) t m Aα m > + < t m Aα m > t m Aα m > t m Aα m > m Aα m, m Aα m >. Q m (t)aα m > As the first two terms of this last expression are polynomials of degree less than or equal to 2N and N respectively, recalling that p has degree less than or equal to 2N +, we see that the third term in the above expression must have the form, < m Aα m, (t ) m Aα m >= c t + c + q(t), (2.35) t where c and c 2 are scalars and q is a polynomial of degree less than or equal to 2N implies that if we set β = m Aα m 5
16 and E is the spectral measure for, then de β,β is supported in {0, }, which in turn implies that ( )β = 0. (2.36) Hence, Now observe in light of 2.36, that t(t )(t ) t(t )(t ) β = (t + )β = t(t )(t ) = t(t ) = t(t ) = t(t ) t m Aα m [(t )Q m (t) + m ]Aα m Q m (t)aα m + t(t )(t ) Q m (t)aα m + t(t )(t ) β Q m (t)aα m + (t + )β. As Q m (t) has degree N, this implies that t(t )(t ) t m Aα m m Aα m is a vector valued polynomial of degree N +. But the set {t n n = N + } forms a basis for the polynomials of degree less than or equal to N +. Hence, there exist vectors α n H, n = N +, such that t(t )(t ) t m Aα m = t n α n. (2.37) n =N+ Unraveling the substitutions 2.24, and 2.37 becomes b AR N(b)α = b α n, n or, R N+ (b)α = n =N+ n =N+ 6 b n α n. (2.38)
17 In addition, recalling that ({α n } n IN, A, ) is an HVMS of size N, we see from Proposition 2.5 that R l (b)α = n =l Taken together, 2.38 and 2.39 imply b n α n for l =,..., N. (2.39) 3 From HVMSs to Loewner Functions We let Π 2 denote the set {z C 2 Im(z ) 0, Im(z 2 ) 0}. We let P denote the Pick class on Π 2, i.e. the set of holomorphic functions on Π 2 that have nonnegative imaginary part. If D R 2, we define the Loewner class, L(D), by L(D) = {h P h is analytic and real valued on D}. L(D), which captures a semi-local version of the notion of inner, arises in a variety of problems involving interpolation, the real edge of the wedge theorem, and the analysis of operator monotone functions see e.g. [3]. In this section we wish to consider a fully local version of L(D). To that end we shall require a number of definitions. Let J k = I k {(0, 0)}. Definition 3.. For x R 2 and S Π 2 let us agree to say that S approaches x non-tangentially, S nt x, if x S and there exists a constant c such that for all z S z x c min{im(z )Im(z 2 )} Definition 3.2. Let h P and x R 2. We say that x is a C k -point of h if h is non-tangentially C k at x i.e. there exists an indexed set of scalars, δ = {δ n } n Jk, such that if S Π 2 and S nt x,then h(z) n J lim k δ n z n = 0. (3.3) z x z S z k Evidently, if h L(D), x D, and x is a C k -point of h, then δ, as uniquely determined by 3.3, has the property that δ n is real whenever n J k. This suggests the following definition as a reasonable localization of the Loewner class. 7
18 Definition 3.4. Let k 0 and x R 2. If h P, we say that h is Loewner to order k at x if x is a C k -point of h and if δ, as uniquely determined by 3.3, has the property that δ n is real for all n J k. We introduce in Definition 3.9 below a class of functions, L N, obtained by adding three extra minor provisos to the notion in Definition 3.4. First we shall assume that k = 2N is odd. Secondly, we wish to consider regularity as z approaches infinity non-tangentially rather than as z approaches a finite point x R 2. Finally, we shall normalize h to have the value zero at infinity. To formalize regularity at, we introduce the following two definitions. Definition 3.5. If {z n } is a sequence in Π 2, we say z n if z n = (λ n, µ n ) and both λ n and µ n. For S Π 2 we say that S approaches non-tangentially, S nt, if there is a sequence {z n } in S such that z n and a constant c such that z c min{im(z )Im(z 2 )} (3.6) for all z S. If S nt, we let adj(s) denote the smallest constant such that 3.6 holds for all z S. Definition 3.7. Let Ω be a metric space, ω Ω, and F : Π 2 Ω a map. We say F (z) ω as z nt if for each S Π 2 such that S nt, lim F (z) = ω. z z S We now can extend the notion of C k -point to. Definition 3.8. If h P we say is a C k -point of h if there exists an indexed set of scalars, ρ = {ρ n } n Jk, referred to as residues, such that z k (h(z) ρ n nt ) 0 as z. zn n J k Finally, notice that the residue, ρ (0,0), when it exists, is the limit of h(z) as z non-tangentially, and hence we denote it by h( ). Our third proviso is to normalize h by requiring that h( ) = 0. 8
19 Definition 3.9. For N a positive integer, let L N denote the set of all h P such that is a C 2N -point for h with real residues and h( ) = 0. Let us note that Theorem.9 implies that any function in L must have a representation as in (.0). In previous work [3], we required to be a projection. This was inspired by representations on the bidisk, as in [6] and [2]. Here, we do not require to be a projection necessarily. But, in order for ({α n } n IN,, A) to be an HVMS of size N, the operator ( ) annihilates α (l,0) and α (0,l) for l N. So these vectors think is a projection. We now can formulate the main result of this section. Theorem 3.0. Suppose that H is a Hilbert space, A is a densely defined self-adjoint operator on H, α H, and h P is defined by the type I Nevanlinna representation, h(z) =< (A z ) α, α >, z Π 2. (3.) If ({α n }, A, ) is a of size N and α = α (,0) + α (0,), then h L N. Furthermore, if r l are the scalar (, α)-moments of A (as given by the formulas 2.8 and 2.9) and ρ n are the residues of h (as given in Definition 3.8),then ρ n b = r l(b) (3.2) n for l =,..., 2N. n =l The remainder of the section will be devoted to the proof of Theorem 3.0. Accordingly, fix an HVMS of size N, ({α n }, A, ), with the property that A is densely defined and self-adjoint, set α = α (,0) + α (0,), and assume that h is given by 3.. The point z will always lie in Π 2, so (A z ) is invertible. Observe that as, A(A z ) = (A z + z )(A z ) = + z (A z ), (3.3) the operator A(A z ) is bounded. Likewise, the operator (A z ) A is bounded. Also, we have the following simple identities involving these operators: z (A z ) A = A(A z ) z (3.4) (A z ) = z (A z ) = z 9 + z A(A z ) (3.5) + (A z ) Az. (3.6)
20 Claim N < (A z ) α, α >= r k (z)+ < A(A z ) z R N (z)α, R N (z) α >. k= Note that as ({α n }, A, ) is an HVMS, Condition (ii) of Proposition 2. guarantees that α Dom(R N (z)) and in addition, that the residues, r k (z), k =,..., 2N, are well defined by equations 2.7 to 2.9. Thus, the expression that appears on the right side of the claim is well defined. To prove Claim 3.7 we proceed by induction. Note that when N = the claim follows immediately from 3.5. Suppose the claim holds for HVMSs of size N. If ({α n }, A, ) is an HVMS of size N +, then as ({α n }, A, ) is also a HVMS of size N, the inductive hypothesis yields that 2N < (A z ) α, α >= r k (z)+ < A(A z ) z R N (z)α, R N (z) α >. But, k= < A(A z ) z R N (z)α, R N (z) α > (i) = < (A z ) z R N (z)α, AR N (z) α > (ii) = < ( z + (A z ) Az )z R N (z)α, AR N (z) α > (3.8) = < R N (z)α, AR N (z) α > + < (A z ) AR N (z)α, AR N (z) α > (iii) = < R N (z)α, AR N (z) α > + < ( z + z A(A z ) )AR N (z)α, AR N (z) α > = < R N (z)α, AR N (z) α > < z AR N(z)α, AR N (z) α > + < z A(A z ) AR N (z)α, AR N (z) α > = < R N (z)α, AR N (z) α > < z AR N(z)α, AR N (z) α > + < A(A z ) z z AR N(z)α, z AR N (z) α > (iv) = < R N (z)α, AR N (z) α > < R N+ (z)α, AR N (z) α > (v) + < A(A z ) z R N+ (z)α, R N+ (z) α > = r 2N (z) r 2N+ (z) + < A(A z ) z R N+ (z)α, R N+ (z) α >. Here, the following facts were used. (i) as ({α n }, A, ) is an HVMS of size N +, R N (z) α = R N ( z)α Dom(A) 20
21 (ii) 3.6 (iii) 3.5 (iv) R N+ (z)α = z AR N(z) (v) 2.8 and 2.9 Combining the result of this calculation with 3.8, we deduce that 2N+ < (A z ) α, α >= r k (z)+ < A(A z ) z R N+ (z)α, R N+ (z) α >, k= which is 3.8 with N replaced with N +. This concludes the proof of Claim 3.7. Now observe that both the facts we need to prove to establish Theorem 3.0, that h L N and 3.2, will follow from Claim 3.7 if we can show that z 2N < A(A z ) z R N (z)α, R N (z) α > 0 as z nt. (3.9) On the other hand, we claim that 3.9 will follow if we can show Claim If β, γ H, then < A(A z ) β, γ > 0 as z nt. (3.2) To see how Claim 3.20 implies 3.9 we use the following simple property of sets that approach non-tangentially. Lemma If n is a multi-index, S Π 2 and S nt, then for all z S. z n (adj(s)) n z n Proof. If z S, then Definition 3.5 implies that Hence, Likewise, z adj(s) min{im(z )Im(z 2 )} adj(s) Im(z ) adj(s) z. z n adj(s) n z n. z 2 n 2 adj(s) n 2 z n 2. The lemma follows by multiplying these last two inequalities together. 2
22 Now, using Proposition 2.5, if N 2, < A(A z ) z R N (z)α, R N (z) α > = < A(A z ) AR N (z)α, R N (z) α > = < A(A z ) A z α m, m z α n n > = n =N n =N z m+n < A(A z ) Aα m, α n >. Thus, using Lemma 3.22, we see that if S nt and z S, then < A(A z ) z R N (z)α, R N (z) α > z < A(A z m+n ) Aα m, α n > n =N adj(s) 2N z (2N ) When N =, we get n =N < A(A z ) z R (z)α, R (z) α > = z < A(A z n ) α, α n > n = < A(A z ) Aα m, α n >. adj(s) z < A(A z ) α, α n >. n = So we see that Claim 3.20 does indeed imply 3.9. There remains to prove Claim For this we shall require three lemmas. These lemmas involve the notion of a proximity estimate, an idea which we make precise in the following definition. Definition Let Ω be a metric space and F : Π 2 Ω a map. We say that F is proximal (or more precisely, proximal at ) if for each S Π 2 such that S nt, there exists a constant c such that z w d(f (z), F (w)) c z 22 (3.24)
23 for all z, w S. We refer to the inequality 3.24 as a proximity estimate. It turns out that frequently, as a consequence of various forms of the Schwarz Lemma, quantities that are formed from holomorphic functions satisfy proximity estimates. In such cases, the following lemma greatly simplifies the analysis of non-tangential regularity. Lemma Let Ω be a metric space, let ω Ω and let F : Π 2 Ω be a proximal map. F (z) ω as z nt if and only if for each δ Π 2, lim F (sδ) = ω. (3.26) s Proof. Clearly, if F (z) ω as z nt, then 3.26 holds. To prove the converse we argue by contradiction. Suppose 3.26 holds. If it is false that F (z) ω as z nt, then there exist ɛ > 0, S Π 2, and a sequence {z l } in S such that S nt, z l, and d(f (z l ), ω) ɛ (3.27) for all positive l. By compactness, there exist δ C 2 and a subsequence z lj, such that z lj z lj δ as j. In fact, δ Π 2. To see this, let δ = (δ, δ 2 ) and z lj = (λ lj, µ lj ) and observe that Im(δ ) = lim j Im(λ lj ) z lj lim min{im(λ lj )Im(µ lj )} j z lj adj(s) > 0, (3.28) Likewise, Im(δ 2 ) > 0 and we conclude that δ Π 2. Now, let w j = z lj and s j = z lj. By construction we have that w j s j δ = o(s j ) so that the proximity estimate gives that d(f (w j ), F (s j δ)) c w j s j δ s j δ 0. (3.29) Also, 3.26 implies that d(f (s j δ), ω) 0. (3.30) Given 3.29 and 3.30, the triangle inequality gives that d(f (w j ), ω)) 0, contradicting
24 Lemma 3.3. Let L(H) denote the algebra of bounded operators on H equipped with the operator norm. F : Π 2 L(H), defined by is proximal. F (z) = A(A z ), z Π 2, Proof. Fix S Π 2 with S nt. For z Π 2 we have that z max{ z, z 2 } 2 z. (3.32) Also, as Im(A z ) = Im(z ) min{im(z )Im(z 2 )}, we have that if in addition, z S, then (A z ) Now, using (3.3), we get F (z) F (w) = A(A z ) A(A w ) = ( + z (A z ) ) ( + w (A w ) ) = z (A z ) w (A w ) min{im(z )Im(z 2 )} adj(s) z. (3.33) = (z w )(A z ) + w ((A z ) (A w ) ) = (z w )(A z ) + w (A w ) (z w )(A z ). Hence using 3.32 and 3.33, F (z) F (w) z w (A z ) + w (A w ) z w (A z ) 2 z w adj(s) z + 2 w adj(s) adj(s) 2 z w w z = ( 2 adj(s) + 2 adj(s) 2 z w ), z which is 3.24 with c = 2adj(S) + 2adj(S) 2. Lemma If β, γ H and δ Π 2, then lim < A(A tδ ) β, γ >= 0 s 24
25 Proof. We claim that for each vector u H, δ (ɛa δ ) u u weakly in H (3.35) as ɛ 0. To prove this claim first notice that as Im(δ ) min{im(δ )Im(δ 2 )}, we have both that δ is invertible and that (ɛa δ ) is uniformly bounded. In particular, as A is densely defined, M = δ Dom(A) is dense in H. If u = δ v M, then as v Dom(A) and (ɛa δ ) is uniformly bounded, as ɛ 0. Hence, (ɛa δ ) ɛav 0 (ɛa δ ) u = (ɛa δ ) δ v = (ɛa δ ) ((δ ɛa) + ɛa)v = v + (ɛa δ ) ɛav v = δ u. Applying the bounded operator δ, yields that 3.35 holds whenever u M. As, M is dense and δ (ɛa δ ) is uniformly bounded, it follows that 3.35 holds for all u H. This proves the claim. Now notice that if in the claim, we substitute ɛ = s, we deduce that for all u H, sδ (A sδ ) u u weakly in H as s. Hence, for all u H, + sδ (A sδ ) u 0 weakly in H as s. The lemma now follows by observing that from (3.3) + sδ (A sδ ) = A(A sδ ) Armed with the above lemmas it is a simple matter to prove Claim 3.20 and thereby complete the proof of Theorem 3.0. If β, γ H, then by Lemma 3.3 F (z) =< A(A z ) β, γ > is proximal. As Lemma 3.34 gives that lim s F (sδ) = 0 whenever δ Π 2, Lemma 3.25 yields that F (z) 0 as z nt as was to be proved. 25
26 4 From Loewner Functions to HVMSs In this section we shall formulate and then prove a converse to Theorem 3.0, using Theorem 2.2. If h L N, then it is easy to check that h is type I and accordingly has a Nevanlinna representation of the form, h(z) =< (A z ) α, α >, z Π 2, (4.) where A and are operators acting on a Hilbert space H, A is a densely defined and self-adjoint, is a positive contraction, and α H. Theorem 4.2. If h L N and A,, and α are such that 4. holds, then A has real vector (, α)-moments to order N and homogenous scalar (, α)-moments to order 2N. Furthermore, ρ n b = r l(b) (4.3) n n =l whenever l 2N and b (R + ) 2, where ρ n are the residues of h. Proof. We proceed by induction. Let N = and assume that h L N has a Nevanlinna representation as in 4.. As N =, the assertion that A have real vector (, α)-moments to order N is vacuous. To see that A has homogenous scalar (, α)-moments to order 2N, first note that since is a C -point for h with real residues, we have that there exist ρ (,0), ρ (0,) R 2 such that < (A z ) α, α >= h(z) = ρ (,0) z + ρ (0,) z 2 + o( z ), (4.4) non-tangentially at. Fixing b (R + ) 2 and setting z = isb in 4.4 gives that is < (A isb ) α, α > ρ (,0) b + ρ (0,) b 2 (4.5) as s in R +. Noting that for b (R + ) 2, b is strictly positive definite and hence, invertible, we define a self-adjoint operator, X b, by the formula, Noting that X b = b 2 Ab 2. (4.6) is < (A isb ) α, α > = is < (b 2 (X b is)b 2 ) α, α > 26
27 = is < b 2 (X b is) b 2 α, α > = is < (X b is) b 2 α, b 2 α > 2 b + s2 = is < X b + is X 2 b =< s2 + isx b X 2 b + s2 α, b 2 α > b 2 α, b 2 α >, we see upon taking real parts in 4.5 that < s 2 2 Xb 2 b + α, b 2 s2 α > ρ (,0) + ρ (0,) (4.7) b b 2 as s in R +. Now, the Lesbesgue Dominated Convergence Theorem guarantees that as s in R +. Hence, s 2 2 Xb 2 b + s2 α b 2 α < b α, α >= < b 2 α, b 2 α >= ρ (,0) b + ρ (0,) b 2 (4.8) As 4.8 holds for all b (R + ) 2, we conclude that A has homogenous scalar (, α)-moments to order as was to be shown. Also note that 4.8 implies that 4.3 holds. We now turn to the inductive step of the proof. Accordingly, assume that A has real vector (, α)-moments to order N, (4.9) A has homogenous scalar (, α)-moments to order 2N, and (4.0) l 2N, b (R + ) 2 = ρ n b = r l(b) n n =l (4.) whenever h L N and has a representation as in 4.. Fix h with a representation as in 4. and assume that h L N+. We need to show that 4.9, 4.0, and 4. hold with N replaced with N +. However, as h L N+ L N, the inductive hypothesis implies that 4.9, 4.0, and 4. hold for N. Therefore, the induction will be complete if we can show the following three conditions: α Dom((Ab )N ), (4.2) 27
28 and r 2N+ (b) = n =2N+ r 2N (b) = n =2N ρ n b n, b (R+ ) 2, (4.3) ρ n b n, b (R+ ) 2. (4.4) First note that as h L N+ and 4. holds, there exist scalar residues, ρ n, n I 2N+, such that < (A z ) α, α >= ρ n z + n o( z (2N+) ) (4.5) n I 2N+ as z non-tangentially in Π 2. Fixing b (R + ) 2 and setting z = isb in 4.5 we deduce that < (A isb ) α, α >= 2N+ l= (is) l n =l ρ n b n + o(s (2N+) ), as s in R +, which, upon taking the imaginary parts, yields that Im(< (A isb ) α, α >) = N+ k= ( ) k s 2k n =2k ρ n b n + o(s (2N+) ) (4.6) as s in R +. Finally, upon multiplying 4.6 by the factor s 2N+, we deduce the limit, lim G b(s) = ( ) N+ ρ n (4.7) s b n n =2N+ where for s R + and b (R + ) 2, G b (s) is defined by G b (s) = s 2N+ Im(< (A isb ) α, α >) N ( ) k s 2(N k+) k= We now compute G b (s) using the substitution 4.6. We set n =2k ρ n b n. (4.8) γ b = b 2 α. (4.9) 28
29 Note that 4.9 implies that γ b Dom(Xb l ) for l =,..., N. Using 4. and 2.4 we see for k =,..., N, that ρ n b = r 2k (b) n n =2k = < b (Ab )k α, (Ab )k α > = < (X b ) k γ b, (X b ) k γ b >. Also, just as in the calculation leading up to 4.7 we compute that 2 b + s2 < (A isb ) α, α >=< X b + is X 2 b α, b 2 α >, so that Im(< (A isb ) α, α >) =< =< X 2 b s 2 b + α, b 2 s2 s X 2 b + s2 γ b, γ b >. α > Hence we have that G b (s) =< s2n+2 X 2 b + s2 γ b, γ b > + N ( ) k s 2(N k+) < (X b ) k γ b, (X b ) k γ b >. k= We claim that the above sum telescopes. Indeed, using the fact that < (X b ) k γ b, (X b ) k γ b > X 2 b = < ( Xb s 2 s2 Xb 2 + )(X b) k γ b, (X b ) k γ b > s2 = < X2 b X 2 b + s2 (X b) k γ b, (X b ) k γ b > + < we compute that G b (s) = < s2n+2 X 2 b + s2 γ b, γ b > + = < s2n+2 X 2 b + s2 γ b, γ b > s 2 X 2 b + s2 (X b) k γ b, (X b ) k γ b > N ( ) k s 2(N k+) < (X b ) k γ b, (X b ) k γ b > k= 29
30 . s 2N (< X2 b X 2 b + s2 γ b, γ b > + < + s 2N 2 (< X2 b X 2 b + s2 X bγ b, X b γ b > + < s 2 X 2 b + s2 γ b, γ b >) s 2 X 2 b + s2 X bγ b, X b γ b >) + ( ) N s 2 (< X2 b X 2 b + s2 (X b) N γ b, (X b ) N γ b > + < s 2 X 2 b + s2 (X b) N γ b, (X b ) N γ b >) = ( ) N s 2 < X2 b X 2 b + s2 (X b) N γ b, (X b ) N γ b >. This last calculation makes sense since X 2 b X 2 b + s2 is a bounded operator and γ b Dom(X b l ) for l =,..., N. Now recall 4.7. From the formula for G b (s) just derived, we see that lim < s s2 X 2 b X 2 b + s2 (X b) N γ b, (X b ) N γ b >= n =2N+ ρ n b n. (4.20) As X b is self-adjoint and γ b Dom(X b N ), we can apply the spectral theorem to X b and thereby obtain the scalar spectral measure of γ b, µ. Analyzing the very existence of the limit on the left side of 4.20 in the space L 2 (µ) yields via the Lesbesgue Dominated Convergence Theorem that Unraveling 4.2 via 4.6 and 4.9 gives that, γ b Dom(X b N ). (4.2) α Dom((Ab )N ), which is 4.2. Note also from 4.20 we have that < (X b ) 2 (X b ) N γ b, (X b ) N γ b >= 30 n =2N+ ρ n b n,
31 which unravels to r 2N+ (b) = n =2N+ ρ n b n. (4.22) which is 4.3. There remains to check 4.4. This is done by following the same line of reasoning that led from 4.5 to One starts with 4.5 but with 2N + replaced with 2N: < (A z ) α, α >= n I 2N ρ n z n + o( z (2N) ) (4.23) Proceeding as before, for a fixed b (R + ) 2 and s R + we set z = isb in However unlike before, where we took imaginary parts to obtain 4.6, we now take real parts. This results in Re(< (A isb ) α, α >) = N ( ) k k= s 2k n =2k ρ n b n + o(s 2N ) (4.24) as s in R +. Finally, upon multiplying 4.23 by the factor s 2N (rather than s 2N+ as before), we deduce the limit, lim F b(s) = ( ) N s n =2N where for s R + and b (R + ) 2, F b (s) is defined by F b (s) = s 2N Re(< (A isb ) α, α >) N k= ρ n b n (4.25) ( ) k s 2(N k) Carrying out the telescoping argument, one computes that F b (s) = ( ) N s 2 < which implies via 4.25 the existence of the limit lim < s n =2k X2 b X 2 b + s2 (X b) N 2 γ b, (X b ) N γ b >, s2 Xb 2 Xb 2 + (X b) N 2 γ b, (X b ) N γ b >= s2 3 n =2N ρ n b n. (4.26) ρ n b n. (4.27)
32 As 4.2 holds, 4.27 implies that < (X b ) 2 (X b ) N 2 γ b, (X b ) N γ b >= As this last equation unravels via 4.6 and 4.9 to r 2N (b) = ρ n b, n the proof that 4.4 holds is complete. 5 Finite Hankel Pairs n =2N n =2N In this section we give an alternate matrix theoretic treatment of HVMS s based on the fact that it is possible to cleanly characterize the Gram matrix formed from the moment vectors of an HVMS. For X a set, we let l 2 (X) denote the Hilbert space of square summable complex valued functions on X. If f l 2 (X), we let supp(f), the support of f, denote the subset of X defined by supp(f) = {x X f(x) 0}. By a matrix on X we mean a square array of scalars, doubly indexed by the elements of X. If a = [a x,y ] is a matrix on X, then a induces a densely defined linear operator, also denoted by a, on the finitely supported functions in l 2 (X) by the formula (af)(x) = a x,y f(y). y supp(f) ρ n b n. If a = [a x,y ] is a matrix on X, then we say that a is symmetric if a x,y = a y,x for all x, y X, and we say that a is positive semi-definite if for each (finite) choice of elements, x, x 2,..., x l X, and each choice of scalars, c, c 2,..., c l C, l a xi,x j c j c i 0. i,j= 32
33 In this section we shall be exclusively interested in the case where X = I N, for N a positive integer. Note that naturally, if M N, then l 2 (I M ) l 2 (I N ), and in addition, that there is a pair of shift operators, S, S 2 : l 2 (I N ) l 2 (I N ) defined by (S f)(n) = (S 2 f)(n) = { f(n e ) n e I N 0 else { f(n e2 ) n e 2 I N 0 else If ({α n }, A, ) is an HVMS of size N, then we may define a pair of matrices a = (a, a 2 ) on I N by a m,n =< α n, α m > and a 2 m,n =< ( )α n, α m > for m, n I N. (5.) Definition 5.2. We say that a = (a, a 2 ) is a finite Hankel pair of size N if a and a 2 are matrices on I N and there exists an HVMS of size N such that (5.) holds. In Theorem 5.7, we give a characterization of when a pair of matrices is a finite Hankel pair. To see how this is a two variable version of Theorem.7, let us restate that theorem more abstractly. Let S : l 2 ({0,,..., N 2}) l 2 ({0,,..., N }) be the shift defined by Sf(j) = f(j ), j > 0, and Sf(0) = 0. Theorem 5.3. Let H be an N-by-N matrix. There is a self-adjoint operator A and a vector α with α Dom(A k ) for k N such that H ij = < A j α, A i α > 0 i, j N if and only if the following three conditions obtain. H is positive semi-definite. (5.4) H i+,j = H i,j+ 0 i, j N 2. (5.5) supp(f) {0,..., N 2} and Hf = 0 HSf = 0. (5.6) Here is our two variable version of Hamburger s Theorem.7. 33
34 Theorem 5.7. Let a be a pair of matrices on I N. Then a is a finite Hankel pair of size N if and only if the following four conditions obtain. a and a 2 are positive semi-definite. (5.8) a m+e,n + a 2 m+e 2,n = a m,n+e + a 2 m,n+e 2 whenever m, n I N. (5.9) a (0,l),(0,l) = a 2 (l,0),(l,0) = 0 for l =,..., N. (5.0) supp(f) I N and (a + a 2 )f = 0 (a S + a 2 S 2 )f = 0. (5.) Proof. (Necessity) Assume that ({α n } n IN,, A) is an HVMS and (5.) holds. Then (5.8) holds because and are positive operators. (5.9) holds because the left-hand side is α n, α m+e + ( )α n, α m+e2 = α n, Aα m, by (2.4). But the right-hand side of (5.9) by a similar calculation is Aα n, α m, which is equal to α n, Aα m because A is self-adjoint and α m, α n are in its domain for m, n I N. Condition (5.0) follows from (2.2). Finally, if supp(f) I N and (a + a 2 )f = 0, this says that n I N f(n)α n, α m = 0 for all m I N. But (a S + a 2 S 2 )f(m) = n I N f(n) α n+e + ( )α n+e2, α m = A( n I N f(n)α n ), α m = 0, so (5.) holds. (Sufficiency). Assume (5.8) (5.) hold. Choose vectors α n in a Hilbert space H so that their Grammian equals the matrix a + a 2 : α n, α m = a m,n + a 2 m,n. Since a α n, α m, there is a positive operator satisfying (5.). Equation (2.2) follows from (5.0). 34
35 If N =, we can define A arbitrarily, e.g. by A = 0. If N 2, we define A on the span of {α n } n IN by Aα n = α n+e + ( )α n+e2. To check that this is a well-defined linear operator, we need to know that if n I N c n α n = 0, then n I N c n ( α n+e + ( )α n+e2 ) = 0. This follows from (5.). It follows from (5.9) that A is symmetric. 6 Infinite sequences As in one variable, passage from the finite to the infinite case is straightforward and leads to some simplifications. Let I denote the set of pairs of non-negative integers, excluding (0, 0). Definition 6.. An infinite Hankel vector moment sequence is a 3-tuple, ({α n } n I,, A) where: {α n } n I is a sequence of vectors in some Hilbert space H; is a positive contraction acting on H, satisfying for each l α (0,l) = 0 = ( )α (l,0) = 0; A is a densely defined self-adjoint operator on H with the property that {α n n I} Dom(A); for each n I, Aα n = α n+e + ( )α n+e2. Theorem.5 becomes a description of functions in L. Theorem 6.2. A Pick function h of two variables has an asymptotic expansion h(z) = ρ n z n n I 35
36 as z nt, for some real numbers ρ n, if and only if it has a representation as in (.0) and for every such representation there is an infinite HVMS ({α n } n I,, A) with α = α (,0) + α (0,). Moreover, {ρ n } are given by whenever l and b (R + ) 2. n =l ρ n b n = r l(b) Sufficiency of the condition follows from Theorem 3.0; necessity follows from the constructive proof of Theorem 4.2. We define an infinite Hankel pair by Definition 6.3. We say that a = (a, a 2 ) is a infinite Hankel pair if a and a 2 are matrices on I and there exists an infinite HVMS such that a m,n = α n, α m and a 2 m,n = ( )α n, α m for m, n I. (6.4) If (5.9) holds for all N, then (5.) holds automatically. So the infinite Hamburger theorem becomes Theorem 6.5. Let a be a pair of matrices on I. Then a is an infinite Hankel pair if and only if the following three conditions obtain. a and a 2 are positive semi-definite. a m+e,n + a 2 m+e 2,n = a m,n+e + a 2 m,n+e 2 whenever m, n I. a (0,l),(0,l) = a 2 (l,0),(l,0) = 0 for l. Here is a two variable version of Kronecker s theorem. Theorem 6.6. Let h L. Then there is an infinite HVMS ({α n } n I,, A) with α = α (,0) + α (0,), satisfying rank(a + a 2 ) < and if and only if h is a rational function. h(z) = (A z ) α, α (6.7) 36
37 Proof. If h is rational of degree (d, d 2 ), then by Theorem 8.2 h has a representation (6.7) on a Hilbert space H of dimension at most d = d + d 2. Since h L, by Theorem 6.2 there is an infinite HVMS ({α n } n I,, A) on H. So (a + a 2 ) m,n = α n, α m H has rank at most d. Conversely, suppose there is an infinite HVMS ({α n } n I,, A) with α = α (,0) + α (0,), satisfying rank(a + a 2 ) = d < and (6.7). Then one can choose vectors β n in a space H of dimension d such that β n, β m H = α n, α m (6.8) and so that the vectors {β n } span H. Define a positive contraction X on H by Xβ n, β m = α n, α m. (6.9) Define B by Bβ n = Xβ n+e + ( X)β n+e2. We claim that B extends by linearity to a well-defined linear operator on H. Indeed, suppose c n β n = 0. Then by (6.8), c n α n, c m α m = c n β n, c m β m = 0. So c n α n = 0, and therefore by (6.9) c n [Xβ n+e + ( X)β n+e2 ], β m = c n [ α n+e + ( )α n+e2 ], α m = A c n α n, α m = 0. As {β m } span H, this means c n [Xβ n+e + ( X)β n+e2 ] = 0; so B is well-defined, and hence ({β n } n I, X, B) is an infinite HVMS on H. Let β = β (,0) + β (0,). By Remark 2.20 the scalar (X, β) moments of B agree with the scalar (, α) moments of A to all orders. Therefore by Theorem 6.2, the rational function g of degree at most d in each variable given by g(z) = (B z X ) β, β H (6.0) has the same asymptotic expansion at as h. done. By Lemma 6., we are 37
38 Lemma 6.. Let g, h be in L and have the same asymptotic expansion at. Assume in addition that g is rational. Then g and h are equal. Proof. For each fixed w in R, the functions g(z, z + w) and h(z, z + w) are in the one variable Pick class and have the same asymptotic expansions at. By Theorem.4, they must be Cauchy transforms of measures with the same moments. Moreover, g(z, z + w) is rational. Therefore by [7, Thm..2], the one-variable moment problem is in this case determinate, so the two measures must be equal. Therefore g(z, z + w) = h(z, z + w) for all z Π, w R, and so the two functions are identically equal. Corollary 6.2. Let h L N have an asymptotic expansion ρ n h(z) = z + n o( z (2N ) ) n 2N as z nt. Then there is a rational function g in L that has the same asymptotic expansion to order 2N. Proof. Let ({α n } n IN,, A) be a finite HVMS corresponding to h as in Theorem 4.2. Choose vectors {β n } n IN in a finite dimensional space H so that (6.8) holds, and define X and B as in the proof of Theorem 6.6. Then g given by (6.0) has the same asymptotic expansion. 7 An example Let {w j } j= be a summable sequence of non-negative numbers, and let {λ j } j= be a sequence of real numbers. Let t j be numbers in the interval [0, ]. Define A = ( ) λ j 0 0 λ j = t 2 j t j t 2 j t j t 2 j t 2 j α (,0) = wj t j t 2 j 38
39 α (0,) = wj ( t 2 j t j If α = α (,0) + α (0,) and h(z) = (A z ) α, α, then h(z) is given by 4t j t 2 j λ j + z + z 2 h(z) = w j λ 2 j λ j(2t 2 j )(z. (7.) z 2 ) z z 2 j= If w j λ 2 j <, then one can extend the HVMS by α (2,0) = wj λ j (2t 2 j ) t 2 j α (,) = 2 t j t 3 j + t 2 j w j λ j α (0,2) = wj λ j ( 2t 2 j) ) t j t 3 j t 2 j t j t 2 j ( t 2 j t j t 2 j ) Calculating, one gets that ( ) [ r (z) = wj + ] z z 2 r 2 (z) = w j λ j 2t2 j 4t j t 2 j + + 2t2 j z 2 z z 2 z2 2 r 3 (z) = w j λ 2 (2t2 j ) 2 4(t 2 j t 4 j) + 4t j (2t 2 j ) t 2 j j + z 3 zz 2 2 4(t 2 j t 4 j) + 4t j ( 2t 2 j) t 2 j + + (2t2 j ) 2. z z2 2 z2 3 These are (up to a minus sign) the first 3 terms in the asymptotic expansion of (7.) at infinity. If one assumes that w j λ 4 j <, then one gets two more terms, and so on. 39.
40 In the special case that every t j = / 2, the formulas simplify. Then 8 Models h(z) = 2λ j + z + z 2 w j λ 2 j z z 2 ( ) z + z 2 r (z) = wj z z 2 ( ) 2 r 2 (z) = wj λ j z z 2 ( ) r 3 (z) = wj λ 2 z + z 2 j. zz A model for h is a reproducing kernel space M on Π 2, and a positive contraction on M so that, if the reproducing kernel K for M is written as with v z analytic in z, then K(z, w) = v z, v w M (8.) h(z) h(w) = (z w ) v z, v w + (z 2 w 2 ) (I )v z, v w. (8.2) Using our earlier notation z = z + z 2 (I ), (8.2) becomes h(z) h(w) = (z w )v z, v w. (8.3) The existence of models for functions in the Pick class was proved in []. Indeed, it was shown there that for every h in the Pick class, there are analytic functions v (z) and v 2 (z) taking values in Hilbert spaces M and M 2 so that Let h(z) h(w) = (z w ) v (z), v (w) M + (z 2 w 2 ) v 2 (z), v 2 (w) M 2. K(z, w) = v (z), v (w) M + v 2 (z), v 2 (w) M 2. This is a kernel, so can be written as in (8.) for some other Hilbert space M, and there is a positive contraction on M so that v (z), v (w) M = v z, v w. This yields (8.3). Write i for the point (i, i) in C 2. The equivalence of (ii) - (iv) in the following theorem was first proved in [4]. 40
41 Theorem 8.4. Let h : Π 2 Π be in the Pick class, and not identically zero. The following are equivalent. (i) For some/every model with reproducing kernel as in (8.), there is a vector α in M such that h(z) = v z, α. (8.5) (ii) There exists a self-adjoint operator A on a Hilbert space H and a vector α in H such that (iii) There exists c > 0 such that (iv) We have Proof. (i) (ii): Define B by h(z) = (A z ) α, α. (8.6) lim sh(si) = ic. (8.7) s lim inf s Equations (8.3) and (8.5) imply that sh(si) < ı. (8.8) B : v z z v z + α. Bv z, v w = v z, Bv w. (8.9) Extend B to finite linear combinations of vectors v zj by linearity, and (8.9) says that B is well-defined and symmetric. Indeed, if some linear combination cj v zj = 0, then for every w we have c j ((z j ) v zj + α), v w = c j v zj, w v w + α = 0, so B(c j v zj ) = 0. If the defect indices of the closure of B match, then B can be extended to a self-adjoint operator on M. If not, B can be extended to a self-adjoint operator on a superspace of M. In either event, we can assume that there is a self-adjoint A on H M such that A : v z z v z + α. Therefore v z = (A z ) α, and (8.6) follows from (8.5). 4
Hankel vector moment sequences and the nontangential regularity at infinity of two variable Pick functions
Washington University in St. Louis Washington University Open Scholarship Mathematics Faculty Publications Mathematics 204 Hankel vector moment sequences and the nontangential regularity at infinity of
More informationHankel vector moment sequences
Hankel vector moment sequences J.E. Pascoe May 29, 2014 Pick functions Let Π be the complex upper halfplane, that is Π = {z C : Im z > 0}. Pick functions Let Π be the complex upper halfplane, that is Π
More informationReal Analysis Math 131AH Rudin, Chapter #1. Dominique Abdi
Real Analysis Math 3AH Rudin, Chapter # Dominique Abdi.. If r is rational (r 0) and x is irrational, prove that r + x and rx are irrational. Solution. Assume the contrary, that r+x and rx are rational.
More informationAn introduction to some aspects of functional analysis
An introduction to some aspects of functional analysis Stephen Semmes Rice University Abstract These informal notes deal with some very basic objects in functional analysis, including norms and seminorms
More informationHomework I, Solutions
Homework I, Solutions I: (15 points) Exercise on lower semi-continuity: Let X be a normed space and f : X R be a function. We say that f is lower semi - continuous at x 0 if for every ε > 0 there exists
More informationMetric Spaces and Topology
Chapter 2 Metric Spaces and Topology From an engineering perspective, the most important way to construct a topology on a set is to define the topology in terms of a metric on the set. This approach underlies
More informationElementary linear algebra
Chapter 1 Elementary linear algebra 1.1 Vector spaces Vector spaces owe their importance to the fact that so many models arising in the solutions of specific problems turn out to be vector spaces. The
More informationMATH 117 LECTURE NOTES
MATH 117 LECTURE NOTES XIN ZHOU Abstract. This is the set of lecture notes for Math 117 during Fall quarter of 2017 at UC Santa Barbara. The lectures follow closely the textbook [1]. Contents 1. The set
More informationNumerical Sequences and Series
Numerical Sequences and Series Written by Men-Gen Tsai email: b89902089@ntu.edu.tw. Prove that the convergence of {s n } implies convergence of { s n }. Is the converse true? Solution: Since {s n } is
More informationCHAPTER 7. Connectedness
CHAPTER 7 Connectedness 7.1. Connected topological spaces Definition 7.1. A topological space (X, T X ) is said to be connected if there is no continuous surjection f : X {0, 1} where the two point set
More informationExercise Solutions to Functional Analysis
Exercise Solutions to Functional Analysis Note: References refer to M. Schechter, Principles of Functional Analysis Exersize that. Let φ,..., φ n be an orthonormal set in a Hilbert space H. Show n f n
More information1 Topology Definition of a topology Basis (Base) of a topology The subspace topology & the product topology on X Y 3
Index Page 1 Topology 2 1.1 Definition of a topology 2 1.2 Basis (Base) of a topology 2 1.3 The subspace topology & the product topology on X Y 3 1.4 Basic topology concepts: limit points, closed sets,
More informationPart III. 10 Topological Space Basics. Topological Spaces
Part III 10 Topological Space Basics Topological Spaces Using the metric space results above as motivation we will axiomatize the notion of being an open set to more general settings. Definition 10.1.
More informationMath 328 Course Notes
Math 328 Course Notes Ian Robertson March 3, 2006 3 Properties of C[0, 1]: Sup-norm and Completeness In this chapter we are going to examine the vector space of all continuous functions defined on the
More informationIntroduction and Preliminaries
Chapter 1 Introduction and Preliminaries This chapter serves two purposes. The first purpose is to prepare the readers for the more systematic development in later chapters of methods of real analysis
More informationMATH 51H Section 4. October 16, Recall what it means for a function between metric spaces to be continuous:
MATH 51H Section 4 October 16, 2015 1 Continuity Recall what it means for a function between metric spaces to be continuous: Definition. Let (X, d X ), (Y, d Y ) be metric spaces. A function f : X Y is
More informationComplete Nevanlinna-Pick Kernels
Complete Nevanlinna-Pick Kernels Jim Agler John E. McCarthy University of California at San Diego, La Jolla California 92093 Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri 63130 Abstract We give a new treatment
More informationREAL AND COMPLEX ANALYSIS
REAL AND COMPLE ANALYSIS Third Edition Walter Rudin Professor of Mathematics University of Wisconsin, Madison Version 1.1 No rights reserved. Any part of this work can be reproduced or transmitted in any
More informationMATH 722, COMPLEX ANALYSIS, SPRING 2009 PART 5
MATH 722, COMPLEX ANALYSIS, SPRING 2009 PART 5.. The Arzela-Ascoli Theorem.. The Riemann mapping theorem Let X be a metric space, and let F be a family of continuous complex-valued functions on X. We have
More informationNORMS ON SPACE OF MATRICES
NORMS ON SPACE OF MATRICES. Operator Norms on Space of linear maps Let A be an n n real matrix and x 0 be a vector in R n. We would like to use the Picard iteration method to solve for the following system
More informationTheorem 5.3. Let E/F, E = F (u), be a simple field extension. Then u is algebraic if and only if E/F is finite. In this case, [E : F ] = deg f u.
5. Fields 5.1. Field extensions. Let F E be a subfield of the field E. We also describe this situation by saying that E is an extension field of F, and we write E/F to express this fact. If E/F is a field
More informationMORE NOTES FOR MATH 823, FALL 2007
MORE NOTES FOR MATH 83, FALL 007 Prop 1.1 Prop 1. Lemma 1.3 1. The Siegel upper half space 1.1. The Siegel upper half space and its Bergman kernel. The Siegel upper half space is the domain { U n+1 z C
More informationMath 350 Fall 2011 Notes about inner product spaces. In this notes we state and prove some important properties of inner product spaces.
Math 350 Fall 2011 Notes about inner product spaces In this notes we state and prove some important properties of inner product spaces. First, recall the dot product on R n : if x, y R n, say x = (x 1,...,
More information2. The Concept of Convergence: Ultrafilters and Nets
2. The Concept of Convergence: Ultrafilters and Nets NOTE: AS OF 2008, SOME OF THIS STUFF IS A BIT OUT- DATED AND HAS A FEW TYPOS. I WILL REVISE THIS MATE- RIAL SOMETIME. In this lecture we discuss two
More informationFunctional Analysis. Franck Sueur Metric spaces Definitions Completeness Compactness Separability...
Functional Analysis Franck Sueur 2018-2019 Contents 1 Metric spaces 1 1.1 Definitions........................................ 1 1.2 Completeness...................................... 3 1.3 Compactness......................................
More informationReal Analysis Notes. Thomas Goller
Real Analysis Notes Thomas Goller September 4, 2011 Contents 1 Abstract Measure Spaces 2 1.1 Basic Definitions........................... 2 1.2 Measurable Functions........................ 2 1.3 Integration..............................
More informationMATH 131A: REAL ANALYSIS (BIG IDEAS)
MATH 131A: REAL ANALYSIS (BIG IDEAS) Theorem 1 (The Triangle Inequality). For all x, y R we have x + y x + y. Proposition 2 (The Archimedean property). For each x R there exists an n N such that n > x.
More informationPROBLEMS. (b) (Polarization Identity) Show that in any inner product space
1 Professor Carl Cowen Math 54600 Fall 09 PROBLEMS 1. (Geometry in Inner Product Spaces) (a) (Parallelogram Law) Show that in any inner product space x + y 2 + x y 2 = 2( x 2 + y 2 ). (b) (Polarization
More informationhere, this space is in fact infinite-dimensional, so t σ ess. Exercise Let T B(H) be a self-adjoint operator on an infinitedimensional
15. Perturbations by compact operators In this chapter, we study the stability (or lack thereof) of various spectral properties under small perturbations. Here s the type of situation we have in mind:
More informationThe following definition is fundamental.
1. Some Basics from Linear Algebra With these notes, I will try and clarify certain topics that I only quickly mention in class. First and foremost, I will assume that you are familiar with many basic
More information08a. Operators on Hilbert spaces. 1. Boundedness, continuity, operator norms
(February 24, 2017) 08a. Operators on Hilbert spaces Paul Garrett garrett@math.umn.edu http://www.math.umn.edu/ garrett/ [This document is http://www.math.umn.edu/ garrett/m/real/notes 2016-17/08a-ops
More informationComplex Analysis Qualifying Exam Solutions
Complex Analysis Qualifying Exam Solutions May, 04 Part.. Let log z be the principal branch of the logarithm defined on G = {z C z (, 0]}. Show that if t > 0, then the equation log z = t has exactly one
More informationEC 521 MATHEMATICAL METHODS FOR ECONOMICS. Lecture 1: Preliminaries
EC 521 MATHEMATICAL METHODS FOR ECONOMICS Lecture 1: Preliminaries Murat YILMAZ Boğaziçi University In this lecture we provide some basic facts from both Linear Algebra and Real Analysis, which are going
More informationSome Background Material
Chapter 1 Some Background Material In the first chapter, we present a quick review of elementary - but important - material as a way of dipping our toes in the water. This chapter also introduces important
More informationEstimates for probabilities of independent events and infinite series
Estimates for probabilities of independent events and infinite series Jürgen Grahl and Shahar evo September 9, 06 arxiv:609.0894v [math.pr] 8 Sep 06 Abstract This paper deals with finite or infinite sequences
More informationIntroduction to Bases in Banach Spaces
Introduction to Bases in Banach Spaces Matt Daws June 5, 2005 Abstract We introduce the notion of Schauder bases in Banach spaces, aiming to be able to give a statement of, and make sense of, the Gowers
More informationMeasure Theory on Topological Spaces. Course: Prof. Tony Dorlas 2010 Typset: Cathal Ormond
Measure Theory on Topological Spaces Course: Prof. Tony Dorlas 2010 Typset: Cathal Ormond May 22, 2011 Contents 1 Introduction 2 1.1 The Riemann Integral........................................ 2 1.2 Measurable..............................................
More informationSuppose R is an ordered ring with positive elements P.
1. The real numbers. 1.1. Ordered rings. Definition 1.1. By an ordered commutative ring with unity we mean an ordered sextuple (R, +, 0,, 1, P ) such that (R, +, 0,, 1) is a commutative ring with unity
More information4 Sums of Independent Random Variables
4 Sums of Independent Random Variables Standing Assumptions: Assume throughout this section that (,F,P) is a fixed probability space and that X 1, X 2, X 3,... are independent real-valued random variables
More informationCHAPTER I THE RIESZ REPRESENTATION THEOREM
CHAPTER I THE RIESZ REPRESENTATION THEOREM We begin our study by identifying certain special kinds of linear functionals on certain special vector spaces of functions. We describe these linear functionals
More informationScattered Data Interpolation with Polynomial Precision and Conditionally Positive Definite Functions
Chapter 3 Scattered Data Interpolation with Polynomial Precision and Conditionally Positive Definite Functions 3.1 Scattered Data Interpolation with Polynomial Precision Sometimes the assumption on the
More informationDepartment of Mathematics, University of California, Berkeley. GRADUATE PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION, Part A Fall Semester 2016
Department of Mathematics, University of California, Berkeley YOUR 1 OR 2 DIGIT EXAM NUMBER GRADUATE PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION, Part A Fall Semester 2016 1. Please write your 1- or 2-digit exam number on
More informationFourth Week: Lectures 10-12
Fourth Week: Lectures 10-12 Lecture 10 The fact that a power series p of positive radius of convergence defines a function inside its disc of convergence via substitution is something that we cannot ignore
More information16 1 Basic Facts from Functional Analysis and Banach Lattices
16 1 Basic Facts from Functional Analysis and Banach Lattices 1.2.3 Banach Steinhaus Theorem Another fundamental theorem of functional analysis is the Banach Steinhaus theorem, or the Uniform Boundedness
More informationTrace Class Operators and Lidskii s Theorem
Trace Class Operators and Lidskii s Theorem Tom Phelan Semester 2 2009 1 Introduction The purpose of this paper is to provide the reader with a self-contained derivation of the celebrated Lidskii Trace
More informationTHE INVERSE FUNCTION THEOREM
THE INVERSE FUNCTION THEOREM W. PATRICK HOOPER The implicit function theorem is the following result: Theorem 1. Let f be a C 1 function from a neighborhood of a point a R n into R n. Suppose A = Df(a)
More informationNOTES (1) FOR MATH 375, FALL 2012
NOTES 1) FOR MATH 375, FALL 2012 1 Vector Spaces 11 Axioms Linear algebra grows out of the problem of solving simultaneous systems of linear equations such as 3x + 2y = 5, 111) x 3y = 9, or 2x + 3y z =
More informationDoubly Indexed Infinite Series
The Islamic University of Gaza Deanery of Higher studies Faculty of Science Department of Mathematics Doubly Indexed Infinite Series Presented By Ahed Khaleel Abu ALees Supervisor Professor Eissa D. Habil
More informationM17 MAT25-21 HOMEWORK 6
M17 MAT25-21 HOMEWORK 6 DUE 10:00AM WEDNESDAY SEPTEMBER 13TH 1. To Hand In Double Series. The exercises in this section will guide you to complete the proof of the following theorem: Theorem 1: Absolute
More informationConvex Optimization Notes
Convex Optimization Notes Jonathan Siegel January 2017 1 Convex Analysis This section is devoted to the study of convex functions f : B R {+ } and convex sets U B, for B a Banach space. The case of B =
More information5 Measure theory II. (or. lim. Prove the proposition. 5. For fixed F A and φ M define the restriction of φ on F by writing.
5 Measure theory II 1. Charges (signed measures). Let (Ω, A) be a σ -algebra. A map φ: A R is called a charge, (or signed measure or σ -additive set function) if φ = φ(a j ) (5.1) A j for any disjoint
More informationINTRODUCTION TO REAL ANALYTIC GEOMETRY
INTRODUCTION TO REAL ANALYTIC GEOMETRY KRZYSZTOF KURDYKA 1. Analytic functions in several variables 1.1. Summable families. Let (E, ) be a normed space over the field R or C, dim E
More informationPlaces of Number Fields and Function Fields MATH 681, Spring 2018
Places of Number Fields and Function Fields MATH 681, Spring 2018 From now on we will denote the field Z/pZ for a prime p more compactly by F p. More generally, for q a power of a prime p, F q will denote
More information(1) Consider the space S consisting of all continuous real-valued functions on the closed interval [0, 1]. For f, g S, define
Homework, Real Analysis I, Fall, 2010. (1) Consider the space S consisting of all continuous real-valued functions on the closed interval [0, 1]. For f, g S, define ρ(f, g) = 1 0 f(x) g(x) dx. Show that
More information1 Math 241A-B Homework Problem List for F2015 and W2016
1 Math 241A-B Homework Problem List for F2015 W2016 1.1 Homework 1. Due Wednesday, October 7, 2015 Notation 1.1 Let U be any set, g be a positive function on U, Y be a normed space. For any f : U Y let
More informationMathematics Department Stanford University Math 61CM/DM Inner products
Mathematics Department Stanford University Math 61CM/DM Inner products Recall the definition of an inner product space; see Appendix A.8 of the textbook. Definition 1 An inner product space V is a vector
More informationFinite-dimensional spaces. C n is the space of n-tuples x = (x 1,..., x n ) of complex numbers. It is a Hilbert space with the inner product
Chapter 4 Hilbert Spaces 4.1 Inner Product Spaces Inner Product Space. A complex vector space E is called an inner product space (or a pre-hilbert space, or a unitary space) if there is a mapping (, )
More informationContribution of Problems
Exam topics 1. Basic structures: sets, lists, functions (a) Sets { }: write all elements, or define by condition (b) Set operations: A B, A B, A\B, A c (c) Lists ( ): Cartesian product A B (d) Functions
More informationTopological vectorspaces
(July 25, 2011) Topological vectorspaces Paul Garrett garrett@math.umn.edu http://www.math.umn.edu/ garrett/ Natural non-fréchet spaces Topological vector spaces Quotients and linear maps More topological
More informationRudin Real and Complex Analysis - Harmonic Functions
Rudin Real and Complex Analysis - Harmonic Functions Aaron Lou December 2018 1 Notes 1.1 The Cauchy-Riemann Equations 11.1: The Operators and Suppose f is a complex function defined in a plane open set
More informationALGEBRA. 1. Some elementary number theory 1.1. Primes and divisibility. We denote the collection of integers
ALGEBRA CHRISTIAN REMLING 1. Some elementary number theory 1.1. Primes and divisibility. We denote the collection of integers by Z = {..., 2, 1, 0, 1,...}. Given a, b Z, we write a b if b = ac for some
More informationCompact operators on Banach spaces
Compact operators on Banach spaces Jordan Bell jordan.bell@gmail.com Department of Mathematics, University of Toronto November 12, 2017 1 Introduction In this note I prove several things about compact
More informationDR.RUPNATHJI( DR.RUPAK NATH )
Contents 1 Sets 1 2 The Real Numbers 9 3 Sequences 29 4 Series 59 5 Functions 81 6 Power Series 105 7 The elementary functions 111 Chapter 1 Sets It is very convenient to introduce some notation and terminology
More informationMath 210B. Artin Rees and completions
Math 210B. Artin Rees and completions 1. Definitions and an example Let A be a ring, I an ideal, and M an A-module. In class we defined the I-adic completion of M to be M = lim M/I n M. We will soon show
More informationNormed and Banach spaces
Normed and Banach spaces László Erdős Nov 11, 2006 1 Norms We recall that the norm is a function on a vectorspace V, : V R +, satisfying the following properties x + y x + y cx = c x x = 0 x = 0 We always
More informationDS-GA 1002 Lecture notes 0 Fall Linear Algebra. These notes provide a review of basic concepts in linear algebra.
DS-GA 1002 Lecture notes 0 Fall 2016 Linear Algebra These notes provide a review of basic concepts in linear algebra. 1 Vector spaces You are no doubt familiar with vectors in R 2 or R 3, i.e. [ ] 1.1
More informationMATH 220: INNER PRODUCT SPACES, SYMMETRIC OPERATORS, ORTHOGONALITY
MATH 22: INNER PRODUCT SPACES, SYMMETRIC OPERATORS, ORTHOGONALITY When discussing separation of variables, we noted that at the last step we need to express the inhomogeneous initial or boundary data as
More informationSolutions Final Exam May. 14, 2014
Solutions Final Exam May. 14, 2014 1. Determine whether the following statements are true or false. Justify your answer (i.e., prove the claim, derive a contradiction or give a counter-example). (a) (10
More informationHILBERT SPACES AND THE RADON-NIKODYM THEOREM. where the bar in the first equation denotes complex conjugation. In either case, for any x V define
HILBERT SPACES AND THE RADON-NIKODYM THEOREM STEVEN P. LALLEY 1. DEFINITIONS Definition 1. A real inner product space is a real vector space V together with a symmetric, bilinear, positive-definite mapping,
More informationContinuity. Chapter 4
Chapter 4 Continuity Throughout this chapter D is a nonempty subset of the real numbers. We recall the definition of a function. Definition 4.1. A function from D into R, denoted f : D R, is a subset of
More informationare Banach algebras. f(x)g(x) max Example 7.4. Similarly, A = L and A = l with the pointwise multiplication
7. Banach algebras Definition 7.1. A is called a Banach algebra (with unit) if: (1) A is a Banach space; (2) There is a multiplication A A A that has the following properties: (xy)z = x(yz), (x + y)z =
More informationFormal Groups. Niki Myrto Mavraki
Formal Groups Niki Myrto Mavraki Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Some preliminaries 2 3. Formal Groups (1 dimensional) 2 4. Groups associated to formal groups 9 5. The Invariant Differential 11 6. The Formal
More informationNotes on Complex Analysis
Michael Papadimitrakis Notes on Complex Analysis Department of Mathematics University of Crete Contents The complex plane.. The complex plane...................................2 Argument and polar representation.........................
More information4 Uniform convergence
4 Uniform convergence In the last few sections we have seen several functions which have been defined via series or integrals. We now want to develop tools that will allow us to show that these functions
More informationKernel Method: Data Analysis with Positive Definite Kernels
Kernel Method: Data Analysis with Positive Definite Kernels 2. Positive Definite Kernel and Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Space Kenji Fukumizu The Institute of Statistical Mathematics. Graduate University
More informationLinear Algebra Massoud Malek
CSUEB Linear Algebra Massoud Malek Inner Product and Normed Space In all that follows, the n n identity matrix is denoted by I n, the n n zero matrix by Z n, and the zero vector by θ n An inner product
More informationMath212a1413 The Lebesgue integral.
Math212a1413 The Lebesgue integral. October 28, 2014 Simple functions. In what follows, (X, F, m) is a space with a σ-field of sets, and m a measure on F. The purpose of today s lecture is to develop the
More informationTopics in linear algebra
Chapter 6 Topics in linear algebra 6.1 Change of basis I want to remind you of one of the basic ideas in linear algebra: change of basis. Let F be a field, V and W be finite dimensional vector spaces over
More informationVC-DENSITY FOR TREES
VC-DENSITY FOR TREES ANTON BOBKOV Abstract. We show that for the theory of infinite trees we have vc(n) = n for all n. VC density was introduced in [1] by Aschenbrenner, Dolich, Haskell, MacPherson, and
More informationSPRING 2006 PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION SOLUTIONS
SPRING 006 PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION SOLUTIONS 1A. Let G be the subgroup of the free abelian group Z 4 consisting of all integer vectors (x, y, z, w) such that x + 3y + 5z + 7w = 0. (a) Determine a linearly
More informationFinite Fields: An introduction through exercises Jonathan Buss Spring 2014
Finite Fields: An introduction through exercises Jonathan Buss Spring 2014 A typical course in abstract algebra starts with groups, and then moves on to rings, vector spaces, fields, etc. This sequence
More informationON MATRIX VALUED SQUARE INTEGRABLE POSITIVE DEFINITE FUNCTIONS
1 2 3 ON MATRIX VALUED SQUARE INTERABLE POSITIVE DEFINITE FUNCTIONS HONYU HE Abstract. In this paper, we study matrix valued positive definite functions on a unimodular group. We generalize two important
More informationTheorems. Theorem 1.11: Greatest-Lower-Bound Property. Theorem 1.20: The Archimedean property of. Theorem 1.21: -th Root of Real Numbers
Page 1 Theorems Wednesday, May 9, 2018 12:53 AM Theorem 1.11: Greatest-Lower-Bound Property Suppose is an ordered set with the least-upper-bound property Suppose, and is bounded below be the set of lower
More informationSupplementary Notes for W. Rudin: Principles of Mathematical Analysis
Supplementary Notes for W. Rudin: Principles of Mathematical Analysis SIGURDUR HELGASON In 8.00B it is customary to cover Chapters 7 in Rudin s book. Experience shows that this requires careful planning
More informationCHAPTER 8: EXPLORING R
CHAPTER 8: EXPLORING R LECTURE NOTES FOR MATH 378 (CSUSM, SPRING 2009). WAYNE AITKEN In the previous chapter we discussed the need for a complete ordered field. The field Q is not complete, so we constructed
More informationStatistics 612: L p spaces, metrics on spaces of probabilites, and connections to estimation
Statistics 62: L p spaces, metrics on spaces of probabilites, and connections to estimation Moulinath Banerjee December 6, 2006 L p spaces and Hilbert spaces We first formally define L p spaces. Consider
More informationAnalysis Finite and Infinite Sets The Real Numbers The Cantor Set
Analysis Finite and Infinite Sets Definition. An initial segment is {n N n n 0 }. Definition. A finite set can be put into one-to-one correspondence with an initial segment. The empty set is also considered
More informationSpectral theory for compact operators on Banach spaces
68 Chapter 9 Spectral theory for compact operators on Banach spaces Recall that a subset S of a metric space X is precompact if its closure is compact, or equivalently every sequence contains a Cauchy
More informationSolutions to Complex Analysis Prelims Ben Strasser
Solutions to Complex Analysis Prelims Ben Strasser In preparation for the complex analysis prelim, I typed up solutions to some old exams. This document includes complete solutions to both exams in 23,
More informationNOTES ON FRAMES. Damir Bakić University of Zagreb. June 6, 2017
NOTES ON FRAMES Damir Bakić University of Zagreb June 6, 017 Contents 1 Unconditional convergence, Riesz bases, and Bessel sequences 1 1.1 Unconditional convergence of series in Banach spaces...............
More informationCambridge University Press The Mathematics of Signal Processing Steven B. Damelin and Willard Miller Excerpt More information
Introduction Consider a linear system y = Φx where Φ can be taken as an m n matrix acting on Euclidean space or more generally, a linear operator on a Hilbert space. We call the vector x a signal or input,
More informationQualifying Exam Complex Analysis (Math 530) January 2019
Qualifying Exam Complex Analysis (Math 53) January 219 1. Let D be a domain. A function f : D C is antiholomorphic if for every z D the limit f(z + h) f(z) lim h h exists. Write f(z) = f(x + iy) = u(x,
More informationarxiv:math.fa/ v1 2 Oct 1996
ON WIDE-(s) SEQUENCES AND THEIR APPLICATIONS TO CERTAIN CLASSES OF OPERATORS arxiv:math.fa/9610209 v1 2 Oct 1996 H. Rosenthal Department of Mathematics The University of Texas at Austin Austin, TX 78712-1082
More informationVectors in Function Spaces
Jim Lambers MAT 66 Spring Semester 15-16 Lecture 18 Notes These notes correspond to Section 6.3 in the text. Vectors in Function Spaces We begin with some necessary terminology. A vector space V, also
More informationBoolean Inner-Product Spaces and Boolean Matrices
Boolean Inner-Product Spaces and Boolean Matrices Stan Gudder Department of Mathematics, University of Denver, Denver CO 80208 Frédéric Latrémolière Department of Mathematics, University of Denver, Denver
More informationBanach Spaces V: A Closer Look at the w- and the w -Topologies
BS V c Gabriel Nagy Banach Spaces V: A Closer Look at the w- and the w -Topologies Notes from the Functional Analysis Course (Fall 07 - Spring 08) In this section we discuss two important, but highly non-trivial,
More informationChapter 1. Measure Spaces. 1.1 Algebras and σ algebras of sets Notation and preliminaries
Chapter 1 Measure Spaces 1.1 Algebras and σ algebras of sets 1.1.1 Notation and preliminaries We shall denote by X a nonempty set, by P(X) the set of all parts (i.e., subsets) of X, and by the empty set.
More informationA linear algebra proof of the fundamental theorem of algebra
A linear algebra proof of the fundamental theorem of algebra Andrés E. Caicedo May 18, 2010 Abstract We present a recent proof due to Harm Derksen, that any linear operator in a complex finite dimensional
More informationProblem Set 5: Solutions Math 201A: Fall 2016
Problem Set 5: s Math 21A: Fall 216 Problem 1. Define f : [1, ) [1, ) by f(x) = x + 1/x. Show that f(x) f(y) < x y for all x, y [1, ) with x y, but f has no fixed point. Why doesn t this example contradict
More informationFormal power series rings, inverse limits, and I-adic completions of rings
Formal power series rings, inverse limits, and I-adic completions of rings Formal semigroup rings and formal power series rings We next want to explore the notion of a (formal) power series ring in finitely
More information