arxiv: v2 [hep-th] 14 Aug 2013

Transcription

1 hase transitions of magnetic AdS 4 with scalar hair Kiril Hristov, Chiara Toldo, Stefan Vandoren * Institute for Theoretical hysics and Spinoza Institute, Utrecht University, 58 TD Utrecht, The Netherlands, and Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Milano-Bicocca, I-226 Milano, Italy, and INFN, sezione di Milano Bicocca, I-226 Milano, Italy arxiv:4.587v2 [hep-th] 4 Aug 2 We determine the thermodynamic properties of a class of spherically symmetric and static black holes in AdS 4 with magnetic charges and scalar hair. These are solutions in 4d N = 2 gauged supergravity that can arise from eleven-dimensional supergravity compactified on S 7. At zero temperature, they preserve supersymmetry and hence are stable. At non-zero temperatures, we explore in detail the canonical ensemble and stability of solutions and find a first order phase transition between small and large hairy. The transition emerges as a liquid-gas phase transition in the dual three-dimensional field theory on R S 2 with magnetic flux through S 2. INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY Black holes behave much like thermodynamical systems. They have an internal energy (the mass), a temperature (due to Hawking radiation) and other quantum numbers like charges and angular momentum. The entropy is determined by the area of the event horizon [, 2], and from these data one can compute the free energy. Black holes can undergo phase transitions, which reveal a particularly interesting structure in anti-de Sitter spacetimes (AdS). Most famous is perhaps the Hawking- age phase transition between a gas of gravitons and Schwarzschild in AdS []. Using the AdS/CFT correspondence, this phase transition was interpreted as the transition from a confining to a deconfining phase in the dual gauge theory [4]. Similarly, phase transitions of charged black branes ( with planar symmetry) with scalar hair have been used in modeling holographic superconductors on the boundary, where a charged condensate forms via a second order phase transitions and a global U() symmetry is spontaneously broken [5]. In this work we present a new phase transition for spherically symmetric, based on a class of magnetic solutions with non-trivial scalar profiles. These magnetic were recently discovered in [6, 7] and can be thought of as excitations over supersymmetric () static with fixed graviphoton magnetic charge [8 ]. Our analysis follows closely the study of charged AdS 4 presented in [ ], but it is applied to a different class of black hole solutions. The phase transition we find shows nevertheless some similarities to the one found in [, ] for electrically charged and in the absence of scalar fields [29]. Anticipating our final results, we already present the phase diagram in the canonical ensemble in Fig., the main result of our study. We denote by = p one of the two magnetic charges carried by the black hole. In region I we find a small/large black hole first order phase transition for < c and a smooth crossover between the two phases for > c. c -c small small Tc non- unstable regions constant scalars large large FIG. : The phase diagram in the canonical ensemble. Regions I, II and III are separated by the two blue lines of black holes with constant scalar profiles. Apart from a very small region close to criticality, the phase diagram consists of solutions with positive specific heat that are stable against fluctuations. In regions II and III, as well as the two lines with for constant scalars, solutions are absent, and one finds a smooth crossover between small and large that are ly stable everywhere in phase space []. Figure needs to be supplemented with the phase diagram for the scalar hair, which we present in the last I III T II

2 2 section of the paper. There, we also discuss the implications of this result for the AdS/CFT correspondence. BLACK HOLE SOLUTIONS We will discuss properties of black hole solutions of gauged 4d N = 2 supergravity [4, 5]. We consider the particular case of the N = 2 gravitational multiplet coupled to a single vector multiplet with gauge coupling constant g and prepotential F = 2i X (X ). The gauge group is U() U(), and the gauging introduces charges for the two gravitini and a scalar potential V that contains Fayet-Iliopoulos (FI) parameters. The Lagrangian is written in e.g. [6], whose conventions and notation we follow here. This is the simplest four-dimensional theory that allows for static supersymmetric in AdS 4 with spherical symmetry. Moreover, for certain values of the FI parameters, the model can be directly embedded in eleven dimensional supergravity [, 6], hence this could lead to an underlying microscopic string/m-theory description. The FI parameters of the theory, denoted by ξ and ξ, determine the electric charges for the two gravitini [] (with respect to the U() gauge fields A µ and A µ). They are e Λ gξ Λ (Λ =, ) for one gravitino and opposite for the other. The magnetic charges p and p of the black hole therefore obey a Dirac quantization condition, gξ Λ p Λ = n, n Z. () In this work we choose n = (the case of n = + is then also covered by a sign flip on the gravitino charges), which ensures that the asymptote to the stable magnetic AdS ground state [8]. For values of n ±, spherical do not preserve supersymmetry at infinity, so we expect instabilities to occur. The magnetically charged black hole background solutions of [6] have all fermions set to zero and are given by the spacetime metric ds 2 = U 2 (r)dt 2 U 2 (r)dr 2 h 2 (r)(dθ 2 + sin 2 θdϕ 2 ), (2) with ( U 2 (r) = e K g 2 r 2 + c µ r + Q ) r 2, h 2 (r) = e K r 2. () In these coordinates, the field strengths are given by F Λ = p Λ sin θ dθ dϕ and we do not allow for electric charges. The vector multiplet contains a complex scalar field z that parametrizes a special Kähler manifold with Kähler potential K given by z = X X, K = log[x X ( z + z) ]. (4) The general solutions with running scalars have X = ξ b 4ξ ξ r, X = + b 4ξ r, c = 2(gξ b ) 2, (5) Q = 6 b2 ξ 2 + g b4 ξg ξ p + 4 g ξ2 (p ) 2, (6) and µ = 8 ξ b 4g 2 ξ b g2 ξ b p 2gb 2ξ (p ) 2 b. (7) The configuration (2-7) is a solution to the full non-linear set of coupled equations of motion for the metric, gauge fields and complex scalar. For fixed gravitino charges e Λ, the solution contains two parameters, which we can choose to be b and p (with p fixed by the quantization condition ()). The solution for the scalar field is real. Its asymptotic expansion is z = ξ b ξ + 6ξ r + O(r 2 ) where the constant term is dictated by the value of the scalar in the (magnetic) AdS 4 vacuum at infinity. The extremum of the potential V sets the value of the cosmological constant which in our conventions is Λ = g 2 V = 2 g 2 ξ ξ [6]. After truncating the imaginary part of z, we can write down the Lagrangian for the real part, canonically normalized as φ = 8 ln z. We then get, using the results of [6, App. ], L = 2 R(g) e 6φ F µνf µν e 2 φ F µνf µν + 2 µφ µ φ + g 2 (ξ ξ e 2 φ + ξ2 e 2 φ ). (8) For values for which ξ = ξ, one gets the cosh-potential of [6], obtained from a truncation of eleven-dimensional supergravity compactified on S 7. The extremum of the 8 ln(ξ /ξ ), which is the maxi- potential is at φ = mum. Expanding around this value, one finds the mass of the scalar to be m 2 φ = 2g2 V /. One can then verify that the mass satisfies the Breitenlohner-Freedman bound, and in the conventions of e.g. [2] in which V =, we have m 2 BF = 9/4 < m2 φ = 2 < m2 BF +. Asymptotically, the scalar field behaves as φ φ = α r + β r 2 + O(r ), (9) with β = α 2 / 6 and α = 4 2/ b ξ. We have, again in the conventions of [2], β = kα 2 with a fixed value of k = / 6 [2]. The magnetic charge p can be varied freely and defines three regions of black hole solutions with running scalars: > I, I > > III and < III. The values I = 4gξ and III = 2gξ correspond to the only smooth solutions with constant scalars (b = ),

3 see [6]. For other values of the magnetic charge, the limit to constant scalars b = is not smooth. This is an important difference compared with the situation in [, ], where there are no scalars and the magnetic charge is free. The temperature of the black hole can be calculated from the surface gravity, and is given by T = 2π UU r=r+, or T = ( 4π ek(r+) 4g 2 r + µ + 2 c ), () r + with the value of the radius at the outer horizon r + found as the largest root of the equation U 2 (r) =. The resulting Bekenstein-Hawking entropy is therefore r 2 + S = A 4 = πh2 (r + ) = πr 2 +e K(r+). () THERMODYNAMICS AND HASE TRANSITIONS In this section we discuss the thermodynamical properties of the in the canonical ensemble. For magnetically charged, the grand-canonical ensemble seems less appealing, since there are no magnetically charged particles the black hole can emit. One can also allow the cosmological constant Λ to vary, as done in [2, 22]. We however keep Λ fixed and we set V =. In particular we set ξ = / 2, ξ = / 2, which allows for an embedding into eleven-dimensional supergravity, as discussed before. Black holes with magnetic charges must satisfy the first law of thermodynamics dm = T ds + χ Λ dp Λ, (2) I where the magnetostatic potentails are defined as χ Λ = r + G Λ,tr dr, and G is the dual field strength. For the case at hand, these potentials can be computed to be ity b χ = 2 + p 2 ( 2r + 2b ), χ = p 2 ( 2r + + 4b ). () All quantities on the right hand side of (2) have now been determined, so we can integrate the expression to find the mass M on the left hand side, I II M = 2 2b 4 2 g 2 b p 4gb (p ) 2 2b. (4) ity III III FIG. 2: arameter space for genuine black hole solutions (shaded) in regions I, II and III. A black hole solution can therefore be plotted in the (p, b ) plane, as shown in Fig. 2. Not all points correspond to solutions with horizons. Singular and regular solutions are separated by two curves. The first one (green curve) corresponds to the /4- solutions of [8 ], and is defined by the relation p = 4e ( 2α 2 g 2 ), such that U 2 (r) = e K (gr + c 2gr )2 with horizon located at r+ 2 = c/(2g 2 ) with c <. The second curve (in orange) defines the, but non- black hole solutions. It can be obtained from setting T = U 2 =, excluding the and solutions with. It yields conditions that can be analyzed numerically and the result is in Fig. 2. This expression for the mass can be reproduced by using the AMD-formalism [2, 24], which we explicitly verified. The AMD mass in asymptotically AdS space guarantees that M is a conserved quantity[]. The canonical ensemble describes a closed system at fixed temperature and charge, dt = dp Λ =. The free energy F = M T S, (5) is extremised at equilibrium, df =, due to the first law (2). One can therefore compare the free energy F (T, ) of different solutions at fixed T and p - the state with lowest F is the one that is thermodynamically preferred. The phase diagram in the canonical ensemble was already presented in Fig., but now we can discuss it in more detail. It is instructive to compare how the temperature behaves as a function of the outer horizon radius r + for constant magnetic charge in the region c c and outside it (Fig. ).

4 c scales inversely with the coupling constant g, and we expect c ( Λ) /2, and T c ( Λ) /2, with cosmological constant Λ. FIG. : Temperature vs. outer horizon radius r + for fixed values of > c (left, =.5) and < c (right, =.). Numerical analysis shows that c.25 for the values ξ = / 2, ξ = / 2 and g =. For > c, the temperature is a monotonic function of the radius, and so there exists only one black hole for fixed T. In the region < c, for fixed T there exist up to three different - a small, a mediumsized, and a large black hole. To see which black hole is preferred in the canonical ensemble, we plot the free energy for these solutions: Log F FIG. 4: Free energy as a function of temperature for the same fixed values of as in Fig.. From Fig. 4 we see that for < c, increasing T leads to the appearance of medium-sized and large black hole branches, whose free energy is initially higher than for small [4]. Upon further increase of T, the free energy of the large rapidly decreases, leading to a crossing point. The free energy is not smooth here, and so a first order phase transition between small and large occurs, similar to [, ]. To check the intrinsic stability of the different phases against fluctuations, one computes the specific heat C at fixed magnetic charge, ( ) S C T, (6) T which must be positive for stable solutions. It turns out that the medium-sized have negative specific heat and are therefore unstable under temperature fluctuations. The other regions on Fig., where the temperature grows with size, have a positive specific heat and are stable. This means that both the small and the large black hole phases are stable. There is a tiny region where this is not exactly true, as shown on Fig. - close to the critical temperature T c 26, the phase with larger size contains some negative specific heat solutions according to our numerical analysis. The exact values and sizes of each feature on the phase diagram depend on the values of the free positive constants g, ξ, ξ. One finds, for instance, that the value of DUAL DESCRITION VIA ADS/CFT The supergravity models we have discussed can be embedded in M-theory compactified on AdS 4 S 7 [, 6], and will have field theory duals in the class of ABJM models [25] defined on R S 2. The bulk gauge group U() U() corresponds to part of the global R-symmetry group on the boundary, which can be gauged to produce background magnetic fields on the boundary with flux through the S 2. The bulk model contains a scalar field with m 2 φ = 2, so the boundary values provide sources for operators of dimensions equal to one or two, depending on the choice of quantization. Examples of such operators in three dimensions are bilinears of boundary scalars ϕ or fermions ψ transforming under the global R-symmetry group are O = Tr(ϕ I a IJ ϕ J ), O 2 = Tr(ψ I b IJ ψ J ), (7) for some constant matrices a and b. According to the holographic dictionary, the expectation values of these operators are given by the boundary values of the bulk scalar field, O = α and O 2 = β. Moreover, the ABJM action S is deformed by multitrace operators, S = S + k O, along the lines of [2, 26, 27]. The dimensionless deformation parameter k is given by the boundary conditions of the scalar field, β = kα 2, using the notation of (9). In our case, it is fixed to be k = / 6. Since α b and β b 2, we can use b as an order parameter and express it as a function of the temperature. Doing so, we get the following plots,.6.2 FIG. 5: Behaviour of the order parameter b in function of the temperature T for values > c (left, =.) and < c (right, =.5). The condensate is actually never vanishing for any finite temperature, and it goes to zero in the limit T, so the global R-symmetry is always broken. The behavior of the order parameter mimics more that of a liquid-gas transition, and one can determine the critical temperature from Maxwell s equal area construction. The thermodynamical behavior of the discussed in this paper should be reproduced by the boundary field theory partition function on S S 2. At.8.6

5 5 zero temperature, degeneracies of the ground state of this system should explain the finite entropy of the -black hole, presumably through the presence of Landau levels that arise because of the magnetic field. At finite temperature, we predict that the system undergoes a phase transition for magnetic charges below a critical value. It would be interesting to understand this phase transition directly in the boundary field theory, perhaps using the techniques recently developed by e.g. [28]. Acknowledgements We thank J. de Boer, A. Gnecchi, S. Minwalla, M. Rangamani, S. Ross, H. Stoof and A. Zaffaroni for valuable discussions. C.T. and S.V. acknowledge support by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) under the VICI grant K.H. is supported in part by INFN and by the MIUR-FIRB grant RBFRQS5J String Theory and Fundamental Interactions. [] J. D. Bekenstein, hys. Rev. D 7 (97) 2. [2] S. W. Hawking, Commun. Math. hys. 4 (975) 99 [Erratum-ibid. 46 (976) 26]. [] S. W. Hawking and D. N. age, Commun. Math. hys. 87 (98) 577. [4] E. Witten, Adv. Theor. Math. hys. 2 (998) 55 [hepth/98]. [5] S. A. Hartnoll, C.. Herzog and G. T. Horowitz, hys. Rev. Lett. (28) 6 [arxiv:8.295 [hep-th]]. [6] C. Toldo and S. Vandoren, JHE 29 (22) 48, arxiv:27.4 [hep-th]. [7] D. Klemm and O. Vaughan, JHE (2) 5, arxiv: [hep-th]. [8] S. L. Cacciatori and D. Klemm, JHE (2) 85, arxiv: [hep-th]. [9] G. Dall Agata and A. Gnecchi, JHE, 7 (2), arxiv:2.756 [hep-th]. [] K. Hristov and S. Vandoren, JHE 4 (2) 47, arxiv:2.44 [hep-th]. [] A. Chamblin, R. Emparan, C. V. Johnson and R. C. Myers, hys. Rev. D 6 (999) 648, hep-th/9927. [2] M. Cvetic and S. S. Gubser, JHE 994 (999) 24, hep-th/ [] A. Chamblin, R. Emparan, C. V. Johnson and R. C. Myers, hys. Rev. D 6 (999) 426, hep-th/ [4] B. de Wit,. G. Lauwers and A. Van roeyen, Nucl. hys. B 255, (985) 569. [5] L. Adrianopoli, M. Bertolini, A. Ceresole, R. D Auria, S. Ferrara,. Fre and T. Magri, J. Geom. hys. 2 (997), hep-th/9652. [6] M. J. Duff and J. T. Liu, Nucl. hys. B554 (999) 27-25, hep-th/9949. [7] A. Gnecchi and C. Toldo, JHE (2) 88 [arxiv:2.966 [hep-th]]. [8] K. Hristov, C. Toldo and S. Vandoren, JHE 2 (2) 4, arxiv:688 [hep-th]. [9] K. Hristov, JHE 2 (22) 95, arxiv: [hep-th]. [2] T. Hertog and G. T. Horowitz, hys. Rev. Lett. 94 (25) 22, [hep-th/4269]. [2] M. Cvetic, G. W. Gibbons, D. Kubiznak and C. N. ope, hys. Rev. D 84 (2) 247 [arxiv: [hepth]]. [22] D. Kubiznak and R. B. Mann, JHE 27 (22) [arxiv: [hep-th]]. [2] A. Ashtekar and A. Magnon, Class. Quant. Grav. (984) L9. [24] A. Ashtekar and S. Das, Class. Quant. Grav. 7 (2) L7 [hep-th/992]. [25] O. Aharony, O. Bergman, D. L. Jafferis and J. Maldacena, JHE 8 (28) 9 [arxiv:86.28 [hep-th]]. [26] E. Witten, hep-th/2258. [27] M. Berkooz, A. Sever and A. Shomer, JHE 25 (22) 4 [hep-th/2264]. [28] S. Jain, S. Minwalla, T. Sharma, T. Takimi, S. R. Wadia and S. Yokoyama, arxiv:.669 [hep-th]. [29] The studied in [, ] and [6] can also be magnetic, but are then related to the electric ones by electro-magnetic duality. Our solutions are not of that kind and have to be studied separately. [] For constant scalars, the magnetic charge is fixed by the Dirac quantization condition and falls outside the critical region. Hence there is no phase transition in our case for constant scalars. [] One can also consider magnetic gaugings and obtain dyonic and non- configurations, like in [9, 7]. [2] Usually, scalar hair solutions allow for arbitrary values of k, but it might be that the absence of electric charges and the coupling of the scalars to the gauge fields, have fixed this parameter to a particular value. It would be interesting to study dyonic extensions of our black hole solutions in which this parameter is free. [] Surprisingly, this quantity does not coincide with the one coming from the superalgebra, computed in [6, 8, 9]. [4] We have an exception of this only at =, where the branch with larger dominates over the smaller everywhere. Therefore the critical lines do not cross the = axis, just as in [, ].