Step Response for the Transfer Function of a Sensor

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Step Response for the Transfer Function of a Sensor"

Transcription

1 Step Response f the Transfer Function of a Sens G(s)=Y(s)/X(s) of a sens with X(s) input and Y(s) output A) First Order Instruments a) First der transfer function G(s)=k/(1+Ts), k=gain, T = time constant Example, J thermocouple with gain at 2 C of =51 µv/ C and time constant of approx.1 sec. k=5 [1 µv/ C] and T=.1 MATLAB program k=5; T=.1; num=[ k]; den=[t 1]; step(num,den);grid Fig. y(t) plot 5 Step Response Amplitude Time (sec)

2 Bode diagram MATLAB program >> bode(num,den); grid; 2 Bode Diagram 1 Magnitude (db) Phase (deg) Frequency (rad/sec) Bandwidth Cutoff frequency, ω b,defining the bandwidth, is defined as the frequency ω f which the Magnitude 2 log G(jω) drops 3 db below its zero-frequency value 2 log G(j) 2 log G(jω) <2 log G(j) - 3 db f ω> ω b In the above case of a first der transfer function G(s)=k/(1+Ts), k=5, T =.1 s G(s)=5/(1+.1s) G(jω)=5/(1+.1jω) its zero-frequency value is G(j)=5 2 log G(j) =14 db Cutoff frequency, ω b,defining the bandwidth, is obtained from the equation 2 log G(jω b ) = 2 log G(j) - 3 =14 3 = 11 db ω b 1 rad/sec f b 1/(2π) 14 Hz

3 Static calibration of the sens F: Xn in unknown sens input to the sens and Ym is the measured output from the sens, static calibration uses steady state sens gain K c f calibration, i.e f estimating the unknown input Using limit value theem f unit step input X(s)=1/s f s tending towards zero K c = lim s G(s) /s= lim G(s) = G(j)=5 Consequently, unknown sens input to the sens is estimated as Y/ K c = Y/5 In practice, this is considered acceptable within bandwidth, i.e f input signal frequencies ω < ω b Sinusoidal Response of the sens x(t)=sin ωt k/(1+ts) y(t) 1/ K c x est (t) f X(s)= ω/(s 2 +ω 2 ) and unit impulse input δ(s)=1 δ(s)=1 ω/(s 2 +ω 2 ) k/(1+ts) y(t) 1/ K c x est (t) k=5; T=.1; K c =5 MATLAB Simulations 1) ω=1 rad/s f= 1.58 Hz period =.63 sec MATLAB program num=[ 5]; den=[ ]; impulse(num,den); Fig. y(t) plot

4 5 Impulse Response Amplitude Time (sec) 2) ω=1 rad/s f= 15.8 Hz period =.63 sec MATLAB program num=[ 5]; den=[ ]; impulse(num,den); Fig. y(t) plot

5 4 Impulse Response Amplitude Time (sec) 3) ω=1 rad/s f= 158 Hz period =.63 sec MATLAB program num=[ 5]; den=[ ]; impulse(num,den); Fig. y(t) plot

6 1 Impulse Response.5 Amplitude Time (sec) Analytical Solutions (K. Ogata, Modern Control Engineering, 4th edition, Prentice Hall pp ), where L{}=Laplace transfm L{x(t)=sin ωt } G(s) =k/(1+ts) L{y(t)} 1/ K c L{ x est (t)} where static calibration constant is K c = G(j) F X(s)= ω/(s 2 +ω 2 ) and unit impulse input δ(s)=1 δ(s)=1 ω/(s 2 +ω 2 ) k/(1+ts) y(t) 1/ K c L{ x est (t)} F k=5; T=.1; results x(t) =1 x(t)=1 sin ωt G(s) =k/(1+ts) G(jω) =k/(1+t jω)=5/(1+.1 jω)= 5(1-j.1ω)/( ω 2 )= 5(1-j.1ω)/( ω 2 ) G(jω) = 5/( ω 2 ) 1/2 Φ = tan -1 (-.1ω) K c = G(j)=k=5 y(t)=1 G(jω) sin (ωt+ Φ) x est (t)= y(t)/ K c =( G(jω) / K c ) sin (ωt+ Φ)= ( G(jω) /5) sin (ωt+ Φ)

7 x est (t) / x(t) = G(jω) /5 F ω = 1 results G(jω) = 5/( ω 2 ) 1/2 =5/( ) 1/2 5 Φ = tan -1 (-.1ω) =-5.71 y(t)=1 G(jω) sin (ωt+ Φ) 5 sin ωt x est (t)= y(t)/k 1 sin ωt=x(t) x est (t) / x(t) 1 Summary of results: ω [rad/s] f[hz] Period [s] G(jω) Φ y(t) x est (t) x est (t) / x(t) sin ωt sin ωt sin(ωt-45).7sin(ωt-45) sin(ωt-9).1sin(ωt-45).1 The result f ω = 1, gives x est (t) / x(t).7 2 log x est (t) / x(t) = - 3 db, i.e ω = 1 = ω b Consequently, f ω > ω b x est (t) / x(t) <.7 ω > >ω b x est (t) / x(t) <<.7 ω = 1 x est (t) / x(t).1 i.e the estimation is only 1% of the amplitude of the sens input signal Dynamic estimation (calibration) can use inverse problem solution, increasing gains, in this case 1/.7 f ω = 1 f and 1/.1=1 f ω = 1. (E. Doebelin, Measurement Systems, McGraw Hill, 199, Ch. 1.5 Dynamic Compensation, pp ) Obviously these gains would increase with ω and can lead to various difficulties (overflow in numerical computations, over-amplification of noise high frequency-low amplitude components in the y(t) signal etc), to be studied as part of inverse problem they, a topic of advanced mechatronics.

8 Bode diagram G -1 (s) = (1+Ts)/ k L{x(t)=sin ωt } G(s) k/(1+ts) L{y(t)} G -1 (s) = (1+Ts)/ k 1/ K c x est (t) MATLAB program f the dynamic compensat k=5; T=.1; num=[t 1]; den=[ k]; bode(num,den);grid; 3 Bode Diagram 2 Magnitude (db) Phase (deg) Frequency (rad/sec) The magnitude of the inverse dynamic compensat G -1 (s) = (1+Ts)/ k shows 2 db/decade increase beyond bandwidth cutoff frequency, ω b =1, indicating growing computational difficulties as ω>> ω b. In general, inverse dynamic compensat f increasing senss bandwidth is subjet to various difficulties :

9 - computational difficulties as ω>> ω b due to increasing magnitude of the inverse dynamic compensat G -1 (s) = (1+Ts)/ k f ω> ω b ; digital wd length limitation can lead to overflow. - high frequency noise in the sens output is amplified by increasing magnitude of the inverse dynamic compensat G -1 (s) = (1+Ts)/ k f ω> ω b reducing signal to noise ratio - unmodelled dynamics and parametric uncertainty result in reduced effect of inverse dynamics compennsat - non-minimum phase sytems have unstable inverse dynamics Some solutions to the above difficulties are : - low pass filter f removing high frequency noise in the sens output L{x(t)} G(s) k/(1+ts) L{y(t)} Low Pass Filter G -1 (s)=(1+ts)/ k 1/ K c x est (t) - Modified Output Approach (MOA) applied to non-minimum phase sytems to avoid unstable inverse dynamics L{x(t)} G(s)k/(1+Ts) L{y(t)} Low Pass Filter G MOA -1 (s)=(1+ts)/ k 1/ K c x est (t)

10 B) Second der Instruments (E. Doebelin, Measurement Systems, McGraw Hill, 199, pp ) b) Second der transfer function (K. Ogata, Modern Control Engineering, Prentice Hall, 1997, Ch. 4-3, pp ) f example f a servo system (pp ), a massspring-damper system (Example 4-7, pp ). G(s)=k /(s 2 +2 ζ ω n s + ω n 2 ) where k=gain, ω n = undamped natural frequency, ζ= damping ratio An example could be a fce f(t) transducer f(t) a fce measuring spring based instrument d(t) position measurement potentiometer v(t) where f(t) [N] is the input fce to measure d(t) [m] is the output displacement v(t) [V]is the output voltage of the potentiometer Assume the fce measuring spring based instrument measured by a mass-spring-damper M-B-K system moving hizontally (such that gravity effect can be igned in deriving motion equation) F(s)/ D(s)= 1/ (M s 2 +B s + K) where D(s) =L{d(t)} F(s) =L{f(t)} Assume the approximate transfer function of the position measurement potentiometer V(s)/D(s)= K p where V(s)= L{v(t)} D(s)=L{d(t)} K p [V/m] is the calibration constant of the potentiometer F(s) 1/ (M s 2 +B s + K) D(s) K p V(s) The overall transfer function is V(s)/F(s)= K p / (M s 2 +B s + K)= (K p / M)/ (s 2 +( B / M) s +( K /M) )

11 G(s)=V(s)/F(s)= k /(s 2 +2 ζ ω n s + ω n 2 ) where ω n 2 = K /M 2 ζ / ω n = B / M k= K p / M Time response of such second der instruments are significantly dependent on the value of ζ = B ω n / (2 M) ζ < 1 underdamped response ζ = 1 critically damped response ζ > 1 overdamped response MATLAB Simulations F k =1, ω n = 1 rad/s f n = 1.58 Hz period =.63 sec 1) Step response of G(s) = k /(s 2 +2 ζ ω n s + ω n 2 ) = k /(s 2 +b s + c) where b=2 ζ ω n c= ω n 2 Steady state of v(t) f unit step input f(t) is obtained using limit value theem f unit step input F(s)=1/s f s tending towards zero V = lim s G(s) /s= lim G(s) =lim k /(s 2 +2 ζ ω n s + ω n 2 )= 1/ω n 2 =.1 a) f ζ =, b=2 ζ ω n = MATLAB program f k=1; b=; c=1; num=[ k]; den=[1 b c]; step(num,den);grid Fig. v(t) plot shows an undamped oscillaty response, obviously not usefull in practical applications. Higher values f ζ are required.

12 .2 Step Response Amplitude b) f ζ =.1, b= 2 ζ ω n =2 MATLAB program k=1; b=2; c=1; num=[ k]; den=[1 b c]; step(num,den);grid Time (sec) The results show significant maximum overshoot of 7% and long 2% settling time of 4/(ζ ω n ) = 4/ (.1 x 1)= 4 sec.

13 .18 Step Response Amplitude Time (sec) c) f ζ =.6, b= 2 ζ ω n =12 MATLAB program k=1; b=12; c=1; num=[ k]; den=[1 b c]; step(num,den);grid The results show significant reduced overshoot of 5% and reduced 2% settling time of 4/(ζ ω n ) = 4/ (.6 x 1)= 1.7 sec.

14 .12 Step Response.1.8 Amplitude Time (sec) d) f overdamped case, ζ = 1.2, b= 2 ζ ω n =24 MATLAB program k=1; b=24; c=1; num=[ k]; den=[1 b c]; step(num,den);grid The results show no overshoot but sluggish response.

15 .1 Step Response Amplitude Time (sec) Present day practice is to provide underdamped response f ζ = B ω n / (2 M) in the range of.6-.7, but selecting a damping coefficient of B = 2 M ζ / ω n (E. Doebelin, Measurement Systems, McGraw Hill, 199, pp. 131). Bode diagram f such a case ζ =.6, b= 2 ζ ω n =12 is given by MATLAB program k=1; b=12; c=1; num=[ k]; den=[1 b c]; bode(num,den); grid;

16 -2 Bode Diagram -4 Magnitude (db) Phase (deg) Frequency (rad/sec) Cutoff frequency, ω b,f the above case of a second der transfer function G(s) = k /(s 2 +2 ζ ω n s + ω n 2 ) = k /(s 2 +b s + c) where k=1; b=12; c=1; gives G(jω)=1/( -ω 2 +12jω + 1) its zero-frequency value is G(j)=1/1=.1 2 log G(j) =- 4 db Cutoff frequency, ω b,defining the bandwidth, is obtained from the equation 2 log G(jω b ) = 2 log G(j) - 3 =-4 3 = -43 db The Magnitude diagram gives ω b 1 rad/sec f b 1/(2π) 1.4 Hz Dynamic estimation (calibration) can use inverse problem solution, increasing gains, in this case Obviously these gains would increase with ω and can lead to various difficulties (overflow in numerical computations, over-amplification of noise high frequency-low amplitude components in the y(t) signal etc).

17 Bode diagram G -1 (s) = (s 2 +b s + c) / k F(s) G(s) D(s) G -1 (s) V(s) MATLAB program k=1; b=12; c=1; den =[ k]; num =[1 b c]; bode(num,den); grid; 12 Bode Diagram 1 Magnitude (db) Phase (deg) Frequency (rad/sec) The magnitude of the inverse dynamic compensat G -1 (s) = (1+Ts)/ k shows 4 db/decade increase beyond bandwidth cutoff frequency, ω b =1, indicating growing computational difficulties as ω>> ω b, even me significant the in the case of first der instruments. N-der instrument will have 2 N db/decade increase beyond bandwidth cutoff frequency.

18 Some solutions to the above difficulties were outlined f the case of first eder instruments: - low pass filter f removing high frequency noise in the sens output - Modified Output Approach (MOA) applied to non-minimum phase sytems to avoid unstable inverse dynamics In practice the increase beyond bandwidth cutoff frequency, ω b is nmally limited up to a maximum useful frequency component ω useful which might be achieved by inverse dynamic compensat approach without reachng unacceptable high magnitudes of the inverse dynamic compensat, making this approach advantageus in computer based instrumentation.

19 Sinusoidal Response of the second der sens with ζ =.6 F F(s) 1/ (M s 2 +B s + K) D(s) V(s) the overall transfer function is V(s)/F(s)= K p / (M s 2 +B s + K)= (K p / M)/ (s 2 +( B / M) s +( K /M) ) G(s)=V(s)/F(s)= k /(s 2 +2 ζ ω n s + ω n 2 ) where ω n 2 = K /M 2 ζ ω n = B / M k= K p / M Time response of such second der instruments are significantly dependent on the value of ζ = B ω n / (2 M) where ζ =.6 MATLAB simulation of x(t)=sin ωt k/( s 2 +2 ζ ω n s + ω n 2 ) y(t) 1/K c x est (t) where static calibration constant is K c = G(j) F X(s)= ω/(s 2 +ω 2 ) and unit impulse input δ(s)=1 can be achieved with MATLAB instruction impulse (num, den) f δ(s)=1 ω/(s 2 +ω 2 ) k/( s 2 +2 ζ ω n s + ω n 2 ) y(t) 1/ K c x est (t) The transfer function f the g eneral MATLAB program is k ω/[(s 2 +ω 2 )( s 2 +2 ζ ω n s + ω n 2 )] = k ω/(s ζ ω n s 3 +(ω n 2 +ω 2 )s 2 +2 ζ ω n ω 2 s + ω n 2 ω 2 ) = k ω /( s 4 +as 3 + (b +ω 2 )s 2 +a ω 2 s + bω 2 ) where a= 2 ζ ω n b= ω n 2 Let us assume k =1, ζ =.6 ω n = 1 rad/s such that a= 2 ζ ω n =12 b= ω n 2 =1

20 a=12; b=1; num=[ ω]; den=[1 a b+ω*ω a*ω*ω b*ω*ω]; impulse(num,den); MATLAB Simulations 1) ω=1 rad/s f=.158 Hz period = 6.3 sec MATLAB program is a=12; b=1; num=[ 1]; den=[1 a b+1 a b]; impulse(num,den);.15 Impulse Response.1.5 Amplitude Time (sec) The result agrees to Bode diagram amplitude f ω=1of -4 db.1 2) ω=5 rad/s

21 a=12; b=1; num=[ 5]; den=[ ]; impulse(num,den);.15 Impulse Response.1.5 Amplitude Time (sec) The result agrees to Bode diagram amplitude f ω=5of -4 db.1 Analytical Solutions (K. Ogata, Modern Control Engineering, 4th edition, Prentice Hall pp ), where L{}=Laplace transfm L{x(t)=sin ωt } G(s)= k/( s 2 +2 ζ ω n s + ω 2 n ) L{y(t)} 1/ K c L{ x est (t)} f X(s)= ω/(s 2 +ω 2 ) and unit impulse input δ(s)=1 δ(s)=1 ω/(s 2 +ω 2 ) k/( s 2 +2 ζ ω n s + ω 2 n ) y(t) 1/ K c L{ x est (t)} F x(t) =1 x(t)=1 sin ωt ζ =.6 ω n = 1 rad/s such that a= 2 ζ ω n =12 b= ω 2 n =1 G(s) = k/( s s + 1) G(jω) =1/( -ω jω)= ( -ω jω)/ [( -ω jω) ( -ω jω)] = (1-ω 2-12 jω)/( (1-ω 2 ) ω 2 ) G(jω) = 1/((1-ω 2 ) ω 2 ) 1/2

22 Φ = tan -1 (-12 ω/(1-ω 2 ) ) y(t)=1 G(jω) sin (ωt+ Φ) G(j) = 1/((1) 2 ) 1/2 =1/1 K c =G(j)=1/1 x est (t)= y(t)/ K c =( G(jω) / K c ) sin (ωt+ Φ)= ( G(jω) /(1/1)) sin (ωt+ Φ) x est (t) / x(t) = G(jω) / K c = G(jω) / G(j) F ω = 1 results G(jω) = 1/((1-ω 2 ) ω 2 ) 1/2 =1/((1-1 2 ) ) 1/2 =1/12 Φ = tan -1 (-12 ω/(1-ω 2 ) )= tan -1 (-12/(1-1 2 ) ) = tan -1 (-12/)=-9 y(t)=1 ( G(jω) / K c )sin (ωt+ Φ) ((1/12)/(1/1)) sin( ωt-9) G(j1) / G(j) = (1/12)/(1/1)=1/12 = x est (t) / x(t).83 F ω = 1, Bode diagram gives appr -42 db and -9 which agrees with the above result. Exact calculation of the cutoff frequency, ω b,defining the bandwidth, obtained from the equation 2 log G(jω b ) = 2 log G(j) - 3 log G(j) - log G(jω b ) = log( G(j) / G(jω b ) )=3/2 G(j) / G(jω b ) = log -1 3/2 = G(jω b ) = G(j) / =.79 G(j) which shows that, at cutoff frequency, ω b, the amplitude G(jω b ) drops to.79 of the G(j) F the above second der instrument G(jω) = 1/((1-ω 2 ) ω 2 ) 1/2 results G(j) = 1/((1-2 ) ) 1/2 = 1/1 The cutoff frequency, ω b can be obtained from G(jω b ) = G(j) / =(1/1)/ =1/ F obtaining ω b the equation to solve is then 1/((1-ω b 2 ) ω b 2 ) 1/2 =1/ ((1-ω b 2 ) ω b 2 ) 1/2 = (1-ω b 2 ) ω b 2 = = ω b 4-2 ω b ω b 2 = ω b 4-56 ω b = The solution f ω b 2 is ω b 2 =28± ( ) =28± and 75.6 Only the positive solution gives ω b = 131.6= [rad/s] that can be recognized on the second der Bode diagram f the magnitude of -4-3 =-43 db

Radar Dish. Armature controlled dc motor. Inside. θ r input. Outside. θ D output. θ m. Gearbox. Control Transmitter. Control. θ D.

Radar Dish. Armature controlled dc motor. Inside. θ r input. Outside. θ D output. θ m. Gearbox. Control Transmitter. Control. θ D. Radar Dish ME 304 CONTROL SYSTEMS Mechanical Engineering Department, Middle East Technical University Armature controlled dc motor Outside θ D output Inside θ r input r θ m Gearbox Control Transmitter

More information

Homework 7 - Solutions

Homework 7 - Solutions Homework 7 - Solutions Note: This homework is worth a total of 48 points. 1. Compensators (9 points) For a unity feedback system given below, with G(s) = K s(s + 5)(s + 11) do the following: (c) Find the

More information

Frequency Response of Linear Time Invariant Systems

Frequency Response of Linear Time Invariant Systems ME 328, Spring 203, Prof. Rajamani, University of Minnesota Frequency Response of Linear Time Invariant Systems Complex Numbers: Recall that every complex number has a magnitude and a phase. Example: z

More information

Systems Analysis and Control

Systems Analysis and Control Systems Analysis and Control Matthew M. Peet Arizona State University Lecture 21: Stability Margins and Closing the Loop Overview In this Lecture, you will learn: Closing the Loop Effect on Bode Plot Effect

More information

EE C128 / ME C134 Fall 2014 HW 8 - Solutions. HW 8 - Solutions

EE C128 / ME C134 Fall 2014 HW 8 - Solutions. HW 8 - Solutions EE C28 / ME C34 Fall 24 HW 8 - Solutions HW 8 - Solutions. Transient Response Design via Gain Adjustment For a transfer function G(s) = in negative feedback, find the gain to yield a 5% s(s+2)(s+85) overshoot

More information

Outline. Classical Control. Lecture 2

Outline. Classical Control. Lecture 2 Outline Outline Outline Review of Material from Lecture 2 New Stuff - Outline Review of Lecture System Performance Effect of Poles Review of Material from Lecture System Performance Effect of Poles 2 New

More information

MAS107 Control Theory Exam Solutions 2008

MAS107 Control Theory Exam Solutions 2008 MAS07 CONTROL THEORY. HOVLAND: EXAM SOLUTION 2008 MAS07 Control Theory Exam Solutions 2008 Geir Hovland, Mechatronics Group, Grimstad, Norway June 30, 2008 C. Repeat question B, but plot the phase curve

More information

Outline. Classical Control. Lecture 1

Outline. Classical Control. Lecture 1 Outline Outline Outline 1 Introduction 2 Prerequisites Block diagram for system modeling Modeling Mechanical Electrical Outline Introduction Background Basic Systems Models/Transfers functions 1 Introduction

More information

Time Response Analysis (Part II)

Time Response Analysis (Part II) Time Response Analysis (Part II). A critically damped, continuous-time, second order system, when sampled, will have (in Z domain) (a) A simple pole (b) Double pole on real axis (c) Double pole on imaginary

More information

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Mechanical Engineering Dynamics and Control II Fall 2007

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Mechanical Engineering Dynamics and Control II Fall 2007 MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Mechanical Engineering.4 Dynamics and Control II Fall 7 Problem Set #9 Solution Posted: Sunday, Dec., 7. The.4 Tower system. The system parameters are

More information

8.1.6 Quadratic pole response: resonance

8.1.6 Quadratic pole response: resonance 8.1.6 Quadratic pole response: resonance Example G(s)= v (s) v 1 (s) = 1 1+s L R + s LC L + Second-order denominator, of the form 1+a 1 s + a s v 1 (s) + C R Two-pole low-pass filter example v (s) with

More information

(a) Find the transfer function of the amplifier. Ans.: G(s) =

(a) Find the transfer function of the amplifier. Ans.: G(s) = 126 INTRDUCTIN T CNTR ENGINEERING 10( s 1) (a) Find the transfer function of the amplifier. Ans.: (. 02s 1)(. 001s 1) (b) Find the expected percent overshoot for a step input for the closed-loop system

More information

APPLICATIONS FOR ROBOTICS

APPLICATIONS FOR ROBOTICS Version: 1 CONTROL APPLICATIONS FOR ROBOTICS TEX d: Feb. 17, 214 PREVIEW We show that the transfer function and conditions of stability for linear systems can be studied using Laplace transforms. Table

More information

Transient response via gain adjustment. Consider a unity feedback system, where G(s) = 2. The closed loop transfer function is. s 2 + 2ζωs + ω 2 n

Transient response via gain adjustment. Consider a unity feedback system, where G(s) = 2. The closed loop transfer function is. s 2 + 2ζωs + ω 2 n Design via frequency response Transient response via gain adjustment Consider a unity feedback system, where G(s) = ωn 2. The closed loop transfer function is s(s+2ζω n ) T(s) = ω 2 n s 2 + 2ζωs + ω 2

More information

Automatic Control 2. Loop shaping. Prof. Alberto Bemporad. University of Trento. Academic year

Automatic Control 2. Loop shaping. Prof. Alberto Bemporad. University of Trento. Academic year Automatic Control 2 Loop shaping Prof. Alberto Bemporad University of Trento Academic year 21-211 Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 2 Academic year 21-211 1 / 39 Feedback

More information

Transient Response of a Second-Order System

Transient Response of a Second-Order System Transient Response of a Second-Order System ECEN 830 Spring 01 1. Introduction In connection with this experiment, you are selecting the gains in your feedback loop to obtain a well-behaved closed-loop

More information

Control of Manufacturing Processes

Control of Manufacturing Processes Control of Manufacturing Processes Subject 2.830 Spring 2004 Lecture #18 Basic Control Loop Analysis" April 15, 2004 Revisit Temperature Control Problem τ dy dt + y = u τ = time constant = gain y ss =

More information

Recursive, Infinite Impulse Response (IIR) Digital Filters:

Recursive, Infinite Impulse Response (IIR) Digital Filters: Recursive, Infinite Impulse Response (IIR) Digital Filters: Filters defined by Laplace Domain transfer functions (analog devices) can be easily converted to Z domain transfer functions (digital, sampled

More information

(b) A unity feedback system is characterized by the transfer function. Design a suitable compensator to meet the following specifications:

(b) A unity feedback system is characterized by the transfer function. Design a suitable compensator to meet the following specifications: 1. (a) The open loop transfer function of a unity feedback control system is given by G(S) = K/S(1+0.1S)(1+S) (i) Determine the value of K so that the resonance peak M r of the system is equal to 1.4.

More information

ROOT LOCUS. Consider the system. Root locus presents the poles of the closed-loop system when the gain K changes from 0 to. H(s) H ( s) = ( s)

ROOT LOCUS. Consider the system. Root locus presents the poles of the closed-loop system when the gain K changes from 0 to. H(s) H ( s) = ( s) C1 ROOT LOCUS Consider the system R(s) E(s) C(s) + K G(s) - H(s) C(s) R(s) = K G(s) 1 + K G(s) H(s) Root locus presents the poles of the closed-loop system when the gain K changes from 0 to 1+ K G ( s)

More information

UNIVERSITY OF BOLTON SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING BENG (HONS) IN BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING SEMESTER 1 EXAMINATION 2017/2018 ADVANCED BIOMECHATRONIC SYSTEMS

UNIVERSITY OF BOLTON SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING BENG (HONS) IN BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING SEMESTER 1 EXAMINATION 2017/2018 ADVANCED BIOMECHATRONIC SYSTEMS ENG0016 UNIVERSITY OF BOLTON SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING BENG (HONS) IN BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING SEMESTER 1 EXAMINATION 2017/2018 ADVANCED BIOMECHATRONIC SYSTEMS MODULE NO: BME6003 Date: Friday 19 January 2018

More information

Section 4.9; Section 5.6. June 30, Free Mechanical Vibrations/Couple Mass-Spring System

Section 4.9; Section 5.6. June 30, Free Mechanical Vibrations/Couple Mass-Spring System Section 4.9; Section 5.6 Free Mechanical Vibrations/Couple Mass-Spring System June 30, 2009 Today s Session Today s Session A Summary of This Session: Today s Session A Summary of This Session: (1) Free

More information

Lab 3: Poles, Zeros, and Time/Frequency Domain Response

Lab 3: Poles, Zeros, and Time/Frequency Domain Response ECEN 33 Linear Systems Spring 2 2-- P. Mathys Lab 3: Poles, Zeros, and Time/Frequency Domain Response of CT Systems Introduction Systems that are used for signal processing are very often characterized

More information

Control for. Maarten Steinbuch Dept. Mechanical Engineering Control Systems Technology Group TU/e

Control for. Maarten Steinbuch Dept. Mechanical Engineering Control Systems Technology Group TU/e Control for Maarten Steinbuch Dept. Mechanical Engineering Control Systems Technology Group TU/e Motion Systems m F Introduction Timedomain tuning Frequency domain & stability Filters Feedforward Servo-oriented

More information

Dynamic circuits: Frequency domain analysis

Dynamic circuits: Frequency domain analysis Electronic Circuits 1 Dynamic circuits: Contents Free oscillation and natural frequency Transfer functions Frequency response Bode plots 1 System behaviour: overview 2 System behaviour : review solution

More information

School of Mechanical Engineering Purdue University

School of Mechanical Engineering Purdue University Case Study ME375 Frequency Response - 1 Case Study SUPPORT POWER WIRE DROPPERS Electric train derives power through a pantograph, which contacts the power wire, which is suspended from a catenary. During

More information

Process Control & Instrumentation (CH 3040)

Process Control & Instrumentation (CH 3040) First-order systems Process Control & Instrumentation (CH 3040) Arun K. Tangirala Department of Chemical Engineering, IIT Madras January - April 010 Lectures: Mon, Tue, Wed, Fri Extra class: Thu A first-order

More information

Introduction to Feedback Control

Introduction to Feedback Control Introduction to Feedback Control Control System Design Why Control? Open-Loop vs Closed-Loop (Feedback) Why Use Feedback Control? Closed-Loop Control System Structure Elements of a Feedback Control System

More information

Delhi Noida Bhopal Hyderabad Jaipur Lucknow Indore Pune Bhubaneswar Kolkata Patna Web: Ph:

Delhi Noida Bhopal Hyderabad Jaipur Lucknow Indore Pune Bhubaneswar Kolkata Patna Web:     Ph: Serial : 0. LS_D_ECIN_Control Systems_30078 Delhi Noida Bhopal Hyderabad Jaipur Lucnow Indore Pune Bhubaneswar Kolata Patna Web: E-mail: info@madeeasy.in Ph: 0-4546 CLASS TEST 08-9 ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING

More information

FREQUENCY-RESPONSE DESIGN

FREQUENCY-RESPONSE DESIGN ECE45/55: Feedback Control Systems. 9 FREQUENCY-RESPONSE DESIGN 9.: PD and lead compensation networks The frequency-response methods we have seen so far largely tell us about stability and stability margins

More information

EXPERIMENTALLY DETERMINING THE TRANSFER FUNCTION OF A SPRING- MASS SYSTEM

EXPERIMENTALLY DETERMINING THE TRANSFER FUNCTION OF A SPRING- MASS SYSTEM EXPERIMENTALLY DETERMINING THE TRANSFER FUNCTION OF A SPRING- MASS SYSTEM Lab 8 OBJECTIVES At the conclusion of this experiment, students should be able to: Experimentally determine the best fourth order

More information

1 The frequency response of the basic mechanical oscillator

1 The frequency response of the basic mechanical oscillator Seismograph systems The frequency response of the basic mechanical oscillator Most seismographic systems are based on a simple mechanical oscillator really just a mass suspended by a spring with some method

More information

INTRODUCTION TO DIGITAL CONTROL

INTRODUCTION TO DIGITAL CONTROL ECE4540/5540: Digital Control Systems INTRODUCTION TO DIGITAL CONTROL.: Introduction In ECE450/ECE550 Feedback Control Systems, welearnedhow to make an analog controller D(s) to control a linear-time-invariant

More information

Introduction. Performance and Robustness (Chapter 1) Advanced Control Systems Spring / 31

Introduction. Performance and Robustness (Chapter 1) Advanced Control Systems Spring / 31 Introduction Classical Control Robust Control u(t) y(t) G u(t) G + y(t) G : nominal model G = G + : plant uncertainty Uncertainty sources : Structured : parametric uncertainty, multimodel uncertainty Unstructured

More information

Control of Manufacturing Processes

Control of Manufacturing Processes Control of Manufacturing Processes Subject 2.830 Spring 2004 Lecture #19 Position Control and Root Locus Analysis" April 22, 2004 The Position Servo Problem, reference position NC Control Robots Injection

More information

Today (10/23/01) Today. Reading Assignment: 6.3. Gain/phase margin lead/lag compensator Ref. 6.4, 6.7, 6.10

Today (10/23/01) Today. Reading Assignment: 6.3. Gain/phase margin lead/lag compensator Ref. 6.4, 6.7, 6.10 Today Today (10/23/01) Gain/phase margin lead/lag compensator Ref. 6.4, 6.7, 6.10 Reading Assignment: 6.3 Last Time In the last lecture, we discussed control design through shaping of the loop gain GK:

More information

Grades will be determined by the correctness of your answers (explanations are not required).

Grades will be determined by the correctness of your answers (explanations are not required). 6.00 (Fall 2011) Final Examination December 19, 2011 Name: Kerberos Username: Please circle your section number: Section Time 2 11 am 1 pm 4 2 pm Grades will be determined by the correctness of your answers

More information

Raktim Bhattacharya. . AERO 632: Design of Advance Flight Control System. Preliminaries

Raktim Bhattacharya. . AERO 632: Design of Advance Flight Control System. Preliminaries . AERO 632: of Advance Flight Control System. Preliminaries Raktim Bhattacharya Laboratory For Uncertainty Quantification Aerospace Engineering, Texas A&M University. Preliminaries Signals & Systems Laplace

More information

CDS 101/110: Lecture 3.1 Linear Systems

CDS 101/110: Lecture 3.1 Linear Systems CDS /: Lecture 3. Linear Systems Goals for Today: Revist and motivate linear time-invariant system models: Summarize properties, examples, and tools Convolution equation describing solution in response

More information

Classify a transfer function to see which order or ramp it can follow and with which expected error.

Classify a transfer function to see which order or ramp it can follow and with which expected error. Dr. J. Tani, Prof. Dr. E. Frazzoli 5-059-00 Control Systems I (Autumn 208) Exercise Set 0 Topic: Specifications for Feedback Systems Discussion: 30.. 208 Learning objectives: The student can grizzi@ethz.ch,

More information

Lecture 1: Introduction to System Modeling and Control. Introduction Basic Definitions Different Model Types System Identification

Lecture 1: Introduction to System Modeling and Control. Introduction Basic Definitions Different Model Types System Identification Lecture 1: Introduction to System Modeling and Control Introduction Basic Definitions Different Model Types System Identification What is Mathematical Model? A set of mathematical equations (e.g., differential

More information

Positioning Servo Design Example

Positioning Servo Design Example Positioning Servo Design Example 1 Goal. The goal in this design example is to design a control system that will be used in a pick-and-place robot to move the link of a robot between two positions. Usually

More information

Frequency Response DR. GYURCSEK ISTVÁN

Frequency Response DR. GYURCSEK ISTVÁN DR. GYURCSEK ISTVÁN Frequency Response Sources and additional materials (recommended) Dr. Gyurcsek Dr. Elmer: Theories in Electric Circuits, GlobeEdit, 2016, ISBN:978-3-330-71341-3 Ch. Alexander, M. Sadiku:

More information

Lecture 6 Classical Control Overview IV. Dr. Radhakant Padhi Asst. Professor Dept. of Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore

Lecture 6 Classical Control Overview IV. Dr. Radhakant Padhi Asst. Professor Dept. of Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore Lecture 6 Classical Control Overview IV Dr. Radhakant Padhi Asst. Professor Dept. of Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore Lead Lag Compensator Design Dr. Radhakant Padhi Asst.

More information

Stability of CL System

Stability of CL System Stability of CL System Consider an open loop stable system that becomes unstable with large gain: At the point of instability, K( j) G( j) = 1 0dB K( j) G( j) K( j) G( j) K( j) G( j) =± 180 o 180 o Closed

More information

KINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING

KINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING KINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK SUB.NAME : CONTROL SYSTEMS BRANCH : ECE YEAR : II SEMESTER: IV 1. What is control system? 2. Define open

More information

Course roadmap. Step response for 2nd-order system. Step response for 2nd-order system

Course roadmap. Step response for 2nd-order system. Step response for 2nd-order system ME45: Control Systems Lecture Time response of nd-order systems Prof. Clar Radcliffe and Prof. Jongeun Choi Department of Mechanical Engineering Michigan State University Modeling Laplace transform Transfer

More information

Dynamic Response. Assoc. Prof. Enver Tatlicioglu. Department of Electrical & Electronics Engineering Izmir Institute of Technology.

Dynamic Response. Assoc. Prof. Enver Tatlicioglu. Department of Electrical & Electronics Engineering Izmir Institute of Technology. Dynamic Response Assoc. Prof. Enver Tatlicioglu Department of Electrical & Electronics Engineering Izmir Institute of Technology Chapter 3 Assoc. Prof. Enver Tatlicioglu (EEE@IYTE) EE362 Feedback Control

More information

Systems Analysis and Control

Systems Analysis and Control Systems Analysis and Control Matthew M. Peet Arizona State University Lecture 24: Compensation in the Frequency Domain Overview In this Lecture, you will learn: Lead Compensators Performance Specs Altering

More information

Performance of Feedback Control Systems

Performance of Feedback Control Systems Performance of Feedback Control Systems Design of a PID Controller Transient Response of a Closed Loop System Damping Coefficient, Natural frequency, Settling time and Steady-state Error and Type 0, Type

More information

ME EXAM #1 Tuesday, October 7, :30 7:30 pm PHYS 112 and 114

ME EXAM #1 Tuesday, October 7, :30 7:30 pm PHYS 112 and 114 ME 36500 EXAM # Tuesday, October 7, 04 6:30 7:30 pm PHYS and 4 Division: Chiu(0:30) / Shelton(:30) / Bae(:30) (circle one) HW ID: Name: Solution Instructions () This is a closed book examination, but you

More information

ME 375 EXAM #1 Friday, March 13, 2015 SOLUTION

ME 375 EXAM #1 Friday, March 13, 2015 SOLUTION ME 375 EXAM #1 Friday, March 13, 2015 SOLUTION PROBLEM 1 A system is made up of a homogeneous disk (of mass m and outer radius R), particle A (of mass m) and particle B (of mass m). The disk is pinned

More information

Richiami di Controlli Automatici

Richiami di Controlli Automatici Richiami di Controlli Automatici Gianmaria De Tommasi 1 1 Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II detommas@unina.it Ottobre 2012 Corsi AnsaldoBreda G. De Tommasi (UNINA) Richiami di Controlli Automatici

More information

ELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATIONS DEP. 3rd YEAR, 2010/2011 CONTROL ENGINEERING SHEET 5 Lead-Lag Compensation Techniques

ELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATIONS DEP. 3rd YEAR, 2010/2011 CONTROL ENGINEERING SHEET 5 Lead-Lag Compensation Techniques CAIRO UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF ENGINEERING ELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATIONS DEP. 3rd YEAR, 00/0 CONTROL ENGINEERING SHEET 5 Lead-Lag Compensation Techniques [] For the following system, Design a compensator such

More information

Control System (ECE411) Lectures 13 & 14

Control System (ECE411) Lectures 13 & 14 Control System (ECE411) Lectures 13 & 14, Professor Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Colorado State University Fall 2016 Steady-State Error Analysis Remark: For a unity feedback system

More information

First and Second Order Circuits. Claudio Talarico, Gonzaga University Spring 2015

First and Second Order Circuits. Claudio Talarico, Gonzaga University Spring 2015 First and Second Order Circuits Claudio Talarico, Gonzaga University Spring 2015 Capacitors and Inductors intuition: bucket of charge q = Cv i = C dv dt Resist change of voltage DC open circuit Store voltage

More information

Dynamic System Response. Dynamic System Response K. Craig 1

Dynamic System Response. Dynamic System Response K. Craig 1 Dynamic System Response Dynamic System Response K. Craig 1 Dynamic System Response LTI Behavior vs. Non-LTI Behavior Solution of Linear, Constant-Coefficient, Ordinary Differential Equations Classical

More information

Overview of Bode Plots Transfer function review Piece-wise linear approximations First-order terms Second-order terms (complex poles & zeros)

Overview of Bode Plots Transfer function review Piece-wise linear approximations First-order terms Second-order terms (complex poles & zeros) Overview of Bode Plots Transfer function review Piece-wise linear approximations First-order terms Second-order terms (complex poles & zeros) J. McNames Portland State University ECE 222 Bode Plots Ver.

More information

GATE EE Topic wise Questions SIGNALS & SYSTEMS

GATE EE Topic wise Questions SIGNALS & SYSTEMS www.gatehelp.com GATE EE Topic wise Questions YEAR 010 ONE MARK Question. 1 For the system /( s + 1), the approximate time taken for a step response to reach 98% of the final value is (A) 1 s (B) s (C)

More information

Solutions to Skill-Assessment Exercises

Solutions to Skill-Assessment Exercises Solutions to Skill-Assessment Exercises To Accompany Control Systems Engineering 4 th Edition By Norman S. Nise John Wiley & Sons Copyright 2004 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved. No part

More information

Systems Analysis and Control

Systems Analysis and Control Systems Analysis and Control Matthew M. Peet Illinois Institute of Technology Lecture 8: Response Characteristics Overview In this Lecture, you will learn: Characteristics of the Response Stability Real

More information

EE 4343/ Control System Design Project LECTURE 10

EE 4343/ Control System Design Project LECTURE 10 Copyright S. Ikenaga 998 All rights reserved EE 4343/5329 - Control System Design Project LECTURE EE 4343/5329 Homepage EE 4343/5329 Course Outline Design of Phase-lead and Phase-lag compensators using

More information

SIGNAL PROCESSING. B14 Option 4 lectures. Stephen Roberts

SIGNAL PROCESSING. B14 Option 4 lectures. Stephen Roberts SIGNAL PROCESSING B14 Option 4 lectures Stephen Roberts Recommended texts Lynn. An introduction to the analysis and processing of signals. Macmillan. Oppenhein & Shafer. Digital signal processing. Prentice

More information

Chapter 8: Frequency Domain Analysis

Chapter 8: Frequency Domain Analysis Chapter 8: Frequency Domain Analysis Samantha Ramirez Preview Questions 1. What is the steady-state response of a linear system excited by a cyclic or oscillatory input? 2. How does one characterize the

More information

Exercise 1 (A Non-minimum Phase System)

Exercise 1 (A Non-minimum Phase System) Prof. Dr. E. Frazzoli 5-59- Control Systems I (HS 25) Solution Exercise Set Loop Shaping Noele Norris, 9th December 26 Exercise (A Non-minimum Phase System) To increase the rise time of the system, we

More information

Lecture 5: Frequency domain analysis: Nyquist, Bode Diagrams, second order systems, system types

Lecture 5: Frequency domain analysis: Nyquist, Bode Diagrams, second order systems, system types Lecture 5: Frequency domain analysis: Nyquist, Bode Diagrams, second order systems, system types Venkata Sonti Department of Mechanical Engineering Indian Institute of Science Bangalore, India, 562 This

More information

Raktim Bhattacharya. . AERO 422: Active Controls for Aerospace Vehicles. Frequency Response-Design Method

Raktim Bhattacharya. . AERO 422: Active Controls for Aerospace Vehicles. Frequency Response-Design Method .. AERO 422: Active Controls for Aerospace Vehicles Frequency Response- Method Raktim Bhattacharya Laboratory For Uncertainty Quantification Aerospace Engineering, Texas A&M University. ... Response to

More information

FEEDBACK CONTROL SYSTEMS

FEEDBACK CONTROL SYSTEMS FEEDBAC CONTROL SYSTEMS. Control System Design. Open and Closed-Loop Control Systems 3. Why Closed-Loop Control? 4. Case Study --- Speed Control of a DC Motor 5. Steady-State Errors in Unity Feedback Control

More information

Part IB Paper 6: Information Engineering LINEAR SYSTEMS AND CONTROL. Glenn Vinnicombe HANDOUT 4. The Frequency ResponseG(jω)

Part IB Paper 6: Information Engineering LINEAR SYSTEMS AND CONTROL. Glenn Vinnicombe HANDOUT 4. The Frequency ResponseG(jω) Part IB Paper 6: Information Engineering LINEAR SYSEMS AND CONROL Glenn Vinnicombe HANDOU 4 he Frequency ResponseG(jω) x(t) 2π ω y(t) G(jω) argg(jω) ω t t Asymptotically stable LI systemg(s) x(t)=cos(ωt)

More information

R. W. Erickson. Department of Electrical, Computer, and Energy Engineering University of Colorado, Boulder

R. W. Erickson. Department of Electrical, Computer, and Energy Engineering University of Colorado, Boulder R. W. Erickson Department of Electrical, Computer, and Energy Engineering University of Colorado, Boulder 8.1. Review of Bode plots Decibels Table 8.1. Expressing magnitudes in decibels G db = 0 log 10

More information

Robust Performance Example #1

Robust Performance Example #1 Robust Performance Example # The transfer function for a nominal system (plant) is given, along with the transfer function for one extreme system. These two transfer functions define a family of plants

More information

Exercise 1 (A Non-minimum Phase System)

Exercise 1 (A Non-minimum Phase System) Prof. Dr. E. Frazzoli 5-59- Control Systems I (Autumn 27) Solution Exercise Set 2 Loop Shaping clruch@ethz.ch, 8th December 27 Exercise (A Non-minimum Phase System) To decrease the rise time of the system,

More information

2.004 Dynamics and Control II Spring 2008

2.004 Dynamics and Control II Spring 2008 MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 2.004 Dynamics and Control II Spring 2008 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms. Massachusetts Institute

More information

DESIGN USING TRANSFORMATION TECHNIQUE CLASSICAL METHOD

DESIGN USING TRANSFORMATION TECHNIQUE CLASSICAL METHOD 206 Spring Semester ELEC733 Digital Control System LECTURE 7: DESIGN USING TRANSFORMATION TECHNIQUE CLASSICAL METHOD For a unit ramp input Tz Ez ( ) 2 ( z ) D( z) G( z) Tz e( ) lim( z) z 2 ( z ) D( z)

More information

Oscillations. Simple Harmonic Motion of a Mass on a Spring The equation of motion for a mass m is attached to a spring of constant k is

Oscillations. Simple Harmonic Motion of a Mass on a Spring The equation of motion for a mass m is attached to a spring of constant k is Dr. Alain Brizard College Physics I (PY 10) Oscillations Textbook Reference: Chapter 14 sections 1-8. Simple Harmonic Motion of a Mass on a Spring The equation of motion for a mass m is attached to a spring

More information

Dynamic Behavior. Chapter 5

Dynamic Behavior. Chapter 5 1 Dynamic Behavior In analyzing process dynamic and process control systems, it is important to know how the process responds to changes in the process inputs. A number of standard types of input changes

More information

Control Systems Design

Control Systems Design ELEC4410 Control Systems Design Lecture 18: State Feedback Tracking and State Estimation Julio H. Braslavsky julio@ee.newcastle.edu.au School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Lecture 18:

More information

Lab Experiment 2: Performance of First order and second order systems

Lab Experiment 2: Performance of First order and second order systems Lab Experiment 2: Performance of First order and second order systems Objective: The objective of this exercise will be to study the performance characteristics of first and second order systems using

More information

Robust Control 3 The Closed Loop

Robust Control 3 The Closed Loop Robust Control 3 The Closed Loop Harry G. Kwatny Department of Mechanical Engineering & Mechanics Drexel University /2/2002 Outline Closed Loop Transfer Functions Traditional Performance Measures Time

More information

Discrete Systems. Step response and pole locations. Mark Cannon. Hilary Term Lecture

Discrete Systems. Step response and pole locations. Mark Cannon. Hilary Term Lecture Discrete Systems Mark Cannon Hilary Term 22 - Lecture 4 Step response and pole locations 4 - Review Definition of -transform: U() = Z{u k } = u k k k= Discrete transfer function: Y () U() = G() = Z{g k},

More information

Dr Ian R. Manchester

Dr Ian R. Manchester Week Content Notes 1 Introduction 2 Frequency Domain Modelling 3 Transient Performance and the s-plane 4 Block Diagrams 5 Feedback System Characteristics Assign 1 Due 6 Root Locus 7 Root Locus 2 Assign

More information

CHAPTER 7 STEADY-STATE RESPONSE ANALYSES

CHAPTER 7 STEADY-STATE RESPONSE ANALYSES CHAPTER 7 STEADY-STATE RESPONSE ANALYSES 1. Introduction The steady state error is a measure of system accuracy. These errors arise from the nature of the inputs, system type and from nonlinearities of

More information

Distributed Real-Time Control Systems

Distributed Real-Time Control Systems Distributed Real-Time Control Systems Chapter 9 Discrete PID Control 1 Computer Control 2 Approximation of Continuous Time Controllers Design Strategy: Design a continuous time controller C c (s) and then

More information

Section 3.7: Mechanical and Electrical Vibrations

Section 3.7: Mechanical and Electrical Vibrations Section 3.7: Mechanical and Electrical Vibrations Second order linear equations with constant coefficients serve as mathematical models for mechanical and electrical oscillations. For example, the motion

More information

1 (20 pts) Nyquist Exercise

1 (20 pts) Nyquist Exercise EE C128 / ME134 Problem Set 6 Solution Fall 2011 1 (20 pts) Nyquist Exercise Consider a close loop system with unity feedback. For each G(s), hand sketch the Nyquist diagram, determine Z = P N, algebraically

More information

Modeling and Experimentation: Mass-Spring-Damper System Dynamics

Modeling and Experimentation: Mass-Spring-Damper System Dynamics Modeling and Experimentation: Mass-Spring-Damper System Dynamics Prof. R.G. Longoria Department of Mechanical Engineering The University of Texas at Austin July 20, 2014 Overview 1 This lab is meant to

More information

C(s) R(s) 1 C(s) C(s) C(s) = s - T. Ts + 1 = 1 s - 1. s + (1 T) Taking the inverse Laplace transform of Equation (5 2), we obtain

C(s) R(s) 1 C(s) C(s) C(s) = s - T. Ts + 1 = 1 s - 1. s + (1 T) Taking the inverse Laplace transform of Equation (5 2), we obtain analyses of the step response, ramp response, and impulse response of the second-order systems are presented. Section 5 4 discusses the transient-response analysis of higherorder systems. Section 5 5 gives

More information

Intro to Frequency Domain Design

Intro to Frequency Domain Design Intro to Frequency Domain Design MEM 355 Performance Enhancement of Dynamical Systems Harry G. Kwatny Department of Mechanical Engineering & Mechanics Drexel University Outline Closed Loop Transfer Functions

More information

We are IntechOpen, the world s leading publisher of Open Access books Built by scientists, for scientists. International authors and editors

We are IntechOpen, the world s leading publisher of Open Access books Built by scientists, for scientists. International authors and editors We are IntechOpen, the world s leading publisher of Open Access books Built by scientists, for scientists 3,500 108,000 1.7 M Open access books available International authors and editors Downloads Our

More information

Frequency domain analysis

Frequency domain analysis Automatic Control 2 Frequency domain analysis Prof. Alberto Bemporad University of Trento Academic year 2010-2011 Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 2 Academic year 2010-2011

More information

Dr Ian R. Manchester Dr Ian R. Manchester AMME 3500 : Review

Dr Ian R. Manchester Dr Ian R. Manchester AMME 3500 : Review Week Date Content Notes 1 6 Mar Introduction 2 13 Mar Frequency Domain Modelling 3 20 Mar Transient Performance and the s-plane 4 27 Mar Block Diagrams Assign 1 Due 5 3 Apr Feedback System Characteristics

More information

= rad/sec. We can find the last parameter, T, from ωcg new

= rad/sec. We can find the last parameter, T, from ωcg new EE572 Solution to HW#22. Keep working on your project!! 1. Consider the following system: W(s) + T s =1 msec G lead (z) G zoh (z) 8 ( s+ 4) - a) Design a lead compensator, G lead (z), which meets the following

More information

CDS 101/110: Lecture 3.1 Linear Systems

CDS 101/110: Lecture 3.1 Linear Systems CDS /: Lecture 3. Linear Systems Goals for Today: Describe and motivate linear system models: Summarize properties, examples, and tools Joel Burdick (substituting for Richard Murray) jwb@robotics.caltech.edu,

More information

LABORATORY INSTRUCTION MANUAL CONTROL SYSTEM II LAB EE 693

LABORATORY INSTRUCTION MANUAL CONTROL SYSTEM II LAB EE 693 LABORATORY INSTRUCTION MANUAL CONTROL SYSTEM II LAB EE 693 ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT JIS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING (AN AUTONOMOUS INSTITUTE) KALYANI, NADIA EXPERIMENT NO : CS II/ TITLE : FAMILIARIZATION

More information

ECE382/ME482 Spring 2005 Homework 6 Solution April 17, (s/2 + 1) s(2s + 1)[(s/8) 2 + (s/20) + 1]

ECE382/ME482 Spring 2005 Homework 6 Solution April 17, (s/2 + 1) s(2s + 1)[(s/8) 2 + (s/20) + 1] ECE382/ME482 Spring 25 Homework 6 Solution April 17, 25 1 Solution to HW6 P8.17 We are given a system with open loop transfer function G(s) = 4(s/2 + 1) s(2s + 1)[(s/8) 2 + (s/2) + 1] (1) and unity negative

More information

Answers to multiple choice questions

Answers to multiple choice questions Answers to multiple choice questions Chapter 2 M2.1 (b) M2.2 (a) M2.3 (d) M2.4 (b) M2.5 (a) M2.6 (b) M2.7 (b) M2.8 (c) M2.9 (a) M2.10 (b) Chapter 3 M3.1 (b) M3.2 (d) M3.3 (d) M3.4 (d) M3.5 (c) M3.6 (c)

More information

Sinusoidal Forcing of a First-Order Process. / τ

Sinusoidal Forcing of a First-Order Process. / τ Frequency Response Analysis Chapter 3 Sinusoidal Forcing of a First-Order Process For a first-order transfer function with gain K and time constant τ, the response to a general sinusoidal input, xt = A

More information

Studio Exercise Time Response & Frequency Response 1 st -Order Dynamic System RC Low-Pass Filter

Studio Exercise Time Response & Frequency Response 1 st -Order Dynamic System RC Low-Pass Filter Studio Exercise Time Response & Frequency Response 1 st -Order Dynamic System RC Low-Pass Filter i i in R out Assignment: Perform a Complete e in C e Dynamic System Investigation out of the RC Low-Pass

More information

The requirements of a plant may be expressed in terms of (a) settling time (b) damping ratio (c) peak overshoot --- in time domain

The requirements of a plant may be expressed in terms of (a) settling time (b) damping ratio (c) peak overshoot --- in time domain Compensators To improve the performance of a given plant or system G f(s) it may be necessary to use a compensator or controller G c(s). Compensator Plant G c (s) G f (s) The requirements of a plant may

More information

Review of Linear Time-Invariant Network Analysis

Review of Linear Time-Invariant Network Analysis D1 APPENDIX D Review of Linear Time-Invariant Network Analysis Consider a network with input x(t) and output y(t) as shown in Figure D-1. If an input x 1 (t) produces an output y 1 (t), and an input x

More information