Step Response for the Transfer Function of a Sensor
|
|
- Horatio Page
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Step Response f the Transfer Function of a Sens G(s)=Y(s)/X(s) of a sens with X(s) input and Y(s) output A) First Order Instruments a) First der transfer function G(s)=k/(1+Ts), k=gain, T = time constant Example, J thermocouple with gain at 2 C of =51 µv/ C and time constant of approx.1 sec. k=5 [1 µv/ C] and T=.1 MATLAB program k=5; T=.1; num=[ k]; den=[t 1]; step(num,den);grid Fig. y(t) plot 5 Step Response Amplitude Time (sec)
2 Bode diagram MATLAB program >> bode(num,den); grid; 2 Bode Diagram 1 Magnitude (db) Phase (deg) Frequency (rad/sec) Bandwidth Cutoff frequency, ω b,defining the bandwidth, is defined as the frequency ω f which the Magnitude 2 log G(jω) drops 3 db below its zero-frequency value 2 log G(j) 2 log G(jω) <2 log G(j) - 3 db f ω> ω b In the above case of a first der transfer function G(s)=k/(1+Ts), k=5, T =.1 s G(s)=5/(1+.1s) G(jω)=5/(1+.1jω) its zero-frequency value is G(j)=5 2 log G(j) =14 db Cutoff frequency, ω b,defining the bandwidth, is obtained from the equation 2 log G(jω b ) = 2 log G(j) - 3 =14 3 = 11 db ω b 1 rad/sec f b 1/(2π) 14 Hz
3 Static calibration of the sens F: Xn in unknown sens input to the sens and Ym is the measured output from the sens, static calibration uses steady state sens gain K c f calibration, i.e f estimating the unknown input Using limit value theem f unit step input X(s)=1/s f s tending towards zero K c = lim s G(s) /s= lim G(s) = G(j)=5 Consequently, unknown sens input to the sens is estimated as Y/ K c = Y/5 In practice, this is considered acceptable within bandwidth, i.e f input signal frequencies ω < ω b Sinusoidal Response of the sens x(t)=sin ωt k/(1+ts) y(t) 1/ K c x est (t) f X(s)= ω/(s 2 +ω 2 ) and unit impulse input δ(s)=1 δ(s)=1 ω/(s 2 +ω 2 ) k/(1+ts) y(t) 1/ K c x est (t) k=5; T=.1; K c =5 MATLAB Simulations 1) ω=1 rad/s f= 1.58 Hz period =.63 sec MATLAB program num=[ 5]; den=[ ]; impulse(num,den); Fig. y(t) plot
4 5 Impulse Response Amplitude Time (sec) 2) ω=1 rad/s f= 15.8 Hz period =.63 sec MATLAB program num=[ 5]; den=[ ]; impulse(num,den); Fig. y(t) plot
5 4 Impulse Response Amplitude Time (sec) 3) ω=1 rad/s f= 158 Hz period =.63 sec MATLAB program num=[ 5]; den=[ ]; impulse(num,den); Fig. y(t) plot
6 1 Impulse Response.5 Amplitude Time (sec) Analytical Solutions (K. Ogata, Modern Control Engineering, 4th edition, Prentice Hall pp ), where L{}=Laplace transfm L{x(t)=sin ωt } G(s) =k/(1+ts) L{y(t)} 1/ K c L{ x est (t)} where static calibration constant is K c = G(j) F X(s)= ω/(s 2 +ω 2 ) and unit impulse input δ(s)=1 δ(s)=1 ω/(s 2 +ω 2 ) k/(1+ts) y(t) 1/ K c L{ x est (t)} F k=5; T=.1; results x(t) =1 x(t)=1 sin ωt G(s) =k/(1+ts) G(jω) =k/(1+t jω)=5/(1+.1 jω)= 5(1-j.1ω)/( ω 2 )= 5(1-j.1ω)/( ω 2 ) G(jω) = 5/( ω 2 ) 1/2 Φ = tan -1 (-.1ω) K c = G(j)=k=5 y(t)=1 G(jω) sin (ωt+ Φ) x est (t)= y(t)/ K c =( G(jω) / K c ) sin (ωt+ Φ)= ( G(jω) /5) sin (ωt+ Φ)
7 x est (t) / x(t) = G(jω) /5 F ω = 1 results G(jω) = 5/( ω 2 ) 1/2 =5/( ) 1/2 5 Φ = tan -1 (-.1ω) =-5.71 y(t)=1 G(jω) sin (ωt+ Φ) 5 sin ωt x est (t)= y(t)/k 1 sin ωt=x(t) x est (t) / x(t) 1 Summary of results: ω [rad/s] f[hz] Period [s] G(jω) Φ y(t) x est (t) x est (t) / x(t) sin ωt sin ωt sin(ωt-45).7sin(ωt-45) sin(ωt-9).1sin(ωt-45).1 The result f ω = 1, gives x est (t) / x(t).7 2 log x est (t) / x(t) = - 3 db, i.e ω = 1 = ω b Consequently, f ω > ω b x est (t) / x(t) <.7 ω > >ω b x est (t) / x(t) <<.7 ω = 1 x est (t) / x(t).1 i.e the estimation is only 1% of the amplitude of the sens input signal Dynamic estimation (calibration) can use inverse problem solution, increasing gains, in this case 1/.7 f ω = 1 f and 1/.1=1 f ω = 1. (E. Doebelin, Measurement Systems, McGraw Hill, 199, Ch. 1.5 Dynamic Compensation, pp ) Obviously these gains would increase with ω and can lead to various difficulties (overflow in numerical computations, over-amplification of noise high frequency-low amplitude components in the y(t) signal etc), to be studied as part of inverse problem they, a topic of advanced mechatronics.
8 Bode diagram G -1 (s) = (1+Ts)/ k L{x(t)=sin ωt } G(s) k/(1+ts) L{y(t)} G -1 (s) = (1+Ts)/ k 1/ K c x est (t) MATLAB program f the dynamic compensat k=5; T=.1; num=[t 1]; den=[ k]; bode(num,den);grid; 3 Bode Diagram 2 Magnitude (db) Phase (deg) Frequency (rad/sec) The magnitude of the inverse dynamic compensat G -1 (s) = (1+Ts)/ k shows 2 db/decade increase beyond bandwidth cutoff frequency, ω b =1, indicating growing computational difficulties as ω>> ω b. In general, inverse dynamic compensat f increasing senss bandwidth is subjet to various difficulties :
9 - computational difficulties as ω>> ω b due to increasing magnitude of the inverse dynamic compensat G -1 (s) = (1+Ts)/ k f ω> ω b ; digital wd length limitation can lead to overflow. - high frequency noise in the sens output is amplified by increasing magnitude of the inverse dynamic compensat G -1 (s) = (1+Ts)/ k f ω> ω b reducing signal to noise ratio - unmodelled dynamics and parametric uncertainty result in reduced effect of inverse dynamics compennsat - non-minimum phase sytems have unstable inverse dynamics Some solutions to the above difficulties are : - low pass filter f removing high frequency noise in the sens output L{x(t)} G(s) k/(1+ts) L{y(t)} Low Pass Filter G -1 (s)=(1+ts)/ k 1/ K c x est (t) - Modified Output Approach (MOA) applied to non-minimum phase sytems to avoid unstable inverse dynamics L{x(t)} G(s)k/(1+Ts) L{y(t)} Low Pass Filter G MOA -1 (s)=(1+ts)/ k 1/ K c x est (t)
10 B) Second der Instruments (E. Doebelin, Measurement Systems, McGraw Hill, 199, pp ) b) Second der transfer function (K. Ogata, Modern Control Engineering, Prentice Hall, 1997, Ch. 4-3, pp ) f example f a servo system (pp ), a massspring-damper system (Example 4-7, pp ). G(s)=k /(s 2 +2 ζ ω n s + ω n 2 ) where k=gain, ω n = undamped natural frequency, ζ= damping ratio An example could be a fce f(t) transducer f(t) a fce measuring spring based instrument d(t) position measurement potentiometer v(t) where f(t) [N] is the input fce to measure d(t) [m] is the output displacement v(t) [V]is the output voltage of the potentiometer Assume the fce measuring spring based instrument measured by a mass-spring-damper M-B-K system moving hizontally (such that gravity effect can be igned in deriving motion equation) F(s)/ D(s)= 1/ (M s 2 +B s + K) where D(s) =L{d(t)} F(s) =L{f(t)} Assume the approximate transfer function of the position measurement potentiometer V(s)/D(s)= K p where V(s)= L{v(t)} D(s)=L{d(t)} K p [V/m] is the calibration constant of the potentiometer F(s) 1/ (M s 2 +B s + K) D(s) K p V(s) The overall transfer function is V(s)/F(s)= K p / (M s 2 +B s + K)= (K p / M)/ (s 2 +( B / M) s +( K /M) )
11 G(s)=V(s)/F(s)= k /(s 2 +2 ζ ω n s + ω n 2 ) where ω n 2 = K /M 2 ζ / ω n = B / M k= K p / M Time response of such second der instruments are significantly dependent on the value of ζ = B ω n / (2 M) ζ < 1 underdamped response ζ = 1 critically damped response ζ > 1 overdamped response MATLAB Simulations F k =1, ω n = 1 rad/s f n = 1.58 Hz period =.63 sec 1) Step response of G(s) = k /(s 2 +2 ζ ω n s + ω n 2 ) = k /(s 2 +b s + c) where b=2 ζ ω n c= ω n 2 Steady state of v(t) f unit step input f(t) is obtained using limit value theem f unit step input F(s)=1/s f s tending towards zero V = lim s G(s) /s= lim G(s) =lim k /(s 2 +2 ζ ω n s + ω n 2 )= 1/ω n 2 =.1 a) f ζ =, b=2 ζ ω n = MATLAB program f k=1; b=; c=1; num=[ k]; den=[1 b c]; step(num,den);grid Fig. v(t) plot shows an undamped oscillaty response, obviously not usefull in practical applications. Higher values f ζ are required.
12 .2 Step Response Amplitude b) f ζ =.1, b= 2 ζ ω n =2 MATLAB program k=1; b=2; c=1; num=[ k]; den=[1 b c]; step(num,den);grid Time (sec) The results show significant maximum overshoot of 7% and long 2% settling time of 4/(ζ ω n ) = 4/ (.1 x 1)= 4 sec.
13 .18 Step Response Amplitude Time (sec) c) f ζ =.6, b= 2 ζ ω n =12 MATLAB program k=1; b=12; c=1; num=[ k]; den=[1 b c]; step(num,den);grid The results show significant reduced overshoot of 5% and reduced 2% settling time of 4/(ζ ω n ) = 4/ (.6 x 1)= 1.7 sec.
14 .12 Step Response.1.8 Amplitude Time (sec) d) f overdamped case, ζ = 1.2, b= 2 ζ ω n =24 MATLAB program k=1; b=24; c=1; num=[ k]; den=[1 b c]; step(num,den);grid The results show no overshoot but sluggish response.
15 .1 Step Response Amplitude Time (sec) Present day practice is to provide underdamped response f ζ = B ω n / (2 M) in the range of.6-.7, but selecting a damping coefficient of B = 2 M ζ / ω n (E. Doebelin, Measurement Systems, McGraw Hill, 199, pp. 131). Bode diagram f such a case ζ =.6, b= 2 ζ ω n =12 is given by MATLAB program k=1; b=12; c=1; num=[ k]; den=[1 b c]; bode(num,den); grid;
16 -2 Bode Diagram -4 Magnitude (db) Phase (deg) Frequency (rad/sec) Cutoff frequency, ω b,f the above case of a second der transfer function G(s) = k /(s 2 +2 ζ ω n s + ω n 2 ) = k /(s 2 +b s + c) where k=1; b=12; c=1; gives G(jω)=1/( -ω 2 +12jω + 1) its zero-frequency value is G(j)=1/1=.1 2 log G(j) =- 4 db Cutoff frequency, ω b,defining the bandwidth, is obtained from the equation 2 log G(jω b ) = 2 log G(j) - 3 =-4 3 = -43 db The Magnitude diagram gives ω b 1 rad/sec f b 1/(2π) 1.4 Hz Dynamic estimation (calibration) can use inverse problem solution, increasing gains, in this case Obviously these gains would increase with ω and can lead to various difficulties (overflow in numerical computations, over-amplification of noise high frequency-low amplitude components in the y(t) signal etc).
17 Bode diagram G -1 (s) = (s 2 +b s + c) / k F(s) G(s) D(s) G -1 (s) V(s) MATLAB program k=1; b=12; c=1; den =[ k]; num =[1 b c]; bode(num,den); grid; 12 Bode Diagram 1 Magnitude (db) Phase (deg) Frequency (rad/sec) The magnitude of the inverse dynamic compensat G -1 (s) = (1+Ts)/ k shows 4 db/decade increase beyond bandwidth cutoff frequency, ω b =1, indicating growing computational difficulties as ω>> ω b, even me significant the in the case of first der instruments. N-der instrument will have 2 N db/decade increase beyond bandwidth cutoff frequency.
18 Some solutions to the above difficulties were outlined f the case of first eder instruments: - low pass filter f removing high frequency noise in the sens output - Modified Output Approach (MOA) applied to non-minimum phase sytems to avoid unstable inverse dynamics In practice the increase beyond bandwidth cutoff frequency, ω b is nmally limited up to a maximum useful frequency component ω useful which might be achieved by inverse dynamic compensat approach without reachng unacceptable high magnitudes of the inverse dynamic compensat, making this approach advantageus in computer based instrumentation.
19 Sinusoidal Response of the second der sens with ζ =.6 F F(s) 1/ (M s 2 +B s + K) D(s) V(s) the overall transfer function is V(s)/F(s)= K p / (M s 2 +B s + K)= (K p / M)/ (s 2 +( B / M) s +( K /M) ) G(s)=V(s)/F(s)= k /(s 2 +2 ζ ω n s + ω n 2 ) where ω n 2 = K /M 2 ζ ω n = B / M k= K p / M Time response of such second der instruments are significantly dependent on the value of ζ = B ω n / (2 M) where ζ =.6 MATLAB simulation of x(t)=sin ωt k/( s 2 +2 ζ ω n s + ω n 2 ) y(t) 1/K c x est (t) where static calibration constant is K c = G(j) F X(s)= ω/(s 2 +ω 2 ) and unit impulse input δ(s)=1 can be achieved with MATLAB instruction impulse (num, den) f δ(s)=1 ω/(s 2 +ω 2 ) k/( s 2 +2 ζ ω n s + ω n 2 ) y(t) 1/ K c x est (t) The transfer function f the g eneral MATLAB program is k ω/[(s 2 +ω 2 )( s 2 +2 ζ ω n s + ω n 2 )] = k ω/(s ζ ω n s 3 +(ω n 2 +ω 2 )s 2 +2 ζ ω n ω 2 s + ω n 2 ω 2 ) = k ω /( s 4 +as 3 + (b +ω 2 )s 2 +a ω 2 s + bω 2 ) where a= 2 ζ ω n b= ω n 2 Let us assume k =1, ζ =.6 ω n = 1 rad/s such that a= 2 ζ ω n =12 b= ω n 2 =1
20 a=12; b=1; num=[ ω]; den=[1 a b+ω*ω a*ω*ω b*ω*ω]; impulse(num,den); MATLAB Simulations 1) ω=1 rad/s f=.158 Hz period = 6.3 sec MATLAB program is a=12; b=1; num=[ 1]; den=[1 a b+1 a b]; impulse(num,den);.15 Impulse Response.1.5 Amplitude Time (sec) The result agrees to Bode diagram amplitude f ω=1of -4 db.1 2) ω=5 rad/s
21 a=12; b=1; num=[ 5]; den=[ ]; impulse(num,den);.15 Impulse Response.1.5 Amplitude Time (sec) The result agrees to Bode diagram amplitude f ω=5of -4 db.1 Analytical Solutions (K. Ogata, Modern Control Engineering, 4th edition, Prentice Hall pp ), where L{}=Laplace transfm L{x(t)=sin ωt } G(s)= k/( s 2 +2 ζ ω n s + ω 2 n ) L{y(t)} 1/ K c L{ x est (t)} f X(s)= ω/(s 2 +ω 2 ) and unit impulse input δ(s)=1 δ(s)=1 ω/(s 2 +ω 2 ) k/( s 2 +2 ζ ω n s + ω 2 n ) y(t) 1/ K c L{ x est (t)} F x(t) =1 x(t)=1 sin ωt ζ =.6 ω n = 1 rad/s such that a= 2 ζ ω n =12 b= ω 2 n =1 G(s) = k/( s s + 1) G(jω) =1/( -ω jω)= ( -ω jω)/ [( -ω jω) ( -ω jω)] = (1-ω 2-12 jω)/( (1-ω 2 ) ω 2 ) G(jω) = 1/((1-ω 2 ) ω 2 ) 1/2
22 Φ = tan -1 (-12 ω/(1-ω 2 ) ) y(t)=1 G(jω) sin (ωt+ Φ) G(j) = 1/((1) 2 ) 1/2 =1/1 K c =G(j)=1/1 x est (t)= y(t)/ K c =( G(jω) / K c ) sin (ωt+ Φ)= ( G(jω) /(1/1)) sin (ωt+ Φ) x est (t) / x(t) = G(jω) / K c = G(jω) / G(j) F ω = 1 results G(jω) = 1/((1-ω 2 ) ω 2 ) 1/2 =1/((1-1 2 ) ) 1/2 =1/12 Φ = tan -1 (-12 ω/(1-ω 2 ) )= tan -1 (-12/(1-1 2 ) ) = tan -1 (-12/)=-9 y(t)=1 ( G(jω) / K c )sin (ωt+ Φ) ((1/12)/(1/1)) sin( ωt-9) G(j1) / G(j) = (1/12)/(1/1)=1/12 = x est (t) / x(t).83 F ω = 1, Bode diagram gives appr -42 db and -9 which agrees with the above result. Exact calculation of the cutoff frequency, ω b,defining the bandwidth, obtained from the equation 2 log G(jω b ) = 2 log G(j) - 3 log G(j) - log G(jω b ) = log( G(j) / G(jω b ) )=3/2 G(j) / G(jω b ) = log -1 3/2 = G(jω b ) = G(j) / =.79 G(j) which shows that, at cutoff frequency, ω b, the amplitude G(jω b ) drops to.79 of the G(j) F the above second der instrument G(jω) = 1/((1-ω 2 ) ω 2 ) 1/2 results G(j) = 1/((1-2 ) ) 1/2 = 1/1 The cutoff frequency, ω b can be obtained from G(jω b ) = G(j) / =(1/1)/ =1/ F obtaining ω b the equation to solve is then 1/((1-ω b 2 ) ω b 2 ) 1/2 =1/ ((1-ω b 2 ) ω b 2 ) 1/2 = (1-ω b 2 ) ω b 2 = = ω b 4-2 ω b ω b 2 = ω b 4-56 ω b = The solution f ω b 2 is ω b 2 =28± ( ) =28± and 75.6 Only the positive solution gives ω b = 131.6= [rad/s] that can be recognized on the second der Bode diagram f the magnitude of -4-3 =-43 db
Radar Dish. Armature controlled dc motor. Inside. θ r input. Outside. θ D output. θ m. Gearbox. Control Transmitter. Control. θ D.
Radar Dish ME 304 CONTROL SYSTEMS Mechanical Engineering Department, Middle East Technical University Armature controlled dc motor Outside θ D output Inside θ r input r θ m Gearbox Control Transmitter
More informationHomework 7 - Solutions
Homework 7 - Solutions Note: This homework is worth a total of 48 points. 1. Compensators (9 points) For a unity feedback system given below, with G(s) = K s(s + 5)(s + 11) do the following: (c) Find the
More informationFrequency Response of Linear Time Invariant Systems
ME 328, Spring 203, Prof. Rajamani, University of Minnesota Frequency Response of Linear Time Invariant Systems Complex Numbers: Recall that every complex number has a magnitude and a phase. Example: z
More informationSystems Analysis and Control
Systems Analysis and Control Matthew M. Peet Arizona State University Lecture 21: Stability Margins and Closing the Loop Overview In this Lecture, you will learn: Closing the Loop Effect on Bode Plot Effect
More informationEE C128 / ME C134 Fall 2014 HW 8 - Solutions. HW 8 - Solutions
EE C28 / ME C34 Fall 24 HW 8 - Solutions HW 8 - Solutions. Transient Response Design via Gain Adjustment For a transfer function G(s) = in negative feedback, find the gain to yield a 5% s(s+2)(s+85) overshoot
More informationOutline. Classical Control. Lecture 2
Outline Outline Outline Review of Material from Lecture 2 New Stuff - Outline Review of Lecture System Performance Effect of Poles Review of Material from Lecture System Performance Effect of Poles 2 New
More informationMAS107 Control Theory Exam Solutions 2008
MAS07 CONTROL THEORY. HOVLAND: EXAM SOLUTION 2008 MAS07 Control Theory Exam Solutions 2008 Geir Hovland, Mechatronics Group, Grimstad, Norway June 30, 2008 C. Repeat question B, but plot the phase curve
More informationOutline. Classical Control. Lecture 1
Outline Outline Outline 1 Introduction 2 Prerequisites Block diagram for system modeling Modeling Mechanical Electrical Outline Introduction Background Basic Systems Models/Transfers functions 1 Introduction
More informationTime Response Analysis (Part II)
Time Response Analysis (Part II). A critically damped, continuous-time, second order system, when sampled, will have (in Z domain) (a) A simple pole (b) Double pole on real axis (c) Double pole on imaginary
More informationMASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Mechanical Engineering Dynamics and Control II Fall 2007
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Mechanical Engineering.4 Dynamics and Control II Fall 7 Problem Set #9 Solution Posted: Sunday, Dec., 7. The.4 Tower system. The system parameters are
More information8.1.6 Quadratic pole response: resonance
8.1.6 Quadratic pole response: resonance Example G(s)= v (s) v 1 (s) = 1 1+s L R + s LC L + Second-order denominator, of the form 1+a 1 s + a s v 1 (s) + C R Two-pole low-pass filter example v (s) with
More information(a) Find the transfer function of the amplifier. Ans.: G(s) =
126 INTRDUCTIN T CNTR ENGINEERING 10( s 1) (a) Find the transfer function of the amplifier. Ans.: (. 02s 1)(. 001s 1) (b) Find the expected percent overshoot for a step input for the closed-loop system
More informationAPPLICATIONS FOR ROBOTICS
Version: 1 CONTROL APPLICATIONS FOR ROBOTICS TEX d: Feb. 17, 214 PREVIEW We show that the transfer function and conditions of stability for linear systems can be studied using Laplace transforms. Table
More informationTransient response via gain adjustment. Consider a unity feedback system, where G(s) = 2. The closed loop transfer function is. s 2 + 2ζωs + ω 2 n
Design via frequency response Transient response via gain adjustment Consider a unity feedback system, where G(s) = ωn 2. The closed loop transfer function is s(s+2ζω n ) T(s) = ω 2 n s 2 + 2ζωs + ω 2
More informationAutomatic Control 2. Loop shaping. Prof. Alberto Bemporad. University of Trento. Academic year
Automatic Control 2 Loop shaping Prof. Alberto Bemporad University of Trento Academic year 21-211 Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 2 Academic year 21-211 1 / 39 Feedback
More informationTransient Response of a Second-Order System
Transient Response of a Second-Order System ECEN 830 Spring 01 1. Introduction In connection with this experiment, you are selecting the gains in your feedback loop to obtain a well-behaved closed-loop
More informationControl of Manufacturing Processes
Control of Manufacturing Processes Subject 2.830 Spring 2004 Lecture #18 Basic Control Loop Analysis" April 15, 2004 Revisit Temperature Control Problem τ dy dt + y = u τ = time constant = gain y ss =
More informationRecursive, Infinite Impulse Response (IIR) Digital Filters:
Recursive, Infinite Impulse Response (IIR) Digital Filters: Filters defined by Laplace Domain transfer functions (analog devices) can be easily converted to Z domain transfer functions (digital, sampled
More information(b) A unity feedback system is characterized by the transfer function. Design a suitable compensator to meet the following specifications:
1. (a) The open loop transfer function of a unity feedback control system is given by G(S) = K/S(1+0.1S)(1+S) (i) Determine the value of K so that the resonance peak M r of the system is equal to 1.4.
More informationROOT LOCUS. Consider the system. Root locus presents the poles of the closed-loop system when the gain K changes from 0 to. H(s) H ( s) = ( s)
C1 ROOT LOCUS Consider the system R(s) E(s) C(s) + K G(s) - H(s) C(s) R(s) = K G(s) 1 + K G(s) H(s) Root locus presents the poles of the closed-loop system when the gain K changes from 0 to 1+ K G ( s)
More informationUNIVERSITY OF BOLTON SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING BENG (HONS) IN BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING SEMESTER 1 EXAMINATION 2017/2018 ADVANCED BIOMECHATRONIC SYSTEMS
ENG0016 UNIVERSITY OF BOLTON SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING BENG (HONS) IN BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING SEMESTER 1 EXAMINATION 2017/2018 ADVANCED BIOMECHATRONIC SYSTEMS MODULE NO: BME6003 Date: Friday 19 January 2018
More informationSection 4.9; Section 5.6. June 30, Free Mechanical Vibrations/Couple Mass-Spring System
Section 4.9; Section 5.6 Free Mechanical Vibrations/Couple Mass-Spring System June 30, 2009 Today s Session Today s Session A Summary of This Session: Today s Session A Summary of This Session: (1) Free
More informationLab 3: Poles, Zeros, and Time/Frequency Domain Response
ECEN 33 Linear Systems Spring 2 2-- P. Mathys Lab 3: Poles, Zeros, and Time/Frequency Domain Response of CT Systems Introduction Systems that are used for signal processing are very often characterized
More informationControl for. Maarten Steinbuch Dept. Mechanical Engineering Control Systems Technology Group TU/e
Control for Maarten Steinbuch Dept. Mechanical Engineering Control Systems Technology Group TU/e Motion Systems m F Introduction Timedomain tuning Frequency domain & stability Filters Feedforward Servo-oriented
More informationDynamic circuits: Frequency domain analysis
Electronic Circuits 1 Dynamic circuits: Contents Free oscillation and natural frequency Transfer functions Frequency response Bode plots 1 System behaviour: overview 2 System behaviour : review solution
More informationSchool of Mechanical Engineering Purdue University
Case Study ME375 Frequency Response - 1 Case Study SUPPORT POWER WIRE DROPPERS Electric train derives power through a pantograph, which contacts the power wire, which is suspended from a catenary. During
More informationProcess Control & Instrumentation (CH 3040)
First-order systems Process Control & Instrumentation (CH 3040) Arun K. Tangirala Department of Chemical Engineering, IIT Madras January - April 010 Lectures: Mon, Tue, Wed, Fri Extra class: Thu A first-order
More informationIntroduction to Feedback Control
Introduction to Feedback Control Control System Design Why Control? Open-Loop vs Closed-Loop (Feedback) Why Use Feedback Control? Closed-Loop Control System Structure Elements of a Feedback Control System
More informationDelhi Noida Bhopal Hyderabad Jaipur Lucknow Indore Pune Bhubaneswar Kolkata Patna Web: Ph:
Serial : 0. LS_D_ECIN_Control Systems_30078 Delhi Noida Bhopal Hyderabad Jaipur Lucnow Indore Pune Bhubaneswar Kolata Patna Web: E-mail: info@madeeasy.in Ph: 0-4546 CLASS TEST 08-9 ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING
More informationFREQUENCY-RESPONSE DESIGN
ECE45/55: Feedback Control Systems. 9 FREQUENCY-RESPONSE DESIGN 9.: PD and lead compensation networks The frequency-response methods we have seen so far largely tell us about stability and stability margins
More informationEXPERIMENTALLY DETERMINING THE TRANSFER FUNCTION OF A SPRING- MASS SYSTEM
EXPERIMENTALLY DETERMINING THE TRANSFER FUNCTION OF A SPRING- MASS SYSTEM Lab 8 OBJECTIVES At the conclusion of this experiment, students should be able to: Experimentally determine the best fourth order
More information1 The frequency response of the basic mechanical oscillator
Seismograph systems The frequency response of the basic mechanical oscillator Most seismographic systems are based on a simple mechanical oscillator really just a mass suspended by a spring with some method
More informationINTRODUCTION TO DIGITAL CONTROL
ECE4540/5540: Digital Control Systems INTRODUCTION TO DIGITAL CONTROL.: Introduction In ECE450/ECE550 Feedback Control Systems, welearnedhow to make an analog controller D(s) to control a linear-time-invariant
More informationIntroduction. Performance and Robustness (Chapter 1) Advanced Control Systems Spring / 31
Introduction Classical Control Robust Control u(t) y(t) G u(t) G + y(t) G : nominal model G = G + : plant uncertainty Uncertainty sources : Structured : parametric uncertainty, multimodel uncertainty Unstructured
More informationControl of Manufacturing Processes
Control of Manufacturing Processes Subject 2.830 Spring 2004 Lecture #19 Position Control and Root Locus Analysis" April 22, 2004 The Position Servo Problem, reference position NC Control Robots Injection
More informationToday (10/23/01) Today. Reading Assignment: 6.3. Gain/phase margin lead/lag compensator Ref. 6.4, 6.7, 6.10
Today Today (10/23/01) Gain/phase margin lead/lag compensator Ref. 6.4, 6.7, 6.10 Reading Assignment: 6.3 Last Time In the last lecture, we discussed control design through shaping of the loop gain GK:
More informationGrades will be determined by the correctness of your answers (explanations are not required).
6.00 (Fall 2011) Final Examination December 19, 2011 Name: Kerberos Username: Please circle your section number: Section Time 2 11 am 1 pm 4 2 pm Grades will be determined by the correctness of your answers
More informationRaktim Bhattacharya. . AERO 632: Design of Advance Flight Control System. Preliminaries
. AERO 632: of Advance Flight Control System. Preliminaries Raktim Bhattacharya Laboratory For Uncertainty Quantification Aerospace Engineering, Texas A&M University. Preliminaries Signals & Systems Laplace
More informationCDS 101/110: Lecture 3.1 Linear Systems
CDS /: Lecture 3. Linear Systems Goals for Today: Revist and motivate linear time-invariant system models: Summarize properties, examples, and tools Convolution equation describing solution in response
More informationClassify a transfer function to see which order or ramp it can follow and with which expected error.
Dr. J. Tani, Prof. Dr. E. Frazzoli 5-059-00 Control Systems I (Autumn 208) Exercise Set 0 Topic: Specifications for Feedback Systems Discussion: 30.. 208 Learning objectives: The student can grizzi@ethz.ch,
More informationLecture 1: Introduction to System Modeling and Control. Introduction Basic Definitions Different Model Types System Identification
Lecture 1: Introduction to System Modeling and Control Introduction Basic Definitions Different Model Types System Identification What is Mathematical Model? A set of mathematical equations (e.g., differential
More informationPositioning Servo Design Example
Positioning Servo Design Example 1 Goal. The goal in this design example is to design a control system that will be used in a pick-and-place robot to move the link of a robot between two positions. Usually
More informationFrequency Response DR. GYURCSEK ISTVÁN
DR. GYURCSEK ISTVÁN Frequency Response Sources and additional materials (recommended) Dr. Gyurcsek Dr. Elmer: Theories in Electric Circuits, GlobeEdit, 2016, ISBN:978-3-330-71341-3 Ch. Alexander, M. Sadiku:
More informationLecture 6 Classical Control Overview IV. Dr. Radhakant Padhi Asst. Professor Dept. of Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore
Lecture 6 Classical Control Overview IV Dr. Radhakant Padhi Asst. Professor Dept. of Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore Lead Lag Compensator Design Dr. Radhakant Padhi Asst.
More informationStability of CL System
Stability of CL System Consider an open loop stable system that becomes unstable with large gain: At the point of instability, K( j) G( j) = 1 0dB K( j) G( j) K( j) G( j) K( j) G( j) =± 180 o 180 o Closed
More informationKINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING
KINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK SUB.NAME : CONTROL SYSTEMS BRANCH : ECE YEAR : II SEMESTER: IV 1. What is control system? 2. Define open
More informationCourse roadmap. Step response for 2nd-order system. Step response for 2nd-order system
ME45: Control Systems Lecture Time response of nd-order systems Prof. Clar Radcliffe and Prof. Jongeun Choi Department of Mechanical Engineering Michigan State University Modeling Laplace transform Transfer
More informationDynamic Response. Assoc. Prof. Enver Tatlicioglu. Department of Electrical & Electronics Engineering Izmir Institute of Technology.
Dynamic Response Assoc. Prof. Enver Tatlicioglu Department of Electrical & Electronics Engineering Izmir Institute of Technology Chapter 3 Assoc. Prof. Enver Tatlicioglu (EEE@IYTE) EE362 Feedback Control
More informationSystems Analysis and Control
Systems Analysis and Control Matthew M. Peet Arizona State University Lecture 24: Compensation in the Frequency Domain Overview In this Lecture, you will learn: Lead Compensators Performance Specs Altering
More informationPerformance of Feedback Control Systems
Performance of Feedback Control Systems Design of a PID Controller Transient Response of a Closed Loop System Damping Coefficient, Natural frequency, Settling time and Steady-state Error and Type 0, Type
More informationME EXAM #1 Tuesday, October 7, :30 7:30 pm PHYS 112 and 114
ME 36500 EXAM # Tuesday, October 7, 04 6:30 7:30 pm PHYS and 4 Division: Chiu(0:30) / Shelton(:30) / Bae(:30) (circle one) HW ID: Name: Solution Instructions () This is a closed book examination, but you
More informationME 375 EXAM #1 Friday, March 13, 2015 SOLUTION
ME 375 EXAM #1 Friday, March 13, 2015 SOLUTION PROBLEM 1 A system is made up of a homogeneous disk (of mass m and outer radius R), particle A (of mass m) and particle B (of mass m). The disk is pinned
More informationRichiami di Controlli Automatici
Richiami di Controlli Automatici Gianmaria De Tommasi 1 1 Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II detommas@unina.it Ottobre 2012 Corsi AnsaldoBreda G. De Tommasi (UNINA) Richiami di Controlli Automatici
More informationELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATIONS DEP. 3rd YEAR, 2010/2011 CONTROL ENGINEERING SHEET 5 Lead-Lag Compensation Techniques
CAIRO UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF ENGINEERING ELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATIONS DEP. 3rd YEAR, 00/0 CONTROL ENGINEERING SHEET 5 Lead-Lag Compensation Techniques [] For the following system, Design a compensator such
More informationControl System (ECE411) Lectures 13 & 14
Control System (ECE411) Lectures 13 & 14, Professor Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Colorado State University Fall 2016 Steady-State Error Analysis Remark: For a unity feedback system
More informationFirst and Second Order Circuits. Claudio Talarico, Gonzaga University Spring 2015
First and Second Order Circuits Claudio Talarico, Gonzaga University Spring 2015 Capacitors and Inductors intuition: bucket of charge q = Cv i = C dv dt Resist change of voltage DC open circuit Store voltage
More informationDynamic System Response. Dynamic System Response K. Craig 1
Dynamic System Response Dynamic System Response K. Craig 1 Dynamic System Response LTI Behavior vs. Non-LTI Behavior Solution of Linear, Constant-Coefficient, Ordinary Differential Equations Classical
More informationOverview of Bode Plots Transfer function review Piece-wise linear approximations First-order terms Second-order terms (complex poles & zeros)
Overview of Bode Plots Transfer function review Piece-wise linear approximations First-order terms Second-order terms (complex poles & zeros) J. McNames Portland State University ECE 222 Bode Plots Ver.
More informationGATE EE Topic wise Questions SIGNALS & SYSTEMS
www.gatehelp.com GATE EE Topic wise Questions YEAR 010 ONE MARK Question. 1 For the system /( s + 1), the approximate time taken for a step response to reach 98% of the final value is (A) 1 s (B) s (C)
More informationSolutions to Skill-Assessment Exercises
Solutions to Skill-Assessment Exercises To Accompany Control Systems Engineering 4 th Edition By Norman S. Nise John Wiley & Sons Copyright 2004 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved. No part
More informationSystems Analysis and Control
Systems Analysis and Control Matthew M. Peet Illinois Institute of Technology Lecture 8: Response Characteristics Overview In this Lecture, you will learn: Characteristics of the Response Stability Real
More informationEE 4343/ Control System Design Project LECTURE 10
Copyright S. Ikenaga 998 All rights reserved EE 4343/5329 - Control System Design Project LECTURE EE 4343/5329 Homepage EE 4343/5329 Course Outline Design of Phase-lead and Phase-lag compensators using
More informationSIGNAL PROCESSING. B14 Option 4 lectures. Stephen Roberts
SIGNAL PROCESSING B14 Option 4 lectures Stephen Roberts Recommended texts Lynn. An introduction to the analysis and processing of signals. Macmillan. Oppenhein & Shafer. Digital signal processing. Prentice
More informationChapter 8: Frequency Domain Analysis
Chapter 8: Frequency Domain Analysis Samantha Ramirez Preview Questions 1. What is the steady-state response of a linear system excited by a cyclic or oscillatory input? 2. How does one characterize the
More informationExercise 1 (A Non-minimum Phase System)
Prof. Dr. E. Frazzoli 5-59- Control Systems I (HS 25) Solution Exercise Set Loop Shaping Noele Norris, 9th December 26 Exercise (A Non-minimum Phase System) To increase the rise time of the system, we
More informationLecture 5: Frequency domain analysis: Nyquist, Bode Diagrams, second order systems, system types
Lecture 5: Frequency domain analysis: Nyquist, Bode Diagrams, second order systems, system types Venkata Sonti Department of Mechanical Engineering Indian Institute of Science Bangalore, India, 562 This
More informationRaktim Bhattacharya. . AERO 422: Active Controls for Aerospace Vehicles. Frequency Response-Design Method
.. AERO 422: Active Controls for Aerospace Vehicles Frequency Response- Method Raktim Bhattacharya Laboratory For Uncertainty Quantification Aerospace Engineering, Texas A&M University. ... Response to
More informationFEEDBACK CONTROL SYSTEMS
FEEDBAC CONTROL SYSTEMS. Control System Design. Open and Closed-Loop Control Systems 3. Why Closed-Loop Control? 4. Case Study --- Speed Control of a DC Motor 5. Steady-State Errors in Unity Feedback Control
More informationPart IB Paper 6: Information Engineering LINEAR SYSTEMS AND CONTROL. Glenn Vinnicombe HANDOUT 4. The Frequency ResponseG(jω)
Part IB Paper 6: Information Engineering LINEAR SYSEMS AND CONROL Glenn Vinnicombe HANDOU 4 he Frequency ResponseG(jω) x(t) 2π ω y(t) G(jω) argg(jω) ω t t Asymptotically stable LI systemg(s) x(t)=cos(ωt)
More informationR. W. Erickson. Department of Electrical, Computer, and Energy Engineering University of Colorado, Boulder
R. W. Erickson Department of Electrical, Computer, and Energy Engineering University of Colorado, Boulder 8.1. Review of Bode plots Decibels Table 8.1. Expressing magnitudes in decibels G db = 0 log 10
More informationRobust Performance Example #1
Robust Performance Example # The transfer function for a nominal system (plant) is given, along with the transfer function for one extreme system. These two transfer functions define a family of plants
More informationExercise 1 (A Non-minimum Phase System)
Prof. Dr. E. Frazzoli 5-59- Control Systems I (Autumn 27) Solution Exercise Set 2 Loop Shaping clruch@ethz.ch, 8th December 27 Exercise (A Non-minimum Phase System) To decrease the rise time of the system,
More information2.004 Dynamics and Control II Spring 2008
MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 2.004 Dynamics and Control II Spring 2008 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms. Massachusetts Institute
More informationDESIGN USING TRANSFORMATION TECHNIQUE CLASSICAL METHOD
206 Spring Semester ELEC733 Digital Control System LECTURE 7: DESIGN USING TRANSFORMATION TECHNIQUE CLASSICAL METHOD For a unit ramp input Tz Ez ( ) 2 ( z ) D( z) G( z) Tz e( ) lim( z) z 2 ( z ) D( z)
More informationOscillations. Simple Harmonic Motion of a Mass on a Spring The equation of motion for a mass m is attached to a spring of constant k is
Dr. Alain Brizard College Physics I (PY 10) Oscillations Textbook Reference: Chapter 14 sections 1-8. Simple Harmonic Motion of a Mass on a Spring The equation of motion for a mass m is attached to a spring
More informationDynamic Behavior. Chapter 5
1 Dynamic Behavior In analyzing process dynamic and process control systems, it is important to know how the process responds to changes in the process inputs. A number of standard types of input changes
More informationControl Systems Design
ELEC4410 Control Systems Design Lecture 18: State Feedback Tracking and State Estimation Julio H. Braslavsky julio@ee.newcastle.edu.au School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Lecture 18:
More informationLab Experiment 2: Performance of First order and second order systems
Lab Experiment 2: Performance of First order and second order systems Objective: The objective of this exercise will be to study the performance characteristics of first and second order systems using
More informationRobust Control 3 The Closed Loop
Robust Control 3 The Closed Loop Harry G. Kwatny Department of Mechanical Engineering & Mechanics Drexel University /2/2002 Outline Closed Loop Transfer Functions Traditional Performance Measures Time
More informationDiscrete Systems. Step response and pole locations. Mark Cannon. Hilary Term Lecture
Discrete Systems Mark Cannon Hilary Term 22 - Lecture 4 Step response and pole locations 4 - Review Definition of -transform: U() = Z{u k } = u k k k= Discrete transfer function: Y () U() = G() = Z{g k},
More informationDr Ian R. Manchester
Week Content Notes 1 Introduction 2 Frequency Domain Modelling 3 Transient Performance and the s-plane 4 Block Diagrams 5 Feedback System Characteristics Assign 1 Due 6 Root Locus 7 Root Locus 2 Assign
More informationCHAPTER 7 STEADY-STATE RESPONSE ANALYSES
CHAPTER 7 STEADY-STATE RESPONSE ANALYSES 1. Introduction The steady state error is a measure of system accuracy. These errors arise from the nature of the inputs, system type and from nonlinearities of
More informationDistributed Real-Time Control Systems
Distributed Real-Time Control Systems Chapter 9 Discrete PID Control 1 Computer Control 2 Approximation of Continuous Time Controllers Design Strategy: Design a continuous time controller C c (s) and then
More informationSection 3.7: Mechanical and Electrical Vibrations
Section 3.7: Mechanical and Electrical Vibrations Second order linear equations with constant coefficients serve as mathematical models for mechanical and electrical oscillations. For example, the motion
More information1 (20 pts) Nyquist Exercise
EE C128 / ME134 Problem Set 6 Solution Fall 2011 1 (20 pts) Nyquist Exercise Consider a close loop system with unity feedback. For each G(s), hand sketch the Nyquist diagram, determine Z = P N, algebraically
More informationModeling and Experimentation: Mass-Spring-Damper System Dynamics
Modeling and Experimentation: Mass-Spring-Damper System Dynamics Prof. R.G. Longoria Department of Mechanical Engineering The University of Texas at Austin July 20, 2014 Overview 1 This lab is meant to
More informationC(s) R(s) 1 C(s) C(s) C(s) = s - T. Ts + 1 = 1 s - 1. s + (1 T) Taking the inverse Laplace transform of Equation (5 2), we obtain
analyses of the step response, ramp response, and impulse response of the second-order systems are presented. Section 5 4 discusses the transient-response analysis of higherorder systems. Section 5 5 gives
More informationIntro to Frequency Domain Design
Intro to Frequency Domain Design MEM 355 Performance Enhancement of Dynamical Systems Harry G. Kwatny Department of Mechanical Engineering & Mechanics Drexel University Outline Closed Loop Transfer Functions
More informationWe are IntechOpen, the world s leading publisher of Open Access books Built by scientists, for scientists. International authors and editors
We are IntechOpen, the world s leading publisher of Open Access books Built by scientists, for scientists 3,500 108,000 1.7 M Open access books available International authors and editors Downloads Our
More informationFrequency domain analysis
Automatic Control 2 Frequency domain analysis Prof. Alberto Bemporad University of Trento Academic year 2010-2011 Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 2 Academic year 2010-2011
More informationDr Ian R. Manchester Dr Ian R. Manchester AMME 3500 : Review
Week Date Content Notes 1 6 Mar Introduction 2 13 Mar Frequency Domain Modelling 3 20 Mar Transient Performance and the s-plane 4 27 Mar Block Diagrams Assign 1 Due 5 3 Apr Feedback System Characteristics
More information= rad/sec. We can find the last parameter, T, from ωcg new
EE572 Solution to HW#22. Keep working on your project!! 1. Consider the following system: W(s) + T s =1 msec G lead (z) G zoh (z) 8 ( s+ 4) - a) Design a lead compensator, G lead (z), which meets the following
More informationCDS 101/110: Lecture 3.1 Linear Systems
CDS /: Lecture 3. Linear Systems Goals for Today: Describe and motivate linear system models: Summarize properties, examples, and tools Joel Burdick (substituting for Richard Murray) jwb@robotics.caltech.edu,
More informationLABORATORY INSTRUCTION MANUAL CONTROL SYSTEM II LAB EE 693
LABORATORY INSTRUCTION MANUAL CONTROL SYSTEM II LAB EE 693 ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT JIS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING (AN AUTONOMOUS INSTITUTE) KALYANI, NADIA EXPERIMENT NO : CS II/ TITLE : FAMILIARIZATION
More informationECE382/ME482 Spring 2005 Homework 6 Solution April 17, (s/2 + 1) s(2s + 1)[(s/8) 2 + (s/20) + 1]
ECE382/ME482 Spring 25 Homework 6 Solution April 17, 25 1 Solution to HW6 P8.17 We are given a system with open loop transfer function G(s) = 4(s/2 + 1) s(2s + 1)[(s/8) 2 + (s/2) + 1] (1) and unity negative
More informationAnswers to multiple choice questions
Answers to multiple choice questions Chapter 2 M2.1 (b) M2.2 (a) M2.3 (d) M2.4 (b) M2.5 (a) M2.6 (b) M2.7 (b) M2.8 (c) M2.9 (a) M2.10 (b) Chapter 3 M3.1 (b) M3.2 (d) M3.3 (d) M3.4 (d) M3.5 (c) M3.6 (c)
More informationSinusoidal Forcing of a First-Order Process. / τ
Frequency Response Analysis Chapter 3 Sinusoidal Forcing of a First-Order Process For a first-order transfer function with gain K and time constant τ, the response to a general sinusoidal input, xt = A
More informationStudio Exercise Time Response & Frequency Response 1 st -Order Dynamic System RC Low-Pass Filter
Studio Exercise Time Response & Frequency Response 1 st -Order Dynamic System RC Low-Pass Filter i i in R out Assignment: Perform a Complete e in C e Dynamic System Investigation out of the RC Low-Pass
More informationThe requirements of a plant may be expressed in terms of (a) settling time (b) damping ratio (c) peak overshoot --- in time domain
Compensators To improve the performance of a given plant or system G f(s) it may be necessary to use a compensator or controller G c(s). Compensator Plant G c (s) G f (s) The requirements of a plant may
More informationReview of Linear Time-Invariant Network Analysis
D1 APPENDIX D Review of Linear Time-Invariant Network Analysis Consider a network with input x(t) and output y(t) as shown in Figure D-1. If an input x 1 (t) produces an output y 1 (t), and an input x
More information