Structure of Compact Quantum Groups A u (Q) and B u (Q) and their Isomorphism Classification
|
|
- Isabel Fisher
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Structure of Compact Quantum Groups A u (Q) and B u (Q) and their Isomorphism Classification Shuzhou Wang Department of Mathematics University of Georgia
2 1. The Notion of Quantum Groups G = Simple compact Lie group, e.g. G = SU(2) = { α γ : αᾱ + γ γ = 1, α, γ C }. γ ᾱ A = C(G)
3 1. The Notion of Quantum Groups G = Simple compact Lie group, e.g. G = SU(2) = { α γ : αᾱ + γ γ = 1, α, γ C }. γ ᾱ A = C(G) Lie group G Hopf algebra (A,, ε, S).
4 1. The Notion of Quantum Groups G = Simple compact Lie group, e.g. G = SU(2) = { α γ : αᾱ + γ γ = 1, α, γ C }. γ ᾱ A = C(G) Lie group G Hopf algebra (A,, ε, S). : A A A, (f )(s, t) = f (st). ε : A C, ε(f ) = f (e). S : A A, S(f )(t) = f (t 1 ).
5 1. The Notion of Quantum Groups (cont.) Spectacular development in Mid-1980 s: Drinfeld, Jimbo, Woronowicz,
6 1. The Notion of Quantum Groups (cont.) Spectacular development in Mid-1980 s: Drinfeld, Jimbo, Woronowicz, Idea of Quantization: Commuting functions on G, e.g. α, γ, Non-commuting operators, e.g. α, γ, Commutative C(G) = Noncommutative C(G q ). G q = quantum group
7 1. The Notion of Quantum Groups (cont.) Recall Hilbert 5th Problem: Characterization of Lie groups among topological groups.
8 1. The Notion of Quantum Groups (cont.) Recall Hilbert 5th Problem: Characterization of Lie groups among topological groups. New Problem: Characterization of quantum groups among Hopf algebras.
9 1. The Notion of Quantum Groups (cont.) Recall Hilbert 5th Problem: Characterization of Lie groups among topological groups. New Problem: Characterization of quantum groups among Hopf algebras. Lesson: Quantums groups = nice Hopf algebras Restrict to such Hopf algebras to obtain nice and deep theory.
10 1. The Notion of Quantum Groups (cont.) DEFINITION: A compact matrix quantum group (CMQG) is a pair G = (A, u) of a unital C -algebra A and u = (u ij ) n i,j=1 M n(a) satisfying
11 1. The Notion of Quantum Groups (cont.) DEFINITION: A compact matrix quantum group (CMQG) is a pair G = (A, u) of a unital C -algebra A and u = (u ij ) n i,j=1 M n(a) satisfying (1) : A A A with n (u ij ) = u ik u kj, i, j = 1,, n; k=1
12 1. The Notion of Quantum Groups (cont.) DEFINITION: A compact matrix quantum group (CMQG) is a pair G = (A, u) of a unital C -algebra A and u = (u ij ) n i,j=1 M n(a) satisfying (1) : A A A with n (u ij ) = u ik u kj, i, j = 1,, n; k=1 (2) u 1 in M n (A) and anti-morphism S on A = alg(u ij ) with S(S(a ) ) = a, a A; S(u) = u 1.
13 1. The Notion of Quantum Groups (cont.) Note: Equivalent definition of CMQG is obtained if condition (2) is replaced with (2 ) u 1 and (u t ) 1 in M n (A)
14 1. The Notion of Quantum Groups (cont.) Note: Equivalent definition of CMQG is obtained if condition (2) is replaced with (2 ) u 1 and (u t ) 1 in M n (A) There are other equivalent definitions of CMQG
15 1. The Notion of Quantum Groups (cont.) Famous Example: C(SU q (2)), q R, q 0
16 1. The Notion of Quantum Groups (cont.) Famous Example: C(SU q (2)), q R, q 0 Generators: α, γ.
17 1. The Notion of Quantum Groups (cont.) Famous Example: C(SU q (2)), q R, q 0 Generators: α, γ. [ α qγ Relations: the 2 2 matrix u := γ α ] is unitary,
18 1. The Notion of Quantum Groups (cont.) Famous Example: C(SU q (2)), q R, q 0 Generators: α, γ. [ α qγ Relations: the 2 2 matrix u := γ α i.e. ] is unitary, α α + γ γ = 1, αα + q 2 γγ = 1, γγ = γ γ, αγ = qγα, αγ = qγ α.
19 1. The Notion of Quantum Groups (cont.) Facts:
20 1. The Notion of Quantum Groups (cont.) Facts: (u t ) 1 = α q 1 γ q 2 γ α
21 1. The Notion of Quantum Groups (cont.) Facts: (u t ) 1 = α q 1 γ q 2 γ α Hopf algebra structure same as C(SU(2)): (u ij ) = 2 u ik u kj, i, j = 1, 2; k=1 ε(u ij ) = δ ij, i, j = 1, 2; S(u) = u 1.
22 1. The Notion of Quantum Groups (cont.) G q = Deformation of arbitrary simple compact Lie groups: Soibelman et al. based on Drinfeld-Jimbo s U q (g)
23 1. The Notion of Quantum Groups (cont.) G q = Deformation of arbitrary simple compact Lie groups: Soibelman et al. based on Drinfeld-Jimbo s U q (g) G u q = Twisting of G q
24 1. The Notion of Quantum Groups (cont.) G q = Deformation of arbitrary simple compact Lie groups: Soibelman et al. based on Drinfeld-Jimbo s U q (g) Gq u = Twisting of G q Woronowicz s theory: Haar measure, Peter-Weyl, Tannka-Krein, etc.
25 1. The Notion of Quantum Groups (cont.) G q = Deformation of arbitrary simple compact Lie groups: Soibelman et al. based on Drinfeld-Jimbo s U q (g) Gq u = Twisting of G q Woronowicz s theory: Haar measure, Peter-Weyl, Tannka-Krein, etc. Any other classses of examples besides G q, Gq? u
26 1. The Notion of Quantum Groups (cont.) G q = Deformation of arbitrary simple compact Lie groups: Soibelman et al. based on Drinfeld-Jimbo s U q (g) Gq u = Twisting of G q Woronowicz s theory: Haar measure, Peter-Weyl, Tannka-Krein, etc. Any other classses of examples besides G q, Gq? u Yes: Universal quantum groups A u (Q) and B u (Q),
27 1. The Notion of Quantum Groups (cont.) G q = Deformation of arbitrary simple compact Lie groups: Soibelman et al. based on Drinfeld-Jimbo s U q (g) Gq u = Twisting of G q Woronowicz s theory: Haar measure, Peter-Weyl, Tannka-Krein, etc. Any other classses of examples besides G q, Gq? u Yes: Universal quantum groups A u (Q) and B u (Q), quantum permutation groups A aut (X n ), etc.
28 2. Universal CMQGs A u (Q) and B u (Q) For u = (u ij ), ū := (u ij ), u := ū t ; Q is an n n non-singular complex scalar matrix.
29 2. Universal CMQGs A u (Q) and B u (Q) For u = (u ij ), ū := (u ij ), u := ū t ; Q is an n n non-singular complex scalar matrix. A u (Q) := C {u ij : u = u 1, (u t ) 1 = QūQ 1 }
30 2. Universal CMQGs A u (Q) and B u (Q) For u = (u ij ), ū := (u ij ), u := ū t ; Q is an n n non-singular complex scalar matrix. A u (Q) := C {u ij : u = u 1, (u t ) 1 = QūQ 1 } B u (Q) := C {u ij : u = u 1, (u t ) 1 = QuQ 1 }
31 2. A u(q) and B u(q) (cont.) THEOREM 1. (1) A u (Q) and B u (Q) are CMQGs (in fact quantum automorphism groups).
32 2. A u(q) and B u(q) (cont.) THEOREM 1. (1) A u (Q) and B u (Q) are CMQGs (in fact quantum automorphism groups). (2) Every CMQG is a quantum subgroup of A u (Q) for some Q > 0;
33 2. A u(q) and B u(q) (cont.) THEOREM 1. (1) A u (Q) and B u (Q) are CMQGs (in fact quantum automorphism groups). (2) Every CMQG is a quantum subgroup of A u (Q) for some Q > 0; Every CMQG with self conjugate fundamental representation is a quantum subgroup of B u (Q) for some Q.
34 2. A u(q) and B u(q) (cont.) The C -algebras A u (Q) and B u (Q) are non-nuclear (even non-exact) for generic Q s. e.g. C (F n ) is a quotient of A u (Q) for Q > 0.
35 2. A u(q) and B u(q) (cont.) The C -algebras A u (Q) and B u (Q) are non-nuclear (even non-exact) for generic Q s. e.g. C (F n ) is a quotient of A u (Q) for Q > 0. B u (Q) = C(SU q (2)) for Q = 0 1, q R, q 0. q 0
36 2. A u(q) and B u(q) (cont.) The C -algebras A u (Q) and B u (Q) are non-nuclear (even non-exact) for generic Q s. e.g. C (F n ) is a quotient of A u (Q) for Q > 0. B u (Q) = C(SU q (2)) for Q = 0 1 q 0, q R, q 0. Banica s computed the fusion rings of A u (Q) (for Q > 0) and B u (Q) (for Q Q) in his deep thesis.
37 3. A u (Q) for Positive Q Q > 0 is called normalized if Tr(Q) = Tr(Q 1 ).
38 3. A u (Q) for Positive Q Q > 0 is called normalized if Tr(Q) = Tr(Q 1 ). THEOREM 2. Let Q GL(n, C) and Q GL(n, C) be positive, normalized, with eigen values q 1 q 2 q n and q 1 q 2 q n respectively.
39 3. A u (Q) for Positive Q Q > 0 is called normalized if Tr(Q) = Tr(Q 1 ). THEOREM 2. Let Q GL(n, C) and Q GL(n, C) be positive, normalized, with eigen values q 1 q 2 q n and q 1 q 2 q n respectively. Then, A u (Q) is isomorphic to A u (Q ) iff, (i) n = n, and
40 3. A u (Q) for Positive Q Q > 0 is called normalized if Tr(Q) = Tr(Q 1 ). THEOREM 2. Let Q GL(n, C) and Q GL(n, C) be positive, normalized, with eigen values q 1 q 2 q n and q 1 q 2 q n respectively. Then, A u (Q) is isomorphic to A u (Q ) iff, (i) n = n, and (ii) (q 1, q 2,, q n ) = (q 1, q 2,, q n) or (q 1 n, q 1 n 1,, q 1 1 ) = (q 1, q 2,, q n).
41 4. B u (Q) with Q Q RI n THEOREM 3. Let Q GL(n, C) and Q GL(n, C) be such that Q Q RI n, Q Q RI n, respectively.
42 4. B u (Q) with Q Q RI n THEOREM 3. Let Q GL(n, C) and Q GL(n, C) be such that Q Q RI n, Q Q RI n, respectively. Then, B u (Q) is isomorphic to B u (Q ) iff, (i) n = n,
43 4. B u (Q) with Q Q RI n THEOREM 3. Let Q GL(n, C) and Q GL(n, C) be such that Q Q RI n, Q Q RI n, respectively. Then, B u (Q) is isomorphic to B u (Q ) iff, (i) n = n, and (ii) there exist S U(n) and z C such that Q = zs t Q S.
44 4. B u (Q) with Q Q RI n THEOREM 3. Let Q GL(n, C) and Q GL(n, C) be such that Q Q RI n, Q Q RI n, respectively. Then, B u (Q) is isomorphic to B u (Q ) iff, (i) n = n, and (ii) there exist S U(n) and z C such that Q = zs t Q S. Note: The quantum groups B u (Q) are simple in an appropriate sense: cf. S. Wang: Simple compact quantum groups I, JFA, 256 (2009),
45 5. A u (Q) and B u (Q) for Arbitrary Q
46 5. A u (Q) and B u (Q) for Arbitrary Q Note: A u (Q) = C(T), B u (Q) = C (Z/2Z) for Q GL(1, C).
47 5. A u (Q) and B u (Q) for Arbitrary Q Note: A u (Q) = C(T), B u (Q) = C (Z/2Z) for Q GL(1, C). THEOREM 4. Let Q GL(n, C). Then there exists positive matrices P j such that
48 5. A u (Q) and B u (Q) for Arbitrary Q Note: A u (Q) = C(T), B u (Q) = C (Z/2Z) for Q GL(1, C). THEOREM 4. Let Q GL(n, C). Then there exists positive matrices P j such that A u (Q) = A u (P 1 ) A u (P 2 ) A u (P k ).
49 5. A u(q) and B u(q) for Arbitrary Q THEOREM 5. Let Q GL(n, C). Then there exist positive matrices P i (i k) and matrices Q j (j l) with Q j Qj s are nonzero scalars
50 5. A u(q) and B u(q) for Arbitrary Q THEOREM 5. Let Q GL(n, C). Then there exist positive matrices P i (i k) and matrices Q j (j l) with Q j Qj s are nonzero scalars and that B u (Q) = A u (P 1 ) A u (P 2 ) A u (P k ) B u (Q 1 ) B u (Q 2 ) B u (Q l ).
51 5. A u(q) and B u(q) for Arbitrary Q THEOREM 5. Let Q GL(n, C). Then there exist positive matrices P i (i k) and matrices Q j (j l) with Q j Qj s are nonzero scalars and that B u (Q) = A u (P 1 ) A u (P 2 ) A u (P k ) B u (Q 1 ) B u (Q 2 ) B u (Q l ). Note: This is contrary to an earlier belief that A u (P i ) s do not appear in the decomp.!
52 5. A u(q) and B u(q) for Arbitrary Q COROLLARY of THEOREM 4. (1). Let Q = diag(e iθ 1P 1, e iθ 2P 2,, e iθ k P k ), with positive matrices P j and distinct angles 0 θ j < 2π, j = 1,, k, k 1
53 5. A u(q) and B u(q) for Arbitrary Q COROLLARY of THEOREM 4. (1). Let Q = diag(e iθ 1P 1, e iθ 2P 2,, e iθ k P k ), with positive matrices P j and distinct angles 0 θ j < 2π, j = 1,, k, k 1 Then A u (Q) = A u (P 1 ) A u (P 2 ) A u (P k ).
54 5. A u(q) and B u(q) for Arbitrary Q COROLLARY of THEOREM 4. (1). Let Q = diag(e iθ 1P 1, e iθ 2P 2,, e iθ k P k ), with positive matrices P j and distinct angles 0 θ j < 2π, j = 1,, k, k 1 Then A u (Q) = A u (P 1 ) A u (P 2 ) A u (P k ). (2). Let Q GL(2, C) be a non-normal matrix. Then A u (Q) = C(T).
55 5. A u(q) and B u(q) for Arbitrary Q COROLLARY of THEOREM 4. (1). Let Q = diag(e iθ 1P 1, e iθ 2P 2,, e iθ k P k ), with positive matrices P j and distinct angles 0 θ j < 2π, j = 1,, k, k 1 Then A u (Q) = A u (P 1 ) A u (P 2 ) A u (P k ). (2). Let Q GL(2, C) be a non-normal matrix. Then A u (Q) = C(T). (3). For Q GL(2, C), A u (Q) is isomorphic to either C(T), or C(T) C(T), or A u (diag(1, q)) with 0 < q 1.
56 5. A u(q) and B u(q) for Arbitrary Q COROLLARY of THEOREM 5. (1). Let Q = diag(t 1, T 2,, T k ) be such that T j Tj = λ j I nj, where the λ j s are distinct non-zero real numbers (the n j s need not be different), j = 1,, k, k 1.
57 5. A u(q) and B u(q) for Arbitrary Q COROLLARY of THEOREM 5. (1). Let Q = diag(t 1, T 2,, T k ) be such that T j Tj = λ j I nj, where the λ j s are distinct non-zero real numbers (the n j s need not be different), j = 1,, k, k 1. Then B u (Q) = B u (T 1 ) B u (T 2 ) B u (T k ).
58 5. A u(q) and B u(q) for Arbitrary Q COROLLARY of THEOREM 5. (1). Let Q = diag(t 1, T 2,, T k ) be such that T j Tj = λ j I nj, where the λ j s are distinct non-zero real numbers (the n j s need not be different), j = 1,, k, k 1. Then B u (Q) = B u (T 1 ) B u (T 2 ) B u (T k ). [ ] 0 T (2). Let Q = q T 1, where T GL(n, C) and q is a 0 complex but non-real number.
59 5. A u(q) and B u(q) for Arbitrary Q COROLLARY of THEOREM 5. (1). Let Q = diag(t 1, T 2,, T k ) be such that T j Tj = λ j I nj, where the λ j s are distinct non-zero real numbers (the n j s need not be different), j = 1,, k, k 1. Then B u (Q) = B u (T 1 ) B u (T 2 ) B u (T k ). [ ] 0 T (2). Let Q = q T 1, where T GL(n, C) and q is a 0 complex but non-real number. Then B u (Q) is isomorphic to A u ( T 2 ).
60 6. Important Related Work A Conceptual Breakthrough:
61 6. Important Related Work A Conceptual Breakthrough: Debashish Goswami used A u (Q) to prove the existence of quantum isometry groups for very general classes of noncommutative spaces in the sense of Connes.
62 6. Important Related Work (cont.) Banica s Fusion Theorem 1:
63 6. Important Related Work (cont.) Banica s Fusion Theorem 1: The irreducible representations π x of the quantum group A u (Q) are parameterized by x N N,
64 6. Important Related Work (cont.) Banica s Fusion Theorem 1: The irreducible representations π x of the quantum group A u (Q) are parameterized by x N N, where N N is the free monoid with generators α and β and anti-multiplicative involution ᾱ = β, and the classes of u, ū are α, β respectively.
65 6. Important Related Work (cont.) Banica s Fusion Theorem 1: The irreducible representations π x of the quantum group A u (Q) are parameterized by x N N, where N N is the free monoid with generators α and β and anti-multiplicative involution ᾱ = β, and the classes of u, ū are α, β respectively. With this parametrization, one has the fusion rules π x π y = x=ag,ḡb=y π ab
66 6. Important Related Work (cont.) Banica s Fusion Theorem 2:
67 6. Important Related Work (cont.) Banica s Fusion Theorem 2: The irreducible representations π k of the quantum group B u (Q) are parameterized by k Z + = {0, 1, 2, },
68 6. Important Related Work (cont.) Banica s Fusion Theorem 2: The irreducible representations π k of the quantum group B u (Q) are parameterized by k Z + = {0, 1, 2, }, and one has the fusion rules π k π l = π k l π k l +2 π k+l 2 π k+l
69 7. Open Problems (1) Construct explicit models of irreducible representations π x (x N N) of the quantum groups A u (Q) for positive Q > 0.
70 7. Open Problems (1) Construct explicit models of irreducible representations π x (x N N) of the quantum groups A u (Q) for positive Q > 0. (2) Construct explicit models of irreducible representations π k (k Z + ) of the quantum groups B u (Q) for Q with Q Q = ±1.
71 THANKS FOR YOUR ATTENTION!
STRUCTURE AND ISOMORPHISM CLASSIFICATION OF COMPACT QUANTUM GROUPS A u (Q) AND B u (Q)
J. OPERATOR THEORY 48(2002), 573 583 c Copyright by Theta, 2002 STRUCTURE AND ISOMORPHISM CLASSIFICATION OF COMPACT QUANTUM GROUPS A u (Q) AND B u (Q) SHUZHOU WANG Communicated by William B. Arveson Abstract.
More informationCoarse geometry and quantum groups
Coarse geometry and quantum groups University of Glasgow christian.voigt@glasgow.ac.uk http://www.maths.gla.ac.uk/~cvoigt/ Sheffield March 27, 2013 Noncommutative discrete spaces Noncommutative discrete
More informationA NOTE ON FREE QUANTUM GROUPS
A NOTE ON FREE QUANTUM GROUPS TEODOR BANICA Abstract. We study the free complexification operation for compact quantum groups, G G c. We prove that, with suitable definitions, this induces a one-to-one
More informationQuantum Symmetries in Free Probability Theory. Roland Speicher Queen s University Kingston, Canada
Quantum Symmetries in Free Probability Theory Roland Speicher Queen s University Kingston, Canada Quantum Groups are generalizations of groups G (actually, of C(G)) are supposed to describe non-classical
More informationProduct type actions of compact quantum groups
Product type actions of compact quantum groups Reiji TOMATSU May 26, 2014 @Fields institute 1 / 31 1 Product type actions I 2 Quantum flag manifolds 3 Product type actions II 4 Classification 2 / 31 Product
More informationJ þ in two special cases
1 Preliminaries... 1 1.1 Operator Algebras and Hilbert Modules... 1 1.1.1 C Algebras... 1 1.1.2 Von Neumann Algebras... 4 1.1.3 Free Product and Tensor Product... 5 1.1.4 Hilbert Modules.... 6 1.2 Quantum
More informationBackground on Chevalley Groups Constructed from a Root System
Background on Chevalley Groups Constructed from a Root System Paul Tokorcheck Department of Mathematics University of California, Santa Cruz 10 October 2011 Abstract In 1955, Claude Chevalley described
More informationBasic Concepts of Group Theory
Chapter 1 Basic Concepts of Group Theory The theory of groups and vector spaces has many important applications in a number of branches of modern theoretical physics. These include the formal theory of
More informationREPRESENTATION THEORY WEEK 7
REPRESENTATION THEORY WEEK 7 1. Characters of L k and S n A character of an irreducible representation of L k is a polynomial function constant on every conjugacy class. Since the set of diagonalizable
More informationHadamard matrices and Compact Quantum Groups
Hadamard matrices and Compact Quantum Groups Uwe Franz 18 février 2014 3ème journée FEMTO-LMB based in part on joint work with: Teodor Banica, Franz Lehner, Adam Skalski Uwe Franz (LMB) Hadamard & CQG
More informationHALF-COMMUTATIVE ORTHOGONAL HOPF ALGEBRAS
HALF-COMMUTATIVE ORTHOGONAL HOPF ALGEBRAS JULIEN BICHON AND MICHEL DUBOIS-VIOLETTE Abstract. A half-commutative orthogonal Hopf algebra is a Hopf -algebra generated by the self-adjoint coefficients of
More informationMAXIMAL TORUS THEORY FOR COMPACT QUANTUM GROUPS
MAXIMAL TORUS THEORY FOR COMPACT QUANTUM GROUPS TEODOR BANICA AND ISSAN PATRI Abstract. Associated to any compact quantum group G U + N is a canonical family of group dual subgroups Γ Q G, parametrized
More informationUnbounded operators in the context of C -algebras
Unbounded operators in the context of C -algebras Department of Mathematical Methods in Physics Faculty of Physics, Warsaw University Bȩdlewo, 23.07.2009 Affiliation relation η Murray, von Neumann: W -algebra
More informationClifford Algebras and Spin Groups
Clifford Algebras and Spin Groups Math G4344, Spring 2012 We ll now turn from the general theory to examine a specific class class of groups: the orthogonal groups. Recall that O(n, R) is the group of
More informationIntroduction to compact (matrix) quantum groups and Banica Speicher (easy) quantum groups
Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Math. Sci.) Vol. 127, No. 5, November 2017, pp. 881 933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12044-017-0362-3 Introduction to compact (matrix) quantum groups and Banica Speicher (easy) quantum
More informationSYMPLECTIC LEAVES AND DEFORMATION QUANTIZATION
PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 124, Number 1, January 1996 SYMPLECTIC LEAVES AND DEFORMATION QUANTIZATION ALBERT J. L. SHEU (Communicated by Palle E. T. Jorgensen) Abstract. In
More informationQUATERNIONS AND ROTATIONS
QUATERNIONS AND ROTATIONS SVANTE JANSON 1. Introduction The purpose of this note is to show some well-known relations between quaternions and the Lie groups SO(3) and SO(4) (rotations in R 3 and R 4 )
More informationMAT 445/ INTRODUCTION TO REPRESENTATION THEORY
MAT 445/1196 - INTRODUCTION TO REPRESENTATION THEORY CHAPTER 1 Representation Theory of Groups - Algebraic Foundations 1.1 Basic definitions, Schur s Lemma 1.2 Tensor products 1.3 Unitary representations
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.qa] 11 Dec 2017
arxiv:72.04067v [math.qa] Dec 207 HIGHER TRANSITIVE QUANTUM GROUPS: THEORY AND MODELS TEODOR BANICA Abstract. We investigate the notion of k-transitivity for the quantum permutation groups G S + N, with
More informationCHAPTER 6. Representations of compact groups
CHAPTER 6 Representations of compact groups Throughout this chapter, denotes a compact group. 6.1. Examples of compact groups A standard theorem in elementary analysis says that a subset of C m (m a positive
More informationPOINCARÉ-BIRKHOFF-WITT BASES FOR TWO-PARAMETER QUANTUM GROUPS. 0. Introduction
POINCARÉ-BIRKHOFF-WITT BASES FOR TWO-PARAMETER QUANTUM GROUPS GEORGIA BENKART, SEOK-JIN KANG, AND KYU-HWAN LEE Abstract. We construct Poincaré-Birkhoff-Witt (PBW) bases for the two-parameter quantum groups
More informationCLASSICAL GROUPS DAVID VOGAN
CLASSICAL GROUPS DAVID VOGAN 1. Orthogonal groups These notes are about classical groups. That term is used in various ways by various people; I ll try to say a little about that as I go along. Basically
More informationarxiv: v2 [quant-ph] 30 Mar 2018
Nonlocal Games and Quantum Permutation Groups Martino Lupini 1, Laura Mančinska 2, and David E. Roberson 3 arxiv:1712.01820v2 [quant-ph] 30 Mar 2018 1 Mathematics Department, California Institute of Technology,
More information7th focused semester on Quantum Groups
7th focused semester on Quantum Groups E. Germain, R. Vergnioux GDR Noncommutative Geometry, France July 2d, 2010 E. Germain, R. Vergnioux (EU-NCG RNT) 7th focused semester on Quantum Groups July 2d, 2010
More informationarxiv: v1 [quant-ph] 5 Dec 2017
Nonlocal Games and Quantum Permutation Groups Martino Lupini 1, Laura Mančinska 2, and David E. Roberson 3 arxiv:1712.01820v1 [quant-ph] 5 Dec 2017 1 Mathematics Department, California Institute of Technology,
More informationChapter 2 The Group U(1) and its Representations
Chapter 2 The Group U(1) and its Representations The simplest example of a Lie group is the group of rotations of the plane, with elements parametrized by a single number, the angle of rotation θ. It is
More informationReal, Complex, and Quarternionic Representations
Real, Complex, and Quarternionic Representations JWR 10 March 2006 1 Group Representations 1. Throughout R denotes the real numbers, C denotes the complex numbers, H denotes the quaternions, and G denotes
More informationA method for construction of Lie group invariants
arxiv:1206.4395v1 [math.rt] 20 Jun 2012 A method for construction of Lie group invariants Yu. Palii Laboratory of Information Technologies, Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia and Institute
More informationCOLOR LIE RINGS AND PBW DEFORMATIONS OF SKEW GROUP ALGEBRAS
COLOR LIE RINGS AND PBW DEFORMATIONS OF SKEW GROUP ALGEBRAS S. FRYER, T. KANSTRUP, E. KIRKMAN, A.V. SHEPLER, AND S. WITHERSPOON Abstract. We investigate color Lie rings over finite group algebras and their
More informationFrom Whittaker Functions. by Daniel Bump. to Quantum Groups. Supported in part by NSF grant
From Whittaker Functions to Quantum Groups by Daniel ump Supported in part by NSF grant 1001079 1 etween Physics and Number Theory We will describe a new connection between existing topics in Mathematical
More information2 JAKOBSEN, JENSEN, JNDRUP AND ZHANG Let U q be a quantum group dened by a Cartan matrix of type A r together with the usual quantized Serre relations
QUADRATIC ALGEBRAS OF TYPE AIII; I HANS PLESNER JAKOBSEN, ANDERS JENSEN, SREN JNDRUP, AND HECHUN ZHANG 1;2 Department of Mathematics, Universitetsparken 5 DK{2100 Copenhagen, Denmark E-mail: jakobsen,
More informationTopics in Representation Theory: Fourier Analysis and the Peter Weyl Theorem
Topics in Representation Theory: Fourier Analysis and the Peter Weyl Theorem 1 Fourier Analysis, a review We ll begin with a short review of simple facts about Fourier analysis, before going on to interpret
More informationQUANTUM PERMUTATIONS, HADAMARD MATRICES, AND THE SEARCH FOR MATRIX MODELS
QUANTUM PERMUTATIONS, HADAMARD MATRICES, AND THE SEARCH FOR MATRIX MODELS TEODOR BANICA Abstract. This is a presentation of recent work on quantum permutation groups, complex Hadamard matrices, and the
More informationDiscrete Series and Characters of the Component Group
Discrete Series and Characters of the Component Group Jeffrey Adams April 9, 2007 Suppose φ : W R L G is an L-homomorphism. There is a close relationship between the L-packet associated to φ and characters
More information11. Representations of compact Lie groups
11. Representations of compact Lie groups 11.1. Integration on compact groups. In the simplest examples like R n and the torus T n we have the classical Lebesgue measure which defines a translation invariant
More informationFrom Schur-Weyl duality to quantum symmetric pairs
.. From Schur-Weyl duality to quantum symmetric pairs Chun-Ju Lai Max Planck Institute for Mathematics in Bonn cjlai@mpim-bonn.mpg.de Dec 8, 2016 Outline...1 Schur-Weyl duality.2.3.4.5 Background.. GL
More informationRepresentations and Linear Actions
Representations and Linear Actions Definition 0.1. Let G be an S-group. A representation of G is a morphism of S-groups φ G GL(n, S) for some n. We say φ is faithful if it is a monomorphism (in the category
More informationIntroduction to Lie Groups
Introduction to Lie Groups MAT 4144/5158 Winter 2015 Alistair Savage Department of Mathematics and Statistics University of Ottawa This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike
More informationCasimir elements for classical Lie algebras. and affine Kac Moody algebras
Casimir elements for classical Lie algebras and affine Kac Moody algebras Alexander Molev University of Sydney Plan of lectures Plan of lectures Casimir elements for the classical Lie algebras from the
More informationQUANTUM AUTOMORPHISMS OF TWISTED GROUP ALGEBRAS AND FREE HYPERGEOMETRIC LAWS
QUANTUM AUTOMORPHISMS OF TWISTED GROUP ALGEBRAS AND FREE HYPERGEOMETRIC LAWS TEODOR BANICA, JULIEN BICHON, AND STEPHEN CURRAN Abstract. We prove that we have an isomorphism of type A aut (C σ [G]) A aut
More informationTHE HYPEROCTAHEDRAL QUANTUM GROUP
THE HYPEROCTAHEDRAL QUANTUM GROUP TEODOR BANICA, JULIEN BICHON, AND BENOÎT COLLINS Abstract. We consider the hypercube in R n, and show that its quantum symmetry group is a q-deformation of O n at q =
More informationKähler configurations of points
Kähler configurations of points Simon Salamon Oxford, 22 May 2017 The Hesse configuration 1/24 Let ω = e 2πi/3. Consider the nine points [0, 1, 1] [0, 1, ω] [0, 1, ω 2 ] [1, 0, 1] [1, 0, ω] [1, 0, ω 2
More informationAlgebra I Fall 2007
MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 18.701 Algebra I Fall 007 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms. 18.701 007 Geometry of the Special Unitary
More informationREPRESENTATION THEORY OF S n
REPRESENTATION THEORY OF S n EVAN JENKINS Abstract. These are notes from three lectures given in MATH 26700, Introduction to Representation Theory of Finite Groups, at the University of Chicago in November
More informationDualities in Mathematics: Locally compact abelian groups
Dualities in Mathematics: Locally compact abelian groups Part III: Pontryagin Duality Prakash Panangaden 1 1 School of Computer Science McGill University Spring School, Oxford 20-22 May 2014 Recall Gelfand
More informationMath 210C. The representation ring
Math 210C. The representation ring 1. Introduction Let G be a nontrivial connected compact Lie group that is semisimple and simply connected (e.g., SU(n) for n 2, Sp(n) for n 1, or Spin(n) for n 3). Let
More informationGeometric Structure and the Local Langlands Conjecture
Geometric Structure and the Local Langlands Conjecture Paul Baum Penn State Representations of Reductive Groups University of Utah, Salt Lake City July 9, 2013 Paul Baum (Penn State) Geometric Structure
More informationOrder 3 elements in G 2 and idempotents in symmetric composition algebras. Alberto Elduque
Order 3 elements in G 2 and idempotents in symmetric composition algebras Alberto Elduque 1 Symmetric composition algebras 2 Classification 3 Idempotents and order 3 automorphisms, char F 3 4 Idempotents
More information1: Lie groups Matix groups, Lie algebras
Lie Groups and Bundles 2014/15 BGSMath 1: Lie groups Matix groups, Lie algebras 1. Prove that O(n) is Lie group and that its tangent space at I O(n) is isomorphic to the space so(n) of skew-symmetric matrices
More informationarxiv:math-ph/ v1 10 Aug 2001
Some Noncommutative Geometric Aspects of SU q (2). by Debashish Goswami 1 arxiv:math-ph/0108003v1 10 Aug 2001 Abstract We study the 3D-calculus on SU q (2) (c.f. [W1]) from the point of view of noncommutative
More informationBerezin-Töplitz Quantization Math 242 Term Paper, Spring 1999 Ilan Hirshberg
1 Introduction Berezin-Töplitz Quantization Math 242 Term Paper, Spring 1999 Ilan Hirshberg The general idea of quantization is to find a way to pass from the classical setting to the quantum one. In the
More informationSubfactors and Modular Tensor Categories
UNSW Topological matter, strings, K-theory and related areas University of Adelaide September 2016 Outline Motivation What is a modular tensor category? Where do modular tensor categories come from? Some
More informationTopics in Representation Theory: Roots and Weights
Topics in Representation Theory: Roots and Weights 1 The Representation Ring Last time we defined the maximal torus T and Weyl group W (G, T ) for a compact, connected Lie group G and explained that our
More informationStable bundles on CP 3 and special holonomies
Stable bundles on CP 3 and special holonomies Misha Verbitsky Géométrie des variétés complexes IV CIRM, Luminy, Oct 26, 2010 1 Hyperkähler manifolds DEFINITION: A hyperkähler structure on a manifold M
More informationKac Moody superalgebras and integrability
Kac Moody superalgebras and integrability Vera Serganova Dept. of Mathematics, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720 serganov@math.berkeley.edu Summary. The first part of this paper
More informationFredholmness of Some Toeplitz Operators
Fredholmness of Some Toeplitz Operators Beyaz Başak Koca Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey IWOTA, 2017 Preliminaries Definition (Fredholm operator) Let H be a Hilbert space and let T B(H). T is said
More informationExtended groups and representation theory
Extended groups and representation theory Jeffrey Adams David Vogan University of Maryland Massachusetts Institute of Technology CUNY Representation Theory Seminar April 19, 2013 Outline Classification
More informationA SURVEY OF C -ALGEBRAIC QUANTUM GROUPS, PART II. Johan Kustermans & Lars Tuset
A SURVEY OF C -ALGEBRAIC QUANTUM GROUPS, PART II Johan Kustermans & Lars Tuset In part I of this survey [29], we introduced the reader to the subject of quantum groups from the C -algebra point of view
More informationTHEORY OF GROUP REPRESENTATIONS AND APPLICATIONS
THEORY OF GROUP REPRESENTATIONS AND APPLICATIONS ASIM 0. BARUT Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colo., U.S.A. RYSZARD RATJZKA Institute for Nuclear Research, Warszawa,
More informationQuantum Field Theory III
Quantum Field Theory III Prof. Erick Weinberg January 19, 2011 1 Lecture 1 1.1 Structure We will start with a bit of group theory, and we will talk about spontaneous symmetry broken. Then we will talk
More informationWeyl Group Representations and Unitarity of Spherical Representations.
Weyl Group Representations and Unitarity of Spherical Representations. Alessandra Pantano, University of California, Irvine Windsor, October 23, 2008 β ν 1 = ν 2 S α S β ν S β ν S α ν S α S β S α S β ν
More informationA remarkable representation of the Clifford group
A remarkable representation of the Clifford group Steve Brierley University of Bristol March 2012 Work with Marcus Appleby, Ingemar Bengtsson, Markus Grassl, David Gross and Jan-Ake Larsson Outline Useful
More informationOn the classification and modular extendability of E 0 -semigroups on factors Joint work with Daniel Markiewicz
On the classification and modular extendability of E 0 -semigroups on factors Joint work with Daniel Markiewicz Panchugopal Bikram Ben-Gurion University of the Nagev Beer Sheva, Israel pg.math@gmail.com
More informationDefects between Gapped Boundaries in (2 + 1)D Topological Phases of Matter
Defects between Gapped Boundaries in (2 + 1)D Topological Phases of Matter Iris Cong, Meng Cheng, Zhenghan Wang cong@g.harvard.edu Department of Physics Harvard University, Cambridge, MA January 13th,
More informationREPRESENTATIONS OF U(N) CLASSIFICATION BY HIGHEST WEIGHTS NOTES FOR MATH 261, FALL 2001
9 REPRESENTATIONS OF U(N) CLASSIFICATION BY HIGHEST WEIGHTS NOTES FOR MATH 261, FALL 21 ALLEN KNUTSON 1 WEIGHT DIAGRAMS OF -REPRESENTATIONS Let be an -dimensional torus, ie a group isomorphic to The we
More information1. Group Theory Permutations.
1.1. Permutations. 1. Group Theory Problem 1.1. Let G be a subgroup of S n of index 2. Show that G = A n. Problem 1.2. Find two elements of S 7 that have the same order but are not conjugate. Let π S 7
More informationAlgebraic Theory of Entanglement
Algebraic Theory of (arxiv: 1205.2882) 1 (in collaboration with T.R. Govindarajan, A. Queiroz and A.F. Reyes-Lega) 1 Physics Department, Syracuse University, Syracuse, N.Y. and The Institute of Mathematical
More informationQuantized Hermitian Symmetric Spaces. Hans Plesner Jakobsen. Dk-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark. Abstract
Quantized Hermitian Symmetric Spaces Hans Plesner Jakobsen Mathematics Institute University of Copenhagen Universitetsparken 5 Dk-00 Copenhagen, Denmark Abstract This talk is basically a progress report
More informationNon-Commutative Covariant Differential Calculi on Quantum Spaces and Quantum Groups
Seminar Sophus Lie 1 (1991) 125 132 Non-Commutative Covariant Differential Calculi on Quantum Spaces and Quantum Groups Konrad Schmüdgen 1. Introduction There are two alternative fundamental approaches
More informationThe Outer Automorphism of S 6
Meena Jagadeesan 1 Karthik Karnik 2 Mentor: Akhil Mathew 1 Phillips Exeter Academy 2 Massachusetts Academy of Math and Science PRIMES Conference, May 2016 What is a Group? A group G is a set of elements
More informationMapping class groups of surfaces and quantization
Mapping class groups of surfaces and quantization Sasha Patotski Cornell University ap744@cornell.edu May 13, 2016 Sasha Patotski (Cornell University) Quantization May 13, 2016 1 / 16 Plan 1 Mapping class
More information1 Hermitian symmetric spaces: examples and basic properties
Contents 1 Hermitian symmetric spaces: examples and basic properties 1 1.1 Almost complex manifolds............................................ 1 1.2 Hermitian manifolds................................................
More informationResults from MathSciNet: Mathematical Reviews on the Web c Copyright American Mathematical Society 1998
98m:11125 11R39 11F27 11F67 11F70 22E50 22E55 Gelbart, Stephen (IL-WEIZ); Rogawski, Jonathan (1-UCLA); Soudry, David (IL-TLAV) Endoscopy, theta-liftings, and period integrals for the unitary group in three
More informationElliott s program and descriptive set theory I
Elliott s program and descriptive set theory I Ilijas Farah LC 2012, Manchester, July 12 a, a, a, a, the, the, the, the. I shall need this exercise later, someone please solve it Exercise If A = limna
More informationAN EXTENSION OF YAMAMOTO S THEOREM ON THE EIGENVALUES AND SINGULAR VALUES OF A MATRIX
Unspecified Journal Volume 00, Number 0, Pages 000 000 S????-????(XX)0000-0 AN EXTENSION OF YAMAMOTO S THEOREM ON THE EIGENVALUES AND SINGULAR VALUES OF A MATRIX TIN-YAU TAM AND HUAJUN HUANG Abstract.
More informationAlexandru Oancea (Strasbourg) joint with Gwénaël Massuyeau (Strasbourg) and Dietmar Salamon (Zurich) Conference Braids in Paris, September 2008
A Outline Part I: A of the braid group Part II: Morse theory Alexru Oancea (Strasbourg) Gwénaël Massuyeau (Strasbourg) Dietmar Salamon (Zurich) Conference Braids in Paris, September 2008 Outline of Part
More informationCombinatorial bases for representations. of the Lie superalgebra gl m n
Combinatorial bases for representations of the Lie superalgebra gl m n Alexander Molev University of Sydney Gelfand Tsetlin bases for gln Gelfand Tsetlin bases for gl n Finite-dimensional irreducible representations
More informationTracial Rokhlin property for actions of amenable group on C*-algebras June 8, / 17
Tracial Rokhlin property for actions of amenable group on C*-algebras Qingyun Wang University of Toronto June 8, 2015 Tracial Rokhlin property for actions of amenable group on C*-algebras June 8, 2015
More informationIntroduction to Quantum Group Theory
Introduction to Quantum Group Theory arxiv:math/0201080v1 [math.qa] 10 Jan 2002 William Gordon Ritter Jefferson Physical Laboratory Harvard University, Cambridge, MA May 2001 Abstract This is a short,
More informationChap. 3. Controlled Systems, Controllability
Chap. 3. Controlled Systems, Controllability 1. Controllability of Linear Systems 1.1. Kalman s Criterion Consider the linear system ẋ = Ax + Bu where x R n : state vector and u R m : input vector. A :
More informationInstitut für Mathematik, Universität Wien, Strudlhofgasse 4, A-1090 Wien, Austria.
Letters in Math. Phys. 28 (1993), 251 255 A QUANTUM GROUP LIKE STRUCTURE ON NON COMMUTATIVE 2 TORI Andreas Cap Peter W. Michor Hermann Schichl Institut für Mathematik, Universität Wien, Strudlhofgasse
More informationIVAN LOSEV. KEK 1 = q 2 E, KF K 1 = q 2 F, EF F E = K K 1 q q 1.
LECTURE 13: REPRESENTATIONS OF U q (g) AND R-MATRICES IVAN LOSEV Introduction In this lecture we study the representation theory of U q (g) when q is not a root of 1. In Section 1, we classify the finite
More informationCrossed products of irrational rotation algebras by finite subgroups of SL 2 (Z) are AF
Crossed products of irrational rotation algebras by finite subgroups of SL 2 (Z) are AF N. Christopher Phillips 7 May 2008 N. Christopher Phillips () C (Z k, A θ ) is AF 7 May 2008 1 / 36 The Sixth Annual
More informationModular Categories and Applications I
I Modular Categories and Applications I Texas A&M University U. South Alabama, November 2009 Outline I 1 Topological Quantum Computation 2 Fusion Categories Ribbon and Modular Categories Fusion Rules and
More informationCHAPTER 2 -idempotent matrices
CHAPTER 2 -idempotent matrices A -idempotent matrix is defined and some of its basic characterizations are derived (see [33]) in this chapter. It is shown that if is a -idempotent matrix then it is quadripotent
More informationCurtis Heberle MTH 189 Final Paper 12/14/2010. Algebraic Groups
Algebraic Groups Curtis Heberle MTH 189 Final Paper 12/14/2010 The primary objects of study in algebraic geometry are varieties. Having become acquainted with these objects, it is interesting to consider
More informationAn Introduction to Kuga Fiber Varieties
An Introduction to Kuga Fiber Varieties Dylan Attwell-Duval Department of Mathematics and Statistics McGill University Montreal, Quebec attwellduval@math.mcgill.ca April 28, 2012 Notation G a Q-simple
More informationPart III Symmetries, Fields and Particles
Part III Symmetries, Fields and Particles Theorems Based on lectures by N. Dorey Notes taken by Dexter Chua Michaelmas 2016 These notes are not endorsed by the lecturers, and I have modified them (often
More informationThe Real Grassmannian Gr(2, 4)
The Real Grassmannian Gr(2, 4) We discuss the topology of the real Grassmannian Gr(2, 4) of 2-planes in R 4 and its double cover Gr + (2, 4) by the Grassmannian of oriented 2-planes They are compact four-manifolds
More informationLECTURE 25-26: CARTAN S THEOREM OF MAXIMAL TORI. 1. Maximal Tori
LECTURE 25-26: CARTAN S THEOREM OF MAXIMAL TORI 1. Maximal Tori By a torus we mean a compact connected abelian Lie group, so a torus is a Lie group that is isomorphic to T n = R n /Z n. Definition 1.1.
More informationNotation. For any Lie group G, we set G 0 to be the connected component of the identity.
Notation. For any Lie group G, we set G 0 to be the connected component of the identity. Problem 1 Prove that GL(n, R) is homotopic to O(n, R). (Hint: Gram-Schmidt Orthogonalization.) Here is a sequence
More informationCompact Quantum Groups and Their Representation Categories. Sergey NESHVEYEV & Lars TUSET
C O U R S S P É C I A L I S É S C O L L E C T I O N S M F Compact Quantum Groups and Their Representation Categories Sergey NESHVEYEV & Lars TUSET 20 Ce cours a été effectué dans le cadre du Prix de la
More informationDefinition 9.1. The scheme µ 1 (O)/G is called the Hamiltonian reduction of M with respect to G along O. We will denote by R(M, G, O).
9. Calogero-Moser spaces 9.1. Hamiltonian reduction along an orbit. Let M be an affine algebraic variety and G a reductive algebraic group. Suppose M is Poisson and the action of G preserves the Poisson
More informationNoncommutative Spaces: a brief overview
Noncommutative Spaces: a brief overview Francesco D Andrea Department of Mathematics and Applications, University of Naples Federico II P.le Tecchio 80, Naples, Italy 14/04/2011 University of Rome La Sapienza
More informationSPHERICAL UNITARY REPRESENTATIONS FOR REDUCTIVE GROUPS
SPHERICAL UNITARY REPRESENTATIONS FOR REDUCTIVE GROUPS DAN CIUBOTARU 1. Classical motivation: spherical functions 1.1. Spherical harmonics. Let S n 1 R n be the (n 1)-dimensional sphere, C (S n 1 ) the
More informationGassner Representation of the Pure Braid Group P 4
International Journal of Algebra, Vol. 3, 2009, no. 16, 793-798 Gassner Representation of the Pure Braid Group P 4 Mohammad N. Abdulrahim Department of Mathematics Beirut Arab University P.O. Box 11-5020,
More informationNotes 9: Eli Cartan s theorem on maximal tori.
Notes 9: Eli Cartan s theorem on maximal tori. Version 1.00 still with misprints, hopefully fewer Tori Let T be a torus of dimension n. This means that there is an isomorphism T S 1 S 1... S 1. Recall
More informationQUANTUM AUTOMORPHISM GROUPS OF HOMOGENEOUS GRAPHS
QUANTUM AUTOMORPHISM GROUPS OF HOMOGENEOUS GRAPHS TEODOR BANICA Abstract. Associated to a finite graph X is its quantum automorphism group G. The main problem is to compute the Poincaré series of G, meaning
More informationSymplectic varieties and Poisson deformations
Symplectic varieties and Poisson deformations Yoshinori Namikawa A symplectic variety X is a normal algebraic variety (defined over C) which admits an everywhere non-degenerate d-closed 2-form ω on the
More informationTHE CENTER OF THE QUANTIZED MATRIX ALGEBRA HANS PLESNER JAKOBSEN AND HECHUN ZHANG 1;2
THE CENTER OF THE QUANTIZED MATRIX ALGEBRA HANS PLESNER JAKOBSEN AND HECHUN ZHANG 1; Abstract. We compute the center in the case where q is a root of unity. Main steps are to compute the degree of an associated
More information