arxiv: v3 [hep-lat] 27 Aug 2008
|
|
- April Wilcox
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 HIP-27-44/TH Energies of B s meson excited states a lattice study (UKQCD Collaboration) J. Koponen, Department of Physics and Helsinki Institute of Physics, P.O. Box 64, FIN 4 University of Helsinki,Finland (Dated: June 6, 23) Abstract arxiv:78.287v3 [hep-lat] 27 Aug 28 This is a follow-up to our earlier work on the energies and radial distributions of heavy-light mesons. The heavy quark is taken to be static (infinitely heavy) and the light quark has a mass about that of the strange quark. We now concentrate on the energies of the excited states with higher angular momentum and with a radial node. A new improvement is the use of hypercubic blocking in the time direction. The calculation is carried out with dynamical fermions on a lattice with a lattice spacing a. fm generated using a non-perturbatively improved clover action. In nature the closest equivalent of this heavy-light system is the B s meson, which allows us to compare our lattice calculations to experimental results (where available) or to give a prediction where the excited states, particularly P-wave states, should lie. We pay special attention to the spin-orbit splitting, to see which one of the states (for a given angular momentum L) has the lower energy. An attempt is made to understand these results in terms of the Dirac equation. Electronic address: jonna.koponen@helsinki.fi
2 I. MOTIVATION There are several advantages in studying a heavy-light system on a lattice. First of all, the lattice calculations are relatively easy to do, and it allows us to do these with QCD from first principles. Our meson is much more simple than in true QCD: one of the quarks is static (infinitely heavy) with the light quark orbiting it. This makes it very beneficial for modelling. On the lattice an abundance of data can be produced, and we know which state we are measuring. In contrast, the physical states can be a mixture of two or more configurations, but on the lattice this complication is, mostly, avoided. Even so, our results on the heavy-light system can still be compared to the B s meson experimental results. II. MEASUREMENTS AND LATTICE PARAMETERS We measure the energies of both angular and first radial excitations of heavy-light mesons. Since the heavy quark spin decouples from any description of the configurations we may label the states as L ± = L ± 2, where L is the orbital angular momentum and ± 2 refers to the spin of the light quark. The measurements are done on lattices using two degenerate quark flavours. The lattice configurations were generated by the UKQCD Collaboration using lattice action parameters β = 5.2, c SW = 2.7 and three different values for the hopping parameter κ (see Table I). The three different lattices are referred to here as DF3, DF4 and DF5. Each of them has a slightly different lattice spacing (a) and a different light quark mass (m q ). Our main results are measured on the DF3 lattice, because the light quark mass is very close to the strange quark mass. More details of the lattice configurations used in this study can be found in Refs. [, 2]. Because our light quarks are heavier than true u and d quarks, we have m π ranging from 73 MeV ( DF3 ) to 4 MeV ( DF5 ). Two different levels of fuzzing (2 and 8 iterations of conventional fuzzing) are used in the spatial directions to permit a cleaner extraction of the excited states. 2
3 III. 2-POINT CORRELATION FUNCTION The 2-point correlation function (see Fig. ) is defined as C 2 (T) = P t ΓG q (x, t + T, t)p t+t Γ U Q (x, t, t + T), () where U Q (x, t, t + T) is the heavy (infinite mass)-quark propagator and G q (x, t + T, t) the light anti-quark propagator. P t is a linear combination of products of gauge links at time t along paths P and Γ defines the spin structure of the operator. The... means the average over the whole lattice. A detailed discussion of lattice operators for orbitally excited mesons can be found in [3]. In this study, the same operators are used as in [4]. The energies (m i ) and amplitudes (a i ) are extracted by fitting the C 2 with a sum of exponentials, [C 2 (T)] f,f 2 N max i= a i,f e m it a i,f2, where N max = 2 4, T 4. (2) The fit is a simple least squares fit. In most of the cases 3 exponentials are used to try to ensure the first radially excited states are not polluted by higher states. Also 2 and 4 exponential fits are used to cross-check the results wherever possible. Indices f and f 2 denote the amount of fuzzing used at the vertices and both of them take two values, f =F, F2 and f 2 =F, F2, where (F=2 iterations and F2=2+6 iterations). For S and P states we have alternative operators (see [4]), so we get a 5 by 5 matrix (5 paths, because one operator has two choices, F and F2, and the other operator has three choices, local, F and F2) instead of just a 2 by 2 matrix (2 paths) given by the fuzzing choices. κ r /a a [fm] (approx.) m q /m s (approx.) r m π No. of configs. DF (4) (3) 6 DF (4) (3) 9 DF (5) (3) 39 TABLE I: Lattice parameters (from []). The Sommer scale parameter can be taken to be r =.525(25) fm and m s is the s quark mass. 3
4 IV. SMEARED HEAVY QUARK We introduce two types of smearing in the time direction to get a better noise to signal ratio. The first type is APE type smearing, where the original links in the time direction are replaced by a sum over the six staples that extend one lattice spacing in the spatial directions (in Fig. 2 on the left). This smearing is called here sum6 for short. We use the notation plain to refer to the original Eichten Hill point static source construction. To smear the heavy quark even more we then use hypercubic blocking (first introduced by Hasenfratz and Knechtli in [5]), again only for the links in the time direction (in Fig. 2 on the right). Now the staples (the red dashed lines in Fig. 2) are not constructed from the original, single links, but from staples (the blue dash-dotted lines in Fig. 2). In more detail, we first construct the links V i, µ ; ν ρ = Proj SU(3) [( α 3 )U i, µ + α 3 2 ±η ρ, ν, µ U i, η U i+ˆη, µ U i+ˆµ, η ], (3) where U i, µ is the original thin link at location i and direction µ. Note that there are no staples in directions ν or ρ. We then construct fat links [ Ṽ i, µ;ν = Proj SU(3) ( α 2 )U i,µ + α 2 4 ±ρ ν, µ V i, ρ ; ν µ Vi+ˆρ, µ;ρν V i+ˆµ, ρ ; ν µ ], (4) where index ν indicates that the link is not decorated with staples in that direction. The last step is V i, µ = Proj SU(3) [ ( α )U i, µ + α 6 ±ν µ ] Ṽ i, ν ; µ Ṽ i+ˆν, µ ; ν Ṽ i+ˆµ, ν ; µ, (5) (x, t + T) Γ U Q G q Γ (x, t) FIG. : Two-point correlation function. 4
5 Time Time FIG. 2: (Color online) APE smearing in the time direction (on the left) and hypercubic blocking (on the right). where the fat links are again used to construct the new links. The values α 3 =.5, α 2 = and α = are used in this study, because this choice was found to be very good in reducing the noise to signal ratio in [6]. Note that α 3 =., α 2 = and α = would give the sum6 smearing. Hypercubic blocking takes into account the links within a hypercube (the edges of the cube are 2a in spatial directions but only one lattice spacing in the time direction). This smearing is called here hyp for short. The plain configurations do not have smearing in the time direction. Smearing the heavy quark improves the noise to signal ratio, which can be seen in Figs The figures show the standard deviation to signal ratio for the largest component of C 2, which is F2F2, for 6 lattice configurations (lattice DF3 ). In all cases the plain signal is clearly inferior to the sum6 and hyp signals, whereas the hyp signal is also better than the sum6 signal. This latter difference wouldbe more apparent in a non-logarithmic scale. Lattices DF4 and DF5 show similar trends as the DF3 lattice. 5
6 DF3plain DF3sum6 DF3hyp Noise to signal ratio T FIG. 3: (Color online) Noise (standard deviation) to signal ratio: S-wave 2-point correlation function C 2 for the lattice DF3. Note the logarithmic scale. DF3plain DF3sum6 DF3hyp Noise to signal ratio T FIG. 4: (Color online) Noise (standard deviation) to signal ratio as in Fig. 3 but for the P case. 6
7 DF3plain DF3sum6 DF3hyp Noise to signal ratio T FIG. 5: (Color online) Noise (standard deviation) to signal ratio for the P + case. DF3plain DF3sum6 DF3hyp Noise to signal ratio T FIG. 6: (Color online) Noise (standard deviation) to signal ratio for the D case. 7
8 DF3plain DF3sum6 DF3hyp Noise to signal ratio T FIG. 7: (Color online) Noise (standard deviation) to signal ratio for the D + case. L ± m m 2 m 3 a,f a,f2 a 2,F a 2,F2 a 3,F a 3,F2 χ 2 d.o.f. S.527(5).98(2).4(2).297().44(2).24(5).56(4).8(5).3() 2/24 P.766(4).29(3).52(3).65(5).93(7) 3.4(3) 2.2(2) -.5(6) 3.4(6) 9/24 P +.76(2).28(3).46(2).62(7).88() 3.6(4) 3.4(5) -2.8(5) 2.6(5) /24 D +.(8).46(5).66(6).(3) 2.(5) 5.3(8).8(9) -.6(7) 5.(3) 22/24 D.(3).52(2).67(4).(4) 2.(2) 7.2(5).5(2) -.4(5) 7.4(8) 36/27 D +.6(2).558(8).8(2).4(9) 2.9() 6.52(6) -.5(5).3(7) 7.6(2) 39/27 F +.2(2).658(5).892(3).77(8).88() 5.3(3) -.(5).3(7) 6.(3) 37/27 TABLE II: Two-point correlation function fits (equation 2) for DF3hyp. 2 path fit results are shown for all states to make comparisons easier, even though our best fits for the S and P states are 5 path fits. In some cases (entries marked with an asterisk) Bayesian ideas are used (see section V B). The errors on the parameters were obtained by bootstrapping the lattice configurations and repeating the fit times. The m i are in lattice units. Note that the χ2 d.o.f. is larger for the D-wave and F-wave states than for the S- and P-wave states. 8
9 .4.2 fit S DF3hyp ln[c 2 (T)/C 2 (T+)] T FIG. 8: (Color online) Effective mass plot for the S-wave F2F2 correlations. The line labelled fit (here and in the other effective mass plots) shows the lowest energy obtained from the fit in Eq. 2 for the lattice DF3hyp. Only 2 paths are used in the fit shown here to make comparisons easier, although the best fit for the S-wave state uses all 5 paths. The thickness of the line indicates the error. As expected from a variational argument, this fit to all data naturally gives a somewhat smaller mass than a fit to F2F2 alone. V. ENERGY SPECTRUM The energies are obtained from the fit in equation 2 see Table II for the results for the lattice DF3hyp. The m i are in lattice units. However, due to the presence of an unknown (but L ± and i independent) self energy in each m i, only the differences m i (L ± ) m (S) are relevant. The ground state energy from the 2-path fit for a given state is compared with the effective mass in Figs To illustrate how plateaux develop with T, ln [C 2 (T)/C 2 (T + )] is shown for the largest component, F2F2, for the same lattice DF3hyp. It is seen that for all states we get a plateau that agrees nicely with the fit result that uses all components, FF, FF2 and F2F2. The errors are large for large T values, and the data points for the highest T values are not shown if the errors render them insignificant. In the fits this is 9
10 2 P - fit P - DF3hyp.5 ln[c 2 (T)/C 2 (T+)] T FIG. 9: (Color online) Effective mass plot for the P F2F2 correlations. Only 2 paths are used in the fit shown here to make comparisons easier, although the best fit for this state uses all 5 paths. Other details as in Fig. 8. under better control, because we fit C 2 (T) and not the ratio, and all fuzzing combinations are used (i.e. more data are used). We can thus use data up to T = 5 in the fits. The fit shown in these figures is only to the 2 path data, to make comparisons easier. When extracting the energy of a state all 5 paths are used for S and P. For other states only 2 path data are available. The resulting energy spectra from the fit (Eq. 2) for different lattices are shown in Figs. 4 6 see also Tables III V. With the lattice DF3, for most states, using different smearing for the heavy quark does not seem to change significantly the energy differences with respect to the S energy the exceptions being the P + and excited D + states. Different smearings should only give the same results in the continuum limit, so it is understandable that at a fixed lattice spacing the results may differ. Unfortunately, all our lattices have approximately the same lattice spacing (about a =. fm, see Table I), and we can not go to the continuum limit properly. However, we can use the results from different smearings
11 2 P + fit P + DF3hyp.5 ln[c 2 (T)/C 2 (T+)] T FIG. : (Color online) Effective mass plot for the P + F2F2 correlations. Other details as in Fig ln[c 2 (T)/C 2 (T+)].5 D - fit D - DF3hyp T FIG. : (Color online) Effective mass plot for the D F2F2 correlations. Other details as in Fig. 8.
12 2.5 ln[c 2 (T)/C 2 (T+)].5 D + fit D + DF3hyp T FIG. 2: (Color online) Effective mass plot for the D + F2F2 correlations. Other details as in Fig. 8. to give a rough estimate of the systematic error. Because studying the noise to signal ratio (Figs. 3 7) shows that the plain configurations are clearly inferior to the configurations that are smeared in the time direction, we use hyp and sum6 configurations to get our main results. The reason for quoting energies in units of r is to avoid the 5% uncertainty in r =.525(25) fm. The uncertainties in r /a are much smaller. To get energies in GeV then requires an additional factor of.38(2). The energy of the D + state had been expected to be near the spin average of the D and D + energies, but it turns out to be a poor estimate of this average. Therefore, it is not clear to what extent the F + energy is near the spin average of the two F-wave states, as was originally hoped. The F- and D-wave results for different smearings for the lattices DF4 and DF5 are somewhat more scattered than for the DF3 lattice (i.e. the systematic errors are larger), but otherwise the same features are seen for all three light quark masses. We are most interested in the DF3 lattice results, because that is closest to the B s meson (the light quark mass on this lattice being close to the s quark mass). One interesting observation is, that the energy spectrum is close to being dependent on L alone. 2
13 2 ln[c 2 (T)/C 2 (T+)].5.5 F +- fit F +- DF3hyp T FIG. 3: (Color online) Effective mass plot for the F + F2F2 correlations. Other details as in Fig. 8. For example our preferred configurations, DF3hyp, show an approximate linear rise in excitation energy with L (up to F-wave) as.4l GeV. A similar linear rise is usually seen in Regge or string models. In contrast, the 2S state is seen to be almost degenerate with the D states, as in a simple harmonic oscillator. A L(L+) term can be added to the linear ansatz to get a better fit more precisely,.34l+.4l(l+) gives a good overall fit to the four energy differences up to D-waves. Our earlier results (for the plain configurations used in this study as well as for some other unquenched and quenched configurations) can be found in Refs. [2, 7]. Because dynamical fermions are used in this study, we can not be absolutely certain that the lattice states are pure quark anti-quark states. However, our radial distribution measurements [8] support the assumption that the states are ordinary meson states: the radial distributions of the lowest lying states are not broad, as would be the case if the states were molecules, and the first radial excitations of S- and P-wave states have one node at short distances (approximately at.3.35 fm). 3
14 4 DF3plain DF3sum6 DF3hyp 3 r 2 2S P - P + D +- D - D + F +- FIG. 4: (Color online) Energy spectrum of the heavy-light meson using lattice DF3 in units of r. Here L + ( ) means that the light quark spin couples to angular momentum L giving the total j = L ± /2. The 2S is the first radially excited L= state. The D + is a mixture of the D and D + states, and likewise for the F +. Energies are given with respect to the S-wave ground state (S). Here r /a = 4.754(4) +2 9 errors on the lattice energy fits. (from []). The error bars shown here contain only the statistical 4 DF4plain DF4sum6 DF4hyp 3 r 2 2S P - P + D +- D - D + F +- FIG. 5: (Color online) Energy spectrum of the heavy-light meson using lattice DF4. See Fig. 4 for details. Here r /a = 5.4(4) + the statistical errors on the lattice energy fits. (from []). The error bars shown here contain only 4
15 4 DF5plain DF5sum6 DF5hyp 3 r 2 2S P - P + D +- D - D + F +- FIG. 6: (Color online) Energy spectrum of the heavy-light meson using lattice DF5. See Fig. 4 for details. Here r /a = 5.32(5) (from []). The error bars shown here contain only the statistical errors from the lattice energy fits. nl ± DF3plain DF3sum6 DF3hyp nl ± DF3plain DF3sum6 DF3hyp S 3.55(6) 2.724(4) 2.52() 2S 5.(2) 4.64() 4.59(8) P 4.74(3) 3.79(4) 3.62(3) 2P 7.3(5) 5.98() 5.97() P + 5.5() 4.2(8) 3.63() 2P + 7.8(9) 6.62(8) 6.(2) D (9) 5.25(4) 2D (4) 7.5(7) D 6.(2) 5.(7) 4.79(3) 2D 8.44(4) 7.5(4) 7.23() D + 6.2(2) 5.23(9) 5.6(7) 2D (5) 7.59(5) 7.4(4) F + 7.2(2) 6.() 5.69(8) 2F + 9.6(3) 8.8(3) 7.88(2) TABLE III: Heavy-light meson energies on the lattice in units of r for DF3. The uncertainty due to the statistical error on r /a [r /a = 4.754(4) +2 9, from []] is small (less than % ), and is not taken into account in the error estimates. The n denotes the radial excitation and n gives the number of nodes in the wavefunction of the state. The dash means that no reliable fit can be found. The results on different lattices can not be compared directly (only energy differences can be compared) due to different self energies. The DF3hyp results are the same as m, m 2 in Table II, but expressed in different units. Also the S, P are now from 5 path fits. 5
16 nl ± DF4plain DF4sum6 DF4hyp nl ± DF4plain DF4sum6 DF4hyp S 3.72(4) 2.66(2) 2.45(2) 2S 5.66(7) 4.77() 4.6() P 4.73(4) 3.64(5) 3.43(5) 2P 7.38(6) 6.3(2) 5.9() P (4) 3.92() 3.37(6) 2P () 6.65(9) 6.(2) D + 6.5(3) 5.8(2) - 2D (2) 7.25(9) - D 6.4(2) 5.(2) 4.6(2) 2D 8.9(8) 7.6(2) 7.2(2) D (5) 5.(3) 4.4(3) 2D + 9.6(8) 7.9(2) 7.(2) F + 6.8(4) 6.24() 5.7(2) 2F + 9.5() 8.62(2) 8.33() TABLE IV: Heavy-light meson energies on the lattice in units of r for DF4. The uncertainty due to the statistical error on r /a [r /a = 5.4(4) +, from []] is small (less than % ), and is not taken into account in the error estimates. Other comments as in Table III. nl ± DF5plain DF5sum6 DF5hyp nl ± DF5plain DF5sum6 DF5hyp S 3.7(5) 2.7(3) 2.46(3) 2S 5.7(6) 5.() 4.63(4) P 4.75(4) 3.6(4) 3.4(4) 2P 7.57(6) 6.23() 6.() P + 5.5(2) 4.(5) 3.4(2) 2P + 8.5(2) 6.96() 6.3(2) D + 6.6(3) - - 2D + 8.7(3) - - D 6.86(2) 4.7(3) 4.6(2) 2D 9.5(5) 7.5(2) 7.4(2) D + 7.(2) 5.2(3) 4.7(5) 2D + 9.6(8) 8.2(2) 7.6(3) F + 7.7(2) 6.72() 6.3(2) 2F +.5(6) 9.(3) 8.6(3) TABLE V: Heavy-light meson energies on the lattice in units of r for DF5. The uncertainty due to the statistical error on r /a [r /a = 5.32(5), from []] is small (less than % ), and is not taken into account in the error estimates. Other comments as in Table III. To check how the results depend on the light quark mass we plot the energies (i.e. energy differences with respect to the S state) as a function of the pion mass squared, (r m π ) 2. As can be seen in Figs. 7 2, for P- and D-wave states the dependence on the light quark mass is not strong. We also compare our results to other static-light meson lattice calculations in Fig. 2. It is seen that the P-wave results do not change much between the different lattices, but the 2S-S and D-wave energy differences vary a lot. However, since the lattices, quark masses and lattice spacings are different, the results should only agree in the continuum 6
17 .2. r.9.8 sum6 hyp (r m π ) 2 FIG. 7: (Color online) The energy difference r [E(P ) E(S)] as a function of the pion mass squared. There is a slight dependence on the light quark mass. Here and in the following figures for P +, D and D + the results, from left to right, are from lattices DF5, DF4 and DF3, respectively. limit. A set of similar lattices with different lattice spacings would be needed to check this. A. Interpolation to the b quark mass Even though we can not go to the continuum limit, we feel that it is worth-while to try to predict where the B s meson excited states lie. To obtain the predictions of the excited state energies, we can now interpolate in /m Q, where m Q is the heavy quark mass, between the DF3 heavy-light lattice calculations and D s meson experimental results, i.e. interpolate between the static quark (m Q = ) and the charm quark (m Q = m c ). Here we, of course, have to assume that the measured D s meson states are simple quark anti-quark states. This is not necessarily true: for example the mass of the Ds(237) is much lower than what is predicted by conventional potential models, and it has thus been proposed that it could be either a four quark state, a DK molecule or a Dπ atom. A short review on meson excited state spectroscopy and the puzzles in interpreting the results is given in Ref. [3]. However, the inclusion of chiral radiative corrections could change the potential model predictions 7
18 r.8.6 sum6 hyp (r m π ) 2 FIG. 8: (Color online) The energy difference r [E(P + ) E(S)] as a function of the pion mass squared. The dependence on the light quark mass is weak, whereas there is a manifest difference between sum6 and hyp configurations. 2.5 r 2 sum6 hyp (r m π ) 2 FIG. 9: (Color online) The energy difference r [E(D ) E(S)] as a function of the pion mass squared. The dependence on the light quark mass is weak, and the differences between the sum6 and hyp smearings are small especially for DF3. 8
19 3 2.5 r 2 sum6 hyp (r m π ) 2 FIG. 2: (Color online) The energy difference r [E(D + ) E(S)] as a function of the pion mass squared. The dependence on the light quark mass is weak, and the differences between the sum6 and hyp smearings are small especially for DF3. considerably [4]. In the following we assume that the states are the usual quark anti-quark states. We use linear interpolation, i.e. = A + B m c m Q + CF j m c m Q. (6) Here A, B and C are fit parameters and F j = 2[J(J + ) j q (j q + ) s Q (s Q + )], where J is the total angular momentum, s Q = /2 is the heavy quark spin and j q is the combined spin and orbital angular momentum L of the light quark (see Table VI). The interpolation procedure is shown in Fig. 22. Note that the linear interpolation works perfectly for the S-wave state, where the experimental energies are known for both B s and D s mesons, and the lattice result (zero) is simply because the two S states are automatically degenerate at m Q =. Our predictions of the energy differences m(p) m(s) for the B s meson are given in Table VII. For our preferred lattice DF3hyp these agree very well with the experimental measurements of the energies of the + and 2 + P-wave states. There we predict that the two lowest P-wave states lie a few MeV below the BK and B K thresholds (minus the S state 9
20 MeV 8 2S-S P - -S P + -S D - -S D + -S 6 UKQCD TrinLat 4 ETM BGR Lattice spacing a fm FIG. 2: (Color online) Comparison of different static-light lattice results. On the left at a =.855 fm are the results from European Twisted Mass Collaboration [9], at a =. fm our results, at a =.6 fm BGR Collaboration s results [] and on the right at a =.7 fm TrinLat group s results [5]. A set of similar lattices with different lattice spacings is needed for going to the continuum limit. J P L F j J P L F j J P L F j TABLE VI: Coefficients F j = 2[J(J + ) j q (j q + ) s Q (s Q + )] (equation 6). energy) at 46 and 452 MeV respectively. We show the DFsum6 results for comparison. As for other excited states, BaBar and Belle observed two new states, DsJ (286) and D sj (27), in 26 [6, 7]. The JP quantum numbers of the D sj (286) can be +,, 2 +, etc., so it could be a radial excitation of the D s(237) or a J P = 3 D-wave state. The first interpretation is rather popular, but our lattice results favor the D-wave J P = 3 assignment in agreement with Colangelo, De Fazio and Nicotri [8]. (The slope of the interpolating line 2
21 MeV 6 B s 2 + D s This work P + P BK J P =?? B * K m c /m Q FIG. 22: (Color online) Interpolation to the b quark mass. The ratio m c /m b is taken to be.3(2) (from []; shown by the vertical band). The D s meson experimental results are from [] (blue circles), and the B s meson experimental results are from [] (blue circles) and [2] (green triangles). Our results (using DF3hyp configurations) are marked with red squares. J P DF3hyp DF3sum6 experiments ± 9 MeV 384 ± MeV ± 9 MeV 432 ± MeV ± 25 MeV 538 ± 2 MeV 463 ± MeV ± 25 MeV 55 ± 2 MeV 473 ± MeV TABLE VII: Our predictions for B s meson mass differences, M(Bs )-M(B s), for the P-wave states. The uncertainty in the ratio m c /m b is not taken into account in the error estimates. The experimental results are from [2]. 2
22 MeV B s D s 4 2P + 2P This work D + D - 2S D * sj (286) D * sj (27) m c /m Q FIG. 23: (Color online) Interpolation to the b quark mass for DF3hyp lattice: higher excited states. The lines illustrate what the interpolation would look like, if the D s meson states were D- wave states. The experimental results are from [6, 7]. Interpolating to m c /m b predicts D-wave J P =, 3 at 87(3) and 932(8) MeV respectively. would be very steep, if the D sj (286) is a radial excitation of the D s(237).) Interpolation then predicts a D-wave J P = 3 B s state at 932(8) MeV. In addition, the DsJ (27) could be a radially excited S-wave state or a D-wave J P = state. If the latter identification is assumed, then a D-wave J P = B s state at 87(3) MeV is expected (see Fig. 23). B. Bayesian ideas In some cases, using 3 exponentials to fit the C 2 data does not work very well. In Table II, these cases are marked with an asterisk. Since these fits are not as good or stable as one would hope, we introduce some Bayesian ideas and use prior knowledge of the energies to 22
23 .5.4 m S P - P + D - D + F +- FIG. 24: (Color online) Mass differences m 32 = m 3 m 2 for the DF3hyp data in lattice units. This seems to be almost constant for angular momentum L (given the sizeable errors on the data). The lines give the m 32 =.234(46) that is used in this study. Looking at the DF3sum6 data gives a very similar picture (not shown here) and an estimate of m 32 =.27(54). See section VB for details. nl ± m 3 3 exp m 3, prior m 3 Bayes m 2 3 exp m 2 Bayes P +.46(2).52(6).47(5).28(3).29(3) D.63(5).74(6).67(4).5(3).52(2) D +.84(2).79(5).8(2).559().558(8) F +.96(43).89(5).89().66(2).657(5) TABLE VIII: Comparison of the m 3,prior with the results from the full 3 exponential fit and the Bayesian fit for DF3hyp configurations. See Section V B for definition of m 3,prior. m 3 3 exp and m 3 Bayes are the results of a full 3 exponential fit and a Bayesian (fixed m 32 ) fit, respectively. Likewise for the m 2. The P + Bayes fit is merely to check that the Bayesian ideas work well and does not restrict the analysis too much. constrain the fit, or rather to guide the fit in the right direction. The third mass, m 3, (which would be the mass of the second radial excitation, if there was no pollution from higher states) is restricted to be in the range m 3, prior ± m 3, prior by adding a term (m 3 m 3, prior ) 2 ( m 3, prior ) 2 (7) 23
24 nl ± m 3 3 exp m 3, prior m 3 Bayes m 2 3 exp m 2 Bayes P +.59(2).6(5).59(2).39(2).393(5) D.8(9).79(5).79(3).578().577(8) D + 2.(2).82(5).84(2).64(2).596() F + 2.6(9).94(6).95().72(2).72(8) TABLE IX: Comparison of the m 3,prior with the results from the full 3 exponential fit and the Bayesian fit for DF3sum6 configurations. Again, the prior m 3 values are in fairly good agreement with the m 3 results from the full 3 exponential fits. Fixing m 3 m 2 does not change the first excited state m 2. See Table VIII for notation. Lattice Direct Indirect Lattice Direct Indirect Lattice Direct Indirect DF3plain.26(4).4(2) DF4plain.69(4).75(4) DF5plain.5(6).7(2) DF3sum6.5(4).32(9) DF4sum6.7(5).27(2) DF5sum6.3(6).4(6) DF3hyp.(4).() DF4hyp.3(5) -.6(7) DF5hyp.7(7).(2) TABLE X: P-wave spin-orbit splitting r = r (m P+ m P ) for the different lattices. To get in GeV requires a factor.38(2). to the χ 2. This is not a hard constraint, unlike fixing m 3 to a given value would be, but rather constrains the parameter to a given range softly. The m 3, prior and m 3, prior are determined beforehand by estimating the difference m 32 = m 3 m 2 from full 3 exponentials fits. This mass difference seems to be almost constant for states that have L = or higher (see Fig. 24). Therefore we use the P state to set the m 32 for D-wave and F-wave states. The m 3, prior for D-wave and F-wave states is then calculated by adding m 32 to the m 2 from the full 3 exponential fit for the state in question (see Tables VIII, IX). The prior m 3 values are in fairly good agreement with the m 3 results from the full 3 exponential fits, and fixing m 3 m 2 does not change the first excited state m 2. The P + Bayes fit are used to check that the Bayesian ideas work well and does not restrict the analysis too much. C. Spin-orbit splitting One interesting point to note here is that the spin-orbit splitting of the P-wave states is small, almost zero, for the preferred hyp smearing. We extract this energy difference of 24
25 .5.4 indirect direct.3 r DF3plain DF3 sum6 DF3 hyp FIG. 25: (Color online) The Spin-Orbit splittings of P-wave states for the DF3 lattice..8 indirect direct.6 r DF4plain DF4 sum6 DF4 hyp FIG. 26: (Color online) The Spin-Orbit splittings of P-wave states for the DF4 lattice. Lattice Direct Indirect Lattice Direct Indirect Lattice Direct Indirect DF3plain.3(9).(3) DF4plain.64(9).6(2) DF5plain.2().2(3) DF3sum6.3(3).3() DF4sum6.7(6).2(4) DF5sum6.43(5).5(4) DF3hyp.28(5).27(4) DF4hyp -.8(7).2(4) DF5hyp.2(6).(5) TABLE XI: D-wave spin-orbit splitting r = r (m D+ m D ) for the different lattices. To get in GeV requires a factor.38(2). 25
26 .8 indirect direct.6 r DF5plain DF5 sum6 DF5 hyp FIG. 27: (Color online) The Spin-Orbit splittings of P-wave states for the DF5 lattice r indirect direct DF3plain DF3 sum6 DF3 hyp FIG. 28: (Color online) The Spin-Orbit splittings of D-wave states for the DF3 lattice. the P + and P states in two different ways:. Indirectly by simply calculating the difference using the energies given by the fits in Eq. 2, when the P + and P data are fitted separately. 2. Combining the P + and P data and fitting the ratio C 2 (P + )/C 2 (P ), which enables us to go directly for the spin-orbit splitting, m P+ m P. 26
27 .8 indirect direct.6 r DF4plain DF4 sum6 DF4 hyp FIG. 29: (Color online) The Spin-Orbit splittings of D-wave states for the DF4 lattice..8 indirect direct.6.4 r DF5plain DF5 sum6 DF5 hyp FIG. 3: (Color online) The Spin-Orbit splittings of D-wave states for the DF5 lattice. In the latter case, the expression (for a given fuzzing) is [ C 2 (P + ) C 2 (P ) = A e m T + b + 2 e m+ 2 T + b + ] 3 e m+ 3 T, (8) + b 2 e m 2 T + b 3 e m 3 T 27
28 where m = m P+ m P, m + 2 = m 2P + m P+, m 2 = m 2P m P, m + 3 = m 3P+ m P+ and m 3 = m 3P m P. We get the best results by fitting m, m + 2, m 2 and the coefficients A, b + 2 and b 2, but fixing the remaining mass differences and b s from the individual two-point correlator fits (equation 2 and Table II). Thus b + 3 = a 3,f (P + )a 3,f2 (P + ) a,f (P + )a,f2 (P + ) and b 3 = a 3,f (P )a 3,f2 (P ) a,f (P )a,f2 (P ) (9) for given values of fuzzing indices f, f 2. The D-wave spin-orbit splitting is also extracted in a similar manner. The results of the fits are given in Tables X, XI and in Figs In all cases the errors on the direct estimates are much smaller than those on the indirect ones. Also in most cases the direct and indirect estimates are consistent with each other the only exception being the P-wave sum6 estimates. There the direct value is somewhat lower than the indirect estimate. In fact this difference brings the sum6 direct estimate closer to the hyp value, and lends support to the preferred hyp estimate, which in all three cases gives a small P-wave spin-orbit splitting (SOS), consistent with zero, for the hyp configurations. The D-wave spin-orbit splitting (SOS) results are more varied, but the DF3hyp lattice suggests clearly a positive, non-zero D-wave SOS. However, the DF4hyp and DF5hyp estimates are considerably smaller, becoming negative for the DF4hyp. At present it is not clear whether this is a lattice artefact due to, say, not being in the continuum limit, or that indeed the D-wave results are more dependent on m q than in the P-wave case. VI. A MODEL BASED ON THE DIRAC EQUATION Since the mass of the heavy quark is infinite, we have for a potential description essentially a one-body problem. Therefore, a simple model based on the Dirac equation is used to try to describe the lattice data. The potential in the Dirac equation has the usual linearly rising 28
29 scalar part, b sc r, but in addition a vector part b vec r is added. The one gluon exchange term, a OGE V OGE, where V OGE = 4 3 with the running coupling constant α s (r) given by and α s (r) = 2 π α s (k 2 ) = 2π 27 α s (r), () r dk sin(kr) k α s (k 2 ) () (2) ln[(k 2 + 4m 2 g)/(λ 2 QCD )]. Here, guided by fits to various meson masses using the Blankenbecler Sugar equation, we fix Λ QCD = 26 MeV and the dynamical gluon mass m g = 29 MeV (see [9] for details). The potential also has a scalar term mωl(l + ), which seems to be needed to increase the energy of D-wave states. This type of term arises in flux tube models, where a flux tube s rotational energy is proportional to L(L + ) (like in Isgur Paton flux tube model, [2]). The lines in the energy spectrum plot (Fig. 3) show three Dirac model fits from Table XII with m = 56 MeV (the constituent quark mass, from [9]) and a OGE =.. Attempts to also vary a OGE easily lead to instabilities. The solid line, labelled fit, is a fit to three DF3hyp energy differences: P and D with respect to the ground state, and the P- wave spin-orbit splitting (direct estimate) SOS(P) [i.e. E(P + ) E(P )]. The fit to these energies is acceptable with total χ 2 =.68, but as soon as a fourth state [e.g. SOS(D)] is added a good χ 2 can no longer be achieved. The dashed line, fit 2, shows an attempt to fit DF3hyp P, SOS(P), D and SOS(D). The χ 2 is not good, and letting a OGE vary does not help: that only leads to unphysical values for the parameters. Using a different constituent quark mass, say m = 49 MeV from [2], gives basically the same fits (the changes are minimal). Fit 3 is a fit to DF3sum6 P, SOS(P), D and SOS(D), and is shown in the figure for comparison. The fits to DF3sum6 energies are also shown in Table XII. In Fig. 32 the same Dirac model fits are shown for the excited states. Here it can be seen that the fit is about 5 MeV lower than the lattice results, and the shift seems to be constant for both lattices ( DF3sum6 and DF3hyp ) for all states, except the 2S. There is no obvious reason why the Dirac model should underestimate the first radial excitations by a constant amount, but a term of the form.5(n ) GeV could be included in the model to improve the fit to excited states and be interpreted as a flux tube effect in 29
30 Case b sc [GeV/fm] b vec [GeV/fm] ω total χ 2 sum6 P, SOS(P).68(2) sum6 P, SOS(P).86(3).57(8).. sum6 P, SOS(P), D.372(4)..96(4) 4.5 sum6 P, SOS(P), D, SOS(D).265(4).57(3).696() 2. hyp P, SOS(P).294()...54 hyp P, SOS(P).4(8) -.2(2).. hyp P, SOS(P), D.763(9)..554(9).83 hyp P, SOS(P), D, SOS(D).48(5).26(2).66(5) 34.3 TABLE XII: Dirac model fits for DF3. Here a OGE = and constituent quark mass m = 56 MeV. Fits are attempted for DF3sum6 and DF3hyp. A perfect fit (2 fit parameters, 2 data points) can be found for P and the P-wave spin-orbit splitting, if both scalar and vector linear potentials are used. However, all P- and D-wave data [P, SOS(P), D, SOS(D)] can not be fitted using the two linear rising potentials and adding a scalar term mωl(l+) still does not give a good χ 2. the same philosophy as the ωl(l+) term. However, as the fit to the ground state energies is poor, this improvement is not pursued. VII. CONCLUSIONS With the DF3hyp lattice, our predictions for the + and 2 + P-wave state masses agree very well with the experimental results. We also predict that the masses of the two lower P-wave states ( + and + ) should lie only a few MeV below the BK and B K thresholds respectively. Also with the DF3hyp lattice, the P-wave spin-orbit splitting is small (essentially zero), but the D-wave spin-orbit splitting is clearly non-zero and positive. In contrast, another lattice group finds the P-wave spin-orbit splitting to be positive (about 35 MeV) and the D-wave SOS to be slightly negative (see [5]), i.e. they seem to observe the famous inversion [2]. However, the recent European Twisted Mass Collaboration results find the P-wave SOS to be negative and the D-wave SOS to be small [9]. One clearly needs to go to the continuum limit before any definite conclusions can 3
31 r DF3plain DF3sum6 DF3hyp fit fit 2 fit 3 2S P - P + D +- D - D + F +- FIG. 3: (Color online) Energy spectrum of the heavy-light meson and three Dirac model fits. Fit is a fit to DF3hyp P, SOS(P) and D, whereas fit 2 is an attempt to fit DF3hyp P, SOS(P), D and SOS(D) (see Table XII). Fit 3 is a fit to DF3sum6 P, SOS(P), D and SOS(D), and is shown here for comparison. r DF3plain DF3sum6 DF3hyp fit fit 2 fit 3 2 2S P - P + D +- D - D + F +- FIG. 32: (Color online) Energies of the first radial excitations of the heavy-light meson and the same Dirac model fits shown in Fig. 3. 3
32 be made. In [4] Woo Lee and Lee suggest that the absence of spin-orbit inversions can be explained by chiral radiative corrections in the potential model. Small spin-orbit splittings throughout the meson spectrum could be explained by a relativistic symmetry in the Dirac Hamiltonian discussed in [22]. This would indicate that the scalar potential is (at least approximately) equal to the vector potential. The one-body Dirac equation model with one-gluon exchange, vector and scalar linear potentials and a scalar term mωl(l + ) (like a flux tube rotational energy) is not good enough to describe the entire lattice energy spectrum. Therefore, one should be very careful in using such simple potentials to describe the interaction between quarks. Acknowledgements I am grateful to my collaborators, Professors A.M. Green and C. Michael, and to the UKQCD Collaboration for providing the lattice configurations. I wish to thank Professor Philippe de Forcrand for useful comments and also the Center for Scientific Computing in Espoo, Finland, for making available the computer resources. This work was supported in part by the EU Contract No. MRTN-CT , FLAVIAnet. APPENDIX A: SOME CHECKS To check that the different results for different smearings (specifically for the spin-orbit splittings) are a real effect and not due to some biasing element in the final analysis, we plot the basic signals in Figs. 33 for the P-wave. The signals clearly are different for DF3sum6 and DF3hyp, supporting the results of the complete analysis in Fig. 25. [] C. R. Allton et al. (UKQCD Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 65, 5452 (22); C. R. Allton, A. Hart, D. Hepburn, A. C. Irving, B. Joó, C. McNeile, C. Michael and S. V. Wright (UKQCD Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 7, 45 (24) 32
33 -ln[c 2 (P +,T)/C 2 (P -,T)]/T DF3sum6 FF DF3hyp FF DF3sum6 fit DF3hyp fit T -ln[c 2 (P +,T)/C 2 (P -,T)]/T DF3sum6 FF2 DF3hyp FF2 DF3sum6 fit DF3hyp fit T -ln[c 2 (P +,T)/C 2 (P -,T)]/T DF3sum6 F2F2 DF3hyp F2F2 DF3sum6 fit DF3hyp fit T FIG. 33: (Color online) To study the observed difference in the P-wave spin-orbit splitting between the DF3hyp and DF3sum6 configurations seen in Fig. 25, these figures show the logarithm of the ratio C 2 (P +,T)/C 2 (P,T) divided by T for DF3hyp and DF3sum6 for the three possible fuzzing combinations (from top to bottom: FF, FF2 and F2F2). This should exhibit a plateux for large enough T. The horizontal lines show the fit results from the full analysis (FF, FF2 and F2F2 all included). The shaded area shows the estimated errors. 33
34 [2] UKQCD Collaboration, A. M. Green, J. Koponen, C. Michael, C. McNeile and G. Thompson, Phys. Rev. D 69, 9455 (24), and UKQCD Collaboration, J. Koponen, hep-lat/45 [3] UKQCD Collaboration, P. Lacock, C. Michael, P. Boyle and P. Rowland, Phys. Rev. D 54, 6997 (996) [4] UKQCD Collaboration, C. Michael and J. Peisa, Phys. Rev. D 58, 3456 (998) [5] A. Hasenfratz and F. Knechtli, Phys. Rev. D 64, 3454 (2) [6] M. Della Morte, A. Shindler and R. Sommer, JHEP 58, 5 (25) [7] UKQCD Collaboration, A. M. Green, J. Ignatius, M. Jahma, J. Koponen, C. McNeile and C. Michael, PoS LAT25 (25) 25, and UKQCD Collaboration, J. Koponen, PoS LAT26 (26) 2 [8] UKQCD Collaboration, J. Koponen, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 4, 437 (25) and hep-lat/45. Part of the work is in progress. [9] K. Jansen, C. Michael, A. Shindler and M. Wagner, arxiv:88.22 [hep-lat] [] T. Burch, D. Chakrabarti, C. Hagen, C. B. Lang, M. Limmer, T. Maurer and A. Schäfer, PoS LAT27 (27) 9 [] W.-M. Yao et al., J. Phys. G 33, (26) [2] CDF and DØCollaborations, R. K. Mommsen, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 7, 72 (27); CDF Collaboration, T. Aaltonen et al., Phys. Rev. lett., 82 (28); DØCollaboration, V. M. Abazov et al., Phys. Rev. lett., 822 (28) [3] V. Poireau, arxiv: [hep-ex], published in Munich 27, Deep-inelastic scattering, pp [4] I. Woo Lee and T. Lee, Phys. Rev. D 76, 47 (27) [5] J. Foley, A. Ó Cais, M. Peardon and S. Ryan, PoS LAT26 (26) 96 and Phys. Rev. D 75, 9453 (27) [6] BABAR Collaboration, B. Aubert, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 222 (26) [7] Belle Collaboration, K. Abe et al., arxiv:hep-ex/683, presented at the 33rd International Conference on High Energy Physics (ICHEP 6), Moscow [8] P. Colangelo, F. De Fazio and S. Nicotri, Phys. Lett. B 642, 48 (26) [9] T. A. Lähde, C. Nyfält and D. O. Riska, Nucl. Phys. A674, 4 (2) [2] N. Isgur and J. Paton, Phys. Rev. D 3, 29 (985) [2] H. J. Schnitzer, Phys. Rev. D 8, 3482 (978) and Phys. Lett. B 226, 7 (989) 34
35 [22] P. R. Page, T. Goldman and J. N. Ginocchio, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 24 (2) 35
Department of Physical Sciences, University of Helsinki and Helsinki Institute of Physics, Finland
Energies and radial distributions of B s mesons - the effect of hypercubic blocking (for UKQCD Collaboration) Department of Physical Sciences, University of Helsinki and Helsinki Institute of Physics,
More informationPoS(LAT2005)205. B s meson excited states from the lattice. UKQCD Collaboration
from the lattice UKQCD Collaboration A. M. Green a, J. Ignatius b, M. Jahma c,, C. McNeile d and C. Michael d a University of Helsinki and Helsinki Institute of Physics, Helsinki, Finland b CSC - Scientific
More informationarxiv: v1 [hep-lat] 7 Oct 2007
Charm and bottom heavy baryon mass spectrum from lattice QCD with 2+1 flavors arxiv:0710.1422v1 [hep-lat] 7 Oct 2007 and Steven Gottlieb Department of Physics, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana
More informationBaryon spectroscopy with spatially improved quark sources
Baryon spectroscopy with spatially improved quark sources T. Burch,, D. Hierl, and A. Schäfer Institut für Theoretische Physik Universität Regensburg D-93040 Regensburg, Germany. E-mail: christian.hagen@physik.uni-regensburg.de
More informationHadronic physics from the lattice
Hadronic physics from the lattice Chris Michael c.michael@liv.ac.uk University of Liverpool Hadronic physics from the lattice p.1/24 Hadronic Structure - Introduction What are hadrons made of? Is a meson
More informationIs the up-quark massless? Hartmut Wittig DESY
Is the up-quark massless? Hartmut Wittig DESY Wuppertal, 5 November 2001 Quark mass ratios in Chiral Perturbation Theory Leutwyler s ellipse: ( mu m d ) 2 + 1 Q 2 ( ms m d ) 2 = 1 25 m s m d 38 R 44 0
More informationPlans for meson spectroscopy
Plans for meson spectroscopy Marc Wagner Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institut für Physik Theorie der Elementarteilchen Phänomenologie/Gittereichtheorie mcwagner@physik.hu-berlin.de http://people.physik.hu-berlin.de/
More informationarxiv: v1 [hep-lat] 18 Aug 2017
arxiv:1708.05562v1 [hep-lat] 18 Aug 2017 Computation of hybrid static potentials in SU(3) lattice gauge theory Christian Reisinger 1,, Stefano Capitani 1, Owe Philipsen 1, and Marc Wagner 1 1 Institut
More informationLow-lying positive-parity excited states of the nucleon
Low-lying positive-parity excited states of the nucleon ab, Alan Ó Cais ac, Waseem Kamleh a, B.G. Lasscock a, Derek B. Leinweber a, Anthony G. Williams a a Special Research Centre for the Subatomic Structure
More informationNational Accelerator Laboratory
Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory FERMILAB-Conf-99/278-T The Heavy Hybrid Spectrum from NRQCD and the Born-Oppenheimer Approximation K.J. Juge, J. Kuti and C.J. Morningstar Fermi National Accelerator
More informationdoi: /PhysRevD
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.64.097505 PHYSICAL REVIEW D, VOLUME 64, 097505 Hybrid quarkonia with dynamical sea quarks T. Manke, 1 A. Ali Khan, 1 S. Aoki, 2 R. Burkhalter, 1,2 S. Ejiri, 1 M. Fukugita, 3 S. Hashimoto,
More informationThe Λ(1405) is an anti-kaon nucleon molecule. Jonathan Hall, Waseem Kamleh, Derek Leinweber, Ben Menadue, Ben Owen, Tony Thomas, Ross Young
The Λ(1405) is an anti-kaon nucleon molecule Jonathan Hall, Waseem Kamleh, Derek Leinweber, Ben Menadue, Ben Owen, Tony Thomas, Ross Young The Λ(1405) The Λ(1405) is the lowest-lying odd-parity state of
More informationarxiv:hep-lat/ v2 13 Oct 1998
Preprint numbers: BI-TP 98/15 UUHEP 98/3 String Breaking in Lattice Quantum Chromodynamics Carleton DeTar Department of Physics, University of Utah Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA arxiv:hep-lat/9808028v2
More informationarxiv: v2 [hep-ph] 5 Feb 2009
A multiquark description of the D sj (2860) and D sj (2700) J. Vijande 1, A. Valcarce 2, F. Fernández 3. arxiv:0810.4988v2 [hep-ph] 5 Feb 2009 1 Dpto. de Física Atómica, Molecular y Nuclear, Universidad
More informationarxiv: v1 [hep-ph] 13 Nov 2013
euniversityofmanchester November 14, 2013 arxiv:1311.3203v1 [hep-ph] 13 Nov 2013 Odd- and even-parity charmed mesons revisited in heavy hadron chiral perturbation theory Mohammad Alhakami 1 School of Physics
More informationCharmSpectroscopy from B factories
CharmSpectroscopy from B factories (SLAC) Representing the BABAR Collaboration Charm 2010 Workshop Beijing October 23, 2010 Contact: benitezj@slac.stanford.edu Production of Charm Mesons at B-factories
More informationarxiv:hep-ph/ v1 18 Mar 2006
Radiative decays of B c mesons in a Bethe-Salpeter model arxiv:hep-ph/0603139v1 18 Mar 2006 A. Abd El-Hady a,1, J. R. Spence b and J. P. Vary b a) Physics Department, King Khalid University, Abha 9004,
More informationProbing the Chiral Limit in 2+1 flavor Domain Wall Fermion QCD
Probing the Chiral Limit in 2+1 flavor Domain Wall Fermion QCD Meifeng Lin for the RBC and UKQCD Collaborations Department of Physics Columbia University July 29 - August 4, 2007 / Lattice 2007 @ Regensburg
More informationThe Λ(1405) is an anti-kaon nucleon molecule. Jonathan Hall, Waseem Kamleh, Derek Leinweber, Ben Menadue, Ben Owen, Tony Thomas, Ross Young
The Λ(1405) is an anti-kaon nucleon molecule Jonathan Hall, Waseem Kamleh, Derek Leinweber, Ben Menadue, Ben Owen, Tony Thomas, Ross Young The Λ(1405) The Λ(1405) is the lowest-lying odd-parity state of
More informationMasses and decay constants of the light mesons in the quenched approximation using the tadpole improved SW-clover action.
Glasgow Preprint GUTPA 95 9 2 Liverpool Preprint LTH 359 arxiv:hep-lat/9509083v1 25 Sep 1995 hep-lat/9509083 Masses and decay constants of the light mesons in the quenched approximation using the tadpole
More informationPoS(EPS-HEP 2009)057. Bottomonium Studies at BaBar. Veronique Ziegler. SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory
SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory E-mail: vziegler@slac.stanford.edu Selected studies in bottomonium physics carried out by the BaBar experiment at the SLAC PEP-II e + e collider are presented. They
More informationBaryon correlators containing different diquarks from lattice simulations
Baryon correlators containing different diquarks from lattice simulations and Thomas DeGrand Department of Physics, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309 USA E-mail: zhaofeng.liu@colorado.edu, degrand@pizero.colorado.edu
More informationarxiv: v1 [hep-lat] 26 Dec 2009
arxiv:091.5037v1 [hep-lat] 6 Dec 009 On Equation of State at physical quark masses Physics Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton NY 11973 E-mail: petreczk@bnl.gov QCD equation of state is calculated
More informationPoS(LATTICE 2015)261. Scalar and vector form factors of D πlν and D Klν decays with N f = Twisted fermions
Scalar and vector form factors of D πlν and D Klν decays with N f = + + Twisted fermions N. Carrasco (a), (a,b), V. Lubicz (a,b), E. Picca (a,b), L. Riggio (a), S. Simula (a), C. Tarantino (a,b) (a) INFN,
More informationSpectroscopy of charmed baryons from lattice QCD
Institute of Physics, University of Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria. E-mail: padmanath.madanagopalan@uni-graz.at Robert G. Edwards Jefferson Laboratory, 12000 Jefferson Avenue, Newport News, VA 23606, USA E-mail:
More informationPoS(LAT2006)094. The decay constants f B + and f D + from three-flavor lattice QCD
The decay constants f B + and f D + from three-flavor lattice QCD C. Bernard a, C. DeTar b, M. Di Pierro c, A.X. El-Khadra d, R.T. Evans d, E. Freeland e, S. Gottlieb f, U.M. Heller g, J.E. Hetrick h,
More informationLatest developments in the Spectroscopy of Heavy Hadrons
Latest developments in the Spectroscopy of Heavy Hadrons Fulvia De Fazio INFN - Bari Question: recent discoveries in charm(onium) and bottom (onium) spectra might be exotic states? Collaborators: P. Colangelo,
More informationSUPA, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK
SUPA, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland E-mail: donaldg@tcd.ie Christine Davies SUPA, School of Physics
More informationLattice QCD investigation of heavy-light four-quark systems
Lattice QCD investigation of heavy-light four-quark systems Antje Peters peters@th.physik.uni-frankfurt.de Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main in collaboration with Pedro Bicudo, Krzysztof Cichy, Luka
More informationB-meson decay constants with domain-wall light quarks and nonperturbatively tuned relativistic b-quarks
B-meson decay constants with domain-wall light quarks and nonperturbatively tuned relativistic b-quarks RBC and UKQCD collaborations Oliver Witzel Center for Computational Science Lattice 2013, Mainz,
More informationarxiv: v1 [hep-lat] 24 Oct 2013
arxiv:30.646v [hep-lat] 24 Oct 203 Lattice NRQCD study of in-medium bottomonium states using N f = 2+,48 3 2 HotQCD configurations Department of Physics, Sejong University, Seoul 43-747, Korea E-mail:
More informationThe heavy-light sector of N f = twisted mass lattice QCD
The heavy-light sector of N f = 2 + 1 + 1 twisted mass lattice QCD Marc Wagner Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institut für Physik mcwagner@physik.hu-berlin.de http://people.physik.hu-berlin.de/ mcwagner/
More informationarxiv: v1 [hep-lat] 23 Nov 2018
B c spectroscopy using highly improved staggered quarks arxiv:1811.09448v1 [hep-lat] 23 Nov 2018 INFN, Sezione di Roma Tor Vergata, Via della Ricerca Scientifica 1, 00133 Roma RM, Italy E-mail: andrew.lytle@roma2.infn.it
More informationPoS(LATTICE 2008)114. Investigation of the η -η c -mixing with improved stochastic estimators
Investigation of the η -η c -mixing with improved stochastic estimators and Gunnar S. Bali Institut für Theoretische Physik, Universität Regensburg, 934 Regensburg, Germany E-mail: christian.ehmann@physik.uni-regensburg.de,
More informationSpectral Properties of Quarks in the Quark-Gluon Plasma
Lattice27 : 2, Aug., 27 Spectral Properties of Quarks in the Quark-Gluon Plasma Masakiyo Kitazawa (Osaka Univ.) F. Karsch and M.K., arxiv:78.299 Why Quark? Because there are quarks. in the deconfined phase
More informationarxiv:hep-lat/ v1 6 Oct 2000
1 Scalar and Tensor Glueballs on Asymmetric Coarse Lattices C. Liu a, a Department of Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, P. R. China arxiv:hep-lat/0010007v1 6 Oct 2000 Scalar and tensor glueball
More informationHeavy-quark hybrid mesons and the Born-Oppenheimer approximation
Heavy-quark hybrid mesons and the Born-Oppenheimer approximation Colin Morningstar Carnegie Mellon University Quarkonium Workshop, Fermilab Sept 20, 2003 9/20/2003 Hybrid mesons (C. Morningstar) 1 Outline!
More informationPoS(LATTICE 2013)500. Charmonium, D s and D s from overlap fermion on domain wall fermion configurations
Charmonium, D s and D s from overlap fermion on domain wall fermion configurations,, Y. Chen, A. Alexandru, S.J. Dong, T. Draper, M. Gong,, F.X. Lee, A. Li, 4 K.F. Liu, Z. Liu, M. Lujan, and N. Mathur
More informationPoS(EPS-HEP2011)179. Lattice Flavour Physics
Rome University Tor Vergata" and INFN sez. Rome Tor Vergata" E-mail: nazario.tantalo@roma.infn.it I briefly discuss recent lattice calculations of a selected list of hadronic matrix elements that play
More informationarxiv: v1 [hep-lat] 30 Oct 2018
E-mail: genwang27@uky.edu arxiv:1810.12824v1 [hep-lat] 30 Oct 2018 Jian Liang E-mail: jian.liang@uky.edu Terrence Draper E-mail: draper@pa.uky.edu Keh-Fei Liu E-mail: liu@pa.uky.edu Yi-Bo Yang Institute
More informationFirst results from dynamical chirally improved fermions
First results from dynamical chirally improved fermions arxiv:hep-lat/595v1 1 Sep 25 C. B.Lang Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz, Austria E-mail: christian.lang@uni-graz.at Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz,
More informationarxiv:hep-ph/ v2 13 Feb 2004
lueball hunting in e + e f 0 Frank E. Close 1 and Qiang Zhao 2 1) Department of Theoretical Physics, University of Oxford, Keble Rd., Oxford, OX1 3NP, United Kingdom and 2) Department of Physics, University
More informationarxiv: v2 [hep-lat] 23 Dec 2008
arxiv:8.964v2 [hep-lat] 23 Dec 28, F. Farchioni, A. Ferling, G. Münster, J. Wuilloud University of Münster, Institute for Theoretical Physics Wilhelm-Klemm-Strasse 9, D-4849 Münster, Germany E-mail: k_demm@uni-muenster.de
More informationarxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 3 Nov 2014
Search for exotic charmonium states arxiv:1411.0720v1 [hep-ex] 3 Nov 2014 representing the BABAR and the Belle Collaborations. Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52428 Jülich, Germany E-mail: e.prencipe@fz-juelich.de
More informationarxiv: v1 [hep-ph] 2 Mar 2012
D s1 (27)± and D sj (286)± revisited within the 3 P model Ling Yuan, Bing Chen and Ailin Zhang Department of Physics, Shanghai University, Shanghai 2444, China arxiv:123.37v1 [hep-ph] 2 Mar 212 The strong
More informationarxiv: v1 [hep-lat] 4 Nov 2014
Meson Mass Decomposition,2, Ying Chen, Terrence Draper 2, Ming Gong,2, Keh-Fei Liu 2, Zhaofeng Liu, and Jian-Ping Ma 3,4 arxiv:4.927v [hep-lat] 4 Nov 24 (χqcd Collaboration) Institute of High Energy Physics,
More informationPoS(LATTICE 2013)393. K and D oscillations in the Standard Model and its. extensions from N f = Twisted Mass LQCD
K and D oscillations in the Standard Model and its extensions from N f = 2+1+1 Twisted Mass LQCD, V. Giménez Dep. de Física Teòrica and IFIC, Universitat de València-CSIC P. Dimopoulos Centro Fermi - Museo
More informationMass of Heavy Mesons from Lattice QCD
Mass of Heavy Mesons from Lattice QCD David Richards Jefferson Laboratory/Hadron Spectrum Collaboration Temple, March 2016 Outline Heavy Mesons Lattice QCD Spectroscopy Recipe Book Results and insight
More informationMass Components of Mesons from Lattice QCD
Mass Components of Mesons from Lattice QCD Ying Chen In collaborating with: Y.-B. Yang, M. Gong, K.-F. Liu, T. Draper, Z. Liu, J.-P. Ma, etc. Peking University, Nov. 28, 2013 Outline I. Motivation II.
More informationlattice QCD and the hadron spectrum Jozef Dudek ODU/JLab
lattice QCD and the hadron spectrum Jozef Dudek ODU/JLab the light meson spectrum relatively simple models of hadrons: bound states of constituent quarks and antiquarks the quark model empirical meson
More informationPROTON DECAY MATRIX ELEMENTS FROM LATTICE QCD. Yasumichi Aoki RIKEN BNL Research Center. 9/23/09 LBV09 at Madison
PROTON DECAY MATRIX ELEMENTS FROM LATTICE QCD Yasumichi Aoki RIKEN BNL Research Center 9/23/09 LBV09 at Madison Plan low energy matrix elements for N PS,l GUT QCD relation what is exactly needed to calculate
More informationStrange Charmed Baryons Spectroscopy
EPJ Web of Conferences 58, 03008 (07) QFTHEP 07 DOI: 0.05/epjconf/075803008 Strange Charmed Baryons Spectroscopy Elena Solovieva, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, 9 Institutskiy pereulok, Dolgoprudny,
More informationQuark Mass and Flavour Dependence of the QCD Phase Transition. F. Karsch, E. Laermann and A. Peikert ABSTRACT
BI-TP 2000/41 Quark Mass and Flavour Dependence of the QCD Phase Transition F. Karsch, E. Laermann and A. Peikert Fakultät für Physik, Universität Bielefeld, D-33615 Bielefeld, Germany ABSTRACT We analyze
More informationPion couplings to the scalar B meson. Antoine Gérardin
Antoine Gérardin 1 Pion couplings to the scalar B meson Pion couplings to the scalar B meson Antoine Gérardin In collaboration with B. Blossier and N. Garron Based on [arxiv:141.349] LPT Orsay January
More informationlattice QCD and the hadron spectrum Jozef Dudek ODU/JLab
lattice QCD and the hadron spectrum Jozef Dudek ODU/JLab a black box? QCD lattice QCD observables (scattering amplitudes?) in these lectures, hope to give you a look inside the box 2 these lectures how
More informationChiral and angular momentum content of rho and rho mesons from dynamical lattice calculations
Chiral and angular momentum content of rho and rho mesons from dynamical lattice calculations L. Ya. Glozman Institut für Physik, FB Theoretische Physik, Universität Graz With Christian Lang and Markus
More informationNon-Relativistic QCD for Heavy Quark Systems
Syracuse University SURFACE Physics College of Arts and Sciences 11-16-1992 Non-Relativistic QCD for Heavy Quark Systems Simon Catterall Syracuse University F. R. Devlin University of Cambridge I. T. Drummond
More informationP. C. Vinodkumar Department of Physics, Sardar Patel University, V. V. Nagar , INDIA
Radial and orbital in a Hypercentral Quark Model Department of Applied Physics, S. V. National Institute of Technology, Surat-395007, INDIA Department of Physics, Sardar Patel University, V. V. Nagar-3880,
More informationDecay constants of charm and beauty pseudoscalar heavy light mesons on fine lattices
Physics Letters B 652 (2007) 150 157 www.elsevier.com/locate/physletb Decay constants of charm and beauty pseudoscalar heavy light mesons on fine lattices QCDSF Collaboration A. Ali Khan a,,v.braun a,t.burch
More informationThe 1405 MeV Lambda Resonance in Full-QCD
, Waseem Kamleh, Derek B. Leinweber, and M. Selim Mahbub Special Research Centre for the Subatomic Structure of Matter School of Chemistry & Physics, University of Adelaide, SA, 5005, Australia E-mail:
More informationLattice QCD study of Radiative Transitions in Charmonium
Lattice QCD study of Radiative Transitions in Charmonium (with a little help from the quark model) Jo Dudek, Jefferson Lab with Robert Edwards & David Richards Charmonium spectrum & radiative transitions
More informationHopping Parameter Expansion for Heavy-Light Systems
Edinburgh Preprint: 92/509 February 1, 2008 Hopping Parameter Expansion for Heavy-Light Systems arxiv:hep-lat/9206009v1 4 Jun 1992 UKQCD Collaboration D.S. Henty and R.D. Kenway Department of Physics,
More informationAnalysis of the Isgur-Wise function of the Λ b Λ c transition with light-cone QCD sum rules
Analysis of the Isgur-Wise function of the Λ b Λ c transition with light-cone QCD sum rules Zhi-Gang Wang 1 Department of Physics, North China Electric Power University, Baoding 713, P. R. China arxiv:96.426v1
More informationQuark Model of Hadrons
Quark Model of Hadrons mesons baryons symmetric antisymmetric mixed symmetry Quark Model of Hadrons 2 Why do quarks have color? ground state baryons orbital wave function = symmetic with L=0 SU(3) f x
More informationRuben Sandapen (Acadia & Mt. A) in collaboration with M. Ahmady & F. Chishtie. September 5 th 2016
Holographic Distribution Amplitudes for mesons Ruben Sandapen (Acadia & Mt. A) in collaboration with M. Ahmady & F. Chishtie Diffraction 2016 Progress in QCD session September 5 th 2016 1 Outline Overview
More informationTetraquark interpretation of e + e ϒπ + π Belle data and e + e b b BaBar data
SLAC-PUB-15546 Tetraquark interpretation of e + e ϒπ + π Belle data and e + e b b BaBar data Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY, Notkestrasse 85, D-22607 Hamburg E-mail: ahmed.ali@desy.de We summarize
More informationBaryon Resonance Determination using LQCD. Robert Edwards Jefferson Lab. Baryons 2013
Baryon Resonance Determination using LQCD Robert Edwards Jefferson Lab Baryons 2013 Where are the Missing Baryon Resonances? What are collective modes? Is there freezing of degrees of freedom? What is
More informationarxiv: v1 [hep-lat] 23 Dec 2010
arxiv:2.568v [hep-lat] 23 Dec 2 C. Alexandrou Department of Physics, University of Cyprus, P.O. Box 2537, 678 Nicosia, Cyprus and Computation-based Science and Technology Research Center, Cyprus Institute,
More information(Towards) Baryon Resonances from Lattice QCD
(Towards) Baryon Resonances from Lattice QCD Daniel Mohler Fermilab Theory Group Batavia, IL, USA Paphos, October 2013 Daniel Mohler (Fermilab) Baryon Resonances from Lattice QCD Paphos, October 2013 1
More informationComputation of NRQCD Parameters in Potential Models
Computation of NRQCD Parameters in Potential Models Brandon Willard Department of Physics, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, 48202 August 2004 Abstract This paper gives details of computing the
More informationspectroscopy overview Jozef Dudek Old Dominion University & Jefferson Lab thanks for inviting a whinging pom
spectroscopy overview Jozef Dudek Old Dominion University & Jefferson Lab thanks for inviting a whinging pom spectroscopy? will touch only lightly on precision spectroscopy - masses of (QCD)-stable hadrons
More informationExotic and excited-state radiative transitions in charmonium from lattice QCD
Exotic and excited-state radiative transitions in charmonium from lattice QCD Christopher Thomas, Jefferson Lab Hadron Spectroscopy Workshop, INT, November 2009 In collaboration with: Jo Dudek, Robert
More informationA Lattice Study of the Glueball Spectrum
Commun. Theor. Phys. (Beijing, China) 35 (2001) pp. 288 292 c International Academic Publishers Vol. 35, No. 3, March 15, 2001 A Lattice Study of the Glueball Spectrum LIU Chuan Department of Physics,
More informationNucleon structure near the physical pion mass
Nucleon structure near the physical pion mass Jeremy Green Center for Theoretical Physics Massachusetts Institute of Technology January 4, 2013 Biographical information Undergraduate: 2003 2007, University
More informationarxiv: v1 [hep-lat] 24 Dec 2008
of hadrons from improved staggered quarks in full QCD arxiv:081.4486v1 [hep-lat] 4 Dec 008, a A. Bazavov, b C. Bernard, c C. DeTar, d W. Freeman, b Steven Gottlieb, a U.M. Heller, e J.E. Hetrick, f J.
More informationHigh Precision. Charm Physics. HISQ quarks
f % f K High Precision m Charm Physics $ with m N m Ds m D m D * HISQ quarks - m s D s m " - m #c "(1P-1S) 2m Bs,av -m! Christine m Davies Bc E. Follana, G. P. Lepage, R. Horgan, K. Hornbostel, C. McNeile,
More informationQuark tensor and axial charges within the Schwinger-Dyson formalism
Quark tensor and axial charges within the Schwinger-Dyson formalism, Takahiro M. Doi, Shotaro Imai, Hideo Suganuma Department of Physics, Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University, Kitashirakawa-oiwake,
More informationLattice QCD. QCD 2002, I. I. T. Kanpur, November 19, 2002 R. V. Gavai Top 1
Lattice QCD QCD 2002, I. I. T. Kanpur, November 19, 2002 R. V. Gavai Top 1 Lattice QCD : Some Topics QCD 2002, I. I. T. Kanpur, November 19, 2002 R. V. Gavai Top 1 Lattice QCD : Some Topics Basic Lattice
More informationTwo Loop Partially Quenched and Finite Volume Chiral Perturbation Theory Results
Two Loop Partially Quenched and Finite Volume Chiral Perturbation Theory Results E-mail: bijnens@thep.lu.se Niclas Danielsson and Division of Mathematical Physics, LTH, Lund University, Box 118, S 221
More informationPHYS 6610: Graduate Nuclear and Particle Physics I, Spring Institute for Nuclear Studies The George Washington University.
PHYS 6610: Graduate Nuclear and Particle Physics I H. W. Grießhammer INS Institute for Nuclear Studies The George Washington University Institute for Nuclear Studies Spring 2018 III. Descriptions 3. Lattice
More informationHadron structure from lattice QCD
Hadron structure from lattice QCD Giannis Koutsou Computation-based Science and Technology Research Centre () The Cyprus Institute EINN2015, 5th Nov. 2015, Pafos Outline Short introduction to lattice calculations
More informationCHARM MESON SPECTROSCOPY AT
CHARM MESON SPECTROSCOPY AT Amina ZGHICHE CNRS-IN2P3, LAPP Annecy On behalf of the BaBar Collaboration 1 A. Zghiche CHARM 2007 August 8 th 2007 2 A. Zghiche CHARM 2007 August 8 th 2007 BABAR B AND c-factory
More informationThe Gell-Mann Okubo Mass Relation among Baryons from Fully-Dynamical, Mixed-Action Lattice QCD
NT@UW-06-08 JLAB-xxxx UNH-06-02 The Gell-Mann Okubo Mass Relation among Baryons from Fully-Dynamical, Mixed-Action Lattice QCD Silas R. Beane, 1, 2 Kostas Orginos, 3, 2 and Martin J. Savage 4 (NPLQCD Collaboration)
More informationQuenched QCD with O a improvement: The spectrum of light hadrons
Quenched QCD with O a improvement: The spectrum of light hadrons K. C. Bowler, P. Boyle,* J. Garden, R. D. Kenway, D. G. Richards, P. A. Rowland, S. M. Ryan, and H. Simma Department of Physics & Astronomy,
More informationPoS(EPS-HEP2015)598. Strong decay of scalar B meson
Laboratoire de Physique Théorique, CNRS, Univ. Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, F-9145 Orsay Cedex, France E-mail: benoit.blossier@th.u-psud.fr The use of Heavy Meson Chiral Perturbation Theory is very
More informationΛ(1405) and Negative-Parity Baryons in Lattice QCD. Y.Nemoto (RIKEN-BNL) N.Nakajima (Kochi U.) H.Matsufuru (KEK) H.Suganuma (Tokyo Inst.Tech.
Λ(1405) and Negative-Parity Baryons in Lattice QCD Y.Nemoto (RIKEN-BNL) N.Nakajima (Kochi U.) H.Matsufuru (KEK) H.Suganuma (Tokyo Inst.Tech.) The Λ(1405) Particle Mass: ~1406.5 MeV Width: ~50 MeV I=0,
More informationHadron Structure from Lattice QCD
Hadron Structure from Lattice QCD Huey-Wen Lin University of Washington 1 Outline Lattice QCD Overview Nucleon Structure PDF, form factors, GPDs Hyperons Axial coupling constants, charge radii... Summary
More informationarxiv:hep-ph/ v2 29 Sep 1999
HIP 1999 04 / TH NORDITA 99/7 February 1, 2008 arxiv:hep-ph/9902249v2 29 Sep 1999 A variational fit to the lattice energy of two heavy-light mesons A.M. Green a,c, J. Koponen a,d, and P. Pennanen b,e a
More informationHybrid Quarkonia with Dynamical Sea Quarks
Hybrid Quarkonia with Dynamical Sea Quarks CP-PACS Collaboration 1 T. Manke, 1 A. Ali Khan, 2 S. Aoki, 1,2 R. Burkhalter, 1 S. Ejiri, 3 M. Fukugita, 4 S. Hashimoto, 1,2 N. Ishizuka, 1,2 Y. Iwasaki, 1,2
More informationΛ QCD and Light Quarks Contents Symmetries of the QCD Lagrangian Chiral Symmetry and Its Breaking Parity and Handedness Parity Doubling Explicit Chira
Lecture 5 QCD Symmetries & Their Breaking From Quarks to Hadrons Adnan Bashir, IFM, UMSNH, Mexico August 2013 Hermosillo Sonora Λ QCD and Light Quarks Contents Symmetries of the QCD Lagrangian Chiral Symmetry
More informationarxiv: v2 [hep-ph] 27 Jul 2012
Prepared for submission to JHEP TCDMATH 12-04 JLAB-THY-12-1510 Excited and exotic charmonium spectroscopy from lattice QCD arxiv:1204.5425v2 [hep-ph] 27 Jul 2012 Liuming Liu a,1 Graham Moir a Michael Peardon
More informationPrecise determination of the lattice spacing in full lattice QCD
Precise determination of the lattice spacing in full lattice QCD None of these quantities can be computed as accurately as r 1 /a in simulations, but we can combine simulation rearxiv:0910.1229v1 [hep-lat]
More informationarxiv:hep-ph/ v1 5 Sep 2006
Masses of the η c (ns) and η b (ns) mesons arxiv:hep-ph/0609044v1 5 Sep 2006 A.M.Badalian 1, B.L.G.Bakker 2 1 Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow, Russia 2 Department of Physics and
More informationarxiv:hep-lat/ v1 5 Oct 2006
arxiv:hep-lat/6141v1 5 Oct 26 Singlet Free Energies and the Renormalized Polyakov Loop in full QCD for RBC-Bielefeld collaboration Niels Bohr Institute E-mail: kpetrov@nbi.dk We calculate the free energy
More informationA Dyson-Schwinger equation study of the baryon-photon interaction.
A Dyson-Schwinger equation study of the baryon-photon interaction. Diana Nicmorus in collaboration with G. Eichmann A. Krassnigg R. Alkofer Jefferson Laboratory, March 24, 2010 What is the nucleon made
More informationUniversality check of the overlap fermions in the Schrödinger functional
Universality check of the overlap fermions in the Schrödinger functional Humboldt Universitaet zu Berlin Newtonstr. 15, 12489 Berlin, Germany. E-mail: takeda@physik.hu-berlin.de HU-EP-8/29 SFB/CPP-8-57
More informationLow-energy QCD II Status of Lattice Calculations
Low-energy QCD II Status of Lattice Calculations Hartmut Wittig Institute for Nuclear Physics and Helmholtz Institute Mainz Determination of the Fundamental Parameters of QCD Nanyang Technical University
More informationWeak interactions. Chapter 7
Chapter 7 Weak interactions As already discussed, weak interactions are responsible for many processes which involve the transformation of particles from one type to another. Weak interactions cause nuclear
More informationCornelius Bennhold George Washington University
Cornelius Bennhold George Washington University The past 7 years Low-lying baryon resonances Missing and exotic (hybrid) resonances How many N* do we need? How many do we have? Resonance form factors The
More informationParticle Physics. Lecture 11: Mesons and Baryons
Particle Physics Lecture 11: Mesons and Baryons Measuring Jets Fragmentation Mesons and Baryons Isospin and hypercharge SU(3) flavour symmetry Heavy Quark states 1 From Tuesday: Summary In QCD, the coupling
More information