Lecture 15: H Control Synthesis
|
|
- Benedict Gallagher
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 c A. Shiriaev/L. Freidovich. March 12, Optimal Control for Linear Systems: Lecture 15 p. 1/14 Lecture 15: H Control Synthesis Example
2 c A. Shiriaev/L. Freidovich. March 12, Optimal Control for Linear Systems: Lecture 15 p. 1/14 Lecture 15: H Control Synthesis Example Sub-optimal H Controllers
3 c A. Shiriaev/L. Freidovich. March 12, Optimal Control for Linear Systems: Lecture 15 p. 2/14 Example Consider a control system ẋ = x + w, y = 2x w, z = x u
4 c A. Shiriaev/L. Freidovich. March 12, Optimal Control for Linear Systems: Lecture 15 p. 2/14 Example Consider a control system ẋ = x + w, y = 2x w, z = x u Find a controller that minimizes its H -norm from w to z, i.e. Find a set of internally stabilizing controllers u = K(s)y Determine the one that ensures the inequality + 0 z(t) 2 dt γ w(t) 2 dt, w L 2 (R + ) with minimal possible constant γ > 0.
5 c A. Shiriaev/L. Freidovich. March 12, Optimal Control for Linear Systems: Lecture 15 p. 3/14 Solution: The system is evolving in open loop; so, the controller is stabilizing if it is stable!
6 c A. Shiriaev/L. Freidovich. March 12, Optimal Control for Linear Systems: Lecture 15 p. 3/14 Solution: The system is evolving in open loop; so, the controller is stabilizing if it is stable! The transfer function from w to z is defined by [ 1 z = T w z (s) w = s + 1 K(s)1 s ] 1 + s w
7 c A. Shiriaev/L. Freidovich. March 12, Optimal Control for Linear Systems: Lecture 15 p. 3/14 Solution: The system is evolving in open loop; so, the controller is stabilizing if it is stable! The transfer function from w to z is defined by [ 1 z = T w z (s) w = s + 1 K(s)1 s ] 1 + s w The inequality that defines γ z(t) 2 dt γ 2 0 can be rewritten as follows with w(jω) = w(t) 2 dt, w L 2 (R + ) + 0 e jωt w(t)dt 1 2π + T w z (jω) w(jω) 2 dω γ 2 + 2π 1 w(jω) 2 dω
8 c A. Shiriaev/L. Freidovich. March 12, Optimal Control for Linear Systems: Lecture 15 p. 3/14 Solution: The system is evolving in open loop; so, the controller is stabilizing if it is stable! The transfer function from w to z is defined by [ 1 z = T w z (s) w = s + 1 K(s)1 s ] 1 + s w The inequality that defines γ z(t) 2 dt γ 2 0 becomes the condition γ = sup ω R T w z (jω) = sup s:res 0 w(t) 2 dt, w L 2 (R + ) 1 s + 1 K(s)1 s 1 + s
9 c A. Shiriaev/L. Freidovich. March 12, Optimal Control for Linear Systems: Lecture 15 p. 3/14 Solution: The system is evolving in open loop; so, the controller is stabilizing if it is stable! The transfer function from w to z is defined by [ 1 z = T w z (s) w = s + 1 K(s)1 s ] 1 + s w The inequality that defines γ z(t) 2 dt γ 2 0 w(t) 2 dt, w L 2 (R + ) becomes the condition γ = sup 1 s:res 0 s + 1 K(s)1 s 1 + s... s=1 = 1 2
10 c A. Shiriaev/L. Freidovich. March 12, Optimal Control for Linear Systems: Lecture 15 p. 4/14 Example Consider a control system ẋ = x + w, y = 2x w, z = x u We have found that the H norm of the system is not less than 1 2 ; It is easy to see that one of optimal controllers is K(s) = 1 2 ; The corresponding transfer function T w z (s) is equal to 1 2, that is all-pass
11 c A. Shiriaev/L. Freidovich. March 12, Optimal Control for Linear Systems: Lecture 15 p. 4/14 Example Consider a control system ẋ = x + w, y = 2x w, z = x u We have found that the H norm of the system is not less than 1 2 ; It is easy to see that one of optimal controllers is K(s) = 1 2 ; The corresponding transfer function T w z (s) is equal to 1 2, that is all-pass This property makes this optimal controller less attractive, and motivates the search of a sub-optimal feedback.
12 c A. Shiriaev/L. Freidovich. March 12, Optimal Control for Linear Systems: Lecture 15 p. 5/14 Important Statement The following two statements are equivalent:
13 c A. Shiriaev/L. Freidovich. March 12, Optimal Control for Linear Systems: Lecture 15 p. 5/14 Important Statement The following two statements are equivalent: The matrix A is Hurwitz matrix, and has H -norm less than γ G(s) = D + C ( si n A ) 1 B
14 c A. Shiriaev/L. Freidovich. March 12, Optimal Control for Linear Systems: Lecture 15 p. 5/14 Important Statement The following two statements are equivalent: The matrix A is Hurwitz matrix, and has H -norm less than γ G(s) = D + C ( si n A ) 1 B There exists P = P T > 0 such that the quadratic form σ P (x,w) = γ 2 w 2 Cx + Dw 2 2xT P ( Ax + Bw ) is strictly positive definite
15 c A. Shiriaev/L. Freidovich. March 12, Optimal Control for Linear Systems: Lecture 15 p. 6/14 Simplified Sub-Optimal Control Design Consider a control system [ ] [ d dt x = Ax + B (1) 1, w 1 B(2) 1 z = C(1) 1 C (2) 1 y = C 2 x + [ x + D(1) 12 D (2) 12 D (1) 21, D(2) 21 w 2 u ] ] [ w 1 w 2 + B 2 u ]
16 c A. Shiriaev/L. Freidovich. March 12, Optimal Control for Linear Systems: Lecture 15 p. 6/14 Simplified Sub-Optimal Control Design Consider a control system [ ] [ d dt x = Ax + B (1) 1, 0 w 1 z = C(1) 1 0 y = C 2 x + [ x + 0, I 0 I w 2 u ] [ w 1 w 2 ] ] + B 2 u
17 c A. Shiriaev/L. Freidovich. March 12, Optimal Control for Linear Systems: Lecture 15 p. 6/14 Simplified Sub-Optimal Control Design Consider a control system d dt x = Ax + B 1w 1 + B 2 u z = C 1 x + 0 u 0 I y = C 2 x + w 2
18 c A. Shiriaev/L. Freidovich. March 12, Optimal Control for Linear Systems: Lecture 15 p. 6/14 Simplified Sub-Optimal Control Design Consider a control system d dt x = Ax + B 1w 1 + B 2 u z = C 1 x + 0 u 0 I y = C 2 x + w 2 The problem is to design a controller d dt x c = A c x c + B c y, u = C c x c + D c y, such that the closed-loop system is internally stable and Tw z (s) γ
19 c A. Shiriaev/L. Freidovich. March 12, Optimal Control for Linear Systems: Lecture 15 p. 7/14 Solution: Combining the plant and the controller, we obtain the closed-loop system d dt [ x x c ] = z = [ ] (A + B 2 D c C 2 ) B 2 C c } B c C 2 {{ A c } = A cl C [ ] 1 0 x + D c C 2 C c x c } {{ } = C cl [ x x c ] D c }{{} D cl + [ ] B 1 B 2 D c 0 B c }{{} = B cl [ ] w 1 w 2 [ ] w 1 w 2
20 c A. Shiriaev/L. Freidovich. March 12, Optimal Control for Linear Systems: Lecture 15 p. 7/14 Solution: Combining the plant and the controller, we obtain the closed-loop system d dt [ x x c ] = z = [ ] (A + B 2 D c C 2 ) B 2 C c } B c C 2 {{ A c } = A cl C [ ] 1 0 x + D c C 2 C c x c } {{ } = C cl [ x x c ] D c }{{} D cl + [ ] B 1 B 2 D c 0 B c }{{} = B cl [ ] w 1 w 2 [ ] w 1 w 2 The transfer function from w to z is then T w z (s) = D cl + C cl ( si Acl ) 1Bcl
21 c A. Shiriaev/L. Freidovich. March 12, Optimal Control for Linear Systems: Lecture 15 p. 8/14 Important Statement The following two statements are equivalent:
22 c A. Shiriaev/L. Freidovich. March 12, Optimal Control for Linear Systems: Lecture 15 p. 8/14 Important Statement The following two statements are equivalent: The matrix A is Hurwitz matrix, and has H -norm less than γ G(s) = D + C ( si n A ) 1 B
23 c A. Shiriaev/L. Freidovich. March 12, Optimal Control for Linear Systems: Lecture 15 p. 8/14 Important Statement The following two statements are equivalent: The matrix A is Hurwitz matrix, and has H -norm less than γ G(s) = D + C ( si n A ) 1 B There exists P = P T > 0 such that the quadratic form σ P (x,w) = γ 2 w 2 Cx + Dw 2 2xT P ( Ax + Bw ) is strictly positive definite
24 c A. Shiriaev/L. Freidovich. March 12, Optimal Control for Linear Systems: Lecture 15 p. 9/14 Solution: For our case G(s) = D cl + C cl ( si Acl ) 1Bcl and the condition σ P ( ) > 0 is σ P ([x T,x T c ],[wt 1,wT 2 ]) = γ2 w 2 Ccl X + D cl w 2 2X T P ( A cl X + B cl w )
25 c A. Shiriaev/L. Freidovich. March 12, Optimal Control for Linear Systems: Lecture 15 p. 9/14 Solution: For our case G(s) = D cl + C cl ( si Acl ) 1Bcl and the condition σ P ( ) > 0 is σ P ([x T,x T c ],[wt 1,wT 2 ]) = γ2 w 2 Ccl X + D cl w 2 2X T P ( A cl X + B cl w ) ( w1 = γ 2 2 ) + w2 2 C1 ( x 2 + ) u 2 [ ][ ][ ] x P 11 P 12 Ax + B 1 w 1 + B 2 u 2 P12 T P 22 A c x c + B c y x c > 0, w 1, w 2, x, x c 0
26 c A. Shiriaev/L. Freidovich. March 12, Optimal Control for Linear Systems: Lecture 15 p. 10/14 Solution: It turns out that the condition σ P ( ) > 0 is valid if: There is X > 0 such that C T 1 C 1 + XA + A T X = X ( B 2 B2 T 1 ) γ 2B 1B1 T X
27 c A. Shiriaev/L. Freidovich. March 12, Optimal Control for Linear Systems: Lecture 15 p. 10/14 Solution: It turns out that the condition σ P ( ) > 0 is valid if: There is X > 0 such that C T 1 C 1 + XA + A T X = X ( B 2 B2 T 1 ) γ 2B 1B1 T X There is Y > 0 such that B T 1 B 1 + Y A T + AY = Y ( C 2 C2 T 1 ) γ 2C 1C1 T Y
28 c A. Shiriaev/L. Freidovich. March 12, Optimal Control for Linear Systems: Lecture 15 p. 10/14 Solution: It turns out that the condition σ P ( ) > 0 is valid if: There is X > 0 such that C T 1 C 1 + XA + A T X = X ( B 2 B2 T 1 ) γ 2B 1B1 T X There is Y > 0 such that B T 1 B 1 + Y A T + AY = Y ( C 2 C2 T 1 ) γ 2C 1C1 T Y γ 2 Y 1 > X
29 c A. Shiriaev/L. Freidovich. March 12, Optimal Control for Linear Systems: Lecture 15 p. 11/14 Solution: One of suboptimal controllers is then u = B T 2 Xˆx d dtˆx = Aˆx + B 1ŵ 1 + B 2 u + L 1 (C 2ˆx y) ŵ 1 = 1 γ 2BT 1 Xˆx where L 1 = ( I 1 γ 2Y X ) 1 Y C T 2
30 c A. Shiriaev/L. Freidovich. March 12, Optimal Control for Linear Systems: Lecture 15 p. 12/14 Modified Problem 13.2 Consider a one degree of freedom control loop with the plant P(s) = s 10 ( s + 10 ) (s + 1), and weighting transfer functions W e (s) = 1 s , W u(s) = s + 2 s + 10
31 c A. Shiriaev/L. Freidovich. March 12, Optimal Control for Linear Systems: Lecture 15 p. 12/14 Modified Problem 13.2 Consider a one degree of freedom control loop with the plant P(s) = s 10 ( s + 10 ) (s + 1), and weighting transfer functions W e (s) = 1 s , W u(s) = s + 2 s + 10 Design a controller K(s) that minimizes W e ( )S( ), S(s) = W u ( )K( )S( ) P(s)K(s) Simulate a step response of the closed-loop system
32 c A. Shiriaev/L. Freidovich. March 12, Optimal Control for Linear Systems: Lecture 15 p. 13/14 Solution of Modified Problem 13.2 Last lecture we have rewritten the problem for H 2 -minimization in the standard form: [ ] [ ] [ ] w z w ẋ = Ax + B, = C x + D u y u defining the generalized plant with G(s) = C (si A) 1 B + D, dimy = 1, dimu = 1
33 c A. Shiriaev/L. Freidovich. March 12, Optimal Control for Linear Systems: Lecture 15 p. 13/14 Solution of Modified Problem 13.2 Last lecture we have rewritten the problem for H 2 -minimization in the standard form: [ ] [ ] [ ] w z w ẋ = Ax + B, = C x + D u y u defining the generalized plant with G(s) = C (si A) 1 B + D, dimy = 1, dimu = 1 H 2 optimal regulator can be obtained in Matlab using: h2syn(g,1,1)
34 c A. Shiriaev/L. Freidovich. March 12, Optimal Control for Linear Systems: Lecture 15 p. 13/14 Solution of Modified Problem 13.2 Last lecture we have rewritten the problem for H 2 -minimization in the standard form: [ ] [ ] [ ] w z w ẋ = Ax + B, = C x + D u y u defining the generalized plant with G(s) = C (si A) 1 B + D, dimy = 1, dimu = 1 H 2 optimal regulator can be obtained in Matlab using: h2syn(g,1,1) H optimal regulator can be obtained in Matlab using: hinfsyn(g,1,1)
35 c A. Shiriaev/L. Freidovich. March 12, Optimal Control for Linear Systems: Lecture 15 p. 14/14 Final Week Presentations of the final projects: and March 16, 10:15-12:00, in A206 March 17, 10:15-12:00, in A205 Final exam: March 19, 13:00-16:00, in A206
Linear Quadratic Gausssian Control Design with Loop Transfer Recovery
Linear Quadratic Gausssian Control Design with Loop Transfer Recovery Leonid Freidovich Department of Mathematics Michigan State University MI 48824, USA e-mail:leonid@math.msu.edu http://www.math.msu.edu/
More informationProblem Set 4 Solution 1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science 6.245: MULTIVARIABLE CONTROL SYSTEMS by A. Megretski Problem Set 4 Solution Problem 4. For the SISO feedback
More informationH 2 Optimal State Feedback Control Synthesis. Raktim Bhattacharya Aerospace Engineering, Texas A&M University
H 2 Optimal State Feedback Control Synthesis Raktim Bhattacharya Aerospace Engineering, Texas A&M University Motivation Motivation w(t) u(t) G K y(t) z(t) w(t) are exogenous signals reference, process
More informationLinear Matrix Inequality (LMI)
Linear Matrix Inequality (LMI) A linear matrix inequality is an expression of the form where F (x) F 0 + x 1 F 1 + + x m F m > 0 (1) x = (x 1,, x m ) R m, F 0,, F m are real symmetric matrices, and the
More informationRiccati Equations and Inequalities in Robust Control
Riccati Equations and Inequalities in Robust Control Lianhao Yin Gabriel Ingesson Martin Karlsson Optimal Control LP4 2014 June 10, 2014 Lianhao Yin Gabriel Ingesson Martin Karlsson (LTH) H control problem
More informationProblem Set 2 Solutions 1
Massachusetts Institute of echnology Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science 6.45: MULIVARIABLE CONROL SYSEMS by A. Megretski Problem Set Solutions Problem. For each of the statements
More informationProblem Set 5 Solutions 1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science 6.245: MULTIVARIABLE CONTROL SYSTEMS by A. Megretski Problem Set 5 Solutions The problem set deals with Hankel
More informationMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science : MULTIVARIABLE CONTROL SYSTEMS by A.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science 6.245: MULTIVARIABLE CONTROL SYSTEMS by A. Megretski Q-Parameterization 1 This lecture introduces the so-called
More informationDenis ARZELIER arzelier
COURSE ON LMI OPTIMIZATION WITH APPLICATIONS IN CONTROL PART II.2 LMIs IN SYSTEMS CONTROL STATE-SPACE METHODS PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS and SYNTHESIS Denis ARZELIER www.laas.fr/ arzelier arzelier@laas.fr 15
More informationModern Optimal Control
Modern Optimal Control Matthew M. Peet Arizona State University Lecture 22: H 2, LQG and LGR Conclusion To solve the H -optimal state-feedback problem, we solve min γ such that γ,x 1,Y 1,A n,b n,c n,d
More informationLecture 8. Applications
Lecture 8. Applications Ivan Papusha CDS270 2: Mathematical Methods in Control and System Engineering May 8, 205 / 3 Logistics hw7 due this Wed, May 20 do an easy problem or CYOA hw8 (design problem) will
More informationLecture 10: Linear Matrix Inequalities Dr.-Ing. Sudchai Boonto
Dr-Ing Sudchai Boonto Department of Control System and Instrumentation Engineering King Mongkuts Unniversity of Technology Thonburi Thailand Linear Matrix Inequalities A linear matrix inequality (LMI)
More informationEE C128 / ME C134 Fall 2014 HW 9 Solutions. HW 9 Solutions. 10(s + 3) s(s + 2)(s + 5) G(s) =
1. Pole Placement Given the following open-loop plant, HW 9 Solutions G(s) = 1(s + 3) s(s + 2)(s + 5) design the state-variable feedback controller u = Kx + r, where K = [k 1 k 2 k 3 ] is the feedback
More informationThe norms can also be characterized in terms of Riccati inequalities.
9 Analysis of stability and H norms Consider the causal, linear, time-invariant system ẋ(t = Ax(t + Bu(t y(t = Cx(t Denote the transfer function G(s := C (si A 1 B. Theorem 85 The following statements
More information1. Find the solution of the following uncontrolled linear system. 2 α 1 1
Appendix B Revision Problems 1. Find the solution of the following uncontrolled linear system 0 1 1 ẋ = x, x(0) =. 2 3 1 Class test, August 1998 2. Given the linear system described by 2 α 1 1 ẋ = x +
More informationTopic # Feedback Control. State-Space Systems Closed-loop control using estimators and regulators. Dynamics output feedback
Topic #17 16.31 Feedback Control State-Space Systems Closed-loop control using estimators and regulators. Dynamics output feedback Back to reality Copyright 21 by Jonathan How. All Rights reserved 1 Fall
More informationCDS Solutions to the Midterm Exam
CDS 22 - Solutions to the Midterm Exam Instructor: Danielle C. Tarraf November 6, 27 Problem (a) Recall that the H norm of a transfer function is time-delay invariant. Hence: ( ) Ĝ(s) = s + a = sup /2
More informationECEN 605 LINEAR SYSTEMS. Lecture 20 Characteristics of Feedback Control Systems II Feedback and Stability 1/27
1/27 ECEN 605 LINEAR SYSTEMS Lecture 20 Characteristics of Feedback Control Systems II Feedback and Stability Feedback System Consider the feedback system u + G ol (s) y Figure 1: A unity feedback system
More information6.241 Dynamic Systems and Control
6.241 Dynamic Systems and Control Lecture 24: H2 Synthesis Emilio Frazzoli Aeronautics and Astronautics Massachusetts Institute of Technology May 4, 2011 E. Frazzoli (MIT) Lecture 24: H 2 Synthesis May
More informationControllability, Observability, Full State Feedback, Observer Based Control
Multivariable Control Lecture 4 Controllability, Observability, Full State Feedback, Observer Based Control John T. Wen September 13, 24 Ref: 3.2-3.4 of Text Controllability ẋ = Ax + Bu; x() = x. At time
More informationLecture 8. Chapter 5: Input-Output Stability Chapter 6: Passivity Chapter 14: Passivity-Based Control. Eugenio Schuster.
Lecture 8 Chapter 5: Input-Output Stability Chapter 6: Passivity Chapter 14: Passivity-Based Control Eugenio Schuster schuster@lehigh.edu Mechanical Engineering and Mechanics Lehigh University Lecture
More information6.241 Dynamic Systems and Control
6.41 Dynamic Systems and Control Lecture 5: H Synthesis Emilio Frazzoli Aeronautics and Astronautics Massachusetts Institute of Technology May 11, 011 E. Frazzoli (MIT) Lecture 5: H Synthesis May 11, 011
More informationModern Optimal Control
Modern Optimal Control Matthew M. Peet Arizona State University Lecture 21: Optimal Output Feedback Control connection is called the (lower) star-product of P and Optimal Output Feedback ansformation (LFT).
More informationChapter 3. LQ, LQG and Control System Design. Dutch Institute of Systems and Control
Chapter 3 LQ, LQG and Control System H 2 Design Overview LQ optimization state feedback LQG optimization output feedback H 2 optimization non-stochastic version of LQG Application to feedback system design
More informationHigh-Gain Observers in Nonlinear Feedback Control
High-Gain Observers in Nonlinear Feedback Control Lecture # 1 Introduction & Stabilization High-Gain ObserversinNonlinear Feedback ControlLecture # 1Introduction & Stabilization p. 1/4 Brief History Linear
More informationTRACKING AND DISTURBANCE REJECTION
TRACKING AND DISTURBANCE REJECTION Sadegh Bolouki Lecture slides for ECE 515 University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Fall 2016 S. Bolouki (UIUC) 1 / 13 General objective: The output to track a reference
More informationLMI Methods in Optimal and Robust Control
LMI Methods in Optimal and Robust Control Matthew M. Peet Arizona State University Lecture 14: LMIs for Robust Control in the LF Framework ypes of Uncertainty In this Lecture, we will cover Unstructured,
More informationPOLE PLACEMENT. Sadegh Bolouki. Lecture slides for ECE 515. University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. Fall S. Bolouki (UIUC) 1 / 19
POLE PLACEMENT Sadegh Bolouki Lecture slides for ECE 515 University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Fall 2016 S. Bolouki (UIUC) 1 / 19 Outline 1 State Feedback 2 Observer 3 Observer Feedback 4 Reduced Order
More informationDesign Methods for Control Systems
Design Methods for Control Systems Maarten Steinbuch TU/e Gjerrit Meinsma UT Dutch Institute of Systems and Control Winter term 2002-2003 Schedule November 25 MSt December 2 MSt Homework # 1 December 9
More informationLecture 7 (Weeks 13-14)
Lecture 7 (Weeks 13-14) Introduction to Multivariable Control (SP - Chapters 3 & 4) Eugenio Schuster schuster@lehigh.edu Mechanical Engineering and Mechanics Lehigh University Lecture 7 (Weeks 13-14) p.
More informationLecture 7 : Generalized Plant and LFT form Dr.-Ing. Sudchai Boonto Assistant Professor
Dr.-Ing. Sudchai Boonto Assistant Professor Department of Control System and Instrumentation Engineering King Mongkuts Unniversity of Technology Thonburi Thailand Linear Quadratic Gaussian The state space
More informationRobust Multivariable Control
Lecture 2 Anders Helmersson anders.helmersson@liu.se ISY/Reglerteknik Linköpings universitet Today s topics Today s topics Norms Today s topics Norms Representation of dynamic systems Today s topics Norms
More informationChapter 5. Standard LTI Feedback Optimization Setup. 5.1 The Canonical Setup
Chapter 5 Standard LTI Feedback Optimization Setup Efficient LTI feedback optimization algorithms comprise a major component of modern feedback design approach: application problems involving complex models
More informationModeling and Analysis of Dynamic Systems
Modeling and Analysis of Dynamic Systems Dr. Guillaume Ducard Fall 2017 Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control ETH Zurich, Switzerland G. Ducard c 1 / 57 Outline 1 Lecture 13: Linear System - Stability
More informationControl Systems Design
ELEC4410 Control Systems Design Lecture 18: State Feedback Tracking and State Estimation Julio H. Braslavsky julio@ee.newcastle.edu.au School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Lecture 18:
More informationTopic # Feedback Control Systems
Topic #20 16.31 Feedback Control Systems Closed-loop system analysis Bounded Gain Theorem Robust Stability Fall 2007 16.31 20 1 SISO Performance Objectives Basic setup: d i d o r u y G c (s) G(s) n control
More informationStationary trajectories, singular Hamiltonian systems and ill-posed Interconnection
Stationary trajectories, singular Hamiltonian systems and ill-posed Interconnection S.C. Jugade, Debasattam Pal, Rachel K. Kalaimani and Madhu N. Belur Department of Electrical Engineering Indian Institute
More informationMTNS 06, Kyoto (July, 2006) Shinji Hara The University of Tokyo, Japan
MTNS 06, Kyoto (July, 2006) Shinji Hara The University of Tokyo, Japan Outline Motivation & Background: H2 Tracking Performance Limits: new paradigm Explicit analytical solutions with examples H2 Regulation
More information6.241 Dynamic Systems and Control
6.241 Dynamic Systems and Control Lecture 12: I/O Stability Readings: DDV, Chapters 15, 16 Emilio Frazzoli Aeronautics and Astronautics Massachusetts Institute of Technology March 14, 2011 E. Frazzoli
More information6.245: MULTIVARIABLE CONTROL SYSTEMS by A. Megretski. Solutions to Problem Set 1 1. Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science 6.245: MULTIVARIABLE CONTROL SYSTEMS by A. Megretski Solutions to Problem Set 1 1 Problem 1.1T Consider the
More information5. Observer-based Controller Design
EE635 - Control System Theory 5. Observer-based Controller Design Jitkomut Songsiri state feedback pole-placement design regulation and tracking state observer feedback observer design LQR and LQG 5-1
More informationStatic Output Feedback Stabilisation with H Performance for a Class of Plants
Static Output Feedback Stabilisation with H Performance for a Class of Plants E. Prempain and I. Postlethwaite Control and Instrumentation Research, Department of Engineering, University of Leicester,
More informationGrammians. Matthew M. Peet. Lecture 20: Grammians. Illinois Institute of Technology
Grammians Matthew M. Peet Illinois Institute of Technology Lecture 2: Grammians Lyapunov Equations Proposition 1. Suppose A is Hurwitz and Q is a square matrix. Then X = e AT s Qe As ds is the unique solution
More informationModern Optimal Control
Modern Optimal Control Matthew M. Peet Arizona State University Lecture 19: Stabilization via LMIs Optimization Optimization can be posed in functional form: min x F objective function : inequality constraints
More informationÜbersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam!
Prüfung Regelungstechnik I (Control Systems I) Prof. Dr. Lino Guzzella 3.. 24 Übersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam! Do not mark up this translation aid -
More informationControl System Design
ELEC ENG 4CL4: Control System Design Notes for Lecture #22 Dr. Ian C. Bruce Room: CRL-229 Phone ext.: 26984 Email: ibruce@mail.ece.mcmaster.ca Friday, March 5, 24 More General Effects of Open Loop Poles
More informationEE363 homework 2 solutions
EE363 Prof. S. Boyd EE363 homework 2 solutions. Derivative of matrix inverse. Suppose that X : R R n n, and that X(t is invertible. Show that ( d d dt X(t = X(t dt X(t X(t. Hint: differentiate X(tX(t =
More informationEE C128 / ME C134 Final Exam Fall 2014
EE C128 / ME C134 Final Exam Fall 2014 December 19, 2014 Your PRINTED FULL NAME Your STUDENT ID NUMBER Number of additional sheets 1. No computers, no tablets, no connected device (phone etc.) 2. Pocket
More informationTopic # Feedback Control
Topic #5 6.3 Feedback Control State-Space Systems Full-state Feedback Control How do we change the poles of the state-space system? Or,evenifwecanchangethepolelocations. Where do we put the poles? Linear
More informationTopic # Feedback Control Systems
Topic #17 16.31 Feedback Control Systems Deterministic LQR Optimal control and the Riccati equation Weight Selection Fall 2007 16.31 17 1 Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) Have seen the solutions to the
More informationMAE 143B - Homework 8 Solutions
MAE 43B - Homework 8 Solutions P6.4 b) With this system, the root locus simply starts at the pole and ends at the zero. Sketches by hand and matlab are in Figure. In matlab, use zpk to build the system
More informationLinear Quadratic Zero-Sum Two-Person Differential Games Pierre Bernhard June 15, 2013
Linear Quadratic Zero-Sum Two-Person Differential Games Pierre Bernhard June 15, 2013 Abstract As in optimal control theory, linear quadratic (LQ) differential games (DG) can be solved, even in high dimension,
More informationSTRUCTURE MATTERS: Some Notes on High Gain Observer Design for Nonlinear Systems. Int. Conf. on Systems, Analysis and Automatic Control 2012
Faculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering Institute of Control Theory STRUCTURE MATTERS: Some Notes on High Gain Observer Design for Nonlinear Systems Klaus Röbenack Int. Conf. on Systems, Analysis
More informationOutput Stabilization of Time-Varying Input Delay System using Interval Observer Technique
Output Stabilization of Time-Varying Input Delay System using Interval Observer Technique Andrey Polyakov a, Denis Efimov a, Wilfrid Perruquetti a,b and Jean-Pierre Richard a,b a - NON-A, INRIA Lille Nord-Europe
More informationME 233, UC Berkeley, Spring Background Parseval s Theorem Frequency-shaped LQ cost function Transformation to a standard LQ
ME 233, UC Berkeley, Spring 214 Xu Chen Lecture 1: LQ with Frequency Shaped Cost Function FSLQ Background Parseval s Theorem Frequency-shaped LQ cost function Transformation to a standard LQ Big picture
More informationMultivariable Control. Lecture 03. Description of Linear Time Invariant Systems. John T. Wen. September 7, 2006
Multivariable Control Lecture 3 Description of Linear Time Invariant Systems John T. Wen September 7, 26 Outline Mathematical description of LTI Systems Ref: 3.1-3.4 of text September 7, 26Copyrighted
More informationZeros and zero dynamics
CHAPTER 4 Zeros and zero dynamics 41 Zero dynamics for SISO systems Consider a linear system defined by a strictly proper scalar transfer function that does not have any common zero and pole: g(s) =α p(s)
More informationLMIs for Observability and Observer Design
LMIs for Observability and Observer Design Matthew M. Peet Arizona State University Lecture 06: LMIs for Observability and Observer Design Observability Consider a system with no input: ẋ(t) = Ax(t), x(0)
More information2006 Fall. G(s) y = Cx + Du
1 Class Handout: Chapter 7 Frequency Domain Analysis of Feedback Systems 2006 Fall Frequency domain analysis of a dynamic system is very useful because it provides much physical insight, has graphical
More informationNonlinear Control. Nonlinear Control Lecture # 18 Stability of Feedback Systems
Nonlinear Control Lecture # 18 Stability of Feedback Systems Absolute Stability + r = 0 u y G(s) ψ( ) Definition 7.1 The system is absolutely stable if the origin is globally uniformly asymptotically stable
More informationLinear State Feedback Controller Design
Assignment For EE5101 - Linear Systems Sem I AY2010/2011 Linear State Feedback Controller Design Phang Swee King A0033585A Email: king@nus.edu.sg NGS/ECE Dept. Faculty of Engineering National University
More informationL2 gains and system approximation quality 1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science 6.242, Fall 24: MODEL REDUCTION L2 gains and system approximation quality 1 This lecture discusses the utility
More informationStability of Parameter Adaptation Algorithms. Big picture
ME5895, UConn, Fall 215 Prof. Xu Chen Big picture For ˆθ (k + 1) = ˆθ (k) + [correction term] we haven t talked about whether ˆθ(k) will converge to the true value θ if k. We haven t even talked about
More informationAnalysis of systems containing nonlinear and uncertain components by using Integral Quadratic Constraints
Analysis of systems containing nonlinear and uncertain components by using Integral Quadratic Constraints Tamas Peni MTA-SZTAKI October 2, 2012 Tamas Peni (MTA-SZTAKI) Seminar October 2, 2012 1 / 42 Contents
More informationMCE/EEC 647/747: Robot Dynamics and Control. Lecture 8: Basic Lyapunov Stability Theory
MCE/EEC 647/747: Robot Dynamics and Control Lecture 8: Basic Lyapunov Stability Theory Reading: SHV Appendix Mechanical Engineering Hanz Richter, PhD MCE503 p.1/17 Stability in the sense of Lyapunov A
More informationDual Proximal Gradient Method
Dual Proximal Gradient Method http://bicmr.pku.edu.cn/~wenzw/opt-2016-fall.html Acknowledgement: this slides is based on Prof. Lieven Vandenberghes lecture notes Outline 2/19 1 proximal gradient method
More informationME 132, Fall 2017, UC Berkeley, A. Packard 317. G 1 (s) = 3 s + 6, G 2(s) = s + 2
ME 132, Fall 2017, UC Berkeley, A. Packard 317 Be sure to check that all of your matrix manipulations have the correct dimensions, and that the concatenations have compatible dimensions (horizontal concatenations
More informationContents lecture 5. Automatic Control III. Summary of lecture 4 (II/II) Summary of lecture 4 (I/II) u y F r. Lecture 5 H 2 and H loop shaping
Contents lecture 5 Automatic Control III Lecture 5 H 2 and H loop shaping Thomas Schön Division of Systems and Control Department of Information Technology Uppsala University. Email: thomas.schon@it.uu.se,
More informationNonlinear Control Systems
Nonlinear Control Systems António Pedro Aguiar pedro@isr.ist.utl.pt 5. Input-Output Stability DEEC PhD Course http://users.isr.ist.utl.pt/%7epedro/ncs2012/ 2012 1 Input-Output Stability y = Hu H denotes
More informationCONTROL DESIGN FOR SET POINT TRACKING
Chapter 5 CONTROL DESIGN FOR SET POINT TRACKING In this chapter, we extend the pole placement, observer-based output feedback design to solve tracking problems. By tracking we mean that the output is commanded
More informationModule 3F2: Systems and Control EXAMPLES PAPER 2 ROOT-LOCUS. Solutions
Cambridge University Engineering Dept. Third Year Module 3F: Systems and Control EXAMPLES PAPER ROOT-LOCUS Solutions. (a) For the system L(s) = (s + a)(s + b) (a, b both real) show that the root-locus
More informationControl Design. Lecture 9: State Feedback and Observers. Two Classes of Control Problems. State Feedback: Problem Formulation
Lecture 9: State Feedback and s [IFAC PB Ch 9] State Feedback s Disturbance Estimation & Integral Action Control Design Many factors to consider, for example: Attenuation of load disturbances Reduction
More informationSoftware Engineering/Mechatronics 3DX4. Slides 6: Stability
Software Engineering/Mechatronics 3DX4 Slides 6: Stability Dr. Ryan Leduc Department of Computing and Software McMaster University Material based on lecture notes by P. Taylor and M. Lawford, and Control
More informationNonlinear Control. Nonlinear Control Lecture # 6 Passivity and Input-Output Stability
Nonlinear Control Lecture # 6 Passivity and Input-Output Stability Passivity: Memoryless Functions y y y u u u (a) (b) (c) Passive Passive Not passive y = h(t,u), h [0, ] Vector case: y = h(t,u), h T =
More informationSubject: Optimal Control Assignment-1 (Related to Lecture notes 1-10)
Subject: Optimal Control Assignment- (Related to Lecture notes -). Design a oil mug, shown in fig., to hold as much oil possible. The height and radius of the mug should not be more than 6cm. The mug must
More information10 Transfer Matrix Models
MIT EECS 6.241 (FALL 26) LECTURE NOTES BY A. MEGRETSKI 1 Transfer Matrix Models So far, transfer matrices were introduced for finite order state space LTI models, in which case they serve as an important
More informationPole placement control: state space and polynomial approaches Lecture 2
: state space and polynomial approaches Lecture 2 : a state O. Sename 1 1 Gipsa-lab, CNRS-INPG, FRANCE Olivier.Sename@gipsa-lab.fr www.gipsa-lab.fr/ o.sename -based November 21, 2017 Outline : a state
More informationLecture 6. Chapter 8: Robust Stability and Performance Analysis for MIMO Systems. Eugenio Schuster.
Lecture 6 Chapter 8: Robust Stability and Performance Analysis for MIMO Systems Eugenio Schuster schuster@lehigh.edu Mechanical Engineering and Mechanics Lehigh University Lecture 6 p. 1/73 6.1 General
More informationDisturbance Attenuation for a Class of Nonlinear Systems by Output Feedback
Disturbance Attenuation for a Class of Nonlinear Systems by Output Feedback Wei in Chunjiang Qian and Xianqing Huang Submitted to Systems & Control etters /5/ Abstract This paper studies the problem of
More informationComputer Problem 1: SIE Guidance, Navigation, and Control
Computer Problem 1: SIE 39 - Guidance, Navigation, and Control Roger Skjetne March 12, 23 1 Problem 1 (DSRV) We have the model: m Zẇ Z q ẇ Mẇ I y M q q + ẋ U cos θ + w sin θ ż U sin θ + w cos θ θ q Zw
More informationAn Internal Stability Example
An Internal Stability Example Roy Smith 26 April 2015 To illustrate the concept of internal stability we will look at an example where there are several pole-zero cancellations between the controller and
More informationProblem Set 4 Solutions 1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science 6245: MULTIVARIABLE CONTROL SYSTEMS by A Megretski Problem Set 4 Solutions Problem 4T For the following transfer
More informationLQR, Kalman Filter, and LQG. Postgraduate Course, M.Sc. Electrical Engineering Department College of Engineering University of Salahaddin
LQR, Kalman Filter, and LQG Postgraduate Course, M.Sc. Electrical Engineering Department College of Engineering University of Salahaddin May 2015 Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) Consider a linear system
More informationECE317 : Feedback and Control
ECE317 : Feedback and Control Lecture : Routh-Hurwitz stability criterion Examples Dr. Richard Tymerski Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering Portland State University 1 Course roadmap Modeling
More informationProf. Krstic Nonlinear Systems MAE281A Homework set 1 Linearization & phase portrait
Prof. Krstic Nonlinear Systems MAE28A Homework set Linearization & phase portrait. For each of the following systems, find all equilibrium points and determine the type of each isolated equilibrium. Use
More informationNonlinear Systems and Control Lecture # 12 Converse Lyapunov Functions & Time Varying Systems. p. 1/1
Nonlinear Systems and Control Lecture # 12 Converse Lyapunov Functions & Time Varying Systems p. 1/1 p. 2/1 Converse Lyapunov Theorem Exponential Stability Let x = 0 be an exponentially stable equilibrium
More informationCourse Outline. Higher Order Poles: Example. Higher Order Poles. Amme 3500 : System Dynamics & Control. State Space Design. 1 G(s) = s(s + 2)(s +10)
Amme 35 : System Dynamics Control State Space Design Course Outline Week Date Content Assignment Notes 1 1 Mar Introduction 2 8 Mar Frequency Domain Modelling 3 15 Mar Transient Performance and the s-plane
More informationTopic # /31 Feedback Control Systems. Analysis of Nonlinear Systems Lyapunov Stability Analysis
Topic # 16.30/31 Feedback Control Systems Analysis of Nonlinear Systems Lyapunov Stability Analysis Fall 010 16.30/31 Lyapunov Stability Analysis Very general method to prove (or disprove) stability of
More informationEEE 184: Introduction to feedback systems
EEE 84: Introduction to feedback systems Summary 6 8 8 x 7 7 6 Level() 6 5 4 4 5 5 time(s) 4 6 8 Time (seconds) Fig.. Illustration of BIBO stability: stable system (the input is a unit step) Fig.. step)
More informationAdvanced Control Theory
State Feedback Control Design chibum@seoultech.ac.kr Outline State feedback control design Benefits of CCF 2 Conceptual steps in controller design We begin by considering the regulation problem the task
More informationH 2 Suboptimal Estimation and Control for Nonnegative
Proceedings of the 2007 American Control Conference Marriott Marquis Hotel at Times Square New York City, USA, July 11-13, 2007 FrC20.3 H 2 Suboptimal Estimation and Control for Nonnegative Dynamical Systems
More informationSYSTEMTEORI - KALMAN FILTER VS LQ CONTROL
SYSTEMTEORI - KALMAN FILTER VS LQ CONTROL 1. Optimal regulator with noisy measurement Consider the following system: ẋ = Ax + Bu + w, x(0) = x 0 where w(t) is white noise with Ew(t) = 0, and x 0 is a stochastic
More informationExam. 135 minutes, 15 minutes reading time
Exam August 6, 208 Control Systems II (5-0590-00) Dr. Jacopo Tani Exam Exam Duration: 35 minutes, 5 minutes reading time Number of Problems: 35 Number of Points: 47 Permitted aids: 0 pages (5 sheets) A4.
More informationJosé C. Geromel. Australian National University Canberra, December 7-8, 2017
5 1 15 2 25 3 35 4 45 5 1 15 2 25 3 35 4 45 5 55 Differential LMI in Optimal Sampled-data Control José C. Geromel School of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Campinas - Brazil Australian
More informationIntro. Computer Control Systems: F9
Intro. Computer Control Systems: F9 State-feedback control and observers Dave Zachariah Dept. Information Technology, Div. Systems and Control 1 / 21 dave.zachariah@it.uu.se F8: Quiz! 2 / 21 dave.zachariah@it.uu.se
More informationLec 6: State Feedback, Controllability, Integral Action
Lec 6: State Feedback, Controllability, Integral Action November 22, 2017 Lund University, Department of Automatic Control Controllability and Observability Example of Kalman decomposition 1 s 1 x 10 x
More informationControl Systems Design, SC4026. SC4026 Fall 2010, dr. A. Abate, DCSC, TU Delft
Control Systems Design, SC426 SC426 Fall 2, dr A Abate, DCSC, TU Delft Lecture 5 Controllable Canonical and Observable Canonical Forms Stabilization by State Feedback State Estimation, Observer Design
More informationControl Systems 2. Lecture 4: Sensitivity function limits. Roy Smith
Control Systems 2 Lecture 4: Sensitivity function limits Roy Smith 2017-3-14 4.1 Input-output controllability Control design questions: 1. How well can the plant be controlled? 2. What control structure
More informationState Regulator. Advanced Control. design of controllers using pole placement and LQ design rules
Advanced Control State Regulator Scope design of controllers using pole placement and LQ design rules Keywords pole placement, optimal control, LQ regulator, weighting matrixes Prerequisites Contact state
More informationIterative methods to compute center and center-stable manifolds with application to the optimal output regulation problem
Iterative methods to compute center and center-stable manifolds with application to the optimal output regulation problem Noboru Sakamoto, Branislav Rehak N.S.: Nagoya University, Department of Aerospace
More information