THE BIO-PSYCHO-SOCIAL EFFECT OF REHABILITATION OF ADULTS WITH ACQUIRED BRAIN INJURY MEDIATED BY COORDINATED INTERVENTIONS

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "THE BIO-PSYCHO-SOCIAL EFFECT OF REHABILITATION OF ADULTS WITH ACQUIRED BRAIN INJURY MEDIATED BY COORDINATED INTERVENTIONS"

Merry Gilmore
5 years ago
Views:

BY COORDINATED INTERVENTIONS E CP 2 0 1 3 I N

1 THE BIO-PSYCHO-SOCIAL EFFECT OF REHABILITATION OF ADULTS WITH ACQUIRED BRAIN INJURY MEDIATED BY COORDINATED INTERVENTIONS E CP I N STOCKHOLM C H A L O T T E G L I N T B O R G, C G H U M. A A U. D K A N E S Ø N D E R G A A R D T H O M S E N, A N E S H U M. A A U. D K

2 Background A c q u i r e d b r a i n injury (ABI) prevalence i n DK In 2010: A p p r o x live with an A B I Current situation R e h a b i lit a t ion i s a n area of priority to the Danish g o v e r n m e n t No r e s e a r c h in DK on eff e c t s of coordinated r e h a b i litation Ve ry f e w i n t e rnational s t u d i e s ( 9 s t u d i e s) 2

3 Objective To p r o v i d e a n e v a l u ation o f a c o o r d i n a t e d r e h a b i litation p r o g r a m E v i d e nce-based i n t e rvention c o n t r i b u t e t o t h e p r o v i s ion o f q u a l i t y s e r v i c e t o p e o p l e s u ff e r i ng f r o m A B I and, thus, to improve t h e i r quality of life a s s i st a d m i n istrators i n m a k i n g p rogram -level d e c i s ions e c o n o m i c b e n e f i t s 3

4 Timeframe Project start Implementation (April) Project end Program theory (August) Organizational halfway status (April) Pretest Posttest Organizational posttest 4

Timeframe the focus of this presentation Project start Implementation (April) Project end 2012 2013 2014

5 Timeframe the focus of this presentation Project start Implementation (April) Project end Program theory (August) Organizational halfway status (April) Pretest Posttest Organizational posttest 5

6 Services provided for a citizen suffering from ABI Temporary housing Permanent housing Own home Aids Special needs teaching Furnishing Counselling Disabled-friendly car Relief care Social education support Accompaniment Home help Communication training Sickness benefit Rehabilitation 6

7 The rehabilitationprogram that we study H e i g h t e ning t h e level o f t h e neuro - s c i e n t ific k n o wledge C o o r d i n a t ion i n t e r n a l ly a t t h e m u n i c ipal level ( e s t a b l i sh a c o o r d i n a t ion c e n t e r and new ways o f working t o g e t h e r ) I n t e r d i s c iplinary c o o r d i n ation o f p r o c e s s e s a c r o s s t h e p r i m a r y and s e c o n d a r y s e c t o rs U n i t e d e ff o rts (joint o u t c o m e m e a s u res, t e s t s and rehabilitation p l a n s ) B a s e d o n the bio - p s yc h o - s ocial m o d e l ( Operationalized b y I C F ) 7

8 Two integrated projects in a mixed method design Interviews (citizens and their relatives) Interviews (employees) Field notes Tests Effect study on adults with ABI Organizational study Documents Observations / participation Surveys 8

9 Interviews (citizens and their relatives) Field notes Effect study on adults with ABI Tests 9

10 Test measures Quality of Life (WHOQOL) M a j o r Depression Inventory (MDI) Functional Independence Measure (FIM) I m p a c t on Participation a n d A u t o n o m y Questionnaire (IPA Q) 10

Research design effect study C o n t r o

FIM, IPAQ QOL, MDI and Field notes I n t

N=140 (70 adult ABI + 70 relatives) Test:

11 Research design effect study C o n t r o l g r o u p N=55 (55 adult ABI survivors) Test: FIM Treatment as usual N= 58 (36 adult ABI + 22 relatives) Test: FIM, IPAQ QOL, MDI and Field notes I n t e r v e n t i o n g r o u p N=140 (70 adult ABI + 70 relatives) Test: FIM, IPAQ, QOL, MDI Interview & Field Notes Eksperimental Intervention N=? Test: FIM, IPAQ, QOL, MDI, Interview & Field Notes 11

Intervention: CI (coordinated intervention, type 1) Intervention: CI (coordinated intervention, type 2) Intervention: CI (coordinated

12 Aalborg Jammerbugt (control) Vesthimmerland (control) Brønderslev (control) 2011 Control 2011 BNC, pretest N=55 Intervention: TAU (treatment as usual) , posttest N= BNC, pretest N= BNC, pretest N= BNC, pretest N= BNC, pretest N=10-20 Intervention: CI (coordinated intervention, type 1) Intervention: CI (coordinated intervention, type 2) Intervention: CI (coordinated intervention, type 3) Intervention: CI (coordinated intervention, type 4) , posttest N=? 2014, posttest N=? 2014, posttest N=? 2014, posttest N=? 12

13 Preliminary results (on an individual level) R e s u l t s from c o n t r o l g r o u p (2011 ) with no c o o r d i n a t e d r e h a b i litation: Pre- and post-functional independence Pre- and post-w o r k situation P o s t Depression l e ve l P o s t QOL l e v e l T h e m e s f r o m f i e l d n o t e s 13

14 Pre- and post-functional independence 14

15 Work situation

16 Post Depression level 16

17 Interviews (employees) Organizational study Documents Observations / participation Surveys 17

18 Program theories S ynonym : m o d e l, c o n c e p t u a l f r a m e work linking t h e i n t e r v e n t ions to t h e p r o j e c t e d outcomes, a r t i c u l a t e d logic o f p r o g r a m s B e n e f i t s C l a r i f y their assumptions a n d implicit t h e o r i e s D e t e c t implausible a s s u m p t ions U s e that theory o r m o d e l t o c h o o s e t h e c r i t e r i a which a r e t o b e m e a s u r e d a n d that will i n d i cate s u c c e s sful i m p l e m e ntation a n d d e s i r a b le o u t c o m e s I d e n t i f y the intermediate results rather than just t h e final o u t c o m e 18

19 Education Appoint key persons Enhance the level of knowledge Easier to spot need Improve triage and referral to the coordinationcenter 19

20 Coordinationcentre One way of access for the citizen Internal coordination among professionals Knowledgetransfer (from hospital to municipal level ) Guide, assistance Get to be known in the organization Uniform efforts Easier transfers across sectors Increased satisfaction among citizens Make the citizen able to concentrate on rehabilitation Break down walls Increased satisfacition among citizens Peace of mind for external collaborators Efficient case work Better economy 20

21 Articulated logic Joint rehabilitation plans and tests Joint objectives Uniform line of direction Joint use of instruments Using the same language / Joint understanding Meet the citiczens with one united package of instruments Better refferals Possiblity of joint accumulation of experiences Easier knowledge transfer Understand one another Easier access for the citizen Continuous sequence of steps Frees resources from repeated tasks Purposive use of resources Identify indicators of rehabilitationpotential A gradual transision across the primary and secondary sectors Easier and better cooperation Easier to involve the citizen Efficient service Rapid decision making 21

22 Halfway evaluation / preliminary results Joint rehabilitation plans and tests Joint objectives Uniform line of direction Joint use of instruments Using the same language / Joint understanding Meet the citiczens with one united package of instruments Better refferals Possiblity of joint accumulation of experiences Easier knowledge transfer Understand one another Easier access for the citizen Continuous sequence of steps Frees resources from repeated tasks Purposive use of resources Identify indicators of rehabilitationpotential A gradual transision across the primary and secondary sectors Easier and better cooperation Easier to involve the citizen Efficient service? Rapid decision making 22

23 Conclusion I n t e r d i s c iplinary c o o r d i n ation o f p r o c e s s e s a c r o s s t h e p r i m a r y and s e c o n d a r y s e c t o rs h a s been e s t a b l ished There is agreement o n j o i n t rehabilitation p l a n s A c o o r d i n a t ion c e n t e r has been established A g r e e m e n t o n a c o l l a boration a c c o r d (new ways o f working together) E d u c a t ional a c t i v ities have s t a rted S o far it seems e m p l o yee s a t i s f a c t ion h a s improved We do not know yet whether or not we wi l l b e able t o i d e n t i f y i n d i cators of r e h a b i litation - p o t e ntial T h e eff e c t on citizens s u ff e r i n g f r o m A B I is s t i l l u n k n o wn 23

24 Questions? Department of Communication and 24

25 Acknowledgement Thank you to Aalborg Kommune and other stakeholders Supervisor Tia G.B. Hansen D E P A R T M E N T O F C O M M U N I C A T I O N A N D P S Y C H O L O G Y C O G N I T I V E P S Y C H O L O G Y U N I T 25

26 Disclaimer The u se of FIM instrument to c ollect data for t h is r e s earch study was a u t h o rized and conducted in a ccordance wi t h the terms of a s pecial p u rpose license g ranted to Licensee by Uniform D a t a S ys t em for M e dical R ehabilitation (a d ivision of UB F oundation Activities, Inc., UDSMR ). L icensee has not b een t r ained by U DSMR in the use of FIM i nstrument, and t he p a tient data c ollected during t he course of t h is research has not b een s u b mitted to or p rocessed by U D S M R. No i m plication is i n t ended t h at s u ch data has been or will be s ubjective to U DSMR s s t a ndard data p r o cessing p r ocedures or that it is o t h e r wise c o m p a r a b l e to data processed by UDSMR 26

Detailed Contents. 1. Science, Society, and Social Work Research The Process and Problems of Social Work Research 27

Detailed Contents. 1. Science, Society, and Social Work Research The Process and Problems of Social Work Research 27 Detailed Contents Preface xiii Acknowledgments xvii 1. Science, Society, and Social Work Research 1 Reasoning About the Social World 2 Everyday Errors in Reasoning 4 Overgeneralization 5 Selective or Inaccurate