Solutions to Tutorial 11 (Week 12)
|
|
- Marshall Watson
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 THE UIVERSITY OF SYDEY SCHOOL OF MATHEMATICS AD STATISTICS Solutions to Tutorial 11 (Week 12) MATH3969: Measure Theory and Fourier Analysis (Advanced) Semester 2, 2017 Web Page: Lecturer: Daniel Daners Material covered (1) The Radon-ikodym theorem (2) An application of the projection theorem (3) The Lebesgue outer measure Outcomes After completing this tutorial you should (1) to apply the Radon-ikodym theorem and associated properties of the density functions. (2) be able to apply the projection theorem in a simple situation. (3) work with the Lebesgue outer measure. Summary of essential material Let μ, ν be measures on X defined on the σ-algebra of subsets of X. We say ν has a density with respect to μ if there exists a measurable function g X [0, ] such that ν(a) = 1 A g dμ for all A. We call g the density of ν with respect to μ. We write say that ν is absolutely continuous with respect to μ if ν() = 0 whenever with μ() = 0. We write ν μ From the definition, any measure ν with a density with respect to μ is absolutely continuous with respect to μ. The Radon-ikodym Theorem characterises provides a converse. Radon-ikodym Theorem. Let μ, ν be σ-finite measures on X defined on the σ-algebra of subsets of X. Then, ν μ if and only if ν has a density with respect to μ. That density is unique (almost everywhere). Questions to complete during the tutorial 1. Let μ, ν be measures on X defined on the σ-algebra of subsets of X, and let a, b 0 be constants. For A define λ(a) = aμ(a) + bν(a). (a) Show that λ is a measure on X. Solution: We know that μ( ) = ν( ) = 0, so λ( ) = aμ( ) + bν( ) = 0. ext let A k, k be disjoint sets. Then, using the countable additivity of μ and ν we get λ(a k ) = lim Hence λ is a measure. ( ) aμ(a k ) + bν(a k ) = a lim Copyright 2017 The University of Sydney 1 μ(a k ) + b lim ν(a k ) ) ) = aμ A k + bν A k = λ A k ).
2 (b) Show that for every non-negative measurable function f X [0, ] we have f = a + b f dν. Then show that the above holds for f L 1 (X, μ) L 1 (X, ν). Solution: We start by a simple measurable function φ = n c k1 Ak with c k 0. By definition of the integral of a simple function φ = c k λ(a k ) = ( c k aμ(ak ) + bν(a k ) ) = a c k μ(a k )a + c k ν(a k ) = a φ dμ + b φ dν. To deal with non-negative functions f X [0, ] we use the existence of a sequence of simple functions φ n with the property that φ n φ n+1 f for all n and φ n f pointwise. From the above we have φ n = a φ n dμ + b φ n dν for all n. Applying the monotone convergence theorem to all three integrals we get f = a + b f dν. ote that there is no simple way to use the definition of the integral as the supremum over all simple functions 0 φ f as this only gives the inequality f a + b f dν. There is no simple way to prove the opposite inequality, and it is better to use the monotone convergence theorem. 2. Let μ, ν and λ be finite measures defined on the same σ-algebra of subsets of X. The Radon-ikodym theorem asserts that if ν μ then there exists a measurable function g X [0, ) such that f dν = fg dμ for all f L 1 (X, ν). The function g is often called the Radon-ikodym derivative and denoted dν dμ. We show that this is justified by proving familiar properties of derivatives. (a) If ν μ, then the function g from the Radon-ikodym theorem is essentially unique, that is, any two differ at most on a set of measure zero. Solution: Suppose that g 1, g 2 are two functions so that for all A. Hence ν(a) = g 1 dμ = g 2 dμ A g 1 g 2 dμ = 0 for all A. If h = g 1 g 2 0 on a set of positive measure, then P = {x X h(x) > 0} or = {x X h(x) < 0} has positive measure. If μ(p ) > 0, then P (g 1 g 2 ) dμ > 0 which is impossible. Hence μ(p ) = 0 and similarly μ() = 0, so g 1 = g 2 almost everywhere. 2
3 (b) Suppose that ν λ and μ λ. Prove that almost everywhere. d(ν + μ) = dν + dμ Solution: By the Radon-ikodym theorem there exist g 1 = dν and g 2 = dμ such that for all A. Hence ν(a) = g 1 and μ(a) = g 2 (ν + μ)(a) = ν(a) + μ(a) = (g 1 + g 2 ) for all A. By uniqueness of the Radon-ikodym derivative we have almost everywhere. d(ν + μ) (c) Suppose ν μ and μ λ. Prove the chain rule almost everywhere. = g 1 + g 2 = dν + dμ dν = dν dμ dμ Solution: By the Radon-ikodym theorem there exist functions g 1, g 2 X [0, ) such that f dν = fg 1 dμ and for all measurable functions f X [0, ). Hence in particular = fg 2 ν(a) 1 A dν = 1 A g 1 dμ = 1 A g 1 g 2 = g 1 g 2 for all A. By uniqueness almost everywhere of the Radon-ikodym derivative we have as claimed. (d) Suppose ν μ and μ ν. Prove that almost everywhere. dν dμ dμ g 1g 2 = dν [ dν dμ ] 1 dμ = dν Solution: By the Radon-ikodym theorem there exists a function g X [0, ) such that f dν = fg dμ for all measurable functions f X [0, ). If we apply the above identity to f replaced by the non-negative measurable function f g we get f g dν = for all measurable functions f X [0, ). By the uniqueness of the Radon-ikodym derivative dν dμ = g = 1 [ dμ 1 g = dν 3 ] 1
4 3. Every non-negative f L 1 (R ) can be identified with the measure μ f on R having density f with respect to the Lebesgue measure. Then, μ f (R ) = f(x) dx = f 1 <, so μ f is a finite measure on R. Using this notation, the Fourier transform of f can be written in the form R e 2πix t f(x)dx = e 2πix t dμ f (x). It makes sense to replace μ f by an arbitrary finite Borel measure μ on R. We define its Fourier transform by μ(t) = e 2πix t dμ(x). (a) Let μ be a finite Borel measure on R. Show that μ C(R ), and that μ μ(r ). Solution: The map t e 2πx t is continuous on R, and e 2πix t = 1 for all x, t R. As R 1 dμ = μ(r ) < we can apply the theorem on the continuity of integrals with parameters to conclude that μ C(R ). Also, μ(t) e 2πix t dμ = 1 dμ = μ(r ) for all t R. Hence μ μ(r ) as claimed. (b) Let f L 1 (R ) and let μ be a finite Borel measure on R. Show that R f(t) μ(t) dt = f(x) dμ(x). You may assume that Fubini s theorem applies to all finite Borel measures on R. Solution: By the definition of the Fourier transform, and interchanging the order of integration (using Fubini s theorem) R f(t) μ(t) dt = f(t) e 2πix t dμ(x) dt We can apply Fubini s theorem since = f(t)e 2πix t dt dμ(x) = f(x) dμ(x) R f(t)e 2πix t dt dμ(x) = 1 dμ(x) f(t) dt = μ(r ) f R R 1 <. (c) Given a finite Borel measure μ on R and a point x 0 R define the translation of the measure by x 0 by (τ x0 μ)(a) = μ(a x 0 ) for every Borel set A R. Then τ x0 μ is again a finite Borel measure on R. Show that τ x0 μ(t) = e 2πix 0 t μ(t), similar to the Fourier transform of a translated function. Solution: We have τ x0 μ(t) = e 2πix t d(τ x0 μ) = e 2πi(x+x0) t dμ = e 2πix 0 t e 2πix t dμ = e 2πix 0 t μ(t). R 4
5 as claimed. Here we used that for any integrable function f we have R f(x) d(τ x0 μ) = f(x x 0 ) dμ. To see this we can first look at indicator functions f = 1 A. We have by definition of τ x0 μ ( ) R 1 A (x) d(τ x0 μ) = (τ x0 μ)(a) = μ(a x 0 ) = 1 A (x x 0 ) dμ. Hence ( ) is valid for indicator functions, and hence for simple functions. Approximating nonnegative measurable functions from below by a sequence of simple functions, ( ) follows by applying the monotone convergence theorem. ow consider positive and negative parts, then real and imaginary parts. (d) Let f L (R ) and let μ be a finite Borel measure on R. We define the convolution of f with μ by (f μ)(x) = f(x y) dμ(y). Let now φ L 1 (R ) and set ψ(x) = φ( x). Show that R μ(t)φ(t)e 2πix t dt = (ψ μ)(x) Solution: First note that μφ L 1 (R ) because it is a product of a bounded and an integrable function. Using Questions (c) and then (b) we obtain R μ(t)φ(t)e 2πix t dt = τ x μ(t)φ(t) dt = φ(t) d(τ x μ)(t) = φ(t x) dμ(t) = φ( (x t)) dμ(t) = (ψ μ)(x) as claimed. *(e) How would you derive an inversion formula for the Fourier transform of a finite Borel measure μ using the formula in (d)? Solution: One would need to choose a sequence φ n so that φ n is an approximate identity. We can use the same as in the inversion formula, namely φ n (x) = e π x 2 n 2 and so ψ n (x) = n e π nx 2 is an approximate identity. The question is whether in some sense ψ n μ converges to μ. Since μ is a measure it does not make sense to consider any form of pointwise convergence. We may consider ψ n μ to be the density of a measure with respect to the Lebesgue measure. We may expect that (ψ n μ)(x) dx = 1 A A (x)(ψ n μ)(x) dx μ(a) ( ) as n for every Borel set A R of finite measure. We can do that by using Fubini s theorem to write = 1 A (x)(ψ n μ)(x) dx = 1 A (x) ψ n (x y) dμ(y) dx = 1 A (x)ψ n (x y) dx dμ(y) = (1 R A ψ n )(y) dμ(y), where we also used that ψ n (x y) = ψ n (y x). From lectures we know that 1 A ψ n 1 A in L 1 (R ), and hence a subsequence converges pointwise almost everywhere. In the case of convolution one can show that the convergence is in fact almost everywhere for the whole sequence. We also have (1 A ψ n 1 A )(x) ψ n 1 = 1, so 1 is a dominating function integrable with respect to the finite measure μ. By the dominated convergence theorem ( ) follows. Hence, we have a Fourier inversion formula for finite measures as well, similar to the one we know already. 5
6 Extra questions for further practice 4. Let μ be a probability measure defined on the σ-algebra of subsets of X. Suppose that A is such that μ(a) (0, 1). Let f L 2 (X) and define g = A 1 μ(a) A + A c μ(a c 1 ) A c. Let M be the subspace of L 2 (X) spanned by 1 A and 1 A c. Show that g is the orthogonal projection of f onto M. Solution: We only need to show that (f g 1 A ) = (f g 1 A c) = 0. Then (f g h) = 0 for all linear combinations of 1 A and 1 A c. By definition of the L 2 -inner product (f g 1 A ) = (f g)1 A dμ = (f g) dμ = f A 1 μ(a) A + A c μ(a c 1 ) A c dμ = A dμ = A μ(a) = 0. μ(a) μ(a) Similarly (f g 1 A c) = 0, completing the proof. 5. Suppose that (X,, μ) is a measure space such that μ(x) <. Let f X [0, ) be a measurable function and set Φ(t) = e tf(x) dμ(x). (a) Show that Φ C([0, ), R), that is, Φ is a continuous function of t [0, ). Solution: We verify the condition of the theorem on the continuity of integrals with parameters: By continuity of the exponential function, the map t e tf(x) is continuous for all x X. The integrand is a function of the form φ f with φ(s) = e ts continuous. Hence, for every fixed t R the function x e tf(x) is measurable, as shown in lectures (Lecture notes Prop. 9.8). Because f 0 we have 0 e tf(x) 1 for all x X. As μ(x) is finite, the constant function g(x) = 1 is an integrable dominating function. The theorem on the continuity of integrals with parameters now implies that Φ is continuous as a function of t [0, ). (b) Suppose that f L m (X) for some m, where m 1. Prove that d k Φ dt k (0) = ( 1)k f k k for k = 1,, m, where the derivative at zero is to be understood as a right derivative. Solution: We give a proof by induction, using the theorem on the differentiation of integrals with parameters. For k = 1 we have t e tf(x) = f(x)e tf(x) is continuous as a function of t and measurable as a function of x, as in the previous part, using also that the product of measurable functions is measurable. As f 0 we also have t e tf(x) f(x) By assumption f L 1 (X) and k 0, so we can use f(x) as a dominating function. 6
7 By the theorem on the differentiation of integrals with parameters we obtain dφ dt (t) = f(x)e tf(x) dμ(x) for all t 0. Setting t = 0 we obtain Φ (0) = f 1. As μ(x) < we have L m (X) L p (X) for all p [1, m]. Assume that f L m (X) and that the formula holds for some 1 k < m. As f 0 we have k+1 t k+1 e tf(x) k t k e tf(x) = ( 1)f(x) k+1 e tf(x) By assumption f L m (X) L k+1 (X), and f 0 so we can use f(x) k+1 as a dominating function. By the theorem on the differentiation of integrals with parameters we obtain d k+1 Φ (t) = ( 1) k+1 f(x) k+1 e tf(x) dμ(x) dt k for all t 0. Setting t = 0 we obtain Φ (k+1) (0) = ( 1) k+1 f k+1. as claimed. k+1 We do an induction because before we can compute the (k + 1)st derivative we need to know that the k-th derivative exists. (c) Assume that there exists ε > 0 such that Φ(t) < for all t ( ε, ε). Show that f p < for all 1 p <. Solution: By assumption, for εt = s < 0 the integral e sf(x) s k f(x) k dμ(x) = dμ < k! for all s (0, ε). As f 0 the monotone convergence theorem allows us to interchange the integral and the series, so e sf(x) s dμ(x) k f(x) k s dμ(x) = k k! k! f k k < for all s (0, ε). In particular f k < for all k. As L p (X) L q (X) whenever p > q if μ(x) is finite, we conclude that f p < for all p [1, ). Challenge questions (optional) The question below generalises the Radon-ikodym theorem and shows that one can finde a decomposition μ = μ a + μ s called the Lebesgue decomposition of a measure μ into a (maximal) absolutely continuous part μ a and a singular part μ s with respect to ν. In particular it shows the existence of a set P such that μ s (P ) = μ a (X P ) = 0. If that is the case we often say μ a μ s because this is reminiscent of orthogonal functions having support on disjoint sets. This question is inspired by the short recent proof of the Lebesgue decomposition theorem from Tamás Titkos. A Simple Proof of the Lebesgue Decomposition Theorem. In: Amer. Math. Monthly (2015), pp DOI: /amer.math.monthly Let be a σ-algebra of subsets of X and let μ, ν be finite measures defined on. Define (X) = { φ X R φ measurable and ν ( {x X φ(x) 0} ) = 0 } to be the vector space of measurable functions that are zero ν-almost everywhere. For A let μ a (A) = inf 1 φ dμ and μ φ (X) s (A) = μ(a) μ a (A). A 7
8 (a) Show that μ a (A) μ(a) for all A. Solution: We know that 0 (X) and hence for all A. μ a (A) = inf 1 φ dμ 1 0 dμ = 1 dμ = μ(a) φ (X) A (b) Let A, B be disjoint sets. The aim is to show that μ a (A B) = μ a (A) + μ a (B) by proving two inequalities. (i) Use the definition of an infimum to show that μ a (A B) μ a (A) + μ a (B). Solution: Using A B = and the definition of an infimum A B 1 φ dμ = 1 φ dμ + 1 φ dμ μ a (A) + μ a (B) (ii) for all φ (X). Hence μ a (A) + μ a (B) is a lower bound for A B 1 φ dμ for all φ (X). By definition of an infimum we conclude that μ a (A B) μ a (A) + μ a (B). Briefly explain why A B 1 (1 A φ B φ 2 ) dμ = 1 φ 1 dμ + 1 φ 2 dμ for all φ 1, φ 2 (X) and hence show that μ a (A B) μ a (A) + μ a (B). Solution: Let φ 1, φ 2 (X). Since A B = we have 1 A (1 A φ B φ 2 ) = 1 A φ 1 (X) and 1 B (1 A φ B φ 2 ) = 1 B φ 2 (X). Hence A B 1 (1 A φ B φ 2 ) dμ = 1 φ 1 dμ + 1 φ 2 dμ. (1) Also note that 1 A φ B φ 2 (X). Taking an infimum on the left hand side of (1) we see that μ a (A B) 1 φ 1 dμ + 1 φ 2 dμ for all φ 1, φ 2 (X). We therefore have, for every fixed φ 2 (X), μ a (A B) 1 φ 2 dμ 1 φ 1 dμ for all φ 1 (X). Taking the infimum over all such φ 1 we obtain μ a (A B) 1 φ 2 dμ for every φ 2 (X). Rearranging we have inf 1 φ φ 1 (X) 1 dμ = μ a (A) A μ a (A B) μ a (A) 1 φ 2 dμ for all φ 2 (X). Taking an infimum over all φ 2 (X) we see that μ a (A B) μ B (A) μ a (A), which is equivalent to the required inequality. (c) Using the previous parts, show that μ a is a measure defined on the σ-algebra. To do so remember that we assume that μ(x) <. Solution: By part (a) and the definition 0 μ a ( ) μ( ) = 0, so that μ a ( ) = 0. To show the countable additivity let A k, k, be disjoint. Then also the union A k = A 1 A 2 A n 8 A k )
9 is a finite disjoint union. Hence, by part (b) and induction we have finite additivity and so ) ) μ a A k = μ a (A k ) + μ a A k (2) for all n. Using part (a) and the fact that μ is a finite measure we see that We therefore conclude that ) ) μ a A k μ A k = μ(a k ) μ(x) <. ) ) 0 lim μ a A k lim μ A k = lim Letting n in (2) therefore implies the countable additivity (d) Show that μ a ν. ) μ a A k = μ a (A k ). μ(a k ) = 0. Solution: If A and ν(a) = 0, then by definition 1 A (X). Hence by definition of μ a we have and so μ a (A) = 0. Therefore μ a ν. μ a (A) 1 1 A dμ = 0 (e) Let μ 1 be a measure on such that μ 1 μ and μ 1 ν. Show that μ 1 μ a, that is, μ 1 (A) μ a (A) for all A. Solution: Let A and fix φ (X). As μ 1 ν we have μ 1 ( {x X φ(x) 0} ) = 0 for all φ (X). As μ 1 μ we therefore have μ 1 (A) = 1 dμ 1 = 1 φ dμ 1 1 φ dμ for all φ (X). By definition of an infimum we obtain μ 1 (A) μ a (A) as claimed. (f) Suppose that η is a measure on such that η μ a and η μ s. Show that η = 0, that is, η(a) = 0 for all A. Solution: Clearly μ a + η μ a + μ s = μ. Assume that (X) with ν() = 0. Then by (d) we have μ a () = 0 and hence by assumption η() μ a () = 0. This implies that μ a () + η() = 0, showing that μ a + η ν. It follows from (e) that μ a + η μ a and hence η = 0. 9
MATH MEASURE THEORY AND FOURIER ANALYSIS. Contents
MATH 3969 - MEASURE THEORY AND FOURIER ANALYSIS ANDREW TULLOCH Contents 1. Measure Theory 2 1.1. Properties of Measures 3 1.2. Constructing σ-algebras and measures 3 1.3. Properties of the Lebesgue measure
More informationSolutions to Tutorial 1 (Week 2)
THE UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY SCHOOL OF MATHEMATICS AND STATISTICS Solutions to Tutorial 1 (Week 2 MATH3969: Measure Theory and Fourier Analysis (Advanced Semester 2, 2017 Web Page: http://sydney.edu.au/science/maths/u/ug/sm/math3969/
More informationFACULTY OF SCIENCE FINAL EXAMINATION MATHEMATICS MATH 355. Analysis 4. Examiner: Professor S. W. Drury Date: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 INSTRUCTIONS
FACULTY OF SCIENCE FINAL EXAMINATION MATHEMATICS MATH 355 Analysis 4 Examiner: Professor S. W. Drury Date: Wednesday, April 18, 27 Associate Examiner: Professor K. N. GowriSankaran Time: 2: pm. 5: pm.
More information6.2 Fubini s Theorem. (µ ν)(c) = f C (x) dµ(x). (6.2) Proof. Note that (X Y, A B, µ ν) must be σ-finite as well, so that.
6.2 Fubini s Theorem Theorem 6.2.1. (Fubini s theorem - first form) Let (, A, µ) and (, B, ν) be complete σ-finite measure spaces. Let C = A B. Then for each µ ν- measurable set C C the section x C is
More information2 Lebesgue integration
2 Lebesgue integration 1. Let (, A, µ) be a measure space. We will always assume that µ is complete, otherwise we first take its completion. The example to have in mind is the Lebesgue measure on R n,
More information3 (Due ). Let A X consist of points (x, y) such that either x or y is a rational number. Is A measurable? What is its Lebesgue measure?
MA 645-4A (Real Analysis), Dr. Chernov Homework assignment 1 (Due ). Show that the open disk x 2 + y 2 < 1 is a countable union of planar elementary sets. Show that the closed disk x 2 + y 2 1 is a countable
More information3. (a) What is a simple function? What is an integrable function? How is f dµ defined? Define it first
Math 632/6321: Theory of Functions of a Real Variable Sample Preinary Exam Questions 1. Let (, M, µ) be a measure space. (a) Prove that if µ() < and if 1 p < q
More informationFACULTY OF SCIENCE FINAL EXAMINATION MATHEMATICS MATH 355. Analysis 4. Examiner: Professor S. W. Drury Date: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 INSTRUCTIONS
FACULTY OF SCIENCE FINAL EXAMINATION MATHEMATICS MATH 355 Analysis 4 Examiner: Professor S. W. Drury Date: Tuesday, April 18, 26 Associate Examiner: Professor K. N. GowriSankaran Time: 2: pm. 5: pm. INSTRUCTIONS
More information2 (Bonus). Let A X consist of points (x, y) such that either x or y is a rational number. Is A measurable? What is its Lebesgue measure?
MA 645-4A (Real Analysis), Dr. Chernov Homework assignment 1 (Due 9/5). Prove that every countable set A is measurable and µ(a) = 0. 2 (Bonus). Let A consist of points (x, y) such that either x or y is
More informationAnnalee Gomm Math 714: Assignment #2
Annalee Gomm Math 714: Assignment #2 3.32. Verify that if A M, λ(a = 0, and B A, then B M and λ(b = 0. Suppose that A M with λ(a = 0, and let B be any subset of A. By the nonnegativity and monotonicity
More informationAnalysis Comprehensive Exam Questions Fall 2008
Analysis Comprehensive xam Questions Fall 28. (a) Let R be measurable with finite Lebesgue measure. Suppose that {f n } n N is a bounded sequence in L 2 () and there exists a function f such that f n (x)
More informationTHEOREMS, ETC., FOR MATH 515
THEOREMS, ETC., FOR MATH 515 Proposition 1 (=comment on page 17). If A is an algebra, then any finite union or finite intersection of sets in A is also in A. Proposition 2 (=Proposition 1.1). For every
More informationMATHS 730 FC Lecture Notes March 5, Introduction
1 INTRODUCTION MATHS 730 FC Lecture Notes March 5, 2014 1 Introduction Definition. If A, B are sets and there exists a bijection A B, they have the same cardinality, which we write as A, #A. If there exists
More information+ 2x sin x. f(b i ) f(a i ) < ɛ. i=1. i=1
Appendix To understand weak derivatives and distributional derivatives in the simplest context of functions of a single variable, we describe without proof some results from real analysis (see [7] and
More informationNotes on the Lebesgue Integral by Francis J. Narcowich November, 2013
Notes on the Lebesgue Integral by Francis J. Narcowich November, 203 Introduction In the definition of the Riemann integral of a function f(x), the x-axis is partitioned and the integral is defined in
More informationChapter 8. General Countably Additive Set Functions. 8.1 Hahn Decomposition Theorem
Chapter 8 General Countably dditive Set Functions In Theorem 5.2.2 the reader saw that if f : X R is integrable on the measure space (X,, µ) then we can define a countably additive set function ν on by
More informationMATH & MATH FUNCTIONS OF A REAL VARIABLE EXERCISES FALL 2015 & SPRING Scientia Imperii Decus et Tutamen 1
MATH 5310.001 & MATH 5320.001 FUNCTIONS OF A REAL VARIABLE EXERCISES FALL 2015 & SPRING 2016 Scientia Imperii Decus et Tutamen 1 Robert R. Kallman University of North Texas Department of Mathematics 1155
More informationAdvanced Analysis Qualifying Examination Department of Mathematics and Statistics University of Massachusetts. Tuesday, January 16th, 2018
NAME: Advanced Analysis Qualifying Examination Department of Mathematics and Statistics University of Massachusetts Tuesday, January 16th, 2018 Instructions 1. This exam consists of eight (8) problems
More informationNotes on the Lebesgue Integral by Francis J. Narcowich Septemmber, 2014
1 Introduction Notes on the Lebesgue Integral by Francis J. Narcowich Septemmber, 2014 In the definition of the Riemann integral of a function f(x), the x-axis is partitioned and the integral is defined
More information5 Measure theory II. (or. lim. Prove the proposition. 5. For fixed F A and φ M define the restriction of φ on F by writing.
5 Measure theory II 1. Charges (signed measures). Let (Ω, A) be a σ -algebra. A map φ: A R is called a charge, (or signed measure or σ -additive set function) if φ = φ(a j ) (5.1) A j for any disjoint
More informationMath 4121 Spring 2012 Weaver. Measure Theory. 1. σ-algebras
Math 4121 Spring 2012 Weaver Measure Theory 1. σ-algebras A measure is a function which gauges the size of subsets of a given set. In general we do not ask that a measure evaluate the size of every subset,
More informationReal Analysis Problems
Real Analysis Problems Cristian E. Gutiérrez September 14, 29 1 1 CONTINUITY 1 Continuity Problem 1.1 Let r n be the sequence of rational numbers and Prove that f(x) = 1. f is continuous on the irrationals.
More informationTHEOREMS, ETC., FOR MATH 516
THEOREMS, ETC., FOR MATH 516 Results labeled Theorem Ea.b.c (or Proposition Ea.b.c, etc.) refer to Theorem c from section a.b of Evans book (Partial Differential Equations). Proposition 1 (=Proposition
More informationProbability and Measure
Part II Year 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2018 84 Paper 4, Section II 26J Let (X, A) be a measurable space. Let T : X X be a measurable map, and µ a probability
More informationThree hours THE UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER. 24th January
Three hours MATH41011 THE UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER FOURIER ANALYSIS AND LEBESGUE INTEGRATION 24th January 2013 9.45 12.45 Answer ALL SIX questions in Section A (25 marks in total). Answer THREE of the
More informationNotes on Measure, Probability and Stochastic Processes. João Lopes Dias
Notes on Measure, Probability and Stochastic Processes João Lopes Dias Departamento de Matemática, ISEG, Universidade de Lisboa, Rua do Quelhas 6, 1200-781 Lisboa, Portugal E-mail address: jldias@iseg.ulisboa.pt
More informationFourier analysis, measures, and distributions. Alan Haynes
Fourier analysis, measures, and distributions Alan Haynes 1 Mathematics of diffraction Physical diffraction As a physical phenomenon, diffraction refers to interference of waves passing through some medium
More informationCHAPTER 6. Differentiation
CHPTER 6 Differentiation The generalization from elementary calculus of differentiation in measure theory is less obvious than that of integration, and the methods of treating it are somewhat involved.
More information02. Measure and integral. 1. Borel-measurable functions and pointwise limits
(October 3, 2017) 02. Measure and integral Paul Garrett garrett@math.umn.edu http://www.math.umn.edu/ garrett/ [This document is http://www.math.umn.edu/ garrett/m/real/notes 2017-18/02 measure and integral.pdf]
More information1/12/05: sec 3.1 and my article: How good is the Lebesgue measure?, Math. Intelligencer 11(2) (1989),
Real Analysis 2, Math 651, Spring 2005 April 26, 2005 1 Real Analysis 2, Math 651, Spring 2005 Krzysztof Chris Ciesielski 1/12/05: sec 3.1 and my article: How good is the Lebesgue measure?, Math. Intelligencer
More informationHILBERT SPACES AND THE RADON-NIKODYM THEOREM. where the bar in the first equation denotes complex conjugation. In either case, for any x V define
HILBERT SPACES AND THE RADON-NIKODYM THEOREM STEVEN P. LALLEY 1. DEFINITIONS Definition 1. A real inner product space is a real vector space V together with a symmetric, bilinear, positive-definite mapping,
More informationMTH 404: Measure and Integration
MTH 404: Measure and Integration Semester 2, 2012-2013 Dr. Prahlad Vaidyanathan Contents I. Introduction....................................... 3 1. Motivation................................... 3 2. The
More informationCHAPTER I THE RIESZ REPRESENTATION THEOREM
CHAPTER I THE RIESZ REPRESENTATION THEOREM We begin our study by identifying certain special kinds of linear functionals on certain special vector spaces of functions. We describe these linear functionals
More informationMAT 571 REAL ANALYSIS II LECTURE NOTES. Contents. 2. Product measures Iterated integrals Complete products Differentiation 17
MAT 57 REAL ANALSIS II LECTURE NOTES PROFESSOR: JOHN QUIGG SEMESTER: SPRING 205 Contents. Convergence in measure 2. Product measures 3 3. Iterated integrals 4 4. Complete products 9 5. Signed measures
More informationIntegration on Measure Spaces
Chapter 3 Integration on Measure Spaces In this chapter we introduce the general notion of a measure on a space X, define the class of measurable functions, and define the integral, first on a class of
More informationChapter 5. Measurable Functions
Chapter 5. Measurable Functions 1. Measurable Functions Let X be a nonempty set, and let S be a σ-algebra of subsets of X. Then (X, S) is a measurable space. A subset E of X is said to be measurable if
More informationChapter 4. The dominated convergence theorem and applications
Chapter 4. The dominated convergence theorem and applications The Monotone Covergence theorem is one of a number of key theorems alllowing one to exchange limits and [Lebesgue] integrals (or derivatives
More informationPart II Probability and Measure
Part II Probability and Measure Theorems Based on lectures by J. Miller Notes taken by Dexter Chua Michaelmas 2016 These notes are not endorsed by the lecturers, and I have modified them (often significantly)
More informationProblem Set. Problem Set #1. Math 5322, Fall March 4, 2002 ANSWERS
Problem Set Problem Set #1 Math 5322, Fall 2001 March 4, 2002 ANSWRS i All of the problems are from Chapter 3 of the text. Problem 1. [Problem 2, page 88] If ν is a signed measure, is ν-null iff ν () 0.
More informationHomework 11. Solutions
Homework 11. Solutions Problem 2.3.2. Let f n : R R be 1/n times the characteristic function of the interval (0, n). Show that f n 0 uniformly and f n µ L = 1. Why isn t it a counterexample to the Lebesgue
More information(U) =, if 0 U, 1 U, (U) = X, if 0 U, and 1 U. (U) = E, if 0 U, but 1 U. (U) = X \ E if 0 U, but 1 U. n=1 A n, then A M.
1. Abstract Integration The main reference for this section is Rudin s Real and Complex Analysis. The purpose of developing an abstract theory of integration is to emphasize the difference between the
More informationA List of Problems in Real Analysis
A List of Problems in Real Analysis W.Yessen & T.Ma December 3, 218 This document was first created by Will Yessen, who was a graduate student at UCI. Timmy Ma, who was also a graduate student at UCI,
More informationconsists of two disjoint copies of X n, each scaled down by 1,
Homework 4 Solutions, Real Analysis I, Fall, 200. (4) Let be a topological space and M be a σ-algebra on which contains all Borel sets. Let m, µ be two positive measures on M. Assume there is a constant
More informationLebesgue-Radon-Nikodym Theorem
Lebesgue-Radon-Nikodym Theorem Matt Rosenzweig 1 Lebesgue-Radon-Nikodym Theorem In what follows, (, A) will denote a measurable space. We begin with a review of signed measures. 1.1 Signed Measures Definition
More informationMATH 650. THE RADON-NIKODYM THEOREM
MATH 650. THE RADON-NIKODYM THEOREM This note presents two important theorems in Measure Theory, the Lebesgue Decomposition and Radon-Nikodym Theorem. They are not treated in the textbook. 1. Closed subspaces
More informationProbability and Random Processes
Probability and Random Processes Lecture 7 Conditional probability and expectation Decomposition of measures Mikael Skoglund, Probability and random processes 1/13 Conditional Probability A probability
More informationSigned Measures. Chapter Basic Properties of Signed Measures. 4.2 Jordan and Hahn Decompositions
Chapter 4 Signed Measures Up until now our measures have always assumed values that were greater than or equal to 0. In this chapter we will extend our definition to allow for both positive negative values.
More informationReview of measure theory
209: Honors nalysis in R n Review of measure theory 1 Outer measure, measure, measurable sets Definition 1 Let X be a set. nonempty family R of subsets of X is a ring if, B R B R and, B R B R hold. bove,
More information2) Let X be a compact space. Prove that the space C(X) of continuous real-valued functions is a complete metric space.
University of Bergen General Functional Analysis Problems with solutions 6 ) Prove that is unique in any normed space. Solution of ) Let us suppose that there are 2 zeros and 2. Then = + 2 = 2 + = 2. 2)
More informationDifferentiation of Measures and Functions
Chapter 6 Differentiation of Measures and Functions This chapter is concerned with the differentiation theory of Radon measures. In the first two sections we introduce the Radon measures and discuss two
More informationChapter 4. Measure Theory. 1. Measure Spaces
Chapter 4. Measure Theory 1. Measure Spaces Let X be a nonempty set. A collection S of subsets of X is said to be an algebra on X if S has the following properties: 1. X S; 2. if A S, then A c S; 3. if
More informationMathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering
Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering Lecture notes for PDEs Sergei V. Shabanov Department of Mathematics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA CHAPTER 1 The integration theory
More informationfor all x,y [a,b]. The Lipschitz constant of f is the infimum of constants C with this property.
viii 3.A. FUNCTIONS 77 Appendix In this appendix, we describe without proof some results from real analysis which help to understand weak and distributional derivatives in the simplest context of functions
More informationMA359 Measure Theory
A359 easure Theory Thomas Reddington Usman Qureshi April 8, 204 Contents Real Line 3. Cantor set.................................................. 5 2 General easures 2 2. Product spaces...............................................
More informationREAL ANALYSIS I Spring 2016 Product Measures
REAL ANALSIS I Spring 216 Product Measures We assume that (, M, µ), (, N, ν) are σ- finite measure spaces. We want to provide the Cartesian product with a measure space structure in which all sets of the
More informationLecture 5 Theorems of Fubini-Tonelli and Radon-Nikodym
Lecture 5: Fubini-onelli and Radon-Nikodym 1 of 13 Course: heory of Probability I erm: Fall 2013 Instructor: Gordan Zitkovic Lecture 5 heorems of Fubini-onelli and Radon-Nikodym Products of measure spaces
More informationProbability and Random Processes
Probability and Random Processes Lecture 4 General integration theory Mikael Skoglund, Probability and random processes 1/15 Measurable xtended Real-valued Functions R = the extended real numbers; a subset
More informationIntegral Jensen inequality
Integral Jensen inequality Let us consider a convex set R d, and a convex function f : (, + ]. For any x,..., x n and λ,..., λ n with n λ i =, we have () f( n λ ix i ) n λ if(x i ). For a R d, let δ a
More information13. Examples of measure-preserving tranformations: rotations of a torus, the doubling map
3. Examples of measure-preserving tranformations: rotations of a torus, the doubling map 3. Rotations of a torus, the doubling map In this lecture we give two methods by which one can show that a given
More informationConstruction of a general measure structure
Chapter 4 Construction of a general measure structure We turn to the development of general measure theory. The ingredients are a set describing the universe of points, a class of measurable subsets along
More informationl(y j ) = 0 for all y j (1)
Problem 1. The closed linear span of a subset {y j } of a normed vector space is defined as the intersection of all closed subspaces containing all y j and thus the smallest such subspace. 1 Show that
More information1.4 Outer measures 10 CHAPTER 1. MEASURE
10 CHAPTER 1. MEASURE 1.3.6. ( Almost everywhere and null sets If (X, A, µ is a measure space, then a set in A is called a null set (or µ-null if its measure is 0. Clearly a countable union of null sets
More informationReal Analysis Notes. Thomas Goller
Real Analysis Notes Thomas Goller September 4, 2011 Contents 1 Abstract Measure Spaces 2 1.1 Basic Definitions........................... 2 1.2 Measurable Functions........................ 2 1.3 Integration..............................
More informationNAME: MATH 172: Lebesgue Integration and Fourier Analysis (winter 2012) Final exam. Wednesday, March 21, time: 2.5h
NAME: SOLUTION problem # 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 points max 15 20 10 15 10 10 10 10 10 110 MATH 172: Lebesgue Integration and Fourier Analysis (winter 2012 Final exam Wednesday, March 21, 2012 time: 2.5h Please
More informationLebesgue s Differentiation Theorem via Maximal Functions
Lebesgue s Differentiation Theorem via Maximal Functions Parth Soneji LMU München Hütteseminar, December 2013 Parth Soneji Lebesgue s Differentiation Theorem via Maximal Functions 1/12 Philosophy behind
More informationChapter 6. Integration. 1. Integrals of Nonnegative Functions. a j µ(e j ) (ca j )µ(e j ) = c X. and ψ =
Chapter 6. Integration 1. Integrals of Nonnegative Functions Let (, S, µ) be a measure space. We denote by L + the set of all measurable functions from to [0, ]. Let φ be a simple function in L +. Suppose
More information+ = x. ± if x > 0. if x < 0, x
2 Set Functions Notation Let R R {, + } and R + {x R : x 0} {+ }. Here + and are symbols satisfying obvious conditions: for any real number x R : < x < +, (± + (± x + (± (± + x ±, (± (± + and (± (, ± if
More informationCarathéodory s extension of a measure on a semi-ring
Carathéodory s extension of a measure on a semi-ring Reinhardt Messerschmidt www.rmesserschmidt.me.uk 7 October 2018 1 Introduction This article presents Carathéodory s extension of a measure on a semi-ring,
More information1 Orthonormal sets in Hilbert space
Math 857 Fall 15 1 Orthonormal sets in Hilbert space Let S H. We denote by [S] the span of S, i.e., the set of all linear combinations of elements from S. A set {u α : α A} is called orthonormal, if u
More informationMeasurable functions are approximately nice, even if look terrible.
Tel Aviv University, 2015 Functions of real variables 74 7 Approximation 7a A terrible integrable function........... 74 7b Approximation of sets................ 76 7c Approximation of functions............
More informationSolutions to Tutorial 8 (Week 9)
The University of Sydney School of Mathematics and Statistics Solutions to Tutorial 8 (Week 9) MATH3961: Metric Spaces (Advanced) Semester 1, 2018 Web Page: http://www.maths.usyd.edu.au/u/ug/sm/math3961/
More informationCHAPTER X THE SPECTRAL THEOREM OF GELFAND
CHAPTER X THE SPECTRAL THEOREM OF GELFAND DEFINITION A Banach algebra is a complex Banach space A on which there is defined an associative multiplication for which: (1) x (y + z) = x y + x z and (y + z)
More informationn [ F (b j ) F (a j ) ], n j=1(a j, b j ] E (4.1)
1.4. CONSTRUCTION OF LEBESGUE-STIELTJES MEASURES In this section we shall put to use the Carathéodory-Hahn theory, in order to construct measures with certain desirable properties first on the real line
More informationReal Analysis, 2nd Edition, G.B.Folland Elements of Functional Analysis
Real Analysis, 2nd Edition, G.B.Folland Chapter 5 Elements of Functional Analysis Yung-Hsiang Huang 5.1 Normed Vector Spaces 1. Note for any x, y X and a, b K, x+y x + y and by ax b y x + b a x. 2. It
More informationMATH41011/MATH61011: FOURIER SERIES AND LEBESGUE INTEGRATION. Extra Reading Material for Level 4 and Level 6
MATH41011/MATH61011: FOURIER SERIES AND LEBESGUE INTEGRATION Extra Reading Material for Level 4 and Level 6 Part A: Construction of Lebesgue Measure The first part the extra material consists of the construction
More informationMEASURE AND INTEGRATION. Dietmar A. Salamon ETH Zürich
MEASURE AND INTEGRATION Dietmar A. Salamon ETH Zürich 9 September 2016 ii Preface This book is based on notes for the lecture course Measure and Integration held at ETH Zürich in the spring semester 2014.
More informationMATH 614 Dynamical Systems and Chaos Lecture 38: Ergodicity (continued). Mixing.
MATH 614 Dynamical Systems and Chaos Lecture 38: Ergodicity (continued). Mixing. Ergodic theorems Let (X,B,µ) be a measured space and T : X X be a measure-preserving transformation. Birkhoff s Ergodic
More informationbe the set of complex valued 2π-periodic functions f on R such that
. Fourier series. Definition.. Given a real number P, we say a complex valued function f on R is P -periodic if f(x + P ) f(x) for all x R. We let be the set of complex valued -periodic functions f on
More informationMath 720: Homework. Assignment 2: Assigned Wed 09/04. Due Wed 09/11. Assignment 1: Assigned Wed 08/28. Due Wed 09/04
Math 720: Homework Do, but don t turn in optional problems There is a firm no late homework policy Assignment : Assigned Wed 08/28 Due Wed 09/04 Keep in mind there is a firm no late homework policy Starred
More informationDisintegration into conditional measures: Rokhlin s theorem
Disintegration into conditional measures: Rokhlin s theorem Let Z be a compact metric space, µ be a Borel probability measure on Z, and P be a partition of Z into measurable subsets. Let π : Z P be the
More informationReal Analysis Chapter 3 Solutions Jonathan Conder. ν(f n ) = lim
. Suppose ( n ) n is an increasing sequence in M. For each n N define F n : n \ n (with 0 : ). Clearly ν( n n ) ν( nf n ) ν(f n ) lim n If ( n ) n is a decreasing sequence in M and ν( )
More informationFUNDAMENTALS OF REAL ANALYSIS by. IV.1. Differentiation of Monotonic Functions
FUNDAMNTALS OF RAL ANALYSIS by Doğan Çömez IV. DIFFRNTIATION AND SIGND MASURS IV.1. Differentiation of Monotonic Functions Question: Can we calculate f easily? More eplicitly, can we hope for a result
More informationNotation. General. Notation Description See. Sets, Functions, and Spaces. a b & a b The minimum and the maximum of a and b
Notation General Notation Description See a b & a b The minimum and the maximum of a and b a + & a f S u The non-negative part, a 0, and non-positive part, (a 0) of a R The restriction of the function
More informationAnalysis of Probabilistic Systems
Analysis of Probabilistic Systems Bootcamp Lecture 2: Measure and Integration Prakash Panangaden 1 1 School of Computer Science McGill University Fall 2016, Simons Institute Panangaden (McGill) Analysis
More informationSection Signed Measures: The Hahn and Jordan Decompositions
17.2. Signed Measures 1 Section 17.2. Signed Measures: The Hahn and Jordan Decompositions Note. If measure space (X, M) admits measures µ 1 and µ 2, then for any α,β R where α 0,β 0, µ 3 = αµ 1 + βµ 2
More informationThe Hilbert Transform and Fine Continuity
Irish Math. Soc. Bulletin 58 (2006), 8 9 8 The Hilbert Transform and Fine Continuity J. B. TWOMEY Abstract. It is shown that the Hilbert transform of a function having bounded variation in a finite interval
More informationExercise 1. Show that the Radon-Nikodym theorem for a finite measure implies the theorem for a σ-finite measure.
Real Variables, Fall 2014 Problem set 8 Solution suggestions xercise 1. Show that the Radon-Nikodym theorem for a finite measure implies the theorem for a σ-finite measure. nswer: ssume that the Radon-Nikodym
More informationREAL AND COMPLEX ANALYSIS
REAL AND COMPLE ANALYSIS Third Edition Walter Rudin Professor of Mathematics University of Wisconsin, Madison Version 1.1 No rights reserved. Any part of this work can be reproduced or transmitted in any
More informationµ (X) := inf l(i k ) where X k=1 I k, I k an open interval Notice that is a map from subsets of R to non-negative number together with infinity
A crash course in Lebesgue measure theory, Math 317, Intro to Analysis II These lecture notes are inspired by the third edition of Royden s Real analysis. The Jordan content is an attempt to extend the
More informationReal Analysis, October 1977
Real Analysis, October 1977 1. Prove that the sequence 2, 2 2, 2 2 2,... converges and find its limit. 2. For which real-x does x n lim n 1 + x 2n converge? On which real sets is the convergence uniform?
More informationL p Spaces and Convexity
L p Spaces and Convexity These notes largely follow the treatments in Royden, Real Analysis, and Rudin, Real & Complex Analysis. 1. Convex functions Let I R be an interval. For I open, we say a function
More informationCompendium and Solutions to exercises TMA4225 Foundation of analysis
Compendium and Solutions to exercises TMA4225 Foundation of analysis Ruben Spaans December 6, 2010 1 Introduction This compendium contains a lexicon over definitions and exercises with solutions. Throughout
More informationG1CMIN Measure and Integration
G1CMIN Measure and Integration 2003-4 Prof. J.K. Langley May 13, 2004 1 Introduction Books: W. Rudin, Real and Complex Analysis ; H.L. Royden, Real Analysis (QA331). Lecturer: Prof. J.K. Langley (jkl@maths,
More informationBasics of Stochastic Analysis
Basics of Stochastic Analysis c Timo Seppäläinen This version November 16, 214 Department of Mathematics, University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 5376 E-mail address: seppalai@math.wisc.edu
More informationReminder Notes for the Course on Measures on Topological Spaces
Reminder Notes for the Course on Measures on Topological Spaces T. C. Dorlas Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies School of Theoretical Physics 10 Burlington Road, Dublin 4, Ireland. Email: dorlas@stp.dias.ie
More informationDefining the Integral
Defining the Integral In these notes we provide a careful definition of the Lebesgue integral and we prove each of the three main convergence theorems. For the duration of these notes, let (, M, µ) be
More informationMATH 418: Lectures on Conditional Expectation
MATH 418: Lectures on Conditional Expectation Instructor: r. Ed Perkins, Notes taken by Adrian She Conditional expectation is one of the most useful tools of probability. The Radon-Nikodym theorem enables
More informationProduct measures, Tonelli s and Fubini s theorems For use in MAT4410, autumn 2017 Nadia S. Larsen. 17 November 2017.
Product measures, Tonelli s and Fubini s theorems For use in MAT4410, autumn 017 Nadia S. Larsen 17 November 017. 1. Construction of the product measure The purpose of these notes is to prove the main
More information1 Measurable Functions
36-752 Advanced Probability Overview Spring 2018 2. Measurable Functions, Random Variables, and Integration Instructor: Alessandro Rinaldo Associated reading: Sec 1.5 of Ash and Doléans-Dade; Sec 1.3 and
More informationFolland: Real Analysis, Chapter 7 Sébastien Picard
Folland: Real Analysis, Chapter 7 Sébastien Picard Problem 7.2 Let µ be a Radon measure on X. a. Let N be the union of all open U X such that µ(u) =. Then N is open and µ(n) =. The complement of N is called
More information