arxiv: v1 [math.ag] 13 Sep 2015
|
|
- Andrew James
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ENHANCED PERVERSITIES ANDREA D AGNOLO AND ASAKI KASHIWARA arxiv: v1 [math.ag] 13 Sep 2015 Abstract. On a complex manifold, the Riemann-Hilbert correspondence embeds the triangulated category of (not necessarily regular) holonomic D-modules into that of R-constructible enhanced indsheaves. The source category has a standard t-structure. Here, we provide the target category with a middle perversity t-structure, and prove that the embedding is exact. In the paper, we also discuss general perversities in the framework of R-constructible enhanced ind-sheaves on bordered subanalytic spaces. Contents Introduction 2 Notations 5 1. T-structures Categories T-structures Slices Exact functors Sheaves R-constructible sheaves Perversities Enhanced ind-sheaves Semi-orthogonal decomposition Ind-sheaves Bordered spaces Ind-sheaves on bordered spaces Ind-sheaves with an extra variable Enhanced ind-sheaves Operations Stable objects Enhanced perverse ind-sheaves 31 Date: September 12, athematics Subject Classification. Primary 18D, 32C38; Secondary 18E30. Key words and phrases. holonomic D-modules, t-structure, perversity, enhanced ind-sheaves. The second author was supported by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B) 15H03608, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science. 1
2 2 A. D AGNOLO AND. KASHIWARA 3.1. Subanalytic bordered spaces Intermediate enhanced perversities R-constructible enhanced ind-sheaves Dual intermediate enhanced perversity Enhanced perversity Riemann-Hilbert correspondence Subanalytic ind-sheaves Enhanced tempered distributions D-modules Enhanced tempered holomorphic functions Riemann-Hilbert correspondence 63 References 64 Introduction On a complex manifold X, the classical Riemann-Hilbert correspondence establishes an equivalence DR X : D b rh (D X) D b C-c (C X) between the derived category of D X -modules with regular holonomic cohomologies, and the derived category of sheaves of C-vector spaces on X with C-constructible cohomologies ([7]). Here, DR X () = Ω X L D X is the de Rham functor, and Ω X the sheaf of top-degree holomorphic differential forms. oreover, the functor DR X interchanges the standard t- structure ond b rh (D X) with the middle perversity t-structure ond b C-c (C X). In particular, DR X induces an equivalence between the abelian category of regular holonomic D X -modules and that of perverse sheaves on X. The Riemann-Hilbert correspondence of [4] provides a fully faithful embedding DR E X : Db hol (D X) E b R-c (IC X) from the derived category of D X -modules with (not necessarily regular) holonomic cohomologies, into the triangulated category of R-constructible enhanced ind-sheaves of C-vector spaces on X. Here, DR E X is the enhanced version of the de Rham functor. The source category D b hol (D X) has a standard t-structure. In this paper, we provide the target category E b R-c (IC X) with a generalized middle perversity t-structure, and prove that DR E X is an exact functor. Generalized t-structures have been introduced in [10], as a reinterpretation of the notion of slicing from [3]. For example, let D b R-c (C X) be the derived category of sheaves of C-vector spaces on X with R-constructible cohomologies. Then, if X has positive dimension, D b R-c (C X) does not admit a middle perversity t-structure in the classical sense. That is, there
3 ENHANCED PERVERSITIES 3 is no perversity whose induced t-structure on D b R-c (C X) is self-dual. However, it is shown in [10] that D b R-c (C X) has a natural middle perversity t-structure in the generalized sense. This generalized t-structure induces the middle perversity t-structure on the subcategory D b C-c (C X). oreover, it is compatible with our construction of the generalized middle perversity t-structure on E b R-c (IC X), since the natural embedding D b R-c (C X) E b R-c (IC X) turns out to be exact. From now on, we shall use the term t-structure for the one in the generalized sense, and refer to the classical notion as a classical t-structure. Let k be a field and a real analytic manifold, or more generally a bordered subanalytic space. Let E b R-c (Ik ) be the triangulated category of R-constructible enhanced ind-sheaves of k-vector spaces on. In this paper, we also discuss the t-structures on E b R-c (Ik ) associated with arbitrary perversities, and study their functorial properties. Let us give some details. On the set of maps p: Z 0 R, consider the involution given by p (n):= p(n) n. A perversity is a map p: Z 0 R such that p and p are decreasing. Let D b R-c (k ) be the derived category of R-constructible sheaves of k- vector spaces on. For a locally closed subset Z of, let k Z be the extension by zero to of the constant sheaf on Z. For c R, set p D R-c (k ):={F D b R-c(k ); for any k Z 0 there exists a closed subanalytic subset Z of dimension < k such that H j (k \Z F) 0 for j > cp(k)}, p D R-c (k ):={F D b R-c (k ); for any k Z 0 and any closed subanalytic subset Z of dimension k one has H j RHom(k Z,F) 0 for j < cp(k)}. Then (p D R-c (k ), p D R-c (k ) ) is a t-structure in the sense of Definition oreover, the duality functor interchanges p D R-c (k ) and c R p D c R-c (k ). In particular, the t-structure ( 1/2 DR-c (k 1/2 ), DR-c (k ) ) c R associated with the middle perversity m(n) = n/2 is self-dual. The analogous definition for R-constructible enhanced ind-sheaves is pe R-c (Ik ):={K E b R-c (Ik ); for any k Z 0 there exists a closed subanalytic subset Z of dimension < k such that H j (π 1 k \Z K) 0 for j > cp(k)},
4 4 A. D AGNOLO AND. KASHIWARA pe R-c (Ik ):={K E b R-c (Ik ); for any k Z 0 and any closed subanalytic subset Z of dimension k one has H j RIhom(π 1 k Z,K) 0 for j < cp(k)}. It turns out that ( pe R-c (Ik ), p E R-c (Ik ) ) is a t-structure, but it does c R not behave well with respect to the duality functor D E. Hence we set p ER-c (Ik ):={K E b R-c(Ik ); K E p R-c (Ik ), D E K E c 1/2 p R-c (Ik )}, p ER-c (Ik ):={K E b R-c (Ik ); K E 1/2 p R-c (Ik ), D E K E c p R-c (Ik )}. Then ( p E R-c (Ik ), p E R-c (Ik ) ) is a t-structure, and the duality functor interchanges p E R-c (Ik p c R ) and c ER-c (Ik ). In particular, the t- structure ( 1/2 ER-c (), 1/2 E R-c ()) associated with the middle perversity m(n) = n/2 is self-dual. c R Going back to the Riemann-Hilbert correspondence, the enhanced de Rham functor DR E X : Db hol (D X) E b R-c (IC X) is exact with respect to the t-structure associated with the middle perversity. The contents of this paper are as follows. In Section 1, we recall the notion of t-structure on a triangulated category. We also recall the t-structure on the derived category of R- constructible sheaves on a subanalytic space associated with a given perversity. In Section 2, we recall the notions of ind-sheaves and of enhanced ind-sheaves on a bordered space. In both cases we also discuss the exactness of Grothendieck operations with respect to the standard classical t-structures. In Section 3, we introduce the t-structure(s) on the derived category of R-constructible enhanced ind-sheaves on a bordered subanalytic space associated with a given perversity. We also discuss the exactness of Grothendieck operations with respect to these t-structures. Finally, in Section 4, we prove the exactness of the embedding, provided by the Riemann-Hilbert correspondence, from the triangulated category of holonomic D-modules on a complex manifold into that of R-constructible enhanced ind-sheaves. Acknowledgments The first author acknowledges the kind hospitality at RIS, Kyoto University, during the preparation of this paper.
5 ENHANCED PERVERSITIES 5 Notations In this paper, we take a field k as base ring. For a category C, we denote by C op the opposite category of C. One says that a full subcategory S of a category C is strictly full if it contains every object of C which is isomorphic to an object of S. LetC, C be categories andf: C C a functor. The essential image of C by F, denoted by F(C), is the strictly full subcategory of C consisting of objects which are isomorphic to F(X) for some X C. For a ring A, we denote by A op the opposite ring of A. We say that a topological space is good if it is Hausdorff, locally compact, countable at infinity, and has finite soft dimension. 1. T-structures The notion of t-structure on a triangulated category was introduced in [1]. As shown in [18], the derived category of a quasi-abelian category has two natural t-structures. They were presented in [9] in a unified manner, by generalizing the notion of t-structure. A further generalization is described in [10], reinterpreting the notion of slicing from [3]. In the present paper, we use the term t-structure in this more general sense, and we refer to the notion introduced in [1] as a classical t-structure. A basic result of [1] asserts that the heart of a classical t-structure is an abelian category. ore generally, it is shown in [3] that small slices of a t-structure are quasi-abelian categories. It is shown in [1] that, on a complex manifold, the middle perversity induces a self-dual classical t-structure on the triangulated category of C-constructible sheaves. On a real analytic manifold, using results of [11], it is shown in [10] that the middle perversity induces a self-dual t-structure on the triangulated category of R-constructible sheaves. Here we recall these facts, considering general perversities Categories. References are made to [11, Chapter I], and to [18] for the notion of quasi-abelian category (see also [9, 2]). Let C be an additive category. The left and right orthogonal of a subcategory S are the strictly full subcategories S :={X C; Hom C (X,Y) 0 for any Y S}, S :={X C; Hom C (Y,X) 0 for any Y S}. Assume that C admits kernels and cokernels. Given f: X Y a morphism in C, one sets imf :=ker ( Y cokerf ), coimf :=coker ( kerf X ). The morphism f is called strict if the canonical morphism coimf imf is an isomorphism.
6 6 A. D AGNOLO AND. KASHIWARA The category C is called abelian if all morphisms are strict. It is called quasi-abelian if every pull-back of a strict epimorphism is a strict epimorphism, and every pushout of a strict monomorphism is a strict monomorphism T-structures. Let T be a triangulated category. Recall the notion of t-structure from [1]. Definition A classical t-structure ( T 0,T 0) on T is a pair of strictly full subcategories of T such that, setting T n :=T 0 [ n], T n :=T 0 [ n] for n Z, one has: (a) T 0 T 1 and T 1 T 0 ; (b) Hom T (T 0,T 1 ) = 0; (c) for any X T, there exists a distinguished triangle X 0 X X 1 1 in T with X 0 T 0 and X 1 T 1. The following definition of [10] is a reinterpretation of the notion of slicing from [3]. Definition A t-structure ( T,T ) on T is a pair of families c R of strictly full subcategories of T satisfying conditions (a) (d) below, where we set T <c := T and T >c := c <c c >ct for c R. (a) T = T and T = T for any c R, c >c c <c (b) T 1 = T [ 1] and T 1 = T [ 1] for any c R, (c) Hom T (T <c,t >c ) = 0 for any c R, (d) for any X T and c R, there are distinguished triangles in T X X X >c 1 and X <c X X 1 with X L T L for L equal to c, > c, < c or c. Condition (c) is equivalent to either of the following: (c) Hom T (T,T >c ) = 0 for any c R, (c) Hom T (T <c,t ) = 0 for any c R. The next lemma is elementary but useful. It shows for example that, under condition (a), for any c R one has T = c >c Lemma Let X be a set. T <c, T = c <ct >c.
7 ENHANCED PERVERSITIES 7 (i) Let (X ) c R be a family of subsets of X such that X = for any c R. Set X <c := X. Then c <c X <c = X <c, X = c <c c >cx <c. X c >c (ii) Conversely, let (X <c ) c R be a family of subsets of X such that X <c = X <c for any c R. Set X := X <c. Then c <c X = c >c c >c X, X <c = c <cx. (iii) Let (X ) c R and (X <c ) c R be as in (i). Let a,b R with a < b. If X <c = X for any c such that a < c b, then X a = X b. Let ( T 0,T 0) be a classical t-structure. For c R, set T :=T 0 [ n] for n Z such that n c < n1, T :=T 0 [ n] for n Z such that n 1 < c n. Then, ( T,T ) is a t-structure. A classical t-structure is regarded c R as a t-structure by this correspondence. Conversely, if ( T,T ) is a t-structure, then c R ( (1.2.1) T 1,T >c) and ( T <c1,t ) are classical t-structures for any c R. For c R, set T c :=T T. Definition Let Σ R be a discrete subset such that Σ = Σ Z. A t-structure ( T,T ) c R is indexed by Σ if T c = 0 for any c R\Σ. If Σ is non empty, this is equivalent to the fact that for any c R one has where s :=max{s Σ; s < c}, t :=min{s Σ; s > c}, T <c = T s, T = T s, T >c = T t, T = T t, s :=max{s Σ; s c}, t :=min{s Σ; s c}. Classical t-structures correspond to t-structures indexed by Z. In this paper, we will mainly consider t-structures indexed by 1 2 Z. The following lemma is easily proved by using Lemma (iii). Lemma Let ( T,T ) be a t-structure on T. The following c R two conditions are equivalent.
8 8 A. D AGNOLO AND. KASHIWARA (a) ( T,T ) is indexed by some discrete subset Σ R such that c R Σ = ΣZ. (b) For any c R, there exist a,b R such that a < c < b and T <c = T a and T >c = T b Slices. Let ( T,T ) be a t-structure on T. Note the following c R facts. For any c R, one has T >c = (T ), T = (T >c ), T = (T <c ), T <c = (T ). The embeddings T T and T <c T admit left adjoints τ : T T and τ <c : T T <c, called the left truncation functors. Similarly, the embeddings T T and T >c T admit right adjoints τ : T T and τ >c : T T >c, called the right truncation functors. The distinguished triangles in Definition (d) are unique up to unique isomorphism. They are, respectively, given by τ X X τ >c X 1 and τ <c X X τ X 1. Summarizing the above notations, to a half-line L (i.e. an unbounded connected subset L R) is associated a truncation functor τ L : T T L. If L R is another half-line, there is an isomorphism of functors (1.3.1) τ L τ L τ L τ L : T T L T L. Let I R be a proper interval (i.e. a bounded connected non empty subset I R). Then there are two half-linesl,l (unique up to ordering) such that I = L L. The slice of T associated with I is the additive category T I :=T L T L, and one denotes the functor (1.3.1) by H I : T T I. For example, T [c,c ) = T T <c for c < c, and T {c} = T c. One writes for short H c :=H {c}.
9 ENHANCED PERVERSITIES 9 Note that the map I R/Z is bijective if and only if I = [c, c 1) or I = (c,c1] for some c R. The map I R/Z is injective if and only if there exists c R such that I [c,c1) or I (c,c1]. The following result generalizes the fact that the heart T 0 of a classical t-structure ( T 0,T 0) is abelian. Proposition (cf. [3, Lemma 4.3]). Let ( T,T ) be a t-structure c R on T, and let I R be an interval. (i) If I R/Z is injective, then the slice T I is a quasi-abelian category, and strict short exact sequences in T I are in one-to-one correspondence with distinguished triangles in T with all vertices in T I. (ii) If I R/Z is bijective, then the slice T I is an abelian category and the functor H I : T T I is cohomological. Remark The notion of slicing from [3] is equivalent to the datum of a t-structure ( T,T ) such that T is generated by the family of c R subcategories {T c } c R Exact functors. Let S and T be triangulated categories. Let ( S,S ) c R and ( T,T ) c R be t-structures on S and T, respectively. Definition A triangulated functor Φ: S T is called (i) left exact, if one has Φ(S ) T for any c R; (ii) right exact, if one has Φ(S ) T for any c R; (iii) exact, if it is both left and right exact. Lemma Consider two triangulated functors Φ: S T and Ψ: T S. Assume that (Φ,Ψ) is an adjoint pair. This means that Φ is left adjoint to Ψ, or equivalently that Ψ is right adjoint to Φ. Then, Ψ is left exact if and only if Φ is right exact. Proof. Let c R. If Ψ is exact, then, for S S and T T >c, one has Hom T (Φ(S),T) Hom S (S,Ψ(T)) Hom S (S,S >c ) = 0. Hence, Φ(S) (T >c ) = T. Thus Φ is right exact. The converse can be proved similarly Sheaves. Let be a good topological space. Denote by od(k ) the abelian category of sheaves of k-vector spaces on, and by D b (k ) its bounded derived category. It has a standard classical t-structure ( D 0 (k ),D 0 (k ) ).
10 10 A. D AGNOLO AND. KASHIWARA For a locally closed subset S, denote by k S the sheaf on obtained extending by zero the constant sheaf on S with stalk k. For f: N a morphism of good topological spaces, denote by, RHom, f 1, Rf, Rf!, f! the six Grothendieck operations for sheaves. We define the duality functor of D b (k ) by D F = RHom(F,ω ) for F D b (k ), where ω denotes the dualizing complex. If is a C 0 -manifold, one has ω or [d ], where d denotes the dimension of and or the orientation sheaf. For a map f: N of C 0 -manifolds, the relative orientation sheaf is defined as or /N :=f! k N [d N d ] or f 1 or N R-constructible sheaves. Recall the notion of subanalytic subsets of a real analytic manifold (see [6, 2]). Definition (i) A subanalytic space = (,S ) is anr-ringed space which is locally isomorphic to (Z,S Z ), where Z is a closed subanalytic subset of a real analytic manifold, and S Z is the sheaf of R-algebras of real valued subanalytic continuous functions. In this paper, we assume that subanalytic spaces are good topological spaces. (ii) A morphism of subanalytic spaces is a morphism of R-ringed spaces. (iii) A subset S of is subanalytic if i(s U) is a subanalytic subset of N for any open subset U of, any real analytic manifold N and any subanalytic morphism i: U N of subanalytic spaces such that i induces an isomorphism from U to a closed subanalytic subset of N. Let be a subanalytic space. One says that a sheaf F od(k ) is R-constructible if there exists a locally finite family of locally closed subanalytic subsets {S i } i I of such that = i I S i and F is locally constant of finite rank on each S i. Denote by D b R-c (k ) the full subcategory of D b (k ) whose objects have R-constructible cohomologies Perversities. On the set of maps p: Z 0 R, consider the involution given by p (n):= p(n) n. Definition (i) A function p: Z 0 R is a perversity if both p and p are decreasing, i.e. if 0 p(n) p(m) m n for any m,n Z 0 such that n m. (ii) A classical perversity is a Z-valued perversity. Let be a subanalytic space. To a classical perversity p is associated a classical t-structure (p D 0 R-c (k ), p D 0 R-c (k ) ) on D b R-c (k ) (refer to [1] and [11, 10.2]). Here, slightly generalizing a construction in [10], we will associate a t-structure to a perversity.
11 Notation Set For Z CS, denote by the embedding. Set For k Z, set ENHANCED PERVERSITIES 11 CS :={closed subanalytic subsets of }. i Z : Z d Z :=dimz (with d = ). CS <k :={Z CS ; d Z < k}, CS k :={Z CS ; d Z k}. Definition Let p be a perversity, c R and k Z 0. Consider the following conditions on F D b (k ) (p k ): i 1 \Z F Dp(k) (k \Z ) for some Z CS <k, (p k ): i! Z F Dp(k) (k Z ) for any Z CS k. We define the following strictly full subcategories of D b (k ) p D (k ):={F D b (k ); (p k ) holds for any k Z 0}, p D (k ):={F D b (k ); (p k ) holds for any k Z 0}. Let us also set p D R-c (k ):= p D (k ) D b R-c (k ), p D R-c (k ):= p D (k ) D b R-c(k ). Note that ( p D (k ), p D (k ) ) is not a t-structure if dim > 0. c R Lemma For c R, k Z 0 and F D b R-c (k ), the following conditions are equivalent (i) F satisfies (p k ), (ii) dim(supp(h j F)) < k for any j with j > cp(k). Proof. It is enough to remark that i 1 \Z F Dp(k) (k \Z ) if and only if supp(h j F) Z for any j such that j > cp(k). Proposition We have the following properties. (i) ( p D R-c (k ), p D R-c (k ) ) is a t-structure on c R Db R-c (k ). (ii) For any c R, the duality functor D interchanges p D R-c (k ) and p c DR-c (k ). (iii) For any interval I R such that I R/Z is injective, the prestack on U p D I R-c (U) is a stack of quasi-abelian categories.
12 12 A. D AGNOLO AND. KASHIWARA Proof. Note that, for (iii), it is enough to consider the case where I R/Z is bijective, i.e. the case where I = [c,c 1) or I = (c,c 1] for some c R. (a) If p is a classical perversity, the result is due to [1]. ore precisely, for the statements (i), (ii) and (iii) refer to Theorem , Proposition and Proposition of [11], respectively. (b) Let now p be an arbitrary perversity. For c R, denote by c the largest integer not greater than c, and by c the smallest integer not smaller than c. Note that c c = 0. Statements (i) and (iii) follow from (a) by noticing that for any c R ( p D <c1 R-c (k ), p D R-c (k ) ) and ( p D R-c (k ), p D >c 1 R-c (k ) ) are the classical t-structures associated to the classical perversities p c, (n):= cp(n), p c, (n):= cp(n), respectively. Statement (ii) follows from (a) by noticing that one has (p c, ± ) = (p ) c,. Note that ( p D R-c (k ), p D R-c (k ) ) is indexed by ( p(k)z). c R 0 k d Definition The middle perversity t-structure ( 1/2 DR-c (k 1/2 ), DR-c (k ) ) c R is the one associated with the middle perversity m(n):= n/2. Note thatmis the only perversity stable by. In particular, the middle perversity t-structure is self-dual. It is indexed by 1 2 Z. 2. Enhanced ind-sheaves Let be a good topological space. The derived category of enhanced ind-sheaves on is defined as a quotient of the derived category of ind-sheaves on the bordered space R. We recall here these notions and some related results from [4]. We also discuss the exactness of Grothendieck operations with respect to the standard classical t-structures. References are made to [13] for ind-sheaves, and to [4] for bordered spaces and enhanced ind-sheaves. See also [15] for enhanced ind-sheaves on bordered spaces and [16] for an exposition.
13 ENHANCED PERVERSITIES Semi-orthogonal decomposition. Let T be a triangulated category, and N T a strictly full triangulated subcategory. We denote by T/N the quotient triangulated category (see e.g. [14, 10.2]). Proposition Let N T be a strictly full triangulated subcategory which contains every direct summand in T of an object of N. Then the following conditions are equivalent: (i) the embedding N T has a left adjoint, (ii) the quotient functor T T /N has a left adjoint, (iii) the composition N T T /N is an equivalence of categories, (iv) for anyx T there is a distinguished triangle X X X 1 with X N and X N, (v) the embedding N T has a right adjoint, and N ( N). A similar result holds switching left with right Ind-sheaves. Let C be a category and denote by C the category of contravariant functors from C to the category of sets. Consider the Yoneda embedding h: C C, X Hom C (,X). The category C admits small colimits. As colimits do not commute with h, one denotes by lim the colimits taken in C, and by lim the colimits taken in C. An ind-object in C is an object of C isomorphic to lim ϕ for some functor ϕ: I C with I a small filtrant category. Denote by Ind(C) the full subcategory of C consisting of ind-objects in C. Let be a good topological space. The category of ind-sheaves on is the category I(k ):=Ind(od c (k )) of ind-objects in the category od c (k ) of sheaves with compact support. The category I(k ) is abelian, and the prestack on given by U I(k U ) is a stack of abelian categories. There is a natural exact fully faithful functor ι : od(k ) I(k ) given by F lim (k U F), for U running over the relatively compact open subsets of. The functorι has an exact left adjointα : I(k ) od(k ) given byα ( lim ϕ) = lim ϕ. In this paper, we set for short and denote by its standard classical t-structure. D():=D b (I(k )), ( D 0 (),D 0 () )
14 14 A. D AGNOLO AND. KASHIWARA For f: N a morphism of good topological spaces, denote by, RIhom, f 1, Rf, Rf!!, f! the six Grothendieck operations for indsheaves. Since ind-sheaves form a stack, they have a sheaf-valued hom-functor Hom. One has RHom α RIhom Bordered spaces. A bordered space = (, ) is a pair of a good topological space and an open subset of. Notation Let = (, ) and N = (N, N) be bordered spaces. For a continuous map f: N, denote by Γ f N its graph, and by Γ f the closure of Γ f in N. Consider the projections q 1 q N 2. Bordered spaces form a category as follows: a morphism f: N is a continuous map f: N such that q 1 Γf : Γ f is proper; the composition of two morphisms is the composition of the underlying continuous maps. Remark (i) If f: N can be extended to a continuous map f: N, then f is a morphism of bordered space. (ii) The forgetful functor from the category of bordered spaces to that of good topological spaces is given by = (, ) :=. It has a fully faithful left adjoint (,). By this functor, we consider good topological spaces as particular bordered spaces, and denote (,) by. Note that = (, ) is not a functor. Let = (, ) be a bordered space. The continuous maps id induce morphisms of bordered spaces (2.3.1) j. Note that (,), where is the closure of in. Notation For a locally closed subset Z of, set Z = (Z,Z), wherez is the closure ofz in, and denotei Z : Z the morphism induced by the embedding Z. Lemma Let f: N be a morphism of bordered spaces. Let Z and W N be locally closed subsets such that f(z) W. Then f Z : Z W induces a morphism Z W of bordered spaces.
15 ENHANCED PERVERSITIES 15 In particular, the bordered space Z only depends on (and not on ). Definition We say that a morphism f: N is semi-proper if q 2 Γf : Γ f N is proper. We say that f is proper if moreover f: N is proper. For example, j and i Z are semi-proper. Definition A subset S of a bordered space = (, ) is a subset of. We say that S is open (resp. closed, locally closed) if it is so in. We say that S is relatively compact if it is contained in a compact subset of. As seen by the following obvious lemma, the notion of relatively compact subsets only depends on (and not on ). Lemma Let f: N be a morphism of bordered spaces. (i) If S is a relatively compact subset of, then its image f(s) N is a relatively compact subset of N. (ii) Assume furthermore that f is semi-proper. If S is a relatively compact subset of N, then its inverse image f 1 (S) is a relatively compact subset of Ind-sheaves on bordered spaces. Let be a bordered space. The abelian category of ind-sheaves on is I(k ):=Ind(od c (k )), where od c (k ) od(k ) is the full subcategory of sheaves on whose support is relatively compact in. There is a natural exact embedding ι : od(k ) I(k ) given by F lim (k U F), for U running over the family of relatively compact open subsets of. We set for short D():=D b (I(k )), and denote by ( D 0 (),D 0 () ) its standard classical t-structure. Let = (, ), and consider the embeddings \ i j. The functorri Ri!! induces the embedding D( \) D( ), which admits a left and a right adjoint.
16 16 A. D AGNOLO AND. KASHIWARA Proposition There is an equivalence of triangulated categories: D() D( )/D( \). Proof. The functor j! induces an exact functor od c (k ) od c (k ), which induces an exact functor I(k ) I(k ) and functors of triangulated categories D() D( ) D( )/D( \). On the other hand, the functorj 1 induces an exact functorod c (k ) od c (k ), which induces an exact functor I(k ) I(k ) and a functor of triangulated categories D( ) D(). Since the composition D( \) D( ) D() vanishes, we obtain a functor D( )/D( \ ) D(). It is obvious that these functors between D() and D( )/D( \) are quasi-inverse to each other. Thus, there are equivalences and one has D() D( )/D( \) D( \) D( \), Denote by D( \) {F D( ); k F F}, D( \) {F D( ); RIhom(k,F) F}. q : D( ) D(), l,r : D() D( ) the quotient functor and its left and right adjoint, respectively. For F D( ), they satisfy (2.4.1) l q F k F, r q F RIhom(k,F). Remark At the level of sheaves, there is a natural equivalence There is a commutative diagram D b (k ) D b (k )/D b (k \ ). D b (k ) ι D() D b (k )/D b (k \ ) D( )/D( \). The functor ι : D b (k ) D() has a left adjoint It coincides with the composition α : D() D b (k ). D() D( ) α D b (k ).
17 ENHANCED PERVERSITIES 17 Letf: N be a morphism of bordered spaces. The six Grothendieck operations for ind-sheaves on bordered spaces : D() D() D(), RIhom : D() op D() D(), Rf!!,Rf : D() D(N), f 1,f! : D(N) D() are defined as follows. Recalling Notation 2.3.1, observe that Γ f is locally closed in N. For F,F D( ) and G D( N), one sets q F q F :=q (F F ), RIhom(q F,q F ):=q RIhom(F,F ), Rf!! q F :=q N Rq 2!! (k Γf q 1 1 F), Rf q F :=q N Rq 2 RIhom(k Γf,q! 1F), f 1 q N G:=q Rq 1!! (k Γf q 1 2 G), Remark The natural embedding f! q N G:=q Rq 1 RIhom(k Γf,q! 2G). ι : D b (k ) D() commutes with the operations, RIhom, f 1, Rf, f!. If f is semiproper, one has (2.4.2) Rf!! ι ιn R f!. Remark Let = (, ). For the natural morphism j :, one has q j 1 j!, l Rj!!, r Rj. The following result generalizes (2.4.1). Lemma Let Z be a locally closed subset of, and let F D(). Using Notation 2.3.3, one has k Z F Ri Z!!i 1 Z F, RIhom(k Z,F) Ri Z i! Z F. Proof. To avoid confusion, let us denote by k Z the extension by zero to of the constant sheaf k Z on Z. Since i Z is semi-proper, (2.4.2) implies k Z Ri Z!!k Z. Hence k Z F (Ri Z!!k Z ) F Ri Z!!(k Z i 1 Z F) Ri Z!!i 1 Z F.
18 18 A. D AGNOLO AND. KASHIWARA We can prove the second isomorphism similarly. Let = (, ) be a bordered space. By [4, 3.4], one has D 0 () = {F D(); Rj!! F D 0 ( )}, D 0 () = {F D(); Rj!! F D 0 ( )}. Proposition Let be a bordered space. (i) The bifunctor is exact, i.e. for any n,n Z one has D n () D n () D nn (), D n () D n () D nn (). (ii) The bifunctor RIhom is left exact, i.e. for any n,n Z one has RIhom(D n (),D n ()) D n n (). Let f: N be a morphism of bordered spaces. (iii) Rf!! and Rf are left exact, i.e. for any n Z one has Rf!! D n () D n (N), Rf D n () D n (N). (iv) f 1 is exact, i.e. for any n Z one has f 1 D n (N) D n (), f 1 D n (N) D n (). Let d Z 0 and assume that f 1 (y) has soft-dimension d for any y N. (v) Rf!! ( )[d] is right exact, i.e., for any n Z one has Rf!! D n () D nd (N). (vi) f! ( )[ d] is left exact, i.e., for any n Z one has f! D n (N) D n d (). Proof. When and N are good topological spaces, statements (i) (iv) follow from [13]. Let = (, ) andn = (N, N). Replacing(, ) with(, Γ f ), we may assume from the beginning that f: N extends to f: N. (i) follows from the topological space case, using the fact that Rj!! commutes with. (ii) follows from (i) by adjunction. (iii) and (iv) follow from the topological space case using the isomorphisms Rf!! j 1 N R f!! Rj!!, Rf j 1 N R f Rj, f 1 j 1 f 1 Rj N!!.
19 ENHANCED PERVERSITIES 19 As (vi) follows from (v) by adjunction, we are left to prove (v). By dévissage, it is enough to show that for F I(k ) one has H k Rf!! F 0 for k > d. Writing F = lim F i with F i od c (k ), one has i Then, for any y N, ( H k Rf! F i ) H k Rf!! F lim H k Rf! F i. i since f 1 (y) has soft-dimension d. y Hk c(f 1 (y);f i f 1 (y) ) 0, Proposition Let f: N be a morphism of bordered spaces. Let n Z and G D(N). Assume Then (a) f is semi-proper, (b) f: N is surjective. (i) f 1 G D n () implies G D n (N), (ii) f 1 G D n () implies G D n (N). Proof. Let = (, ) and N = (N, N). Since f 1 is exact, it is enough to show that, for G D 0 (N) I(k N ), f 1 G 0 implies G 0. Write G = lim G i, where {G i } i I is a filtrant inductive system of objects G i od c (k N ). Recall that this means that G i od(k N ) and supp(g i ) is relatively compact in N. Since f is semi-proper, f 1 G i od c (k ) by Lemma (ii). The assumption f 1 G = lim f 1 G i 0 implies that, for any i I, there exists i j in I whose induced morphism f 1 G i f 1 G j is the zero map. Since f is surjective, G i G j is the zero map. Thus G = 0. Proposition Let f: N be a continuous map of good topological spaces, and {V i } i I an open covering of N. Let K i D(f 1 V i ) satisfy Rf RHom(K i,k i ) D 0 (k Vi ) and let u ij : K j f 1 V i f 1 V j Ki f 1 V i f 1 V j be isomorphisms satisfying the usual cochain condition: u ij u jk = u ik on f 1 V i f 1 V j f 1 V k. Then there exist K D() and isomorphisms u i : K f 1 V i Ki compatible with u ij, that is, u ij u j = u i on f 1 V i f 1 V j. oreover, such a K is unique up to a unique isomorphism.
20 20 A. D AGNOLO AND. KASHIWARA Proof. The arguments we use are standard (see e.g. [10, Proposition 5.9]). Let us set U i :=f 1 V i. (i) Let us first discuss uniqueness. Let K D() be such that there are isomorphisms u i: K Ui Ki compatible with u ij. Note that for any open subset V of N, one has Hom D(f 1 V) (K f 1 V,K f 1 V) H 0 RΓ(V;Rf RHom(K,K )). Since one has Rf RHom(K,K ) Vi Rf RHom(K i,k i ) D 0 (k Vi ), we have Rf RHom(K,K ) D 0 (k N ). Hence V Hom D(f 1 V) (K f 1 V,K f 1 V) is a sheaf on N. We thus get an isomorphism K K on by patching together the isomorphisms u 1 i u i on U i. (ii) Let us now prove the existence of K as in the statement. (ii-1) Assume that I is finite. In order to prove the statement, by induction we reduce to the case I = {1,2}. Set V 0 := V 1 V 2 and K 0 :=K 1 U0 K 2 U0. Let j i : U i (i = 0,1,2) be the open inclusion. By adjunction, for i = 1,2 there are natural morphisms β i : Rj 0!! K 0 Rj i!! K i. Let us complete the morphism (β 1,β 2 ) into a distinguished triangle Rj 0!! K 0 (β 1,β 2 ) Rj 1!! K 1 Rj 2!! K 2 K 1. Then K satisfies the desired condition. (ii-2) Assume that I = Z 0 and that {V n } n Z 0 is an increasing sequence of open subsets of N. Then K n1 Un K n. Let j n : U n (n Z 0 ) be the open inclusion. By adjunction, there are natural morphisms β n : Rj n!! K n Rj n1!! K n1 (n Z 0 ). Let K be the homotopy colimit of the inductive system {Rj n!! K n } n Z 0, that is, let K be the third term of the distinguished triangle β Rj n!! K n Rj n!! K n K 1. n Z 0 n Z 0 Here β is the only morphism making the following diagram commute for any m Z 0 Rj m!! K m (id, β m) Rjm!! K m Rj m1!! K m1 n Z 0 Rj n!! K n β n Z 0 Rj n!! K n. Then K satisfies the desired condition.
21 ENHANCED PERVERSITIES 21 (ii-3) Let I be arbitrary. Let {Z n } n Z 0 be an increasing sequence of compact subsets of N such that N = n Z 0 Z n. Let us take an increasing sequence {I n } n Z 0 of finite subsets of I such that Z n is covered by {V i } i In, and set V n:= i I n V i, U n:=f 1 V n. Applying (ii-1) with N = V n and I = I n, we can find an object K n D(U n ) such that K n Ui K i for any i I n. Then we can apply (ii-2) with V n = V n Ind-sheaves with an extra variable. Let R := R {, } be the two-point compactification of the affine line. The bordered line is R :=(R,R). Let be a bordered space. Consider the morphisms (2.5.1) µ,q 1,q 2 : R R R, where µ(x,t 1,t 2 ) = (x,t 1 t 2 ), and q 1,q 2 are the natural projections. The convolution functors : D( R ) D( R ) D( R ), Ihom : D( R ) op D( R ) D( R ) are defined as follows, for F 1,F 2 D( R ), F 1 F2 :=Rµ!! (q 1 1 F 1 q 1 2 F 2 ), Ihom (F 1,F 2 ):=Rq 1 RIhom(q 1 2 F 1,µ! F 2 ). Example Let = {pt} and let a,b R. (i) For a b, one has k {t 0} k{t a} k {t a}, k {t 0} k{a t<b} k {a t<b}, Ihom (k {t 0},k {t a} ) k {t<a} [1], Ihom (k {t 0},k {a t<b} ) k {a t<b}. (ii) For 0 < a b, one has k {0 t<a} k{0 t<b} k {0 t<a} k {b t<ab} [ 1]. Consider the standard classical t-structure ( D 0 ( R ),D 0 ( R ) ) on D( R ) discussed in 2.4. Lemma Let be a bordered space. (i) For n,n Z one has D n ( R ) D n ( R ) D nn 1 ( R ), D n ( R ) D n ( R ) D nn ( R ). In particular, the bifunctor is left exact.
22 22 A. D AGNOLO AND. KASHIWARA (ii) For n,n Z one has Ihom (D n ( R ),D n ( R )) D n n 1 ( R ). Proof. Recall the maps (2.5.1). (i) By the definition, for F 1,F 2 D( R ) one has F 1 F2 :=Rµ!! (q 1 1 F 1 q 1 2 F 2 ). Then the statement follows from Proposition (ii) The proof is similar, recalling that Ihom (F 1,F 2 ):=Rq 1 RIhom(q 1 2 F 1,µ! F 2 ). Remark There are no estimates of the form Ihom (k {t 0},D 0 ( R )) D m ( R ) with m Z 0 independent of. In fact, setting, one has = R n (n 1), F = k {x 0, t=1/ x }, (2.5.2) Ihom (k {t 0},F) / D n 3 ( R ), which follows from π 1 k {x=0} Ihom (k {t 0},F) π 1 k {x=0} [1] π 1 k {x=0} [2 n]. Lemma For K D( R ) and n Z one has k {t 0} τ n (k {t 0} K) τ n (k {t 0} K), k {t 0} τ n (k {t 0} K) τ n (k {t 0} K), Let us give a proof of this result slightly different from that in [4, Proposition 4.6.2]. Proof. Consider the distinguished triangle k {t>0} τ n (k {t 0} K) k{t>0} (k{t 0} K) Since the middle term vanishes, one has k {t>0} τ >n (k {t 0} K) 1. k {t>0} τ >n (k {t 0} K) k{t>0} τ n (k {t 0} K)[1]. By Lemma 2.5.2, the first term belongs to D >n ( R ) and the second term belongs to D n ( R ). Hence they both vanish.
23 ENHANCED PERVERSITIES Enhanced ind-sheaves. Let be a bordered space, and consider the natural morphisms π R Consider the full subcategories of D( R ) j R π. N ± :={K D( R ); k { t 0} K 0} = {K D( R ); Ihom (k { t 0},K) 0}, N :=N N = π 1 D(), where the equalities hold by [4, Corollary and Lemma 4.4.3]. The categories of enhanced ind-sheaves are defined by E b ± (Ik ):=D( R )/N, E b (Ik ):=D( R )/N. In this paper, we set for short E ± ():=E b ± (Ik ), E():=E b (Ik ). By [4, Proposition 4.4.4], there are natural equivalences E ± () N ± /N N = N ± N, E() N E () E (), and the same equivalences hold when replacing left with right orthogonals. oreover, one has N = {K D( R ); k {±t 0} K K}, N = {K D( R ); (k {t 0} k {t 0} ) K K} = {K D( R ); Rπ!! K 0}, and the same equalities hold for right orthogonals, replacing with Ihom and Rπ!! with Rπ. We use the following notations Q D( R ) D( R E(), ) L E, R E Q ± E ± (), L E ±, RE ± for the quotient functors and their left and right adjoints, respectively. For F D( R ) one has L E (Q F) ( k {t 0} k {t 0} ) F, R E (Q F) Ihom ( k {t 0} k {t 0}, F ). For a locally closed subset Z R, we set (2.6.1) k Q Z :=Q (k Z ) E().
24 24 A. D AGNOLO AND. KASHIWARA There are functors (2.6.2) ǫ: D() E(), F k Q {t=0} π 1 F, ǫ ± : D() E ± (), F k Q {±t 0} π 1 F. The functors ǫ ± are fully faithful and ǫ(f) ǫ (F) ǫ (F). The bifunctors are defined by One has Ihom E : E() E() D(), Hom E : E() op E() D b (k ), Ihom E (K,K ):=Rπ RIhom(L E K,L E K ) Rπ RIhom(L E K,R E K ) Rπ RIhom(R E K,R E K ) Rπ RIhom(Rj!! L E K,Rj R E K ) and Hom E :=α Ihom E. (2.6.3) Hom E() (K,K ) Hom D() (k,ihom E (K,K )). If is a topological space, that is, if is an isomorphism, one has Hom E() (K,K ) H 0 RΓ ( ;Hom E (K,K ) ). Note, however, that Hom E() (K,K ) H 0 RΓ ( ;Hom E (K,K ) ) does not hold in general. Definition ([4, Definition 4.6.3]). For n Z, set Note that E n ():={K E(); L E K D n ( R )}, E n ():={K E(); L E K D n ( R )}. E 0 () {F I(k R ); ( k {t 0} k {t 0} ) F F in D( R )} ={F I(k R ); Rπ!! F 0 in D()}. Proposition ([4, Proposition 4.6.2]). ( E 0 (),E 0 () ) is a classical t-structure on E(). Example Let a, b R with a < b. In the category E({pt}), one has L E k Q {a t} k {a t}, L E k Q {a t<b} k {a t<b}, R E k Q {a t} k {t<a}[1], R E k Q {a t<b} k {a t<b}.
25 In particular, ENHANCED PERVERSITIES 25 k Q {a t}, kq {a t<b} E0 ({pt}). Proposition Let be a good topological space. Then the prestack on given by U E 0 (U) is a stack of abelian categories. Proof. The statement holds since U E 0 (U) is a sub-prestack of the direct image by π of the stack of ind-sheaves on R. ore precisely, one has E 0 (U) {F I(k U R ); (k {t 0} k {t 0} ) F F}. Lemma For any n Z one has In particular, Q is left exact. Q D n ( R ) E n1 (), Q D n ( R ) = E n (). Proof. (i) For F D( R ), one has L E Q F (k {t 0} k {t 0} ) F. Hence the inclusions follow from Lemma (ii) It remains to show the opposite inclusionq D n ( R ) E n (). If K E n (), then F :=L E K D n ( R ), and K Q (F). Lemma For any n Z one has R E E n () D n 1 ( R ). Proof. By Lemma 2.6.5, the functor Q [1] is right exact. Hence its right adjoint R E [ 1] is left exact. Remark (i) It follows from Example that the estimate in Lemma is optimal. (ii) It follows from Remark that there are no estimates of the form R E E 0 () D m ( R ) with m Z independent of. (iii) The example in Remark shows that ( {K E(); R E K D 0 ( R )}, {K E(); R E K D 0 ( R )} ) is not a classical t-structure on E(), in general. Proposition The functors Ihom E and Hom E are left exact, i.e. for n,n Z one has (i) Ihom E (E n (),E n ()) D n n (), (ii) Hom E (E n (),E n ()) D n n (k ).
26 26 A. D AGNOLO AND. KASHIWARA Proof. (i) By the definition, for K,K E() one has Ihom E (K,K ) = Rπ RIhom(L E K,L E K ). Hence the statement follows from Proposition (ii) One has Hom E = α Ihom E. Since α is exact, the statement follows from (i) Operations. Let f: N be a morphism of bordered spaces. The six Grothendieck operations for enhanced ind-sheaves : E() E() E(), Ihom : E() op E() E(), Ef!!,Ef : E() E(N), Ef 1,Ef! : E(N) E() are defined as follows. Set f R = f id R : R N R. For F,F D( R ) and G D(N R ), one sets Q F Q F :=Q (F F ), Ihom (Q F,Q F ):=Q Ihom (F,F ), The duality functor is defined by Ef!! Q F :=Q N Rf R!!F, Ef Q F :=Q N Rf R F, Ef 1 Q N G:=Q f 1 R G, Ef! Q N G:=Q f! R G. D Q : E() E()op, K Ihom (K,ω Q ), where ω :=j! ω D() and ωq :=ǫ(ω ):=π 1 ω k Q {t=0} E(). Lemma ([4, Lemma 4.3.2]). Let = (, ). For F D(k R ), one has D Q (Q F) Q (a 1 D R F), where a is the involution of R defined by a(x, t) = (x, t). Example Let a, b R with a < b. In the category E({pt}), one has D Q k Q {a t} kq {t< a} [1] kq { a t} and D Q k Q {a t<b} kq { b t< a} [1]. In particular, D Q k Q {a t} E0 ({pt}) and Proposition Let be a bordered space. D Q k Q {a t<b} E 1 ({pt}).
27 (i) For n,n Z one has ENHANCED PERVERSITIES 27 E n () E n () E nn 1 (), E n () E n () E nn (). In particular, the bifunctor is left exact. (ii) For n,n Z one has Ihom (E n (),E n ()) E n n 1 (). Let f: N be a morphism of bordered spaces. (iii) Ef!! and Ef are left exact, i.e. for any n Z one has Ef!! E n () E n (N), Ef E n () E n (N). (iv) Ef 1 is exact, i.e. for any n Z one has Ef 1 E n (N) E n (), Ef 1 E n (N) E n (). Let d Z 0 and assume that f 1 (y) has soft-dimension d for any y N. (v) Ef!! ( )[d] is right exact, i.e. for any n Z one has Ef!! E n () E nd (N). (vi) Ef! ( )[ d] is left exact, i.e. for any n Z one has Ef! E n (N) E n d (). Proof. (i) For K E() and K E() one has L E (K K ) L E K L E K. Then the statement follows from Lemma (ii) follows from (i) by adjunction. As we deal here with bifunctors, let us spell out the proof. Let K E n (), K E n (), and L E <n n 1 (). Then one has Hom E() (L,Ihom (K,K )) Hom E() (L K,K ) Hom E() (E <n (),E n ()) = 0. Then Ihom (K,K ) E <n n 1 (N) = E n n 1 (N). (iii-1) The fact that Ef!! is left exact follows from Proposition 2.4.6, since one has L E Ef!! Rf R!! L E, where we recall that f R :=f id R.
28 28 A. D AGNOLO AND. KASHIWARA (iv) also follows from Proposition 2.4.6, since one has L E Ef 1 f 1 R L E. (iii-2) The fact that Ef is left exact follows from (iv) by adjunction. (v) has a proof similar to (iii-1). (vi) follows from (v) by adjunction. Proposition Let f: N be a morphism of bordered spaces. Let n Z and L E(N). Assume (a) f is semi-proper, (b) f: N is surjective. Then (i) f 1 L E n () implies L E n (N), (ii) f 1 L E n () implies L E n (N). Proof. It is enough to apply Proposition to the morphism f R : R N R and the object G = L E L D(N R ). The bifunctors π 1 ( ) ( ): D() E() E(), RIhom(π 1 ( ), ): D() op E() E() are defined as follows, for L D() and F D( R ), π 1 L Q F :=Q (π 1 L F), RIhom(π 1 L,Q F):=Q RIhom(π 1 L,F). Lemma Let be a bordered space. (i) The bifunctor π 1 ( ) ( ) is exact, i.e. for n,n Z one has π 1 D n () E n () E nn (), π 1 D n () E n () E nn (). In particular, the functor ǫ from (2.6.2) is exact. (ii) The bifunctor RIhom(π 1 ( ), ) is left exact, i.e. for n,n Z one has RIhom(π 1 D n (),E n ()) E n n (). Proof. (i) For F D() and K E() one has L E (π 1 F K) π 1 F L E K. Hence the statement follows from Proposition (ii) follows by adjunction from (i). Let us end this section stating some facts related to Notation
29 ENHANCED PERVERSITIES 29 Lemma Let Z be a locally closed subset of, and K E(). One has π 1 k Z K Ei Z!! Ei 1 Z K, RIhom(π 1 k Z,K) Ei Z Ei! Z K. Proof. Note that(z R) = Z R andi Z id R = i (Z R). Hence the statement follows from Lemma Lemma Let Z be a locally closed subset of, and Z Z a closed subset. For K E(), there are distinguished triangles in E(Z ) Ei!! Ei 1 (Z\Z ) K Ei 1 Z K Ei!!Ei 1 Z K 1, Ei Ei! Z K Ei! Z K Ei Ei! (Z\Z ) K 1, where i: (Z \Z ) Z and i : Z Z are the natural morphisms. Proof. Since the proofs are similar, we shall only construct the first distinguished triangle. By Lemma 2.7.6, applying the functor π 1 ( ) K to the distinguished triangle k Z\Z k Z k Z one gets the distinguished triangle 1, Ei (Z\Z )!! Ei 1 (Z\Z ) K Ei Z!! Ei 1 Z K Ei Z!! Ei 1 Z K 1. Since i Z = i Z i and i (Z\Z ) = i Z i, the distinguished triangle in the statement is obtained by applying the functor Ei 1 Z to the above distinguished triangle. Lemma Let c R and Z a locally closed subset of. (i) The following conditions are equivalent: (a) Ei 1 Z K E (Z ), (b) π 1 k Z K E (). (ii) The following conditions are equivalent: (a) Ei Z! K E (Z ), (b) RIhom(π 1 k Z,K) E (). Proof. (i) By Lemma 2.7.6, one has π 1 k Z K Ei Z!! Ei 1 Z K, Ei 1 Z K Ei 1 Z (π 1 k Z K). The statement follows, since the functors Ei Z!! and Ei 1 Z are exact by Proposition (It follows that (a) and (b) remain equivalent when replacing c by c.) (ii) is proved similarly.
30 30 A. D AGNOLO AND. KASHIWARA 2.8. Stable objects. Setting k {t 0} := lim k {t a}, a k {0 t< } := lim k {0 t<a}, a there are distinguished triangles in D( R ) The objects of E() k {t 0} k {t< } [1] k R [1] k {t< } := lim k {t<a}, a 1, k {0 t< } k {t 0} k {t 0} 1. k E :=Q (k {t 0} ) Q (k {t< } [1]) and k tor :=Q (k {0 t< } ) enter the distinguished triangle (2.8.1) k tor k {t 0} k E 1. Note that we have k tor k tor k tor, k E k E k E and k tor k E 0. Definition The category E st () of stable enhanced ind-sheaves is the full subcategory of E () given by E st ():={K E (); k tor K 0} = {K E (); K k E = {K E (); K k E = {K E (); K k Q {t a} K} L for some L E b (Ik )} K for any a 0}, where the equivalences follow from (2.8.1) and [4, Proposition 4.7.5]. Similar equivalences hold by replacing with Ihom. The embedding E st () E() has a left adjoint k E, and a right adjoint Ihom (k E, ). There is an embedding (2.8.2) e: D() E st (), F k E π 1 F. Note that e(f) k E ǫ(f). For a locally closed subset Z R, we set (2.8.3) k E Z :=ke k Q Z E st(). Lemma (i) The embedding e from (2.8.2) is fully faithful and exact.
31 (ii) The functor k E ENHANCED PERVERSITIES 31 ( ) is exact. Proof. (i) follows from [4, Proposition ] and Lemma 2.7.5, and (ii) from [4, Lemma 4.7.4]. The duality functor for stable enhanced ind-sheaves is defined by D E : E() E st() op, K Ihom (K,ω E ), where we set ω E :=e(ω ). Lemma ([4, Proposition 4.8.3]). Let = (, ). For F D b (k R ), one has D E (ke Q F) k E (D Q Q F) k E Q (a 1 D R F), where a is the involution of R defined by a(x, t) = (x, t). 3. Enhanced perverse ind-sheaves As we recalled in Section 1, a perversity endows the triangulated category of R-constructible sheaves on a subanalytic space with a t-structure. Here, we extend this result to the triangulated category of R-constructible enhanced ind-sheaves. We allow the subanalytic space to be bordered, and we also discuss exactness of the six Grothendieck operations Subanalytic bordered spaces. Recall Notation Definition (i) A subanalytic bordered space = (, ) is a bordered space such that is a subanalytic space and is an open subanalytic subset of. (ii) A morphism f: N = (N, N) of subanalytic bordered spaces is a morphism f: N of subanalytic spaces such that its graphγ f is a subanalytic subset of N, and q 1 Γf is proper. In particular, f: N is a morphism of bordered spaces. (iii) is smooth of dimension d if is locally isomorphic to R d as a subanalytic space. (iv) A subset S of (see Definition 2.3.6) is called subanalytic if it is subanalytic in. (v) A morphismf: N of subanalytic bordered spaces is submersive if the continuous map f: N is locally (in ) isomorphic to the projection N R d N for some d. Let = (, ) be a subanalytic bordered space, and consider the embedding j :.
32 32 A. D AGNOLO AND. KASHIWARA Definition D b R-c (k ) is the full subcategory of D b (k ) whose objects F are such that Rj! F is an R-constructible object of D b (k ). We regard D b R-c (k ) as a full subcategory of D(). Proposition Let f: N be a morphism of subanalytic bordered spaces. (i) The functors f 1 and f! send D b R-c (k N) to D b R-c (k ). (ii) If f is semi-proper, then the functors Rf!! and Rf send D b R-c (k ) to D b R-c (k N). In particular, the category D b R-c (k ) only depends on. Notation For a subanalytic bordered space, set CS :={closed subanalytic subsets of }, LCS :={locally closed subanalytic subsets of }. For Z LCS, denote by i Z : Z the morphism induced by the embedding Z (see Notation 2.3.3). For k Z, set CS <k :={Z CS ; d Z < k}, CS k :={Z CS ; d Z k}, and similarly for LCS <k and LCS k. Definition Let p be a perversity, c R and k Z 0. Consider the following conditions for F D() (Ip k ): i 1 (\Z) F D p(k) (( \Z) ) for some Z CS <k, (Ip k ): i! Z F D p(k) (Z ) for any Z CS k. Consider the following strictly full subcategories of D() p D ():={F D(); (Ip k ) holds for any k Z 0}, p D ():={F D(); (Ip k ) holds for any k Z 0}. Let us also set p D R-c (k ):= p D () D b R-c(k ), p DR-c (k ):= p D () D b R-c(k ). It is easy to check that ( p D R-c (k ), p D R-c (k ) ) satisfies the analogue c R of Proposition (i) and (ii). Note that ( p D (), p D () ) is not a t-structure if dim > 0. c R Lemma For any c R one has ( p α D () ) p D (k ).
8 Perverse Sheaves. 8.1 Theory of perverse sheaves
8 Perverse Sheaves In this chapter we will give a self-contained account of the theory of perverse sheaves and intersection cohomology groups assuming the basic notions concerning constructible sheaves
More informationPERVERSE SHEAVES: PART I
PERVERSE SHEAVES: PART I Let X be an algebraic variety (not necessarily smooth). Let D b (X) be the bounded derived category of Mod(C X ), the category of left C X -Modules, which is in turn a full subcategory
More informationDerived categories, perverse sheaves and intermediate extension functor
Derived categories, perverse sheaves and intermediate extension functor Riccardo Grandi July 26, 2013 Contents 1 Derived categories 1 2 The category of sheaves 5 3 t-structures 7 4 Perverse sheaves 8 1
More informationAFFINE PUSHFORWARD AND SMOOTH PULLBACK FOR PERVERSE SHEAVES
AFFINE PUSHFORWARD AND SMOOTH PULLBACK FOR PERVERSE SHEAVES YEHAO ZHOU Conventions In this lecture note, a variety means a separated algebraic variety over complex numbers, and sheaves are C-linear. 1.
More informationIntroduction and preliminaries Wouter Zomervrucht, Februari 26, 2014
Introduction and preliminaries Wouter Zomervrucht, Februari 26, 204. Introduction Theorem. Serre duality). Let k be a field, X a smooth projective scheme over k of relative dimension n, and F a locally
More informationConstructible Derived Category
Constructible Derived Category Dongkwan Kim September 29, 2015 1 Category of Sheaves In this talk we mainly deal with sheaves of C-vector spaces. For a topological space X, we denote by Sh(X) the abelian
More informationA Homological Study of Bornological Spaces
Prépublications Mathématiques de l Université Paris 13 A Homological Study of Bornological Spaces by Fabienne Prosmans Jean-Pierre Schneiders 00-21 December 2000 Laboratoire Analyse, Géométrie et Applications,
More informationPART II.1. IND-COHERENT SHEAVES ON SCHEMES
PART II.1. IND-COHERENT SHEAVES ON SCHEMES Contents Introduction 1 1. Ind-coherent sheaves on a scheme 2 1.1. Definition of the category 2 1.2. t-structure 3 2. The direct image functor 4 2.1. Direct image
More informationPERVERSE SHEAVES. Contents
PERVERSE SHEAVES SIDDHARTH VENKATESH Abstract. These are notes for a talk given in the MIT Graduate Seminar on D-modules and Perverse Sheaves in Fall 2015. In this talk, I define perverse sheaves on a
More informationIndCoh Seminar: Ind-coherent sheaves I
IndCoh Seminar: Ind-coherent sheaves I Justin Campbell March 11, 2016 1 Finiteness conditions 1.1 Fix a cocomplete category C (as usual category means -category ). This section contains a discussion of
More informationAn overview of D-modules: holonomic D-modules, b-functions, and V -filtrations
An overview of D-modules: holonomic D-modules, b-functions, and V -filtrations Mircea Mustaţă University of Michigan Mainz July 9, 2018 Mircea Mustaţă () An overview of D-modules Mainz July 9, 2018 1 The
More information1. Algebraic vector bundles. Affine Varieties
0. Brief overview Cycles and bundles are intrinsic invariants of algebraic varieties Close connections going back to Grothendieck Work with quasi-projective varieties over a field k Affine Varieties 1.
More informationAn introduction to derived and triangulated categories. Jon Woolf
An introduction to derived and triangulated categories Jon Woolf PSSL, Glasgow, 6 7th May 2006 Abelian categories and complexes Derived categories and functors arise because 1. we want to work with complexes
More informationWIDE SUBCATEGORIES OF d-cluster TILTING SUBCATEGORIES
WIDE SUBCATEGORIES OF d-cluster TILTING SUBCATEGORIES MARTIN HERSCHEND, PETER JØRGENSEN, AND LAERTIS VASO Abstract. A subcategory of an abelian category is wide if it is closed under sums, summands, kernels,
More informationMIXED HODGE MODULES PAVEL SAFRONOV
MIED HODGE MODULES PAVEL SAFRONOV 1. Mixed Hodge theory 1.1. Pure Hodge structures. Let be a smooth projective complex variety and Ω the complex of sheaves of holomorphic differential forms with the de
More informationGK-SEMINAR SS2015: SHEAF COHOMOLOGY
GK-SEMINAR SS2015: SHEAF COHOMOLOGY FLORIAN BECK, JENS EBERHARDT, NATALIE PETERNELL Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Talks 1 2.1. Introduction: Jordan curve theorem 1 2.2. Derived categories 2 2.3. Derived
More informationWhat is an ind-coherent sheaf?
What is an ind-coherent sheaf? Harrison Chen March 8, 2018 0.1 Introduction All algebras in this note will be considered over a field k of characteristic zero (an assumption made in [Ga:IC]), so that we
More informationGood tilting modules and recollements of derived module categories, II.
Good tilting modules and recollements of derived module categories, II. Hongxing Chen and Changchang Xi Abstract Homological tilting modules of finite projective dimension are investigated. They generalize
More informationWEIGHT STRUCTURES AND SIMPLE DG MODULES FOR POSITIVE DG ALGEBRAS
WEIGHT STRUCTURES AND SIMPLE DG MODULES FOR POSITIVE DG ALGEBRAS BERNHARD KELLER AND PEDRO NICOLÁS Abstract. Using techniques due to Dwyer Greenlees Iyengar we construct weight structures in triangulated
More informationElementary (ha-ha) Aspects of Topos Theory
Elementary (ha-ha) Aspects of Topos Theory Matt Booth June 3, 2016 Contents 1 Sheaves on topological spaces 1 1.1 Presheaves on spaces......................... 1 1.2 Digression on pointless topology..................
More informationPERVERSE SHEAVES ON A TRIANGULATED SPACE
PERVERSE SHEAVES ON A TRIANGULATED SPACE A. POLISHCHUK The goal of this note is to prove that the category of perverse sheaves constructible with respect to a triangulation is Koszul (i.e. equivalent to
More informationAn introduction to Algebra and Topology
An introduction to Algebra and Topology Pierre Schapira http://www.math.jussieu.fr/ schapira/lectnotes schapira@math.jussieu.fr Course at University of Luxemburg 1/3/2012 30/4/2012, v5 2 Contents 1 Linear
More informationTHE SIX OPERATIONS FOR SHEAVES ON ARTIN STACKS II: ADIC COEFFICIENTS
THE SIX OPERATIONS FOR SHEAVES ON ARTIN STACKS II: ADIC COEFFICIENTS YVES ASZO AND MARTIN OSSON Abstract. In this paper we develop a theory of Grothendieck s six operations for adic constructible sheaves
More information1 Replete topoi. X = Shv proét (X) X is locally weakly contractible (next lecture) X is replete. D(X ) is left complete. K D(X ) we have R lim
Reference: [BS] Bhatt, Scholze, The pro-étale topology for schemes In this lecture we consider replete topoi This is a nice class of topoi that include the pro-étale topos, and whose derived categories
More informationTRIANGULATED CATEGORIES, SUMMER SEMESTER 2012
TRIANGULATED CATEGORIES, SUMMER SEMESTER 2012 P. SOSNA Contents 1. Triangulated categories and functors 2 2. A first example: The homotopy category 8 3. Localization and the derived category 12 4. Derived
More informationLectures on Grothendieck Duality. II: Derived Hom -Tensor adjointness. Local duality.
Lectures on Grothendieck Duality II: Derived Hom -Tensor adjointness. Local duality. Joseph Lipman February 16, 2009 Contents 1 Left-derived functors. Tensor and Tor. 1 2 Hom-Tensor adjunction. 3 3 Abstract
More informationDe Rham Cohomology. Smooth singular cochains. (Hatcher, 2.1)
II. De Rham Cohomology There is an obvious similarity between the condition d o q 1 d q = 0 for the differentials in a singular chain complex and the condition d[q] o d[q 1] = 0 which is satisfied by the
More informationLIMITS OF CATEGORIES, AND SHEAVES ON IND-SCHEMES
LIMITS OF CATEGORIES, AND SHEAVES ON IND-SCHEMES JONATHAN BARLEV 1. Inverse limits of categories This notes aim to describe the categorical framework for discussing quasi coherent sheaves and D-modules
More informationAlgebra and Topology
Algebra and Topology Course at Paris VI University, 2007/2008 1 Pierre Schapira http://www.math.jussieu.fr/ schapira/lectnotes schapira@math.jussieu.fr 1/9/2011, v2 1 To the students: the material covered
More informationdi Scienze matematiche, fisiche e naturali Corso di Laurea in Matematica
Università degli studi di Padova Facoltà di Scienze matematiche, fisiche e naturali Corso di Laurea in Matematica Tesi Magistrale Perversity of the Nearby Cycles Relatore: Ch.mo Prof. Bruno Chiarellotto
More informationMicro-support of sheaves
Micro-support of sheaves Vincent Humilière 17/01/14 The microlocal theory of sheaves and in particular the denition of the micro-support is due to Kashiwara and Schapira (the main reference is their book
More information0.1 Spec of a monoid
These notes were prepared to accompany the first lecture in a seminar on logarithmic geometry. As we shall see in later lectures, logarithmic geometry offers a natural approach to study semistable schemes.
More informationAlgebraic Geometry Spring 2009
MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 18.726 Algebraic Geometry Spring 2009 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms. 18.726: Algebraic Geometry
More informationDERIVED CATEGORIES OF COHERENT SHEAVES
DERIVED CATEGORIES OF COHERENT SHEAVES OLIVER E. ANDERSON Abstract. We give an overview of derived categories of coherent sheaves. [Huy06]. Our main reference is 1. For the participants without bacground
More information1. THE CONSTRUCTIBLE DERIVED CATEGORY
1. THE ONSTRUTIBLE DERIVED ATEGORY DONU ARAPURA Given a family of varieties, we want to be able to describe the cohomology in a suitably flexible way. We describe with the basic homological framework.
More informationStructures of AS-regular Algebras
Structures of AS-regular Algebras Hiroyuki Minamoto and Izuru Mori Abstract In this paper, we define a notion of AS-Gorenstein algebra for N-graded algebras, and show that symmetric AS-regular algebras
More informationDirect Limits. Mathematics 683, Fall 2013
Direct Limits Mathematics 683, Fall 2013 In this note we define direct limits and prove their basic properties. This notion is important in various places in algebra. In particular, in algebraic geometry
More informationBasic results on Grothendieck Duality
Basic results on Grothendieck Duality Joseph Lipman 1 Purdue University Department of Mathematics lipman@math.purdue.edu http://www.math.purdue.edu/ lipman November 2007 1 Supported in part by NSA Grant
More informationIC of subvarieties. Logarithmic perversity. Hyperplane complements.
12. Lecture 12: Examples of perverse sheaves 12.1. IC of subvarieties. As above we consider the middle perversity m and a Whitney stratified space of dimension n with even dimensional strata. Let Y denote
More informationDuality, Residues, Fundamental class
Duality, Residues, Fundamental class Joseph Lipman Purdue University Department of Mathematics lipman@math.purdue.edu May 22, 2011 Joseph Lipman (Purdue University) Duality, Residues, Fundamental class
More informationLectures on Grothendieck Duality II: Derived Hom -Tensor adjointness. Local duality.
Lectures on Grothendieck Duality II: Derived Hom -Tensor adjointness. Local duality. Joseph Lipman Purdue University Department of Mathematics lipman@math.purdue.edu February 16, 2009 Joseph Lipman (Purdue
More informationSERRE FINITENESS AND SERRE VANISHING FOR NON-COMMUTATIVE P 1 -BUNDLES ADAM NYMAN
SERRE FINITENESS AND SERRE VANISHING FOR NON-COMMUTATIVE P 1 -BUNDLES ADAM NYMAN Abstract. Suppose X is a smooth projective scheme of finite type over a field K, E is a locally free O X -bimodule of rank
More informationAN INTRODUCTION TO PERVERSE SHEAVES AND CHARACTER SHEAVES
AN INTRODUCTION TO PERVERSE SHEAVES AND CHARACTER SHEAVES ANNE-MARIE AUBERT Abstract. After a brief review of derived categories, triangulated categories and t-structures, we shall consider the bounded
More informationSection Higher Direct Images of Sheaves
Section 3.8 - Higher Direct Images of Sheaves Daniel Murfet October 5, 2006 In this note we study the higher direct image functors R i f ( ) and the higher coinverse image functors R i f! ( ) which will
More informationAlgebraic Geometry Spring 2009
MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 18.726 Algebraic Geometry Spring 2009 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms. 18.726: Algebraic Geometry
More informationChern classes à la Grothendieck
Chern classes à la Grothendieck Theo Raedschelders October 16, 2014 Abstract In this note we introduce Chern classes based on Grothendieck s 1958 paper [4]. His approach is completely formal and he deduces
More informationPART II.2. THE!-PULLBACK AND BASE CHANGE
PART II.2. THE!-PULLBACK AND BASE CHANGE Contents Introduction 1 1. Factorizations of morphisms of DG schemes 2 1.1. Colimits of closed embeddings 2 1.2. The closure 4 1.3. Transitivity of closure 5 2.
More informationVERDIER DUALITY AKHIL MATHEW
VERDIER DUALITY AKHIL MATHEW 1. Introduction Let M be a smooth, compact oriented manifold of dimension n, and let k be a field. Recall that there is a natural pairing in singular cohomology H r (M; k)
More informationAlgebraic v.s. Analytic Point of View
Algebraic v.s. Analytic Point of View Ziwen Zhu September 19, 2015 In this talk, we will compare 3 different yet similar objects of interest in algebraic and complex geometry, namely algebraic variety,
More informationALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY COURSE NOTES, LECTURE 9: SCHEMES AND THEIR MODULES.
ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY COURSE NOTES, LECTURE 9: SCHEMES AND THEIR MODULES. ANDREW SALCH 1. Affine schemes. About notation: I am in the habit of writing f (U) instead of f 1 (U) for the preimage of a subset
More informationNon characteristic finiteness theorems in crystalline cohomology
Non characteristic finiteness theorems in crystalline cohomology 1 Non characteristic finiteness theorems in crystalline cohomology Pierre Berthelot Université de Rennes 1 I.H.É.S., September 23, 2015
More informationDERIVED CATEGORIES OF STACKS. Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Conventions, notation, and abuse of language The lisse-étale and the flat-fppf sites
DERIVED CATEGORIES OF STACKS Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Conventions, notation, and abuse of language 1 3. The lisse-étale and the flat-fppf sites 1 4. Derived categories of quasi-coherent modules 5
More informationSTABLE MODULE THEORY WITH KERNELS
Math. J. Okayama Univ. 43(21), 31 41 STABLE MODULE THEORY WITH KERNELS Kiriko KATO 1. Introduction Auslander and Bridger introduced the notion of projective stabilization mod R of a category of finite
More informationLecture 9: Sheaves. February 11, 2018
Lecture 9: Sheaves February 11, 2018 Recall that a category X is a topos if there exists an equivalence X Shv(C), where C is a small category (which can be assumed to admit finite limits) equipped with
More informationLECTURE 1: SOME GENERALITIES; 1 DIMENSIONAL EXAMPLES
LECTURE 1: SOME GENERALITIES; 1 DIMENSIONAL EAMPLES VIVEK SHENDE Historically, sheaves come from topology and analysis; subsequently they have played a fundamental role in algebraic geometry and certain
More informationRIEMANN S INEQUALITY AND RIEMANN-ROCH
RIEMANN S INEQUALITY AND RIEMANN-ROCH DONU ARAPURA Fix a compact connected Riemann surface X of genus g. Riemann s inequality gives a sufficient condition to construct meromorphic functions with prescribed
More informationModules over a Scheme
Modules over a Scheme Daniel Murfet October 5, 2006 In these notes we collect various facts about quasi-coherent sheaves on a scheme. Nearly all of the material is trivial or can be found in [Gro60]. These
More informationEtale cohomology of fields by Johan M. Commelin, December 5, 2013
Etale cohomology of fields by Johan M. Commelin, December 5, 2013 Etale cohomology The canonical topology on a Grothendieck topos Let E be a Grothendieck topos. The canonical topology T on E is given in
More informationFormal power series rings, inverse limits, and I-adic completions of rings
Formal power series rings, inverse limits, and I-adic completions of rings Formal semigroup rings and formal power series rings We next want to explore the notion of a (formal) power series ring in finitely
More informationOverview of Atiyah-Singer Index Theory
Overview of Atiyah-Singer Index Theory Nikolai Nowaczyk December 4, 2014 Abstract. The aim of this text is to give an overview of the Index Theorems by Atiyah and Singer. Our primary motivation is to understand
More informationUNIVERSAL DERIVED EQUIVALENCES OF POSETS
UNIVERSAL DERIVED EQUIVALENCES OF POSETS SEFI LADKANI Abstract. By using only combinatorial data on two posets X and Y, we construct a set of so-called formulas. A formula produces simultaneously, for
More informationDerived Categories Of Sheaves
Derived Categories Of Sheaves Daniel Murfet October 5, 2006 We give a standard exposition of the elementary properties of derived categories of sheaves on a ringed space. This includes the derived direct
More informationLectures on Homological Algebra. Weizhe Zheng
Lectures on Homological Algebra Weizhe Zheng Morningside Center of Mathematics Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing 100190, China University of the Chinese Academy
More informationDeformation theory of representable morphisms of algebraic stacks
Deformation theory of representable morphisms of algebraic stacks Martin C. Olsson School of Mathematics, Institute for Advanced Study, 1 Einstein Drive, Princeton, NJ 08540, molsson@math.ias.edu Received:
More informationALGEBRAIC K-THEORY HANDOUT 5: K 0 OF SCHEMES, THE LOCALIZATION SEQUENCE FOR G 0.
ALGEBRAIC K-THEORY HANDOUT 5: K 0 OF SCHEMES, THE LOCALIZATION SEQUENCE FOR G 0. ANDREW SALCH During the last lecture, we found that it is natural (even just for doing undergraduatelevel complex analysis!)
More informationDerivations and differentials
Derivations and differentials Johan Commelin April 24, 2012 In the following text all rings are commutative with 1, unless otherwise specified. 1 Modules of derivations Let A be a ring, α : A B an A algebra,
More informationNOTES ON PERVERSE SHEAVES AND VANISHING CYCLES. David B. Massey
NOTES ON PERVERSE SHEAVES AND VANISHING CYCLES David B. Massey 0. Introduction to Version 2-16 These notes are my continuing effort to provide a sort of working mathematician s guide to the derived category
More informationDerived Algebraic Geometry I: Stable -Categories
Derived Algebraic Geometry I: Stable -Categories October 8, 2009 Contents 1 Introduction 2 2 Stable -Categories 3 3 The Homotopy Category of a Stable -Category 6 4 Properties of Stable -Categories 12 5
More informationMath 530 Lecture Notes. Xi Chen
Math 530 Lecture Notes Xi Chen 632 Central Academic Building, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2G1, CANADA E-mail address: xichen@math.ualberta.ca 1991 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary
More informationModules over a Ringed Space
Modules over a Ringed Space Daniel Murfet October 5, 2006 In these notes we collect some useful facts about sheaves of modules on a ringed space that are either left as exercises in [Har77] or omitted
More informationLOCAL VS GLOBAL DEFINITION OF THE FUSION TENSOR PRODUCT
LOCAL VS GLOBAL DEFINITION OF THE FUSION TENSOR PRODUCT DENNIS GAITSGORY 1. Statement of the problem Throughout the talk, by a chiral module we shall understand a chiral D-module, unless explicitly stated
More informationMatrix factorisations
28.08.2013 Outline Main Theorem (Eisenbud) Let R = S/(f ) be a hypersurface. Then MCM(R) MF S (f ) Survey of the talk: 1 Define hypersurfaces. Explain, why they fit in our setting. 2 Define. Prove, that
More informationFORMAL GLUEING OF MODULE CATEGORIES
FORMAL GLUEING OF MODULE CATEGORIES BHARGAV BHATT Fix a noetherian scheme X, and a closed subscheme Z with complement U. Our goal is to explain a result of Artin that describes how coherent sheaves on
More informationLECTURE 3: RELATIVE SINGULAR HOMOLOGY
LECTURE 3: RELATIVE SINGULAR HOMOLOGY In this lecture we want to cover some basic concepts from homological algebra. These prove to be very helpful in our discussion of singular homology. The following
More informationDerived Categories. Mistuo Hoshino
Derived Categories Mistuo Hoshino Contents 01. Cochain complexes 02. Mapping cones 03. Homotopy categories 04. Quasi-isomorphisms 05. Mapping cylinders 06. Triangulated categories 07. Épaisse subcategories
More informationPART I. Abstract algebraic categories
PART I Abstract algebraic categories It should be observed first that the whole concept of category is essentially an auxiliary one; our basic concepts are those of a functor and a natural transformation.
More informationInjective Modules and Matlis Duality
Appendix A Injective Modules and Matlis Duality Notes on 24 Hours of Local Cohomology William D. Taylor We take R to be a commutative ring, and will discuss the theory of injective R-modules. The following
More informationDerived Algebraic Geometry IX: Closed Immersions
Derived Algebraic Geometry I: Closed Immersions November 5, 2011 Contents 1 Unramified Pregeometries and Closed Immersions 4 2 Resolutions of T-Structures 7 3 The Proof of Proposition 1.0.10 14 4 Closed
More informationALGEBRAIC GROUPS JEROEN SIJSLING
ALGEBRAIC GROUPS JEROEN SIJSLING The goal of these notes is to introduce and motivate some notions from the theory of group schemes. For the sake of simplicity, we restrict to algebraic groups (as defined
More informationLECTURE IV: PERFECT PRISMS AND PERFECTOID RINGS
LECTURE IV: PERFECT PRISMS AND PERFECTOID RINGS In this lecture, we study the commutative algebra properties of perfect prisms. These turn out to be equivalent to perfectoid rings, and most of the lecture
More informationA GLIMPSE OF ALGEBRAIC K-THEORY: Eric M. Friedlander
A GLIMPSE OF ALGEBRAIC K-THEORY: Eric M. Friedlander During the first three days of September, 1997, I had the privilege of giving a series of five lectures at the beginning of the School on Algebraic
More informationFourier Mukai transforms II Orlov s criterion
Fourier Mukai transforms II Orlov s criterion Gregor Bruns 07.01.2015 1 Orlov s criterion In this note we re going to rely heavily on the projection formula, discussed earlier in Rostislav s talk) and
More informationCommutative algebraic groups up to isogeny
Commutative algebraic groups up to isogeny Michel Brion Abstract Consider the abelian category C k of commutative algebraic groups over a field k. By results of Serre and Oort, C k has homological dimension
More informationRAPHAËL ROUQUIER. k( )
GLUING p-permutation MODULES 1. Introduction We give a local construction of the stable category of p-permutation modules : a p- permutation kg-module gives rise, via the Brauer functor, to a family of
More informationSchemes via Noncommutative Localisation
Schemes via Noncommutative Localisation Daniel Murfet September 18, 2005 In this note we give an exposition of the well-known results of Gabriel, which show how to define affine schemes in terms of the
More informationSMA. Grothendieck topologies and schemes
SMA Grothendieck topologies and schemes Rafael GUGLIELMETTI Semester project Supervised by Prof. Eva BAYER FLUCKIGER Assistant: Valéry MAHÉ April 27, 2012 2 CONTENTS 3 Contents 1 Prerequisites 5 1.1 Fibred
More informationarxiv:math/ v1 [math.at] 6 Oct 2004
arxiv:math/0410162v1 [math.at] 6 Oct 2004 EQUIVARIANT UNIVERSAL COEFFICIENT AND KÜNNETH SPECTRAL SEQUENCES L. GAUNCE LEWIS, JR. AND MICHAEL A. MANDELL Abstract. We construct hyper-homology spectral sequences
More informationFOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 2
FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 2 RAVI VAKIL CONTENTS 1. Where we were 1 2. Yoneda s lemma 2 3. Limits and colimits 6 4. Adjoints 8 First, some bureaucratic details. We will move to 380-F for Monday
More informationTHE TELESCOPE CONJECTURE FOR HEREDITARY RINGS VIA EXT-ORTHOGONAL PAIRS
THE TELESCOPE CONJECTURE FOR HEREDITARY RINGS VIA EXT-ORTHOGONAL PAIRS HENNING KRAUSE AND JAN ŠŤOVÍČEK Abstract. For the module category of a hereditary ring, the Ext-orthogonal pairs of subcategories
More informationAlgebraic Geometry
MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 18.726 Algebraic Geometry Spring 2009 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms. 18.726: Algebraic Geometry
More informationV. SRINIVAS. h p,q (X)u p v q
THE HODGE CHARACTERISTIC V. SRINIVAS 1. Introduction The goal of this lecture is to discuss the proof of the following result, used in Kontsevich s proof of the theorem that the Hodge numbers of two birationally
More informationwhich is a group homomorphism, such that if W V U, then
4. Sheaves Definition 4.1. Let X be a topological space. A presheaf of groups F on X is a a function which assigns to every open set U X a group F(U) and to every inclusion V U a restriction map, ρ UV
More informationMath Homotopy Theory Hurewicz theorem
Math 527 - Homotopy Theory Hurewicz theorem Martin Frankland March 25, 2013 1 Background material Proposition 1.1. For all n 1, we have π n (S n ) = Z, generated by the class of the identity map id: S
More informationarxiv: v2 [math.ct] 27 Dec 2014
ON DIRECT SUMMANDS OF HOMOLOGICAL FUNCTORS ON LENGTH CATEGORIES arxiv:1305.1914v2 [math.ct] 27 Dec 2014 ALEX MARTSINKOVSKY Abstract. We show that direct summands of certain additive functors arising as
More informationBasic Facts on Sheaves
Applications of Homological Algebra Spring 2007 Basic Facts on Sheaves Introduction to Perverse Sheaves P. Achar Definition 1. A sheaf of abelian groups F on a topological space X is the following collection
More informationTOPICS IN ALGEBRA COURSE NOTES AUTUMN Contents. Preface Notations and Conventions
TOPICS IN ALGEBRA COURSE NOTES AUTUMN 2003 ROBERT E. KOTTWITZ WRITTEN UP BY BRIAN D. SMITHLING Preface Notations and Conventions Contents ii ii 1. Grothendieck Topologies and Sheaves 1 1.1. A Motivating
More informationIND-COHERENT SHEAVES AND SERRE DUALITY II. 1. Introduction
IND-COHERENT SHEAVES AND SERRE DUALITY II 1. Introduction Let X be a smooth projective variety over a field k of dimension n. Let V be a vector bundle on X. In this case, we have an isomorphism H i (X,
More informationTopological K-theory
Topological K-theory Robert Hines December 15, 2016 The idea of topological K-theory is that spaces can be distinguished by the vector bundles they support. Below we present the basic ideas and definitions
More informationFOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 25
FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 25 RAVI VAKIL CONTENTS 1. Quasicoherent sheaves 1 2. Quasicoherent sheaves form an abelian category 5 We began by recalling the distinguished affine base. Definition.
More informationABSTRACT DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY VIA SHEAF THEORY
ABSTRACT DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY VIA SHEAF THEORY ARDA H. DEMIRHAN Abstract. We examine the conditions for uniqueness of differentials in the abstract setting of differential geometry. Then we ll come up
More information