RIGIDITY OF GROUP ACTIONS. II. Orbit Equivalence in Ergodic Theory
|
|
- Oswin Jones
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 RIGIDITY OF GROUP ACTIONS II. Orbit Equivalence in Ergodic Theory Alex Furman (University of Illinois at Chicago) March 1, 2007
2 Ergodic Theory of II 1 Group Actions II 1 Systems: Γ discrete countable group (X, B, µ) std prob space = ([0, 1], Borel, Lebesgue) Γ (X, µ) ergodic m.p. (γ µ = µ, γ Γ)
3 Ergodic Theory of II 1 Group Actions II 1 Systems: Γ discrete countable group (X, B, µ) std prob space = ([0, 1], Borel, Lebesgue) Γ (X, µ) ergodic m.p. (γ µ = µ, γ Γ) Quotient Maps: Γ (X, µ) T Γ (Y, ν) T : X Y with T µ = ν and T (γ.x) = γ.t (x) a.e. (γ Γ)
4 Ergodic Theory of II 1 Group Actions II 1 Systems: Γ discrete countable group (X, B, µ) std prob space = ([0, 1], Borel, Lebesgue) Γ (X, µ) ergodic m.p. (γ µ = µ, γ Γ) Quotient Maps: Γ (X, µ) T Γ (Y, ν) T : X Y with T µ = ν and T (γ.x) = γ.t (x) a.e. (γ Γ) Standing Convention: Everything is measurable and considered modulo null sets
5 Orbit Equivalence Orbit Equivalence: Γ (X, µ) is OE to Λ (Y, ν) if T (X, µ) (Y, ν) meas space iso, T (Γ.x) = Λ.T (x)
6 Orbit Equivalence Orbit Equivalence: Γ (X, µ) is OE to Λ (Y, ν) if T (X, µ) (Y, ν) meas space iso, T (Γ.x) = Λ.T (x) equivalently, an iso T : R Γ,X = RΛ,Y of orbit relations. R Γ,X = {(x, x ) X X Γ.x = Γ.x }
7 Orbit Equivalence Orbit Equivalence: Γ (X, µ) is OE to Λ (Y, ν) if T (X, µ) (Y, ν) meas space iso, T (Γ.x) = Λ.T (x) equivalently, an iso T : R Γ,X = RΛ,Y of orbit relations. R Γ,X = {(x, x ) X X Γ.x = Γ.x } Equivalence Relations (Feldman-Moore, 1977) - Axiomatization; types: I n, II 1, II, III λ, 0 λ 1. - Axiomatization of L (X ) vn(r)... - Every R = R Γ,X for some countable Γ (X, µ)
8 First Impressions Theorem (Ornstein-Weiss, 1980) All ergodic II 1 actions of all amenable groups are OE.
9 First Impressions Theorem (Ornstein-Weiss, 1980) All ergodic II 1 actions of all amenable groups are OE. Theorem (Zimmer, 1981) Let G 1, G 2 be simple Lie groups, rk(g 1 ) 2, Γ i < G i lattices, and Γ i (X i, µ i ) erg free II 1 actions. Then R Γ1,X 1 = RΓ2,X 2 = G 1 G 2, and iso of induced actions.
10 First Impressions Theorem (Ornstein-Weiss, 1980) All ergodic II 1 actions of all amenable groups are OE. Theorem (Zimmer, 1981) Let G 1, G 2 be simple Lie groups, rk(g 1 ) 2, Γ i < G i lattices, and Γ i (X i, µ i ) erg free II 1 actions. Then R Γ1,X 1 = RΓ2,X 2 = G 1 G 2, and iso of induced actions. Proof: induced actions G i Y i = (G i Γi X i ) are OE: Y 1 Y2 T
11 First Impressions Theorem (Ornstein-Weiss, 1980) All ergodic II 1 actions of all amenable groups are OE. Theorem (Zimmer, 1981) Let G 1, G 2 be simple Lie groups, rk(g 1 ) 2, Γ i < G i lattices, and Γ i (X i, µ i ) erg free II 1 actions. Then R Γ1,X 1 = RΓ2,X 2 = G 1 G 2, and iso of induced actions. Proof: induced actions G i Y i = (G i Γi X i ) are OE: Y 1 Y2 Cocycle α : G 1 Y 1 G 2 from T (g 1.y 1 ) = α(g 1, y 1 ).T (y 1 ) T
12 First Impressions Theorem (Ornstein-Weiss, 1980) All ergodic II 1 actions of all amenable groups are OE. Theorem (Zimmer, 1981) Let G 1, G 2 be simple Lie groups, rk(g 1 ) 2, Γ i < G i lattices, and Γ i (X i, µ i ) erg free II 1 actions. Then R Γ1,X 1 = RΓ2,X 2 = G 1 G 2, and iso of induced actions. Proof: induced actions G i Y i = (G i Γi X i ) are OE: Y 1 Y2 Cocycle α : G 1 Y 1 G 2 from T (g 1.y 1 ) = α(g 1, y 1 ).T (y 1 ) Cocycle Superrigidity: α ρ : G 1 G 2 (isomorphism) = G T
13 First Impressions Theorem (Ornstein-Weiss, 1980) All ergodic II 1 actions of all amenable groups are OE. Theorem (Zimmer, 1981) Let G 1, G 2 be simple Lie groups, rk(g 1 ) 2, Γ i < G i lattices, and Γ i (X i, µ i ) erg free II 1 actions. Then R Γ1,X 1 = RΓ2,X 2 = G 1 G 2, and iso of induced actions. Proof: induced actions G i Y i = (G i Γi X i ) are OE: Y 1 Y2 Cocycle α : G 1 Y 1 G 2 from T (g 1.y 1 ) = α(g 1, y 1 ).T (y 1 ) Cocycle Superrigidity: α ρ : G 1 G 2 (isomorphism) = G Conjugation map gives G Y 1 = G Y2 T
14 First Impressions Theorem (Ornstein-Weiss, 1980) All ergodic II 1 actions of all amenable groups are OE. Theorem (Zimmer, 1981) Let G 1, G 2 be simple Lie groups, rk(g 1 ) 2, Γ i < G i lattices, and Γ i (X i, µ i ) erg free II 1 actions. Then R Γ1,X 1 = RΓ2,X 2 = G 1 G 2, and iso of induced actions. Proof: induced actions G i Y i = (G i Γi X i ) are OE: Y 1 Y2 Cocycle α : G 1 Y 1 G 2 from T (g 1.y 1 ) = α(g 1, y 1 ).T (y 1 ) Cocycle Superrigidity: α ρ : G 1 G 2 (isomorphism) = G Conjugation map gives G Y 1 = G Y2 Example SL n (Z) T n are pairwise non-oe for n 3. T
15 Basic Questions Axiomatization and study of abstract eq. rel. (Feldman-Moore 1977)
16 Basic Questions Axiomatization and study of abstract eq. rel. (Feldman-Moore 1977) Orbit structure of specific actions (Descriptive Set Theory)
17 Basic Questions Axiomatization and study of abstract eq. rel. (Feldman-Moore 1977) Orbit structure of specific actions (Descriptive Set Theory) R Γ,X properties of Γ and Γ (X, µ)
18 Basic Questions Axiomatization and study of abstract eq. rel. (Feldman-Moore 1977) Orbit structure of specific actions (Descriptive Set Theory) R Γ,X properties of Γ and Γ (X, µ) Given R how to get R = R Γ,X?
19 Basic Questions Axiomatization and study of abstract eq. rel. (Feldman-Moore 1977) Orbit structure of specific actions (Descriptive Set Theory) R Γ,X properties of Γ and Γ (X, µ) Given R how to get R = R Γ,X? Given Γ how many R Γ,X?
20 II 1 Equivalence Relations Invariants of a II 1 relation R on (X, µ): vn(r) and L (X ) vn(r) Cohomologies H n (R, T 1 ), H 1 (R, L)
21 II 1 Equivalence Relations Invariants of a II 1 relation R on (X, µ): vn(r) and L (X ) vn(r) Cohomologies H n (R, T 1 ), H 1 (R, L) F(R) = { µ(a) µ(b) : R A A = R B B A, B X }
22 II 1 Equivalence Relations Invariants of a II 1 relation R on (X, µ): vn(r) and L (X ) vn(r) Cohomologies H n (R, T 1 ), H 1 (R, L) F(R) = { µ(a) µ(b) : R A A = R B B A, B X } Out (R) = Aut (R)/Inn (R) amenability, (T), Haagerup property,...
23 II 1 Equivalence Relations Invariants of a II 1 relation R on (X, µ): vn(r) and L (X ) vn(r) Cohomologies H n (R, T 1 ), H 1 (R, L) F(R) = { µ(a) µ(b) : R A A = R B B A, B X } Out (R) = Aut (R)/Inn (R) amenability, (T), Haagerup property,... Treeability and anti-treeability (Adams)
24 II 1 Equivalence Relations Invariants of a II 1 relation R on (X, µ): vn(r) and L (X ) vn(r) Cohomologies H n (R, T 1 ), H 1 (R, L) F(R) = { µ(a) µ(b) : R A A = R B B A, B X } Out (R) = Aut (R)/Inn (R) amenability, (T), Haagerup property,... Treeability and anti-treeability (Adams) cost(r) (Levitt, Gaboriau) β (2) n (R) (Gaboriau)
25 II 1 Equivalence Relations Invariants of a II 1 relation R on (X, µ): vn(r) and L (X ) vn(r) Cohomologies H n (R, T 1 ), H 1 (R, L) F(R) = { µ(a) µ(b) : R A A = R B B A, B X } Out (R) = Aut (R)/Inn (R) amenability, (T), Haagerup property,... Treeability and anti-treeability (Adams) cost(r) (Levitt, Gaboriau) β (2) n (R) (Gaboriau) Ergodic dimension... (Gaboriau)
26 II 1 Equivalence Relations Invariants of a II 1 relation R on (X, µ): vn(r) and L (X ) vn(r) Cohomologies H n (R, T 1 ), H 1 (R, L) F(R) = { µ(a) µ(b) : R A A = R B B A, B X } Out (R) = Aut (R)/Inn (R) amenability, (T), Haagerup property,... Treeability and anti-treeability (Adams) cost(r) (Levitt, Gaboriau) β (2) n (R) (Gaboriau) Ergodic dimension... (Gaboriau) Weal/Stable iso R 1 R 2 if R 1 A A = R2 B B compression index: ind(r 1 : R 2 ) := µ(b)/µ(a).
27 II 1 Equivalence Relations Invariants of a II 1 relation R on (X, µ): vn(r) and L (X ) vn(r) Cohomologies H n (R, T 1 ), H 1 (R, L) F(R) = { µ(a) µ(b) : R A A = R B B A, B X } Out (R) = Aut (R)/Inn (R) amenability, (T), Haagerup property,... Treeability and anti-treeability (Adams) cost(r) (Levitt, Gaboriau) β (2) n (R) (Gaboriau) Ergodic dimension... (Gaboriau) Weal/Stable iso R 1 R 2 if R 1 A A = R2 B B compression index: ind(r 1 : R 2 ) := µ(b)/µ(a). (Weak) Morphisms R 1 R 2 in/sur/bi-jective morphisms
28 Rigidity of Orbit Structures of Higher Rank Lattices Theorem (Zimmer 1981) Let Γ < G simple rk(g) 2. Then any R X,Γ remembers Lie(G) and G G Γ X.
29 Rigidity of Orbit Structures of Higher Rank Lattices Theorem (Zimmer 1981) Let Γ < G simple rk(g) 2. Then any R X,Γ remembers Lie(G) and G G Γ X. Theorem (F. 1999) Let Γ < G simple rk(g) 2, Γ (X, µ) erg,
30 Rigidity of Orbit Structures of Higher Rank Lattices Theorem (Zimmer 1981) Let Γ < G simple rk(g) 2. Then any R X,Γ remembers Lie(G) and G G Γ X. Theorem (F. 1999) Let Γ < G simple rk(g) 2, Γ (X, µ) erg, X G/Γ
31 Rigidity of Orbit Structures of Higher Rank Lattices Theorem (Zimmer 1981) Let Γ < G simple rk(g) 2. Then any R X,Γ remembers Lie(G) and G G Γ X. Theorem (F. 1999) Let Γ < G simple rk(g) 2, Γ (X, µ) erg, X G/Γ Let Λ be any group, Λ (Y, ν) free erg, R Γ,X R Λ,Y
32 Rigidity of Orbit Structures of Higher Rank Lattices Theorem (Zimmer 1981) Let Γ < G simple rk(g) 2. Then any R X,Γ remembers Lie(G) and G G Γ X. Theorem (F. 1999) Let Γ < G simple rk(g) 2, Γ (X, µ) erg, X G/Γ Let Λ be any group, Λ (Y, ν) free erg, R Γ,X R Λ,Y Then Γ Λ and Γ X Λ Y
33 Rigidity of Orbit Structures of Higher Rank Lattices Theorem (Zimmer 1981) Let Γ < G simple rk(g) 2. Then any R X,Γ remembers Lie(G) and G G Γ X. Theorem (F. 1999) Let Γ < G simple rk(g) 2, Γ (X, µ) erg, X G/Γ Let Λ be any group, Λ (Y, ν) free erg, R Γ,X R Λ,Y Then Γ Λ and Γ X Λ Y Remarks virtual iso for actions means iso = modulo finite groups and fin index
34 Rigidity of Orbit Structures of Higher Rank Lattices Theorem (Zimmer 1981) Let Γ < G simple rk(g) 2. Then any R X,Γ remembers Lie(G) and G G Γ X. Theorem (F. 1999) Let Γ < G simple rk(g) 2, Γ (X, µ) erg, X G/Γ Let Λ be any group, Λ (Y, ν) free erg, R Γ,X R Λ,Y Then Γ Λ and Γ X Λ Y Remarks virtual iso for actions means iso = modulo finite groups and fin index = ind(r Γ,X : R Λ,Y ) Q
35 Rigidity of Orbit Structures of Higher Rank Lattices Theorem (Zimmer 1981) Let Γ < G simple rk(g) 2. Then any R X,Γ remembers Lie(G) and G G Γ X. Theorem (F. 1999) Let Γ < G simple rk(g) 2, Γ (X, µ) erg, Let Λ be any group, Λ (Y, ν) free erg, R Γ,X R Λ,Y Then Γ Λ and Γ X Λ Y Remarks virtual iso for actions means iso = modulo finite groups and fin index = ind(r Γ,X : R Λ,Y ) Q
36 Rigidity of Orbit Structures of Higher Rank Lattices Theorem (Zimmer 1981) Let Γ < G simple rk(g) 2. Then any R X,Γ remembers Lie(G) and G G Γ X. Theorem (F. 1999) Let Γ < G simple rk(g) 2, Γ (X, µ) erg, Let Λ be any group, Λ (Y, ν) free erg, R Γ,X R Λ,Y Then Γ Λ and Γ X Λ Y Remarks virtual iso for actions means iso = modulo finite groups and fin index = ind(r Γ,X : R Λ,Y ) Q π : X G/Γ π Γ π X π OE to Γ X
37 Rigidity of Orbit Structures of Higher Rank Lattices Theorem (Zimmer 1981) Let Γ < G simple rk(g) 2. Then any R X,Γ remembers Lie(G) and G G Γ X. Theorem (F. 1999) Let Γ < G simple rk(g) 2, Γ (X, µ) erg, Let Λ be any group, Λ (Y, ν) free erg, R Γ,X R Λ,Y Then Γ Λ and Γ X Λ Y or π : X G/Γ π so that Λ Γ π and Λ Y Γ π X π. Remarks virtual iso for actions means iso = modulo finite groups and fin index = ind(r Γ,X : R Λ,Y ) Q π : X G/Γ π Γ π X π OE to Γ X
38 Rigidity of Orbit Structures of Higher Rank Lattices Theorem (Zimmer 1981) Let Γ < G simple rk(g) 2. Then any R X,Γ remembers Lie(G) and G G Γ X. Theorem (F. 1999) Let Γ < G simple rk(g) 2, Γ (X, µ) erg, Let Λ be any group, Λ (Y, ν) free erg, R Γ,X R Λ,Y Then Γ Λ and Γ X Λ Y or π : X G/Γ π so that Λ Γ π and Λ Y Γ π X π. Remarks virtual iso for actions means iso = modulo finite groups and fin index = ind(r Γ,X : R Λ,Y ) Q {vol(g/γ)/vol(g/γ )} π : X G/Γ π Γ π X π OE to Γ X
39 A question of Feldman and Moore Theorem (Feldman-Moore 1977) For any countable relation R there exists an action of a countable group Γ with R = R Γ,X
40 A question of Feldman and Moore Theorem (Feldman-Moore 1977) For any countable relation R there exists an action of a countable group Γ with R = R Γ,X Question: (Feldman-Moore) Can one always find an essentially free action of some group?
41 A question of Feldman and Moore Theorem (Feldman-Moore 1977) For any countable relation R there exists an action of a countable group Γ with R = R Γ,X Question: (Feldman-Moore) Can one always find an essentially free action of some group? Theorem (F. 1999) There exist II 1 (and II ) relations that cannot be generated by a free action of any group.
42 A question of Feldman and Moore Theorem (Feldman-Moore 1977) For any countable relation R there exists an action of a countable group Γ with R = R Γ,X Question: (Feldman-Moore) Can one always find an essentially free action of some group? Theorem (F. 1999) There exist II 1 (and II ) relations that cannot be generated by a free action of any group. Idea: Cripple a very rigid relation: e.g. R := R SL3 (Z),T 3 A where A T 3 with µ(a) Q
43 Rigidity for Products of Hyperboli-like groups Theorem (Monod-Shalom 2005) Let Γ = n i Γ i (X, µ) free n 2, where Γ i are hyperbolic-like and Γ i (X, µ) erg.
44 Rigidity for Products of Hyperboli-like groups Theorem (Monod-Shalom 2005) Let Γ = n i Γ i (X, µ) free n 2, where Γ i are hyperbolic-like and Γ i (X, µ) erg. Then R X,Γ remembers the number of factors: n.
45 Rigidity for Products of Hyperboli-like groups Theorem (Monod-Shalom 2005) Let Γ = n i Γ i (X, µ) free n 2, where Γ i are hyperbolic-like and Γ i (X, µ) erg. Then R X,Γ remembers the number of factors: n. If Λ (Y, ν) is a free and mildly mixing, and R X,Γ R Y,ν then Γ = Λ and Γ X = Λ Y.
46 Rigidity for Products of Hyperboli-like groups Theorem (Monod-Shalom 2005) Let Γ = n i Γ i (X, µ) free n 2, where Γ i are hyperbolic-like and Γ i (X, µ) erg. Then R X,Γ remembers the number of factors: n. If Λ (Y, ν) is a free and mildly mixing, and R X,Γ R Y,ν then Γ = Λ and Γ X = Λ Y. Theorem (Monod-Shalom 2005, Hjorth-Kechris 2004) Let Γ = Γ 1 Γ 2 acts on (X, µ) with both Γ 1, Γ 2 erg, α : Γ X Γ a non-elementary cocycle into a hyp-like Γ. Then α is cohom to a hom ρ : Γ Γ i Γ for i = 1 or 2.
47 Computations of Out (R) = Aut (R)/Inn (R) Theorem (Gefter ) There exist equivalence relations without outer automorphisms.
48 Computations of Out (R) = Aut (R)/Inn (R) Theorem (Gefter ) There exist equivalence relations without outer automorphisms. Theorem (F. 2005) One can explicitly compute Out (R Γ,X ) for all the standard algebraic actions of higher rank lattices.
49 Computations of Out (R) = Aut (R)/Inn (R) Theorem (Gefter ) There exist equivalence relations without outer automorphisms. Theorem (F. 2005) One can explicitly compute Out (R Γ,X ) for all the standard algebraic actions of higher rank lattices. SL n (Z) T n gives Out (R Γ,X ) = {Id, x x} Γ G/Γ gives Out (R Γ,G/Γ ) = Z/2Z Γ K with K cpct connected, Out (R Γ,K ) K Γ K/K 0 with K cpct connected, Out (R Γ,K ) N K (K 0 )/K 0 SL n (Z) SL n (Z p ) gives Out (R Γ,X ) = SL n (Q p )
50 Computations of Out (R) = Aut (R)/Inn (R) Theorem (Gefter ) There exist equivalence relations without outer automorphisms. Theorem (F. 2005) One can explicitly compute Out (R Γ,X ) for all the standard algebraic actions of higher rank lattices. SL n (Z) T n gives Out (R Γ,X ) = {Id, x x} Γ G/Γ gives Out (R Γ,G/Γ ) = Z/2Z Γ K with K cpct connected, Out (R Γ,K ) K Γ K/K 0 with K cpct connected, Out (R Γ,K ) N K (K 0 )/K 0 SL n (Z) SL n (Z p ) gives Out (R Γ,X ) = SL n (Q p ) Ingredients Rigidity: Out (R Γ,X ) comes from Aut (Γ X ) and quotients X G/Γ uses Ratner s theorem...
51 Cost, L 2 -Betti numbers etc. after D.Gaboriau Definition (From groups to II 1 relations, or groupoids...) cost(r) in analogy to d(γ) = min{n F n Γ} (Levitt)
52 Cost, L 2 -Betti numbers etc. after D.Gaboriau Definition (From groups to II 1 relations, or groupoids...) cost(r) in analogy to d(γ) = min{n F n Γ} β (2) i (R) in analogy to β (2) i (Γ) (Gaboriau) (Levitt)
53 Cost, L 2 -Betti numbers etc. after D.Gaboriau Definition (From groups to II 1 relations, or groupoids...) cost(r) in analogy to d(γ) = min{n F n Γ} β (2) i (R) in analogy to β (2) i (Γ) (Gaboriau) (Levitt) Basic Facts: cost(r A ) = µ(b) µ(a) cost(r B)
54 Cost, L 2 -Betti numbers etc. after D.Gaboriau Definition (From groups to II 1 relations, or groupoids...) cost(r) in analogy to d(γ) = min{n F n Γ} β (2) i (R) in analogy to β (2) i (Γ) (Gaboriau) (Levitt) Basic Facts: cost(r A ) = µ(b) µ(a) cost(r B) β (2) i (R A ) = µ(b) µ(a) β(2) i (R B ) ( i 1)
55 Cost, L 2 -Betti numbers etc. after D.Gaboriau Definition (From groups to II 1 relations, or groupoids...) cost(r) in analogy to d(γ) = min{n F n Γ} β (2) i (R) in analogy to β (2) i (Γ) (Gaboriau) (Levitt) Basic Facts: cost(r A ) = µ(b) µ(a) cost(r B) β (2) i (R A ) = µ(b) µ(a) β(2) i (R B ) ( i 1) β (2) 1 (R) cost(r) 1 (no known examples with <)
56 Cost, L 2 -Betti numbers etc. after D.Gaboriau Definition (From groups to II 1 relations, or groupoids...) cost(r) in analogy to d(γ) = min{n F n Γ} β (2) i (R) in analogy to β (2) i (Γ) (Gaboriau) (Levitt) Basic Facts: cost(r A ) = µ(b) µ(a) cost(r B) β (2) i (R A ) = µ(b) µ(a) β(2) i (R B ) ( i 1) β (2) 1 (R) cost(r) 1 (no known examples with <) Theorem (Gaboriau 1998) For free actions of free groups: cost(r Fn,X ) = n. Corollary F n and F k with n k do not have free OE actions.
57 Cost, L 2 -Betti numbers etc. after D.Gaboriau (cont.) If cost(r Γ,X ) depends only on Γ set =: price(γ).
58 Cost, L 2 -Betti numbers etc. after D.Gaboriau (cont.) If cost(r Γ,X ) depends only on Γ set =: price(γ). Examples: price > 1: for F n, surface groups,... price = 1: for amenable, Γ 1 Γ 2, SL n (Z) (n 3)...
59 Cost, L 2 -Betti numbers etc. after D.Gaboriau (cont.) If cost(r Γ,X ) depends only on Γ set =: price(γ). Examples: price > 1: for F n, surface groups,... price = 1: for amenable, Γ 1 Γ 2, SL n (Z) (n 3)... Theorem (Gaboriau 2002) For Γ (X, µ) free erg: β (2) i (Γ) = β (2) i (R Γ,X )
60 Cost, L 2 -Betti numbers etc. after D.Gaboriau (cont.) If cost(r Γ,X ) depends only on Γ set =: price(γ). Examples: price > 1: for F n, surface groups,... price = 1: for amenable, Γ 1 Γ 2, SL n (Z) (n 3)... Theorem (Gaboriau 2002) For Γ (X, µ) free erg: β (2) i (Γ) = β (2) i (R Γ,X ) Corollary (Gaboriau) For free actions R Γ,X remembers the Euler characteristic χ(γ)
61 Cost, L 2 -Betti numbers etc. after D.Gaboriau (cont.) If cost(r Γ,X ) depends only on Γ set =: price(γ). Examples: price > 1: for F n, surface groups,... price = 1: for amenable, Γ 1 Γ 2, SL n (Z) (n 3)... Theorem (Gaboriau 2002) For Γ (X, µ) free erg: β (2) i (Γ) = β (2) i (R Γ,X ) Corollary (Gaboriau) For free actions R Γ,X remembers the Euler characteristic χ(γ) Theorem (Gaboriau) For f.g. Γ with an infinite normal amenable subgroup β (2) 1 (Γ) = 0
62 After S.Popa... Theorem (S.Popa 2006) Let Γ have (T) and Γ X = (X 0, µ 0 ) Γ be a Bernoulli action. Then for any discrete Λ every cocycle α : Γ X Λ is cohomologous to a homomorphism ρ : Γ Λ.
63 After S.Popa... Theorem (S.Popa 2006) Let Γ have (T) and Γ X = (X 0, µ 0 ) Γ be a Bernoulli action. Then for any discrete Λ every cocycle α : Γ X Λ is cohomologous to a homomorphism ρ : Γ Λ. A gold mine of applications/related results (Popa, Popa-Sasyk, Popa-Vaes,...): Rigidity: R Γ,X determines Γ and Γ X R not generated by free actions Prescribed countable F(R) Prescribed H 1 (R, T) Prescribed Out (R) any Countable Compact Many non-oe actions for many groups von Neumann rigidity! F(factor),...!
64 Many Orbit Structures for non-amenable groups Question Given Γ how big is OrbStr Γ = {R Γ,X Γ (X, µ) free erg}?
65 Many Orbit Structures for non-amenable groups Question Given Γ how big is Conjecture Γ Amen = OrbStr Γ = 2 ℵ 0 OrbStr Γ = {R Γ,X Γ (X, µ) free erg}?
66 Many Orbit Structures for non-amenable groups Question Given Γ how big is Conjecture Γ Amen = OrbStr Γ = 2 ℵ 0 OrbStr Γ = {R Γ,X Γ (X, µ) free erg}? Ornstein-Weiss: Γ Amen = OrbStr Γ = {R hyp.fin }
67 Many Orbit Structures for non-amenable groups Question Given Γ how big is OrbStr Γ = {R Γ,X Γ (X, µ) free erg}? Conjecture Γ Amen = OrbStr Γ = 2 ℵ 0 Ornstein-Weiss: Γ Amen = OrbStr Γ = {R hyp.fin } Connes-Weiss: Γ Amen (T) = OrbStr Γ 2.
68 Many Orbit Structures for non-amenable groups Question Given Γ how big is OrbStr Γ = {R Γ,X Γ (X, µ) free erg}? Conjecture Γ Amen = OrbStr Γ = 2 ℵ 0 Ornstein-Weiss: Γ Amen = OrbStr Γ = {R hyp.fin } Connes-Weiss: Γ Amen (T) = OrbStr Γ 2. Theorem (Hjorth 2005) For Γ (T) the map Acts Γ OrbStr Γ is countable to one.
69 Many Orbit Structures for non-amenable groups Question Given Γ how big is OrbStr Γ = {R Γ,X Γ (X, µ) free erg}? Conjecture Γ Amen = OrbStr Γ = 2 ℵ 0 Ornstein-Weiss: Γ Amen = OrbStr Γ = {R hyp.fin } Connes-Weiss: Γ Amen (T) = OrbStr Γ 2. Theorem (Hjorth 2005) For Γ (T) the map Acts Γ OrbStr Γ is countable to one. Theorem (Gaboriau-Popa 2005) The Conjecture is true for F n
70 Many Orbit Structures for non-amenable groups Question Given Γ how big is OrbStr Γ = {R Γ,X Γ (X, µ) free erg}? Conjecture Γ Amen = OrbStr Γ = 2 ℵ 0 Ornstein-Weiss: Γ Amen = OrbStr Γ = {R hyp.fin } Connes-Weiss: Γ Amen (T) = OrbStr Γ 2. Theorem (Hjorth 2005) For Γ (T) the map Acts Γ OrbStr Γ is countable to one. Theorem (Gaboriau-Popa 2005) The Conjecture is true for F n Theorem (A.Ionna 2007) The Conjecture is true for Γ containing F 2.
Orbit equivalence rigidity and bounded cohomology
Annals of Mathematics, 164 (2006), 825 878 Orbit equivalence rigidity and bounded cohomology By Nicolas Monod and Yehuda Shalom Abstract We establish new results and introduce new methods in the theory
More informationON POPA S COCYCLE SUPERRIGIDITY THEOREM
ON POPA S COCYCLE SUPERRIGIDITY THEOREM ALEX FURMAN Abstract. These notes contain a purely Ergodic-theoretic account of the Cocycle Superrigidity Theorem recently obtained by Sorin Popa. We prove a relative
More informationSéminaire BOURBAKI Mars e année, , n o 961, p. 237 à 294
Séminaire BOURBAKI Mars 2006 58 e année, 2005-2006, n o 961, p. 237 à 294 RIGIDITY RESULTS FOR BERNOULLI ACTIONS AND THEIR VON NEUMANN ALGEBRAS [after Sorin Popa] by Stefaan VAES Contents 1. Introduction...
More informationarxiv:math/ v2 [math.gr] 9 Sep 2006
arxiv:math/0607601v2 [math.gr] 9 Sep 2006 ORBIT EQUIVALENCE RIGIDITY AND CERTAIN GENERALIZED BERNOULLI SHIFTS OF THE MAPPING CLASS GROUP YOSHIKATA KIDA Abstract. We establish orbit equivalence rigidity
More informationPopa s rigidity theorems and II 1 factors without non-trivial finite index subfactors
Popa s rigidity theorems and II 1 factors without non-trivial finite index subfactors Stefaan Vaes March 19, 2007 1/17 Talk in two parts 1 Sorin Popa s cocycle superrigidity theorems. Sketch of proof.
More informationOrbit equivalence rigidity
Annals of Mathematics, 150 (1999), 1083 1108 Orbit equivalence rigidity By Alex Furman Abstract Consider a countable group Γ acting ergodically by measure preserving transformations on a probability space
More informationCharacter rigidity for lattices in higher-rank groups
Character rigidity for lattices in higher-rank groups Jesse Peterson NCGOA 2016 www.math.vanderbilt.edu/ peters10/ncgoa2016slides.pdf www.math.vanderbilt.edu/ peters10/viennalecture.pdf 24 May 2016 Jesse
More informationarxiv: v2 [math.ds] 8 Aug 2010
. To Robert Zimmer on the occasion of his 60th birthday. A SURVEY OF MEASURED GROUP THEORY arxiv:0901.0678v2 [math.ds] 8 Aug 2010 ALEX FURMAN Abstract. The title refers to the area of research which studies
More informationFree products and Bass-Serre rigidity
Free products and Bass-Serre rigidity Damien Gaboriau Unité de Mathématiques Pures et Appliquées CNRS, ENS Lyon UCLA, 2009 Inessential free product decompositions Definition (Slicing) The slicing affiliated
More informationCharacter rigidity for lattices in higher-rank groups
Character rigidity for lattices in higher-rank groups Jesse Peterson MSJ-SI Operator Algebras and Mathematical Physics www.math.vanderbilt.edu/ peters10/viennalecture.pdf 8 August 2016 Jesse Peterson (Vanderbilt
More informationA SURVEY OF MEASURED GROUP THEORY
10 alex furman A SURVEY OF MEASURED GROUP THEORY to robert zimmer on the occasion of his 60th birthday Abstract Measured group theory is an area of research that studies infinite groups using measure-theoretic
More informationCocycle and orbit superrigidity for lattices in SL(n,R) acting on homogeneous spaces
Cocycle and orbit superrigidity for lattices in SL(n,R) acting on homogeneous spaces (joint work with Sorin Popa) UCLA, March 2009 Stefaan Vaes 1/15 Orbit equivalence superrigidity Theorem (Popa - V, 2008)
More informationVon Neumann algebras and ergodic theory of group actions
Von Neumann algebras and ergodic theory of group actions CEMPI Inaugural Conference Lille, September 2012 Stefaan Vaes Supported by ERC Starting Grant VNALG-200749 1/21 Functional analysis Hilbert space
More informationCountable Borel Equivalence Relations: The Appendix
Countable Borel Equivalence Relations: The Appendix Simon Thomas Rutgers University 17th November 2007 Popa s Cocycle Superrigidity Theorem In this lecture, we shall sketch the proof of: Theorem (Popa)
More informationTopological conjugacy relation. minimal G-subshifts
The topological conjugacy relation for free minimal G-subshifts Toronto, April 2, 2015 A Borel equivalence relation on a standard Borel space is countable if it has countable classes. A Borel equivalence
More informationTHE MODULAR COCYCLE FROM COMMENSURATION AND ITS MACKEY RANGE
THE MODULAR COCYCLE FROM COMMENSURATION AND ITS MACKEY RANGE YOSHIKATA KIDA 1. Introduction Let Γ be a group. A subgroup E of Γ is called quasi-normal (or commensurated) in Γ if for any γ Γ, the group
More informationTreeable equivalence relations
Treeable Treeable equivalence relations Greg Hjorth December 22, 2008 Abstract There are continuum many B-incomparable equivalence relations induced by a free, Borel action of a countable non-abelian free
More informationMargulis Superrigidity I & II
Margulis Superrigidity I & II Alastair Litterick 1,2 and Yuri Santos Rego 1 Universität Bielefeld 1 and Ruhr-Universität Bochum 2 Block seminar on arithmetic groups and rigidity Universität Bielefeld 22nd
More information1 A dυ. The Radon-Nikodym derivative is unique up to measure zero for υ. If γ 1, γ 2 Γ, and A B then we have. (γx) R is a cocycle almost everywhere.
2.1 Examples Definition 2.1.1. Let (X, B, υ) be a σ-finite measure space, and let Γ be a countable group, an action Γ X such that γ 1 (B) = B, for all γ Γ is measure preserving if for each measurable set
More informationarxiv:math/ v2 [math.gr] 21 Mar 2008
ORBIT INEQUIVALENT ACTIONS FOR GROUPS CONTAINING A COPY OF F 2 ADRIAN IOANA arxiv:math/0701027v2 [math.gr] 21 Mar 2008 Abstract. We prove that if a countable group Γ contains a copy of F 2, then it admits
More informationInvariant Random Subgroups
Invariant Random Subgroups Lewis Bowen Group Theory International Webinar May 2012 Lewis Bowen (Texas A&M) Invariant Random Subgroups 1 / 29 Set-up G : a locally compact group. Lewis Bowen (Texas A&M)
More informationCOUNTABLE BOREL EQUIVALENCE RELATIONS
COUNTABLE BOREL EQUIVALENCE RELATIONS SCOTT SCHNEIDER AND SIMON THOMAS Introduction. These notes are an account of a day-long lecture workshop presented by Simon Thomas of Rutgers University at the University
More informationGeometric Structure and the Local Langlands Conjecture
Geometric Structure and the Local Langlands Conjecture Paul Baum Penn State Representations of Reductive Groups University of Utah, Salt Lake City July 9, 2013 Paul Baum (Penn State) Geometric Structure
More informationContinuous and Borel Dynamics of Countable Borel Equivalence Relations
Continuous and Borel Dynamics of Countable Borel Equivalence Relations S. Jackson (joint with S. Gao, E. Krohne, and B. Seward) Department of Mathematics University of North Texas June 9, 2015 BLAST 2015,
More informationMeasurable chromatic and independence numbers for ergodic graphs and group actions
Measurable chromatic and independence numbers for ergodic graphs and group actions Clinton T. Conley and Alexander S. Kechris July 9, 2010 0 Introduction We study in this paper some combinatorial invariants
More informationOn the structure and arithmeticity of lattice envelopes
On the structure and arithmeticity of lattice envelopes Uri Bader a, Alex Furman b, Roman Sauer c a Technion, Haifa, Israel b University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, USA c Karlsruhe Institute of Technology,
More informationBorel complexity and automorphisms of C*-algebras
Martino Lupini York University Toronto, Canada January 15th, 2013 Table of Contents 1 Auto-homeomorphisms of compact metrizable spaces 2 Measure preserving automorphisms of probability spaces 3 Automorphisms
More informationTracial Rokhlin property for actions of amenable group on C*-algebras June 8, / 17
Tracial Rokhlin property for actions of amenable group on C*-algebras Qingyun Wang University of Toronto June 8, 2015 Tracial Rokhlin property for actions of amenable group on C*-algebras June 8, 2015
More informationTurbulence, representations, and trace-preserving actions
Turbulence, representations, and trace-preserving actions Hanfeng Li SUNY at Buffalo June 6, 2009 GPOTS-Boulder Joint work with David Kerr and Mikaël Pichot 1 / 24 Type of questions to consider: Question
More informationKrieger s finite generator theorem for ergodic actions of countable groups
Krieger s finite generator theorem for ergodic actions of countable groups Brandon Seward University of Michigan UNT RTG Conference Logic, Dynamics, and Their Interactions II June 6, 2014 Brandon Seward
More informationAround the orbit equivalence theory of the free groups, cost and l 2 Betti numbers
Around the orbit equivalence theory of the free groups, cost and l 2 Betti numbers Damien Gaboriau February 23, 2018 Abstract Abstract: The goal of this series of lectures is to present an overview of
More informationIn this paper we introduce the notion of a "normal" subrelation of. an ergodic equivalence relation, and study some of its consequences.
95 NORMAL SUBRELATIONS OF ERGODIC EQUIVALENCE RELATIONS. Feldman (1), C.E. Sutherland(2) and R.. Zimmer (3) O INTRODUCTION In this paper we introduce the notion of a "normal" subrelation of an erodic equivalence
More informationA BRIEF INTRODUCTION TO AMENABLE EQUIVALENCE RELATIONS
A BRIEF INTRODUCTION TO AMENABLE EQUIVALENCE RELATIONS JUSTIN TATCH MOORE 1. Introduction The notion of an amenable equivalence relation was introduced by Zimmer in the course of his analysis of orbit
More informationCrossed products of irrational rotation algebras by finite subgroups of SL 2 (Z) are AF
Crossed products of irrational rotation algebras by finite subgroups of SL 2 (Z) are AF N. Christopher Phillips 7 May 2008 N. Christopher Phillips () C (Z k, A θ ) is AF 7 May 2008 1 / 36 The Sixth Annual
More informationBoundaries, rigidity of representations, and Lyapunov exponents
Boundaries, rigidity of representations, and Lyapunov exponents Uri Bader, Alex Furman Abstract. In this paper we discuss some connections between measurable dynamics and rigidity aspects of group representations
More informationActions of semisimple Lie groups on circle bundles. Dave Witte. Department of Mathematics Oklahoma State University Stillwater, OK 74078
1 Actions of semisimple Lie groups on circle bundles Dave Witte Department of Mathematics Oklahoma State University Stillwater, OK 74078 (joint work with Robert J. Zimmer) 2 Γ = SL(3, Z) = { T Mat 3 (Z)
More informationNoncommutative Geometry
Noncommutative Geometry Alain Connes College de France Institut des Hautes Etudes Scientifiques Paris, France ACADEMIC PRESS, INC. Harcourt Brace & Company, Publishers San Diego New York Boston London
More informationA class of II 1 factors with many non conjugate Cartan subalgebras
A class of II 1 factors with many non conjugate Cartan subalgebras by An Speelman (1) and Stefaan Vaes (2) Advances in Mathematics 231 (2012), 2224-2251. Abstract We construct a class of II 1 factors M
More informationA Crash Course in Topological Groups
A Crash Course in Topological Groups Iian B. Smythe Department of Mathematics Cornell University Olivetti Club November 8, 2011 Iian B. Smythe (Cornell) Topological Groups Nov. 8, 2011 1 / 28 Outline 1
More informationThe Margulis-Zimmer Conjecture
The Margulis-Zimmer Conjecture Definition. Let K be a global field, O its ring of integers, and let G be an absolutely simple, simply connected algebraic group defined over K. Let V be the set of all inequivalent
More informationLocally definable groups and lattices
Locally definable groups and lattices Kobi Peterzil (Based on work (with, of) Eleftheriou, work of Berarducci-Edmundo-Mamino) Department of Mathematics University of Haifa Ravello 2013 Kobi Peterzil (University
More informationON CO-AMENABILITY FOR GROUPS AND VON NEUMANN ALGEBRAS NICOLAS MONOD & SORIN POPA
ON CO-AMENABILITY FOR GROUPS AND VON NEUMANN ALGEBRAS NICOLAS MONOD & SORIN POPA Abstract. We first show that co-amenability does not pass to subgroups, answering a question asked by Eymard in 1972. We
More informationTHE COMPLEXITY OF CLASSIFICATION PROBLEMS IN ERGODIC THEORY
THE COMPLEXITY OF CLASSIFICATION PROBLEMS IN ERGODIC THEORY ALEXANDER S. KECHRIS AND ROBIN D. TUCKER-DROB Dedicated to the memory of Greg Hjorth (1963-2011) The last two decades have seen the emergence
More informationUFFE HAAGERUPS FIRST TALK AT MASTERCLASS ON VON NEUMANN ALGEBRAS AND GROUP ACTIONS
UFFE HAAGERUPS FIRST TALK AT MASTERCLASS ON VON NEUMANN ALGEBRAS AND GROUP ACTIONS 1. Von Neumann Algebras Denition 1. Let H be a Hilbert space (usually nite dimensional separable), let B(H) be the *-algebra
More informationA Descriptive View of Combinatorial Group Theory
A Descriptive View of Combinatorial Group Theory Simon Thomas Rutgers University May 12th 2014 Introduction The Basic Theme: Descriptive set theory provides a framework for explaining the inevitable non-uniformity
More informationCayley Graphs of Finitely Generated Groups
Cayley Graphs of Finitely Generated Groups Simon Thomas Rutgers University 13th May 2014 Cayley graphs of finitely generated groups Definition Let G be a f.g. group and let S G { 1 } be a finite generating
More informationOn a measurable analogue of small topological full groups
On a measurable analogue of small topological full groups François Le Maître November 5, 2018 arxiv:1608.07399v2 [math.ds] 7 May 2018 Abstract We initiate the study of a measurable analogue of small topological
More informationRank gradient, cost of groups and the rank versus Heegaard genus problem
Rank gradient, cost of groups and the rank versus Heegaard genus problem Miklós Abért and Nikolay Nikolov Abstract We study the growth of the rank of subgroups of finite index in residually finite groups,
More informationERGODIC DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS CONJUGATE TO THEIR COMPOSITION SQUARES. 0. Introduction
Acta Math. Univ. Comenianae Vol. LXXI, 2(2002), pp. 201 210 201 ERGODIC DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS CONJUGATE TO THEIR COMPOSITION SQUARES G. R. GOODSON Abstract. We investigate the question of when an ergodic automorphism
More informationCohomology of actions of discrete groups on factors of type II 1. Yasuyuki Kawahigashi. Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science
Cohomology of actions of discrete groups on factors of type II 1 Yasuyuki Kawahigashi Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science University of Tokyo, Hongo, Tokyo, 113, JAPAN (email: d33844%tansei.cc.u-tokyo.ac.jp@relay.cs.net)
More informationBERNOULLI ACTIONS OF SOFIC GROUPS HAVE COMPLETELY POSITIVE ENTROPY
BERNOULLI ACTIONS OF SOFIC GROUPS HAVE COMPLETELY POSITIVE ENTROPY DAVID KERR Abstract. We prove that every Bernoulli action of a sofic group has completely positive entropy with respect to every sofic
More informationCountable Borel Equivalence Relations
Countable Borel Equivalence Relations S. Jackson, A.S. Kechris, and A. Louveau This paper is a contribution to a new direction in descriptive set theory that is being extensively pursued over the last
More informationWeak containment of measure preserving group actions
Weak containment of measure preserving group actions Peter J. Burton and Alexander S. Kechris (Preliminary version; May 25, 2017) Introduction This paper is a contribution to the study of the global structure
More informationSome algebraic properties of. compact topological groups
Some algebraic properties of compact topological groups 1 Compact topological groups: examples connected: S 1, circle group. SO(3, R), rotation group not connected: Every finite group, with the discrete
More informationFirst Cohomology of Anosov Actions of Higher Rank Abelian Groups And Applications to Rigidity
First Cohomology of Anosov Actions of Higher Rank Abelian Groups And Applications to Rigidity A. Katok Department of Mathematics The Pennsylvania State University State College, PA 16802 R. J. Spatzier
More informationTHREE ZUTOT ELI GLASNER AND BENJAMIN WEISS
THREE ZUTOT ELI GLASNER AND BENJAMIN WEISS Abstract. Three topics in dynamical systems are discussed. In the first two sections we solve some open problems concerning, respectively, Furstenberg entropy
More informationOn spectra of Koopman, groupoid and quasi-regular representations
On spectra of Koopman, groupoid and quasi-regular representations Artem Dudko Stony Brook University Group Theory International Webinar March 17, 2016 Preliminaries Throughout the talk G is a countable
More informationAbstract A countable group Γ is called shift-minimal if every non-trivial measure preserving action of Γ weakly contained in the Bernoulli shift Γ
1 Abstract A countable group Γ is called shift-minimal if every non-trivial measure preserving action of Γ weakly contained in the Bernoulli shift Γ ([0, 1] Γ, λ Γ ) is free. We show that any group Γ whose
More informationExtended groups and representation theory
Extended groups and representation theory Jeffrey Adams David Vogan University of Maryland Massachusetts Institute of Technology CUNY Representation Theory Seminar April 19, 2013 Outline Classification
More informationImplications of hyperbolic geometry to operator K-theory of arithmetic groups
Implications of hyperbolic geometry to operator K-theory of arithmetic groups Weizmann Institute of Science - Department of Mathematics LMS EPSRC Durham Symposium Geometry and Arithmetic of Lattices, July
More informationAMENABLE ACTIONS AND ALMOST INVARIANT SETS
AMENABLE ACTIONS AND ALMOST INVARIANT SETS ALEXANDER S. KECHRIS AND TODOR TSANKOV Abstract. In this paper, we study the connections between properties of the action of a countable group Γ on a countable
More informationINVARIANT MEASURES ON G/Γ FOR SPLIT SIMPLE LIE-GROUPS G.
INVARIANT MEASURES ON G/Γ FOR SPLIT SIMPLE LIE-GROUPS G. MANFRED EINSIEDLER, ANATOLE KATOK In memory of Jurgen Moser Abstract. We study the left action α of a Cartan subgroup on the space X = G/Γ, where
More informationIntermediate Jacobians and Abel-Jacobi Maps
Intermediate Jacobians and Abel-Jacobi Maps Patrick Walls April 28, 2012 Introduction Let X be a smooth projective complex variety. Introduction Let X be a smooth projective complex variety. Intermediate
More informationMARGULIS SUPER-RIGIDITY THEOREM FOR NON-LATTICES
MARGULIS SUPER-RIGIDITY THEOREM FOR NON-LATTICES URI BADER AND ALEX FURMAN Abstract. We give a Super-Rigidity theorem a la Margulis which applies for a wider class of groups. In particular it applies to
More informationOn Dense Embeddings of Discrete Groups into Locally Compact Groups
QUALITATIVE THEORY OF DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS 4, 31 37 (2003) ARTICLE NO. 50 On Dense Embeddings of Discrete Groups into Locally Compact Groups Maxim S. Boyko Institute for Low Temperature Physics and Engineering,
More informationA topological semigroup structure on the space of actions modulo weak equivalence.
A topological semigroup structure on the space of actions modulo wea equivalence. Peter Burton January 8, 08 Abstract We introduce a topology on the space of actions modulo wea equivalence finer than the
More informationIntroduction to Ratner s Theorems on Unipotent Flows
Introduction to Ratner s Theorems on Unipotent Flows Dave Witte Morris University of Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada http://people.uleth.ca/ dave.morris Dave.Morris@uleth.ca Part 2: Variations of Ratner s
More informationEquidistribution for groups of toral automorphisms
1/17 Equidistribution for groups of toral automorphisms J. Bourgain A. Furman E. Lindenstrauss S. Mozes 1 Institute for Advanced Study 2 University of Illinois at Chicago 3 Princeton and Hebrew University
More informationAbstract This note answers a question of Kechris: if H < G is a normal subgroup of a countable group G, H has property MD and G/H is amenable and
Abstract This note answers a question of Kechris: if H < G is a normal subgroup of a countable group G, H has property MD and G/H is amenable and residually finite then G also has property MD. Under the
More informationDepartment of Mathematics, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712, USA
PROFINITE PROPERTIES OF DISCRETE GROUPS ALAN W. REID Department of Mathematics, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712, USA Email: areid@math.utexas.edu 1 Introduction This paper is based on a series of
More informationIntersection of stable and unstable manifolds for invariant Morse functions
Intersection of stable and unstable manifolds for invariant Morse functions Hitoshi Yamanaka (Osaka City University) March 14, 2011 Hitoshi Yamanaka (Osaka City University) ()Intersection of stable and
More informationBROOKS S THEOREM FOR MEASURABLE COLORINGS
BROOKS S THEOREM FOR MEASURABLE COLORINGS CLINTON T. CONLEY, ANDREW S. MARKS, AND ROBIN D. TUCKER-DROB Abstract. We generalize Brooks s theorem to show that if G is a Borel graph on a standard Borel space
More informationManfred Einsiedler Thomas Ward. Ergodic Theory. with a view towards Number Theory. ^ Springer
Manfred Einsiedler Thomas Ward Ergodic Theory with a view towards Number Theory ^ Springer 1 Motivation 1 1.1 Examples of Ergodic Behavior 1 1.2 Equidistribution for Polynomials 3 1.3 Szemeredi's Theorem
More informationDeformations and rigidity of lattices in solvable Lie groups
1 Deformations and rigidity of lattices in solvable Lie groups joint work with Benjamin Klopsch Oliver Baues Institut für Algebra und Geometrie, Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT), 76128 Karlsruhe,
More informationLinear representations and arithmeticity of lattices in products of trees
Linear representations and arithmeticity of lattices in products of trees Marc Burger, Shahar Mozes, Robert J. Zimmer 0 Prolegomenon In this paper we continue our study of lattices in the automorphisms
More informationIsolated cohomological representations
Isolated cohomological representations p. 1 Isolated cohomological representations and some cohomological applications Nicolas Bergeron E.N.S. Paris (C.N.R.S.) Isolated cohomological representations p.
More informationRESEARCH ANNOUNCEMENTS
RESEARCH ANNOUNCEMENTS BULLETIN (New Series) OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 24, Number 2, April 1991 DISTRIBUTION RIGIDITY FOR UNIPOTENT ACTIONS ON HOMOGENEOUS SPACES MARINA RATNER In this
More informationErgodic Theory, Groups, and Geometry. Robert J. Zimmer Dave Witte Morris
Ergodic Theory, Groups, and Geometry Robert J. Zimmer Dave Witte Morris Version 1.0 of June 24, 2008 Office of the President, University of Chicago, 5801 South Ellis Avenue, Chicago, Illinois 60637 E-mail
More informationCartan sub-c*-algebras in C*-algebras
Plan Cartan sub-c*-algebras in C*-algebras Jean Renault Université d Orléans 22 July 2008 1 C*-algebra constructions. 2 Effective versus topologically principal. 3 Cartan subalgebras in C*-algebras. 4
More informationCOUNTABLE BOREL QUASI-ORDERS
COUNTABLE BOREL QUASI-ORDERS BY JAY WILLIAMS A dissertation submitted to the Graduate School New Brunswick Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the
More informationMeasure-theoretic unfriendly colorings
Measure-theoretic unfriendly colorings Clinton T. Conley August 26, 2013 Abstract We consider the problem of finding a measurable unfriendly partition of the vertex set of a locally finite Borel graph
More informationAn introduction to arithmetic groups. Lizhen Ji CMS, Zhejiang University Hangzhou , China & Dept of Math, Univ of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI 48109
An introduction to arithmetic groups Lizhen Ji CMS, Zhejiang University Hangzhou 310027, China & Dept of Math, Univ of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI 48109 June 27, 2006 Plan. 1. Examples of arithmetic groups
More informationarxiv:math.lo/ v1 28 Nov 2004
HILBERT SPACES WITH GENERIC GROUPS OF AUTOMORPHISMS arxiv:math.lo/0411625 v1 28 Nov 2004 ALEXANDER BERENSTEIN Abstract. Let G be a countable group. We proof that there is a model companion for the approximate
More informationGROUP ACTIONS ON INJECTIVE FACTORS. Yasuyuki Kawahigashi. Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science University of Tokyo, Hongo, Tokyo, 113, JAPAN
GROUP ACTIONS ON INJECTIVE FACTORS Yasuyuki Kawahigashi Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science University of Tokyo, Hongo, Tokyo, 113, JAPAN Abstract. We survey recent progress in classification
More informationDESCRIPTIVE SET THEORY AND THE ERGODIC THEORY OF COUNTABLE
DESCRIPTIVE SET THEORY AND THE ERGODIC THEORY OF COUNTABLE GROUPS Thesis by Robin Daniel Tucker-Drob In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy California Institute
More informationCARTAN SUBALGEBRAS AND BIMODULE DECOMPOSITIONS OF II 1 FACTORS.
CARTAN SUBALGEBRAS AND BIMODULE DECOMPOSITIONS OF II 1 FACTORS. SORIN POPA AND DIMITRI SHLYAKHTENKO ABSTRACT. Let A M be a MASA in a II 1 factor M. We describe the von Neumann subalgebra of M generated
More informationNormalizers of group algebras and mixing
Normalizers of group algebras and mixing Paul Jolissaint, Université de Neuchâtel Copenhagen, November 2011 1 Introduction Recall that if 1 B M is a pair of von Neumann algebras, the normalizer of B in
More informationCategorical tori and their representations A report on work in progress
Categorical tori and their representations A report on work in progress Nora Ganter Workshop on Infinite-dimensional Structures in Higher Geometry and Representation Theory Hamburg, February 2015 Crossed
More informationNOTES ON KLEINER S PROOF OF GROMOV S POLYNOMIAL GROWTH THEOREM
NOTES ON KLEINER S PROOF OF GROMOV S POLYNOMIAL GROWTH THEOREM ROMAN SAUER Abstract. We present and explain Kleiner s new proof of Gromov s polynomial growth [Kle07] theorem which avoids the use of Montgomery-Zippin
More informationNotes on relative Kazhdan s property (T)
Notes on relative Kazhdan s property (T) Ghislain Jaudon 24 th may 2007 Abstract This note is in major part a summary (which is probably non-exhaustive) of results and examples known concerning the relative
More informationResearch Statement. Aaron Brown 1. INTRODUCTION
Research Statement Aaron Brown 1. INTRODUCTION My primary research area is smooth dynamical systems, particularly dynamical systems with some degree of hyperbolicity. In discrete time, a dynamical system
More information1 MONOTONE COMPLETE C*-ALGEBRAS AND GENERIC DYNAMICS
1 MONOTONE COMPLETE C*-ALGEBRAS AND GENERIC DYNAMICS JDM Wright (University of Aberdeen) This talk is on joint work with Kazuyuki SAITÔ. I shall begin by talking about Monotone Complete C*-algebras. Then
More informationSurvey on Weak Amenability
Survey on Weak Amenability OZAWA, Narutaka RIMS at Kyoto University Conference on von Neumann Algebras and Related Topics January 2012 Research partially supported by JSPS N. OZAWA (RIMS at Kyoto University)
More informationOn the centralizer of a regular, semi-simple, stable conjugacy class. Benedict H. Gross
On the centralizer of a regular, semi-simple, stable conjugacy class Benedict H. Gross Let k be a field, and let G be a semi-simple, simply-connected algebraic group, which is quasi-split over k. The theory
More informationGroup actions and K-theory
Group actions and K-theory Day : March 12, 2012 March 15 Place : Department of Mathematics, Kyoto University Room 110 http://www.math.kyoto-u.ac.jp/%7etomo/g-and-k/ Abstracts Shin-ichi Oguni (Ehime university)
More informationRigidity of stationary measures
Rigidity of stationary measures Arbeitgemeinschaft MFO, Oberwolfach October 7-12 2018 Organizers: Yves Benoist & Jean-François Quint 1 Introduction Stationary probability measures ν are useful when one
More informationClassification Problems in Mathematics. Greg Hjorth. University of Melbourne
Classification Problems in Mathematics Greg Hjorth greg.hjorth@gmail.com University of Melbourne Tarski Lectures University of California, Berkeley April 7, 2010 1 1 Recall Definition The cardinality of
More informationNew York Journal of Mathematics. Characterizing Mildly Mixing Actions by Orbit Equivalence of Products
New York Journal of Mathematics New York J. Math. 3A (1998) 99 115. Characterizing Mildly Mixing Actions by Orbit Equivalence of Products Jane Hawkins and Cesar E. Silva Abstract. We characterize mildly
More informationConvex Sets Associated to C -Algebras
Convex Sets Associated to C -Algebras Scott Atkinson University of Virginia Joint Mathematics Meetings 2016 Overview Goal: Define and investigate invariants for a unital separable tracial C*-algebra A.
More information1.4 Outer measures 10 CHAPTER 1. MEASURE
10 CHAPTER 1. MEASURE 1.3.6. ( Almost everywhere and null sets If (X, A, µ is a measure space, then a set in A is called a null set (or µ-null if its measure is 0. Clearly a countable union of null sets
More information