arxiv: v1 [physics.comp-ph] 30 Jun 2016

Transcription

1 On anisotropy function in crystal growth simulations using Lattic Boltzmann quation AMINA YOUNSI a,1, ALAIN CARTALADE a, a Dn DM2S, STMF, LMSF, CEA, Univrsité d Paris-Saclay, F-91191, Gif-sur-Yvtt, Franc. arxiv: v1 [physics.comp-ph] 30 Jun 2016 Abstract In this papr, w prsnt th ability of th Lattic Boltzmann (LB) quation, usually applid to simulat fluid flows, to simulat various shaps of crystals. Crystal growth is modld with a phas-fild modl for a pur substanc, numrically solvd with a LB mthod in 2D and 3D. This study focuss on th anisotropy function that is rsponsibl for th anisotropic surfac tnsion btwn th solid phas and th liquid phas. Th anisotropy function involvs th unit normal vctors of th intrfac, dfind by gradints of phas-fild. Thos gradints hav to b consistnt with th undrlying lattic of th LB mthod in ordr to avoid unwantd ffcts of numrical anisotropy. Isotropy of th solution is obtaind whn th dirctional drivativs mthod, spcific for ach lattic, is applid for computing th gradint trms. With th cntral finit diffrncs mthod, th phas-fild dos not match with its rotation and th solution is not any mor isotropic. Nxt, th mthod is applid to simulat simultanous growth of svral crystals, ach of thm bing dfind by its own anisotropy function. Finally, various shaps of 3D crystals ar simulatd with standard and non standard anisotropy functions which favor growth in 100 -, and 111 -dirctions. Kywords: Lattic Boltzmann mthod, phas-fild modl, crystal growth, anisotropy function, dirctional drivativs mthod. 1. Introduction Simulation of crystal growth [1 4] is a problm of phas chang btwn a solid phas and a liquid phas sparatd by an intrfac. Modling of crystal growth ncssitats to follow that intrfac which is charactrizd by its surfac nrgy and its kintic mobility. Thos two proprtis ar two anisotropic functions dpnding on th undrlying structur of th crystal. Th phas-fild mthod has bcom, in rcnt yars, on of th most popular mthods for simulating crystal growth and microstructur volution in matrials [1, 2, 4]. In this approach, th gomtry of domains and intrfacs is dscribd by on or svral scalar functions, th phas filds, that tak constant valus within ach domain and vary smoothly but rapidly through th intrfacs. Th volution quations for th phas filds, which giv th intrfac dynamics without th nd for an xplicit front-tracking algorithm, ar nonlinar partial diffrntial quations (PDEs) that can b obtaind from th principls of out-of-quilibrium thrmodynamics. Thrfor, thy also naturally incorporat thrmodynamic boundary conditions at th intrfacs, such as th Gibbs-Thomson condition. Morovr, it is straightforward to introduc intrfacial anisotropy in phas-fild modls, which maks it possibl to prform accurat simulations of dndritic growth. In phas-fild modls, th intrfacial nrgy and th mobility ar dcomposd into a product of a constant valu with a function dpnding locally on th normal vctor of th intrfac [5 19]. In th rst of this papr, this function will b calld «anisotropy function» and will b notd a s (n), whr n is th unit normal vctor of th intrfac. This function is rsponsibl for th charactristic shap of th crystals, it is involvd in th phas-fild quation. Lt Corrsponding author. Tl.:+33 (0) addrsss: amina.younsi@c-s.fr (AMINA YOUNSI), alain.cartalad@ca.fr (ALAIN CARTALADE) 1 Prsnt addrss: CS, 22 avnu Galilé, F-92350, L Plssis Robinson, Franc. Prprint submittd to Journal of Computational Physics July 1, 2016

2 us rmind that in th «sharp intrfac» formulations [20], th anisotropy function appars in th Gibbs-Thomson condition which givs th intrfac tmpratur as a function of th mlting tmpratur, corrctd by th curvatur and th kintic mobility of th intrfac. In th litratur, for most of 3D crystal growth simulations, th anisotropy function is chosn such as th branchs of crystal grow along th main axs of th coordinat systm, i.. in th x-, y- and z-dirctions [12, 21 24]. This particular dirction of growth is calld th 100 -dirction in 3D. Thus, th crystal prsnts gnrally a dndritic shap with six tips, two of thm bing dirctd along th x-axis, two othr dirctd along th y-axis and two last ons dirctd along th z-axis. Phas-fild modls ar composd of highly non-linar PDEs that ncssitat to tak a spcial car whn discrtizing thos PDEs, particularly whn valuating th laplacian trm in th phas-fild quation [12, 25]. Indd, whn a standard finit diffrnc mthod is usd, involving only th first narst nighbors, a numrical rror can occur on th crystal shap: th growth of a sphr has not th sphrical shap during th simulation. Such an rror is calld «grid anisotropy» and this problm is fixd by using a finit diffrnc mthod using ightn narst nighbors in 3D [12, 14]. Th Lattic Boltzmann (LB) quation is a popular numrical mthod for simulating fluid flows modld by Navir- Stoks quations [26 28]. Th mthod has achivd many succsss in problms involving complx fluids, such as two-phas flows [29 31], flows intracting with a magntic fild [32, 33] and vn thos that ar influncd by crystal growth and solidification [17, 34 36]. In this mthod, th main quantity is a distribution function that is movd and prforms a collision at ach nod of a lattic. Macroscopic variabls such as dnsity and vlocity ar calculatd at ach tim stp by updating momnts of zroth and first ordr of this distribution function. Many works xist in th litratur that combin th lattic Boltzmann mthod with modls of solidification or crystal growth [17, 33 35, 37 39]. Howvr, in thos paprs, th LBE is oftn usd to simulat fluid flow, whras th modl of phas chang is simulatd with anothr numrical mthod (.g. finit diffrnc with an xplicit tim schm [37]). In [40, 41], th LB quation was applid to simulat a phas-fild modl, but th phas-fild quation dos not corrspond to th modl solvd in this prsnt work ([12]). Th main diffrnc is that th anisotropy function a s (n) dos not xplicitly appar in th modls. W propos hr to tak into account xplicitly that anisotropy function by modifying first th standard lattic Boltzmann quation and scond th quilibrium distribution function. W will introduc th dirctional drivativs mthod to comput accuratly that function. On that basis, various anisotropy functions a s (n) will b implmntd and simulatd in th framwork of LB mthod. In othr xampls whr th LBE is applid to simulat solidification in prsnc of intrfacial anisotropy, th modl usd to track th intrfac btwn th solid and th liquid is not basd on th phas-fild thory. For instanc in [39], th Gibbs-Thomson condition at th intrfac is xplicitly solvd in th numrical procdur, which corrsponds to a «sharp intrfac» mthod. In [35, 38, 42] th modl is basd on th «nthalpy-porosity» approach, an altrnativ modl of solid/liquid phas transition for a pur substanc [43, 44]. Finally anothr class of LB mthod xists to simulat crystal growth. Th mthod is basd on a raction-diffusion modl [45] by applying a first-ordr kintic-raction as boundary conditions at th fluid-solid intrfac. This mthod is xtndd to study dissolution and prcipitation in [46, 47]. In that approach, th intrfac is not xplicitly followd by using a PDE and no anisotropy function is involvd in th modl. Rcntly, th lattic Boltzmann schms wr applid on a phas-fild modl, with or without anti-trapping currnt, in ordr to simulat crystal growth of a binary mixtur [48, 49]. In thos rfrncs, numrical mthods ar wll suitd for simulating crystal growth with low and modrat Lwis numbrs. In mor gnral problms involving high Lwis numbrs, th LB numrical schms hav to b modifid to tak into account a diffusion cofficint which can b tn thousands tims smallr than th thrmal diffusivity. Nvrthlss, th main advantag of this nw algorithm lis in its formulation that is idntical to th on usd in fluid flow. A monolithic cod that uss th sam distribution functions and sam libraris can b usd to simulat fluid flow and solidification procss. Thank to th sam stags of collision and displacmnt, which can b applid for ach quation, a samlss intgration with fluid flow simulations could b prformd in th futur. In continuation of rfrnc [49], crystal growth is discussd hr in trms of anisotropy function a s (n), whn th lattic Boltzmann schms ar usd for simulations. For simplicity, w focus th prsntation on th solidification of a pur substanc with th modl prsntd in [12]. Lt us mphasiz that th mthods prsntd in this papr ar also suitd for dilut binary mixturs bcaus th anisotropy function is involvd only in th phas-fild quation. In th LB framwork, th grid anisotropy ffcts on th crystal shap ar avoidd by using for phas-fild quation th lattics D3Q15 or D3Q19 in 3D or D2Q9 in 2D [49]. Howvr, a numrical rror may rmain if a s (n) is calculatd by using 2

3 th standard mthod of cntral finit diffrncs. Indd, that function ncssitats to calculat th intrfac normal vctor n, dfind by th gradint of phas-fild. Thos drivativs must b consistnt with th moving dirctions of undrlying lattic in ordr to avoid additional numrical rrors. In this papr, thos unwantd numrical rrors will b calld «lattic anisotropy». Th lattic anisotropy occurs spcially whn th growth of crystal occurs in diffrnt dirctions from th standard 100 on,.g. 110 or 111. W show in this work, that th lattic anisotropy can b dcrasd by using th dirctional drivativs mthod [50] for calculating th gradints. Such drivativs ar calculatd along ach dirction of propagation on th lattic. Th numbr of dirctional drivativs is qual to th numbr of displacmnt vctors in th LB mthod. Th thr gradint componnts ar obtaind by calculating thir momnt of first ordr. With a standard mthod of cntral finit diffrncs, th solution is not isotropic and th phas-fild dos not match with its rotation. Th dirctional drivativs mthod has alrady dmonstratd its prformanc for hydrodynamics problm in ordr to rduc parasitic currnts for two-phas flow problm [51, 52]. Hr, w study th impact of th gradint calculation for crystal growth simulations. To th bst of authors knowldg, th ffcts of dirctional drivativs in lattic Boltzmann schm wr not studid for such problms. Th ntir approach dmonstrats th ability of th LB quation for simulating various shaps of crystal in 2D and 3D. This papr is organizd as follows. Sction 2 will prsnt th mathmatical modl for crystal growth basd on th phas-fild thory. Nxt, Sction 3 will prsnt th lattic Boltzmann mthods that w usd to simulat th phas-fild modl. Sction 4 will rmind th main formulations of anisotropy function a s (n), which can b dfind ithr with th local angl ϕ (btwn n and th x-axis) in 2D, or by using th componnts of normal vctor n = (n x, n y, n z ) T in 3D. A comparison btwn th dirctional drivativs mthod and th finit diffrncs mthod will b prsntd in this sction. That sction will also prsnt simulations on simultanous growth of svral crystals, ach of thm bing dfind by its own anisotropy function. Finally, sction 5 will prsnt 3D simulations of various crystals shaps obtaind with standard and non standard anisotropy functions which favor th growth in dirctions 100, 110 and Phas-fild modl for a pur substanc In this work, w focus on th solidification of a pur substanc. For such a problm, th main physical procss is th hat diffusion in solid and liquid. Th hat fluxs ar modld by th Fourir s law and w assum for simplicity that proprtis such as spcific hat C p and thrmal diffusivity κ ar constant and idntical in ach phas. Th solidification can b modld by hat quation applid in th bulk phass with two additional quations at th intrfac. Th first on is th nrgy consrvation and th scond on is th Gibbs-Thomson condition. During th solidification, th vlocity of th intrfac multiplid by th latnt hat L, rlasd into th liquid, is balancd with th diffrnc btwn th hat fluxs in th solid and th liquid. For th scond intrfacial boundary condition, th Gibbs-Thomson condition givs th intrfacial tmpratur as a function of th mlting tmpratur T m corrctd by th curvatur and th mobility of th intrfac. Th mathmatical quations of that «sharp intrfac» modl can b found in many rfrncs such as [2, 12, 14, 53]. In phas-fild thory, th intrfacial boundary conditions ar rplacd by th phas-fild quation. Th intrfac position is givn by a continuous function φ φ(x, t), th phas-fild (dimnsionlss), dfind ovr th whol computational domain. Th intrfac is now a diffus on with an intrfac thicknss notd W 0. In our work w assum that φ = 1 and φ = +1 corrspond rspctivly to th liquid phas and th solid phas. Th modl is thrmodynamically consistnt, i.. it is drivd by postulating a fr nrgy functional dpnding upon a doubl-wll potntial plus a gradint trm [11, 12, 21]. Th modl is composd of two PDEs, th first on for th phas-fild φ and th scond on for th normalizd tmpratur u u(x, t) (dimnsionlss) dfind by u(x, t) = C p (T (x, t) T m )/L: τ(n) φ t = W 0 2 (a 2 s (n) φ) +W0 2 N + (φ φ 3 ) λu(1 φ 2 ) 2, u t = κ 2 u + 1 φ 2 t, (1a) (1b) 3

4 whr N N (x, t) is dfind by: N (x, t) = ( φ 2 as (n) a s (n) ( x φ), a s(n) ( y φ), a ) T s(n). (1c) ( z φ) Th anisotropy function a s (n) (dimnsionlss) for a growing dirction 100 is: a s (n) = 1 3ε s + 4ε s α=x,y,z In Eq. (1a), φ is th phas-fild, W 0 is th intrfac thicknss, λ is th coupling cofficint with th normalizd tmpratur u(x, t). Th normal vctor n n(x, t) is dfind such as: n 4 α. (1d) n(x, t) = φ φ, (1) dirctd from th solid to th liquid. Th cofficint τ(n) is th kintic cofficint of th intrfac, it is dfind as τ(n) = τ 0 a 2 s (n) whr τ 0 is th kintic charactristic tim. Lt us notic that ach trm of Eq. (1a) is dimnsionlss. Th physical dimnsions of W 0, N, τ 0 and λ ar rspctivly [W 0 ] [L ], [N ] [L ] 1, [τ 0 ] [T ] and [λ] [ ], whr [L ] indicats th lngth dimnsion and [T ] indicats th tim dimnsion. In Eq. (1b), th physical dimnsion of κ is [L ] 2 /[T ]. In phas-fild modls, th capillary ffcts can b simulatd by dfining th intrfac thicknss as a function dpnding on th normal vctor of th intrfac n. In othr words, th dfinition W(n) = W 0 a s (n) whr a s (n) is th anisotropy function of th intrfacial nrgy allows to simulat corrctly th growth of crystal with anisotropic shaps. In th modl, th scond trm in th right-hand sid of Eq. (1a) is rsponsibl for such a dndritic structur. Th trm (φ φ 3 ) is th drivativ of th doubl-wll potntial and th last trm λu(1 φ 2 ) 2 is th coupling trm with th normalizd tmpratur, intrpolatd in th diffus intrfac. Hat quation (Eq. (1b)) is a standard diffusiv quation with a sourc trm involving th tim drivativ of phas-fild: (1/2) φ/ t. Th maning of this trm can b undrstood by multiplying Eq. (1b) by th latnt hat L which is involvd in th dfinition of u. That trm modls th rlas of latnt hat during th solidification procss. Th phas-fild quation Eq. (1a) involvs thr paramtrs W 0, τ 0 and λ. Matchd asymptotic xpansions provid rlationships btwn thos paramtrs with th capillary lngth d 0 and th intrfac kintic cofficint β of th sharpintrfac modl [12]: d 0 = a 1 W 0 λ, β = a 1 ( τ0 W 0 λ a 2 (2a) ) W 0. (2b) κ Cofficints a 1 and a 2 ar two numbrs of ordr unity: a 1 = 5 2/8, and a Ths rlations mak it possibl to choos phas-fild paramtrs for prscribd valus of th capillary lngth (surfac nrgy) and th intrfac mobility (intrfac kintic cofficint). Eqs. (2a) and (2b) will b applid in Sction 4 for simulating a crystal which grows without kintic cofficint (β = 0). Not that th intrfac width W 0 is a paramtr that can b frly chosn in this formulation; th asymptotic analysis rmains valid as long as W 0 rmains much smallr than any lngth scal prsnt in th sharp-intrfac solution of th considrd problm (for xampl, a dndrit tip radius in th cas of dndritic growth). Mor dtails about th dpndnc of paramtrs with n and th link of th phas-fild modl with th sharp intrfac modl can b found in [14]. That modl of crystal growth was applid in many rfrncs [14, 23, 25, 54] and srvs as basis for modl of dilut binary mixtur [16, 24] and modl of coupling with fluid flows [17, 22, 55]. Th charactristic shap of th crystal is obtaind by dfining appropriatly th a s (n) function. If th growing dirction 100 is considrd, this function is dfind by Eq. (1d). In this rlationship, ε s is th strngth of anisotropy and n α (α = x, y, z) is th α-componnt of n. Th choic of function (1d) yilds to a dndritic shap which prsnts four tips in 2D and six tips in 3D [11, 21]. In this papr, w focus on th way to simulat crystal growth with various anisotropy functions a s (n) by using th LB mthod. 4

5 For all simulations in this papr, th computational domain is a squar in 2D or a cub in 3D, and zro fluxs ar imposd on all boundaris for both quations. For phas-fild quation, a nuclus is initializd as a diffus sphr: [ Rs d s φ(x, 0) = tanh ], (3) 2W 0 whr R s is th radius, d s is th distanc dfind by d s = [(x x s ) 2 + (y y s ) 2 + (z z s ) 2 ] 1/2 and x s = (x s, y s, z s ) T is th position of its cntr. With this initial condition, φ = +1 insid th sphr (solid) and φ = 1 outsid (liquid). Th initial tmpratur is considrd as a constant on th whol domain and fixd blow th mlting tmpratur: T < T m. Th initial condition of th normalizd tmpratur is st such as: u(x, 0) = u 0 < 0. (4) In th following simulations, th undrcooling dfind by = u 0 will b spcifid. 3. Lattic Boltzmann schms LB mthods ar usually applid to simulat fluid flows. Hr, th standard LB quation with th classical quilibrium distribution function (.d.f.) hav to b modifid for simulating Eqs. (1a) (1). Indd, fluid flows modl involvs on scalar quation (mass balanc) plus on vctorial quation (momntum) whras th phas-fild modl is composd of two scalar quations which ar coupld and non-linar. LB mthods for phas-fild modl of crystal growth ar alrady prsntd in dtails in rfrnc [49]. Thy wr applid on a modl of dilut binary mixtur with anti-trapping currnt which is an xtnsion of a pur substanc modl. Following that rfrnc, LB schms ar dscribd hr for hat quation and phas-fild quation. Th hat quation is a standard diffusion quation with a particular sourc trm. For a pdagogical prsntation, w start th dscription of algorithms with that quation, bcaus th classical LB mthod for a diffusiv quation is applid (.g. [56]). Modifications that hav to b don for th phas-fild quation will b prsntd and commntd in subsction Hat quation Th LB mthod works on a distribution function f i (x, t) dpnding on position x and tim t. Th indx i idntifis th moving dirctions on a lattic: i = 0,..., N pop whr N pop is th total numbr of dirctions. Th lattic choic (spac dimnsion and numbr of moving dirctions) dpnds on th physical problm to b simulatd. Th lattics usd in this work ar prsntd in subsction 3.3. Th hat quation (1b) is a diffusion quation with a sourc trm involving th tim drivativ of φ. For that quation, th standard LB quation with th Bhatnagar-Gross-Krook (BGK) approximation for th collision trm is applid: f i (x + i δx, t + δt) = f i (x, t) 1 [ ] f i (x, t) f (0) i (x, t) + w i Q u (x, t)δt. (5a) η u Not that th LB quation (Eq. (5a)) is an volution quation for f i (x, t) which is alrady discrtizd in spac, tim, and moving dirctions. Th spac-stp is notd δx by assuming δx = δy = δz and th tim-stp is notd δt. Vctors of displacmnt on th lattic ar notd i and w i ar wights. Th quantitis N pop, i and w i ar lattic-dpndnt and will b spcifid in tabl 1 of subsction 3.3. In Eq. (5a), th BGK collision trm is th scond trm in th right-hand sid. It rlaxs th distribution function f i (x, t) toward an quilibrium distribution function (.d.f.) f (0) i (x, t) with a rlaxation rat η u. In such an quation, f i (x, t) can b rgardd as an intrmdiat function introducd to calculat th normalizd tmpratur u(x, t) and updatd at ach tim stp by: N pop u(x, t) = f i (x, t). i=0 Eq. (5b) is calld th momnt of zroth ordr of th distribution function f i. Momnts of first and scond ordr ar dfind rspctivly by N pop i=0 f i i (vctor) and N pop i=0 f i i i (tnsor of scond ordr). In Eq. (5a), th quilibrium distribution function f (0) i (x, t) and th sourc trm Q u (x, t) ar givn by: 5 (5b)

6 f (0) i (x, t) = w i u(x, t), (5c) Q u (x, t) = 1 φ 2 t. (5d) By carrying out th Chapman-Enskog s xpansions of Eq. (5a) with Eq. (5c), th first- and scond-ordr momnts of th quilibrium distribution function ar qual to i f (0) i i = 0 and i f (0) i i i = u(x, t) 2 I, whr I is th idntity tnsor of rank 2. An additional lattic-dpndnt cofficint, 2, ariss from th scond-ordr momnt of f (0) i. Valus of 2 ar givn in tabl 1 for four lattics usd in this work. Th thrmal diffusivity κ is rlatd to th rlaxation rat of collision η u by: ( κ = 2 η u 1 ) δx 2 2 δt. (5) Th indx u in Q u and η u indicats that both quantitis ar rlativ to th hat quation. Not that th rlaxation rat η u is a constant bcaus th thrmal diffusivity κ was assumd constant in th modl. Bing givn κ, δx and δt, th rlaxation paramtr is initializd bfor th tim loop and kpt constant during th simulation. In a mor gnral cas, κ can b a function dpnding on spac and tim. In that cas, th rlationship (5) must b invrtd and th rlaxation paramtr has to b updatd at ach tim stp. Lt us notic that th factor δx 2 /δt in th right-hand sid is homognous to [L ] 2 /[T ], which is consistnt with th physical dimnsion of κ. Th principl of th LB schm is th following. Onc th normalizd tmpratur u is known with th initial condition, th quilibrium distribution function f (0) is computd by using Eq. (5c). Th collision stag (right-hand i sid of Eq. (5a)) is nxt calculatd and yilds an intrmdiat distribution function that will b stramd in ach dirction (lft-hand sid of Eq. (5a)). Finally aftr updating th boundary conditions, th nw tmpratur is calculatd by using Eq. (5b) and th algorithm is itratd in tim. Notic that th collision trm is local and th schm is fully xplicit, i.., all trms in th right-hand sid of Eq. (5a) ar dfind at position x and tim t. Also not that th sourc trm Q u involvs th tim drivativ of th phas fild which is approximatd hr by an xplicit Eulr schm: φ/ t = (φ(x, t) φ(x, t δt))/δt. In practic, th hat quation must b solvd aftr solving th phas-fild quation. At th first tim-stp, th drivativ is obtaind by th diffrnc btwn th phas-fild at th first tim-stp and its initial condition. Finally, this schm can b asily xtndd to simulat th Advction-Diffusion Equation (ADE) (.g. [57]): u/ t = κ 2 u (uv), whr v is th advctiv vlocity, by modifying th quilibrium distribution function such as f (0)ADE i = w i u [ i vδt/δx ]. Momnts of zroth-, first- and scond-ordr of f (0)ADE i ar rspctivly u, vuδt/δx and 2 ui. In nxt subsction, th LB mthod for th phas-fild quation is prsntd with an analogy with this ADE Phas-Fild quation Phas-fild quation (Eq. (1a)) looks lik an ADE with two diffrncs. Th first on is th prsnc of an additional factor τ(n) = τ 0 a 2 s (n) in front of th tim drivativ φ/ t in th lft-hand sid. Th scond diffrnc is th prsnc of th divrgnc trm W0 2 N in th right-hand sid, which is not strictly spaking on «advctiv» trm. In ordr to handl thos two trms, th standard LB schm has to b modifid. First, a nw distribution function g i (x, t) is introducd. Th LBE for th phas-fild quation works on that function. Th first diffrnc ncssitats a modification of th volution quation for g i. Th scond diffrnc rquirs a modification of th quilibrium distribution function g (0) i (x, t). Th numrical schm is: a 2 s (n)g i (x+ i δx, t +δt) = g i (x, t) (1 a 2 s (n))g i (x+ i δx, t) 1 [ ] g i (x, t) g (0) i (x, t) +w i Q φ (x, t) δt, (6a) η φ (x, t) τ 0 with th quilibrium distribution function g (0) i (x, t) dfind by: 6

7 ( g (0) i (x, t) = w i φ(x, t) 1 2 i N (x, t) δt W 2 ) 0. (6b) δx τ 0 In Eq. (6a), th anisotropy function a s (n) has to b spcifid. It is dfind by Eq. (1d) for simulating on crystal that grows in a prfrntial dirction 100. In ordr to simulat othr prfrntial dirctions of growth, a modification of that function is ncssary. Analytic xprssions of various anisotropy functions will b spcifid in Sction 4.1. Whatvr th rlationship usd, calculation of a s (n) rquirs th computation of n which is dfind by th gradint of phas-fild φ. Th calculation of that gradint will b prsntd in Sction 4.2. In Eq. (6b), th vctor N (x, t) is dfind by Eq. (1c). Onc th anisotropy function a s (n) is st, th componnts of N ar calculatd by driving a s (n) with rspct to x φ, y φ and z φ. In Eqs. (6a) (6b), functions a s (n) and N (x, t) ar tratd xplicitly in tim. Th lattic Boltzmann schm for th phas-fild quation diffrs from th standard LB mthod for ADE on two points. Th first diffrnc is th prsnc in Eq. (6a) of (i) a factor a 2 s (n) in front of g i (x+ i δx, t +δt) in th lft-hand sid and (ii) an additional trm (1 a 2 s (n))g i (x + i δx, t) in th right-hand sid. Th lattr trm is non-local in spac, i.., it is involvd in th collision stp at tim t and nds th knowldg of g i at th nighboring nods x+ i δx. Thos two trms appar to handl th factor a 2 s (n) in front of th tim drivativ φ/ t in Eq. (1a). It is straightforward to prov it by carrying out th Taylor s xpansion of Eq. (6a). Th scond diffrnc with th LB algorithm for ADE, is th dfinition of th quilibrium distribution function g (0) i (Eq. (6b)). Momnts of zroth-, first- and scond-ordr of this function ar rspctivly: N pop g (0) i (x, t) = φ(x, t) (7a) i=0 N pop i=0 g (0) i (x, t) i = N (x, t) δt W0 2 δx τ 0 (7b) N pop g (0) i (x, t) i i = φ(x, t) 2 I (7c) i=0 whr I is still th idntity tnsor of rank 2. Th main diffrnc with th.d.f. of ADE appars in th momnt of first ordr (Eq. (7b)). In that trm, th scalar fild φ(x, t) is not involvd in th right-hand sid bcaus it dos not appar in th divrgnc trm of Eq. (1a). Th absnc of phas fild φ(x, t) in th divrgnc trm, xplains its prsnc in th first trm insid th brackts (6b), and not bfor th brackts. Morovr, not th sign chang in front of th scalar product i N, which corrsponds to th sign chang of + N compard to (vu) for th ADE. A dimnsional analysis shows that Eqs. (6a) and (6b) ar both dimnsionlss. In th.d.f., th scond trm in th brackts is dimnsionlss sinc [N ] [L ] 1, [W 0 ] [L ] and [τ 0 ] [T ]. Th algorithm works in th sam way than th prvious on for th tmpratur fild u(x, t). Aftr th collision stag and th straming stp, th phas-fild φ(x, t) is calculatd by th momnt of zroth ordr: N pop φ(x, t) = i=0 g i (x, t). Th scalar function Q φ (x, t) is th sourc trm of th phas-fild quation (1a) which is dfind by: (8a) Q φ (x, t) = [ φ λu(1 φ 2 ) ] (1 φ 2 ). (8b) In Eq. (1a), cofficint a 2 s (n) in th first trm of th right-hand sid plays a similar rol as a «diffusion» cofficint dpnding on position and tim (through n that dpnds on φ). Th rlaxation rat η φ (x, t) is a function of position and tim and must b updatd at ach tim stp by th rlationship: η φ (x, t) = 1 2 a2 s (n) W 0 2 δt τ 0 δx (8c)

8 Lattics 2D N pop 2 D2Q5 4 1/3 D2Q9 8 1/3 3D N pop 2 D3Q7 6 1/4 D3Q /3 Wights w 0 w 1,...,4 w 5,...,8 1/3 1/6 4/9 1/9 1/36 w 0 w 1,...,6 w 7,...,14 1/4 1/8 2/9 1/9 1/72 Tabl 1: Valus of N pop, w i, and 2 for lattics D2Q5, D2Q9, D3Q7 and D3Q15. In Eq. (8c), w can chck that th first trm of th right-hand sid is dimnsionlss: W0 2/τ 0 is dimnsionally balancd with δt/δx 2. Th origin of factor W0 2/τ 0 insid g (0) i (Eq. (6b)) and η φ (Eq. (8c)), can b undrstood by dividing ach trm of Eq. (1a) by τ 0. Th first trm in th right-hand sid bcoms [(a 2 s (n)w0 2/τ 0) φ ], th scond on bcoms (N W0 2/τ 0) and th last on is Q φ /τ 0. Each trm (a 2 s (n)w0 2/τ 0), (N W0 2/τ 0) and Q φ /τ 0 is rspctivly involvd in Eqs. (8c), (6b) and (6a). Mor rigorously, aftr th asymptotic xpansions of Eq. (6a), th momnts quation for g (0) i is compard to Eq. (1a) dividd by τ 0. Th idntification of ach trm yilds to th rlationships (7a) (7c) and (8c). Th Chapman-Enskog s xpansions of that numrical schm can b found in Appndics of rfrnc [49]. Th LB schm for phas-fild quation uss th sam BGK collision rul than tmpratur quation. Othr approximations of th collision trm xist in th litratur: Multipl-Rlaxation Tim (MRT) [58] and Two-Rlaxation Tim (TRT) [59]. With th MRT approximation th collisions ar carrid out in th momnts spac. For ADE, tnsorial diffusion cofficints can b takn into account for problms that involv diffusion cofficints varying with dirction [60]. Morovr, with th MRT and TRT approximations, it is possibl to simulat problms with highr Pclt numbrs than thos rachd with th BGK collision. High Pclt numbr and anisotropic diffusion cofficint ar not studid hr Lattics Svral lattics xist in th LB mthod, thy diffr by th spac dimnsion and th numbr of moving dirctions. In this work, 2D and 3D simulations ar carrid out with four lattics: D2Q5, D2Q9, D3Q7 and D3Q15 (s Fig. 1). Th lattics D2Q5 and D2Q9 ar applid for two-dimnsional simulations (D2) and uss rspctivly fiv (Q5) and nin (Q9) dirctions of displacmnt. Th lattic D2Q5 is applid for tmpratur quation and D2Q9 for phas-fild quation. For thr-dimnsional simulations, th tmpratur u is computd on a lattic D3Q7, whras th phasfild φ is computd on a lattic D3Q15. Th first on is dfind by svn dirctions of displacmnt (Q7) and th scond on is dfind by fiftn dirctions (Q15). Th displacmnt vctors i ar dfind blow for ach lattic. Although th phas-fild quation (Eq. (1a)) is a scalar on, th simplst lattics such as D2Q5 and D3Q7 ar avoidd. Indd, som unwantd ffcts of grid anisotropy can occur by using thm. For instanc, th choic ε s = 0 in Eq. (1d) dos not yild to a solution with a sphrical shap (s [49]). Lt us mntion that th sam problm occurs whn th laplacian trm of phas-fild quation is discrtizd with a finit diffrnc mthod which uss only th first four (in 2D) or six (in 3D) nighbors [12]. That problm is fixd by using ightn nighboring nods in 3D simulations [14]. At last, th lattics D3Q19 and D3Q27 ar not applid bcaus th sam solution as D3Q15 is obtaind by using thm. Thos two lattics us mor moving dirctions and rquir mor mmory. Th two-dimnsional lattics D2Q5 and D2Q9 ar dfind as follows. Th numbr of moving dirctions ar rspctivly N pop = 4 and N pop = 8. For D2Q5, vctors i ar dfind by 0 = (0, 0) T, 1 = (1, 0) T, 2 = (0, 1) T, 3 = ( 1, 0) T and 4 = (0, 1) T (Fig. 1a). For D2Q9 th first fiv vctors ar th sam (blu vctors on Fig. 1b) and th last four vctors corrspond to th four diagonals of th squar (rd vctors on Fig. 1b): 5 = (1, 1) T, 6 = ( 1, 1) T, 7 = ( 1, 1) T, 8 = (1, 1) T. For D3Q7, th numbr of moving dirctions is N pop = 6. Vctors i ar dfind such as 0 = (0, 0, 0) T, 1 = (1, 0, 0) T, 2 = (0, 1, 0) T, 3 = ( 1, 0, 0) T, 4 = (0, 1, 0) T, 5 = (0, 0, 1) T and 6 = (0, 0, 1) T (Fig. 1c). For D3Q15, th numbr of moving dirctions is N pop = 14. Th first svn vctors i ar th sam as D3Q7 (blu vctors on Fig. 1d). Th ight othr dirctions corrspond to th ight diagonals of th cub (rd vctors on Fig. 8

9 (a) D2Q5 2 (b) D2Q (c) D3Q7 (d) D3Q Figur 1: (a) Two-dimnsional simulations: lattics (a) D2Q5 for tmpratur quation and (b) D2Q9 for phas-fild quation. Thr-dimnsional simulations: (c) D3Q7 for tmpratur quation and (d) D3Q15 for phas-fild quation. 9

10 1d) and ar dfind by: 7 = (1, 1, 1) T, 8 = ( 1, 1, 1) T, 9 = ( 1, 1, 1) T, 10 = (1, 1, 1) T, 11 = (1, 1, 1) T, 12 = ( 1, 1, 1) T, 13 = ( 1, 1, 1) T, 14 = (1, 1, 1) T. Finally, valus of 2 and w i for thos four lattics ar givn in Tabl 1. All quantitis ar calculatd at nods and th wights w i ar dfind such as i=1,...,npop w i = 1. As usual in LB mthod, th condition δx = δy = δz is assumd: mshs ar squars (in 2D) or cubs (in 3D). In this work, for all boundaris of computational domain, th standard bounc-back mthod is applid for both distribution functions f i and g i : f i (x, t) = f i (x, t), g i (x, t) = g i (x, t), (9a) (9b) whr i is th opposit dirction of i. For instanc, for tmpratur quation, aftr th straming stp, componnts f 1, f 5 and f 8 ar unknown at th lft boundary. Th bounc-back mthod consists to updat ach componnt f i with th valu of f i which movs in opposit dirction i.. f 1 = f 3, f 5 = f 7 and f 8 = f 6. LB mthods ar composd of Eqs. (5a) (5) for tmpratur quation and Eqs. (6a), (6b) and (8a) (8c) for phas-fild quation. Numrical implmntation of thos schms is validatd in [49] by comparing th tip vlocity volution with a finit diffrnc mthod dscribd in rfrnc [53]. Th comparisons wr carrid out on a D2Q9 lattic with an anisotropy function dfind by Eq. (1d) for two undrcoolings = 0.3 and = Th mthodology was applid to simulat hydrodynamics ffcts on crystal growth in [61] and crystal growth of dilut binary mixtur in [48] Validations That LB algorithm was validatd with anothr numrical cod by comparing th tip vlocity V p and th dndrit shap (φ = 0) for two undrcoolings: 1 = 0.30 and 2 = W usd for th comparison a 2D numrical cod basd on a Finit Diffrnc mthod for phas-fild quation and a Mont-Carlo algorithm for tmpratur [53]. For LB schms, w usd th lattics D2Q9 for Eq. (1a) and D2Q5 for Eq. (1b). On Fig. 2, rsults of first cod ar labld by «FDMC» and rsults for LB schms ar labld by «LBE». Th domain is a squar discrtizd with mshs of siz δx. Th initial sd is a diffus circl of radius R s = 10δx which is st at th origin of th computational domain. Th problm is symmtrical with rspct to th x-axis and y-axis. Th intrfac thicknss W 0 and th charactristic tim τ 0 ar st to W 0 = τ 0 = 1. Th spac stp is chosn such as δx/w 0 = 0.4 [12], th tim stp is δt = and th lngths of th systm dpnd on th undrcooling = u 0. A smallr undrcooling ncssitats a biggr msh bcaus of th largr diffusiv lngth. Th tim to rach th stationary vlocity is also mor important. For 1 = 0.30 and 2 = 0.55, w hav usd rspctivly a msh of nods and nods. Th capillary lngth d 0 and th kintic cofficint β ar rspctivly givn by Eq. (2a) and Eq. (2b) with a and a In th bnchmark, w hav chosn th paramtr λ such as β = 0, i.. λ = κτ 0 /a 2 W 2 0. With W 0 = τ 0 = 1, th cofficint λ is qual to λ = κ. For a thrmal diffusivity quals to κ = 4, th cofficints ar λ = and d 0 = Rsults of such a bnchmark ar prsntd on Fig. 2 for ε s = In th comparisons, th solid lins rprsnt th rsults for FDMC mthod and th rd dots rprsnt th rsults for LB schms. Th tip vlocity V p is dimnsionlss by using th factor d 0 /κ (V p = Ṽ p d 0 /κ), th position x is also dimnsionlss by using th spac-stp (x = x/δx) and th tim T is th tim t dividd by τ 0 (T = t/τ 0 ). That bnchmark validats th LB schms prsntd in Sction 3. Mor dtails about rlativ rrors of thos rsults ar commntd in subsction 4.1 of rfrnc [49]. Th suprposition of dndrit shaps φ = 0 can b found in this sam rfrnc. 4. Anisotropy functions This sction focuss on th a s (n) function rsponsibl for th charactristic shaps of crystals. In LB schms for phas-fild modl, th a s function appars (i) in th phas-fild quation (Eq. (6a)), (ii) in th vctorial function N (x, t) of.d.f. (Eq. (6b)) and (iii) in th rlaxation rat η φ (Eq. (8c)). This sction invstigats th anisotropy function for which th growth of branchs ar not dirctd along th main axs of th coordinat systm, i.. w focus on th anisotropy function for a prfrntial growth othr than 10 in 2D and 100 in 3D. First, main formulations of th a s function ar rmindd and nxt, ffcts of gradint calculation on th crystal shap ar prsntd. 10

11 V p (dimnsionlss tip vlocity) LBE - 1 = 0.30 FDMC - 1 = 0.30 LBE - 2 = 0.55 FDMC - 2 = Figur 2: Dimnsionlss tip vlocity V p as a function of tim for FDMC (solid lins) and LBE (rd dots) for two undrcoolings 1 = 0.30 and 2 = 0.55 (from [49]). Paramtrs ar κ = 4, λ = , d 0 = and ε s = T 4.1. Sphrical or Cartsian formulations Two main formulations ar usd in th litratur to simulat dndritic crystals. In 2D, th standard formulations ar basd on th angl ϕ ϕ(x, t) (.g. [5]) btwn th normal vctor of th intrfac and th x-axis. In phasfild modls, this angl is xprssd in trms of drivativs of th phas-fild φ. Dfinition of normal vctor is givn by n = φ/ φ and its componnts ar nx = x φ/ φ and ny = y φ/ φ. Th angl ϕ is dfind by: tanϕ = sinϕ/cosϕ = n y /n x = y φ/ x φ i.. it can b obtaind by th rlationship ϕ = tan 1 ( y φ/ x φ). Thrfor, if x φ 0, th angl ϕ is calculatd from th phas-fild φ. Th standard form of a s (ϕ) in 2D is: a s (ϕ) = 1 + ε s cos[q(ϕ(x, t) ϕ 0 )], (10) whr ϕ 0 is a rfrnc angl. Both cofficints ε s > 0 and q ar rspctivly th strngth and mod of anisotropy. For instanc, th choic q = 4 and ϕ 0 = 0 lads to th dvlopmnt of crystal with four tips dirctd along th main axs x and y. Indd, th growth is maximal whn cos(4ϕ) is qual to on, i.. for multipl intgrs of ϕ = π/2. Othr similar 2D formulations xist in th litratur. For instanc in [20]: a s (ϕ) = 1 + ε s [ 8/3sin 4 (q/2(ϕ ϕ 0 )) 1 ]. Th powr four of th sin function yilds an asymmtry btwn th maximal and minimal valus of a s. Also not th modification of a s (ϕ) for simulating crystals that ar factd [62, 63]. Thos shaps ar not studid in this work. A formulation of a s (ϕ), dfind by an angl ϕ, is quivalnt to a s (n) dfind by a normal vctor n. By xpanding th particular cas a s (ϕ) = 1 + ε s cos(4ϕ) in powrs of cosϕ and sinϕ (with cos(4ϕ) = cos2(2ϕ)), and nxt by idntifying n x = cosϕ and n y = sinϕ, th 2D rlationship a s (n) = 1 3ε s + 4ε s (n 4 x + n 4 y) is obtaind [12]. Mor gnrally, th function cos(qϕ) can b drivd from a formalism involving sphrical harmonics. On a sphrical surfac, any scalar function can b dcomposd on a basis of sphrical functions dpnding on two angls ϕ and θ: th sphrical harmonics. Th distanc r is th third coordinat to dfin th position on a sphr. For instanc cos(4ϕ) corrsponds to th ral part of th sphrical harmonic Y 4,4 (θ, ϕ) in th XY -plan (i.. with θ = π/2): R[Y 4,4 (π/2, ϕ)] cos(4ϕ). Th symbol mans that th sphrical harmonic Y 4,4 is proportional to that function with a normalization factor. An application of such a formalism is givn hr. Th a s (n) function that is drivd will b usd in Sction 5, for comparisons btwn a 2D cod which uss a ϕ-formulation and a 3D cod which uss a n-formulation. That bnchmark will b carrid out in ordr to validat numrical implmntation of th dirctional drivativs mthod. If w want to driv a a s (n) function that is quivalnt to a s (ϕ) = 1+ε s cos(6ϕ), th ral part of Y 6,6 (θ, ϕ) is considrd: R(Y 6,6 (θ, ϕ)) cos(6ϕ)sin 6 θ. Aftr dvloping cos(6ϕ) and using th variabl chang from sphrical to Cartsian coordinats, sinθcosϕ = x/r, sinθsinϕ = y/r and cosθ = z/r, th calculation lads to R(Y 6,6 (x)) (x 6 15x 4 y

12 15x 2 y 4 y 6 )/r 6. Aftr idntifying n x = x/r, n y = y/r and n z = z/r, th anisotropy function is: a s (n) = 1 + ε s (n 6 x 15n 4 xn 2 y + 15n 2 xn 4 y n 6 y). (11) Eq. (11) favors crystal growth in six main growing dirctions in th XY -plan. That function will b usd in Sction 5.1. Th sam procdur can b followd for othr charactristic shaps aftr idntification of sphrical harmonics suitd to th problm. In 3D, any anisotropy function a s (n) can b xprssd as a linar combination of cubic harmonics. Th cubic harmonics ar linar combinations of ral sphrical harmonics with an appropriat cubic symmtry [64 66]. For instanc, function Q(n) = n 4 x + n 4 y + n 4 z of Eq. (1d), which favors th growth in 100 prfrntial dirction, can b drivd from th cubic harmonic K 4,1 (θ, ϕ) [ 5cos 4 θ 3 + 5sin 4 θ(cos 4 ϕ + sin 4 ϕ) ]. Aftr th variabl chang in Cartsian coordinats, that function bcoms K 4,1 (θ, ϕ) [ 5(n 4 x + n 4 y + n 4 z ) 3 ]. By considring an additional cubic harmonic K 6,1, th a s (n) function can b gnralizd for othr growing dirctions. For instanc, th 110 -dirction can b simulatd by [67]: a s (n) = 1 + ε s ( α=x,y,zn 4 α 3 5 ) + γ ( 3 α=x,y,zn 4 α + 66n 2 xn 2 yn 2 z 17 7 ), (12) whr ε s is th anisotropy strngth in th 100 -dirctions and γ is th anisotropy strngth in th 110 -dirctions. Th first trm of th right-hand sid is th cubic harmonic K 0,0 = 1, th scond on is K 4,1 [5Q(n) 3] and th last on is th cubic harmonic K 6,1 [462S(n) + 21Q(n) 17] with S(n) = n 2 xn 2 yn 2 z. W can rfr to [64, 68] for othr cubic harmonics of highr ordr, dfind in trms of functions Q(n) and S(n). Lt us mntion that svral xprimnts and simulations, involving th anisotropy function (Eq. (12)), wr carrid out in th litratur to study th «dndrit orintation transition» from 100 to 110 [69, 70]. In thos rfrncs, phas-fild simulations ar prformd by varying systmatically th anisotropy paramtrs ε s and γ to xplor th rol of ths paramtrs on th rsulting microstructurs. Simulations ar carrid out for pur substanc and binary mixtur for quiaxd crystals and dirctional solidification. In ordr to s th influnc of ach trm of Eq. (12), a graphical rprsntation is plottd on a sphrical surfac. First, th phas-fild φ(x, 0) is initializd (by using Eq. (3)) insid a cubic domain composd of nods. Th initial sphr is st at th cntr of th domain x s = (100, 100, 100) T with a radius quals to R s = 50 lattic units (l.u.). Nxt, th componnts n x, n y and n z ar drivd by calculating th gradint of φ. Finally, ach trm of Eq. (12) is calculatd and post-procssd on a sphrical surfac of radius R s and cntrd at x s. Rsults ar prsntd in Figs. 3 for various valus of ε s and γ. On thos figurs, th rd and blu aras corrspond to th zons for which th growth is rspctivly maximal and minimal. All figurs ar plottd for a sam orintation of th coordinat systm to facilitat th comparison btwn functions. As xpctd, function Q(n) favors growth in th 100 -dirction (Fig. 3a); S(n) favors growth in th 111 -dirction (Fig. 3b), and a s (n) dfind by Eq. (12) with ε s = 0 and γ = 0.02 favors growth in th 110 -dirction (Fig. 3). Simulations of crystal growth with thos thr anisotropy functions will b carrid out in Sction Effct of dirctional drivativs of gradints in LB schms For ach formulation of a s, it is ncssary to comput th gradint of φ for driving th componnts of n. It is also ncssary to comput th drivativs of a s (n) with rspct to x φ, y φ and z φ involvd in th vctor N (x, t). Two approachs wr compard in this work. In th first on, th gradint is calculatd by using th classical formula of cntral finit diffrncs, i.. in 2D: x φ (φ j+1,k φ j 1,k )/2δx and y φ (φ j,k+1 φ j,k 1 )/2δx, whr j and k ar indxs of coordinats x and y. In th scond approach, th mthod basd on th dirctional drivativs is applid. Th mthod has alrady dmonstratd its prformanc for hydrodynamics problm in ordr to rduc parasitic currnts for two-phas flow problm [50 52]. Th dirctional drivativ is th drivativ along ach moving dirction on th lattic. Taylor s xpansion at scond-ordr of a diffrntiabl scalar function φ(x) at x + i δx and x i δx yilds th following approximation of dirctional drivativs: i φ x = 1 2δx [φ(x + iδx) φ(x i δx)]. 12 (13a)

13 (a) Q(n) = n 4 x + n 4 y + n 4 z (b) S(n) = n 2 xn 2 yn 2 z (c) 3Q(n) + 66S(n) (d) a s (n) with ε s = 0.02, γ = 0.02 () a s (n) with ε s = 0, γ = 0.02 (f) a s (n) with ε s = 0.05, γ = 0.02 Figur 3: Graphical rprsntation of ach trm of Eq. (12). Th numbr of dirctional drivativs is qual to th numbr of moving dirction i on th lattic i.. N pop. Th gradint is obtaind by: φ x = 1 N pop ( 2 w i i i φ ) x. i=0 Th thr componnts of gradint x φ, y φ and z φ ar obtaind by calculating ach dirctional drivativ with th rlationship (13a) and nxt, by calculating th momnt of first ordr with Eq. (13b). In Eq. (13b), ach dirction is wightd by cofficints w i and th sum is normalizd by factor 1/ 2. For gradint computation, th numbr and dirctions of dirctional drivativs ar consistnt with th numbr and moving dirctions of distribution functions. Th dirctional drivativs mthod is consistnt with th lattic that ar usd for simulations. This is th main advantag of th mthod. Indd, on lattics D2Q9 and D3Q15, th distribution functions f i and g i can mov in diagonal dirctions. With this mthod, ach drivativ along th dirction of propagation is usd to calculat th gradint. Thus, th drivativs contain th contributions of diagonal dirctions of lattics D2Q9 and D3Q15. Thos rlationships can also b usd for othr lattics, such as D3Q19 and D3Q27. Not that th scond-ordr cntral diffrnc is usd in Eq. (13a) for approximating th dirctional drivativs. Othr approximations xist [50] such as th first-ordr and scond-ordr upwind schms (or biasd diffrncs) rspctivly dfind by i up 1φ x = [φ(x + i δx) φ(x)]/δx and i up 2φ x = [ φ(x + 2 i δx) + 4φ(x + i δx) 3φ(x)]/(2δx). If ncssary, th scond drivativ of φ can also b obtaind by ( i ) 2 φ x = [φ(x + i δx) 2φ(x) + φ(x i δx)]/δx 2. Hr, th cntral diffrnc approximation Eq. (13a) is applid for all simulations. W compar th impact of both mthods on th solution φ. W simulat Eqs. (1a) (1c) in 2D with a s (ϕ) dfind by Eq. (10) for q = 6 and ϕ 0 = 0. Componnts of gradint ar calculatd by using first (i) th classical formula of cntral finit diffrnc (FD) and scond (ii) th dirctional drivativs (DD) givn by Eqs. (13a) (13b). For simulations, th msh is composd of nods. Th paramtrs ar δx = δy = 0.01, δt = , τ 0 = , W 0 = , κ = 1, th undrcooling is = 0.30, λ = 10, ε s = Th sd is initializd at th cntr of th domain x c = (400, 400), and th radius is R s = 10 lattic unit (l.u.). 13 (13b)

14 For both mthods, w prsnt on Fig. 4 th solution φ = 0 at t = 10 5 δt (rd curv) and th sam solution with a rotation of 60 (blu curv). Whn th gradints ar calculatd with a finit diffrncs mthod, th phas-fild φ = 0 dos not match prfctly with its rotation of 60 (Fig. 4a). Th phas-fild is not any mor isotropic and th numrical solution prsnts som lattic anisotropy ffcts. Thos ffcts can b sn mor prcisly on Fig. 5a which plots th diffrnc φ rot (x) φ(x) with th FD mthod. In two main dirctions dfind by n a = (1, 0) and n b = (1/2, 3/2) th diffrncs ar maximal at th tips (rspctivly and 1.454), whras in th third dirction n c = (1/2, + 3/2) th diffrnc is lowr than Whn th gradints ar calculatd with th DD mthod, th phas-fild φ = 0 is much mor isotropic (Fig. 4b) as confirmd by th diffrncs φ rot (x) φ(x) plottd on Fig.5b. Th diffrncs ar now mor uniformly distributd insid th domain and th maximal and minimal valus ar dividd by a factor 14 (rspctivly 0.1 and 0.103). Th lattic anisotropy is rducd. In ordr to quantify th rrors, th l 2 rlativ rror norm is calculatd with two φ-profils plottd along two dirctions n a and n b dfind abov. Th l 2 rlativ rror norm is dfind by: j (φ a, j φ b, j ) 2 Err l 2 = N j N j j φ 2 a, j, (14) whr φ a and φ b ar th phas-filds collctd along th dirctions n a and n b rspctivly. Th profils of φ a and φ b ar prsntd on Figs. 6a,b for both mthods of gradint computation. Th phas-fild φ a sampld along th dirction n a is takn as a rfrnc for th rror calculation. N j is th total numbr of valus and j is th indx. Th l 2 rlativ rror for th finit diffrnc mthod is Err FD l 2 = and th rlativ rror for th dirctional drivativs mthod is Err DD l 2 = Th rror is dcrasd by a factor 56 by using th DD mthod. This problm of lattic anisotropy is dcrasd whn th rlationships (13a) and (13b) ar applid to calculat th gradints (Fig. 4b and Fig. 6b). Th origin of thos diffrncs can b undrstood whn th a s function is plottd as a function of position (Fig. 7). At t = 10 5 δt, with th finit diffrncs mthod, th valus of a s dpnd on th dirction of growth, th function is not isotropic by rotation. In othr words, on Fig. 7a, th first pattrn insid th box B, which corrsponds to a dirction of growth n a, is diffrnt of th scond on insid th box A corrsponding to a dirction n c. Th pattrn of a s is not priodic. On th contrary, with th dirctional drivativs mthod, th pattrns in boxs A and B ar idntical (Fig. 7b). By considring th diagonals of th lattic in th calculation of gradint, a s is mor accurat and fully symmtric by rotation. Lt us mntion that thos diffrncs do not appar whn q = 4, vn for gradints computd by cntral finit diffrnc, bcaus th growth occurs in th main dirction of th coordinat systm: x- and y-axis. Finally, th whol approach (LB+DD) is applid to simulat again th crystal growth with q = 6 and ϕ 0 = 0, by modifying th undrcooling and th intrfacial kintic. In this simulation, w choos th paramtr λ such as th intrfacial kintic (Eq. (2b)) is cancld. Th condition β = 0 is satisfid for on particular valu of λ: λ = κτ 0 /a 2 W0 2. By considring W 0 = 1 and τ 0 = 1, th cofficint λ is qual to λ = κ/a 2 = κ. For a thrmal diffusivity quals to κ = 4, w obtain λ = and th capillary lngth is d 0 = Th msh is composd of nods. Paramtrs ar δx = δy = 0.4, δt = 0.008, th undrcooling is = 0.55 and th anisotropic strngth is ε s = Th radius of th initial sd is R s = 10 lattic unit (l.u.). Rsults ar prsntd on Fig. 8 at t = δt. Th anisotropy function is plottd on Fig. 8a. On that figur, w can obsrv that th pattrn is idntical in ach branch of th crystal. Th a s function is symmtric by rotation of 60. On Fig. 8b, th tmpratur fild is plottd and th volution of φ is suprimposd at four diffrnt tims (black lins). W can chck that th solution of φ is isotropic, th phas-fild matchs prfctly with its rotation of Simultanous growth of crystals with diffrnt anisotropy functions Now, w ar intrstd in th simultanous growth of svral crystals with diffrnt numbrs of branchs and diffrnt angl of rfrnc ϕ 0. Th difficulty dos not li in th growth of svral crystals sinc thir numbr is naturally takn into account in th phas-fild modl, mor prcisly in th initial condition of φ. For instanc, for simulating th growth of thr crystals, thr initial grains ar st with th rlationship (3). Each of thm will grow progrssivly during th simulation but thy will hav th sam anisotropy function. Hr, w considr that ach crystal can b dfind by its own anisotropy function a s (n). 14

15 (a) φ = 0 with standard finit diffrncs (b) φ = 0 with dirctional drivativs mthod Y 400 Without rotation Rotation 60 dg Y 400 Without rotation Rotation 60 dg 350 A 350 B X X Zoom A Zoom B Y 400 Without rotation Rotation 60 dg Y 400 Without rotation Rotation 60 dg X X Figur 4: Effct of using a cntral finit diffrnc mthod (a), or a dirctional drivativs mthod (b) to calculat th gradints of φ on a D2Q9 lattic. Without dirctional drivativs, th phas-fild φ = 0 (rd) at t = 10 5 δt dos not match with its rotation of 60 (blu). Th rotation matchs prfctly whn th dirctional drivativs mthod is applid. (a) Diffrnc φ rot (x) φ(x) with FD (b) Diffrnc φ rot (x) φ(x) with DD Figur 5: Diffrncs btwn φ rot (x) φ(x) (a) with Finit Diffrnc and (b) with Dirctional Drivativs. φ rot (x) is obtaind from φ(x) aftr a rotation of

16 (a) Profils with finit diffrncs (b) Profils with dirctional drivativs 1 Dir n a Dir n b 1 Dir n a Dir n b φ 0 φ r r Figur 6: φ-profils along th dirctions n a = (1, 0) and n b = (1/2, 3/2). (a) With a finit diffrnc mthod th rlativ rror (l 2 -norm) is and (b) its valu is qual to with a dirctional drivativs mthod. (a) a s (ϕ) with finit diffrncs mthod (b) a s (ϕ) with dirctional drivativs mthod Figur 7: Anisotropy function a s (ϕ) at t = 10 5 δt. (a) With a finit diffrncs mthod th valus of th a s function ar diffrnt insid boxs A and B, whras (b) with a dirctional drivativs mthod, thy ar idntical. 16

17 (a) Anisotropy function a s (ϕ) (b) Tmpratur fild u and volution of φ = 0 Figur 8: Simulation for = 0.55 and q = 6, rsults at t = δt. (a) Anisotropy function a s (ϕ) with dirctional drivativs. (b) Dimnsionlss tmpratur u and phas-fild φ = 0 (black lins) at t = 1, 2, 3, δt. For that purpos, w considr that this function dpnds on a nw indx I I(x, t): [ ( )] a (I) s (x, t) = 1 + ε (I) s cos q (I) ϕ(x, t) ϕ (I) 0, (15) whr I is a fild indicating th crystal numbr. This nw function dpnds on position and tim and varis from 1 to N I whr N I is th numbr of crystals: it is qual to 1 for th first crystal; 2 for th scond on; 3 for th third on, and so on... Its valu is zro vrywhr ls. For xampl in 2D, if w choos N I = 3 crystals, with q (1) = 4, q (2) = 5 and q (3) = 6 rspctivly, th volution of I(x, t) has to b updatd at ach tim stp. Aftr initialization of φ(x, t) and I(x, t), th nods surrounding ach crystal ar slctd with a critrion basd on th variation of φ: φ > ξ whr ξ is a small numrical valu. This critrion is usd to idntify all nods that hav a zro valu and locatd nar th diffus zon of ach crystal. Thn th indx of thos nods taks th valu of th narst nod having an indx diffrnt to zro. Thr sds ar initializd in a computational domain composd of nods. Th radius is st at R s = 8 l.u for ach of thm and positions ar x (1) = (350, 350), x (2) = (850, 400) and x (3) = (600, 820). An angl ϕ (1) 0 = 45 is st for th first crystal and ϕ (2) 0 = 5 for th scond on. Paramtrs ar δx = , δt = , W 0 = 0.012, τ 0 = 10 4, λ = 10, ε 1,2,3 s = 0.04, κ = 0.7 and = 0.3. Th small numrical valu for th critrion is ξ = Rsults ar prsntd on Fig. 9a. Black lins rprsnt th tim volution of φ = 0, and th tmpratur fild is plottd at th nd of simulation. Crystals hav rspctivly four, fiv and six tips. On th figur, for short tims (< 10 5 δt), th branch siz is idntical for ach crystal. At t = 10 5 δt th pattrn of ach branch for ach crystal is idntical as confirmd by Fig. 9b. On th othr hand, for gratr tims, som branchs ar smallr bcaus of th influnc of othr crystals. Th growth of thos branchs is limitd by th tmpratur fild that is uniform and highr in th intraction zon of crystals. In this ara, th latnt hat rlasd during th solidification is vacuatd lss rapidly in th systm and th spd of growth dcrass. 5. 3D simulations In this sction, w prsnt 3D simulations basd on anisotropy functions dfind in sction 4. Lt us rmind that svral xprimnts and simulations wr carrid out in th litratur to study th «dndrit orintation transition» from 100 to 110 for a pur substanc and binary mixturs [69, 70]. Hr, thos simulations ar prformd to dmonstrat th flxibility of th LB mthod and its ability to simulat various crystal shaps. Onc th anisotropy function a s (n) is modifid and its drivativs with rspct to α φ (α = x, y, z) calculatd, implmntation of 3D 17

18 (a) Tmpratur fild u and volution of φ = 0 (b) Anisotropy function a (I) s (x, t) at t = 10 5 δt Figur 9: Simultanous growth of thr crystals with 4, 5 and 6 tips. (a) phas-fild φ = 0 at t = 0, 2.5, 5, 7.5, 10, 15, δt with tmpratur fild at t = δt. (b) Anisotropy function a s (I) (x, t) at t = 10 5 δt. schms is straightforward by modifying th lattics. In subsction 5.1, th dirctional drivativs mthod implmntd in th 3D cod is chckd with th 2D cod validatd in [49] with a finit diffrnc cod. In subsction 5.2, 3D simulations with thr diffrnt anisotropy functions will b prsntd Comparisons btwn 2D and 3D cods In ordr to chck numrical implmntation of dirctional drivativs mthod in th 3D cod, a comparison is carrid out with th 2D on. Th validation is basd on a comparison of Eq. (11), stablishd in subsction 4.1, that is quivalnt to th 2D function a s (ϕ) = 1 + ε s cos(6ϕ). Simulations of crystal growth ar prformd with a msh composd of nods in 2D and nods in 3D. Only four nods ar usd for th third dimnsion z bcaus Eq. (11) favors th growth of six tips in th XY -plan. For both cods th paramtrs ar st as follows. Th spac stp is qual to δx = 0.01 and th tim stp is chosn such as δt = Th initial condition is a diffus sphr initializd at th domain cntr with a radius quals to R s = 6 lattic unit (l.u.). All boundary conditions ar zro-flux typs. Th initial undrcooling is uniform and qual to u = 0.3 and th thrmal diffusivity is qual to κ = 0.7. Paramtrs of th phas-fild ar W 0 = , τ 0 = , λ = 10 and ε s = Rsults ar prsntd on Fig. 10. On this figur, th lft plot prsnts th phas-fild φ = 0 for a s (ϕ) in 2D (blu squars) and a s (n) in 3D (rd dots) at four tims t = 2, 4, 6, δt. Th shap with six tips in th XY -plan is wll rproducd by using th anisotropy function dfind by Eq. (11) in th 3D cod. For both cods, svral iso-valus of tmpratur fild at t = δt ar suprimposd on th right plot. Th 3D implmntation of th LB schms is validatd Simulations with non standard anisotropy functions In this sction, 3D simulations ar carrid out by using thr anisotropy functions a s (n). Th first anisotropy function is th standard on, dfind by Eq. (1d) with ε s = That function favors th growth in th 100 -dirction (s Fig. 3a). Th scond on is dfind by Eq. (12) which favors th crystal dvlopmnt in th 110 -dirction if ε s = 0 and γ = 0.02 (s Fig. 3). Th last on is dfind by: a s (n) = 66γn 2 xn 2 yn 2 z, (16) with γ = That function favors th growth in th 111 -dirction (s Fig. 3b). For ach simulation, th computational domain is composd of nods and th undrcooling is fixd at = Th spac stp is δx = 0.01 and th tim stp is δt = Th sd is initializd at th cntr x c = 18

19 (a) Phas-fild φ = 0 (t = t 10 3 δt) (b) Tmpratur iso-valus 200 t =8 Cod 2D Cod 3D 250 Cod 2D Cod 3D 180 t = Y Y t =6 t = X X Figur 10: (a) Iso-valus φ = 0 for Eq. (10) with q = 6 and ϕ 0 = 0 (blu squars; 2D cod) and Eq. (11) (rd dots; 3D cod) at t = δt and t = δt. (b) Iso-valus u = 0.25, 0.2, 0.15, 0.1 and 0.05 at t = δt in 2D (blu squar) and 3D (rd dots). (175, 175, 175) T of th domain. Th intrfac thicknss is qual to W 0 = , th kintic tim is τ 0 = , th coupling cofficint is λ = 10, and th thrmal diffusivity is κ = 1. Dndritic shaps φ = 0 of ach crystal ar prsntd on Fig. 11 for a sam orintation of th coordinat systm. Dirctions of growth 100, 110 and 111 ar prsntd rspctivly on Figs. 11a (dndrit A), 11b (dndrit B) and 11c (dndrit C). For dndrit B, as xpctd in viw of Fig. 3, th crystal shap prsnts twlv tips: four containd in th XY -plan cntrd at x c, four othr abov this plan and four blow. Finally, for dndrit C, w can s four tips abov th sam plan and four blow, as xpctd in viw of Fig. 3b. In ordr to chck th isotropy of phas-fild φ = 0, obtaind with th dirctional drivativs mthod, svral slics ar carrid out for ach dndrit. Th cntr of ach plan is x c. For dndrit A, two slics ar carrid out in th plans of normal vctors n A 1 = (1, 0, 0) and na 2 = (0, 1, 0). Solution φ = 0 of th na 1 -plan (Y Z-plan) is compard to th scond on (n A 2 -plan) aftr a rotation of 90 around th z-axis for th scond plan (s Fig. 12a). For dndrit B, two slics of normal vctors n B 1 = (1, 1, 1) and nb 2 = (1, 1, 1) ar carrid out. Th solution φ = 0 from th first plan is compard with th scond on obtaind aftr rotation (s Fig. 12b). Finally, for dndrit C, th phas-filds φ = 0 from plans of normal vctors n C 1 = (1, 1, 0) and nc 2 = (1, 1, 0) ar compard on Fig. 12c aftr a rotation of -45 for th first plan and +45 for th scond on. Th rotation is prformd around th z-axis. For ach dndrit, th phas-filds ar suprimposd and th dirctional drivativs mthod givs satisfying rsults for th numrical isotropy of th solution. On Fig. 11c, which corrsponds to th dndrit C, w can obsrv a thrfold symmtry for th scondary branchs that appar along th main dirctions of growth 111. Th thrfold symmtry xplains why, in th slics of Fig. 12c, th scondary branchs appar only on on sid of ach branch. Th branchs ar not symmtric in thos plans. For dndrits A and B, th symmtry is fourfold and th branchs ar fully symmtric on Figs. 12a and 12b. For dndrit C, th origin of th thrfold symmtry can b undrstood by analyzing th a s (n) function and its drivativs with rspct to ach componnt x φ, y φ and z φ, i.. th vctor N (x, t): ( N as (n) (x, t) = ( x φ), a s(n) ( y φ), a ) T s(n). (17) ( z φ) For an anisotropy function dfind by Eq. (16), th a s (n) function and th stramlins of vctors N (x) ar plottd on a sphrical surfac (Fig. 13a). Hr, th «stramlins» ar th curvs that ar tangnt to vctors N (x). Th sam word is usd by analogy to stramlins that ar tangnt to th vlocity filds in fluid flow problms. On figur 13a, th 19

20 (a) Dndrit A: growing dirction 100 (b) Dndrit B: growing dirction 110 (c) Dndrit C: growing dirction 111 Figur 11: Dndritic shaps φ = 0 for a s (n) dfind by (a) Eq. (1d) with ε s = 0.05 at t = δt; (b) Eq. (12) with ε s = 0 and γ = 0.02 at t = δt; (c) Eq. (16) with γ = 0.02 at t = δt. anisotropy function is th colord fild and th stramlins ar th whit lins. For a bttr clarity of th figur, th stramlins ar not plottd on th whol sphr, but only in th ara around th spcific dirction of growth dfind by n d = (1, 1, 1) T. Th stramlins of N (x) indicat that th growth can also occur in th thr dirctions which corrspond to th scondary growing dirctions obsrvd on Fig. 13b. On that figur, th phas-fild φ = 0 is plottd in th sam orintation of coordinat systm of Fig. 13a, at final tim of simulation t = δt. Th main branch that corrsponds to th dirction n d is highlightd. On Fig. 13c, th a s (n) function is plottd in a plan of normal vctor n d and cntrd at x p = (331, 244, 244) T. That slic is prformd at final tim, nar th tip, whr th scondary branchs do not xist yt. Th a s (n) function has its maximal valus in th thr sam dirctions. Consquntly, th thr scondary branchs that appar during th calculation ar consistnt with th a s (n) function applid for th simulations. Prvious simulations wr prformd with a sd initializd at th cntr of th domain. Nvrthlss, with this way to procd, th dndrit is influncd by th domain boundaris bfor its full dvlopmnt. On first mthod consists to incras th computational domain by incrasing th numbr of nods. Howvr, bcaus 3D simulations rquir a lot of tim computations, symmtris of problm ar considrd by kping th sam msh. For dndrit B, th sd is initializd at th origin (0, 0, 0) of th domain composd of nods and th rsults ar post-procssd at th nd of simulation. For that simulation, th 3D cod calculats in paralll on 50 cors. Th global domain is cut in z-dirction for both quations. Each cor calculats on a thin part of th global msh composd of nods. For tims stps, th rsults ar obtaind aftr hours ( 4 days). For comparison, rsults of Figs. 11(a), (b), (c) ar rspctivly obtaind aftr 3h, 8.97h and 9.18h for calculations on 100 cors. Th full dndrit is obtaind by symmtry with rspct to th plans XY, Y Z and XZ. In th simulation, th undrcooling is = 0.25 and paramtrs of a s (n) ar ε s = 0 and γ = Th volution of th dndritic structur φ = 0 is prsntd on Fig. 14 for six diffrnt tims. A sam orintation of th coordinat systm was st for ach figur. 6. Conclusion In this papr, th Lattic Boltzmann (LB) mthod, usually applid to simulat fluid flows, is applid to simulat crystal growth. Th intrfac position and th tmpratur ar modld by a phas-fild modl which is numrically solvd with a LB mthod. In this work, various dndritic shaps in 2D and 3D wr simulatd through th study of anisotropy function a s (n). That function is rsponsibl for th anisotropic growth of crystals and appars in th phas-fild quation. A spcial car must b don whn calculating th anisotropy function that involvs th normal vctor n of th intrfac. Indd, for a sixfold symmtry in 2D, whn a standard mthod of cntral finit diffrncs is usd to calculat n, th phas-fild φ = 0 is not any mor isotropic. Th solution dos not match with itslf aftr a rotation of 60 bcaus a numrical anisotropy occurs on a s (n): th pattrn of that function is not priodic. That lattic anisotropy 20

21 (a) Slics for dndrit A; plans (c) Slics for dndrit C; plans of normal vctors n A 1 and na 2 of normal vctors n C 1 and nc Plan 1 : without rotation Plan 2 : rotation 90 dg Plan 1 : rotation -45 dg Plan 2 : rotation 45 dg Z Z Y X (b) Slics for dndrit B; plans of normal vctors n B 1 and nb 2 Plan 1 without rot Plan 2 aftr rot X Y Figur 12: All plans ar cntrd at x c = (175, 175, 175) T. (a) Growth in 100 -dirction: plans of normal vctors n A 1 = (1, 0, 0) and na 2 = (0, 1, 0). Phas-fild φ = 0 from th first plan (rd) matchs prfctly φ = 0 from th scond plan (blu) aftr rotation of 90 around th z- axis. (b) Growth in 110 -dirction: plans of normal vctor n B 1 = (1, 1, 1) and nb 2 = (1, 1, 1). Phas-fild φ = 0 from th first plan (rd) matchs prfctly φ = 0 from th scond plan (blu) aftr rotation. (c) Growth in 111 -dirction: plans of normal vctors n C 1 = (1, 1, 0) and n C 2 = (1, 1, 0). Phas-fild from th first plan rotatd from -45 around th z-axis (rd) matchs prfctly φ = 0 from th scond plan rotatd from 45 (blu). 21

22 (a) a s (n) and stramlins (b) φ = 0 at t = δt (c) a s (n) in th plan (n d, x p ) of N at t = 0 Figur 13: (a) Stramlins of N (whit lins) indicat that growth can occur in thr dirctions which corrspond to th scondary growing dirctions obsrvd on (b). At th sam tim t = δt, (c) a s (n) function is plottd in th plan of normal vctor n d = (1, 1, 1) T cntrd at x p = (331, 244, 244) T. a s is maximal in th sam thr dirctions. (a) t = 0 (b) t = δt (c) t = δt (d) t = δt () t = 10 5 δt (f) t = δt Figur 14: Phas-fild volution for a s (n) dfind by Eq. (12) with ε s = 0 and γ = Th paramtrs ar W 0 = , τ 0 = , λ = 10, = 0.25 and κ = 1. 22