SYSTEMTEORI - ÖVNING 5: FEEDBACK, POLE ASSIGNMENT AND OBSERVER
|
|
- Sabina Miles
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 SYSTEMTEORI - ÖVNING 5: FEEDBACK, POLE ASSIGNMENT AND OBSERVER Exercise 54 Consider the system: ẍ aẋ bx u where u is the input and x the output signal (a): Determine a state space realization (b): Is the system reachable? (c): Determine a state feedback so that the closed loop system has poles in ± i (d): Is it possible to stabilize the system with an output feedback y x? If we take the output signal y ẋ, is it possible to determine an output feedback to stabilize the system? (e): Determine a regulator for the case y x (a): To determine a state space realization, we simply take x x, and x 2 ẋ Then the system becomes: [ [ [ [ ẋ x u, ẋ 2 b a x 2 y [ [ x x 2 (b): The system is reachable since it is in the standard reachable form (c): We have to determine a matrix K so that the closed loop system has poles in ± i: eig(a BK) ± i We can use two different methods to find the right K () By substitution The desired characteristic polynomial is: ϕ(s) (s ( i))(s ( i)) s 2 2s 2 By setting K [k, k 2, we have that: [ [ [ [ A BK k k b a 2 b k a k 2 Let us compute the characteristic polynomial of A BK: det(si (A BK)) s 2 (a k 2 )s (b k ) From this, we get that K has to be such that: a k 2 2 k 2 2 a, b k 2 k 2 b
2 2 SYSTEMTEORI - ÖVNING 5: FEEDBACK, POLE ASSIGNMENT AND OBSERVER (2) By using the standard reachable form, Lemma 64 in the compendium Suppose that we have a completely reachable system (A, B), with B R n Let χ A be the characteristic polynomial of A: χ A (s) : det(si A) s n a s n a n Then, from Lemma 64, there is a nonsingular matrix T such that : T AT F, T B h a n a n a n 2 a F hg According to Lemma 64, T is given by: t ta T, ta n where the row vector t is uniquely determined by: t [ B AB A n B [ Note that we do not need T to determine the standard reachable form(we need only the characteristic polynomial χ A ) By writing the system in the standard reachable form, we just need to find a vector g [g n, g n,, g such that: a n a n a n 2 a γ n γ n γ n 2 γ g n g n g n 2 g g i a i γ i, i,, n, where γ i are the coefficients of the desired characteristic polynomial Once the vector g has been determined, we have to transform back the system to the original form That is: A Bk T (F hg)t Therefore, the state feedback vector k is given by: k gt The matrix F is called the companion form
3 SYSTEMTEORI - ÖVNING 5: FEEDBACK, POLE ASSIGNMENT AND OBSERVER 3 Let us apply the method to this example In this case (A, B) are already in the standard reachable form Hence, the transformation matrix T is the identity We can check this by applying the lemma: t [ B AB [ t, t 2 [ [ t T ta The desired characteristic polynomial is: ϕ(s) (s ( i))(s ( i)) s 2 2s 2 γ 2, γ 2 2 Then, the vector g is given by: Finally, we have that: g a γ a 2 g 2 a 2 γ 2 b 2 K gt [ g 2 g I [ b 2 a 2 (d): To check if it is possible to stabilize the system with an output signal feedback, we have to check if the system is both stabilizable and detectable The system is reachable, since it is written in the standard reachable form Therefore, it is stabilizable To check the detectability, we first form the observability matrix: Ω [ C CA [ which is of full rank Therefore, the system is observable, and thus detectable So, we can stabilize the system by output feedback If we take the output signal y ẋ x 2, then the C matrix becomes: y [ [ x C [ x 2 In this case the observability matrix becomes: [ [ C Ω CA b a and it has full rank if b Hence, if b, then the system is observable and detectable, and can be stabilized with output feedback How about the case when b? In this case, rankω, and therefore, the system is not observable Now, we use the decomposition theorem for observability To this end, we change the variable x T z with the transformation matrix T [ Then, the system becomes [ [ [ ż a z ż 2 z 2 y [ [ z z 2, [ u,
4 4 SYSTEMTEORI - ÖVNING 5: FEEDBACK, POLE ASSIGNMENT AND OBSERVER Since the A-matrix of the unobservable part is not a stability matrix, the system is not asymptotically stabilizable (e): The design of an output feedback can be done in two separate steps: the design of a state feedback gain K, and the design of a state observer gain L Since a controller gain K has already been designed in part (c), we have only to determine an observer Let us choose two stable poles for the observer, for example 2 ± i The desired characteristic polynomial is then: ϕ(s) (s ( 2 i))(s ( 2 i)) s 2 4s 5 γ 4, γ 2 5 Then, let us determine a feedback matrix K L T system (Ã, b) (A T, C T ) The characteristic polynomial of à is: for the reachable χã(s) det(si Ã) s2 as b a a, a 2 b We look for a compensator g [g, g 2 such that: [ [ [ a 2 a g 2 g γ 2 γ { g2 a 2 γ 2 b 5 g a γ a 4 In this case à is not in companion form, like before, and so we have to determine the transformation matrix T : [ [ t t 2 b à b [ [ t t 2 [ t, t 2 Then, we get that: T [ t tã K gt [ b 5 a 4 [ a Therefore, we have that: [ L K T [ a [ a 4 b a 2 4a 5 a 4 a 2 4a b 5 Together with the controller K derived in part (c), we have the following dynamical regulator 2 : [ [ [ [ d x A BK x I Bv dt ˆx LC A LC BK ˆx I [ [ 2 I I Note that the last term Bv is correct, and the one Bv I I page 62 of the compendium is wrong which is shown in
5 SYSTEMTEORI - ÖVNING 5: FEEDBACK, POLE ASSIGNMENT AND OBSERVER 5 Exercise 53 Consider the following system: 2 ẋ 2 x u (a): Show that the system is unstable (b): Can you, using state feedback, place the poles of the close loop system in the following locations? (i): 2, 2,, (ii): 2, 2, 2, (iii): 2, 2, 2, 2 (a): Note that the matrix A is in Jordan form The eigenvalues are then [,, 2, 2, and the Jordan block corresponding to the unstable eigenvalues is of size 2 Therefore, the system is unstable (b): Note that the state x 4 is not reachable, since we cannot influence it with the input u The remaining part of the system is instead completely reachable In fact, we have that the reachability matrix Γ has rank 3: 4 2 Γ [B, AB, A 2 B, A 3 B Note also that the system is already in the reachable form Therefore, by using state feedback, we can place the poles of the close loop system freely, except one pole at cannot be moved Thus, the pole placement is possible for the locations (i) and (ii), but not (iii) Exercise 5 Consider the following discrete-time system: x(k ) x(k) u(k) Find a linear feedback such that for any initial state, the system returns to the origin in a fixed number of steps (dead-beat control) The closed loop system is: The solution of the previous system is: We have a dead-beat controller if x(k ) (A BK)x(k) x(k N) (A BK) N x(k) (A BK) N for some N > We can achieve such result by using Cayley-Hamilton theorem If the characteristic polynomial of the closed loop system is χ ABK (z) z 3, then we have that (A BK) 3 So what we need to do is to place all the poles of the system in the origin
6 6 SYSTEMTEORI - ÖVNING 5: FEEDBACK, POLE ASSIGNMENT AND OBSERVER We use the pole assignment algorithm First, we compute t 5 [,, t [5, 5, Hence, we can obtain the transformation matrix T as T t ta ta Since g [2, 3, 4, we can obtain the state feedback matrix as K gt [76, 96, Exercise Prove the following theorem: Theorem: Let Σ (A, B, C) a LTI system in a reachable form, that is: [ [ A A A 2 B, B, A 22 where (A, B ) is completely reachable Consider the feedback system Σ K (ABK, B, C) Σ K is also in a reachable form, and has the same unreachable part A 22 Let us partition the feedback gain matrix K accordingly to B as [K, K 2 Then, it is easy to show that: [ A B A BK K A 2 B K 2 A 22 Therefore, the unreachable poles are not affected by the state feedback So, in order to analyze the effects of feedback, it is enough to consider only the reachable part of the system If A 22 is a stability matrix, then the pair (A, B) is called stabilizable 3 As a dual concept of stabilizability, the pair (A, C) is called detectable if (A, C ) is stabilizable Exercise from Tenta 322 Let us consider the following LTI system: ẋ x u Find an appropriate control input u Kx to stabilize the system First of all, let us compute the poles of the system The characteristic polynomial of A is: χ A (λ) det(λi A) (λ 3)(λ )(λ ) 3 In other words, a system is stabilizable if its unstable subspace is contained in its reachable subspace
7 SYSTEMTEORI - ÖVNING 5: FEEDBACK, POLE ASSIGNMENT AND OBSERVER 7 and hence the system is unstable To check if it is possible to stabilize it, we have to determine its reachable space: Γ [B, AB, A 2 B So, the reachable space has dimension 2 and hence the system is not completely reachable Is it stabilizable? Let us transform the system to a reachable form using the following transformation matrix: T 2 In the new basis the system has the following form: ż T AT z T Bu 2 4 z which is clearly stabilizable In order to determine a stabilizing feedback, we can consider only the reachable subspace: [ ż [ [ 5 4 z ż 2 2 z 2 [ u Let u α z α 2 z 2 v and take the new poles in [ 2, 3: [ [ [ [ ż 5 α 4 α 2 z ż 2 2 z 2 The parameters α and α 2 have to be such that: χ(λ) λ 2 (4 α )λ 3 α 2α 2 (λ 2)(λ 3) α 9, α 2 3 Therefore, for the overall system we can take u [ 9, 3, z v so that: 4 8 ż T AT z T Bu 2 4 z v Finally, since z T x we have that the control input in the original coordinate system is: u [9, 3, /2 x v [9, 3/2, x v /2 v u Example (State feedback with multiple inputs) Suppose that a linear (unstable) system is described by ẋ x u
8 8 SYSTEMTEORI - ÖVNING 5: FEEDBACK, POLE ASSIGNMENT AND OBSERVER This system is reachable; indeed it is in the standard reachable form in a multiple input case Design a state feedback gain matrix K that places all the closed-loop poles at The desired characteristic polynomial is χ ABK (s) (s ) 4 s 4 4s 3 6s 2 4s So, we aim at obtaining a closed-loop system matrix of the companion matrix form: () A BK Suppose that [ k k K 2 k 3 k 4 k 5 k 6 k 7 k 8 Then, the closed-loop system matrix becomes (2) A BK k k 2 k 3 k 4 k 5 k 6 k 7 k 8 By comparing the elements in () and (2), we can obtain [ K
SYSTEMTEORI - ÖVNING Stability of linear systems Exercise 3.1 (LTI system). Consider the following matrix:
SYSTEMTEORI - ÖVNING 3 1. Stability of linear systems Exercise 3.1 (LTI system. Consider the following matrix: ( A = 2 1 Use the Lyapunov method to determine if A is a stability matrix: a: in continuous
More informationPOLE PLACEMENT. Sadegh Bolouki. Lecture slides for ECE 515. University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. Fall S. Bolouki (UIUC) 1 / 19
POLE PLACEMENT Sadegh Bolouki Lecture slides for ECE 515 University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Fall 2016 S. Bolouki (UIUC) 1 / 19 Outline 1 State Feedback 2 Observer 3 Observer Feedback 4 Reduced Order
More informationSystems and Control Theory Lecture Notes. Laura Giarré
Systems and Control Theory Lecture Notes Laura Giarré L. Giarré 2017-2018 Lesson 17: Model-based Controller Feedback Stabilization Observers Ackerman Formula Model-based Controller L. Giarré- Systems and
More informationModule 07 Controllability and Controller Design of Dynamical LTI Systems
Module 07 Controllability and Controller Design of Dynamical LTI Systems Ahmad F. Taha EE 5143: Linear Systems and Control Email: ahmad.taha@utsa.edu Webpage: http://engineering.utsa.edu/ataha October
More information5. Observer-based Controller Design
EE635 - Control System Theory 5. Observer-based Controller Design Jitkomut Songsiri state feedback pole-placement design regulation and tracking state observer feedback observer design LQR and LQG 5-1
More informationUniversity of Toronto Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering ECE410F Control Systems Problem Set #3 Solutions = Q o = CA.
University of Toronto Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering ECE41F Control Systems Problem Set #3 Solutions 1. The observability matrix is Q o C CA 5 6 3 34. Since det(q o ), the matrix is
More informationSYSTEMTEORI - KALMAN FILTER VS LQ CONTROL
SYSTEMTEORI - KALMAN FILTER VS LQ CONTROL 1. Optimal regulator with noisy measurement Consider the following system: ẋ = Ax + Bu + w, x(0) = x 0 where w(t) is white noise with Ew(t) = 0, and x 0 is a stochastic
More informationModule 03 Linear Systems Theory: Necessary Background
Module 03 Linear Systems Theory: Necessary Background Ahmad F. Taha EE 5243: Introduction to Cyber-Physical Systems Email: ahmad.taha@utsa.edu Webpage: http://engineering.utsa.edu/ taha/index.html September
More informationCONTROL DESIGN FOR SET POINT TRACKING
Chapter 5 CONTROL DESIGN FOR SET POINT TRACKING In this chapter, we extend the pole placement, observer-based output feedback design to solve tracking problems. By tracking we mean that the output is commanded
More informationLecture 7 and 8. Fall EE 105, Feedback Control Systems (Prof. Khan) September 30 and October 05, 2015
1 Lecture 7 and 8 Fall 2015 - EE 105, Feedback Control Systems (Prof Khan) September 30 and October 05, 2015 I CONTROLLABILITY OF AN DT-LTI SYSTEM IN k TIME-STEPS The DT-LTI system is given by the following
More informationControllability. Chapter Reachable States. This chapter develops the fundamental results about controllability and pole assignment.
Chapter Controllability This chapter develops the fundamental results about controllability and pole assignment Reachable States We study the linear system ẋ = Ax + Bu, t, where x(t) R n and u(t) R m Thus
More informationLecture 2 and 3: Controllability of DT-LTI systems
1 Lecture 2 and 3: Controllability of DT-LTI systems Spring 2013 - EE 194, Advanced Control (Prof Khan) January 23 (Wed) and 28 (Mon), 2013 I LTI SYSTEMS Recall that continuous-time LTI systems can be
More informationEL 625 Lecture 10. Pole Placement and Observer Design. ẋ = Ax (1)
EL 625 Lecture 0 EL 625 Lecture 0 Pole Placement and Observer Design Pole Placement Consider the system ẋ Ax () The solution to this system is x(t) e At x(0) (2) If the eigenvalues of A all lie in the
More informationControl engineering sample exam paper - Model answers
Question Control engineering sample exam paper - Model answers a) By a direct computation we obtain x() =, x(2) =, x(3) =, x(4) = = x(). This trajectory is sketched in Figure (left). Note that A 2 = I
More informationLec 6: State Feedback, Controllability, Integral Action
Lec 6: State Feedback, Controllability, Integral Action November 22, 2017 Lund University, Department of Automatic Control Controllability and Observability Example of Kalman decomposition 1 s 1 x 10 x
More informationMASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science : Dynamic Systems Spring 2011
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science 6.4: Dynamic Systems Spring Homework Solutions Exercise 3. a) We are given the single input LTI system: [
More information4F3 - Predictive Control
4F3 Predictive Control - Discrete-time systems p. 1/30 4F3 - Predictive Control Discrete-time State Space Control Theory For reference only Jan Maciejowski jmm@eng.cam.ac.uk 4F3 Predictive Control - Discrete-time
More information1 Continuous-time Systems
Observability Completely controllable systems can be restructured by means of state feedback to have many desirable properties. But what if the state is not available for feedback? What if only the output
More informationModule 9: State Feedback Control Design Lecture Note 1
Module 9: State Feedback Control Design Lecture Note 1 The design techniques described in the preceding lectures are based on the transfer function of a system. In this lecture we would discuss the state
More informationModule 08 Observability and State Estimator Design of Dynamical LTI Systems
Module 08 Observability and State Estimator Design of Dynamical LTI Systems Ahmad F. Taha EE 5143: Linear Systems and Control Email: ahmad.taha@utsa.edu Webpage: http://engineering.utsa.edu/ataha November
More informationZeros and zero dynamics
CHAPTER 4 Zeros and zero dynamics 41 Zero dynamics for SISO systems Consider a linear system defined by a strictly proper scalar transfer function that does not have any common zero and pole: g(s) =α p(s)
More informationControl Systems Design, SC4026. SC4026 Fall 2010, dr. A. Abate, DCSC, TU Delft
Control Systems Design, SC426 SC426 Fall 2, dr A Abate, DCSC, TU Delft Lecture 5 Controllable Canonical and Observable Canonical Forms Stabilization by State Feedback State Estimation, Observer Design
More informationChap. 3. Controlled Systems, Controllability
Chap. 3. Controlled Systems, Controllability 1. Controllability of Linear Systems 1.1. Kalman s Criterion Consider the linear system ẋ = Ax + Bu where x R n : state vector and u R m : input vector. A :
More informationEEE582 Homework Problems
EEE582 Homework Problems HW. Write a state-space realization of the linearized model for the cruise control system around speeds v = 4 (Section.3, http://tsakalis.faculty.asu.edu/notes/models.pdf). Use
More informationControl Systems I. Lecture 4: Diagonalization, Modal Analysis, Intro to Feedback. Readings: Emilio Frazzoli
Control Systems I Lecture 4: Diagonalization, Modal Analysis, Intro to Feedback Readings: Emilio Frazzoli Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control D-MAVT ETH Zürich October 13, 2017 E. Frazzoli (ETH)
More information16.31 Fall 2005 Lecture Presentation Mon 31-Oct-05 ver 1.1
16.31 Fall 2005 Lecture Presentation Mon 31-Oct-05 ver 1.1 Charles P. Coleman October 31, 2005 1 / 40 : Controllability Tests Observability Tests LEARNING OUTCOMES: Perform controllability tests Perform
More informationStability, Pole Placement, Observers and Stabilization
Stability, Pole Placement, Observers and Stabilization 1 1, The Netherlands DISC Course Mathematical Models of Systems Outline 1 Stability of autonomous systems 2 The pole placement problem 3 Stabilization
More informationLinear System Theory
Linear System Theory Wonhee Kim Chapter 6: Controllability & Observability Chapter 7: Minimal Realizations May 2, 217 1 / 31 Recap State space equation Linear Algebra Solutions of LTI and LTV system Stability
More informationThe disturbance decoupling problem (DDP)
CHAPTER 3 The disturbance decoupling problem (DDP) Consider the system 3.1. Geometric formulation { ẋ = Ax + Bu + Ew y = Cx. Problem 3.1 (Disturbance decoupling). Find a state feedback u = Fx+ v such that
More information10/8/2015. Control Design. Pole-placement by state-space methods. Process to be controlled. State controller
Pole-placement by state-space methods Control Design To be considered in controller design * Compensate the effect of load disturbances * Reduce the effect of measurement noise * Setpoint following (target
More informationTopic # Feedback Control. State-Space Systems Closed-loop control using estimators and regulators. Dynamics output feedback
Topic #17 16.31 Feedback Control State-Space Systems Closed-loop control using estimators and regulators. Dynamics output feedback Back to reality Copyright 21 by Jonathan How. All Rights reserved 1 Fall
More informationSYSTEMTEORI - ÖVNING 1. In this exercise, we will learn how to solve the following linear differential equation:
SYSTEMTEORI - ÖVNING 1 GIANANTONIO BORTOLIN AND RYOZO NAGAMUNE In this exercise, we will learn how to solve the following linear differential equation: 01 ẋt Atxt, xt 0 x 0, xt R n, At R n n The equation
More information1. Find the solution of the following uncontrolled linear system. 2 α 1 1
Appendix B Revision Problems 1. Find the solution of the following uncontrolled linear system 0 1 1 ẋ = x, x(0) =. 2 3 1 Class test, August 1998 2. Given the linear system described by 2 α 1 1 ẋ = x +
More informationLecture 4 and 5 Controllability and Observability: Kalman decompositions
1 Lecture 4 and 5 Controllability and Observability: Kalman decompositions Spring 2013 - EE 194, Advanced Control (Prof. Khan) January 30 (Wed.) and Feb. 04 (Mon.), 2013 I. OBSERVABILITY OF DT LTI SYSTEMS
More informationKalman Decomposition B 2. z = T 1 x, where C = ( C. z + u (7) T 1, and. where B = T, and
Kalman Decomposition Controllable / uncontrollable decomposition Suppose that the controllability matrix C R n n of a system has rank n 1
More informationEE C128 / ME C134 Fall 2014 HW 9 Solutions. HW 9 Solutions. 10(s + 3) s(s + 2)(s + 5) G(s) =
1. Pole Placement Given the following open-loop plant, HW 9 Solutions G(s) = 1(s + 3) s(s + 2)(s + 5) design the state-variable feedback controller u = Kx + r, where K = [k 1 k 2 k 3 ] is the feedback
More informationContents. 1 State-Space Linear Systems 5. 2 Linearization Causality, Time Invariance, and Linearity 31
Contents Preamble xiii Linear Systems I Basic Concepts 1 I System Representation 3 1 State-Space Linear Systems 5 1.1 State-Space Linear Systems 5 1.2 Block Diagrams 7 1.3 Exercises 11 2 Linearization
More informationExam. 135 minutes, 15 minutes reading time
Exam August 6, 208 Control Systems II (5-0590-00) Dr. Jacopo Tani Exam Exam Duration: 35 minutes, 5 minutes reading time Number of Problems: 35 Number of Points: 47 Permitted aids: 0 pages (5 sheets) A4.
More informationIntro. Computer Control Systems: F8
Intro. Computer Control Systems: F8 Properties of state-space descriptions and feedback Dave Zachariah Dept. Information Technology, Div. Systems and Control 1 / 22 dave.zachariah@it.uu.se F7: Quiz! 2
More informationControllability, Observability, Full State Feedback, Observer Based Control
Multivariable Control Lecture 4 Controllability, Observability, Full State Feedback, Observer Based Control John T. Wen September 13, 24 Ref: 3.2-3.4 of Text Controllability ẋ = Ax + Bu; x() = x. At time
More informationPARAMETERIZATION OF STATE FEEDBACK GAINS FOR POLE PLACEMENT
PARAMETERIZATION OF STATE FEEDBACK GAINS FOR POLE PLACEMENT Hans Norlander Systems and Control, Department of Information Technology Uppsala University P O Box 337 SE 75105 UPPSALA, Sweden HansNorlander@ituuse
More informationTopics in control Tracking and regulation A. Astolfi
Topics in control Tracking and regulation A. Astolfi Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 The full information regulator problem 3 3 The FBI equations 5 4 The error feedback regulator problem 5 5 The internal model
More informationState Regulator. Advanced Control. design of controllers using pole placement and LQ design rules
Advanced Control State Regulator Scope design of controllers using pole placement and LQ design rules Keywords pole placement, optimal control, LQ regulator, weighting matrixes Prerequisites Contact state
More informationExtensions and applications of LQ
Extensions and applications of LQ 1 Discrete time systems 2 Assigning closed loop pole location 3 Frequency shaping LQ Regulator for Discrete Time Systems Consider the discrete time system: x(k + 1) =
More informationẋ n = f n (x 1,...,x n,u 1,...,u m ) (5) y 1 = g 1 (x 1,...,x n,u 1,...,u m ) (6) y p = g p (x 1,...,x n,u 1,...,u m ) (7)
EEE582 Topical Outline A.A. Rodriguez Fall 2007 GWC 352, 965-3712 The following represents a detailed topical outline of the course. It attempts to highlight most of the key concepts to be covered and
More informationIntro. Computer Control Systems: F9
Intro. Computer Control Systems: F9 State-feedback control and observers Dave Zachariah Dept. Information Technology, Div. Systems and Control 1 / 21 dave.zachariah@it.uu.se F8: Quiz! 2 / 21 dave.zachariah@it.uu.se
More informationProblem 2 (Gaussian Elimination, Fundamental Spaces, Least Squares, Minimum Norm) Consider the following linear algebraic system of equations:
EEE58 Exam, Fall 6 AA Rodriguez Rules: Closed notes/books, No calculators permitted, open minds GWC 35, 965-37 Problem (Dynamic Augmentation: State Space Representation) Consider a dynamical system consisting
More informationTRACKING AND DISTURBANCE REJECTION
TRACKING AND DISTURBANCE REJECTION Sadegh Bolouki Lecture slides for ECE 515 University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Fall 2016 S. Bolouki (UIUC) 1 / 13 General objective: The output to track a reference
More informationObservability. Dynamic Systems. Lecture 2 Observability. Observability, continuous time: Observability, discrete time: = h (2) (x, u, u)
Observability Dynamic Systems Lecture 2 Observability Continuous time model: Discrete time model: ẋ(t) = f (x(t), u(t)), y(t) = h(x(t), u(t)) x(t + 1) = f (x(t), u(t)), y(t) = h(x(t)) Reglerteknik, ISY,
More informationControl System Design
ELEC4410 Control System Design Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States and Discrete-Time Control Design Julio H. Braslavsky julio@ee.newcastle.edu.au School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
More informationLinear State Feedback Controller Design
Assignment For EE5101 - Linear Systems Sem I AY2010/2011 Linear State Feedback Controller Design Phang Swee King A0033585A Email: king@nus.edu.sg NGS/ECE Dept. Faculty of Engineering National University
More informationECE504: Lecture 9. D. Richard Brown III. Worcester Polytechnic Institute. 04-Nov-2008
ECE504: Lecture 9 D. Richard Brown III Worcester Polytechnic Institute 04-Nov-2008 Worcester Polytechnic Institute D. Richard Brown III 04-Nov-2008 1 / 38 Lecture 9 Major Topics ECE504: Lecture 9 We are
More informationControl Systems Design, SC4026. SC4026 Fall 2010, dr. A. Abate, DCSC, TU Delft
Control Systems Design, SC4026 SC4026 Fall 2010, dr. A. Abate, DCSC, TU Delft Lecture 4 Controllability (a.k.a. Reachability) and Observability Algebraic Tests (Kalman rank condition & Hautus test) A few
More informationEC Control Engineering Quiz II IIT Madras
EC34 - Control Engineering Quiz II IIT Madras Linear algebra Find the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of A, A, A and A + 4I Find the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the following matrices: (a) cos θ sin θ
More informationLinear System Theory
Linear System Theory Wonhee Kim Lecture 4 Apr. 4, 2018 1 / 40 Recap Vector space, linear space, linear vector space Subspace Linearly independence and dependence Dimension, Basis, Change of Basis 2 / 40
More informationHANDOUT E.22 - EXAMPLES ON STABILITY ANALYSIS
Example 1 HANDOUT E. - EXAMPLES ON STABILITY ANALYSIS Determine the stability of the system whose characteristics equation given by 6 3 = s + s + 3s + s + s + s +. The above polynomial satisfies the necessary
More informationChapter 30 Minimality and Stability of Interconnected Systems 30.1 Introduction: Relating I/O and State-Space Properties We have already seen in Chapt
Lectures on Dynamic Systems and Control Mohammed Dahleh Munther A. Dahleh George Verghese Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Massachuasetts Institute of Technology 1 1 c Chapter
More information6 OUTPUT FEEDBACK DESIGN
6 OUTPUT FEEDBACK DESIGN When the whole sate vector is not available for feedback, i.e, we can measure only y = Cx. 6.1 Review of observer design Recall from the first class in linear systems that a simple
More informationObservability. It was the property in Lyapunov stability which allowed us to resolve that
Observability We have seen observability twice already It was the property which permitted us to retrieve the initial state from the initial data {u(0),y(0),u(1),y(1),...,u(n 1),y(n 1)} It was the property
More informationEE221A Linear System Theory Final Exam
EE221A Linear System Theory Final Exam Professor C. Tomlin Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, UC Berkeley Fall 2016 12/16/16, 8-11am Your answers must be supported by analysis,
More informationReachability, Observability and Minimality for a Class of 2D Continuous-Discrete Systems
Proceedings of the 7th WSEAS International Conference on Systems Theory and Scientific Computation, Athens, Greece, August 24-26, 27 Reachability, Observability and Minimality for a Class of 2D Continuous-Discrete
More informationECEEN 5448 Fall 2011 Homework #4 Solutions
ECEEN 5448 Fall 2 Homework #4 Solutions Professor David G. Meyer Novemeber 29, 2. The state-space realization is A = [ [ ; b = ; c = [ which describes, of course, a free mass (in normalized units) with
More informationFull State Feedback for State Space Approach
Full State Feedback for State Space Approach State Space Equations Using Cramer s rule it can be shown that the characteristic equation of the system is : det[ si A] 0 Roots (for s) of the resulting polynomial
More informationDecentralized control with input saturation
Decentralized control with input saturation Ciprian Deliu Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science Technical University Eindhoven Eindhoven, The Netherlands November 2006 Decentralized control with
More information2 The Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR)
2 The Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) Problem: Compute a state feedback controller u(t) = Kx(t) that stabilizes the closed loop system and minimizes J := 0 x(t) T Qx(t)+u(t) T Ru(t)dt where x and u are
More informationControl Systems Design
ELEC4410 Control Systems Design Lecture 18: State Feedback Tracking and State Estimation Julio H. Braslavsky julio@ee.newcastle.edu.au School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Lecture 18:
More informationFall 線性系統 Linear Systems. Chapter 08 State Feedback & State Estimators (SISO) Feng-Li Lian. NTU-EE Sep07 Jan08
Fall 2007 線性系統 Linear Systems Chapter 08 State Feedback & State Estimators (SISO) Feng-Li Lian NTU-EE Sep07 Jan08 Materials used in these lecture notes are adopted from Linear System Theory & Design, 3rd.
More informationControl Systems Design, SC4026. SC4026 Fall 2009, dr. A. Abate, DCSC, TU Delft
Control Systems Design, SC4026 SC4026 Fall 2009, dr. A. Abate, DCSC, TU Delft Lecture 4 Controllability (a.k.a. Reachability) vs Observability Algebraic Tests (Kalman rank condition & Hautus test) A few
More informationDenis ARZELIER arzelier
COURSE ON LMI OPTIMIZATION WITH APPLICATIONS IN CONTROL PART II.2 LMIs IN SYSTEMS CONTROL STATE-SPACE METHODS PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS and SYNTHESIS Denis ARZELIER www.laas.fr/ arzelier arzelier@laas.fr 15
More informationCBE507 LECTURE III Controller Design Using State-space Methods. Professor Dae Ryook Yang
CBE507 LECTURE III Controller Design Using State-space Methods Professor Dae Ryook Yang Fall 2013 Dept. of Chemical and Biological Engineering Korea University Korea University III -1 Overview States What
More informationChap 3. Linear Algebra
Chap 3. Linear Algebra Outlines 1. Introduction 2. Basis, Representation, and Orthonormalization 3. Linear Algebraic Equations 4. Similarity Transformation 5. Diagonal Form and Jordan Form 6. Functions
More informationLecture 18 : State Space Design
UCSI University Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Faculty of Engineering Department of Mechatronics Lecture 18 State Space Design Mohd Sulhi bin Azman Lecturer Department of Mechatronics UCSI University sulhi@ucsi.edu.my
More informationMultivariable Control. Lecture 03. Description of Linear Time Invariant Systems. John T. Wen. September 7, 2006
Multivariable Control Lecture 3 Description of Linear Time Invariant Systems John T. Wen September 7, 26 Outline Mathematical description of LTI Systems Ref: 3.1-3.4 of text September 7, 26Copyrighted
More informationJoão P. Hespanha. January 16, 2009
LINEAR SYSTEMS THEORY João P. Hespanha January 16, 2009 Disclaimer: This is a draft and probably contains a few typos. Comments and information about typos are welcome. Please contact the author at hespanha@ece.ucsb.edu.
More informationChapter 8 Stabilization: State Feedback 8. Introduction: Stabilization One reason feedback control systems are designed is to stabilize systems that m
Lectures on Dynamic Systems and Control Mohammed Dahleh Munther A. Dahleh George Verghese Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Massachuasetts Institute of echnology c Chapter 8 Stabilization:
More informationSemidefinite Programming Duality and Linear Time-invariant Systems
Semidefinite Programming Duality and Linear Time-invariant Systems Venkataramanan (Ragu) Balakrishnan School of ECE, Purdue University 2 July 2004 Workshop on Linear Matrix Inequalities in Control LAAS-CNRS,
More informationMA 265 FINAL EXAM Fall 2012
MA 265 FINAL EXAM Fall 22 NAME: INSTRUCTOR S NAME:. There are a total of 25 problems. You should show work on the exam sheet, and pencil in the correct answer on the scantron. 2. No books, notes, or calculators
More information6.241 Dynamic Systems and Control
6.241 Dynamic Systems and Control Lecture 24: H2 Synthesis Emilio Frazzoli Aeronautics and Astronautics Massachusetts Institute of Technology May 4, 2011 E. Frazzoli (MIT) Lecture 24: H 2 Synthesis May
More informationBalanced Truncation 1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science 6.242, Fall 2004: MODEL REDUCTION Balanced Truncation This lecture introduces balanced truncation for LTI
More informationChap 8. State Feedback and State Estimators
Chap 8. State Feedback and State Estimators Outlines Introduction State feedback Regulation and tracking State estimator Feedback from estimated states State feedback-multivariable case State estimators-multivariable
More informationSAMPLE SOLUTION TO EXAM in MAS501 Control Systems 2 Autumn 2015
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE SAMPLE SOLUTION TO EXAM in MAS501 Control Systems 2 Autumn 2015 Lecturer: Michael Ruderman Problem 1: Frequency-domain analysis and control design (15 pt) Given is a
More informationThere are none. Abstract for Gauranteed Margins for LQG Regulators, John Doyle, 1978 [Doy78].
Chapter 7 Output Feedback There are none. Abstract for Gauranteed Margins for LQG Regulators, John Doyle, 1978 [Doy78]. In the last chapter we considered the use of state feedback to modify the dynamics
More informationAnalysis of Discrete-Time Systems
TU Berlin Discrete-Time Control Systems 1 Analysis of Discrete-Time Systems Overview Stability Sensitivity and Robustness Controllability, Reachability, Observability, and Detectabiliy TU Berlin Discrete-Time
More informationNonlinear Control Systems
Nonlinear Control Systems António Pedro Aguiar pedro@isr.ist.utl.pt 7. Feedback Linearization IST-DEEC PhD Course http://users.isr.ist.utl.pt/%7epedro/ncs1/ 1 1 Feedback Linearization Given a nonlinear
More informationState Feedback and State Estimators Linear System Theory and Design, Chapter 8.
1 Linear System Theory and Design, http://zitompul.wordpress.com 2 0 1 4 2 Homework 7: State Estimators (a) For the same system as discussed in previous slides, design another closed-loop state estimator,
More informationESC794: Special Topics: Model Predictive Control
ESC794: Special Topics: Model Predictive Control Discrete-Time Systems Hanz Richter, Professor Mechanical Engineering Department Cleveland State University Discrete-Time vs. Sampled-Data Systems A continuous-time
More informationChapter 6 State-Space Design
Chapter 6 State-Space Design wo steps. Assumption is made that we have all the states at our disposal for feedback purposes (in practice, we would not measure all these states). his allows us to implement
More informationControl Systems. Laplace domain analysis
Control Systems Laplace domain analysis L. Lanari outline introduce the Laplace unilateral transform define its properties show its advantages in turning ODEs to algebraic equations define an Input/Output
More informationSolution for Homework 5
Solution for Homework 5 ME243A/ECE23A Fall 27 Exercise 1 The computation of the reachable subspace in continuous time can be handled easily introducing the concepts of inner product, orthogonal complement
More informationECE 388 Automatic Control
Controllability and State Feedback Control Associate Prof. Dr. of Mechatronics Engineeering Çankaya University Compulsory Course in Electronic and Communication Engineering Credits (2/2/3) Course Webpage:
More informationSystems and Control Theory Lecture Notes. Laura Giarré
Systems and Control Theory Lecture Notes Laura Giarré L. Giarré 2018-2019 Lesson 14: Rechability Reachability (DT) Reachability theorem (DT) Reachability properties (DT) Reachability gramian (DT) Reachability
More informationStability of Parameter Adaptation Algorithms. Big picture
ME5895, UConn, Fall 215 Prof. Xu Chen Big picture For ˆθ (k + 1) = ˆθ (k) + [correction term] we haven t talked about whether ˆθ(k) will converge to the true value θ if k. We haven t even talked about
More informationTopic # Feedback Control
Topic #11 16.31 Feedback Control State-Space Systems State-space model features Observability Controllability Minimal Realizations Copyright 21 by Jonathan How. 1 Fall 21 16.31 11 1 State-Space Model Features
More informationDO NOT DO HOMEWORK UNTIL IT IS ASSIGNED. THE ASSIGNMENTS MAY CHANGE UNTIL ANNOUNCED.
EE 537 Homewors Friedland Text Updated: Wednesday November 8 Some homewor assignments refer to Friedland s text For full credit show all wor. Some problems require hand calculations. In those cases do
More informationAdvanced Control Theory
State Feedback Control Design chibum@seoultech.ac.kr Outline State feedback control design Benefits of CCF 2 Conceptual steps in controller design We begin by considering the regulation problem the task
More informationPerspective. ECE 3640 Lecture 11 State-Space Analysis. To learn about state-space analysis for continuous and discrete-time. Objective: systems
ECE 3640 Lecture State-Space Analysis Objective: systems To learn about state-space analysis for continuous and discrete-time Perspective Transfer functions provide only an input/output perspective of
More information1 Similarity transform 2. 2 Controllability The PBH test for controllability Observability The PBH test for observability...
Contents 1 Similarity transform 2 2 Controllability 3 21 The PBH test for controllability 5 3 Observability 6 31 The PBH test for observability 7 4 Example ([1, pp121) 9 5 Subspace decomposition 11 51
More informationProblem Set 5 Solutions 1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science 6.245: MULTIVARIABLE CONTROL SYSTEMS by A. Megretski Problem Set 5 Solutions The problem set deals with Hankel
More informationAnalysis of Discrete-Time Systems
TU Berlin Discrete-Time Control Systems TU Berlin Discrete-Time Control Systems 2 Stability Definitions We define stability first with respect to changes in the initial conditions Analysis of Discrete-Time
More informationInternal Model Principle
Internal Model Principle If the reference signal, or disturbance d(t) satisfy some differential equation: e.g. d n d dt n d(t)+γ n d d 1 dt n d 1 d(t)+...γ d 1 dt d(t)+γ 0d(t) =0 d n d 1 then, taking Laplace
More information