Top-antitop charge asymmetry measurements in the lepton+jets channel with the ATLAS detector arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 15 Jan 2019

Transcription

1 SNSN-2-6 January 17, 219 Top-antitop charge asymmetry measurements in the lepton+jets channel with the detector arxiv:191.54v1 [hep-ex] 15 Jan 219 Matej Melo, on behalf of the Collaboration Faculty of Mathematics, Physics and Informatics Comenius University in Bratislava, Mlynská dolina Bratislava, Slovakia We report a measurement of the charge asymmetry in top uark pair production with the experiment at the LHC using 2. fb 1 of pp collision data at s = 8 TeV. The data are unfolded using a fully Bayesian unfolding method. Differential measurements of the charge asymmetry are performed. PRESENTED AT 11 th International Workshop on Top Quark Physics Bad Neuenahr, Germany, September 16 21, 218 c 219 CERN for the benefit of the Collaboration. Reproduction of this article or parts of it is allowed as specified in the CC-BY-4. license.

2 1 Introduction Q Q Charge asymmetry A C in top-antitop uark pair (tt) production is defined as: AC tt N( y > ) N( y < ) = N( y Q > Q ) + N( y < ), (a) (a) (b) (b) where y = y t y t and y t (y t ) is the rapidity of the top (antitop) uark. In Figure (c) 1: Box (c) (left) and Born (right) (d) diagrams (d) [1]. Figure Figure 1: Origin 1: Origin of theof QCD the QCD charge charge asymmetry asymmetry in hadroproduction in of heavy of heavy uarks: uarks: interference interference of of final-state the final-state Standard (a) with (a) with initial-state Model initial-state (SM), (b) gluon (b) non-zero gluon bremsstrahlung asymmetry plus interference plus is predicted interference of thedue ofbox theto (c) box interference with (c) with the Born the Born of diagram higher diagram (d). order Crossed (d). Crossed uark-antiuark diagrams diagrams are omitted. are omitted. annihilation diagrams. Main contribution to the A C comes from the Box and Born diagram interference [1], shown in Figure 1. Many theories beyond the Standard Model (BSM) predict an enhancement of the asymmetry, especially in the region of high tt invariant mass. Two measurements were performed by the experiment [2] at the LHC using 2. fb 1 of pp collision data at s = 8 TeV in the lepton+jets channel: in the so-called resolved topology [] and using events with highly boosted top or antitop uarks [4]. (a) (a) 2 Event Selection and Reconstruction Figure Figure 2: Cut 2: diagrams. Cut diagrams. Single lepton trigger reuirements are applied in the lepton+jets decay channel and Another Another QED QED term term originates originates from from the interference the interference between between the gluon-γ the gluon-γ box with box with the QCD the QCD Born Born amplitude. exactly tude. Since Since gluons onegluons good and photon and lepton photon are(electron distinct distinct fields, orfields, two muon) contributions two with p T as> depicted as 25depicted GeV in Fig. is in4b reuired Fig. and 4b4c and arise in4c both arise.. ampli- Each topologies. Each of these of these contributes To contributes suppress with with thebackground factor factor given given incontribution E. in(). E. In (). total Invarious total the relative thecriteria relative factor factor between on missing between QCD QCD transverse QED asymmetries energy amounts ET miss amounts are to applied, to depending on the multiplicity of b-tagged jets. In and and QED resolved topology, at least four f QED = α QED Q t Q ( ) α S d 2 = α QED 6 f QED = α jets with p QED Q t Q T > ( ) abc α S 5 Q t Q (4) α S d 2 2 = α 25 GeV are reuired. Kinematic Likelihood Fitter [5] is then used to reconstruct tt kinematics QED 6 abc α S 5 Q t Q and events are separated (4) into six signal regions based on the lepton charge (+1, 1) and b-tag multiplicity (, , 2), obtained by using a working point of the b-tagging algorithm corresponding fortone anuark one efficiency uark species. species. of Let 7% us, Let in for us, a first identifying in astep, first step, assume b-jets. assume identical In identical the functional boosted functional dependence topology, dependence of the atof least PDFs the PDFs for oneu for jetu andwith dand valence pd T valence > uarks 25 uarks GeV in the close inproton the proton the(modulo charged obvious thelepton obvious factor ( R factor two) < two) and 1.5) similarly and issimilarly reuired. for antiuarks for The antiuarks boosted in thein the antiproton. topology antiproton. Assuming, reuires Assuming, furthermore, also at least dominance dominance one of of valence annihilation in t t production, the relative of the uū versus d d valence uark-antiuark annihilation in t t production, the relative contributions of the uū versus d d large radius jet (R = 1.) with p T > GeV, induced induced reactions reactions to theto cross the cross section section have have to beto weighted be weighted top-uark tagged by using jet substructure variables and well separated from the lepton with φ(l, jet R=1. ) > 2.. Either the jet close to the lepton or the jet matched with with the ratio the ratio 4:1. The 4:1. QED The QED asymmetry asymmetry has tohas beto weighted, be weighted, furthermore, with with relative relative factors factors fu QED fand u QED and to These the These small large small terms jet terms hadwithin been hadneglected been R neglected in < [12], 1.5 in in [12], must [11] in only [11] beone only b-tagged ofone theof two thehad using twobeen hadthe included. been 7% included. Theefficient present present result working result is is in agreement agreement with [5] with [5] point. (b) (b) 1

3 Unfolding Fully Bayesian Unfolding (FBU) [6] is used in both measurements to unfold the reconstructed distributions to the parton level. In the case of the boosted topology, the measurement is performed in a fiducial phase space (m tt >.75 TeV and 2 < y < 2) due to small acceptance outside this region. For all systematic uncertainties, except those related to Monte Carlo generator modelling and the unfolding procedure itself, nuisance parameters are assigned. FBU enables to marginalize and to contrain systematic uncertainties. In the resolved topology -b tag region is used for in situ calibration of the W +jets background, Figure 2. Events Data / Pred s= 8 TeV, 2. fb b tags [ 5, 5] 1 b tag 2 b tags l+jets 1 Data tt Q > Q l l < W+light jets Wc+jets b tags Wbb/cc+jets Z+jets Diboson Single top Multijet Tot. Unc. 1 b tag 2 b tags [ 5, 5] y Figure 2: Comparison between prediction and data for the 18 bins used in the inclusive A C measurement in the resolved topology after applying the simultaneous unfolding procedure and W +jets in situ calibration []. 4 Results The inclusive asymmetry measured in the resolved topology is A C =.9 ±.5 (stat. + syst.), compatible with the Standard Model prediction A SM C =.111±.4 [7]. The fiducial asymmetry (m tt >.75 TeV and 2 < y < 2) measured in the boosted topology is A C =.42 ±.2, compatible with A SM C =.16 ±.4 [1]. Results of the A C measurements in the resolved topology as a function of mass, β z and p T of the tt system are shown in Figure, as well as the mass-dependent measurement in the boosted topology. Inclusive and differential measurements as a function of the tt mass are mostly limited by statistical uncertainties; measurements as a function of the top pair β z and p T are mostly limited by modelling uncertainties. No significant deviations from the SM predictions are observed. 2

4 A C..2 data NLO 1 8 TeV, 2. fb > > 1. m interval [TeV] tt Figure : Measured A C values in the resolved topology as a function of bin-averaged tt mass (top left), β z (top right), p T (bottom left) and fiducial and mass-dependent measurement in the boosted topology (bottom right). Measured values are compared with the SM predictions and in the case of the upper two plots also with BSM predictions [, 4]. 4.1 Impact on BSM Scenarios The 8 TeV A C measurements in the lepton+jets channel allow for the exclusion of a large region in the parameter space of various BSM models, as demonstrated in Figure 4. The cloud of points in Figure 4 corresponds to a number of models described in Refs. [8, 9]: a W boson, a heavy axigluon G µ, a scalar isodoublet φ, a colour-triplet scalar ω 4 and a colour-sextet scalar Ω 4. Each point corresponds to a choice of the new particle s mass in the range between 1 GeV and 1 TeV, as well as a choice of the couplings to SM particles which are reuired to be compatible with the Tevatron cross-section measurements. 5 Summary Measurements of the tt charge asymmetry A C by the experiment at the LHC using 2. fb 1 of pp collision data in the lepton+jets topology are consistent with

5 A C SM D CDF W Models from PRD 84, 1151; JHEP 119, A FB Ω 4 φ ω 4 CMS G µ A C (m tt > 1. TeV) W SM D CDF 8 TeV, 2 fb -1 Tevatron: PRD87/922; PRD84/1125 Models: PRD 84/1151; JHEP 119/ A FB (pp, 1.96 TeV) Ω 4 φ G µ ω 4 Figure 4: Measured A C inclusive (left) and in the high mass region of m tt > 1. TeV (right) versus the Tevatron forward-backward asymmetry A FB results, compared with the SM predictions as well as predictions incorporating various potential BSM contributions [8, 9]. The uncertainty bands correspond to 68% confidence level interval [, 4]. the SM predictions and disfavour a large phase-space of parameters describing several BSM scenarios. References [1] J. H. Kuhn and G. Rodrigo, JHEP 121 (212) 6. [2] Collaboration, JINST (28) S8. [] Collaboration, Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (216) 87. [4] Collaboration, Phys. Lett. B 756 (216) 52. [5] J. Erdmann et al., Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 748 (214) [6] G. Choudalakis, arxiv: (212). [7] W. Bernreuther and Z. G. Si, Phys. Rev. D 86 (212) 426. [8] J. A.-Saavedra and M. P.-Victoria, Phys. Rev. D 84 (211) [9] J. A.-Saavedra and M. P.-Victoria, JHEP 9 (211) 97. 4