Topic # Feedback Control Systems


 Vernon Walton
 3 years ago
 Views:
Transcription
1 Topic # Feedback Control Systems Closedloop system analysis Bounded Gain Theorem Robust Stability
2 Fall SISO Performance Objectives Basic setup: d i d o r u y G c (s) G(s) n control error: where e = y r = Sr T n + SGd i + Sd o L = GG c, S = (I + L) 1, T = L(I + L) 1 For good tracking performance of r (typically low frequency), require S(jω) small 0 ω w 1 To reduce impact of sensor noise n (typically high frequency), require T (jω) small ω w 2 Since T (s) + S(s) = I s, then we cannot make both S(jω) and T (jω) small at the same frequencies. Design constraint
3 Fall SISO Design Approaches There are two basic approaches to design: Indirect that works on L itself Direct that works on S and T Indirect. Note that If L(jω) 1 S L 1 ( S 1), T 1 If L(jω) 1 S 1, T L(T 1) So we can convert the performance requirements on S, T into specifications on L (A) High loop gain Good command following & dist rejection (B) Low loop gain Attenuation of sensor noise. Must be careful when L(jω) 1, require that arg L ±180 to maintain stability
4 Fall Direct approach works with S and T. Since e = y r, then for perfect tracking, we need e 0 want S 0 since e = Sr +... Sufficient to discuss the magnitude of S because the only requirement is that it be small. Direct approach is to develop an upper bound for S and then test if S is below this bound. 1 S(jω) < Ws (jω) or equivalently, whether W s (jω)s(jω) < 1, ω? Typically pick simple forms for weighting functions (first or second order), and then cascade them as necessary. Basic one: s/m + ω B W s (s) = s + ωb A ω Figure 1: Example of a standard performance weighting filter. Typically have A 1, M > 1, and 1/W s 1 at ω B
5 Fall Example: Simple system with G c = G(s) = (10s + 1)(0.05s + 1) 2 Require ω B 5, a slope of 1, low frequency value less than A = 0.01 and a high frequency peak less than M = 5. s/m + ω B W s = s + ωb A Figure 2: Want SW p < 1, so we just fail the test Graph testing is OK, but what we need is a an analytical way of determining whether W s (jω)s(jω) < 1, ω Avoids a graphical/plotting test, which might be OK for analysis (a bit cumbersome), but very hard to use for synthesis
6 Fall Limits of Performance When considering performance goals, it is good to keep in mind that there are fundamental limits that must be respected. Captured via Bode s Sensitivity Integral: Given the LTF L(s) for which there are at least 2 more poles than zeros and N p RHP poles at locations p i, then the closedloop sensitivity function must satisfy: N p ln S(jω) dω = π R(p i ) > 0 0 i=1 Obviously for stable systems/controllers, the constraint reduces to ln S(jω) dω = 0 0 which implies that the area of sensitivity reduction (ln S(jω) < 0) must equal the area of sensitivity increase (ln S(jω) > 0). So the benefits and costs of feedback are balanced. Commonly known as the waterbed effect
7 Fall Suppose instead that L(s) has at least one more pole than zeros, a RHP zero (could be a real zero at z or a complex pair at z = x ± jy), and N p RHP poles at p i, then the closedloop sensitivity function must satisfy: ln S(jω) W (z, ω) dω = π ln B 1 p (z) where 0 B p (z) = and if p = q + jr, p = q jr N p p i z p + z 2z W (z, ω) = if z real z 2 + ω 2 x x W (z, ω) = + otherwise x 2 + (y ω) 2 x 2 + (y + ω) 2 Interesting result: If S(jω) α < 1 ω Ω = [0, ω c ], then z RHP ( ) W (z,ω) 1 π W (z,ω) B 1 π π W (z,ω) max S(jω) p (z) ω α where W (z, Ω) = Ω W (z, ω) dω. i=1 Note that max ω S(jω) is large if: ω c is very large, since then W (z, Ω) π α 1 NMP zero and unstable pole close, since (p i +z)/(p i z) 1. Formula captures performance tradeoffs/impact associated with RHP poles and zeros in the LTF. i
8 Fall Figure 3: Waterbed effect for stable L(s) Figure 4: Waterbed effect for NMP L(s). NMP zeros greatly influence the pushpop/waterbed effect, indicating that they have a significant impact on the performance limitations.
9 Fall Bounded Gain There exist very easy ways of testing (analytically) whether S(jω) < γ, ω Critically important test for robustness SISO Bounded Gain Theorem: Gain of generic stable system ẋ(t) = Ax(t) + Bu(t) y(t) = Cx(t) + Du(t) is bounded in the sense that G max = sup G(jω) = sup C(jωI A) 1 B + D < γ ω if and only if (iff) 1. D < γ ω 2. The Hamiltonian matrix H = [ A + B(γ 2 I D T D) 1 D T C B(γ 2 I D T D) 1 B T C T (I + D(γ 2 I D T D) 1 D T )C A T C T D(γ 2 I D T D) 1 B T has no eigenvalues on the imaginary axis. ] Note that with D = 0, the Hamiltonian matrix is [ ] 1 A γ 2 BB T H = C T C A T Eigenvalues of this matrix are symmetric about the real and imaginary axis (related to the SRL)
10 Fall So sup ω G(jω) < γ iff H has no eigenvalues on the jωaxis. An equivalent test is if there exists a X 0 such that 1 A T X + XA + C T C + XBB T X = 0 γ 2 and A + γ 1 2 BB T X is stable. This is another Algebraic Riccati Equation (ARE) Typical application: since e = r y, then for perfect tracking, we want e 0 want S 0 since e = Sr +... Sufficient to discuss the magnitude of S because the only requirement is that it be small. Direct approach is to develop an upper bound for S and then test if S is below this bound. 1 S(jω) < Ws (jω) ω? or equivalently, whether W s (jω)s(jω) < 1, ω Note: The statespace tests can also be used for MIMO systems but in that case, we need different frequency domain tests.
11 Fall Typically pick simple forms for weighting functions (first or second order), and then cascade them as necessary. Basic one: s/m + ω B W s (s) = s + ωb A ω b M 1/W s 10 1 A Freq (rad/sec) Figure 5: Example of a standard performance weighting filter. Typically have A 1, M > 1, and 1/W s 1 at ω B Thus we can test whether W s (jω)s(jω) < 1, ω by: Forming a state space model of the combined system W s (s)s(s) Use the bounded gain theorem with γ = 1 Typically use a bisection section of γ to find W s (jω)s(jω) max
12 Fall Continue example: Simple system with G c = G(s) = (10s + 1)(0.05s + 1) 2 Require ω B 5, a slope of 1, low frequency value less than A = 0.01 and a high frequency peak less than M = 5. s/m + ω B W s = s + ωb A In this case γ = 1.02, so we just fail the test Sensitivity and Inverse of Performance Weight 10 0 Magnitude /W s S W s 10 2 S γ= Frequency Figure 6: Want W s S < 1, so we just fail the test
13 Fall Sketch of Proof Sufficiency: consider γ = 1, and assume D = 0 for simplicity Now analyze properties of this special SISO closedloop system. r u y y 2 G(s) G T ( s) + [ ] [ ] A B C T G(s) := and G (s) = G T A T ( s) := C 0 B T 0 Note that u/r = S(s) = [1 G G] 1 Now find the state space representation of S(s) ẋ 1 = Ax 1 + B(r + y 2 ) = Ax 1 + BB T x 2 + Br ẋ 2 = A T x 2 C T y = A T x 2 C T Cx u = r + B T x 2 [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] ẋ 1 A BB T x 1 B = ẋ 2 C T C A T + r x 2 0 [ ] u = [ 0 B ] T x 1 + r x 2 poles of S(s) are contained in the eigenvalues of the matrix H.
14 Fall Now assume that H has no eigenvalues on the jωaxis, S = [I G G] 1 has no poles there I G G has no zeros there So I G G has no zeros on the jωaxis, and we also know that I G G I > 0 as ω (since D = 0). Together, these imply that I G T ( jω)g(jω) = I G G > 0 ω For a SISO system, condition (I G G > 0) is equivalent to which is true iff G(jω) < 1 ω G max = max G(jω) < 1 ω Can use statespace tools to test if a generic system has a gain less that 1, and can easily redo this analysis to include bound γ.
15 Fall Issues Note that it is actually not easy to find G max directly using the state space techniques It is easy to check if G max < γ So we just keep changing γ to find the smallest value for which we can show that G max < γ (called γ min ) Bisection search algorithm. Bisection search algorithm (see web) 1. Select γ u, γ l so that γ l G max γ u 2. Test (γ u γ l )/γ l < TOL. Yes Stop (G max 1 2(γ u + γ l )) No go to step With γ = 1 (γ l + γ u ), test if G max < γ using λ i (H) 2 4. If λ i (H) jr, then set γ l = γ (test value too low), otherwise set γ u = γ and go to step 2. This is the basis of H control theory.
Control Systems 2. Lecture 4: Sensitivity function limits. Roy Smith
Control Systems 2 Lecture 4: Sensitivity function limits Roy Smith 2017314 4.1 Inputoutput controllability Control design questions: 1. How well can the plant be controlled? 2. What control structure
More informationTopic # Feedback Control
Topic #5 6.3 Feedback Control StateSpace Systems Fullstate Feedback Control How do we change the poles of the statespace system? Or,evenifwecanchangethepolelocations. Where do we put the poles? Linear
More informationIntroduction. Performance and Robustness (Chapter 1) Advanced Control Systems Spring / 31
Introduction Classical Control Robust Control u(t) y(t) G u(t) G + y(t) G : nominal model G = G + : plant uncertainty Uncertainty sources : Structured : parametric uncertainty, multimodel uncertainty Unstructured
More informationProblem Set 4 Solution 1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science 6.245: MULTIVARIABLE CONTROL SYSTEMS by A. Megretski Problem Set 4 Solution Problem 4. For the SISO feedback
More informationTopic # Feedback Control. StateSpace Systems Closedloop control using estimators and regulators. Dynamics output feedback
Topic #17 16.31 Feedback Control StateSpace Systems Closedloop control using estimators and regulators. Dynamics output feedback Back to reality Copyright 21 by Jonathan How. All Rights reserved 1 Fall
More informationSingular Value Decomposition Analysis
Singular Value Decomposition Analysis Singular Value Decomposition Analysis Introduction Introduce a linear algebra tool: singular values of a matrix Motivation Why do we need singular values in MIMO control
More informationPrinciples of Optimal Control Spring 2008
MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 16.323 Principles of Optimal Control Spring 2008 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms. 16.323 Lecture
More informationMEM 355 Performance Enhancement of Dynamical Systems
MEM 355 Performance Enhancement of Dynamical Systems Frequency Domain Design Harry G. Kwatny Department of Mechanical Engineering & Mechanics Drexel University 5/8/25 Outline Closed Loop Transfer Functions
More informationControl Systems I. Lecture 9: The Nyquist condition
Control Systems I Lecture 9: The Nyquist condition adings: Guzzella, Chapter 9.4 6 Åstrom and Murray, Chapter 9.1 4 www.cds.caltech.edu/~murray/amwiki/index.php/first_edition Emilio Frazzoli Institute
More informationFrequency methods for the analysis of feedback systems. Lecture 6. Loop analysis of feedback systems. Nyquist approach to study stability
Lecture 6. Loop analysis of feedback systems 1. Motivation 2. Graphical representation of frequency response: Bode and Nyquist curves 3. Nyquist stability theorem 4. Stability margins Frequency methods
More informationThe loop shaping paradigm. Lecture 7. Loop analysis of feedback systems (2) Essential specifications (2)
Lecture 7. Loop analysis of feedback systems (2). Loop shaping 2. Performance limitations The loop shaping paradigm. Estimate performance and robustness of the feedback system from the loop transfer L(jω)
More informationTopic # Feedback Control Systems
Topic #17 16.31 Feedback Control Systems Deterministic LQR Optimal control and the Riccati equation Weight Selection Fall 2007 16.31 17 1 Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) Have seen the solutions to the
More informationK(s +2) s +20 K (s + 10)(s +1) 2. (c) KG(s) = K(s + 10)(s +1) (s + 100)(s +5) 3. Solution : (a) KG(s) = s +20 = K s s
321 16. Determine the range of K for which each of the following systems is stable by making a Bode plot for K = 1 and imagining the magnitude plot sliding up or down until instability results. Verify
More informationControl Systems I Lecture 10: System Specifications
Control Systems I Lecture 10: System Specifications Readings: Guzzella, Chapter 10 Emilio Frazzoli Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control DMAVT ETH Zürich November 24, 2017 E. Frazzoli (ETH) Lecture
More informationUncertainty and Robustness for SISO Systems
Uncertainty and Robustness for SISO Systems ELEC 571L Robust Multivariable Control prepared by: Greg Stewart Outline Nature of uncertainty (models and signals). Physical sources of model uncertainty. Mathematical
More informationRobust Multivariable Control
Lecture 2 Anders Helmersson anders.helmersson@liu.se ISY/Reglerteknik Linköpings universitet Today s topics Today s topics Norms Today s topics Norms Representation of dynamic systems Today s topics Norms
More informationRaktim Bhattacharya. . AERO 422: Active Controls for Aerospace Vehicles. Frequency ResponseDesign Method
.. AERO 422: Active Controls for Aerospace Vehicles Frequency Response Method Raktim Bhattacharya Laboratory For Uncertainty Quantification Aerospace Engineering, Texas A&M University. ... Response to
More informationFEL3210 Multivariable Feedback Control
FEL3210 Multivariable Feedback Control Lecture 5: Uncertainty and Robustness in SISO Systems [Ch.7(8)] Elling W. Jacobsen, Automatic Control Lab, KTH Lecture 5:Uncertainty and Robustness () FEL3210 MIMO
More informationClassify a transfer function to see which order or ramp it can follow and with which expected error.
Dr. J. Tani, Prof. Dr. E. Frazzoli 505900 Control Systems I (Autumn 208) Exercise Set 0 Topic: Specifications for Feedback Systems Discussion: 30.. 208 Learning objectives: The student can grizzi@ethz.ch,
More informationCHAPTER 7 : BODE PLOTS AND GAIN ADJUSTMENTS COMPENSATION
CHAPTER 7 : BODE PLOTS AND GAIN ADJUSTMENTS COMPENSATION Objectives Students should be able to: Draw the bode plots for first order and second order system. Determine the stability through the bode plots.
More informationAn Internal Stability Example
An Internal Stability Example Roy Smith 26 April 2015 To illustrate the concept of internal stability we will look at an example where there are several polezero cancellations between the controller and
More informationControl Systems Design
ELEC4410 Control Systems Design Lecture 13: Stability Julio H. Braslavsky julio@ee.newcastle.edu.au School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Lecture 13: Stability p.1/20 Outline InputOutput
More informationKars Heinen. Frequency analysis of reset systems containing a Clegg integrator. An introduction to higher order sinusoidal input describing functions
Frequency analysis of reset systems containing a Clegg integrator An introduction to higher order sinusoidal input describing functions Delft Center for Systems and Control Frequency analysis of reset
More informationRichiami di Controlli Automatici
Richiami di Controlli Automatici Gianmaria De Tommasi 1 1 Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II detommas@unina.it Ottobre 2012 Corsi AnsaldoBreda G. De Tommasi (UNINA) Richiami di Controlli Automatici
More informationLet the plant and controller be described as:
Summary of Fundamental Limitations in Feedback Design (LTI SISO Systems) From Chapter 6 of A FIRST GRADUATE COURSE IN FEEDBACK CONTROL By J. S. Freudenberg (Winter 2008) Prepared by: Hammad Munawar (Institute
More informationRaktim Bhattacharya. . AERO 632: Design of Advance Flight Control System. Preliminaries
. AERO 632: of Advance Flight Control System. Preliminaries Raktim Bhattacharya Laboratory For Uncertainty Quantification Aerospace Engineering, Texas A&M University. Preliminaries Signals & Systems Laplace
More informationDenis ARZELIER arzelier
COURSE ON LMI OPTIMIZATION WITH APPLICATIONS IN CONTROL PART II.2 LMIs IN SYSTEMS CONTROL STATESPACE METHODS PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS and SYNTHESIS Denis ARZELIER www.laas.fr/ arzelier arzelier@laas.fr 15
More informationState Regulator. Advanced Control. design of controllers using pole placement and LQ design rules
Advanced Control State Regulator Scope design of controllers using pole placement and LQ design rules Keywords pole placement, optimal control, LQ regulator, weighting matrixes Prerequisites Contact state
More informationMASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Mechanical Engineering Dynamics and Control II Fall 2007
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Mechanical Engineering.4 Dynamics and Control II Fall 7 Problem Set #9 Solution Posted: Sunday, Dec., 7. The.4 Tower system. The system parameters are
More informationEE3CL4: Introduction to Linear Control Systems
1 / 30 EE3CL4: Introduction to Linear Control Systems Section 9: of and using Techniques McMaster University Winter 2017 2 / 30 Outline 1 2 3 4 / 30 domain analysis Analyze closed loop using open loop
More informationLecture 5: Linear Systems. Transfer functions. Frequency Domain Analysis. Basic Control Design.
ISS0031 Modeling and Identification Lecture 5: Linear Systems. Transfer functions. Frequency Domain Analysis. Basic Control Design. Aleksei Tepljakov, Ph.D. September 30, 2015 Linear Dynamic Systems Definition
More informationDesign Methods for Control Systems
Design Methods for Control Systems Maarten Steinbuch TU/e Gjerrit Meinsma UT Dutch Institute of Systems and Control Winter term 20022003 Schedule November 25 MSt December 2 MSt Homework # 1 December 9
More information6.241 Dynamic Systems and Control
6.241 Dynamic Systems and Control Lecture 24: H2 Synthesis Emilio Frazzoli Aeronautics and Astronautics Massachusetts Institute of Technology May 4, 2011 E. Frazzoli (MIT) Lecture 24: H 2 Synthesis May
More informationControls Problems for Qualifying Exam  Spring 2014
Controls Problems for Qualifying Exam  Spring 2014 Problem 1 Consider the system block diagram given in Figure 1. Find the overall transfer function T(s) = C(s)/R(s). Note that this transfer function
More informationRaktim Bhattacharya. . AERO 632: Design of Advance Flight Control System. Norms for Signals and Systems
. AERO 632: Design of Advance Flight Control System Norms for Signals and. Raktim Bhattacharya Laboratory For Uncertainty Quantification Aerospace Engineering, Texas A&M University. Norms for Signals ...
More informationOutline. Classical Control. Lecture 1
Outline Outline Outline 1 Introduction 2 Prerequisites Block diagram for system modeling Modeling Mechanical Electrical Outline Introduction Background Basic Systems Models/Transfers functions 1 Introduction
More informationAutomatic Control 2. Loop shaping. Prof. Alberto Bemporad. University of Trento. Academic year
Automatic Control 2 Loop shaping Prof. Alberto Bemporad University of Trento Academic year 21211 Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 2 Academic year 21211 1 / 39 Feedback
More informationPole placement control: state space and polynomial approaches Lecture 2
: state space and polynomial approaches Lecture 2 : a state O. Sename 1 1 Gipsalab, CNRSINPG, FRANCE Olivier.Sename@gipsalab.fr www.gipsalab.fr/ o.sename based November 21, 2017 Outline : a state
More informationD(s) G(s) A control system design definition
R E Compensation D(s) U Plant G(s) Y Figure 7. A control system design definition x x x 2 x 2 U 2 s s 7 2 Y Figure 7.2 A block diagram representing Eq. (7.) in control form z U 2 s z Y 4 z 2 s z 2 3 Figure
More information16.30/31, Fall 2010 Recitation # 2
16.30/31, Fall 2010 Recitation # 2 September 22, 2010 In this recitation, we will consider two problems from Chapter 8 of the Van de Vegte book. R +  E G c (s) G(s) C Figure 1: The standard block diagram
More informationRobust fixedorder H Controller Design for Spectral Models by Convex Optimization
Robust fixedorder H Controller Design for Spectral Models by Convex Optimization Alireza Karimi, Gorka Galdos and Roland Longchamp Abstract A new approach for robust fixedorder H controller design by
More informationChapter 5. Standard LTI Feedback Optimization Setup. 5.1 The Canonical Setup
Chapter 5 Standard LTI Feedback Optimization Setup Efficient LTI feedback optimization algorithms comprise a major component of modern feedback design approach: application problems involving complex models
More informationRobust and Optimal Control, Spring A: SISO Feedback Control A.1 Internal Stability and Youla Parameterization
Robust and Optimal Control, Spring 2015 Instructor: Prof. Masayuki Fujita (S5303B) A: SISO Feedback Control A.1 Internal Stability and Youla Parameterization A.2 Sensitivity and Feedback Performance A.3
More informationThe norms can also be characterized in terms of Riccati inequalities.
9 Analysis of stability and H norms Consider the causal, linear, timeinvariant system ẋ(t = Ax(t + Bu(t y(t = Cx(t Denote the transfer function G(s := C (si A 1 B. Theorem 85 The following statements
More informationA brief introduction to robust H control
A brief introduction to robust H control JeanMarc Biannic System Control and Flight Dynamics Department ONERA, Toulouse. http://www.onera.fr/staff/jeanmarcbiannic/ http://jm.biannic.free.fr/ European
More informationTopic # Feedback Control
Topic #4 16.31 Feedback Control Stability in the Frequency Domain Nyquist Stability Theorem Examples Appendix (details) This is the basis of future robustness tests. Fall 2007 16.31 4 2 Frequency Stability
More informationControl Systems I. Lecture 9: The Nyquist condition
Control Systems I Lecture 9: The Nyquist condition Readings: Åstrom and Murray, Chapter 9.1 4 www.cds.caltech.edu/~murray/amwiki/index.php/first_edition Jacopo Tani Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control
More informationCDS 101/110a: Lecture 102 Control Systems Implementation
CDS 101/110a: Lecture 102 Control Systems Implementation Richard M. Murray 5 December 2012 Goals Provide an overview of the key principles, concepts and tools from control theory  Classical control 
More informationRobust Performance Example #1
Robust Performance Example # The transfer function for a nominal system (plant) is given, along with the transfer function for one extreme system. These two transfer functions define a family of plants
More informationProblem Set 2 Solutions 1
Massachusetts Institute of echnology Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science 6.45: MULIVARIABLE CONROL SYSEMS by A. Megretski Problem Set Solutions Problem. For each of the statements
More informationMTNS 06, Kyoto (July, 2006) Shinji Hara The University of Tokyo, Japan
MTNS 06, Kyoto (July, 2006) Shinji Hara The University of Tokyo, Japan Outline Motivation & Background: H2 Tracking Performance Limits: new paradigm Explicit analytical solutions with examples H2 Regulation
More informationLecture 7 (Weeks 1314)
Lecture 7 (Weeks 1314) Introduction to Multivariable Control (SP  Chapters 3 & 4) Eugenio Schuster schuster@lehigh.edu Mechanical Engineering and Mechanics Lehigh University Lecture 7 (Weeks 1314) p.
More informationTopic # Feedback Control Systems
Topic #19 16.31 Feedback Control Systems Stengel Chapter 6 Question: how well do the large gain and phase margins discussed for LQR map over to DOFB using LQR and LQE (called LQG)? Fall 2010 16.30/31 19
More informationLecture 1: Feedback Control Loop
Lecture : Feedback Control Loop Loop Transfer function The standard feedback control system structure is depicted in Figure. This represend(t) n(t) r(t) e(t) u(t) v(t) η(t) y(t) F (s) C(s) P (s) Figure
More informationTopic # Feedback Control Systems
Topic #16 16.31 Feedback Control Systems StateSpace Systems Closedloop control using estimators and regulators. Dynamics output feedback Back to reality Fall 2007 16.31 16 1 Combined Estimators and Regulators
More informationRobust control of MIMO systems
Robust control of MIMO systems Olivier Sename Grenoble INP / GIPSAlab September 2017 Olivier Sename (Grenoble INP / GIPSAlab) Robust control September 2017 1 / 162 O. Sename [GIPSAlab] 2/162 1. Some
More informationME 234, Lyapunov and Riccati Problems. 1. This problem is to recall some facts and formulae you already know. e Aτ BB e A τ dτ
ME 234, Lyapunov and Riccati Problems. This problem is to recall some facts and formulae you already know. (a) Let A and B be matrices of appropriate dimension. Show that (A, B) is controllable if and
More informationProblem Set 5 Solutions 1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science 6.245: MULTIVARIABLE CONTROL SYSTEMS by A. Megretski Problem Set 5 Solutions The problem set deals with Hankel
More informationExam. 135 minutes, 15 minutes reading time
Exam August 6, 208 Control Systems II (5059000) Dr. Jacopo Tani Exam Exam Duration: 35 minutes, 5 minutes reading time Number of Problems: 35 Number of Points: 47 Permitted aids: 0 pages (5 sheets) A4.
More information1 (20 pts) Nyquist Exercise
EE C128 / ME134 Problem Set 6 Solution Fall 2011 1 (20 pts) Nyquist Exercise Consider a close loop system with unity feedback. For each G(s), hand sketch the Nyquist diagram, determine Z = P N, algebraically
More informationAnalysis of SISO Control Loops
Chapter 5 Analysis of SISO Control Loops Topics to be covered For a given controller and plant connected in feedback we ask and answer the following questions: Is the loop stable? What are the sensitivities
More informationExercise 1 (A Nonminimum Phase System)
Prof. Dr. E. Frazzoli 559 Control Systems I (Autumn 27) Solution Exercise Set 2 Loop Shaping clruch@ethz.ch, 8th December 27 Exercise (A Nonminimum Phase System) To decrease the rise time of the system,
More informationME 132, Fall 2017, UC Berkeley, A. Packard 334 # 6 # 7 # 13 # 15 # 14
ME 132, Fall 2017, UC Berkeley, A. Packard 334 30.3 Fall 2017 Final # 1 # 2 # 3 # 4 # 5 # 6 # 7 # 8 NAME 20 15 20 15 15 18 15 20 # 9 # 10 # 11 # 12 # 13 # 14 # 15 # 16 18 12 12 15 12 20 18 15 Facts: 1.
More informationTopic # Feedback Control Systems
Topic #14 16.31 Feedback Control Systems StateSpace Systems Fullstate Feedback Control How do we change the poles of the statespace system? Or, even if we can change the pole locations. Where do we
More informationRobust Control. 2nd class. Spring, 2018 Instructor: Prof. Masayuki Fujita (S5303B) Tue., 17th April, 2018, 10:45~12:15, S423 Lecture Room
Robust Control Spring, 2018 Instructor: Prof. Masayuki Fujita (S5303B) 2nd class Tue., 17th April, 2018, 10:45~12:15, S423 Lecture Room 2. Nominal Performance 2.1 Weighted Sensitivity [SP05, Sec. 2.8,
More informationLimiting Performance of Optimal Linear Filters
Limiting Performance of Optimal Linear Filters J.H. Braslavsky M.M. Seron D.Q. Mayne P.V. Kokotović Technical Report CCEC 97414 Center for Control Engineering and Computation University of California
More informationH 2 Optimal State Feedback Control Synthesis. Raktim Bhattacharya Aerospace Engineering, Texas A&M University
H 2 Optimal State Feedback Control Synthesis Raktim Bhattacharya Aerospace Engineering, Texas A&M University Motivation Motivation w(t) u(t) G K y(t) z(t) w(t) are exogenous signals reference, process
More informationEE C128 / ME C134 Fall 2014 HW 9 Solutions. HW 9 Solutions. 10(s + 3) s(s + 2)(s + 5) G(s) =
1. Pole Placement Given the following openloop plant, HW 9 Solutions G(s) = 1(s + 3) s(s + 2)(s + 5) design the statevariable feedback controller u = Kx + r, where K = [k 1 k 2 k 3 ] is the feedback
More informationRobust control of MIMO systems
Robust control of MIMO systems Olivier Sename Grenoble INP / GIPSAlab September 2018 Olivier Sename (Grenoble INP / GIPSAlab) Robust control September 2018 1 / 169 O. Sename [GIPSAlab] 2/169 1. Some
More informationActive Control? Contact : Website : Teaching
Active Control? Contact : bmokrani@ulb.ac.be Website : http://scmero.ulb.ac.be Teaching Active Control? Disturbances System Measurement Control Controler. Regulator.,,, Aims of an Active Control Disturbances
More information6.241 Dynamic Systems and Control
6.41 Dynamic Systems and Control Lecture 5: H Synthesis Emilio Frazzoli Aeronautics and Astronautics Massachusetts Institute of Technology May 11, 011 E. Frazzoli (MIT) Lecture 5: H Synthesis May 11, 011
More informationExercise 1 (A Nonminimum Phase System)
Prof. Dr. E. Frazzoli 559 Control Systems I (HS 25) Solution Exercise Set Loop Shaping Noele Norris, 9th December 26 Exercise (A Nonminimum Phase System) To increase the rise time of the system, we
More informationTopic # Feedback Control Systems
Topic #1 16.31 Feedback Control Systems Motivation Basic Linear System Response Fall 2007 16.31 1 1 16.31: Introduction r(t) e(t) d(t) y(t) G c (s) G(s) u(t) Goal: Design a controller G c (s) so that the
More informationCDS 101/110a: Lecture 81 Frequency Domain Design
CDS 11/11a: Lecture 81 Frequency Domain Design Richard M. Murray 17 November 28 Goals: Describe canonical control design problem and standard performance measures Show how to use loop shaping to achieve
More informationCourse Outline. Closed Loop Stability. Stability. Amme 3500 : System Dynamics & Control. Nyquist Stability. Dr. Dunant Halim
Amme 3 : System Dynamics & Control Nyquist Stability Dr. Dunant Halim Course Outline Week Date Content Assignment Notes 1 5 Mar Introduction 2 12 Mar Frequency Domain Modelling 3 19 Mar System Response
More informationEECS C128/ ME C134 Final Thu. May 14, pm. Closed book. One page, 2 sides of formula sheets. No calculators.
Name: SID: EECS C28/ ME C34 Final Thu. May 4, 25 58 pm Closed book. One page, 2 sides of formula sheets. No calculators. There are 8 problems worth points total. Problem Points Score 4 2 4 3 6 4 8 5 3
More informationCompensation 8. f4 that separate these regions of stability and instability. The characteristic S 0 L U T I 0 N S
S 0 L U T I 0 N S Compensation 8 Note: All references to Figures and Equations whose numbers are not preceded by an "S"refer to the textbook. As suggested in Lecture 8, to perform a Nyquist analysis, we
More informationModule 09 From sdomain to timedomain From ODEs, TFs to StateSpace Modern Control
Module 09 From sdomain to timedomain From ODEs, TFs to StateSpace Modern Control Ahmad F. Taha EE 3413: Analysis and Desgin of Control Systems Email: ahmad.taha@utsa.edu Webpage: http://engineering.utsa.edu/
More informationEXPERIMENTALLY DETERMINING THE TRANSFER FUNCTION OF A SPRING MASS SYSTEM
EXPERIMENTALLY DETERMINING THE TRANSFER FUNCTION OF A SPRING MASS SYSTEM Lab 8 OBJECTIVES At the conclusion of this experiment, students should be able to: Experimentally determine the best fourth order
More informationControl Systems I. Lecture 6: Poles and Zeros. Readings: Emilio Frazzoli. Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control DMAVT ETH Zürich
Control Systems I Lecture 6: Poles and Zeros Readings: Emilio Frazzoli Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control DMAVT ETH Zürich October 27, 2017 E. Frazzoli (ETH) Lecture 6: Control Systems I 27/10/2017
More informationExam. 135 minutes, 15 minutes reading time
Exam August 15, 2017 Control Systems I (151059100L) Prof Emilio Frazzoli Exam Exam Duration: 135 minutes, 15 minutes reading time Number of Problems: 44 Number of Points: 52 Permitted aids: Important:
More informationRobust Control ÉCOLE POLYTECHNIQUE FÉDÉRALE DE LAUSANNE. Alireza Karimi Laboratoire d Automatique
Robust Control ÉCOLE POLYTECHNIQUE FÉDÉRALE DE LAUSANNE Alireza Karimi Laboratoire d Automatique Course Program 1. Introduction 2. Norms for Signals and Systems 3. Basic Concepts (stability and performance)
More informationMultivariable Control. Lecture 05. Multivariable Poles and Zeros. John T. Wen. September 14, 2006
Multivariable Control Lecture 05 Multivariable Poles and Zeros John T. Wen September 4, 2006 SISO poles/zeros SISO transfer function: G(s) = n(s) d(s) (no common factors between n(s) and d(s)). Poles:
More informationRobust Control 3 The Closed Loop
Robust Control 3 The Closed Loop Harry G. Kwatny Department of Mechanical Engineering & Mechanics Drexel University /2/2002 Outline Closed Loop Transfer Functions Traditional Performance Measures Time
More informationEECE 460. Decentralized Control of MIMO Systems. Guy A. Dumont. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of British Columbia
EECE 460 Decentralized Control of MIMO Systems Guy A. Dumont Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of British Columbia January 2011 Guy A. Dumont (UBC EECE) EECE 460  Decentralized
More informationProblem Set 4 Solutions 1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science 6245: MULTIVARIABLE CONTROL SYSTEMS by A Megretski Problem Set 4 Solutions Problem 4T For the following transfer
More informationEEE582 Homework Problems
EEE582 Homework Problems HW. Write a statespace realization of the linearized model for the cruise control system around speeds v = 4 (Section.3, http://tsakalis.faculty.asu.edu/notes/models.pdf). Use
More informationNonlinear Control. Nonlinear Control Lecture # 18 Stability of Feedback Systems
Nonlinear Control Lecture # 18 Stability of Feedback Systems Absolute Stability + r = 0 u y G(s) ψ( ) Definition 7.1 The system is absolutely stable if the origin is globally uniformly asymptotically stable
More informationAn Overview on Robust Control
Advanced Control An Overview on Robust Control P C Scope Keywords Prerequisites allow the student to assess the potential of different methods in robust control without entering deep into theory. Sensitize
More informationContents lecture 5. Automatic Control III. Summary of lecture 4 (II/II) Summary of lecture 4 (I/II) u y F r. Lecture 5 H 2 and H loop shaping
Contents lecture 5 Automatic Control III Lecture 5 H 2 and H loop shaping Thomas Schön Division of Systems and Control Department of Information Technology Uppsala University. Email: thomas.schon@it.uu.se,
More informationPrüfung Regelungstechnik I (Control Systems I) Übersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam!
Prüfung Regelungstechnik I (Control Systems I) Prof. Dr. Lino Guzzella 29. 8. 2 Übersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam! Do not mark up this translation aid
More informationControl Systems Lab  SC4070 Control techniques
Control Systems Lab  SC4070 Control techniques Dr. Manuel Mazo Jr. Delft Center for Systems and Control (TU Delft) m.mazo@tudelft.nl Tel.:0152788131 TU Delft, February 16, 2015 (slides modified from
More information1 (s + 3)(s + 2)(s + a) G(s) = C(s) = K P + K I
MAE 43B Linear Control Prof. M. Krstic FINAL June 9, Problem. ( points) Consider a plant in feedback with the PI controller G(s) = (s + 3)(s + )(s + a) C(s) = K P + K I s. (a) (4 points) For a given constant
More informationRobust Control 9 Design Summary & Examples
Robust Control 9 Design Summary & Examples Harry G. Kwatny Department of Mechanical Engineering & Mechanics Drexel University 5/6/003 Outline he H Problem Solution via γiteration Robust stability via
More informationLecture 15: H Control Synthesis
c A. Shiriaev/L. Freidovich. March 12, 2010. Optimal Control for Linear Systems: Lecture 15 p. 1/14 Lecture 15: H Control Synthesis Example c A. Shiriaev/L. Freidovich. March 12, 2010. Optimal Control
More informationPrinciples of Optimal Control Spring 2008
MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 16.323 Principles of Optimal Control Spring 2008 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms. 16.323 Lecture
More informationControl Systems (ECE411) Lectures 7 & 8
(ECE411) Lectures 7 & 8, Professor Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Colorado State University Fall 2016 Signal Flow Graph Examples Example 3: Find y6 y 1 and y5 y 2. Part (a): Input: y
More informationCourse Outline. Higher Order Poles: Example. Higher Order Poles. Amme 3500 : System Dynamics & Control. State Space Design. 1 G(s) = s(s + 2)(s +10)
Amme 35 : System Dynamics Control State Space Design Course Outline Week Date Content Assignment Notes 1 1 Mar Introduction 2 8 Mar Frequency Domain Modelling 3 15 Mar Transient Performance and the splane
More informationSome New Results on Linear Quadratic Regulator Design for Lossless Systems
Some New Results on Linear Quadratic Regulator Design for Lossless Systems Luigi Fortuna, Giovanni Muscato Maria Gabriella Xibilia Dipartimento Elettrico Elettronico e Sistemistico Universitá degli Studi
More informationAnalysis of DiscreteTime Systems
TU Berlin DiscreteTime Control Systems 1 Analysis of DiscreteTime Systems Overview Stability Sensitivity and Robustness Controllability, Reachability, Observability, and Detectabiliy TU Berlin DiscreteTime
More information