A New Two Sample Type-II Progressive Censoring Scheme
|
|
- Samson Willis
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 A New Two Sample Type-II Progressive Censoring Scheme arxiv: v [stat.me] 9 Sep 206 Shuvashree Mondal, Debasis Kundu Abstract Progressive censoring scheme has received considerable attention in recent years. In this paper we introduce a new type-ii progressive censoring scheme for two samples. It is observed that the proposed censoring scheme is analytically more tractable than the existing joint progressive type-ii censoring scheme proposed by Rasouli and Balakrishnan [2]. It has some other advantages also. We study the statistical inference of the unknown parameters based on the assumptions that the lifetime distribution of the experimental units for the two samples follow exponential distribution with different scale parameters. The maximum likelihood estimators of the unknown parameters are obtained and their exact distributions are derived. Based on the exact distributions of the maximum likelihood estimators exact confidence intervals are also constructed. For comparison purposes we have used bootstrap confidence intervals also. It is observed that the bootstrap confidence intervals work very well and they are very easy to implement in practice. Some simulation experiments are performed to compare the performances of the proposed method with the existing one, and the performances of the proposed method are quite satisfactory. One data analysis has been performed for illustrative purposes. Finally we propose some open problems. Key Words and Phrases: Type-I censoring scheme; type-ii censoring scheme; progressive censoring scheme; joint progressive censoring scheme; maximum likelihood estimator; confidence interval; bootstrap confidence interval. AMS Subject Classifications: 62N0, 62N02, 62F0. Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Pin 20806, India. Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Pin 20806, India. Corresponding author. kundu@iitk.ac.in, Phone no , Fax no
2 2 Introduction Different censoring schemes are extensively used in practice to make a life testing experiment to be more time and cost effective. In a type-i censoring scheme, the experiment is terminated at a prefixed time point. But it may happen that, no failure is observed during that time and it will lead to a very poor statistical analysis of the associated model parameters. To ensure a certain number of failures, type-ii censoring scheme has been introduced in the literature. But in none of these censoring schemes any experimental unit can be removed during the experiment. The progressive censoring scheme allows to withdraw some experimental units during the experiment also. Different progressive censoring schemes have been introduced in the literature. The most popular one is known as the progressive type-ii censoring scheme and it can be briefly described as follows. Suppose n identical units are put on a life testing experiment. The integer k < n is prefixed, and R,...,R k are k prefixed non-negative integers k such that R i + k = n. At the time of the first failure, R units are chosen randomly from i= the remaining n units and they are removed from the experiment. Similarly at the time of the second failure, R 2 units are chosen randomly from the remaining n R 2 units and they are removed, and so on. Finally at the time of k-th failure remaining R k units are removed, and the experiment stops. Extensive work has been done during the last ten years on various aspects of different progressive censoring schemes. Interested readers may refer to the recent book by Balakrishnan and Cramer [3] for a detailed account on different progressive censoring schemes and the related issues. See also Balakrishnan [2], Pradhan and Kundu [0] and Kundu [7], in this respect. Although extensive work has been done on different aspects of the progressive censoring schemes for one sample, not much work has been done related to two sample problems. Recently, Rasouli and Balakrishnan [2] introduced the joint progressive type-ii censoring for two samples. The joint progressive censoring scheme is quite useful to compare the lifetime
3 3 distribution of products from different units which are being manufactured by two different lines in the same facility. The joint progressive censoring (JPC) scheme introduced by Rasouli and Balakrishnan [2] can be briefly stated as follows. It is assumed that two samples of products of sizes m and n, respectively, are selected from these two lines of operation (say Line and Line 2), and they are placed on a life testing experiment simultaneously. A type-ii progressive censoring scheme is implemented on the combined sample of size N = m + n as follows. Let k < N, and R,..., R k are pre-fixed non-negative integers such that k R i +k = N. At the time of the first failure, it may be from Line or Line 2, R units are i= chosen at random from the remaining combined N units which consists of S units from Line and T units from Line 2, and they are removed from the experiment. Similarly at the the time of the second failure from the combined N 2 R remaining units R 2 items are chosen at random, which consists of S 2 and T 2 units from Line and Line 2, respectively, are removed, and so on. Finally at the k-th failure remaining R k = S k + T k units are removed from the experiment, and the experiment stops. Note that in a JPC, although R j s are pre-fixed, S j s and T j s are random quantities, and that makes the analysis more difficult. Rasouli and Balakrishnan [2] provided the exact likelihood inference for two exponential populations under the proposed JPC scheme. See also Parsi and Bairamov [9], Ashour and Abo-Kasem [], Balakrishnan and Su [6] for some problems related to the JPC scheme. In this paper we introduce a new joint progressive type-ii censoring (NJPC) scheme. It is observed that the proposed NJPC scheme is easier to handle analytically, therefore the properties of the proposed estimators can be derived quite conveniently. It has some other advantages also. In this paper we provide the exact inference for two exponential populations under the NJPC scheme, although the results can be extended for other lifetime distributions also. We obtain the maximum likelihood estimators (MLEs) of the unknown parameters when it exist, and provide the exact distributions of the MLEs. The generation of samples from the NJPC are quite simple, hence the simulation experiments can be performed
4 4 quite conveniently. It is observed that the MLEs obtained from the NJPC scheme satisfy the stochastic monotonicity properties stated by Balakrishnan and Iliopoulos [4], hence the exact distribution of the MLEs can be used to construct the confidence intervals of the unknown parameters. For comparison purposes we proposed to use bootstrap confidence intervals also. Some simulation experiments are performed to compare the performances of the estimators based on JPC and NJPC. It is observed that the estimators based on NJPC behave better than the corresponding estimators based on JPC for certain censoring schemes. One data analysis has been performed for illustrative purposes. The rest of the paper is organized as follows. In Section 2 we introduce the model and provide the necessary assumptions. The MLEs are obtained and their exact distributions are provided in Section 3. In Section 4 we provide a simple algorithm to simulate data from a NJPC scheme and obtain the expected time of the experiment. The construction of confidence intervals are provided in Section 5. Simulation results and the analysis of one data set are provided in Section 6. Finally in Section 7 we propose some open problems and conclude the paper. 2 Model Description and Model Assumption Suppose we have products from two different populations. We draw a random sample of size m from population one (Pop-) and a random sample of size n from population two (Pop-2). We place two independent samples simultaneously on a life testing experiment. The proposed NJPC can be described as follows. Let k < min{m, n} be the total number of k failures to be observed and R,..., R k are such that (R i + ) < min{m, n}. Suppose the first failure takes place at the time point W and it comes from Pop-, then R units are randomly chosen from the remaining m surviving units of Pop- and they are removed. At the same time (R + ) units are randomly chosen from n surviving units of Pop-2 and i=
5 5 they are removed. Suppose the next failure takes place at the time point W 2 and it comes from Pop-2, then R 2 + units are chosen at random from the remaining m R surviving units of Pop-, and they are removed. At the same time R 2 units are chosen at random from the remaining n 2 R surviving units of Pop-2, and they are removed, and so on. Finally, at the time of the k-th failure, it may be either from Pop- or from Pop-2, all the remaining items from both the populations are removed and the experiment stops. We further define a new set of random variables Z,..., Z k, where Z j = if the j-th failure takes place from Pop- and Z j = 0, otherwise. Hence for a NJPC scheme, the data will be of the form (W, Z), where W = (W,..., W k ), W... W k and Z = (Z,..., Z k ). Schematically, NJPC can be described as follows. Case-I: k-th failure comes from Pop- R withdrawn R 2 + withdrawn m k j= (R j + ) withdrawn start Pop- W W k R + withdrawn R 2 withdrawn n k j= (R j + ) withdrawn start Pop-2 W 2
6 6 Case-II: k-th failure comes from Pop-2 R withdrawn R 2 + withdrawn m k j= (R j + ) withdrawn start Pop- W R + withdrawn R 2 withdrawn n k j= (R j + ) withdrawn start Pop-2 W 2 W k Suppose X,..., X m denote the lifetimes of m units of Pop-, and it is assumed that they are independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) exponential random variables with mean θ (Exp(θ )). Similarly, it is assumed that Y,..., Y n denote the lifetimes of n units of Pop-2, and they are i.i.d exponential random variables with mean θ 2. 3 Maximum likelihood estimators And Their Exact Distributions 3. Maximum Likelihood Estimators For a given sampling scheme m, n, k and R,..., R k based on the observation (W, Z) the likelihood function can be written as L(θ, θ 2 w, z) = C θ m k where the normalizing constant C = i= i= θ n k 2 e ( A θ + A 2 θ 2 ) ; () k i i [(m (R j + ))z i + (n (R j + ))( z i )], i= k k k k A = (R i + )w i + (m (R i + ))w k, A 2 = (R i + )w i + (n (R i + ))w k, j= i= j= i=
7 7 m k = k i= z i, n k = k i= ( z i) = k m k. From () it follows that (m k, n k, A, A 2 ) is the joint complete sufficient statistics of the unknown parameters (θ, θ ). It is immediate that the MLEs of both θ and θ 2 exist when m k k, and they are as follows: θ = A m k and θ2 = A 2 n k. Hence ( θ, θ 2 ) is the conditional MLE of (θ, θ 2 ), conditioning on m k k. 3.2 Joint and Marginal Distributions In this section we provide the joint and marginal distribution function of θ and θ 2 based on the joint and marginal moment generating function (MGF) approach. Lemma is needed for further development. Lemma : P (m k = r) = k (m i j= { (R j + ))z i + (n i j= (R j + ))( z i ) z Q r (m i i= j= (R j + ))θ 2 + (n i j= (R }θ k r θ2, r j + ))θ { } k where Q r = z = (z,..., z k ) : z i = r ; r = 0,..., k. Proof: See in the Appendix. i= Note that when m = n, then ( ) ( ) r ( ) k r k θ2 θ2 P (m k = r) = ; r θ + θ 2 θ + θ 2 r = 0,..., k. (2) Now we provide the joint moment generating function (MGF) of ( θ, θ 2 ) conditioning on m k k. Theorem : The joint MGF of ( θ, θ 2 ) conditioning on m k k is given by ( ) k M θ, θ t 2, t 2 = r= P (m k = r) k s= ( α srt β sr t 2 ), (3) P ( m k k )
8 8 where α sr = β sr = Proof: See in the Appendix. (m s i= (R i + ))θ θ 2 r{(m s i= (R i + ))θ 2 + (n s i= (R i + ))θ } (n s i= (R i + ))θ θ 2 (k r){(m s i= (R i + ))θ 2 + (n s i= (R i + ))θ }. Using Theorem, we immediately get the following corollary. Corollary : Conditioning on m k k, the marginal MGF of θ and θ 2 are given by M θ ( t ) = k r= P (m k = r) k s= ( α srt) P ( m k k ) ( ) k M θ2 t = r= P (m k = r) k s= ( β srt), P ( m k k ) and respectively. Hence we have the PDFs of θ and θ 2 as follows. Theorem 2: Conditioning on m k k, the PDF of θ is given by Here X r d = ( ) k f θ t = r= P (m k = r)g Xr (t). (4) P ( m k k ) k U sr, where U sr Exp(α sr ) and they are independently distributed. Also, s= g Xr (t) is the PDF of X r, and when m n, g Xr (t) = k s= and 0, otherwise. When m = n, α sr k s= e t αsr k j=,j s ( α jr α sr ) ; t > 0, g Xr (t) = Γ(k)α k r t k e t αr ; t > 0, and 0, otherwise. Here α r = θ θ 2 r(θ + θ 2 ).
9 9 The PDF of θ 2 is given by Here Y r f θ2 ( t ) = k r= P (m k = r)g Yr (t) P ( m k k ). (5) d = k s= V sr, where V sr Exp(β sr ) and they are independently distributed. Also, g Yr (t) is the PDF of Y r, and when m n, g Yr (t) = k s= and 0, otherwise. When m = n, β sr k s= e t βsr k j=,j s ( β jr β sr ) ; t > 0, g Yr (t) = Γ(k)β k r t k e t βr ; t > 0, and 0, otherwise. Here β r = θ θ 2 (k r)(θ + θ 2 ). Proof: It immediately follows from Corollary. Remark: The distribution of the MLE is a mixture of k components, where each component is a sum of k independent exponentially distributed random variables. When m = n, it is a weighted mixture of gamma distributions. We can easily obtain the moments of θ and θ 2. When m n, the first two moments are E( θ ) = E( θ ) 2 = E( θ 2 ) = E( θ 2) 2 = k r= P (m k = r) k s= α sr P ( m k k ) k r= P (m k = r)(2 k s= α2 sr + i j α irα jr ) P ( m k k ) k r= P (m k = r) k s= β sr P ( m k k ) k r= P (m k = r)(2 k s= β2 sr + i j β irβ jr ). P ( m k k ) When m = n, E( θ ) = k r= P (m k = r)kα r P ( m k k ) and E( θ 2 ) = k r= P (m k = r)k(k + )α r 2 P ( m k k )
10 0 E( θ 2 ) = k r= P (m k = r)kβ r P ( m k k ) and E( θ 2 2) = k r= P (m 2 k = r)k(k + )β r. P ( m k k ) Here α r and β r are same as defined before, and P (m k = r) is given by (2). Now to get an idea about the shape of the PDFs of θ and θ 2, for different censoring schemes, we have plotted in Figures to 4 the PDFs of θ and θ 2 along with the histograms of θ and θ 2 based on 0,000 replications. Density Density θ ^ θ ^ 2 (a) Histogram of θ along with its PDF (b) Histogram of θ 2 along with its PDF Figure : Histogram of θ and θ 2 along with its PDF,taking θ =.5, θ 2 =, m = 20, n = 25, k = 8,R = (7, 0 (6) )
11 Density Density θ ^ θ ^ 2 (a) Histogram of θ along with its PDF (b) Histogram of θ 2 along with its PDF Figure 2: Histogram of θ and θ 2 along with its PDF,taking θ =.5, θ 2 =.5, m = 20, n = 25, k = 8,R = (7, 0 (6) ) Density Density θ ^ θ ^ 2 (a) Histogram of θ along with its PDF (b) Histogram of θ 2 along with its PDF Figure 3: Histogram of θ and θ 2 along with its PDF,taking θ =.5, θ 2 =, m = 20, n = 25, k = 6, R = (2 (5) )
12 2 Density Density θ ^ θ ^ 2 (a) Histogram of θ along with its PDF (b) Histogram of θ 2 along with its PDF Figure 4: Histogram of θ and θ 2 along with its PDF,taking θ =.5, θ 2 =.5, m = 20, n = 25, k = 6,R = (2 (5) ) Some of the points are quite clear from the PDFs of θ and θ 2. The PDFs of both θ and θ 2 are unimodal and are right skewed for different parameter values and for different sample sizes. Moreover, in all the cases it is observed that the modes of the PDFs are very close to the corresponding true parameter values, as expected. 4 Generation of the Data and the Expected Experimental Time It is observed that for the proposed NJPC scheme, it is quite simple to generate samples for a given censoring scheme, hence simulation experiments can be performed quite efficiently. In this section we provide an algorithm to generate sample from a given NJPC scheme. This algorithm is based on the following lemma.
13 3 Lemma 2: If W... W k are the ordered lifetime from a NJPC, then W i d = i V s, s= where V s s are independent random variables such that ( ) V s Exp E, E s = (m s j= (R j + )) + (n s j= (R j + )). s θ θ 2 Proof: See in the Appendix. Now we can use the following algorithm to generate (W, Z) for a given n, m, k, R,..., R k. Algorithm: Step : Compute E s, for s =,..., k. ( ) Step 2: Generate V s Exp, s =,..., k. E s Step 3: Compute W i = i V s, i =,..., k. s= Step 4: Generate Z i Bin(, p i ), i =,..., k, where p i = (m i j= (R j + ))θ 2 (m i j= (R j + ))θ 2 + (n i j= (R. j + ))θ Using Lemma 2, we can easily obtain the expected experimental time as E(W k ) = k E(V s ) = s= k s= E s.
14 4 5 Construction of Confidence Interval 5. Exact Confidence Interval Based on the assumptions that P θ ( θ > t) is a strictly increasing function of θ for any point t > 0 when θ 2 is fixed, a 00( α)% exact confidence interval of θ can be constructed. Similarly, based on the assumption that P θ2 ( θ 2 > t) is a strictly increasing function of θ 2 for any point t when θ is fixed, a 00( α)% exact confidence interval of θ 2 can be constructed as follows, see for example Lehmann and Romano [8]. Conditioning on m k k, a 00( α)% exact confidence interval for θ as (θ L, θ U ) can be obtained by solving the following two nonlinear equations keeping θ 2 fixed. { P θl ( θ > θ obs m k k ) = α 2, P θu ( θ > θ obs m k k ) = α 2. (6) Similarly, conditioning on m k k, a 00( α)% exact confidence interval for θ 2 as (θ 2L, θ 2U ) can be obtained by solving the following nonlinear equations keeping θ fixed. { P θ2l ( θ 2 > θ 2obs m k k ) = α 2, P θ2u ( θ 2 > θ 2obs m k k ) = α 2. (7) In practice to compute (θ L, θ U ), we replace θ 2 by its MLE θ 2, similarly, to compute (θ 2L, θ 2U ), we replace θ by its MLE θ. One can use the standard bisection method or Newton-Raphson method to solve these two (6) and (7) non-linear equations. The following result provides the necessary monotonicity properties of P θ ( θ > t) and P θ2 ( θ 2 > t). It also justifies using (6) and (7) to construct the exact confidence intervals of θ and θ 2, respectively. Lemma 3: (i) P θ ( θ > t m k k ) is a strictly increasing function of θ for any point t when θ 2 is kept fixed.
15 5 (ii) P θ2 ( θ 2 > t m k k ) is a strictly increasing function of θ 2 for any point t when θ is kept fixed. Proof: See in appendix. 5.2 Bootstrap Confidence Interval Since the exact confidence intervals can be obtained by solving two non-linear equations we propose to use parametric bootstrap confidence intervals also as an alternative. The following steps can be followed to construct parametric bootstrap confidence intervals. Step : Given the original data, compute θ, θ 2. Step 2: Generate a bootstrap sample {(W, Z )..., (W k, Z k )} using the algorithm provided in Section 4 for a given m, n, k, (R,... R k ), θ, θ 2,. Step 3: Compute θ, θ 2 based on the bootstrap sample. Step 4: Repeat Step -Step 3 say B times and obtain { θ,..., θ B } and { θ 2,..., θ 2B }. Sort θ j in ascending order to get ( θ (),..., θ (B)). Similarly sort θ 2j in ascending order to get ( θ 2(),..., θ 2(B)). Step 5: Construct a 00( α)% confidence interval for θ as ( θ ([ α 2 B]), θ ([( α 2 )B]) ) and a 00( α)% confidence interval for θ 2 as ( θ 2([ α 2 B]), θ 2([( α 2 B)]) ). Here [x] denotes the largest integer less than or equal to x. 6 Simulation Results And Data Analysis 6. Simulation Results We perform some simulation experiments to compare the performances of the estimators based on NJPC and JPC schemes. We have taken different m, n, k, different (θ, θ 2 ) and
16 6 different R,..., R k values. For a given set of parameters and the sample sizes, we generate sample based on the algorithm provided in Section 4. In each case we compute the MLEs based on the observed sample, and report their average estimates (AE) and mean squared errors (MSEs) based on 0,000 replications. In each case for the NJPC scheme we construct the exact confidence intervals of θ and θ 2, and we report the average lengths (AL) and the coverage percentages (CP) based on 000 replications. For each sample we compute the bootstrap confidence intervals based on 000 replications and we report the average lengths and the coverage percentages based on 000 replications. All the results are reported in Tables - 4. We use the following notation to denote a particular progressive censoring scheme. For example when m = 5, n = 2, k = 6 and R = (4, 0 (4) ) means R = 4, R 2 = R 3 = R 4 = R 5 = 0. Table : AE and MSE of the MLE s taking θ =.5, θ 2 =, m = 5, n = 2 Censoring scheme MLE NJPC JPC AE MSE AE MSE k=6,r=(4,0 (4) ) θ θ k=6,r=(0,4,0 (3) ) θ θ k=6,r=(0 (2),4,0 (2) ) θ ˆθ k=6,r=(0 (3),4,0) ˆθ ˆθ k=6,r=(0 (4),4) ˆθ ˆθ
17 7 Table 2: AE and MSE of the MLE s taking θ =.5, θ 2 =, m = 5, n = 2 Censoring scheme MLE NJPC JPC AE MSE AE MSE k=8,r=(3,0 (6) ) θ θ k=8,r=(0 (2),3,0 (4) ) θ θ k=8,r=(0 (3),3,0 (3) ) θ θ k=8,r=(0 (5),7,0) θ θ k=8,r=(0 (6),7) θ θ Table 3: AL and CP of CI s taking θ =.5, θ 2 =.6, m = 20, n = 25 Censoring scheme Parameter Exact 90% CI Bootstrap 90%CI AL CP AL CP k=8,r=(7,0 (6) ) θ % % θ % % k=8,r=(0 (3),7,0 (3) ) θ % % θ % % k=8,r=(0 (5),7,0) θ % % θ % % k=8,r=(0 (6),7) θ % % θ % % k=8,r=(0 (7) ) θ % % θ % %
18 8 Table 4: AL and CP of CI s taking θ =.5, θ 2 =.6, m = 20, n = 25 Censoring scheme Parameter Exact 90% CI Bootstrap 90%CI AL CP AL CP k=6,r=(0,0 (4) ) θ % % θ % % k=6,r=(0 (2),0,0 (2) ) θ % % θ % % k=6,r=(0 (4),0) θ % % θ % % k=6,r=(0 (5) ) θ % % θ % % Some of the points are quite clear from the above Tables. It is clear that for both the censoring schemes the estimators are quite satisfactory. In most of the cases considered here it is observed that the MSEs of both the estimators are smaller in case of NJPC than the JPC. Regarding the confidence intervals it is observed that the confidence intervals obtained using the exact distribution and also using the bootstrap method provide satisfactory results. In all the cases the coverage percentages are very close to the nominal level. Regarding the length of the confidence intervals, the bootstrap confidence intervals perform slightly better than the exact confidence intervals. Moreover, the implementation of the bootstrap method is also quite simple in this case. Now we would like to discuss some of the computational issues we have encountered during the simulation experiments mainly to calculate the exact confidence intervals of θ and θ 2. It is observed that for m n, and when k is large the computation of P (X r > t) and P (Y r > t) become quite difficult for large value of t. For small value of k, if θ and θ 2 are quite different, then solving the two non-linear equations (6) and (7) become quite difficult. In this case P θu ( θ > θ obs m k k ) and P θ2u ( θ 2 > θ 2obs m k k ) become very
19 9 flat for large values of θ U and θ 2U, respectively. Hence the confidence intervals become very wide. On the other hand the construction of confidence intervals based on bootstrapping does not have any numerical issues. Considering all these points we propose to use bootstrap method for constructing the confidence intervals in this case. 6.2 Data Analysis In this section we provide the analysis of a data set mainly for illustrative purposes. These data sets were used by Rasouli and Balakrishnan [2] also and they were originally taken from Proschan []. The data represent the intervals between failures (in hours) of the air conditioning system of a fleet of 3 Boeing 720 jet airplanes. It is observed by Proschan [] that the failure time distribution of the air conditioning system for each of the planes can be well approximated by exponential distributions. We have considered the planes 793 and 794 for our illustrative purposes. The data are presented below: Plane 794: 3, 5, 5, 3, 4, 5, 22, 22, 23, 30, 36, 39, 44, 46, 50, 72, 79, 88, 97, 02, 39, 88, 97, 20. Plane 793:, 4,, 6, 8, 8, 8, 24, 3, 39, 46, 5, 54, 63, 68, 77, 80, 82, 97, 06,, 4, 42, 63, 9, 206, 26. In this case m = 24 and n = 27. We have considered two different NJPC with k = 8, and different R i values. Censoring Scheme : k = 8 and R = (0 (7) ) Based on the above censoring scheme we generate W and Z, and they are as follows. w = (, 3, 4, 5, 5,, 3, 5) z = (0,, 0,,, 0,, ). We compute the MLEs of the unknown
20 20 parameters and 90% exact and bootstrap confidence intervals in both the cases. The results are reported in Table 5. Table 5: Results related to Censoring Scheme. parameter MLE Bootstrap 90% CI Exact 90% CI θ 59.4 (27.862,32.9) (30.027,4.049) θ (49.46, ) (49.83, ) Censoring Scheme 2: k = 8 and R = (2 (7) ) For the Censoring Scheme 2, the generated W and Z are w = (, 3, 4, 5, 5, 4, 5, 6) and z = (0,, 0,,,,, 0). In this case the MLEs and the associate confidence intervals are reported in Table 6 Table 6: Results related to Censoring Scheme 2. parameter MLE Bootstrap 90% CI Exact 90% CI θ 37.8 (7.239,82.9) (9.38,93.453) θ (3.003, ) (34.588, ) It is clear that the MLEs of the unknown parameters depend quite significantly on the censoring schemes, as expected. The length of the confidence intervals based on bootstrapping are smaller than the exact confidence intervals. 7 Conclusion In this paper we introduce a new joint progressive censoring scheme for two samples. Based on the assumptions that the lifetime distributions of the two populations follow exponential distributions we obtain the MLE s of the unknown parameters, and derive their exact
21 2 distributions. It is observed that analytically the proposed model is easier to handle than the existing joint progressive censoring scheme of Rasouli and Balakrishnan [2]. We perform some simulation experiments and it is observed that in certain cases the MLEs of the unknown parameters based on the proposed model behave better than the existing model. Moreover, performing the simulation experiments based on the proposed model is easier compared to the existing model. Therefore, the proposed model can be used for two sample problem quite conveniently in practice. In this paper we have assumed that the lifetimes of the items follow exponential distribution. In practice it may not be the case always because exponential distribution has a constant hazard rate. It is well known that because of the flexibility, the Weibull distribution or the generalized exponential distribution are more useful in practice. Therefore, it is important to develop the proper inferential procedures for other lifetime distributions for a two sample problem. More work is needed along these directions. Appendix Proof of Lemma : Note that P (m k = r) = z Q r P (Z = z,..., Z k = z k ) = z Q r P (Z = z )P (Z 2 = z 2 Z = z ) P (Z k = z k Z k = z k,..., Z = z ). Now P (Z i = z i Z i,..., Z = z ) = (m i j= (R j + ))z i + (n i j= (R j + ))( z i ) p z i q z i, (m i j= (R j + ))p + (n i j= (R j + ))q
22 22 where p = P (X < Y ) = θ 2 θ + θ 2, q = p. Hence Z is are independent, therefore P (m k = r) = k { (m i j= (R j + ))z i + (n i j= (R j + ))( z i ) z Q r (m i j= (R j + ))p + (n i j= (R p z i q z i } j + ))q i= = k (m i j= (R j + ))z i + (n i j= (R j + ))( z i ) z Q r (m i j= (R j + ))p + (n i j= (R p m k q n k j + ))q i= = z Q r k i= (m i j= (R j + ))z i + (n i j= (R j + ))( z i ) (m i j= (R j + ))θ 2 + (n i j= (R θ k r θ r 2. j + ))θ Proof of Theorem : Conditioning on m k k, M θ, θ 2 ( t, t 2 ) = E(e t θ +t 2 θ2 m k k ) = = = k E(e t θ +t 2 θ2 m k = r)p (m k = r m k k ) r= k E(e t r= z Q r C k P ( m k k ) 0 w... w k θ +t 2 θ2 m k = r, Z = z)p (Z = z m k = r)p (m k = r m k k ) r= C r θ z Q r θ 2 k r t { k i= e (R i +)w i +(m k i= (R i +))w k } e θ { k i= (R i+)w i +(m k i= (R i+))w k } r e t 2 { k i= (R i +)w i +(n k i= (R i +))w k } k r = = e { k θ 2 i= (R i+)w i +(n k i= (R i+))w k } dw k... dw 2 dw k P ( m k k ) { k j= r= z Q r C θ r θ 2 k r (m j i= (R i + )) + (n j i= (R i + )) } θ θ 2 k P (m k = r) P ( m k k ) r= k ( α sr t β sr t 2 ) s= k ( α sr t β sr t 2 ). s=
23 23 Proof of Lemma 2: E(e tw j ) = = C = C k r=0 z Q r E(e twj m k = r, Z = z)p (Z = z m k = r)p (m k = r) k r= z Q r 0 w... w k θ r k r θ etw j e 2 e { k θ 2 i= (R i+)w i +(n k i= (R i+))w k } dw k... dw 2 dw k r=0 z Q r θ r θ 2 k r { k θ i= (R i+)w i +(m k i= (R i+))w k } {a k (a k + a k ) (a k + a k + + a j+ )(a k + a k + + a j+ + a j + a j )} Here (a k + a k + + a j+ + a j + a j + + a ) k = C r θ k r r=0 z Q r θ 2 = = = {a k (a k + a k ) (a k + a k + + a j ) (a k + a k + + a j + a j + a )} (a k + a k + + a j ) (a k + a k + + a j + a j + + a ) (a k + a k + + a j ) (a k + a k + + a j + aj + + a ) k { } (ak + a k + + a j ) (a k + a k + + a j + a j + + a ) P (m k = r) (a r=0 k + a k + + a j ) (a k + a k + + a j + a j + + a ) { } k (ak + a k + + a j ) (a k + a k + + a j + a j + + a ) (a k + a k + + a j ) (a k + a k + + a j + a P (m k = r) j + + a ) r=0 j ( t ). E s s= a j = (R j + ) θ + (R j + ) a k = (m k j= (R j + )) θ θ 2, j =,..., k ; + (n E s = (m s j= (R j + )) + (n θ k j= (R j + )) ; a j = a j t; θ 2 s j= (R j + )). θ 2 Proof of Lemma 3: To prove Lemma 3, we mainly use the Three Monotonicity Lemmas of Balakrishnan and Iliopoulos [4]. We briefly state the Three Monotonicity Lemmas for
24 24 convenience, and we will show that both θ and θ 2 satisfy the Three Monotonicity Lemmas. Suppose θ is an estimate of θ, and the survival function of θ can be written in the following form: P θ ( θ > x) = P θ ( θ > x D = d)p θ (D = d), d D where D is a finite set. Lemma (Three Monotonicity Lemmas:) Assume that the following hold true: (M) P θ ( θ > x D = d) is increasing in θ for all x and d D; (M2) For all x and θ > 0, P θ ( θ > x D = d) is decreasing in d D; (M3) D is stochastically decreasing in θ. Then P θ ( θ > x) is increasing in θ for any fixed x. Now to prove (i), first observe that k P θ ( θ > t m k k ) = P θ ( θ > t m k = r)p θ (m k = r m k k ). r= Hence, (i) can be proved if we can show that (M) P θ ( θ > t m k = r) is increasing in θ, t, r {,... k }; (M2) P θ ( θ > t m k = r) is decreasing in r, t, θ > 0; (M3) The conditional distribution of m k is stochastically decreasing in θ. From the moment generating function of E(e t θ m k = r) it is easily observe that conditioning on m k = r, θ d = k s= X sr, where X sr Exp(α sr ) and they are independently distributed. Here α sr s are same as defined in Theorem. Since α sr is increasing with θ, the distribution of X sr is stochastically increasing with θ. Since X sr s are independently distributed, (M) is satisfied.
25 25 Now to prove (M2), observe that θ {m k = r} θ {m k = r + } d = d = k i= (R i + )w i + (m k i= (R i + ))w k r k i= (R i + )w i + (m k i= (R i + ))w k. r + Hence for all t and for θ > 0, P θ ( θ > t m k = r) > P θ ( θ > t m k = r + ). This proves (M2). To prove (M3) it is enough to show m k has monotone likelihood ratio property with respect to θ. For θ < θ P θ (m k = r m k k ) P θ (m k = r m k k ) P θ (m k = r) P θ (m k = r) ( θ ) k r r. θ References [] Ashour, S.K. and Abo-Kasem, O.E. (204), Parameter Estimation for Two Weibull Populations under Joint Type II Censored Scheme, International Journal of Engineering, vol. 5, pp [2] Balakrishnan, N. (2007), Progressive censoring methodology: an apprisal, TEST, vol. 6, pp (with discussions). [3] Balakrishnan, N and Cramer, E. (204), Art of Progressive Censoring, Springer, New York. [4] Balakrishnan, N and Iliopoulos, G (2009), Stochastic monotonicity of the MLE of exponential mean under different censoring schemes, Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 6, pp [5] Balakrishnan, N and Rasouli, A. (2008), Exact likelihood inference for two exponential populations under joint Type-II censoring, Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, vol. 52, pp
26 26 [6] Balakrishnan, N and Su, Feng (205), Exact likelihood inference for k exponential populations under joint type-ii censoring, Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation, vol. 44, pp [7] Kundu, D. (2008), Bayesian inference and life testing plan for the Weibull distribution in presence of progressive censoring, Technometrics, vol. 50, [8] Lehmann, E.L. and Romano, J.P. (2005), Testing Statistical Hypotheses Springer Texts in Statistics, New York. [9] Parsi, S. and Bairamov, I. (2009), Expected values of the number of failures for two populations under joint Type-II progressive censoring, Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, vol. 53, pp [0] Pradhan, B. and Kundu, D. (2009), On progressively censored generalized exponential distribution, TEST, vol. 8, [] Proschan, F. (963), Theoretical explanation of observed decreasing failure rate, Technometrics, vol. 5, [2] Rasouli, A. and Balakrishnan, N (200), Exact likelihood inference for two exponential populations under joint progressive type-ii censoring, Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, vol. 39, pp
Point and Interval Estimation of Weibull Parameters Based on Joint Progressively Censored Data
Point and Interval Estimation of Weibull Parameters Based on Joint Progressively Censored Data Shuvashree Mondal and Debasis Kundu Abstract Analysis of progressively censored data has received considerable
More informationExact Inference for the Two-Parameter Exponential Distribution Under Type-II Hybrid Censoring
Exact Inference for the Two-Parameter Exponential Distribution Under Type-II Hybrid Censoring A. Ganguly, S. Mitra, D. Samanta, D. Kundu,2 Abstract Epstein [9] introduced the Type-I hybrid censoring scheme
More informationAnalysis of Type-II Progressively Hybrid Censored Data
Analysis of Type-II Progressively Hybrid Censored Data Debasis Kundu & Avijit Joarder Abstract The mixture of Type-I and Type-II censoring schemes, called the hybrid censoring scheme is quite common in
More informationAnalysis of Middle Censored Data with Exponential Lifetime Distributions
Analysis of Middle Censored Data with Exponential Lifetime Distributions Srikanth K. Iyer S. Rao Jammalamadaka Debasis Kundu Abstract Recently Jammalamadaka and Mangalam (2003) introduced a general censoring
More informationOn Generalized Progressive Hybrid Censoring in presence of competing risks
On Generalized Progressive Hybrid Censoring in presence of competing risks Arnab Koley & Debasis Kundu Abstract The progressive Type-II hybrid censoring scheme introduced by Kundu and Joarder (Computational
More informationHybrid Censoring; An Introduction 2
Hybrid Censoring; An Introduction 2 Debasis Kundu Department of Mathematics & Statistics Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur 23-rd November, 2010 2 This is a joint work with N. Balakrishnan Debasis Kundu
More informationOn Weighted Exponential Distribution and its Length Biased Version
On Weighted Exponential Distribution and its Length Biased Version Suchismita Das 1 and Debasis Kundu 2 Abstract In this paper we consider the weighted exponential distribution proposed by Gupta and Kundu
More informationBayes Estimation and Prediction of the Two-Parameter Gamma Distribution
Bayes Estimation and Prediction of the Two-Parameter Gamma Distribution Biswabrata Pradhan & Debasis Kundu Abstract In this article the Bayes estimates of two-parameter gamma distribution is considered.
More informationinferences on stress-strength reliability from lindley distributions
inferences on stress-strength reliability from lindley distributions D.K. Al-Mutairi, M.E. Ghitany & Debasis Kundu Abstract This paper deals with the estimation of the stress-strength parameter R = P (Y
More informationOn the Comparison of Fisher Information of the Weibull and GE Distributions
On the Comparison of Fisher Information of the Weibull and GE Distributions Rameshwar D. Gupta Debasis Kundu Abstract In this paper we consider the Fisher information matrices of the generalized exponential
More informationBayesian Analysis of Simple Step-stress Model under Weibull Lifetimes
Bayesian Analysis of Simple Step-stress Model under Weibull Lifetimes A. Ganguly 1, D. Kundu 2,3, S. Mitra 2 Abstract Step-stress model is becoming quite popular in recent times for analyzing lifetime
More informationSTATISTICAL INFERENCE IN ACCELERATED LIFE TESTING WITH GEOMETRIC PROCESS MODEL. A Thesis. Presented to the. Faculty of. San Diego State University
STATISTICAL INFERENCE IN ACCELERATED LIFE TESTING WITH GEOMETRIC PROCESS MODEL A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of San Diego State University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree
More informationA Convenient Way of Generating Gamma Random Variables Using Generalized Exponential Distribution
A Convenient Way of Generating Gamma Random Variables Using Generalized Exponential Distribution Debasis Kundu & Rameshwar D. Gupta 2 Abstract In this paper we propose a very convenient way to generate
More informationHybrid Censoring Scheme: An Introduction
Department of Mathematics & Statistics Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur August 19, 2014 Outline 1 2 3 4 5 Outline 1 2 3 4 5 What is? Lifetime data analysis is used to analyze data in which the time
More informationPoint and Interval Estimation for Gaussian Distribution, Based on Progressively Type-II Censored Samples
90 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RELIABILITY, VOL. 52, NO. 1, MARCH 2003 Point and Interval Estimation for Gaussian Distribution, Based on Progressively Type-II Censored Samples N. Balakrishnan, N. Kannan, C. T.
More informationConditional independence of blocked ordered data
Conditional independence of blocked ordered data G. Iliopoulos 1 and N. Balakrishnan 2 Abstract In this paper, we prove that blocks of ordered data formed by some conditioning events are mutually independent.
More informationStatistical Inference Using Progressively Type-II Censored Data with Random Scheme
International Mathematical Forum, 3, 28, no. 35, 1713-1725 Statistical Inference Using Progressively Type-II Censored Data with Random Scheme Ammar M. Sarhan 1 and A. Abuammoh Department of Statistics
More informationBayesian Inference and Life Testing Plan for the Weibull Distribution in Presence of Progressive Censoring
Bayesian Inference and Life Testing Plan for the Weibull Distribution in Presence of Progressive Censoring Debasis KUNDU Department of Mathematics and Statistics Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur Pin
More informationStatistical Inference on Constant Stress Accelerated Life Tests Under Generalized Gamma Lifetime Distributions
Int. Statistical Inst.: Proc. 58th World Statistical Congress, 2011, Dublin (Session CPS040) p.4828 Statistical Inference on Constant Stress Accelerated Life Tests Under Generalized Gamma Lifetime Distributions
More informationTwo Weighted Distributions Generated by Exponential Distribution
Journal of Mathematical Extension Vol. 9, No. 1, (2015), 1-12 ISSN: 1735-8299 URL: http://www.ijmex.com Two Weighted Distributions Generated by Exponential Distribution A. Mahdavi Vali-e-Asr University
More informationAn Extended Weighted Exponential Distribution
Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods Volume 16 Issue 1 Article 17 5-1-017 An Extended Weighted Exponential Distribution Abbas Mahdavi Department of Statistics, Faculty of Mathematical Sciences,
More informationStatistics - Lecture One. Outline. Charlotte Wickham 1. Basic ideas about estimation
Statistics - Lecture One Charlotte Wickham wickham@stat.berkeley.edu http://www.stat.berkeley.edu/~wickham/ Outline 1. Basic ideas about estimation 2. Method of Moments 3. Maximum Likelihood 4. Confidence
More informationStep-Stress Models and Associated Inference
Department of Mathematics & Statistics Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur August 19, 2014 Outline Accelerated Life Test 1 Accelerated Life Test 2 3 4 5 6 7 Outline Accelerated Life Test 1 Accelerated
More informationBurr Type X Distribution: Revisited
Burr Type X Distribution: Revisited Mohammad Z. Raqab 1 Debasis Kundu Abstract In this paper, we consider the two-parameter Burr-Type X distribution. We observe several interesting properties of this distribution.
More informationEstimation of Parameters of the Weibull Distribution Based on Progressively Censored Data
International Mathematical Forum, 2, 2007, no. 41, 2031-2043 Estimation of Parameters of the Weibull Distribution Based on Progressively Censored Data K. S. Sultan 1 Department of Statistics Operations
More informationEstimation for inverse Gaussian Distribution Under First-failure Progressive Hybird Censored Samples
Filomat 31:18 (217), 5743 5752 https://doi.org/1.2298/fil1718743j Published by Faculty of Sciences and Mathematics, University of Niš, Serbia Available at: http://www.pmf.ni.ac.rs/filomat Estimation for
More informationOn Sarhan-Balakrishnan Bivariate Distribution
J. Stat. Appl. Pro. 1, No. 3, 163-17 (212) 163 Journal of Statistics Applications & Probability An International Journal c 212 NSP On Sarhan-Balakrishnan Bivariate Distribution D. Kundu 1, A. Sarhan 2
More informationParameter Estimation of Power Lomax Distribution Based on Type-II Progressively Hybrid Censoring Scheme
Applied Mathematical Sciences, Vol. 12, 2018, no. 18, 879-891 HIKARI Ltd, www.m-hikari.com https://doi.org/10.12988/ams.2018.8691 Parameter Estimation of Power Lomax Distribution Based on Type-II Progressively
More informationBootstrap and Parametric Inference: Successes and Challenges
Bootstrap and Parametric Inference: Successes and Challenges G. Alastair Young Department of Mathematics Imperial College London Newton Institute, January 2008 Overview Overview Review key aspects of frequentist
More informationOn Simple Step-stress Model for Two-Parameter Exponential Distribution
On Simple Step-stress Model for Two-Parameter Exponential Distribution S. Mitra, A. Ganguly, D. Samanta, D. Kundu,2 Abstract In this paper, we consider the simple step-stress model for a two-parameter
More informationAn Extension of the Generalized Exponential Distribution
An Extension of the Generalized Exponential Distribution Debasis Kundu and Rameshwar D. Gupta Abstract The two-parameter generalized exponential distribution has been used recently quite extensively to
More informationConstant Stress Partially Accelerated Life Test Design for Inverted Weibull Distribution with Type-I Censoring
Algorithms Research 013, (): 43-49 DOI: 10.593/j.algorithms.01300.0 Constant Stress Partially Accelerated Life Test Design for Mustafa Kamal *, Shazia Zarrin, Arif-Ul-Islam Department of Statistics & Operations
More informationDiscriminating Between the Bivariate Generalized Exponential and Bivariate Weibull Distributions
Discriminating Between the Bivariate Generalized Exponential and Bivariate Weibull Distributions Arabin Kumar Dey & Debasis Kundu Abstract Recently Kundu and Gupta ( Bivariate generalized exponential distribution,
More informationarxiv: v4 [stat.co] 18 Mar 2018
An EM algorithm for absolute continuous bivariate Pareto distribution Arabin Kumar Dey, Biplab Paul and Debasis Kundu arxiv:1608.02199v4 [stat.co] 18 Mar 2018 Abstract: Recently [3] used EM algorithm to
More informationOptimum Hybrid Censoring Scheme using Cost Function Approach
Optimum Hybrid Censoring Scheme using Cost Function Approach Ritwik Bhattacharya 1, Biswabrata Pradhan 1, Anup Dewanji 2 1 SQC and OR Unit, Indian Statistical Institute, 203, B. T. Road, Kolkata, PIN-
More informationBayesian Analysis for Partially Complete Time and Type of Failure Data
Bayesian Analysis for Partially Complete Time and Type of Failure Data Debasis Kundu Abstract In this paper we consider the Bayesian analysis of competing risks data, when the data are partially complete
More informationWeighted Marshall-Olkin Bivariate Exponential Distribution
Weighted Marshall-Olkin Bivariate Exponential Distribution Ahad Jamalizadeh & Debasis Kundu Abstract Recently Gupta and Kundu [9] introduced a new class of weighted exponential distributions, and it can
More informationINVERTED KUMARASWAMY DISTRIBUTION: PROPERTIES AND ESTIMATION
Pak. J. Statist. 2017 Vol. 33(1), 37-61 INVERTED KUMARASWAMY DISTRIBUTION: PROPERTIES AND ESTIMATION A. M. Abd AL-Fattah, A.A. EL-Helbawy G.R. AL-Dayian Statistics Department, Faculty of Commerce, AL-Azhar
More informationStatistics 3858 : Maximum Likelihood Estimators
Statistics 3858 : Maximum Likelihood Estimators 1 Method of Maximum Likelihood In this method we construct the so called likelihood function, that is L(θ) = L(θ; X 1, X 2,..., X n ) = f n (X 1, X 2,...,
More informationEstimation of Stress-Strength Reliability Using Record Ranked Set Sampling Scheme from the Exponential Distribution
Filomat 9:5 015, 1149 116 DOI 10.98/FIL1505149S Published by Faculty of Sciences and Mathematics, University of Niš, Serbia Available at: http://www.pmf.ni.ac.rs/filomat Estimation of Stress-Strength eliability
More informationA comparison of inverse transform and composition methods of data simulation from the Lindley distribution
Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods 2016, Vol. 23, No. 6, 517 529 http://dx.doi.org/10.5351/csam.2016.23.6.517 Print ISSN 2287-7843 / Online ISSN 2383-4757 A comparison of inverse transform
More informationOn Bivariate Birnbaum-Saunders Distribution
On Bivariate Birnbaum-Saunders Distribution Debasis Kundu 1 & Ramesh C. Gupta Abstract Univariate Birnbaum-Saunders distribution has been used quite effectively to analyze positively skewed lifetime data.
More informationAnalysis of incomplete data in presence of competing risks
Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 87 (2000) 221 239 www.elsevier.com/locate/jspi Analysis of incomplete data in presence of competing risks Debasis Kundu a;, Sankarshan Basu b a Department
More informationExact Linear Likelihood Inference for Laplace
Exact Linear Likelihood Inference for Laplace Prof. N. Balakrishnan McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada bala@mcmaster.ca p. 1/52 Pierre-Simon Laplace 1749 1827 p. 2/52 Laplace s Biography Born: On March
More informationFixed Point Iteration for Estimating The Parameters of Extreme Value Distributions
Fixed Point Iteration for Estimating The Parameters of Extreme Value Distributions arxiv:0902.07v [stat.co] Feb 2009 Tewfik Kernane and Zohrh A. Raizah 2 Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Sciences
More informationSTEP STRESS TESTS AND SOME EXACT INFERENTIAL RESULTS N. BALAKRISHNAN. McMaster University Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. p.
p. 1/6 STEP STRESS TESTS AND SOME EXACT INFERENTIAL RESULTS N. BALAKRISHNAN bala@mcmaster.ca McMaster University Hamilton, Ontario, Canada p. 2/6 In collaboration with Debasis Kundu, IIT, Kapur, India
More informationPARAMETER ESTIMATION OF CHIRP SIGNALS IN PRESENCE OF STATIONARY NOISE
PARAMETER ESTIMATION OF CHIRP SIGNALS IN PRESENCE OF STATIONARY NOISE DEBASIS KUNDU AND SWAGATA NANDI Abstract. The problem of parameter estimation of the chirp signals in presence of stationary noise
More informationST495: Survival Analysis: Hypothesis testing and confidence intervals
ST495: Survival Analysis: Hypothesis testing and confidence intervals Eric B. Laber Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University April 3, 2014 I remember that one fateful day when Coach took
More informationBivariate Geometric (Maximum) Generalized Exponential Distribution
Bivariate Geometric (Maximum) Generalized Exponential Distribution Debasis Kundu 1 Abstract In this paper we propose a new five parameter bivariate distribution obtained by taking geometric maximum of
More informationBivariate Sinh-Normal Distribution and A Related Model
Bivariate Sinh-Normal Distribution and A Related Model Debasis Kundu 1 Abstract Sinh-normal distribution is a symmetric distribution with three parameters. In this paper we introduce bivariate sinh-normal
More informationMultivariate Survival Analysis
Multivariate Survival Analysis Previously we have assumed that either (X i, δ i ) or (X i, δ i, Z i ), i = 1,..., n, are i.i.d.. This may not always be the case. Multivariate survival data can arise in
More informationINFERENCE FOR A GAMMA STEP-STRESS MODEL UNDER CENSORING
INFERENCE FOR A GAMMA STEP-STRESS MODEL UNDER CENSORING INFERENCE FOR A GAMMA STEP-STRESS MODEL UNDER CENSORING BY LAILA ALKHALFAN, M.Sc. McMaster University a thesis submitted to the school of graduate
More informationDesign of Optimal Bayesian Reliability Test Plans for a Series System
Volume 109 No 9 2016, 125 133 ISSN: 1311-8080 (printed version); ISSN: 1314-3395 (on-line version) url: http://wwwijpameu ijpameu Design of Optimal Bayesian Reliability Test Plans for a Series System P
More informationChecking the Reliability of Reliability Models.
Checking the Reliability of Reliability. INFORMS 007 Puerto Rico. July 8-11. Víctor Aguirre Torres Stat Department Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México ITAM Credits. Partially Sponsored by Asociación
More informationUnivariate and Bivariate Geometric Discrete Generalized Exponential Distributions
Univariate and Bivariate Geometric Discrete Generalized Exponential Distributions Debasis Kundu 1 & Vahid Nekoukhou 2 Abstract Marshall and Olkin (1997, Biometrika, 84, 641-652) introduced a very powerful
More informationFrailty Models and Copulas: Similarities and Differences
Frailty Models and Copulas: Similarities and Differences KLARA GOETHALS, PAUL JANSSEN & LUC DUCHATEAU Department of Physiology and Biometrics, Ghent University, Belgium; Center for Statistics, Hasselt
More informationChecking the Reliability of Reliability Models.
Checking the Reliability of Reliability Models. Seminario de Estadística, CIMAT Abril 3, 007. Víctor Aguirre Torres Departmento de Estadística, ITAM Área de Probabilidad y Estadística, CIMAT Credits. Partially
More informationHacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Volume 45 (5) (2016), Abstract
Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Volume 45 (5) (2016), 1605 1620 Comparing of some estimation methods for parameters of the Marshall-Olkin generalized exponential distribution under progressive
More informationIntroduction of Shape/Skewness Parameter(s) in a Probability Distribution
Journal of Probability and Statistical Science 7(2), 153-171, Aug. 2009 Introduction of Shape/Skewness Parameter(s) in a Probability Distribution Rameshwar D. Gupta University of New Brunswick Debasis
More informationSome Inferential Results for One-Shot Device. Testing Data Analysis
Some Inferential Results for One-Shot Device Testing Data Analysis SOME INFERENTIAL RESULTS FOR ONE-SHOT DEVICE TESTING DATA ANALYSIS BY HON YIU SO, B.Sc., M.Phil. a thesis submitted to the Department
More informationEstimation of the Bivariate Generalized. Lomax Distribution Parameters. Based on Censored Samples
Int. J. Contemp. Math. Sciences, Vol. 9, 2014, no. 6, 257-267 HIKARI Ltd, www.m-hikari.com http://dx.doi.org/10.12988/ijcms.2014.4329 Estimation of the Bivariate Generalized Lomax Distribution Parameters
More informationThe comparative studies on reliability for Rayleigh models
Journal of the Korean Data & Information Science Society 018, 9, 533 545 http://dx.doi.org/10.7465/jkdi.018.9..533 한국데이터정보과학회지 The comparative studies on reliability for Rayleigh models Ji Eun Oh 1 Joong
More informationSome Statistical Properties of Exponentiated Weighted Weibull Distribution
Global Journal of Science Frontier Research: F Mathematics and Decision Sciences Volume 4 Issue 2 Version. Year 24 Type : Double Blind Peer Reviewed International Research Journal Publisher: Global Journals
More informationInferences on stress-strength reliability from weighted Lindley distributions
Inferences on stress-strength reliability from weighted Lindley distributions D.K. Al-Mutairi, M.E. Ghitany & Debasis Kundu Abstract This paper deals with the estimation of the stress-strength parameter
More informationAnalysis of Type-II Hybrid Censored Competing Risks Data
Analysis of Type-II Hybrid Censored Competing Risks Data Arnab Koley, Debasis Kundu,2 & Ayon Ganguly 3 Abstract Kundu and Gupta [22] provided the analysis of Type-I hybrid censored competing risks data,
More informationSTAT 6350 Analysis of Lifetime Data. Probability Plotting
STAT 6350 Analysis of Lifetime Data Probability Plotting Purpose of Probability Plots Probability plots are an important tool for analyzing data and have been particular popular in the analysis of life
More informationAnalysis of interval-censored data with Weibull lifetime distribution
Analysis of interval-censored data with Weibull lifetime distribution Biswabrata Pradhan & Debasis Kundu Abstract In this work the analysis of interval-censored data, with Weibull distribution as the underlying
More informationAnalysis of Gamma and Weibull Lifetime Data under a General Censoring Scheme and in the presence of Covariates
Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods ISSN: 0361-0926 (Print) 1532-415X (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/lsta20 Analysis of Gamma and Weibull Lifetime Data under a
More informationInference on reliability in two-parameter exponential stress strength model
Metrika DOI 10.1007/s00184-006-0074-7 Inference on reliability in two-parameter exponential stress strength model K. Krishnamoorthy Shubhabrata Mukherjee Huizhen Guo Received: 19 January 2005 Springer-Verlag
More informationEstimation of Stress-Strength Reliability for Kumaraswamy Exponential Distribution Based on Upper Record Values
International Journal of Contemporary Mathematical Sciences Vol. 12, 2017, no. 2, 59-71 HIKARI Ltd, www.m-hikari.com https://doi.org/10.12988/ijcms.2017.7210 Estimation of Stress-Strength Reliability for
More informationEstimation of Quantiles
9 Estimation of Quantiles The notion of quantiles was introduced in Section 3.2: recall that a quantile x α for an r.v. X is a constant such that P(X x α )=1 α. (9.1) In this chapter we examine quantiles
More informationExponentiated Rayleigh Distribution: A Bayes Study Using MCMC Approach Based on Unified Hybrid Censored Data
Exponentiated Rayleigh Distribution: A Bayes Study Using MCMC Approach Based on Unified Hybrid Censored Data ABSTRACT M. G. M. Ghazal 1, H. M. Hasaballah 2 1 Mathematics Department, Faculty of Science,
More informationIntroduction to Reliability Theory (part 2)
Introduction to Reliability Theory (part 2) Frank Coolen UTOPIAE Training School II, Durham University 3 July 2018 (UTOPIAE) Introduction to Reliability Theory 1 / 21 Outline Statistical issues Software
More informationPARAMETER ESTIMATION OF CHIRP SIGNALS IN PRESENCE OF STATIONARY NOISE
Statistica Sinica 8(008), 87-0 PARAMETER ESTIMATION OF CHIRP SIGNALS IN PRESENCE OF STATIONARY NOISE Debasis Kundu and Swagata Nandi Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur and Indian Statistical Institute
More informationEstimation of parametric functions in Downton s bivariate exponential distribution
Estimation of parametric functions in Downton s bivariate exponential distribution George Iliopoulos Department of Mathematics University of the Aegean 83200 Karlovasi, Samos, Greece e-mail: geh@aegean.gr
More informationReview Quiz. 1. Prove that in a one-dimensional canonical exponential family, the complete and sufficient statistic achieves the
Review Quiz 1. Prove that in a one-dimensional canonical exponential family, the complete and sufficient statistic achieves the Cramér Rao lower bound (CRLB). That is, if where { } and are scalars, then
More informationTime-varying failure rate for system reliability analysis in large-scale railway risk assessment simulation
Time-varying failure rate for system reliability analysis in large-scale railway risk assessment simulation H. Zhang, E. Cutright & T. Giras Center of Rail Safety-Critical Excellence, University of Virginia,
More informationGeneralized Exponential Distribution: Existing Results and Some Recent Developments
Generalized Exponential Distribution: Existing Results and Some Recent Developments Rameshwar D. Gupta 1 Debasis Kundu 2 Abstract Mudholkar and Srivastava [25] introduced three-parameter exponentiated
More informationBayesian Predictions for Exponentially Distributed Failure Times With One Change-Point
c Heldermann Verlag Economic Quality Control ISSN 0940-5151 Vol 18 2003, No. 2, 195 207 Bayesian Predictions for Exponentially Distributed Failure Times With One Change-Point Y. Abdel-Aty, J. Franz, M.A.W.
More informationMATH c UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS Examination for the Module MATH2715 (January 2015) STATISTICAL METHODS. Time allowed: 2 hours
MATH2750 This question paper consists of 8 printed pages, each of which is identified by the reference MATH275. All calculators must carry an approval sticker issued by the School of Mathematics. c UNIVERSITY
More informationA Quasi Gamma Distribution
08; 3(4): 08-7 ISSN: 456-45 Maths 08; 3(4): 08-7 08 Stats & Maths www.mathsjournal.com Received: 05-03-08 Accepted: 06-04-08 Rama Shanker Department of Statistics, College of Science, Eritrea Institute
More informationNoninformative Priors for the Ratio of the Scale Parameters in the Inverted Exponential Distributions
Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods 03, Vol. 0, No. 5, 387 394 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/0.535/csam.03.0.5.387 Noninformative Priors for the Ratio of the Scale Parameters in the Inverted
More informationUNIVERSITÄT POTSDAM Institut für Mathematik
UNIVERSITÄT POTSDAM Institut für Mathematik Testing the Acceleration Function in Life Time Models Hannelore Liero Matthias Liero Mathematische Statistik und Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie Universität Potsdam
More informationComputational Statistics and Data Analysis. Estimation for the three-parameter lognormal distribution based on progressively censored data
Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 53 (9) 358 359 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Computational Statistics and Data Analysis journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/csda stimation for
More informationESTIMATION AND PREDICTION FOR TYPE-II HYBRID CENSORED DATA FOLLOW FLEXIBLE WEIBULL DISTRIBUTION
STATISTICA, anno LXXVII, n. 4, 2017 ESTIMATION AND PREDICTION FOR TYPE-II HYBRID CENSORED DATA FOLLOW FLEXIBLE WEIBULL DISTRIBUTION Vikas Kumar Sharma 1 Department of Mathematics, Institute of Infrastructure
More informationp y (1 p) 1 y, y = 0, 1 p Y (y p) = 0, otherwise.
1. Suppose Y 1, Y 2,..., Y n is an iid sample from a Bernoulli(p) population distribution, where 0 < p < 1 is unknown. The population pmf is p y (1 p) 1 y, y = 0, 1 p Y (y p) = (a) Prove that Y is the
More informationTHE MODIFIED EXPONENTIAL DISTRIBUTION WITH APPLICATIONS. Department of Statistics, Malayer University, Iran
Pak. J. Statist. 2017 Vol. 33(5), 383-398 THE MODIFIED EXPONENTIAL DISTRIBUTION WITH APPLICATIONS Mahdi Rasekhi 1, Morad Alizadeh 2, Emrah Altun 3, G.G. Hamedani 4 Ahmed Z. Afify 5 and Munir Ahmad 6 1
More informationISI Web of Knowledge (Articles )
ISI Web of Knowledge (Articles 1 -- 18) Record 1 of 18 Title: Estimation and prediction from gamma distribution based on record values Author(s): Sultan, KS; Al-Dayian, GR; Mohammad, HH Source: COMPUTATIONAL
More informationA TEST OF FIT FOR THE GENERALIZED PARETO DISTRIBUTION BASED ON TRANSFORMS
A TEST OF FIT FOR THE GENERALIZED PARETO DISTRIBUTION BASED ON TRANSFORMS Dimitrios Konstantinides, Simos G. Meintanis Department of Statistics and Acturial Science, University of the Aegean, Karlovassi,
More informationSTAT 512 sp 2018 Summary Sheet
STAT 5 sp 08 Summary Sheet Karl B. Gregory Spring 08. Transformations of a random variable Let X be a rv with support X and let g be a function mapping X to Y with inverse mapping g (A = {x X : g(x A}
More informationChapter 2: Fundamentals of Statistics Lecture 15: Models and statistics
Chapter 2: Fundamentals of Statistics Lecture 15: Models and statistics Data from one or a series of random experiments are collected. Planning experiments and collecting data (not discussed here). Analysis:
More informationFall 2017 STAT 532 Homework Peter Hoff. 1. Let P be a probability measure on a collection of sets A.
1. Let P be a probability measure on a collection of sets A. (a) For each n N, let H n be a set in A such that H n H n+1. Show that P (H n ) monotonically converges to P ( k=1 H k) as n. (b) For each n
More informationON THE FAILURE RATE ESTIMATION OF THE INVERSE GAUSSIAN DISTRIBUTION
ON THE FAILURE RATE ESTIMATION OF THE INVERSE GAUSSIAN DISTRIBUTION ZHENLINYANGandRONNIET.C.LEE Department of Statistics and Applied Probability, National University of Singapore, 3 Science Drive 2, Singapore
More informationEstimation in an Exponentiated Half Logistic Distribution under Progressively Type-II Censoring
Communications of the Korean Statistical Society 2011, Vol. 18, No. 5, 657 666 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5351/ckss.2011.18.5.657 Estimation in an Exponentiated Half Logistic Distribution under Progressively
More informationTHE WEIBULL GENERALIZED FLEXIBLE WEIBULL EXTENSION DISTRIBUTION
Journal of Data Science 14(2016), 453-478 THE WEIBULL GENERALIZED FLEXIBLE WEIBULL EXTENSION DISTRIBUTION Abdelfattah Mustafa, Beih S. El-Desouky, Shamsan AL-Garash Department of Mathematics, Faculty of
More informationAn Extension of the Freund s Bivariate Distribution to Model Load Sharing Systems
An Extension of the Freund s Bivariate Distribution to Model Load Sharing Systems G Asha Department of Statistics Cochin University of Science and Technology Cochin, Kerala, e-mail:asha@cusat.ac.in Jagathnath
More informationST495: Survival Analysis: Maximum likelihood
ST495: Survival Analysis: Maximum likelihood Eric B. Laber Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University February 11, 2014 Everything is deception: seeking the minimum of illusion, keeping
More informationChapter 2 Inference on Mean Residual Life-Overview
Chapter 2 Inference on Mean Residual Life-Overview Statistical inference based on the remaining lifetimes would be intuitively more appealing than the popular hazard function defined as the risk of immediate
More informationProportional hazards regression
Proportional hazards regression Patrick Breheny October 8 Patrick Breheny Survival Data Analysis (BIOS 7210) 1/28 Introduction The model Solving for the MLE Inference Today we will begin discussing regression
More information