TEST REPORT No. Date : Page:

Transcription

1 1of 10 IONIA TELTOS PIETRE QUARTZ NATURALI STONE CO S.R.L. LTD Via dell Industria Ovest, Rivoli V.se (VR) Italy Xiaozhou Country, Jinli Town Zhaoqin City, Guangdong Province, China. The following sample(s) was/ were submitted and identified on behalf of the client as: Sample name QUARTZ STONE Test required Date of receipt Test period EN 15285:2008 Agglomerated stone - Modular tiles for flooring and stairs (internai) Nov.20,2014 Nov.20,2014 to Test result(s) For further details, please referto the following page(s) ******** To be continued******** Signed for and on behalf of SGS-CSTC Co., Ltd. Civi Huang Xiamen Materials Lab Technical Supervisor

2 2of 10 Generai information: The following tests have been requested,also according to EN 15285:2008 Agglomerated stone - Modular tiles for flooring and stairs (internai) CE harmonized standards for modular tiles for internai floo ring and stairs: - Apparent density and water absorption,according to EN : Flexural strength, according to EN : Slip resistance, according to EN 14231: Abrasion resistance, according to EN : lmpact resistance, according to EN : Chemical resistance, according to EN : Linear thermal expansio n coefficient,according to EN : Dimensionai stability, according to EN : Dimensions, geometrie character istics and surface quality,according to EN :2005 lntend use: Internaifloo ring and stairs Summary of testing: After testing, the tested items of the sample comply with the specified requirement of standard EN 15285:2008 and client's declaration of conformity. ********To be continued ********

3 3of 10 Summary of test results: (Average of results) Test items Test methods Test results Page Apparent density EN : kg/m 3 4 Water absorption EN :2005 Flexural strength EN :2008 Slip resistance (polished) EN 14231:2003 Abrasion resistance EN : % Classification: W4 62.2MPa Classif ication: F4 SRV "dry": 50 SRV "wet": mm Classification: A lmpact resistance EN : J 7 Chemical resistance EN :2005 Classification: C4 8 Linear thermal expansion coeff icient EN : x 10" 6 / 'C 9 Dimensionai stability EN :2005 Classification: A 9 Dimensions, geomet rie characteristics and surface quality EN :2005 ******** To be contmued******** Dimensions tolerance: Pass Surface quality: No defect 10

4 4of Apparent density and water absorption EN :2005 Agglomerated stone - Test methods - Part 1: Determination of apparent density and water absorptio n Specimens: 50mmx50mm x20mm,6pcs, one tace polished Specimens identification Water absorption (%) Arithmetic mean of the water absorption (%} 0.04 Apparent density (kg/m 3 ) Arithmetic mean of the apparent density (kg/m 3 ) 2320 Classif ication:w 4 note Note:Wt>2.0%, 2.0%2:W2>0.5%, 0.5%2:W3>0.05%, W4:::0.05% ******** To be continued********

5 5of Flexural Strength EN :2008 Agglomerated stone - Test methods - Part 2: Determination of flexuralstrength (bending) Specimens: 200mm x 50mm x 12mm, 6pcs,one tace polished Loading rate: (0.25±0.05)MPa/s Specimens identification Flexural strength (MPa) Mean value (MPa) 62.2 Standard deviation (MPa) 1.9 Lower expected value (MPa) 57.9 Classification: F 4 note Note: Ft <12.0MPa, 12.0MPa:::F2<25.0MPa, 25.0MPa:::F3<40.0MPa, F4 40.0MPa ******** To be continued ********

6 6of Slip resistance EN :2003 Natural stone test methods - Determination ot the slip resistance by means ot the pendulum tester Specimens: 200mmx150mm x 12mm, 6pcs,one tace polished Testing surface : polished Specimens identitication Mean pendulum value (Dry condition) Slip resistance value (SRV "dry") Mean pendulum value (Wet condition) Slip resistance value (SRV "wet") Abrasion resistance EN :2005 Agglomerated stone - Test methods - Part 4: Determination ot abrasion resistance Specimens: 150mmx 100mmx 12mm, 6pcs,one tace polished Testing surface : polished Specimens identitication The length ot the groove (mm) Mean value (mm) 17.4 Classitication:A 4 note Note:At >36.5mm,36.5mm A2>33.0mm, 33.0mm>29.0mm, A.p29.0mm. ******** To be continued ********

7 7of lmpact resistance EN :2005 Agglomerated stone- Test methods- Part 9: Determination of impact resistance Specimens: 200mmx200mmx19mm, 4pcs,polished tace Specimens identification Drop height,h (m) Fracture work, L (J) Average value (J) 8.40 Note: The fracture work L in j oule is expressed by the formula L=Mxhxg W here Mis the sphere mass,1.050kg, h is the drop height in meters of the sphere which causes the sample to break, g is the gravity acceleration equal to 9.806m/s 2 ******** To be continued****** **

8 8of Chemical resistance EN :2005 Agglomerated stone- Test methods - Part 10: Determination of chemical resistance Specimens: 100mmx 1OOmm, 4pcs,polished surface Water solutions preparation: 1) Hydrochloric acid solution,50% (V/V), prepared from N hydrochloric acid solution 2} Sodium hydroxide solution, 50% (V/V), prepared from normal wate r sodium hydroxide not carbonated solution Type of glossmeter used and the kind and intensity of the light source: Sheen 260,CIE 065 Reflection direction of the light: 60 o Test Result Chemical resistance Sample NO. Reference value Classif icatian Hydrochloric acid solution (HCI) 1 (1h) 100.5% 2 (8h) 94.2% 3 (1h) 96.1% Sodium hydroxide solution (NaOH) 4 (8h) 94.0% Note: C1:Agglomerate<! stones which keep below 60 % of the reference reflection values (see EN O) after 8 h of alkali or acid attack. C2: Agglomerate<! stones which keep between 60% and 80% of the reference reflection value (see EN } after 8 h of alkali attack and 1 h of acid attack. C3: Agglomerate<! stones which keep between 60% and 80% of the reference reflection value (see EN } after 8 h of acid attack and 1 h of alkaliattack. C4:Agglomerate<! stones which keep at least 80% of the reference reflection value (see EN O) after 8 h of acid or alkali attack (or in one case,see EN , is between 60 % and 80 %). ********To be continued** ****** c Note 4

9 9of Linear thermal expansion coetticient EN :2005 Agglomerated stone- Test methods- Part 11: Determination ot linear thermal expansion coeff icient Specimens: 50mmx 10mmx 10mm,3pcs Temperature: tram 30'C to 60'C. Specimens identitication Linear thermal expansion coetticient (10-6/ 'C) Mean value(10-6/ 'C) Dimensionai stability EN :2005 Agglomerated stone- Test methods- Part 12: Determination ot dimensionai stability Specimens: 300mmx300mmx12mm, 1pcs,one tace polished Verticaldisplacement after the testing ot 12 days: 0.1mm Classitication: A Annex: Class A B c ********To be contmued******** Vertical displacement after test s0.3mm >0.3mm,s0.6mm >0.6mm

10 Date XMML Dec.12, of Dimensions,geometrie characteristics and surface quality EN :2005 Agglomerated stone - Test methods - Part 16: Determination of dimensions, geometrie characteristics and surface quality of modular tiles Specimens: 200mmx200mm x 12mm, 10pcs, one tace polished Work size:200mm x 200mmx12mm Test items Requirements Test results 200± 0.5 mm Average : mm Length and width Thick ness Deviation,as a percentage, of the average size of each tile from work size Deviation,as a percentage, of the average size of each tile from the average size of the 1O test specimens 12±0.7mm The deviation,as a percentage, of the average thickness of each tile from the work size thickness +0.10%-+0.35% -0.15% % Average: 12.0mm %-+1.67% Straightness Maximum deviation from straightness:± 0.3 mm O.Omm-+0.1 mm rectang ularity Maximum deviation f rom rectangularity: ± 0.9 mm -0.1mm-+0.2mm Centre curvature Flatness Edge curvature Warping Surface quality Maximum centre curvature,as a percentage : ± 2% referred to length Maximum edge curvature,as a percentage: ± 2 % referred to length Maximum warping,as a percentage: ± 2% referred to length Any visual variations are permissible provided that they are characteristic of the relevant type of agglomerated stone and provided that they do not adverselv affect the performance of the tiles %--0.05% +0.05%-+0.10% -0.25% % No defects