1 Introduction Category Theory Topological Preliminaries Function Spaces Algebraic Preliminaries...

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "1 Introduction Category Theory Topological Preliminaries Function Spaces Algebraic Preliminaries..."

Transcription

1 Contents 1 Introduction Category Theory Topological Preliminaries Function Spaces Algebraic Preliminaries Homotopy Basic Results H-groups and H-cogroups The Fundamental Group Free Groups and Free Products The Fundamental Groupoid Covering Spaces The Van Kampen Theorem Homology Basic Results Jordan Curve Theorem Degrees of Maps Finite CW Complexes Examples Topological Properties i

2 ii CONTENTS 5.3 Euler Characteristics Homology of CW complexes Examples Orientation in Balls and Spheres Homology of Products Defining Homology Chain Complexes Cubical Singular Homology Excision Products and Cohomology Tensor Products Cohomology Cup Product Exterior Cohomology Product Cap Product Manifolds 91

3 0 CONTENTS

4 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 Category Theory Definition 1.1 A category, C consists of a class Ob, of objects and another class Mor of Morphisms. We assume two functions, dom, cod : Mor C with the following properties: a) If X, Y C, then hom(x, Y ) = {f Mor : dom f = X, cod f = Y } is a set. b) If f, g Mor with cod f = dom g, then there is an g f Mor such that dom g f = dom f and cod g f = cod g. c) If f, g, h Mor with cod f = dom g and cod g = dom h, then h (g f) = (h g) f. d) For each object X, there is a morphism 1 X hom(x, X) with 1 X f = f whenever cod f = X and f 1 X = f whenever dom f = X. If f hom(x, Y ) we write f : X Y. There are many examples of categories. (1) Let Set denote the category whose objects are sets and where the morphisms with domain X and codomain Y are simply the functions from X to Y. Use ordinary composition of functions for composition. 1

5 2 CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION (2) Let Top denote the category whose objects are topological spaces and where the morphisms with domain X and codomain Y are the continuous functions f : X Y. Composition is the usual composition of functions. (3) Let Grp denote the category whose objects are groups and where the morphisms with domain X and codomain Y are the homomorphisms f : X Y. Comosition is the usual composition of functions. (4) Let Ab denote the category whose objects are abelian groups and whose morphisms are homomorphisms. (5) Let R be a ring. Let RMod denote the category whose objects are R- Modules and whose morphsims are module homomorphisms with ordinary function composition. (6) Let Top 2 denote the category of pairs (X, A) where X is a topological space and A X. A morphism f : (X, A) (Y, B) is defined to be a continuous map from X to Y with f[a] B. (7) Let ptop Denote the category whose objects are ordered pairs (X, x 0 ) where X is a topological space and x 0 X. A morphism f : (X, x 0 ) (Y, y 0 ) is a continuous function from X to Y with f(x 0 ) = y 0. (8) Let (X, ) be an ordered set. Define a category whose objects are the points of X and where hom(x, y) = {(x, y)}, the ordered pair, exactly when x y. If x y and y z, we define (x, y) (y, z) = (x, z). Then 1 x = (x, x). (9) For any category C, there is an opposite category C op that has the same objects, but where hom C op(x, Y ) = hom C (Y, X) and g C op f = f C g. (10) If M is any monoid (associate operation with identity), we may define C = {x} to be any singleton, Mor = M and f g = fg the operation in M. Suppose that f : X Y in a category C. We say that f is a section, (resp, a retract, resp. an isomorphism) if there is a g : Y X such that g f = 1 X,

6 1.1. CATEGORY THEORY 3 (resp. f g = 1 Y, resp. f g = 1 Y and g f = 1 X ). In other words, f is an isomorphism if and only if f is invertible. In this case, we say that X and Y are isomorphic objects. Notice that f is an isomorphism if and only if it is both a section and a retract. Proposition 1.2 Isomorphism is an equivalence relation on Ob. In the category of sets, sections are the one-to-one functions and retracts are the onto functions. In the category of topological spaces, isomorphism is the same as homeomorphism. Now, if C and D are categories, a (covariant) functor, F : C D consists of a map from the objects of C to the objects of D, where we write F (X) for the object in D corresponding to the object X in C, and a map between morphisms, so that if f : X Y in C, we have F (f) : F (X) F (Y ) in D such that F (1 X ) = 1 F (X) for every object X in C and that F (g f) = F (g) F (f) whenever g f is defined in C. A contravariant functor is similar, but we require that when f : X Y in C, that F (f) : F (Y ) F (X) in D and that F (g f) = F (f) F (g). Notice that the direction of the arrows is reversed for contravariant functors. For example, (1) If C is any of Top, Grp, Ab, we can define the forgetful functor from C to Set by letting F (X) denote the underlying set for X and F (f) be the function. In other words, the forgetful functors forget the topological, group, or other structures. Similarly, there are forgetful functors from R Mod to Ab and from Top 2 to Top that forget the ring multiplication and the second component, resp. (2) Let A be an element of any category C. Define a functor from C to Set by defining F (X) = hom(a, X) and, for f : X Y, defining F (f)(g) = g f. Similarly, we can define a contravariant functor G by letting G(X) = hom(x, A) and G(f)(g) = f g.

7 4 CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION (3) In the case where C = RMod, the collection hom(x, Y ) is an abelian group and the functors in the last example can be considered to go into Ab. (4) The identity functor is contravariant from C to C op. Proposition 1.3 Suppose F : C D is a functor. If A, B are isomorphic objects in C, then F (A), F (B) are isomorphic objects in D. More specifically, a covariant functor takes retracts to retracts and sections to sections while a contravariant functor takes retracts to sections and sections to retracts. The primary technique of algebraic topology is to find functors from topological categories into algebraic categories. In this way, questions about the existence of continuous functions turn into questions about the existence of homomorphisms, which are usually easier questions to answer. Definition 1.4 Let X and Y be objects in the category C. A product consists of an object, denoted by X Y and morphisms π X : X Y X and π Y : X Y Y such that whenever Z is an object with morphisms f X : Z X and f Y : Z Y, then there is a unique f : Z X Y such that f X = π X f and f Y = π Y f. Products in the categories Set, Top, Grp all consist of the usual products with the usual projection maps π X and π Y. Definition 1.5 Let X and Y be objects in the category C. A coproduct consists of an object, denoted by X Y and morphisms i X : X X Y and i Y : Y X Y such that whenever Z is an object with morphisms f X : X Z and f Y : Y Z, then there is a unique f : X Y Z such that f X = f i X and f Y = f i Y. Now suppose that C and D are categories and that F, G : C D are two functors. A natural transformation η from F to G consists of an assigment of some η X hom(f (X), G(X)) for each object X of C such that whenever f : X Y is a morphism in C, we have η Y F (f) = G(f) η X. If η X is an isomorphism for every X, we say that η is a natural equivalence.

8 1.2. TOPOLOGICAL PRELIMINARIES Topological Preliminaries We let I = [0, 1], and R denote the closed unit interval and the real line with the usual topology. Also define R n to be the Euclidean space with norm (x 1,, x n ) 2 = x x n 2 and distance d(x, y) = x y. Also, define the unit sphere S n = {x R n+1 : x = 1} and the unit ball B n+1 = {x R n+1 : x 1}. Note that S 0 = { 1, +1} R and B 1 = [ 1, 1] R. We will also and without comment consider R n R n+1 via the identification of x with (x, 0). In this way, for example, S n S n+1. Then each B n is compact and S n is compact and is connected if n 1. Two results we will use frequently are the following: Proposition 1.6 Suppose that X is a topological space and A 1,, A n are closed subspaces of X. Suppose that Y is a topological space and that f : X Y is a function such that f Ai is continuous on A i for each 1 i n. Then f is continuous. Proposition 1.7 Suppose that X is a compact space, Y is a Hausdorff space, and f : X Y is one-to-one and continuous. Then f is a homeomorphism. Suppose that X and Y are topological spaces. We define the product X Y and the disjoint union X Y by setting X Y = {(x, y) : x X, y Y } and X Y = (X {1}) (Y {2}). A basis for the product topology of X Y is given by the set B = {U V : U open in X, V open in Y} and the topology on X Y is given by all sets of the form (U {1}) (V {2}) where U is open in X and V is open in Y. There are continuous functions p X : X Y X, p Y : X Y Y, i X : X X Y, and i Y : Y X Y such that Proposition 1.8 Suppose that Z is a topological space and f : Z X, g : Z Y are continuous functions. Then there is a unique continuous function f g : Z X Y such that p X (f g) = f and p Y (f g) = g. In fact, (f g)(z) = (f(z), g(z)) for z Z. Proposition 1.9 Suppose that Z is a topological space and f : X Z and g : Y Z are continuous functions. Then there is a unique continuous function

9 6 CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION f g : X Y Z such that (f g) i X = f and (f g) i Y (f g)(x, 1) = f(x) and (f g)(y, 2) = g(y). = g. In fact, In other words, X Y and X Y are the product and co-product of X and Y in the category of topological spaces. We typically identify X with the subspace X {1} and Y with Y {2} in X Y without further comment. An important operation with topological spaces that we will need frequently is that of forming quotient spaces. Let X be a topological space and an equivalence relation on X. Let X/ denote the set of equivalence classes and let q : X X/ be the quotient map q(x) = [x]. We define U X/ to be open exactly when q 1 [U] is open in X. This defines a topology on X/ making q a continuous function. Furthermore, we have the following: Proposition 1.10 Let X be a topological space and an equivalence relation on X. Suppose that f : X Y is continuous such that x 1 x 2 implies that f(x 1 ) = f(x 2 ). Then, there is a unique ˆf : X/ Y which is continuous and satisfies f = ˆf q, where q : X X/ is the quotient map. An example of a quotient space is given by the projective spaces. For this, for x, y S n, define x y if and only if x = y or x = y. Let RP n = S n / for this equivalence relation. Notice that this space can also be obtained as B n by identifying opposite points on the boundary. A very important example is provided by the situation where A X and the equivalence classes of consist precisely of the set A and the singletons outside of A. In other words, we define x y if and only if x = y or x, y A. In this case, we write the quotient space as X/A and say that X/A is obtained by collapsing A to a point. We can simiarly define the operation of collapsing disjoint sets A 1,, A n to separate points. In this case, x y if and only if x = y or there is an 1 i n such that x, y A i. We denote this by X/{A 1,, A n }. As an example, S 1 is homeomorphic to I/{0, 1}. In general, S n is homeomorphic to B n /S n 1. For X a topological space, define the cone of X by CX = (X I)/(X {1}).

10 1.2. TOPOLOGICAL PRELIMINARIES 7 We notice that the map i(x) = [(x, 0)] is an embedding of X into CX. We typically identify the image of i with X. Similarly, we define the suspension SX by collapsing X {0} to one point and X {1} to another point in X I. So SX = X I/{X {0}, X {1}}. Because of this, SX = CX/X. For convenience, we will sometimes construct SX from X [ 1, 1] by identifying X { 1} to one point and X {1} to another. This will allow us to identify X with X {0}. For both CX and SX, we denote the equivalence class of (x, t) by [x, t]. Next, suppose that X and Y are topological spaces and suppose that A X and f : A Y is a continuous map. Define X f Y = (X Y )/ where we require a f(a) for a A and all other points are in their own equivalence classes. The main result, which is surprisingly tricky to prove is Theorem 1.11 Suppose that X and Y are T 4 spaces and A X is closed. Then, for f : A Y continuous, X f Y is T 4. Proof: For clarity, let i X : X X Y and i Y : Y X Y be the embeddings and let q : X Y X f Y be the quotient. Suppose that C and D are disjoint closed subsets of X f Y. Then, (q i Y ) 1 [C] and (q i Y ) 1 [D] are disjoint closed subsets of Y. By the T 4 property, there is a continuous g Y : Y I such that g Y (y) = 0 if y (q i Y ) 1 [C] and g Y (y) = 1 if y (q i Y ) 1 [D]. Now, let F = A (q i X ) 1 [C] (q i X ) 1 [D], so F is a closed subset of X. For x F, define g F (x) = g Y f(x) if x A, g F (x) = 0 if x (q i X ) 1 [C] and g F (x) = 1 if x (q i X ) 1 [D]. We need to show this definition is consistent. So, for example, suppose that x A (q i X ) 1 [C]. Then, q i X (x) = q i Y f(x) by nature of the equivalence relation defining q, so f(x) (q i Y ) 1 [C]. Hence it follows that g Y f(x) = 1 as required for consistency for the definition of g F. A similar treatment works for x A (q i X ) 1 [D]. Next, use Tietze s extension theorem to find g X : X I with g X (x) = g F (x) for x F. This gives maps g X and g Y which are continuous, so by the basic property of X Y, there is a function g : X Y I such that g i X = g X and g i Y = g Y.

11 8 CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION But now, if a A, we have g i X (a) = g X (a) = g F (a) = g Y f(a) = g i Y f(a), so we can factor g through q to find ĝ : X f Y I such that g = q ĝ. But now, since g X = 0 on (q i X ) 1 [C] and similarly for Y and for D, we see that ĝ = 0 on C and ĝ = 1 on D. Since points of X f Y are closed (why?), this shows that X Y is a T 4 space. As an example, let X be T 4, A X closed. If we let Y = {y 0 } and f(a) = y 0, then X f Y is the same as X/A. Hence, X/A is T 4. In the particular case where X = B n, A = S n 1 and f : S n 1 Y we say that X f Y is obtained from Y by attaching a n-cell via the boundary map f. This will be a very useful way to build up spaces in the future. More generally, suppose that f : X Y is a continous function. Then, recalling X CX, we can form the mapping cone of f as CX f Y and the mapping cylinder M f = (X I) f Y where we regard f as a map of X {0} to Y. Notice that X {1} is homeomorphic to X in M f. Proposition 1.12 Let i : A X be the inclusion map of A X. Then X/A is homeomorphic to CA i X/CA. Proof: Let q : CA i X CA i X/CA and p : X X/A be the quotient maps, the collapse points, and j : X CA i X the inclusion map. Then q j[a] =, so there is a k : X/A CA i X/CA with q j = k p. Also, we may define a map φ : CA X X/A by sending everything in CA to and X to X/A via p. This factors through CA i X and then through q to give g : CA i X/CA X/A which is an inverse to k. In the category of pointed topological spaces, the situation is a bit different. Instead of X Y, the coproduct of (X, x 0 ) and (Y, y 0 ) is obtained from the subspace X Y = (X {y 0 }) ({x 0 } Y ) of X Y. This can also be obtained by taking X Y and identifying x 0 with y 0. The maps i X : (X, x 0 ) (X Y, (x 0, y 0 )) and i Y : (Y, y 0 ) (X Y, (x 0, y 0 )) then have the required properties.

12 1.3. FUNCTION SPACES 9 Similarly, the product of (X, x 0 ) and (Y, y 0 ) is (X Y, (x 0, y 0 )) with usual projections. When disussing pointed spaces, we usually use p = (1, 0,, 0) and consider spaces (B n, p), (S n, p), etc. We default to (R n, 0). In this way, spaces such as S n S k are obtained. Another construction for pointed spaces is a bit more complicated. The smash product is defined as (X, x 0 ) (Y, y 0 ) = (X Y )/(X Y ) with the collapse point as the distinguished point. If q : X Y X Y is the quotient map, we write q(x, y) = [x, y] for convenience. Proposition 1.13 If X, Y, and Z are compact, then (X Y ) Z X (Y Z). Proof: In fact, both are homeomorphic to (X Y Z)/A where A = (X Y {z 0 }) (X {y 0 } Z) ({x 0 } Y Z). Proposition 1.14 We have (S 1 S n, ) is homeomorphic to (S n+1, p). Proof: For this, we identify S 1 as [ 1, 1]/{ 1, 1}. Define F : S n [ 1, 1] S n+1 by F (x, t) = p + ((1 t)x + tp) for t 0 and F (x, t) = p ((1 + t)x tp) for t 0. Here, p + (x) = (x, + 1 x 2 ) for x B n+1. Similarly for p. A consequence of this is that S n S m S n+m via induction. We also extend the suspension and cone constructions to pointed spaces by letting, for (X, x 0 ), C(X, x 0 ) = (X I)/(X {1}) ({x 0 } I) and S(X, x 0 ) = (X I)/(X {0}) (X {1}) ({x 0 } I). In both cases, we let the collase point be the special point. It should be notes that (SX, ) is then the same as (S 1 X, ). 1.3 Function Spaces Suppose that X and Y are topological spaces. We set Y X to be the set of all continuous f : X Y. We want to give the set Y X a topology reflecting the topologies of X and Y. While this can be done in a great deal of generality, we will content ourselves to the case where X is a compact space and Y is a

13 10 CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION metric space. If d is the metric on Y, we can give Y X the uniform metric by setting d u (f, g) = sup{d(f(x), g(x)) : x X}. Since X is compact and f, g are continuous, this supremum is finite and d u defines a metric, hence a topology, on Y X. In the more general situation, the so-called compact-open topology is used. This is equal to the uniform topology in our case. We then have the following. Proposition 1.15 The evaluation map e : Y X X Y defined by e(f, x) = f(x) is continuous. Proof: Let (f, x) Y X X and ε > 0. Choose open U X such that y U implies that d(f(x), f(y)) < ε/2. Then, if y U and d u (f, g) < ε/2 implies d(f(x), g(y)) d(f(x), f(y)) + d(f(y), g(y)) < ε/2 + d u (f, g) < ε. Proposition 1.16 If X and Y are compact and Z is metric, then (Z X ) Y is homeomorphic to Z X Y via a homeomorphsim defined by T (f)(x, y) = f(y)(x). Proof: We first have to show that the image of T is conained in Z X Y. So, suppose that f (Z X ) Y and let (x 0, y 0 ) X Y and ε > 0. Choose δ > 0 so that d(y, y 0 ) < δ implies that d u (f(y), f(y 0 )) < ε/2. Since f(y 0 ) is continuous, there is a η > 0 so that d(x, x 0 ) < η implies that d(f(y 0 )(x), f(y 0 )(x 0 )) < ε/2. Then d(y, y 0 ) < δ and d(x, x 0 ) < η implies that d(t (f)(x, y), T (f)(x 0, y 0 )) < ε. Next, we show that T is onto. So, suppose that g Z X Y. If we fix y Y, the map x g(x, y) is continous. So, letting f(y)(x) = g(x, y) defines a function f : Y Z X. We need to show this function is continuous. So let ε > 0 and y 0 Y. For each x X, g is continuous at (x, y 0 ), so there are open sets U x and V x in X and Y resp. such that (x, y) U V implies that d(g(x, y), g(x, y 0 )) < ε. But now, X is compact and is covered by the sets U x, so there are finitely many x 1,, x n so that U 1,, U n covers X. Let V = n k=1 V n. Then V is open, y 0 V and if x X, y V, we have that d(g(x, y), g(x, y 0 )) < ε. In other words, d(f(y), f(y 0 )) < ε. Now we have that f (Z X ) Y and clearly T (f) = g. Finally, we show that T is a homeomorphism. Actually, we have even more: T is an isometry. In fact, for f 1, f 2 (Z X ) Y, we have d(f 1, f 2 ) =

14 1.4. ALGEBRAIC PRELIMINARIES 11 sup{d(f 1 (y), f 2 (y)) : y Y } = sup{d(f 1 (y)(x), f 2 (y)(x) : y Y, x X} But this is equal to sup{d(t (f 1 )(x, y), T (f 2 )(x, y) : x X, y Y } = d(t (f 1 ), T (f 2 )). Proposition 1.17 We have that Z X Y is homeomorphic to Z X Z Y via the map where T (f) = (f i X, f i Y ). Proof: Clearly, the image of T is contained in Z X Z Y. By the coproduct property of X Y, T is onto. We identify (Y, y 0 ) (X,x0) with the subspace of Y X of functions with f(x 0 ) = y 0. What we find is that, instead of the product (X Y, (x 0, y 0 )) in the above results, we need the pair (X Y, X Y ). Since this is not a pointed space, we define the smash product X Y = (X Y )/(X Y ). Then (X Y, ) is the appropriate exponent in the pointed versions of the above results. 1.4 Algebraic Preliminaries All rings in this course will be abelian. In fact, the most common will be Z, and Z 2, although Q will occasionally appear. Central to this course is the notion of an R module and of a homomorphism between such modules. In particular, an R module is an abelian group M with a multiplication R M M satisfying 1 m = m, r(m + n) = rm + rn, and r(sm) = (rs)m. A module homomorphism is a homomorphism of abelian groups f : M N such that f(rm) = rf(m) for r R. In this case, ker f = {m M : f(m) = 0} is a submodule of M and im f = {f(m) : m M} is a submodule of N. We always have that im f is isomorphic to M/ ker f as R-modules. We say that a sequence of R modules and homomorphisms M f N g P is exact if im f = ker g. Extending this, a sequence M n f n Mn+1 is said to be exact if im f n = ker f n+1 for each n. Hence, 0 M f N 0 is exact if and only if f is an isomorphism. Similarly, 0 N M i P p 0 is exact if and only if i is one-to-one, p is onto, and im i = ker p. In this case, we have that P is isomorphic to N/f[M]. We say that thi sis a short exact sequence.

15 12 CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION If M and N are modules, we let M N = {(m, n) : m M, n N} with coordinatewise operations. There are inclusion maps i M : M M N, i M (m) = (m, 0), projection maps p M : M N M, p(m, n) = m and similar maps i N such that p N such that p M i M = 1 M, p N i N = 1 N, p N i M = 0 = p M i N, i M p M + i N p M = 1 M N. In this way, M N is both a product and a co-product in the category of R modules and homomorphisms. Proposition 1.18 Suppose that N and P are submodules of an R module M. Then M is isomorphic to N P via the map (n, p) n + p if and only if M = N + P and M P = 0. In this case, we say that M is the internal direct product of N and P. We can create a category of short exact sequences of R modules where the objects are short exact sequences 0 N M i P p 0 and a morphism from one short exact sequence 0 N 1 i 1 M1 p 1 P1 0 to another 0 N 2 i 2 M2 p 2 P2 0 is a triple of homomorphisms φ 1 : N 1 N 2, φ 2 : M 1 M 2 and φ 3 : P 1 P 2 such that i 2 φ 1 = φ 2 i 1 and p 2 φ 2 = φ 3 p 1 as in the following diagram. i 0 N 1 p 1 1 M1 P1 0 φ 1 φ 2 φ 3 i 0 N 2 p 2 2 M2 P2 0 Composition of morphisms is defined by composition at each stage. Similarly, we can define a category of long exact sequences. An important result is the following: Theorem 1.19 Suppose that 0 N M i P p 0 is a short exact sequence of R modules. Then the following are equivalent: a) 0 N i M p P 0 is equivalent to 0 N i N N P p P P 0 with identity maps for N and P. b) There is a map k : M N such that k i = 1 N, c) There is a map j : P M such that j p = 1 P.

16 1.4. ALGEBRAIC PRELIMINARIES 13 If any of these happen, we say the exact sequence splits. Notice that every abelian group can be given the structure of a Z module by setting nx = x + x + x (n times) for n > 0 and nx = ( n)( x) for n < 0. Also notice that the above definitions of exactness are good for groups that are not necessarily abelian. A very important result is the following: Theorem 1.20 (The 5 Lemma) Suppose we have a commutative diagram M 1 M 2 M 3 M 4 M 5 f 1 f 2 f 3 f 4 φ 1 φ 2 φ 3 φ 4 φ 5 N 1 N 2 N 3 N 4 N 5 g1 g2 g3 g4 with exact rows. Suppose that φ 1, φ 2, φ 4 and φ 5 are isomorphisms. Then φ 4 is an isomorphism also. The proof of this result is a perfect example of what is known as diagram chasing. We will chase many diagrams in this course. Exercises: 1. Show that a morphism f in a category is an isomorphism if and only if it is both a section and a retract. In particular, show that if f has a left inverse and a right inverse, they are equal and f is invertible. 2. Let C be a category and A 0 an object in C. Define F : C Set by setting F (A) = hom(a 0, A) and for f : A B a morphism in C, let F (f)(g) = f g where g hom(a 0, A) = F (A). covariant functor from C to Set. Show that F is a 3. Let C be a category and A 0 an object in C. Define F : C Set by setting F (A) = hom(a, A 0 ) and for f : A B a morphism in C, let F (f)(g) = g f where g hom(b, A 0 ) = F (B). contravariant functor from C to Set. Show that F is a 4. Let f : G H be a morphism in the category of groups and homomorphisms. Show that f is a section if and only if f is one-to-one and there exists a normal subgroup N of H such that H = f[g] N and f[g] N = e.

17 14 CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 5. Suppose that f : X Y and g : Y Z are quotient maps. Show that g f : X Z is a quotient map. 6. Show that CX/X is homeomorphic to SX. 7. Show that CS n is homeomorphic to B n Show that B n+1 /S n is homeomorphic to S n Show that S(S n ) is homeomorphic to S n Show that SX and CX are connected for any space X. 11. Let S n = {(x 1,, x n+1 ) S n : x 1 0}. Show that S n /S n is homeomorphic to S n. 12. What are products and co-products in the category of topological pairs, Top 2? f g 13. Suppose that R is a field and 0 V 1 V 2 V 3 0 is an exact sequnece of finite dimensional vector spaces over R. Show that dim V 1 dim V 2 + dim V 3 = 0. f 1 f Suppose that R is a field and suppose that 0 V 1 V2 Vn 0 is an exact sequence of finite dimensional vector spaces over R. Show that n+1 i=1 ( 1)i dim V i = Suppose that N 1 f 1 M1 g 1 P1 and N 2 f 2 M2 g 2 P2 are exact. Show that f 1 f 2 g 1 g 2 N 1 N 2 M1 M 2 P1 P 2 is exact. 16. Show that X/{A, B} is homeomorphic to (X/A)/B. 17. Show that S n /S n 1 is homeomorphic to S n S n. 18. Show that S n /S 0 is homeomorphic to (S n 1 S 1 )/(S n 1 p). 19. Regard SX as a quotient of X [ 1, 1] and identify X with X 0. Show that SX/X is homeomorphic to SX SX.

18 Chapter 2 Homotopy Definition 2.1 Suppose that f, g : X Y are two continuous maps between topological spaces. We say that f and g are homotopic if there is a continous H : X I Y such that H(x, 0) = f(x) and H(x, 1) = g(x) for all x X. We write f g and say that H is a homotopy from f to g. If A X and f(a) = g(a) for all a A, we say that f and g are homotopic relative to A if there is a homotopy H from f to g such that H(a, t) = a for all a A and t I. In this case, we write f g(rel A). So homotopic maps are homotopic relative to the empty set. Similarly, if f, g : (X, A) (Y, B) are maps of pairs, we say f and g are homotopic if there is a H : (X I, A I) (Y, B) with H(x, 0) = f(x) and H(x, 1) = g(x) for all x X. Theorem 2.2 Homotopoy of maps is an equivalence relation on the space Y X. We denote the set of equivalence classes of such maps by [X : Y ]. In the case of pairs and pointed spaces, we use the notation [X, A : Y, B] instead of [(X, A) : (Y, B)]. Theorem 2.3 Suppose that f 1, f 2 : X Y are homotopic as are g 1, g 2 : Y Z. Then g 1 f 1 g 2 f 2. This allows us to defne a new category Hop whose objects are topological spaces and whose morphisms are equivalence classes of maps under homotopoy. 15

19 16 CHAPTER 2. HOMOTOPY In other words hom(x, Y ) = [X : Y ]. There is functor Top Hop that is the identity on objects and takes every continuous function to its homotopy equivalence class. Most functors of interest in algebraic topology factor through this forgetful functor. We also get a category of pairs in a similar way which we denote by Hop Basic Results Definition 2.4 We say that a subset A R n is convex if x, y A and t I implies that (1 t)x + ty A. Proposition 2.5 If Y R n is a convex set and f, g : X Y are two continuous functions, then f g. Furthermore, if f = g on A X, then f g (rel A). Lemma 2.6 Suppose that q : X Y is a quotient map and Z is locally compact. Then q 1 : X Z Y Z is a quotient map. Proof: Suppose that U Y Z is such that (p 1) 1 [U] is open in X Z. We need to show that U is open in Y Z. So, let (y 0, z 0 ) U and choose x 0 X with p(x 0 ) = y 0. Then (x 0, z 0 ) (p 1) 1 [U]. Hence, there are open sets V X and W Z such that (x 0, z 0 ) V W (p 1) 1 [U]. Since Z is locally compact, we may even obtain that V W (p 1) 1 [U] and W compact. Now, let V = {x X : {x} W (p 1) 1 [U]}. We claim that V is open. In fact, if x V, there is an open set J containing x such that J W (p 1) 1 [U] by compactness of W. Then, J V. But now, p(v ) satisfies p 1 p[v ] = V, so p[v ] is open in Y. Finally, (y 0, z 0 ) p[v ] W U. Hence, U is open, as required. Theorem 2.7 Suppose that f, g : (X, A) (Y, B) are homotopic as maps of pairs. Then the induced maps ˆf, ĝ : X/A Y/B are homotopic as maps of pointed spaces.

20 2.1. BASIC RESULTS 17 Proof: In fact, let H : (X I, A I) (Y, B) be a hommotopy from f to g. Compose H with the quotient map q : (Y, B) (Y/B, ). The resulting map factors through q 1, which is a quotient map by the lemma, so the induced map (X/A) I Y/B is continuous and is clearly a homotopy from ˆf to ĝ. Definition 2.8 We say that two spaces X and Y are homotopy equivalent if there is an isomorphism f : X Y in the category Hop. In other words, there exists g : Y X such that f g 1 Y and g f 1 X. We write X Y. Clearly, homeomorphic spaces are homotopy equivalent. The converse fails, though. For example, the space B n is homotopy equivalent to a single point. This follows since B n is convex, so the identity function and any constant function are homotopic. For another example, let X = R n \ {0} and Y = S n 1. Define f(x) = and g(x) = x. clearly, f g = 1 Y. But, H(x, t) = tx + (1 t) x x provide a homotopy from g f to 1 X. Here, the crucial point is that the image of H really is in X. Notice that B n \ 0 is homotopy equivalent to S n 1 in the same way. It is often not easy to determine whether two spaces are homotopy equivalent. x x Definition 2.9 We say that a topological space X is contractible if there is a x 0 X such that the inclusion map i : {x 0 } X is a homotopy equivalence. For a pair (X, x 0 ), we require that the inclusion ({x 0 }, x 0 ) into (X, x 0 ) be a homotopy equivalence. In each case, the only possible inverse map is the constant map c : X {x 0 }. But some care is required. In the case of spaces, the homotopy H : X I X need not satisfy H(x 0, t) = x 0 for all t, while for the map of pairs, it is required to do so. See comb space example. As an example, the cone space of X is always contractible since we may define H : (X I) I X I by H(x, t, s) = (x, (1 s)t + s). notice that H(x, 1, s) = (x, 1), so H factors through the quotient map to CX I. So, H ([x, t], s) = [x, (1 s)t + s] is then a homotopy from the identity map on CX

21 18 CHAPTER 2. HOMOTOPY to the constant map to the point [x, 1]. Similarly, the cone space of (X, x 0 ) is contractible to the collapse point. In particular, each B n is contractible. Definition 2.10 We say that a map f : X Y is null-homotopic if it is homotopic to a constant map. Proposition 2.11 A map f : X Y is null-homotopic if and only if it has an extension to some F : CX Y. Definition 2.12 We say that A X is a retract if there is a map r : X A such that r(a) = a for all a A. In other words, we require r i = 1 A. We say that A is a deformation retract if there is a retract r : X A which is a homotopy equivalence. In other words, we require that r(a) = a for all a A and that there is a homotopy H : X I X such that H(x, 0) = x, H(x, 1) = r(x). If the homotopy can be made relative to A, we say that A is a strong deformation retract. Definition 2.13 We say a T 4 space X is an absolute retract if whenever f : X Y is an embedding of X into a closed subspace of a T 4 space, then f[x] is a retract of Y. For example, S n 1 is a strong deformation retract of B n \ {0}. It is a later theorem that S n 1 is not a retract of B n. Proposition 2.14 I is an absolute retract. This follows from Tietze s Extension Theorem. We say that I is an absolute retract: it is retract in any T 4 space in which it is embedded. With a bit more work, we can replace I by I n in this result. It is a fundamental result that S n 1 is NOT a retract of B n. For n = 1, this follows from connectivity of B 1. Definition 2.15 We say that a closed subset A X satisfies the homotopy extension property if whenever f : X Y and H 0 : A I Y are maps with H 0 (a, 0) = f(a) for all a A, there exists a map H : X I Y such that H = H 0 on A I and H(x, 0) = f(x) for all x X.

22 2.1. BASIC RESULTS 19 Theorem 2.16 Suppose that (X, A) has the homotopy extension property and that A is contractible. Then the quotient q : X X/A is a homotopy equivalence. Proof: Let F : A I A be a homotopy from 1 A to the constant map at a 0 A. By the homotopy extension property, there is a map H : X I X such that H(x, 0) = x for all x and H(a, t) = F (a, t) for all a A, t I. How consider q H : X I X/A. This factors through the quotient map q 1 to give G : X/A I X/A with G (q 1) = q H. Also notice that H(a, 1) = a 0 for all a A, so there is a map g : X/A X such that g q(x) = H(x, 1) for all x X. Now, clearly, H is a homotopy from 1 X to g q. On the other hand G([x], 0) = G (q 1)(x, 0) = q H(x, 0) = q(x) = [x], and G([x], 1) = G (q 1)(x, 1) = q H(x, 1) = q g q(x) = q g([x]), so G is a homotopy from 1 X/A to q g. Proposition 2.17 The subset A X has the homotopy extension property if and only if (X 0) (A I) is a retract of X I. As an example, (B n, S n 1 ) has the homotopy extension property. Even more so, it turns out that (X {0}) (A I) is a strong deformation retract of X I. Theorem 2.18 Suppose that (X, A) has the homotopy extension property. Then (X {0}) (A I) is a strong deformation retract of X I. Proof: Let r : X I (X {0}) (A I) be a retract. In other words, r(x, 0) = (x, 0) for all x X and r(a, t) = (a, t) for all (a, t) A I. Define H : (X I) I X I by H(x, t, s) = (π 1 r(x, st), min{1, (1 s 2 )t+sπ 2 r(x, st)}). Then H is clearly continuous, H(x, t, 0) = (π 1 r(x, t) = (x, t), H(x, t, 1) = (π 1 r(x, t), π 2 r(x, t)) = r(x, t), so H is a homotopy from the identity map of X I to the retract r. Even more H(x, 0, s) = (π 1 r(x, 0), sπ 2 r(x, 0)) = (x, 0) and for a A, H(a, t, s) = (π 1 r(a, st), (1 s 2 )t + sπ 2 r(a, st)) = (a, (1 s 2 )t + s(st)) = (a, t), so H is a homotopy relative to X {0}) (A I).

23 20 CHAPTER 2. HOMOTOPY Theorem 2.19 Suppose that (X, A) has the homotopy extension property and that f : A Y is a map. Then (X f Y, Y ) has the homotopy extension property. Proof: let r : X I (X {0}) A I be a retraction. Let q : X Y X f Y be the quotient map. Then (q 1) (r 1) : (X Y ) I (X f Y ) I factors through (X f Y ) I to give the desired retract. Definition 2.20 We say that a closed A X is a neighborhood deformation retract (NDR) if there exists u : X I and H : X I X such that a) A = u 1 [0] b) H(a, t) = a for all a A, t I. c) H(x, 0) = x for all x X. d) if u(x) < 1, then H(x, 1) A. As an example, {0} is a NDR of I. Let u(x) = x/2 and H(x, t) = x(1 t). Proposition 2.21 If X is a metric space A is closed and U is open with A U, then there is a u : X I such that A = u 1 [0] and U = u 1 [0, 1). So, in metric spaces, for a closed set A X to be an NDR requires an open set A U and a homotopy H : X I X that is relative to A such that H(x, 1) A for all x U. Theorem 2.22 If A X is a NDR, then (X, A) satisfies the homotopy extension property. Proof: We give a retract of X I to (X 0) (A I). let u : X I and H : X I X be as given in the definition of NDR. Define ( ( ) ) t H x,, 0 0 t u(x) r(x, t) = u(x) (H(x, 1), t u(x)) u(x) t 1 Continuity of r follows from compactness of I and the constancy of H on A.

24 2.2. H-GROUPS AND H-COGROUPS 21 Proposition 2.23 If A is an NDR in X, then A Y is an NDR in X Y. Theorem 2.24 Let A X be closed and f : A Y a map. Then (X {1}) Y is an NDR in the mapping cylinder M f. Theorem 2.25 Let X be a topological space. Then X is an NDR in CX. Theorem 2.26 Suppose that (X, A) has the homotopy extension property. Suppose that f, g : A Y are homotopic maps. Then X f Y and X g Y are homotopy equivalent spaces. Proof: Let F : A I Y be a homotopy from f to g and consider (X I) F Y. The image of X {0} Y is homeomorphic to X f Y and the image of X {1} Y is homeomorphic to X g Y. But now, suppose that H : (X I) I X I is a homotopy of 1 X I to a retract onto A I X {0}. Let Y I Y be the projection. Then we obtain a map [(X I) Y ] I (X I) Y (X I) F Y. This factors through the quotient to give a homotopy [(X I) F Y ] I (X I) F Y from the identity map to a retract onto X f Y. Hence (X I) F Y is homotopy equivalent to X f Y. By symmetry, (X I) F Y is also homotopy equivalent to X g Y and we are finished. 2.2 H-groups and H-cogroups We now turn to the question of when the set [X, x 0 : Y, y 0 ] can be made into a group. One hint is the following characterization of groups: A group is a pointed set (G, e) with maps m : G G G and ν : G G such that m (1 m) = m (m 1), m (1 c e ) = 1 = m (c e 1), and m (1 ν) = m (ν 1) = c e. Here, c e : G G is the constant map. Definition 2.27 An H-group is a pointed toplogical space (H, e) and maps m : H H H and ν : H H such that m (1 m) m (m 1), m (1 c e ) 1 m (c e 1) and m (1 ν) c e m (ν 1).

25 22 CHAPTER 2. HOMOTOPY Proposition 2.28 Assume that (H, e) is an H-group. Define an operation on [(X, x 0 ) : (H, e)] by f g = m (f g). Then [(X, x 0 ), (H, e)] is a group under this operation. Furthermore, if k : (X, x 0 ) (Y, y 0 ), then ˆk(f) = k f defines a homomorphism of groups ˆf : [Y, H] [X, H]. Clearly any topological group is an H-group. The converse is far from being true. In fact, loop spaces are always H-groups as we now show. Definition 2.29 Let (X, x 0 ) be a pointed metric space. Define Ω(X, x 0 ) = (X, x 0 ) (S1,p) (X, x 0 ) (I,{0,1}). Let ω 0 (t) = x 0, so ω 0 is the constant loop, ω 0 ΩX. Now, suppose that p, q Ω(X, x 0 ) and regard them as maps p, q : I X. We define p(2t) 0 t 1 2 p q(t) = 1 q(2t 1) 2 t 1 Then p q ΩX and we obtain a continuous : ΩX ΩX ΩX. We show that this makes (ΩX, ω 0 ) into an H-group. In fact, for p ΩX, define i(p)(t) = p(1 t). Next, we note that (ΩX, ω 0 ) (Y,y0) ((X, x 0 ) (S1,p) ) (Y,y0) (X, x 0 ) (SY, ). This suggests that it might be simpler to work with maps out of SY rather than into ΩX. This in turn, leads us to the definition of an H-cogroup. Definition 2.30 An H-cogroup is a pointed topological space (H, e) and a comultiplication m : H H H and a co-inversion ν : H H such that (1, m) m (m, 1) m, (1, c e ) m 1 H (c e, 1) m, and (1, ν) m c e (ν, 1) m. Theorem 2.31 If (H, e) is an H-cogroup, then the set [H, e : X, x 0 ] can be given the structure of a group with operations f g = m (f g) and f 1 = f ν. Furthermore, if k : (X, x 0 ) (Y, y 0 ) is a map, then k (f) = k f defines a homomorphism of groups, k : [H, e : X, x 0 ] [H, e : Y, y 0 ]. Proposition 2.32 For any compact space (Y, y 0 ), the space (SY, ) is an H- cogroup.

26 2.2. H-GROUPS AND H-COGROUPS 23 In particular, for each n 1, the space (S n, ) S(S n 1, ) is an H- cogroup. Hence [(S n, p), (Y, y 0 )] is a group. We define the n-th homotopy group of (Y, y 0 ) by π n (Y, y 0 ) = [(S n, p) : (Y, y 0 )] What is more, we have π n (X, x 0 ) π n 1 (ΩX, ω 0 ). There is one special case which does not turn out to be a group and that is π 0 (X, x 0 ) = [S 0, p : X, x 0 ]. Here, S 0 = { 1, +1 = p} so a basepoint preserving map, f, can be identified with the point f( 1) X. A homotopy from f to g is then simply a map p : I X with p(0) = f( 1) and p(1) = g( 1). Such a map is called a pth from f( 1) to g( 1). Hence, π 0 (X, x 0 ) can be identified with the set of equivalence classes where two points are equivalent if there is a path between them. The equivalence classes are then called path components and the space X is said to be path connected if there is exactly one path component. Theorem 2.33 For a map f : (S n, p) (X, x 0 ), the following are equivalent: a) [f] = 0 in π n (X, x 0 ), b) f is null-homotopic, c) There is an extension of f to some F : (B n+1, p) (X, x 0 ) We can obtain another description of π n (X, x 0 ) by noting that B n is homeomorphic to I n and that (S n, p) (B n /S n 1, ) (I n / I n, ), so maps (S n, p) (X, x 0 ) are also represented by maps f : (I n, I n ) (X, x 0 ). With this, identification, the operation on π n (X, x 0 ) is given by f(x 1,, x n 1, 2x n ) 0 x n 1 2 f g(x 1,, x n ) = 1 g(x 1,, x n 1, 2x n 1) 2 x n 1 Theorem 2.34 For n 2, the group π n (X, x 0 ) is abelian. There is a more general construction for triples where we define π n (X, A, x 0 ) = [B n, S n 1, p : X, A, x 0 ]. There is a map B n B n B n where S n 1 S n 1 S n 1 for n 2 which makes π n (X, A, x 0 ) into a group. Proposition 2.35 Let f : (B n, S n 1, p) (X, A, x 0 ) be a map. The following are equivlent:

27 24 CHAPTER 2. HOMOTOPY a) f is null-homotopic b) [f] = 0 in π n (X, A, x 0 ) c) f is homotopic relative to S n 1 to a map into A. We notice that π n (X, x 0, x 0 ) = π n (X, x 0 ). From the inclusion maps i : (A, x 0 ) (X, x 0 ) and j : (X, x 0, x 0 ) (X, A, x 0 ) we get correspnding maps between homotopy groups. We also get a map : π n (X, A, x 0 ) π n 1 (A, x 0 ). Theorem 2.36 For a triple (X, A, x 0 ), we have a long exact sequence π n (A, x 0 ) i π n (X, x 0 ) j π n (X, A, x 0 ) π n 1 (A, x 0 ) Furthermore, this is natural in the sense that a map f : (X, A, x 0 ) (Y, B, y 0 ) induces a commutative diagram between the long exact sequences. So, the end result of our work so far is a collection of functors π n : phom Grp. In general, it is quite difficult to evaluate these functors, even at spheres. This is a major problem in the theory of homotopy groups. However, we will turn our attention to the simplest of these, π 1, which can be computed in many cases. Exercises: 1. Define f, g : S 1 S 1 by f(x) = x and g(x) = x. Show f g. 2. Let n be odd and define f, g : S n S n by f(x) = x and g(x) = x. Show that f g. 3. Suppose that f, g : S n S n and that for no x S n is it the case that f(x) = g(x). Show f g. 4. Show that X and X I are homotopy equivalent. 5. Show that (S 1 S 1 ) \ {(p, p)} is homotopy equivalent to S 1 S Suppose that A is a retract of the Hausdorff space X. Show that A is closed in X.

28 2.2. H-GROUPS AND H-COGROUPS Suppose that A X and f : A Y. Show that f has an extension to X if and only if Y is a retract of X f Y. 8. Show that a retract of a contractible space is contractible. 9. Show that a retract of a retract is a retract. 10. Show that Y is an absolute retract if and only if whenever A X is a closed subspace of a T 4 space and f : A Y is continuous, then f has an extension F : X Y. 11. Show that products of absolute retracts are absolute retracts. 12. Show that a retract of an absoute retract is an absolute retract. 13. Show that {0, 1} is an NDR of I. 14. Suppose that X = A B is the disjoint union of two closed sets. Show that (X, A) has the homotopy extension property. 15. Suppose that X = A B is a union of two closed subsets. Suppose that (A, A B) has the homotopy extension property. Show that (X, B) has the homotopy extension property. 16. Suppose that B A X and that (X, A) and (A, B) both have the homotopy extension property. Show that (X, B) has the homotopy extension property. 17. Suppose that (X, A) has the homotopy extension property. Show that (X Z, A Z) has the homotopy extension property. 18. Let f : X {x 0 } be the constant map. Show that M f is homeomorphic to CX, the cone of X. 19. Suppose that A U where A is closed and U is open. Suppose also that U B where B is closed. Suppose that (B, A (B \ U)) has the homotopy extension property. Show that (X, A) has the homotopy extension property. It is often possible to choose (B, A) to be homeomorphic to a mapping cylinder (M f, A) for some map f : B \ U A.

29 26 CHAPTER 2. HOMOTOPY 20. Suppose that A B X, that (X, A) has the homotopy extension property, and that B is and NDR in X and is contractible. Show that X/A is homotopy equivalent to X SA. Hint: consider the space X i CA. Then take the quotient with respect to two different contractible sets. 21. Show that S n /S k is homotopy equivalent to S n S k+1 for k n Let f : S 1 S 1 S 1 S 1 be the identity map on each component of the domain. Let X = ([ 1, 1] {0}) ({0} [0, 1]) R 2. Show that the mapping cylinder M f is homeomorphic to X S Let (X, x 0 ) be contractible. Show that [X, x 0 : Y, y 0 ] and [Y, y 0 : X, x 0 ] both have exactly one point. In particular, π n (X, x 0 ) = Show that π n (X Y, (x 0, y 0 )) is isomorphic to π n (X, x 0 ) π n (Y, y 0 ) via the map π n (p X ) π n (p Y ) where p X and p Y are the projections. 25. Show that π k (B n, S n 1, p) π k 1 (S n 1, p).

30 Chapter 3 The Fundamental Group 3.1 Free Groups and Free Products Definition 3.1 A monoid is a set with an associative operation with an identity. If M and N are monoids, a homomorphism is a function f : M N such that f(1) = 1 and f(xy) = f(x)f(y) for all x, y M. An equivalence relation on a monoid M is said to be multiplicative if a a and b b implies that ab a b. In this case, M/ becomes a monoid by defining [a]b] = [ab]. Let S be a set and let M(S) = {1} n=1s n. Define multiplication on M by juxtaposition, 1(x 1,, x n ) = (x 1,, x n ) = (x 1,, x n )1 and (x 1, x n )(y 1, y m ) = (x 1,, x n, y 1, y m ). Then M(S) is a monoid. Furthermore, if N is any other monoid and ϕ : S N is a function, there is a homomorphism ˆϕ : M(S) N defined by ˆϕ(x 1, x n ) = ϕ(x 1 ) ϕ(x n ). We call M(S) the free monoid generated by S. We want to find a group with a similar property concerning homomorphisms and maps from S. We want this group to be generated by S as a group, which means that it is generated by S S 1 as a monoid. So consider M(S S 1 ) and let be the smallest multiplicative equivalence relation such that ss 1 1 s 1 s for each s S. Then F G(S) = M(S S 1 )/ is a group since each [s] is invertible with inverse [s 1 ] and every element of F G(S) is a product of 27

31 28 CHAPTER 3. THE FUNDAMENTAL GROUP such elements. Theorem 3.2 Let S be a set. Then F G(S) is a group. Furthermore, if φ : S G is any function from S into a group, there is a unique homomorphism ˆϕ : F G(S) G such that ˆϕ i = ϕ where i : S F G(S) is the map i(s) = [s]. Definition 3.3 Let S be a set and let R F G(S). Let N R be the normal subgroup of F G(S) generated by R. We call the group F G(S)/N R the group generated by S with relations R and denote it by S R. In this group, all words in R are identified to the identity. Now, suppose that G and H are groups. Regard G and H as sets and consider the free group F G(G H). Let i G and i H be the inclusion functions into this free group. Let R consist all all words in F G(G H) of the form i G (g 1 )i G (g 2 )i G (g 3 ) where g 1 g 2 g 3 = e G in G as well as i H (h 1 )i H (h 2 )i H (h 3 ) where h 1 h 2 h 3 = e in H. Also, include in R the words i G (e G ) and i H (e H ). In other words, we identify those words in the free group to the identity that multiply to be the identity in their particular group. This will give the group G H =< G H R >, the amalgum of G and H. Note that there are functions i G : G G H and i H : H G H that factor through the free group. Proposition 3.4 The functions i G and i H are homomorphisms. Proof: First note that i G (e G ) = 1 and i H (e H ) = 1 since both are in R. Next, for g G, gg 1 e G = e G, so i G (g)i G (g 1 )i G (e G ) = 1. This shows that i G (g 1 ) = i G (g) 1. Now, let g = (g 1 g 2 ) 1. Then g 1 g 2 g = e G, so i G (g 1 )i G (g 2 )i G (g) = 1. But this shows that i G (g 1 )i G (g 2 ) = i G (g) 1 = i G (g 1 ) = i G (g 1 g 2 ). Thus, i G is a homomorphism. Similarly, i H is a homomorphism. Theorem 3.5 Suppose that K is a group and that ϕ G : G K and ϕ H : H K are homomorphisms. Then there is a unique homomorphism ϕ : G H K such that ϕ i G = ϕ G and ϕ i H = ϕ H. In other words, G H is a co-product in the category of groups.

32 3.2. THE FUNDAMENTAL GROUPOID 29 Proof: There is a homomorphism ˆϕ : F G(G H) K induced by ϕ G and ϕ H. Let N be the kernel of this map. Clearly, e G, e H N. Also, if g 1 g 2 g 3 = e G in G, we have that ϕ G (g 1 )ϕ G (g 2 )ϕ G (g 3 ) = e K since ϕ G is a homomorphism. Thus, ˆϕ(i G (g 1 )i G (g 2 )i G (g 3 )) = e K. This shows that i G (g 1 )i G (g 2 )i G (g 3 ) N. A similar consideration holds for relations in H. Thus, N N R where R is the collection of relations defining G H. This allows the factorization through G H and gives ϕ. Note that a similar construction holds for a collection {G α } α of groups to give a co-product α G α. 3.2 The Fundamental Groupoid Definition 3.6 A groupoid is a small category (i.e. the collection of objects is a set) such that every morphism is an isomorphism. As an example, let G be a group and let C be the category with one object such that hom(, ) = G with composition being the group multiplication. Conversely, if C is a groupoid and X is an object in C, then hom(x, X) is a group. Suppose that Y is another object in C and that f : X Y is a morphism. Then, the function F : hom(y, Y ) hom(x, X) defined by F (g) = f 1 g f is a homomorphism of groups whose inverse is F 1 (g) = f g f 1. Thus hom(x, X) and hom(y, Y ) are isomorphic as groups. Our primary example of a groupoid is the fundamental groupoid of a topological space π 1 (X). The objects of this category are the points of X and the morphisms from x X to y X are homotopy equivalence classes of maps (I, 0, 1) (X, x, y). The composition is then defined by p q = q p (reversal is required because of the way composition and path composition are defined). As above, we have that this composition is associative up to homotopy and the constant path at x is the identity at x. Furthermore, each morphism has an inverse defined by p 1 (t) = [(1 t). We notice that hom(x, x) = π 1 (X, x) as defined above. This leads immediately to the following result. Proposition 3.7 Let X be a topological space and x, y X. If there is a path

33 30 CHAPTER 3. THE FUNDAMENTAL GROUP from x to y, then π 1 (X, x) and π 1 (X, y) are isomorphic as groups. Definition 3.8 We say that a space is path connected if there is a path between any two points. Definition 3.9 We say that a topological space X is simply connected if X is path connected and π 1 (X, x) is trivial for some (hence all) x X. Proposition 3.10 A space is simply connected if and only if it is path connected and whenever p, q are paths with p(0) = q(0) and p(1) = q(1), then p q (rel {0, 1}). Proof: Let x = p(0) = q(0) and y = p(1) = q(1). Then p p c y p q 1 q c x q q, where we used that p q 1 is a loop at x, so is homotopy equivalent to c x. Proposition 3.11 Any contractible space is simply connected. Proof: This is slightly more subtle that it looks. Suppose that H : X I X is a homotopy from the identity map to the constant map at x X. If we knew that H was a homotopy that fixed x, we would have π 1 (X, x) = π 1 (x, x) is trivial. The problem is that no such homotopy may exist. So let p be a loop with p(0) = p(1) = x In I I, let a(t) = (t, 0), b(t) = (0, t), c(t) = (t, 1), and d(t) = (1, 1 t). Then a and b c d have common endpoints, so are homotpoic relative to {0, 1}. If we define G(s, t) = H(p(s), t) and q(t) = G(0, t) = H(x, t) = G(1, t), we then see that p = G a is homotopic to G (b c d) = q c x q 1 relative to {0, 1}. But now, q c x q 1 q q 1 c x relative to {0, 1}, so [p] is trivial in π 1 (X, x). Theorem 3.12 For n 2, S n is simply connected. Proof: Let p : I S n with p(0) = p(1) = P. If p fails to be onto, we may consider p : I S n \ {x} with the last space homeomorphic to R n, which is contactible. So, in this case, p is null-homotopic.

SECTION 2: THE COMPACT-OPEN TOPOLOGY AND LOOP SPACES

SECTION 2: THE COMPACT-OPEN TOPOLOGY AND LOOP SPACES SECTION 2: THE COMPACT-OPEN TOPOLOGY AND LOOP SPACES In this section we will give the important constructions of loop spaces and reduced suspensions associated to pointed spaces. For this purpose there

More information

7. Homotopy and the Fundamental Group

7. Homotopy and the Fundamental Group 7. Homotopy and the Fundamental Group The group G will be called the fundamental group of the manifold V. J. Henri Poincaré, 895 The properties of a topological space that we have developed so far have

More information

Exercises for Algebraic Topology

Exercises for Algebraic Topology Sheet 1, September 13, 2017 Definition. Let A be an abelian group and let M be a set. The A-linearization of M is the set A[M] = {f : M A f 1 (A \ {0}) is finite}. We view A[M] as an abelian group via

More information

MTH 428/528. Introduction to Topology II. Elements of Algebraic Topology. Bernard Badzioch

MTH 428/528. Introduction to Topology II. Elements of Algebraic Topology. Bernard Badzioch MTH 428/528 Introduction to Topology II Elements of Algebraic Topology Bernard Badzioch 2016.12.12 Contents 1. Some Motivation.......................................................... 3 2. Categories

More information

3. Categories and Functors We recall the definition of a category: Definition 3.1. A category C is the data of two collections. The first collection

3. Categories and Functors We recall the definition of a category: Definition 3.1. A category C is the data of two collections. The first collection 3. Categories and Functors We recall the definition of a category: Definition 3.1. A category C is the data of two collections. The first collection is called the objects of C and is denoted Obj(C). Given

More information

MATH8808: ALGEBRAIC TOPOLOGY

MATH8808: ALGEBRAIC TOPOLOGY MATH8808: ALGEBRAIC TOPOLOGY DAWEI CHEN Contents 1. Underlying Geometric Notions 2 1.1. Homotopy 2 1.2. Cell Complexes 3 1.3. Operations on Cell Complexes 3 1.4. Criteria for Homotopy Equivalence 4 1.5.

More information

SMSTC Geometry & Topology 1 Assignment 1 Matt Booth

SMSTC Geometry & Topology 1 Assignment 1 Matt Booth SMSTC Geometry & Topology 1 Assignment 1 Matt Booth Question 1 i) Let be the space with one point. Suppose X is contractible. Then by definition we have maps f : X and g : X such that gf id X and fg id.

More information

p,q H (X), H (Y ) ), where the index p has the same meaning as the

p,q H (X), H (Y ) ), where the index p has the same meaning as the There are two Eilenberg-Moore spectral sequences that we shall consider, one for homology and the other for cohomology. In contrast with the situation for the Serre spectral sequence, for the Eilenberg-Moore

More information

Hungry, Hungry Homology

Hungry, Hungry Homology September 27, 2017 Motiving Problem: Algebra Problem (Preliminary Version) Given two groups A, C, does there exist a group E so that A E and E /A = C? If such an group exists, we call E an extension of

More information

NOTES ON BASIC HOMOLOGICAL ALGEBRA 0 L M N 0

NOTES ON BASIC HOMOLOGICAL ALGEBRA 0 L M N 0 NOTES ON BASIC HOMOLOGICAL ALGEBRA ANDREW BAKER 1. Chain complexes and their homology Let R be a ring and Mod R the category of right R-modules; a very similar discussion can be had for the category of

More information

1 Categorical Background

1 Categorical Background 1 Categorical Background 1.1 Categories and Functors Definition 1.1.1 A category C is given by a class of objects, often denoted by ob C, and for any two objects A, B of C a proper set of morphisms C(A,

More information

Category Theory. Categories. Definition.

Category Theory. Categories. Definition. Category Theory Category theory is a general mathematical theory of structures, systems of structures and relationships between systems of structures. It provides a unifying and economic mathematical modeling

More information

10 Excision and applications

10 Excision and applications 22 CHAPTER 1. SINGULAR HOMOLOGY be a map of short exact sequences of chain complexes. If two of the three maps induced in homology by f, g, and h are isomorphisms, then so is the third. Here s an application.

More information

1. Classifying Spaces. Classifying Spaces

1. Classifying Spaces. Classifying Spaces Classifying Spaces 1. Classifying Spaces. To make our lives much easier, all topological spaces from now on will be homeomorphic to CW complexes. Fact: All smooth manifolds are homeomorphic to CW complexes.

More information

Algebraic Topology. Len Evens Rob Thompson

Algebraic Topology. Len Evens Rob Thompson Algebraic Topology Len Evens Rob Thompson Northwestern University City University of New York Contents Chapter 1. Introduction 5 1. Introduction 5 2. Point Set Topology, Brief Review 7 Chapter 2. Homotopy

More information

ALGEBRAICALLY TRIVIAL, BUT TOPOLOGICALLY NON-TRIVIAL MAP. Contents 1. Introduction 1

ALGEBRAICALLY TRIVIAL, BUT TOPOLOGICALLY NON-TRIVIAL MAP. Contents 1. Introduction 1 ALGEBRAICALLY TRIVIAL, BUT TOPOLOGICALLY NON-TRIVIAL MAP HONG GYUN KIM Abstract. I studied the construction of an algebraically trivial, but topologically non-trivial map by Hopf map p : S 3 S 2 and a

More information

L E C T U R E N O T E S O N H O M O T O P Y T H E O R Y A N D A P P L I C AT I O N S

L E C T U R E N O T E S O N H O M O T O P Y T H E O R Y A N D A P P L I C AT I O N S L A U R E N T I U M A X I M U N I V E R S I T Y O F W I S C O N S I N - M A D I S O N L E C T U R E N O T E S O N H O M O T O P Y T H E O R Y A N D A P P L I C AT I O N S i Contents 1 Basics of Homotopy

More information

Lie Algebra Cohomology

Lie Algebra Cohomology Lie Algebra Cohomology Carsten Liese 1 Chain Complexes Definition 1.1. A chain complex (C, d) of R-modules is a family {C n } n Z of R-modules, together with R-modul maps d n : C n C n 1 such that d d

More information

CATEGORY THEORY. Cats have been around for 70 years. Eilenberg + Mac Lane =. Cats are about building bridges between different parts of maths.

CATEGORY THEORY. Cats have been around for 70 years. Eilenberg + Mac Lane =. Cats are about building bridges between different parts of maths. CATEGORY THEORY PROFESSOR PETER JOHNSTONE Cats have been around for 70 years. Eilenberg + Mac Lane =. Cats are about building bridges between different parts of maths. Definition 1.1. A category C consists

More information

Lecture 2. x if x X B n f(x) = α(x) if x S n 1 D n

Lecture 2. x if x X B n f(x) = α(x) if x S n 1 D n Lecture 2 1.10 Cell attachments Let X be a topological space and α : S n 1 X be a map. Consider the space X D n with the disjoint union topology. Consider further the set X B n and a function f : X D n

More information

FUNDAMENTAL GROUPS AND THE VAN KAMPEN S THEOREM. Contents

FUNDAMENTAL GROUPS AND THE VAN KAMPEN S THEOREM. Contents FUNDAMENTAL GROUPS AND THE VAN KAMPEN S THEOREM SAMUEL BLOOM Abstract. In this paper, we define the fundamental group of a topological space and explore its structure, and we proceed to prove Van-Kampen

More information

Some K-theory examples

Some K-theory examples Some K-theory examples The purpose of these notes is to compute K-groups of various spaces and outline some useful methods for Ma448: K-theory and Solitons, given by Dr Sergey Cherkis in 2008-09. Throughout

More information

Homework 3: Relative homology and excision

Homework 3: Relative homology and excision Homework 3: Relative homology and excision 0. Pre-requisites. The main theorem you ll have to assume is the excision theorem, but only for Problem 6. Recall what this says: Let A V X, where the interior

More information

Categories and functors

Categories and functors Lecture 1 Categories and functors Definition 1.1 A category A consists of a collection ob(a) (whose elements are called the objects of A) for each A, B ob(a), a collection A(A, B) (whose elements are called

More information

Math 757 Homology theory

Math 757 Homology theory theory Math 757 theory January 27, 2011 theory Definition 90 (Direct sum in Ab) Given abelian groups {A α }, the direct sum is an abelian group A with s γ α : A α A satifying the following universal property

More information

Math 637 Topology Paulo Lima-Filho. Problem List I. b. Show that a contractible space is path connected.

Math 637 Topology Paulo Lima-Filho. Problem List I. b. Show that a contractible space is path connected. Problem List I Problem 1. A space X is said to be contractible if the identiy map i X : X X is nullhomotopic. a. Show that any convex subset of R n is contractible. b. Show that a contractible space is

More information

A TALE OF TWO FUNCTORS. Marc Culler. 1. Hom and Tensor

A TALE OF TWO FUNCTORS. Marc Culler. 1. Hom and Tensor A TALE OF TWO FUNCTORS Marc Culler 1. Hom and Tensor It was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age of covariance, it was the age of contravariance, it was the epoch of homology, it

More information

Math 752 Week s 1 1

Math 752 Week s 1 1 Math 752 Week 13 1 Homotopy Groups Definition 1. For n 0 and X a topological space with x 0 X, define π n (X) = {f : (I n, I n ) (X, x 0 )}/ where is the usual homotopy of maps. Then we have the following

More information

Category Theory (UMV/TK/07)

Category Theory (UMV/TK/07) P. J. Šafárik University, Faculty of Science, Košice Project 2005/NP1-051 11230100466 Basic information Extent: 2 hrs lecture/1 hrs seminar per week. Assessment: Written tests during the semester, written

More information

38 Irreducibility criteria in rings of polynomials

38 Irreducibility criteria in rings of polynomials 38 Irreducibility criteria in rings of polynomials 38.1 Theorem. Let p(x), q(x) R[x] be polynomials such that p(x) = a 0 + a 1 x +... + a n x n, q(x) = b 0 + b 1 x +... + b m x m and a n, b m 0. If b m

More information

Lecture 4: Stabilization

Lecture 4: Stabilization Lecture 4: Stabilization There are many stabilization processes in topology, and often matters simplify in a stable limit. As a first example, consider the sequence of inclusions (4.1) S 0 S 1 S 2 S 3

More information

Math 6510 Homework 10

Math 6510 Homework 10 2.2 Problems 9 Problem. Compute the homology group of the following 2-complexes X: a) The quotient of S 2 obtained by identifying north and south poles to a point b) S 1 (S 1 S 1 ) c) The space obtained

More information

Adjunctions, the Stone-Čech compactification, the compact-open topology, the theorems of Ascoli and Arzela

Adjunctions, the Stone-Čech compactification, the compact-open topology, the theorems of Ascoli and Arzela Adjunctions, the Stone-Čech compactification, the compact-open topology, the theorems of Ascoli and Arzela John Terilla Fall 2014 Contents 1 Adjoint functors 2 2 Example: Product-Hom adjunction in Set

More information

Math 440 Problem Set 2

Math 440 Problem Set 2 Math 440 Problem Set 2 Problem 4, p. 52. Let X R 3 be the union of n lines through the origin. Compute π 1 (R 3 X). Solution: R 3 X deformation retracts to S 2 with 2n points removed. Choose one of them.

More information

MAT 530: Topology&Geometry, I Fall 2005

MAT 530: Topology&Geometry, I Fall 2005 MAT 530: Topology&Geometry, I Fall 2005 Problem Set 11 Solution to Problem p433, #2 Suppose U,V X are open, X =U V, U, V, and U V are path-connected, x 0 U V, and i 1 π 1 U,x 0 j 1 π 1 U V,x 0 i 2 π 1

More information

The Universal Coefficient Theorem

The Universal Coefficient Theorem The Universal Coefficient Theorem Renzo s math 571 The Universal Coefficient Theorem relates homology and cohomology. It describes the k-th cohomology group with coefficients in a(n abelian) group G in

More information

Derived Categories. Mistuo Hoshino

Derived Categories. Mistuo Hoshino Derived Categories Mistuo Hoshino Contents 01. Cochain complexes 02. Mapping cones 03. Homotopy categories 04. Quasi-isomorphisms 05. Mapping cylinders 06. Triangulated categories 07. Épaisse subcategories

More information

Algebraic Topology Homework 4 Solutions

Algebraic Topology Homework 4 Solutions Algebraic Topology Homework 4 Solutions Here are a few solutions to some of the trickier problems... Recall: Let X be a topological space, A X a subspace of X. Suppose f, g : X X are maps restricting to

More information

S n 1 i D n l S n 1 is the identity map. Associated to this sequence of maps is the sequence of group homomorphisms

S n 1 i D n l S n 1 is the identity map. Associated to this sequence of maps is the sequence of group homomorphisms ALGEBRAIC TOPOLOGY Contents 1. Informal introduction 1 1.1. What is algebraic topology? 1 1.2. Brower fixed point theorem 2 2. Review of background material 3 2.1. Algebra 3 2.2. Topological spaces 5 2.3.

More information

Algebraic Topology exam

Algebraic Topology exam Instituto Superior Técnico Departamento de Matemática Algebraic Topology exam June 12th 2017 1. Let X be a square with the edges cyclically identified: X = [0, 1] 2 / with (a) Compute π 1 (X). (x, 0) (1,

More information

EXAMPLES AND EXERCISES IN BASIC CATEGORY THEORY

EXAMPLES AND EXERCISES IN BASIC CATEGORY THEORY EXAMPLES AND EXERCISES IN BASIC CATEGORY THEORY 1. Categories 1.1. Generalities. I ve tried to be as consistent as possible. In particular, throughout the text below, categories will be denoted by capital

More information

FUNCTORS AND ADJUNCTIONS. 1. Functors

FUNCTORS AND ADJUNCTIONS. 1. Functors FUNCTORS AND ADJUNCTIONS Abstract. Graphs, quivers, natural transformations, adjunctions, Galois connections, Galois theory. 1.1. Graph maps. 1. Functors 1.1.1. Quivers. Quivers generalize directed graphs,

More information

121B: ALGEBRAIC TOPOLOGY. Contents. 6. Poincaré Duality

121B: ALGEBRAIC TOPOLOGY. Contents. 6. Poincaré Duality 121B: ALGEBRAIC TOPOLOGY Contents 6. Poincaré Duality 1 6.1. Manifolds 2 6.2. Orientation 3 6.3. Orientation sheaf 9 6.4. Cap product 11 6.5. Proof for good coverings 15 6.6. Direct limit 18 6.7. Proof

More information

Part II. Algebraic Topology. Year

Part II. Algebraic Topology. Year Part II Year 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2017 Paper 3, Section II 18I The n-torus is the product of n circles: 5 T n = } S 1. {{.. S } 1. n times For all n 1 and 0

More information

FREUDENTHAL SUSPENSION THEOREM

FREUDENTHAL SUSPENSION THEOREM FREUDENTHAL SUSPENSION THEOREM TENGREN ZHANG Abstract. In this paper, I will prove the Freudenthal suspension theorem, and use that to explain what stable homotopy groups are. All the results stated in

More information

CALCULATION OF FUNDAMENTAL GROUPS OF SPACES

CALCULATION OF FUNDAMENTAL GROUPS OF SPACES CALCULATION OF FUNDAMENTAL GROUPS OF SPACES PETER ROBICHEAUX Abstract. We develop theory, particularly that of covering spaces and the van Kampen Theorem, in order to calculate the fundamental groups of

More information

SOME EXERCISES. This is not an assignment, though some exercises on this list might become part of an assignment. Class 2

SOME EXERCISES. This is not an assignment, though some exercises on this list might become part of an assignment. Class 2 SOME EXERCISES This is not an assignment, though some exercises on this list might become part of an assignment. Class 2 (1) Let C be a category and let X C. Prove that the assignment Y C(Y, X) is a functor

More information

A GLIMPSE OF ALGEBRAIC K-THEORY: Eric M. Friedlander

A GLIMPSE OF ALGEBRAIC K-THEORY: Eric M. Friedlander A GLIMPSE OF ALGEBRAIC K-THEORY: Eric M. Friedlander During the first three days of September, 1997, I had the privilege of giving a series of five lectures at the beginning of the School on Algebraic

More information

Minimal Cell Structures for G-CW Complexes

Minimal Cell Structures for G-CW Complexes Minimal Cell Structures for G-CW Complexes UROP+ Final Paper, Summer 2016 Yutao Liu Mentor: Siddharth Venkatesh Project suggested by: Haynes Miller August 31, 2016 Abstract: In this paper, we consider

More information

THE FUNDAMENTAL GROUP AND CW COMPLEXES

THE FUNDAMENTAL GROUP AND CW COMPLEXES THE FUNDAMENTAL GROUP AND CW COMPLEXES JAE HYUNG SIM Abstract. This paper is a quick introduction to some basic concepts in Algebraic Topology. We start by defining homotopy and delving into the Fundamental

More information

An Outline of Homology Theory

An Outline of Homology Theory An Outline of Homology Theory Stephen A. Mitchell June 1997, revised October 2001 Note: These notes contain few examples and even fewer proofs. They are intended only as an outline, to be supplemented

More information

Manifolds and Poincaré duality

Manifolds and Poincaré duality 226 CHAPTER 11 Manifolds and Poincaré duality 1. Manifolds The homology H (M) of a manifold M often exhibits an interesting symmetry. Here are some examples. M = S 1 S 1 S 1 : M = S 2 S 3 : H 0 = Z, H

More information

Solutions to Problem Set 1

Solutions to Problem Set 1 Solutions to Problem Set 1 18.904 Spring 2011 Problem 1 Statement. Let n 1 be an integer. Let CP n denote the set of all lines in C n+1 passing through the origin. There is a natural map π : C n+1 \ {0}

More information

LECTURE: KOBORDISMENTHEORIE, WINTER TERM 2011/12; SUMMARY AND LITERATURE

LECTURE: KOBORDISMENTHEORIE, WINTER TERM 2011/12; SUMMARY AND LITERATURE LECTURE: KOBORDISMENTHEORIE, WINTER TERM 2011/12; SUMMARY AND LITERATURE JOHANNES EBERT 1.1. October 11th. 1. Recapitulation from differential topology Definition 1.1. Let M m, N n, be two smooth manifolds

More information

1. Simplify the following. Solution: = {0} Hint: glossary: there is for all : such that & and

1. Simplify the following. Solution: = {0} Hint: glossary: there is for all : such that & and Topology MT434P Problems/Homework Recommended Reading: Munkres, J.R. Topology Hatcher, A. Algebraic Topology, http://www.math.cornell.edu/ hatcher/at/atpage.html For those who have a lot of outstanding

More information

A C 0 coarse structure for families of pseudometrics and the Higson-Roe functor

A C 0 coarse structure for families of pseudometrics and the Higson-Roe functor A C 0 coarse structure for families of pseudometrics and the Higson-Roe functor Jesús P. Moreno-Damas arxiv:1410.2756v1 [math.gn] 10 Oct 2014 Abstract This paper deepens into the relations between coarse

More information

Adjoints, naturality, exactness, small Yoneda lemma. 1. Hom(X, ) is left exact

Adjoints, naturality, exactness, small Yoneda lemma. 1. Hom(X, ) is left exact (April 8, 2010) Adjoints, naturality, exactness, small Yoneda lemma Paul Garrett garrett@math.umn.edu http://www.math.umn.edu/ garrett/ The best way to understand or remember left-exactness or right-exactness

More information

B 1 = {B(x, r) x = (x 1, x 2 ) H, 0 < r < x 2 }. (a) Show that B = B 1 B 2 is a basis for a topology on X.

B 1 = {B(x, r) x = (x 1, x 2 ) H, 0 < r < x 2 }. (a) Show that B = B 1 B 2 is a basis for a topology on X. Math 6342/7350: Topology and Geometry Sample Preliminary Exam Questions 1. For each of the following topological spaces X i, determine whether X i and X i X i are homeomorphic. (a) X 1 = [0, 1] (b) X 2

More information

Eilenberg-Steenrod properties. (Hatcher, 2.1, 2.3, 3.1; Conlon, 2.6, 8.1, )

Eilenberg-Steenrod properties. (Hatcher, 2.1, 2.3, 3.1; Conlon, 2.6, 8.1, ) II.3 : Eilenberg-Steenrod properties (Hatcher, 2.1, 2.3, 3.1; Conlon, 2.6, 8.1, 8.3 8.5 Definition. Let U be an open subset of R n for some n. The de Rham cohomology groups (U are the cohomology groups

More information

GALOIS CATEGORIES MELISSA LYNN

GALOIS CATEGORIES MELISSA LYNN GALOIS CATEGORIES MELISSA LYNN Abstract. In abstract algebra, we considered finite Galois extensions of fields with their Galois groups. Here, we noticed a correspondence between the intermediate fields

More information

Project: Construction of the Fundamental Group

Project: Construction of the Fundamental Group Project: Construction of the Fundamental Group Renzo s math 472 This worksheet is designed to lead you to define and discover our first functor: the fundamental group. 1 Definitions First of all, let us

More information

CELLULAR HOMOLOGY AND THE CELLULAR BOUNDARY FORMULA. Contents 1. Introduction 1

CELLULAR HOMOLOGY AND THE CELLULAR BOUNDARY FORMULA. Contents 1. Introduction 1 CELLULAR HOMOLOGY AND THE CELLULAR BOUNDARY FORMULA PAOLO DEGIORGI Abstract. This paper will first go through some core concepts and results in homology, then introduce the concepts of CW complex, subcomplex

More information

HOMOTOPY THEORY ADAM KAYE

HOMOTOPY THEORY ADAM KAYE HOMOTOPY THEORY ADAM KAYE 1. CW Approximation The CW approximation theorem says that every space is weakly equivalent to a CW complex. Theorem 1.1 (CW Approximation). There exists a functor Γ from the

More information

SECTION 5: EILENBERG ZILBER EQUIVALENCES AND THE KÜNNETH THEOREMS

SECTION 5: EILENBERG ZILBER EQUIVALENCES AND THE KÜNNETH THEOREMS SECTION 5: EILENBERG ZILBER EQUIVALENCES AND THE KÜNNETH THEOREMS In this section we will prove the Künneth theorem which in principle allows us to calculate the (co)homology of product spaces as soon

More information

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.at] 5 Oct 1999

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.at] 5 Oct 1999 arxiv:math/990026v [math.at] 5 Oct 999 REPRESENTATIONS OF THE HOMOTOPY SURFACE CATEGORY OF A SIMPLY CONNECTED SPACE MARK BRIGHTWELL AND PAUL TURNER. Introduction At the heart of the axiomatic formulation

More information

The Ordinary RO(C 2 )-graded Cohomology of a Point

The Ordinary RO(C 2 )-graded Cohomology of a Point The Ordinary RO(C 2 )-graded Cohomology of a Point Tiago uerreiro May 27, 2015 Abstract This paper consists of an extended abstract of the Master Thesis of the author. Here, we outline the most important

More information

EXT, TOR AND THE UCT

EXT, TOR AND THE UCT EXT, TOR AND THE UCT CHRIS KOTTKE Contents 1. Left/right exact functors 1 2. Projective resolutions 2 3. Two useful lemmas 3 4. Ext 6 5. Ext as a covariant derived functor 8 6. Universal Coefficient Theorem

More information

ALGEBRAIC TOPOLOGY IV. Definition 1.1. Let A, B be abelian groups. The set of homomorphisms ϕ: A B is denoted by

ALGEBRAIC TOPOLOGY IV. Definition 1.1. Let A, B be abelian groups. The set of homomorphisms ϕ: A B is denoted by ALGEBRAIC TOPOLOGY IV DIRK SCHÜTZ 1. Cochain complexes and singular cohomology Definition 1.1. Let A, B be abelian groups. The set of homomorphisms ϕ: A B is denoted by Hom(A, B) = {ϕ: A B ϕ homomorphism}

More information

The Fundamental Group and Covering Spaces

The Fundamental Group and Covering Spaces Chapter 8 The Fundamental Group and Covering Spaces In the first seven chapters we have dealt with point-set topology. This chapter provides an introduction to algebraic topology. Algebraic topology may

More information

6 Axiomatic Homology Theory

6 Axiomatic Homology Theory MATH41071/MATH61071 Algebraic topology 6 Axiomatic Homology Theory Autumn Semester 2016 2017 The basic ideas of homology go back to Poincaré in 1895 when he defined the Betti numbers and torsion numbers

More information

LECTURE 3: RELATIVE SINGULAR HOMOLOGY

LECTURE 3: RELATIVE SINGULAR HOMOLOGY LECTURE 3: RELATIVE SINGULAR HOMOLOGY In this lecture we want to cover some basic concepts from homological algebra. These prove to be very helpful in our discussion of singular homology. The following

More information

Homotopy and homology groups of the n-dimensional Hawaiian earring

Homotopy and homology groups of the n-dimensional Hawaiian earring F U N D A M E N T A MATHEMATICAE 165 (2000) Homotopy and homology groups of the n-dimensional Hawaiian earring by Katsuya E d a (Tokyo) and Kazuhiro K a w a m u r a (Tsukuba) Abstract. For the n-dimensional

More information

Algebraic Topology II Notes Week 12

Algebraic Topology II Notes Week 12 Algebraic Topology II Notes Week 12 1 Cohomology Theory (Continued) 1.1 More Applications of Poincaré Duality Proposition 1.1. Any homotopy equivalence CP 2n f CP 2n preserves orientation (n 1). In other

More information

Topological properties

Topological properties CHAPTER 4 Topological properties 1. Connectedness Definitions and examples Basic properties Connected components Connected versus path connected, again 2. Compactness Definition and first examples Topological

More information

The Fundamental Group

The Fundamental Group The Fundamental Group Renzo s math 472 This worksheet is designed to accompany our lectures on the fundamental group, collecting relevant definitions and main ideas. 1 Homotopy Intuition: Homotopy formalizes

More information

Topology. Xiaolong Han. Department of Mathematics, California State University, Northridge, CA 91330, USA address:

Topology. Xiaolong Han. Department of Mathematics, California State University, Northridge, CA 91330, USA  address: Topology Xiaolong Han Department of Mathematics, California State University, Northridge, CA 91330, USA E-mail address: Xiaolong.Han@csun.edu Remark. You are entitled to a reward of 1 point toward a homework

More information

EQUIVARIANT ALGEBRAIC TOPOLOGY

EQUIVARIANT ALGEBRAIC TOPOLOGY EQUIVARIANT ALGEBRAIC TOPOLOGY JAY SHAH Abstract. This paper develops the introductory theory of equivariant algebraic topology. We first define G-CW complexes and prove some basic homotopy-theoretic results

More information

Homology of a Cell Complex

Homology of a Cell Complex M:01 Fall 06 J. Simon Homology of a Cell Complex A finite cell complex X is constructed one cell at a time, working up in dimension. Each time a cell is added, we can analyze the effect on homology, by

More information

Lecture 17: Invertible Topological Quantum Field Theories

Lecture 17: Invertible Topological Quantum Field Theories Lecture 17: Invertible Topological Quantum Field Theories In this lecture we introduce the notion of an invertible TQFT. These arise in both topological and non-topological quantum field theory as anomaly

More information

MATH 547 ALGEBRAIC TOPOLOGY HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENT 4

MATH 547 ALGEBRAIC TOPOLOGY HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENT 4 MATH 547 ALGEBRAIC TOPOLOGY HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENT 4 ROI DOCAMPO ÁLVAREZ Chapter 0 Exercise We think of the torus T as the quotient of X = I I by the equivalence relation generated by the conditions (, s)

More information

Homework 4: Mayer-Vietoris Sequence and CW complexes

Homework 4: Mayer-Vietoris Sequence and CW complexes Homework 4: Mayer-Vietoris Sequence and CW complexes Due date: Friday, October 4th. 0. Goals and Prerequisites The goal of this homework assignment is to begin using the Mayer-Vietoris sequence and cellular

More information

Homework 3 MTH 869 Algebraic Topology

Homework 3 MTH 869 Algebraic Topology Homework 3 MTH 869 Algebraic Topology Joshua Ruiter February 12, 2018 Proposition 0.1 (Exercise 1.1.10). Let (X, x 0 ) and (Y, y 0 ) be pointed, path-connected spaces. Let f : I X y 0 } and g : I x 0 }

More information

Algebraic Topology European Mathematical Society Zürich 2008 Tammo tom Dieck Georg-August-Universität

Algebraic Topology European Mathematical Society Zürich 2008 Tammo tom Dieck Georg-August-Universität 1 Algebraic Topology European Mathematical Society Zürich 2008 Tammo tom Dieck Georg-August-Universität Corrections for the first printing Page 7 +6: j is already assumed to be an inclusion. But the assertion

More information

UNIVERSAL DERIVED EQUIVALENCES OF POSETS

UNIVERSAL DERIVED EQUIVALENCES OF POSETS UNIVERSAL DERIVED EQUIVALENCES OF POSETS SEFI LADKANI Abstract. By using only combinatorial data on two posets X and Y, we construct a set of so-called formulas. A formula produces simultaneously, for

More information

CATEGORICAL GROTHENDIECK RINGS AND PICARD GROUPS. Contents. 1. The ring K(R) and the group Pic(R)

CATEGORICAL GROTHENDIECK RINGS AND PICARD GROUPS. Contents. 1. The ring K(R) and the group Pic(R) CATEGORICAL GROTHENDIECK RINGS AND PICARD GROUPS J. P. MAY Contents 1. The ring K(R) and the group Pic(R) 1 2. Symmetric monoidal categories, K(C), and Pic(C) 2 3. The unit endomorphism ring R(C ) 5 4.

More information

COMMUTATIVE ALGEBRA LECTURE 1: SOME CATEGORY THEORY

COMMUTATIVE ALGEBRA LECTURE 1: SOME CATEGORY THEORY COMMUTATIVE ALGEBRA LECTURE 1: SOME CATEGORY THEORY VIVEK SHENDE A ring is a set R with two binary operations, an addition + and a multiplication. Always there should be an identity 0 for addition, an

More information

fy (X(g)) Y (f)x(g) gy (X(f)) Y (g)x(f)) = fx(y (g)) + gx(y (f)) fy (X(g)) gy (X(f))

fy (X(g)) Y (f)x(g) gy (X(f)) Y (g)x(f)) = fx(y (g)) + gx(y (f)) fy (X(g)) gy (X(f)) 1. Basic algebra of vector fields Let V be a finite dimensional vector space over R. Recall that V = {L : V R} is defined to be the set of all linear maps to R. V is isomorphic to V, but there is no canonical

More information

CW-complexes. Stephen A. Mitchell. November 1997

CW-complexes. Stephen A. Mitchell. November 1997 CW-complexes Stephen A. Mitchell November 1997 A CW-complex is first of all a Hausdorff space X equipped with a collection of characteristic maps φ n α : D n X. Here n ranges over the nonnegative integers,

More information

FUNDAMENTAL GROUPS AND THE VAN KAMPEN S THEOREM

FUNDAMENTAL GROUPS AND THE VAN KAMPEN S THEOREM FUNDAMENTAL GROUPS AND THE VAN KAMPEN S THEOREM ANG LI Abstract. In this paper, we start with the definitions and properties of the fundamental group of a topological space, and then proceed to prove Van-

More information

Operads. Spencer Liang. March 10, 2015

Operads. Spencer Liang. March 10, 2015 Operads Spencer Liang March 10, 2015 1 Introduction The notion of an operad was created in order to have a well-defined mathematical object which encodes the idea of an abstract family of composable n-ary

More information

3. Prove or disprove: If a space X is second countable, then every open covering of X contains a countable subcollection covering X.

3. Prove or disprove: If a space X is second countable, then every open covering of X contains a countable subcollection covering X. Department of Mathematics and Statistics University of South Florida TOPOLOGY QUALIFYING EXAM January 24, 2015 Examiners: Dr. M. Elhamdadi, Dr. M. Saito Instructions: For Ph.D. level, complete at least

More information

Math 215B: Solutions 3

Math 215B: Solutions 3 Math 215B: Solutions 3 (1) For this problem you may assume the classification of smooth one-dimensional manifolds: Any compact smooth one-dimensional manifold is diffeomorphic to a finite disjoint union

More information

We have the following immediate corollary. 1

We have the following immediate corollary. 1 1. Thom Spaces and Transversality Definition 1.1. Let π : E B be a real k vector bundle with a Euclidean metric and let E 1 be the set of elements of norm 1. The Thom space T (E) of E is the quotient E/E

More information

11 Annihilators. Suppose that R, S, and T are rings, that R P S, S Q T, and R U T are bimodules, and finally, that

11 Annihilators. Suppose that R, S, and T are rings, that R P S, S Q T, and R U T are bimodules, and finally, that 11 Annihilators. In this Section we take a brief look at the important notion of annihilators. Although we shall use these in only very limited contexts, we will give a fairly general initial treatment,

More information

Algebraic Topology. Oscar Randal-Williams. or257/teaching/notes/at.pdf

Algebraic Topology. Oscar Randal-Williams.   or257/teaching/notes/at.pdf Algebraic Topology Oscar Randal-Williams https://www.dpmms.cam.ac.uk/ or257/teaching/notes/at.pdf 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Some recollections and conventions...................... 2 1.2 Cell complexes.................................

More information

Applications of Homotopy

Applications of Homotopy Chapter 9 Applications of Homotopy In Section 8.2 we showed that the fundamental group can be used to show that two spaces are not homeomorphic. In this chapter we exhibit other uses of the fundamental

More information

Basic Notions in Algebraic Topology 1

Basic Notions in Algebraic Topology 1 Basic Notions in Algebraic Topology 1 Yonatan Harpaz Remark 1. In these notes when we say map we always mean continuous map. 1 The Spaces of Algebraic Topology One of the main difference in passing from

More information

CLASS NOTES MATH 527 (SPRING 2011) WEEK 5

CLASS NOTES MATH 527 (SPRING 2011) WEEK 5 CLASS NOTES MATH 527 (SPRING 2011) WEEK 5 BERTRAND GUILLOU 1. Mon, Feb. 14 The same method we used to prove the Whitehead theorem last time also gives the following result. Theorem 1.1. Let X be CW and

More information

A BRIEF GUIDE TO ORDINARY K-THEORY

A BRIEF GUIDE TO ORDINARY K-THEORY A BRIEF GUIDE TO ORDINARY K-THEORY SPENCER STIRLING Abstract. In this paper we describe some basic notions behind ordinary K- theory. Following closely [Hat02b] we ll first study unreduced K-theory. Without

More information

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.at] 6 Oct 2004

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.at] 6 Oct 2004 arxiv:math/0410162v1 [math.at] 6 Oct 2004 EQUIVARIANT UNIVERSAL COEFFICIENT AND KÜNNETH SPECTRAL SEQUENCES L. GAUNCE LEWIS, JR. AND MICHAEL A. MANDELL Abstract. We construct hyper-homology spectral sequences

More information